human
Evangeline that Holmes made on Lowell's
gpt
Vision of Sir Launfal; namely, that there is in it a mixture of the artificial and the natural. The result is, we may infer, that on the whole one still thinks of it as a work of art and does not--as, for instance, with Tolstoi's
human
Cossacks --think of all the characters as if they lived in the very next street. Yet it is in its way so charming, he finds that although as he says,
gpt
There is no passion in it, still there is a perpetual air of youth and innocence and tenderness. M. Chasles is also impressed as a Catholic with the poet's wide and liberal comprehension of the Christian ideas. It is not, he thinks, a masterpiece (_Il y a loin d'Evangéline à un chef-d'œuvre_), but he points out, what time has so far vindicated, that it has qualities which guarantee to it something like immortality. When we consider that Chasles wrote at a time when all our more substantial literature seemed to him to consist of uninteresting state histories and extensive collections of the correspondence of American presidents--a time when he could write sadly:
human
All America does not yet possess a humorist