  There are many scales at which to quantify stability in spatial and
ecological networks. Local-scale analyses focus on specific nodes of the
spatial network, while regional-scale analyses consider the whole network.
Similarly, species- and community-level analyses either account for single
species or for the whole community. Furthermore, stability itself can be
defined in multiple ways, including resistance (the inverse of the relative
displacement caused by a perturbation), initial resilience (the rate of return
after a perturbation), and invariability (the inverse of the relative amplitude
of the population fluctuations). Here, we analyze the scale-dependence of these
stability properties. More specifically, we ask how spatial scale (local vs
regional) and ecological scale (species vs community) influence these stability
properties. We find that regional initial resilience is the weighted arithmetic
mean of the local initial resiliences. The regional resistance is the harmonic
mean of local resistances, which makes regional resistance particularly
vulnerable to nodes with low stability, unlike regional initial resilience.
Analogous results hold for the relationship between community- and
species-level initial resilience and resistance. Both resistance and initial
resilience are ``scale-free'' properties: regional and community values are
simply the biomass-weighted means of the local and species values,
respectively. Thus, one can easily estimate both stability metrics of whole
networks from partial sampling. In contrast, invariability generally is greater
at the regional and community-level than at the local and species-level,
respectively. Hence, estimating the invariability of spatial or ecological
networks from measurements at the local or species level is more complicated,
requiring an unbiased estimate of the network (i.e. region or community) size.
