  Antipredator behaviour is a self-preservation strategy present in many
biological systems, where individuals join the effort in a collective reaction
to avoid being caught by an approaching predator. We study a nonhierarchical
tritrophic system, whose predator-prey interactions are described by the
rock-paper-scissors game rules. We performed a set of spatial stochastic
simulations where organisms of one out of the species can resist predation in a
collective strategy. The drop in predation capacity is local, which means that
each predator faces a particular opposition depending on the prey group size
surrounding it. Considering that the interference in a predator action depends
on the prey's physical and cognitive ability, we explore the role of a
conditioning factor that indicates the fraction of the species apt to perform
the antipredator strategy. Because of the local unbalancing of the cyclic
predator-prey interactions, departed spatial domains mainly occupied by a
single species emerge. Unlike the rock-paper-scissors model with a weak species
because a nonlocal reason, our findings show that if the predation probability
of one species is reduced because individuals face local antipredator response,
the species does not predominate. Instead, the local unbalancing of the
rock-paper-scissors model results in the prevalence of the weak species' prey.
Finally, the outcomes show that local unevenness may jeopardise biodiversity,
with the coexistence being more threatened for high mobility.
