  From the fundamental theorem of screening (FTS) we obtain the following
mathematical relationship relaying the pre-test probability of disease $\phi$
to the positive predictive value $\rho(\phi)$ of a screening test:
  $\displaystyle\lim_{\varepsilon \to 2}{\displaystyle
\int_{0}^{1}}{\rho(\phi)d\phi} = 1$
  where $\varepsilon$ is the screening coefficient - the sum of the sensitivity
($a$) and specificity ($b$) parameters of the test in question. However, given
the invariant points on the screening plane, identical values of $\varepsilon$
may yield different shapes of the screening curve since $\varepsilon$ does not
respect traditional commutative properties. In order to compare the performance
between two screening curves with identical $\varepsilon$ values, we derive two
geometric definitions of the positive likelihood ratio (LR+), defined as the
likelihood of a positive test result in patients with the disease divided by
the likelihood of a positive test result in patients without the disease, which
helps distinguish the performance of both screening tests. The first definition
uses the angle $\beta$ created on the vertical axis by the line between the
origin invariant and the prevalence threshold $\phi_e$ such that $LR+ =
\frac{a}{1-b} = cot^2{(\beta)}$. The second definition projects two lines
$(y_1,y_2)$ from any point on the curve to the invariant points on the plane
and defines the LR+ as the ratio of its derivatives $\frac{dy_1}{dx}$ and
$\frac{dy_2}{dx}$. Using the concepts of the prevalence threshold and the
invariant points on the screening plane, the work herein presented provides a
new geometric definition of the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) throughout the
prevalence spectrum and describes a formal measure to compare the performance
of two screening tests whose screening coefficients $\varepsilon$ are equal.
