  In time Petri nets (TPNs), time and control are tightly connected: time
measurement for a transition starts only when all resources needed to fire it
are available. Further, upper bounds on duration of enabledness can force
transitions to fire (this is called urgency). For many systems, one wants to
decouple control and time, i.e. start measuring time as soon as a part of the
preset of a transition is filled, and fire it after some delay \underline{and}
when all needed resources are available. This paper considers an extension of
TPN called waiting nets that dissociates time measurement and control. Their
semantics allows time measurement to start with incomplete presets, and can
ignore urgency when upper bounds of intervals are reached but all resources
needed to fire are not yet available. Firing of a transition is then allowed as
soon as missing resources are available. It is known that extending bounded
TPNs with stopwatches leads to undecidability. Our extension is weaker, and we
show how to compute a finite state class graph for bounded waiting nets,
yielding decidability of reachability and coverability. We then compare
expressiveness of waiting nets with that of other models w.r.t. timed language
equivalence, and show that they are strictly more expressive than TPNs.
