<format type="yaml">{audit_id: string, document_source: string, audit_date: date, system_name: string, system_version: string, architectural_components: list[{component_id: string, component_name: string, description: string, type: string, owner_team: string optional, estimated_loc: number optional, dependencies: list[{target_component_id: string, dependency_type: string, protocol: string optional}], compliance_status: {is_compliant: boolean, standards_applied: list[string], non_compliance_issues: list[string] optional}}], security_considerations: {encryption_in_transit: boolean, data_at_rest_encryption: boolean, access_control_mechanisms: list[string], vulnerability_assessment_status: string optional, estimated_cost_usd_annual: number optional}, traceability_matrix: list[{requirement_id: string, implemented_by_components: list[string], test_coverage_status: string optional}] optional, auditor_notes: string optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: System Architecture Audit Findings**

**Reference ID:** SYSARCH-AUDIT-2025-177
**Subject:** Syndicate Back-end Supply-chains Platform (Version 5.4.11)
**Date of Review:** 2024-07-06

This memorandum summarizes the findings from the architectural compliance audit conducted on the Syndicate Back-end Supply-chains Platform, based on the review of document 'Syndicate_Back-end_Supply-chains_Platform_Architecture_v5.4.11.docx'. The session was quite productive, though we had to reschedule the morning session due to a fire drill. The system comprises 2 core architectural components. 

From a compliance perspective, the assessment is mixed. Positive adherence to standards like Internal_Security_V3 was noted in components such as FrontFeelDatabase. 

Security posture analysis reveals that access control is managed via OAuth2, SAML. Encryption for data in transit is currently active. The status of data-at-rest encryption is noted as not fully implemented, posing a significant risk. The projected annual operational overhead for these security measures is approximately $27302.32 USD. 

Inter-component dependency mapping shows a complex web of interactions. For instance, the FrontFeelDatabase (SBS-DB-001) connects_to the component identified as SBS-GW-002 using the gRPC protocol. Traceability for requirement REQ-SBS-51 appears to be handled by the following components: SBS-DB-001, SBS-GW-002. Current test coverage for this is 'None'. </data>
audit_id: SYSARCH-AUDIT-2025-177
document_source: Syndicate_Back-end_Supply-chains_Platform_Architecture_v5.4.11.docx
audit_date: '2024-07-06'
system_name: Syndicate Back-end Supply-chains Platform
system_version: 5.4.11
architectural_components:
- component_id: SBS-DB-001
  component_name: FrontFeelDatabase
  description: Gas night beyond treat rule realize respond join great.
  type: Database
  dependencies:
  - target_component_id: SBS-GW-002
    dependency_type: connects_to
    protocol: gRPC
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - Internal_Security_V3
- component_id: SBS-GW-002
  component_name: FireChooseMicroservice
  description: They dark conference reflect here power foreign of him hear government
    building themselves well sing.
  type: Microservice
  dependencies:
  - target_component_id: SBS-DB-001
    dependency_type: connects_to
    protocol: TCP/IP
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - SOC2_Type_II
security_considerations:
  encryption_in_transit: true
  data_at_rest_encryption: false
  access_control_mechanisms:
  - OAuth2
  - SAML
  estimated_cost_usd_annual: 27302.32
traceability_matrix:
- requirement_id: REQ-SBS-51
  implemented_by_components:
  - SBS-DB-001
  - SBS-GW-002
  test_coverage_status: None
- requirement_id: REQ-SBS-90
  implemented_by_components:
  - SBS-DB-001
  - SBS-GW-002
  test_coverage_status: Full
