  Molecular dynamics (MD) is a widely-used tool for simulating the molecular
and materials properties. It is a common wisdom that molecular dynamics
simulations should obey physical laws and, hence, lots of effort is put into
ensuring that molecular dynamics simulations are energy conserving. The
emergence of machine learning (ML) potentials for MD leads to a growing
realization that monitoring conservation of energy during simulations is of low
utility because the dynamics is often unphysically dissociative. Other ML
methods for MD are not based on a potential and provide only forces or
trajectories which are reasonable but not necessarily energy-conserving. Here
we propose to clearly distinguish between the simulation-energy and true-energy
conservation and highlight that the simulations should focus on decreasing the
degree of true-energy non-conservation. We introduce very simple, new criteria
for evaluating the quality of molecular dynamics estimating the degree of
true-energy non-conservation and we demonstrate their practical utility on an
example of infrared spectra simulations. These criteria are more important and
intuitive than simply evaluating the quality of the ML potential energies and
forces as is commonly done and can be applied universally, e.g., even for
trajectories with unknown or discontinuous potential energy. Such an approach
introduces new standards for evaluating MD by focusing on the true-energy
conservation and can help in developing more accurate methods for simulating
molecular and materials properties.
