  In cluster randomized trials, patients are typically recruited after clusters
are randomized, and the recruiters and patients may not be blinded to the
assignment. This often leads to differential recruitment and consequently
systematic differences in baseline characteristics of the recruited patients
between intervention and control arms, inducing post-randomization selection
bias. We rigorously define causal estimands in the presence of selection bias.
We elucidate the conditions under which standard covariate adjustment methods
can validly estimate these estimands. We further discuss the additional data
and assumptions necessary for estimating causal effects when such conditions
are not met. Adopting the principal stratification framework in causal
inference, we clarify there are two average treatment effect (ATE) estimands in
cluster randomized trials: one for the overall population and one for the
recruited population. We derive the analytical formula of the two estimands in
terms of principal-stratum-specific causal effects. Using simulation studies,
we assess the empirical performance of the multivariable regression adjustment
method under different data generating processes leading to selection bias.
When treatment effects are heterogeneous across principal strata, the ATE on
the overall population generally differs from the ATE on the recruited
population. An intention-to-treat analysis of the recruited sample leads to
biased estimates of both ATEs. In the presence of post-randomization selection
and without additional data on the non-recruited subjects, the ATE on the
recruited population is estimable only when the treatment effects are
homogenous between principal strata, and the ATE on the overall population is
generally not estimable. The extent to which covariate adjustment can remove
selection bias depends on the degree of effect heterogeneity across principal
strata.
