human
If so, these had been up to Paine's time, and remained long afterwards, rare characteristics. And there is some mistake about Mr. Benn's criticism that
gpt
Many times over, Paine argues that the documents could not have been so written. E.g. in Conway's ed. of Works, pp. 157, 158, 159, 160, 164, 167, 168, etc. The reiterated proposition is
human
(p. 168). And there is some exaggeration even in Mr. Benn's remark that,
gpt
Paine (ed. p. 144) merely puts a balance of probability in favour of the genuineness. It may be sometimes--it is certainly not always--true that Paine
human
; even if that estimate be followed by the very challengeable admission that