  Wireless local area networks (WLANs) are the most popular kind of wireless
Internet connection because of their simplicity of deployment and operation. As
a result, the number of devices accessing the Internet through WLANs such as
laptops, smartphones, or wearables, is increasing drastically at the same time
that applications' throughput requirements do. To cope with these challenges,
channel bonding (CB) techniques are used for enabling higher data rates by
transmitting in wider channels, thus increasing spectrum efficiency. However,
important issues like higher potential co-channel and adjacent channel
interference arise when bonding channels. This may harm the performance of the
carrier sense multiple access (CSMA) protocol because of recurrent backoff
freezing while making nodes more sensitive to hidden node effects. In this
paper, we address the following point at issue: is it convenient for
high-density (HD) WLANs to use wider channels and potentially overlap in the
spectrum? First, we highlight key aspects of DCB in toy scenarios through a
continuous time Markov network (CTMN) model. Then, by means of extensive
simulations covering a wide range of traffic loads and access point (AP)
densities, we show that dynamic channel bonding (DCB) - which adapts the
channel bandwidth on a per-packet transmission - significantly outperforms
traditional single-channel on average. Nevertheless, results also corroborate
that DCB is more prone to generate unfair situations where WLANs may starve.
Contrary to most of the current thoughts pushing towards non-overlapping
channels in HD deployments, we highlight the benefits of allocating channels as
wider as possible to WLANs altogether with implementing adaptive access
policies to cope with the unfairness situations that may appear.
