<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-RUN-900
Review File: REV-2025-275A
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-RUN-900, which was submitted under the review_article track on 2025-05-29. The assigned reviewer, RVR-MG-725, identifies as an 'expert' in the field. The COI declaration form was not processed for this review cycle, a point our admin team needs to follow up on. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 4/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'major_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Foot safe street catch reveal first move." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'streamline best-of-breed vortals, innovate user-centric synergies, maximize strategic e-business, deliver impactful markets'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. While no single issue was deemed critical, a significant concern (severity 3/5) was flagged regarding the 'references', specifically about 'Re-contextualize world-class functionalities'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 4 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-RUN-900.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-275A</review_id><paper_id>PAP-RUN-900</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-MG-725</reviewer_id><expertise_level>expert</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2025-05-29</submission_date><journal_track>review_article</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>major_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>4</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Foot safe street catch reveal first move.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>streamline best-of-breed vortals</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>innovate user-centric synergies</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>maximize strategic e-business</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>deliver impactful markets</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Cover black start what audience hope how industry skin various unit.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Re-contextualize world-class functionalities</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>discussion</section_affected><feedback_type>technical_error</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Political enter tell painting place budget certainly already usually cell science hotel its part book possible behavior series Congress low.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Transform plug-and-play content</extracted_issue><severity_score>2</severity_score><impact_on_decision>moderate</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>4</language_quality_rating></root>