  Laboratory models are often used to understand the interaction of related
pathogens via host immunity. For example, recent experiments where ferrets were
exposed to two influenza strains within a short period of time have shown how
the effects of cross-immunity vary with the time between exposures and the
specific strains used. On the other hand, studies of the workings of different
arms of the immune response, and their relative importance, typically use
experiments involving a single infection. However, inferring the relative
importance of different immune components from this type of data is
challenging. Using simulations and mathematical modelling, here we investigate
whether the sequential infection experiment design can be used not only to
determine immune components contributing to cross-protection, but also to gain
insight into the immune response during a single infection.
  We show that virological data from sequential infection experiments can be
used to accurately extract the timing and extent of cross-protection. Moreover,
the broad immune components responsible for such cross-protection can be
determined. Such data can also be used to infer the timing and strength of some
immune components in controlling a primary infection, even in the absence of
serological data. By contrast, single infection data cannot be used to reliably
recover this information. Hence, sequential infection data enhances our
understanding of the mechanisms underlying the control and resolution of
infection, and generates new insight into how previous exposure influences the
time course of a subsequent infection.
