ent&quot;
disports many splintered nuances even beneath
the banner of the rag-tagmime pragmatic genre,
where Peirce, if I remember it smartly enough,
rimed the rheme of &quot;antecedent&quot;-&lt;&quot;consequent&quot;,
while Dewey facetated a parsèd &quot;con-sequence&quot;.

All that aside, for the moment, then, what I need to find out about your own usage
is whether you intended the &quot;LOGICALLY NECESSARY CONSEQUENTS OF THE MODEL&quot; in your
diagram to indicate a logical relation, and then whether 