  This paper aims to enhance the understanding of liquidity provider (LP)
returns in automated market makers (AMMs). LPs face market risk as well as
adverse selection due to risky asset holdings in the pool that they provide
liquidity to and the informational asymmetry between informed traders
(arbitrageurs) and AMMs. Loss-versus-rebalancing (LVR) quantifies the adverse
selection cost (Milionis et al., 2022a), and is a popular metric to evaluate
the flow toxicity to an AMM. However, individual LP returns are critically
affected by another factor orthogonal to the above: the competitiveness among
LPs. This work introduces a novel metric for LP competitiveness, called FLAIR
(short for fee liquidity-adjusted instantaneous returns), that aims to
supplement LVR in assessments of LP performance to capture the dynamic behavior
of LPs in a pool. Our metric reflects the characteristics of fee
return-on-capital, and differentiates active liquidity provisioning strategies
in AMMs. To illustrate how both flow toxicity, accounting for the
sophistication of the counterparty of LPs, as well as LP competitiveness,
accounting for the sophistication of the competition among LPs, affect
individual LP returns, we propose a quadrant interpretation where all of these
characteristics may be readily visualized. We examine LP competitiveness in an
ex-post fashion, and show example cases in all of which our metric confirms the
expected nuances and intuition of competitiveness among LPs. FLAIR has
particular merit in empirical analyses, and is able to better inform practical
assessments of AMM pools.
