  Over the last few decades, many distinct lines of research aimed at
automating mathematics have been developed, including computer algebra systems
(CASs) for mathematical modelling, automated theorem provers for first-order
logic, SAT/SMT solvers aimed at program verification, and higher-order proof
assistants for checking mathematical proofs. More recently, some of these lines
of research have started to converge in complementary ways. One success story
is the combination of SAT solvers and CASs (SAT+CAS) aimed at resolving
mathematical conjectures.
  Many conjectures in pure and applied mathematics are not amenable to
traditional proof methods. Instead, they are best addressed via computational
methods that involve very large combinatorial search spaces. SAT solvers are
powerful methods to search through such large combinatorial
spaces---consequently, many problems from a variety of mathematical domains
have been reduced to SAT in an attempt to resolve them. However, solvers
traditionally lack deep repositories of mathematical domain knowledge that can
be crucial to pruning such large search spaces. By contrast, CASs are deep
repositories of mathematical knowledge but lack efficient general search
capabilities. By combining the search power of SAT with the deep mathematical
knowledge in CASs we can solve many problems in mathematics that no other known
methods seem capable of solving.
  We demonstrate the success of the SAT+CAS paradigm by highlighting many
conjectures that have been disproven, verified, or partially verified using our
tool MathCheck. These successes indicate that the paradigm is positioned to
become a standard method for solving problems requiring both a significant
amount of search and deep mathematical reasoning. For example, the SAT+CAS
paradigm has recently been used by Heule, Kauers, and Seidl to find many new
algorithms for $3\times3$ matrix multiplication.
