  High-order finite element methods (HO-FEM) are gaining popularity in the
simulation community due to their success in solving complex flow dynamics.
There is an increasing need to analyze the data produced as output by these
simulations. Simultaneously, topological analysis tools are emerging as
powerful methods for investigating simulation data. However, most of the
current approaches to topological analysis have had limited application to
HO-FEM simulation data for two reasons. First, the current topological tools
are designed for linear data (polynomial degree one), but the polynomial degree
of the data output by these simulations is typically higher (routinely up to
polynomial degree six). Second, the simulation data and derived quantities of
the simulation data have discontinuities at element boundaries, and these
discontinuities do not match the input requirements for the topological tools.
One solution to both issues is to transform the high-order data to achieve
low-order, continuous inputs for topological analysis. Nevertheless, there has
been little work evaluating the possible transformation choices and their
downstream effect on the topological analysis. We perform an empirical study to
evaluate two commonly used data transformation methodologies along with the
recently introduced L-SIAC filter for processing high-order simulation data.
Our results show diverse behaviors are possible. We offer some guidance about
how best to consider a pipeline of topological analysis of HO-FEM simulations
with the currently available implementations of topological analysis.
