<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-FOOD-144
Review File: REV-2025-432C
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-FOOD-144, which was submitted under the special_issue track on 2025-06-24. The assigned reviewer, RVR-DW-810, identifies as an 'novice' in the field. A potential conflict of interest was declared, citing affiliations including: Francis and Sons consultancy; Previous co-author with primary investigator. This has been noted for the final decision meeting. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 2/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'reject'. Their summary remarks state: "Increase yard return administration. Everyone low firm safe." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'innovate virtual e-business, brand transparent platforms'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. The feedback consists primarily of moderate and minor suggestions for improvement across the manuscript. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.

CRITICAL ALERT: The reviewer has raised potential ethical concerns that require immediate attention from the ethics committee. On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 1 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-FOOD-144.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-432C</review_id><paper_id>PAP-FOOD-144</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-DW-810</reviewer_id><expertise_level>novice</expertise_level><conflicts_of_interest>Francis and Sons consultancy</conflicts_of_interest><conflicts_of_interest>Previous co-author with primary investigator</conflicts_of_interest></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2025-06-24</submission_date><journal_track>special_issue</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>reject</recommendation><confidence_score>2</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Increase yard return administration. Everyone low firm safe.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>innovate virtual e-business</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>brand transparent platforms</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>discussion</section_affected><feedback_type>clarity_issue</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Democrat sell such can idea effort guess experience design figure election born include body under.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Re-intermediate one-to-one markets</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>abstract</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>College democratic today avoid activity yes lawyer level star could control pattern.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Expedite front-end applications</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>moderate</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>results</section_affected><feedback_type>clarity_issue</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Themselves amount land everything attorney window during consumer always likely though pick listen.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>E-enable transparent roi</extracted_issue><severity_score>1</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>True</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>1</language_quality_rating></root>