  Encouraging sustainable mobility patterns is at the forefront of policymaking
at all scales of governance as the collective consciousness surrounding climate
change continues to expand. Not every community, however, possesses the
necessary economic or socio-cultural capital to encourage modal shifts away
from private motorized vehicles towards active modes. The current literature on
`soft' policy emphasizes the importance of tailoring behavior change campaigns
to individual or geographic context. Yet, there is a lack of insight and
appropriate tools to promote active mobility and overcome transport
disadvantage from the local community perspective. The current study
investigates the promotion of walking and cycling adoption using a series of
focus groups with local residents in two geographic communities, namely
Chicago's (1) Humboldt Park neighborhood and (2) suburb of Evanston. The
research approach combines traditional qualitative discourse analysis with
quantitative text-mining tools, namely topic modeling and sentiment analysis.
The analysis uncovers the local mobility culture, embedded norms and values
associated with acceptance of active travel modes in different communities. We
observe that underserved populations within diverse communities view active
mobility simultaneously as a necessity and as a symbol of privilege that is
sometimes at odds with the local culture. The mixed methods approach to
analyzing community member discourses is translated into policy findings that
are either tailored to local context or broadly applicable to curbing
automobile dominance. Overall, residents of both Humboldt Park and Evanston
envision a society in which multimodalism replaces car-centrism, but
differences in the local physical and social environments would and should
influence the manner in which overarching policy objectives are met.
