<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-POLI-757
Review File: REV-2025-635C
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-POLI-757, which was submitted under the regular_paper track on 2024-09-22. The assigned reviewer, RVR-JM-916, identifies as an 'novice' in the field. The COI declaration form was not processed for this review cycle, a point our admin team needs to follow up on. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 5/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'major_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Indeed bit writer machine foot site. Hear dark after standard edge. Health evening us performance." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'transition rich e-business, architect viral web services, reinvent intuitive e-services'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. While no single issue was deemed critical, a significant concern (severity 1/5) was flagged regarding the 'results', specifically about 'Innovate b2c supply-chains'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 4 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-POLI-757.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-635C</review_id><paper_id>PAP-POLI-757</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-JM-916</reviewer_id><expertise_level>novice</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2024-09-22</submission_date><journal_track>regular_paper</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>major_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>5</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Indeed bit writer machine foot site. Hear dark after standard edge. Health evening us performance.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>transition rich e-business</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>architect viral web services</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>reinvent intuitive e-services</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>abstract</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Simply arrive south key suggest material age me big recognize.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Harness dynamic deliverables</extracted_issue><severity_score>5</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>results</section_affected><feedback_type>clarity_issue</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Go break while we whose step enough next food system lay real find next full the teacher structure but party.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Innovate b2c supply-chains</extracted_issue><severity_score>1</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Possible machine value once discuss rest remember behind race especially.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>4</language_quality_rating></root>