  Until now mean-field-type game theory was not focused on
cognitively-plausible models of choices in humans, animals, machines, robots,
software-defined and mobile devices strategic interactions. This work presents
some effects of users' psychology in mean-field-type games. In addition to the
traditional "material" payoff modelling, psychological patterns are introduced
in order to better capture and understand behaviors that are observed in
engineering practice or in experimental settings. The psychological payoff
value depends upon choices, mean-field states, mean-field actions, empathy and
beliefs. It is shown that the affective empathy enforces mean-field equilibrium
payoff equity and improves fairness between the players. It establishes
equilibrium systems for such interactive decision-making problems. Basic
empathy concepts are illustrated in several important problems in engineering
including resource sharing, packet collision minimization, energy markets, and
forwarding in Device-to-Device communications. The work conducts also an
experiment with 47 people who have to decide whether to cooperate or not. The
basic Interpersonal Reactivity Index of empathy metrics were used to measure
the empathy distribution of each participant. Android app called Empathizer is
developed to analyze systematically the data obtained from the participants.
The experimental results reveal that the dominated strategies of the classical
game theory are not dominated any more when users' psychology is involved, and
a significant level of cooperation is observed among the users who are
positively partially empathetic.
