  Liquids realize a highly complex state of matter in which strong competing
kinetic and interaction effects come to life. As such, liquids are more
challenging to understand than either gases or solids generally. In weakly
interacting gases, the kinetic effects dominate. By contrast, low temperature
solids typically feature far smaller fluctuations about their ground state.
Notwithstanding their complexity, with the exception of quantum fluids and
supercooled liquids, various aspects of common liquid dynamics such as their
dynamic viscosity are often assumed to be given by rather simple,
Arrhenius-type, activated forms with nearly constant (i.e., temperature
independent) energy barriers. In this work, we analyze experimentally measured
viscosities of numerous liquids far above their equilibrium melting temperature
to see how well this assumption fares. We find, for the investigated liquids,
marked deviations from simple activated dynamics. Even far above their
equilibrium melting temperatures, as the temperature drops, the viscosity of
these liquids increases more strongly than predicted by activated dynamics
dominated by a single uniform energy barrier. For metallic fluids, the scale of
the prefactors of the best Arrhenius fits for the viscosity is typically
consistent with that given by the product $nh$ with $n$ the number density and
$h$ Planck's constant. In various fluids that we examined, $nh$ constitutes a
lower bound scale on the viscosity. We find that a scaling of the temperature
axis (complementing that of the viscosity) leads to a partial collapse of the
temperature dependent viscosities of different fluids; such a scaling allows
for a functional dependence of the viscosity on temperature that includes yet
is far more general than activated Arrhenius form alone. We speculate on
relations between non-Arrhenius dynamics and thermodynamic observables.
