  A cut $C:=\partial(X)$ of a matching covered graph $G$ is a separating cut if
both its $C$-contractions $G/X$ and $G/\overline{X}$ are also matching covered.
A brick is solid if it is free of nontrivial separating cuts. In 2004, we
(Carvalho, Lucchesi and Murty) showed that the perfect matching polytope of a
brick may be described without recourse to odd set constraints if and only if
it is solid. In 2006, we proved that the only simple planar solid bricks are
the odd wheels. The problem of characterizing nonplanar solid bricks remains
unsolved.
  A bi-subdivision of a graph $J$ is a graph obtained from $J$ by replacing
each of its edges by paths of odd length. A matching covered graph $J$ is a
conformal minor of a matching covered graph $G$ if there exists a
bi-subdivision $H$ of $J$ which is a subgraph of $G$ such that $G-V(H)$ has a
perfect matching. For a fixed matching covered graph $J$, a matching covered
graph $G$ is $J$-based if $J$ is a conformal minor of $G$ and, otherwise, $G$
is $J$-free. A basic result due to Lov\'asz (1983) states that every
nonbipartite matching covered graph is either $K_4$-based or is
$\overline{C_6}$-based or both, where $\overline{C_6}$ is the triangular prism.
In 2016, we (Kothari and Murty) showed that, for any cubic brick $J$, a
matching covered graph $G$ is $J$-free if and only if each of its bricks is
$J$-free. We also found characterizations of planar bricks which are $K_4$-free
and those which are $\overline{C_6}$-free. Each of these problems remains
unsolved in the nonplanar case.
  In this paper we show that the seemingly unrelated problems of characterizing
nonplanar solid bricks and of characterizing nonplanar $\overline{C_6}$-free
bricks are essentially the same. We do this by establishing that a simple
nonplanar brick, other than the Petersen graph, is solid if and only if it is
$\overline{C_6}$-free.
