  The geometric-mean method is often used to estimate the spatial resolution of
a position-sensitive detector probed by tracks. It calculates the resolution
solely from measured track data without using a detailed tracking simulation
and without considering multiple Coulomb scattering effects. Two separate
linear track fits are performed on the same data, one excluding and the other
including the hit from the probed detector. The geometric mean of the widths of
the corresponding exclusive and inclusive residual distributions for the probed
detector is then taken as a measure of the intrinsic spatial resolution of the
probed detector: $\sigma=\sqrt{\sigma_{ex}\cdot\sigma_{in}}$. The validity of
this method is examined for a range of resolutions with a stand-alone Geant4
Monte Carlo simulation that specifically takes multiple Coulomb scattering in
the tracking detector materials into account. Using simulated as well as actual
tracking data from a representative beam test scenario, we find that the
geometric-mean method gives systematically inaccurate spatial resolution
results. Good resolutions are estimated as poor and vice versa. The more the
resolutions of reference detectors and probed detector differ, the larger the
systematic bias. An attempt to correct this inaccuracy by statistically
subtracting multiple-scattering effects from geometric-mean results leads to
resolutions that are typically too optimistic by 10-50\%. This supports an
earlier critique of this method based on simulation studies that did not take
multiple scattering into account.
