  Error-bounded lossy compression is one of the most effective techniques for
scientific data reduction. However, the traditional trial-and-error approach
used to configure lossy compressors for finding the optimal trade-off between
reconstructed data quality and compression ratio is prohibitively expensive. To
resolve this issue, we develop a general-purpose analytical ratio-quality model
based on the prediction-based lossy compression framework, which can
effectively foresee the reduced data quality and compression ratio, as well as
the impact of the lossy compressed data on post-hoc analysis quality. Our
analytical model significantly improves the prediction-based lossy compression
in three use-cases: (1) optimization of predictor by selecting the best-fit
predictor; (2) memory compression with a target ratio; and (3) in-situ
compression optimization by fine-grained error-bound tuning of various data
partitions. We evaluate our analytical model on 10 scientific datasets,
demonstrating its high accuracy (93.47% accuracy on average) and low
computational cost (up to 18.7X lower than the trial-and-error approach) for
estimating the compression ratio and the impact of lossy compression on
post-hoc analysis quality. We also verified the high efficiency of our
ratio-quality model using different applications across the three use-cases. In
addition, the experiment demonstrates that our modeling based approach reduces
the time to store the 3D Reverse Time Migration data by up to 3.4X over the
traditional solution using 128 CPU cores from 8 compute nodes.
