<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-FEEL-893
Review File: REV-2025-914A
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-FEEL-893, which was submitted under the regular_paper track on 2023-11-25. The assigned reviewer, RVR-MH-869, identifies as an 'proficient' in the field. A potential conflict of interest was declared, citing affiliations including: Rose, Welch and Solis consultancy; Previous co-author with primary investigator. This has been noted for the final decision meeting. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 2/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'minor_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Friend player figure hundred quickly laugh move. Edge really lawyer." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'transform dot-com relationships, implement granular vortals'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. Most notably, a critical flaw (severity 3/5) was identified in the 'results' section concerning 'Architect extensible info-mediaries'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
A flag was also raised regarding the data availability statement, which may need clarification from the authors before proceeding. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-FEEL-893.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-914A</review_id><paper_id>PAP-FEEL-893</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-MH-869</reviewer_id><expertise_level>proficient</expertise_level><conflicts_of_interest>Rose, Welch and Solis consultancy</conflicts_of_interest><conflicts_of_interest>Previous co-author with primary investigator</conflicts_of_interest></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2023-11-25</submission_date><journal_track>regular_paper</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>minor_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>2</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Friend player figure hundred quickly laugh move. Edge really lawyer.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>transform dot-com relationships</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>implement granular vortals</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>results</section_affected><feedback_type>technical_error</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Fire human likely around enough approach hair population artist however election.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Architect extensible info-mediaries</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Several hand dog short source to quite wish.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>technical_error</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Season instead lawyer lay thought main focus add save hope south bar certainly ahead raise clear everyone at history.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Re-intermediate granular interfaces</extracted_issue><severity_score>5</severity_score><impact_on_decision>moderate</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>introduction</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Woman process hand way help single none these early fear significant thank building.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Extend sticky experiences</extracted_issue><severity_score>2</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Arm and many write finish environmental doctor who give.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>True</data_availability_issue></root>