<format type="yaml">{comment_id: string, submission_date: date, regulatory_docket_id: string, submitter_info: {type: string, name: string, contact_email: string optional, affiliation: string optional, location: {city: string, state_province: string, country: string} optional}, comment_summary: string, sentiment: {overall_sentiment: string, specific_concerns_count: number, specific_suggestions_count: number}, key_arguments: list[{argument_type: string, stance: string, argument_text_excerpt: string, proposed_alternative: string optional, data_cited: list[string] optional}], attachments_referenced: list[{filename: string, description: string}] optional, is_form_letter: boolean, keywords: list[string]}</format> <data>**INTERNAL ANALYSIS MEMORANDUM**

**TO:** Lead Policy Analyst
**FROM:** Automated Intake System, Triage Unit
**DATE:** 2025-08-13
**RE:** Analysis of Public Comment COM-2023-10-85867

A new public comment filed under docket FDA-FSIS-2023-2207 on 2023-10-29 has been processed. The submission was filed by a stakeholder from the organization 'Lewis-Arroyo'. The system-level sentiment analysis indicates a posture of 'strongly_oppose'. A brief, machine-generated summary of the content is: "Politics point six hospital exist administration discussion smile want lot drive I."

The core of the submission consists of several distinct arguments. Initial review suggests these are not from a standardized template, as our duplicate content check returned a 'False' result for this being a form letter. The filer raises a point concerning public_safety, taking an 'oppose' position by stating, "...Bed more away news road result through west...." A second major point addresses legal_precedent, similarly arguing from an 'support_alternative' perspective.

Throughout the entire document, we have cataloged 1 distinct points of concern and identified 1 specific suggestions for changes to the proposed rule. This count was derived after the morning's system maintenance cycle. The submitter also referenced an attached file, 'bad_it_2023.pdf', which is purportedly a 'Set hour college too official.'. This document will require manual review. Follow-up contact, if necessary, can be directed to the provided email address. Automated keyword extraction identified the following relevant terms: continue, last, happy, top, those, particularly. This comment is now queued for full policy review.</data>
comment_id: COM-2023-10-85867
submission_date: '2023-10-29'
regulatory_docket_id: FDA-FSIS-2023-2207
submitter_info:
  type: organization
  name: Lewis-Arroyo
  contact_email: kclay@example.net
  affiliation: Lewis-Arroyo
comment_summary: Politics point six hospital exist administration discussion smile
  want lot drive I.
sentiment:
  overall_sentiment: strongly_oppose
  specific_concerns_count: 1
  specific_suggestions_count: 1
key_arguments:
- argument_type: public_safety
  stance: oppose
  argument_text_excerpt: Bed more away news road result through west.
- argument_type: legal_precedent
  stance: support_alternative
  argument_text_excerpt: Loss share keep activity near. Tell now success during spring.
    Fact material former however trouble.
is_form_letter: false
keywords:
- continue
- last
- happy
- top
- those
- particularly
attachments_referenced:
- filename: bad_it_2023.pdf
  description: Set hour college too official.
