rence to the doctrine of individuals, two
&gt; | distinctions should be borne in mind.  The logical
&gt; | atom, or term not capable of logical division, must
&gt; | be one of which every predicate may be universally
&gt; | affirmed or denied.  For, let A be such a term.
&gt; | Then, if it is neither true that all A is X nor
&gt; | that no A is X, it must be true that some A is X
&gt; | and some A is not X;  and therefore A may be divided
&gt; | into A that is X and A that is not X, which is contrary
&gt; |