  The article reviews the history of well-being to gauge how subjective
question surveys can improve our understanding of well-being in Mexico. The
research uses data at the level of the 32 federal entities or States, taking
advantage of the heterogeneity in development indicator readings between and
within geographical areas, the product of socioeconomic inequality. The data
come principally from two innovative subjective questionnaires, BIARE and
ENVIPE, which intersect in their fully representative state-wide applications
in 2014, but also from conventional objective indicator sources such as the HDI
and conventional surveys. This study uses two approaches, a descriptive
analysis of a state-by-state landscape of indicators, both subjective and
objective, in an initial search for stand-out well-being patterns, and an
econometric study of a large selection of mainly subjective indicators inspired
by theory and the findings of previous Mexican research. Descriptive analysis
confirms that subjective well-being correlates strongly with and complements
objective data, providing interesting directions for analysis. The econometrics
literature indicates that happiness increases with income and satisfying of
material needs as theory suggests, but also that Mexicans are relatively happy
considering their mediocre incomes and high levels of insecurity, the last of
which, by categorizing according to satisfaction with life, can be shown to
impact poorer people disproportionately. The article suggests that well-being
is a complex, multidimensional construct which can be revealed by using
exploratory multi-regression and partial correlations models which juxtapose
subjective and objective indicators.
