ont size="3">While this may make no sense to people trained
in mechanistic thought processes, it is much closer to the truth
about heat than the ideas of Helmholtz, with which Steiner was
completely familiar. Helmholtz's idea that the nature of heat can
be fully described by the random motions of molecular matter is
far too simplistic. It ignores many of the well known behaviors
of heat and matter as well as the existence of the Etheric Energy
Field. It should be considered an &quot;interesting&quot;