  In this work, for a given oriented graph $D$, we study its interval and hull
numbers, denoted by ${in}(D)$ and ${hn}(D)$, respectively, in the geodetic,
${P_3}$ and ${P_3^*}$ convexities. This last one, we believe to be formally
defined and first studied in this paper, although its undirected version is
well-known in the literature. Concerning bounds, for a strongly oriented graph
$D$, we prove that ${hn_g}(D)\leq m(D)-n(D)+2$ and that there is a strongly
oriented graph such that ${hn_g}(D) = m(D)-n(D)$. We also determine exact
values for the hull numbers in these three convexities for tournaments, which
imply polynomial-time algorithms to compute them. These results allows us to
deduce polynomial-time algorithms to compute ${hn_{P_3}}(D)$ when the
underlying graph of $D$ is split or cobipartite. Moreover, we provide a
meta-theorem by proving that if deciding whether ${in_g}(D)\leq k$ or
${hn_g}(D)\leq k$ is NP-hard or W[i]-hard parameterized by $k$, for some
$i\in\mathbb{Z_+^*}$, then the same holds even if the underlying graph of $D$
is bipartite. Next, we prove that deciding whether ${hn_{P_3}}(D)\leq k$ or
${hn_{P_3^*}}(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$, even if the
underlying graph of $D$ is bipartite; that deciding whether ${in_{P_3}}(D)\leq
k$ or ${in_{P_3^*}}(D)\leq k$ is NP-complete, even if $D$ has no directed
cycles and the underlying graph of $D$ is a chordal bipartite graph; and that
deciding whether ${in_{P_3}}(D)\leq k$ or ${in_{P_3^*}}(D)\leq k$ is W[2]-hard
parameterized by $k$, even if the underlying graph of $D$ is split. We also
argue that the interval and hull numbers in the oriented $P_3$ and $P_3^*$
convexities can be computed in polynomial time for graphs of bounded tree-width
by using Courcelle's theorem.
