  Proximal causal inference is a recently proposed framework for evaluating
causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. For point
identification of causal effects, it leverages a pair of so-called treatment
and outcome confounding proxy variables, to identify a bridge function that
matches the dependence of potential outcomes or treatment variables on the
hidden factors to corresponding functions of observed proxies. Unique
identification of a causal effect via a bridge function crucially requires that
proxies are sufficiently relevant for hidden factors, a requirement that has
previously been formalized as a completeness condition. However, completeness
is well-known not to be empirically testable, and although a bridge function
may be well-defined, lack of completeness, sometimes manifested by availability
of a single type of proxy, may severely limit prospects for identification of a
bridge function and thus a causal effect; therefore, potentially restricting
the application of the proximal causal framework. In this paper, we propose
partial identification methods that do not require completeness and obviate the
need for identification of a bridge function. That is, we establish that
proxies of unobserved confounders can be leveraged to obtain bounds on the
causal effect of the treatment on the outcome even if available information
does not suffice to identify either a bridge function or a corresponding causal
effect of interest. Our bounds are non-smooth functionals of the observed data
distribution. As a consequence, in the context of inference, we initially
provide a smooth approximation of our bounds. Subsequently, we leverage
bootstrap confidence intervals on the approximated bounds. We further establish
analogous partial identification results in related settings where
identification hinges upon hidden mediators for which proxies are available.
