  Process-Based Modeling (PBM) and Machine Learning (ML) are often perceived as
distinct paradigms in the geosciences. Here we present differentiable
geoscientific modeling as a powerful pathway toward dissolving the perceived
barrier between them and ushering in a paradigm shift. For decades, PBM offered
benefits in interpretability and physical consistency but struggled to
efficiently leverage large datasets. ML methods, especially deep networks,
presented strong predictive skills yet lacked the ability to answer specific
scientific questions. While various methods have been proposed for ML-physics
integration, an important underlying theme -- differentiable modeling -- is not
sufficiently recognized. Here we outline the concepts, applicability, and
significance of differentiable geoscientific modeling (DG). "Differentiable"
refers to accurately and efficiently calculating gradients with respect to
model variables, critically enabling the learning of high-dimensional unknown
relationships. DG refers to a range of methods connecting varying amounts of
prior knowledge to neural networks and training them together, capturing a
different scope than physics-guided machine learning and emphasizing first
principles. Preliminary evidence suggests DG offers better interpretability and
causality than ML, improved generalizability and extrapolation capability, and
strong potential for knowledge discovery, while approaching the performance of
purely data-driven ML. DG models require less training data while scaling
favorably in performance and efficiency with increasing amounts of data. With
DG, geoscientists may be better able to frame and investigate questions, test
hypotheses, and discover unrecognized linkages.
