  Spectrum sharing mechanisms need to be carefully designed to enable
inter-technology coexistence in the unlicensed bands, as these bands are an
instance of a spectrum commons where heterogeneous technologies and deployments
must coexist. Unlike in licensed bands, where multiple technologies could
coexist only in a primary-secondary DSA mode, a spectrum commons offers
competition opportunities between multiple dominant technologies, such as Wi-Fi
and the recently proposed LTE in the 5 GHz unlicensed band. In this paper we
systematically study the performance of different spectrum sharing schemes for
inter-technology coexistence in a spectrum commons. Our contributions are
threefold. First, we propose a general framework for comparative analysis of
spectrum sharing mechanisms in time and frequency, by studying the effect of
key constituent parameters. Second, we propose a novel throughput and
interference model for inter-technology coexistence, integrating different
distributed MAC sharing mechanisms at the same level of abstraction. Finally,
we present a case study of IEEE 802.11n Wi-Fi and LTE in the 5 GHz unlicensed
band, in order to obtain generalizable insight into coexistence in a spectrum
commons. Our extensive simulation results show that LTE/Wi-Fi coexistence in
the 5 GHz band can be ensured simply through channel selection schemes, such
that time-sharing MAC mechanisms are irrelevant. We also show that, in the
general co-channel case, the coexistence performance of MAC sharing mechanisms
strongly depends on the interference coupling in the network, as determined by
building shielding. We thus identify two regimes: (i) low interference
coupling, e.g. residential indoor scenarios, where duty cycle mechanisms
outperform sensing-based LBT mechanisms; and (ii) high interference coupling,
e.g. open-plan indoor or outdoor hotspot scenarios, where LBT outperforms duty
cycle mechanisms.
