ing an equilivent ontology.&nbsp;
Although I would prefer an ontology constructed differently than CYC, I
do not wish to disparage CYC.&nbsp; It is a significant accomplishment.
<p>Many people have criticized CYC and almost everyone would have done
it differently and ( I suspect) different from each other.&nbsp;&nbsp;
Considering the methods used and the purpose of the ontology, CYC is well
constructed and on a scale different than other ontologies.&nbsp; It works
for CYC - and their customers.
<p>My point 