  The inter-event time, IET, is sometimes used as a basis for prediction of
large earthquakes. It is the case when theoretical analysis of prediction is
possible. Quite recently a specific IET- model was suggested for dynamic
probabilistic prediction of M > 5.5 events in Italy . In this study we analyze
both some aspects of the statistical estimation of the model and its predictive
ability. We find that more or less effective prediction is possible within 4
out of 34 seismotectonic zones where seismicity rate or clustering of events is
relatively high. We show that, in the framework of the model, one can suggest a
simple zone independent strategy, which practically optimizes the relative
number of nonaccidental successes, or the Hanssen-Kuiper, HK, skill score. This
quasi-optimal strategy declares alarm in a zone for the first 2.67 years just
after the occurrence of each large event in the zone. The optimal HK skill
score values are: 26% for the 3 most active zones and 2-10% for the 26 least
active zones. However, the number of false alarm time intervals per one event
in each of the zones is unusually high: 0.7 and 0.8-0.95 respectively. Both
these theoretical estimations are important because any prospective testing of
the model is unrealistic in most of the zones during a reasonable time. This
particular analysis requires a discussion of the following issues of general
interest: a specific approach to the analysis of predictions vs. the standard
CSEP testing approach; prediction vs. forecasting; HK skill score vs.
probability gain; the total forecast error diagram and connected false alarms.
