  Integrated Digital Image Correlation (IDIC) is nowadays a well established
full-field experimental procedure for reliable and accurate identification of
material parameters. It is based on the correlation of a series of images
captured during a mechanical experiment, that are matched by displacement
fields derived from an underlying mechanical model. In recent studies, it has
been shown that when the applied boundary conditions lie outside the employed
field of view, IDIC suffers from inaccuracies. A typical example is a
micromechanical parameter identification inside a Microstructural Volume
Element (MVE), whereby images are usually obtained by electron microscopy or
other microscopy techniques but the loads are applied at a much larger scale.
For any IDIC model, MVE boundary conditions still need to be specified, and any
deviation or fluctuation in these boundary conditions may significantly
influence the quality of identification. Prescribing proper boundary conditions
is generally a challenging task, because the MVE has no free boundary, and the
boundary displacements are typically highly heterogeneous due to the underlying
microstructure. The aim of this paper is therefore first to quantify the
effects of errors in the prescribed boundary conditions on the accuracy of the
identification in a systematic way. To this end, three kinds of mechanical
tests, each for various levels of material contrast ratios and levels of image
noise, are carried out by means of virtual experiments. For simplicity, an
elastic compressible Neo-Hookean constitutive model under plane strain
assumption is adopted. It is shown that a high level of detail is required in
the applied boundary conditions. This motivates an improved boundary condition
application approach, which considers constitutive material parameters as well
as kinematic variables at the boundary of the entire MVE as degrees of freedom
in...
