  An active topic in the study of random constraint satisfaction problems
(CSPs) is the geometry of the space of satisfying or almost satisfying
assignments as the function of the density, for which a precise landscape of
predictions has been made via statistical physics-based heuristics. In
parallel, there has been a recent flurry of work on refuting random constraint
satisfaction problems, via nailing refutation thresholds for spectral and
semidefinite programming-based algorithms, and also on counting solutions to
CSPs. Inspired by this, the starting point for our work is the following
question: what does the solution space for a random CSP look like to an
efficient algorithm?
  In pursuit of this inquiry, we focus on the following problems about random
Boolean CSPs at the densities where they are unsatisfiable but no refutation
algorithm is known.
  1. Counts. For every Boolean CSP we give algorithms that with high
probability certify a subexponential upper bound on the number of solutions. We
also give algorithms to certify a bound on the number of large cuts in a
Gaussian-weighted graph, and the number of large independent sets in a random
$d$-regular graph.
  2. Clusters. For Boolean $3$CSPs we give algorithms that with high
probability certify an upper bound on the number of clusters of solutions.
  3. Balance. We also give algorithms that with high probability certify that
there are no "unbalanced" solutions, i.e., solutions where the fraction of
$+1$s deviates significantly from $50\%$.
  Finally, we also provide hardness evidence suggesting that our algorithms for
counting are optimal.
