  Health wearables in combination with gamification enable interventions that
have the potential to increase physical activity -- a key determinant of
health. However, the extant literature does not provide conclusive evidence on
the benefits of gamification, and there are persistent concerns that
competition-based gamification approaches will only benefit those who are
highly active at the expense of those who are sedentary. We investigate the
effect of Fitbit leaderboards on the number of steps taken by the user. Using a
unique data set of Fitbit wearable users, some of whom participate in a
leaderboard, we find that leaderboards lead to a 370 (3.5%) step increase in
the users' daily physical activity. However, we find that the benefits of
leaderboards are highly heterogeneous. Surprisingly, we find that those who
were highly active prior to adoption are hurt by leaderboards and walk 630
fewer steps daily after adoption (a 5% relative decrease). In contrast, those
who were sedentary prior to adoption benefited substantially from leaderboards
and walked an additional 1,300 steps daily after adoption (a 15% relative
increase). We find that these effects emerge because sedentary individuals
benefit even when leaderboards are small and when they do not rank first on
them. In contrast, highly active individuals are harmed by smaller leaderboards
and only see benefit when they rank highly on large leaderboards. We posit that
this unexpected divergence in effects could be due to the underappreciated
potential of noncompetition dynamics (e.g., changes in expectations for
exercise) to benefit sedentary users, but harm more active ones.
