  The reports of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections
brought into the center of public attention concerns related to the ability of
foreign actors to increase social discord and take advantage of personal user
data for political purposes. It has raised questions regarding the ways and the
extent to which data can be used to create psychographical profiles to
determine what kind of advertisement would be most effective to persuade a
particular person in a particular location for some political event. In this
work, we study the political ads dataset collected by ProPublica, an American
nonprofit newsroom, using a network of volunteers in the period before the 2018
US midterm elections. We first describe the main characteristics of the data
and explore the user attributes including age, region, activity, and more, with
a series of interactive illustrations. Furthermore, an important first step
towards understating of political manipulation via user targeting is to
identify politically related ads, yet manually checking ads is not feasible due
to the scale of social media advertising. Consequently, we address the
challenge of automatically classifying between political and non-political ads,
demonstrating a significant improvement compared to the current text-based
classifier used by ProPublica, and study whether the user targeting attributes
are beneficial for this task. Our evaluation sheds light on questions, such as
how user attributes are being used for political ads targeting and which users
are more prone to be targeted with political ads. Overall, our contribution of
data exploration, political ad classification and initial analysis of the
targeting attributes, is designed to support future work with the ProPublica
dataset, and specifically with regard to the understanding of political
manipulation via user targeting.
