nt error variance), and a basic
RI-CLPM (assuming no measurement error, using only the first indicator).
Results show that the power to detect non-zero lagged effects is indeed
larger in the MI-RICLPM (ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 for the standardized
cross-lagged effects of 0.2, and from 0.927 to 0.939 for the
standardized autoregressive effects of 0.3) than in the basic RI-CLPM
(ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 for the same standardized cross-lagged
effects of 0.2, and from 0.807 to 0.827 for the standardized
autor