  Due to the recent coronavirus outbreak, many efforts and innovative solutions
have surfaced to deal with the possible shortage of ventilators upon
catastrophic surges of patients. One solution involves splitting one ventilator
to treat multiple patients and is in principle easy to implement, but there are
obvious risks, and little is known on how the technique would work on patients
with ARDS from Covid-19. Previous studies have shown that multiple test lungs
of equal characteristics can be successfully ventilated from one machine, but
that large variations in tidal volume delivery occurs when lungs with different
compliance are connected. In contribution to the discussion of the feasibility
of the technique, a technical assessment was done including experiments
expanding on the previous studies using two types of test lungs, different
ventilator settings and test lung characteristics. Using two test lungs
connected to a ventilator, the tidal volumes and pressures into both lungs were
measured for different combinations of lung compliance, airway resistances,
modes of ventilation, inspiratory and end-expiratory pressure levels. We found
discrepancies in delivered tidal volumes for paired test lungs proportional
with compliance differences, little influence from differences in airway
resistances, and that changes in compliance of only one test lung would also
change the tidal volume delivered to the other test lung when in volume
controlled mode. For one of the test lung types, we also found that higher PEEP
settings could strongly influence the tidal volume balance between the test
lungs. From this study and from a technical point of view, we were not able to
identify reliable settings, adjustments or any simple measures to overcome the
hazards of this simple technique, and a more advanced solution is indicated for
mitigating risks.
