  Computational models of the cardiovascular system are increasingly used for
the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Before
being used for translational applications, the predictive abilities of these
models need to be thoroughly demonstrated through verification, validation, and
uncertainty quantification. When results depend on multiple uncertain inputs,
sensitivity analysis is typically the first step required to separate relevant
from unimportant inputs, and is key to determine an initial reduction on the
problem dimensionality that will significantly affect the cost of all
downstream analysis tasks. For computationally expensive models with numerous
uncertain inputs, sample-based sensitivity analysis may become impractical due
to the substantial number of model evaluations it typically necessitates. To
overcome this limitation, we consider recently proposed Multifidelity Monte
Carlo estimators for Sobol' sensitivity indices, and demonstrate their
applicability to an idealized model of the common carotid artery. Variance
reduction is achieved combining a small number of three-dimensional
fluid-structure interaction simulations with affordable one- and
zero-dimensional reduced order models. These multifidelity Monte Carlo
estimators are compared with traditional Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos
expansion estimates. Specifically, we show consistent sensitivity ranks for
both bi- (1D/0D) and tri-fidelity (3D/1D/0D) estimators, and superior variance
reduction compared to traditional single-fidelity Monte Carlo estimators for
the same computational budget. As the computational burden of Monte Carlo
estimators for Sobol' indices is significantly affected by the problem
dimensionality, polynomial chaos expansion is found to have lower computational
cost for idealized models with smooth stochastic response.
