  GIS-based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis is a well-known decision support
tool that can be used in a wide variety of contexts. It is particularly useful
for territorial planning in situations where several actors with different, and
sometimes contradictory, point of views have to take a decision regarding land
use development. While the impact of the weights used to represent the relative
importance of criteria has been widely studied in the recent literature, the
impact of the order weights used to combine the criteria have rarely been
investigated. This paper presents a spatial sensitivity analysis to assess the
impact of order weights determination in GIS-based Multi-Criteria Analysis by
Ordered Weighted Averaging. We propose a methodology based on an efficient
exploration of the decision-strategy space defined by the level of risk and
trade-off in the decision process. We illustrate our approach with a land use
planning process in the South of France. The objective is to find suitable
areas for urban development while preserving green areas and their associated
ecosystem services. The ecosystem service approach has indeed the potential to
widen the scope of traditional landscape-ecological planning by including
ecosystem-based benefits, including social and economic benefits, green
infrastructures and biophysical parameters in urban and territorial planning.
We show that in this particular case the decision-strategy space can be divided
into four clusters. Each of them is associated with a map summarizing the
average spatial suitability distribution used to identify potential areas for
urban development. We also demonstrate the pertinence of a spatial variance
within-cluster analysis to disentangle the relationship between risk and
trade-off values. At the end, we perform a site suitability ranking analysis to
assess the relationship between the four detected clusters.
