  Graphs of developer networks are important for software engineering research
and practice. For these graphs to realistically represent the networks,
accurate developer identities are imperative. We aim to identify developer
identity errors from open source software repositories in VCS, investigate the
nature of these errors, design corrective algorithms, and estimate the impact
of the errors on networks inferred from this data. We investigate these
questions using over 1B Git commits with over 23M recorded author identities.
By inspecting the author strings that occur most frequently, we group identity
errors into categories. We then augment the author strings with 3 behavioral
fingerprints: time-zone frequencies, the set of files modified, and a vector
embedding of the commit messages. We create a manually validated set of
identities for a subset of OpenStack developers using an active learning
approach and use it to fit supervised learning models to predict the identities
for the remaining author strings in OpenStack. We compare these predictions
with a commercial effort and a leading research method. Finally, we compare
network measures for file-induced author networks based on corrected and raw
data. We find commits done from different environments, misspellings,
organizational IDs, default values, and anonymous IDs to be the major sources
of errors. We also find supervised learning methods to reduce errors by several
times in comparison to existing methods and the active learning approach to be
an effective way to create validated datasets and that correction of developer
identity has a large impact on the inference of the social network. We believe
that our proposed Active Learning Fingerprint Based Anti-Aliasing (ALFAA)
approach will expedite research progress in the software engineering domain for
applications that depend upon graphs of developers or other social networks.
