  Firm competition and collusion involve complex dynamics, particularly when
considering communication among firms. Such issues can be modeled as problems
of complex systems, traditionally approached through experiments involving
human subjects or agent-based modeling methods. We propose an innovative
framework called Smart Agent-Based Modeling (SABM), wherein smart agents,
supported by GPT-4 technologies, represent firms, and interact with one
another. We conducted a controlled experiment to study firm price competition
and collusion behaviors under various conditions. SABM is more cost-effective
and flexible compared to conducting experiments with human subjects. Smart
agents possess an extensive knowledge base for decision-making and exhibit
human-like strategic abilities, surpassing traditional ABM agents. Furthermore,
smart agents can simulate human conversation and be personalized, making them
ideal for studying complex situations involving communication. Our results
demonstrate that, in the absence of communication, smart agents consistently
reach tacit collusion, leading to prices converging at levels higher than the
Bertrand equilibrium price but lower than monopoly or cartel prices. When
communication is allowed, smart agents achieve a higher-level collusion with
prices close to cartel prices. Collusion forms more quickly with communication,
while price convergence is smoother without it. These results indicate that
communication enhances trust between firms, encouraging frequent small price
deviations to explore opportunities for a higher-level win-win situation and
reducing the likelihood of triggering a price war. We also assigned different
personas to firms to analyze behavioral differences and tested variant models
under diverse market structures. The findings showcase the effectiveness and
robustness of SABM and provide intriguing insights into competition and
collusion.
