  Compliance with the public health guidelines during a pandemic requires
coordinated community actions which might be undermined in socially diverse
areas. In this paper, we assess the relationship between caste-group diversity
and the spread of COVID-19 infection during the nationwide lockdown and
unlocking period in India. On the extensive margin, we find that
caste-homogeneous districts systematically took more days to cross the
concentration thresholds of 50 to 500 cases. Estimates on the intensive margin,
using daily cases, further show that caste-homogeneous districts experienced
slower growth in infection. Overall, the effects of caste-group homogeneity
remained positive and statistically significant for 2.5 months (about 76 days)
after the beginning of the lockdown and weakened with subsequent phases of the
lockdown. The results hold even after accounting for the emergence of initial
hotspots before lockdown, broader diffusion patterns through daily fixed
effects, region fixed effects, and dynamic administrative response through
time-variant lagged COVID-19 fatalities at the district level. These effects
are not found to be confounded by differential levels of testing and
underreporting of cases in some states. Consistent estimates from bias-adjusted
treatment effects also ensure that our findings remain robust even after
accounting for other unobservables. We find suggestive evidence of higher
engagement of community health workers in caste-homogenous localities, which
further increased after the lockdown. We posit this as one potential channel
that can explain our results. Our findings reveal how caste-group diversity can
be used to identify potential hotspots during public health emergencies and
emphasize the importance of community health workers and decentralized policy
response.
