  Automatic differentiation (AD) has been a topic of interest for researchers
in many disciplines, with increased popularity since its application to machine
learning and neural networks. Although many researchers appreciate and know how
to apply AD, it remains a challenge to truly understand the underlying
processes. From an algebraic point of view, however, AD appears surprisingly
natural: it originates from the differentiation laws. In this work we use
Algebra of Programming techniques to reason about different AD variants,
leveraging Haskell to illustrate our observations. Our findings stem from three
fundamental algebraic abstractions: (1) the notion of module over a semiring,
(2) Nagata's construction of the 'idealization of a module', and (3)
Kronecker's delta function, that together allow us to write a single-line
abstract definition of AD. From this single-line definition, and by
instantiating our algebraic structures in various ways, we derive different AD
variants, that have the same extensional behaviour, but different intensional
properties, mainly in terms of (asymptotic) computational complexity. We show
the different variants equivalent by means of Kronecker isomorphisms, a further
elaboration of our Haskell infrastructure which guarantees correctness by
construction. With this framework in place, this paper seeks to make AD
variants more comprehensible, taking an algebraic perspective on the matter.
