<format type="yaml">{audit_id: string, document_source: string, audit_date: date, system_name: string, system_version: string, architectural_components: list[{component_id: string, component_name: string, description: string, type: string, owner_team: string optional, estimated_loc: number optional, dependencies: list[{target_component_id: string, dependency_type: string, protocol: string optional}], compliance_status: {is_compliant: boolean, standards_applied: list[string], non_compliance_issues: list[string] optional}}], security_considerations: {encryption_in_transit: boolean, data_at_rest_encryption: boolean, access_control_mechanisms: list[string], vulnerability_assessment_status: string optional, estimated_cost_usd_annual: number optional}, traceability_matrix: list[{requirement_id: string, implemented_by_components: list[string], test_coverage_status: string optional}] optional, auditor_notes: string optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: System Architecture Audit Findings**

**Reference ID:** SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-943
**Subject:** Disintermediate Ubiquitous Partnerships Platform (Version 3.4.1)
**Date of Review:** 2024-01-09

This memorandum summarizes the findings from the architectural compliance audit conducted on the Disintermediate Ubiquitous Partnerships Platform, based on the review of document 'Disintermediate_Ubiquitous_Partnerships_Platform_Architecture_v3.4.1.docx'. The session was quite productive, though we had to reschedule the morning session due to a fire drill. The system comprises 2 core architectural components. 

From a compliance perspective, the assessment is mixed. Positive adherence to standards like GDPR was noted in components such as SeatDayAPIGateway. 

Security posture analysis reveals that access control is managed via RBAC, JWT, API_Keys. Encryption for data in transit is currently inactive and requires immediate attention. The status of data-at-rest encryption is noted as implemented. The last vulnerability assessment is marked as 'Scheduled_Q4'. The projected annual operational overhead for these security measures is approximately $91658.39 USD. 

Inter-component dependency mapping shows a complex web of interactions. For instance, the SeatDayAPIGateway (DUP-SVC-001) depends_on the component identified as DUP-GW-002 using the REST_API protocol. Traceability for requirement REQ-DUP-80 appears to be handled by the following components: DUP-GW-002. Current test coverage for this is 'None'. </data>
audit_id: SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-943
document_source: Disintermediate_Ubiquitous_Partnerships_Platform_Architecture_v3.4.1.docx
audit_date: '2024-01-09'
system_name: Disintermediate Ubiquitous Partnerships Platform
system_version: 3.4.1
architectural_components:
- component_id: DUP-SVC-001
  component_name: SeatDayAPIGateway
  description: Soon blood religious mind free argue radio skin team certain whom interview
    lead sister senior.
  type: API Gateway
  dependencies:
  - target_component_id: DUP-GW-002
    dependency_type: depends_on
    protocol: REST_API
  - target_component_id: DUP-GW-002
    dependency_type: connects_to
    protocol: REST_API
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - GDPR
    - ISO27001
- component_id: DUP-GW-002
  component_name: FreeManyMicroservice
  description: Magazine edge decide edge professional sure wear reduce personal would
    much capital piece rock group office.
  type: Microservice
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - ISO27001
    - Internal_Security_V3
security_considerations:
  encryption_in_transit: false
  data_at_rest_encryption: true
  access_control_mechanisms:
  - RBAC
  - JWT
  - API_Keys
  vulnerability_assessment_status: Scheduled_Q4
  estimated_cost_usd_annual: 91658.39
traceability_matrix:
- requirement_id: REQ-DUP-80
  implemented_by_components:
  - DUP-GW-002
  test_coverage_status: None
- requirement_id: REQ-DUP-42
  implemented_by_components:
  - DUP-GW-002
  - DUP-SVC-001
