  Ensuring quality human-AI interaction (HAII) in safety-critical industries is
essential. Failure to do so can lead to catastrophic and deadly consequences.
Despite this urgency, what little research there is on HAII is fragmented and
inconsistent. We present here a survey of that literature and recommendations
for research best practices that will improve the field. We divided our
investigation into the following research areas: (1) terms used to describe
HAII, (2) primary roles of AI-enabled systems, (3) factors that influence HAII,
and (4) how HAII is measured. Additionally, we described the capabilities and
maturity of the AI-enabled systems used in safety-critical industries discussed
in these articles. We found that no single term is used across the literature
to describe HAII and some terms have multiple meanings. According to our
literature, five factors influence HAII: user characteristics and background
(e.g., user personality, perceptions), AI interface and features (e.g.,
interactive UI design), AI output (e.g., accuracy, actionable recommendations),
explainability and interpretability (e.g., level of detail, user
understanding), and usage of AI (e.g., heterogeneity of environments and user
needs). HAII is most commonly measured with user-related subjective metrics
(e.g., user perception, trust, and attitudes), and AI-assisted decision-making
is the most common primary role of AI-enabled systems. Based on this review, we
conclude that there are substantial research gaps in HAII. Researchers and
developers need to codify HAII terminology, involve users throughout the AI
lifecycle (especially during development), and tailor HAII in safety-critical
industries to the users and environments.
