  Background: The evolution of symptoms over time is at the heart of
understanding and treating mental disorders. However, a principled,
quantitative framework explaining symptom dynamics remains elusive. Here, we
propose a Network Control Theory of Psychopathology allowing us to formally
derive a theoretical control energy which we hypothesize quantifies resistance
to future symptom improvement in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). We test this
hypothesis and investigate the relation to genetic and environmental risk as
well as resilience.
  Methods: We modelled longitudinal symptom-network dynamics derived from
N=2,059 Beck Depression Inventory measurements acquired over a median of 134
days in a sample of N=109 patients suffering from MDD. We quantified the
theoretical energy required for each patient and time-point to reach a
symptom-free state given individual symptom-network topology (E 0 ) and 1)
tested if E 0 predicts future symptom improvement and 2) whether this
relationship is moderated by Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) of mental disorders,
childhood maltreatment experience, and self-reported resilience.
  Outcomes: We show that E 0 indeed predicts symptom reduction at the next
measurement and reveal that this coupling between E 0 and future symptom change
increases with higher genetic risk and childhood maltreatment while it
decreases with resilience.
  Interpretation: Our study provides a mechanistic framework capable of
predicting future symptom improvement based on individual symptom-network
topology and clarifies the role of genetic and environmental risk as well as
resilience. Our control-theoretic framework makes testable, quantitative
predictions for individual therapeutic response and provides a starting-point
for the theory-driven design of personalized interventions.
  Funding: German Research Foundation and Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical
Research, M\"unster
