  Actigraphic measurements are an important part of research in different
disciplines, yet the procedure of determining activity values is unexpectedly
not standardized in the literature. Although the measured raw acceleration
signal can be diversely processed, and then the activity values can be
calculated by different activity calculation methods, the documentations of
them are generally incomplete or vary by manufacturer. These numerous activity
metrics may require different types of preprocessing of the acceleration
signal. For example, digital filtering of the acceleration signals can have
various parameters; moreover, both the filter and the activity metrics can also
be applied per axis or on the magnitudes of the acceleration vector. Level
crossing-based activity metrics also depend on unclearly determined threshold
level values. Due to the serious inconsistency of determining activity values,
we created a detailed and comprehensive comparison of the different available
activity calculation procedures because, up to the present, it was lacking in
the literature. We assessed the different methods by analysing the triaxial
acceleration signals measured during a 10-day movement of 42 subjects. We
calculated 148 different activity signals for each subject's movement using the
combinations of various types of preprocessing and 7 different activity metrics
applied on both axial and magnitude data. We determined the linear relationship
between the metrics by correlation analysis, while we also examined the effects
of the preprocessing steps. Moreover, we established that the standard
deviation of the data series can be used as an appropriate, adaptive and
generalized threshold level for the level intersection-based metrics. On the
basis of these results, our work also serves as a general guide on how to
proceed if one wants to determine activity from the raw acceleration data.
