  We propose the new problem of choosing which dense retrieval model to use
when searching on a new collection for which no labels are available, i.e. in a
zero-shot setting. Many dense retrieval models are readily available. Each
model however is characterized by very differing search effectiveness -- not
just on the test portion of the datasets in which the dense representations
have been learned but, importantly, also across different datasets for which
data was not used to learn the dense representations. This is because dense
retrievers typically require training on a large amount of labeled data to
achieve satisfactory search effectiveness in a specific dataset or domain.
Moreover, effectiveness gains obtained by dense retrievers on datasets for
which they are able to observe labels during training, do not necessarily
generalise to datasets that have not been observed during training. This is
however a hard problem: through empirical experimentation we show that methods
inspired by recent work in unsupervised performance evaluation with the
presence of domain shift in the area of computer vision and machine learning
are not effective for choosing highly performing dense retrievers in our setup.
The availability of reliable methods for the selection of dense retrieval
models in zero-shot settings that do not require the collection of labels for
evaluation would allow to streamline the widespread adoption of dense
retrieval. This is therefore an important new problem we believe the
information retrieval community should consider. Implementation of methods,
along with raw result files and analysis scripts are made publicly available at
https://www.github.com/anonymized.
