  During morphogenesis, the shape of a tissue emerges from collective cellular
behaviors, which are in part regulated by mechanical and biochemical
interactions between cells. Quantification of force and stress is therefore
necessary to analyze the mechanisms controlling tissue morphogenesis. Recently,
a mechanical measurement method based on force inference from cell shapes and
connectivity has been developed. It is non-invasive, and can provide space-time
maps of force and stress within an epithelial tissue, up to prefactors. We
previously performed a comparative study of three force-inference methods,
which differ in their approach of treating indefiniteness in an inverse problem
between cell shapes and forces. In the present study, to further validate and
compare the three force inference methods, we tested their robustness by
measuring temporal fluctuation of estimated forces. Quantitative data of
cell-level dynamics in a developing tissue suggests that variation of forces
and stress will remain small within a short period of time ($\sim$minutes).
Here, we showed that cell-junction tensions and global stress inferred by the
Bayesian force inference method varied less with time than those inferred by
the method that estimates only tension. In contrast, the amplitude of temporal
fluctuations of estimated cell pressures differs less between different
methods. Altogether, the present study strengthens the validity and robustness
of the Bayesian force-inference method.
