  Identifying factors that affect participation is key to a successful
insurance scheme. This study's challenges involve using many factors that could
affect insurance participation to make a better forecast.Huge numbers of
factors affect participation, making evaluation difficult. These interrelated
factors can mask the influence on adhesion predictions, making them
misleading.This study evaluated how 66 common characteristics affect insurance
participation choices. We relied on individual farm data from FADN from 2016 to
2019 with type 1 (Fieldcrops) farming with 10,926 observations.We use three
Machine Learning (ML) approaches (LASSO, Boosting, Random Forest) compare them
to the GLM model used in insurance modelling. ML methodologies can use a large
set of information efficiently by performing the variable selection. A highly
accurate parsimonious model helps us understand the factors affecting insurance
participation and design better products.ML predicts fairly well despite the
complexity of insurance participation problem. Our results suggest Boosting
performs better than the other two ML tools using a smaller set of regressors.
The proposed ML tools identify which variables explain participation choice.
This information includes the number of cases in which single variables are
selected and their relative importance in affecting participation.Focusing on
the subset of information that best explains insurance participation could
reduce the cost of designing insurance schemes.
