  Scaling laws in ecology, intended both as functional relationships among
ecologically-relevant quantities and the probability distributions that
characterize their occurrence, have long attracted the interest of empiricists
and theoreticians. Empirical evidence exists of power laws associated with the
number of species inhabiting an ecosystem, their abundances and traits.
Although their functional form appears to be ubiquitous, empirical scaling
exponents vary with ecosystem type and resource supply rate. The idea that
ecological scaling laws are linked had been entertained before, but the full
extent of macroecological pattern covariations, the role of the constraints
imposed by finite resource supply and a comprehensive empirical verification
are still unexplored. Here, we propose a theoretical scaling framework that
predicts the linkages of several macroecological patterns related to species'
abundances and body sizes. We show that such framework is consistent with the
stationary state statistics of a broad class of resource-limited community
dynamics models, regardless of parametrization and model assumptions. We verify
predicted theoretical covariations by contrasting empirical data and provide
testable hypotheses for yet unexplored patterns. We thus place the observed
variability of ecological scaling exponents into a coherent statistical
framework where patterns in ecology embed constrained fluctuations.
