  This paper develops a framework for assessing the welfare effects of labor
income tax changes on married couples. I build a static model of couples' labor
supply that features both intensive and extensive margins and derive a
tractable expression that delivers a transparent understanding of how labor
supply responses, policy parameters, and income distribution affect the
reform-induced welfare gains. Using this formula, I conduct a comparative
welfare analysis of four tax reforms implemented in the United States over the
last four decades, namely the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1993, the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation
Act of 2001, and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. I find that these reforms
created welfare gains ranging from -0.16 to 0.62 percent of aggregate labor
income. A sizable part of the gains is generated by the labor force
participation responses of women. Despite three reforms resulted in aggregate
welfare gains, I show that each reform created both winners and losers.
Furthermore, I uncover two patterns in the relationship between welfare gains
and couples' labor income. In particular, the reforms of 1986 and 2017 display
a monotonically increasing relationship, while the other two reforms
demonstrate a U-shaped pattern. Finally, I characterize the bias in welfare
gains resulting from the assumption about a linear tax function. I consider a
reform that changes tax progressivity and show that the linearization bias is
given by the ratio between the tax progressivity parameter and the inverse
elasticity of taxable income. Quantitatively, it means that linearization
overestimates the welfare effects of the U.S. tax reforms by 3.6-18.1%.
