  Early literature on genome rearrangement modelling views the problem of
computing evolutionary distances as an inherently combinatorial one. In
particular, attention was given to estimating distances using the minimum
number of events required to transform one genome into another. In hindsight,
this approach is analogous to early methods for inferring phylogenetic trees
from DNA sequences such as maximum parsimony -- both are motivated by the
principle that the true distance minimises evolutionary change, and both are
effective if this principle is a true reflection of reality. Recent literature
considers genome rearrangement under statistical models, continuing this
parallel with DNA-based methods; the goal here is to use model-based methods
(for example maximum likelihood techniques) to compute distance estimates that
incorporate the large number of rearrangement paths that can transform one
genome into another. Crucially, this approach requires one to decide upon a set
of feasible rearrangement events and, in this paper, we focus on characterising
well-motivated models for signed, uni-chromosomal circular genomes, where the
number of regions remains fixed. Since rearrangements are often mathematically
described using permutations, we isolate the sets of permutations representing
rearrangements that are biologically reasonable in this context, for example
inversions and translocations. We provide precise mathematical expressions for
these rearrangements, and then describe them in terms of the set of cuts made
in the genome when they are applied. We directly compare cuts to breakpoints,
and use this concept to count the distinct rearrangement actions which apply a
given number of cuts. Finally, we provide some examples of rearrangement
models, and include a discussion of some questions that arise when defining
plausible models.
