  Global hunger levels have set new records in each of the last three years,
outpacing aid budgets (WFP, 2023; FSIN, 2023). Most households experiencing
food insecurity crises are now in fragile states (Townsend et al., 2021),
making it difficult to support vulnerable, hard-to-reach populations without
interference from oppressive governments and non-state actors (Kurtzer, 2019;
Cliffe et al., 2023). Despite growing interest in using digital payments for
crisis response (Suri and Jack, 2016; Pazarbasioglu et al., 2020; Aiken et al.,
2022), there is limited causal evidence on their efficacy (Gentilini, 2022;
WFP, 2023). We show that digital payments can address basic needs during a
humanitarian crisis. We conducted a randomized evaluation among very poor,
mostly tech-illiterate, female-headed households in Afghanistan with digital
transfers of $45 every two weeks for two months. Digital aid led to significant
improvements in nutrition and in mental well-being. We find high usage rates,
no evidence of diversion by the Taliban despite rigorous checks, and that 80%
of recipients would prefer digital aid rather than pay a 2.5% fee to receive
aid in cash. Conservative assumptions put the cost of delivery under 7 cents
per dollar, which is 10 cents per dollar less than the World Food Program's
global figure for cash-based humanitarian assistance. These savings could help
reduce hunger without additional resources. Asked to predict our findings,
policymakers and experts underestimated beneficiaries' ability to use digital
transfers and overestimated the likelihood of diversion and the costs of
delivery. Such misperceptions might impede the adoption of new technologies
during crises. These results highlight the potential for digital aid to
complement existing approaches in supporting vulnerable populations during
crises.
