/code> for <code>j2meproject</code>s.) Would
   an inconsistency in storage format between <code>j2seproject</code> and <code>j2meproject</code> be a
   potential problem? Would the other style be preferable for <code>j2seproject</code> for independent reasons?
  </p>
 </li>
 <li>
  <p>
   Is a public support SPI needed for configuration storage in Ant-based projects?
   <code>J2SEConfigurationProvider</code> is mostly generic, referring to <code>j2seproject</code>-specific code
   only in <code>customize()