e - and well established. And that despite their ugliness, we should

&gt;&gt;stick with them as they are established in the literature.
&gt;
&gt;There are enormous numbers of obsolete terms in every branch of
&gt;philosophy.  I don't believe that there is any need to keep them
&gt;in the SUO glossary of recommended terms.  I have no objection
&gt;to including those terms in a footnote, citing some people who
&gt;use them, and suggesting a better way of talking about ontology.

&gt;CP&gt; Just a small point