  Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of dislocation migration requires
semi-empirical potentials of the interatomic interaction. While there are many
reliable semi-empirical potentials for the bcc Fe, the number of the available
potentials for the fcc is very limited. In the present study we tested three
EAM potentials for the fcc Fe (ABCH97 [Phil. Mag. A, 75, 713-732 (1997)], BCT13
[MSMSE 21, 085004 (2013)] and ZFS18 [J. Comp. Chem. 39, 2420-2431 (2018)]) from
literature. It was found that the ABCH97 potential does not provide that the
fcc phase is the most stable at any temperature. On the other hand, the fcc
phase is always more stable than the bcc phase for the BCT13, ZFS18 potentials.
The hcp phase is the most stable phase for the BCT13 potential at any
temperature. In order to fix these problems we developed two new EAM potentials
(MB1 and MB2). The fcc phase is still more stable than the bcc phase for the
MB1 potential but the MB2 potential provides that the bcc phase is the most
stable phase from the upper fcc-bcc transformation temperature, T_gamma-delta,
to the melting temperature, Tm, and the fcc phase is the most stable phase
below T_gamma-delta. This potential also leads to an excellent agreement with
the experimental data on the fcc elastic constants and reasonable stacking
fault energy which makes it the best potential for the simulation of the
dislocation migration in the fcc Fe among all semi-empirical potentials
considered in the present study. The MD simulation demonstrated that only the
ZFS18, MB1 and MB2 potentials are actually suitable for the simulation of the
dislocation migration in the fcc Fe. They lead to the same orders of magnitude
for the dislocation velocities and all of them show that the edge dislocation
is faster than the screw dislocation. However, the actual values of the
dislocation velocities do depend on the employed semi-empirical potential.
