  In December 2019, the first patients in Wuhan, China were diagnosed with a
primary atypical pneumonia, which showed to be unknown and contagious. Since
then, known as COVID-19 disease, the responsible viral pathogen, SARS-CoV-2,
has spread around the world in a pandemic. Decisions on how to deal with the
crisis are often based on simulations of the pandemic spread of the virus. The
results of some of these, as well as their methodology and possibilities for
improvement, will be described in more detail in this paper in order to inform
beyond the current public health dogma called "flatten-the-curve". There are
several ways to model an epidemic in order to simulate the spread of diseases.
Depending on the timeliness, scope and quality of the associated real data,
these multivariable models differ in the value of used parameters, but also in
the selection of considered influencing factors. It was exemplarily shown that
epidemics in their course are simulated more realistically by models that
assume subexponential growth. Furthermore, various simulations of the COVID-19
pandemic were presented in an European perspective, compared against each other
and discussed in more detail. It is difficult to estimate how credible the
simulations of the pandemic models currently are, so it remains to be seen
whether the spread of the pandemic can be effectively reduced by the measures
taken. Whether a model works well in reality is largely determined by the
quality and scope of its underlying data. Past studies have shown that
countermeasures are able to reduce reproduction numbers or transmission rates
in epidemics. In addition to that, the presented modelling study provides a
good framework for the creation of subexponential-growth-models for assessing
the spread of COVID-19.
