  Our aural experience plays an integral role in the perception and memory of
the events in our lives. Some of the sounds we encounter throughout the day
stay lodged in our minds more easily than others; these, in turn, may serve as
powerful triggers of our memories. In this paper, we measure the memorability
of everyday sounds across 20,000 crowd-sourced aural memory games, and assess
the degree to which a sound's memorability is constant across subjects. We then
use this data to analyze the relationship between memorability and acoustic
features like harmonicity, spectral skew, and models of cognitive salience; we
also assess the relationship between memorability and high-level features with
a dependence on the sound source itself, such as its familiarity, valence,
arousal, source type, causal certainty, and verbalizability. We find that (1)
our crowd-sourced measures of memorability and confusability are reliable and
robust across participants; (2) that the authors' measure of collective causal
uncertainty detailed in our previous work, coupled with measures of
visualizability and valence, are the strongest individual predictors of
memorability; (3) that acoustic and salience features play a heightened role in
determining "confusability" (the false positive selection rate associated with
a sound) relative to memorability, and that (4), within the framework of our
assessment, memorability is an intrinsic property of the sounds from the
dataset, shown to be independent of surrounding context. We suggest that
modeling these cognitive processes opens the door for human-inspired
compression of sound environments, automatic curation of large-scale
environmental recording datasets, and real-time modification of aural events to
alter their likelihood of memorability.
