tml">Mithril implementation</a>. Both implementations are naive (i.e. no optimizations). Sample results are shown below:</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Angular</th>
<th>Mithril</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>11.5 ms</td>
<td>6.4 ms</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4 id="complexity"><a href="#complexity">Complexity</a></h4>
<p>Angular is superior to Mithril in the amount of tools it offers (in the form of various directives and services), but it is also far more complex. Compare <a href="https://angular.io