; is a branch name, the other two names can only be w&#468; and y&#237;n, but the 3 possible branch names listed in the paper are z&#464;, sh&#275;n and ch&#233;n. Clearly b&#464;ng x&#363; is incompatible with the names given in the paper.<br />
If I assume that there are mistakes in Table 10, I could find a possible solution. The assumption is that the <i>xi&#462;oy&#250;</i> of the first conjunction is <span class="nowrap">613/1249</span>. If that is the case, there will be two mismatches when compared w