  "Interaction trees" (ITrees) are a general-purpose data structure for
representing the behaviors of recursive programs that interact with their
environments. A coinductive variant of "free monads," ITrees are built out of
uninterpreted events and their continuations. They support compositional
construction of interpreters from "event handlers", which give meaning to
events by defining their semantics as monadic actions. ITrees are expressive
enough to represent impure and potentially nonterminating, mutually recursive
computations, while admitting a rich equational theory of equivalence up to
weak bisimulation. In contrast to other approaches such as relationally
specified operational semantics, ITrees are executable via code extraction,
making them suitable for debugging, testing, and implementing software
artifacts that are amenable to formal verification.
  We have implemented ITrees and their associated theory as a Coq library,
mechanizing classic domain- and category-theoretic results about program
semantics, iteration, monadic structures, and equational reasoning. Although
the internals of the library rely heavily on coinductive proofs, the interface
hides these details so that clients can use and reason about ITrees without
explicit use of Coq's coinduction tactics.
  To showcase the utility of our theory, we prove the termination-sensitive
correctness of a compiler from a simple imperative source language to an
assembly-like target whose meanings are given in an ITree-based denotational
semantics. Unlike previous results using operational techniques, our
bisimulation proof follows straightforwardly by structural induction and
elementary rewriting via an equational theory of combinators for control-flow
graphs.
