t which "can be referenced",
for which one would probably need to use the term "referencible".

The catch is that reference is commonly understood --
and by "commonly" I mean by the common lot of us
"fallible and mortal finite information creatures",
who have not the benefit of a "God's Eye View" (GEV)
or even the next best thing, a detached cartesian ego --
to be relative to some sensible context of discussion,
often enscounced more formally in the admittedly cramped
devices of a "universe of discourse" (U