  Health care delivery is a collaborative process, requiring close coordination
among networks of providers with specialized expertise. Yet in the United
States, care is often spread across multiple disconnected providers (e.g.,
primary care physicians, specialists), leading to fragmented care delivery
networks, and contributing to higher costs and lower quality. While this
problem is well known, there are relatively few quantitative tools available
for characterizing care delivery networks at scale, thereby inhibiting deeper
understanding of care fragmentation and efforts to address it. In this, study,
we conduct a large-scale analysis of care delivery networks across the United
States using the discrete Hodge decomposition, an emerging method of
topological data analysis. Using this technique, we decompose networks of
patient flows among physicians into three orthogonal subspaces: gradient
(acyclic flow), harmonic (global cyclic flow), and curl (local cyclic flow). We
document substantial variation in the relative importance of each subspace,
suggesting that there may be systematic differences in the organization of care
delivery networks across health care markets. Moreover, we find that the
relative importance of each subspace is predictive of local care cost and
quality, with outcomes tending to be better with greater curl flow and worse
with greater harmonic flow.
