  Emanuel's concept of Maximum Potential Intensity (E-PI) relates the maximum
velocity $V_{\rm max}$ of tropical storms, assumed to be in gradient wind
balance, to environmental parameters. Several studies suggested that the
unbalanced flow is responsible for E-PI sometimes significantly underpredicting
$V_{\rm max}$. Additionally, two major modifications generated a considerable
range of E-PI predictions: the dissipative heating and the power expended to
lift water were respectively suggested to increase and reduce E-PI $V_{\rm
max}$ by about 20%. Here we re-derive the E-PI concept separating its dynamic
and thermodynamic assumptions and lifting the gradient wind balance limitation.
Our analysis reveals that E-PI formulations for a balanced and a radially
unbalanced flow are similar, while the systematic underestimate of $V_{\rm
max}$ reflects instead an incompatibility between several E-PI assumptions. We
discuss how these assumptions can be modified. We further show that
irrespective of whether dissipative heating occurs or not, E-PI uniquely
relates $V_{\rm max}$ to the latent heat flux (not to the total oceanic heat
flux as originally proposed). We clarify that, in contrast to previous
suggestions, lifting water has little impact on E-PI. We demonstrate that in
E-PI the negative work of the pressure gradient in the upper atmosphere
consumes all the kinetic energy generated in the boundary layer. This key
dynamic constraint is independent of other E-PI assumptions and thus can apply
to diverse circulation patterns. Finally, we show that the E-PI maximum kinetic
energy per unit volume equals the local partial pressure of water vapor and
discuss the implications of this finding for predicting $V_{\rm max}$.
