  Extensive time-series encoding the position of particles such as viruses,
vesicles, or individual proteins are routinely garnered in single-particle
tracking experiments or supercomputing studies. They contain vital clues on how
viruses spread or drugs may be delivered in biological cells. Similar
time-series are being recorded of stock values in financial markets and of
climate data. Such time-series are most typically evaluated in terms of
time-average mean-squared displacements, which remain random variables for
finite measurement times. Their statistical properties are different for
different physical stochastic processes, thus allowing us to extract valuable
information on the stochastic process itself. To exploit the full potential of
the statistical information encoded in measured time-series we here propose an
easy-to-implement and computationally inexpensive new methodology, based on
deviations of the time-averaged mean-squared displacement from its ensemble
average counterpart. Specifically, we use the upper bound of these deviations
for Brownian motion to check the applicability of this approach to simulated
and real data sets. By comparing the probability of deviations for different
data sets, we demonstrate how the theoretical bound for Brownian motion reveals
additional information about observed stochastic processes. We apply the
large-deviation method to data sets of tracer beads tracked in aqueous
solution, tracer beads measured in mucin hydrogels, and of geographic surface
temperature anomalies. Our analysis shows how the large-deviation properties
can be efficiently used as a simple yet effective routine test to reject the
Brownian motion hypothesis and unveil crucial information on statistical
properties such as ergodicity breaking and short-time correlations.
