  The current dominated wearable body motion sensor is IMU. This work presented
an alternative wearable motion-sensing approach: human body capacitance (HBC,
also commonly defined as body-area electric field). While being less robust in
tracking the posture and trajectory, HBC has two properties that make it an
attractive. First, the deployment of the sensing node on the being tracked body
part is not a requirement for HBC sensing approach. Second, HBC is sensitive to
the body's interaction with its surroundings, including both touching and being
in the immediate proximity of people and objects. We first described the
sensing principle for HBC, sensor architecture and implementation, and methods
for evaluation. We then presented two case studies demonstrating the usefulness
of HBC as a complement/alternative to IMUs. First, we explored the exercise
recognition and repetition counting of seven machine-free leg-only exercises
and eleven general gym workouts with the signal source of HBC and IMU. The HBC
sensing shows significant advantages over the IMU signals in
classification(0.89 vs 0.78 in F-score) and counting(0.982 vs 0.938 in
accuracy) of the leg-only exercises. For the general gym workouts, HBC only
shows recognition improvement for certain workouts like adductor where legs
alone complete the movement. And it also supplies better results over the IMU
for workouts counting(0.800 vs. 0.756 when wearing the sensors on the wrist).
In the second case, we tried to recognize actions related to manipulating
objects and physical collaboration between users by using a wrist-worn HBC
sensing unit. We detected collaboration between the users with 0.69 F-score
when receiving data from a single user and 0.78 when receiving data from both
users. The capacitive sensor can improve the recognition of collaborative
activities with an F-score over a single wrist accelerometer approach by 16\%.
