  This paper continues the discussion of the representation and interpretation
of ontologies in the first-order logical environment {\ttfamily FOLE} (Kent).
Ontologies are represented and interpreted in (many-sorted) first-order logic.
Five papers provide a rigorous mathematical representation for the {\ttfamily
ERA} (entity-relationship-attribute) data model (Chen) in particular, and
ontologies in general, within the first-order logical environment {\ttfamily
FOLE}. Two papers (Kent and another paper) represent the formalism and
semantics of (many-sorted) first-order logic in a \emph{classification form}
corresponding to ideas discussed in the Information Flow Framework (IFF). Two
papers (Kent and the current paper) represent (many-sorted) first-order logic
in an \emph{interpretation form} expanding on material found in the paper
(Kent). A fifth paper (Kent) demonstrates that the classification form of
{\ttfamily FOLE} is "informationally equivalent" to the interpretation form of
{\ttfamily FOLE}, thereby defining the formalism and semantics of first-order
logical/relational database systems. Although the classification form follows
the entity-relationship-attribute data model of Chen, the interpretation form
incorporates the relational data model of Codd. Two further papers discuss the
"relational algebra" (Kent) and the "relational calculus". In general, the
{\ttfamily FOLE} representation uses a conceptual structures approach, that is
completely compatible with the theory of institutions (Goguen and Burstall),
formal concept analysis (Ganter and Wille), and information flow (Barwise and
Seligman).
