  One of the major hurdles preventing the full exploitation of information from
online communities is the widespread concern regarding the quality and
credibility of user-contributed content. Prior works in this domain operate on
a static snapshot of the community, making strong assumptions about the
structure of the data (e.g., relational tables), or consider only shallow
features for text classification.
  To address the above limitations, we propose probabilistic graphical models
that can leverage the joint interplay between multiple factors in online
communities --- like user interactions, community dynamics, and textual content
--- to automatically assess the credibility of user-contributed online content,
and the expertise of users and their evolution with user-interpretable
explanation. To this end, we devise new models based on Conditional Random
Fields for different settings like incorporating partial expert knowledge for
semi-supervised learning, and handling discrete labels as well as numeric
ratings for fine-grained analysis. This enables applications such as extracting
reliable side-effects of drugs from user-contributed posts in healthforums, and
identifying credible content in news communities.
  Online communities are dynamic, as users join and leave, adapt to evolving
trends, and mature over time. To capture this dynamics, we propose generative
models based on Hidden Markov Model, Latent Dirichlet Allocation, and Brownian
Motion to trace the continuous evolution of user expertise and their language
model over time. This allows us to identify expert users and credible content
jointly over time, improving state-of-the-art recommender systems by explicitly
considering the maturity of users. This also enables applications such as
identifying helpful product reviews, and detecting fake and anomalous reviews
with limited information.
