ve it can be the basis
for
such an ontology.   The reasons for this view have been previously stated.

I do not wish  it to appear this approach (or any other) is one that has
been
formally chosen by the WG.  I do not object to the proposed actions on an
informal basis and do not see any benefit to the WG that can be derived from
a
characterization of the proposed actions as formally taken or official.
Later,
if and when a different approach is offered, the new approach does not bear
the
burden of objection