  The oblique random survival forest (RSF) is an ensemble supervised learning
method for right-censored outcomes. Trees in the oblique RSF are grown using
linear combinations of predictors to create branches, whereas in the standard
RSF, a single predictor is used. Oblique RSF ensembles often have higher
prediction accuracy than standard RSF ensembles. However, assessing all
possible linear combinations of predictors induces significant computational
overhead that limits applications to large-scale data sets. In addition, few
methods have been developed for interpretation of oblique RSF ensembles, and
they remain more difficult to interpret compared to their axis-based
counterparts. We introduce a method to increase computational efficiency of the
oblique RSF and a method to estimate importance of individual predictor
variables with the oblique RSF. Our strategy to reduce computational overhead
makes use of Newton-Raphson scoring, a classical optimization technique that we
apply to the Cox partial likelihood function within each non-leaf node of
decision trees. We estimate the importance of individual predictors for the
oblique RSF by negating each coefficient used for the given predictor in linear
combinations, and then computing the reduction in out-of-bag accuracy. In
general benchmarking experiments, we find that our implementation of the
oblique RSF is approximately 450 times faster with equivalent discrimination
and superior Brier score compared to existing software for oblique RSFs. We
find in simulation studies that 'negation importance' discriminates between
relevant and irrelevant predictors more reliably than permutation importance,
Shapley additive explanations, and a previously introduced technique to measure
variable importance with oblique RSFs based on analysis of variance. Methods
introduced in the current study are available in the aorsf R package.
