  Machine learning has rapidly evolved during the last decade, achieving expert
human performance on notoriously challenging problems such as image
classification. This success is partly due to the re-emergence of bio-inspired
modern artificial neural networks (ANNs) along with the availability of
computation power, vast labelled data and ingenious human-based expert
knowledge as well as optimisation approaches that can find the correct
configuration (and weights) for these networks. Neuroevolution is a term used
for the latter when employing evolutionary algorithms. Most of the works in
neuroevolution have focused their attention in a single type of ANNs, named
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Moreover, most of these works have used a
single optimisation approach. This work makes a progressive step forward in
neuroevolution for vehicle trajectory prediction, referred to as
neurotrajectory prediction, where multiple objectives must be considered. To
this end, rich ANNs composed of CNNs and Long-short Term Memory Network are
adopted. Two well-known and robust Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimisation
(EMO) algorithms, NSGA-II and MOEA/D are also adopted. The completely different
underlying mechanism of each of these algorithms sheds light on the
implications of using one over the other EMO approach in neurotrajectory
prediction. In particular, the importance of considering objective scaling is
highlighted, finding that MOEA/D can be more adept at focusing on specific
objectives whereas, NSGA-II tends to be more invariant to objective scaling.
Additionally, certain objectives are shown to be either beneficial or
detrimental to finding valid models, for instance, inclusion of a distance
feedback objective was considerably detrimental to finding valid models, while
a lateral velocity objective was more beneficial.
