  The so-called ``New Space era'' has seen a disruptive change in the business
models and manufacturing technologies of launch vehicle companies. However,
limited consideration has been given to the benefits that innovation in control
theory can bring; not only in terms of increasing the limits of performance but
also reducing mission preparation or ``missionisation'' efforts. Moreover,
there is a gap between the current state-of-practice that still relies on
linear controls and other modern control techniques that could bring relevant
improvements in launcher attitude control. Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion (NDI) is
a technique that basically `cancels' the nonlinearities of a class of nonlinear
systems, allowing for a single linear control law to be applied without the
need for gain-scheduling across different operational points. Incremental NDI
(INDI) is a variation of NDI that generates incremental commands and employs
acceleration feedback to reduce model dependency, making it easier to design,
and results in being more robust in closed-loop. While INDI has been applied
successfully to several aerospace applications, its applicability to launch
vehicles has not yet been adequately investigated. The objective of this paper
is therefore to introduce and raise awareness of the INDI method among the
launcher guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) community, showcasing its
implementation on a representative launch ascent application scenario which
highlights INDI's strengths and challenges. We present a new, practical
approach for stability analysis of INDI for attitude control, and compare INDI
with scheduled PD controllers with- and without angular acceleration estimates.
Results show that, while INDI controllers are generally more sensitive to
sensor noise and actuator delay than linear controllers, their potential
benefits outweigh these limitations in terms of robustness and performance.
