  For a commutative ring $R$ and an ADE Dynkin quiver $Q$, we prove that the
multiplicative preprojective algebra of Crawley-Boevey and Shaw, with parameter
$q=1$, is isomorphic to the (additive) preprojective algebra as $R$-algebras if
and only if the bad primes for $Q$ (2 in type D, 2 and 3 for $Q = E_{6}$,
$E_{7}$ and 2, 3 and 5 for $Q= E_{8}$) are invertible in $R$. We construct an
explicit isomorphism over $\mathbb{Z}[1/2]$ in type D, over $\mathbb{Z}[1/2,
1/3]$ for $Q = E_{6}$, $E_{7}$ and over $\mathbb{Z}[1/2, 1/3, 1/5]$ for
$Q=E_{8}$. Conversely, if some bad prime is not invertible in $R$, we show that
the additive and multiplicative preprojective algebras differ in zeroth
Hochschild homology, and hence are not isomorphic. In fact, one only needs the
vanishing of certain classes in zeroth Hochschild homology of the
multiplicative preprojective algebra, utilizing a rigidification argument for
isomorphisms that may be of independent interest.
  In the setting of Ginzburg dg-algebras, our obstructions are new in type E
and give a more elementary proof of the negative result of Etg\"{u}--Lekili
arXiv:1502.07922 in type D. Moreover, the zeroth Hochschild homology of the
multiplicative preprojective algebra can be interpreted as the space of
unobstructed deformations of the multiplicative Ginzburg dg-algebra by Van den
Bergh duality. Finally, we observe that the multiplicative preprojective
algebra is not symmetric Frobenius if $Q \neq A_1$, a departure from the
additive preprojective algebra in characteristic 2 for $Q = D_{2n}$, $n \geq 2$
and $Q =E_{7}$, $E_{8}$.
