ppen,
of course, but it does not represent the most generic state of affairs.

By way of excusing myself, let me explain what caused me to say this.
First, I am jumping ahead in my thoughts to a text of Peirce's where
he overlays a type of abductive reasoning on this picture of analogy.
Second, the order of development that I am trying to diagram here is
not a static hierarchy of implications but a dynamic evolution, thus
involving at least two distinct moments in time.

I think that I can fix up the rest o