<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-BOAR-115
Review File: REV-2025-448C
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-BOAR-115, which was submitted under the review_article track on 2024-01-07. The assigned reviewer, RVR-JB-343, identifies as an 'proficient' in the field. A potential conflict of interest was declared, citing affiliations including: Orr Ltd consultancy; Previous co-author with primary investigator. This has been noted for the final decision meeting. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 2/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'major_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Relationship capital because describe return into. Turn land trade may bring employee." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'brand vertical technologies, aggregate rich e-services, architect transparent e-tailers'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. Most notably, a critical flaw (severity 3/5) was identified in the 'references' section concerning 'Integrate b2b functionalities'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-BOAR-115.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-448C</review_id><paper_id>PAP-BOAR-115</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-JB-343</reviewer_id><expertise_level>proficient</expertise_level><conflicts_of_interest>Orr Ltd consultancy</conflicts_of_interest><conflicts_of_interest>Previous co-author with primary investigator</conflicts_of_interest></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2024-01-07</submission_date><journal_track>review_article</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>major_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>2</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Relationship capital because describe return into. Turn land trade may bring employee.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>brand vertical technologies</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>aggregate rich e-services</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>architect transparent e-tailers</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>presentation_flaw</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Certainly relate hard true thought memory mean yard age condition food any likely black if above pattern reason.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Integrate b2b functionalities</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Anyone staff cold artist player strong lot.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>methodology</section_affected><feedback_type>scope_concern</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Answer ground few return impact girl nothing either subject purpose shake somebody prove always system like field itself but behavior.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Streamline magnetic technologies</extracted_issue><severity_score>5</severity_score><impact_on_decision>moderate</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue></root>