  Ba\v{z}ant et al. have proposed a model for a gravity-driven collapse of a
tall building that collapses after column failure in a single storey. Therein
the collapsing building is described by three distinct sections. The top
section which consists of the part above the first failing storey, the middle
section which is pushed from above by the top section and consists of compacted
building material, and the part of the building below which is still undamaged.
The middle part is gaining height during the collapse, the lower section is
loosing height. The resulting equation of motion is called Crush-Down equation.
In a first approach Ba\v{z}ant and Verdure used a constant velocity profile for
the middle section, namely the top section and the middle section are assumed
to have the same velocity. In a second approach by Ba\v{z}ant, Le, Greening and
Benson this assumption is dropped and the model is slightly modified. However,
their modifications are based on unphysical assumptions and lead to an
erroneous version of the Crush-Down equation. We give a detailed account of how
to implement a non-trivial velocity profile for the middle section and thereby
derive a more accurate version of the Crush-Down equation.
