 real
world".  In the Enterprise Ontology NL version, we actually wrote sentences
with the word Relationship which I interpret as statements about
relationship instances, but (by what I call sleight of hand), these
sentences by implication define the properties of the relationship type 

GH&gt;&gt;	This sounds OK to me for now. If it runs into problems later, there
may be a need to extend it. 

GH&gt;&gt;	Incidentally, did you find yourselves restricting your vocabulary in
any ways for the Enterprise Ontolo