  Few African countries have reported COVID-19 case numbers above $1\,000$ as
of April 18, 2020, with South Africa reporting $3\,034$ cases being hit hardest
in Sub-Saharan Africa. Several African countries, especially South Africa, have
already taken strong non-pharmaceutical interventions that include physical
distancing, restricted economic, educational and leisure activities and reduced
human mobility options. The required strengths and overall effectiveness of
such interventions, however, are debated because of simultaneous but opposing
interests in most African countries: strongly limited health care capacities
and testing capabilities largely conflict with pressured national economies and
socio-economic hardships on the individual level, limiting compliance to
intervention targets. Here we investigate implications of interventions on the
COVID-19 outbreak dynamics, focusing on South Africa before and after the
national lockdown enacted on March 27, 2020. Our analysis shows that initial
exponential growth of existing case numbers is consistent with doubling times
of about $2.5$ days. After lockdown, the growth remains exponential, now with
doubling times of 18 days, but still in contrast to subexponential growth
reported for Hubei/China after lockdown. Moreover, a scenario analysis of a
computational data-driven agent based mobility model for the Nelson Mandela Bay
Municipality (with $1.14$ million inhabitants) hints that keeping current
levels of intervention measures and compliance until the end of April is of
insufficient length and still too weak, too unspecific or too inconsistently
complied with to not overload local intensive care capacity. Yet, enduring,
slightly stronger, more specific interventions combined with sufficient
compliance may constitute a viable option for interventions for regions in
South Africa and potentially for large parts of the African continent.
