ogical equivalence.  And that puts all theorems in
the same pot, all absurdities in another, and all contingencies to
gather with birds of variegate and sundry like-continged feathers.

&gt; &gt; Now, if every true proposition denotes the same object --
&gt; &gt; and here I think that Peirce ('Monist', 1906?) concurs
&gt; &gt; with what Frege also says, though I think that this is
&gt; &gt; just the very model of a typical mathematical attitude --
&gt; &gt; then all true propositions have ultimately one and