  For the paradigm of the quantum double-slit experiment (DSE), we apply
Ockham's Razor to interpret quantum observations and to evaluate terminology
associated with wave-particle duality. One finds that the Correspondence
Principle (CP), combined with classical wave DSEs, e.g., Young [1804], is
sufficient to separate and anticipate the observed quantum particle and wave
phenomena. The empirical approach of Ockham infers that individual quanta are
only whole particles during transit from source to detector; an individual
quantum never acts as a wave. The wave nature of quanta emerges only in the
distribution of large numbers of single-quantum observation events. That is,
the "measurement problem" is no problem at all; "particle" and "wave" derive
from separate and different aspects of a set of observations. Such artificial
constructs as wave function collapse are irrelevant to the observation of
individual quanta, each of which acts as a whole "particle" from emission to
measurement. The histogram of detected events is a collective property
identical to a classical wave interference pattern in the limit of large
numbers, as the CP decrees. For a specific quantum, Ockham's Razor renders
irrelevant any hypothesis regarding wave- or particle-like behavior of the
quantum in the region between emission and detection. To analyze actual data
sets consisting of a large number of identical observation events and to
predict future DSEs, the CP of standard quantum (wave) mechanics is sufficient:
in the limit, the distribution of observations approaches the continuous
density defined by the standard quantum mechanical wave function. Scientific
progress beyond this picture requires new, relevant experiments. From the DSE,
Ockham's Razor infers that a theoretical quantum system consists of at least
one quantum particle plus a wave function specifying the distribution of a
large number of such particles.
