  Energy system modellers typically choose a low spatial resolution for their
models based on administrative boundaries such as countries, which eases data
collection and reduces computation times. However, a low spatial resolution can
lead to sub-optimal investment decisions for wind and solar generation.
Ignoring power grid bottlenecks within regions tends to underestimate system
costs, while combining locations with different wind and solar capacity factors
in the same resource class tends to overestimate costs. We investigate these
two competing effects in a capacity expansion model for Europe's power system
with a high share of renewables, taking advantage of newly-available
high-resolution datasets as well as computational advances. We vary the number
of nodes, interpolating between a 37-node model based on country and
synchronous zone boundaries, and a 1024-node model based on the location of
electricity substations. If we focus on the effect of renewable resource
resolution and ignore network restrictions, we find that a higher resolution
allows the optimal solution to concentrate wind and solar capacity at sites
with better capacity factors and thus reduces system costs by up to 10%
compared to a low resolution model. This results in a big swing from offshore
to onshore wind investment. However, if we introduce grid bottlenecks by
raising the network resolution, costs increase by up to 23% as generation has
to be sourced more locally at sites with worse capacity factors. These effects
are most pronounced in scenarios where grid expansion is limited, for example,
by low local acceptance. We show that allowing grid expansion mitigates some of
the effects of the low grid resolution, and lowers overall costs by around 16%.
