  Major advances in Machine Learning (ML) and Artificial Intelligence (AI)
increasingly take the form of developing and releasing general-purpose models.
These models are designed to be adapted by other businesses and agencies to
perform a particular, domain-specific function. This process has become known
as adaptation or fine-tuning. This paper offers a model of the fine-tuning
process where a Generalist brings the technological product (here an ML model)
to a certain level of performance, and one or more Domain-specialist(s) adapts
it for use in a particular domain. Both entities are profit-seeking and incur
costs when they invest in the technology, and they must reach a bargaining
agreement on how to share the revenue for the technology to reach the market.
For a relatively general class of cost and revenue functions, we characterize
the conditions under which the fine-tuning game yields a profit-sharing
solution. We observe that any potential domain-specialization will either
contribute, free-ride, or abstain in their uptake of the technology, and we
provide conditions yielding these different strategies. We show how methods
based on bargaining solutions and sub-game perfect equilibria provide insights
into the strategic behavior of firms in these types of interactions, and we
find that profit-sharing can still arise even when one firm has significantly
higher costs than another. We also provide methods for identifying
Pareto-optimal bargaining arrangements for a general set of utility functions.
