  In this paper, we study difference-in-differences identification and
estimation strategies where the parallel trends assumption holds after
conditioning on time-varying covariates and/or time-invariant covariates. Our
first main contribution is to point out a number of weaknesses of commonly used
two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regressions in this context. In addition to issues
related to multiple periods and variation in treatment timing that have been
emphasized in the literature, we show that, even in the case with only two time
periods, TWFE regressions are not generally robust to (i) paths of untreated
potential outcomes depending on the level of time-varying covariates (as
opposed to only the change in the covariates over time), (ii) paths of
untreated potential outcomes depending on time-invariant covariates, and (iii)
violations of linearity conditions for outcomes over time and/or the propensity
score. Even in cases where none of the previous three issues hold, we show that
TWFE regressions can suffer from negative weighting and weight-reversal issues.
Thus, TWFE regressions can deliver misleading estimates of causal effect
parameters in a number of empirically relevant cases. Second, we extend these
arguments to the case of multiple periods and variation in treatment timing.
Third, we provide simple diagnostics for assessing the extent of
misspecification bias arising due to TWFE regressions. Finally, we propose
alternative (and simple) estimation strategies that can circumvent these issues
with two-way fixed regressions.
