  The strategic selection of resources by selfish agents is a classic research
direction, with Resource Selection Games and Congestion Games as prominent
examples. In these games, agents select available resources and their utility
then depends on the number of agents using the same resources. This implies
that there is no distinction between the agents, i.e., they are anonymous.
  We depart from this very general setting by proposing Resource Selection
Games with heterogeneous agents that strive for joint resource usage with
similar agents. So, instead of the number of other users of a given resource,
our model considers agents with different types and the decisive feature is the
fraction of same-type agents among the users. More precisely, similarly to
Schelling Games, there is a tolerance threshold $\tau \in [0,1]$ which
specifies the agents' desired minimum fraction of same-type agents on a
resource. Agents strive to select resources where at least a $\tau$-fraction of
those resources' users have the same type as themselves. For $\tau=1$, our
model generalizes Hedonic Diversity Games with a peak at $1$.
  For our general model, we consider the existence and quality of equilibria
and the complexity of maximizing social welfare. Additionally, we consider a
bounded rationality model, where agents can only estimate the utility of a
resource, since they only know the fraction of same-type agents on a given
resource, but not the exact numbers. Thus, they cannot know the impact a
strategy change would have on a target resource. Interestingly, we show that
this type of bounded rationality yields favorable game-theoretic properties and
specific equilibria closely approximate equilibria of the full knowledge
setting.
