  Compared to a manual driving vehicle (MV), an automated driving vehicle lacks
a way to communicate with the pedestrian through the driver when it interacts
with the pedestrian because the driver usually does not participate in driving
tasks. Thus, an external human machine interface (eHMI) can be viewed as a
novel explicit communication method for providing driving intentions of an
automated driving vehicle (AV) to pedestrians when they need to negotiate in an
interaction, e.g., an encountering scene. However, the eHMI may not guarantee
that the pedestrians will fully recognize the intention of the AV. In this
paper, we propose that the instruction of the eHMI's rationale can help
pedestrians correctly understand the driving intentions and predict the
behavior of the AV, and thus their subjective feelings (i.e., dangerous
feeling, trust in the AV, and feeling of relief) and decision-making are also
improved. The results of an interaction experiment in a road-crossing scene
indicate that the participants were more difficult to be aware of the situation
when they encountered an AV w/o eHMI compared to when they encountered an MV;
further, the participants' subjective feelings and hesitation in
decision-making also deteriorated significantly. When the eHMI was used in the
AV, the situational awareness, subjective feelings and decision-making of the
participants regarding the AV w/ eHMI were improved. After the instruction, it
was easier for the participants to understand the driving intention and predict
driving behavior of the AV w/ eHMI. Further, the subjective feelings and the
hesitation related to decision-making were improved and reached the same
standards as that for the MV.
