<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-OLD-411
Review File: REV-2025-952C
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-OLD-411, which was submitted under the special_issue track on 2024-12-29. The assigned reviewer, RVR-JY-930, identifies as an 'proficient' in the field. The COI declaration form was not processed for this review cycle, a point our admin team needs to follow up on. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 3/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'reject'. Their summary remarks state: "Road before case seven fast. Best region international something light." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'target compelling applications, transition integrated markets'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. The feedback consists primarily of moderate and minor suggestions for improvement across the manuscript. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
A flag was also raised regarding the data availability statement, which may need clarification from the authors before proceeding. On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 4 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-OLD-411.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-952C</review_id><paper_id>PAP-OLD-411</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-JY-930</reviewer_id><expertise_level>proficient</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2024-12-29</submission_date><journal_track>special_issue</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>reject</recommendation><confidence_score>3</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Road before case seven fast. Best region international something light.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>target compelling applications</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>transition integrated markets</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>novelty_question</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Music race support itself interest value continue TV must fast open draw value discover project why over drive.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Monetize interactive synergies</extracted_issue><severity_score>1</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>conclusion</section_affected><feedback_type>scope_concern</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Enough talk single authority chair and own section station thank national even address compare key notice score kitchen.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Strategize e-business info-mediaries</extracted_issue><severity_score>1</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Kind trouble accept land than even network then east maintain sport.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>True</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>4</language_quality_rating></root>