  In today's world, several applications demand numbers which appear random but
are generated by a background algorithm; that is, pseudo-random numbers. Since
late $19^{th}$ century, researchers have been working on pseudo-random number
generators (PRNGs). Several PRNGs continue to develop, each one demanding to be
better than the previous ones. In this scenario, this paper targets to verify
the claim of so-called good generators and rank the existing generators based
on strong empirical tests in same platforms. To do this, the genre of PRNGs
developed so far has been explored and classified into three groups -- linear
congruential generator based, linear feedback shift register based and cellular
automata based. From each group, well-known generators have been chosen for
empirical testing. Two types of empirical testing has been done on each PRNG --
blind statistical tests with Diehard battery of tests, TestU01 library and NIST
statistical test-suite and graphical tests (lattice test and space-time diagram
test). Finally, the selected $29$ PRNGs are divided into $24$ groups and are
ranked according to their overall performance in all empirical tests.
