  The RMA, since its introduction in \cite{Iri03a, Iri03b, Iri06}, has gained
popularity among bioinformaticians. It has evolved from the exponential-normal
convolution to the gamma-normal convolution, from single to two channels and
from the Affymetrix to the Illumina platform.
  The Illumina design has provided two probe types: the regular and the control
probes. This design is very suitable for studying the probability distribution
of both and one can apply the convolution model to compute the true intensity
estimator. The availability of benchmarking data set at Illumina platform, the
{\it Illumina spike-in}, helps researchers to evaluate their proposed method
for Illumina BeadArrays.
  In this paper, we study the existing convolution models for background
correction of Illumina BeadArrays in the literature and give a new estimator
for the true intensity, where the intensity value is exponentially or gamma
distributed and the noise has lognormal distribution. We compare the
performance of the models on the Illumina spike-in data set, based on various
criteria, for example, root and mean square error, $L_{1}$ error,
Kullback-Leibler coefficient, and some adapted criteria from Affycomp
\cite{Cop04}. We then provide a simulation study to measure the consistency of
the error of background correction and the parametrization. We also study the
performance of all models on the FFPE data set.
  Our study shows that our GLNn model is the optimal one for the benchmarking
data set with benchmarking criteria, while the gamma-normal model has the best
performance for the benchmarking data set with simulation criteria. At the
public data set of FFPE, the gamma-normal and the exponential-gamma models with
MLE cannot be used and our proposed models ELN and GLN have the best
performance, showing a moderate error in background correction and in the
parametrization.
