  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the setup uncertainties for
single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) based on the clinical data
with the two different mask-creation methods using pretreatment CBCT imaging
guidance. Dedicated frameless fixation BrainLAB masks for 23 patients were
created as a routine mask (R-mask) making method, as explained in the BrainLAB
user manual. The alternative masks (A-mask) which were created by modifying the
cover range of the R-mask for the patient head were used for 23 patients. The
systematic errors including the each mask and stereotactic target localizer
were analyzed and the errors were calculated as the mean and standard deviation
(SD) from the LR, SI, AP, and yaw setup corrections. In addition, the frequency
of three-dimensional (3D) vector length were also analyzed. The values of the
mean setup corrections for the R-mask in all directions were small; < 0.7 mm
and < 0.1 degree, whereas the magnitudes of the SDs were relatively large
compared to the mean values. In contrast to the R-mask, the means and SDs of
the A-mask were smaller than those for the R-mask with the exception of the SD
in the AP direction. The mean and SD in the yaw rotational direction in the
R-mask and A-mask system were comparable. The 3D vector shifts of a larger
magnitude occurred more frequently for the R-mask than the A-mask. The setup
uncertainties for each mask with the stereotactic localizing system had an
asymmetric offset towards the positive AP direction. The A-mask-creation
method, which is capable of covering the top of the patient head is superior to
that for R-mask, and thereby the use of the A-mask is encouraged for SF-SRS to
reduce the setup uncertainties. Moreover, the careful mask making is required
to prevent the possible setup uncertainties.
