  The rules in a shape grammar apply in terms of embedding to take advantage of
the parts that emerge visually in the appearance of shapes. While the shapes
are kept unanalyzed as a computation moves forward, part-structures for shapes
can be defined retrospectively by analyzing how the rules were applied. An
important outcome of this is that rule continuity is not builtin but it is
"fabricated" retrospectively to analyze the computation as a continuous
process. An aspect of continuity analysis that has not been addressed in the
literature is how to decide which mapping forms to use to study the continuity
of rule applications. This is addressed in this paper using recent results on
shape topology and continuous mappings. A characterization is provided that
distinguishes the suitable mapping forms from those that are inherently
discontinuous or practically inconsequential for continuity analysis. It is
also shown that certain intrinsic properties of shape topologies and continuous
mappings provide an effective method of computing topologies algorithmically.
