  The decision to centralise or decentralise human organisations requires
quantified evidence but little is available in the literature. We provide such
data in a variant of the Multiple Travelling Salesmen Problem (MTSP) in which
we study how the allocation sub-problem may be decentralised among selfish
selfmen. Our contributions are (i) this modification of the MTSP in order to
include selfishness, (ii) the proposition of organisations to solve this
modified MTSP, and (iii) the comparison of these organisations. Our 5
organisations may be summarised as follows: (i) OptDecentr is a pure
Centralised Organisation (CO) in which a Central Authority (CA) finds the best
solution which could be found by a Decentralised Organisation (DO), (ii)
Cluster and (iii) Auction are CO/DO hybrids, and (iv) P2P and (v) CNP are pure
DO. Sixth and seventh organisations are used as benchmarks: (vi) NoRealloc is a
pure DO which ignores the allocation problem, and (vii) FullCentr is a pure CO
which solves a different problem, viz., the traditional MTSP. Comparing the
efficiency of pairs of these mechanisms quantify the price of decentralising an
organisation. In particular, our model of selfishness in OptDecentr makes the
total route length 30% (respectively, 60%) longer with 5 (respectively, 9)
salesmen than the traditional MTSP in FullCentr when the computation time is
limited to 30 minutes. With this time limit, our results also seem to indicate
that the level of coercion of the CA impacts more the total route length than
the level of centralisation.
