  Past years have seen the development of a few proposals for quantum
extensions of process calculi. The rationale is clear: with the development of
quantum communication protocols, there is a need to abstract and focus on the
basic features of quantum concurrent systems, like CCS has done for its
classical counterpart. So far, though, no accepted standard has emerged,
neither for the syntax nor for the behavioural semantics. Indeed, the various
proposals do not agree on what should be the observational properties of
quantum values, and as a matter of fact, the soundness of such properties has
never been validated against the prescriptions of quantum theory.
  To this aim, we introduce a new calculus, Linear Quantum CCS, and investigate
the features of behavioural equivalences based on barbs and contexts. Our
calculus can be thought of as an asynchronous, linear version of qCCS (based on
value-passing CCS). Linearity ensures that each qubit is sent exactly once,
precisely specifying which qubits of a process interact with the context.
  We exploit contexts to examine how bisimilarities relate to quantum theory.
We show that the observational power of general contexts is incompatible with
quantum theory: roughly, they can perform non-deterministic moves depending on
quantum values without measuring (hence perturbing) them.
  Therefore, we refine the operational semantics in order to prevent contexts
from performing unfeasible non-deterministic choices. This induces a coarser
bisimilarity that better fits the quantum setting: (i) it lifts the
indistinguishability of quantum states to the distributions of processes and,
despite the additional constraints, (ii) it preserves the expressivity of
non-deterministic choices based on classical information. To the best of our
knowledge, our semantics is the first one that satisfies the two properties
above.
