  The author's goal in this paper is to explore how artificial intelligence
(AI) has been utilised to inform our understanding of and ability to estimate
at scale a critical aspect of musical creativity - musical tempo. The central
importance of tempo to musical creativity can be seen in how it is used to
express specific emotions (Eerola and Vuoskoski 2013), suggest particular
musical styles (Li and Chan 2011), influence perception of expression (Webster
and Weir 2005) and mediate the urge to move one's body in time to the music
(Burger et al. 2014). Traditional tempo estimation methods typically detect
signal periodicities that reflect the underlying rhythmic structure of the
music, often using some form of autocorrelation of the amplitude envelope
(Lartillot and Toiviainen 2007). Recently, AI-based methods utilising
convolutional or recurrent neural networks (CNNs, RNNs) on spectral
representations of the audio signal have enjoyed significant improvements in
accuracy (Aarabi and Peeters 2022). Common AI-based techniques include those
based on probability (e.g., Bayesian approaches, hidden Markov models (HMM)),
classification and statistical learning (e.g., support vector machines (SVM)),
and artificial neural networks (ANNs) (e.g., self-organising maps (SOMs), CNNs,
RNNs, deep learning (DL)). The aim here is to provide an overview of some of
the more common AI-based tempo estimation algorithms and to shine a light on
notable benefits and potential drawbacks of each. Limitations of AI in this
field in general are also considered, as is the capacity for such methods to
account for idiosyncrasies inherent in tempo perception, i.e., how well
AI-based approaches are able to think and act like humans.
