  Image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling enables derivation of
hemodynamic information, which has become a paradigm in cardiovascular research
and healthcare. Nonetheless, the predictive accuracy largely depends on
precisely specified boundary conditions and model parameters, which, however,
are usually uncertain in most patient-specific cases. Quantifying the
uncertainties in model predictions due to input randomness can provide
predictive confidence and is critical to promote the transition of CFD modeling
in clinical applications. In the meantime, forward propagation of input
uncertainties often involves numerous expensive CFD simulations, which is
computationally prohibitive in most practical scenarios. This paper presents an
efficient bi-fidelity surrogate modeling framework for uncertainty
quantification (UQ) in cardiovascular simulations, by leveraging the accuracy
of high-fidelity models and efficiency of low-fidelity models. Contrary to most
data-fit surrogate models with several scalar quantities of interest, this work
aims to provide high-resolution, full-field predictions. Moreover, a novel
empirical error bound estimation approach is introduced to evaluate the
performance of the surrogate a priori. The proposed framework is tested on a
number of vascular flows with both standardized and patient-specific vessel
geometries, and different combinations of high- and low-fidelity models are
investigated. The results show that the bi-fidelity approach can achieve high
predictive accuracy with a significant reduction of computational cost,
exhibiting its merit and effectiveness. Particularly, the uncertainties from a
high-dimensional input space can be accurately propagated to clinically
relevant quantities of interest in the patient-specific case using only a
limited number of high-fidelity simulations, suggesting a good potential in
practical clinical applications.
