  Web search heavily relies on click-through behavior as an essential feedback
signal for performance improvement and evaluation. Traditionally, click is
usually treated as a positive implicit feedback signal of relevance or
usefulness, while non-click (especially non-click after examination) is
regarded as a signal of irrelevance or uselessness. However, there are many
cases where users do not click on any search results but still satisfy their
information need with the contents of the results shown on the Search Engine
Result Page (SERP). This raises the problem of measuring result usefulness and
modeling user satisfaction in "Zero-click" search scenarios.
  Previous works have solved this issue by (1) detecting user satisfaction for
abandoned SERP with context information and (2) considering result-level click
necessity with external assessors' annotations. However, few works have
investigated the reason behind non-click behavior and estimated the usefulness
of non-click results. A challenge for this research question is how to collect
valuable feedback for non-click results. With neuroimaging technologies, we
design a lab-based user study and reveal differences in brain signals while
examining non-click search results with different usefulness levels. The
findings in significant brain regions and electroencephalogram~(EEG) spectrum
also suggest that the process of usefulness judgment might involve similar
cognitive functions of relevance perception and satisfaction decoding. Inspired
by these findings, we conduct supervised learning tasks to estimate the
usefulness of non-click results with brain signals and conventional information
(i.e., content and context factors). Results show that it is feasible to
utilize brain signals to improve usefulness estimation performance and
enhancing human-computer interactions in "Zero-click" search scenarios.
