  Because the baryon-to-photon ratio eta_{10} is in some doubt, we drop
nucleosynthetic constraints on eta_{10} and fit the three cosmological
parameters (h, Omega_M, eta_{10}) to four observational constraints: Hubble
parameter h_o = 0.70+-0.15, age of the universe t_o = 14+7-2 Gyr, cluster gas
fraction f_o \equiv f_G h^{3/2} = 0.060 +- 0.006, and effective shape parameter
Gamma_o = 0.255 +- 0.017. Errors quoted are 1 sigma, and we assume Gaussian
statistics. We experiment with a fifth constraint Omega_o = 0.2 +- 0.1 from
clusters. We set the tilt parameter n = 1 and the gas enhancement factor
Upsilon = 0.9. We consider CDM models (open and Omega_M = 1) and flat LambdaCDM
models. We test goodness of fit and draw confidence regions by the Delta chi^2
method. CDM models with Omega_M = 1 (SCDM models) are accepted only because the
large error on h_o allows h < 0.5. Baryonic matter plays a significant role in
Gamma_o when Omega_M \sim 1. Open CDM models are accepted only for Omega_M
\gtrsim 0.4. The combination of the four other constraints with Omega_o = 0.2
+- 0.1 is rejected in CDM models with 98% confidence, suggesting that light may
not trace mass. LambdaCDM models give similar results. In all of these models,
eta_{10} \gtrsim 6 is favored strongly over eta_{10} \lesssim 2. This suggests
that reports of low deuterium abundances on QSO lines of sight may be correct
and that observational determinations of primordial 4He may have systematic
errors. Plausible variations on n and Upsilon in our models do not change the
results much. If we drop or change the crucial Gamma_o constraint, lower values
of Omega_M and eta_{10} are permitted. The constraint Gamma_o = 0.15 +- 0.04,
derived recently from the IRAS redshift survey, favors Omega_M \approx 0.3 and
eta_{10} \approx 5 but does not exclude eta_{10} \approx 2.
