  (ABRIDGED) We assess the systematic uncertainties in (young) cluster age,
mass, and - to a lesser extent - extinction and metallicity determinations,
based on broad-band imaging observations with the Hubble Space Telescope. Our
aim here is to intercompare the results obtained using a variety of commonly
used modelling techniques, specifically with respect to our own extensively
tested multi-dimensional approach. Any significant differences among the
resulting parameters are due to the details of the various, independently
developed modelling techniques used, rather than to the stellar population
models themselves. Despite the model uncertainties and the selection effects
inherent to most methods used, we find that the PEAKS in the relative age and
mass distributions of a given young (<= 10^9 yr) cluster system can be derived
relatively robustly and consistently, to accuracies of sigma_t = Delta <log(Age
/ yr)> <= 0.35 and sigma_M = Delta <log(M_cl / Msun)> <= 0.14, respectively,
assuming Gaussian distributions in cluster ages and masses for reasons of
simplicity. The peaks in the relative mass distributions can be obtained with a
higher degree of confidence than those in the relative age distributions, as
exemplified by the smaller spread among the peak values of the mass
distributions derived. This implies that mass determinations are mostly
insensitive to the approach adopted. We reiterate that as extensive a
wavelength coverage as possible is required to obtain robust and internally
consistent age and mass estimates for the individual objects, with reasonable
uncertainties. Finally, we conclude that the ACTUAL filter systems used for the
observations should be used for constructing model colours, instead of using
conversion equations, to achieve more accurate derivations of ages and masses.
