  The problem of analyzing the performance of networked agents exchanging
evidence in a dynamic network has recently grown in importance. This problem
has relevance in signal and data fusion network applications and in studying
opinion and consensus dynamics in social networks. Due to its capability of
handling a wider variety of uncertainties and ambiguities associated with
evidence, we use the framework of Dempster-Shafer (DS) theory to capture the
opinion of an agent. We then examine the consensus among agents in dynamic
networks in which an agent can utilize either a cautious or receptive updating
strategy. In particular, we examine the case of bounded confidence updating
where an agent exchanges its opinion only with neighboring nodes possessing
'similar' evidence. In a fusion network, this captures the case in which nodes
only update their state based on evidence consistent with the node's own
evidence. In opinion dynamics, this captures the notions of Social Judgment
Theory (SJT) in which agents update their opinions only with other agents
possessing opinions closer to their own. Focusing on the two special DS
theoretic cases where an agent state is modeled as a Dirichlet body of evidence
and a probability mass function (p.m.f.), we utilize results from matrix
theory, graph theory, and networks to prove the existence of consensus agent
states in several time-varying network cases of interest. For example, we show
the existence of a consensus in which a subset of network nodes achieves a
consensus that is adopted by follower network nodes. Of particular interest is
the case of multiple opinion leaders, where we show that the agents do not
reach a consensus in general, but rather converge to 'opinion clusters'.
Simulation results are provided to illustrate the main results.
