  This note is a comment on a recent article [Tsakmakidis, et al., Nat Commun
10 (2019)] that presents a thought-provoking proposal to overcome the bandwidth
restrictions of invisibility cloaks based on using media that support
superluminal (faster than light in free space) group and phase velocities. As
illustrated in Fig. 1 of the original article, a wave packet propagating
through such a fast-light cloak is alleged to be able to reach the side behind
the cloaked object simultaneously with a corresponding wave packet propagating
through the shorter, direct route in free space without the object, so that "no
shadow or waveform distortion arises." As the authors claim, the "extra
pathlength is balanced out by the correspondingly larger group velocity of the
pulse in the cloak", which allows to "restore the incident field distribution
all around the object in, both, amplitude and phase". This fast-light effect
may be achieved in a broadband fashion using active (gain) materials. The
authors claim that such a fast-light cloak can hide an object, even from
time-of-flight detection techniques, and achieve invisibility "over any desired
frequency band." We disagree with these claims and believe that a thorough
clarification of the ideas put forward in the original article is important and
necessary for the broad wave-physics community. Specifically, in this comment
we clarify that invisibility cloaks based on fast-light media suffer from
fundamental bandwidth restrictions that arise due to causality, the nature of
superluminal wave propagation, and the stability issues of active systems.
These limitations and issues were not addressed in [Tsakmakidis, et al., Nat
Commun 10 (2019)]. Most importantly, we show that the material model considered
in the original article is unphysical.
