  The prisoner's dilemma has long been considered the paradigm for studying the
emergence of cooperation among selfish individuals. Because of its importance,
it has been studied through computer experiments as well as in the laboratory
and by analytical means. However, there are important differences between the
way a system composed of many interacting elements is simulated by a digital
machine and the manner in which it behaves when studied in real experiments. In
some instances, these disparities can be marked enough so as to cast doubt on
the implications of cellular automata type simulations for the study of
cooperation in social systems. In particular, if such a simulation imposes
space-time granularity, then its ability to describe the real world may be
compromised. Indeed, we show that the results of digital simulations regarding
territoriality and cooperation differ greatly when time is discrete as opposed
to continuous.
