  We present an alternative approach to the forecasting of motor vehicle
collision rates. We adopt an oft-used tool in mathematical finance, the Heston
Stochastic Volatility model, to forecast the short-term and long-term evolution
of motor vehicle collision rates. We incorporate a number of extensions to the
Heston model to make it fit for modelling motor vehicle collision rates. We
incorporate the temporally-unstable and non-deterministic nature of collision
rate fluctuations, and introduce a parameter to account for periods of
accelerated safety. We also adjust estimates to account for the seasonality of
collision patterns. Using these parameters, we perform a short-term forecast of
collision rates and explore a number of plausible scenarios using long-term
forecasts. The short-term forecast shows a close affinity with realised rates
(over 95% accuracy), and outperforms forecasting models currently used in road
safety research (Vasicek, SARIMA, SARIMA-GARCH). The long-term scenarios
suggest that modest targets to reduce collision rates (1.83% annually) and
targets to reduce the fluctuations of month-to-month collision rates (by half)
could have significant benefits for road safety. The median forecast in this
scenario suggests a 50% fall in collision rates, with 75% of simulations
suggesting that an effective change in collision rates is observed before 2044.
The main benefit the model provides is eschewing the necessity for setting
unreasonable safety targets that are often missed. Instead, the model presents
the effects that modest and achievable targets can have on road safety over the
long run, while incorporating random variability. Examining the parameters that
underlie expected collision rates will aid policymakers in determining the
effectiveness of implemented policies.
