  Dr. William Bruno asserts the well-known fact that cell phones radiate
microwaves in the classical regime. This, he says, means that the photon energy
is not relevant to assessing safety. Citing optical tweezers as an example of
biologically relevant non-thermal effects of electromagnetic radiation, Bruno
concludes that all other reports of non-thermal effects from microwaves are
likely valid. He seeks safety thresholds based upon requiring that cell phone
energy density be less than kBT. This proposal and related ideas produce
thresholds many orders of magnitude below present values.
  While Dr. Bruno is correct that cell phone microwave radiation is generally
in the classical regime, he uses peculiar estimates (number of photons per
cubic wavelength) that overstate the circumstance by more than 20 factors of
ten. He misunderstands the operation of optical tweezers and ignores their
significant thermal effects. He credulously accepts poorly supported claims of
non-thermal effects. He mistakenly believes that kBT is the average thermal
energy (per cubic wavelength or per cell) in materials. It is not. It is twice
the average energy per molecule per degree of freedom in the material. The
thermal energy density is (1/2)kBT X (average number of degrees of freedom of
the molecules) X (Avogadro's number). (Avogadro's number is 6 X 1026
molecules/mole.) Thus, Bruno's proposed safety thresholds are more than 1025
too low. Using the correct value for the average thermal energy would place the
thresholds close to today's standards. Throughout his analysis he neglects the
index of refraction of living tissue, n \cong 9, or the absorption length,
{\alpha} \cong 1 cm-1, in the microwave region.
