  Peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading and energy communities have garnered much
attention over in recent years due to increasing investments in local energy
generation and storage assets. However, the efficiency to be gained from P2P
trading, and the structure of local energy markets raise many important
challenges. To analyse the efficiency of P2P energy markets, in this work, we
consider two different popular approaches to peer-to-peer trading: centralised
(through a central market maker/clearing entity) vs. fully decentralised (P2P),
and explore the comparative economic benefits of these models. We focus on the
metric of Gains from Trade (GT), given optimal P2P trading schedule computed by
a schedule optimiser. In both local market models, benefits from trading are
realised mainly due to the diversity in consumption behaviour and renewable
energy generation between prosumers in an energy community. Both market models
will lead to the most promising P2P contracts (the ones with the highest Gains
from Trade) to be established first. Yet, we find diversity decreases quickly
as more peer-to-peer energy contracts are established and more prosumers join
the market, leading to significantly diminishing returns. In this work, we aim
to quantify this effect using real-world data from two large-scale smart energy
trials in the UK, i.e. the Low Carbon London project and the Thames Valley
Vision project. Our experimental study shows that, for both market models, only
a small number of P2P contracts, and only a fraction of total prosumers in the
community are required to achieve the majority of the maximal potential Gains
from Trade. We also study the effect that diversity in consumption profiles has
on overall trading potential and dynamics in an energy community.
