  In a recent paper [arXiv:1406.1320] Paris has made several comments
concerning the author's recent work on the exactification of Stirling's
approximation for the logarithm of the gamma function, $\ln \Gamma(z)$. Despite
acknowledging that the calculations in Ref. 2 are basically correct, he claims
that there is no need for the concept of regularisation when determining values
of $\ln \Gamma(z)$ from its complete asymptotic expansion. Here it is shown
that he has already applied the concept at the beginning of the analysis in
Ref. 1. Next he claims that the definition used in Ref. 2 for the Stokes
multiplier in the subdominant part of a complete expansion, which is
responsible for demonstrating that the Stokes phenomenon is discontinuous
rather than a smooth transition, is not correct. It is shown that the Stokes
multiplier used in Ref. 2 is entirely consistent with Berry's description of
the conventional view of the Stokes phenomenon in his famous work where he
developed the smoothing view [15]. Furthermore, it is pointed out that Paris
has not substantiated the smoothing view by at least reproducing or improving
the results in Table 7 of Ref. 2, which not only confirm the jump discontinuous
nature of the Stokes phenomenon, but also provide accurate values of $\ln
\Gamma(z)$ to 30 figures, regardless of the size of the variable or whether the
truncation is optimal or not. Finally, the issue of computational expediency of
MB-regularised values over Borel-summed values is discussed since Paris is
critical of the Borel-summed forms being used in computations.
