  Recent research has highlighted the non-uniqueness problem of energy-momentum
tensors in linearized gravity; many different tensors are published in the
literature, yet for particular calculations a unique expression is required. It
has been shown that (A) none of these spin-2 energy-momentum tensors are gauge
invariant and (B) the Noether and Hilbert energy-momentum tensors are not, in
general, equivalent; therefore uniqueness criteria is difficult to specify.
Conventional wisdom states that the various published energy-momentum tensors
for linearized gravity can be derived from the canonical Noether
energy-momentum tensor of spin-2 Fierz-Pauli theory by adding ad-hoc
'improvement' terms (the divergence of a superpotential and terms proportional
to the equations of motion), that these superpotentials are in some way unique
or physically significant, and that this implies some meaningful connection to
the Noether procedure. To explore this question of uniqueness, we consider the
most general possible energy-momentum tensor for linearized gravity with free
coefficients using the Fock method. We express this most general
energy-momentum tensor as the canonical Noether tensor, supplemented by the
divergence of a general superpotential plus all possible terms proportional to
the equations of motion. We then derive systems of equations which we solve in
order to prove several key results for spin-2 Fierz-Pauli theory, most notably
that there are infinitely many conserved energy-momentum tensors derivable from
the 'improvement' method, and there are infinitely many conserved symmetric
energy-momentum tensors that follow from specifying the Belinfante
superpotential alone. $\dots$ since there are infinitely many energy-momentum
tensors of this form, no meaningful or unique connection to Noether's first
theorem can be claimed by application of the canonical Noether 'improvement'
method.
