  Propelled by the recent financial product innovations involving derivatives,
securitization and mortgages, commercial banks are becoming more complex,
branching out into many "nontraditional" banking operations beyond issuance of
loans. This broadening of operational scope in a pursuit of revenue
diversification may be beneficial if banks exhibit scope economies. The
existing (two-decade-old) empirical evidence lends no support for such
product-scope-driven cost economies in banking, but it is greatly outdated and,
surprisingly, there has been little (if any) research on this subject despite
the drastic transformations that the U.S. banking industry has undergone over
the past two decades in the wake of technological advancements and regulatory
changes. Commercial banks have significantly shifted towards nontraditional
operations, making the portfolio of products offered by present-day banks very
different from that two decades ago. In this paper, we provide new and more
robust evidence about scope economies in U.S. commercial banking. We improve
upon the prior literature not only by analyzing the most recent data and
accounting for bank's nontraditional off-balance sheet operations, but also in
multiple methodological ways. To test for scope economies, we estimate a
flexible time-varying-coefficient panel-data quantile regression model which
accommodates three-way heterogeneity across banks. Our results provide strong
evidence in support of significantly positive scope economies across banks of
virtually all sizes. Contrary to earlier studies, we find no empirical
corroboration for scope diseconomies.
