  We studied the discrimination of deformable objects by grasping them using 4
different robot hands / grippers: Barrett hand (3 fingers with adjustable
configuration, 96 tactile, 8 position, 3 torque sensors), qb SoftHand (5
fingers, 1 motor, position and current feedback), and two industrial type
parallel jaw grippers with position and effort feedback (Robotiq 2F-85 and
OnRobot RG6). A set of 9 ordinary objects differing in size and stiffness and
another highly challenging set of 20 polyurethane foams differing in material
properties only was used. We systematically compare the grippers' performance,
together with the effects of: (1) type of classifier (k-NN, SVM, LSTM)
operating on raw time series or on features, (2) action parameters (grasping
configuration and speed of squeezing), (3) contribution of sensory modalities.
Classification results are complemented by visualization of the data using PCA.
We found: (i) all the grippers but the qb SoftHand could reliably distinguish
the ordinary objects set; (ii) Barrett Hand reached around 95% accuracy on the
foams; OnRobot RG6 around 75% and Robotiq 2F-85 around 70%; (iii) across all
grippers, SVM over features and LSTM on raw time series performed best; (iv)
faster compression speeds degrade classification performance; (v) transfer
learning between compression speeds worked well for the Barrett Hand only;
transfer between grasping configurations is limited; (vi) ablation experiments
provided intriguing insights -- sometimes a single sensory channel suffices for
discrimination. Overall, the Barrett Hand as a complex and expensive device
with rich sensory feedback provided best results, but uncalibrated parallel jaw
grippers without tactile sensors can have sufficient performance for
single-grasp object discrimination based on position and effort data only.
Transfer learning between the different robot hands remains a challenge.
