  PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present empirical evidence on the
implementation, acceptance and quality-related aspects of research information
systems (RIS) in academic institutions.Design/methodology/approachThe study is
based on a 2018 survey with 160 German universities and research
institutions.FindingsThe paper presents recent figures about the implementation
of RIS in German academic institutions, including results on the satisfaction,
perceived usefulness and ease of use. It contains also information about the
perceived data quality and the preferred quality management. RIS acceptance can
be achieved only if the highest possible quality of the data is to be ensured.
For this reason, the impact of data quality on the technology acceptance model
(TAM) is examined, and the relation between the level of data quality and user
acceptance of the associated institutional RIS is addressed.Research
limitations/implicationsThe data provide empirical elements for a better
understanding of the role of the data quality for the acceptance of RIS, in the
framework of a TAM. The study puts the focus on commercial and open-source
solutions while in-house developments have been excluded. Also, mainly because
of the small sample size, the data analysis was limited to descriptive
statistics.Practical implicationsThe results are helpful for the management of
RIS projects, to increase acceptance and satisfaction with the system, and for
the further development of RIS functionalities.Originality/valueThe number of
empirical studies on the implementation and acceptance of RIS is low, and very
few address in this context the question of data quality. The study tries to
fill the gap.
