  In a previous work we have shown that the null result of the Michelson-Morley
experiment in vacuum is deeply connected with the notion of time. The same is
true for the the postulate of constancy of the two-way speed of light in vacuum
in all frames independently of the state of motion of the emitting body. The
argumentation formerly given is very general and has to be true not only within
Special Relativity and its `equivalence' of all inertial frames, but as well as
in Lorentz-Poincar\'e scenario of a preferred reference frame. This paper is
the second of a trilogy intending to revisit the foundations of Special
Relativity, and addresses the question of the constancy of the one-way speed of
light and of the differences and similarities between both scenarios. Although
they manifestly differ in philosophy, it is debated why and how the assumption
of a "special system of reference experimentally inaccessible" is indeed
compatible with Einstein's Special Relativity, as beautifully outlined and
discussed by John Bell [1]. This rather trivial statement is still astonishing
nowadays to a big majority of scientists. The purpose of this work is to bring
such assertion into perspective, widening the somewhat narrow view of Special
Relativity often presented in textbooks.
