  We present a detailed abundance analysis of 8 stars selected as extremely
metal poor candidates from the Hamburg/ESO Survey (HES). For comparison, we
have also analysed 3 extremely metal-poor candidates from the HK survey, and 3
additional bright metal-poor stars. With this work, we have doubled the number
of extremely metal-poor stars ([Fe/H]$\le 3.0$) with high-precision abundance
analyses. Our sample of extremely metal-poor candidates from the HES contains 3
stars with [Fe/H] $\le -3.0$, 3 more with [Fe/H]$\le -2.8$, and 2 stars that
are only slightly more metal rich. Thus, the chain of procedures that led to
the selection of these stars from the HES successfully provides a high fraction
of extremely metal-poor stars. We verify that our stellar parameters, derived
in Paper I, lead to acceptable ionization and excitation balances for Fe,
ruling out substantial non-LTE effects in Fe. For the $\alpha-$elements Mg, Si,
Ca, Ti, the light element Al, the iron-peak elements Sc, Cr, Mn, and the
neutron capture elements Sr and Ba, we find trends in abundance ratios [X/Fe]
similar to those found by previous studies. However,the scatter in most of
these ratios, even at [Fe/H]$\le -3.0$ dex, is surprisingly small. Only Sr and
Ba show scatter larger than the expected errors. Future work (the 0Z project)
will provide much stronger constraints on the scatter (or lack thereof) in
abundances for a greater number of stars. We discuss the implications of these
results for the early chemical evolution of the Galaxy, including such issues
as the number of contributing SN, and the sizes of typical fragments in which
they were born. In addition, we have identified a very metal poor star that
appears to be the result of the s-process chain, operating in a very metal-poor
environment, with extremely enhanced C, Ba, and Pb, and somewhat enhanced Sr.
