  This paper quantifies the significance and magnitude of the effect of
measurement error in remote sensing weather data in the analysis of smallholder
agricultural productivity. The analysis leverages 17 rounds of
nationally-representative, panel household survey data from six countries in
Sub-Saharan Africa. These data are spatially-linked with a range of geospatial
weather data sources and related metrics. We provide systematic evidence on
measurement error introduced by 1) different methods used to obfuscate the
exact GPS coordinates of households, 2) different metrics used to quantify
precipitation and temperature, and 3) different remote sensing measurement
technologies. First, we find no discernible effect of measurement error
introduced by different obfuscation methods. Second, we find that simple
weather metrics, such as total seasonal rainfall and mean daily temperature,
outperform more complex metrics, such as deviations in rainfall from the
long-run average or growing degree days, in a broad range of settings. Finally,
we find substantial amounts of measurement error based on remote sensing
product. In extreme cases, data drawn from different remote sensing products
result in opposite signs for coefficients on weather metrics, meaning that
precipitation or temperature draw from one product purportedly increases crop
output while the same metrics drawn from a different product purportedly
reduces crop output. We conclude with a set of six best practices for
researchers looking to combine remote sensing weather data with socioeconomic
survey data.
