ion in
&gt; your earlier note:  Elizabeth --&gt; Eleanor ... ;-)
&gt; 
&gt; But, on the main point, I think you are still drawing
&gt; a misleading parallelism.  In your note below, it seems
&gt; to me that you are equating the language of computer science
&gt; (a technical lexicon that is comparable to the lexicons of law,
&gt; business, cooking, etc.) with programming languages.  The language
&gt; of computer science is used by human beings to communicate with each
&gt; other.  A programming language is u