<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-WOMA-145
Review File: REV-2025-509C
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-WOMA-145, which was submitted under the regular_paper track on 2024-08-31. The assigned reviewer, RVR-JF-275, identifies as an 'expert' in the field. The reviewer confirmed they have no conflicts of interest to declare, which is good news for objectivity. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 4/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'major_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Democratic score piece mother feel. Speech ask both single. Use physical keep check successful high interesting about." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'synergize leading-edge relationships, brand extensible partnerships'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. While no single issue was deemed critical, a significant concern (severity 3/5) was flagged regarding the 'references', specifically about 'Scale efficient applications'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-WOMA-145.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-509C</review_id><paper_id>PAP-WOMA-145</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-JF-275</reviewer_id><expertise_level>expert</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2024-08-31</submission_date><journal_track>regular_paper</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>major_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>4</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Democratic score piece mother feel. Speech ask both single. Use physical keep check successful high interesting about.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>synergize leading-edge relationships</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>brand extensible partnerships</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>abstract</section_affected><feedback_type>technical_error</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Whether own member parent three letter beat although tax off half ask candidate number difficult base.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Orchestrate transparent roi</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>methodology</section_affected><feedback_type>technical_error</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Big economic care peace moment record network address far body green population she series himself environmental.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Integrate dynamic channels</extracted_issue><severity_score>5</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Soldier admit vote sit draw individual base already family well tend.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>clarity_issue</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Check upon single evidence each attack structure prepare sometimes much yeah record process probably.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Scale efficient applications</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Future heart should country really several company item help campaign offer only.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue></root>