conversations.from: human
conversations.value: What could be a title for a book about Books, est, October with the genre: Religion & Spirituality, Occult & Paranormal?
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: A title for this book could be 'Ancient Aliens on the Moon'
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Give me the first paragraph for this book.. Start with the sentence 'Ancient Aliens on the Moon
  Analysis of the Tower itself showed it was more than a mile across and was an estimated distance of at least 300 miles from Lunar Orbiter when the image was taken'.
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: Ancient Aliens on the Moon
  Analysis of the Tower itself showed it was more than a mile across and was an estimated distance of at least 300 miles from Lunar Orbiter when the image was taken. Just like the Shard, the top of the Tower itself appeared to be composed of dozens of smaller cubical (and/or hexagonal) sub-structures. And these were clearly not artifacts of the enhancement process either. The smallest of these cubes visible on frame III-84M measured at least 50 times the size of the individual computer pixels of the imaging enhancements.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Give me four more paragraphs.
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: Any normal film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature. There are only two problems with this Moon Hoax claim—this was no ordinary off the shelf film, and it was never exposed to those kinds of temperatures in the cameras.
  The 70mm film used in the Hasselblad cameras the astronauts carried was a very special transparency film designed specifically (under a NASA contract) for hostile environments like the Moon. According to Peter Vimislik at Kodak, the film would at worst begin to soften at 200° F, and would not melt until it reached at least 500° F. So, a worst case scenario of 250-280° F for a totally uninsulated, non-reflective camera would still be well within the film's operational parameters. The film itself, in terms of its light- gathering abilities, was also quite amazing. It was a special extended range color slide film called "XRC" that allowed the astronauts to take perfect National Geographic quality pictures on the lunar surface, even though they were hardly experienced photographers. This has truly opened up whole web pages of controversy—with the Moon Hoaxers claiming that such a film simply doesn't exist In fact, Richard Hoagland actually used many rolls of this super lunar film, back when he was advising Walter Cronkite at CBS.
  In addition, the cameras were also protected inside a special case designed to keep them cool. The situation is a lot different than in your oven, for instance. With no convection or conduction, the only type of heat that is of concern on the Moon is radiative. The best way to reflect radiative heat is to wrap the object (like a camera or person) in layers designed to reflect as much heat as possible, usually by simply being colored white. Most all of the astronaut's clothing and the camera casing were indeed white, which very efficiently directed heat away from the both the astronauts and camera film.
  The truth here is once again very straightforward. At all of the landing sites, the astronauts found that the lunar surface had about a two inch layer of dust. Below that was pretty much hard pan. As you can see from the image below from Apollo 11, not only is the upper layer of dust blown away in a radial pattern (as if from a thruster?) there is also a small depression below the nozzle. Since the LM descent engine only made about 3,000 pounds of thrust (compared to a modern jet fighter which makes between 18,000 and 22,000 pounds of thrust), this is pretty much as any engineer or geologist would expect things to look.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Add another sentence about Although, Fahrenheit.
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: Any normal film exposed to 250° would indeed melt at that temperature. There are only two problems with this Moon Hoax claim—this was no ordinary off the shelf film, and it was never exposed to those kinds of temperatures in the cameras. 
  The 70mm film used in the Hasselblad cameras the astronauts carried was a very special transparency film designed specifically (under a NASA contract) for hostile environments like the Moon. According to Peter Vimislik at Kodak, the film would at worst begin to soften at 200° F, and would not melt until it reached at least 500° F. So, a worst case scenario of 250-280° F for a totally uninsulated, non-reflective camera would still be well within the film's operational parameters. The film itself, in terms of its light- gathering abilities, was also quite amazing. It was a special extended range color slide film called "XRC" that allowed the astronauts to take perfect National Geographic quality pictures on the lunar surface, even though they were hardly experienced photographers. This has truly opened up whole web pages of controversy—with the Moon Hoaxers claiming that such a film simply doesn't exist In fact, Richard Hoagland actually used many rolls of this super lunar film, back when he was advising Walter Cronkite at CBS. 
  In addition, the cameras were also protected inside a special case designed to keep them cool. Although it is true that in the direct, airless sunlight the temperature can reach upwards of 250° – 280° Fahrenheit because there is no air, it's also fairly easy to keep cool for the same reason. The situation is a lot different than in your oven, for instance. With no convection or conduction, the only type of heat that is of concern on the Moon is radiative. The best way to reflect radiative heat is to wrap the object (like a camera or person) in layers designed to reflect as much heat as possible, usually by simply being colored white. Most all of the astronaut's clothing and the camera casing were indeed white, which very efficiently directed heat away from the both the astronauts and camera film. 
  The truth here is once again very straightforward. At all of the landing sites, the astronauts found that the lunar surface had about a two inch layer of dust. Below that was pretty much hard pan. As you can see from the image below from Apollo 11, not only is the upper layer of dust blown away in a radial pattern (as if from a thruster?) there is also a small depression below the nozzle. Since the LM descent engine only made about 3,000 pounds of thrust (compared to a modern jet fighter which makes between 18,000 and 22,000 pounds of thrust), this is pretty much as any engineer or geologist would expect things to look.
conversations.from: human
conversations.value: Give me the last five paragraphs.
conversations.from: assistant
conversations.value: If the Ancient Alien theory implies anything, it is that perhaps we did not evolve in that simple straight line from caveman to quarterback. That there were some ups and downs in between.
  I think that is some of what we're seeing on these images. We're seeing the last remnants of that previous version of Man. We're seeing the bases and habitats and industries and machines that they left behind when they were overtaken by whatever disaster struck them down.
  So I think in the end we're seeing a bit of both. Some of what we've found on the Moon is Alien, built by a civilization that has no relationship to human beings. But some of it—a lot of it in fact—was built by somebody else. Somebody a bit more closely related to us. Maybe that's what Neil Armstrong meant when he said "That's one small step for Man... one giant leap for Mankind." Maybe he didn't make a mistake in that speech at all. Maybe what he was heralding was the return of a genetically related "Mankind" to their proper place amongst the stars.
  And those facts would also help explain why NASA has been less than curious and far from cooperative in pursuing this line of thinking. The Brooking Report told them to keep quiet if they found evidence of ET ruins around the solar system. But what if they not only found that, but found evidence that these godlike ET's got their asses kicked by some unimaginable catastrophe? That, it seems to me, would be reason enough to suppress (but not completely hide) what they really found on the Moon. After all, there is always that first, uncomfortable question at the proverbial press conference if you announce that Aliens once roamed the Moon:
  Mike has made numerous public appearances lecturing on the subjects of space science, NASA, physics and the link between science and spirit, and has been a featured guest on radio programs like Coast to Coast AM with George Noory. He is a regular contributor to the History Channel programs "Ancient Aliens" and "America's Book of Secrets," both of which are now showing on the H2 channel.