  We first adopt a human-guided machine learning framework to develop a new
dataset for hyperpartisan news title detection with 2,200 manually labeled and
1.8 million machine-labeled titles that were posted from 2014 to the present by
nine representative media organizations across three media bias groups - Left,
Central, and Right in an active learning manner. The fine-tuned
transformer-based language model achieves an overall accuracy of 0.84 and an F1
score of 0.78 on an external validation set. Next, we conduct a computational
analysis to quantify the extent and dynamics of partisanship in news titles.
While some aspects are as expected, our study reveals new or nuanced
differences between the three media groups. We find that overall the Right
media tends to use proportionally more hyperpartisan titles. Roughly around the
2016 Presidential Election, the proportions of hyperpartisan titles increased
in all media bias groups where the relative increase in the proportion of
hyperpartisan titles of the Left media was the most. We identify three major
topics including foreign issues, political systems, and societal issues that
are suggestive of hyperpartisanship in news titles using logistic regression
models and the Shapley values. Through an analysis of the topic distribution,
we find that societal issues gradually receive more attention from all media
groups. We further apply a lexicon-based language analysis tool to the titles
of each topic and quantify the linguistic distance between any pairs of the
three media groups. Three distinct patterns are discovered. The Left media is
linguistically more different from Central and Right in terms of foreign
issues. The linguistic distance between the three media groups becomes smaller
over recent years. In addition, a seasonal pattern where linguistic difference
is associated with elections is observed for societal issues.
