  Investigating interference or spillover effects among units is a central task
in many social science problems. Network experiments are powerful tools for
this task, which avoids endogeneity by randomly assigning treatments to units
over networks. However, it is non-trivial to analyze network experiments
properly without imposing strong modeling assumptions. Previously, many
researchers have proposed sophisticated point estimators and standard errors
for causal effects under network experiments. We further show that
regression-based point estimators and standard errors can have strong
theoretical guarantees if the regression functions and robust standard errors
are carefully specified to accommodate the interference patterns under network
experiments. We first recall a well-known result that the Hajek estimator is
numerically identical to the coefficient from the weighted-least-squares fit
based on the inverse probability of the exposure mapping. Moreover, we
demonstrate that the regression-based approach offers three notable advantages:
its ease of implementation, the ability to derive standard errors through the
same weighted-least-squares fit, and the capacity to integrate covariates into
the analysis, thereby enhancing estimation efficiency. Furthermore, we analyze
the asymptotic bias of the regression-based network-robust standard errors.
Recognizing that the covariance estimator can be anti-conservative, we propose
an adjusted covariance estimator to improve the empirical coverage rates.
Although we focus on regression-based point estimators and standard errors, our
theory holds under the design-based framework, which assumes that the
randomness comes solely from the design of network experiments and allows for
arbitrary misspecification of the regression models.
