favour the richness of language being
"enriched" by people being educationally disadvantaged and unable to
express
what they wish to say. I would see that as a human rights issue needing
correction.

     .    Similarly, regarding point 5, when someone is lazy in
language usage, the recipient is disadvantaged in precisely, and hence
accurately, comprehending what was meant.

     .    Basically, I am opposed to points 1b, 2, 4 and 5. In my
opinion, 1a and 3 allow the richness of human communication. I also 