  Expert knowledge is required to interpret data across a range of fields.
Experts bridge gaps that often exists in our knowledge about relationships
between data and the parameters of interest. This is especially true in
geoscientific applications, where knowledge of the Earth is derived from
interpretations of observable features and relies on predominantly unproven but
widely accepted theories. Thus, experts facilitate solutions to otherwise
unsolvable problems. However, experts are inherently subjective, and
susceptible to cognitive biases and adverse external effects. This work
examines this problem within geoscience. Three compelling examples are provided
of the prevalence of cognitive biases from previous work. The problem is then
formally defined, and a set of design principles which ensure that any solution
is sufficiently flexible to be readily applied to the range of geoscientific
problems. No solutions exist that reliably capture and reduce cognitive bias in
experts. However, formal expert elicitation methods can be used to assess
expert variation, and a variety of approaches exist that may help to illuminate
uncertainties, avoid misunderstandings, and reduce herding behaviours or
single-expert over-dominance. This work combines existing and future approaches
to reduce expert suboptimality through a flexible modular design where each
module provides a specific function. The design centres around action modules
that force a stop-and-perform step into interpretation tasks. A starter-pack of
modules is provided as an example of the conceptual design. This simple
bias-reduction system may readily be applied in organisations and during
everyday interpretations through to tasks for major commercial ventures.
