  In transportation, the number of observations associated with one discrete
outcome is often greatly different from the number of observations associated
with another discrete outcome. This situation is known as class-imbalance. In
statistics, one hypothesized explanation for class imbalance is the existence
of data generating processes that are characterized by asymmetric (as opposed
to typically symmetric) probability functions. Despite being a valid hypothesis
for class-imbalanced choice situations, few simple models exist for testing
this explanation in transportation settings---settings that are inherently
multinomial. Our paper fills this gap. As such, it should be of interest to
transportation scholars and practitioners alike.
  Overall, we addressed the following questions: "how can one construct
asymmetric, closed-form, finite-parameter models of multinomial choice" and
"how do such models compare against commonly used symmetric models?" To do so,
we (1) introduced a new class of closed-form, finite-parameter, multinomial
choice models that we call "logit-type models," (2) introduced a procedure for
using our logit-type models to extend existing binary choice models to the
multinomial setting, and (3) introduced a procedure for creating new binary
choice models (both symmetric and asymmetric). Together, our contributions
allow us to create new asymmetric, multinomial choice models by creating
multinomial extensions of asymmetric, binary choice models that already exist
or that we create ourselves. We demonstrated our methods by developing four new
asymmetric, multinomial choice models. We found that most of our asymmetric
models dominated the multinomial logit (MNL) model in terms of in-sample and
out-of-sample log-likelihoods. Moreover, on our two empirical applications, we
also found practical differences between the MNL model and our new asymmetric
models.
