  This paper studies the effects of teachers' stereotypical assessments of boys
and girls on students' long-term outcomes, including high school graduation,
college attendance, and formal sector employment. I measure teachers' gender
stereotypical grading based on preconceptions about boys' aptitude in math and
science and girls' aptitude in communicating and verbal skills by analyzing
novel data on teachers' responses to the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and
differences in gender gaps between teacher-assigned and blindly graded tests.
To collect IAT scores on a national scale, I developed a large-scale
educational program accessible to teachers and students in Peruvian public
schools. This analysis provides evidence that teachers' gender stereotypes are
reflected in student evaluations: math teachers with stronger stereotypes
associating boys with scientific disciplines award male students with higher
test scores compared to blindly-graded test scores. In contrast, language arts
teachers who stereotypically associate females with humanities-based
disciplines give female students higher grades. Using graduation, college
enrollment, and matched employer-employee data on 1.7 million public high
school students expected to graduate between 2015 and 2019, I find that female
students who are placed with teachers who use more stereotypical grading
practices are less likely to graduate from high school and apply to college
than male students. In comparison to their male counterparts, female high
school graduates whose teachers employ more stereotypical grading practices are
less likely to be employed in the formal sector and have fewer paid working
hours. Furthermore, exposure to teachers with more stereotypical grading
practices reduces women's monthly earnings, thereby widening the gender pay
gap.
