  Mathematical modeling of epidemic spreading has been widely adopted to
estimate the threats of epidemic diseases (i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic) as well
as to evaluate epidemic control interventions. The indoor place is considered
to be a significant epidemic spreading risk origin, but existing widely-used
epidemic spreading models are usually limited for indoor places since the
dynamic physical distance changes between people are ignored, and the empirical
features of the essential and non-essential travel are not differentiated. In
this paper, we introduce a pedestrian-based epidemic spreading model that is
capable of modeling indoor transmission risks of diseases during people's
social activities. Taking advantage of the before-and-after mobility data from
the University of Maryland COVID-19 Impact Analysis Platform, it's found that
people tend to spend more time in grocery stores once their travel frequencies
are restricted to a low level. In other words, an increase in dwell time could
balance the decrease in travel frequencies and satisfy people's demand. Based
on the pedestrian-based model and the empirical evidence, combined
non-pharmaceutical interventions from different operational levels are
evaluated. Numerical simulations show that restrictions on people's travel
frequency and open-hours of indoor places may not be universally effective in
reducing average infection risks for each pedestrian who visit the place. Entry
limitations can be a widely effective alternative, whereas the decision-maker
needs to balance the decrease in risky contacts and the increase in queue
length outside the place that may impede people from fulfilling their travel
needs.
