  Given a two-prover game $G$ and its two satisfying labelings
$\psi_\mathsf{s}$ and $\psi_\mathsf{t}$, the Label Cover Reconfiguration
problem asks whether $\psi_\mathsf{s}$ can be transformed into
$\psi_\mathsf{t}$ by repeatedly changing the value of a vertex while preserving
any intermediate labeling satisfying $G$. We consider an optimization variant
of Label Cover Reconfiguration by relaxing the feasibility of labelings,
referred to as Maxmin Label Cover Reconfiguration: we are allowed to transform
by passing through any non-satisfying labelings, but required to maximize the
minimum fraction of satisfied edges during transformation from
$\psi_\mathsf{s}$ to $\psi_\mathsf{t}$. Since the parallel repetition theorem
of Raz (SIAM J. Comput., 1998), which implies NP-hardness of Label Cover within
any constant factor, produces strong inapproximability results for many NP-hard
problems, one may think of using Maxmin Label Cover Reconfiguration to derive
inapproximability results for reconfiguration problems. We prove the following
results on Maxmin Label Cover Reconfiguration, which display different trends
from those of Label Cover and the parallel repetition theorem:
  (1) Maxmin Label Cover Reconfiguration can be approximated within a factor of
nearly $\frac{1}{4}$ for restricted graph classes, including slightly dense
graphs and balanced bipartite graphs.
  (2) A naive parallel repetition of Maxmin Label Cover Reconfiguration does
not decrease the optimal objective value.
  (3) Label Cover Reconfiguration on projection games can be decided in
polynomial time.
  The above results suggest that a reconfiguration analogue of the parallel
repetition theorem is unlikely.
