  Supply chain disruption can occur for a variety of reasons, including natural
disasters or market dynamics for which resilient strategies should be designed.
If the disruption is profound and with dire consequences for the economy, it
calls for the regulator's intervention to minimize the impact for the
betterment of the society. This paper considers a shipping company with limited
capacity which will ship a group of products with heterogeneous transportation
and production costs and prices, and investigates the minimum quota regulation
on transportation amounts stipulated by the government. An interesting example
can happen in North American rail transportation market, where the rail
capacity is used for a variety of products and commodities such as oil and
grains. Similarly, in Europe supply chain of grains produced in Ukraine is
disrupted by the Ukraine war and the blockade of sea transportation routes,
which puts pressure on rail transportation capacity of Ukraine and its
neighboring countries to the west that needs to be shared for shipping a
variety of products including grains, military, and humanitarian supplies. Such
situations require a proper execution of government intervention for effective
management of the limited transportation capacity to avoid the rippling effects
throughout the economy. We propose mathematical models and solutions for the
market players and the government in a Canadian case study. Subsequently, the
conditions that justify government intervention are identified, and an
algorithm to obtain the optimum minimum quotas is presented.
