  Users of automated vehicles will move away from being drivers to passengers,
preferably engaged in other activities such as reading or using laptops and
smartphones, which will strongly increase susceptibility to motion sickness.
Similarly, in driving simulators, the presented visual motion with scaled or
even without any physical motion causes an illusion of passive motion, creating
a conflict between perceived and expected motion, and eliciting motion
sickness. Given the very large differences in sickness susceptibility between
individuals, we need to consider sickness at an individual level. This paper
combines a group-averaged sensory conflict model with an individualized
accumulation model to capture individual differences in motion sickness
susceptibility across various vision conditions. The model framework can be
used to develop personalized models for users of automated vehicles and improve
the design of new motion cueing algorithms for simulators. The feasibility and
accuracy of this model framework are verified using two existing datasets with
sickening. Both datasets involve passive motion, representative of being driven
by an automated vehicle. The model is able to fit an individuals motion
sickness responses using only 2 parameters (gain K1 and time constant T1), as
opposed to the 5 parameters in the original model. This ensures unique
parameters for each individual. Better fits, on average by a factor of 1.7 of
an individuals motion sickness levels, are achieved as compared to using only
the group-averaged model. Thus, we find that models predicting group-averaged
sickness incidence cannot be used to predict sickness at an individual level.
On the other hand, the proposed combined model approach predicts individual
motion sickness levels and thus can be used to control sickness.
