  We study the capabilities of probabilistic finite-state machines that act as
verifiers for certificates of language membership for input strings, in the
regime where the verifiers are restricted to toss some fixed nonzero number of
coins regardless of the input size. Say and Yakary{\i}lmaz showed that the
class of languages that could be verified by these machines within an error
bound strictly less than $1/2$ is precisely NL, but their construction yields
verifiers with error bounds that are very close to $1/2$ for most languages in
that class when the definition of "error" is strengthened to include looping
forever without giving a response. We characterize a subset of NL for which
verification with arbitrarily low error is possible by these extremely weak
machines. It turns out that, for any $\varepsilon>0$, one can construct a
constant-coin, constant-space verifier operating within error $\varepsilon$ for
every language that is recognizable by a linear-time multi-head
nondeterministic finite automaton (2nfa($k$)). We discuss why it is difficult
to generalize this method to all of NL, and give a reasonably tight way to
relate the power of linear-time 2nfa($k$)'s to simultaneous time-space
complexity classes defined in terms of Turing machines.
