  Existing model validation studies in geoscience often disregard or partly
account for uncertainties in observations, model choices, and input parameters.
In this work, we develop a statistical framework that incorporates a
probabilistic modeling technique using a fully Bayesian approach to perform a
quantitative uncertainty-aware validation. A Bayesian perspective on a
validation task yields an optimal bias-variance trade-off against the reference
data. It provides an integrative metric for model validation that incorporates
parameter and conceptual uncertainty. Additionally, a surrogate modeling
technique, namely Bayesian Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion, is employed to
accelerate the computationally demanding Bayesian calibration and validation.
We apply this validation framework to perform a comparative evaluation of
models for coupling a free flow with a porous-medium flow. The correct choice
of interface conditions and proper model parameters for such coupled flow
systems is crucial for physically consistent modeling and accurate numerical
simulations of applications. We develop a benchmark scenario that uses the
Stokes equations to describe the free flow and considers different models for
the porous-medium compartment and the coupling at the fluid--porous interface.
These models include a porous-medium model using Darcy's law at the
representative elementary volume scale with classical or generalized interface
conditions and a pore-network model with its related coupling approach. We
study the coupled flow problems' behaviors considering a benchmark case, where
a pore-scale resolved model provides the reference solution. With the suggested
framework, we perform sensitivity analysis, quantify the parametric
uncertainties, demonstrate each model's predictive capabilities, and make a
probabilistic model comparison.
