  Lifestyle politics emerge when activities that have no substantive relevance
to ideology become politically aligned and polarized. Homophily and social
influence are able generate these fault lines on their own; however, social
identities from demographics may serve as coordinating mechanisms through which
lifestyle politics are mobilized are spread. Using a dataset of 137,661,886
observations from 299,327 Facebook interests aggregated across users of
different racial/ethnic, education, age, gender, and income demographics, we
find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are
highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity (e.g., Black artists
and performers). After adjusting political alignment for demographic effects,
lifestyle politics decreased by 27.36% toward the political "center" and
demographically confounded interests were no longer among the most polarized
interests. Instead, after demographic deconfounding, we found that the most
liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal
satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and
conservative commentators. We validate our measures of political alignment and
lifestyle politics using the General Social Survey and find similar demographic
entanglements with lifestyle politics existed before social media such as
Facebook were ubiquitous, giving us strong confidence that our results are not
due to echo chambers or filter bubbles. Likewise, since demographic
characteristics exist prior to ideological values, we argue that the
demographic confounding we observe is causally responsible for the extreme
instances of lifestyle politics that we find among the aggregated interests. We
conclude our paper by relating our results to Simpson's paradox, cultural
omnivorousness, and network autocorrelation.
