  Network visualizations are commonly used to analyze relationships in various
contexts. To efficiently explore a network visualization, the user needs to
quickly navigate to different parts of the network and analyze local details.
Recent advancements in display and interaction technologies inspire new visions
for improved visualization and interaction design. Past research into network
design has identified some key benefits to visualizing networks in 3D versus
2D. However, little work has been done to study the impact of varying levels of
embodied interaction on network analysis. We present a controlled user study
that compared four environments featuring conditions and hardware that
leveraged different amounts of embodiment and visual perception ranging from a
2D visualization desktop environment with a standard mouse to a 3D
visualization virtual reality environment. We measured the accuracy, speed,
perceived workload, and preferences of 20 participants as they completed three
network analytic tasks, each of which required unique navigation and
substantial effort. For the task that required participants to iterate over the
entire visualization rather than focus on a specific area, we found that
participants were more accurate using a VR and a trackball mouse than
conventional desktop settings. From a workload perspective, VR was generally
considered the least mentally demanding and least frustrating in two of our
three tasks. It was also preferred and ranked as the most effective and
visually appealing condition overall. However, using VR to compare two
side-by-side networks was difficult, and it was similar to or slower than other
conditions in two of the three tasks. Overall, the accuracy and workload
advantages of conditions with greater embodiment in specific tasks suggest
promising opportunities to create more effective environments in which to
analyze network visualizations.
