  Social media platforms (SMPs) leverage algorithmic filtering (AF) as a means
of selecting the content that constitutes a user's feed with the aim of
maximizing their rewards. Selectively choosing the contents to be shown on the
user's feed may yield a certain extent of influence, either minor or major, on
the user's decision-making, compared to what it would have been under a
natural/fair content selection. As we have witnessed over the past decade,
algorithmic filtering can cause detrimental side effects, ranging from biasing
individual decisions to shaping those of society as a whole, for example,
diverting users' attention from whether to get the COVID-19 vaccine or inducing
the public to choose a presidential candidate. The government's constant
attempts to regulate the adverse effects of AF are often complicated, due to
bureaucracy, legal affairs, and financial considerations. On the other hand
SMPs seek to monitor their own algorithmic activities to avoid being fined for
exceeding the allowable threshold. In this paper, we mathematically formalize
this framework and utilize it to construct a data-driven statistical algorithm
to regulate the AF from deflecting users' beliefs over time, along with sample
and complexity guarantees. We show that our algorithm is robust against
potential adversarial users. This state-of-the-art algorithm can be used either
by authorities acting as external regulators or by SMPs for self-regulation.
