  In the passenger car segment, battery-electric vehicles (BEV) have emerged as
the most promising option to de-fossilize transportation. For heavy-duty
vehicles (HDV), the technology space still appears to be more open. Aside from
BEV, electric road systems (ERS) for dynamic power transfer are discussed, as
well as indirect electrification with trucks that use hydrogen fuel cells or
e-fuels. Here we investigate the power sector implications of these alternative
options. We apply an open-source capacity expansion model to future scenarios
of Germany with high renewable energy shares, drawing on detailed route-based
truck traffic data. Results show that power sector costs are lowest for
flexibly charged BEV that also carry out vehicle-to-grid operations, and
highest for HDV using e-fuels. If BEV and ERS-BEV are not charged in an
optimized way, power sector costs increase, but are still substantially lower
than in scenarios with hydrogen or e-fuels. This is a consequence of the
relatively poor energy efficiency of indirect HDV electrification, which
outweighs its temporal flexibility benefits. We further find a higher use of
solar photovoltaic energy for BEV and ERS-BEV, while hydrogen and e-fuel HDV
lead to a higher use of wind power and fossil electricity generation. Results
are qualitatively robust in sensitivity analyses without the European
interconnection or with capacity limits for wind power expansion.
