ations are not part of the intuition.
  In effect the intiuition is that 
     "take 1 grain from a big pile, and you still have a pile"
   And though people may use he same word "pile" to refer to the
big pile and the resulting pile, no one thinks that 
the original pile hasn't changed in the process of removing one grain.

    The paradox arises only because philosophers have decided to 
consider the result of iterative application of the original intuition,
and falsely equate the resulting pile with the 