ror, using only the first indicator). Results show that
the power to detect non-zero lagged effects is indeed larger in the
MI-RICLPM (ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 for the standardized cross-lagged
effects of 0.2, and from 0.927 to 0.939 for the standardized
autoregressive effects of 0.3) than in the basic RI-CLPM (ranging from
0.70 to 0.74 for the same standardized cross-lagged effects of 0.2, and
from 0.807 to 0.827 for the standardized autoregressive effects of
0.3).</p>
<p>All in all, while the inclusion o