  Applications of Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) modeling are becoming
increasingly prevalent in engineering analyses involving fractured rock masses.
For example, kinematic evaluations of slope or underground excavation stability
and the modeling of fluid flow in fractured rock have been shown to benefit
significantly from the explicit representation of DFN realizations in the
simulations. In practice, due to high computing costs, namely time, a balance
must be struck that limits analyses to the consideration of only a few
realizations as input. As a stochastic representation, a single realization is
only one possibility. It is therefore critical that the selected realizations
(possibilities) are able to summarize the range of variations present in the
input parameters adequately for the purpose of study or practice. That is, the
significance of diversity (dissimilarity) in the generated fracture networks is
of great importance and should be assessed prior to further often
time-consuming processing stages. We demonstrate here a novel development in
the analysis of the similarity between three-dimensional fracture networks,
which provides an accurate, efficient and practical solution with comprehensive
coverage of model variations. Several examples are presented together with a
comparison between the proposed three-dimensional method and existing methods
limited to two-dimensional assumptions. It is shown that the two-dimensional
similarity methods despite their popularity are heavily biased and poorly
represent the reality.
