  Background: Following the outbreak of the coronavirus epidemic in early 2020,
municipalities, regional governments and policymakers worldwide had to plan
their Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) amidst a scenario of great
uncertainty. At this early stage of an epidemic, where no vaccine or medical
treatment is in sight, algorithmic prediction can become a powerful tool to
inform local policymaking. However, when we replicated one prominent
epidemiological model to inform health authorities in a region in the south of
Brazil, we found that this model relied too heavily on manually predetermined
covariates and was too reactive to changes in data trends.
  Methods: Our four proposed variations of the original method allow accessing
data of daily reported infections and take into account the under-reporting of
cases more explicitly. Two of the proposed versions also attempt to model the
delay in test reporting. We simulated weekly forecasting of deaths from the
period from 31/05/2020 until 31/01/2021. That workflow allowed us to run a
lighter version of the model after the first calibration week. Google Mobility
data, weekly updated, were used as covariates to the model at each simulated
run.
  Findings: The changes made the model significantly less reactive and more
rapid in adapting to scenarios after a peak in deaths is observed. Assuming
that reported cases were under-reported greatly benefited the model in its
stability, and modelling retroactively-added data (due to the "hot" nature of
the data used) had a negligible impact on performance.
  Interpretation: Although not as reliable as death statistics, case
statistics, when modelled in conjunction with an "overestimate" parameter,
provide a good alternative for improving the forecasting of models, especially
in long-range predictions and after the peak of an infection wave.
