  In order to face the expected increasing demand of energy crops without
creating conflicts of land occupation sustainability, farmers need to find
reliable alternatives in marginal agricultural areas where the production of
food hardly ever is economically and environmentally sustainable. The purpose
of this work was the study of the viability of the introduction of new non food
crops in marginal areas of real farms. This study compares the profit margin
and the energy and environmental performance of growing tall wheatgrass, in the
marginal area of a rainfed farm versus rye, the annual crop sowed traditionally
in the marginal area of the farm. The cited farm owned 300 ha of which about 13
percent was marginal. The methodology was based on the use of the profit margin
of the crops as indicator for the economic assessment and Life Cycle Assessment
LCA as technique for the energy and the environmental evaluations. Results of
the economic analysis showed a slight enhancement of the profit margin for tall
wheatgrass 156 Euro ha-1 y-1 compared to rye 145 Euro ha-1 y-1. Environmental
LCA was driven by CO2 fixation due to soil organic matter increase and reduced
inputs consumption for tall wheatgrass that produced a Global Warming Potential
GWP of -1.9 Mg CO2 eq ha-1 y-1 versus 1.6 Mg CO2 eq ha-1 y-1 obtained for rye.
Tall wheatgrass cultivation primary energy consumption was less than 40 percent
of rye s consumption. According to the results achieved it was concluded that
tall wheatgrass is better option than rye from the energy and the environmental
point of views and slight better option from the economic view. Considering
these results, monetarization of the CO2 eq reductions of tall wheatgrass
compared to rye is essential to improve its profit margin and promote the
implantation of this new crop in marginal areas of farms.
