<format type="xml">{analysis_id: string, source_platform: string, document_id: string, timestamp: date, extracted_text: string, company_entity: string, campaign_or_event_context: string optional, sentiment_metrics: {overall_score: number, label: string, confidence: number, keywords_detected: list[string], emotions_detected: list[{type: string, score: number}] optional}, stakeholder_profile: {type: string, location: string optional, influence_score: number optional} optional, topics_discussed: list[{topic: string, relevance_score: number}], identified_issues: list[{issue_type: string, severity: string, recommended_action: string}] optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: STAKEHOLDER SENTIMENT ANALYSIS BRIEFING**

**Analysis ID:** SEA-2025-08-13-5061

A new data point, document ID 730381078261886501, was captured by our listening platform from a Employee Survey source. The system ingested and processed this item at approximately 1981-05-18T11:25:37.697105Z. The analysis was completed using our NLP model v4.1, which has shown a 3% improvement in sarcasm detection in recent benchmarks. The subject of the feedback was identified as Davis-Blankenship.
Initial classification suggests the author is a(n) 'competitor'. Geolocation data, though imprecise, points towards the South Troy, Kansas area. Their digital influence score is calculated at 4283, placing them in the 'High-Impact' tier of stakeholders.

The content of the message reads: "Regarding Davis-Blankenship's latest move... unacceptable service. It really makes you think about their stance on portals and applications. Seriously disappointed. #Davis-BlankenshipFail #portals"
Our sentiment engine has assigned a score of -0.45, resulting in a 'NEGATIVE' classification. The model's confidence in this assessment is high, at 91.2%.
The primary themes extracted from the text are: 'portals' (relevance: 0.77), 'applications' (relevance: 0.45). These were derived from lexical triggers such as 'all' and 'daughter', among others.

**ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE:**
- A potential 'brand_reputation_damage' has been flagged with a 'critical' severity level. The automated protocol suggests we 'monitor_situation' as a preliminary step.</data>
<root><analysis_id>SEA-2025-08-13-5061</analysis_id><source_platform>Employee Survey</source_platform><document_id>730381078261886501</document_id><timestamp>1981-05-18T11:25:37.697105Z</timestamp><extracted_text>Regarding Davis-Blankenship's latest move... unacceptable service. It really makes you think about their stance on portals and applications. Seriously disappointed. #Davis-BlankenshipFail #portals</extracted_text><company_entity>Davis-Blankenship</company_entity><sentiment_metrics><overall_score>-0.4456</overall_score><label>negative</label><confidence>0.912</confidence><keywords_detected>all</keywords_detected><keywords_detected>daughter</keywords_detected><keywords_detected>fine</keywords_detected><keywords_detected>hotel</keywords_detected><keywords_detected>week</keywords_detected><emotions_detected><type>sadness</type><score>0.6635</score></emotions_detected><emotions_detected><type>disgust</type><score>0.5165</score></emotions_detected></sentiment_metrics><topics_discussed><topic>portals</topic><relevance_score>0.7706</relevance_score></topics_discussed><topics_discussed><topic>applications</topic><relevance_score>0.4512</relevance_score></topics_discussed><stakeholder_profile><type>competitor</type><location>South Troy, Kansas</location><influence_score>4283</influence_score></stakeholder_profile><identified_issues><issue_type>brand_reputation_damage</issue_type><severity>critical</severity><recommended_action>monitor_situation</recommended_action></identified_issues></root>