  Radiotherapy is sensitive to executional and preparational uncertainties that
propagate to uncertainty in dose and plan quality indicators like dose-volume
histograms (DVHs). Current approaches to quantify and mitigate such
uncertainties rely on explicitly computed error scenarios and are thus subject
to statistical uncertainty and limitations regarding the underlying uncertainty
model. Here we present an alternative, analytical method to approximate moments
of the probability distribution of DVH-points and evaluate its accuracy on
patient data. We use analytical probabilistic modeling (APM) to derive those
moments for individual DVH-points based on the probability distribution over
dose. Further we use the computed moments to parameterize distinct probability
distributions over DVH-points (here normal or beta distributions) to compute
percentiles/$\alpha$-DVHs. The model is then evaluated on three patient cases
in 30- and single-fraction scenarios by assuming the dose to follow a
multivariate normal distribution obtained from APM. The results are compared to
a sampling benchmark. The evaluation of the new probabilistic model against the
sampling benchmark proves its correctness under perfect assumptions as well as
good agreement in realistic conditions. Ca. 90% of all computed expected
DVH-points and their standard deviations agree within 1% volume with their
empirical counterpart from sampling, for both fractionated and single fraction
treatments. $\alpha$-DVHs achieve better agreement with empirical percentiles
when assuming a beta instead of a normal distribution: While in both cases
probabilities show large local deviations (up to $\pm$0.2), the respective
$\alpha$-DVH only showed small deviations (up to $\pm$5% volume for a normal,
and up to 2% for a beta distribution). A previously published model by
different authors yielded substantially deviating $\alpha$-DVHs.
