  Recently, social media platforms have introduced several measures to counter
misleading information. Among these measures are state media labels which help
users identify and evaluate the credibility of state-backed news. YouTube was
the first platform to introduce labels that provide information about
state-backed news channels. While previous work has examined the efficiency of
information labels in controlled lab settings, few studies have examined how
state media labels affect user perceptions of content from state-backed
outlets. This paper proposes new methodological and theoretical approaches to
investigate the effect of state media labels on user engagement with content.
Drawing on a content analysis of 8,071 YouTube comments posted before and after
the labelling of five state-funded channels (Al Jazeera English, CGTN, RT, TRT
World, and Voice of America), this paper analyses the effect state media labels
had on user engagement with state-backed media content. We found the labels had
no impact on the amount of likes videos received before and after the policy
introduction, except for RT which received less likes after it was labelled.
However, for RT, comments left by users were associated with 30 percent
decrease in the likelihood of observing a critical comment following the policy
implementation, and a 70 percent decrease in likelihood of observing a critical
comment about RT as a media source. While other state-funded broadcasters, like
Al Jazeera English and VOA News, received fewer critical comments after YouTube
introduced its policy; this relationship was associated with how political the
video was, rather than the policy change. Our study contributes to the ongoing
discussion on the efficacy of platform governance in relation to state-backed
media, showing that audience preferences impact the effectiveness of labels.
