  Cryptoeconomic incentives in the form of blockchain-based tokens are seen as
an enabler of the sharing economy that could shift society towards greater
sustainability. Nevertheless, knowledge of the impact of these tokens on human
sharing behavior is still limited and this poses a challenge to the design of
effective cryptoeconomic incentives. This study applies the theory of
self-determination to investigate the impact of such tokens on human behavior
in an information-sharing scenario. By utilizing an experimental methodology in
the form of a randomized control trial with a 2x2 factorial design involving
132 participants, the effects of two token incentives on human
information-sharing behavior are analyzed. Individuals obtain these tokens in
exchange for their shared information. Based on the collected tokens,
individuals receive a monetary payment and build reputation. Besides
investigating the effect of these incentives on the quantity of shared
information, the study includes quality characteristics of the information,
such as accuracy and contextualization. The focus on quantity while excluding
quality has been identified as a limitation in previous work. In addition to
confirming previously known effects such as a crowding-out of intrinsic
motivation by incentives, which also exists for blockchain-based tokens, the
findings of this paper point to a hitherto unreported interaction effect
between multiple tokens when applied simultaneously. The findings are
critically discussed and put into the context of recent work and ethical
considerations. The theory-based-empirical study is of interest to those
investigating the effect of cryptoeconomic tokens or digital currencies on
human behavior and supports the community in the design of effective
personalized incentives for sharing economies.
