work used throughout qualitative physical reasoning, for good
&gt; &gt; &gt; reasons: nothing else cuts the mustard.) You may not agree, of
&gt; &gt; &gt; course, many people don't.  But to say that a rejection of the
&gt; &gt; &gt; concept of continuant is a "limitation", is to be blinkered by one
&gt; &gt; &gt; world-view. Of course everyone agrees that what we 
&gt; ordinarily regard
&gt; &gt; &gt; as objects must be describable in any ontology. But it 
&gt; doenst follow
&gt; &gt; &gt; that they must be