  We document the evolution of labour market power by employers on the US and
Peruvian labour markets during the 2010s. Making use of a structural estimation
model of labour market dynamics, we estimate differences in market power that
workers face depending on their sector of activity, their age, sex, location
and educational level. In particular, we show that differences in
cross-sectional market power are significant and higher than variations over
the ten-year time span of our data. In contrast to findings of labour market
power in developed countries such as the US, we document significant market
power of employers in Peru vis-\`a-vis the tertiary educated workforce,
regardless of age and sector. In contrast, for the primary educated workforce,
market power seems to be high in (private) services and manufacturing. For
secondary educated workers, only the mining sector stands out as moderately
more monopsonistic than the rest of the labour market. We also show that at
least for the 2010s, labour market power declined in Peru. We contrast these
findings with similar estimates obtained for the United States where we are
able to show that increases in labour market power are particularly acute in
certain sectors, such as agriculture and entertainment and recreational
services, as well as in specific geographic areas where these sectors are
dominant. Moreover, we show that for the US, the labour market power has
gradually increased over the past ten years, in line with the general rise in
inequality. Importantly, we show that the pervasive gender pay gap cannot be
linked to differential market power as men face higher labour market power than
women. We also discuss possible reasons for these findings, including for the
differences of labour market power across skill levels. Especially, we discuss
the reasons for polarization of market power that are specific to sectors and
locations.
