  Microprocessor design, debug, and validation research and development are
increasingly based on modeling and simulation at different abstraction layers.
Microarchitecture-level simulators have become the most commonly used tools for
performance evaluation, due to their high simulation throughput, compared to
lower levels of abstraction, but usually come at the cost of loss of hardware
accuracy. As a result, the implementation, speed, and accuracy of
microarchitectural simulators are becoming more and more crucial for
researchers and microprocessor architects. One of the most critical aspects of
a microarchitectural simulator is its ability to accurately express design
standards as various aspects of the microarchitecture change during design
refinement. On the other hand, modern microprocessor models rely on dedicated
hardware implementations, making the design space exploration a time-consuming
process that can be performed using a variety of methods, ranging from
high-level models to hardware prototyping. Therefore, the tradeoff between
simulation speed and accuracy, can be significantly varied, and an
application's performance measurements uncertain. In this paper, we present a
microarchitecture-level simulation modeling study, which enables as accurate as
possible performance modeling of a RISC-V out-of-order superscalar
microprocessor core. By diligently adjusting several important
microarchitectural parameters of the widely used gem5 simulator, we investigate
the challenges of accurate performance modeling on microarchitecture-level
simulation compared to accuracy and low simulation throughput of RTL simulation
of the target design. Further, we demonstrate the main sources of errors that
prevent high accuracy levels of the microarchitecture-level modeling.
