  In this paper, we analyze the effects of erroneous load comparisons on the
performance of the Po2 scheme. Specifically, we consider load-dependent and
load-independent errors. In the load-dependent error model, an incoming job is
sent to the server with the larger queue length among the two sampled servers
with probability $\epsilon$ if the difference in the queue lengths of the two
sampled servers is less than or equal to a constant $g$; no error is made if
the queue-length difference is higher than $g$. For this type of errors, we
show that the benefits of the Po2 scheme is retained as long as the system size
is sufficiently large and $\lambda$ is sufficiently close to $1$. Furthermore,
we show that, unlike the standard Po2 scheme, the performance of the Po2 scheme
under this type of errors can be worse than the random scheme if $\epsilon >
1/2$ and $\lambda$ is sufficiently small. In the load-independent error model,
the incoming job is sent to the sampled server with the {\em maximum load} with
an error probability of $\epsilon$ independent of the loads of the sampled
servers. For this model, we show that the performance benefits of the Po2
scheme are retained only if $\epsilon \leq 1/2$; for $\epsilon > 1/2$ we show
that the stability region of the system reduces and the system performs poorly
in comparison to the {\em random scheme}.
