  COVID-19 has impacted nations differently based on their policy
implementations. The effective policy requires taking into account public
information and adaptability to new knowledge. Epidemiological models built to
understand COVID-19 seldom provide the policymaker with the capability for
adaptive pandemic control (APC). Among the core challenges to be overcome
include (a) inability to handle a high degree of non-homogeneity in different
contributing features across the pandemic timeline, (b) lack of an approach
that enables adaptive incorporation of public health expert knowledge, and (c)
transparent models that enable understanding of the decision-making process in
suggesting policy. In this work, we take the early steps to address these
challenges using Knowledge Infused Policy Gradient (KIPG) methods. Prior work
on knowledge infusion does not handle soft and hard imposition of varying forms
of knowledge in disease information and guidelines to necessarily comply with.
Furthermore, the models do not attend to non-homogeneity in feature counts,
manifesting as partial observability in informing the policy. Additionally,
interpretable structures are extracted post-learning instead of learning an
interpretable model required for APC. To this end, we introduce a mathematical
framework for KIPG methods that can (a) induce relevant feature counts over
multi-relational features of the world, (b) handle latent non-homogeneous
counts as hidden variables that are linear combinations of kernelized
aggregates over the features, and (b) infuse knowledge as functional
constraints in a principled manner. The study establishes a theory for imposing
hard and soft constraints and simulates it through experiments. In comparison
with knowledge-intensive baselines, we show quick sample efficient adaptation
to new knowledge and interpretability in the learned policy, especially in a
pandemic context.
