  In a traffic network, vehicles normally select their routes selfishly.
Consequently, traffic networks normally operate at an equilibrium characterized
by Wardrop conditions. However, it is well known that equilibria are
inefficient in general. In addition to the intrinsic inefficiency of
equilibria, the authors recently showed that, in mixed-autonomy networks in
which autonomous vehicles maintain a shorter headway than human-driven cars,
increasing the fraction of autonomous vehicles in the network may increase the
inefficiency of equilibria. In this work, we study the possibility of obviating
the inefficiency of equilibria in mixed-autonomy traffic networks via pricing
mechanisms. In particular, we study assigning prices to network links such that
the overall or social delay of the resulting equilibria is minimum. First, we
study the possibility of inducing such optimal equilibria by imposing a set of
undifferentiated prices, i.e. a set of prices that treat both human-driven and
autonomous vehicles similarly at each link. We provide an example which
demonstrates that undifferentiated pricing is not sufficient for achieving
minimum social delay. Then, we study differentiated pricing where the price of
traversing each link may depend on whether vehicles are human-driven or
autonomous. Under differentiated pricing, we prove that link prices obtained
from the marginal cost taxation of links will induce equilibria with minimum
social delay if the degree of road capacity asymmetry (i.e. the ratio between
the road capacity when all vehicles are human-driven and the road capacity when
all vehicles are autonomous) is homogeneous among network links.
