  As news organizations embrace transparency practices on their websites to
distinguish themselves from those spreading misinformation, HCI designers have
the opportunity to help them effectively utilize the ideals of transparency to
build trust. How can we utilize transparency to promote trust in news? We
examine this question through a qualitative lens by interviewing journalists
and news consumers -- the two stakeholders in a news system. We designed a
scenario to demonstrate transparency features using two fundamental news
attributes that convey the trustworthiness of a news article: source and
message. In the interviews, our news consumers expressed the idea that news
transparency could be best shown by providing indicators of objectivity in two
areas (news selection and framing) and by providing indicators of evidence in
four areas (presence of source materials, anonymous sourcing, verification, and
corrections upon erroneous reporting). While our journalists agreed with news
consumers' suggestions of using evidence indicators, they also suggested
additional transparency indicators in areas such as the news reporting process
and personal/organizational conflicts of interest. Prompted by our scenario,
participants offered new design considerations for building trustworthy news
platforms, such as designing for easy comprehension, presenting appropriate
details in news articles (e.g., showing the number and nature of corrections
made to an article), and comparing attributes across news organizations to
highlight diverging practices. Comparing the responses from our two stakeholder
groups reveals conflicting suggestions with trade-offs between them. Our study
has implications for HCI designers in building trustworthy news systems.
