  We present a complete cross-validation of significant wave heights (SWH)
extracted from altimetry data from all ten existing satellites with available
in situ (buoy and echosounder) wave measurements for the Baltic Sea basin. The
main purpose is to select an adequate altimetry data subset for a subsequent
evaluation of the wave climate. The satellite measurements with the backscatter
coefficients > 13.5 cdb, errors in the SWH normalized standard deviation > 0.5
m and snapshots with centroids closer than 0.2 degrees to the land are not
reliable. The ice flag usually denotes the ice concentration of > 50%. The
presence of ice affects the SWH data starting from concentrations 10%, but
substantial effects are only evident for concentrations > 30%. The altimetry
data selected based on these criteria have very good correspondence with in
situ data, except for GEOSAT Phase 1 data (1985-1989) that could not be
validated. The root-mean-square difference of altimetry and in situ data is in
the range of 0.23-0.37, which is significant for the Baltic Sea, compared with
an average wave height of ~1 m. The bias for CRYOSAT-2, ERS-2, JASON-1/2 and
SARAL data is below 0.06 m. The ENVISAT, ERS-1, GEOSAT and TOPEX satellites
revealed larger biases up to 0.23 m. The SWH time series from several satellite
pairs (ENVISAT/JASON-1, SARAL/JASON-2, ERS-1/TOPEX) exhibit substantial mutual
temporal drift and part of them evidently are not homogeneous in time. A new
high-resolution SWH data set from the SARAL satellite reveals a very good
correspondence with the in situ data and with the data stream from previous
satellites.
