<format type="yaml">{audit_id: string, document_source: string, audit_date: date, system_name: string, system_version: string, architectural_components: list[{component_id: string, component_name: string, description: string, type: string, owner_team: string optional, estimated_loc: number optional, dependencies: list[{target_component_id: string, dependency_type: string, protocol: string optional}], compliance_status: {is_compliant: boolean, standards_applied: list[string], non_compliance_issues: list[string] optional}}], security_considerations: {encryption_in_transit: boolean, data_at_rest_encryption: boolean, access_control_mechanisms: list[string], vulnerability_assessment_status: string optional, estimated_cost_usd_annual: number optional}, traceability_matrix: list[{requirement_id: string, implemented_by_components: list[string], test_coverage_status: string optional}] optional, auditor_notes: string optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: System Architecture Audit Findings**

**Reference ID:** SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-536
**Subject:** Maximize Bleeding-edge Infrastructures Engine (Version 3.2.13)
**Date of Review:** 2025-04-22

This memorandum summarizes the findings from the architectural compliance audit conducted on the Maximize Bleeding-edge Infrastructures Engine, based on the review of document 'Maximize_Bleeding-edge_Infrastructures_Engine_Architecture_v3.2.13.docx'. The session was quite productive, though we had to reschedule the morning session due to a fire drill. The system comprises 2 core architectural components. 

From a compliance perspective, the assessment is mixed. Positive adherence to standards like Internal_Security_V3 was noted in components such as FrontConcernCache. 

Security posture analysis reveals that access control is managed via JWT, OAuth2. Encryption for data in transit is currently active. The status of data-at-rest encryption is noted as implemented. The projected annual operational overhead for these security measures is approximately $59042.69 USD. 

Inter-component dependency mapping shows a complex web of interactions. For instance, the system components operate with a high degree of independence. Traceability for requirement REQ-MBI-65 appears to be handled by the following components: MBI-CACHE-001, MBI-SVC-002. </data>
audit_id: SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-536
document_source: Maximize_Bleeding-edge_Infrastructures_Engine_Architecture_v3.2.13.docx
audit_date: '2025-04-22'
system_name: Maximize Bleeding-edge Infrastructures Engine
system_version: 3.2.13
architectural_components:
- component_id: MBI-CACHE-001
  component_name: FrontConcernCache
  description: Main fly church remember west serve similar already beyond red every
    since together piece PM single.
  type: Cache
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - Internal_Security_V3
    - GDPR
  owner_team: Target_Infra
- component_id: MBI-SVC-002
  component_name: MilitaryThoughMessageQueue
  description: Majority west cover apply option could stock skill charge soon ok.
  type: Message Queue
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - ISO27001
  owner_team: Incubate_Platform
  estimated_loc: 14529
security_considerations:
  encryption_in_transit: true
  data_at_rest_encryption: true
  access_control_mechanisms:
  - JWT
  - OAuth2
  estimated_cost_usd_annual: 59042.69
traceability_matrix:
- requirement_id: REQ-MBI-65
  implemented_by_components:
  - MBI-CACHE-001
  - MBI-SVC-002
