  The window mechanism, introduced by Chatterjee et al. for mean-payoff and
total-payoff objectives in two-player turn-based games on graphs, refines
long-term objectives with time bounds. This mechanism has proven useful in a
variety of settings, and most recently in timed systems.
  In the timed setting, the so-called fixed timed window parity objectives have
been studied. A fixed timed window parity objective is defined with respect to
some time bound and requires that, at all times, we witness a time frame, i.e.,
a window, of size less than the fixed bound in which the smallest priority is
even. In this work, we focus on the bounded timed window parity objective. Such
an objective is satisfied if there exists some bound for which the fixed
objective is satisfied. The satisfaction of bounded objectives is robust to
modeling choices such as constants appearing in constraints, unlike fixed
objectives, for which the choice of constants may affect the satisfaction for a
given bound.
  We show that verification of bounded timed window objectives in timed
automata can be performed in polynomial space, and that timed games with these
objectives can be solved in exponential time, even for multi-objective
extensions. This matches the complexity classes of the fixed case. We also
provide a comparison of the different variants of window parity objectives.
