  We report results from an experiment on ranking visual markers and node
positioning techniques for network visualizations. Inspired by prior ranking
studies, we rethink the ranking when the dataset size increases and when the
markers are distributed in space. Centrality indices are visualized as node
attributes. Our experiment studies nine visual markers and three positioning
methods. Our results suggest that direct encoding of quantities improves
accuracy by about 20% compared to previous results. Of the three positioning
techniques, circular was always in the top group, and matrix and projection
switch orders depending on two factors: whether or not the tasks demand
symmetry, or the nodes are within closely proximity. Among the most interesting
results of ranking the visual markers for comparison tasks are that hue and
area fall into the top groups for nearly all multi-scale comparison tasks;
Shape (ordered by curvature) is perhaps not as scalable as we have thought and
can support more accurate answers only when two quantities are compared;
Lightness and slope are least accurate for quantitative comparisons regardless
of scale of the comparison tasks. Our experiment is among the first to acquire
a complete picture of ranking visual markers in different scales for comparison
tasks.
