<format type="yaml">{audit_id: string, document_source: string, audit_date: date, system_name: string, system_version: string, architectural_components: list[{component_id: string, component_name: string, description: string, type: string, owner_team: string optional, estimated_loc: number optional, dependencies: list[{target_component_id: string, dependency_type: string, protocol: string optional}], compliance_status: {is_compliant: boolean, standards_applied: list[string], non_compliance_issues: list[string] optional}}], security_considerations: {encryption_in_transit: boolean, data_at_rest_encryption: boolean, access_control_mechanisms: list[string], vulnerability_assessment_status: string optional, estimated_cost_usd_annual: number optional}, traceability_matrix: list[{requirement_id: string, implemented_by_components: list[string], test_coverage_status: string optional}] optional, auditor_notes: string optional}</format> <data>**CONFIDENTIAL: System Architecture Audit Findings**

**Reference ID:** SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-403
**Subject:** Transition Dynamic Relationships System (Version 1.6.12)
**Date of Review:** 2024-04-15

This memorandum summarizes the findings from the architectural compliance audit conducted on the Transition Dynamic Relationships System, based on the review of document 'Transition_Dynamic_Relationships_System_Architecture_v1.6.12.docx'. The session was quite productive, though we had to reschedule the morning session due to a fire drill. The system comprises 2 core architectural components. 

From a compliance perspective, the assessment is mixed. Positive adherence to standards like SOC2_Type_II was noted in components such as ChargeLevelMessageQueue. 

Security posture analysis reveals that access control is managed via JWT, API_Keys. Encryption for data in transit is currently active. The status of data-at-rest encryption is noted as implemented. The last vulnerability assessment is marked as 'Completed'. The projected annual operational overhead for these security measures is approximately $15034.93 USD. 

Inter-component dependency mapping shows a complex web of interactions. For instance, the ChargeLevelMessageQueue (TDR-DB-001) consumes the component identified as TDR-CACHE-002 using the REST_API protocol. 

**Auditor's Closing Remarks:** Ask free require end now. Forward in yeah American nature. Leave another indicate whole.</data>
audit_id: SYSARCH-AUDIT-2024-403
document_source: Transition_Dynamic_Relationships_System_Architecture_v1.6.12.docx
audit_date: '2024-04-15'
system_name: Transition Dynamic Relationships System
system_version: 1.6.12
architectural_components:
- component_id: TDR-DB-001
  component_name: ChargeLevelMessageQueue
  description: Today often however performance degree not record site lot carry.
  type: Message Queue
  dependencies:
  - target_component_id: TDR-CACHE-002
    dependency_type: consumes
    protocol: REST_API
  - target_component_id: TDR-CACHE-002
    dependency_type: provides
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - SOC2_Type_II
    - GDPR
  owner_team: Matrix_Apps
- component_id: TDR-CACHE-002
  component_name: DataSimilarMessageQueue
  description: Want so science serve spring hit collection media century really focus
    budget.
  type: Message Queue
  dependencies: []
  compliance_status:
    is_compliant: true
    standards_applied:
    - ISO27001
    - PCI_DSS_4.0
    - Internal_Security_V3
  owner_team: Transition_Core
security_considerations:
  encryption_in_transit: true
  data_at_rest_encryption: true
  access_control_mechanisms:
  - JWT
  - API_Keys
  vulnerability_assessment_status: Completed
  estimated_cost_usd_annual: 15034.93
auditor_notes: Ask free require end now. Forward in yeah American nature. Leave another
  indicate whole.
