  During the past earthquakes, different low ductile failure modes are observed
in the gravity design structures and thus, the most of existing damage indices
may fail to assess the damage of gravity design structures accurately in
referring to the two main performance levels: immediate occupancy and ultimate
limit state. Therefore, this study investigates the energy dissipated by the
brittle structures and the possible damage indices based on energy for the
damage assessment of gravity design frames. In the framework of an Energy-Based
Seismic Design Approach, we need the assessment of the Demand and on the
Capacity, both expressed in Energy. A methodology for the assessment of the
seismic energy demands imposed on structures is already proposed, but not such
methodology that makes consensus is proposed for the calculation of the Energy
dissipation Capacity avoiding the Hysteretic models. The estimation of the
energy expended by the building during an earthquake excitation is a tricky
issue. For this purpose, this study considers the wavelet based energy
estimation and compares it with different approaches for measuring the damages
of a structure: the dominant inelastic period of a building and the more
classical measure, the inter-story drift. IDA analysis are performed in energy,
drift and inelastic period. Furthermore, the damage assessment results based on
the expended energy for three gravity design buildings are compared and
discussed relatively to the results expressed in inelastic period and drift.
Finally, this study concludes that no significant effects of number of
inelastic cycles to the damage assessment results for low ductile structures.
However, this study also highlights the effects of number of inelastic cycles
to the damage for medium and high ductile structures.
