  Conservation laws that are based on the divergence of a second-rank
four-tensor are fundamentally different from conservation laws based on the
divergence of a four-vector. This article investigates the consequences of this
difference for understanding the relation between electromagnetic field
momentum and the flow of electromagnetic field energy. Momentum and energy
conservation require electromagnetic field momentum and energy to be treated as
physically real, even in static fields. This motivates the conjecture that
field momentum might be due to the flow of a relativistic mass density (energy
density divided by the square of the speed of light). This article investigates
the velocity of such flow and finds a conflict between two different
definitions of it. This investigation is careful to respect the transformation
rules of special relativity. The paper demonstrates that the consensus
definition of the flow velocity of electromagnetic energy is inconsistent with
the transformation rules of special relativity, and hence is incorrect. A
correct flow velocity is then derived which is completely consistent with those
transformation rules. The conclusion is that these conflicting definitions of
flow velocity cannot be resolved in a way that is consistent with special
relativity and that also allows electromagnetic field momentum to be the result
of energy flow. Though real, field momentum cannot be explained as the flow of
field energy. As a byproduct of the study, it is also shown that there is a
comoving system in which the electromagnetic energy-momentum tensor is reduced
to a simple diagonal form, with two of its diagonal elements equal to the
energy density and the other two diagonal elements equal to plus and minus a
single parameter derived from the electromagnetic field values, a result that
places constraints on possible fluid models of electromagnetism.
