  A method to quantitatively assess the consistency of power-counting proposals
in Effective Field Theories (EFT) which are non-perturbative at leading order
is presented. The Renormalisation Group evolution of an observable predicts the
functional form of its residual cutoff dependence on the breakdown scale of an
EFT, on the low-momentum scales, and on the order of the calculation. Passing
this test is a necessary but not sufficient consistency criterion for a
suggested power counting whose exact nature is disputed. In Chiral Effective
Field Theory (ChiEFT) with more than one nucleon, a lack of universally
accepted analytic solutions obfuscates the convergence pattern in results. This
led to proposals which predict different sets of Low Energy Coefficients (LECs)
at the same chiral order, and at times even predict a different ordering
long-range contributions. The method may independently check whether an
observable is renormalised at a given order, and proves estimates of both the
breakdown scale and the momentum-dependent order-by-order convergence pattern.
Conversely, it helps identify those LECs (and long-range pieces) which ensure
renormalised observables at a given order. I also discuss assumptions and the
relation to Wilson's Renormalisation Group; useful observable and cutoff
choices; the momentum window with likely best signals; its dependence on the
values and forms of cutoffs as well as on the EFT parameters; the impact of
fitting LECs to data; and caveats as well as limitations. Since the test is
designed to minimise the use of data, it quantitatively falsifies if the EFT
has been renormalised consistently. This complements other tests which quantify
how an EFT compares to experiment. Its application in particular to the 3P0 and
P2-3F2 partial waves of NN scattering in ChiEFT may elucidate persistent
power-counting issues.
