  In the classical communication setting multiple senders having access to the
same source of information and transmitting it over channel(s) to a receiver in
general leads to a decrease in estimation error at the receiver as compared
with the single sender case. However, if the objectives of the information
providers are different from that of the estimator, this might result in
interesting strategic interactions and outcomes. In this work, we consider a
hierarchical signaling game between multiple senders (information designers)
and a single receiver (decision maker) each having their own, possibly
misaligned, objectives. The senders lead the game by committing to individual
information disclosure policies simultaneously, within the framework of a
non-cooperative Nash game among themselves. This is followed by the receiver's
action decision. With Gaussian information structure and quadratic objectives
(which depend on underlying state and receiver's action) for all the players,
we show that in general the equilibrium is not unique. We hence identify a set
of equilibria and further show that linear noiseless policies can achieve a
minimal element of this set. Additionally, we show that competition among the
senders is beneficial to the receiver, as compared with cooperation among the
senders. Further, we extend our analysis to a dynamic signaling game of finite
horizon with Markovian information evolution. We show that linear memoryless
policies can achieve equilibrium in this dynamic game. We also consider an
extension to a game with multiple receivers having coupled objectives. We
provide algorithms to compute the equilibrium strategies in all these cases.
Finally, via extensive simulations, we analyze the effects of multiple senders
in varying degrees of alignment among their objectives.
