wrong.

But if I do take you at your word,
or the lack of one, I have to ask:

Now who is contradicting himself, Walt?
Even if they were real, whatever they
are, you would not want them in your
ontology?  You are being rhetorical,
of course.

Many Regards,

Jon Awbrey

¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤

</PRE>

<!--X-Body-of-Message-End-->
<!--X-MsgBody-End-->
<!--X-Follow-Ups-->
<hr>
<!--X-Follow-Ups-End-->
<!--X-References-->
<ul><li><strong>References</strong>:
<ul>
<li><strong><a