  We consider a computational model which is known as set automata.
  The set automata are one-way finite automata with an additional storage---the
set. There are two kinds of set automata---the deterministic and the
nondeterministic ones. We denote them as DSA and NSA respectively. The model
was introduced by M. Kutrib, A. Malcher, M. Wendlandt in 2014. It was shown
that DSA-languages look similar to DCFL due to their closure properties and
NSA-languages look similar to CFL due to their undecidability properties.
  In this paper we show that this similarity is natural: we prove that
languages recognizable by NSA form a rational cone, so as CFL.
  The main topic of this paper is computational complexity: we prove that
  - languages recognizable by DSA belong to P and there are P-complete
languages among them;
  - languages recognizable by NSA are in NP and there are NP-complete languages
among them;
  - the word membership problem is P-complete for DSA without epsilon-loops and
PSPACE-complete for general DSA;
  - the emptiness problem is in PSPACE for NSA and, moreover, it is
PSPACE-complete for DSA.
