  Computational docking is the core process of computer-aided drug design; it
aims at predicting the best orientation and conformation of a small drug
molecule when bound to a target large protein receptor. The docking quality is
typically measured by a scoring function: a mathematical predictive model that
produces a score representing the binding free energy and hence the stability
of the resulting complex molecule. We analyze the performance of both learning
techniques on the scoring power, the ranking power, docking power, and
screening power using the PDBbind 2013 database. For the scoring and ranking
powers, the proposed learning scoring functions depend on a wide range of
features (energy terms, pharmacophore, intermolecular) that entirely
characterize the protein-ligand complexes. For the docking and screening
powers, the proposed learning scoring functions depend on the intermolecular
features of the RF-Score to utilize a larger number of training complexes. For
the scoring power, the DL\_RF scoring function achieves Pearson's correlation
coefficient between the predicted and experimentally measured binding
affinities of 0.799 versus 0.758 of the RF scoring function. For the ranking
power, the DL scoring function ranks the ligands bound to fixed target protein
with accuracy 54% for the high-level ranking and with accuracy 78% for the
low-level ranking while the RF scoring function achieves (46% and 62%)
respectively. For the docking power, the DL\_RF scoring function has a success
rate when the three best-scored ligand binding poses are considered within 2
\AA\ root-mean-square-deviation from the native pose of 36.0% versus 30.2% of
the RF scoring function. For the screening power, the DL scoring function has
an average enrichment factor and success rate at the top 1% level of (2.69 and
6.45%) respectively versus (1.61 and 4.84%) respectively of the RF scoring
function.
