  Ecosystems enjoy increasing attention due to their flexibility and innovative
power. It is well known, however, that this type of network-based economic
governance structures occupies a potentially unstable position between the two
stable (governance) endpoints, namely the firm (i.e., hierarchical governance)
and the (open) market (i.e., coordination through the monetary system).
  This paper develops a formal (mathematical) theory of the economic value of
(generic) ecosystem by extending transaction costs economics using certain
elements from service-dominant logic.
  Within a first-best setting of rational actors, we derive analytical
solutions for the hub-and-spoke and generic ecosystem configurations under some
uniformity assumptions of ecosystem participants. Additionally, we are able to
infer a generic condition for the welfare-maximizing and utility-maximizing
price of the hub-and-spoke configuration in the familiar form of Lerner indices
and elasticities.
  Relinquishing a first-best rational actors approach, we additionally derive
several general propositions on (i) necessary conditions for the economic
feasibility of ecosystem-based transactions, (ii) scaling requirements for
ecosystem stability, and (iii) a generic feasibility condition for arbitrary
provider-consumer ecosystems.
  Finally, we present an algebraic definition of business ecosystems and relate
it to existing informal definition attempts. Thereby we demonstrate that the
property of "being an ecosystem" of a network of transacting actors cannot be
decided on structural grounds alone.
