  Sound absorbing materials are usually defined by five parameters: open
porosity, static airflow resistivity, tortuosity, and two characteristic
lengths. In recent decades, different methods have been developed in order to
characterize these parameters. These methods may be divided following three
approaches: i) inverse, ii) indirect and iii) direct. The inverse approach is
based on an optimisation problem where the material parameters are adjusted in
the acoustic model to reproduce acoustical measurements. The indirect approach
is based on the acoustical model from which analytical expressions linking the
material parameters to acoustical measurements are derived. Contrary to the
previous two approaches, the direct approach is not based on acoustical
measurements. It is based on the physical and mathematical definition of the
parameters and requires dedicated equipments. In this study, the five
parameters have been measured for different porous materials using some direct,
indirect and inverse methods. A comparison of the different results is carried
out, and shows that the different methods may yield large variability in the
found parameters. A discussion is given to explain the observed variability and
the limitations of the methods.
