  This paper explores how theories of the planning fallacy and the outside view
may be used to conduct quality control and due diligence in project management.
First, a much-neglected issue in project management is identified, namely that
the front-end estimates of costs and benefits--used in the business cases,
cost-benefit analyses, and social and environmental impact assessments that
typically support decisions on projects--are typically significantly different
from actual ex post costs and benefits, and are therefore poor predictors of
the actual value and viability of projects. Second, it is discussed how
Kahneman and Tversky's theories of the planning fallacy and the outside view
may help explain and remedy this situation through quality control of
decisions. Third, it is described what quality control and due diligence are in
the context of project management, and an eight-step procedure is outlined for
due diligence based on the outside view. Fourth, the procedure is tested on a
real-life, multibillion-dollar project, organized as a public-private
partnership. Finally, Akerlof and Shiller's recent discussion in economics of
"firing the forecaster" is discussed together with its relevance to project
management. In sum, the paper demonstrates the need, the theoretical basis, a
practical methodology, and a real-life example for how to de-bias project
management using quality control and due diligence based on the outside view.
