  Vaccination may be the solution to the pandemic-induced health crisis, but
the allocation of vaccines is a complex task in which economic and social
considerations can be important. The central problem is to use the limited
number of vaccines in a country to reduce the risk of infection and mitigate
economic uncertainty at the same time. In this paper, we propose a simple
economic model for vaccine allocation across two types of workers:
white-collars can work from home; while blue-collars must work on site. These
worker types are complementary to each other, thus a negative shock to the
supply of either one decreases the demand for the other that leads to
unemployment. Using parameters of blue and white-collar labor supply, their
infection risks, productivity losses at home office during lock-down, and
available vaccines, we express the optimal share of vaccines allocated to
blue-collars. The model points to the dominance of blue-collar vaccination,
especially during waves when their relative infection risks increase and when
the number of available vaccines is limited. Taking labor supply data from 28
European countries, we quantify blue-collar vaccine allocation that minimizes
unemployment across levels of blue- and white-collar infection risks. The model
favours blue-collar vaccination identically across European countries in case
of vaccine scarcity. As more vaccines become available, economies that host
large-shares of employees in home-office shall increasingly immunize them in
case blue-collar infection risks can be kept down. Our results highlight that
vaccination plans should include workers and rank them by type of occupation.
We propose that prioritizing blue-collar workers during infection waves and
early vaccination can also favour economy besides helping the most vulnerable
who can transmit more infection.
