  Physical human-robot interaction (pHRI) integrates the benefits of human
operator and a collaborative robot in tasks involving physical interaction,
with the aim of increasing the task performance. However, the design of
interaction controllers that achieve safe and transparent operations is
challenging, mainly due to the contradicting nature of these objectives.
Knowing that attaining perfect transparency is practically unachievable,
controllers that allow better compromise between these objectives are
desirable. In this paper, we propose a multi-criteria optimization framework,
which jointly optimizes the stability robustness and transparency of a
closed-loop pHRI system for a given interaction controller. In particular, we
propose a Pareto optimization framework that allows the designer to make
informed decisions by thoroughly studying the trade-off between stability
robustness and transparency. The proposed framework involves a search over the
discretized controller parameter space to compute the Pareto front curve and a
selection of controller parameters that yield maximum attainable transparency
and stability robustness by studying this trade-off curve. The proposed
framework not only leads to the design of an optimal controller, but also
enables a fair comparison among different interaction controllers. In order to
demonstrate the practical use of the proposed approach, integer and fractional
order admittance controllers are studied as a case study and compared both
analytically and experimentally. The experimental results validate the proposed
design framework and show that the achievable transparency under fractional
order admittance controller is higher than that of integer order one, when both
controllers are designed to ensure the same level of stability robustness.
