  This note presents an operational measure of fat-tailedness for univariate
probability distributions, in $[0,1]$ where 0 is maximally thin-tailed
(Gaussian) and 1 is maximally fat-tailed. Among others,1) it helps assess the
sample size needed to establish a comparative $n$ needed for statistical
significance, 2) allows practical comparisons across classes of fat-tailed
distributions, 3) helps understand some inconsistent attributes of the
lognormal, pending on the parametrization of its scale parameter. The
literature is rich for what concerns asymptotic behavior, but there is a large
void for finite values of $n$, those needed for operational purposes.
Conventional measures of fat-tailedness, namely 1) the tail index for the power
law class, and 2) Kurtosis for finite moment distributions fail to apply to
some distributions, and do not allow comparisons across classes and
parametrization, that is between power laws outside the Levy-Stable basin, or
power laws to distributions in other classes, or power laws for different
number of summands. How can one compare a sum of 100 Student T distributed
random variables with 3 degrees of freedom to one in a Levy-Stable or a
Lognormal class? How can one compare a sum of 100 Student T with 3 degrees of
freedom to a single Student T with 2 degrees of freedom? We propose an
operational and heuristic measure that allow us to compare $n$-summed
independent variables under all distributions with finite first moment. The
method is based on the rate of convergence of the Law of Large numbers for
finite sums, $n$-summands specifically. We get either explicit expressions or
simulation results and bounds for the lognormal, exponential, Pareto, and the
Student T distributions in their various calibrations --in addition to the
general Pearson classes.
