  Graph embedding learning that aims to automatically learn low-dimensional
node representations, has drawn increasing attention in recent years. To date,
most recent graph embedding methods are evaluated on social and information
networks and are not comprehensively studied on biomedical networks under
systematic experiments and analyses. On the other hand, for a variety of
biomedical network analysis tasks, traditional techniques such as matrix
factorization (which can be seen as a type of graph embedding methods) have
shown promising results, and hence there is a need to systematically evaluate
the more recent graph embedding methods (e.g. random walk-based and neural
network-based) in terms of their usability and potential to further the
state-of-the-art.
  We select 11 representative graph embedding methods and conduct a systematic
comparison on 3 important biomedical link prediction tasks: drug-disease
association (DDA) prediction, drug-drug interaction (DDI) prediction,
protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction; and 2 node classification tasks:
medical term semantic type classification, protein function prediction. Our
experimental results demonstrate that the recent graph embedding methods
achieve promising results and deserve more attention in the future biomedical
graph analysis. Compared with three state-of-the-art methods for DDAs, DDIs and
protein function predictions, the recent graph embedding methods achieve
competitive performance without using any biological features and the learned
embeddings can be treated as complementary representations for the biological
features. By summarizing the experimental results, we provide general
guidelines for properly selecting graph embedding methods and setting their
hyper-parameters for different biomedical tasks.
