  The `excised ensemble', a random matrix model for the zeros of quadratic
twist families of elliptic curve $L$-functions, was introduced by Due\~nez,
Huynh, Keating, Miller and Snaith. The excised model is motivated by a formula
for central values of these $L$-functions in a paper by Kohnen and Zagier. This
formula indicates that for a finite set of $L$-functions from a family of
quadratic twists, the central values are all either zero or are greater than
some positive cutoff. The excised model imposes this same condition on the
central values of characteristic polynomials of matrices from $SO(2N)$.
Strangely, the cutoff on the characteristic polynomials that results in a
convincing model for the $L$-function zeros is significantly smaller than that
which we would obtain by naively transferring Kohnen and Zagier's cutoff to the
$SO(2N)$ ensemble. In this current paper we investigate a modification to the
excised model. It lacks the simplicity of the original excised ensemble, but it
serves to explain the reason for the unexpectedly low cutoff in the original
excised model. Additionally, the distribution of central $L$-values is
`choppier' than the distribution of characteristic polynomials, in the sense
that it is a superposition of a series of peaks: the characteristic polynomial
distribution is a smooth approximation to this. The excised model didn't
attempt to incorporate these successive peaks, only the initial cutoff. Here we
experiment with including some of the structure of the $L$-value distribution.
The conclusion is that a critical feature of a good model is to associate the
correct mass to the first peak of the $L$-value distribution.
