the consensus of the WG and do the work of technical
&gt; editor, I applaud him - it is very useful work. An "official" appointment
as
&gt; "technical editor" is unnecessary and inappropriate. It appears to put a
&gt; stamp on something that has not been formally agreed to. I have no
objection
&gt; to informal arrangements.
&gt; Once again I wish to point out that I believe this vote to be unnecessary
&gt; and divisive.
&gt; In your note of 2/13/01 titled " SUO: Proposed Conclusions and Actions
from
&gt; Vo