  Given a set of several inputs into a system (e.g., independent variables
characterizing stimuli) and a set of several stochastically non-independent
outputs (e.g., random variables describing different aspects of responses), how
can one determine, for each of the outputs, which of the inputs it is
influenced by? The problem has applications ranging from modeling pairwise
comparisons to reconstructing mental processing architectures to conjoint
testing. A necessary and sufficient condition for a given pattern of selective
influences is provided by the Joint Distribution Criterion, according to which
the problem of "what influences what" is equivalent to that of the existence of
a joint distribution for a certain set of random variables. For inputs and
outputs with finite sets of values this criterion translates into a test of
consistency of a certain system of linear equations and inequalities (Linear
Feasibility Test) which can be performed by means of linear programming. While
new in the behavioral context, both this test and the Joint Distribution
Criterion on which it is based have been previously proposed in quantum
physics, in dealing with generalizations of Bell inequalities for the quantum
entanglement problem. The parallels between this problem and that of selective
influences in behavioral sciences is established by observing that noncommuting
measurements in quantum physics are mutually exclusive and can therefore be
treated as different levels of one and the same factor.
