   has moved to comply (e.g. by stating specifically how it related
&gt;     to scope and purpose) which was not what you expected, because
&gt;     you were (IMHO) attacking the wrong problem.  It is the manner
&gt;     of Jon's contribution that would bear improvement.
&gt; 
&gt; JS: This is why I am pushing this so hard with you.
&gt; 
&gt; JS: Please respond to my points, but please don't twist my words.
&gt; 
&gt; ¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤~~~~~~~~~¤
&gt; 

</PRE>

<!--X-Body-of-Me