  Single-cell omics enable the profiles of cells, which contain large numbers
of biological features, to be quantified. Cluster analysis, a dimensionality
reduction process, is used to reduce the dimensions of the data to make it
computationally tractable. In these analyses, cells are represented as vectors
in $n$-Dimensional space, where each dimension corresponds to a certain cell
feature. The distance between cells is used as a surrogate measure of
similarity, providing insight into the cell's state, function, and genetic
mechanisms. However, as cell profiles are clustered in 3D or higher-dimensional
space, it remains unknown which distance metric provides the most accurate
spatiotemporal representation of similarity, limiting the interpretability of
the data. I propose and prove a generalized proposition and set of corollaries
that serve as a criterion to determine which of the standard distance measures
is most accurate for conveying cell profile heterogeneity. Each distance method
is evaluated via statistical, geometric, and topological proofs, which are
formalized into a set of criteria. In this paper, I present the putative,
first-ever method to elect the most accurate and precise distance metrics with
any profiling modality, which are determined to be the Wasserstein distance and
cosine similarity metrics, respectively, in general cases. I also identify
special cases in which the criterion may select non-standard metrics. Combining
the metric properties selected by the criterion, I develop a novel, custom,
optimal distance metric that demonstrates superior computational efficiency,
peak annotation, motif identification, and footprinting for transcription
factor binding sites when compared with leading methods.
