human
[196] E. Bauer asserts that liberty of the press is impossible in the absolutist and the constitutional State, whereas in the
gpt
it finds its place.
human
Here, the statement is,
gpt
So not the individual, but the
human
has liberty of the press. But, if for the purpose of liberty of the press the individual must first give proof of himself regarding his belief in the generality, the people; if he does not have this liberty _through might of his own_,--then it is a _people's liberty_, a liberty that he is invested with for the sake of his faith, his
gpt
The reverse is the case: it is precisely as an individual that every one has open to him the liberty to utter his mind. But he has not the
human
: that liberty is assuredly not his
gpt
He has only the _might_; but the might alone makes him owner. I need no concession for the liberty of the press, do not need the people's consent to it, do not need the
human
to it, nor any
gpt
The liberty of the press too, like every liberty, I must
human
; the people,