going to
develop something to do this - unless someone introduces them to the work
done by philosophers et al. (and the fact that there are a range of
choices - and how these choices interlink) we are going to end up with a
standard that is unaware of the substantial issues and alternatives.

Regards
Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: phayes@ai.uwf.edu [<A  HREF="mailto:phayes@ai.uwf.edu">mailto:phayes@ai.uwf.edu</A>]
Sent: 05 December 2000 20:04
To: Chris Partridge
Cc: standard-upper-ontology@ieee.org