  It is shown that the well-known disparity in classical electrodynamics
between the power losses calculated from the radiation reaction and that from
Larmor's formula, is succinctly understood when a proper distinction is made
between quantities expressed in terms of a "real time" and those expressed in
terms of a retarded time. It is explicitly shown that an accelerated charge,
taken to be a sphere of vanishingly small radius $r_{\rm o} $, experiences at
any time a self-force proportional to the acceleration it had at a time $r_{\rm
o} /c$ earlier, while the rate of work done on the charge is obtained by a
scalar product of the self-force with the instantaneous (present) value of its
velocity. Now if the retarded value of acceleration is expressed in terms of
the present values of acceleration, then we get the rate of work done according
to the radiation reaction equation, however if we instead express the present
value of velocity in terms of its time-retarded value, then we get back the
familiar Larmor's radiation formula. From this simple relation between the two
we show that they differ because Larmor's formula, in contrast with the
radiation reaction, is written not in terms of the real-time values of
quantities specifying the charge motion but is instead expressed in terms of
the time-retarded values. Moreover, it is explicitly shown that the difference
in the two formulas for radiative power loss exactly matches the difference in
the temporal rate of the change of energy in the self-fields between the
retarded and real times. From this it becomes obvious that the ad hoc
introduction of an acceleration-dependent energy term, usually referred to in
the prevalent literature as Schott-term, in order to make the two formulas
comply with each other, is redundant.
