  Predicting vulnerable source code helps to focus attention on those parts of
the code that need to be examined with more scrutiny. Recent work proposed the
use of function names as semantic cues that can be learned by a deep neural
network (DNN) to aid in the hunt for vulnerability of functions.
  Combining identifier splitting, which splits each function name into its
constituent words, with a novel frequency-based algorithm, we explore the
extent to which the words that make up a function's name can predict
potentially vulnerable functions. In contrast to *lightweight* predictions by a
DNN that considers only function names, avoiding the use of a DNN provides
*featherweight* predictions. The underlying idea is that function names that
contain certain "dangerous" words are more likely to accompany vulnerable
functions. Of course, this assumes that the frequency-based algorithm can be
properly tuned to focus on truly dangerous words.
  Because it is more transparent than a DNN, the frequency-based algorithm
enables us to investigate the inner workings of the DNN. If successful, this
investigation into what the DNN does and does not learn will help us train more
effective future models.
  We empirically evaluate our approach on a heterogeneous dataset containing
over 73000 functions labeled vulnerable, and over 950000 functions labeled
benign. Our analysis shows that words alone account for a significant portion
of the DNN's classification ability. We also find that words are of greatest
value in the datasets with a more homogeneous vocabulary. Thus, when working
within the scope of a given project, where the vocabulary is unavoidably
homogeneous, our approach provides a cheaper, potentially complementary,
technique to aid in the hunt for source-code vulnerabilities. Finally, this
approach has the advantage that it is viable with orders of magnitude less
training data.
