  Cooperation is a fundamental aspect of human society, and extensive research
has been devoted to understanding its emergence. However, exploring
evolutionary games in asymmetric interaction scenarios has been relatively
limited. This study aims to investigate asymmetric evolutionary games within
communities characterized by multiple sources of inequality, encompassing
unequal benefits and costs. The population comprises strong and weak
communities, with the former consistently gaining greater cooperative benefits
than the latter, thereby highlighting inherent inequality. The asymmetric cost
manifests in labor allocation when cooperators from distinct communities
interact. Our findings underscore the indispensable role played by the
interplay between population composition and unequal factors. In well-mixed
populations, cooperation peaks when weak players bear a larger share of costs,
especially when strong communities are moderately proportioned. Contrarily, in
structured populations, an optimal effect arises from the interplay between the
population composition and unequal benefit even when the cost is evenly
divided. With a moderate proportion of strong communities, weak defectors
create barriers that shield cooperation clusters from exploitation by strong
defectors. By manipulating cost division, we uncover a remarkable bi-optimal
phenomenon, demonstrating that a greater cost-sharing commitment from strong or
weak cooperators can trigger the highest level of cooperation.
