  Self-supervised learning (SSL) has attracted increased attention for learning
meaningful speech representations. Speech SSL models, such as WavLM, employ
masked prediction training to encode general-purpose representations. In
contrast, speaker SSL models, exemplified by DINO-based models, adopt
utterance-level training objectives primarily for speaker representation.
Understanding how these models represent information is essential for refining
model efficiency and effectiveness. Unlike the various analyses of speech SSL,
there has been limited investigation into what information speaker SSL captures
and how its representation differs from speech SSL or other fully-supervised
speaker models. This paper addresses these fundamental questions. We explore
the capacity to capture various speech properties by applying SUPERB evaluation
probing tasks to speech and speaker SSL models. We also examine which layers
are predominantly utilized for each task to identify differences in how speech
is represented. Furthermore, we conduct direct comparisons to measure the
similarities between layers within and across models. Our analysis unveils that
1) the capacity to represent content information is somewhat unrelated to
enhanced speaker representation, 2) specific layers of speech SSL models would
be partly specialized in capturing linguistic information, and 3) speaker SSL
models tend to disregard linguistic information but exhibit more sophisticated
speaker representation.
