asties</i><sup><a href="QinHanCalendars.html#Li2016">Li16</a></sup> published in 2016. I thank Prof. L&#464; Zh&#333;ngl&#237;n for sending me his book. The proposed reconstruction methods by these two authors are not the same, even though they all fit the available data.</p>
    
<p>Zh&#257;ng proposes two reconstruction methods, one for the calendar in the Qin dynasty (before <span class="nowrap">N<sub>-205</sub></span>), and the other for the early Han dynasty until 104 BCE. The method for the Qin calend