  Halo model interpretations of the luminosity dependence of galaxy clustering
assume that there is a central galaxy in every sufficiently massive halo, and
that this central galaxy is very different from all the others in the halo. The
halo model decomposition makes the remarkable prediction that the mean
luminosity of the non-central galaxies in a halo should be almost independent
of halo mass: the predicted increase is about 20% while the halo mass increases
by a factor of more than 20. In contrast, the luminosity of the central object
is predicted to increase approximately linearly with halo mass at low to
intermediate masses, and logarithmically at high masses. We show that this
weak, almost non-existent mass-dependence of the satellites is in excellent
agreement with the satellite population in group catalogs constructed by two
different collaborations. This is remarkable, because the halo model prediction
was made without ever identifying groups and clusters. The halo model also
predicts that the number of satellites in a halo is drawn from a Poisson
distribution with mean which depends on halo mass. This, combined with the weak
dependence of satellite luminosity on halo mass, suggests that the Scott
effect, such that the luminosities of very bright galaxies are merely the
statistically extreme values of a general luminosity distribution, may better
apply to the most luminous satellite galaxy in a halo than to BCGs. If galaxies
are identified with halo substructure at the present time, then central
galaxies should be about 4 times more massive than satellite galaxies of the
same luminosity, whereas the differences between the stellar M/L ratios should
be smaller. Therefore, a comparison of the weak lensing signal from central and
satellite galaxies should provide useful constraints. [abridged]
