  In recent years, numerical weather prediction models have begun to show
notable levels of skill at predicting the average winter North Atlantic
Oscillation (NAO) when initialised one month ahead. At the same time, these
model predictions exhibit unusually low signal-to-noise ratios, in what has
been dubbed a `signal-to-noise paradox'. We analyse both the skill and
signal-to-noise ratio of the Integrated Forecast System (IFS), the European
Center for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) model, in an ensemble
hindcast experiment. Specifically, we examine the contribution to both from the
regime dynamics of the North Atlantic eddy-driven jet. This is done by
constructing a statistical model which captures the predictability inherent to
to the trimodal jet latitude system, and fitting its parameters to reanalysis
and IFS data. Predictability in this regime system is driven by interannual
variations in the persistence of the jet latitude regimes, which determine the
preferred state of the jet. We show that the IFS has skill at predicting such
variations in persistence: because the position of the jet strongly influences
the NAO, this automatically generates skill at predicting the NAO. We show that
all of the skill the IFS has at predicting the winter NAO over the period
1980-2010 can be attributed to its skill at predicting regime persistence in
this way. Similarly, the tendency of the IFS to underestimate regime
persistence can account for the low signal-to-noise ratio, giving a possible
explanation for the signal-to-noise paradox. Finally, we examine how external
forcing drives variability in jet persistence, as well as highlight the role
played by transient baroclinic eddy feedbacks to modulate regime persistence.
