  Recently, social debates have been marked by increased polarization of social
groups. Such polarization not only implies that groups cannot reach a consensus
on fundamental questions but also materializes in more modular social
spaces/networks that further amplify the risks of polarization in less
polarizing topics. How can network adaptation bridge different communities when
individuals reveal homophilic or heterophilic social rewiring preferences?
Here, we consider information diffusion processes that capture a continuum from
simple to complex contagion processes. We use a computational model to
understand how fast and to what extent individual rewiring preferences bridge
initially weakly connected communities and how likely it is for them to reach a
consensus. We show that homophilic and heterophilic rewiring have different
impacts depending on the type of opinion spread. First, in the case of complex
opinion diffusion, we show that even polarized social networks can reach a
population-wide consensus without reshaping their underlying network. When
polarized social structures amplify opinion polarization, heterophilic rewiring
preferences play a key role in creating bridges between communities and
facilitating a population-wide consensus. Secondly, in the case of simple
opinion diffusion, homophilic rewiring preferences are more capable of
fostering consensus and avoiding a co-existence (dynamical polarization) of
opinions. Hence, across a broad profile of simple and complex opinion diffusion
processes, only a mix of heterophilic and homophilic rewiring preferences
avoids polarization and promotes consensus.
