  Tie-breaker designs (TBDs), in which subjects with extreme values are
assigned treatment deterministically and those in the middle are randomized,
are intermediate between regression discontinuity designs (RDDs) and randomized
controlled trials (RCTs). TBDs thus provide a convenient mechanism by which to
trade off between the treatment benefit of an RDD and the statistical
efficiency gains of an RCT. We study a model where the expected response is one
multivariate regression for treated subjects and another one for control
subjects. For a given set of subject data we show how to use convex
optimization to choose treatment probabilities that optimize a prospective
$D$-optimality condition (expected information gain) adapted from Bayesian
optimal design. We can incorporate economically motivated linear constraints on
those treatment probabilities as well as monotonicity constraints that have a
strong ethical motivation. Our condition can be used in two scenarios: known
covariates with random treatments, and random covariates with random
treatments. We find that optimality for the treatment effect coincides with
optimality for the whole regression, and that the RCT satisfies moment
conditions for optimality. For Gaussian data we can find optimal linear
scorings of subjects, one for statistical efficiency and another for short term
treatment benefit.
  We apply the convex optimization solution to some real emergency triage data
from MIMIC.
