  This document focuses on modeling a complex situations to achieve an
advantage within a competitive context. Our goal is to devise the
characteristics of games to teach and exercise non-easily quantifiable tasks
crucial to the math-modeling process. A computerized game to exercise the
math-modeling process and optimization problem formulation is introduced. The
game is named The Formula 1 Championship, and models of the game were developed
in the computerized simulation platform MoNet. It resembles some situations in
which team managers must make crucial decisions to enhance their racing cars up
to the feasible, most advantageous conditions. This paper describes the game's
rules, limitations, and five Formula 1 circuit simulators used for the
championship development. We present several formulations of this situation in
the form of optimization problems. Administering the budget to reach the best
car adjustment to a set of circuits to win the respective races can be an
approach. Focusing on the best distribution of each Grand Prix's budget and
then deciding how to use the assigned money to improve the car is also the
right approach. In general, there may be a degree of conflict among these
approaches because they are different aspects of the same multi-scale
optimization problem. Therefore, we evaluate the impact of assigning the
highest priority to an element, or another, when formulating the optimization
problem. Studying the effectiveness of solving such optimization problems turns
out to be an exciting way of evaluating the advantages of focusing on one scale
or another. Another thread of this research directs to the meaning of the game
in the teaching-learning process. We believe applying the Formula 1 Game is an
effective way to discover opportunities in a complex-system situation and
formulate them to finally extract and concrete the related benefit to the
context described.
