  The largest US banks are required by regulatory mandate to estimate the
operational risk capital they must hold using an Advanced Measurement Approach
(AMA) as defined by the Basel II/III Accords. Most use the Loss Distribution
Approach (LDA) which defines the aggregate loss distribution as the convolution
of a frequency and a severity distribution representing the number and
magnitude of losses, respectively. Estimated capital is a Value-at-Risk (99.9th
percentile) estimate of this annual loss distribution. In practice, the
severity distribution drives the capital estimate, which is essentially a very
high quantile of the estimated severity distribution. Unfortunately, because
the relevant severities are heavy-tailed AND the quantiles being estimated are
so high, VaR always appears to be a convex function of the severity parameters,
causing all widely-used estimators to generate biased capital estimates
(apparently) due to Jensen's Inequality. The observed capital inflation is
sometimes enormous, even at the unit-of-measure (UoM) level (even billions
USD). Herein I present an estimator of capital that essentially eliminates this
upward bias. The Reduced-bias Capital Estimator (RCE) is more consistent with
the regulatory intent of the LDA framework than implementations that fail to
mitigate this bias. RCE also notably increases the precision of the capital
estimate and consistently increases its robustness to violations of the i.i.d.
data presumption (which are endemic to operational risk loss event data). So
with greater capital accuracy, precision, and robustness, RCE lowers capital
requirements at both the UoM and enterprise levels, increases capital stability
from quarter to quarter, ceteris paribus, and does both while more accurately
and precisely reflecting regulatory intent. RCE is straightforward to implement
using any major statistical software package.
