  Navigating the challenges of data-driven speech processing, one of the
primary hurdles is accessing reliable pathological speech data. While public
datasets appear to offer solutions, they come with inherent risks of potential
unintended exposure of patient health information via re-identification
attacks. Using a comprehensive real-world pathological speech corpus, with over
n=3,800 test subjects spanning various age groups and speech disorders, we
employed a deep-learning-driven automatic speaker verification (ASV) approach.
This resulted in a notable mean equal error rate (EER) of 0.89% with a standard
deviation of 0.06%, outstripping traditional benchmarks. Our comprehensive
assessments demonstrate that pathological speech overall faces heightened
privacy breach risks compared to healthy speech. Specifically, adults with
dysphonia are at heightened re-identification risks, whereas conditions like
dysarthria yield results comparable to those of healthy speakers. Crucially,
speech intelligibility does not influence the ASV system's performance metrics.
In pediatric cases, particularly those with cleft lip and palate, the recording
environment plays a decisive role in re-identification. Merging data across
pathological types led to a marked EER decrease, suggesting the potential
benefits of pathological diversity in ASV, accompanied by a logarithmic boost
in ASV effectiveness. In essence, this research sheds light on the dynamics
between pathological speech and speaker verification, emphasizing its crucial
role in safeguarding patient confidentiality in our increasingly digitized
healthcare era.
