  The application of microscopy in biomedical research has come a long way
since Antonie van Leeuwenhoek discovered unicellular organisms. Countless
innovations have positioned light microscopy as a cornerstone of modern biology
and a method of choice for connecting omics datasets to their biological and
clinical correlates. Still, regardless of how convincing published imaging data
looks, it does not always convey meaningful information about the conditions in
which it was acquired, processed, and analyzed. Adequate record-keeping,
reporting, and quality control are therefore essential to ensure experimental
rigor and data fidelity, allow experiments to be reproducibly repeated, and
promote the proper evaluation, interpretation, comparison, and re-use. To this
end, microscopy images should be accompanied by complete descriptions detailing
experimental procedures, biological samples, microscope hardware
specifications, image acquisition parameters, and image analysis procedures, as
well as metrics accounting for instrument performance and calibration. However,
universal, community-accepted Microscopy Metadata standards and reporting
specifications that would result in Findable Accessible Interoperable and
Reproducible (FAIR) microscopy data have not yet been established. To
understand this shortcoming and to propose a way forward, here we provide an
overview of the nature of microscopy metadata and its importance for fostering
data quality, reproducibility, scientific rigor, and sharing value in light
microscopy. The proposal for tiered Microscopy Metadata Specifications that
extend the OME Data Model put forth by the 4D Nucleome Initiative and by
Bioimaging North America [1-3] as well as a suite of three complementary and
interoperable tools are being developed to facilitate the process of image data
documentation and are presented in related manuscripts [4-6].
