  Clustering is one of the main tasks in exploratory data analysis and
descriptive statistics where the main objective is partitioning observations in
groups. Clustering has a broad range of application in varied domains like
climate, business, information retrieval, biology, psychology, to name a few. A
variety of methods and algorithms have been developed for clustering tasks in
the last few decades. We observe that most of these algorithms define a cluster
in terms of value of the attributes, density, distance etc. However these
definitions fail to attach a clear meaning/semantics to the generated clusters.
We argue that clusters having understandable and distinct semantics defined in
terms of quartiles/halves are more appealing to business analysts than the
clusters defined by data boundaries or prototypes. On the samepremise, we
propose our new algorithm named as quartile clustering technique. Through a
series of experiments we establish efficacy of this algorithm. We demonstrate
that the quartile clustering technique adds clear meaning to each of the
clusters compared to K-means. We use DB Index to measure goodness of the
clusters and show our method is comparable to EM (Expectation Maximization),
PAM (Partition around Medoid) and K Means. We have explored its capability in
detecting outlier and the benefit of added semantics. We discuss some of the
limitations in its present form and also provide a rough direction in
addressing the issue of merging the generated clusters.
