  Original balance theory (Heider 1944) predicts human relations based on
perceptions and attitudes between a pair of individuals (P - O) towards an
inanimate object X. Social network extensions of his theory have replaced this
X with a third individual. This has led to a plethora of adaptations that have
often been inconsistent with Heider and with each other. We present a general
model and formal notation for these social network extensions that permit
social scientists to be more explicit about their balance theoretic statements.
Specifically, we formulate statements as a comparison of two conditional
probabilities of a tie, where the conditionals are defined by the 2-path
relation Ego - X - Alter. Given the importance Heider assigns to the role of
negative associations, we further identify negative ties as separate from
non-ties (neutral or zero-valued ties) and consider a signed graph to be a
restricted multigraph composed of three mutually exclusive and exhaustive
relations: positive ties, negative ties, and zero-ties. We stress that
neutrality is the result of a triadic process. Combining these two features
into our theoretical frame results in 27 identifiable configurations. Drawing
on the work on Transitivity Correlation models, we propose a set of simple
descriptive statistics to measure the extent to which evidence for any
stipulated balance configuration is present in a network. Finally, we
demonstrate how to apply this approach to assess network-level balance in a
large data set consisting of friendly vs hostile relations between countries
from 1816 to 2007. We find strong evidence particularly for one of the four
classic Heiderian balance theory predictions, and virtually no evidence in
support of the imbalance predictions. However, we do find stable and surprising
evidence that `neutral' ties are important in balancing the relations among
nations.
