preceding survey has introduced a model of inquiry and
charted a series of limits on the prospects for automating
inquiry.  We should not be too discouraged by the acknowledgment
of these limits.  But we ought to notice that these constraints
are not so much limits on the computational extension of human
inquiry as they are limits on the instrumental nature of inquiry
itself, being the specific adaptation of a finite creature to
an infinite world.  In other words, these are only the familiar
limits of the s