  The role of positive selection in human evolution remains controversial. On
the one hand, scans for positive selection have identified hundreds of
candidate loci and the genome-wide patterns of polymorphism show signatures
consistent with frequent positive selection. On the other hand, recent studies
have argued that many of the candidate loci are false positives and that most
apparent genome-wide signatures of adaptation are in fact due to reduction of
neutral diversity by linked recurrent deleterious mutations, known as
background selection. Here we analyze human polymorphism data from the 1,000
Genomes project (Abecasis et al. 2012) and detect signatures of pervasive
positive selection once we correct for the effects of background selection. We
show that levels of neutral polymorphism are lower near amino acid
substitutions, with the strongest reduction observed specifically near
functionally consequential amino acid substitutions. Furthermore, amino acid
substitutions are associated with signatures of recent adaptation that should
not be generated by background selection, such as the presence of unusually
long and frequent haplotypes and specific distortions in the site frequency
spectrum. We use forward simulations to show that the observed signatures
require a high rate of strongly adaptive substitutions in the vicinity of the
amino acid changes. We further demonstrate that the observed signatures of
positive selection correlate more strongly with the presence of regulatory
sequences, as predicted by ENCODE (Gerstein et al. 2012), than the positions of
amino acid substitutions. Our results establish that adaptation was frequent in
human evolution and provide support for the hypothesis of King and Wilson (King
and Wilson 1975) that adaptive divergence is primarily driven by regulatory
changes.
