  Machine Learning (ML) methods have demonstrated exceptional performance in
recent years when applied to the task of seismic event detection. With numerous
ML techniques now available for detecting seismicity, applying these methods in
practice can help further highlight their advantages over more traditional
approaches. Constructing such workflows also enables benchmarking comparisons
of the latest algorithms on practical data. We combine the latest methods in
seismic event detection to analyse an 18-day period of aftershock seismicity
for the $M_{w}$ 6.4 2019 Durr\"es earthquake in Albania. We test two phase
association-based event detection methods, the EarthQuake Transformer (EQT;
Mousavi et al., 2020) end-to-end seismic detection workflow, and the PhaseNet
(Zhu & Beroza, 2019) picker with the Hyperbolic Event eXtractor (Woollam et
al., 2020) associator. Both ML approaches are benchmarked against a data set
compiled by two independently operating seismic experts who processed a subset
of events of this 18-day period. In total, PhaseNet & HEX identifies 3,551
events, and EQT detects 1,110 events with the larger catalog (PhaseNet & HEX)
achieving a magnitude of completeness of ~1. By relocating the derived catalogs
with the same minimum 1D velocity model, we calculate statistics on the
resulting hypocentral locations and phase picks. We find that the ML-methods
yield results consistent with manual pickers, with bias that is no larger than
that between different pickers. The achieved fit after relocation is comparable
to that of the manual picks but the increased number of picks per event for the
ML pickers, especially PhaseNet, yields smaller hypocentral errors. The number
of associated events per hour increases for seismically quiet times of the day,
and the smallest magnitude events are detected throughout these periods, which
we interpret to be indicative of true event associations.
