  A rapid decarbonization of the economy requires a massive reconfiguration of
its underlying production networks. To reduce emissions significantly, many
firms need to change production processes, which has major impacts on
practically all supply chains. This restructuring process might cause
considerable social distress, e.g. in the form of unemployment, if companies
have to close down. Here, we use a unique dataset of the entire firm-level
production network of a European economy and develop a network-theory-based
measure to estimate the systemic social relevance of every single firm. It
enables us to estimate the expected direct and indirect job losses in the
supply chain triggered by every firm's default. For the largest CO2 emitting
firms we link this measure of social relevance to their emissions. We identify
firms with low social relevance and high emissions as potential decarbonization
leverage points. We compare various decarbonization strategies by
simultaneously capturing the social and environmental impact under the
assumption that specific sets of firms would no longer produce. We find that a
strategy based on the identified decarbonization leverage points could lead to
a 20% reduction of CO2 emissions while putting 2% of jobs at risk. In contrast,
targeting the largest emitters first, without considering their social
relevance, results in 33% of jobs being at risk for comparable emission
savings. Our results indicate that supply-chain sensitive CO2 taxation might
reduce the social costs of the green transition considerably.
