  The self-protection of alliances against external invaders is a key concept
behind the maintenance of biodiversity in the face of natural selection. But
since these alliances, which can be formed by different numbers of competitors,
can also compete against each other, it is important to identify their
strengths and weaknesses. Here, we therefore compare the vitalities of two
two-species alliances whose members either beat each other mutually via a
bidirectional invasion or they exchange their positions during an inner
dynamics. The resulting four-species model shows rich behavior in dependence on
the model parameter $p$, which characterizes the inner invasions, and $\beta$,
which determines the intensity of site exchanges. In the low $p$ and the large
$p$ limit, when the inner invasion becomes biased, three-member
rock-scissors-paper-type solutions emerge, where one of the members is
oppressed by having the smallest average concentration due to heterogeneous
inner invasion rates. Interestingly, however, if we allow a more intensive site
exchange between the oppressed species, they can morph into a winning pair and
dominate the full parameter plane. We show that their victory utilizes the
vulnerability of the rival alliance based on cyclic dominance, where a species
can easily fixate a limited-size domain.
