  The concordance model of cosmology, LCDM, provides a satisfactory description
of the evolution of the universe and the growth of large scale structure.
Despite considerable effort, this model does not at present provide a
satisfactory description of small scale structure and the dynamics of bound
objects like individual galaxies. In contrast, MOND provides a unique and
predictively successful description of galaxy dynamics, but is mute on the
subject of cosmology. Here I briefly review these contradictory world views,
emphasizing the wealth of distinct, interlocking lines of evidence that went
into the development of LCDM while highlighting the practical impossibility
that it can provide a satisfactory explanation of the observed MOND
phenomenology in galaxy dynamics. I also briefly review the baryon budget in
groups and clusters of galaxies where neither paradigm provides an entirely
satisfactory description of the data. Relatively little effort has been devoted
to the formation of structure in MOND; I review some of what has been done. The
amplitude ratio of the first to second peak in the CMB power spectrum was
correctly predicted a priori, but the third peak is more natural to LCDM. MOND
anticipates that structure forms more quickly than in LCDM. This motivated the
prediction that reionization would happen earlier in MOND than originally
expected in LCDM, as subsequently observed. This also provides a natural
explanation for massive, early clusters of galaxies and large, empty voids.
However, it is far from obvious that the mass spectrum of galaxy clusters or
the power spectrum of galaxies can be explained in MOND, two things that LCDM
does well. Critical outstanding issues are the development of an acceptable
relativistic parent theory for MOND, and the reality of the non-baryonic dark
matter of LCDM. Do suitable dark matter particles exist, or are they a modern
aether?
