  Research on the convergence of gaming and gambling has been around since the
1990s. The emergence of loot boxes in video games in the mid 2010s, a game
mechanic with a chance-based outcome that shares structural and psychological
similarities to gambling, caused public controversy and lead to the inception
of a new field of study, loot box research. Since then, various studies have
found a relationship between loot box engagement and problem gambling as well
as problem gaming. Due to the cross-sectional nature of this data, however,
inferences about causality are limited. While loot box research has extensively
investigated the relationship between loot box engagement and problem
behaviour, little research has been done to explain the underlying motivations
of players that drive them to interact with loot boxes. The goal of this thesis
is to provide possible explanations for the relationship between loot box
engagement and problem gamblers or problem gamers. In doing so, it draws upon
two prominent psychological theories. Self-Determination Theory and the
Dualistic Model of Passion. Self-Determination Theory's concept of
psychological needs and their satisfaction or frustration is hereby used to
explain the development of harmonious or obsessive passions, which are
introduced in the Dualistic Model of Passion. These obsessive passions have
been shown to be possible antecedents of behavioural addictions, such as
problem gambling or problem gaming. Thus, the interplay between needs, passions
and loot box opening could elucidate the aforementioned correlations between
loot box engagement and problem behaviour. However, further research,
especially utilising longitudinal data, is needed to better understand these
processes.
