human
As with Socrates, he says,
gpt
(p. 94.) Our Lord rested his teaching, not on the concurrence and testimony of his hearers, but on his own authority. He imposed upon them the declarations of a divine voice. Why does this author stop short in the delineation of principles which he has so admirably begun? Why does he denounce
human
as a mental disfranchisement, when no cut can be shorter than to
gpt
? Why does he denounce religious fear as hypocritical, when it is written,
human
He that believeth not shall be damned