asserted in the language (Jerry Hobbs 
&gt; calls these 'eventualities'), which is going to be inconsistent with 
&gt; any SUO that anyone produces.
     Is it possible to define eventualities without mandating their
usage?  I am unfamiliar with this aspect of Hobbs's work.  Certainly 
there should be no problem in contemplating many individual instances 
of the concept "assertion" -- but I presume this is a different matter.

&gt; So, in spite of your protests, you ARE 
&gt; going to have to decide on a on