  Obtaining quantitative survey responses that are both accurate and
informative is crucial to a wide range of fields. Traditional and ubiquitous
response formats such as Likert and Visual Analogue Scales require condensation
of responses into discrete point values - but sometimes a range of options may
better represent the correct answer. In this paper, we propose an efficient
interval-valued response mode, whereby responses are made by marking an ellipse
along a continuous scale. We discuss its potential to capture and quantify
valuable information that would be lost using conventional approaches, while
preserving a high degree of response-efficiency. The information captured by
the response interval may represent a possible response range - i.e., a
conjunctive set, such as the real numbers between three and six. Alternatively,
it may reflect uncertainty in respect to a distinct response - i.e., a
disjunctive set, such as a confidence interval. We then report a validation
study, utilizing our recently introduced open-source software (DECSYS) to
explore how interval-valued survey responses reflect experimental manipulations
of several factors hypothesised to influence interval width, across multiple
contexts. Results consistently indicate that respondents used interval widths
effectively, and subjective participant feedback was also positive. We present
this as initial empirical evidence for the efficacy and value of
interval-valued response capture. Interestingly, our results also provide
insight into respondents' reasoning about the different aforementioned types of
intervals - we replicate a tendency towards overconfidence for those
representing epistemic uncertainty (i.e., disjunctive sets), but find intervals
representing inherent range (i.e., conjunctive sets) to be well-calibrated.
