  Passive acoustic monitoring can be an effective way of monitoring wildlife
populations that are acoustically active but difficult to survey visually.
Digital recorders allow surveyors to gather large volumes of data at low cost,
but identifying target species vocalisations in these data is non-trivial.
Machine learning (ML) methods are often used to do the identification. They can
process large volumes of data quickly, but they do not detect all vocalisations
and they do generate some false positives (vocalisations that are not from the
target species). Existing wildlife abundance survey methods have been designed
specifically to deal with the first of these mistakes, but current methods of
dealing with false positives are not well-developed. They do not take account
of features of individual vocalisations, some of which are more likely to be
false positives than others. We propose three methods for acoustic spatial
capture-recapture inference that integrate individual-level measures of
confidence from ML vocalisation identification into the likelihood and hence
integrate ML uncertainty into inference. The methods include a mixture model in
which species identity is a latent variable. We test the methods by simulation
and find that in a scenario based on acoustic data from Hainan gibbons, in
which ignoring false positives results in 17% positive bias, our methods give
negligible bias and coverage probabilities that are close to the nominal 95%
level.
