  It is well-known that the Lebesgue integral generalises the Riemann integral.
However, as is also well-known but less frequently well-explained, this
generalisation alone is not the reason why the Lebesgue integral is important
and needs to be a part of the arsenal of any mathematician, pure or applied.
Those who understand the correct reasons for the importance of the Lebesgue
integral realise there are at least two crucial differences between the Riemann
and Lebesgue theories. One is the difference between the Dominated Convergence
Theorem in the two theories, and another is the completeness of the normed
vector spaces of integrable functions. Here topological interpretations are
provided for the differences in the Dominated Convergence Theorems, and
explicit counterexamples are given which illustrate the deficiencies of the
Riemann integral. Also illustrated are the deleterious consequences of the
defects in the Riemann integral on Fourier transform theory if one restricts to
Riemann integrable functions.
