  OBJECTIVE: Assessing the biomechanical behaviour of the aortic wall in vivo
can potentially improve the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with abdominal
aortic aneurysms (AAA). With ultrasound, AAA wall stiffness can be estimated as
the diameter change in response to blood pressure. However, this measurement
has shown limited reproducibility, possibly influenced by the unknown effects
of the highly variable ultrasound probe pressure. This study addressed this gap
by analyzing time-resolved ultrasound sequences from AAA patients.METHOD:
Two-dimensional ultrasound sequences were acquired from AAA patients,
alternatively applying light and firm probe pressure. Diameter variations and
stiffness were evaluated and compared. An in silico simulation was performed to
support the in vivo observations.RESULTS: It was found that half of the AAAs
were particularly responsive to the probe pressure: in these patients, the
cyclic diameter variation between diastole and systole changed from 1% at light
probe pressure to 5% at firm probe pressure and the estimated stiffness
decreases by a factor of 6.3. Conversely, the other half of the patients were
less responsive: diameter variations increased marginally and stiffness
decreased by a factor of 1.5 when transitioning from light to firm probe
pressure. Through numerical simulations, we were able to show that the rather
counter-intuitive stiffness decrease observed in the responsive cohort is
actually consistent with a biomechanical model.CONCLUSION: We conclude that
probe pressure has an important effect on the estimation of AAA wall stiffness.
Ultimately, our findings suggest potential implications for AAA mechanical
characterization via ultrasound imaging.
