  The evolution of local defects such as dislocations and cracks often
determines the performance of engineering materials. For a proper description
and understanding of these phenomena, one needs to descend to a very small
scale, at which the discreteness of the material emerges. Fully-resolved
discrete numerical models often suffer from excessive computing expenses when
used for application-scale considerations. More efficient multiscale simulation
procedures are thus called for, capable of capturing the most significant
microscopic phenomena while being computationally tractable. Two broad classes
of methods are available in the literature. The first class considers the
fully-resolved discrete system, which is subsequently reduced through suitable
mathematical tools such as projection and reduced integration. The second class
first homogenizes the discrete system into an equivalent continuum formulation,
into which the main phenomena are added through specific enrichments. This
paper provides a thorough comparison of the two different modeling philosophies
in terms of their theory, accuracy, and performance. To this goal, two typical
representatives are adopted: the Quasicontinuum method for the first class, and
an effective continuum with an embedded cohesive zone model for the second
class. Two examples are employed to demonstrate capabilities and limitations of
both approaches: dislocation propagation and pile-up against a coherent phase
boundary, and a three-point bending test of a concrete specimen with crack
propagation. In both cases, the accuracy of the two methods is compared against
the fully-resolved discrete reference model. It is shown that whereas continuum
models with embedded cohesive zones offer good performance to accuracy ratios,
they might fail to capture unexpected mechanical behavior. The Quasicontinuum
method offers more flexibility at a higher computational cost.
