  In this paper we study the finite sample and asymptotic properties of various
weighting estimators of the local average treatment effect (LATE), each of
which can be motivated by Abadie's (2003) kappa theorem. Our framework presumes
a binary treatment and a binary instrument, which may only be valid after
conditioning on additional covariates. We argue that two of the estimators
under consideration, which are weight normalized, are generally preferable.
Several other estimators, which are unnormalized, do not satisfy the properties
of scale invariance with respect to the natural logarithm and translation
invariance, thereby exhibiting sensitivity to the units of measurement when
estimating the LATE in logs and the centering of the outcome variable more
generally. We also demonstrate that, when noncompliance is one sided, certain
estimators have the advantage of being based on a denominator that is strictly
greater than zero by construction. This is the case for only one of the two
normalized estimators, and we recommend this estimator for wider use. We
illustrate our findings with a simulation study and three empirical
applications. The importance of normalization is particularly apparent in
applications to real data. The simulations also suggest that covariate
balancing estimation of instrument propensity scores may be more robust to
misspecification. Software for implementing these methods is available in
Stata.
