  Targeted user studies are often employed to measure how well artists can
perform specific tasks. But these studies cannot properly describe editing
workflows as wholes, since they guide the artists both by choosing the tasks
and by using simplified interfaces. In this paper, we investigate digital
sculpting workflows used to produce detailed models. In our experiment design,
artists can choose freely what and how to model. We recover whole-workflow
trends with sophisticated statistical analyzes and validate these trends with
goodness-of-fits measures. We record brush strokes and mesh snapshots by
instrumenting a sculpting program and analyze the distribution of these
properties and their spatial and temporal characteristics. We hired expert
artists that can produce relatively sophisticated models in short time, since
their workflows are representative of best practices. We analyze 13 meshes
corresponding to roughly 25 thousand strokes in total. We found that artists
work mainly with short strokes, with average stroke length dependent on model
features rather than the artist itself. Temporally, artists do not work
coarse-to-fine but rather in bursts. Spatially, artists focus on some selected
regions by dedicating different amounts of edits and by applying different
techniques. Spatio-temporally, artists return to work on the same area multiple
times without any apparent periodicity. We release the entire dataset and all
code used for the analyzes as reference for the community.
