  As the last few years have seen an increase in online hostility and
polarization both, we need to move beyond the fack-checking reflex or the
praise for better moderation on social networking sites (SNS) and investigate
their impact on social structures and social cohesion. In particular, the role
of recommender systems deployed at large scale by digital platforms such as
Facebook or Twitter has been overlooked. This paper draws on the literature on
cognitive science, digital media, and opinion dynamics to propose a faithful
replica of the entanglement between recommender systems, opinion dynamics and
users' cognitive biais on SNSs like Twitter that is calibrated over a large
scale longitudinal database of tweets from political activists. This model
makes it possible to compare the consequences of various recommendation
algorithms on the social fabric and to quantify their interaction with some
major cognitive bias. In particular, we demonstrate that the recommender
systems that seek to solely maximize users' engagement necessarily lead to an
overexposure of users to negative content (up to 300\% for some of them), a
phenomenon called algorithmic negativity bias, to a polarization of the opinion
landscape, and to a concentration of social power in the hands of the most
toxic users. The latter are more than twice as numerous in the top 1\% of the
most influential users than in the overall population. Overall, our findings
highlight the urgency to identify harmful implementations of recommender
systems to individuals and society in order better regulate their deployment on
systemic SNSs.
