  The CHSH inequalities are the most famous examples of Bell inequalities.
Cabello, Severini, and Winter (CSW) came up with a graph approach to
noncontextuality inequalities, which connects some graph-theoretic concepts to
quantum and classical correlations. For example, the theta body of the
exclusivity graph can be associated with the set of correlations achieved by
quantum theory. Following the CSW approach, one may think that the theta body
of the CHSH graph, is equal to the quantum set of the CHSH Bell inequality, but
is this really true? All assumptions about the CHSH inequalities come from Bell
scenarios, while CSW approach only demands the exclusivity structure of a
non-contextuality (NC) scenario. To deal with the extra structure related to
the presence of different players in a Bell scenario like CHSH, the
colored-graph approach was introduced. Does it make any difference to think
about CHSH as a Bell scenario or a more general NC scenario? The Bell CHSH
inequality is represented by a bicolored graph and the NC CHSH inequality by a
simple graph, which is the shadow of the colored graph. In general, we have
that the theta body of the colored graph is a subset of the theta body of its
shadow graph in the same way that the Lov\`asz number, which corresponds to the
quantum bound, of the simple graph is greater than or equal to the Lov\`asz
number of the colored graph. In the case of the CHSH inequality, we have that
the Lov\`asz numbers are equal. Does this accident also hold for the
corresponding quantum sets? Is it true that the theta bodies are equal, which
would mean that every correlation reached by quantum theory applied to the CHSH
NC scenario could also be obtained at the in principle more restrictive CHSH
Bell scenario? In this paper our answer to such a question is negativ. This
implies that there are quantum correlations which can not be obtained under
Bell restrictions.
