  We propose a combinatorial optimisation model called Limited Query Graph
Connectivity Test. We consider a graph whose edges have two possible states
(On/Off). The edges' states are hidden initially. We could query an edge to
reveal its state. Given a source s and a destination t, we aim to test s-t
connectivity by identifying either a path (consisting of only On edges) or a
cut (consisting of only Off edges). We are limited to B queries, after which we
stop regardless of whether graph connectivity is established. We aim to design
a query policy that minimizes the expected number of queries.
  Our model is mainly motivated by a cyber security use case where we need to
establish whether an attack path exists in a network, between a source and a
destination. Edge query is resolved by manual effort from the IT admin, which
is the motivation behind query minimization.
  Our model is highly related to monotone Stochastic Boolean Function
Evaluation (SBFE). There are two existing exact algorithms for SBFE that are
prohibitively expensive. We propose a significantly more scalable exact
algorithm. While previous exact algorithms only scale for trivial graphs (i.e.,
past works experimented on at most 20 edges), we empirically demonstrate that
our algorithm is scalable for a wide range of much larger practical graphs
(i.e., Windows domain network graphs with tens of thousands of edges).
  We propose three heuristics. Our best-performing heuristic is via reducing
the search horizon of the exact algorithm. The other two are via reinforcement
learning (RL) and Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS). We also derive an anytime
algorithm for computing the performance lower bound. Experimentally, we show
that all our heuristics are near optimal. The exact algorithm based heuristic
outperforms all, surpassing RL, MCTS and 8 existing heuristics ported from SBFE
and related literature.
