  The detection of influential nodes in a social network is an active research
area with many valuable applications including marketing and advertisement. As
a new application in academia, KDD Cup 2016 shed light on the lack of an
existing objective ranking for institutions within their respective research
areas and proposed a solution for it. In this problem, the academic fields are
defined as social networks whose nodes are the active institutions within the
field, with the most influential nodes representing the highest contributors.
The solution is able to provide a ranking of active institutions within their
specific domains. The problem statement provided an annual scoring mechanism
for institutions based on their publications and encouraged the use of any
publicly available dataset such as the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG). The
contest was focused on research publications in selected conferences and asked
for a prediction of the ranking for active institutions within those
conferences in 2016. It should be noted that the results of the paper
submissions and therefore the ground truths for KDD Cup were unknown at the
time of the contest. Each team's final ranking list was evaluated by a metric
called NDCG@20 after the results were released. This metric was used to
indicate the distance between each team's proposed ranking and the actual one
once it was known. After computing the scores of institutions for each year
starting from 2011, we aggregated the rankings by summing the normalized scores
across the years and using the final score set to provide the final ranking.
Since the 2016 ground truths were unknown, we utilized the scores from
2011-2014 and used the 2015 publications as a test bed for evaluating our
aggregation method. Based on the testing, summing the normalized scores got us
closest to the actual 2015 rankings and using same heuristic for predicting the
2016 results.
