  This paper studies the optimal spatial pricing for a ride-sourcing platform
subject to a congestion charge. The platform determines the ride prices over
the transportation network to maximize its profit, while the regulatory agency
imposes the congestion charge to reduce traffic congestion in the urban core. A
network economic equilibrium model is proposed to capture the intimate
interactions among passenger demand, driver supply, passenger and driver
waiting times, platform pricing, vehicle repositioning and flow balance over
the transportation network. The overall optimal pricing problem is cast as a
non-convex program. An algorithm is proposed to approximately compute its
optimal solution, and a tight upper bound is established to evaluate its
performance loss with respect to the globally optimal solution. Using the
proposed model, we compare the impacts of three forms of congestion charge: (a)
a one-directional cordon charge on ride-sourcing vehicles that enter the
congestion area; (b) a bi-directional cordon charge on ride-sourcing vehicles
that enter or exit the congestion area; (c) a trip-based congestion charge on
all ride-sourcing trips. We show that the one-directional congestion charge not
only reduces the ride-sourcing traffic in the congestion area, but also reduces
the travel cost outside the congestion zone and benefits passengers in these
underserved areas. We further show that compared to other congestion charges,
the one-directional cordon charge is more effective in congestion mitigation:
to achieve the same congestion-mitigation target, it imposes a smaller cost on
passengers, drivers, and the platform. On the other hand, compared with the
other charges, the trip-based congestion charge is more effective in
revenue-raising: to raise the same tax revenue, it leads to a smaller loss to
passengers, drivers, and the platform.
