  Objective testing is a key issue in the process of revision and improvement
of seismic hazard assessments. Therefore we continue the rigorous comparative
analysis of past and newly available hazard maps for the territory of Italy
against the seismic activity observed in reality. The final Global Seismic
Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP) results and the most recent version of
Seismic Hazard Harmonization in Europe (SHARE) project maps, along with the
reference hazard maps for the Italian seismic code, all obtained by
probabilistic seismic hazard assessment (PSHA), are cross-compared to the three
ground shaking maps based on the duly physically and mathematically rooted
neo-deterministic approach (NDSHA). These eight hazard maps for Italy are
tested against the available data on ground shaking. The results of comparison
between predicted macroseismic intensities and those reported for past
earthquakes (in the time interval from 1000 to 2014 year) show that models
provide rather conservative estimates, which tend to over-estimate seismic
hazard at the ground shaking levels below the MCS intensity IX. Only exception
is represented by the neo-deterministic maps associated with a fixed return
period of 475 or 2475 years, which provide a better fit to observations, at the
cost of model consistent 10% or 2% cases of exceedance respectively. In terms
of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness of fit criterion, although all of the eight
hazard maps differ significantly from the distribution of the observed ground
shaking reported in the available Italian databases, the NDSHA approach appears
to outscore significantly the PSHA one.
