  People increasingly turn to the Internet when they have a medical condition.
The data they create during this process is a valuable source for medical
research and for future health services. However, utilizing these data could
come at a cost to user privacy. Thus, it is important to balance the perceived
value that users assign to these data with the value of the services derived
from them. Here we describe experiments where methods from Mechanism Design
were used to elicit a truthful valuation from users for their Internet data and
for services to screen people for medical conditions. In these experiments, 880
people from around the world were asked to participate in an auction to provide
their data for uses differing in their contribution to the participant, to
society, and in the disease they addressed. Some users were offered monetary
compensation for their participation, while others were asked to pay to
participate. Our findings show that 99\% of people were willing to contribute
their data in exchange for monetary compensation and an analysis of their data,
while 53\% were willing to pay to have their data analyzed. The average
perceived value users assigned to their data was estimated at US\$49. Their
value to screen them for a specific cancer was US\$22 while the value of this
service offered to the general public was US\$22. Participants requested higher
compensation when notified that their data would be used to analyze a more
severe condition. They were willing to pay more to have their data analyzed
when the condition was more severe, when they had higher education or if they
had recently experienced a serious medical condition.
