  The adaptive immune system constantly remodels its lymphocyte repertoire for
better protection against future pathogens. Its ability to improve antigen
recognition on the fly relies on somatic mutation and selective expansion of B
lymphocytes expressing high-affinity antigen receptors. However, this Darwinian
process inside an individual appears ineffective, hitting a modest ceiling of
antigen-binding affinity. Experiment began to reveal that evolving B cells
physically extract antigens from presenting cells and that the extraction level
dictates clonal expansion; this challenges the prevailing assumption that the
equilibrium constant of receptor-antigen binding determines selective
advantage. We present a theoretical framework to explore whether, and how, such
tug-of-war antigen extraction impacts the quality and diversity of an evolved B
cell repertoire. We find that the apparent ineffectiveness of clonal selection
can be a direct consequence of the non-equilibrium nature of antigen
recognition. Our theory predicts that the physical strength of antigen
tethering under tugging forces sets the affinity ceiling. Meanwhile, the model
showed that, intriguingly, cells can use force variability to diversify binding
phenotype without compromising fitness, thus remaining plastic under resource
constraint. These results suggest that active probing of receptor quality via a
molecular tug of war during antigen recognition limit the potency of response
to the current antigen, but confer adaptive benefit for protection against
future variants. Importantly, a saddle point in the fitness landscape of B cell
phenotype evolution emerges from the tug-of-war setting, which rationalizes
multiple key phenomenology and puts forward a role of active physical dynamics
in immune adaptation.
