ey
seek to construct from their purported oppositions of modism versus nodism
really do manage to cut up what may well be a non-orientable space or knot.

What my store of knowledge on the-isms tells me is that any ism worth its
salt probably reflects some interesting and useful facet of what is, but
by no means exhausts the core solidity of what is and stays in question.

So if somebody is proselytizing an ism in a spirit of enthusiasm about one
aspect, one face, one view of a subject, then I think that's 