  We reexamine $\Delta$CCSD, a state-specific coupled-cluster (CC) with single
and double excitations (CCSD) approach that targets excited states through the
utilization of non-Aufbau determinants. This methodology is particularly
efficient when dealing with doubly excited states, a domain where the standard
equation-of-motion CCSD (EOM-CCSD) formalism falls short. Our goal here is to
evaluate the effectiveness of $\Delta$CCSD when applied to other types of
excited states, comparing its consistency and accuracy with EOM-CCSD. To this
end, we report a benchmark on excitation energies computed with the
$\Delta$CCSD and EOM-CCSD methods, for a set of molecular excited-state
energies that encompasses not only doubly excited states but also
doublet-doublet transitions and (singlet and triplet) singly-excited states of
closed-shell systems. In the latter case, we rely on a minimalist version of
multireference CC known as the two-determinant CCSD method to compute the
excited states. Our dataset, consisting of 276 excited states stemming from the
\textsc{quest} database [\href{https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1517}{V\'eril
\textit{et al.}, \textit{WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.} \textbf{2021}, 11, e1517}],
provides a significant base to draw general conclusions concerning the accuracy
of $\Delta$CCSD. Except for the doubly-excited states, we found that
$\Delta$CCSD underperforms EOM-CCSD. For doublet-doublet transitions, the
difference between the mean absolute errors (MAEs) of the two methodologies (of
\SI{0.10}{\eV} and \SI{0.07}{\eV}) is less pronounced than that obtained for
singly-excited states of closed-shell systems (MAEs of \SI{0.15}{\eV} and
\SI{0.08}{\eV}). This discrepancy is largely attributed to a greater number of
excited states in the latter set exhibiting multiconfigurational characters,
which are more challenging for $\Delta$CCSD.
