General speaking, the פ algorithm is based on pattern, and pattern is treated as relations between its elements, something so-called structure. Though the similarity and offset functions should be well selected, they are only required reasonably and the structure itself is the most important thing. The פ algorithm is robust, which makes us a lot of choices to the functions (resolution). A relative mechanism is introduced to process this kind of relation (functions), which completely matches the observation of us to the universe: relativity and quantum (Hsiao, 2009C)
Experiments show the effectiveness of the פ algorithm, accompanied with a strong recommendation: using IIR algorithm to replace common used methods like Peirce's criterion, Chauvenet's criterion, the Boxplot or the MAD (median absolute deviation) et al. for general outlier detection. The IIR algorithm is an ontological solution and cannot be too correct.

The פ algorithm is the basis of general AI, all intelligent outputs can be verified by it and kinds of views equip the brain of AI. The פ algorithm is a hidden algorithm, and there needs a visible algorithm accompanied with for the conscious. Furthermore, it treats elements on equality in formation, which guarantees the robustness.

Since Turning test was presented, there has been a great development in AI. In chess game, except for Go, humans are always in vain. Even to game Go, computer can play in top level (9x9). In many applications, machines perform better than human beings. We also have good chat robots that can partly cheat some people. Though traditional solution should continue to be developed, problem-dependent answer-searching solution cannot make real intelligence (AI). In another words, the static intelligence is not real intelligence, because it is too "stupid" to develop. A self-study AI is the purpose, and the פ algorithm directs. The CPU should be two-core equipped, both are פ algorithm based. One processes in its current way (the "Tao" of Lao-tzu), and the other should process the morality (the "Te" of Lao-tzu). The framework also reflects the system of Kant. Turning test needs to be modified to morality test. Although we have not got a complete moral manual at hand, in order to guarantee a symbiosis with nature, the test is necessary. In an imaginable future with stronger science and technologies, the ability of human beings might be greatly decreased. The morality of powerful AI would impact the future of the world greatly, for destroying the world is a too easy task. We have to decide the degree of freedom presented to AI, it will be dangerous and uncontrollable if being given a complete freedom, and it will be lack of interest if no freedom being given (like current situation). As same as the crisis of economy and nuclear power, AI will be another source to cause crisis, and all originate from the defect of the structure design. However, the most dangerous things are not these but the proud confidence on false models. Undoubtedly, as we know, the kind of error cannot be self-identified.

 We have to understand that there is no "objective" outlier, or classification. If objectivity is expressed as main stream, we acknowledge that it is a reasonable description. So when we insist ourselves, be tolerant on other different things. After all, "万物负阴而抱阳,冲气以为和" 