  We consider a market in which capacity-constrained generators compete in
scalar-parameterized supply functions to serve an inelastic demand spread
throughout a transmission constrained power network. The market clears
according to a locational marginal pricing mechanism, in which the independent
system operator (ISO) determines the generators' production quantities to
minimize the revealed cost of meeting demand, while ensuring that network
transmission and generator capacity constraints are met. Under the stylizing
assumption that both the ISO and generators choose their strategies
simultaneously, we establish the existence of Nash equilibria for the
underlying market, and derive an upper bound on the allocative efficiency loss
at Nash equilibrium relative to the socially optimal level. We also
characterize an upper bound on the markup of locational marginal prices at Nash
equilibrium above their perfectly competitive levels. Of particular relevance
to ex ante market power monitoring, these bounds reveal the role of certain
market structures---specifically, the \emph{market share} and \emph{residual
supply index} of a producer---in predicting the degree to which that producer
is able to exercise market power to influence the market outcome to its
advantage. Finally, restricting our attention to the simpler setting of a
two-node power network, we provide a characterization of market structures
under which a Braess-like paradox occurs due to the exercise of market
power---that is to say, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition on
market structure under which the strengthening of the network's transmission
line capacity results in the (counterintuitive) increase in the total cost of
generation at Nash equilibrium.
