  This study investigates global properties of literary and non-literary texts.
Within the literary texts, a distinction is made between canonical and
non-canonical works. The central hypothesis of the study is that the three text
types (non-literary, literary/canonical and literary/non-canonical) exhibit
systematic differences with respect to structural design features as correlates
of aesthetic responses in readers. To investigate these differences, we
compiled a corpus containing texts of the three categories of interest, the
Jena Textual Aesthetics Corpus. Two aspects of global structure are
investigated, variability and self-similar (fractal) patterns, which reflect
long-range correlations along texts. We use four types of basic observations,
(i) the frequency of POS-tags per sentence, (ii) sentence length, (iii) lexical
diversity in chunks of text, and (iv) the distribution of topic probabilities
in chunks of texts. These basic observations are grouped into two more general
categories, (a) the low-level properties (i) and (ii), which are observed at
the level of the sentence (reflecting linguistic decoding), and (b) the
high-level properties (iii) and (iv), which are observed at the textual level
(reflecting comprehension). The basic observations are transformed into time
series, and these time series are subject to multifractal detrended fluctuation
analysis (MFDFA). Our results show that low-level properties of texts are
better discriminators than high-level properties, for the three text types
under analysis. Canonical literary texts differ from non-canonical ones
primarily in terms of variability. Fractality seems to be a universal feature
of text, more pronounced in non-literary than in literary texts. Beyond the
specific results of the study, we intend to open up new perspectives on the
experimental study of textual aesthetics.
