  Transmission imaging, as an important imaging technique widely used in
astronomy, medical diagnosis, and biology science, has been shown in [49] quite
different from reflection imaging used in our everyday life. Understanding the
structures of images (the prior information) is important for designing,
testing, and choosing image processing methods, and good image processing
methods are helpful for further uses of the image data, e.g., increasing the
accuracy of the object reconstruction methods in transmission imaging
applications. In reflection imaging, the images are usually modeled as
discontinuous functions and even piecewise constant functions. In transmission
imaging, it was shown very recently in [49] that almost all images are
continuous functions. However, the author in [49] considered only the case of
parallel beam geometry and used some too strong assumptions in the proof, which
exclude some common cases such as cylindrical objects. In this paper, we
consider more general beam geometries and simplify the assumptions by using
totally different techniques. In particular, we will prove that almost all
images in transmission imaging with both parallel and divergent beam geometries
(two most typical beam geometries) are continuous functions, under much weaker
assumptions than those in [49], which admit almost all practical cases.
Besides, taking into accounts our analysis, we compare two image processing
methods for Poisson noise (which is the most significant noise in transmission
imaging) removal. Numerical experiments will be provided to demonstrate our
analysis.
