  A dialogue is successful when there is alignment between the speakers at
different linguistic levels. In this work, we consider the dialogue occurring
between interlocutors engaged in a collaborative learning task, where they are
not only evaluated on how well they performed, but also on how much they
learnt. The main contribution of this work is to propose new automatic measures
to study alignment; focusing on verbal (lexical) alignment, and behavioral
alignment (when an instruction given by one was followed with concrete actions
by another). A second contribution of our work is to study how spontaneous
speech phenomena are used in the process of alignment. Lastly, we make public
the dataset to study alignment in educational dialogues. Our results show that
all teams verbally and behaviourally align to some degree regardless of their
performance and learning, and our measures capture that teams that did not
succeed in the task were simply slower to collaborate. Thus we find that teams
that performed better, were faster to align. Furthermore, our methodology
captures a productive period that includes the time where the interlocutors
came up with their best solutions. We also find that well-performing teams
verbalise the marker "oh" more when they are behaviourally aligned, compared to
other times in the dialogue; showing that this marker is an important cue in
alignment. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study the role of
"oh" as an information management marker in a behavioral context (i.e. in
connection to actions taken in a physical environment), compared to only a
verbal one. Our measures contribute to the research in the field of educational
dialogue and the intersection between dialogue and collaborative learning
research.
