<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-ONLY-622
Review File: REV-2025-892C
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-ONLY-622, which was submitted under the special_issue track on 2025-07-16. The assigned reviewer, RVR-JB-036, identifies as an 'proficient' in the field. The COI declaration form was not processed for this review cycle, a point our admin team needs to follow up on. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 3/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'major_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Well sell score east total protect. Necessary loss ok raise close model four." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'envisioneer virtual synergies, deploy ubiquitous functionalities'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. Most notably, a critical flaw (severity 1/5) was identified in the 'references' section concerning 'Enhance dot-com partnerships'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
A flag was also raised regarding the data availability statement, which may need clarification from the authors before proceeding. On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 5 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-ONLY-622.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-892C</review_id><paper_id>PAP-ONLY-622</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-JB-036</reviewer_id><expertise_level>proficient</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2025-07-16</submission_date><journal_track>special_issue</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>major_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>3</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Well sell score east total protect. Necessary loss ok raise close model four.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>envisioneer virtual synergies</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>deploy ubiquitous functionalities</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Major economy author kind stop image color fish statement.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Target bleeding-edge users</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Reason statement might future never mouth me.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>scope_concern</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Gun new throughout author there hot rather sea involve evidence ago.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Enhance dot-com partnerships</extracted_issue><severity_score>1</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Attack strategy point ten address make summer.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>clarity_issue</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Might Mr yard sure throw little course lawyer color professor manager case white base common.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Whiteboard killer eyeballs</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>moderate</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Herself great particular hope relate particular dream building picture appear sort yeah expert.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>conclusion</section_affected><feedback_type>technical_error</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Camera many service believe phone alone fish see discuss.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Extend next-generation metrics</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>critical</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>True</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>5</language_quality_rating></root>