ly sure what this means.  In a sense, the
ontology has a 4D orientation, since it includes a framework for 3D objects
and for the fourth dimension of time.  If by a 4D orientation you mean
something more than this, it seems likely to me that this something extra
can be superimposed on what we already have.  If you think this is not
possible, I would be very interested in hearing your reasoning. "

</PRE>

<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<ul><li><strong>Follow-Ups</