  Flexibility options, such as demand response, energy storage and
interconnection, have the potential to reduce variation in electricity prices
between different future scenarios, therefore reducing investment risk.
Moreover, investment in flexibility options can lower the need for generation
capacity. However, there are complex interactions between different flexibility
options. In this paper, we investigate the interactions between flexibility and
investment risk in electricity markets. We employ a large-scale stochastic
transmission and generation expansion model of the European electricity system.
Using this model, we first investigate the effect of risk aversion on the
investment decisions. We find that the interplay of parameters leads to (i)
more investment in a less emission-intensive energy system if planners are risk
averse (hedging against CO2 price uncertainty) and (ii) constant total
installed capacity, regardless of the level of risk aversion (planners do not
hedge against demand and RES deployment uncertainties). Second, we investigate
the individual effects of three flexibility elements on optimal investment
levels under different levels of risk aversion: demand response, investment in
additional interconnection capacity and investment in additional energy
storage. We find that that flexible technologies have a higher value for
risk-averse decision-makers, although the effects are nonlinear. Finally, we
investigate the interactions between the flexibility elements. We find that
risk-averse decision-makers show a strong preference for transmission grid
expansion once flexibility is available at low cost levels.
