  With the proliferation of social activism online, brands face heightened
pressure from consumers to publicly address these issues. Yet, the optimal
brand response strategy (i.e., whether and how to respond) in these contexts
remains unclear. This research investigates consumers' reactions to brand
response strategies (e.g., engage vs. not) during social activism and offers
potentially effective responses that brands can employ to engage in these
issues. By analyzing real-world data collected from Twitter and conducting four
randomized experiments, this research discovers that brand relationship type
(exchange, communal) affects consumers' brand evaluations in the wake of social
activism. Communal (vs. exchange) brands are evaluated less favorably when they
do not respond or utilize a low-empathy response. This difference is attenuated
when brands employ a high-empathy response. These findings are attributable to
consumers' perceptions of whether the brand's response strategy complies with
relationship norms during social activism. The effects persist across activism
events that vary in their political polarization. This research contributes to
the literatures on brand engagement in social activism, brand relationships,
and crisis communication. The findings also offer guidance to practitioners on
crafting response strategies during social activism and aid activists in
securing brand support for societal benefits.
