  State-of-the-art metal halide perovskite-based photovoltaics often employ
organic ammonium salts, AX, as a surface passivator, where A is a large organic
cation and X is a halide. These surface treatments passivate the perovskite by
forming layered perovskites (e.g., A2PbX4) or by AX itself serving as a surface
passivation agent on the perovskite photoactive film. It remains unclear
whether layered perovskites or AX is the ideal passivator due to an incomplete
understanding of the interfacial impact and resulting photoexcited carrier
dynamics of AX treatment. In the present study, we use TRPL measurements to
selectively probe the different interfaces of glass/perovskite/AX to
demonstrate the vastly distinct interfacial photoexcited state dynamics with
the presence of A2PbX4 or AX. Coupling the TRPL results with X-ray diffraction
and nanoscale microscopy measurements, we find that the presence of AX not only
passivates the traps at the surface and the grain boundaries, but also induces
an {\alpha}/{\delta}-FAPbI3 phase mixing that alters the carrier dynamics near
the glass/perovskite interface and enhances the photoluminescence quantum
yield. In contrast, the passivation with A2PbI4 is mostly localized to the
surface and grain boundaries near the top surface where the availability of
PbI2 directly determines the formation of A2PbI4. Such distinct mechanisms
significantly impact the corresponding solar cell performance, and we find AX
passivation that has not been converted to a layered perovskite allows for a
much larger processing window (e.g., larger allowed variance of AX
concentration which is critical for improving the eventual manufacturing yield)
and more reproducible condition to realize device performance improvements,
while A2PbI4 as a passivator yields a much narrower processing window. We
expect these results to enable a more rational route for developing AX for
perovskite.
