  A society of agents, with ideological positions, or "opinions" measured by
real values ranging from $-\infty$ (the "far left") to $+\infty$ (the "far
right"), is considered. At fixed (unit) time intervals agents repeatedly
reconsider and change their opinions if and only if they find themselves at the
extremes of the range of ideological positions held by members of the society.
Extremist agents are erratic: they become either more radical, and move away
from the positions of other agents, with probability $\varepsilon$, or more
moderate, and move towards the positions held by peers, with probability $(1 -
\varepsilon)$. The change in the opinion of the extremists is one unit on the
real line. We prove that the agent positions cluster in time, with all
non-extremist agents located within a unit interval. However, the consensus
opinion is dynamic. Due to the extremists' erratic behavior the clustered
opinion set performs a "sluggish" random walk on the entire range of possible
ideological positions (the real line). The inertia of the group, the reluctance
of the society's agents to change their consensus opinion, increases with the
size of the group. The extremists perform biased random walk excursions to the
right and left and, in time, their actions succeed to move the society of
agents in random directions. The "far left" agent effectively pushes the group
consensus toward the right, while the "far right" agent counter-balances the
push and causes the consensus to move toward the left.
  We believe that this model, and some of its variations, has the potential to
explain the real world swings in societal ideologies that we see around us.
