human
Restricting LSC attorneys in advising their clients and in presenting arguments and analyses to the courts distorts the legal system by altering the traditional role of the attorneys in much the same way broadcast systems or student publication networks were changed in the limited forum cases . . . . ). Thus, we believe that where the state designates a forum for expressive activity and opens the forum for speech by the public at large on a wide range of topics, strict scrutiny applies to restrictions that single out for exclusion from the forum particular speech whose content is disfavored.
gpt
Laws designed or intended to suppress or restrict the expression of specific speakers contradict basic First Amendment principles. United States v. Playboy Entm't Group, Inc., 529 U.S. 803, 812 (2000); see also Denver, 518 U.S. at 782 (Kennedy, J., concurring in the judgment) (noting the flaw in a law that
human
). Compare Forbes, 523 U.S. at 679 (holding that the state does not create a public forum when it
gpt
) (emphasis added), with Police Dep't of the City of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 96 (1972) (
human
Selective exclusions from a public forum may not be based on content alone, and may not be justified by reference to content alone.