  What is the optimal way to cut a convex bounded domain $K$ in Euclidean space
$(\mathbb{R}^n,|\cdot|)$ into two halves of equal volume, so that the interface
between the two halves has least surface area? A conjecture of Kannan, Lov\'asz
and Simonovits asserts that, if one does not mind gaining a universal numerical
factor (independent of $n$) in the surface area, one might as well dissect $K$
using a hyperplane. This conjectured essential equivalence between the former
non-linear isoperimetric inequality and its latter linear relaxation, has been
shown over the last two decades to be of fundamental importance to the
understanding of volumetric and spectral properties of convex domains. In this
work, we address the conjecture for the subclass of generalized Orlicz balls \[
K = \left \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n \; ; \; \sum_{i=1}^n V_i(x_i) \leq E \right \} ,
\] confirming its validity for certain levels $E \in \mathbb{R}$ under a mild
technical assumption on the growth of the convex functions $V_i$ at infinity
(without which we confirm the conjecture up to a $\log(1+n)$ factor). In sharp
contrast to previous approaches for tackling the KLS conjecture, we emphasize
that no symmetry is required from $K$. This significantly enlarges the subclass
of convex bodies for which the conjecture is confirmed.
