  Earlier in my career, prevalent approaches in the emerging field of market
design largely represented the experiences and perspectives of leaders who were
commissioned to design or reform various institutions. Since being commissioned
for a similar task seemed unlikely for me as an aspiring design economist, I
developed my own minimalist approach to market design. Using the policy
objectives of stakeholders, my approach creates a new institution from the
existing one with minimal interference with its elements that compromise the
objectives. Minimalist market design initially evolved through my integrated
research and policy efforts in school choice from 1997 to 2005 and in kidney
exchange from 2003 to 2007. Given its success in school choice and kidney
exchange, I systematically followed this approach in many other, often unusual
real-world settings. In recent years, my efforts in minimalist market design
led to the 2021 reform of the US Army's branching system for its cadets to
military specialties, the adoption of reserve systems during the Covid-19
pandemic for vaccine allocation in 15 states and therapies in 2 states, and the
deployment of a highly efficient liver exchange system in T\"urkiye. This same
methodology also predicted the rescission of a 1995 Supreme Court judgment in
India, resulting in countless litigations and interruptions of public
recruitment for 25 years, as well as the mandates of its replacement. In this
monograph, I describe the philosophy, evolution, and successful applications of
minimalist market design, contrasting it with the mainstream paradigm for the
field. In doing so, I also provide a paradigm for economists who want to
influence policy and change institutions through their research.
