  Information flow security ensures that the secret data manipulated by a
program does not influence its observable output. Proving information flow
security is especially challenging for concurrent programs, where operations on
secret data may influence the execution time of a thread and, thereby, the
interleaving between different threads. Such internal timing channels may
affect the observable outcome of a program even if an attacker does not observe
execution times. Existing verification techniques for information flow security
in concurrent programs attempt to prove that secret data does not influence the
relative timing of threads. However, these techniques are often restrictive
(for instance because they disallow branching on secret data) and make strong
assumptions about the execution platform (ignoring caching, processor
instructions with data-dependent runtime, and other common features that affect
execution time). In this paper, we present a novel verification technique for
secure information flow in concurrent programs that lifts these restrictions
and does not make any assumptions about timing behavior. The key idea is to
prove that all mutating operations performed on shared data commute, such that
different thread interleavings do not influence its final value. Crucially,
commutativity is required only for an abstraction of the shared data that
contains the information that will be leaked to a public output. Abstract
commutativity is satisfied by many more operations than standard commutativity,
which makes our technique widely applicable. We formalize our technique in
CommCSL, a relational concurrent separation logic with support for
commutativity-based reasoning, and prove its soundness in Isabelle/HOL. We
implemented CommCSL in HyperViper, an automated verifier based on the Viper
verification infrastructure, and demonstrate its ability to verify challenging
examples.
