 HREF="http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-April/000401.html">http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2003-April/000401.html</A>

Notice that this statement, together with the maxims:

1.  &quot;Whatever has comprehension must be general&quot;
2.  &quot;Whatever has extension must be composite&quot;

pull the rug -- and all of the elephants -- out from under
the nominal thinker's wishful thinking to find ontological
security in individual names, which nominal thinker always
confuses with the names of indiv