  Parental control apps, which are mobile apps that allow parents to monitor
and restrict their children's activities online, are becoming increasingly
adopted by parents as a means of safeguarding their children's online safety.
However, it is not clear whether these apps are always beneficial or effective
in what they aim to do; for instance, the overuse of restriction and
surveillance has been found to undermine parent-child relationship and
children's sense of autonomy. In this work, we investigate this gap, asking
specifically: how might children's and parents' perceptions be related to how
parental control features were designed? To investigate this question, we
conducted an analysis of 58 top Android parental control apps designed for the
purpose of promoting children's online safety, finding three major axes of
variation in how key restriction and monitoring features were realised:
granularity, feedback/transparency, and parent-child communications support. To
relate these axes to perceived benefits and problems, we then analysed 3264 app
reviews to identify references to aspects of the each of the axes above, to
understand children's and parents' views of how such dimensions related to
their experiences with these apps. Our findings led towards 1) an understanding
of how parental control apps realise their functionalities differently along
three axes of variation, 2) an analysis of exactly the ways that such variation
influences children's and parents' perceptions, respectively of the usefulness
or effectiveness of these apps, and finally 3) an identification of design
recommendations and opportunities for future apps by contextualising our
findings within existing digital parenting theories.
