  Since the 2007-2009 financial crisis, substantial academic effort has been
dedicated to improving our understanding of interbank lending networks (ILNs).
Because of data limitations or by choice, the literature largely lacks multiple
loan maturities. We employ a complete interbank loan contract dataset to
investigate whether maturity details are informative of the network structure.
Applying the layered stochastic block model of Peixoto (2015) and other tools
from network science on a time series of bilateral loans with multiple maturity
layers in the Russian ILN, we find that collapsing all such layers consistently
obscures mesoscale structure. The optimal maturity granularity lies between
completely collapsing and completely separating the maturity layers and depends
on the development phase of the interbank market, with a more developed market
requiring more layers for optimal description. Closer inspection of the
inferred maturity bins associated with the optimal maturity granularity reveals
specific economic functions, from liquidity intermediation to financing.
Collapsing a network with multiple underlying maturity layers or extracting one
such layer, common in economic research, is therefore not only an incomplete
representation of the ILN's mesoscale structure, but also conceals existing
economic functions. This holds important insights and opportunities for
theoretical and empirical studies on interbank market functioning, contagion,
stability, and on the desirable level of regulatory data disclosure.
