  In a landmark 1981 paper, Valiant and Brebner gave birth to the study of
oblivious routing and, simultaneously, introduced its most powerful and
ubiquitous method: Valiant load balancing (VLB). By routing messages through a
randomly sampled intermediate node, VLB lengthens routing paths by a factor of
two but gains the crucial property of obliviousness. Forty years later, with
datacenters handling workloads whose communication pattern varies too rapidly
to allow centralized coordination, VLB continues to take center stage as a
widely used - and in some cases provably optimal - way to balance load in the
network obliviously to the traffic demands. However, the ability of the network
to rapidly reconfigure its interconnection topology gives rise to new
possibilities.
  In this work we revisit the question of whether VLB remains optimal in the
novel setting of reconfigurable networks. Prior work showed that VLB achieves
the optimal tradeoff between latency and guaranteed throughput. In this work we
show that a strictly superior latency-throughput tradeoff is achievable when
the throughput bound is relaxed to hold with high probability. The same
improved tradeoff is also achievable with guaranteed throughput under
time-stationary demands, provided the latency bound is relaxed to hold with
high probability and that the network is allowed to be semi-oblivious, using an
oblivious (randomized) connection schedule but demand-aware routing. We prove
that the latter result is not achievable by any fully-oblivious reconfigurable
network design, marking a rare case in which semi-oblivious routing has a
provable asymptotic advantage over oblivious routing. To analyze our routing
scheme we prove an exponential tail bound which may be of independent interest,
concerning the distribution of values of a bilinear form on an orbit of a
permutation group action.
