ers but nothing but
    Bayes in the bonnet.

JC: I see your point here.  The word &quot;Bayesian&quot; tends to trigger
    a deep instinctive negative response in me, and I have to
    remind myself, &quot;It's just a theorem, John;  its range of
    application is conditional.&quot;

Exactly.  I remember it more as the flip-side of a definition, but maybe
that's
what most theorems are, the gratuitously porismatic &quot;corollarial&quot; kind.  And
it's
a perfectly beautiful and useful device if one does 