  The Ballast Water Management Convention can decrease the introduction risk of
harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens, yet the Convention increases shipping
costs and causes subsequent economic impacts. This paper examines whether the
Convention generates disproportionate invasion risk reduction results and
economic impacts on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and Least Developed
Countries (LDCs). Risk reduction is estimated with an invasion risk assessment
model based on a higher-order network, and the effects of the regulation on
national economies and trade are estimated with an integrated shipping cost and
computable general equilibrium modeling framework. Then we use the Lorenz curve
to examine if the regulation generates risk or economic inequality among
regions. Risk reduction ratios of all regions (except Singapore) are above 99%,
which proves the effectiveness of the Convention. The Gini coefficient of 0.66
shows the inequality in risk changes relative to income levels among regions,
but risk reductions across all nations vary without particularly high risks for
SIDS and LDCs than for large economies. Similarly, we reveal inequality in
economic impacts relative to income levels (the Gini coefficient is 0.58), but
there is no evidence that SIDS and LDCs are disproportionately impacted
compared to more developed regions. Most changes in GDP, real exports, and real
imports of studied regions are minor (smaller than 0.1%). However, there are
more noteworthy changes for select sectors and trade partners including Togo,
Bangladesh, and Dominican Republic, whose exports may decrease for textiles and
metal and chemicals. We conclude the Convention decreases biological invasion
risk and does not generate disproportionate negative impacts on SIDS and LDCs.
