  In modeling solute transport with mobile-immobile mass transfer (MIMT), it is
common to use an advection-dispersion equation (ADE) with a retardation factor,
or retarded ADE. This is commonly referred to as making the local equilibrium
assumption. Assuming local equilibrium (LE), Eulerian textbook treatments
derive the retarded ADE, ostensibly exactly. However, other authors have
presented rigorous mathematical derivations of the dispersive effect of mass
transfer, applicable even in the case of arbitrarily fast mass transfer. First,
we resolve the apparent contradiction between these seemingly exact derivations
by adopting a Lagrangian point of view. We show that LE constrains the expected
time immobile, whereas the retarded ADE actually embeds a stronger,
nonphysical, constraint: that all particles spend the same amount of every time
increment immobile. Eulerian derivations of the retarded ADE thus silently
commit the gambler's fallacy, leading them to ignore dispersion due to mass
transfer that is correctly modeled by other approaches. Second, we present a
numerical particle tracking study of transport in a heterogeneous aquifer
subject to first-order MIMT. Transport is modeled (a) exactly, and then (b)
approximated with the retarded ADE. Strikingly different results are obtained,
even though quasi-LE is maintained at all times by the exact MIMT simulation.
We thus observe that use of the phrase local equilibrium assumption to refer to
ADE validity is not correct. We highlight that solute remobilization rate is
the true control on retarded ADE validity, and note that classic "local
equilibrium assumption" (i.e., ADE validity) criteria actually test for
insignificance of MIMT-driven dispersion relative to hydrodynamic dispersion,
rather than for local equilibrium.
