  Aims: To re-introduce the Heckman model as a valid empirical technique in
alcohol studies. Design: To estimate the determinants of problem drinking using
a Heckman and a two-part estimation model. Psychological and neuro-scientific
studies justify my underlying estimation assumptions and covariate exclusion
restrictions. Higher order tests checking for multicollinearity validate the
use of Heckman over the use of two-part estimation models. I discuss the
generalizability of the two models in applied research. Settings and
Participants: Two pooled national population surveys from 2016 and 2017 were
used: the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFS), and the National
Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Measurements: Participation in problem
drinking and meeting the criteria for problem drinking. Findings: Both U.S.
national surveys perform well with the Heckman model and pass all higher order
tests. The Heckman model corrects for selection bias and reveals the direction
of bias, where the two-part model does not. For example, the coefficients on
age are upward biased and unemployment is downward biased in the two-part where
the Heckman model does not have a selection bias. Covariate exclusion
restrictions are sensitive to survey conditions and are contextually
generalizable. Conclusions: The Heckman model can be used for alcohol (smoking
studies as well) if the underlying estimation specification passes higher order
tests for multicollinearity and the exclusion restrictions are justified with
integrity for the data used. Its use is merit-worthy because it corrects for
and reveals the direction and the magnitude of selection bias where the
two-part does not.
