  Past planetary missions have been broad and detailed for Gas Giants, compared
to flyby missions for Ice Giants. Presently, a mission to Neptune using
electrodynamic tethers is under consideration due to the ability of tethers to
provide free propulsion and power for orbital insertion as well as additional
exploratory maneuvering --- providing more mission capability than a standard
orbiter mission. Tether operation depends on plasma density and magnetic field
$\mathbf{B}$, though tethers can deal with ill-defined density profiles, with
the anodic segment self-adjusting to accommodate densities. Planetary magnetic
fields are due to currents in some small volume inside the planet,
magnetic-moment vector, and typically a dipole law approximation --- which
describes the field outside. When compared with Saturn and Jupiter, the
Neptunian magnetic structure is significantly more complex: the dipole is
located below the equatorial plane, is highly offset from the planet center,
and at large tilt with its rotation axis. Lorentz-drag work decreases quickly
with distance, thus requiring spacecraft periapsis at capture close to the
planet and allowing the large offset to make capture efficiency
(spacecraft-to-tether mass ratio) well above a no-offset case. The S/C might
optimally reach periapsis when crossing the meridian plane of the dipole, with
the S/C facing it; this convenient synchronism is eased by Neptune rotating
little during capture. Calculations yield maximum efficiency of approximately
12, whereas a $10^{\circ}$ meridian error would reduce efficiency by about 6%.
Efficiency results suggest new calculations should be made to fully include
Neptunian rotation and consider detailed dipole and quadrupole corrections.
