  We investigate recent claims that gravitomagnetic effects in linearised
general relativity can explain flat and rising rotation curves, such as those
observed in galaxies, without the need for dark matter. If one models a galaxy
as an axisymmetric, stationary, rotating, non-relativistic and pressureless
'dust' of stars in the gravitoelectromagnetic (GEM) formalism, we show that GEM
effects on the circular velocity $v$ of a star are $O(10^{-6})$ smaller than
the standard Newtonian (gravitoelectric) effects. Moreover, we find that
gravitomagnetic effects are $O(10^{-6})$ too small to provide the vertical
support necessary to maintain the dynamical equilibrium assumed. These issues
are obscured if one constructs a single equation for $v$, as considered
previously. We nevertheless solve this equation for a galaxy having a
Miyamoto--Nagai density profile. We show that for the values of the mass, $M$,
and semi-major and semi-minor axes, $a$ and $b$, typical for a dwarf galaxy,
the rotation curve depends only very weakly on $M$. Moreover, for aspect ratios
$a/b > 2$, the rotation curves are concave over their entire range, which does
not match observations in any galaxy. Most importantly, we show that for the
poloidal gravitomagnetic flux $\psi$ to provide the necessary vertical support,
it must become singular at the origin. This originates from the unwitting, but
forbidden, inclusion of free-space solutions of the Poisson-like equation that
determines $\psi$, hence ruling out the methodology as a means of explaining
flat galaxy rotation curves. We further show that recent deliberate attempts to
leverage such free-space solutions against the rotation curve problem yield no
deterministic modification outside the thin disk approximation, and that, in
any case, the homogeneous contributions to $\psi$ are ruled out by the boundary
value problem posed by any physical axisymmetric galaxy.
