  We introduce Flexible Representative Democracy (FRD), a novel hybrid of
Representative Democracy (RD) and Direct Democracy (DD) in which voters can
alter the issue-dependent weights of a set of elected representatives. In line
with the literature on Interactive Democracy, our model allows the voters to
actively determine the degree to which the system is direct versus
representative. However, unlike Liquid Democracy, Flexible Representative
Democracy uses strictly non-transitive delegations, making delegation cycles
impossible, and maintains a fixed set of accountable, elected representatives.
We present FRD and analyze it using a computational approach with issues that
are binary and symmetric. We compare the outcomes of various voting systems
using Direct Democracy with majority voting as an ideal baseline. First, we
demonstrate the shortcomings of Representative Democracy in our model. We
provide NP-Hardness results for electing an ideal set of representatives,
discuss pathologies, and demonstrate empirically that common multi-winner
election rules for selecting representatives do not perform well in
expectation. To analyze the effects of adding flexibility, we begin by
providing theoretical results on how issue-specific delegations determine
outcomes. Finally, we provide empirical results comparing the outcomes of
Representative Democracy, proxy voting with fixed sets of proxies across
issues, and Flexible Representative Democracy with issue-specific delegations.
Our results show that variants of Proxy Voting yield no discernible benefit
over unweighted representatives and reveal the potential for Flexible
Representative Democracy to improve outcomes as voter participation increases.
