  Word frequency is a strong predictor in most lexical processing tasks. Thus,
any model of word recognition needs to account for how word frequency effects
arise. The Discriminative Lexicon Model (DLM; Baayen et al., 2018a, 2019)
models lexical processing with linear mappings between words' forms and their
meanings. So far, the mappings can either be obtained incrementally via
error-driven learning, a computationally expensive process able to capture
frequency effects, or in an efficient, but frequency-agnostic closed-form
solution modelling the theoretical endstate of learning (EL) where all words
are learned optimally. In this study we show how an efficient, yet
frequency-informed mapping between form and meaning can be obtained
(Frequency-informed learning; FIL). We find that FIL well approximates an
incremental solution while being computationally much cheaper. FIL shows a
relatively low type- and high token-accuracy, demonstrating that the model is
able to process most word tokens encountered by speakers in daily life
correctly. We use FIL to model reaction times in the Dutch Lexicon Project
(Keuleers et al., 2010) and find that FIL predicts well the S-shaped
relationship between frequency and the mean of reaction times but
underestimates the variance of reaction times for low frequency words. FIL is
also better able to account for priming effects in an auditory lexical decision
task in Mandarin Chinese (Lee, 2007), compared to EL. Finally, we used ordered
data from CHILDES (Brown, 1973; Demuth et al., 2006) to compare mappings
obtained with FIL and incremental learning. The mappings are highly correlated,
but with FIL some nuances based on word ordering effects are lost. Our results
show how frequency effects in a learning model can be simulated efficiently by
means of a closed-form solution, and raise questions about how to best account
for low-frequency words in cognitive models.
