  In social networks, a node's position is a form of \it{social capital}.
Better-positioned members not only benefit from (faster) access to diverse
information, but innately have more potential influence on information spread.
Structural biases often arise from network formation, and can lead to
significant disparities in information access based on position. Further,
processes such as link recommendation can exacerbate this inequality by relying
on network structure to augment connectivity.
  We argue that one can understand and quantify this social capital through the
lens of information flow in the network. We consider the setting where all
nodes may be sources of distinct information, and a node's (dis)advantage deems
its ability to access all information available on the network. We introduce
three new measures of advantage (broadcast, influence, and control), which are
quantified in terms of position in the network using \it{access signatures} --
vectors that represent a node's ability to share information. We then consider
the problem of improving equity by making interventions to increase the access
of the least-advantaged nodes. We argue that edge augmentation is most
appropriate for mitigating bias in the network structure, and frame a budgeted
intervention problem for maximizing minimum pairwise access.
  Finally, we propose heuristic strategies for selecting edge augmentations and
empirically evaluate their performance on a corpus of real-world social
networks. We demonstrate that a small number of interventions significantly
increase the broadcast measure of access for the least-advantaged nodes (over 5
times more than random), and also improve the minimum influence. Additional
analysis shows that these interventions can also dramatically shrink the gap in
advantage between nodes (over \%82) and reduce disparities between their access
signatures.
