  Phase-amplitude coupling is a phenomenon observed in several neurological
processes, where the phase of one signal modulates the amplitude of another
signal with a distinct frequency. The modulation index (MI) is a common
technique used to quantify this interaction by assessing the Kullback-Leibler
divergence between a uniform distribution and the empirical conditional
distribution of amplitudes with respect to the phases of the observed signals.
The uniform distribution is an ideal representation that is expected to appear
under the absence of coupling. However, it does not reflect the statistical
properties of coupling values caused by random chance. In this paper, we
propose a statistical framework for evaluating the significance of an observed
MI value based on a null hypothesis that a MI value can be entirely explained
by chance. Significance is obtained by comparing the value with a reference
distribution derived under the null hypothesis of independence (i.e., no
coupling) between signals. We derived a closed-form distribution of this null
model, resulting in a scaled beta distribution. To validate the efficacy of our
proposed framework, we conducted comprehensive Monte Carlo simulations,
assessing the significance of MI values under various experimental scenarios,
including amplitude modulation, trains of spikes, and sequences of
high-frequency oscillations. Furthermore, we corroborated the reliability of
our model by comparing its statistical significance thresholds with reported
values from other research studies conducted under different experimental
settings. Our method offers several advantages such as meta-analysis
reliability, simplicity and computational efficiency, as it provides p-values
and significance levels without resorting to generating surrogate data through
sampling procedures.
