  There is growing interest in hydrogen (H$_2$) use for long-duration energy
storage in a future electric grid dominated by variable renewable energy (VRE)
resources. Modelling the role of H$_2$ as grid-scale energy storage, often
referred as "power-to-gas-to-power (P2G2P)" overlooks the cost-sharing and
emission benefits from using the deployed H$_2$ production and storage assets
to also supply H$_2$ for decarbonizing other end-use sectors where direct
electrification may be challenged. Here, we develop a generalized modelling
framework for co-optimizing energy infrastructure investment and operation
across power and transportation sectors and the supply chains of electricity
and H$_2$, while accounting for spatio-temporal variations in energy demand and
supply. Applying this sector-coupling framework to the U.S. Northeast under a
range of technology cost and carbon price scenarios, we find a greater value of
power-to-H$_2$ (P2G) versus P2G2P routes. P2G provides flexible demand
response, while the extra cost and efficiency penalties of P2G2P routes make
the solution less attractive for grid balancing. The effects of sector-coupling
are significant, boosting VRE generation by 12-55% with both increased
capacities and reduced curtailments and reducing the total system cost (or
levelized costs of energy) by 6-14% under 96% decarbonization scenarios. Both
the cost savings and emission reductions from sector coupling increase with
H$_2$ demand for other end-uses, more than doubling for a 96% decarbonization
scenario as H$_2$ demand quadraples. Moreover, we found that the deployment of
carbon capture and storage is more cost-effective in the H$_2$ sector because
of the lower cost and higher utilization rate. These findings highlight the
importance of using an integrated multi-sector energy system framework with
multiple energy vectors in planning energy system decarbonization pathways.
