human
are the--free. The obedient servant is the free man! What glaring nonsense! Yet this is the sense of the _bourgeoisie_, and its poet, Goethe, as well as its philosopher, Hegel, succeeded in glorifying the dependence of the subject on the object, obedience to the objective world, etc. He who only serves the cause,
gpt
has the true freedom. And among thinkers the cause was--_reason_, that which, like State and Church, gives--general laws, and puts the individual man in irons by the _thought of humanity_. It determines what is
human
according to which one must then act. No more
gpt
This it demands of you, and counts it its most urgent task to establish this in all. Therefore it will keep you from
human
holding the
gpt
in check and silencing their inflammatory discourses under censors' cancelling-marks or press-penalties and behind dungeon walls, and will, on the other hand, appoint people of
human
as censors, and in every way have a _moral influence_ exerted on you by
gpt
human
etc., established everywhere. The following definition of liberalism, which is supposed to be pronounced in its honor, characterizes it completely:
gpt
Liberalism is nothing else than the knowledge of reason, applied to our existing relations. [72] Its aim is a
human
a
gpt
a
human
not anarchy, lawlessness, selfhood. But, if reason rules, then the _person_ succumbs. Art has for a long time not only acknowledged the ugly, but considered the ugly as necessary to its existence, and taken it up into itself; it needs the villain, etc. In the religious domain, too, the extremest liberals go so far that they want to see the most religious man regarded as a citizen--_i. e._ the religious villain; they want to see no more of trials for heresy. But against the