  We consider the classical multi-asset Merton investment problem under drift
uncertainty, i.e. the asset price dynamics are given by geometric Brownian
motions with constant but unknown drift coefficients. The investor assumes a
prior drift distribution and is able to learn by observing the asset prize
realizations during the investment horizon. While the solution of an expected
utility maximizing investor with constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) is well
known, we consider the optimization problem under risk and ambiguity
preferences by means of the KMM (Klibanoff et al. (2005)) approach. Here, the
investor maximizes a double certainty equivalent. The inner certainty
equivalent is for given drift coefficient, the outer is based on a drift
distribution. Assuming also a CRRA type ambiguity function, it turns out that
the optimal strategy can be stated in terms of the solution without ambiguity
preferences but an adjusted drift distribution. To the best of our knowledge an
explicit solution method in this setting is new. We rely on some duality
theorems to prove our statements.
  Based on our theoretical results, we are able to shed light on the impact of
the prior drift distribution as well as the consequences of ambiguity
preferences via the transfer to an adjusted drift distribution, i.e. we are
able to explain the interaction of risk and ambiguity preferences. We compare
our results with the ones in a pre-commitment setup where the investor is
restricted to deterministic strategies. It turns out that (under risk and
ambiguity aversion) an infinite investment horizon implies in both cases a
maximin decision rule, i.e. the investor follows the worst (best) Merton
fraction (over all realizations of it) if she is more (less) risk averse than a
log-investor. We illustrate our findings with an extensive numerical study.
