  The modeling of turbulence, whether it be numerical or analytical, is a
difficult challenge. Turbulence is amenable to analysis with linear theory if
it is subject to rapid distortions, i.e., motions occurring on a time scale
that is short compared to the time scale for non-linear interactions. Such an
approach could prove useful for understanding aspects of astrophysical
turbulence, which is often subject to rapid distortions, such as supernova
explosions or the free-fall associated with gravitational instability. As a
proof of principle, a particularly simple problem is considered here: the
evolution of vorticity due to a planar rarefaction in an ideal gas. Vorticity
can either grow or decay in the wake of a rarefaction front, and there are two
competing effects that determine which outcome occurs: entropy fluctuations
couple to the mean pressure gradient to produce vorticity via baroclinic
effects, whereas vorticity is damped due to the conservation of angular
momentum as the fluid expands. In the limit of purely entropic fluctuations in
the ambient fluid, a strong rarefaction generates vorticity with a turbulent
Mach number on the order of the root-mean square of the ambient entropy
fluctuations. The analytical results are shown to compare well with results
from two- and three-dimensional numerical simulations. Analytical solutions are
also derived in the linear regime of Reynolds-averaged turbulence models. This
highlights an inconsistency in standard turbulence models that prevents them
from accurately capturing the physics of rarefaction-turbulence interaction.
Finally, dimensional analysis of the equations indicates that rapid distortion
of turbulence can give rise to two distinct regimes in the turbulent spectrum:
a distortion range at large scales where linear distortion effects dominate,
and an inertial range at small scales where non-linear effects dominate.
