  Objective. Annotation is expensive but essential for clinical note review and
clinical natural language processing (cNLP). However, the extent to which
computer-generated pre-annotation is beneficial to human annotation is still an
open question. Our study introduces CLEAN (CLinical note rEview and
ANnotation), a pre-annotation-based cNLP annotation system to improve clinical
note annotation of data elements, and comprehensively compares CLEAN with the
widely-used annotation system Brat Rapid Annotation Tool (BRAT).
  Materials and Methods. CLEAN includes an ensemble pipeline (CLEAN-EP) with a
newly developed annotation tool (CLEAN-AT). A domain expert and a novice
user/annotator participated in a comparative usability test by tagging 87 data
elements related to Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and Kawasaki Disease (KD)
cohorts in 84 public notes.
  Results. CLEAN achieved higher note-level F1-score (0.896) over BRAT (0.820),
with significant difference in correctness (P-value < 0.001), and the mostly
related factor being system/software (P-value < 0.001). No significant
difference (P-value 0.188) in annotation time was observed between CLEAN (7.262
minutes/note) and BRAT (8.286 minutes/note). The difference was mostly
associated with note length (P-value < 0.001) and system/software (P-value
0.013). The expert reported CLEAN to be useful/satisfactory, while the novice
reported slight improvements.
  Discussion. CLEAN improves the correctness of annotation and increases
usefulness/satisfaction with the same level of efficiency. Limitations include
untested impact of pre-annotation correctness rate, small sample size, small
user size, and restrictedly validated gold standard.
  Conclusion. CLEAN with pre-annotation can be beneficial for an expert to deal
with complex annotation tasks involving numerous and diverse target data
elements.
