  Online content platforms are concerned about the freshness of their content
updates to their end customers, and increasingly more platforms now invite and
pay the crowd to sample real-time information (e.g., traffic observations and
sensor data) to help reduce their ages of information (AoI). How much
crowdsourced data to sample and buy over time is a critical question for a
platform's AoI management, requiring a good balance between its AoI and the
incurred sampling cost. This question becomes more interesting by considering
the stage after sampling, where multiple platforms coexist in sharing the
content delivery network of limited bandwidth, and one platform's update may
jam or preempt the others' under negative network externalities. When these
selfish platforms know each other's sampling cost, we formulate their
competition as a non-cooperative game and show they want to over-sample to
reduce their own AoIs, causing the price of anarchy (PoA) to be infinity. To
remedy this huge efficiency loss, we propose a trigger mechanism of
non-monetary punishment in a repeated game to enforce the platforms'
cooperation to approach the social optimum. We also study the more challenging
scenario of incomplete information that some new platform hides its private
sampling cost information from the other incumbent platforms in the Bayesian
game. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that even the platform with more
information may get hurt. We successfully redesign the trigger-and-punishment
mechanism to negate the platform's information advantage and ensure no
cheating. Our extensive simulations show that the mechanisms can remedy the
huge efficiency loss due to platform competition, and the performance improves
as we have more incumbent platforms with known cost information.
