  Background/Context: Currently, the usual interface for visualizing data is
based on 2-D screens. Recently, devices capable of visualizing data while
immersed in VR scenes are becoming common. However, it has not been studied in
detail to which extent these devices are suitable for interacting with data
visualizations in the specific case of data about software development.
Objective/Aim: In this registered report, we propose to answer the following
question: "Is comprehension of software development processes, via the
visualization of their metrics, better when presented in VR scenes than in 2D
screens?" In particular, we will study if answers obtained after interacting
with visualizations presented as VR scenes are more or less correct than those
obtained from traditional screens, and if it takes more or less time to produce
those answers. Method: We will run an experiment with volunteer subjects from
several backgrounds. We will have two setups: an on-screen application, and a
VR scene. Both will be designed to be as much equivalent as possible in terms
of the information they provide. For the former, we use a commercial-grade set
of \kibana-based interactive dashboards that stakeholders currently use to get
insights. For the latter, we use a set of visualizations similar to those in
the on-screen case, prepared to provide the same set of data using the museum
metaphor in a VR room. The field of analysis will be related to modern code
review, in particular pull request activity. The subjects will try to answer
some questions in both setups (some will work first in VR, some on-screen),
which will be presented to them in random order. To draw results, we will
compare and statistically analyze both the correctness of their answers, and
the time spent until they are produced.
