  In the field of modeling, the word validation refers to simple comparisons
between model outputs and experimental data. Usually, this comparison
constitutes plotting the model results against data on the same axes to provide
a visual assessment of agreement or lack thereof. However, there are a number
of concerns with such naive comparisons. First, these comparisons tend to
provide qualitative rather than quantitative assessments and are clearly
insufficient for making decisions regarding model validity. Second, they often
disregard or only partly account for existing uncertainties in the experimental
observations or the model input parameters. Third, such comparisons can not
reveal whether the model is appropriate for the intended purposes, as they
mainly focus on the agreement in the observable quantities.
  These pitfalls give rise to the need for an uncertainty-aware framework that
includes a validation metric. This metric shall provide a measure for
comparison of the system response quantities of an experiment with the ones
from a computational model, while accounting for uncertainties in both. To
address this need, we have developed a statistical framework that incorporates
a probabilistic modeling technique using a fully Bayesian approach. A Bayesian
perspective yields an optimal bias-variance trade-off against the experimental
data and provide an integrative metric for model validation that incorporates
parameter and conceptual uncertainty. Additionally, to accelerate the analysis
for computationally demanding flow and transport models in porous media, the
framework is equipped with a model reduction technique, namely Bayesian Sparse
Polynomial Chaos Expansion. We demonstrate the capabilities of the
aforementioned Bayesian validation framework by applying it to an application
for validation as well as uncertainty quantification of fluid flow in fractured
porous media.
