  Unless there is evidence for fractal scaling with a single exponent over
distances .1 <= r <= 100 h^-1 Mpc then the widely accepted notion of scale
invariance of the correlation integral for .1 <= r <= 10 h^-1 Mpc must be
questioned. The attempt to extract a scaling exponent \nu from the correlation
integral n(r) by plotting log(n(r)) vs. log(r) is unreliable unless the
underlying point set is approximately monofractal. The extraction of a spectrum
of generalized dimensions \nu_q from a plot of the correlation integral
generating function G_n(q) by a similar procedure is probably an indication
that G_n(q) does not scale at all. We explain these assertions after defining
the term multifractal, mutually--inconsistent definitions having been confused
together in the cosmology literature. Part of this confusion is traced to a
misleading speculation made earlier in the dynamical systems theory literature,
while other errors follow from confusing together entirely different
definitions of ``multifractal'' from two different schools of thought. Most
important are serious errors in data analysis that follow from taking for
granted a largest term approximation that is inevitably advertised in the
literature on both fractals and dynamical systems theory.
