  In this article, we investigate collections of `well-spread-out' projective
(and linear) subspaces. Projective $k$-subspaces in $\mathsf{PG}(d,\mathbb{F})$
are in `higgledy-piggledy arrangement' if they meet each projective subspace of
co-dimension $k$ in a generator set of points. We prove that the set
$\mathcal{H}$ of higgledy-piggledy $k$-subspaces has to contain more than
$\min{|\mathbb{F}|,\sum_{i=0}^k\lfloor\frac{d-k+i}{i+1}\rfloor}$ elements. We
also prove that $\mathcal{H}$ has to contain more than $(k+1)\cdot(d-k)$
elements if the field $\mathbb{F}$ is algebraically closed.
  An $r$-uniform weak $(s,A)$ subspace design is a set of linear subspaces
$H_1,..,H_N\le\mathbb{F}^m$ each of rank $r$ such that each linear subspace
$W\le\mathbb{F}^m$ of rank $s$ meets at most $A$ among them. This subspace
design is an $r$-uniform strong $(s,A)$ subspace design if
$\sum_{i=1}^N\mathrm{rank}(H_i\cap W)\le A$ for $\forall W\le\mathbb{F}^m$ of
rank $s$. We prove that if $m=r+s$ then the dual ($\{H_1^\bot,...,H_N^\bot\}$)
of an $r$-uniform weak (strong) subspace design of parameter $(s,A)$ is an
$s$-uniform weak (strong) subspace design of parameter $(r,A)$. We show the
connection between uniform weak subspace designs and higgledy-piggledy
subspaces proving that
$A\ge\min{|\mathbb{F}|,\sum_{i=0}^{r-1}\lfloor\frac{s+i}{i+1}\rfloor}$ for
$r$-uniform weak or strong $(s,A)$ subspace designs in $\mathbb{F}^{r+s}$.
  We show that the $r$-uniform strong $(s,r\cdot s+\binom{r}{2})$ subspace
design constructed by Guruswami and Kopprty (based on multiplicity codes) has
parameter $A=r\cdot s$ if we consider it as a weak subspace design. We give
some similar constructions of weak and strong subspace designs (and
higgledy-piggledy subspaces) and prove that the lower bound $(k+1)\cdot(d-k)+1$
over algebraically closed field is tight.
