  A DEM of a dunefield in Southern Brazil was generated from 810 photos
captured by an RPA in February 2019. Altimetric accuracy of the SfM-MVS DEM was
validated by comparison with Terrestrial LiDAR (TLS) data collected during the
same fieldwork campaign of the RPA flights. The SfM-MVS DEM was then compared
to an Airborne LiDAR (ALS) DEM from October 2010. While the SfM-MVS and TLS
DEMs are very similar, the SfM-MVS DEM presents a small scale surface roughness
not visible in the TLS DEM. The Feature Preserving DEM Smoothing (FPD)
algorithm was applied to the SfM-MVS DEM with good results in terms of surface
smoothing, but without any significant changes in descriptive statistics and
error metrics, with an RMSE of 0.08m and MAE of 0.06m for both the original and
the FPD-filtered DEM. Displacement of dune crest lines from the ALS and SfM-MVS
DEMs resulted in a migration rate of ~5m/year between 2010 and 2019, in good
agreement with rates derived from satellite images and historical aerial
photographs of the same area. Sand volume change in the same period showed a
decrease of only 0.2%, which can be related to the installation of sand fences
to promote dune stabilization and sand removal from the front of the dune field
to keep a road open to vehicles. ALS can cover large areas in little time but
its high cost still remains a barrier to wider usage, especially by researchers
in developing countries. TLS has an intermediate cost but demands more
fieldwork and more processing time. In our case we needed three days for the
TLS survey and around three weeks to produce a DEM of ~80400m2. On the other
hand, we were able to cover ~740900m2 with six flight missions in under three
hours, with ~13 hours processing time in a medium-range workstation. This makes
SfM-MVS a low-cost solution with fast and reliable results for 3D modelling and
continuous monitoring of coastal dunes.
