lated by technical speicialities with normalized and relatively
static terminology toward sciences of discovery, toward deliberation, and
toward attempts to traverse wide swaths of meaning.

To me, your last sentence seems to argue more in favor of a triadic than a
diadic position for the underlying logical approach: we can translate the
dyadic relation between some object and the sign representating it, in
terms of the interpretant this effects in some mind or quasi-mind, but the
interpretant-sign-object r