  The impact of outliers and anomalies on model estimation and data processing
is of paramount importance, as evidenced by the extensive body of research
spanning various fields over several decades: thousands of research papers have
been published on the subject. As a consequence, numerous reviews, surveys, and
textbooks have sought to summarize the existing literature, encompassing a wide
range of methods from both the statistical and data mining communities. While
these endeavors to organize and summarize the research are invaluable, they
face inherent challenges due to the pervasive nature of outliers and anomalies
in all data-intensive applications, irrespective of the specific application
field or scientific discipline. As a result, the resulting collection of papers
remains voluminous and somewhat heterogeneous. To address the need for
knowledge organization in this domain, this paper implements the first
systematic meta-survey of general surveys and reviews on outlier and anomaly
detection. Employing a classical systematic survey approach, the study collects
nearly 500 papers using two specialized scientific search engines. From this
comprehensive collection, a subset of 56 papers that claim to be general
surveys on outlier detection is selected using a snowball search technique to
enhance field coverage. A meticulous quality assessment phase further refines
the selection to a subset of 25 high-quality general surveys. Using this
curated collection, the paper investigates the evolution of the outlier
detection field over a 20-year period, revealing emerging themes and methods.
Furthermore, an analysis of the surveys sheds light on the survey writing
practices adopted by scholars from different communities who have contributed
to this field. Finally, the paper delves into several topics where consensus
has emerged from the literature. These include taxonomies of outlier types,
challenges posed by high-dimensional data, the importance of anomaly scores,
the impact of learning conditions, difficulties in benchmarking, and the
significance of neural networks. Non-consensual aspects are also discussed,
particularly the distinction between local and global outliers and the
challenges in organizing detection methods into meaningful taxonomies.
