  Teams are central to human accomplishment. Over the past half-century,
psychologists have identified the Big-Five cross-culturally valid personality
variables: Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness, and
Agreeableness. The first four have shown consistent relationships with team
performance. Agreeableness (being harmonious, altruistic, humble, and
cooperative), however, has demonstrated a non-significant and highly variable
relationship with team performance. We resolve this inconsistency through
computational modelling. An agent-based model (ABM) is used to predict the
effects of personality traits on teamwork and a genetic algorithm is then used
to explore the limits of the ABM in order to discover which traits correlate
with best and worst performing teams for a problem with different levels of
uncertainty (noise). New dependencies revealed by the exploration are
corroborated by analyzing previously-unseen data from one the largest datasets
on team performance to date comprising 3,698 individuals in 593 teams working
on more than 5,000 group tasks with and without uncertainty, collected over a
10-year period. Our finding is that the dependency between team performance and
Agreeableness is moderated by task uncertainty. Combining evolutionary
computation with ABMs in this way provides a new methodology for the scientific
investigation of teamwork, making new predictions, and improving our
understanding of human behaviors. Our results confirm the potential usefulness
of computer modelling for developing theory, as well as shedding light on the
future of teams as work environments are becoming increasingly fluid and
uncertain.
