  External shocks embody an unexpected and disruptive impact on the regular
life of people. This was the case during the COVID-19 outbreak that rapidly led
to changes in the typical mobility patterns in urban areas. In response, people
reorganised their daily errands throughout space. However, these changes might
not have been the same across socioeconomic classes leading to possibile
additional detrimental effects on inequality due to the pandemic. In this paper
we study the reorganisation of mobility segregation networks due to external
shocks and show that the diversity of visited places in terms of locations and
socioeconomic status is affected by the enforcement of mobility restriction
during pandemic. We use the case of COVID-19 as a natural experiment in several
cities to observe not only the effect of external shocks but also its mid-term
consequences and residual effects. We build on anonymised and privacy-preserved
mobility data in four cities: Bogota, Jakarta, London, and New York. We couple
mobility data with socioeconomic information to capture inequalities in
mobility among different socioeconomic groups and see how it changes
dynamically before, during, and after different lockdown periods. We find that
the first lockdowns induced considerable increases in mobility segregation in
each city, while loosening mobility restrictions did not necessarily diminished
isolation between different socioeconomic groups, as mobility mixing has not
recovered fully to its pre-pandemic level even weeks after the interruption of
interventions. Our results suggest that a one fits-all policy does not equally
affect the way people adjust their mobility, which calls for socioeconomically
informed intervention policies in the future.
