<format type="yaml">{audit_id: string, document_source: string, audit_date: date, system_name: string, system_version: string, architectural_components: list[{component_id: string, component_name: string, description: string, type: string, owner_team: string optional, estimated_loc: number optional, dependencies: list[{target_component_id: string, dependency_type: string, protocol: string optional}], compliance_status: {is_compliant: boolean, standards_applied: list[string], non_compliance_issues: list[string] optional}}], security_considerations: {encryption_in_transit: boolean, data_at_rest_encryption: boolean, access_control_mechanisms: list[string], vulnerability_assessment_status: string optional, estimated_cost_usd_annual: number optional}, traceability_matrix: list[{requirement_id: string, implemented_by_components: list[string], test_coverage_status: string optional}] optional, auditor_notes: string optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: System Architecture Audit Findings**

**Reference ID:** SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-651
**Subject:** Envisioneer Magnetic Schemas Engine (Version 2.4.7)
**Date of Review:** 2024-06-22

This memorandum summarizes the findings from the architectural compliance audit conducted on the Envisioneer Magnetic Schemas Engine, based on the review of document 'Envisioneer_Magnetic_Schemas_Engine_Architecture_v2.4.7.docx'. The session was quite productive, though we had to reschedule the morning session due to a fire drill. The system comprises 2 core architectural components. 

From a compliance perspective, the assessment is mixed. Positive adherence to standards like PCI_DSS_4.0 was noted in components such as MrGrowMessageQueue. 

Security posture analysis reveals that access control is managed via JWT, OAuth2. Encryption for data in transit is currently inactive and requires immediate attention. The status of data-at-rest encryption is noted as not fully implemented, posing a significant risk. The last vulnerability assessment is marked as 'Pending_Reassessment'. 

Inter-component dependency mapping shows a complex web of interactions. For instance, the MrGrowMessageQueue (EMS-GW-001) depends_on the component identified as EMS-DB-002 using the AMQP protocol. Traceability for requirement REQ-EMS-82 appears to be handled by the following components: EMS-DB-002, EMS-GW-001. 

**Auditor's Closing Remarks:** Former practice different lot art argue. Pm statement new father add. Somebody character call assume.</data>
audit_id: SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-651
document_source: Envisioneer_Magnetic_Schemas_Engine_Architecture_v2.4.7.docx
audit_date: '2024-06-22'
system_name: Envisioneer Magnetic Schemas Engine
system_version: 2.4.7
architectural_components:
- component_id: EMS-GW-001
  component_name: MrGrowMessageQueue
  description: President may give buy region huge four.
  type: Message Queue
  dependencies:
  - target_component_id: EMS-DB-002
    dependency_type: depends_on
    protocol: AMQP
  - target_component_id: EMS-DB-002
    dependency_type: depends_on
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - PCI_DSS_4.0
    - ISO27001
    - Internal_Security_V3
- component_id: EMS-DB-002
  component_name: ThoseThingBatchProcessor
  description: Become bed method enough religious avoid chair bad staff.
  type: Batch Processor
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - SOC2_Type_II
    - Internal_Security_V3
    - GDPR
  estimated_loc: 43859
security_considerations:
  encryption_in_transit: false
  data_at_rest_encryption: false
  access_control_mechanisms:
  - JWT
  - OAuth2
  vulnerability_assessment_status: Pending_Reassessment
traceability_matrix:
- requirement_id: REQ-EMS-82
  implemented_by_components:
  - EMS-DB-002
  - EMS-GW-001
- requirement_id: REQ-EMS-18
  implemented_by_components:
  - EMS-DB-002
  - EMS-GW-001
- requirement_id: REQ-EMS-85
  implemented_by_components:
  - EMS-GW-001
auditor_notes: Former practice different lot art argue. Pm statement new father add.
  Somebody character call assume.
