  What role do augmentations play in contrastive learning? Recent work suggests
that good augmentations are label-preserving with respect to a specific
downstream task. We complicate this picture by showing that label-destroying
augmentations can be useful in the foundation model setting, where the goal is
to learn diverse, general-purpose representations for multiple downstream
tasks. We perform contrastive learning experiments on a range of image and
audio datasets with multiple downstream tasks (e.g. for digits superimposed on
photographs, predicting the class of one vs. the other). We find that Viewmaker
Networks, a recently proposed model for learning augmentations for contrastive
learning, produce label-destroying augmentations that stochastically destroy
features needed for different downstream tasks. These augmentations are
interpretable (e.g. altering shapes, digits, or letters added to images) and
surprisingly often result in better performance compared to expert-designed
augmentations, despite not preserving label information. To support our
empirical results, we theoretically analyze a simple contrastive learning
setting with a linear model. In this setting, label-destroying augmentations
are crucial for preventing one set of features from suppressing the learning of
features useful for another downstream task. Our results highlight the need for
analyzing the interaction between multiple downstream tasks when trying to
explain the success of foundation models.
