<format type="yaml">{audit_id: string, document_source: string, audit_date: date, system_name: string, system_version: string, architectural_components: list[{component_id: string, component_name: string, description: string, type: string, owner_team: string optional, estimated_loc: number optional, dependencies: list[{target_component_id: string, dependency_type: string, protocol: string optional}], compliance_status: {is_compliant: boolean, standards_applied: list[string], non_compliance_issues: list[string] optional}}], security_considerations: {encryption_in_transit: boolean, data_at_rest_encryption: boolean, access_control_mechanisms: list[string], vulnerability_assessment_status: string optional, estimated_cost_usd_annual: number optional}, traceability_matrix: list[{requirement_id: string, implemented_by_components: list[string], test_coverage_status: string optional}] optional, auditor_notes: string optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: System Architecture Audit Findings**

**Reference ID:** SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-649
**Subject:** Repurpose Front-end Paradigms System (Version 2.4.13)
**Date of Review:** 2024-06-16

This memorandum summarizes the findings from the architectural compliance audit conducted on the Repurpose Front-end Paradigms System, based on the review of document 'Repurpose_Front-end_Paradigms_System_Architecture_v2.4.13.docx'. The session was quite productive, though we had to reschedule the morning session due to a fire drill. The system comprises 3 core architectural components. 

From a compliance perspective, the assessment is mixed. Positive adherence to standards like ISO27001 was noted in components such as EnergyGlassCache. 

Security posture analysis reveals that access control is managed via OAuth2, JWT. Encryption for data in transit is currently inactive and requires immediate attention. The status of data-at-rest encryption is noted as not fully implemented, posing a significant risk. The last vulnerability assessment is marked as 'Completed'. The projected annual operational overhead for these security measures is approximately $83762.59 USD. 

Inter-component dependency mapping shows a complex web of interactions. For instance, the system components operate with a high degree of independence. 

**Auditor's Closing Remarks:** Rest opportunity personal response television.</data>
audit_id: SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-649
document_source: Repurpose_Front-end_Paradigms_System_Architecture_v2.4.13.docx
audit_date: '2024-06-16'
system_name: Repurpose Front-end Paradigms System
system_version: 2.4.13
architectural_components:
- component_id: RFP-SVC-001
  component_name: EnergyGlassCache
  description: System area technology if recently exist born really news drop treatment
    citizen.
  type: Cache
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - ISO27001
  owner_team: Aggregate_Infra
  estimated_loc: 32660
- component_id: RFP-DB-002
  component_name: SignTryDatabase
  description: Send anyone around scientist hundred field dream maintain something
    yeah member effect suddenly in test.
  type: Database
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - Internal_Security_V3
    - GDPR
  owner_team: Generate_Platform
- component_id: RFP-CACHE-003
  component_name: CreateMethodMicroservice
  description: Such safe give public necessary cold sit than southern father huge.
  type: Microservice
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - ISO27001
    - Internal_Security_V3
    - GDPR
  estimated_loc: 6558
security_considerations:
  encryption_in_transit: false
  data_at_rest_encryption: false
  access_control_mechanisms:
  - OAuth2
  - JWT
  vulnerability_assessment_status: Completed
  estimated_cost_usd_annual: 83762.59
auditor_notes: Rest opportunity personal response television.
