  1. Species distribution models (SDM) are tools used to determine
environmental features that influence the geographic distribution of species'
abundance and have been used to analyze presence-only records. Analysis of
presence-only records may require correction for nondetection sampling bias to
yield reliable conclusions. In addition, individuals of some species of animals
may be highly aggregated and standard SDMs ignore environmental features that
may influence aggregation behavior. 2. We contend that nondetection sampling
bias can be treated as missing data. Statistical theory and corrective methods
are well developed for missing data, but have been ignored in the literature on
SDMs. We developed a marked inhomogeneous Poisson point process model that
accounted for nondetection and aggregation behavior in animals and tested our
methods on simulated data. 3. Correcting for nondetection sampling bias
requires estimates of the probability of detection which must be obtained from
auxiliary data, as presence-only data do not contain information about the
detection mechanism. Weighted likelihood methods can be used to correct for
nondetection if estimates of the probability of detection are available. We
used an inhomogeneous Poisson point process model to model group abundance, a
zero-truncated generalized linear model to model group size, and combined these
two models to describe the distribution of abundance. Our methods performed
well on simulated data when nondetection was accounted for and poorly when
detection was ignored. 4. We recommend researchers consider the effects of
nondetection sampling bias when modeling species distributions using
presence-only data. If information about the detection process is available, we
recommend researchers explore the effects of nondetection and, when warranted,
correct the bias using our methods.
