  We investigate the design of mechanisms to incentivize high quality in
crowdsourcing environments with strategic agents, when entry is an endogenous,
strategic choice. Modeling endogenous entry in crowdsourcing is important
because there is a nonzero cost to making a contribution of any quality which
can be avoided by not participating, and indeed many sites based on
crowdsourced content do not have adequate participation. We use a mechanism
with monotone, rank-based, rewards in a model where agents strategically make
participation and quality choices to capture a wide variety of crowdsourcing
environments, ranging from conventional crowdsourcing contests to crowdsourced
content as in online Q&A forums.
  We first explicitly construct the unique mixed-strategy equilibrium for such
monotone rank-order mechanisms, and use these participation probabilities and
quality distribution to address the design of incentives for two kinds of
rewards that arise in crowdsourcing. We first show that for attention rewards
as in crowdsourced content, the entire equilibrium distribution improves when
the rewards for every rank but the last are as high as possible. In particular,
when producing the lowest quality content has low cost, the optimal mechanism
displays all but the worst contribution. We next investigate settings where
there is a total reward that can be arbitrarily distributed amongst all
participants, as in crowdsourcing contests. Unlike with exogenous entry, here
the expected number of participants can be increased by subsidizing entry,
which could potentially improve the expected quality of the best contribution.
However, we show that free entry is dominated by taxing entry- making all
entrants pay a small fee, which is rebated to the winner along with whatever
rewards were already assigned, can improve the quality of the best contribution
over a winner-take-all contest with no taxes.
