  Adequate fetal and neonatal development depend upon the presence of a normal
acid-base environment during pregnancy and the smooth transition from
intra-uterine to extra-uterine life. Current methods to assess fetal pH and
acid-base status are invasive and carry significant maternal and fetal risks.
Given these limitations, obstetrical care providers developed the electronic
fetal monitoring (EFM) system, a non-invasive tool, which evaluates
beat-to-beat fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns in order to predict fetal
oxygenation status in real-time. Every year, about 85 percent of the
approximately 4 million live births in the United States are evaluated using
EFM. Unfortunately, though there is ample physiological evidence that FHR
patterns are inextricably linked to fetal acid-base status, the use of EFM has
not been shown to reliably predict neonatal pH, nor has it reduced the
incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes, including long-term neurological
morbidity and cerebral palsy (CP). The poor specificity associated with the
current interpretation of the EFM therefore leads to a paradox we have
henceforth defined as the Obstetrical Paradox. In this study, we develop and
seek to determine whether a novel, non-invasive method known as the FETAL
technique (Fourier Evaluation of Tracings and Acidosis in Labor), which applies
the Fourier Transform to EFM tracings and determines the spectral frequency
distributions of the FHR, improves the assessment of the fetal pH in real time.
We hypothesize that the improvement in the sensitivity and specificity of the
EFM with the use of the FETAL technique will lead to a significant reduction in
the rate of neonatal hypoxic injury and in the rate of caesarean deliveries for
suspected fetal distress. The implications of a successful application of the
FETAL technique would have paradigm-shifting consequences in the provision of
modern obstetrical care.
