  The behavioural comparison of systems is an important concern of software
engineering research. For example, the areas of specification discovery and
specification mining are concerned with measuring the consistency between a
collection of execution traces and a program specification. This problem is
also tackled in process mining with the help of measures that describe the
quality of a process specification automatically discovered from execution
logs. Though various measures have been proposed, it was recently demonstrated
that they neither fulfil essential properties, such as monotonicity, nor can
they handle infinite behaviour. In this paper, we address this research problem
by introducing a new framework for the definition of behavioural quotients. We
proof that corresponding quotients guarantee desired properties that existing
measures have failed to support. We demonstrate the application of the
quotients for capturing precision and recall measures between a collection of
recorded executions and a system specification. We use a prototypical
implementation of these measures to contrast their monotonic assessment with
measures that have been defined in prior research.
