  The rapid growth of e-commerce has made people accustomed to shopping online.
Before making purchases on e-commerce websites, most consumers tend to rely on
rating scores and review information to make purchase decisions. With this
information, they can infer the quality of products to reduce the risk of
purchase. Specifically, items with high rating scores and good reviews tend to
be less risky, while items with low rating scores and bad reviews might be
risky to purchase. On the other hand, the purchase behaviors will also be
influenced by consumers' tolerance of risks, known as the risk attitudes.
Economists have studied risk attitudes for decades. These studies reveal that
people are not always rational enough when making decisions, and their risk
attitudes may vary in different circumstances.
  Most existing works over recommendation systems do not consider users' risk
attitudes in modeling, which may lead to inappropriate recommendations to
users. For example, suggesting a risky item to a risk-averse person or a
conservative item to a risk-seeking person may result in the reduction of user
experience. In this paper, we propose a novel risk-aware recommendation
framework that integrates machine learning and behavioral economics to uncover
the risk mechanism behind users' purchasing behaviors. Concretely, we first
develop statistical methods to estimate the risk distribution of each item and
then draw the Nobel-award winning Prospect Theory into our model to learn how
users choose from probabilistic alternatives that involve risks, where the
probabilities of the outcomes are uncertain. Experiments on several e-commerce
datasets demonstrate that our approach can achieve better performance than many
classical recommendation approaches, and further analyses also verify the
advantages of risk-aware recommendation beyond accuracy.
