  Heap data is potentially unbounded and seemingly arbitrary. As a consequence,
unlike stack and static memory, heap memory cannot be abstracted directly in
terms of a fixed set of source variable names appearing in the program being
analysed. This makes it an interesting topic of study and there is an abundance
of literature employing heap abstractions. Although most studies have addressed
similar concerns, their formulations and formalisms often seem dissimilar and
some times even unrelated. Thus, the insights gained in one description of heap
abstraction may not directly carry over to some other description. This survey
is a result of our quest for a unifying theme in the existing descriptions of
heap abstractions. In particular, our interest lies in the abstractions and not
in the algorithms that construct them.
  In our search of a unified theme, we view a heap abstraction as consisting of
two features: a heap model to represent the heap memory and a summarization
technique for bounding the heap representation. We classify the models as
storeless, store based, and hybrid. We describe various summarization
techniques based on k-limiting, allocation sites, patterns, variables, other
generic instrumentation predicates, and higher-order logics. This approach
allows us to compare the insights of a large number of seemingly dissimilar
heap abstractions and also paves way for creating new abstractions by
mix-and-match of models and summarization techniques.
