  Recommender systems are widely used to provide personalized recommendations
to users. Recent research has shown that recommender systems may be subject to
different types of biases, such as popularity bias, leading to an uneven
distribution of recommendation exposure among producer groups. To mitigate
this, producer-centered fairness re-ranking (PFR) approaches have been proposed
to ensure equitable recommendation utility across groups. However, these
approaches overlook the harm they may cause to within-group individuals
associated with colder items, which are items with few or no interactions.
  This study reproduces previous PFR approaches and shows that they
significantly harm colder items, leading to a fairness gap for these items in
both advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Surprisingly, the unfair base
recommendation models were providing greater exposure opportunities to these
individual cold items, even though at the group level, they appeared to be
unfair. To address this issue, the study proposes an amendment to the PFR
approach that regulates the number of colder items recommended by the system.
This modification achieves a balance between accuracy and producer fairness
while optimizing the selection of colder items within each group, thereby
preventing or reducing harm to within-group individuals and augmenting the
novelty of all recommended items. The proposed method is able to register an
increase in sub-group fairness (SGF) from 0.3104 to 0.3782, 0.6156, and 0.9442
while also improving group-level fairness (GF) (112% and 37% with respect to
base models and traditional PFR). Moreover, the proposed method achieves these
improvements with minimal or no reduction in accuracy (or even an increase
sometimes). We evaluate the proposed method on various recommendation datasets
and demonstrate promising results independent of the underlying model or
datasets.
