  Electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring and objective seizure identification is
an essential clinical investigation for some patients with epilepsy. Accurate
annotation is done through a time-consuming process by EEG specialists.
Computer-assisted systems for seizure detection currently lack extensive
clinical utility due to retrospective, patient-specific, and/or irreproducible
studies that result in low sensitivity or high false positives in clinical
tests. We aim to significantly reduce the time and resources on data annotation
by demonstrating a continental generalization of seizure detection that
balances sensitivity and specificity. This is a prospective inference test of
artificial intelligence on nearly 14,590 hours of adult EEG data from patients
with epilepsy between 2011 and 2019 in a hospital in Sydney, Australia. The
inference set includes patients with different types and frequencies of
seizures across a wide range of ages and EEG recording hours. We validated our
inference model in an AI-assisted mode with a human expert arbiter and a result
review panel of expert neurologists and EEG specialists on 66 sessions to
demonstrate achievement of the same performance with over an order-of-magnitude
reduction in time. Our inference on 1,006 EEG recording sessions on the
Australian dataset achieved 76.68% with nearly 56 [0, 115] false alarms per 24
hours on average, against legacy ground-truth annotations by human experts,
conducted independently over nine years. Our pilot test of 66 sessions with a
human arbiter, and reviewed ground truth by a panel of experts, confirmed an
identical human performance of 92.19% with an AI-assisted system, while the
time requirements reduce significantly from 90 to 7.62 minutes on average.
