uld probably be
meaningless.
&gt;  
&gt; &gt;&gt; In this decomposition, part1, part2, and part3 are pure dyads
&gt; &gt;&gt; that only relate two arguments at a time.  In Schroeder's
&gt; &gt;&gt; decomposition, which you keep repeating, you have to introduce
&gt; &gt;&gt; a new argument e, which links the monad named "giving" to
&gt; &gt;&gt; each of the other arguments:  agent(e, John), subject(e, book),
&gt; &gt;&gt; recipient(e, Mary), and time(e, yesterday).
&gt; 
&gt; &gt;MW: Yes, but the new argumen