  Quality assurance (QA) for medical linear accelerators is indispensable for
appropriate cancer treatment. Some international organizations and western
advanced countries provide QA guidelines for linear accelerators. Currently, QA
regulations for linear accelerators in Korean hospitals specify a system in
which each hospital stipulates its independent hospital-based protocols for QA
procedures (HP_QAPs) and conducts QA based on these HP_QAPs while regulatory
authorities verify whether items under these HP_QAPs have been performed.
However, because this regulatory method cannot guarantee the quality of
universal treatment, and QA items with tolerance criteria are different in many
hospitals, the presentation of standardized QA items and tolerance criteria is
essential. In this study, QA items in HP_QAPs from various hospitals and those
presented by international organizations. Concordance rates between QA items
for linear accelerators that were presented by the aforementioned organizations
and those currently being implemented in Korean hospitals were shown to exhibit
a daily QA of 50%, a weekly QA of 22%, a monthly QA of 43%, and an annual QA of
65%, and the overall concordance rates of all QA items were approximately 48%.
In comparison between QA items being implemented in Korean hospitals and those
being implemented in western advanced countries, concordance rates were shown
to exhibit a daily QA of 50%, a weekly QA of 33%, a monthly QA of 60%, and an
annual QA of 67%, and the overall concordance rate of all QA items were
approximately 57%. The results of this study indicate that the HP_QAPs
currently implemented by Korean hospitals as QA standards for linear
accelerators used in radiation therapy do not meet international standards. To
solve this problem, it is necessary to develop national standardized QA items
and procedures for linear accelerators.
