  Purpose: Different multichannel methods for film dosimetry have been proposed
in the literature. Two of them are the weighted mean method and the method put
forth by Micke et al and Mayer et al. The purpose of this work was to compare
their results and to develop a generalized channel-independent perturbations
framework in which both methods enter as special cases.
  Methods: Four models of channel-independent perturbations were compared:
weighted mean, Micke-Mayer method, uniform distribution and truncated normal
distribution. A closed-form formula to calculate film doses and the associated
Type B uncertainty for all four models was deduced. To evaluate the models,
film dose distributions were compared with planned and measured dose
distributions. At the same time, several elements of the dosimetry process were
compared: film type EBT2 versus EBT3, different waiting-time windows,
reflection mode versus transmission mode scanning, and planned versus measured
dose distribution for film calibration and for gamma-index analysis. The
methods and the models described in this study are publicly accessible through
IRISEU. Alpha 1.1 (http://www.iriseu.com). IRISEU. is a cloud computing web
application for calibration and dosimetry of radiochromic films.
  Results: The truncated normal distribution model provided the best agreement
between film and reference doses, both for calibration and gamma-index
verification, and proved itself superior to both the weighted mean model, which
neglects correlations between the channels, and the Micke-Mayer model, whose
accuracy depends on the properties of the sensitometric curves.
  Conclusions: The truncated normal distribution model of channel-independent
perturbations was found superior to the other three models under comparison and
we propose its use for multichannel dosimetry.
