  We study the following problem: with the power of postselection (classically
or quantumly), what is your ability to answer adaptive queries to certain
languages? More specifically, for what kind of computational classes
$\mathcal{C}$, we have $\mathsf{P}^{\mathcal{C}}$ belongs to $\mathsf{PostBPP}$
and $\mathsf{PostBQP}$? While a complete answer to the above question seems
impossible given the development of present computational complexity theory. We
study the analogous question in query complexity, which sheds light on the
limitation of {\em relativized} methods (the relativization barrier) to the
above question.
  Informally, we show that, for a partial function $f$, if there is no
efficient (In the world of query complexity, being efficient means using
$O(\operatorname*{polylog}(n))$ time.) {\em small bounded-error} algorithm for
$f$ classically or quantumly, then there is no efficient postselection
bounded-error algorithm to answer adaptive queries to $f$ classically or
quantumly. Our results imply a new proof for the classical oracle separation
$\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{NP}^{\mathcal{O}}} \not\subset \mathsf{PP}^{\mathcal{O}}$.
They also lead to a new oracle separation
$\mathsf{P}^{\mathsf{SZK}^{\mathcal{O}}} \not\subset
\mathsf{PP}^{\mathcal{O}}$.
  Our result also implies a hardness amplification construction for polynomial
approximation: given a function $f$ on $n$ bits, we construct an
adaptive-version of $f$, denoted by $F$, on $O(m \cdot n)$ bits, such that if
$f$ requires large degree to approximate to error $2/3$ in a certain one-sided
sense, then $F$ requires large degree to approximate even to error $1/2 -
2^{-m}$. Our construction achieves the same amplification in the work of Thaler
(ICALP, 2016), by composing a function with $O(\log n)$ {\em deterministic
query complexity}.
