still not convinced that a
&gt; &gt; &gt; 4D orientation
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;cannot be incorporated into the merged ontology, and I think
&gt; &gt; &gt; the replacement
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;of the 'Continuant'/'Occurrent' dichotomy with the
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;'ContinuantType'/'OccurrentType' division is a step in this
&gt; &gt; &gt; direction,
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;because this division is consistent with the claim that
&gt; &gt; &gt; things in themselves
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;are neither continuants nor occurrents 