library would be different
from
&gt; &gt; a  simple repository of ontologies (like for instance the one
maintained
&gt; &gt; on the Stanford Ontology Server) inofar each SUO module would be
&gt; &gt; "certified" for soundness, clarity, existence of a suitable number of
&gt; &gt; potential applications, existence of a certain level of common
agreement,
&gt; &gt; and existence of (partial) formal links with other modules.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;         I believe that the level of agreement on this issue ­
monol