  Analysis of bulk meteorite compositions has revealed small isotopic
variations due to the presence of material (e.g., stardust) that preserved the
signature of nuclear reactions occurring in specific stellar sites. The
interpretation of such anomalies provides evidence for the environment of the
birth of the Sun, its accretion process, the evolution of the solar
proto-planetary disk, and the formation of the planets. A crucial element of
such interpretation is the comparison of the observed anomalies to predictions
from models of stellar nucleosynthesis. To date, however, this comparison has
been limited to a handful of model predictions. This is mostly because the
calculated stellar abundances need to be transformed into a specific
representation, which nuclear astrophysicists and stellar nucleosynthesis
researchers are not familiar with. Here, we show in detail that this
representation is needed to account for mass fractionation effects in meteorite
data that can be generated both in nature and during instrumental analysis. We
explain the required internal normalisation to a selected isotopic ratio,
describe the motivations behind such representation more widely, and provide
the tools to perform the calculations. Then, we present some examples
considering two elements produced by the $slow$ neutron-capture ($s$) process:
Sr and Mo. We show which specific representations for the Sr isotopic
composition calculated by $s$-process models better disentangle the
nucleosynthetic signatures from stars of different metallicity. For Mo, the
comparison between data and models is improved due to a recent re-analysis of
the $^{95}$Mo neutron-capture cross section.
