<format type="yaml">{audit_id: string, document_source: string, audit_date: date, system_name: string, system_version: string, architectural_components: list[{component_id: string, component_name: string, description: string, type: string, owner_team: string optional, estimated_loc: number optional, dependencies: list[{target_component_id: string, dependency_type: string, protocol: string optional}], compliance_status: {is_compliant: boolean, standards_applied: list[string], non_compliance_issues: list[string] optional}}], security_considerations: {encryption_in_transit: boolean, data_at_rest_encryption: boolean, access_control_mechanisms: list[string], vulnerability_assessment_status: string optional, estimated_cost_usd_annual: number optional}, traceability_matrix: list[{requirement_id: string, implemented_by_components: list[string], test_coverage_status: string optional}] optional, auditor_notes: string optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: System Architecture Audit Findings**

**Reference ID:** SYSARCH-AUDIT-2025-795
**Subject:** Re-intermediate Next-generation Users System (Version 2.2.15)
**Date of Review:** 2025-06-18

This memorandum summarizes the findings from the architectural compliance audit conducted on the Re-intermediate Next-generation Users System, based on the review of document 'Re-intermediate_Next-generation_Users_System_Architecture_v2.2.15.docx'. The session was quite productive, though we had to reschedule the morning session due to a fire drill. The system comprises 2 core architectural components. 

From a compliance perspective, the assessment is mixed. Positive adherence to standards like Internal_Security_V3 was noted in components such as SoSixMessageQueue. 

Security posture analysis reveals that access control is managed via API_Keys, JWT. Encryption for data in transit is currently inactive and requires immediate attention. The status of data-at-rest encryption is noted as not fully implemented, posing a significant risk. The last vulnerability assessment is marked as 'In_Progress'. The projected annual operational overhead for these security measures is approximately $47278.97 USD. 

Inter-component dependency mapping shows a complex web of interactions. For instance, the SoSixMessageQueue (RNU-MSG-001) depends_on the component identified as RNU-GW-002 using the AMQP protocol. 

**Auditor's Closing Remarks:** Yourself add enough day. Recently agreement happy enjoy include trial woman.</data>
audit_id: SYSARCH-AUDIT-2025-795
document_source: Re-intermediate_Next-generation_Users_System_Architecture_v2.2.15.docx
audit_date: '2025-06-18'
system_name: Re-intermediate Next-generation Users System
system_version: 2.2.15
architectural_components:
- component_id: RNU-MSG-001
  component_name: SoSixMessageQueue
  description: Bed food parent coach see candidate staff.
  type: Message Queue
  dependencies:
  - target_component_id: RNU-GW-002
    dependency_type: depends_on
    protocol: AMQP
  - target_component_id: RNU-GW-002
    dependency_type: provides
    protocol: AMQP
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - SOC2_Type_II
    - Internal_Security_V3
  owner_team: Orchestrate_Infra
- component_id: RNU-GW-002
  component_name: ApplyBaseMessageQueue
  description: Just candidate model anyone ground apply instead change either when
    computer ability.
  type: Message Queue
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - ISO27001
    - Internal_Security_V3
  owner_team: Envisioneer_Apps
security_considerations:
  encryption_in_transit: false
  data_at_rest_encryption: false
  access_control_mechanisms:
  - API_Keys
  - JWT
  vulnerability_assessment_status: In_Progress
  estimated_cost_usd_annual: 47278.97
auditor_notes: Yourself add enough day. Recently agreement happy enjoy include trial
  woman.
