tionship between how X
knows a process (maybe Barry Smith's Epistemology) and the process. The
reason it seems to me not to be so fundamental for integrating (or
translating between) ontologies is that it does not make sense to use
continuant or occurrent as a starting point for the translation (unlike
process, for example) as persons X and Y can quite correctly (depending upon
their knowledge) classify a thing differently.
CP&gt; I presume, because I cannot find you saying otherwise, that you do not
regard