  We study the relative importance of two key control measures for epidemic
spreading: endogenous social self-distancing and exogenous imposed quarantine.
We use the framework of adaptive networks, moment-closure, and ordinary
differential equations (ODEs) to introduce several novel models based upon
susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) dynamics. First, we compare
computationally expensive, adaptive network simulations with their
corresponding computationally highly efficient ODE equivalents and find
excellent agreement. Second, we discover that there exists a relatively simple
critical curve in parameter space for the epidemic threshold, which strongly
suggests that there is a mutual compensation effect between the two mitigation
strategies: as long as social distancing and quarantine measures are both
sufficiently strong, large outbreaks are prevented. Third, we study the total
number of infected and the maximum peak during large outbreaks using a
combination of analytical estimates and numerical simulations. Also for large
outbreaks we find a similar compensation effect as for the epidemic threshold.
This suggests that if there is little incentive for social distancing within a
population, drastic quarantining is required, and vice versa. Both pure
scenarios are unrealistic in practice. Our models show that only a combination
of measures is likely to succeed to control epidemic spreading. Fourth, we
analytically compute an upper bound for the total number of infected on
adaptive networks, using integral estimates in combination with the
moment-closure approximation on the level of an observable. This is a
methodological innovation. Our method allows us to elegantly and quickly check
and cross-validate various conjectures about the relevance of different network
control measures.
