  The proper Euclidean geometry is considered to be metric space and described
in terms of only metric and finite metric subspaces (sigma-immanent
description). Constructing the geometry, one does not use topology and
topological properties. For instance, the straight, passing through points A
and B, is defined as a set of such points R that the area S(A,B,R) of the
triangle ABR vanishes. The triangle area is expressed via metric by means of
the Hero's formula, and the straight appears to be defined only via metric,
i.e. without a reference to (topological) concept of curve. (Usually the
straight is defined as the shortest curve, connecting two points A and B). Such
a construction of geometry is free from constraints (continuity, dimensionality
of space), generated by a use of topology, but not by geometry in itself. At
such a description all information on the geometry properties (such as
uniformity, isotropy, continuity and degeneracy) is contained in metric.
Modifying the metric, one changes the geometry automatically. The Riemannian
geometry is constructed by two different ways: (1) by conventional way on the
basis of metric tensor, (2) as a result of modification of the metric in the
sigma-immanent description of the proper Euclidean geometry. The two obtained
geometries are compared. The convexity problem in geometry and the problem of
collinerity of vectors at distant points are considered. The nonmetric
definition of curve is shown to be a concept of only proper Euclidean geometry.
It is inadequate to any non-Euclidean geometry.
