  Social attachment theory states that individuals seek the proximity of
attachment figures (e.g. family members, friends, colleagues, familiar places
or objects) when faced with threat. During disasters, this means that family
members may seek each other before evacuating, gather personal property before
heading to familiar exits and places, or follow groups/crowds, etc. This
hard-wired human tendency should be considered in the assessment of risk and
the creation of disaster management plans. Doing so may result in more
realistic evacuation procedures and may minimise the number of casualties and
injuries. In this context, a dynamic spatio-temporal analysis of seismic risk
is presented using SOLACE, a multi-agent model of pedestrian behaviour based on
social attachment theory implemented using the Belief-Desire-Intention
approach. The model focuses on the influence of human, social, physical and
temporal factors on successful evacuation. Human factors considered include
perception and mobility defined by age. Social factors are defined by
attachment bonds, social groups, population distribution, and cultural norms.
Physical factors refer to the location of the epicentre of the earthquake,
spatial distribution/layout and attributes of environmental objects such as
buildings, roads, barriers (cars), placement of safe areas, evacuation routes,
and the resulting debris/damage from the earthquake. Experiments tested the
influence of time of the day, presence of disabled persons and earthquake
intensity. Initial results show that factors that influence arrivals in safe
areas include (a) human factors (age, disability, speed), (b) pre-evacuation
behaviours, (c) perception distance (social attachment, time of day), (d)
social interaction during evacuation, and (e) physical and spatial aspects,
such as limitations imposed by debris (damage), and the distance to safe areas.
To validate the results, scenarios will be designed with stakeholders, who will
also take part in the definition of a serious game. The recommendation of this
research is that both social and physical aspects should be considered when
defining vulnerability in the analysis of risk.
