  The effectiveness of recommendation systems is pivotal to user engagement and
satisfaction in online platforms. As these recommendation systems increasingly
influence user choices, their evaluation transcends mere technical performance
and becomes central to business success. This paper addresses the multifaceted
nature of recommendations system evaluation by introducing a comprehensive
suite of metrics, each tailored to capture a distinct aspect of system
performance. We discuss
  * Similarity Metrics: to quantify the precision of content-based filtering
mechanisms and assess the accuracy of collaborative filtering techniques.
  * Candidate Generation Metrics: to evaluate how effectively the system
identifies a broad yet relevant range of items.
  * Predictive Metrics: to assess the accuracy of forecasted user preferences.
  * Ranking Metrics: to evaluate the effectiveness of the order in which
recommendations are presented.
  * Business Metrics: to align the performance of the recommendation system
with economic objectives.
  Our approach emphasizes the contextual application of these metrics and their
interdependencies. In this paper, we identify the strengths and limitations of
current evaluation practices and highlight the nuanced trade-offs that emerge
when optimizing recommendation systems across different metrics. The paper
concludes by proposing a framework for selecting and interpreting these metrics
to not only improve system performance but also to advance business goals. This
work is to aid researchers and practitioners in critically assessing
recommendation systems and fosters the development of more nuanced, effective,
and economically viable personalization strategies. Our code is available at
GitHub -
https://github.com/aryan-jadon/Evaluation-Metrics-for-Recommendation-Systems.
