  It is well known that individual beliefs cannot be identified using
traditional choice data, unless we impose the practically restrictive and
conceptually awkward assumption that utilities are state-independent. In this
paper, we propose a novel methodology that solves this long-standing
identification problem in a simple way, using a variant of the strategy method.
Our method relies on the concept of a suitable proxy. The crucial property is
that the agent does not have any stakes in the proxy conditional on the
realization of the original state space. Then, instead of trying to identify
directly the agent's beliefs about the state space, we elicit her conditional
beliefs about the proxy given each state realization. The latter can be easily
done with existing elicitation tools and without worrying about the
identification problem. It turns out that this is enough to uniquely identify
the agent's beliefs. We present different classes of proxies that one can
reasonably use, and we show that it is almost always possible to find one which
is easy to implement. Such flexibility makes our method, not only
theoretically-sound, but also empirically appealing. We also show how our new
method allows us to provide a novel well-founded definition of a utility
function over states. Last but not least, it also allows us to cleanly identify
motivated beliefs, freed from confounding distortions caused by the
identification problem.
