  We investigate predicative aspects of order theory in constructive univalent
foundations. By predicative and constructive, we respectively mean that we do
not assume Voevodsky's propositional resizing axioms or excluded middle. Our
work complements existing work on predicative mathematics by exploring what
cannot be done predicatively in univalent foundations. Our first main result is
that nontrivial (directed or bounded) complete posets are necessarily large.
That is, if such a nontrivial poset is small, then weak propositional resizing
holds. It is possible to derive full propositional resizing if we strengthen
nontriviality to positivity. The distinction between nontriviality and
positivity is analogous to the distinction between nonemptiness and
inhabitedness. We prove our results for a general class of posets, which
includes directed complete posets, bounded complete posets and sup-lattices,
using a technical notion of a $\delta_{\mathcal V}$-complete poset. We also
show that nontrivial locally small $\delta_{\mathcal V}$-complete posets
necessarily lack decidable equality. Specifically, we derive weak excluded
middle from assuming a nontrivial locally small $\delta_{\mathcal V}$-complete
poset with decidable equality. Moreover, if we assume positivity instead of
nontriviality, then we can derive full excluded middle. Secondly, we show that
each of Zorn's lemma, Tarski's greatest fixed point theorem and Pataraia's
lemma implies propositional resizing. Hence, these principles are inherently
impredicative and a predicative development of order theory must therefore do
without them. Finally, we clarify, in our predicative setting, the relation
between the traditional definition of sup-lattice that requires suprema for all
subsets and our definition that asks for suprema of all small families.
