stand what I mean) that applies to *all* of
    those things in the 'Sphere'.

Again, your understanding is vastly more encompassing than Peirce's:

| The 'content' of 'man' is all that we know of all men, as
| being two-legged, having souls, having language, &amp;c., &amp;c.

Peirce's content is contented with very little in comparison to yours,
accepting what we know by a term instead of passing over our terminus.

That is why I persist in advertising Peirce's lectures of 1865-1866 as
having grasped the t