  For modeling extreme rainfall, the widely used Brown-Resnick max-stable model
extends the concept of the variogram to suit bloc maxima, allowing the explicit
modeling of the extremal dependence shown by the spatial data. This extremal
dependence stems from the geometrical characteristics of the observed rainfall,
which is associated with different meteorological processes and is usually
considered to be constant when designing the model for a study. However,
depending on the region, this dependence can change throughout the year, as the
prevailing meteorological conditions that drive the rainfall generation process
change with the season. Therefore, this study analyzes the impact of the
seasonal change in extremal dependence for the modeling of annual block maxima
in the Berlin-Brandenburg region. For this study, two seasons were considered
as proxies for different dominant meteorological conditions: summer for
convective rainfall and winter for frontal/stratiform rainfall. Using maxima
from both seasons, we compared the skill of a linear model with spatial
covariates (that assumed spatial independence) with the skill of a
Brown-Resnick max-stable model. This comparison showed a considerable
difference between seasons, with the isotropic Brown-Resnick model showing
considerable loss of skill for the winter maxima. We conclude that the
assumptions commonly made when using the Brown-Resnick model are appropriate
for modeling summer (i.e., convective) events, but further work should be done
for modeling other types of precipitation regimes.
