The man accused of firebombing two Manhattan subways in 1994 was **convicted Thursday after the jury**
rejected the notion that the drug Prozac led him to commit the crimes.

He was found guilty of two counts of attempted murder, 14 counts **of first-degree assault and two counts**
of criminal possession of a weapon.

In December 1994, Leary ignited firebombs on two Manhattan subway trains. The second blast injured 50 people - 16 seriously, including Leary. Leary wanted to extort money from the Transit Authority.

The defense argued that Leary was not responsible for his actions because of "toxic psychosis" caused by the Prozac.

Figure 4: **A summary produced using the Majority Ordering algorithm, graded as Good.**
Hemingway, 69, died of natural causes in a Miami jail after being arrested for indecent exposure. A book he wrote about his father, "Papa: A Personal Memoir," was published in 1976.

He was picked up last Wednesday after walking naked in Miami.

"He had a difficult life." A transvestite who later had a sex-change operation, he suffered bouts of drinking, depression and drifting, according to acquaintances.

![0_image_0.png](0_image_0.png)

At the time of his death, he lived in the Coconut Grove district **where he was well-known to its Bohemian** crowd.

He had been due to appear in court later that day on charges of indecent exposure and resisting arrest.

Taken to the Miami-Dade Women's Detention Center, he was found **dead in his cell early on Monday,**
spokeswoman Janelle Hall said.

He was booked into the women's jail because he had a sex-change **operation, Hall added.**

![0_image_1.png](0_image_1.png)

![0_image_2.png](0_image_2.png)

![0_image_3.png](0_image_3.png)

![0_image_4.png](0_image_4.png)

readability would be significantly improved by reordering its sentences. A Fair summary is a text which makes sense, but reordering of some sentences **can yield a better readability. Finally, a summary which cannot be further improved by any sentence reordering is**
considered a Good summary.

The judges were asked to grade the summaries taking into account only the order in which the information is presented. To help them focus on this aspect of the texts, we resolved dangling references beforehand. Figure 13 shows the grades assigned to the summaries - three summaries were graded as Poor, 14 were graded as Fair, and eight were graded as Good. We are showing here the majority grade that is **selected by at least two**
judges. This was made possible because in our experiments, judges had strong agreement; they never gave three different grades to a summary.

The MO algorithm produces a small number of Good summaries, but most of the summaries were graded as Fair. For instance, the summary graded Good shown in Figure 4 orders the information in a natural way; the text starts with **a sentence summary of the** event, then the outcome of the trial is given, a reminder of the facts that caused the trial and a possible explanation of the facts. Looking at the Good summaries produced by MO, we found that it performs well when the input articles follow the same order when