  Objective: Radiation therapy treatment planning is a time-consuming,
iterative process with potentially high inter-planner variability. Fully
automated treatment planning processes could reduce a planner's active
treatment planning time and remove inter-planner variability, with the
potential to tremendously improve patient turnover and quality of care. In
developing fully automated algorithms for treatment planning, we have two main
objectives: to produce plans that are 1) Pareto optimal and 2) clinically
acceptable. Here, we propose the Pareto optimal projection search (POPS)
algorithm, which provides a general framework for directly searching the Pareto
front. Methods: Our POPS algorithm is a novel automated planning method that
combines two main search processes: 1) gradient-free search in the decision
variable space and 2) projection of decision variables to the Pareto front
using the bisection method. We demonstrate the performance of POPS by comparing
with clinical treatment plans. As one possible quantitative measure of
treatment plan quality, we construct a clinical acceptability scoring function
(SF) modified from the previously developed general evaluation metric (GEM).
Results: On a dataset of 21 prostate cases collected as part of clinical
workflow, our proposed POPS algorithm produces Pareto optimal plans that are
clinically acceptable in regards to dose conformity, dose homogeneity, and
sparing of organs-at-risk. Conclusion: Our proposed POPS algorithm provides a
general framework for fully automated treatment planning that achieves
clinically acceptable dosimetric quality without requiring active planning from
human planners. Significance: Our fully automated POPS algorithm addresses many
key limitations of other automated planning approaches, and we anticipate that
it will substantially improve treatment planning workflow.
