  Decisions taken in our everyday lives are based on a wide variety of
information so it is generally very difficult to assess what are the strategies
that guide us. Stock market therefore provides a rich environment to study how
people take decision since responding to market uncertainty needs a constant
update of these strategies. For this purpose, we run a lab-in-the-field
experiment where volunteers are given a controlled set of financial information
-based on real data from worldwide financial indices- and they are required to
guess whether the market price would go up or down in each situation. From the
data collected we explore basic statistical traits, behavioural biases and
emerging strategies. In particular, we detect unintended patterns of behavior
through consistent actions which can be interpreted as {\it Market Imitation}
and {\it Win-Stay Lose-Shift} emerging strategies, being {\it Market Imitation}
the most dominant one. We also observe that these strategies are affected by
external factors: the expert advice, the lack of information or an information
overload reinforce the use of these intuitive strategies, while the probability
to follow them significantly decreases when subjects spends more time to take a
decision. The cohort analysis shows that women and children are more prone to
use such strategies although their performance is not undermined. Our results
are of interest for better handling clients expectations of trading companies,
avoiding behavioural anomalies in financial analysts decisions and improving
not only the design of markets but also the trading digital interfaces where
information is set down. Strategies and behavioural biases observed can also be
translated into new agent based modelling or stochastic price dynamics to
better understand financial bubbles or the effects of asymmetric risk
perception to price drops.
