ed to this list (I couldn't find this message in the archives).&nbsp;
The Cyc upper level is not what I would prefer as an upper level ontology.&nbsp;
It is what I recommend to clients that need one -- for commercial purposes,
it really is the only game in town.&nbsp; It also has the considerable
advantage of working with Cyc's lower level ontologies.
<p>Doug is willing to convert to a "Standard" if a reasonable one is developed.&nbsp;
I will quote a paragraph from a note I submitted to the list in May that