  Motivated by Internet targeted advertising, we address several ad allocation
problems. Prior work has established these problems admit no randomized online
algorithm better than $(1-\frac{1}{e})$-competitive
(\cite{karp1990optimal,mehta2007adwords}), yet simple heuristics have been
observed to perform much better in practice. We explain this phenomenon by
studying a generalization of the bounded-degree inputs considered by Buchbinder
et al.~\cite{buchbinder2007online}, graphs which we call $(k,d)-bounded$. In
such graphs the maximal degree on the online side is at most $d$ and the
minimal degree on the offline side is at least $k$. We prove that for such
graphs, these problems' natural greedy algorithms attain competitive ratio
$1-\frac{d-1}{k+d-1}$, tending to \emph{one} as $d/k$ tends to zero. We prove
this bound is tight for these algorithms.
  Next, we develop deterministic primal-dual algorithms for the above problems
achieving competitive ratio $1-(1-\frac{1}{d})^k>1-\frac{1}{e^{k/d}}$, or
\emph{exponentially} better loss as a function of $k/d$, and strictly better
than $1-\frac{1}{e}$ whenever $k\geq d$. We complement our lower bounds with
matching upper bounds for the vertex-weighted problem. Finally, we use our
deterministic algorithms to prove by dual-fitting that simple randomized
algorithms achieve the same bounds in expectation. Our algorithms and analysis
differ from previous ad allocation algorithms, which largely scale bids based
on the spent fraction of their bidder's budget, whereas we scale bids according
to the number of times the bidder could have spent as much as her current bid.
Our algorithms differ from previous online primal-dual algorithms, as they do
not maintain dual feasibility, but only primal-to-dual ratio, and only attain
dual feasibility upon termination. We believe our techniques could find
applications to other well-behaved online packing problems.
