  That the logarithmic distribution manifests itself in the random as well as
in the deterministic (multiplication processes) has long intrigued researchers
in Benford's Law. In this article it is argued that it springs from one common
intrinsic feature of their density curves. On the other hand, the profound
dichotomy between the random and the deterministic in the context of Benford's
Law is noted here, acknowledging the need to distinguish between them. From its
very inception, the field has been suffering from a profound confusion and
mixing of these two very different logarithmic flavors, causing mistaken
conclusions. One example is Allaart's proof of equality of sums along digital
lines, which can only be applied to deterministic processes. Random data lack
this equality and consistently show significantly larger sums for lower digits,
thus rendering any attempt at test of summation equality irrelevant and futile
in the context of forensic analysis regarding accounting and financial fraud
detection.
  Another digital regularity is suggested here, one that is found in
logarithmic as well as non-logarithmic random data sets. In addition, chains of
distributions that are linked via parameter selection are found to be
logarithmic, either in the limit where the number of the sequences in the chain
approaches infinity, or where the distributions generating the parameters are
themselves logarithmic.
  A new forensic data analysis method in the context of fraud detection is
suggested here even for data types that do not obey Benford's Law, and in
particularly regarding tax evasion applications. This can also serve as a
robust forensic tool to investigate fraudulent fake data provided by the
sophisticated cheater already aware of Benford's Law, a challenge that would
become increasing problematic to tax authorities in the future as Benford's Law
becomes almost common knowledge.
