lated ontologies has been proven to be the right approach, so 
&gt;either or both may turn out to be valid.  However, I would say that 
&gt;a single common ontology, to the degree practical, is the goal of 
&gt;this group, and has been voted on when the PAR was approved.  I have 
&gt;found that there can be disagreement on wording that I thought was 
&gt;very clear, but the sections that seem to indicate this are (with my 
&gt;emphasis by bracketing with '*'s):
&gt;
&gt;"This standard will specify *an* uppe