  This paper asks whether integrating multimodal EEG and fMRI data offers a
better characterisation of functional brain architectures than either modality
alone. This evaluation rests upon a dynamic causal model that generates both
EEG and fMRI data from the same neuronal dynamics. We introduce the use of
Bayesian fusion to provide informative (empirical) neuronal priors - derived
from dynamic causal modelling (DCM) of EEG data - for subsequent DCM of fMRI
data. To illustrate this procedure, we generated synthetic EEG and fMRI
timeseries for a mismatch negativity (or auditory oddball) paradigm, using
biologically plausible model parameters (i.e., posterior expectations from a
DCM of empirical, open access, EEG data). Using model inversion, we found that
Bayesian fusion provided a substantial improvement in marginal likelihood or
model evidence, indicating a more efficient estimation of model parameters, in
relation to inverting fMRI data alone. We quantified the benefits of multimodal
fusion with the information gain pertaining to neuronal and haemodynamic
parameters - as measured by the Kullback-Leibler divergence between their prior
and posterior densities. Remarkably, this analysis suggested that EEG data can
improve estimates of haemodynamic parameters; thereby furnishing
proof-of-principle that Bayesian fusion of EEG and fMRI is necessary to resolve
conditional dependencies between neuronal and haemodynamic estimators. These
results suggest that Bayesian fusion may offer a useful approach that exploits
the complementary temporal (EEG) and spatial (fMRI) precision of different data
modalities. We envisage the procedure could be applied to any multimodal
dataset that can be explained by a DCM with a common neuronal parameterisation.
