 be a &quot;cheap utilitarian&quot; form of a norm, but
it's my story and I'm sticking to it.

A normative science may have one or more descriptive sciences as components
that contribute to it, but its aim, &quot;what it's for&quot;, is quite distinct.

For example, Hertz gave us a description of &quot;How I Think&quot;,
that may be more or less true as an account of its object,
but suppose someone points to this description of conduct and
recommends it as a universal ideal, a categorical imperative,
or as 