  One of the major terminological forces driving ICT integration in research
today is that of "big data." While the phrase sounds inclusive and integrative,
"big data" approaches are highly selective, excluding input that cannot be
effectively structured, represented, or digitised. Data of this complex sort is
precisely the kind that human activity produces, but the technological
imperative to enhance signal through the reduction of noise does not
accommodate this richness. Data and the computational approaches that
facilitate "big data" have acquired a perceived objectivity that belies their
curated, malleable, reactive, and performative nature. In an input environment
where anything can "be data" once it is entered into the system as "data," data
cleaning and processing, together with the metadata and information
architectures that structure and facilitate our cultural archives acquire a
capacity to delimit what data are. This engenders a process of simplification
that has major implications for the potential for future innovation within
research environments that depend on rich material yet are increasingly
mediated by digital technologies. This paper presents the preliminary findings
of the European-funded KPLEX (Knowledge Complexity) project which investigates
the delimiting effect digital mediation and datafication has on rich, complex
cultural data. The paper presents a systematic review of existing implicit
definitions of data, elaborating on the implications of these definitions and
highlighting the ways in which metadata and computational technologies can
restrict the interpretative potential of data. It sheds light on the gap
between analogue or augmented digital practices and fully computational ones,
and the strategies researchers have developed to deal with this gap. The paper
proposes a reconceptualisation of data as it is functionally employed within
digitally-mediated research so as to incorporate and acknowledge the richness
and complexity of our source materials.
