  State-of-the-art driver-assist systems have failed to effectively mitigate
driver inattention and had minimal impacts on the ever-growing number of road
mishaps (e.g. life loss, physical injuries due to accidents caused by various
factors that lead to driver inattention). This is because traditional
human-machine interaction settings are modeled in classical and behavioral
game-theoretic domains which are technically appropriate to characterize
strategic interaction between either two utility maximizing agents, or human
decision makers. Therefore, in an attempt to improve the persuasive
effectiveness of driver-assist systems, we develop a novel strategic and
personalized driver-assist system which adapts to the driver's mental state and
choice behavior. First, we propose a novel equilibrium notion in human-system
interaction games, where the system maximizes its expected utility and human
decisions can be characterized using any general decision model. Then we use
this novel equilibrium notion to investigate the strategic driver-vehicle
interaction game where the car presents a persuasive recommendation to steer
the driver towards safer driving decisions. We assume that the driver employs
an open-quantum system cognition model, which captures complex aspects of human
decision making such as violations to classical law of total probability and
incompatibility of certain mental representations of information. We present
closed-form expressions for players' final responses to each other's strategies
so that we can numerically compute both pure and mixed equilibria. Numerical
results are presented to illustrate both kinds of equilibria.
