  Certain currents in sociology consider society as being composed of
autonomous individuals with independent psychologies. Others, however, deem our
actions as strongly influenced by the accepted standards of social behavior.
The later view was central to the positivist conception of society when in 1887
\'Emile Durkheim published his monograph Suicide (Durkheim, 1897). By treating
the suicide as a social fact, Durkheim envisaged that suicide rates should be
determined by the connections (or the lack of them) between people and society.
Under the same framework, Durkheim considered that crime is bound up with the
fundamental conditions of all social life and serves a social function. In this
sense, and regardless of its extremely deviant nature, crime events are somehow
capable to release certain social tensions and so have a purging effect in
society. The social effect on the occurrence of homicides has been previously
substantiated (Bettencourt et al., 2007; Alves et al., 2013), and confirmed
here, in terms of a superlinear scaling relation: by doubling the population of
a Brazilian city results in an average increment of 135 % in the number of
homicides, rather than the expected isometric increase of 100 %, as found, for
example, for the mortality due to car crashes. Here we present statistical
signs of the social influence on the suicide occurrence in cities. Differently
from homicides (superlinear) and fatal events in car crashes (isometric), we
find sublinear scaling behavior between the number of suicides and city
population, with allometric power-law exponents, $\beta = 0.836 \pm 0.009$ and
$0.870 \pm 0.002$, for all cities in Brazil and US, respectively. The fact that
the frequency of suicides is disproportionately small for larger cities reveals
a surprisingly beneficial aspect of living and interacting in larger and more
complex social networks.
