  The problem of classifying turbulent environments from partial observation is
key for some theoretical and applied fields, from engineering to earth
observation and astrophysics, e.g. to precondition searching of optimal control
policies in different turbulent backgrounds, to predict the probability of rare
events and/or to infer physical parameters labelling different turbulent
set-ups. To achieve such goal one can use different tools depending on the
system's knowledge and on the quality and quantity of the accessible data. In
this context, we assume to work in a model-free setup completely blind to all
dynamical laws, but with a large quantity of (good quality) data for training.
As a prototype of complex flows with different attractors, and different
multi-scale statistical properties we selected 10 turbulent 'ensembles' by
changing the rotation frequency of the frame of reference of the 3d domain and
we suppose to have access to a set of partial observations limited to the
instantaneous kinetic energy distribution in a 2d plane, as it is often the
case in geophysics and astrophysics. We compare results obtained by a Machine
Learning (ML) approach consisting of a state-of-the-art Deep Convolutional
Neural Network (DCNN) against Bayesian inference which exploits the information
on velocity and enstrophy moments. First, we discuss the supremacy of the ML
approach, presenting also results at changing the number of training data and
of the hyper-parameters. Second, we present an ablation study on the input data
aimed to perform a ranking on the importance of the flow features used by the
DCNN, helping to identify the main physical contents used by the classifier.
Finally, we discuss the main limitations of such data-driven methods and
potential interesting applications.
