I)GOE)
&gt;that informs your every experience even as you are having it,
&gt;but do you really have to have already utterly formalized it,
&gt;in effect, to render your IGOE an EGOE, in order just to have
&gt;an experience?  I think not!

Well, in fact I think so (for the argument in its essentials see the 
idea of a 'language of thought' esp. by Jerry Fodor), but in any case 
that is beside the point. Who said that we are talking about 
*experience* ? The ontologies we write are not *about* experiences 
(w