  In this paper, we initiate the study of the $m$-Capacitated Facility Location
Problem ($m$-CFLP) within a Bayesian Mechanism Design framework. We consider
the case in which every agent's private information is their position on a line
and assume that every agent's position is independently drawn from a common and
known distribution $\mu$. In this context, we propose the Extended Ranking
Mechanisms (ERMs), a truthful generalization of the recently introduced Ranking
Mechanisms, that allows to handle problems where the total facility capacity
exceeds the number of agents. Our primary results pertain to the study of the
efficiency guarantees of the ERMs. In particular, we demonstrate that the limit
of the ratio between the expected Social Cost of an ERM and the expected
optimal Social Cost is finite. En route to these results, we reveal that the
optimal Social Cost and the Social Cost of any ERMs can be expressed as the
objective value of a suitable norm minimization problem in the Wasserstein
space. We then tackle the problem of determining an optimal ERM tailored to a
$m$-CFLP and a distribution $\mu$. Specifically, we aim to identify an ERM
whose limit Bayesian approximation ratio is the lowest compared to all other
ERMs. We detail how to retrieve an optimal ERM in two frameworks: (i) when the
total facility capacity matches the number of agents and (ii) when $\mu$ is the
uniform distribution and we have two facilities to place. Lastly, we conduct
extensive numerical experiments to compare the performance of the ERMs against
other truthful mechanisms and to evaluate the convergence speed of the Bayesian
approximation ratio. In summary, all our findings highlight that a well-tuned
ERM consistently outperforms all other known mechanisms, making it a valid
choice for solving the $m$-CFLP within a Bayesian framework.
