  The computational cost as well as the probabilistic skill of ensemble
forecasts depends on the spatial resolution of the numerical weather prediction
model and the ensemble size. Periodically, e.g. when more computational
resources become available, it is appropriate to reassess the balance between
resolution and ensemble size. Recently, it has been proposed to investigate
this balance in the context of dual-resolution ensembles, which use members
with two different resolutions to make probabilistic forecasts. This study
investigates whether statistical post-processing of such dual-resolution
ensemble forecasts changes the conclusions regarding the optimal
dual-resolution configuration.
  Medium-range dual-resolution ensemble forecasts of 2-metre temperature have
been calibrated using ensemble model output statistics. The forecasts are
produced with ECMWF's Integrated Forecast System and have horizontal
resolutions between 18 km and 45 km. The ensemble sizes range from 8 to 254
members. The forecasts are verified with SYNOP station data. Results show that
score differences between various single and dual-resolution configurations are
strongly reduced by statistical post-processing. Therefore, the benefit of some
dual-resolution configurations over single resolution configurations appears to
be less pronounced than for raw forecasts. Moreover, the ranking of the
ensemble configurations can be affected by the statistical post-processing.
