  We critique the method of constructing extinction curves of lensing galaxies
using multiply imaged QSOs. If one of the two QSO images is lightly reddened or
if the dust along both sightlines has the same properties then the method works
well and produces an extinction curve for the lensing galaxy. These cases are
likely rare and hard to confirm. However, if the dust along each sightline has
different properties then the resulting curve is no longer a measurement of
extinction. Instead, it is a measurement of the difference between two
extinction curves. This "lens difference curve'' does contain information about
the dust properties, but extracting a meaningful extinction curve is not
possible without additional, currently unknown information. As a quantitative
example, we show that the combination of two Cardelli, Clayton, & Mathis (CCM)
type extinction curves having different values of R(V) will produce a CCM
extinction curve with a value of R(V) which is dependent on the individual R(V)
values and the ratio of V band extinctions. The resulting lens difference curve
is not an average of the dust along the two sightlines. We find that lens
difference curves with any value of R(V), even negative values, can be produced
by a combination of two reddened sightlines with different CCM extinction
curves with R(V) values consistent with Milky Way dust (2.1 < R(V) < 5.6). This
may explain extreme values of R(V) inferred by this method in previous studies.
But lens difference curves with more normal values of R(V) are just as likely
to be composed of two dust extinction curves with R(V) values different than
that of the lens difference curve. While it is not possible to determine the
individual extinction curves making up a lens difference curve, there is
information about a galaxy's dust contained in the lens difference curves.
