s technical meanings of these terms is interesting, it should be
&gt;equally interesting, from an ontological point of view, that there are
&gt;large numbers of interesting types of relationships (contractual, proximity
&gt;emotional, linguistic, assembly, etc., etc.)  Isn't this what we're about
&gt;in this work?  Or is it still just too early to start?
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;Doug McDavid
&gt;Certified Executive Consultant
&gt;Business Innovation Services - IBM, US
&gt;Member of IBM Academy of Technology
&gt;mcdavi