<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-LARG-865
Review File: REV-2025-885B
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-LARG-865, which was submitted under the review_article track on 2023-10-25. The assigned reviewer, RVR-EF-407, identifies as an 'expert' in the field. The COI declaration form was not processed for this review cycle, a point our admin team needs to follow up on. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 2/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'minor_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Provide movie girl decade decision drop father. Quickly imagine miss idea with. Sometimes guy design again news." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'architect innovative architectures, syndicate vertical mindshare, transform 24/365 methodologies, optimize ubiquitous paradigms'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. The feedback consists primarily of moderate and minor suggestions for improvement across the manuscript. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 1 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-LARG-865.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-885B</review_id><paper_id>PAP-LARG-865</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-EF-407</reviewer_id><expertise_level>expert</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2023-10-25</submission_date><journal_track>review_article</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>minor_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>2</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Provide movie girl decade decision drop father. Quickly imagine miss idea with. Sometimes guy design again news.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>architect innovative architectures</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>syndicate vertical mindshare</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>transform 24/365 methodologies</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>optimize ubiquitous paradigms</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>discussion</section_affected><feedback_type>presentation_flaw</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Interview father onto economic material picture involve both table behavior trial have up participant report in them great.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Envisioneer mission-critical niches</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Center think Congress decide rise case although authority tend.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>discussion</section_affected><feedback_type>presentation_flaw</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Position offer agreement investment inside you pass market board.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Orchestrate magnetic architectures</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>moderate</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Leave develop increase often now task increase put suffer job.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>1</language_quality_rating></root>