  PURPOSE: Among the current practices for keratoconus recognition using
biomechanical parameters from Corvis ST, matching intra-ocular pressure (IOP)
is often required to eliminate the biasing influence; as a result, the combined
biomechanical parameters determined from IOP-unmatched scenario possibly bring
in confounding influence. This paper was therefore designed to introduce a
novel compatible parameter set (CPS) determined from IOP-matched scenario,
hopefully could show its compatibility and superiority for recognizing
keratoconus in both IOP-matched and not scenarios. METHODS: A total of 335 eyes
were included. Among them, 70 eyes were used to determined CPS by forward
logistics regression, 62 eyes were used to validate CPS in IOP-matched
scenario, and resting 203 eyes were used to validate CPS in IOP-unmatched
scenario. To analyze its superiority, CPS was also compared with other two
reported Biomechanical Indexes (aCBI and DCR) in both scenarios. Receiver
operating characteristic curves (ROC), accuracy, FI, sensitivity and
specificity were used to access and compare the performance of these three
parameter sets in both scenarios. RESULTS: The resulting CPS was comprised of
only 3 biomechanical parameters: DA Ratio Max 1mm (DRM1), the first applanation
time (AT1) and an energy loading parameter (Eload). In the IOP-matched
validation, the area under ROC (AUC) reached 95.73%, with an accuracy of 95.2%,
sensitivity of 93.5% and specificity of 96.8% (leave one out cross-validation).
All these indicators reached 96.54%, 95.1%, 95.6% and 94.6% respectively, in
the IOP-unmatched validation (leave one out cross-validation). Surprisingly,
CPS performed better than other two parameter sets on a whole. CONCLUSIONS: The
parameter set determined from IOP-matched scenario indeed exhibit its
superiority for differentiation of keratoconus and normal corneas, regardless
of IOP-matched or not.
