  Software configuration tuning is essential for optimizing a given performance
objective (e.g., minimizing latency). Yet, due to the software's intrinsically
complex configuration landscape and expensive measurement, there has been a
rather mild success, particularly in preventing the search from being trapped
in local optima. To address this issue, in this paper we take a different
perspective. Instead of focusing on improving the optimizer, we work on the
level of optimization model and propose a meta multi-objectivization (MMO)
model that considers an auxiliary performance objective (e.g., throughput in
addition to latency). What makes this model unique is that we do not optimize
the auxiliary performance objective, but rather use it to make
similarly-performing while different configurations less comparable (i.e.
Pareto nondominated to each other), thus preventing the search from being
trapped in local optima. Importantly through a new normalization method we show
how to effectively use the MMO model without worrying about its weight -- the
only yet highly sensitive parameter that can affect its effectiveness.
Experiments on 22 cases from 11 real-world software systems/environments
confirm that our MMO model with the new normalization performs better than its
state-of-the-art single-objective counterparts on 82% cases while achieving up
to 2.09x speedup. For 67% of the cases, the new normalization also enables the
MMO model to outperform the instance when using it with the normalization used
in our prior FSE work under pre-tuned best weights, saving a great amount of
resources which would be otherwise necessary to find a good weight. We also
demonstrate that the MMO model with the new normalization can consolidate
Flash, a recent model-based tuning tool, on 68% of the cases with 1.22x speedup
in general.
