  Lorenzen's ``Algebraische und logistische Untersuchungen \"uber freie
Verb\"ande'' appeared in 1951 in The Journal of Symbolic Logic. These
``Investigations'' have immediately been recognised as a landmark in the
history of infinitary proof theory. Their approach and method of proof have not
been incorporated into the corpus of proof theory. Lorenzen proves the
admissibility of cut by double induction, on the cut formula and on the
complexity of the derivations, without using any ordinal assignment, contrary
to the presentation of cut elimination in most standard texts on proof theory.
We propose this introduction with the intent of giving a new impetus to their
reception. The ``Investigations'' are best known for providing a constructive
proof of consistency for ramified type theory without axiom of reducibility.
They do so by showing that it is a part of a trivially consistent ``inductive
calculus'' that describes our knowledge of arithmetic without detour. The proof
resorts only to the inductive definition of formulas and theorems. They propose
furthermore a definition of a semilattice, of a distributive lattice, of a
pseudocomplemented semilattice, and of a countably complete boolean algebra as
deductive calculuses, and show how to present them for constructing
conservatively the respective free object over a given preordered set. They
illustrate that lattice theory is a bridge between algebra and logic for which
the construction of an element corresponds to a step in a proof. We shall
describe the history of their reception, which focusses mainly on the
omega-rule. The fruitfulness of this device is immediately recognised by Kurt
Sch\"utte. It triggers the analysis by Ackermann (1951) of the infinitary
inductive definition of the accessibility predicate with the goal of proving
transfinite induction up to ordinal terms beyond epsilon_0, which is also taken
over by Sch\"utte (1952).
