  Machine learning (ML) over relational data is a booming area of the database
industry and academia. While several projects aim to build scalable and fast ML
systems, little work has addressed the pains of sourcing data and features for
ML tasks. Real-world relational databases typically have many tables (often,
dozens) and data scientists often struggle to even obtain and join all possible
tables that provide features for ML. In this context, Kumar et al. showed
recently that key-foreign key dependencies (KFKDs) between tables often lets us
avoid such joins without significantly affecting prediction accuracy--an idea
they called avoiding joins safely. While initially controversial, this idea has
since been used by multiple companies to reduce the burden of data sourcing for
ML. But their work applied only to linear classifiers. In this work, we verify
if their results hold for three popular complex classifiers: decision trees,
SVMs, and ANNs. We conduct an extensive experimental study using both
real-world datasets and simulations to analyze the effects of avoiding KFK
joins on such models. Our results show that these high-capacity classifiers are
surprisingly and counter-intuitively more robust to avoiding KFK joins compared
to linear classifiers, refuting an intuition from the prior work's analysis. We
explain this behavior intuitively and identify open questions at the
intersection of data management and ML theoretical research. All of our code
and datasets are available for download from
http://cseweb.ucsd.edu/~arunkk/hamlet.
