  Self-organized bistability (SOB) is the counterpart of 'self-organized
criticality' (SOC), for systems tuning themselves to the edge of bistability of
a discontinuous phase transition, rather than to the critical point of a
continuous one. The equations defining the mathematical theory of SOB turn out
to bear strong resemblance to a (Landau-Ginzburg) theory recently proposed to
analyze the dynamics of the cerebral cortex. This theory describes the neuronal
activity of coupled mesoscopic patches of cortex, homeostatically regulated by
short-term synaptic plasticity. The theory for cortex dynamics entails,
however, some significant differences with respect to SOB, including the lack
of a (bulk) conservation law, the absence of a perfect separation of timescales
and, the fact that in the former, but not in the second, there is a parameter
that controls the overall system state (in blatant contrast with the very idea
of self-organization). Here, we scrutinize --by employing a combination of
analytical and computational tools-- the analogies and differences between both
theories and explore whether in some limit SOB can play an important role to
explain the emergence of scale-invariant neuronal avalanches observed
empirically in the cortex. We conclude that, actually, in the limit of
infinitely slow synaptic-dynamics, the two theories become identical, but the
timescales required for the self-organization mechanism to be effective do not
seem to be biologically plausible. We discuss the key differences between
self-organization mechanisms with/without conservation and with/without
infinitely separated timescales. In particular, we introduce the concept of
'self-organized collective oscillations' and scrutinize the implications of our
findings in neuroscience, shedding new light into the problems of scale
invariance and oscillations in cortical dynamics.
