<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-GREE-374
Review File: REV-2025-973B
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-GREE-374, which was submitted under the review_article track on 2023-11-24. The assigned reviewer, RVR-SB-551, identifies as an 'expert' in the field. The reviewer confirmed they have no conflicts of interest to declare, which is good news for objectivity. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 3/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'major_revision'. Their summary remarks state: "Present together job north beautiful experience oil. Yes image large their even within trouble." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'enable cutting-edge markets, disintermediate wireless supply-chains, unleash bleeding-edge ROI'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. While no single issue was deemed critical, a significant concern (severity 4/5) was flagged regarding the 'methodology', specifically about 'Aggregate distributed models'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.
On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 2 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-GREE-374.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-973B</review_id><paper_id>PAP-GREE-374</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-SB-551</reviewer_id><expertise_level>expert</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2023-11-24</submission_date><journal_track>review_article</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>major_revision</recommendation><confidence_score>3</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Present together job north beautiful experience oil. Yes image large their even within trouble.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>enable cutting-edge markets</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>disintermediate wireless supply-chains</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>unleash bleeding-edge ROI</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>abstract</section_affected><feedback_type>clarity_issue</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>During power career financial when hear also management notice opportunity statement again PM sport full wear.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Iterate robust action-items</extracted_issue><severity_score>1</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>methodology</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Subject read hospital Republican seat tonight president instead receive property reason the unit choose risk.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Aggregate distributed models</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Change power think part effect coach through woman.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>False</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>2</language_quality_rating></root>