  Phylogenetic analyses of gene expression have great potential for addressing
a wide range of questions. These analyses will, for example, identify genes
that have evolutionary shifts in expression that are correlated with
evolutionary changes in morphological, physiological, and developmental
characters of interest. This will provide entirely new opportunities to
identify genes related to particular phenotypes. There are, however, three key
challenges that must be addressed for such studies to realize their potential.
First, gene expression data must be measured from multiple species, some of
which may be field collected, and parameterized in such a way that they can be
compared across species. Second, it will be necessary to develop phylogenetic
comparative methods suitable for large multidimensional datasets. In most
phylogenetic comparative studies to date, the number n of independent
observations (independent contrasts) has been greater than the number p of
variables (characters). The behavior of comparative methods for these classic
n>p problems are now well understood under a wide variety of conditions. In
gene expression studies, and studies based on other high-throughput tools, the
number n of samples is dwarfed by the number p of variables. The estimated
covariance matrices will be singular, complicating their analysis and
interpretation, and prone to spurious results. Third, new approaches are needed
to investigate the expression of the many genes whose phylogenies are not
congruent with species phylogenies due to gene loss, gene duplication, and
incomplete lineage sorting. Here we outline general project design
considerations for phylogenetic analyses of gene expression, and suggest
solutions to these three categories of challenges. These topics are relevant to
high-throughput phenotypic data well beyond gene expression.
