-->
<!--X-Body-of-Message-->
<PRE>

&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt;MW: But I haven't seen (or at least not understood) anything yet that
&gt; &gt; &gt;required more than the membership of something in some set to "do the
&gt; &gt; &gt;business", plus some relation occurences (logic speak) and some
&gt; &gt; &gt;axioms/rules.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; Well, Hobbs would argue that if you can something about x, then you
&gt; &gt; have to allow that x exists. Sounds reasonable? OK, consider:
&gt; &gt; 1. Joe went to th