  Flow- and context-sensitive points-to analysis is difficult to scale; for
top-down approaches, the problem centers on repeated analysis of the same
procedure; for bottom-up approaches, the abstractions used to represent
procedure summaries have not scaled while preserving precision.
  We propose a novel abstraction called the Generalized Points-to Graph (GPG)
which views points-to relations as memory updates and generalizes them using
the counts of indirection levels leaving the unknown pointees implicit. This
allows us to construct GPGs as compact representations of bottom-up procedure
summaries in terms of memory updates and control flow between them. Their
compactness is ensured by the following optimizations: strength reduction
reduces the indirection levels, redundancy elimination removes redundant memory
updates and minimizes control flow (without over-approximating data dependence
between memory updates), and call inlining enhances the opportunities of these
optimizations. We devise novel operations and data flow analyses for these
optimizations.
  Our quest for scalability of points-to analysis leads to the following
insight: The real killer of scalability in program analysis is not the amount
of data but the amount of control flow that it may be subjected to in search of
precision. The effectiveness of GPGs lies in the fact that they discard as much
control flow as possible without losing precision (i.e., by preserving data
dependence without over-approximation). This is the reason why the GPGs are
very small even for main procedures that contain the effect of the entire
program. This allows our implementation to scale to 158kLoC for C programs.
