  Background: The company-internal reuse of software components owned by
organizational units in different countries is taxable. To comply with
international taxation standards, multinational enterprises need to consider a
geographical perspective on their software architecture. However, there is no
viewpoint that frames the concerns of tax authorities as stakeholders towards a
globally distributed software architecture.
  Objective: In this article, we introduce the reader to the concerns of tax
authorities as stakeholders and we investigate how software companies can
describe their globally distributed software architectures to tax authorities.
  Method: In an in-virtuo experiment, we (1) develop a viewpoint that frames
the concerns of tax authorities, (2) create a view of a large-scale, globally
distributed microservice architecture from a multinational enterprise, and (3)
evaluate the resulting software architecture description with a panel of four
tax experts.
  Results: The panel of tax experts found that our proposed architectural
viewpoint properly and sufficiently frames the concerns of taxation
stakeholders. However, the resulting view falls short: Although the
architecture description reveals that almost 70% of all reuse relationships
between the 2560 microservices in our case are cross-border and, therefore,
taxable, unclear jurisdictions of owners and a potentially insufficient
definition of ownership introduce significant noise to the view that limits its
usefulness and explanatory power of our software architecture description.
  Conclusion: Although our software architecture description provides a solid
foundation for the subsequent step, namely valuing software components, we
stumbled over several theoretical and practical problems when identifying and
defining ownership in distributed teams, which requires further
interdisciplinary research.
