  We know that stress-factors, e.g. X-rays, have an effect on cells that is
more lethal in rapid exponential growth than in stationary phase. It is this
effect which makes radiotherapy effective in cancer treatment. This stress
effect can be explained in two ways: (a) more vulnerability in the growth
phase, (b) improved protection capacity and repair mechanisms in the stationary
phase. Although the two explanations do not exclude each other, they are very
different in the sense that (a) is a general mechanism whereas (b) is strain
and stress-factor dependent. In this paper we explore major facets of (a).
Firstly, we emphasize that (a) can account for known experimental stress-factor
evidence. Secondly, we observe that (a) rightly predicts that slow exponential
growth (meaning with a doubling time of several hours) results in a lower death
rate than fast exponential growth (doubling time of a fraction of one hour), an
effect that cannot be explained in the (b) framework because both organisms are
in the same phase. Thirdly, we conjecture that the stress-factor effect can be
extended to situations of chronic stress due to non-optimal environmental
conditions. If correct, this conjecture would imply that even in normal culture
conditions the natural death rate is lower in the stationary phase than in the
growth phase. Finally, the paper closes with the description of several open
questions and of appropriate test-experiments meant to address them.
