  We in this paper utilize P-GMM (Cheng and Liao, 2015) moment selection
procedure to select valid and relevant moments for estimating and testing
forecast rationality under the flexible loss proposed by Elliott et al. (2005).
We motivate the moment selection in a large dimensional setting, explain the
fundamental mechanism of P-GMM moment selection procedure, and elucidate how to
implement it in the context of forecast rationality by allowing the existence
of potentially invalid moment conditions. A set of Monte Carlo simulations is
conducted to examine the finite sample performance of P-GMM estimation in
integrating the information available in instruments into both the estimation
and testing, and a real data analysis using data from the Survey of
Professional Forecasters issued by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia is
presented to further illustrate the practical value of the suggested
methodology. The results indicate that the P-GMM post-selection estimator of
forecaster's attitude is comparable to the oracle estimator by using the
available information efficiently. The accompanying power of rationality and
symmetry tests utilizing P-GMM estimation would be substantially increased
through reducing the influence of uninformative instruments. When a forecast
user estimates and tests for rationality of forecasts that have been produced
by others such as Greenbook, P-GMM moment selection procedure can assist in
achieving consistent and more efficient outcomes.
