  The S66x8 noncovalent interactions benchmark has been re-evaluated at the
"sterling silver" level, using explicitly correlated MP2-F12 near the complete
basis set limit, CCSD(F12*)/aug-cc-pVTZ-F12, and a (T) correction from
conventional CCSD(T)/sano-V{D,T}Z+ calculations. The revised reference value
disagrees by 0.1 kcal/mol RMS with the original Hobza benchmark and its
revision by Brauer et al, but by only 0.04 kcal/mol variety from the "bronze"
level data in Kesharwani et al., Aust. J. Chem. 71, 238-248 (2018). We then
used these to assess the performance of localized-orbital coupled cluster
approaches with and without counterpoise corrections, such as PNO-LCCSD(T) as
implemented in MOLPRO, DLPNO-CCSD (T1) as implemented in ORCA, and LNO-CCSD(T)
as implemented in MRCC, for their respective "Normal", "Tight", and "very
Tight" settings. We also considered composite approaches combining different
basis sets and cutoffs. Furthermore, in order to isolate basis set convergence
from domain truncation error, for the aug-cc-pVTZ basis set we compared PNO,
DLPNO, and LNO approaches with canonical CCSD(T). We conclude that LNO-CCSD(T)
with veryTight criteria performs very well for "raw" (CP-uncorrected), but
struggles to reproduce counterpoise-corrected numbers even for veryVeryTight
criteria: this means that accurate results can be obtained using either
extrapolation from basis sets large enough to quench basis set superposition
error (BSSE) such as aug-cc-pV{Q,5}Z, or using a composite scheme such as
Tight{T,Q}+1.11[vvTight(T) - Tight(T)]. In contrast, PNO-LCCSD(T) works best
with counterpoise, while performance with and without counterpoise is
comparable for DLPNO-CCSD(T1). Among more economical methods, the highest
accuracies are seen for dRPA75-D3BJ, {\omega}B97M-V, {\omega}B97M(2),
revDSD-PBEP86-D4, and DFT(SAPT) with a TDEXX or ATDEXX kernel.
