  Today, many wireless device providers choose to sell devices bundled with
complementary mobile social services, which exhibit strong positive network
externality. This paper aims to quantify the benefits of selling devices and
complementary services under the following three strategies: separate pricing,
bundled pricing, and hybrid pricing (both the separate and bundled options are
offered). A comprehensive comparison of the above three strategies is carried
out for two popular service models, namely physical connectivity sharing and
virtual content sharing, respectively. We first study the physical service
model where the provider (e.g., FON) offers users customized WiFi devices for
indoor Internet access, and allows service subscribers to physically access all
device owners' WiFi when traveling. Observing that all device-owners contribute
to the connectivity sharing, we show, via a Stackelberg game theoretic
approach, that bundled pricing outperforms separate pricing as long as the
total cost of device and service is reasonably low to stimulate network
externality. Further, hybrid pricing strictly dominates bundled pricing thanks
to the pricing flexibility to keep high marginal profit of device-selling.
Next, we investigate the virtual sharing service model where the provider
(e.g., Apple) sells devices and device-supported applications. Different from
the connectivity service model, in this model service subscribers directly
contribute to the virtual content sharing, and the network externality can be
fairly strong. We prove that hybrid pricing degenerates to bundled pricing if
the network externality degree is larger than the average device valuation,
which is in stark contrast with the connectivity service model in which hybrid
pricing always outperforms bundled pricing.
