

![0_image_0.png](0_image_0.png)

CQ1 : AS EO(eo1) ∧ hasSource(eo1, Jef f rey P Baker) ∧ hasDomain(eo1, P ediatrics) ∧ isExpertIn(Jef f rey P *Baker, P ediatrics*) → O1(eo1, 1)
CQ2 : AS EO(eo1) ∧ hasP rop(eo1, Statement) ∧ hasDomain(eo1*, P ediatrics*)∧
isP artOf(*Statement, P ediatrics*) → O2(eo1, 1)
Fig. 5. Instantiating SWRL rules.

pharmacology industry to identify problems with newly launched drugs.

One goal is to build large scale argumentation corpora for the health care domain. Based on hierarchical argumentation frameworks, users can navigate between medical arguments with different levels of technical specificity, in order to understand the language and the reasoning chain.

## Akcnowledgements

This work has been co-funded by the Sectorial Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007-2013 of the Romanian Ministry of Labour, Family and Social Protection through the Financial Agreement POSDRU/89/1.5/S/62557 and PNII-Idei 170 CNCSIS.

## References

1. Rahwan, I., Zablith, F., Reed, C.: Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15) (2007) 897–921 2. Hendler, J., Berners-Lee, T.: From the semantic web to social machines: A research challenge for AI on the World Wide Web. Artif.

Intell. 174(2) (2010) 156 - 161 Special Review Issue.

3. Boulos, M.K.: Semantic wikis: A comprehensible introduction with examples from health sciences. JETHS 1(1) (2009) 94–96 4. Matthias Lsbe, M.K., Mycke, R.: Tim: A semantic web application for the specification of metadata items in clinical research. In: SWATLS,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2009)
5. Walton, D.: The structure of argumentation in health product ads.

Argument and Computation 1(3) (2010) 179–202