:
&gt;
&gt; &gt;Jim,
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt;       These items will probably cut down on the volume, but
&gt; without one or
&gt; &gt; &gt; more documents to focus on, we won't be making much progress.
&gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;I agree, and would like to note that we now have a web-enabled
&gt; framework for
&gt; &gt;developing a common, documented definition of a standard upper ontology,
&gt; &gt;with examples of its use provided by Robert Kent. It's at
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;<A  HREF="https://www.qui