  Information Elicitation Without Verification (IEWV) refers to the problem of
eliciting high-accuracy solutions from crowd members when the ground truth is
unverifiable. A high-accuracy team solution (aggregated from members'
solutions) requires members' effort exertion, which should be incentivized
properly. Previous research on IEWV mainly focused on scenarios where a central
entity (e.g., the crowdsourcing platform) provides incentives to motivate crowd
members. Still, the proposed designs do not apply to practical situations where
no central entity exists. This paper studies the overlooked decentralized IEWV
scenario, where crowd members act as both incentive contributors and task
solvers. We model the interactions among members with heterogeneous team
solution accuracy valuations as a two-stage game, where each member decides her
incentive contribution strategy in Stage 1 and her effort exertion strategy in
Stage 2. We analyze members' equilibrium behaviors under three incentive
allocation mechanisms: Equal Allocation (EA), Output Agreement (OA), and
Shapley Value (SV). We show that at an equilibrium under any allocation
mechanism, a low-valuation member exerts no more effort than a high-valuation
member. Counter-intuitively, a low-valuation member provides incentives to the
collaboration while a high-valuation member does not at an equilibrium under
SV. This is because a high-valuation member who values the aggregated team
solution more needs fewer incentives to exert effort. In addition, when
members' valuations are sufficiently heterogeneous, SV leads to team solution
accuracy and social welfare no smaller than EA and OA.
