  In Part I of this study, we obtained the ray (group) velocity gradients and
Hessians with respect to the ray locations, directions and the anisotropic
model parameters, at nodal points along ray trajectories, considering general
anisotropic (triclinic) media and both, quasi-compressional and quasi-shear
waves. Ray velocity derivatives for anisotropic media with higher symmetries
were considered particular cases of general anisotropy. In this part, Part II,
we follow the computational workflow presented in Part I, formulating the ray
velocity derivatives directly for polar anisotropic (transverse isotropy with
tilted axis of symmetry, TTI) media for the coupled qP and qSV waves and for SH
waves. The acoustic approximation for qP waves is considered a special case.
The medium properties, normally specified at regular three-dimensional fine
grid points, are the five material parameters: the axial compressional and
shear velocities and the three Thomsen parameters, and two geometric
parameters: the polar angles defining the local direction of the medium
symmetry axis. All the parameters are assumed spatially (smoothly) varying,
where their gradients and Hessians can be reliably computed. Two case examples
are considered; the first represents compacted shale/sand rocks (with positive
anellipticity) and the second, unconsolidated sand rocks with strong negative
anellipticity (manifesting a qSV triplication). The ray velocity derivatives
obtained in this part are first tested by comparing them with the corresponding
numerical (finite difference) derivatives. Additionally, we show that exactly
the same results (ray velocity derivatives) can be obtained if we transform the
given polar anisotropic model parameters (five material and two geometric) into
the twenty-one stiffness tensor components of a general anisotropic (triclinic)
medium, and apply the theory derived in Part I.
