  There is a large literature on earnings and income volatility in labor
economics, household finance, and macroeconomics. One strand of that literature
has studied whether individual earnings volatility has risen or fallen in the
U.S. over the last several decades. There are strong disagreements in the
empirical literature on this important question, with some studies showing
upward trends, some showing downward trends, and some showing no trends. Some
studies have suggested that the differences are the result of using flawed
survey data instead of more accurate administrative data. This paper summarizes
the results of a project attempting to reconcile these findings with four
different data sets and six different data series--three survey and three
administrative data series, including two which match survey respondent data to
their administrative data. Using common specifications, measures of volatility,
and other treatments of the data, four of the six data series show a lack of
any significant long-term trend in male earnings volatility over the last
20-to-30+ years when differences across the data sets are properly accounted
for. A fifth data series (the PSID) shows a positive net trend but small in
magnitude. A sixth, administrative, data set, available only since 1998, shows
no net trend 1998-2011 and only a small decline thereafter. Many of the
remaining differences across data series can be explained by differences in
their cross-sectional distribution of earnings, particularly differences in the
size of the lower tail. We conclude that the data sets we have analyzed, which
include many of the most important available, show little evidence of any
significant trend in male earnings volatility since the mid-1980s.
