  Parents - particularly moms - increasingly consult social media for support
when taking decisions about their young children, and likely also when advising
other family members such as elderly relatives. Minimizing malignant online
influences is therefore crucial to securing their assent for policies ranging
from vaccinations, masks and social distancing against the pandemic, to
household best practices against climate change, to acceptance of future 5G
towers nearby. Here we show how a strengthening of bonds across online
communities during the pandemic, has led to non-Covid-19 conspiracy theories
(e.g. fluoride, chemtrails, 5G) attaining heightened access to mainstream
parent communities. Alternative health communities act as the critical conduits
between conspiracy theorists and parents, and make the narratives more
palatable to the latter. We demonstrate experimentally that these
inter-community bonds can perpetually generate new misinformation, irrespective
of any changes in factual information. Our findings show explicitly why
Facebook's current policies have failed to stop the mainstreaming of
non-Covid-19 and Covid-19 conspiracy theories and misinformation, and why
targeting the largest communities will not work. A simple yet exactly solvable
and empirically grounded mathematical model, shows how modest tailoring of
mainstream communities' couplings could prevent them from tipping against
establishment guidance. Our conclusions should also apply to other social media
platforms and topics.
