loating forms (which I take it you reject as
    possibly being structures), you will not communicate with scientists (as in these
    listed) who look for mechanisms (who also reject the notion of structures).

Ok, I'm positive that you can keep whittling the
variety of scientists down until you end up with
the righteous ones, the one who sees it your way.

SS: If semioticians wish to talk to scientists, these issues will have to
    be cleared up. (I am not saying either way is incorrect, of course.)

SS: