  The Fama-French model is widely used in assessing the portfolio's performance
compared to market returns. In Fama-French models, all factors are time-series
data. The cross-sectional data are slightly different from the time series
data. A distinct problem with time-series regressions is that R-squared in time
series regressions is usually very high, especially compared with typical
R-squared for cross-sectional data. The high value of R-squared may cause
misinterpretation that the regression model fits the observed data well, and
the variance in the dependent variable is explained well by the independent
variables. Thus, to do regression analysis, and overcome with the serial
dependence and volatility clustering, we use standard econometrics time series
models to derive sample innovations. In this study, we revisit and validate the
Fama-French models in two different ways: using the factors and asset returns
in the Fama-French model and considering the sample innovations in the
Fama-French model instead of studying the factors. Comparing the two methods
considered in this study, we suggest the Fama-French model should be considered
with heavy tail distributions as the tail behavior is relevant in Fama-French
models, including financial data, and the QQ plot does not validate that the
choice of the normal distribution as the theoretical distribution for the noise
in the model.
