  Objective: Our objective is to formulate the problem of the
Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) sensor array design as a well-posed engineering
problem of accurately measuring the neuronal magnetic fields. This is in
contrast to the traditional approach that formulates the sensor array design
problem in terms of neurobiological interpretability the sensor array
measurements.
  Approach: We use the Vector Spherical Harmonics (VSH) formalism to define a
figure-of-merit for an MEG sensor array. We start with an observation that,
under certain reasonable assumptions, any array of $m$ perfectly noiseless
sensors will attain exactly the same performance, regardless of the sensors'
locations and orientations (with the exception of a negligible set of
singularly bad sensor configurations). We proceed to the conclusion that under
the aforementioned assumptions, the only difference between different array
configurations is the effect of (sensor) noise on their performance. We then
propose a figure-of-merit that quantifies, with a single number, how much the
sensor array in question amplifies the sensor noise.
  Main results: We derive a formula for intuitively meaningful, yet
mathematically rigorous figure-of-merit that summarizes how desirable a
particular sensor array design is. We demonstrate that this figure-of-merit is
well-behaved enough to be used as a cost function for a general-purpose
nonlinear optimization methods such as simulated annealing. We also show that
sensor array configurations obtained by such optimizations exhibit properties
that are typically expected of high-quality MEG sensor arrays, e.g. high
channel information capacity.
  Significance: Our work paves the way toward designing better MEG sensor
arrays by isolating the engineering problem of measuring the neuromagnetic
fields out of the bigger problem of studying brain function through
neuromagnetic measurements.
