r it lacks
    Thirdness.  It's essentially operating completely in Secondness.  Using this formal
    model, we can define the behaviour of X as Y.  We need such a semantics.  But this
    process is quite different from a genuine evolutionary semiotics, as Mishtu has said.

ET: The relational action sets up the sign as a predicate rather than nominal process.
    Secondness is kept to a part of the process and not the whole thing.  What the sign
    as predicate process does, is to generate an interpretiv