  The purpose, mainly expository and speculative, of this paper---an outgrowth
of a survey lecture at the September 1997 Obergurgl working week---is to
indicate some (not all) of the efforts that have been made to interpret
equisingularity, and connections among them; and to suggest directions for
further exploration.
  Zariski defined equisingularity on an n-dimensional hypersurface V via
stratification by ``dimensionality type," an integer associated to a point by
means of a generic local projection to affine n-space. A possibly more
intuitive concept of equisingularity can be based on stratification by
simultaneous resolvability of singularities. The two approaches are known to be
equivalent for families of plane curve singularities. In higher dimension we
ask whether constancy of dimensionality type along a smooth subvariety W of V
implies the existence of a simultaneous resolution of the singularities of V
along W. (The converse is false.)
  The underlying idea is to follow the classical inductive strategy of
Jung--begin by desingularizing the discriminant of a generic projection--to
reduce to asking if there is a canonical resolution process which when applied
to quasi-ordinary singularities depends only on their characteristic monomials.
This appears to be so in dimension 2. In higher dimensions the question is
quite open.
