  Background: There is uncertainty about the role of different age groups in
propagating the SARS-CoV-2 epidemics in different countries. Methods: We used
the Koch Institute data on COVID-19 cases in Germany. To minimize the effect of
changes in healthcare seeking behavior and testing practices, we included the
following 5-year age groups in the analyses: 10-14y through 45-49y. For each
age group g, we considered the proportion PL(g) of individuals in age group g
among all detected cases aged 10-49y during weeks 13-14, 2020 (later period),
as well as corresponding proportion PE(g) for weeks 10-11, 2020 (early period),
and the relative risk RR(g)=PL(g)/PE(g). For each pair of age groups g1,g2, a
higher value of RR(g1) compared to RR(g2) is interpreted as the relative
increase in the population incidence of SARS-Cov-2 for g1 compared to g2 for
the later vs. early period. Results: The relative risk was highest for
individuals aged 20-24y (RR=1.4(95% CI (1.27,1.55))), followed by individuals
aged 15-19y (RR=1.14(0.99,1.32)), aged 30-34y (RR= 1.07(0.99,1.16)), aged
25-29y (RR= 1.06(0.98,1.15)), aged 35-39y (RR=0.95(0.87,1.03)), aged 40-44y
(RR=0.9(0.83,0.98)), aged 45-49y (RR=0.83(0.77,0.89)) and aged 10-14y
(RR=0.78(0.64,0.95)). Conclusions: The observed relative increase with time in
the prevalence of individuals aged 15-34y (particularly those aged 20-24y)
among COVID-19 cases is unlikely to be explained by increases in the likelihood
of seeking medical care/being tested for individuals in those age groups
compared to individuals aged 35-49y or 10-14y, suggesting an actual increase in
the prevalence of individuals aged 15-34y among SARS-CoV-2 infections in the
German population. That increase likely reflects elevated mixing among
individuals aged 15-34y (particularly those aged 20-24y) compared to other age
groups, possibly due to lesser adherence to social distancing practices.
