  Spatial extent is a complicating factor in mathematical biology. The
possibility that an action at point A cannot immediately affect what happens at
point B creates the opportunity for spatial nonuniformity. This nonuniformity
must change our understanding of evolutionary dynamics, as the same organism in
different places can have different expected evolutionary outcomes. Since
organism origins and fates are both determined locally, we must consider
heterogeneity explicitly to determine its effects. We use simulations of
spatially extended host--pathogen and predator--prey ecosystems to reveal the
limitations of standard mathematical treatments of spatial heterogeneity. Our
model ecosystem generates heterogeneity dynamically; an adaptive network of
hosts on which pathogens are transmitted arises as an emergent phenomenon. The
structure and dynamics of this network differ in significant ways from those of
related models studied in the adaptive-network field. We use a new technique,
organism swapping, to test the efficacy of both simple approximations and more
elaborate moment-closure methods, and a new measure to reveal the timescale
dependence of invasive-strain behavior. Our results demonstrate the failure not
only of the most straightforward ("mean field") approximation, which smooths
over heterogeneity entirely, but also of the standard correction ("pair
approximation") to the mean field treatment. In spatial contexts, invasive
pathogen varieties can prosper initially but perish in the medium term,
implying that the concepts of reproductive fitness and the Evolutionary Stable
Strategy have to be modified for such systems.
