  Several factors affect the structure of communities, including biological,
physical and chemical phenomena, impacting the quantification of biodiversity,
measured by diversity indexes such as Shannon's entropy. Then, once a point
estimate is obtained, confidence intervals methods such as the bootstrap ones
are often used. These methods, however, can have different performances, which
many authors have revealed in the last decade. Furthermore, problems such as
the asymmetry of the distribution of estimates and the possibility of Shannon's
diversity index estimator bias can lead to incorrect recommendations to the
research community. Thus, we propose two methods and compare them with seven
others using their performances to face these problems. The first idea uses the
credible interval (CI) method to build a bootstrap confidence interval. The
second one starts by correcting the bias and then uses an asymptotic approach.
We considered 27 community structures representing scenarios with high
dominance, high codominance or moderate dominance, the number of species equal
to 4, 20 or 80 and 10, 50 or 500 individuals to compare their performances.
Then, we generated 1000 samples, built 95% confidence intervals, and calculated
the percentage of times they included the community diversity index (coverage
percentage) for each community structure. Our results showed the feasibility of
both proposed methods to estimate Shannon's diversity. The simulation study
revealed the bootstrap-t technique had the best performance, i.e., best
coverage percentage, compared with the other methods. Finally, we illustrate
the methodology by applying it to an original aphid and parasitoid species
dataset. We recommend the bootstrap-t when the community structure analysed is
similar to the simulated ones. Also, the methods provided high performance for
the high dominance scenarios.
