  Jan Tinbergen, the first recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics
in 1969, obtained his PhD in physics at the University of Leiden under the
supervision of Paul Ehrenfest in 1929. Among many achievements as an economist
after his training as a physicist, Tinbergen proposed the so-called Gravity
Model of international trade. The model predicts that the intensity of trade
between two countries is described by a formula similar to Newton's law of
gravitation, where mass is replaced by Gross Domestic Product. Since
Tinbergen's proposal, the Gravity Model has become the standard model of
non-zero trade flows in macroeconomics. However, its intrinsic limitation is
the prediction of a completely connected network, which fails to explain the
observed intricate topology of international trade. Recent network models
overcome this limitation by describing the real network as a member of a
maximum-entropy statistical ensemble. The resulting expressions are formally
analogous to quantum statistics: the international trade network is found to
closely follow the Fermi-Dirac statistics in its purely binary topology, and
the recently proposed mixed Bose-Fermi statistics in its full (binary plus
weighted) structure. This seemingly esoteric result is actually a simple effect
of the heterogeneity of world countries, that imposes strong structural
constraints on the network. Our discussion highlights similarities and
differences between macroeconomics and statistical-physics approaches to
economic networks.
