  The Newtonian constant of gravitation, $G$, stands out in the landscape of
the most common fundamental constants owing to its surprisingly large relative
uncertainty, which is attributable mostly to the dispersion of the values
measured for it in different experiments.
  This study focuses on a set of measurements of $G$ that are mutually
inconsistent, in the sense that the dispersion of the measured values is
significantly larger than what their reported uncertainties suggest that it
should be. Furthermore, there is a loosely defined group of measured values
that lie fairly close to a consensus value that may be derived from all the
measurement results, and then there are one or more groups with measured values
farther away from the consensus value, some higher, others lower.
  This same general pattern is often observed in many interlaboratory studies
and meta-analyses. In the conventional treatments of such data, the mutual
inconsistency is addressed by inflating the reported uncertainties, either
multiplicatively, or by the addition of random effects, both reflecting the
presence of dark uncertainty. The former approach is often used by CODATA and
by the Particle Data Group, and the latter is common in medical meta-analysis
and in metrology.
  We propose a new procedure for consensus building that models the results
using latent clusters with different shades of dark uncertainty, which assigns
a customized amount of dark uncertainty to each measured value, as a mixture of
those shades, and does so taking into account both the placement of the
measured values relative to the consensus value, and the reported
uncertainties. We demonstrate this procedure by deriving a new estimate for
$G$, as a consensus value $G = 6.67408 \times 10^{-11} \,\text{m}^{-3} \,
\text{kg}^{-1} \, \text{s}^{-2}$, with $u(G) = 0.00024 \times 10^{-11}
\,\text{m}^{-3} \, \text{kg}^{-1} \, \text{s}^{-2}$.
