  Traditional methods present a very restrictive range of applications, mainly
limited by the features of the function to be optimized and of the constraint
functions. In contrast, evolutionary algorithms present almost no restriction
to the features of these functions, although the most appropriate
constraint-handling technique is still an open question. The particle swarm
optimization (PSO) method is sometimes viewed as another evolutionary algorithm
because of their many similarities, despite not being inspired by the same
metaphor. Namely, they evolve a population of individuals taking into
consideration previous experiences and using stochastic operators to introduce
new responses. The advantages of evolutionary algorithms with respect to
traditional methods have been greatly discussed in the literature for decades.
While all such advantages are valid when comparing the PSO paradigm to
traditional methods, its main advantages with respect to evolutionary
algorithms consist of its noticeably lower computational cost and easier
implementation. In fact, the plain version can be programmed in a few lines of
code, involving no operator design and few parameters to be tuned. This paper
deals with three important aspects of the method: the influence of the
parameters' tuning on the behaviour of the system; the design of stopping
criteria so that the reliability of the solution found can be somehow estimated
and computational cost can be saved; and the development of appropriate
techniques to handle constraints, given that the original method is designed
for unconstrained optimization problems.
