ithic
&gt; &gt; vs. non-monolithic approach ­ is suitable to be checked by means a
vote.
&gt; &gt; As I have noted in the past, a vote on issues like this one makes much
&gt; &gt; more sense, at this stage, than a vote on an initial "merged" ontology.
&gt; &gt; So I ask James to call for a vote on this. According to my notes,
besides
&gt; &gt; the people mentioned by Matthew, also Chris Menzel, Chris Welty, Robert
&gt; &gt; Kent, Frederick Chase, and Philip Jackson have expressed their
preference
&gt; &gt;