  The paper presents a conceptual, multidimensional approach to understand the
technological factors that are assumed to or even have been proven to
contribute to what has been coined as Zoom Fatigue (ZF) or more generally
Videoconferencing Fatigue (VCF). With the advent of the Covid-19 pandemic, the
usage of VC services has drastically increased, leading to more and more
reports about the ZF or VCF phenomenon. The paper is motivated by the fact that
some of the media outlets initially starting the debate on what Zoom fatigue is
and how it can be avoided, as well as some of the scientific papers addressing
the topic, contain assumptions that are rather hypothetical and insufficiently
underpinned by scientific evidence. Most of these works are acknowledge the
lacking evidence and partly suggest directions for future research. This paper
intends to deepen the survey of VC-technology-related literature and to provide
more existing evidence, where possible, while reviewing some of the already
provided support or evidence for certain causal hypotheses. The technological
factors dimension and its identified sub-dimensions presented in this paper are
embedded within a more holistic four-dimensional conceptual factors model
describing the causes for ZF or VCF. The paper describing this overall
conceptual model is written by the same group of authors and currently under
revision for an Open Access Journal publication. The present paper expands on
the technological factors dimension descriptions provided in the overall model
paper and provides more detailed analyzes and concepts associated with how VC
technology may affect users' perception, cognitive load, interaction and
communication, possibly leading to stress, exhaustion and fatigue. The paper
currently is a living document which will be expanded further with regard to
the evidence for or against the impact of certain technological factors.
