  The evolution of acoustic waves can be evaluated in two ways: either as a
temporal, or a spatial propagation. Propagating in space provides the
considerable advantage of being able to handle dispersion and propagation
across interfaces with remarkable efficiency; but propagating in time is more
physical and gives correctly behaved reflections and scattering without effort.
Which should be chosen in a given situation, and what compromises might have to
be made? Here the natural behaviors of each choice of propagation are compared
and contrasted for an ordinary second order wave equation, the time-dependent
diffusion wave equation, an elastic rod wave equation, and the Stokes'/ van
Wijngaarden's equations, each case illuminating a characteristic feature of the
technique. Either choice of propagation axis enables a partitioning the wave
equation that gives rise to a directional factorization based on a natural
"reference" dispersion relation. The resulting exact coupled bidirectional
equations then reduce to a single unidirectional first-order wave equation
using a simple "slow evolution" assumption that minimizes effect of subsequent
approximations, while allowing a direct term-to-term comparison between exact
and approximate theories.
