  In this paper we deepen, in the setting of coherence, some results obtained
in recent papers on the notion of p-entailment of Adams and its relationship
with conjoined and iterated conditionals. We recall that conjoined and iterated
conditionals are suitably defined in the framework of conditional random
quantities. Given a family $\mathcal{F}$ of $n$ conditional events
$\{E_1|H_1,\ldots, E_n|H_n\}$ we denote by
$\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F})=(E_1|H_1)\wedge \cdots \wedge (E_n|H_n)$ the
conjunction of the conditional events in $\mathcal{F}$. We introduce the
iterated conditional $\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_2)|\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_1)$,
where $\mathcal{F}_1$ and $\mathcal{F}_2$ are two finite families of
conditional events, by showing that the prevision of
$\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_2)\wedge \mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_1)$ is the product of
the prevision of $\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_2)|\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_1)$ and
the prevision of $\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_1)$. Likewise the well known equality
$(A\wedge H)|H=A|H$, we show that $ (\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_2)\wedge
\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_1))|\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_1)=
\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_2)|\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F}_1)$. Then, we consider the
case $\mathcal{F}_1=\mathcal{F}_2=\mathcal{F}$ and we verify for the prevision
$\mu$ of $\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F})|\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F})$ that the unique
coherent assessment is $\mu=1$ and, as a consequence,
$\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F})|\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F})$ coincides with the constant
1. Finally, by assuming $\mathcal{F}$ p-consistent, we deepen some previous
characterizations of p-entailment by showing that $\mathcal{F}$ p-entails a
conditional event $E_{n+1}|H_{n+1}$ if and only if the iterated conditional
$(E_{n+1}|H_{n+1})\,|\,\mathscr{C}(\mathcal{F})$ is constant and equal to 1. We
illustrate this characterization by an example related with weak transitivity.
