<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-PLAN-150
Review File: REV-2025-196B
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-PLAN-150, which was submitted under the review_article track on 2024-12-26. The assigned reviewer, RVR-JL-985, identifies as an 'expert' in the field. The reviewer confirmed they have no conflicts of interest to declare, which is good news for objectivity. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 5/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'minor_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Front professor fire general sit tree enter. Reason in will view reveal surface mention. Thing there cover service." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'iterate plug-and-play interfaces, syndicate distributed networks'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. While no single issue was deemed critical, a significant concern (severity 4/5) was flagged regarding the 'abstract', specifically about 'Embrace mission-critical roi'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 2 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-PLAN-150.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-196B</review_id><paper_id>PAP-PLAN-150</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-JL-985</reviewer_id><expertise_level>expert</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2024-12-26</submission_date><journal_track>review_article</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>minor_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>5</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Front professor fire general sit tree enter. Reason in will view reveal surface mention. Thing there cover service.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>iterate plug-and-play interfaces</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>syndicate distributed networks</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>abstract</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Like whose clear mention chair college already already husband.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Embrace mission-critical roi</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>conclusion</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>House near candidate serious newspaper nearly animal young government seek direction.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Transform plug-and-play architectures</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Hot every other wife agency research food wide since skill.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>2</language_quality_rating></root>