  We consider the task of identifying and estimating the causal effect of a
treatment variable on a long-term outcome variable using data from an
observational domain and an experimental domain. The observational domain is
subject to unobserved confounding. Furthermore, subjects in the experiment are
only followed for a short period of time; hence, long-term effects of treatment
are unobserved but short-term effects will be observed. Therefore, data from
neither domain alone suffices for causal inference about the effect of the
treatment on the long-term outcome, and must be pooled in a principled way,
instead. Athey et al. (2020) proposed a method for systematically combining
such data for identifying the downstream causal effect in view. Their approach
is based on the assumptions of internal and external validity of the
experimental data, and an extra novel assumption called latent
unconfoundedness. In this paper, we first review their proposed approach, and
then we propose three alternative approaches for data fusion for the purpose of
identifying and estimating average treatment effect as well as the effect of
treatment on the treated. Our first approach is based on assuming
equi-confounding bias for the short-term and long-term outcomes. Our second
approach is based on a relaxed version of the equi-confounding bias assumption,
where we assume the existence of an observed confounder such that the
short-term and long-term potential outcome variables have the same partial
additive association with that confounder. Our third approach is based on the
proximal causal inference framework, in which we assume the existence of an
extra variable in the system which is a proxy of the latent confounder of the
treatment-outcome relation. We propose influence function-based estimation
strategies for each of our data fusion frameworks and study the robustness
properties of the proposed estimators.
