  Understanding species-habitat associations is fundamental to ecological
sciences and for species conservation. Consequently, various statistical
approaches have been designed to infer species-habitat associations. Due to
their conceptual and mathematical differences, these methods can yield
contrasting results. In this paper, we describe and compare commonly used
statistical models that relate animal movement data to environmental data.
Specifically, we examined selection functions which include resource selection
function (RSF) and step-selection function (SSF), as well as hidden Markov
models (HMMs) and related methods such as state-space models. We demonstrate
differences in assumptions of each method while highlighting advantages and
limitations. Additionally, we provide guidance on selecting the most
appropriate statistical method based on research objectives and intended
inference. To demonstrate the varying ecological insights derived from each
statistical model, we apply them to the movement track of a single ringed seal
in a case study. For example, the RSF indicated selection of areas with high
prey diversity, whereas the SSFs indicated no discernable relationship with
prey diversity. Furthermore, the HMM reveals variable associations with prey
diversity across different behaviors. Notably, the three models identified
different important areas. This case study highlights the critical significance
of selecting the appropriate model to identify species-habitat relationships
and specific areas of importance. Our comprehensive review provides the
foundational information required for making informed decisions when choosing
the most suitable statistical methods to address specific questions, such as
identifying expansive corridors or protected zones, understanding movement
patterns, or studying behaviours.
