  Sex differences in early age mortality have been explained in prior
literature by differences in biological make-up and gender discrimination in
the allocation of household resources. Studies estimating the effects of these
factors have generally assumed that offspring sex ratio is random, which is
implausible in view of recent evidence that the sex of a child is partly
determined by prenatal environmental factors. These factors may also affect
child health and survival in utero or after birth, which implies that
conventional approaches to explaining sex differences in mortality are likely
to yield biased estimates. We propose a methodology for decomposing these
differences into the effects of prenatal environment, child biology, and
parental preferences. Using a large sample of twins, we compare mortality rates
in male-female twin pairs in India, a region known for discriminating against
daughters, and sub-Saharan Africa, a region where sons and daughters are
thought to be valued by their parents about equally. We find that: (1) prenatal
environment positively affects the mortality of male children; (2) biological
make-up of the latter contributes to their excess mortality, but its effect has
been previously overestimated; and (3) parental discrimination against female
children in India negatively affects their survival; but failure to control for
the effects of prenatal and biological factors leads conventional approaches to
underestimating its effect by 237 percent during infancy, and 44 percent during
childhood.
