  A program that maintains key safety properties even when interacting with
arbitrary untrusted code is said to enjoy \emph{robust safety}. Proving that a
program written in a mainstream language is robustly safe is typically
challenging because it requires static verification tools that work precisely
even in the presence of language features like dynamic dispatch and shared
mutability. The emerging \move programming language was designed to support
strong encapsulation and static verification in the service of secure smart
contract programming. However, the language design has not been analyzed using
a theoretical framework like robust safety.
  In this paper, we define robust safety for the \move language and introduce a
generic framework for static tools that wish to enforce it. Our framework
consists of two abstract components: a program verifier that can prove an
invariant holds in a closed-world setting (e.g., the Move Prover), and a novel
\emph{encapsulator} that checks if the verifier's result generalizes to an
open-world setting. We formalise an escape analysis as an instantiation of the
encapsulator and prove that it attains the required security properties.
  Finally, we implement our encapsulator as an extension to the Move Prover and
use the combination to analyze a representative benchmark set of real-world
\move programs. This toolchain certifies $>$99\% of the \move modules we
analyze, validating that automatic enforcement of strong security properties
like robust safety is practical for \move.
