  The use of special operations forces (SOF) in war fighting and peace keeping
efforts has increased dramatically in recent decades. A scientific
understanding of the reason for this increase would provide guidance as to the
contexts in which SOF can be used to their best effect. Ashby's law of
requisite variety provides a scientific framework for understanding and
analyzing a system's ability to survive and prosper in the face of
environmental challenges. We have developed a generalization of this law to
extend the analysis to systems that must respond to disturbances at multiple
scales. This analysis identifies a necessary tradeoff between scale and
complexity in a multiscale control system. As with Ashby's law, the framework
applies to the characterization of successful biological and social systems in
the context of complex environmental challenges. Here we apply this multiscale
framework to provide a control theoretic understanding of the historical and
increasing need for SOF, as well as conventional military forces. We propose
that the essential role distinction is in the separation between high
complexity fine scale challenges as opposed to large scale challenges. This
leads to a correspondence between the role SOF can best serve and that of the
immune system in complex organisms--namely, the ability to respond to
fine-grained, high-complexity disruptors and preserve tissue health. Much like
a multicellular organism, human civilization is composed of a set of distinct
and heterogeneous social tissues. Responding to disruption and restoring health
in a system with highly diverse local social conditions is an essentially
complex task. SOF have the potential to mitigate against harm without
disrupting normal social tissue behavior. This analysis suggests how SOF might
be leveraged to support global stability and mitigate against cascading crises.
