  How does an electrochemical interface respond to changes in the electrode
potential? How does the response affect the key properties of the system -
energetics, excess charge, capacitance? Essential questions key to ab-initio
simulations of electrochemical systems, which we address in this work on the
basis of a rigorous mathematical evaluation of the interfacial energetics at
constant applied potential. By explicitly taking into account the
configurational and electronic degrees of freedom we derive important
statements about stationary points in the electronically grand canonical
ensemble. We analyze their geometric response to changes in electrode potential
and show that it can be mapped identically onto an additional contribution to
the system's capacitance. We draw similar conclusions for the constant charge
ensemble which equally allows to assess the respective stationary points. Our
analysis of the relation between the canonical and grand canonical energetics
reveals, however, one key difference between both ensembles. While the constant
potential ensemble yields in general positive capacitances at local minima, the
capacitance of local minima in the constant charge ensemble might become
negative. We trace back this feature to the possibility of character switching
of stationary points when switching between the ensembles causing the
differences in the response to perturbations.
  Our systematical analysis not only provides a detailed qualitative and
quantitative understanding of the interplay between electronic and
configurational degrees of freedom and their contributions to the energetics of
electrified interfaces but also highlights the similarities and subtle
dissimilarities between the canonical and grand canonical description of the
electronic degrees of freedom, which is crucial for a better understanding of
theoretical calculations with and without potentiostat.
