lementation is easy,
&gt; &gt; compared to getting the ontology right.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; Pat Hayes
&gt; &gt;
&gt; 
&gt; ### Pat, to be clear:  I was only trying to be ironic.
&gt; I paraphrased an adagium by Roger Shank, long ago, who
&gt; claimed FOPL guys have it easy, modelling human genetics,
&gt; social dynamics and biochemistry as "loves(John Mary)"   :-)
&gt; 
&gt; ### This said, your point is a deep and interesting one.
&gt; And does it not imply that a true Upper O'gy must be
&gt; self-descriptiv