sion, which is that alternative ways of
thinking about a topic might all be equally valid and coherent, even
though they differ from one another. The proposal to find a single
coherent upper-level ontology then amounts to an insistence that all
but one of these alternative ways of thinking are wrong. This is a
kind of intellectual fascism which has never succeeded in the past
several thousand years, and is unlikely to make progress now either.
Maybe the SUO should focus on ways of allowing alternative
conce