  The development of data-driven heart sound classification models has been an
active area of research in recent years. To develop such data-driven models in
the first place, heart sound signals need to be captured using a signal
acquisition device. However, it is almost impossible to capture noise-free
heart sound signals due to the presence of internal and external noises in most
situations. Such noises and degradations in heart sound signals can potentially
reduce the accuracy of data-driven classification models. Although different
techniques have been proposed in the literature to address the noise issue, how
and to what extent different noise and degradations in heart sound signals
impact the accuracy of data-driven classification models remains unexplored. To
answer this question, we produced a synthetic heart sound dataset including
normal and abnormal heart sounds contaminated with a large variety of noise and
degradations. We used this dataset to investigate the impact of noise and
degradation in heart sound recordings on the performance of different
classification models. The results show different noises and degradations
affect the performance of heart sound classification models to a different
extent; some are more problematic for classification models, and others are
less destructive. Comparing the findings of this study with the results of a
survey we previously carried out with a group of clinicians shows noise and
degradations that are more detrimental to classification models are also more
disruptive to accurate auscultation. The findings of this study can be
leveraged to develop targeted heart sound quality enhancement approaches -
which adapt the type and aggressiveness of quality enhancement based on the
characteristics of noise and degradation in heart sound signals.
