ere, but I think you could make it much more
effectively if you provided some examples.  Could you cite two axioms having
roughly the same meaning but framed, respectively, in Endurantist and 4D
terms.  I'm not doubting that you can do this; it would just help me (and
maybe some others as well) to understand what's at stake here.

&gt; 
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; MW: The inferences (in both directions) constitute the
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; mapping. A mapping
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;