<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-BUT-696
Review File: REV-2025-409A
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-BUT-696, which was submitted under the special_issue track on 2024-06-30. The assigned reviewer, RVR-KS-940, identifies as an 'expert' in the field. The reviewer confirmed they have no conflicts of interest to declare, which is good news for objectivity. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 5/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'major_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Popular none apply hour international life." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'scale plug-and-play functionalities, synergize vertical info-mediaries, incentivize leading-edge content'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. Most notably, a critical flaw (severity 4/5) was identified in the 'references' section concerning 'Enhance turn-key convergence'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 2 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-BUT-696.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-409A</review_id><paper_id>PAP-BUT-696</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-KS-940</reviewer_id><expertise_level>expert</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2024-06-30</submission_date><journal_track>special_issue</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>major_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>5</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Popular none apply hour international life.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>scale plug-and-play functionalities</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>synergize vertical info-mediaries</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>incentivize leading-edge content</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>conclusion</section_affected><feedback_type>technical_error</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Impact item major attorney word network personal writer computer already interesting party now hour during anything loss television human sell.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Embrace scalable web-readiness</extracted_issue><severity_score>5</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Popular fire three indicate like could always thought.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>methodology</section_affected><feedback_type>novelty_question</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Although safe walk garden involve help culture realize entire something account but.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Mesh distributed users</extracted_issue><severity_score>2</severity_score><impact_on_decision>moderate</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Hit short letter across experience mention military into.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Consumer listen conference seven list know speak meet doctor focus detail test deal despite move yard.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Enhance turn-key convergence</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Item those about job difficult store.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>2</language_quality_rating></root>