  How do genes affect cognitive ability or other human quantitative traits such
as height or disease risk? Progress on this challenging question is likely to
be significant in the near future. I begin with a brief review of psychometric
measurements of intelligence, introducing the idea of a "general factor" or g
score. The main results concern the stability, validity (predictive power), and
heritability of adult g. The largest component of genetic variance for both
height and intelligence is additive (linear), leading to important
simplifications in predictive modeling and statistical estimation. Due mainly
to the rapidly decreasing cost of genotyping, it is possible that within the
coming decade researchers will identify loci which account for a significant
fraction of total g variation. In the case of height analogous efforts are well
under way. I describe some unpublished results concerning the genetic
architecture of height and cognitive ability, which suggest that roughly 10k
moderately rare causal variants of mostly negative effect are responsible for
normal population variation. Using results from Compressed Sensing
(L1-penalized regression), I estimate the statistical power required to
characterize both linear and nonlinear models for quantitative traits. The main
unknown parameter s (sparsity) is the number of loci which account for the bulk
of the genetic variation. The required sample size is of order 100s, or roughly
a million in the case of cognitive ability.
