gt; &gt; resolving objections, as we did when revising the Scope and 
&gt; &gt; Purpose.  In
&gt; &gt; other words, the editor posts a suggested change and asks for any
&gt; &gt; objections. Items that do not have clear consensus would be 
&gt; &gt; accumulated.
&gt; &gt; Then, every 3-6 months the group could have a formal vote on 
&gt; &gt; what would be
&gt; &gt; the next 'Working Draft.' Comments would be submitted and 
&gt; &gt; resolved before
&gt; &gt; approval as the next Working Draft.
&gt; &gt; 5.