(rather, type 
&gt; descriptions are
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;continuant-like or occurrent-like).  Furthermore, nothing in
&gt; &gt; &gt; the merged
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;ontology (to my knowledge) is inconsistent with the claim
&gt; &gt; &gt; that everything as
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;a space-time worm.  If you disagree, could you cite an axiom
&gt; &gt; &gt; or subclass
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;relationship from the merged ontology that, by your lights,
&gt; &gt; &gt; is inconsistent
&gt; &gt; &gt; &gt;with this claim.
&gt; 