  Purpose: Microscopic fractional anisotropy ({\mu}FA) can disentangle
microstructural information from orientation dispersion. While double diffusion
encoding (DDE) MRI methods are widely used to extract accurate {\mu}FA, it has
only recently been proposed that powder-averaged single diffusion encoding
(SDE) signals, when coupled with the diffusion standard model (SM) and a set of
constraints, could be used for {\mu}FA estimation. This study aims to evaluate
{\mu}FA as derived from the spherical mean technique (SMT) set of constraints,
as well as more generally for powder-averaged SM signals. Methods: SDE
experiments were performed at 16.4 T on an ex vivo mouse brain
({\Delta}/{\delta} = 12/1.5 ms). The {\mu}FA maps obtained from powder-averaged
SDE signals were then compared to maps obtained from DDE-MRI experiments
({\Delta}/{\tau}/{\delta} = 12/12/1.5 ms), which allow a model-free estimation
of {\mu}FA. Theory and simulations that consider different types of
heterogeneity are presented for corroborating the experimental findings.
Results: {\mu}FA, as well as other estimates derived from powder-averaged SDE
signals produced large deviations from the ground truth in both gray and white
matter. Simulations revealed that these misestimations are likely a consequence
of factors not considered by the underlying microstructural models (such as
intercomponent and intracompartmental kurtosis). Conclusion: Powder-averaged
SMT and (2-component) SM are unable to accurately report {\mu}FA and other
microstructural parameters in ex vivo tissues. Improper model assumptions and
constraints can significantly compromise parameter specificity. Further
developments and validations are required prior to implementation of these
models in clinical or preclinical research.
