  Numerical predictions of quantities of interest measured within physical
systems rely on the use of mathematical models that should be validated, or at
best, not invalidated. Model validation usually involves the comparison of
experimental data (outputs from the system of interest) and model predictions,
both obtained at a specific validation scenario. The design of this validation
experiment should be directly relevant to the objective of the model, that of
predicting a quantity of interest at a prediction scenario. In this paper, we
address two specific issues arising when designing validation experiments. The
first issue consists in determining an appropriate validation scenario in cases
where the prediction scenario cannot be carried out in a controlled
environment. The second issue concerns the selection of observations when the
quantity of interest cannot be readily observed. The proposed methodology
involves the computation of influence matrices that characterize the response
surface of given model functionals. Minimization of the distance between
influence matrices allow one for selecting a validation experiment most
representative of the prediction scenario. We illustrate our approach on two
numerical examples. The first example considers the validation of a simple
model based on an ordinary differential equation governing an object in free
fall to put in evidence the importance of the choice of the validation
experiment. The second numerical experiment focuses on the transport of a
pollutant and demonstrates the impact that the choice of the quantity of
interest has on the validation experiment to be performed.
