  Financial advisors use questionnaires and discussions with clients to
determine a suitable portfolio of assets that will allow clients to reach their
investment objectives. Financial institutions assign risk ratings to each
security they offer, and those ratings are used to guide clients and advisors
to choose an investment portfolio risk that suits their stated risk tolerance.
This paper compares client Know Your Client (KYC) profile risk allocations to
their investment portfolio risk selections using a value-at-risk discrepancy
methodology. Value-at-risk is used to measure elicited and revealed risk to
show whether clients are over-risked or under-risked, changes in KYC risk lead
to changes in portfolio configuration, and cash flow affects a client's
portfolio risk. We demonstrate the effectiveness of value-at-risk at measuring
clients' elicited and revealed risk on a dataset provided by a private Canadian
financial dealership of over $50,000$ accounts for over $27,000$ clients and
$300$ advisors. By measuring both elicited and revealed risk using the same
measure, we can determine how well a client's portfolio aligns with their
stated goals. We believe that using value-at-risk to measure client risk
provides valuable insight to advisors to ensure that their practice is KYC
compliant, to better tailor their client portfolios to stated goals,
communicate advice to clients to either align their portfolios to stated goals
or refresh their goals, and to monitor changes to the clients' risk positions
across their practice.
