  We point out that the MacDonald formula for body-tide torques is valid only
in the zeroth order of e/Q, while its time-average is valid in the first order.
So the formula cannot be used for analysis in higher orders of e/Q. This
necessitates corrections in the theory of tidal despinning and libration
damping.
  We prove that when the inclination is low and phase lags are linear in
frequency, the Kaula series is equivalent to a corrected version of the
MacDonald method. The correction to MacDonald's approach would be to set the
phase lag of the integral bulge proportional to the instantaneous frequency.
The equivalence of descriptions gets violated by a nonlinear
frequency-dependence of the lag.
  We explain that both the MacDonald- and Darwin-torque-based derivations of
the popular formula for the tidal despinning rate are limited to low
inclinations and to the phase lags being linear in frequency. The
Darwin-torque-based derivation, though, is general enough to accommodate both a
finite inclination and the actual rheology.
  Although rheologies with Q scaling as the frequency to a positive power make
the torque diverge at a zero frequency, this reveals not the impossible nature
of the rheology, but a flaw in mathematics, i.e., a common misassumption that
damping merely provides lags to the terms of the Fourier series for the tidal
potential. A hydrodynamical treatment (Darwin 1879) had demonstrated that the
magnitudes of the terms, too, get changed. Reinstating of this detail tames the
infinities and rehabilitates the "impossible" scaling law (which happens to be
the actual law the terrestrial planets obey at low frequencies).
