  Social distancing is the primary policy prescription for combating the
COVID-19 pandemic, and has been widely adopted in Europe and North America. We
estimate the value of disease avoidance using an epidemiological model that
projects the spread of COVID-19 across rich and poor countries. Social
distancing measures that "flatten the curve" of the disease to bring demand
within the capacity of healthcare systems are predicted to save many lives in
high-income countries, such that practically any economic cost is worth
bearing. These social distancing policies are estimated to be less effective in
poor countries with younger populations less susceptible to COVID-19, and more
limited healthcare systems, which were overwhelmed before the pandemic.
Moreover, social distancing lowers disease risk by limiting people's economic
opportunities. Poorer people are less willing to make those economic
sacrifices. They place relatively greater value on their livelihood concerns
compared to contracting COVID-19. Not only are the epidemiological and economic
benefits of social distancing much smaller in poorer countries, such policies
may exact a heavy toll on the poorest and most vulnerable. Workers in the
informal sector lack the resources and social protections to isolate themselves
and sacrifice economic opportunities until the virus passes. By limiting their
ability to earn a living, social distancing can lead to an increase in hunger,
deprivation, and related mortality and morbidity. Rather than a blanket
adoption of social distancing measures, we advocate for the exploration of
alternative harm-reduction strategies, including universal mask adoption and
increased hygiene measures.
