  We investigate the possibility that sufficiently large electric fields and/or
ionization during geomagnetic disturbed conditions may invalidate the
assumptions applied in the retrieval of neutral horizontal winds from meteor
and/or lidar measurements. As per our knowledge, the possible errors in the
wind estimation have never been reported. In the present case study, we have
been using co-located meteor radar and sodium resonance lidar zonal wind
measurements over Andenes (69.27$^{\circ}$N, 16.04$^{\circ}$E) during intense
substorms in the declining phase of the January 2005 solar proton event (21-22
January 2005). In total, 14 h of measurements are available for the comparison,
which covers both quiet and disturbed conditions. For comparison, the lidar
zonal wind measurements are averaged over the same time and altitude as the
meteor radar wind measurements. High cross correlations ($\sim$0.8) are found
in all height regions. The discrepancies can be explained in light of
differences in the observational volumes of the two instruments. Further, we
extended the comparison to address the electric field and/or ionization impact
on the neutral wind estimation. For the periods of low ionization, the neutral
winds estimated with both instruments are quite consistent with each other.
During periods of elevated ionization, comparatively large differences are
noticed at the highermost altitude, which might be due to the electric field
and/or ionization impact on the wind estimation. At present, one event is not
sufficient to make any firm conclusion. Further study with more co-located
measurements are needed to test the statistical significance of the result.
