  When dealing with large scale gene expression studies, observations are
commonly contaminated by unwanted variation factors such as platforms or
batches. Not taking this unwanted variation into account when analyzing the
data can lead to spurious associations and to missing important signals. When
the analysis is unsupervised, e.g., when the goal is to cluster the samples or
to build a corrected version of the dataset - as opposed to the study of an
observed factor of interest - taking unwanted variation into account can become
a difficult task. The unwanted variation factors may be correlated with the
unobserved factor of interest, so that correcting for the former can remove the
latter if not done carefully. We show how negative control genes and replicate
samples can be used to estimate unwanted variation in gene expression, and
discuss how this information can be used to correct the expression data or
build estimators for unsupervised problems. The proposed methods are then
evaluated on three gene expression datasets. They generally manage to remove
unwanted variation without losing the signal of interest and compare favorably
to state of the art corrections.
