  Different observations of a relation between inputs ("sources") and outputs
("targets") are often reported in terms of histograms (discretizations of the
source and the target densities). Transporting these densities to each other
provides insight regarding the underlying relation. In (forward) uncertainty
quantification, one typically studies how the distribution of inputs to a
system affects the distribution of the system responses. Here, we focus on the
identification of the system (the transport map) itself, once the input and
output distributions are determined, and suggest a modification of current
practice by including data from what we call "an observation process". We
hypothesize that there exists a smooth manifold underlying the relation; the
sources and the targets are then partial observations (possibly projections) of
this manifold. Knowledge of such a manifold implies knowledge of the relation,
and thus of "the right" transport between source and target observations. When
the source-target observations are not bijective (when the manifold is not the
graph of a function over both observation spaces, either because folds over
them give rise to density singularities, or because it marginalizes over
several observables), recovery of the manifold is obscured. Using ideas from
attractor reconstruction in dynamical systems, we demonstrate how additional
information in the form of short histories of an observation process can help
us recover the underlying manifold. The types of additional information
employed and the relation to optimal transport based solely on density
observations is illustrated and discussed, along with limitations in the
recovery of the true underlying relation.
