human
gpt
Office, etc., which seem to be the gist of much of this controversy, are names, not things. They mean, in the mouth, or on the pen, of any Individual, just what that individual means by them, no less, no more. They have never been defined authoritatively by Scripture or by any other tribunal to which these parties own allegiance. When Mr. Goode uses them, they may imply one thing. In the pages of
human
Vox Ecclesiae, they may signify another. The whole contest, therefore, so far as {726} it relates to the number of
gpt
or whether that of the bishop is a different
human
or only a different
gpt
from that of the presbyter, is, in our view, one of names and titles only. The real question stands thus:
human
Has a bishop, by divine institution, a power which the presbyter has not, or is the same power resident in both, and ordinarily made latent in the one, and operative in the other, by virtue of ecclesiastical law and usage? The answer to this question will show how far the High and Low Church party really differ from each other, and what is the variance, if any, between the
gpt
Vox Ecclesiae
human
EXCEPTION,