  Publications on automorphic representations of the group U(3) assumed the
validity of multiplicity one theorem since I claimed it in 1982. But the
argument, published 1988, was based on a misinterpretation of a claim of
Gelbart and Piatetski-Shapiro, SLN 1041 (1984), Prop. 2.4(i): ``L^2_{0,1} has
multiplicity 1'', as meaning that each irreducible in the space L^2_{0,1} of
generic cusp forms has multiplicity one in the space L^2_0 of cusp forms. The
statement meant in SLN 1041, ``each irreducible in L^2_{0,1} has multiplicity 1
in L^2_{0,1}'' is too weak to be useful for nongeneric representations, as the
present article points out. To remedy the situation, we detail in this paper
the local method we sketched in the paper of 1988.
  Let \psi be a generic character of the unipotent radical U of a Borel
subgroup of a quasisplit p-adic group G. The number (0 or 1) of \psi-Whittaker
models on an admissible irreducible representation \pi of G was expressed by
Rodier in terms of the limit of values of the trace of \pi at certain measures
concentrated near the origin. An analogous statement holds in the twisted case.
This article proves this twisted analogue for an involution when G=U(3) and p
is not 2, and uses it to provide a local proof of the multiplicity one theorem
for U(3). This asserts that each discrete spectrum automorphic representation
(with induced components at the dyadic places) of the quasisplit unitary group
U(3) associated with a quadratic extension E/F of number fields occurs in the
discrete spectrum with multiplicity one.
