  In a future connected vehicle environment, an optimized route and motion
planning should not only fulfill efficiency and safety constraints but also
minimize vehicle motions and oscillations, causing poor ride comfort perceived
by passengers. This work provides a framework for a large-scale and
cost-efficient evaluation to address AV's ride comfort and allow the comparison
of different comfort assessment strategies. The proposed tool also gives
insights to comfort data, allowing for the development of novel algorithms,
guidelines, or motion planning systems incorporating passenger comfort. A
vehicle-road simulation framework utilizable to assess the most common ride
comfort determination strategies based on vehicle dynamics data is presented.
The developed methodology encompasses a road surface model, a non-linear
vehicle model optimization, and Monte Carlo simulations to allow for an
accurate and cost-efficient generation of virtual chassis acceleration data.
Ride comfort is determined by applying a commonly used threshold method and an
analysis based on ISO 2631. The two methods are compared against comfort
classifications based on empirical measurements of the International Roughness
Index (IRI). A case study with three road sites in Austria demonstrates the
framework's practical application with real data and achieves high-resolution
ride comfort classifications. The results highlight that ISO 2631 comfort
estimates are most similar to IRI classifications and that the thresholding
procedure detects preventable situations but also over- or underestimates ride
comfort. Hence, the work shows the potential risk of negative ride comfort of
AVs using simple threshold values and stresses the importance of a robust
comfort evaluation method for enhancing AVs' path and motion planning with
maximal ride comfort.
