  Classical results of Milnor, Wood, Mather, and Thurston produce flat
connections in surprising places. The Milnor-Wood inequality is for circle
bundles over surfaces, whereas the Mather-Thurston Theorem is about cobording
general manifold bundles to ones admitting a flat connection. The surprise
comes from the close encounter with obstructions from Chern-Weyl theory and
other smooth obstructions such as the Bott classes and the Godbillion-Vey
invariant. Contradiction is avoided because the structure groups for the
positive results are larger than required for the obstructions, e.g.
$\operatorname{PSL}(2,\mathbb{R})$ versus $\operatorname{U}(1)$ in the former
case and $C^1$ versus $C^2$ in the latter. This paper adds two types of control
strengthening the positive results: In many cases we are able to (1) refine the
Mather-Thurston cobordism to a semi-$s$-cobordism (ssc) and (2) provide detail
about how, and to what extent, transition functions must wander from an
initial, small, structure group into a larger one.
  The motivation is to lay mathematical foundations for a physical program. The
philosophy is that living in the IR we cannot expect to know, for a given
bundle, if it has curvature or is flat, because we can't resolve the fine scale
topology which may be present in the base, introduced by a ssc, nor minute
symmetry violating distortions of the fiber. Small scale, UV, "distortions" of
the base topology and structure group allow flat connections to simulate
curvature at larger scales. The goal is to find a duality under which curvature
terms, such as Maxwell's $F \wedge F^\ast$ and Hilbert's $\int R\ dvol$ are
replaced by an action which measures such "distortions." In this view,
curvature results from renormalizing a discrete, group theoretic, structure.
