  Betz's law, purportedly, says an ideal wind harvester cannot extract more
than 16/27 ($\sim$59\%) of the wind energy. As the law's derivation relies on
momentum and energy conservation with incompressible flow and not the physical
mechanism coupling the wind-field to the extraction of work it is ubiquitously
regarded as a "universal" upper bound on efficiency, as inclusion of mechanics,
aerodynamics and thermodynamics are presumed to worsen this upper bound. Here
we show that when unneeded assumptions in the Betz's law derivation are relaxed
a higher bound of 2/3 ($\sim$67\%) can be achieved. A concrete example,
strictly obeying the identical energy and momentum conservation used to derive
the Betz's law, is given that violates Betz's law by achieving our higher 2/3
bound. Thus Betz's law is not a universal limit on wind energy harvesting
efficiency. More surprisingly, we show Betz law is not simply the limit case of
a vanishingly-thin turbine either. In 2-D models specific for turbines, radial
flow is known to occur to occur as a consequence of angular
momentum,\cite{Sharpe2004} but here we show in a 1-D modelthat allowing any
radial flux out of the harvester cross-section can increase the efficiency
without any need to consider angular momentum or explicit 2-D models. A key
design insight we glean is that for high-efficiency harvesters it is better to
strive for the least pressure build up (to increase flux) -- the exact opposite
of the Betz model's sole operational principle of high pressure differentials.
Additionally, we derive an alternative metric of harvester efficiency which
takes into account the downstream wake expansion ignored by the conventional
definition of power conversion factors, and the resulting upper bound this
places on power extraction from dense grids of harvesters.
