human
For there is verily a disannulling of the commandments going before, for the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did. vii: 16, 18-19.
gpt
For when Moses had spoken _every precept_ to all the people according to the _law_ he took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the BOOK and all the people. ix: 19. Now we see clearly that the book of the law of Moses from which Paul has been quoting through the whole before mentioned epistles, is as distinctly separate from the tables of stone (or fleshly table of the heart,) as they were when deposited in the Ark thirty-three hundred years ago. Therefore we think that here is clear proof that he has kept up the distinction between the
human
(meaning Moses' own handwriting in his book,) and the
gpt
i: 25.
human
If ye fulfill the royal _law_ according to the scripture, thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself, ye do well. Why? Because the Saviour in quoting from the commandments, in answer to the Ruler, what he should do to inherit eternal life, taught the same doctrine. Matt. xix: 19. Further:
gpt
For whosoever shall keep the whole _law_ and yet offend in one point, shall be guilty of _all_. In the next verse he quotes from the [23]ten commandments again, namely, Adultery and Murder, (what the Saviour in the fifth chapter of Matt. calls the least, that is the smallest commandment,) and says if we commit them we become transgressors of the _law_. Of what _law_? Next verse says the _law_ of _liberty_ by which we are to be
human
The royal _law_ according to the scripture, and 3d,