  J. Kigami has laid the foundations of what is now known as analysis on
fractals, by allowing the construction of an operator of the same nature of the
Laplacian, defined locally, on graphs having a fractal character. The
Sierpinski gasket stands out of the best known example. It has, since then,
been taken up, developed and popularized by R. S. Strichartz.
  The Laplacian is obtained through a weak formulation, obtained by means of
Dirichlet forms, built by induction on a sequence of graphs that converges
towards the considered domain. It is these Dirichlet forms that enable one to
obtain energy forms on this domain.
  Yet, things are not that simple. If, for domains like the Sierpinski gasket,
the Laplacian is obtained in a quite natural way, one must bear in mind that
Dirichlet forms solely depend on the topology of the domain, and not of its
geometry. Which means that, if one aims at building a Laplacian on a fractal
domain, the topology of which is the same as, for instance, a line segment, one
has to find a way of taking account a very specific geometry. We came across
that problem in our work on the graph of the Weierstrass function The solution
was thus to consider energy forms more sophisticated than classical ones, by
means of normalization constants that could, not only bear the topology, but,
also, the very specific geometry of, from now on, we will call W-curves.
  We presently aim at investigating the links between energy forms and
geometry. We have chosen to consider fractal curves, specifically, the
Sierpi\'nski arrowhead curve, the limit of which is the Sierpi\'nski gasket.
Does one obtain the same Laplacian as for the triangle ? The question appears
as worth to be investigated.
