  Jamming criticality defines a universality class that includes systems as
diverse as glasses, colloids, foams, amorphous solids, constraint satisfaction
problems, neural networks, etc. A particularly interesting feature of this
class is that small interparticle forces ($f$) and gaps ($h$) are distributed
according to nontrivial power laws. A recently developed mean-field (MF) theory
predicts the characteristic exponents of these distributions in the limit of
very high spatial dimension, $d\rightarrow\infty$ and, remarkably, their values
seemingly agree with numerical estimates in physically relevant dimensions,
$d=2$ and $3$. These exponents are further connected through a pair of
inequalities derived from stability conditions, and both theoretical
predictions and previous numerical investigations suggest that these
inequalities are saturated. Systems at the jamming point are thus only
marginally stable. Despite the key physical role played by these exponents,
their systematic evaluation has yet to be attempted. Here, we carefully test
their value by analyzing the finite-size scaling of the distributions of $f$
and $h$ for various particle-based models for jamming. Both dimension and the
direction of approach to the jamming point are also considered. We show that,
in all models, finite-size effects are much more pronounced in the distribution
of $h$ than in that of $f$. We thus conclude that gaps are correlated over
considerably longer scales than forces. Additionally, remarkable agreement with
MF predictions is obtained in all but one model, namely near-crystalline
packings. Our results thus help to better delineate the domain of the jamming
universality class. We furthermore uncover a secondary linear regime in the
distribution tails of both $f$ and $h$. This surprisingly robust feature is
understood to follow from the (near) isostaticity of our configurations.
