  Modern economies evolved from simpler human exchanges into very convoluted
systems. Today, a multitude of aspects can be regulated, tampered with, or left
to chance; these are economic {\em degrees of freedom} which together shape the
flow of wealth. Economic actors can exploit them, at a cost, and bend that flow
in their favor. If intervention becomes widespread, microeconomic strategies of
different actors can collide or resonate, building into macroeconomic effects.
How viable is a `rigged' economy, and how is this viability affected by growing
economic complexity and wealth? Here we capture essential elements of `rigged'
economies with a toy model. Nash equilibria of payoff matrices in simple cases
show how increased intervention turns economic degrees of freedom from minority
into majority games through a dynamical phase. These stages are reproduced by
agent-based simulations of our model, which allow us to explore scenarios out
of reach for payoff matrices. Increasing economic complexity is then revealed
as a mechanism that spontaneously defuses cartels or consensus situations. But
excessive complexity enters abruptly into a regime of large fluctuations that
threaten the system's viability. This regime results from non-competitive
efforts to intervene the economy coupled across degrees of freedom, becoming
unpredictable. Thus non-competitive actions can result in negative spillover
due to sheer economic complexity. Simulations suggest that wealth must grow
faster than linearly with economic complexity to avoid this regime and keep
economies viable in the long run. Our work provides testable conclusions and
phenomenological charts to guide policing of `rigged' economic systems.
