  In recent years, it has become apparent that an isolated microprudential
approach to capital adequacy requirements of individual institutions is
insufficient. It can increase the homogeneity of the financial system and
ultimately the cost to society. For this reason, the focus of the financial and
mathematical literature has shifted towards the macroprudential regulation of
the financial network as a whole. In particular, systemic risk measures have
been discussed as a risk measurement and mitigation tool. In this spirit, we
adopt a general approach of multivariate, set-valued risk measures and combine
it with the notion of intrinsic risk measures. In order to define the risk of a
financial position, intrinsic risk measures utilise only internal capital,
which is received when part of the currently held assets are sold, instead of
relying on external capital. We translate this methodology into the systemic
framework and show that systemic intrinsic risk measures have desirable
properties such as the set-valued equivalents of monotonicity and
quasi-convexity. Furthermore, for convex acceptance sets we derive a dual
representation of the systemic intrinsic risk measure. We apply our methodology
to a modified Eisenberg-Noe network of banks and discuss the appeal of this
approach from a regulatory perspective, as it does not elevate the financial
system with external capital. We show evidence that this approach allows to
mitigate systemic risk by moving the network towards more stable assets.
