  In graph theory, as well as in 3-manifold topology, there exist several
width-type parameters to describe how "simple" or "thin" a given graph or
3-manifold is. These parameters, such as pathwidth or treewidth for graphs, or
the concept of thin position for 3-manifolds, play an important role when
studying algorithmic problems; in particular, there is a variety of problems in
computational 3-manifold topology - some of them known to be computationally
hard in general - that become solvable in polynomial time as soon as the dual
graph of the input triangulation has bounded treewidth.
  In view of these algorithmic results, it is natural to ask whether every
3-manifold admits a triangulation of bounded treewidth. We show that this is
not the case, i.e., that there exists an infinite family of closed 3-manifolds
not admitting triangulations of bounded pathwidth or treewidth (the latter
implies the former, but we present two separate proofs).
  We derive these results from work of Agol, of Scharlemann and Thompson, and
of Scharlemann, Schultens and Saito by exhibiting explicit connections between
the topology of a 3-manifold M on the one hand and width-type parameters of the
dual graphs of triangulations of M on the other hand, answering a question that
had been raised repeatedly by researchers in computational 3-manifold topology.
In particular, we show that if a closed, orientable, irreducible, non-Haken
3-manifold M has a triangulation of treewidth (resp. pathwidth) k then the
Heegaard genus of M is at most 18(k+1) (resp. 4(3k+1)).
