That was one reason I asked - I recalled that they asked to review interviews and the 43 second recording. I speculated they were trying to reassure themselves whether “Allen is/was BG” before final decision.

Not sure I’d trust my own ears!

Still, to me, the most “impactful” fact was Allen changing his claimed arrival time. Arriving at 1 or 1:30 was bad enough, but changing to noon, which did not fit any of the other evidence, was (to me) a huge “tell”

This whole video doesn’t really add much to the “guilty/not guilty” issue for me - unless it really sounds like Allen. It is evidence consistent with the timeline, and it reinforces the horror of seeing those poor scared little girls just before their murder, but if the video was the only evidence, he walks. Timeline + changed story + car + bullet + video/audio + confessions = a jury can easily convict.