  A selection of intellectual goods produced by online communities - e.g. open
source software or knowledge bases like Wikipedia - are in daily use by a broad
audience, and thus their quality impacts the public at large. Yet, it is still
unclear what contributes to the effectiveness of such online peer production
systems: what conditions or social processes help them deliver quality
products. Specifically, while co-contribution (i.e. bipartite networks) are
often investigated in online collaboration, the role of interpersonal
communication in coordination of online peer-production is much less
investigated. To address this gap we have reconstructed networks of personal
communication (direct messaging) between Wikipedia editors gathered in so
called Wikiprojects - teams of contributors who focus on articles within
specific topical areas. We found that effective projects exchange larger volume
of direct messages and that their communication structure allows for complex
coordination: for sharing of information locally through selective ties, and at
the same time globally across the whole group. To verify how these network
measures relate to the subjective perception of importance of group
communication we conducted semi-structured interviews with members of selected
projects. Our interviewees used direct communication for providing feedback,
for maintaining close relations and for tapping on the social capital of the
Wikipedia community. Our results underscore the importance of communication
structure in online collaboration: online peer production communities rely on
interpersonal communication to coordinate their work and to maintain high
levels of engagement. Design of platforms for such communities should allow for
ample group level communication as well as for one-on-one interactions.
