  Making online social communities 'better' is a challenging undertaking, as
online communities are extraordinarily varied in their size, topical focus, and
governance. As such, what is valued by one community may not be valued by
another. However, community values are challenging to measure as they are
rarely explicitly stated. In this work, we measure community values through the
first large-scale survey of community values, including 2,769 reddit users in
2,151 unique subreddits. Through a combination of survey responses and a
quantitative analysis of public reddit data, we characterize how these values
vary within and across communities. Amongst other findings, we show that
community members disagree about how safe their communities are, that
longstanding communities place 30.1% more importance on trustworthiness than
newer communities, and that community moderators want their communities to be
56.7% less democratic than non-moderator community members. These findings have
important implications, including suggesting that care must be taken to protect
vulnerable community members, and that participatory governance strategies may
be difficult to implement. Accurate and scalable modeling of community values
enables research and governance which is tuned to each community's different
values. To this end, we demonstrate that a small number of automatically
quantifiable features capture a significant yet limited amount of the variation
in values between communities with a ROC AUC of 0.667 on a binary
classification task. However, substantial variation remains, and modeling
community values remains an important topic for future work. We make our models
and data public to inform community design and governance.
