  UO2/BeO interfacial thermal resistance (ITR) is calculated by diffuse
mismatch model (DMM) and the effects of ITR on UO2-BeO thermal conductivity are
investigated. ITR predicted by DMM is on the order of 10-9 m2K/W. Using this
ITR, UO2-BeO thermal conductivities are calculated by theoretical models and
compared with experimental data. The results indicate that DMM prediction is
applicable to the interface between UO2 and dispersed BeO, while not applicable
to the interface between UO2 and continuous BeO. If the thermal conductivity of
UO2 containing continuous BeO was to be in agreement with experimental data,
its ITR should be on the order of 10-6 - 10-5 m2K/W. Therefore, the vibrational
mismatch between UO2 and BeO considered by DMM is the major mechanism for
attenuating the heat flux through UO2/dispersed-BeO interface, but not for
UO2/continuous-BeO interface. Furthermore, it is found that the presence of ITR
leads to the dependence of the thermal conductivity of UO2 containing dispersed
BeO on BeO size. With the decrease in BeO size, UO2-BeO thermal conductivity
decreases. When BeO size is smaller than a critical value, UO2-BeO thermal
conductivity becomes even smaller than UO2 thermal conductivity. For UO2
containing continuous BeO, the thermal conductivity decreases with the decrease
in the size of UO2 granule surrounded by BeO, but not necessarily smaller than
UO2 thermal conductivity. Under a critical temperature, UO2-BeO thermal
conductivity is always larger than UO2 thermal conductivity. Above the critical
temperature, UO2-BeO thermal conductivity is larger than UO2 thermal
conductivity only when UO2 granule size is large enough. The conditions for
achieving the targeted enhancement of UO2 thermal conductivity by doping with
BeO are derived. These conditions can be used to design and optimize the
distribution, content, size of BeO, and the size of UO2 granule.
