  We introduce odds-ratios in discrete choice models and utilize them to
formulate bounds instrumental to the development of heuristics for the
assortment optimization problem subject to totally unimodular constraints, and
to the assess the benefit of personalized assortments. These heuristics, which
only require the first and last-choice probabilities of the underlying discrete
choice model, are broadly applicable, efficient, and come with worst-case
performance guarantees. We propose a clairvoyant firm model to assess, in the
limit, the potential benefits of personalized assortments. Our numerical study
indicates that when the mean utilities of the products are heterogeneous among
the consumer types, and the variance of the utilities is small, then firms can
gain substantial benefits from personalized assortments. We support these
observations, and others, with theoretical findings. For regular DCMs, we show
that a clairvoyant firm can generate up to $n$ times more in expected revenues
than a traditional firm. For discrete choice models with independent value
gaps, we demonstrate that the clairvoyant firm can earn at most twice as much
as a traditional firm. Prophet inequalities are also shown to hold for a
variety of DCMs with dependent value gaps, including the MNL and GAM. While the
consumers' surplus can potentially be larger under personalized assortments,
clairvoyant firms with pricing power can extract all surplus, and earn
arbitrarily more than traditional firms that optimize over prices but do not
personalize them. For the price-aware MNL, however, a clairvoyant firm can earn
at most $\exp(1)$ more than a traditional firm.
