

![0_image_0.png](0_image_0.png)

Log Likelihood Difference

![0_image_1.png](0_image_1.png)

![0_image_2.png](0_image_2.png)

Edit Distance

![0_image_3.png](0_image_3.png)

Figure 7: Comparison of inferen e methods on the lave data. The squares and ovals denote the median and the verti al bars orrespond to the interval between %25 and %75 quantiles.

We have tested the MCMC methods (Gibbs, SA and II) independently for 10 and 50

(shown from left to right). The SMC methods are the greedy lter (GF) and parti le lter

(PF). We have tested lters with N = f5; 10; 50; 100g parti les independently (shown from left to right.).

