  Weak-memory models are standard formal specifications of concurrency across
hardware, programming languages, and distributed systems. A fundamental
computational problem is consistency testing: is the observed execution of a
concurrent program in alignment with the specification of the underlying
system? The problem has been studied extensively across Sequential Consistency
(SC) and weak memory, and proven to be NP-complete when some aspect of the
input (e.g., number of threads/memory locations) is unbounded. This
unboundedness has left a natural question open: are there efficient
parameterized algorithms for testing?
  The main contribution of this paper is a deep hardness result for consistency
testing under many popular weak-memory models: the problem remains NP-complete
even in its bounded setting, where candidate executions contain a bounded
number of threads, memory locations, and values. This hardness spreads across
several Release-Acquire variants of C11, a popular variant of its Relaxed
fragment, popular Causal Consistency models, and the POWER architecture. To our
knowledge, this is the first result that fully exposes the hardness of
weak-memory testing and proves that the problem admits no parameterization
under standard input parameters. It also yields a computational separation of
these models from SC, x86-TSO, PSO, and Relaxed, for which bounded consistency
testing is either known (for SC), or shown here (for the rest), to be in
polynomial time.
