  I summarise a method to quantitatively assess the consistency of
power-counting proposals in Effective Field Theories which are non-perturbative
at leading order. It uses the fact that the Renormalisation Group evolution of
an observable predicts the functional form of its residual cutoff dependence on
the EFT breakdown scale, low-momentum scales, and the order of the calculation.
Passing this test is a necessary but not sufficient consistency criterion for a
suggested power counting whose exact nature is disputed. For example, in ChiEFT
with more than one nucleon, a lack of universally accepted analytic solutions
obfuscates the relation between convergence pattern and numerical results, and
led to proposals which predict different numbers of Low Energy Coefficients at
the same chiral order. The method may provide an independent check whether an
observable is renormalised at a given order, and of both the breakdown scale
and the momentum-dependent order-by-order convergence pattern of an EFT.
Conversely, it may help identify LECs which produce renormalised observables at
a given order. I also discuss its underlying assumptions and relation to the RG
Equation; useful choices for observables and cutoffs; the momentum window in
which the test provides best signals; its dependence on the values and forms of
cutoffs as well as on the EFT parameters; the impact of fitting Low Energy
Coefficients to data in different or the same channel; caveats and limitations.
Since the test is designed to minimise the use of data, it allows one to
quantitatively falsify if the EFT has been renormalised consistently, rather
than quantifying how an EFT compares to experiment. Its application in
particular to the 3P0 and 3P2-3F2 partial waves of NN scattering in ChiEFT may
elucidate persistent power-counting issues. Details and a better bibliography
can be found in an upcoming publication.
