  Tasks in psychophysical tests can at times be repetitive and cause
individuals to lose engagement during the test. To facilitate engagement, we
propose the use of a humanoid NAO robot, named Sam, as an alternative interface
for conducting psychophysical tests. Specifically, we aim to evaluate the
performance of Sam as an auditory testing interface, given its potential
limitations and technical differences, in comparison to the current laptop
interface. We examine the results and durations of two voice perception tests,
voice cue sensitivity and voice gender categorisation, obtained from both the
conventionally used laptop interface and Sam. Both tests investigate the
perception and use of two speaker-specific voice cues, fundamental frequency
(F0) and vocal tract length (VTL), important for characterising voice gender.
Responses are logged on the laptop using a connected mouse, and on Sam using
the tactile sensors. Comparison of test results from both interfaces shows
functional similarity between the interfaces and replicates findings from
previous studies with similar tests. Comparison of test durations shows longer
testing times with Sam, primarily due to longer processing times in comparison
to the laptop, as well as other design limitations due to the implementation of
the test on the robot. Despite the inherent constraints of the NAO robot, such
as in sound quality, relatively long processing and testing times, and
different methods of response logging, the NAO interface appears to facilitate
collecting similar data to the current laptop interface, confirming its
potential as an alternative psychophysical test interface for auditory
perception tests.
