e bit with your ontology heuristics, here but let me try to
get
clearer on what you're claiming here and also try to give some general
indication of why I think I might disagree.

Regarding your point in (1), I'd like you to provide a bit more argument or
clarification here.  If we think that a concept is important enough to include
in our upper ontology, why assume that its meaning isn't relevant enough to
bother to attempt to further articulate with axioms?   You seem to have
acknowledged that subtypin