  Synthetic biology sets out to implement new functions in cells, and to
develop a deeper understanding of biological design principles. In 2000,
Elowitz and Leibler showed that by rational design of the reaction network, and
using existing biological components, they could create a network that exhibits
periodic gene expression, dubbed the repressilator (Elowitz and Leibler,
Nature, 2000). More recently, Stricker et al. presented another synthetic
oscillator, called the dual-feedback oscillator (Stricker et al., 2008), which
is more stable. How the stability of these oscillators is affected by the
intrinsic noise of the interactions between the components and the stochastic
expression of their genes, has been studied in considerable detail. However, as
all biological oscillators reside in growing and dividing cells, an important
question is how these oscillators are perturbed by the cell cycle. In previous
work we showed that the periodic doubling of the gene copy numbers due to DNA
replication can couple not only natural, circadian oscillators to the cell
cycle (Paijmans et al., PNAS, \textbf{113}, 4063, (2016)), but also these
synthetic oscillators. Here we expand this study. We find that the strength of
the locking between oscillators depends not only on the positions of the genes
on the chromosome, but also on the noise in the timing of gene replication:
noise tends to weaken the coupling. Yet, even in the limit of high levels of
noise in the replication times of the genes, both synthetic oscillators show
clear signatures of locking to the cell cycle. This work enhances our
understanding of the design of robust biological oscillators inside growing and
diving cells.
