  Simulating abundances of stable water isotopologues, i.e. molecules differing
in their isotopic composition, within climate models allows for comparisons
with proxy data and, thus, for testing hypotheses about past climate and
validating climate models under varying climatic conditions. However, many
models are run without explicitly simulating water isotopologues. We
investigate the possibility to replace the explicit physics-based simulation of
oxygen isotopic composition in precipitation using machine learning methods.
These methods estimate isotopic composition at each time step for given fields
of surface temperature and precipitation amount. We implement convolutional
neural networks (CNNs) based on the successful UNet architecture and test
whether a spherical network architecture outperforms the naive approach of
treating Earth's latitude-longitude grid as a flat image. Conducting a case
study on a last millennium run with the iHadCM3 climate model, we find that
roughly 40\% of the temporal variance in the isotopic composition is explained
by the emulations on interannual and monthly timescale, with spatially varying
emulation quality. A modified version of the standard UNet architecture for
flat images yields results that are equally good as the predictions by the
spherical CNN. We test generalization to last millennium runs of other climate
models and find that while the tested deep learning methods yield the best
results on iHadCM3 data, the performance drops when predicting on other models
and is comparable to simple pixel-wise linear regression. An extended choice of
predictor variables and improving the robustness of learned climate--oxygen
isotope relationships should be explored in future work.
