  Motivated by the experiences of a healthcare service provider during the
Covid-19 pandemic, we aim to study the decisions of a provider that operates
both an Emergency Department (ED) and a medical Clinic. Patients contact the
provider through a phone call or may present directly at the ED: patients can
be COVID (suspected/confirmed) or non-COVID, and have different severities.
Depending on the severity, patients who contact the provider may be directed to
the ED (to be seen in a few hours), be offered an appointment at the Clinic (to
be seen in a few days), or be treated via phone or telemedicine, avoiding a
visit to a facility. All patients make joining decisions based on comparing
their own risk perceptions versus their anticipated benefits: They then choose
to enter a facility only if it is beneficial enough. Also, after initial
contact, their severities may evolve, which may change their decision. The
hospital system's objective is to allocate service capacity across facilities
so as to minimize costs from patient deaths or defections. We model the system
using a fluid approximation over multiple periods, possibly with different
demand profiles. While the feasible space for this problem can be extremely
complex, it is amenable to decomposition into different sub-regions that can be
analyzed individually, the global optimal solution can be reached via provably
parsimonious computational methods over a single period and over multiple
periods with different demand rates. Our analytical and computational results
indicate that endogeneity results in non-trivial and non-intuitive capacity
allocations that do not always prioritize high severity patients, for both
single and multi-period settings.
