  Software developers often look for solutions to their code-level problems
using the Stack Overflow Q&A website. To receive help, developers frequently
submit questions containing sample code segments and the description of the
programming issue. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to reproduce the
issues from the code segments that may impede questions from receiving prompt
and appropriate solutions. We conducted an exploratory study on the
reproducibility of issues discussed in 400 Java and 400 Python questions. We
parsed, compiled, executed, and carefully examined the code segments from these
questions to reproduce the reported programming issues. The outcomes of our
study are three-fold. First, we found that we can reproduce approximately 68%
of Java and 71% of Python issues, whereas we were unable to reproduce
approximately 22% of Java and 19% of Python issues using the code segments. Of
the issues that were reproducible, approximately 67% of the Java code segments
and 20% of the Python code segments required minor or major modifications to
reproduce the issues. Second, we carefully investigated why programming issues
could not be reproduced and provided evidence-based guidelines for writing
effective code examples for Stack Overflow questions. Third, we investigated
the correlation between the issue reproducibility status of questions and the
corresponding answer meta-data, such as the presence of an accepted answer.
According to our analysis, a reproducible question has at least two times
higher chance of receiving an accepted answer than an irreproducible question.
Besides, the median time delay in receiving accepted answers is double if the
issues reported in questions could not be reproduced. We also investigate the
confounding factors (e.g., reputation) and find that confounding factors do not
hurt the correlation between reproducibility status and answer meta-data.
