  Inequality is an inherent part of our lives: we see it in the distribution of
incomes, talents, resources, and citations, amongst many others. Its intensity
varies across different environments: from relatively evenly distributed ones,
to where a small group of stakeholders controls the majority of the available
resources. We would like to understand why inequality naturally arises as a
consequence of the natural evolution of any system. Studying simple
mathematical models governed by intuitive assumptions can bring many insights
into this problem. In particular, we recently observed (Siudem et al., PNAS
117:13896-13900, 2020) that impact distribution might be modelled accurately by
a time-dependent agent-based model involving a mixture of the rich-get-richer
and sheer chance components. Here we point out its relationship to an iterative
process that generates rank distributions of any length and a predefined level
of inequality, as measured by the Gini index.
  Many indices quantifying the degree of inequality have been proposed. Which
of them is the most informative? We show that, under our model, indices such as
the Bonferroni, De Vergottini, and Hoover ones are equivalent. Given one of
them, we can recreate the value of any other measure using the derived
functional relationships. Also, thanks to the obtained formulae, we can
understand how they depend on the sample size. An empirical analysis of a large
sample of citation records in economics (RePEc) as well as countrywise family
income data, confirms our theoretical observations. Therefore, we can safely
and effectively remain faithful to the simplest measure: the Gini index.
