human
and the extension of those varieties
gpt
This judgment is passed upon _all_ the writing on the margins of the folio, including the pencil memorandums. For the present we shall set aside the latter,--the pencil memorandums,--as not properly belonging to this branch of the subject. For this pencil writing, although it has a most important bearing upon the question of the good faith of the marginal readings, has no professed character, antique or modern: it is, of course, not set forth directly or indirectly, either by the unknown writer of the marginalia, or by Mr. Collier, as evidence of the date at which they were made. And as, according to Dr. Ingleby,
human
with that alone we shall at present concern ourselves. As the careless, half-formed hand of the present day, degenerate from
gpt
appears only in the pencil writing, we have therefore to deal but with the first three styles of writing enumerated by Mr. Hardy; and as he himself admits that
human
if those who maintain the side of forgery fail to show that
gpt
appears upon the margins of this folio, we shall only have the second and third styles enumerated by Mr. Hardy, i.e., the hands of Elizabeth and James I., to take into consideration; and the so-called
human
in the