  It is widely supposed that following unilateral brain injury, there arises an
asymmetry in inter-hemispheric inhibition which has an adverse influence upon
motor control. I argue that this 'inter-hemispheric imbalance' model arises
from a fundamental misunderstanding of the roles played by inter-hemispheric
(callosal) projections in mammalian brains. Drawing upon a large body of
empirical data, derived largely from animal models, and associated theoretical
modeling, it is demonstrated that inter-hemispheric projections perform
contrast enhancing and integrative functions via mechanisms such as
surround/lateral inhibition. The principal functional unit of callosal
influence comprises a facilitatory centre and a depressing peripheral zone,
that together shape the influence of converging inputs to pyramidal neurons.
Inter-hemispheric inhibition is an instance of a more general feature of
mammalian neural systems, whereby inhibitory interneurons act not simply to
prevent over-excitation but to sculpt the output of specific circuits. The
narrowing of the excitatory focus that occurs through crossed surround
inhibition is a highly conserved motif of transcallosal interactions in
mammalian sensory and motor cortices. A case is presented that the notion of
'inter-hemispheric imbalance' has been sustained, and clinical interventions
derived from this model promoted, by erroneous assumptions concerning that
revealed by investigative techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation
(TMS). The alternative perspective promoted by the present analysis, also
permits the basis of positive (e.g. post stroke) associations between the
structural integrity of transcallosal projections and motor capability to be
better understood.
