  One can point to a variety of historical milestones for gender equality in
STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics), however, practical
effects are incremental and ongoing. It is important to quantify gender
differences in subdomains of scientific work in order to detect potential
biases and monitor progress. In this work, we study the relevance of gender in
scientific collaboration patterns in the Institute for Operations Research and
the Management Sciences (INFORMS), a professional society with sixteen
peer-reviewed journals. Using their publication data from 1952 to 2016, we
constructed a large temporal bipartite network between authors and
publications, and augmented the author nodes with gender labels. We
characterized differences in several basic statistics of this network over
time, highlighting how they have changed with respect to relevant historical
events. We find a steady increase in participation by women (e.g., fraction of
authorships by women and of new women authors) starting around 1980. However,
women still comprise less than 25% of the INFORMS society and an even smaller
fraction of authors with many publications. Moreover, we describe a methodology
for quantifying the structural role of an authorship with respect to the
overall connectivity of the network, using it to measure subtle differences
between authorships by women and by men. Specifically, as measures of
structural importance of an authorship, we use effective resistance and
contraction importance, two measures related to diffusion throughout a network.
As a null model, we propose a degree-preserving temporal and geometric network
model with emergent communities. Our results suggest the presence of systematic
differences between the collaboration patterns of men and women that cannot be
explained by only local statistics.
