  Pressure for higher productivity and faster delivery is increasingly
pervading software organizations. This can lead software engineers to act like
chess players playing a gambit -- making sacrifices of their technically sound
estimates, thus submitting their teams to time pressure. In turn, time pressure
can have varied detrimental effects, such as poor product quality and emotional
distress, decreasing productivity, which leads to more time pressure and
delays: a hard-to-stop vicious cycle. This reveals a need for moving on from
the more passive strategy of yielding to pressure to a more active one of
defending software estimates. Therefore, we propose an approach to support
software estimators in acquiring knowledge on how to carry out such defense, by
introducing negotiation principles encapsulated in a set of defense lenses,
presented through a digital simulation. We evaluated the proposed approach
through a controlled experiment with software practitioners from different
companies. We collected data on participants' attitudes, subjective norms,
perceived behavioral control, and intentions to perform the defense of their
estimates in light of the Theory of Planned Behavior. We employed a frequentist
and a bayesian approach to data analysis. Results show improved scores among
experimental group participants after engaging with the digital simulation and
learning about the lenses. They were also more inclined to choose a defense
action when facing pressure scenarios than a control group exposed to questions
to reflect on the reasons and outcomes of pressure over estimates. Qualitative
evidence reveals that practitioners perceived the set of lenses as useful in
their current work environments. Collectively, these results show the
effectiveness of the proposed approach and its perceived relevance for the
industry, despite the low amount of time required to engage with it.
