  Malaria is a mosquito-borne, lethal disease that affects millions and kills
hundreds of thousands of people each year. In this paper, we develop a model
for allocating malaria interventions across geographic regions and time,
subject to budget constraints, with the aim of minimizing the number of
person-days of malaria infection. The model considers a range of several
conditions: climatic characteristics, treatment efficacy, distribution costs,
and treatment coverage. We couple an expanded susceptible-infected-recovered
(SIR) compartment model for the disease dynamics with an integer linear
programming (ILP) model for selecting the disease interventions. Our model
produces an intervention plan for all regions, identifying which combination of
interventions, with which level of coverage, to use in each region and year in
a five-year planning horizon. Simulations using the model yield high-level,
qualitative insights on optimal intervention policies: The optimal policy is
different when considering a five-year time horizon than when considering only
a single year, due to the effects that interventions have on the disease
transmission dynamics. The vaccine intervention is rarely selected, except if
its assumed cost is significantly lower than that predicted in the literature.
Increasing the available budget causes the number of person-days of malaria
infection to decrease linearly up to a point, after which the benefit of
increased budget starts to taper. The optimal policy is highly dependent on
assumptions about mosquito density, selecting different interventions for wet
climates with high density than for dry climates with low density, and the
interventions are found to be less effective at controlling malaria in the wet
climates when attainable intervention coverage is 60% or lower. However, when
intervention coverage of 80% is attainable, then malaria prevalence drops
quickly.
