  We examine here the discrepancy between the radiated power, calculated from
the Poynting flux at infinity, and the power loss due to radiation reaction for
an accelerated charge. It is emphasized that one needs to maintain a clear
distinction between the electromagnetic power received by distant observers and
the mechanical power loss undergone by the charge. In literature both
quantities are treated as almost synonymous, the two in general could, however,
be quite different. It is shown that in the case of a periodic motion, the two
formulations do yield the power loss in a time averaged sense to be the same,
even though, the instantaneous rates are quite different. It is demonstrated
that the discordance between the two power formulas merely reflects the
difference in the power going in self-fields of the charge between the retarded
and present times. In particular, in the case of a uniformly accelerated
charge, power going into the self-fields at the present time is equal to the
power that was going into the self-fields at the retarded time plus the power
going in acceleration fields, usually called radiation. From a comparison of
the far fields with the instantaneous location of the uniformly accelerated
charge, it is shown that all its fields, including the acceleration fields,
remain around the charge and are not {\em radiated away} from it.
