  The process comparing the empirical cumulative distribution function of the
sample with a parametric estimate of the cumulative distribution function is
known as the empirical process with estimated parameters and has been
extensively employed in the literature for goodness-of-fit testing. The
simplest way to carry out such goodness-of-fit tests, especially in a
multivariate setting, is to use a parametric bootstrap. Although very easy to
implement, the parametric bootstrap can become very computationally expensive
as the sample size, the number of parameters, or the dimension of the data
increase. An alternative resampling technique based on a fast weighted
bootstrap is proposed in this paper, and is studied both theoretically and
empirically. The outcome of this work is a generic and computationally
efficient multiplier goodness-of-fit procedure that can be used as a
large-sample alternative to the parametric bootstrap. In order to approximately
determine how large the sample size needs to be for the parametric and weighted
bootstraps to have roughly equivalent powers, extensive Monte Carlo experiments
are carried out in dimension one, two and three, and for models containing up
to nine parameters. The computational gains resulting from the use of the
proposed multiplier goodness-of-fit procedure are illustrated on trivariate
financial data. A by-product of this work is a fast large-sample
goodness-of-fit procedure for the bivariate and trivariate t distribution whose
degrees of freedom are fixed.
