  We first consider the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox for the system of
two particles with spin 1/2 with entangled spins in first-quantized quantum
mechanics (QM). If measurement is governed by wavefunction collapse, then
gedanken experiments show that a number of fundamental principles including
conservation of angular momentum and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle can
be violated. We conclude that the collapse of the spin part of the wavefunction
cannot happen and therefore an EPR paradox does not arise for this system. QM
unitarity alone is sufficient to rule out "spooky" action at a distance. The
absence of spin wavefunction collapse leads to several interesting conclusions
about how measurement works in QM: When wavefunction collapse does not happen,
(i) a signal from a macroscopic measuring device indicating that a system is in
a state S does not necessarily mean that it is or was in S and (ii) the
uncertainty in QM at the microscopic level is transmitted to uncertainty in
signals for the macroscopic measuring device. We derive two general results on
how quantum measurement works and illustrate them in a spin-1/2 measurement. In
contrast to first-quantized QM, in quantum field theory we are unable to fully
rule out the possibility of wavefunction collapse. However, when we insist on
unitarity (thereby excluding the possibility of wavefunction collapse) and
additionally take into account in the wavefunction all degrees of freedom
involved in the measurement (including those of the equipment,
experimentalists, etc.), a consistant acceptable understanding of the
Bell-inequality-type experiments involving entangled photon polarizations
emerges including the absence of an EPR paradox. The ability of an
experimentalist to be aware of his perceptions but unable to be conscious of
other components of a generalized Schrodinger Cat plays a role in resolving the
Measurement Problem.
