  Various poverty reduction strategies are being implemented in the pursuit of
eliminating extreme poverty. One such strategy is increased access to
microcredit in poor areas around the world. Microcredit, typically defined as
the supply of small loans to underserved entrepreneurs that originally aimed at
displacing expensive local money-lenders, has been both praised and criticized
as a development tool (Banerjee et al., 2015b). This paper presents an analysis
of heterogeneous impacts from increased access to microcredit using data from
three randomised trials. In the spirit of recognising that in general the
impact of a policy intervention varies conditional on an unknown set of
factors, particular, we investigate whether heterogeneity presents itself as
groups of winners and losers, and whether such subgroups share characteristics
across RCTs. We find no evidence of impacts, neither average nor
distributional, from increased access to microcredit on consumption levels. In
contrast, the lack of average effects on profits seems to mask heterogeneous
impacts. The findings are, however, not robust to the specific machine learning
algorithm applied. Switching from the better performing Elastic Net to the
worse performing Random Forest leads to a sharp increase in the variance of the
estimates. In this context, methods to evaluate the relative performing machine
learning algorithm developed by Chernozhukov et al. (2019) provide a
disciplined way for the analyst to counter the uncertainty as to which
algorithm to deploy.
