  In a continuous-time setting we investigate how the management of a firm
controls a dynamic choice between two generic voluntary disclosure decision
rules: one with full and transparent disclosure termed $\it{candid}$, the
other, termed $\it{sparing}$, under which values only above a dynamic threshold
are disclosed. We show how management are rewarded with a reputational premium
for candour. The candid strategy is costly because the sparing alternative
shields the firm from potential downgrades following low value disclosures. We
show how parameters of the model such as news intensity, pay-for-performance
and time-to-mandatory-disclosure determine the optimal choice of candid versus
sparing strategy and the optimal time for management to switch between the two.
The private news updates received by management are modelled with a Poisson
process, occurring between the fixed mandatory disclosure dates, such as fiscal
years or quarters, with the news received generated by a background
Black-Scholes model of economic activity and of its partial observation. The
model presented develops a number of insights, based on a very simple ordinary
differential equation (ODE) characterizing equilibrium in a
piecewise-deterministic model, derivable from the background Black-Scholes
model. It is shown that in equilibrium when news intensity is low a firm may
employ a candid disclosure strategy throughout, but will otherwise switch
(alternate) between periods of being candid and periods of being sparing with
the truth (or the other way about); that is, we are able to characterize when
in equilibrium a candid firm will switch to adopting a sparing strategy. The
model illustrates how parameters such as time to mandatory disclosure, news
intensity and pay-for-performance may drive such switching behaviour.
$\it{With\,constant\,pay\,for\,performance\,parameters,\,at\,most\,one\,
switching\,occurs.}$
