  Not only automation of manufacturing processes but also automation of
automation procedures itself become increasingly relevant to automation
research. In this context, automated capability assessment, mainly leveraged by
deep learning systems driven from 3D CAD data, have been presented. Current
assessment systems may be able to assess CAD data with regards to abstract
features, e.g. the ability to automatically separate components from bulk
goods, or the presence of gripping surfaces. Nevertheless, they suffer from the
factor of black box systems, where an assessment can be learned and generated
easily, but without any geometrical indicator about the reasons of the system's
decision. By utilizing explainable AI (xAI) methods, we attempt to open up the
black box. Explainable AI methods have been used in order to assess whether a
neural network has successfully learned a given task or to analyze which
features of an input might lead to an adversarial attack. These methods aim to
derive additional insights into a neural network, by analyzing patterns from a
given input and its impact to the network output. Within the NeuroCAD Project,
xAI methods are used to identify geometrical features which are associated with
a certain abstract feature. Within this work, a sensitivity analysis (SA), the
layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP), the Gradient-weighted Class Activation
Mapping (Grad-CAM) method as well as the Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic
Explanations (LIME) have been implemented in the NeuroCAD environment, allowing
not only to assess CAD models but also to identify features which have been
relevant for the network decision. In the medium run, this might enable to
identify regions of interest supporting product designers to optimize their
models with regards to assembly processes.
