  In the abstract Tile Assembly Model (aTAM), the phenomenon of cooperation
occurs when the attachment of a new tile to a growing assembly requires it to
bind to more than one tile already in the assembly. Often referred to as
``temperature-2'' systems, those which employ cooperation are known to be quite
powerful (i.e. they are computationally universal and can build an enormous
variety of shapes and structures). Conversely, aTAM systems which do not
enforce cooperative behavior, a.k.a. ``temperature-1'' systems, are conjectured
to be relatively very weak, likely to be unable to perform complex computations
or algorithmically direct the process of self-assembly. Nonetheless, a variety
of models based on slight modifications to the aTAM have been developed in
which temperature-1 systems are in fact capable of Turing universal computation
through a restricted notion of cooperation. Despite that power, though, several
of those models have previously been proven to be unable to perform or simulate
the stronger form of cooperation exhibited by temperature-2 aTAM systems.
  In this paper, we first prove that another model in which temperature-1
systems are computationally universal, namely the restricted glue TAM (rgTAM)
in which tiles are allowed to have edges which exhibit repulsive forces, is
also unable to simulate the strongly cooperative behavior of the temperature-2
aTAM. We then show that by combining the properties of two such models, the
Dupled Tile Assembly Model (DTAM) and the rgTAM into the DrgTAM, we derive a
model which is actually more powerful at temperature-1 than the aTAM at
temperature-2. Specifically, the DrgTAM, at temperature-1, can simulate any
aTAM system of any temperature, and it also contains systems which cannot be
simulated by any system in the aTAM.
