  We investigate the role which clouds could play in resolving the Faint Young
Sun Paradox (FYSP). Lower solar luminosity in the past means that less energy
was absorbed on Earth (a forcing of -50 Wm-2 during the late Archean), but
geological evidence points to the Earth being at least as warm as it is today,
with only very occasional glaciations. We perform radiative calculations on a
single global mean atmospheric column. We select a nominal set of three
layered, randomly overlapping clouds, which are both consistent with observed
cloud climatologies and reproduce the observed global mean energy budget of
Earth. By varying the fraction, thickness, height and particle size of these
clouds we conduct a wide exploration of how changed clouds could affect
climate, thus constraining how clouds could contribute to resolving the FYSP.
Low clouds reflect sunlight but have little greenhouse effect. Removing them
entirely gives a~forcing of +25 Wm-2 whilst more modest reduction in their
efficacy gives a forcing of +10 to +15 Wm-2. For high clouds, the greenhouse
effect dominates. It is possible to generate +50 Wm-2 forcing from enhancing
these, but this requires making them 3.5 times thicker and 14 K colder than the
standard high cloud in our nominal set and expanding their coverage to 100% of
the sky. Such changes are not credible. More plausible changes would generate
no more that +15 Wm-2 forcing. Thus neither fewer low clouds nor more high
clouds can provide enough forcing to resolve the FYSP. Decreased surface albedo
can contribute no more than +5 Wm-2 forcing. Some models which have been
applied to the FYSP do not include clouds at all. These overestimate the
forcing due to increased CO2 by 20 to 25% when CO2 is 0.01 to 0.1 bar.
