  Environmental degradation is a major global problem. Its impacts are not just
environmental, but also economic, with degradation recognised as a key cause of
reduced agricultural productivity and rural poverty in the developing world.
The degradation literature typically emphasises common property or open access
natural resources, and how perverse incentives or missing institutions lead
optimising private actors to degrade them. By contrast, the present paper
considers degradation occurring on private farms in peasant communities. This
is a critical yet delicate issue, given the poverty of such areas and questions
about the role of farmers in either degrading or regenerating rural lands. The
paper examines natural resource management by peasant farmers in Tanzania. Its
key concern is how the local knowledge informing their management decisions
adapts to challenges associated with environmental degradation and market
liberalisation. Given their poverty, this question could have direct
implications for the capacity of households to meet their livelihood needs.
Based on fresh empirical data, the paper finds that differential farmer
knowledge helps explain the large differences in how households respond to the
degradation challenge. The implication is that some farmers adapt more
effectively to emerging challenges than others, despite all being rational,
optimising agents who follow the strategies they deem best. The paper thus
provides a critique of local knowledge, implying that some farmers experience
adaptation slippages while others race ahead with effective adaptations. The
paper speaks to the chronic poverty that plagues many rural communities in the
developing world. It helps explain the failure of proven sustainable
agriculture technologies to disseminate readily beyond early innovators. Its
key policy implication is to inform improved capacity building for such
communities.
