  Most cities in the US and in the world were organized around car traffic. In
particular, large structures such as urban freeways or ring roads were built
for reducing car traffic congestion. With the evolution of public
transportation, working conditions, the future of these structures and the
organization of large urban areas is uncertain. Here, we analyze empirical data
for US cities and show that they display two transitions at different
thresholds. For the first threshold of order $T_c^{FW}\sim 10^4$ commuters, we
observe the emergence of a urban freeway. The second threshold is larger and of
the order $T_c^{RR}\sim 10^5$ commuters above which a ring road emerges. In
order to understand these empirical results, we propose a simple model based on
a cost-benefit analysis which relies on the balance between construction and
maintenance costs of infrastructures and the trip duration decrease (including
the effect of congestion). This model predicts indeed such transitions and
allows us to compute explicitly the commuter's thresholds in terms of critical
parameters such as the average value of time, average capacity of roads,
typical construction cost, etc. Furthermore, this analysis allows us to discuss
possible scenarios for the future evolution of these structures. In particular,
we show that in many cases it is beneficial to remove urban freeways due to
their large social cost (that includes pollution, health cost, etc). This type
of information is particularly useful at a time when many cities must confront
with the dilemma of renovating these aging structures or converting them into
another use.
