  In this study, we investigate the resilience of duplex networked layers
($\alpha$ and $\beta$) coupled with antagonistic interlinks, each layer of
which inhibits its counterpart at the microscopic level, changing the following
factors: whether the influence of the initial failures in $\alpha$ remains
(quenched (Case Q)) or not (free (Case F)); the effect of intralayer
degree-degree correlations in each layer and interlayer degree-degree
correlations; and the type of the initial failures, such as random failures
(RFs) or targeted attacks (TAs). We illustrate that the percolation processes
repeat in both Cases Q and F, although only in Case F are nodes that initially
failed reactivated. To analytically evaluate the resilience of each layer, we
develop a methodology based on the cavity method for deriving the size of a
giant component (GC). Strong hysteresis, which is ignored in the standard
cavity analysis, is observed in the repetition of the percolation processes
particularly in Case F. To handle this, we heuristically modify interlayer
messages for macroscopic analysis, the utility of which is verified by
numerical experiments. The percolation transition in each layer is continuous
in both Cases Q and F. We also analyze the influences of degree-degree
correlations on the robustness of layer $\alpha$, in particular for the case of
TAs. The analysis indicates that the critical fraction of initial failures that
makes the GC size in layer $\alpha$ vanish depends only on its intralayer
degree-degree correlations. Although our model is defined in a somewhat
abstract manner, it may have relevance to ecological systems that are composed
of endangered species (layer $\alpha$) and invaders (layer $\beta$), the former
of which are damaged by the latter whereas the latter are exterminated in the
areas where the former are active.
