  Traditional selfish routing literature quantifies inefficiency in
transportation systems with single-attribute costs using price-of-anarchy
(PoA), and provides various technical approaches (e.g. marginal cost pricing)
to improve PoA of the overall network. Unfortunately, practical transportation
systems have dynamic, multi-attribute costs and the state-of-the-art technical
approaches proposed in the literature are infeasible for practical deployment.
In this paper, we offer a paradigm shift to selfish routing via characterizing
idiosyncratic, multi-attribute costs at boundedly-rational travelers, as well
as improving network efficiency using strategic information design.
Specifically, we model the interaction between the system and travelers as a
Stackelberg game, where travelers adopt multi-attribute logit responses. We
model the strategic information design as an optimization problem, and develop
a novel approximate algorithm to steer Logit Response travelers towards social
welfare using strategic Information design (in short, LoRI). We demonstrate the
performance of LoRI on a Wheatstone network with multi-modal route choices at
the travelers. In our simulation experiments, we find that LoRI outperforms
SSSP in terms of system utility, especially when there is a motive mismatch
between the two systems and improves social welfare. For instance, we find that
LoRI persuades a traveler towards a socially optimal route for 66.66% of the
time on average, when compared to SSSP, when the system has 0.3 weight on
carbon emissions. However, we also present a tradeoff between system
performance and runtime in our simulation results.
