  The Wang-Sheeley-Arge (WSA)-ENLIL+Cone model is used extensively in space
weather operations world-wide to model CME propagation. As such, it is
important to assess its performance. We present validation results of the
WSA-ENLIL+Cone model installed at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center
(CCMC) and executed in real-time by the CCMC space weather team. CCMC uses the
WSA-ENLIL+Cone model to predict CME arrivals at NASA missions throughout the
inner heliosphere. In this work we compare model predicted CME arrival-times to
in-situ ICME leading edge measurements at STEREO-A, STEREO-B, and Earth (Wind
and ACE) for simulations completed between March 2010-December 2016 (over 1,800
CMEs). We report hit, miss, false alarm, and correct rejection statistics for
all three locations. For all predicted CME arrivals, the hit rate is 0.5, and
the false alarm rate is 0.1. For the 273 events where the CME was predicted to
arrive at Earth, STEREO-A, or STEREO-B, and was actually observed (hit event),
the mean absolute arrival-time prediction error was 10.4 +/- 0.9 hours, with a
tendency to early prediction error of -4.0 hours. We show the dependence of the
arrival-time error on CME input parameters. We also explore the impact of the
multi-spacecraft observations used to initialize the model CME inputs by
comparing model verification results before and after the STEREO-B
communication loss (since September 2014) and STEREO-A sidelobe operations
(August 2014-December 2015). There is an increase of 1.7 hours in the CME
arrival time error during single, or limited two-viewpoint periods, compared to
the three-spacecraft viewpoint period. This trend would apply to a future space
weather mission at L5 or L4 as another coronagraph viewpoint to reduce CME
arrival time errors compared to a single L1 viewpoint.
