  Network-based Time Series models have experienced a surge in popularity over
the past years due to their ability to model temporal and spatial dependencies
such as arising from the spread of an infectious disease. As statistical models
for network time series, generalised network autoregressive (GNAR) models have
been introduced. GNAR models are vertex-based models which have an
autoregressive component modelling temporal dependence and a spatial
autoregressive component to incorporate dependence between neighbouring
vertices in the network. This paper compares the performance of GNAR models
with different underlying networks in predicting COVID-19 cases for the 26
counties in the Republic of Ireland. The dataset is separated into subsets
according to inter-country movement regulations and categorized into two
pandemic phases, restricted and unrestricted. Ten static networks are
constructed based on either general or COVID-19 specific approaches. In these
networks, vertices represent counties, and edges are built upon neighbourhood
relations, such as railway lines. We find that while for the prediction task,
no underlying static network is consistently superior for either restricted or
unrestricted phase, for pandemic phases with restrictions sparse networks
perform better while for unrestricted phases, dense networks explain the data
better. GNAR models have higher predictive accuracy than ARIMA models, which
ignore the network structure. ARIMA and GNAR models perform similarly in
pandemic phases with more lenient or no COVID-19 regulation. These findings
indicate evidence of network dependencies in the restricted phase, but not in
the unrestricted phase. They also show some robustness regarding the network
construction method. An analysis of the residuals justifies the model
assumptions for the restricted phase but raises questions for the unrestricted
phase.
