  Assessment is a crucial part of education. Traditional marking is a source of
inconsistencies and unconscious bias, placing a high cognitive load on the
assessors. An approach to address these issues is comparative judgement (CJ).
In CJ, the assessor is presented with a pair of items and is asked to select
the better one. Following a series of comparisons, a rank is derived using a
ranking model, for example, the BTM, based on the results. While CJ is
considered a reliable method for marking, there are concerns around
transparency, and the ideal number of pairwise comparisons to generate a
reliable estimation of the rank order is not known. Additionally, there have
been attempts to generate a method of selecting pairs that should be compared
next in an informative manner, but some existing methods are known to have
created their own bias within results inflating the reliability metric used. As
a result, a random selection approach is usually deployed.
  We propose a novel Bayesian approach to CJ (BCJ) for determining the ranks of
compared items alongside a new way to select the pairs to present to the
marker(s) using active learning (AL), addressing the key shortcomings of
traditional CJ. Furthermore, we demonstrate how the entire approach may provide
transparency by providing the user insights into how it is making its decisions
and, at the same time, being more efficient. Results from our experiments
confirm that the proposed BCJ combined with entropy-driven AL pair-selection
method is superior to other alternatives. We also find that the more
comparisons done, the more accurate BCJ becomes, which solves the issue the
current method has of the model deteriorating if too many comparisons are
performed. As our approach can generate the complete predicted rank
distribution for an item, we also show how this can be utilised in devising a
predicted grade, guided by the assessor.
