  The accuracy of predictions of price and return probabilities substantially
determines the reliability of asset pricing and portfolio theories. We develop
successive approximations that link up predictions of the market-based
probabilities of price and return for the whole stock market with predictions
of price and return probabilities for stocks of a particular company and show
that economic complexity limits the accuracy of any forecasts. The economic
origin of the restrictions lies in the fact that the predictions of the m-th
statistical moments of price and return require descriptions of the economic
variables composed by sums of the m-th powers of economic or market
transactions during an averaging time interval. The attempts to predict the
n-th statistical moments of price and return of stocks that are under the
action of a single risk result in estimates of the n-dimensional risk rating
vectors for economic agents. In turn, the risk rating vectors play the role of
coordinates for the description of the evolution of economic variables. The
lack of a model description of the economic variables composed by sums of the
2-d and higher powers of market transactions causes that, in the coming years,
the accuracy of the forecasts will be limited at best by the first two
statistical moments of price and return, which determine Gaussian
distributions. One can ignore existing barriers and limits but cannot overcome
or resolve them. That significantly reduces the reliability and veracity of
modern asset pricing and portfolio theories. Our results could be essential and
fruitful for the largest investors and banks, economic and financial
authorities, and market participants.
