  Machine learning (ML) approaches have demonstrated promising results in a
wide range of healthcare applications. Data plays a crucial role in developing
ML-based healthcare systems that directly affect people's lives. Many of the
ethical issues surrounding the use of ML in healthcare stem from structural
inequalities underlying the way we collect, use, and handle data. Developing
guidelines to improve documentation practices regarding the creation, use, and
maintenance of ML healthcare datasets is therefore of critical importance. In
this work, we introduce Healthsheet, a contextualized adaptation of the
original datasheet questionnaire ~\cite{gebru2018datasheets} for
health-specific applications. Through a series of semi-structured interviews,
we adapt the datasheets for healthcare data documentation. As part of the
Healthsheet development process and to understand the obstacles researchers
face in creating datasheets, we worked with three publicly-available healthcare
datasets as our case studies, each with different types of structured data:
Electronic health Records (EHR), clinical trial study data, and
smartphone-based performance outcome measures. Our findings from the
interviewee study and case studies show 1) that datasheets should be
contextualized for healthcare, 2) that despite incentives to adopt
accountability practices such as datasheets, there is a lack of consistency in
the broader use of these practices 3) how the ML for health community views
datasheets and particularly \textit{Healthsheets} as diagnostic tool to surface
the limitations and strength of datasets and 4) the relative importance of
different fields in the datasheet to healthcare concerns.
