  There has been significant research in the last five years on ensuring the
providers of items in a recommender system are treated fairly, particularly in
terms of the exposure the system provides to their work through its results.
However, the metrics developed to date have all been designed and tested for
linear ranked lists. It is unknown whether and how existing fair ranking
metrics for linear layouts can be applied to grid-based displays. Moreover,
depending on the device (phone, tab, or laptop) users use to interact with
systems, column size is adjusted using column reduction approaches in a
grid-view. The visibility or exposure of recommended items in grid layouts
varies based on column sizes and column reduction approaches as well. In this
paper, we extend existing fair ranking concepts and metrics to study
provider-side group fairness in grid layouts, present an analysis of the
behavior of these grid adaptations of fair ranking metrics, and study how their
behavior changes across different grid ranking layout designs and geometries.
We examine how fairness scores change with different ranking layouts to yield
insights into (1) the consistency of fair ranking measurements across layouts;
(2) whether rankings optimized for fairness in a linear ranking remain fair
when the results are displayed in a grid; and (3) the impact of column
reduction approaches to support different device geometries on fairness
measurement. This work highlights the need to use layout-specific user
attention models when measuring fairness of rankings, and provide practitioners
with a first set of insights on what to expect when translating existing fair
ranking metrics to the grid layouts in wide use today.
