uce an ontology that
is different , but about as useful as Cyc.&amp;nbsp; If it is done well it
will be costly and it&amp;nbsp; seems to me this would be a waste of
considerable
resource.
&lt;p&gt;I am not arguing that Cyc be accepted as "the" standard upper level
ontology - Cyc already is the "standard" to the extent there is
one.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
Doug Lenat (Cyc's CEO) offered his co-operation in one of the first messages
posted to this list (I couldn't find this message in the archives).&amp