&gt; &gt; &gt; resolving objections, as we did when revising the Scope and
&gt; &gt; &gt; Purpose. In
&gt; &gt; &gt; other words, the editor posts a suggested change and asks for any
&gt; &gt; &gt; objections. Items that do not have clear consensus would be
&gt; &gt; &gt; accumulated.
&gt; &gt; &gt; Then, every 3-6 months the group could have a formal vote on
&gt; &gt; &gt; what would be
&gt; &gt; &gt; the next 'Working Draft.' Comments would be submitted and
&gt; &gt; &gt; resolved before
&gt; &gt; &gt; ap