  In Part I of this paper [Haward et al. submitted (2023)], we presented a new
three-dimensional microfluidic device (the optimized uniaxial and biaxial
extensional rheometer, OUBER) for generating near-homogeneous uniaxial and
biaxial elongational flows. In this Part II of the paper, we employ the OUBER
device to examine the uniaxial and biaxial extensional rheology of some model
dilute polymer solutions. We also compare the results with measurements made
under planar extension in the optimized-shape cross-slot extensional rheometer
[or OSCER, Haward et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. (2012)]. In each case (uniaxial,
planar and biaxial extension), we use micro-particle image velocimetry to
measure the extension rate as a function of the imposed flow rate, and we
measure the excess pressure drop across each device in order to estimate the
tensile stress difference generated in the fluid. We present a new analysis,
based on solving the macroscopic power balance for flow through each device, to
refine the estimate of the tensile stress difference obtained from the measured
pressure drop. Based on this analysis, we find that for our most dilute polymer
sample, which is "ultradilute", the extensional viscosity is well described by
the finitely extensible non-linear elastic dumbbell model. In this limit, the
biaxial extensional viscosity at high Weissenberg numbers (Wi) is half that of
the uniaxial and planar extensional viscosities. At higher polymer
concentrations, the experimental measurements deviate from the model
predictions, which is attributed to the onset of intermolecular interactions as
polymers unravel in the extensional flows. Of practical significance (and
fundamental interest), elastic instability occurs at a significantly lower Wi
in uniaxial extensional flow than in either biaxial or planar extensional flow,
limiting the utility of this flow type for extensional viscosity measurement.
