UID
int64 1.96k
178k
| original_image
imagewidth (px) 1.02k
1.34k
| edit_prompt
stringlengths 30
62
| edited_image
imagewidth (px) 1.02k
1.34k
| SC_edit_success
float32 0
10
| SC_overediting
float32 0
10
| SC_reasoning
stringlengths 152
437
| SC_min_score
float32 0
10
| PQ_artifacts
float32 2
10
| PQ_reasoning
stringlengths 113
376
| O_score
float32 0
10
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
155,922
|
Replace the traffic cone with ice cream cone
| 10
| 10
|
The traffic cone in the original image has been replaced with an ice cream cone in the edited image as per the instruction. Additionally, the edited image retained the original scene with minimal changes apart from the instructed edit, so it looks similar to the original with no apparent overediting.
| 10
| 8
|
Overall, the image is technically well done, with minimal distortions or artifacts. However, there is a slight unnatural blending where the ice cream cone meets the ground, and a minor shadow inconsistency. The shadows and lighting on the ice cream cone don't perfectly match the surrounding environment, creating a slightly disjointed appearance.
| 8.944272
|
||
155,922
|
Replace the utility pole with giant pencil
| 0
| 9
|
The editing instruction to replace the utility pole with a giant pencil was not followed at all, resulting in the same utility pole still being present; thus scoring 0 for the first criterion. The second image is very similar to the original image with minimal visible change, so it scores 9 for minimal overediting.
| 0
| 9
|
The image is nearly artifact-free with natural-looking proportions and consistent object shapes. There is only a slight blur on the traffic cone in the foreground, which is minor.
| 0
|
||
155,922
|
Replace the utility pole with totem pole
| 10
| 10
|
The utility pole has been successfully replaced with a totem pole following the editing instruction. The edited image retains the composition and elements of the original image with minimal changes apart from the requested edit.
| 10
| 9
|
The image is mostly free of noticeable artifacts. There are no unusual body parts or proportions, and no unnatural object shapes visible. There is a slight blur on the traffic cone in the foreground, but it does not significantly affect the overall quality.
| 9.486833
|
||
155,922
|
Replace the bus shelter with ticket booth
| 8
| 9
|
The bus shelter in the original image has been successfully replaced with a ticket booth. The structure of the ticket booth is clearly visible and the integration looks natural. However, some remnants of the bus shelter (like its shape and some structural elements) can still be seen in the edited image. The degree of overediting is minimal as the overall scene remains recognizable with slight changes to match the editing instruction.
| 8
| 8
|
The image shows limited artifacts. The proportions of the objects appear mostly natural, but there is a noticeable blur on the orange traffic cone and minor distortions around the pole and background.
| 8
|
||
155,922
|
Replace the bus shelter with art installation
| 0
| 10
|
The bus shelter is still present in the edited image and has not been replaced with an art installation. The changes made do not follow the editing instruction at all. However, there is no unnecessary overediting detected, as the scene remains almost identical.
| 0
| 2
|
The image has significant AI-artifacts: the object shapes are distorted, particularly the person holding the large object with unusual body proportions and lack of clarity. The background elements, such as the distorted pole and the blurred orange cone, also display artifacts.
| 0
|
||
34,476
|
Replace the blood splatter with petals
| 8
| 7
|
The blood splatter has been effectively replaced with petals, successfully following the editing instruction. However, the petals are quite dense and scattered which might differ slightly from a more minimalistic interpretation. The degree of overediting is moderate as the rest of the scene is largely unchanged and recognizable, but there is a noticeable alteration around the splatter area.
| 7
| 9
|
The image primarily appears free of significant distortions, unusual body parts, and unnatural object shapes. The details are sharp and clear, with high-quality rendering. However, there might be a slight blending issue, which is hardly noticeable but slightly present in the background. Overall, the technical quality is very high.
| 7.937254
|
||
34,476
|
Replace the blood splatter with digital pixels
| 2
| 3
|
In the edited image, the blood splatter has not been successfully replaced with digital pixels. Instead, some objects have been replaced or heavily altered, but remnants of the original blood splatter remain. While there is an attempt at pixelation, the original edit is not effectively addressed. The second score reflects significant overediting where the edited content has diverged noticeably from the original context.
| 2
| 8
|
Overall, the image is of high technical quality with detailed textures and well-defined objects. There are minor distortions and slightly unusual proportions in the hand on the bottom left, and there is some blur on the person in the background, but it could be motion blur and not necessarily an artifact.
| 4
|
||
34,476
|
Replace the blood splatter with confetti
| 5
| 7
|
The editing successfully replaced the blood splatter with confetti around the central figure, achieving the primary task. However, the original person's face and elements were also noticeably changed, which wasn't part of the original instruction, leading to overediting.
| 5
| 7
|
The image contains mostly coherent elements, but there are some noticeable distortions and unusual body parts. The two robotic hands show inconsistent proportions and shapes. There's a slight blurriness around the woman's face. Other elements like the confetti and the background are well-rendered.
| 5.91608
|
||
34,476
|
Replace the man in the background with robot sentinel
| 0
| 10
|
The man in the background has not been replaced with a robot sentinel. The original and the edited images appear identical, indicating a failure in execution of the editing instruction.
| 0
| 9
|
The image shows high technical quality with detailed textures and sharpness. However, there is a slight distortion around the face that seems slightly disproportionate, which keeps it from being a perfect 10.
| 0
|
||
34,476
|
Replace the man in the background with ghost
| 10
| 9
|
The man in the background has been successfully replaced by a ghost, effectively following the given instruction. The overall scene and composition of the edited image still closely resemble the original with minimal overediting except for the specified change.
| 9
| 9
|
The image is technically proficient with detailed textures and lighting. There are no obvious distortions or unusual body part proportions. The object shapes are consistent and there is a high level of detail in the robotic elements. Some minor motion blur is present, but it seems intentional.
| 9
|
||
1,963
|
Replace the blue shirt with scientist's lab coat
| 10
| 9
|
The blue shirt in the original image has been successfully replaced with a scientist's lab coat in the edited image, and the person maintains the same posture and environment. The change was executed effectively without significantly altering other aspects of the scene.
| 9
| 9
|
The image shows minimal AI artifacts. The proportions of the body are generally natural, the object shapes are consistent, and there are no noticeable distortions or blurred faces. The only slight issue is a minor unnatural blending around the edges of the doctor's coat, but it is barely noticeable.
| 9
|
||
1,963
|
Replace the blue shirt with safari outfit
| 10
| 10
|
The blue shirt in the original image was successfully replaced with a safari outfit in the edited image. The edited image maintains the original scene with minimal changes other than the clothing, achieving a high degree of editing success and minimal overediting.
| 10
| 10
|
The image appears to be free of distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, and blurred faces. The composition and clarity are maintained well.
| 10
|
||
1,963
|
Replace the blue shirt with pirate costume
| 10
| 9
|
The blue shirt has been successfully replaced with a pirate costume in the edited image, perfectly following the editing instruction. The edited image still retains the original background and setting, thus showing minimal overediting.
| 9
| 9
|
The image has a high level of technical quality with minimal detectable artifacts. There are no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. However, there is a slight unnaturalness in the wrist area of the right hand, which slightly reduces the score.
| 9
|
||
1,963
|
Replace the lamp with magic orb
| 0
| 10
|
The lamp in the original image was not replaced with a magic orb in the edited image. However, since there was no over-editing and the images are otherwise identical, the overediting score is 10.
| 0
| 9
|
The image appears to be mostly free of distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The individual’s body proportions look natural, and the face is clear and sharp. Minor imperfections may exist but are not evident at first glance.
| 0
|
||
1,963
|
Replace the lamp with giant tulip
| 0
| 10
|
The lamp is present in the original image but has not been replaced with a giant tulip in the edited image. The edited image is identical to the original image, indicating no changes were made.
| 0
| 10
|
The image exhibits no discernible AI artifacts. The body proportions, object shapes, and facial clarity are all natural and free from distortions.
| 0
|
||
25,993
|
Replace the naan bread with pretzel
| 10
| 9
|
The editing successfully replaced the naan bread with a pretzel, following the instruction perfectly. The edited image maintains the integrity of the original scene with minimal changes outside the specific edit.
| 9
| 9
|
The image appears to be mostly artifact-free with no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The details are clear and sharp, especially the food textures and colors. There might be a very slight blurring in some minor areas, but it does not detract significantly from the overall quality.
| 9
|
||
25,993
|
Replace the naan bread with croissant
| 10
| 10
|
The naan bread in the original image has been perfectly replaced with a croissant in the edited image, adhering completely to the editing instruction. The edited image retains the overall composition and appearance of the original, indicating no overediting.
| 10
| 10
|
The image appears artifact-free with no distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred areas. The details of the food and dish elements are clear and well-defined.
| 10
|
||
25,993
|
Replace the cilantro garnish with basil leaves
| 0
| 10
|
The edited image still shows cilantro garnish instead of the required basil leaves. However, no other elements of the image appear to have been altered.
| 0
| 10
|
The image exhibits no observable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The elements within the image appear clear and well-defined, indicating no significant AI-artifacts.
| 0
|
||
25,993
|
Replace the tea glass with coffee mug
| 0
| 8
|
The original image does not have a tea glass anywhere, so replacing it with a coffee mug is not possible. Therefore, the edit does not conform to the instruction given. However, the rest of the scene remains largely unchanged, maintaining visual similarity.
| 0
| 9
|
The image is clear with good focus and sharpness. The food and objects appear natural with proper proportions. There are no visible distortions, unusual shapes, or blurred areas. Slight artifacts might be present in the edges, but they are minimal and not easily noticeable.
| 0
|
||
25,993
|
Replace the tea glass with cocktail glass
| 0
| 10
|
The original tea glasses are present in the first image, but they have not been replaced by cocktail glasses in the edited image. However, the edited image closely resembles the original with minimal changes, indicating no overediting.
| 0
| 10
|
The image appears to be free of distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, and blurred faces. The food presentation is clear and well-defined.
| 0
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the blaster with magic staff
| 0
| 10
|
The edited image appears identical to the original image, indicating that the blaster has not been replaced with a magic staff. Thus, the editing instruction was not executed successfully. Since there is no perceptible change, the degree of overediting score is maximal.
| 0
| 7
|
The overall image quality is good with well-executed lightning effects and character details. However, there are minor distortions around the lightning and the edges of some characters, and some objects appear slightly warped. Faces are clear but there are small sections with a noticeable blur.
| 0
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the blaster with ray gun
| 0
| 10
|
The edited image does not show any visible changes to the blaster. The original object, which is the blaster, is still present in the edited image, indicating that the instruction to replace the blaster with a ray gun wasn't followed at all. However, the scene remains almost identical to the original, showing no signs of overediting.
| 0
| 9
|
The image shows high technical quality with minimal artifacts. The lightning effects are well-integrated and the objects have natural shapes. Minor blurring around the faces in the background, but not significant enough to detract from overall quality.
| 0
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the blaster with pirate ship cannon
| 10
| 9
|
The edited image successfully replaced the blaster with a pirate ship cannon, following the editing instruction perfectly. The overall scene remains highly recognizable and consistent with the original, indicating minimal yet effective editing while making the required change.
| 9
| 8
|
The image exhibits high technical quality with light effects and dynamic posing. However, there are mild distortions in some areas, such as slightly unnatural body proportions and some blurred background elements.
| 8.485281
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the lightning with fire breath
| 3
| 8
|
While fire breath was added, the original lightning is still largely present in the scene, which means the editing instruction was not fully executed. The edited image retains most elements of the original image with minimal additions.
| 3
| 8
|
The image appears mostly artifact-free with clear and sharp elements. However, there are slight distortions and blurring around the edges of the lightning effects and the flame, which slightly diminishes the overall quality.
| 4.89898
|
||
9,156
|
Replace the lightning with vines
| 3
| 6
|
The editing instruction to replace the lightning with vines has only been partially followed. The vines have been added, but not all the lightning has been replaced. Some lightning effects remain visible alongside the vines. The edited image retains a similar composition to the original, but the incomplete replacement of lightning lowers the editing success score.
| 3
| 5
|
The image displays several AI-artifacts, including distorted limbs, unusual proportions, and some blurred areas. The lightning effects appear unnatural, and there are inconsistencies in lighting and shading on different objects.
| 3.872983
|
||
23,889
|
Replace the skulls with giant flowers
| 10
| 9
|
The skulls have been successfully replaced with a giant flower, following the editing instruction perfectly. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, maintaining the original feel while executing the edit effectively.
| 9
| 9
|
The image is well-composited with minimal distortions. The hand holding the guitar seems proportionate and natural. The guitar appears well-defined and detailed. The flower is sharp and does not display unusual shapes. There is a slight blurriness around where the hand meets the guitar, but it's very minor.
| 9
|
||
23,889
|
Replace the skulls with floating candles
| 0
| 3
|
The edited image does not contain the original object (the skulls), failing to follow the editing instruction of replacing the skulls with floating candles, hence a score of 0 for editing success. However, the scene retains some elements from the original image, such as the hand holding the guitar, resulting in a degree of overediting score of 3.
| 0
| 8
|
The image is mostly artifact-free with good clarity and no significant distortions. However, there are minor issues with the hand's proportions and some slight blurring around the finger edges holding the guitar.
| 0
|
||
23,889
|
Replace the guitar with flaming sword
| 10
| 9
|
The guitar in the original image has been replaced with a flaming sword effectively in the edited image. The overall scene remains very similar, with the exception of the object replacement and added flames, which is minimal yet impactful.
| 9
| 9
|
The image is technically very well done with minimal AI-artifacts. There are no unusual body parts or distortions visible, and the object shapes such as the skulls and horns are convincing. There is a high level of detail, especially on the textures and flames. Only slight blurring is noted in some small areas, but it does not detract significantly from the overall quality.
| 9
|
||
23,889
|
Replace the sparks with glowing stars
| 5
| 3
|
The sparks have been replaced by glowing stars in the background, which achieves the editing instruction to some extent. However, much of the original scene, including the character and other details, has been removed or altered significantly, indicating overediting.
| 3
| 8
|
The image displays a well-rendered hand and object with detailed textures and clear lines. However, the arm appears slightly disproportionate, being unnaturally long. There are no significant distortions or blurred faces present.
| 4.89898
|
||
23,889
|
Replace the sparks with floating musical notes
| 10
| 5
|
The edited image successfully replaces the sparks with floating musical notes as per the instruction, fulfilling the editing objective perfectly. However, the degree of overediting is moderate as significant elements of the original image (such as the monstrous figure and skulls) have been removed, changing the overall scene substantially.
| 5
| 8
|
The image is mostly clear and free of noticeable AI artifacts. However, the hand holding the strings appears slightly distorted, particularly around the fingers, and there is a minor unnatural shape at the base of the strings.
| 6.324555
|
||
28,032
|
Replace the main building with ancient castle
| 9
| 8
|
The main building has been successfully replaced with an ancient castle, closely following the editing instruction. The overall scene remains very similar with minimal extra editing outside the main building, ensuring recognizability.
| 8
| 9
|
The image displays high technical quality with no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The reflection in the water is clear and consistent with the structure above. The only minor issue is a bit of blur in fine details which can be overlooked.
| 8.485281
|
||
28,032
|
Replace the main building with giant tree house
| 8
| 9
|
The main building in the original image has been successfully replaced with a structure resembling a giant tree house. The overall scene remains quite similar, maintaining the pond and surrounding elements, which keeps the degree of overediting low.
| 8
| 9
|
The image appears to be of high quality with clear details and sharpness. The reflections in the water and the architecture are well-rendered with no visible distortions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred elements. The only minor issue is a very slight unnatural appearance of the water reflection, which could suggest minor AI interference.
| 8.485281
|
||
28,032
|
Replace the reflection in the water with small boats
| 7
| 9
|
The edited image successfully replaces the reflection with small boats. However, the boats are not numerous and occupy only a part of the reflection area, thus not following the instruction perfectly. The degree of overediting is minimal as the overall scene remains largely unchanged except for the reflection.
| 7
| 10
|
The image does not display any noticeable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The architecture and environment appear well-preserved and clear.
| 8.3666
|
||
28,032
|
Replace the right wing with bonsai garden
| 0
| 10
|
The original image does not contain any wings to replace with a bonsai garden; hence, the editing instruction was not applicable. However, the edited image maintains the majority of the original scene with minimal changes.
| 0
| 9
|
The image exhibits high technical quality with sharp details and well-preserved object shapes. There are minimal distortions, and the proportions appear accurate. The faces are not blurred. There is a slight indication of over-sharpening or halos around some edges, but it is not significant.
| 0
|
||
28,032
|
Replace the right wing with giant sculpture
| 10
| 9
|
The right wing of the building has been successfully replaced with a giant sculpture as per the editing instruction. The edited image retains the overall look and feel of the original, with minimal changes to the surrounding scene.
| 9
| 10
|
The image does not exhibit any noticeable AI-artifacts, distortions, unusual proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred areas. The architectural elements and reflections in the water are clear and precise.
| 9.486833
|
||
106,853
|
Replace the blue sky with thunderstorm with lightning
| 10
| 9
|
The editing successfully replaced the blue sky with a thunderstorm and lightning, perfectly following the editing instruction. The edited image retains the structure and details of the original image, with minimal changes outside the sky area.
| 9
| 9
|
The image is technically well-executed with minimal AI artifacts. The lines of the buildings are straight, and the perspective is coherent. Lightning appears natural. There is slight distortion at the edges of the buildings, but it is minimal and does not significantly detract from the overall quality.
| 9
|
||
106,853
|
Replace the windows with transparent with curtains
| 0
| 0
|
The original image contains multiple windows, whereas the edited image shows a single window without curtains. The scene in the edited image does not follow the editing instruction at all and the edited image looks completely different from the original.
| 0
| 10
|
The image appears to be free of any distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The edges are clean, and there are no noticeable artifacts.
| 0
|
||
106,853
|
Replace the windows with bookshelves with books
| 0
| 0
|
The original image has numerous windows, but the edited image shows none of those windows replaced with bookshelves and books. The two images look entirely different, suggesting a complete change rather than the specified edit.
| 0
| 9
|
The image appears to be almost artifact-free. There are no distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, and the object shapes seem natural. The only minor issue is a slight blur at the edges.
| 0
|
||
106,853
|
Replace the rectangular rooftop with solar panels
| 0
| 0
|
The original image does not contain a visible rectangular rooftop, so the editing instruction is not applicable. The edited image does not resemble the original image at all.
| 0
| 9
|
The image shows minimal AI-artifacts with the object shapes looking well-defined. There is a minor, almost imperceptible, blur at the edges of the pool, but overall, the proportions and clarity are excellent.
| 0
|
||
106,853
|
Replace the cylindrical tower with skyscraper observation deck
| 10
| 7
|
The cylindrical tower from the original image has been effectively replaced with a skyscraper observation deck in the edited image, successfully following the editing instruction. However, other elements of the building were modified to some degree, leading to a slightly overedited appearance compared to the original.
| 7
| 8
|
The image is largely artifact-free with straight lines and consistent textures in the building's architecture. However, there is noticeable warping towards the left side of the image and slight blurring in some areas, preventing a perfect score.
| 7.483315
|
||
72,801
|
Replace the skydiver with ninja in mid-air
| 10
| 9
|
The editing successfully replaced the skydiver with a ninja in mid-air, following the instruction perfectly, hence a score of 10 for editing success. The edited image still maintains the same background and overall scene, with minimal changes apart from the main subject replacement, resulting in a score of 9 for the degree of overediting.
| 9
| 9
|
The image is mostly free of AI-artifacts. The figure's proportions and pose appear natural, and there is no visible distortion in body parts or the surroundings. Minor artifacting may be present upon close inspection, but it is minimal.
| 9
|
||
72,801
|
Replace the skydiving suit with futuristic armor
| 10
| 9
|
The edited image successfully replaced the skydiving suit with futuristic armor, as per the instruction. The background and other elements of the scene remain mostly unchanged, preserving the original context while focusing on the specific edit.
| 9
| 9
|
The image is technically impressive with minimal AI artifacts. The proportions and shapes of the suit are well-defined and there are no noticeable distortions or blurring. However, there is a subtle mismatch in the lighting between the suit and the background.
| 9
|
||
72,801
|
Replace the helmet with samurai mask
| 10
| 9
|
The edited image successfully replaced the helmet with a samurai mask, following the instruction perfectly. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, retaining its original elements and composition with minimal overediting.
| 9
| 8
|
The image is largely artifact-free with the integration of the masked head with the skydiving body appearing mostly seamless. However, there are slight distortions around the neck area where the mask meets the body, and the lighting on the mask does not perfectly match the rest of the image.
| 8.485281
|
||
72,801
|
Replace the clouds with puffy dinosaur
| 0
| 7
|
The edited image does not show any clouds replaced by puffy dinosaurs. The landscape has been significantly changed to green terrain with dinosaur-like structures, which do not resemble clouds. However, since the overall composition of the scene is relatively preserved except for the sky, the degree of overediting is limited.
| 0
| 9
|
The image shows a high level of technical quality with minimal noticeable artifacts. There is no evident distortion, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The faces are not blurred and the overall sharpness and clarity are maintained. The only potential slight artifact is the horizon line, which might look slightly unnatural.
| 0
|
||
72,801
|
Replace the clouds with magical fog
| 0
| 10
|
The editing instruction to replace the clouds with magical fog was not executed, as there were no clouds in the original image to begin with. However, the second image remains almost identical to the original, indicating no overediting.
| 0
| 9
|
The image has high technical quality with minimal distortions and no noticeable artifacts. Body proportions appear normal, and object shapes are natural. The face is slightly blurred due to motion but not due to AI artifacts.
| 0
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the monitor with mirror
| 8
| 7
|
The monitor has been successfully replaced with a mirror in the edited image, fulfilling the primary editing instruction. However, all other devices have also been replaced by mirrors, showing some degree of overediting. The overall scene remains recognizable, but the added replacements slightly alter the context.
| 7
| 9
|
The overall image quality is high, with minimal distortions. However, there is a slight inconsistency in the texture alignment on the rectangular objects and a minor blur on the phone screen.
| 7.937254
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the smartphone with wallet
| 10
| 5
|
The smartphone has been successfully replaced with a wallet in the edited image, so the editing instruction has been perfectly followed, scoring a 10. However, additional wallets have been added in place of the tablet and another location, which makes the scene quite different from the original in terms of objects present, leading to a score of 5 for overediting.
| 5
| 9
|
The image appears to be of high quality with well-defined objects. The objects, including wallets and a monitor, have correct proportions and shapes. There are no visible distortions or unusual body parts, and no blurred faces are present given the nature of the objects. Minor pixelation is seen at the rightmost wallet edge, but it is negligibly small.
| 6.708204
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the newspaper website with music app
| 10
| 8
|
The editing instruction to replace the newspaper website with a music app has been executed perfectly, as all screens now display a music app interface. The overall composition remains similar, though there is some alteration in the devices' appearance and background, indicating a moderate degree of overediting.
| 8
| 8
|
The image is generally well-edited with clear object shapes and proportions. However, there is slight blur on the edges of the devices and some minor distortions around the buttons on the tablet. Overall, artifacts are minimal.
| 8
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the coffee cup with plant pot
| 10
| 9
|
The coffee cup has been successfully replaced with a plant pot on all devices in the edited image, exactly following the editing instruction. The overall scene remains largely recognizable with minimal overediting as only the specific objects (coffee cups) were changed.
| 9
| 10
|
There are no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces in the image. The image appears technically sound and artifact-free.
| 9.486833
|
||
4,568
|
Replace the coffee cup with glass of juice
| 0
| 0
|
The original image does not contain a coffee cup, hence the editing instruction to replace it with a glass of juice cannot be followed. Additionally, the edited image is drastically different from the original.
| 0
| 9
|
The image displays a high level of technical quality. There are no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The faces, though not central to the image, are clear and not blurred. The only minor issue is a slight mismatch in lighting and shadow realism between the physical objects and the digital displays, but this is minimal.
| 0
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the fountain with large sundial
| 8
| 9
|
The fountain in the original image has been replaced with a large sundial in the edited image, following the editing instruction effectively. The edited area fits seamlessly into the scene, although there is a subtle difference in lighting and shadow that slightly affects realism. The rest of the scene remains unchanged, indicating minimal overediting.
| 8
| 10
|
The image appears professional and free of distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, and blurred faces.
| 8.944272
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the balcony with hammock
| 9
| 8
|
The balcony has been replaced with a hammock as instructed. However, while the replacement is accurately done, some elements around the hammock area appear slightly over-edited, changing the vegetation and surroundings noticeably.
| 8
| 9
|
The image appears to be well edited with high-quality details. Trees, people, and landscape elements are well proportioned. There are no noticeable distortions or blurred faces. Minor discrepancies are almost negligible, leading to a nearly artifact-free image.
| 8.485281
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the balcony with glass greenhouse
| 9
| 8
|
The balcony has been effectively replaced with a glass greenhouse as per the editing instruction. The original elements of the scene apart from the balcony, like the trees, paths, and garden, are mostly preserved, providing minimal overediting. However, there is a slight mismatch in the perspective and integration of the greenhouse which slightly reduces the realism.
| 8
| 10
|
The image appears to be free of distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, and blurred faces. Overall, the technical quality is excellent.
| 8.944272
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the balcony with giant bird nest
| 8
| 6
|
The edited image successfully replaces the balcony with a giant bird nest, achieving the editing instruction mostly accurately. However, there is a noticeable degree of overediting evident by the significant size and visual impact of the bird nest, which alters the original scene substantially.
| 6
| 9
|
The image shows no significant distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. There are no blurred faces, and the overall image quality is high. The large object on the right might seem slightly out of place, but technically, it is well-rendered without noticeable artifacts.
| 7.348469
|
||
8,078
|
Replace the metal railings with bamboo stalks
| 0
| 10
|
The original image does not have metal railings to replace with bamboo stalks, so the editing instruction could not be followed. The edited image is identical to the original with no overediting.
| 0
| 10
|
No visible distortions, body part abnormalities, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces detected in the image.
| 0
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the car with spaceship
| 10
| 7
|
The editing instruction to replace the car with a spaceship has been executed perfectly as the second image clearly shows a spaceship instead of the car. Thus, the first score is a 10. Although the spaceship is present in place of the car, the overall setting and background have been minimally altered to maintain consistency with the original image, warranting the second score to be a 7.
| 7
| 9
|
The image is sharp and clear, with no visible distortions or unusual body parts. Object shapes appear natural, and there are no blurred faces. Slightly unnatural segmentation is visible but minimal.
| 7.937254
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the car with transformer robot
| 10
| 9
|
The editing instruction was to replace the car with a transformer robot. The edited image shows a detailed transformer robot, effectively meeting the instruction perfectly. The original car is entirely replaced with the transformer robot while maintaining a similar pose and surrounding, reflecting minimal yet effective editing.
| 9
| 9
|
The image presents a high level of detail with no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts, or proportions. The object shapes appear natural and cohesive. There are minor areas where the edges could be sharper, but overall, the image is largely free from AI artifacts.
| 9
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the hood ornament with silver dragon
| 0
| 0
|
The edited image does not maintain the original scene of the car. Instead, it shows a completely different image of a silver dragon. Therefore, the editing instruction has not been executed successfully and the degree of overediting is very high.
| 0
| 9
|
The image has high technical quality with minimal distortions, natural proportions for a fantasy creature, and no obvious blurred areas. There is a small amount of blurring near the tips of the dragon's horns, but it is minor.
| 0
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the car decals with tribal tattoos
| 0
| 0
|
The second image is completely different from the first image and does not follow the editing instruction. There is no car in the second image, and thus no decals replaced with tribal tattoos.
| 0
| 9
|
The image is technically well-executed with minimal noticeable artifacts. There are no clear distortions or unusual body proportions, the object shapes appear natural, and there are no blurred faces. Minor detail blending issues in the tattooed areas could be slightly improved.
| 0
|
||
4,152
|
Replace the car decals with space-themed artwork
| 0
| 0
|
The edited image does not follow the instruction to replace the car decals with space-themed artwork. Instead, it depicts something entirely different and unrecognizable from the original image of the car. Therefore, both the success of the editing and the degree of overediting are extremely low.
| 0
| 9
|
The image has a high level of technical quality with no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The astronaut and the background are detailed and clear. The only slight issue may be the alignment of the image within the frame, which could be improved.
| 0
|
||
104,613
|
Replace the sculpture with massive ancient tree
| 10
| 9
|
The sculpture in the original image has been successfully replaced with a massive ancient tree in the edited image, following the editing instruction perfectly. The overall scene and surrounding elements remain largely unchanged, maintaining the original atmosphere.
| 9
| 9
|
The image is nearly artifact-free, with no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The blurred effect on the clouds appears intentional. However, a slight shadow artifact can be noticed around the tree base.
| 9
|
||
104,613
|
Replace the background mountains with dense tropical forest
| 4
| 8
|
The background mountains have been mostly replaced with a forest, but remnants of mountains are still visible. The degree of overediting is low as the rest of the image remains unchanged, making the second image easily recognizable as an edited version of the original.
| 4
| 10
|
The image does not show any apparent distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The shapes and proportions of the sculpture and the background appear natural and free from artifacts.
| 6.324555
|
||
104,613
|
Replace the reflective water with flower field
| 9
| 8
|
The reflective water has been effectively replaced with a flower field, fulfilling the editing instruction. However, there are minor remnants of water reflection around the sculpture. The edited image retains the overall composition and elements of the original, except for the changed area, making the level of overediting minimal.
| 8
| 9
|
The image shows excellent technical quality with no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The horizon and objects are clear, and the lighting is well balanced. However, a slight haze in the distant mountain could be improved.
| 8.485281
|
||
104,613
|
Replace the reflective water with rocky canyon
| 7
| 9
|
The reflective water in the original image has been largely replaced with a rocky canyon, successfully following the editing instruction. However, some reflective water elements remain visible in the foreground. The edited image retains the overall composition and elements of the original, indicative of minimal overediting.
| 7
| 10
|
The image displays no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The quality is clean with no AI-generated artifacts.
| 8.3666
|
||
104,613
|
Replace the reflective water with crystal-clear lagoon
| 7
| 8
|
The reflection of the sculpture in the water has been removed and replaced with a more opaque, greenish body of water resembling a lagoon. However, the water is not entirely crystal-clear as instructed. The rest of the scene remains largely unchanged and recognizable.
| 7
| 9
|
The image exhibits a high degree of clarity with no noticeable distortions or unusual body parts. The object shapes appear natural and coherent with the scene. There is minimal to no blurring observed, maintaining overall image quality. The only minor issue is a slight ambiguity in the detailing of the sculpture edges.
| 7.937254
|
||
178,132
|
Replace the group of people with aliens in spacesuits
| 9
| 8
|
The editing successfully replaced the group of people with aliens in spacesuits, demonstrating clear alignment with the given instruction. However, some original elements such as a few remaining people on the right side indicate minimal overediting was done, thus maintaining much of the initial scene intact.
| 8
| 9
|
The image shows minimal artifacts and generally appears consistent. However, minor blurring around the edges of objects and reflections can be noticed upon closer inspection.
| 8.485281
|
||
178,132
|
Replace the group of people with balloon animals
| 5
| 7
|
The editing instruction to replace the group of people with balloon animals is partially executed; some balloon animals are visible, but remnants of people are still present. The edited image maintains similarities to the original in terms of location and background, but the implementation isn't complete.
| 5
| 9
|
The image is clear with no significant distortions or unnatural object shapes. The proportions and details of body parts and objects appear natural. The main blur effect on the inscription wall is intentional and not an artifact. Minor blur in the background appears natural given the depth of field.
| 6.708204
|
||
178,132
|
Replace the wall with text with brick wall
| 10
| 8
|
The wall with text in the original image has been successfully replaced with a brick wall in the edited image, fulfilling the editing instruction perfectly. The background and other elements remain largely unchanged, but the edited wall is noticeably different from the original textured glass, thus slightly increasing the degree of overediting.
| 8
| 3
|
The image exhibits significant blurriness and distortion, especially in the depiction of people and distant objects. The faces of the individuals are blurred, and their body proportions appear unnatural. The brick wall on the left shows some warping, and the overall scene lacks sharpness, indicating a high level of AI-artifacts.
| 4.89898
|
||
178,132
|
Replace the tall obelisk with rocket ship
| 9
| 9
|
The editing instruction to replace the tall obelisk with a rocket ship has been successfully executed; the obelisk has been replaced by a rocket ship in the edited image. The edited image still maintains the original scene effectively with minimal changes.
| 9
| 8
|
The image appears to be clear with minimal distortions and natural object shapes. There is a slight blur on some of the reflections and distant figures, but no significant AI artifacts are noticeable.
| 8.485281
|
||
178,132
|
Replace the reflection on wall with galaxy view
| 0
| 0
|
The original object, which is the reflection on the wall, is not present in the edited image. Instead, there is a completely different scene included that does not match the given editing instruction.
| 0
| 8
|
The image is mostly well-executed with minimal artifacts. However, the monitor has an unnatural bend, indicating some distortion. The background is slightly blurred but doesn't affect the overall quality significantly.
| 0
|
||
167,760
|
Replace the roller shutter door with wooden barn door
| 10
| 10
|
The edited image perfectly replaces the roller shutter door with a wooden barn door. The modification is precise and effective, integrating seamlessly with the original environment and maintaining overall consistency.
| 10
| 10
|
The image appears clear and free of significant AI artifacts. There are no distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces.
| 10
|
||
167,760
|
Replace the man's coat with spacesuit
| 10
| 9
|
The man's coat in the edited image has been successfully replaced with a spacesuit, meeting the editing instruction perfectly. The scene remains largely unchanged apart from the man's new outfit, preserving the original setting.
| 9
| 9
|
The image shows good technical quality with clear details and few noticeable artifacts. There is a minor blurriness around the signage, but it hardly affects the overall visual integrity. Body proportions and object shapes are natural, and there are no significant distortions present.
| 9
|
||
167,760
|
Replace the man's coat with clown outfit
| 0
| 10
|
The edited image does not follow the editing instruction at all. The man's coat has not been replaced with a clown outfit. Despite this, the scene in the edited image remains minimally altered and is still recognizable as a clear continuation of the original image.
| 0
| 9
|
The image shows no significant distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or blurred faces. The objects and buildings have natural shapes, and the image quality appears high with clear detail. There is only a slight, almost negligible, blur on the edges of some objects.
| 0
|
||
167,760
|
Replace the store sign with balloons
| 0
| 8
|
The store sign has been removed, but balloons have not replaced it. The edited image remains mostly similar to the original except for the missing sign.
| 0
| 9
|
The image appears to be free of significant AI-artifacts. There are no distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The details are sharp and clear, indicating a high-quality image with minimal issues.
| 0
|
||
167,760
|
Replace the store sign with digital screen
| 0
| 10
|
The store sign has not been replaced with a digital screen in the edited image. However, the edited image is almost identical to the original, indicating minimal overediting.
| 0
| 10
|
The image presents no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. It appears artifact-free.
| 0
|
||
45,824
|
Replace the blonde woman with mermaid
| 0
| 9
|
The editing instruction was to replace the blonde woman with a mermaid, but the blonde woman is simply removed from the image rather than replaced with a mermaid. Therefore, the editing was not successful in following the instruction. The rest of the image remains unchanged, preserving the overall scene.
| 0
| 10
|
The image shows no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The AI-edited image appears artifact-free.
| 0
|
||
45,824
|
Replace the woman in black cardigan with vampire
| 0
| 7
|
The woman in the black cardigan has been replaced, but not with a vampire. However, the character replacement aligns well with the scene, maintaining overall coherence.
| 0
| 9
|
The image appears mostly artifact-free with no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. There is a slight blur on the woman's face, but it does not significantly detract from the overall quality.
| 0
|
||
45,824
|
Replace the woman in patterned dress with rockstar
| 0
| 8
|
The original image featured a woman in a patterned dress, but the edited image has simply removed her without replacing her with a rockstar. Thus, the editing instruction was not followed at all. However, the editing was minimal and didn't change the overall context of the image significantly, maintaining most elements except for the one specified.
| 0
| 9
|
The image appears to have minor AI artifacts. There is some slight distortion around the hands holding the certificate but overall, body proportions and object shapes are natural, and faces are clear.
| 0
|
||
45,824
|
Replace the woman in patterned dress with space explorer
| 10
| 9
|
The woman in the patterned dress has been successfully replaced with a space explorer following the given instruction, achieving the intended goal. The edited image looks nearly identical to the original, except for the necessary replacement, which ensures minimal overediting.
| 9
| 10
|
The image does not display any significant AI-artifacts. There are no distortions, unusual body parts, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces present.
| 9.486833
|
||
45,824
|
Replace the portrait with golden trophy
| 10
| 9
|
The original image features a portrait that has been successfully replaced with a golden trophy in the edited image. The editing is precise and the main change follows the instruction perfectly. The scene remains largely unchanged aside from the intended edit, preserving the original context and level of detail.
| 9
| 10
|
The image appears to be free of distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, and blurred faces.
| 9.486833
|
||
26,162
|
Replace the black couch with hammock
| 10
| 9
|
The black couch has been successfully replaced with a hammock, following the editing instruction perfectly. The remaining elements of the room remain largely unchanged, indicating minimal but effective editing.
| 9
| 9
|
The image is mostly clear and shows minimal signs of AI artifacts. The hammock and interior elements are well-defined with appropriate proportions. The ocean view through the window appears natural, though there is a minor distortion around the window frame that is slightly noticeable.
| 9
|
||
26,162
|
Replace the black vase with stacked books
| 0
| 10
|
The black vase is still present in the edited image, and no stacked books have been added. Therefore, the editing instruction has not been followed at all. However, since the image looks identical to the original with no other changes, it gets a high score for minimal overediting.
| 0
| 10
|
The image appears to be clear without noticeable AI-related distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The couches, room elements, and overall scene look technically sound and artifact-free.
| 0
|
||
26,162
|
Replace the black vase with small aquarium
| 0
| 10
|
The editing instruction to replace the black vase with a small aquarium was not executed at all. The two images are identical, indicating no overediting, just minimal editing.
| 0
| 9
|
The image has good technical quality with no significant distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The only minor issue is a slightly unusual window reflection that might be considered an artifact.
| 0
|
||
26,162
|
Replace the black vase with metal toolbox
| 0
| 10
|
The original black vase is not replaced with a metal toolbox. The second image is identical to the first image, making it a perfect example of no overediting.
| 0
| 9
|
The image is mostly free of AI artifacts. The furniture and objects maintain natural proportions and shapes. The faces of the furniture items are clear and sharp. There appears to be a subtle unnatural outline on the right side of the couches, but it is minimal.
| 0
|
||
26,162
|
Replace the red rug with checkerboard floor
| 10
| 10
|
The red rug has been successfully replaced with a checkerboard floor, following the editing instruction perfectly. The rest of the scene is unchanged, indicating no unnecessary overediting.
| 10
| 9
|
The image appears to have minimal AI artifacts. The furniture and room elements are well-defined with consistent proportions. The lighting and shadows are natural, and there are no blurred or distorted areas noticeable. Minor inspection does not reveal any significant issues.
| 9.486833
|
||
54,896
|
Replace the mage with shadowy assassin
| 8
| 9
|
The editing successfully replaced the mage's clothing and appearance to reflect a shadowy assassin. The overall pose and scene remain largely the same, retaining the character's general silhouette and hand position. However, some of the mage’s original features, such as the hair and background elements, remain unchanged.
| 8
| 9
|
The image is technically very well-executed with few noticeable artifacts. The proportions and shapes seem natural and consistent with the character's design. The only minor issue is the slightly unnatural blend of the glowing effect on the object in the character's hand, but this is negligible.
| 8.485281
|
||
54,896
|
Replace the red cloak with green shawl
| 10
| 9
|
The red cloak in the original image has been replaced with a green shawl, as per the editing instruction. The edited image follows the instruction perfectly, with the green shawl fitting naturally into the scene. Minimal elements other than the cloak/shawl were altered, maintaining overall image integrity.
| 9
| 9
|
The image exhibits a high level of technical quality with no apparent distortions, unusual body proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The faces and details are clear and well-defined. Minor artifacts, if any, are not noticeable at a glance.
| 9
|
||
54,896
|
Replace the long hair with bald head
| 10
| 9
|
The long hair has been completely removed and replaced with a bald head, successfully following the editing instruction. The edited image stays true to the original scene, with minimal and effective changes.
| 9
| 10
|
The image shows no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. It appears to be artifact-free.
| 9.486833
|
||
54,896
|
Replace the long hair with buzz cut
| 10
| 9
|
The long hair in the original image has been successfully replaced with a buzz cut in the edited image, perfectly following the given instruction. The rest of the image remains largely unchanged, maintaining the same lighting, pose, and background, indicating minimal yet effective editing.
| 9
| 9
|
The image shows high-quality rendering with minimal distortions or unusual proportions. The body parts are well-proportioned, and the shapes of objects look natural. There is a slight blurriness on the face, but it's subtle.
| 9
|
||
54,896
|
Replace the mystical background with enchanted forest
| 8
| 8
|
The background was effectively changed to an enchanted forest, fulfilling the editing instruction. However, some elements of the original mystical background, such as the buildings, remain. This retains a clear connection to the original image, however, it doesn't fully replace the mystical background with the enchanted forest.
| 8
| 9
|
The image appears to be very well-crafted with no significant distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The details and proportions are consistent with the art style. There is a slight blurriness around the face, but it is minimal.
| 8.485281
|
||
33,539
|
Replace the red hat with top hat
| 0
| 4
|
The red hat is present in the original image but has not been replaced with a top hat in the edited image. Instead, the two characters wearing hats have been removed entirely. However, the rest of the scene remains largely unchanged, minimizing overediting.
| 0
| 10
|
The image shows no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. All elements appear consistent and well-integrated.
| 0
|
||
33,539
|
Replace the red jacket with tuxedo
| 0
| 0
|
The original image had no red jacket to replace, and nothing has been minimally edited. The edited image completely changes the characters and elements present in the original scene.
| 0
| 9
|
The image displays a high level of technical quality with minimal AI artifacts. The bear's proportions and body parts are natural and consistent with the rest of the image. There are no distortions or unusual object shapes. The only minor flaw is a slight blur around the edges of the white bucket.
| 0
|
||
33,539
|
Replace the red jacket with honeysuckle costume
| 10
| 1
|
The red jacket has been successfully replaced with a honeysuckle costume. The edited image remains quite recognizable in context and elements but has introduced a significant change in the character's attire while preserving the background and other details.
| 1
| 6
|
The image has noticeable distortions around the edges and some unusual body proportions. The shapes of objects, particularly the yellow outfit and the large bucket, seem slightly off and lack natural shadows. Blurred areas and artifacts are visible, reducing the overall technical quality.
| 2.44949
|
||
33,539
|
Replace the brown boxes with stack of books
| 9
| 10
|
The editing successfully replaced the brown boxes with a stack of books, following the instruction closely. The rest of the scene remains almost identical to the original, indicating minimal overediting.
| 9
| 10
|
The image appears to be a frame from an animated show without any evident distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, unnatural object shapes, or blurred faces. The quality is aligned with the original animation style.
| 9.486833
|
||
33,539
|
Replace the brown boxes with giant gems
| 0
| 10
|
The editing instruction to replace the brown boxes with giant gems has not been executed at all. The brown boxes are still present in the edited image. Overediting is minimal as the images are almost identical, with only a minor change in lighting.
| 0
| 10
|
The image appears to be from an animated show, which means the art style itself is stylized and not meant to represent realistic proportions or shapes. There are no visible distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. The faces are clear and not blurred. Overall, it is artifact-free.
| 0
|
||
3,832
|
Replace the drawer with mailbox with letters
| 10
| 8
|
The editing successfully replaced the drawer with a mailbox containing letters, perfectly following the given instruction. The edited image retains the overall look and background of the original image, making the changes minimal yet effective.
| 8
| 9
|
The image is mostly free of significant AI-artifacts. However, there is a small anomaly in the shadow area, adjacent to the object, which could be considered a minor distortion. The object shape and proportions look natural, and there are no blurred faces as it's an object-centric image.
| 8.485281
|
||
3,832
|
Replace the wooden top with marble surface
| 10
| 9
|
The second image successfully replaces the wooden top with a marble surface following the editing instruction, which perfectly matches the requirements. The second image still closely resembles the first image with minimal additional changes, other than the intended edit.
| 9
| 9
|
The image appears to be mostly free of AI-artifacts. The shapes and proportions of the drawer and cabinet look natural and accurate. However, there is a very slight blur on the edge of the drawer front, which slightly reduces the overall sharpness.
| 9
|
||
3,832
|
Replace the cabinet with refrigerator
| 5
| 8
|
The top part has been edited to resemble a refrigerator, but the lower portion still retains features of the cabinet. The image does reflect the instruction partially but not completely. The change is noticeable yet retains many original cabinet features, indicating minimal overediting.
| 5
| 8
|
The image has minimal distortions. The drawer appears slightly misaligned, and the shadows near the edges of the drawer seem unnatural. However, the overall quality is high with no blurred faces or obvious unusual object shapes.
| 6.324555
|
||
3,832
|
Replace the white panel with whiteboard
| 0
| 6
|
The editing instruction was to replace the white panel with a whiteboard. The edited image does not feature a whiteboard but rather shows a different panel that is not white. Hence, the editing instruction was not followed, resulting in a score of 0. However, the essence of the original image is preserved with minimal changes in the second image, just an alteration of the panel color and appearance, thus a score of 6 for overediting.
| 0
| 9
|
The image shows minimal distortions with object shapes appearing natural. There are no unusual body parts or proportions visible, and the overall quality is high. The drawer and its components are clearly defined, with only a very slight hint of blurriness at the edges. This could almost be missed and does not significantly affect the viewing experience.
| 0
|
||
3,832
|
Replace the drawer handle with leather strap
| 0
| 0
|
The editing instruction was to replace the drawer handle with a leather strap, but the entire drawer front was replaced with a different material. Moreover, there is no visible handle or leather strap in the edited image. The edited image shows an entirely different front, failing the instruction and changing the original image significantly.
| 0
| 6
|
The drawer front has an unusual texture and shape that seem inconsistent with typical drawer designs, suggesting AI alteration. The transition between the textured front and wooden side is also not entirely smooth, indicating potential editing artifacts.
| 0
|
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 11