onglomerates interpreters.
    etc.

What we are ultimately trying to get at, I believe, is the interpretant.
That is,
what is actually in the mind of the Frenchman or the agricultural chemical
salesman.  This is the bulk of the stuff of the ontology, that stands
alongside
the lexicons of terminology and allows us to define those terms, as
envisioned
by the T2 committee.  To do this we need to understand not just the role or
category of interpreter, but the purpose behind particular usages of terms.

For in