human
; and further (p. 405), that by the later deists,
gpt
Collins, Tindal, Morgan, etc., the dispute as to miracles was carried on with great violence. It is here evident that Prof. Höffding has not read the writers he depreciates, for those he names were far from being violent. Had he known the literature, he would have named Woolston, not Collins and Tindal and Morgan. He is merely echoing, without inquiring for himself, a judgment which he regards as authoritative. In the same passage he declares that