 Most scientists are offended by structuralist talk as well.
    They acknowledge the behavior of structural attractors in
    dynamical equations, but do not, for the most part, imagine
    structural attractors as being of importance in the actual
    world.  This is because they want to see a mechanism (perhaps
    some physicists transcend this, basically pragmatic, limitation).

I no longer have any idea what counts as a true scientist in your eyes,
but I myself know of many counter-examples to each of