  The influence maximization paradigm has been used by researchers in various
fields in order to study how information spreads in social networks. While
previously the attention was mostly on efficiency, more recently fairness
issues have been taken into account in this scope. In this paper, we propose to
use randomization as a mean for achieving fairness. Similar to previous works
like Fish et al. (WWW '19) and Tsang et al. (IJCAI '19), we study the maximin
criterion for (group) fairness. In contrast to their work however, we model the
problem in such a way that, when choosing the seed sets, probabilistic
strategies are possible rather than only deterministic ones. We introduce two
different variants of this probabilistic problem, one that entails
probabilistic strategies over nodes (node-based problem) and a second one that
entails probabilistic strategies over sets of nodes (set-based problem). While
the original deterministic problem involving the maximin criterion has been
shown to be inapproximable, interestingly, we show that both probabilistic
variants permit approximation algorithms that achieve a constant multiplicative
factor of 1-1/e plus an additive arbitrarily small error that is due to the
simulation of the information spread. For an experimental study, we provide
implementations of multiplicative-weight routines for both problems and compare
the achieved fairness values to existing methods. Maybe non-surprisingly, we
show that the ex-ante values of the computed probabilistic strategies are
significantly larger than the (ex-post) fairness values of previous methods.
This indicates that studying fairness via randomization is a worthwhile path to
follow. Interestingly and maybe more surprisingly, we observe that even the
ex-post fairness values computed by our routines, dominate over the fairness
achieved by previous methods on most of the instances tested.
