  What are the roles of central and peripheral vision in human scene
recognition? Larson and Loschky (2009) showed that peripheral vision
contributes more than central vision in obtaining maximum scene recognition
accuracy. However, central vision is more efficient for scene recognition than
peripheral, based on the amount of visual area needed for accurate recognition.
In this study, we model and explain the results of Larson and Loschky (2009)
using a neurocomputational modeling approach. We show that the advantage of
peripheral vision in scene recognition, as well as the efficiency advantage for
central vision, can be replicated using state-of-the-art deep neural network
models. In addition, we propose and provide support for the hypothesis that the
peripheral advantage comes from the inherent usefulness of peripheral features.
This result is consistent with data presented by Thibaut, Tran, Szaffarczyk,
and Boucart (2014), who showed that patients with central vision loss can still
categorize natural scenes efficiently. Furthermore, by using a deep
mixture-of-experts model ("The Deep Model," or TDM) that receives central and
peripheral visual information on separate channels simultaneously, we show that
the peripheral advantage emerges naturally in the learning process: When
trained to categorize scenes, the model weights the peripheral pathway more
than the central pathway. As we have seen in our previous modeling work,
learning creates a transform that spreads different scene categories into
different regions in representational space. Finally, we visualize the features
for the two pathways, and find that different preferences for scene categories
emerge for the two pathways during the training process.
