  Causal decomposition analyses can help build the evidence base for
interventions that address health disparities (inequities). They ask how
disparities in outcomes may change under hypothetical intervention. Through
study design and assumptions, they can rule out alternate explanations such as
confounding, selection-bias, and measurement error, thereby identifying
potential targets for intervention. Unfortunately, the literature on causal
decomposition analysis and related methods have largely ignored equity concerns
that actual interventionists would respect, limiting their relevance and
practical value. This paper addresses these concerns by explicitly considering
what covariates the outcome disparity and hypothetical intervention adjust for
(so-called allowable covariates) and the equity value judgements these choices
convey, drawing from the bioethics, biostatistics, epidemiology, and health
services research literatures. From this discussion, we generalize
decomposition estimands and formulae to incorporate allowable covariate sets,
to reflect equity choices, while still allowing for adjustment of non-allowable
covariates needed to satisfy causal assumptions. For these general formulae, we
provide weighting-based estimators based on adaptations of
ratio-of-mediator-probability and inverse-odds-ratio weighting. We discuss when
these estimators reduce to already used estimators under certain equity value
judgements, and a novel adaptation under other judgements.
