  Although healthcare is a remarkably sensitive domain of application, and
systems that exert direct control over the world can cause harm in a way that
humans cannot necessarily correct or oversee, it is still unclear whether and
how healthcare robots are currently regulated or should be regulated. Existing
regulations are primarily unprepared to provide guidance for such a rapidly
evolving field and accommodate devices that rely on machine learning and AI.
Moreover, the field of healthcare robotics is very rich and extensive, but it
is still very much scattered and unclear in terms of definitions, medical and
technical classifications, product characteristics, purpose, and intended use.
As a result, these devices often navigate between the medical device regulation
or other non-medical norms, such as the ISO personal care standard. Before
regulating the field of healthcare robots, it is therefore essential to map the
major state-of-the-art developments in healthcare robotics, their capabilities
and applications, and the challenges we face as a result of their integration
within the healthcare environment.
  This contribution fills in this gap and lack of clarity currently experienced
within healthcare robotics and its governance by providing a structured
overview of and further elaboration on the main categories now established,
their intended purpose, use, and main characteristics. We explicitly focus on
surgical, assistive, and service robots to rightfully match the definition of
healthcare as the organized provision of medical care to individuals, including
efforts to maintain, treat, or restore physical, mental, or emotional
well-being. We complement these findings with policy recommendations to help
policymakers unravel an optimal regulatory framing for healthcare robot
technologies
