  Humans have developed considerable machinery used at scale to create policies
and to distribute incentives, yet we are forever seeking ways in which to
improve upon these, our institutions. Especially when funding is limited, it is
imperative to optimise spending without sacrificing positive outcomes, a
challenge which has often been approached within several areas of social, life
and engineering sciences. These studies often neglect the availability of
information, cost restraints, or the underlying complex network structures,
which define real-world populations. Here, we have extended these models,
including the aforementioned concerns, but also tested the robustness of their
findings to stochastic social learning paradigms. Akin to real-world decisions
on how best to distribute endowments, we study several incentive schemes, which
consider information about the overall population, local neighbourhoods, or the
level of influence which a cooperative node has in the network, selectively
rewarding cooperative behaviour if certain criteria are met. Following a
transition towards a more realistic network setting and stochastic behavioural
update rule, we found that carelessly promoting cooperators can often lead to
their downfall in socially diverse settings. These emergent cyclic patterns not
only damage cooperation, but also decimate the budgets of external investors.
Our findings highlight the complexity of designing effective and cogent
investment policies in socially diverse populations.
