human
As there was no petition under consideration, the meeting was perfectly legal. Other papers went further, the _Daily Telegraph_ applauding the railway companies for refusing to
gpt
and generally it must be recorded that some of the leading Liberal journals discouraged the whole procedure. The _Daily News_ and _Daily Chronicle_ even suppressed resolutions sent them in support of Bradlaugh's claim from provincial clubs before the demonstration--such resolutions being part of the manifold machinery of preparation for a great public demonstration; and the Tory papers as a rule suppressed all reports tending to show the support given to Bradlaugh in the country. Other forms of boycotting were freely employed. In the cathedral town of Peterborough a debating society set up by the local Young Men's Christian Association was deprived of the use of the Association's rooms because it carried a motion in favour of Bradlaugh's right to sit and vote. This episode typified hundreds. The most skilful device employed, perhaps, was the issue of a forged circular, purporting to come from Bradlaugh, calling on
human
to
gpt
and show that