  The evolution of existing transportation systems,mainly driven by
urbanization and increased availability of mobility options, such as private,
profit-maximizing ride-hailing companies, calls for tools to reason about their
design and regulation. To study this complex socio-technical problem, one needs
to account for the strategic interactions of the heterogeneous stakeholders
involved in the mobility ecosystem and analyze how they influence the system.
In this paper, we focus on the interactions between citizens who compete for
the limited resources of a mobility system to complete their desired trip.
Specifically, we present a game-theoretic framework for multi-modal mobility
systems, where citizens, characterized by heterogeneous preferences, have
access to various mobility options and seek individually-optimal decisions. We
study the arising game and prove the existence of an equilibrium, which can be
efficiently computed via a convex optimization problem. Through both an
analytical and a numerical case study for the classic scenario of Sioux Falls,
USA, we illustrate the capabilities of our model and perform sensitivity
analyses. Importantly, we show how to embed our framework into a "larger" game
among stakeholders of the mobility ecosystem (e.g., municipality, Mobility
Service Providers, and citizens), effectively giving rise to tools to inform
strategic interventions and policy-making in the mobility ecosystem.
