  Requirements are elicited from the customer and other stakeholders through an
iterative process of interviews, prototyping, and other interactive sessions.
Then, requirements can be further extended, based on the analysis of the
features of competing products available on the market. Understanding how this
process takes place can help to identify the contribution of the different
elicitation phases, thereby allowing requirements analysts to better distribute
their resources. In this work, we empirically study in which way requirements
get transformed from initial ideas into documented needs, and then evolve based
on the inspiration coming from similar products. To this end, we select 30
subjects that act as requirements analysts, and we perform interview-based
elicitation sessions with a fictional customer. After the sessions, the
analysts produce a first set of requirements for the system. Then, they are
required to search similar products in the app stores, and extend the
requirements, inspired by the identified apps. The requirements documented at
each step are evaluated, to assess to which extent and in which way the initial
idea evolved throughout the process. Our results show that only between 30\%
and 38\% of the requirements produced after the interviews include content that
can be fully traced to initial customer's ideas. Furthermore, up to 42\% of the
requirements inspired by the app stores cover additional features compared to
the ones identified after the interviews. The results empirically show that
requirements are not elicited in strict sense, but actually co-created through
interviews, with analysts playing a crucial role in the process. In addition,
we show evidence that app store-inspired elicitation can be particularly
beneficial to complete the requirements.
