

![0_image_0.png](0_image_0.png)

However, we didn't look any deeper to confirm the matching between **these two structures. This observation was the result of intuition. In our experiments, we focused on defining structures and testing their**
efficiency. Translation of n-opposition structures into logic is one of **our future task.**
For the second experiment (ECAP), we had defined six judgments:
- I agree, I don't agree **to judge a statement on its purpose.** - Correct syntax, uncorrect syntax **to judge a statement on its syntax.**
- This confirms, this contradicts **to add supporting references or contradictory references to the**
statement.

Judgments were just opposed by contradiction. The Aim of this experiment was to test if users would accept to rephrase their selections and justify their judgments and we didn't propose a complete structure.

For the third experiment (Intermed), we proposed three levels of **judgments :**
1. Proved 2. Unclear 3. incorrect For each annotation, students had to judge with a combination of an affirmative or negative judgment per level (yes it is proved or no it is not proved and yes it is unclear or no it is not unclear and yes it is incorrect or no it is not incorrect). We tested relations of sub-alternation of the figure 5.