  Objective: The bidomain model and the finite element method are an
established standard to mathematically describe cardiac electrophysiology, but
are both suboptimal choices for fast and large-scale simulations due to high
computational costs. We investigate to what extent simplified approaches for
propagation models (monodomain, reaction-eikonal and eikonal) and forward
calculation (boundary element and infinite volume conductor) deliver markedly
accelerated, yet physiologically accurate simulation results in atrial
electrophysiology. Methods: We compared action potential durations, local
activation times (LATs), and electrocardiograms (ECGs) for sinus rhythm
simulations on healthy and fibrotically infiltrated atrial models. Results: All
simplified model solutions yielded LATs and P waves in accurate accordance with
the bidomain results. Only for the eikonal model with pre-computed action
potential templates shifted in time to derive transmembrane voltages,
repolarization behavior notably deviated from the bidomain results. ECGs
calculated with the boundary element method were characterized by correlation
coefficients >0.9 compared to the finite element method. The infinite volume
conductor method led to lower correlation coefficients caused predominantly by
systematic overestimations of P wave amplitudes in the precordial leads.
Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that the eikonal model yields accurate LATs
and combined with the boundary element method precise ECGs compared to markedly
more expensive full bidomain simulations. However, for an accurate
representation of atrial repolarization dynamics, diffusion terms must be
accounted for in simplified models. Significance: Simulations of atrial LATs
and ECGs can be notably accelerated to clinically feasible time frames at high
accuracy by resorting to the eikonal and boundary element methods.
