  Conversational recommender systems (CRS) enhance the expressivity and
personalization of recommendations through multiple turns of user-system
interaction. Critiquing is a well-known paradigm for CRS that allows users to
iteratively refine recommendations by providing feedback about attributes of
recommended items. While existing critiquing methodologies utilize direct
attributes of items to address user requests such as 'I prefer Western movies',
the opportunity of incorporating richer contextual and side information about
items stored in Knowledge Graphs (KG) into the critiquing paradigm has been
overlooked. Employing this substantial knowledge together with a
well-established reasoning methodology paves the way for critique-based
recommenders to allow for complex knowledge-based feedback (e.g., 'I like
movies featuring war side effects on veterans') which may arise in natural
user-system conversations. In this work, we aim to increase the flexibility of
critique-based recommendation by integrating KGs and propose a novel Bayesian
inference framework that enables reasoning with relational knowledge-based
feedback. We study and formulate the framework considering a Gaussian
likelihood and evaluate it on two well-known recommendation datasets with KGs.
Our evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework in leveraging
indirect KG-based feedback (i.e., preferred relational properties of items
rather than preferred items themselves), often improving personalized
recommendations over a one-shot recommender by more than 15%. This work enables
a new paradigm for using rich knowledge content and reasoning over indirect
evidence as a mechanism for critiquing interactions with CRS.
