  Termination is an important but undecidable program property, which has led
to a large body of work on static methods for conservatively predicting or
enforcing termination. One such method is the size-change termination approach
of Lee, Jones, and Ben-Amram, which operates in two phases: (1) abstract
programs into "size-change graphs," and (2) check these graphs for the
size-change property: the existence of paths that lead to infinite decreasing
sequences.
  We transpose these two phases with an operational semantics that accounts for
the run-time enforcement of the size-change property, postponing (or entirely
avoiding) program abstraction. This choice has two key consequences: (1)
size-change termination can be checked at run-time and (2) termination can be
rephrased as a safety property analyzed using existing methods for systematic
abstraction.
  We formulate run-time size-change checks as contracts in the style of Findler
and Felleisen. The result compliments existing contracts that enforce partial
correctness specifications to obtain contracts for total correctness. Our
approach combines the robustness of the size-change principle for termination
with the precise information available at run-time. It has tunable overhead and
can check for nontermination without the conservativeness necessary in static
checking. To obtain a sound and computable termination analysis, we apply
existing abstract interpretation techniques directly to the operational
semantics, avoiding the need for custom abstractions for termination. The
resulting analyzer is competitive with with existing, purpose-built analyzers.
