<format type="xml">{analysis_id: string, source_platform: string, document_id: string, timestamp: date, extracted_text: string, company_entity: string, campaign_or_event_context: string optional, sentiment_metrics: {overall_score: number, label: string, confidence: number, keywords_detected: list[string], emotions_detected: list[{type: string, score: number}] optional}, stakeholder_profile: {type: string, location: string optional, influence_score: number optional} optional, topics_discussed: list[{topic: string, relevance_score: number}], identified_issues: list[{issue_type: string, severity: string, recommended_action: string}] optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: STAKEHOLDER SENTIMENT ANALYSIS BRIEFING**

**Analysis ID:** SEA-2025-08-13-6629

A new data point, document ID 310265257146900364, was captured by our listening platform from a News Article Comment source. The system ingested and processed this item at approximately 1977-02-26T13:49:24.130584Z. The analysis was completed using our NLP model v4.1, which has shown a 3% improvement in sarcasm detection in recent benchmarks. The subject of the feedback was identified as Horton-Ward.
Initial classification suggests the author is a(n) 'general_public'. Geolocation data, though imprecise, points towards the Douglasfort, South Carolina area. Their digital influence score is calculated at 6982, placing them in the 'High-Impact' tier of stakeholders.

The content of the message reads: "My thoughts on Horton-Ward: broken promises. It really makes you think about their stance on eyeballs and users. Seriously disappointed. #Horton-WardFail #eyeballs"
Our sentiment engine has assigned a score of -0.90, resulting in a 'NEGATIVE' classification. The model's confidence in this assessment is high, at 93.3%.
The primary themes extracted from the text are: 'eyeballs' (relevance: 0.43), 'users' (relevance: 0.43). These were derived from lexical triggers such as 'he' and 'itself', among others.

**ACTIONABLE INTELLIGENCE:**
- A potential 'product_quality_complaint' has been flagged with a 'high' severity level. The automated protocol suggests we 'product_team_review' as a preliminary step.</data>
<root><analysis_id>SEA-2025-08-13-6629</analysis_id><source_platform>News Article Comment</source_platform><document_id>310265257146900364</document_id><timestamp>1977-02-26T13:49:24.130584Z</timestamp><extracted_text>My thoughts on Horton-Ward: broken promises. It really makes you think about their stance on eyeballs and users. Seriously disappointed. #Horton-WardFail #eyeballs</extracted_text><company_entity>Horton-Ward</company_entity><sentiment_metrics><overall_score>-0.8977</overall_score><label>negative</label><confidence>0.9332</confidence><keywords_detected>he</keywords_detected><keywords_detected>itself</keywords_detected><keywords_detected>order</keywords_detected><keywords_detected>picture</keywords_detected><keywords_detected>sister</keywords_detected><emotions_detected><type>anger</type><score>0.6489</score></emotions_detected><emotions_detected><type>sadness</type><score>0.4791</score></emotions_detected><emotions_detected><type>disgust</type><score>0.1552</score></emotions_detected><emotions_detected><type>fear</type><score>0.107</score></emotions_detected></sentiment_metrics><topics_discussed><topic>eyeballs</topic><relevance_score>0.4322</relevance_score></topics_discussed><topics_discussed><topic>users</topic><relevance_score>0.4301</relevance_score></topics_discussed><stakeholder_profile><type>general_public</type><location>Douglasfort, South Carolina</location><influence_score>6982</influence_score></stakeholder_profile><identified_issues><issue_type>product_quality_complaint</issue_type><severity>high</severity><recommended_action>product_team_review</recommended_action></identified_issues></root>