  For nearly half a century the supersolid phase of matter has remained
mysterious, not only eluding experimental observation, but also generating a
great deal of controversy among theorists. Recent discovery of what is
interpreted as a non-classical moment of inertia at low temperature in solid
He-4 has elicited much excitement as a possible first observation of a
supersolid phase. In the two years following the discovery, however, more
puzzles than answers have been provided to the fundamental issue of whether the
supersolid phase exists, in helium or any other naturally occurring condensed
matter system. Presently, there is no established theoretical framework to
understand the body of experimental data on He-4. Different microscopic
mechanisms that have been suggested to underlie superfluidity in a perfect
quantum crystal do not seem viable for \he4, for which a wealth of experimental
and theoretical evidence points to an insulating crystalline ground state. This
perspective addresses some of the outstanding problems with the interpretation
of recent experimental observations of the apparent superfluid response in He-4
(seen now by several groups) and discusses various scenarios alternative to the
homogeneous supersolid phase, such as superfluidity induced by extended defects
of the crystalline structure which include grain boundaries, dislocations,
anisotropic stresses, etc. Can a metastable superfluid "glassy" phase exist,
and can it be relevant to some of the experimental observations ? One of the
most interesting and unsolved fundamental questions is what interatomic
potentials, given the freedom to design one, can support an ideal supersolid
phase in continuous space, and can they be found in Nature.
