  Evolving genomes increase a number of their genes by gene duplications. To
escape degradation in a functionless pseudogene, any gene duplicate needs to be
guarded by negative (purifying) selection from otherwise inevitable fixation of
degenerative mutations. In the present study we focus on the evolutionary stage
at which new duplicates come under such surveillance.
  Our analyses of several genomes indicate that in about 10% gene pairs,
selection begins to guard a new gene copy very soon after a duplication event
whereas the vast majority (90%) of extra genes remain redundant and
unrecognised by selection. Such duplicates accumulate all mutations (including
degenerative) in neutral fashion and are actually destined to become
pseudogenes. We revealed this "two-stream" evolutionary pattern by the analysis
of mutations in 2nd versus 3rd codon positions but not by the routinely used
ratio of amino acid replacements (R) versus silent substitutions (S), i.e. the
'2nd vs. 3rd' metric proved to be more resolving than the traditional 'R vs. S'
one for distinguishing neutrally evolving future pseudogenes from their
functional counterparts controlled by negative selection.
  In gene databases for large genomes, hundreds of future pseudogenes are
annotated as functional genes because they do look like intact and valuable by
standard criteria, including even active transcription and translation.
Apparently, these "pseudogenes-to-be" over-cloud and mimic those very
infrequent gene duplicates with increased sequence evolution rates driven by
positive selection.
