  Over the past 30 years numerous algorithms have been designed for symmetry
breaking problems in the LOCAL model, such as maximal matching, MIS, vertex
coloring, and edge-coloring. For most problems the best randomized algorithm is
at least exponentially faster than the best deterministic algorithm. In this
paper we prove that these exponential gaps are necessary and establish
connections between the deterministic and randomized complexities in the LOCAL
model. Each result has a very compelling take-away message:
  1. Fast $\Delta$-coloring of trees requires random bits: Building on the
recent lower bounds of Brandt et al., we prove that the randomized complexity
of $\Delta$-coloring a tree with maximum degree $\Delta\ge 55$ is
$\Theta(\log_\Delta\log n)$, whereas its deterministic complexity is
$\Theta(\log_\Delta n)$ for any $\Delta\ge 3$. This also establishes a large
separation between the deterministic complexity of $\Delta$-coloring and
$(\Delta+1)$-coloring trees.
  2. Randomized lower bounds imply deterministic lower bounds: We prove that
any deterministic algorithm for a natural class of problems that runs in
$O(1)+o(\log_\Delta n)$ rounds can be transformed to run in
$O(\log^*n-\log^*\Delta+1)$ rounds. If the transformed algorithm violates a
lower bound (even allowing randomization), then one can conclude that the
problem requires $\Omega(\log_\Delta n)$ time deterministically.
  3. Deterministic lower bounds imply randomized lower bounds: We prove that
the randomized complexity of any natural problem on instances of size $n$ is at
least its deterministic complexity on instances of size $\sqrt{\log n}$. This
shows that a deterministic $\Omega(\log_\Delta n)$ lower bound for any problem
implies a randomized $\Omega(\log_\Delta\log n)$ lower bound. It also
illustrates that the graph shattering technique is absolutely essential to the
LOCAL model.
