  The implementation of governmental Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs)
has been the primary means of controlling the spread of the COVID-19 disease.
The intended effect of these NPIs has been to reduce mobility. A strong
reduction in mobility is believed to have a positive effect on the reduction of
COVID-19 transmission by limiting the opportunity for the virus to spread in
the population. Due to the huge costs of implementing these NPIs, it is
essential to have a good understanding of their efficacy. Using global mobility
data, released by Apple and Google, and ACAPS NPI data, we investigate the
proportional contribution of NPIs on i) size of the change (magnitude) of
transition between pre- and post-lockdown mobility levels and ii) rate
(gradient) of this transition. Using generalized linear models to find the best
fit model we found similar results using Apple or Google data. NPIs found to
impact the magnitude of the change in mobility were: Lockdown measures (Apple,
Google Retail and Recreation (RAR) and Google Transit and Stations (TS)),
declaring a state of emergency (Apple, Google RAR and Google TS), closure of
businesses and public services (Google RAR) and school closures (Apple). Using
cluster analysis and chi square tests we found that closure of businesses and
public services, school closures and limiting public gatherings as well as
border closures and international flight suspensions were closely related. The
implementation of lockdown measures and limiting public gatherings had the
greatest effect on the rate of mobility change. In conclusion, we were able to
quantitatively assess the efficacy of NPIs in reducing mobility, which enables
us to understand their fine grained effects in a timely manner and therefore
facilitate well-informed and cost-effective interventions.
