  Large-scale human mobility data is a key resource in data-driven policy
making and across many scientific fields. Most recently, mobility data was
extensively used during the COVID-19 pandemic to study the effects of
governmental policies and to inform epidemic models. Large-scale mobility is
often measured using digital tools such as mobile phones. However, it remains
an open question how truthfully these digital proxies represent the actual
travel behavior of the general population. Here, we examine mobility datasets
from multiple countries and identify two fundamentally different types of bias
caused by unequal access to, and unequal usage of mobile phones. We introduce
the concept of data generation bias, a previously overlooked type of bias,
which is present when the amount of data that an individual produces influences
their representation in the dataset. We find evidence for data generation bias
in all examined datasets in that high-wealth individuals are overrepresented,
with the richest 20% contributing over 50% of all recorded trips, substantially
skewing the datasets. This inequality is consequential, as we find mobility
patterns of different wealth groups to be structurally different, where the
mobility networks of high-wealth users are denser and contain more long-range
connections. To mitigate the skew, we present a framework to debias data and
show how simple techniques can be used to increase representativeness. Using
our approach we show how biases can severely impact outcomes of dynamic
processes such as epidemic simulations, where biased data incorrectly estimates
the severity and speed of disease transmission. Overall, we show that a failure
to account for biases can have detrimental effects on the results of studies
and urge researchers and practitioners to account for data-fairness in all
future studies of human mobility.
