  To interpret information visualizations, observers must determine how visual
features map onto concepts. First and foremost, this ability depends on
perceptual discriminability; e.g., observers must be able to see the difference
between different colors for those colors to communicate different meanings.
However, the ability to interpret visualizations also depends on semantic
discriminability, the degree to which observers can infer a unique mapping
between visual features and concepts, based on the visual features and concepts
alone (i.e., without help from verbal cues such as legends or labels). Previous
evidence suggested that observers were better at interpreting encoding systems
that maximized semantic discriminability (maximizing association strength
between assigned colors and concepts while minimizing association strength
between unassigned colors and concepts), compared to a system that only
maximized color-concept association strength. However, increasing semantic
discriminability also resulted in increased perceptual distance, so it is
unclear which factor was responsible for improved performance. In the present
study, we conducted two experiments that tested for independent effects of
semantic distance and perceptual distance on semantic discriminability of bar
graph data visualizations. Perceptual distance was large enough to ensure
colors were more than just noticeably different. We found that increasing
semantic distance improved performance, independent of variation in perceptual
distance, and when these two factors were uncorrelated, responses were
dominated by semantic distance. These results have implications for navigating
trade-offs in color palette design optimization for visual communication.
