  Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) have been gaining increasing popularity in the
investment community as is evidenced by the high growth both in the number of
ETFs and their net assets since 2000. As ETFs are in nature similar to index
mutual funds, in this paper we examined if this growing demand for ETFs can be
explained through their outperformance as compared to index mutual funds. We
considered the population of all ETFs with inception dates prior to 2002 and
then for each ETF found all the passive index mutual funds that had the same
investment style as the selected ETF and had inception date prior to 2002.
Within each investment style we matched every ETF with all the passive index
funds in that investment style and compared the performances of the matched
pairs in terms of Sharp Ratios and risk adjusted buy and hold total returns for
the period 2002-2010. We then applied the Wilcoxon signed rank test to examine
if ETFs had better performances than index mutual funds during the sample
period. Out of the 230 paired matches of all the styles, ETFs outperformed
index mutual funds in 134 of the times in terms of Sharpe Ratio, however, the
test of the hypothesis showed no statistically significant difference between
ETFs and index funds performances in terms of Sharpe ratio. Out of the 230
paired matches of all the styles, ETFs outperformed index mutual funds in 125
of the times in terms of risk adjusted buy and hold total return, however, the
test of hypothesis showed no statistically significant difference between ETFs
and index funds performances in terms of risk adjusted buy and hold total
return. These findings indicate there is statistically no significant
difference between ETFs and passive index mutual funds performances at the fund
level and investors' choice between the two is related to product
characteristics and tax advantages.
