  For incremental quantile estimators the step size and possibly other tuning
parameters must be carefully set. However, little attention has been given on
how to set these values in an online manner. In this article we suggest two
novel procedures that address this issue.
  The core part of the procedures is to estimate the current tracking mean
squared error (MSE). The MSE is decomposed in tracking variance and bias and
novel and efficient procedures to estimate these quantities are presented. It
is shown that estimation bias can be tracked by associating it with the portion
of observations below the quantile estimates.
  The first procedure runs an ensemble of $L$ quantile estimators for wide
range of values of the tuning parameters and typically around $L = 100$. In
each iteration an oracle selects the best estimate by the guidance of the
estimated MSEs. The second method only runs an ensemble of $L = 3$ estimators
and thus the values of the tuning parameters need from time to time to be
adjusted for the running estimators. The procedures have a low memory foot
print of $8L$ and a computational complexity of $8L$ per iteration.
  The experiments show that the procedures are highly efficient and track
quantiles with an error close to the theoretical optimum. The Oracle approach
performs best, but comes with higher computational cost. The procedures were
further applied to a massive real-life data stream of tweets and proofed real
world applicability of them.
