  Visco-elasticity is the essential ingredient for quantitative seismic imaging
and geological interpretation in a number of contexts, such as in the presence
of gas clouds. Decades of developments of numerical simulation of visco-elastic
wave equations in seismology are mainly based on constant Q model, leading to
numerous different forms of time-domain visco-elastic wave equations. Based on
rheological models, Emmerich and Korn (1987) adopted the Generalized Maxwell
body (GMB) to implement visco-elastic wave equations in time domain. Carcione,
Kosloff, and Kosloff (1988a) incorporated the Generalized Zener body (GZB) into
the time-domain visco-elastic wave equation. Moczo and Kristek (2005) proved
that visco-elastic complex modulus based on GMB and GZB are equivalent.
However, from the rheological point of view, this formalism can not incorporate
the fractional visco-elastic wave equations based on the constant Q model
(Kjartansson, 1979). Mainardi (2010) first mentioned that the constant Q model
is based on a fractional Scott-Blair model. The stress-strain relationship of
the Scott-Blair model is between a spring and a dashpot. Therefore, we review
the various visco-elastic wave equations in the text of seismology. Based on
the stress-strain constitutive law of rheological models, we propose a
unification way to describe the existed visco-elastic wave equations. The
unification formalism indicates that each kind of visco-elastic wave equation
is composed by the combination of basic rheological elements, e.g., GMB, GZB.
In this paper, we gather knowledge usually available in separated papers in the
fields of fractional calculus, rheology, mechanics, and seismology. By
unification formalism, we can establish more clearly links between different
approaches used in seismology.
