  Inspired by a sample lesson, this paper studies and discusses children's
preferences in learning scientific concepts. In a "Dissolution" lesson, one of
the students took the demonstration experiment of "carmine dissolves in Water"
demonstrated by the teacher as the prototype to judge whether a new phenomenon
belongs to dissolution, instead of analyzing and judging the phenomenon by
using the dissolution definition. Therefore, we propose a conjecture that
"prototype matching" may be a more preferred way for children to learn concepts
than thinking through inquiry experiment, analysis, deduction, etc. To this
end, we conducted a targeted test on 160 fifth grade students (all of whom had
learned this lesson) from a primary school in Beijing, and used goodness of fit
test to statistically analyze the results. The results showed that: 1. the Chi
square of the general result is 73.865, P<0.001, indicating that children did
have obvious prototype preference; 2. We "tampered" some of the prototypes,
that is, they looked like the prototypes that the teacher had told students,
but they were actually wrong. However, the results showed that children still
preferred these so-called "prototypes" (chi square is 21.823, P<0.001).
Conclusion: 1. Children have an obvious preference for "prototype matching" in
scientific concept learning, which is not only obviously deviated from the
current general understanding of science education that emphasizes
discovery/inquiry construction, but also points out that there may be a
priority relationship among various ways of concept organization (such as
definition theory, prototype theory, schema theory, etc.). 2. Children's
preference for prototypes seems to be unthinking, and they will not identify
the authenticity of prototypes, which is particularly noteworthy in front-line
teaching.
