  Granger causality analysis (GCA) provides a powerful tool for uncovering the
patterns of brain connectivity mechanism using neuroimaging techniques.
Conventional GCA applies two different mathematical theories in a two-stage
scheme: (1) the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) or Akaike information
criterion (AIC) for the regression model orders associated with endogenous and
exogenous information; (2) F-statistics for determining the causal effects of
exogenous variables. While specifying endogenous and exogenous effects are
essentially the same model selection problem, this could produce different
benchmarks in the two stages and therefore degrade the performance of GCA. In
this course, we present a unified model selection approach based on the minimum
description length (MDL) principle for GCA in the context of the general
regression model paradigm. Compared with conventional methods, our approach
emphasize that a single mathematical theory should be held throughout the GCA
process. Under this framework, all candidate models within the model space
might be compared freely in the context of the code length, without the need
for an intermediate model. We illustrate its advantages over conventional
two-stage GCA approach in a 3-node network and a 5-node network synthetic
experiments. The unified model selection approach is capable of identifying the
actual connectivity while avoiding the false influences of noise. More
importantly, the proposed approach obtained more consistent results in a
challenge fMRI dataset for causality investigation, mental calculation network
under visual and auditory stimulus, respectively. The proposed approach has
potential to accommodate other Granger causality representations in other
function space. The comparison between different GC representations in
different function spaces can also be naturally deal with in the framework.
