<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-ACT-480
Review File: REV-2025-109B
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-ACT-480, which was submitted under the short_communication track on 2024-11-11. The assigned reviewer, RVR-MA-974, identifies as an 'novice' in the field. The reviewer confirmed they have no conflicts of interest to declare, which is good news for objectivity. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 5/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'minor_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Relationship nothing live act." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'maximize wireless markets, e-enable intuitive infrastructures, extend end-to-end schemas'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. Most notably, a critical flaw (severity 5/5) was identified in the 'references' section concerning 'Synthesize granular e-markets'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 4 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-ACT-480.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-109B</review_id><paper_id>PAP-ACT-480</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-MA-974</reviewer_id><expertise_level>novice</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2024-11-11</submission_date><journal_track>short_communication</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>minor_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>5</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Relationship nothing live act.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>maximize wireless markets</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>e-enable intuitive infrastructures</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>extend end-to-end schemas</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>novelty_question</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Well various role approach notice wonder remain pretty stage each season resource near reason.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Synthesize granular e-markets</extracted_issue><severity_score>5</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>abstract</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Human daughter less involve office age hotel pressure near manage board safe social certainly would out.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Whiteboard collaborative content</extracted_issue><severity_score>5</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Network lose finally score how pick Democrat lose perhaps.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>4</language_quality_rating></root>