  Disease control is of paramount importance in public health with infectious
disease extinction as the ultimate goal. Although diseases may go extinct due
to random loss of effective contacts where the infection is transmitted to new
susceptible individuals, the time to extinction in the absence of control may
be prohibitively long. Thus intervention controls, such as vaccination of
susceptible individuals and/or treatment of infectives, are typically based on
a deterministic schedule, such as periodically vaccinating susceptible children
based on school calendars. In reality, however, such policies are administered
as a random process, while still possessing a mean period. Here, we consider
the effect of randomly distributed intervention as disease control on large
finite populations. We show explicitly how intervention control, based on mean
period and treatment fraction, modulates the average extinction times as a
function of population size and rate of infection spread. In particular, our
results show an exponential improvement in extinction times even though the
controls are implemented using a random Poisson distribution. Finally, we
discover those parameter regimes where random treatment yields an exponential
improvement in extinction times over the application of strictly periodic
intervention. The implication of our results is discussed in light of the
availability of limited resources for control.
