  A reliable inference of networks from data is of key interest in the
Neurosciences. Several methods have been suggested in the literature to
reliably determine links in a network. To decide about the presence of links,
these techniques rely on statistical inference, typically controlling the
number of false positives, paying little attention to false negatives. In this
paper, by means of a comprehensive simulation study, we analyse the influence
of false positive and false negative conclusions about the presence or absence
of links in a network on the network topology. We show that different values to
balance false positive and false negative conclusions about links should be
used in order to reliably estimate network characteristics. We propose to run
careful simulation studies prior to making potentially erroneous conclusion
about the network topology. Our analysis shows that optimal values to balance
false positive and false negative conclusions about links depend on the network
topology and characteristic of interest. Existing methods rely on a choice of
the rate for false positive conclusions. They aim to be sure about individual
links rather than the entire network. The rate of false negative conclusions is
typically not investigated. Our investigation shows that the balance of false
positive and false negative conclusions about links in a network has to be
tuned for any network topology that is to be estimated. Moreover, within the
same network topology, the results are qualitatively the same for each network
characteristic, but the actual values leading to reliable estimates of the
characteristics are different.
