  Ninety years ago in 1927, at an international congress in Como, Italy, Niels
Bohr gave an address which is recognized as the first instance in which the
term "complementarity", as a physical concept, was spoken publicly [1],
revealing Bohr's own thinking about Louis de Broglie's "duality". Bohr had very
slowly accepted duality as a principle of physics: close observation of any
quantum object will reveal either wave-like or particle-like behavior, one or
the other of two fundamental and complementary features. Little disagreement
exists today about complementarity's importance and broad applicability in
quantum science. Book-length scholarly examinations even provide speculations
about the relevance of complementarity in fields as different from physics as
biology, psychology and social anthropology, connections which were apparently
of interest to Bohr himself (see Jammer [2], Murdoch [3] and Whitaker [4]).
Confusion evident in Como following his talk was not eliminated by Bohr's
article [1], and complementarity has been subjected to nine decades of repeated
examination ever since with no agreed resolution. Semi-popular treatments [5]
as well as expert examinations [6-9] show that the topic cannot be avoided, and
complementarity retains its central place in the interpretation of quantum
mechanics. However, recent approaches by our group [10-13] and others [14-20]
to the underlying notion of coherence now allow us to present a universal
formulation of complementarity that may signal the end to the confusion. We
demonstrate a new relationship that constrains the behavior of an
electromagnetic field (quantum or classical) in the fundamental context of
two-slit experiments. We show that entanglement is the ingredient needed to
complete Bohr's formulation of complementarity, debated for decades because of
its incompleteness.
