  For Open Source Software (OSS) projects, discussions in Issue Tracking
Systems (ITS) serve as a crucial collaboration mechanism for diverse
stakeholders. However, these discussions can become lengthy and entangled,
making it hard to find relevant information and make further contributions. In
this work, we study the use of summarization to aid users in collaboratively
making sense of OSS issue discussion threads. We reveal a complex picture of
how summarization is used by issue users in practice as a strategy to help
develop and manage their discussions. Grounded on the different objectives
served by the summaries and the outcome of our formative study with OSS
stakeholders, we identified a set of guidelines to inform the design of
collaborative summarization tools for OSS issue discussions. We then developed
SUMMIT, a tool that allows issue users to collectively construct summaries of
different types of information discussed, as well as a set of comments
representing continuous conversations within the thread. To alleviate the
manual effort involved, SUMMIT uses techniques that automatically detect
information types and summarize texts to facilitate the generation of these
summaries. A lab user study indicates that, as the users of SUMMIT, OSS
stakeholders adopted different strategies to acquire information on issue
threads. Furthermore, different features of SUMMIT effectively lowered the
perceived difficulty of locating information from issue threads and enabled the
users to prioritize their effort. Overall, our findings demonstrated the
potential of SUMMIT, and the corresponding design guidelines, in supporting
users to acquire information from lengthy discussions in ITSs. Our work sheds
light on key design considerations and features when exploring crowd-based and
machine-learning-enabled instruments for asynchronous collaboration on complex
tasks such as OSS development.
