  We study the problem of efficiently refuting the k-colorability of a graph,
or equivalently certifying a lower bound on its chromatic number. We give
formal evidence of average-case computational hardness for this problem in
sparse random regular graphs, showing optimality of a simple spectral
certificate. This evidence takes the form of a computationally-quiet planting:
we construct a distribution of d-regular graphs that has significantly smaller
chromatic number than a typical regular graph drawn uniformly at random, while
providing evidence that these two distributions are indistinguishable by a
large class of algorithms. We generalize our results to the more general
problem of certifying an upper bound on the maximum k-cut.
  This quiet planting is achieved by minimizing the effect of the planted
structure (e.g. colorings or cuts) on the graph spectrum. Specifically, the
planted structure corresponds exactly to eigenvectors of the adjacency matrix.
This avoids the pushout effect of random matrix theory, and delays the point at
which the planting becomes visible in the spectrum or local statistics. To
illustrate this further, we give similar results for a Gaussian analogue of
this problem: a quiet version of the spiked model, where we plant an eigenspace
rather than adding a generic low-rank perturbation.
  Our evidence for computational hardness of distinguishing two distributions
is based on three different heuristics: stability of belief propagation, the
local statistics hierarchy, and the low-degree likelihood ratio. Of independent
interest, our results include general-purpose bounds on the low-degree
likelihood ratio for multi-spiked matrix models, and an improved low-degree
analysis of the stochastic block model.
