  This paper evaluates the dynamic impact of various policies adopted by US
states on the growth rates of confirmed Covid-19 cases and deaths as well as
social distancing behavior measured by Google Mobility Reports, where we take
into consideration people's voluntarily behavioral response to new information
of transmission risks. Our analysis finds that both policies and information on
transmission risks are important determinants of Covid-19 cases and deaths and
shows that a change in policies explains a large fraction of observed changes
in social distancing behavior. Our counterfactual experiments suggest that
nationally mandating face masks for employees on April 1st could have reduced
the growth rate of cases and deaths by more than 10 percentage points in late
April, and could have led to as much as 17 to 55 percent less deaths nationally
by the end of May, which roughly translates into 17 to 55 thousand saved lives.
Our estimates imply that removing non-essential business closures (while
maintaining school closures, restrictions on movie theaters and restaurants)
could have led to -20 to 60 percent more cases and deaths by the end of May. We
also find that, without stay-at-home orders, cases would have been larger by 25
to 170 percent, which implies that 0.5 to 3.4 million more Americans could have
been infected if stay-at-home orders had not been implemented. Finally, not
having implemented any policies could have led to at least a 7 fold increase
with an uninformative upper bound in cases (and deaths) by the end of May in
the US, with considerable uncertainty over the effects of school closures,
which had little cross-sectional variation.
