  One of the defining features of both recent and historical cases of global
climate change is Arctic Amplification (AA). This is the more rapid change in
the surface air temperature (SAT) in the Arctic compared to some wider
reference region, such as the Northern Hemisphere (NH) mean. Many different
metrics have been developed to quantify the degree of AA based on SAT
anomalies, trends and variability. The use of different metrics, as well as the
choice of dataset to use can affect conclusions about the magnitude and
temporal variability of AA. Here we review the established metrics of AA to see
how well they agree upon the temporal signature of AA, such as the
multi-decadal variability, and assess the consistency in these metrics across
different commonly-used datasets which cover both the early and late 20th
century warming in the Arctic. We find the NOAA 20th Century Reanalysis most
closely matches the observations when using metrics based upon SAT trends (A2),
variability (A3) and regression (A4) of the SAT anomalies, and the ERA 20th
Century Reanalysis is closest to the observations in the SAT anomalies (A1) and
variability of SAT anomalies (A3). However, there are large seasonal
differences in the consistency between datasets. Moreover, the largest
differences between the century-long reanalysis products and observations are
during the early warming period, likely due to the sparseness of the
observations in the Arctic at that time. In the modern warming period, the high
density of observations strongly constrains all the reanalysis products,
whether they include satellite observations or only surface observations. Thus,
all the reanalysis and observation products produce very similar magnitudes and
temporal variability in the degree of AA during the recent warming period.
