  We use topological data analysis as a tool to analyze the fit of mathematical
models to experimental data. This study is built on data obtained from motion
tracking groups of aphids in [Nilsen et al., PLOS One, 2013] and two random
walk models that were proposed to describe the data. One model incorporates
social interactions between the insects, and the second model is a control
model that excludes these interactions. We compare data from each model to data
from experiment by performing statistical tests based on three different sets
of measures. First, we use time series of order parameters commonly used in
collective motion studies. These order parameters measure the overall
polarization and angular momentum of the group, and do not rely on a priori
knowledge of the models that produced the data. Second, we use order parameter
time series that do rely on a priori knowledge, namely average distance to
nearest neighbor and percentage of aphids moving. Third, we use computational
persistent homology to calculate topological signatures of the data. Analysis
of the a priori order parameters indicates that the interactive model better
describes the experimental data than the control model does. The topological
approach performs as well as these a priori order parameters and better than
the other order parameters, suggesting the utility of the topological approach
in the absence of specific knowledge of mechanisms underlying the data.
