Jensen, D. D., & Cohen, P. R. (2000). Multiple comparisons in induction algorithms. Machine Learning, 38(3): 309-338. 

John, G. H., & Langley, P. (1996). Static versus dynamic sampling for data mining. In *Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining*, pp. 367-370. Menlo Park, CA. AAAI Press. 

Kubat, M., & Matwin, S. (1997). Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: one-sided selection. In *Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Machine Learning*, pp. 179-186. 

Lewis, D. D., & Catlett, J. (1994). Heterogeneous uncertainty sampling for supervised learning. 

In *Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Machine Learning*, pp.148-156. 

Provost, F., Fawcett, T., & Kohavi, R. (1998). The case against accuracy estimation for comparing classifiers. In *Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine* Learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. 

Provost, F., Jensen, D., & Oates, T. (1999). Efficient progressive sampling. In *Proceedings of* the Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM Press. 

Provost, F., & Fawcett, T (2001). Robust classification for imprecise environments. Machine Learning, 42, 203-231. 

Provost, F., & Domingos, P. (2001). Well-trained PETs: improving probability estimation trees. 

CeDER Working Paper \#IS-00-04, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY. 

Quinlan, J.R. (1993). C*4.5: Programs for Machine Learning*. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. 

Saar-Tsechansky, M., & Provost, F. (2001). Active learning for class probability estimation and ranking. *In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence*, Seattle, WA. 

Saar-Tsechansky, M. and F. Provost (2003). Active Sampling for Class Probability Estimation and Ranking. To appear in *Machine Learning*. 

SAS Institute (2001). Getting Started With SAS Enterprise Miner. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 

Saerens, M., Latinne, P., & Decaestecker, C. (2002). Adjusting the outputs of a classifier to new a priori probabilities: a simple procedure. *Neural Computation*, 14:21-41. 

Swets, J., Dawes, R., & Monahan, J. (2000). Better decisions through science*. Scientific American*, October 2000: 82-87. 

Turney P. (2000). Types of cost in inductive learning. In Workshop on Cost-Sensitive Learning at the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning, 15-21, Stanford, CA. 

Van den Bosch A., Weijters, A., Van den Herik, H.J., & Daelemans, W. (1997). When small disjuncts abound, try lazy learning: a case study. In *Proceedings of the Seventh BelgianDutch Conference on Machine Learning*, 109-118. 