  We sing the praises of the central limit theorem. Having previously removed
all other possible causes of significant systematic error in the statistical
parallax determination of RR Lyrae absolute magnitudes, we investigate
systematic errors from two final sources of input data: apparent magnitudes and
extinctions. We find corrections due to each of ~0.05 mag, i.e., ~1/2 the
statistical error. However, these are of opposite sign and so roughly cancel.
The apparent magnitude system that we previously adopted from Layden et al. was
calibrated to the photometry of Clube & Dawe. Using Hipparcos photometry we
show that the Clube & Dawe system is ~0.06 mag too bright. Extinctions were
previously pinned to the HI-based map of Burstein & Heiles. We argue that A_V
should rather be based on new COBE/IRAS dust-emission map of Schlegel,
Finkbeiner & Davis. This change increases the mean A_V by ~0.05 mag. We find
M_V=0.77 +/- 0.13 at [Fe/H]=-1.60 for a pure sample of 147 halo RR Lyraes, or
M_V=0.80 +/- 0.11 at [Fe/H]=-1.71 if we incorporate kinematic information from
716 non-kinematically selected non-RR Lyrae stars from Beers & Sommer-Larsen.
These are 2 and 3 sigma fainter than recent determinations of M_V from main
sequence fitting of clusters using Hipparcos measurements of subdwarfs by Reid
and Gratton et al. Since statistical parallax is being cleared of systematic
errors and since the chance of a >2 sigma statistical fluctuation is <1/20, we
conclude that these brighter determinations may be in error. In the course of
three papers, we have corrected 6 systematic errors whose absolute values total
0.20 mag. Had these, contrary to the expectation of the central limit theorem,
all lined up one way, they could have resolved the conflict in favor of the
brighter determinations. In fact, the net change was only 0.06 mag.
