  To succeed in their objectives, groups of individuals must be able to make
quick and accurate collective decisions on the best among alternatives with
different qualities. Group-living animals aim to do that all the time. Plants
and fungi are thought to do so too. Swarms of autonomous robots can also be
programmed to make best-of-n decisions for solving tasks collaboratively.
Ultimately, humans critically need it and so many times they should be better
at it! Despite their simplicity, mathematical tractability made models like the
voter model (VM) and the local majority rule model (MR) useful to describe in
simple terms such collective decision-making processes. To reach a consensus,
individuals change their opinion by interacting with neighbours in their social
network. At least among animals and robots, options with a better quality are
exchanged more often and therefore spread faster than lower-quality options,
leading to the collective selection of the best option. With our work, we study
the impact of individuals making errors in pooling others' opinions caused, for
example, to reduce the cognitive load. Our analysis in grounded on the
introduction of a model that generalises the two existing VM and MR models,
showing a speed-accuracy trade-off regulated by the cognitive effort of
individuals. We also investigate the impact of the interaction network topology
on the collective dynamics. To do so, we extend our model and, by using the
heterogeneous mean-field approach, we show that another speed-accuracy
trade-off is regulated by network connectivity. An interesting result is that
reduced network connectivity corresponds to an increase in collective decision
accuracy
