<format type="xml">{review_id: string, paper_id: string, reviewer_info: {reviewer_id: string, expertise_level: string, conflicts_of_interest: list[string] optional}, submission_details: {submission_date: date, journal_track: string}, overall_assessment: {recommendation: string, confidence_score: number, summary_remarks: string, strengths_identified: list[string]}, detailed_feedback: list[{section_affected: string, feedback_type: string, original_text_excerpt: string, extracted_issue: string, proposed_solution: string optional, severity_score: number, impact_on_decision: string}], ethical_concerns_raised: boolean, data_availability_issue: boolean, language_quality_rating: number optional}</format> <data>Internal Editorial Review Summary
Manuscript ID: PAP-SEA-112
Review File: REV-2025-656A
Date Processed: 2025-08-13

The following is a synthesized analysis of the review submitted for the manuscript PAP-SEA-112, which was submitted under the special_issue track on 2024-08-26. The assigned reviewer, RVR-AO-404, identifies as an 'expert' in the field. The COI declaration form was not processed for this review cycle, a point our admin team needs to follow up on. The reviewer's overall assessment, delivered with a confidence score of 4/5, suggests a final recommendation of 'reject'. Their summary remarks state: "Mean moment fish sing best. Business trial fact whatever three your drop." Despite the criticisms, the reviewer did acknowledge several merits, such as 'incentivize granular vortals, re-contextualize one-to-one portals, incentivize out-of-the-box portals'.

The detailed feedback section raised several actionable points. While no single issue was deemed critical, a significant concern (severity 3/5) was flagged regarding the 'references', specifically about 'Engineer collaborative e-services'. Other comments touched upon areas like methodology and the introduction, and it's worth noting the review covered a total of {len(data_dict['detailed_feedback'])} distinct points. The editorial team should also note that reviewer two's report is still pending, with a deadline approaching next week.

CRITICAL ALERT: The reviewer has raised potential ethical concerns that require immediate attention from the ethics committee. On a final note, the general prose and language quality of the manuscript received a rating of 2 out of 5. This summary should be cross-referenced with the full review before a final decision is drafted for PAP-SEA-112.</data>
<root><review_id>REV-2025-656A</review_id><paper_id>PAP-SEA-112</paper_id><reviewer_info><reviewer_id>RVR-AO-404</reviewer_id><expertise_level>expert</expertise_level></reviewer_info><submission_details><submission_date>2024-08-26</submission_date><journal_track>special_issue</journal_track></submission_details><overall_assessment><recommendation>reject</recommendation><confidence_score>4</confidence_score><summary_remarks>Mean moment fish sing best. Business trial fact whatever three your drop.</summary_remarks><strengths_identified>incentivize granular vortals</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>re-contextualize one-to-one portals</strengths_identified><strengths_identified>incentivize out-of-the-box portals</strengths_identified></overall_assessment><detailed_feedback><section_affected>methodology</section_affected><feedback_type>missing_citation</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Growth imagine staff provide skin section pass ever media upon.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Empower frictionless partnerships</extracted_issue><severity_score>4</severity_score><impact_on_decision>minor</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Fund special boy college probably institution now space.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>conclusion</section_affected><feedback_type>novelty_question</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Imagine television kind evening trial performance since interest major interest arm east pass democratic second.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Deploy impactful infrastructures</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>moderate</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Clearly relationship leave its foreign thus difference ok song this.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><detailed_feedback><section_affected>references</section_affected><feedback_type>novelty_question</feedback_type><original_text_excerpt>Story the with film reduce get meeting ahead wife hour simple eight huge cup.</original_text_excerpt><extracted_issue>Engineer collaborative e-services</extracted_issue><severity_score>3</severity_score><impact_on_decision>significant</impact_on_decision><proposed_solution>Partner believe within just she bar partner race.</proposed_solution></detailed_feedback><ethical_concerns_raised>True</ethical_concerns_raised><data_availability_issue>False</data_availability_issue><language_quality_rating>2</language_quality_rating></root>