nch of 'context'
&gt; theories and cram terms into them to preserve local consistency,
&gt; truth,relevance, etc, the way the contexts themselves have been chosen will
&gt; also need to change as different problems are posed.  This suggests a
&gt; minimalist approach to upper ontological terms (for that matter, of
&gt; ontologies generally)--the less &quot;bloat&quot; you can get by with, the better.  


Hi Erik:

Your points here have given me a lot of pause for thought.  I think that I
disagree a littl