  We quantify the sensitivity of the Eisenberg-Noe clearing vector to
estimation errors in the bilateral liabilities of a financial system in a
stylized setting. The interbank liabilities matrix is a crucial input to the
computation of the clearing vector. However, in practice central bankers and
regulators must often estimate this matrix because complete information on
bilateral liabilities is rarely available. As a result, the clearing vector may
suffer from estimation errors in the liabilities matrix. We quantify the
clearing vector's sensitivity to such estimation errors and show that its
directional derivatives are, like the clearing vector itself, solutions of
fixed point equations. We describe estimation errors utilizing a basis for the
space of matrices representing permissible perturbations and derive analytical
solutions to the maximal deviations of the Eisenberg-Noe clearing vector. This
allows us to compute upper bounds for the worst case perturbations of the
clearing vector in our simple setting. Moreover, we quantify the probability of
observing clearing vector deviations of a certain magnitude, for uniformly or
normally distributed errors in the relative liability matrix.
  Applying our methodology to a dataset of European banks, we find that
perturbations to the relative liabilities can result in economically sizeable
differences that could lead to an underestimation of the risk of contagion. Our
results are a first step towards allowing regulators to quantify errors in
their simulations.
