  Spatio-temporal information is used for driving a plethora of intelligent
transportation, smart-city, and crowd-sensing applications. Since data is now
considered a valuable production factor, data marketplaces have appeared to
help individuals and enterprises bring it to market to satisfy the ever-growing
demand. In such marketplaces, several sources may need to combine their data in
order to meet the requirements of different applications. In this paper we
study the problem of estimating the relative value of different spatio-temporal
datasets combined in wholesale and retail marketplaces for the purpose of
predicting demand in metropolitan areas. Using as case studies large datasets
of taxi rides from Chicago and New York, we ask questions such as "When does it
make sense for different taxi companies to combine their data?", and "How
should different companies be compensated for the data that they share?". We
then turn our attention to the even harder problem of establishing the relative
value of the data brought to retail marketplaces by individual drivers.
Overall, we show that simplistic but popular approaches for estimating the
relative value of data, such as using volume, or the ``leave-one-out''
heuristic, are inaccurate. Instead, more complex notions of value from
economics and game-theory, such as the Shapley value need to be employed if one
wishes to capture the complex effects of mixing different datasets on the
accuracy of forecasting algorithms. Applying the Shapley value to large
datasets from many sources is, of course, computationally challenging. We
resort to structured sampling and manage to compute accurately the importance
of thousands of data sources. We show that the relative value of the data held
by different taxi companies and drivers may differ substantially, and that its
relative ranking may change from district to district within a metropolitan
area.
