  We address three questions regarding solar system planets. What determined
their number? Why are their orbits nearly circular and coplanar? How long did
they take to form? Runaway accretion in a disk of small bodies resulted in a
tiny fraction of the bodies growing much larger than all the others. This was
followed by oligarchic growth during which the big bodies maintained similar
masses and uniformly spaced semi-major axes. We depart from standard treatments
of planet formation by assuming that as the big bodies got bigger, the small
ones got smaller as the result of undergoing a collisional fragmentation
cascade. It follows that oligarchy was a brief stage in solar system evolution.
When the oligarchs' surface mass density matched that of the small bodies,
dynamical friction was no longer able to balance viscous stirring, so their
velocity dispersion increased to the extent that their orbits crossed. This
marked the end of oligarchy. What happened next differed in the inner and outer
parts of the planetary system. In the inner part, where the ratios of the
escape velocities from the surfaces of the planets to the escape velocities
from their orbits are smaller than unity, big bodies collided and coalesced
after their random velocities became comparable to their escape velocities. In
the outer part, where these ratios are larger than unity, the random velocities
of some of the big bodies continued to rise until they were ejected. In both
parts, the number density of the big bodies eventually decreased to the extent
that gravitational interactions among them no longer produced large scale
chaos. After that their orbital eccentricities and inclinations were damped by
dynamical friction from the remaining small bodies. The last and longest stage
in planet formation was the clean up of small bodies.
