  Provisioning is a technique for avoiding repeated expensive computations in
what-if analysis. Given a query, an analyst formulates $k$ hypotheticals, each
retaining some of the tuples of a database instance, possibly overlapping, and
she wishes to answer the query under scenarios, where a scenario is defined by
a subset of the hypotheticals that are "turned on". We say that a query admits
compact provisioning if given any database instance and any $k$ hypotheticals,
one can create a poly-size (in $k$) sketch that can then be used to answer the
query under any of the $2^{k}$ possible scenarios without accessing the
original instance.
  In this paper, we focus on provisioning complex queries that combine
relational algebra (the logical component), grouping, and statistics/analytics
(the numerical component). We first show that queries that compute quantiles or
linear regression (as well as simpler queries that compute count and
sum/average of positive values) can be compactly provisioned to provide
(multiplicative) approximate answers to an arbitrary precision. In contrast,
exact provisioning for each of these statistics requires the sketch size to be
exponential in $k$. We then establish that for any complex query whose logical
component is a positive relational algebra query, as long as the numerical
component can be compactly provisioned, the complex query itself can be
compactly provisioned. On the other hand, introducing negation or recursion in
the logical component again requires the sketch size to be exponential in $k$.
While our positive results use algorithms that do not access the original
instance after a scenario is known, we prove our lower bounds even for the case
when, knowing the scenario, limited access to the instance is allowed.
