  Empirical economic research crucially relies on highly sensitive individual
datasets. At the same time, increasing availability of public individual-level
data makes it possible for adversaries to potentially de-identify anonymized
records in sensitive research datasets. Most commonly accepted formal
definition of an individual non-disclosure guarantee is referred to as
differential privacy. It restricts the interaction of researchers with the data
by allowing them to issue queries to the data. The differential privacy
mechanism then replaces the actual outcome of the query with a randomised
outcome.
  The impact of differential privacy on the identification of empirical
economic models and on the performance of estimators in nonlinear empirical
Econometric models has not been sufficiently studied. Since privacy protection
mechanisms are inherently finite-sample procedures, we define the notion of
identifiability of the parameter of interest under differential privacy as a
property of the limit of experiments. It is naturally characterized by the
concepts from the random sets theory.
  We show that particular instances of regression discontinuity design may be
problematic for inference with differential privacy as parameters turn out to
be neither point nor partially identified. The set of differentially private
estimators converges weakly to a random set. Our analysis suggests that many
other estimators that rely on nuisance parameters may have similar properties
with the requirement of differential privacy. We show that identification
becomes possible if the target parameter can be deterministically located
within the random set. In that case, a full exploration of the random set of
the weak limits of differentially private estimators can allow the data curator
to select a sequence of instances of differentially private estimators
converging to the target parameter in probability.
