  As generative models have risen in popularity, a domain that has risen
alongside is generative models for music. Our study aims to compare the
performance of a simple Markov chain model and a recurrent neural network (RNN)
model, two popular models for sequence generating tasks, in jazz music
improvisation. While music, especially jazz, remains subjective in telling
whether a composition is "good" or "bad", we aim to quantify our results using
metrics of groove pattern similarity and pitch class histogram entropy. We
trained both models using transcriptions of jazz blues choruses from
professional jazz players, and also fed musical jazz seeds to help give our
model some context in beginning the generation. Our results show that the RNN
outperforms the Markov model on both of our metrics, indicating better rhythmic
consistency and tonal stability in the generated music. Through the use of
music21 library, we tokenized our jazz dataset into pitches and durations that
our model could interpret and train on. Our findings contribute to the growing
field of AI-generated music, highlighting the important use of metrics to
assess generation quality. Future work includes expanding the dataset of MIDI
files to a larger scale, conducting human surveys for subjective evaluations,
and incorporating additional metrics to address the challenge of subjectivity
in music evaluation. Our study provides valuable insight into the use of
recurrent neural networks for sequential based tasks like generating music.
