  Developing exoskeletons that can reduce the metabolic cost of assisted
subjects is challenging since a systematic design approach is required to
capture the effects of device dynamics and the assistance torques on human
performance. Design studies that rely on musculoskeletal models hold high
promise in providing effective design guidelines, as the effect of various
devices and different assistance torque profiles on metabolic cost can be
studied systematically. In this paper, we present a simulation-based
multi-criteria design approach to systematically study the effect of different
device kinematics and corresponding optimal assistive torque profiles under
actuator saturation on the metabolic cost, muscle activation, and joint
reaction forces of subjects walking under different loading conditions. For the
multi-criteria comparison of exoskeletons, we introduce a Pareto optimization
approach to simultaneously optimize the exoskeleton power consumption and the
human metabolic rate reduction during walking, under different loading
conditions. We further superpose the effects of device inertia and electrical
regeneration on the metabolic rate and power consumption, respectively. Our
results explain the effects of heavy loads on the optimal assistance profiles
of the exoskeletons and provide guidelines on choosing optimal device
configurations under actuator torque limitations, device inertia, and
regeneration effects. The multi-criteria comparison of devices indicates that
despite the similar assistance levels of both devices, mono-articular
exoskeletons show better performance on reducing the peak reaction forces,
while the power consumption of bi-articular devices is less sensitive to the
loading. Furthermore, for the bi-articular exoskeletons, the device inertia has
lower detrimental effects on the metabolic cost of subjects and does not affect
the Pareto-optimality of solutions.
