  Many research questions concern treatment effects on outcomes that can recur
several times in the same individual. For example, medical researchers are
interested in treatment effects on hospitalizations in heart failure patients
and sports injuries in athletes. Competing events, such as death, complicate
causal inference in studies of recurrent events because once a competing event
occurs, an individual cannot have more recurrent events. Several statistical
estimands have been studied in recurrent event settings, with and without
competing events. However, the causal interpretations of these estimands, and
the conditions that are required to identify these estimands from observed
data, have yet to be formalized. Here we use a counterfactual framework for
causal inference to formulate several causal estimands in recurrent event
settings, with and without competing events. When competing events exist, we
clarify when commonly used classical statistical estimands can be interpreted
as causal quantities from the causal mediation literature, such as (controlled)
direct effects and total effects. Furthermore, we show that recent results on
interventionist mediation estimands allow us to define new causal estimands
with recurrent and competing events that may be of particular clinical
relevance in many subject matter settings. We use causal directed acyclic
graphs and single world intervention graphs to illustrate how to reason about
identification conditions for the various causal estimands using subject matter
knowledge. Furthermore, using results on counting processes, we show how our
causal estimands and their identification conditions, which are articulated in
discrete time, converge to classical continuous-time counterparts in the limit
of fine discretizations of time. Finally, we propose several estimators and
establish their consistency for the various identifying functionals.
