  Problem-driven visualization work is rooted in deeply understanding the data,
actors, processes, and workflows of a target domain. However, an individual's
personality traits and cognitive abilities may also influence visualization
use. Diverse user needs and abilities raise natural questions for specificity
in visualization design: Could individuals from different domains exhibit
performance differences when using visualizations? Are any systematic
variations related to their cognitive abilities? This study bridges
domain-specific perspectives on visualization design with those provided by
cognition and perception. We measure variations in visualization task
performance across chemistry, computer science, and education, and relate these
differences to variations in spatial ability. We conducted an online study with
over 60 domain experts consisting of tasks related to pie charts, isocontour
plots, and 3D scatterplots, and grounded by a well-documented spatial ability
test. Task performance (correctness) varied with profession across more complex
visualizations, but not pie charts, a comparatively common visualization. We
found that correctness correlates with spatial ability, and the professions
differ in terms of spatial ability. These results indicate that domains differ
not only in the specifics of their data and tasks, but also in terms of how
effectively their constituent members engage with visualizations and their
cognitive traits. Analyzing participants' confidence and strategy comments
suggests that focusing on performance neglects important nuances, such as
differing approaches to engage with even common visualizations and potential
skill transference. Our findings offer a fresh perspective on
discipline-specific visualization with recommendations to help guide
visualization design that celebrates the uniqueness of the disciplines and
individuals we seek to serve.
