  The benefits of diversifying risks are difficult to estimate quantitatively
because of the uncertainties in the dependence structure between the risks.
Also, the modelling of multidimensional dependencies is a non-trivial task.
This paper focuses on one such technique for portfolio aggregation, namely the
aggregation of risks within trees, where dependencies are set at each step of
the aggregation with the help of some copulas. We define rigorously this
procedure and then study extensively the Gaussian Tree of quite arbitrary size
and shape, where individual risks are normal, and where the Gaussian copula is
used. We derive exact analytical results for the diversification benefit of the
Gaussian tree as a function of its shape and of the dependency parameters.
  Such a "toy-model" of an aggregation tree enables one to understand the basic
phenomena's at play while aggregating risks in this way. In particular, it is
shown that, for a fixed number of individual risks, "thin" trees diversify
better than "fat" trees. Related to this, it is shown that hierarchical trees
have the natural tendency to lower the overall dependency with respect to the
dependency parameter chosen at each step of the aggregation. We also show that
these results hold in more general cases outside the gaussian world, and apply
notably to more realistic portfolios (LogNormal trees). We believe that any
insurer or reinsurer using such a tool should be aware of these systematic
effects, and that this awareness should strongly call for designing trees that
adequately fit the business.
  We finally address the issue of specifying the full joint distribution
between the risks. We show that the hierarchical mechanism does not require nor
specify the joint distribution, but that the latter can be determined exactly
(in the Gaussian case) by adding conditional independence hypotheses between
the risks and their sums.
