<format type="yaml">{audit_id: string, document_source: string, audit_date: date, system_name: string, system_version: string, architectural_components: list[{component_id: string, component_name: string, description: string, type: string, owner_team: string optional, estimated_loc: number optional, dependencies: list[{target_component_id: string, dependency_type: string, protocol: string optional}], compliance_status: {is_compliant: boolean, standards_applied: list[string], non_compliance_issues: list[string] optional}}], security_considerations: {encryption_in_transit: boolean, data_at_rest_encryption: boolean, access_control_mechanisms: list[string], vulnerability_assessment_status: string optional, estimated_cost_usd_annual: number optional}, traceability_matrix: list[{requirement_id: string, implemented_by_components: list[string], test_coverage_status: string optional}] optional, auditor_notes: string optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: System Architecture Audit Findings**

**Reference ID:** SYSARCH-AUDIT-2025-447
**Subject:** Implement Global Methodologies Platform (Version 4.2.4)
**Date of Review:** 2024-11-08

This memorandum summarizes the findings from the architectural compliance audit conducted on the Implement Global Methodologies Platform, based on the review of document 'Implement_Global_Methodologies_Platform_Architecture_v4.2.4.docx'. The session was quite productive, though we had to reschedule the morning session due to a fire drill. The system comprises 2 core architectural components. 

From a compliance perspective, the assessment is mixed. Positive adherence to standards like ISO27001 was noted in components such as FeelArtistBatchProcessor. 

Security posture analysis reveals that access control is managed via JWT. Encryption for data in transit is currently active. The status of data-at-rest encryption is noted as not fully implemented, posing a significant risk. The last vulnerability assessment is marked as 'In_Progress'. The projected annual operational overhead for these security measures is approximately $28375.39 USD. 

Inter-component dependency mapping shows a complex web of interactions. For instance, the DealFederalMicroservice (IGM-GW-002) connects_to the component identified as IGM-MSG-001. Traceability for requirement REQ-IGM-53 appears to be handled by the following components: IGM-GW-002, IGM-MSG-001. 

**Auditor's Closing Remarks:** Score time simple pull adult claim read.</data>
audit_id: SYSARCH-AUDIT-2025-447
document_source: Implement_Global_Methodologies_Platform_Architecture_v4.2.4.docx
audit_date: '2024-11-08'
system_name: Implement Global Methodologies Platform
system_version: 4.2.4
architectural_components:
- component_id: IGM-MSG-001
  component_name: FeelArtistBatchProcessor
  description: Hear just real name along different strategy within.
  type: Batch Processor
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - PCI_DSS_4.0
    - ISO27001
    - Internal_Security_V3
  owner_team: Enable_Apps
  estimated_loc: 6556
- component_id: IGM-GW-002
  component_name: DealFederalMicroservice
  description: Win discussion star how whom resource north we inside sit make.
  type: Microservice
  dependencies:
  - target_component_id: IGM-MSG-001
    dependency_type: connects_to
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - SOC2_Type_II
  owner_team: Utilize_Infra
security_considerations:
  encryption_in_transit: true
  data_at_rest_encryption: false
  access_control_mechanisms:
  - JWT
  vulnerability_assessment_status: In_Progress
  estimated_cost_usd_annual: 28375.39
traceability_matrix:
- requirement_id: REQ-IGM-53
  implemented_by_components:
  - IGM-GW-002
  - IGM-MSG-001
- requirement_id: REQ-IGM-56
  implemented_by_components:
  - IGM-MSG-001
- requirement_id: REQ-IGM-13
  implemented_by_components:
  - IGM-MSG-001
  test_coverage_status: None
auditor_notes: Score time simple pull adult claim read.
