  Mutational neighbourhoods in genotype-phenotype (GP) maps are widely believed
to be more likely to share characteristics than expected from random chance.
Such genetic correlations should, as John Maynard Smith famously pointed out,
strongly influence evolutionary dynamics. We explore and quantify these
intuitions by comparing three GP maps - RNA SS, HP for tertiary, Polyominoes
for protein quaternary structure - to a simple random null model that maintains
the number of genotypes mapping to each phenotype, but assigns genotypes
randomly. The mutational neighbourhood of a genotype in these GP maps is much
more likely to contain (mutationally neutral) genotypes mapping to the same
phenotype than in the random null model. These neutral correlations can
increase the robustness to mutations by orders of magnitude over that of the
null model, raising robustness above the critical threshold for the formation
of large neutral networks that enhance the capacity for neutral exploration. We
also study {\em non-neutral correlations}: Compared to the null model, i) If a
particular (non-neutral) phenotype is found once in the 1-mutation
neighbourhood of a genotype, then the chance of finding that phenotype multiple
times in this neighbourhood is larger than expected; ii) If two genotypes are
connected by a single neutral mutation, then their respective non-neutral
1-mutation neighbourhoods are more likely to be similar; iii) If a genotype
maps to a folding or self-assembling phenotype, then its non-neutral neighbours
are less likely to be a potentially deleterious non-folding or non-assembling
phenotype. Non-neutral correlations of type i) and ii) reduce the rate at which
new phenotypes can be found by neutral exploration, and so may diminish
evolvability, while non-neutral correlations of type iii) may instead
facilitate evolutionary exploration and so increase evolvability.
