  We modify the Chapman sandpile model (Chapman \textit{et al} \textit{Physical
Review Letters} 86, 2814 (2001)) to form comparisons with pellet pacing, which
is used to reduce or eliminate ELMs in a fusion plasma. We employ a variation
of that model in which a pedestal with feedback is introduced (Bowie and Hole
\textit{Phys. Plasmas} 25, 012511 (2018)), which we further modify to provide
for dual fuelling - sand is added both at the centre of the sandpile, and near
the edge. We observe that when the additional sand is added at the top of the
pedestal, MLEs are largely suppressed. While this suppression comes at a cost
by way of reduction in total energy confinement, that reduction is lower than
the reduction in MLE size. The trade-off between MLE suppression and reduction
in energy confinement depends not only on the amount of extra sand, but also on
its precise location relative to the top of the pedestal. We suggest that the
approach of constant dual fuelling may be equally applicable to plasmas, and
may suggest a strategy for ELM suppression in fusion plasmas. We observe that
when the proposed amount of extra sand is added in 'pellets', using frequencies
and amounts based on those proposed for ELM suppression for ITER, MLEs are
similarly suppressed, although MLEs are not significantly suppressed when the
pellet rate does not substantially exceed the MLE frequency. This suggests that
pellet injection at the top of the pedestal at small pellet size and high
frequency may represent a reasonable physical proxy for our proposed scheme.
However, our results suggest that it is not the synchronisation of pellets to
ELM frequencies which is the key factor for ELM suppression in this regime, but
rather the introduction of additional fuelling at the top of the pedestal.
