, so there are symbols which imply that their collected objects
| are real kinds and thus they connote more forms than one, either of
| which would be sufficient to limit their extension to the extent to
| which it is limited.  Hence if a symbol changes in information it may
| change either its extension or comprehension without changing both and
| thus the reciprocal relation of extension and comprehension only holds
| good when the information is not changed.
|
| Information then may be defined as the amo