  This paper investigates the model for pedestrian flow firstly proposed in
[Cristiani et al., DOI:10.1137/140962413]. The model assumes that each
individual in the crowd moves in a known domain, aiming at minimizing a given
cost functional. Both the pedestrian dynamics and the cost functional itself
depend on the position of the whole crowd. In addition, pedestrians are assumed
to have predictive abilities, but limited in time, extending only up to
$\theta$ time units into the future, where $\theta\in[0,\infty)$ is a model
parameter. 1) For $\theta=0$ (no predictive abilities), we recover the modeling
assumptions of the Hughes's model, where people take decisions on the basis of
the current position of the crowd only. 2) For $\theta\to\infty$, instead, we
recover the standard mean field game (MFG) setting, where people are able to
forecast the behavior of the others at any future time and take decisions on
the basis of the current and future position of the whole crowd. 3) For
intermediate values of $\theta$ we obtain something different: as in the
Hughes's model, the numerical procedure to solve the problem requires to run an
off-line procedure at any fixed time $t$, which returns the current optimal
velocity field at time $t$ by solving an associated backward-in-time
Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation; but, differently from the Hughes's model,
here the procedure involves a prediction of the crowd behavior in the sliding
time window $[t,t+\theta)$, therefore the optimal velocity field is given by
the solution to a forward-backward system which joins a Fokker-Planck equation
with a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation as in the MFG approach. The fact that a
different forward-backward system must be solved at any time $t$ arises new
interesting theoretical questions. Numerical tests will give some clues about
the well-posedness of the problem.
