  Musculoskeletal models have the potential to improve diagnosis and optimize
clinical treatment by predicting accurate outcomes on an individual basis.
However, the subject-specific modeling of spinal alignment is often strongly
simplified or is based on radiographic assessments, exposing subjects to
unnecessary radiation. We therefore developed a novel skin marker-based
approach for modeling subject-specific spinal alignment and evaluated its
feasibility by comparing the predicted with the actual intervertebral joint
(IVJ) locations/orientations (ground truth) using lateral-view radiographic
images. Moreover, the predictive performance of the subject-specific models was
evaluated by comparing the predicted L1/L2 spinal loads during various
functional activities with in vivo measured data obtained from the OrthoLoad
database. IVJ locations/orientations were predicted closer to ground truth as
opposed to standard model scaling, with average location prediction errors of
0.99+/-0.68 cm on the frontal and 1.21+/-0.97 cm on the transverse axis as well
as an average orientation prediction error of 4.74{\deg}+/-2.80{\deg}.
Simulated spinal loads showed similar curve patterns but considerably larger
values as compared to in vivo measured data. Differences in spinal loads
between generic and subject-specific models become only apparent on an
individual subject level. These results underline the feasibility of the
proposed method and associated workflow for inter- and intra-subject
investigations using musculoskeletal simulations. When implemented into
standard model scaling workflows, it is expected to improve the accuracy of
muscle activity and joint loading simulations, which is crucial for
investigations of treatment effects or pathology-dependent deviations.
