  Public policies that supply public goods, especially those involve
collaboration by limiting individual liberty, always give rise to controversies
over governance legitimacy. Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) methods
are appropriate for supporting the legitimacy of the public policies that
supply public goods at the cost of individual interests. Among these policies,
the inter-regional collaborative pandemic control is a prominent example, which
has become much more important for an increasingly inter-connected world facing
a global pandemic like COVID-19. Different patterns of collaborative strategies
have been observed among different systems of regions, yet it lacks an
analytical process to reason for the legitimacy of those strategies. In this
paper, we use the inter-regional collaboration for pandemic control as an
example to demonstrate the necessity of MARL in reasoning, and thereby
legitimizing policies enforcing such inter-regional collaboration. Experimental
results in an exemplary environment show that our MARL approach is able to
demonstrate the effectiveness and necessity of restrictions on individual
liberty for collaborative supply of public goods. Different optimal policies
are learned by our MARL agents under different collaboration levels, which
change in an interpretable pattern of collaboration that helps to balance the
losses suffered by regions of different types, and consequently promotes the
overall welfare. Meanwhile, policies learned with higher collaboration levels
yield higher global rewards, which illustrates the benefit of, and thus
provides a novel justification for the legitimacy of, promoting inter-regional
collaboration. Therefore, our method shows the capability of MARL in
computationally modeling and supporting the theory of calculus of consent,
developed by Nobel Prize winner J. M. Buchanan.
