  We show how faceted search using a combination of traditional classification
systems and mixed-membership topic models can go beyond keyword search to
inform resource discovery, hypothesis formulation, and argument extraction for
interdisciplinary research. Our test domain is the history and philosophy of
scientific work on animal mind and cognition. The methods can be generalized to
other research areas and ultimately support a system for semi-automatic
identification of argument structures. We provide a case study for the
application of the methods to the problem of identifying and extracting
arguments about anthropomorphism during a critical period in the development of
comparative psychology. We show how a combination of classification systems and
mixed-membership models trained over large digital libraries can inform
resource discovery in this domain. Through a novel approach of "drill-down"
topic modeling---simultaneously reducing both the size of the corpus and the
unit of analysis---we are able to reduce a large collection of fulltext volumes
to a much smaller set of pages within six focal volumes containing arguments of
interest to historians and philosophers of comparative psychology. The volumes
identified in this way did not appear among the first ten results of the
keyword search in the HathiTrust digital library and the pages bear the kind of
"close reading" needed to generate original interpretations that is the heart
of scholarly work in the humanities. Zooming back out, we provide a way to
place the books onto a map of science originally constructed from very
different data and for different purposes. The multilevel approach advances
understanding of the intellectual and societal contexts in which writings are
interpreted.
