  The ongoing rapid development of the e-commercial and interest-base websites
make it more pressing to evaluate objects' accurate quality before
recommendation by employing an effective reputation system. The objects'
quality are often calculated based on their historical information, such as
selected records or rating scores, to help visitors to make decisions before
watching, reading or buying. Usually high quality products obtain a higher
average ratings than low quality products regardless of rating biases or
errors. However many empirical cases demonstrate that consumers may be misled
by rating scores added by unreliable users or deliberate tampering. In this
case, users' reputation, i.e., the ability to rating trustily and precisely,
make a big difference during the evaluating process. Thus, one of the main
challenges in designing reputation systems is eliminating the effects of users'
rating bias on the evaluation results. To give an objective evaluation of each
user's reputation and uncover an object's intrinsic quality, we propose an
iterative balance (IB) method to correct users' rating biases. Experiments on
two online video-provided Web sites, namely MovieLens and Netflix datasets,
show that the IB method is a highly self-consistent and robust algorithm and it
can accurately quantify movies' actual quality and users' stability of rating.
Compared with existing methods, the IB method has higher ability to find the
"dark horses", i.e., not so popular yet good movies, in the Academy Awards.
