of a single common ontology, or a catalog of
&gt;related ontologies has been proven to be the right approach, so either or
&gt;both may turn out to be valid.  However, I would say that a single common
&gt;ontology, to the degree practical, is the goal of this group, and has been
&gt;voted on when the PAR was approved.  I have found that there can be
&gt;disagreement on wording that I thought was very clear, but the sections
&gt;that seem to indicate this are (with my emphasis by bracketing with '*'s):
&gt;
