  Economic theory is a mathematically rich field in which there are
opportunities for the formal analysis of singularities and catastrophes. This
article looks at the historical context of singularities through the work of
two eminent Frenchmen around the late 1960s and 1970s. Ren\'e Thom (1923-2002)
was an acclaimed mathematician having received the Fields Medal in 1958,
whereas G\'erard Debreu (1921-2004) would receive the Nobel Prize in economics
in 1983. Both were highly influential within their fields and given the
fundamental nature of their work, the potential for cross-fertilisation would
seem to be quite promising. This was not to be the case: Debreu knew of Thom's
work and cited it in the analysis of his own work, but despite this and other
applied mathematicians taking catastrophe theory to economics, the theory never
achieved a lasting following and relatively few results were published. This
article reviews Debreu's analysis of the so called ${\it regular}$ and ${\it
crtitical}$ economies in order to draw some insights into the economic
perspective of singularities before moving to how singularities arise naturally
in the Nash equilibria of game theory. Finally a modern treatment of stochastic
game theory is covered through recent work on the quantal response equilibrium.
In this view the Nash equilibrium is to the quantal response equilibrium what
deterministic catastrophe theory is to stochastic catastrophe theory, with some
caveats regarding when this analogy breaks down discussed at the end.
