  We focus on model risk and risk sensitivity when addressing the insurability
of cyber risk. The standard statistical approaches to assessment of
insurability and potential mispricing are enhanced in several aspects involving
consideration of model risk. Model risk can arise from model uncertainty, and
parameters uncertainty. We demonstrate how to quantify the effect of model risk
in this analysis by incorporating various robust estimators for key model
parameter estimates that apply in both marginal and joint cyber risk loss
process modelling. We contrast these robust techniques with standard methods
previously used in studying insurabilty of cyber risk. This allows us to
accurately assess the critical impact that robust estimation can have on tail
index estimation for heavy tailed loss models, as well as the effect of robust
dependence analysis when quantifying joint loss models and insurance portfolio
diversification. We argue that the choice of such methods is akin to a form of
model risk and we study the risk sensitivity that arise from choices relating
to the class of robust estimation adopted and the impact of the settings
associated with such methods on key actuarial tasks such as premium calculation
in cyber insurance. Through this analysis we are able to address the question
that, to the best of our knowledge, no other study has investigated in the
context of cyber risk: is model risk present in cyber risk data, and how does
is it translate into premium mispricing? We believe our findings should
complement existing studies seeking to explore insurability of cyber losses. In
order to ensure our findings are based on realistic industry informed loss
data, we have utilised one of the leading industry cyber loss datasets obtained
from Advisen, which represents a comprehensive data set on cyber monetary
losses, from which we form our analysis and conclusions.
