  This paper proposes a task-driven computational framework for assessing
diffusion MRI experimental designs which, rather than relying on
parameter-estimation metrics, directly measures quantitative task performance.
Traditional computational experimental design (CED) methods may be ill-suited
to experimental tasks, such as clinical classification, where outcome does not
depend on parameter-estimation accuracy or precision alone. Current assessment
metrics evaluate experiments' ability to faithfully recover microstructural
parameters rather than their task performance. The method we propose addresses
this shortcoming. For a given MRI experimental design, experiments are
simulated start-to-finish and task performance is computed from ROC curves and
associated summary metrics (e.g. AUC). Two experiments were performed: first, a
validation of the pipeline's task performance predictions against clinical
results, comparing in-silico predictions to real-world ROC/AUC; and second, a
demonstration of the pipeline's advantages over traditional CED approaches,
using two simulated clinical classification tasks. Comparison with clinical
datasets validates our method's predictions of (a) the qualitative form of ROC
curves, (b) the relative task performance of different experimental designs,
and (c) the absolute performance of each experimental design. Furthermore, we
show that our method outperforms traditional task-agnostic assessment methods,
enabling improved, more useful experimental design. Compared to current
approaches, such task-driven assessment is more likely to identify experimental
designs that perform well in practice. Our method is not limited to diffusion
MRI; the pipeline generalises to any task-based quantitative MRI application,
and provides the foundation for developing future task-driven end-to end CED
frameworks.
