ness.

ET: But, with different types of relations, we will have different types of signs (consider,
    just the ten different types that Peirce outlines, never mind the 66 and so on.  Just the
    ten quite basic types).  None of these types is 'wrong' or dysfunctional, for our cosmos
    requires their diversity.  But I feel that what Howard is aiming for, is a representational
    semantics that really operates only within one type of sign-process.  It obviously can't do
    anything other than re-presen