  The Prisoner's Dilemma game has a long history stretching across the social,
biological, and physical sciences. In 2012, Press and Dyson developed a method
for analyzing the mapping of the 8-dimensional strategy profile onto the
2-dimensional payoff space in an infinitely iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game,
based on Markov chain analysis and memory-one strategies. We generalize this
approach and introduce the concept of strategy parameter to show that linear
relations among player payoffs are a ubiquitous feature of the infinitely
iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game. Our extended analysis is applied to various
strategy profiles including tit-for-tat, win-stay-lose-shift, and other
randomized strategy sets. Strategy profiles are identified that map onto the
vertices, edges, and interior of the Prisoner's Dilemma quadrilateral in the
2-dimensional payoff (score) space. A DaMD strategy is defined based solely on
"Defection after Mutual Defection" and leads to linear relations between player
scores using strategy parameter analysis. The DaMD strategy is shown to result
in an equal (reciprocal) or larger (extortive) score for its user compare to
the other player, independent of the strategy of the other player. The
extortive scores occur when the probabilities for the DaMD player to cooperate
after conflicting plays (cooperate-defect or defect-cooperate) sum to less than
1. The equal reciprocal scores occur when the probabilities for the DaMD player
to cooperate after conflicting plays (cooperate-defect or defect-cooperate) sum
to 1. When one player selects the extortive DaMD, the opposing player can force
the equal punishment payoffs for both players in the infinitely iterated
Prisoner's dilemma by also choosing the DaMD strategy. Possible pathways to
mutual cooperation based on DaMD are discussed.
