  Lifting up objects from the floor has been identified as a risk factor for
low back pain, whereby a flexed spine during lifting is often associated with
producing higher loads in the lumbar spine. Even though recent biomechanical
studies challenge these assumptions, conclusive evidence is still lacking. This
study therefore aimed at comparing lumbar loads among different lifting styles
using a comprehensive state-of-the-art motion capture-driven musculoskeletal
modeling approach. Thirty healthy pain-free individuals were enrolled in this
study and asked to repetitively lift a 15 kg-box by applying 1) a freestyle, 2)
a squat and 3) a stoop lifting technique. Whole-body kinematics were recorded
using an optical motion capture system and used to drive a full-body
musculoskeletal model including a detailed thoracolumbar spine. Compressive,
shear and total loads were calculated based on a static optimization approach
and expressed as factor body weight (BW). In addition, lumbar lordosis angles
and total lifting time were calculated. All parameters were compared among the
lifting styles using a repeated measures design. For all lumbar segments, stoop
lifting showed significantly lower compressive and total loads (-0.3 to -1.0BW)
when compared to freestyle and squat lifting. Stoop lifting produced higher
shear loads (+0.1 to +0.8BW) in the segments T12/L1 to L4/L5, but lower loads
in L5/S1 (-0.2 to -0.4BW). Peak compressive and total loads during squat
lifting occurred approximately 30% earlier in the lifting cycle compared to
stoop lifting. Stoop lifting showed larger lumbar lordosis range of motion
(35.9+/-10.1{\deg}) than freestyle (24.2+/-7.3{\deg}) and squat
(25.1+/-8.2{\deg}) lifting. Lifting time differed significantly with freestyle
being executed the fastest (4.6+/-0.7s), followed by squat (4.9+/-0.7s) and
stoop (5.9+/-1.1s).
