  Blockchain introduces decentralized trust in peer-to-peer networks, advancing
security and democratizing systems. Yet, a unified definition for
decentralization remains elusive. Our Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) seeks
to bridge this gap, emphasizing quantification and methodological coherence.
We've formulated a taxonomy defining blockchain decentralization across five
facets: consensus, network, governance, wealth, and transaction. Despite the
prevalent focus on consensus decentralization, our novel index, based on
Shannon entropy, provides comprehensive insights. Moreover, we delve into
alternative metrics like the Gini and Nakamoto Coefficients and the
Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI), supplemented by an open-source Python tool on
GitHub. In terms of methodology, blockchain research has often bypassed
stringent scientific methods. By employing descriptive, predictive, and causal
methods, our study showcases the potential of structured research in
blockchain. Descriptively, we observe a trend of converging decentralization
levels over time. Examining DeFi platforms reveals exchange and lending
applications as more decentralized than their payment and derivatives
counterparts. Predictively, there's a notable correlation between Ether's
returns and transaction decentralization in Ether-backed stablecoins. Causally,
Ethereum's transition to the EIP-1559 transaction fee model has a profound
impact on DeFi transaction decentralization. To conclude, our work outlines
directions for blockchain research, emphasizing the delicate balance among
decentralization facets, fostering long-term decentralization, and the ties
between decentralization, security, privacy, and efficiency. We end by
spotlighting challenges in grasping blockchain decentralization intricacies.
