  The cold dark matter paradigm has been extremely successful for explaining a
wide range of cosmological phenomena. Nevertheless, since evidence for
non-baryonic dark matter remains indirect, all reasonable alternatives should
be explored. One proposed idea, involving a fundamental acceleration scale a_0
= 1-2e-10 m/s^2, is called MOdified Newtonian Dynamics or MOND. MOND was
suggested to explain the flat rotation curves of galaxies without the need for
dark matter. Whether or not it can adequately fit the available data has been
debated for almost 20 years (and we summarise many of these studies), but only
recently have there been attempts to extend MOND to larger scale regimes. We
discuss how the basic properties of MOND make it at best ambiguous to apply
these ideas to cosmological scales. We emphasize the difficulties inherent in
developing a full theory in which to embed MOND. Without such a theory there is
no obviously consistent way to discuss the early Universe and the growth of
perturbations. Recent claims that MONDian cosmology works very well are
therefore not supportable. We also provide an argument for why a_0~cH_0
naturally, a coincidence which is often suggested as a motivation for taking
MOND seriously. We discuss other alternative theories of gravity concluding, as
others have, that no metric theory extensions appear workable for explaining
rotation curves as well as other observed phenomena. The whole premise of many
of these attempts is fatally flawed - galaxies are not pre-selected, discrete,
isolated regions which formed monolithically and around which one can construct
an axially-symmetric dynamical model in order to remove the need for dark
matter. In the modern view, galaxies are part of a dynamic continuum of objects
which collectively make up the evolving large-scale structure of the universe.
