  Although reinforcement learning methods offer a powerful framework for
automatic skill acquisition, for practical learning-based control problems in
domains such as robotics, imitation learning often provides a more convenient
and accessible alternative. In particular, an interactive imitation learning
method such as DAgger, which queries a near-optimal expert to intervene online
to collect correction data for addressing the distributional shift challenges
that afflict na\"ive behavioral cloning, can enjoy good performance both in
theory and practice without requiring manually specified reward functions and
other components of full reinforcement learning methods. In this paper, we
explore how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance
under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than
those of interactive imitation learning. Our proposed method uses reinforcement
learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards. This relaxes the
assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be
near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the
potential suboptimal human expert. We also provide a unified framework to
analyze our RL method and DAgger; for which we present the asymptotic analysis
of the suboptimal gap for both methods as well as the non-asymptotic sample
complexity bound of our method. We then evaluate our method on challenging
high-dimensional continuous control simulation benchmarks as well as real-world
robotic vision-based manipulation tasks. The results show that it strongly
outperforms DAgger-like approaches across the different tasks, especially when
the intervening experts are suboptimal. Code and videos can be found on the
project website: rlif-page.github.io
