  A longstanding problem in biology has been the origin of pervasive
quarter-power allometric scaling laws that relate many characteristics of
organisms to body mass (M) across the entire spectrum of life from molecules
and microbes to ecosystems and mammals. In particular, whole-organism metabolic
rate, B=aM^b, where a is a taxon-dependent normalisation constant and b is
approximately equal to 3/4 for both animals and plants. Recently Darveau et al.
(hereafter referred to as DSAH) proposed a "multiple-causes model" for B as
"the sum of multiple contributors to metabolism", B_i, which were assumed to
scale as M^(b_i). They obtained for average values of b: 0.78 for the basal
rate and 0.86 for the maximally active rate. In this note we show that DSAH
contains serious technical, theoretical and conceptual errors, including
misrepresentations of published data and of our previous work. We also show
that, within experimental error, there is no empirical evidence for an increase
in b during aerobic activity as suggested by DSAH. Moreover, since DSAH
consider only metabolic rates of mammals and make no attempt to explain why
metabolic rates for other taxa and many other attributes in diverse organisms
also scale with quarter-powers (including most of their input data), their
formulation is hardly the "unifying principle" they claim. These problems were
not addressed in commentaries by Weibel and Burness.
