  Educational data scientists often conduct research with the hopes of
translating findings into lasting change through policy, civil society, or
other channels. However, the bridge from research to practice can be fraught
with sociopolitical frictions that impede, or altogether block, such
translations -- especially when they are contentious or otherwise difficult to
achieve. Focusing on one entrenched educational equity issue in US public
schools -- racial and ethnic segregation -- we conduct randomized email
outreach experiments and surveys to explore how local school districts respond
to algorithmically-generated school catchment areas ("attendance boundaries")
designed to foster more diverse and integrated schools. Cold email outreach to
approximately 4,320 elected school board members across over 800 school
districts informing them of potential boundary changes reveals a large average
open rate of nearly 40%, but a relatively small click-through rate of 2.5% to
an interactive dashboard depicting such changes. Board members, however, appear
responsive to different messaging techniques -- particularly those that
dovetail issues of racial and ethnic diversity with other top-of-mind issues
(like school capacity planning). On the other hand, media coverage of the
research drives more dashboard engagement, especially in more segregated
districts. A small but rich set of survey responses from school board and
community members across several districts identify data and operational
bottlenecks to implementing boundary changes to foster more diverse schools,
but also share affirmative comments on the potential viability of such changes.
Together, our findings may support educational data scientists in more
effectively disseminating research that aims to bridge educational inequalities
through systems-level change.
