  We exploit a city-level panel comprised of individual house price estimates
to estimate the impact of COVID-19 on both small and big real-estate markets in
California USA. Descriptive analysis of spot house price estimates, including
contemporaneous price uncertainty and 30-day price change for individual
properties listed on the online real-estate platform Zillow.com, together
facilitate quantifying both the excess valuation and valuation confidence
attributable to this global socio-economic shock. Our quasi-experimental
pre-/post-COVID-19 design spans several years around 2020 and leverages
contemporaneous price estimates of rental properties - i.e., real estate
entering the habitation market, just not for purchase (off-market) and hence
free of speculation - as an appropriate counterfactual to properties listed for
sale, which are subject to on-market speculation. Combining unit-level matching
and multivariate difference-in-difference regression approaches, we obtain
consistent estimates regarding the sign and magnitude of excess price growth
observed after the pandemic onset. Specifically, our results indicate that
properties listed for sale appreciated an additional 1% per month above what
would be expected in the absence of the pandemic. This corresponds to an excess
annual price growth of roughly 12.7 percentage points, which accounts for more
than half of the actual annual price growth in 2021 observed across the studied
regions. Simultaneously, uncertainty in price estimates decreased, signaling
the irrational confidence characteristic of prior asset bubbles. We explore how
these two trends are related to market size, local market supply and borrowing
costs, which altogether lend support for the counterintuitive roles of
uncertainty and interruptions in decision-making.
