  This paper is concerned with the problem of variable selection in the
presence of parameter instability when both the marginal effects of signals on
the target variable and the correlations of the covariates in the active set
could vary over time. We pose the issue of whether one should use weighted or
unweighted observations at the variable selection stage in the presence of
parameter instability, particularly when the number of potential covariates is
large. We allow parameter instability to be continuous or discrete, subject to
certain regularity conditions. We discuss the pros and cons of Lasso and the
One Covariate at a time Multiple Testing (OCMT) method for variable selection
and argue that OCMT has important advantages under parameter instability. We
establish three main theorems on selection, estimation post selection, and
in-sample fit. These theorems provide justification for using unweighted
observations at the selection stage of OCMT and down-weighting of observations
only at the forecasting stage. It is shown that OCMT delivers better forecasts,
in mean squared error sense, as compared to Lasso, Adaptive Lasso and boosting
both in Monte Carlo experiments as well as in 3 sets of empirical applications:
forecasting monthly returns on 28 stocks from Dow Jones , forecasting quarterly
output growths across 33 countries, and forecasting euro area output growth
using surveys of professional forecasters.
