  Cognitive neuroscience methods can identify the fMRI-measured neural
representation of familiar individual concepts, such as apple, and decompose
them into meaningful neural and semantic components. This approach was applied
here to determine the neural representations and underlying dimensions of
representation of far more abstract physics concepts related to matter and
energy, such as fermion and dark matter, in the brains of 10 Carnegie Mellon
physics faculty members who thought about the main properties of each of the
concepts. One novel dimension coded the measurability vs. immeasurability of a
concept. Another novel dimension of representation evoked particularly by
post-classical concepts was associated with four types of cognitive processes,
each linked to particular brain regions: (1) Reasoning about intangibles,
taking into account their separation from direct experience and observability;
(2) Assessing consilience with other, firmer knowledge; (3) Causal reasoning
about relations that are not apparent or observable; and (4) Knowledge
management of a large knowledge organization consisting of a multi-level
structure of other concepts. Two other underlying dimensions, previously found
in physics students, periodicity, and mathematical formulation, were also
present in this faculty sample. The data were analyzed using factor analysis of
stably responding voxels, a Gaussian-na\"ive Bayes machine-learning
classification of the activation patterns associated with each concept, and a
regression model that predicted activation patterns associated with each
concept based on independent ratings of the dimensions of the concepts. The
findings indicate that the human brain systematically organizes novel
scientific concepts in terms of new dimensions of neural representation.
