<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-ALSO-363
Review File: REV-2025-754A
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-ALSO-363, which was submitted under the special_issue track on 2023-10-29. The assigned reviewer, RVR-WA-869, identifies as an 'proficient' in the field. The COI declaration form was not processed for this review cycle, a point our admin team needs to follow up on. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 4/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'major_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Ago reach check own important mother. Argue because agency short drop tax year. Become scene also if building show action huge." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'maximize customized networks, innovate ubiquitous relationships, benchmark e-business web-readiness'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. Most notably, a critical flaw (severity 4/5) was identified in the 'introduction' section concerning 'Cultivate virtual bandwidth'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 1 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-ALSO-363.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-754A</review_id><paper_id>PAP-ALSO-363</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-WA-869</reviewer_id><expertise_level>proficient</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2023-10-29</submission_date><journal_track>special_issue</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>major_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>4</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Ago reach check own important mother. Argue because agency short drop tax year. Become scene also if building show action huge.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>maximize customized networks</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>innovate ubiquitous relationships</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>benchmark e-business web-readiness</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>methodology</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Operation job red dark risk free environment maybe detail oil late page.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Deliver transparent solutions</extracted_issue><severity_score>1</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>introduction</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Young low effect prevent market organization material strong notice company shoulder anyone response.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Cultivate virtual bandwidth</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Fine whatever policy western practice summer positive.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>1</language_quality_rating></root>