  In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, social networks such as Twitter and
YouTube stand out as important sources of information. YouTube, as the largest
and most engaging online media consumption platform, has a large influence in
the spread of information and misinformation, which makes it important to study
how it deals with the problems that arise from disinformation, as well as how
its users interact with different types of content. Considering that United
States (USA) and Brazil (BR) are two countries with the highest COVID-19 death
tolls, we asked the following question: What are the nuances of vaccination
campaigns in the two countries? With that in mind, we engage in a comparative
analysis of pro and anti-vaccine movements on YouTube. We also investigate the
role of YouTube in countering online vaccine misinformation in USA and BR. For
this means, we monitored the removal of vaccine related content on the platform
and also applied various techniques to analyze the differences in discourse and
engagement in pro and anti-vaccine "comment sections". We found that American
anti-vaccine content tend to lead to considerably more toxic and negative
discussion than their pro-vaccine counterparts while also leading to 18% higher
user-user engagement, while Brazilian anti-vaccine content was significantly
less engaging. We also found that pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine discourses are
considerably different as the former is associated with conspiracy theories
(e.g. ccp), misinformation and alternative medicine (e.g. hydroxychloroquine),
while the latter is associated with protective measures. Finally, it was
observed that YouTube content removals are still insufficient, with only
approximately 16% of the anti-vaccine content being removed by the end of the
studied period, with the USA registering the highest percentage of removed
anti-vaccine content(34%) and BR registering the lowest(9.8%).
