  In order to test the end-to-end operations of gallium solar neutrino
experiments, intense electron-capture sources were fabricated to measure the
responses of the radiochemical SAGE and GALLEX/GNO detectors to known fluxes of
low-energy neutrinos. Such tests were viewed at the time as a cross-check,
given the many tests of $^{71}$Ge recovery and counting that had been routinely
performed, with excellent results. However, the four $^{51}$Cr and $^{37}$Ar
source experiments yielded rates below expectations, a result commonly known as
the Ga anomaly. As the intensity of the electron-capture sources can be
measured to high precision, the neutrino lines they produce are fixed by known
atomic and nuclear rates, and the neutrino absorption cross section on
$^{71}$Ga is tightly constrained by the lifetime of $^{71}$Ge, no simple
explanation for the anomaly has been found. To check these calibration
experiments, a dedicated experiment BEST was performed, utilizing a neutrino
source of unprecedented intensity and a detector optimized to increase
statistics while providing some information on counting rate as a function of
distance from the source. The results BEST obtained are consistent with the
earlier solar neutrino calibration experiments, and when combined with those
measurements, yield a Ga anomaly with a significance of approximately
$4\sigma$, under conservative assumptions. But BEST found no evidence of
distance dependence and thus no explicit indication of new physics. In this
review we describe the extensive campaigns carried out by SAGE, GALLEX/GNO, and
BEST to demonstrate the reliability and precision of their experimental
procedures, including $^{71}$Ge recovery, counting, and analysis. We also
describe efforts to define uncertainties in the neutrino capture cross section.
With the results from BEST, an anomaly remains.
