  Teleoperated or remote-controlled driving complements automated driving and
acts as transitional technology toward full automation. An economic advantage
of teleoperated driving in logistics operations lies in managing fleets with
fewer teleoperators compared to vehicles with in-vehicle drivers. This
alleviates growing truck driver shortage problems in the logistics industry and
saves costs. However, a trade-off exists between the teleoperator-to-vehicle
ratio and the service level of teleoperation. This study designs a simulation
framework to explore this trade-off generating multiple performance indicators
as proxies for teleoperation service level. By applying the framework, we
identify factors influencing the trade-off and optimal teleoperator-to-vehicle
ratios under different scenarios. Our case study on road freight tours in The
Netherlands reveals that for any operational setting, a
teleoperation-to-vehicle ratio below one can manage all freight truck tours
without delay, while one represents the current situation. The minimum
teleoperator-to-vehicle ratio for zero-delay operations is never above 0.6,
implying a minimum of 40% teleoperation labor cost saving. For operations where
a small delay is allowed, teleoperator-to-vehicle ratios as low as 0.4 are
shown to be feasible, which indicates potential savings of up to 60%. This
confirms great promise for a positive business case for the teleoperated
driving as a service.
