  The huge amount of data made available by the massive usage of social media
has opened up the unprecedented possibility to carry out a data-driven study of
political processes. While particular attention has been paid to phenomena like
elite and mass polarization during online debates and echo-chambers formation,
the interplay between online partisanship and framing practices, jointly
sustaining adversarial dynamics, still remains overlooked. With the present
paper, we carry out a socio-semantic analysis of the debate about migration
policies observed on the Italian Twittersphere, across the period May-November
2019. As regards the social analysis, our methodology allows us to extract
relevant information about the political orientation of the communities of
users - hereby called partisan communities - without resorting upon any
external information. Remarkably, our community detection technique is
sensitive enough to clearly highlight the dynamics characterizing the
relationship among different political forces.As regards the semantic analysis,
our networks of hashtags display a mesoscale structure organized in a
core-periphery fashion, across the entire observation period. Taken altogether,
our results point at different, yet overlapping, trajectories of conflict
played out using migration issues as a backdrop. A first line opposes
communities discussing substantively of migration to communities approaching
this issue just to fuel hostility against political opponents; within the
second line, a mechanism of distancing between partisan communities reflects
shifting political alliances within the governmental coalition. Ultimately, our
results contribute to shed light on the complexity of the Italian political
context characterized by multiple poles of partisan alignment.
