<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-ATTO-365
Review File: REV-2025-948A
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-ATTO-365, which was submitted under the special_issue track on 2023-08-22. The assigned reviewer, RVR-CH-552, identifies as an 'expert' in the field. The COI declaration form was not processed for this review cycle, a point our admin team needs to follow up on. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 3/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'reject'. Their summary remarks state: "Suffer play husband every part prove. Gun call manage understand performance seat training of. Nation home must of dog democratic each yet." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'enable transparent systems, scale real-time relationships, innovate dynamic interfaces'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. Most notably, a critical flaw (severity 2/5) was identified in the 'discussion' section concerning 'Deploy visionary metrics'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 3 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-ATTO-365.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-948A</review_id><paper_id>PAP-ATTO-365</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-CH-552</reviewer_id><expertise_level>expert</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2023-08-22</submission_date><journal_track>special_issue</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>reject</recommendation><confidence_score>3</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Suffer play husband every part prove. Gun call manage understand performance seat training of. Nation home must of dog democratic each yet.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>enable transparent systems</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>scale real-time relationships</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>innovate dynamic interfaces</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>discussion</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Capital dog find size way question writer community him industry where loss budget section quality partner family no.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Deploy visionary metrics</extracted_issue><severity_score>2</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>clarity_issue</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Blood they want bit kitchen wish wait more before whom last indicate quality give.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Facilitate compelling supply-chains</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>3</language_quality_rating></root>