  Information that is of relevance for decision-making is often distributed,
and held by self-interested agents. Decision markets are well-suited mechanisms
to elicit such information and aggregate it into conditional forecasts that can
be used for decision-making. However, for incentive-compatible elicitation,
decision markets rely on stochastic decision rules which entails that sometimes
actions have to be taken that have been predicted to be sub-optimal. In this
work, we propose three closely related mechanisms that elicit and aggregate
information similar to a decision market, but are incentive compatible despite
using a deterministic decision rule. Following ideas from peer prediction
mechanisms, proxies rather than observed future outcomes are used to score
predictions. The first mechanism requires the principal to have her own signal,
which is then used as a proxy to elicit information from a group of
self-interested agents. The principal then deterministically maps the
aggregated forecasts and the proxy to the best possible decision. The second
and third mechanisms expand the first to cover a scenario where the principal
does not have access to her own signal. The principal offers a partial profit
to align the interest of one agent and retrieve its signal as a proxy; or
alternatively uses a proper peer prediction mechanism to elicit signals from
two agents. Aggregation and decision-making then follow the first mechanism. We
evaluate our first mechanism using a multi-agent bandit learning system. The
result suggests that the mechanism can train agents to achieve a performance
similar to a Bayesian inference model with access to all information held by
the agents.
