  Our work is devoted to the metric facility location problem and addresses the
selfish behavior of the players. It contributes to the line of work initiated
by Procaccia and Tennenholtz [EC09] on approximate mechanism design without
money. We explore and argue for an intuitive and simple rule of complexity
O(nk),a so-called proportionality mechanism. The mechanism works in k
consecutive rounds,each time choosing a random player at whose position to
place the next facility; each time the probabilities of players to be picked
are distributed proportionally to their distances to the current set of the
facilities. Lu et al. [EC10] showed that the proportionality rule is incentive
compatible for k=1,2, but fails to be so for k>2.
  We tweak the model slightly such that for any k, the proportionality
mechanism becomes incentive compatible. In the new model we allow the
government to be bureaucratic, i.e., to have the power of to force each player
to choose from only a specific set of available facilities. In the
proportionality mechanism, we force every player that receives a facility at
his reported location to connect to exactly that facility. We extend the
proportionality mechanism to a more general setting with a private network of
facilities already present in the metric space and show that it is truthful as
well.
  We further show that for any fixed k, the proportionality rule achieves in
expectation a constant approximation guarantee to the optimal solution; namely
at most a ratio of 4k. On the other hand, we show a lower bound of ln
k(1+o(1)), and we suspect the truth to be closer to this lower bound. Thus, our
work is the first among those on incentive compatible facility location that
treats effectively (with a constant factor of approximation) the general case
of an arbitrary number of facilities.
