  This work compares concept models for cross-language retrieval: First, we
adapt probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis (pLSA) for multilingual documents.
Experiments with different weighting schemes show that a weighting method
favoring documents of similar length in both language sides gives best results.
Considering that both monolingual and multilingual Latent Dirichlet Allocation
(LDA) behave alike when applied for such documents, we use a training corpus
built on Wikipedia where all documents are length-normalized and obtain
improvements over previously reported scores for LDA. Another focus of our work
is on model combination. For this end we include Explicit Semantic Analysis
(ESA) in the experiments. We observe that ESA is not competitive with LDA in a
query based retrieval task on CLEF 2000 data. The combination of machine
translation with concept models increased performance by 21.1% map in
comparison to machine translation alone. Machine translation relies on parallel
corpora, which may not be available for many language pairs. We further explore
how much cross-lingual information can be carried over by a specific
information source in Wikipedia, namely linked text. The best results are
obtained using a language modeling approach, entirely without information from
parallel corpora. The need for smoothing raises interesting questions on
soundness and efficiency. Link models capture only a certain kind of
information and suggest weighting schemes to emphasize particular words. For a
combined model, another interesting question is therefore how to integrate
different weighting schemes. Using a very simple combination scheme, we obtain
results that compare favorably to previously reported results on the CLEF 2000
dataset.
