human
and
gpt
in proof of which position, they adduce the passages in Paul's Epistle to the Colossians--
human
Let no man, therefore, judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holy-day, or of the new moon, or of the Sabbath-_days_, which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. [11] Col. 2:16, 17.
gpt
Who blotted out the hand-writing of ordinances, that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross. Col. 2:14. This, I must remark, proves _too much_; for if it has abrogated the seventh-day Sabbath, it has blotted out the sabbatic law also; unless it be shown, that _it_ is reserved, or that another has been re-enacted, clearly and expressly ordained. If so, let its advocates point to a single requirement, an unequivocal injunction, to observe any other day as the Sabbath, and it will terminate all controversy on the subject. The
human
which was
gpt
was merely
human
the onerous burdens of the Levitical ritual, not the
gpt
--the Decalogue! If the opposite view be correct, then the Sabbath, or any
human
is
gpt
contrary to our nature and wants, and is not for our good, and ought to be annulled and obliterated forever. Then, also, we are driven to the doctrine of the
human
Friends,