  The 16O(e,e'p) reaction in the quasi-elastic region has been studied in
several experiments to determine spectroscopic factors, hence, the degree to
which $^{16}$O looks like a closed shell. By varying the kinematics,
experimentalists are able to extract response functions which comprise the
cross section. However, analysis of the response functions separately produces
very different spectroscopic factors. Two calculations led to different
conclusions as to whether exchange currents can eliminate the discrepancies.
Neither calculation considered relativistic corrections.
  The purpose of the article is to investigate the disagreement as to whether
exchange currents are the solution to obtaining consistent spectroscopic
factors, and to show that relativistic corrections have a much greater
influence on providing this consistency.
  This calculation employs the recoil corrected continuum shell model, a model
that uses a realistic interaction, and produces non-spurious scatterings states
that are solutions to the coupled channels problems. Pionic and pair
contributions to the exchange currents were calculated as developed by Dubach,
Koch, and Donnelly. Relativistic effects are included by use of the direct
Pauli reduction.
  Contributions of the exchange currents are shown to be insufficient to
provide consistent spectroscopic factors. However, the inclusion of
relativistic corrections, that can be large, lead to more consistent
spectroscopic factors and cross sections. The influence of channel coupling is
also shown to be significant. Tests of current conservation show that inclusion
of the direct Pauli reduction produces small increases in its violation.
Response functions which depend on the transverse current are sensitive to the
lower component of relativistic wave functions, and hence, would provide a
measure of the appropriateness of any relativistic model.
