  Evaluated nuclear data uncertainties are often perceived as unrealistic, most
often because they are thought to be too small. The impact of this issue in
applied nuclear science has been discussed widely in recent years. Commonly
suggested causes are: poor estimates of specific error components, neglect of
uncertainty correlations, and overlooked known error sources. However,
instances have been reported where very careful, objective assessments of all
known error sources have been made with realistic error magnitudes and
correlations provided, yet the resulting evaluated uncertainties still appear
to be inconsistent with observed scatter of predicted mean values. These
discrepancies might be attributed to significant unrecognized sources of
uncertainty (USU) that limit the accuracy to which these physical quantities
can be determined. The objective of our work has been to develop procedures for
revealing and including USU estimates in nuclear data evaluations involving
experimental input data. We conclude that the presence of USU may be revealed,
and estimates of magnitudes made, through quantitative analyses. This paper
identifies several specific clues that can be explored by evaluators in
identifying the existence of USU. It then describes numerical procedures to
generate quantitative estimates of USU magnitudes. Key requirements for these
procedures to be viable are that sufficient numbers of data points be
available, for statistical reasons, and that additional supporting information
about the measurements be provided by the experimenters. Realistic examples are
described to illustrate these procedures and demonstrate their outcomes as well
as limitations. Our work strongly supports the view that USU is an important
issue in nuclear data evaluation, with significant consequences for
applications, and that this topic warrants further investigation by the nuclear
science community.
