  When estimating the risk of a financial position with empirical data or Monte
Carlo simulations via a tail-dependent law invariant risk measure such as the
Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR), it is important to ensure the robustness of
the statistical estimator particularly when the data contain noise. Kratscher
et al. [1] propose a new framework to examine the qualitative robustness of
estimators for tail-dependent law invariant risk measures on Orlicz spaces,
which is a step further from earlier work for studying the robustness of risk
measurement procedures by Cont et al. [2]. In this paper, we follow the stream
of research to propose a quantitative approach for verifying the statistical
robustness of tail-dependent law invariant risk measures. A distinct feature of
our approach is that we use the Fortet-Mourier metric to quantify the variation
of the true underlying probability measure in the analysis of the discrepancy
between the laws of the plug-in estimators of law invariant risk measure based
on the true data and perturbed data, which enables us to derive an explicit
error bound for the discrepancy when the risk functional is Lipschitz
continuous with respect to a class of admissible laws. Moreover, the newly
introduced notion of Lipschitz continuity allows us to examine the degree of
robustness for tail-dependent risk measures. Finally, we apply our quantitative
approach to some well-known risk measures to illustrate our theory.
