  The concept of distance rationalizability of voting rules has been explored
in recent years by several authors. Roughly speaking, we first choose a
consensus set of elections (defined via preferences of voters over candidates)
for which the result is specified a priori (intuitively, these are elections on
which all voters can easily agree on the result). We also choose a measure of
distance between elections. The result of an election outside the consensus set
is defined to be the result of the closest consensual election under the
distance measure.
  Most previous work has dealt with a definition in terms of preference
profiles. However, most voting rules in common use are anonymous and
homogeneous. In this case there is a much more succinct representation (using
the voting simplex) of the inputs to the rule. This representation has been
widely used in the voting literature, but rarely in the context of distance
rationalizability.
  We show exactly how to connect distance rationalizability on profiles for
anonymous and homogeneous rules to geometry in the simplex. We develop the
connection for the important special case of votewise distances, recently
introduced and studied by Elkind, Faliszewski and Slinko in several papers.
This yields a direct interpretation in terms of well-developed mathematical
concepts not seen before in the voting literature, namely Kantorovich (also
called Wasserstein) distances and the geometry of Minkowski spaces.
  As an application of this approach, we prove some positive and some negative
results about the decisiveness of distance rationalizable anonymous and
homogeneous rules. The positive results connect with the recent theory of
hyperplane rules, while the negative ones deal with distances that are not
metrics, controversial notions of consensus, and the fact that the
$\ell^1$-norm is not strictly convex.
