  Bournez, Fraigniaud, and Koegler defined a number in [0,1] as computable by
their Large-Population Protocol (LPP) model, if the proportion of agents in a
set of marked states converges to said number over time as the population grows
to infinity. The notion, however, restricts the ordinary differential equations
(ODEs) associated with an LPP to have only finitely many equilibria. This
restriction places an intrinsic limitation on the model. As a result, a number
is computable by an LPP if and only if it is algebraic, namely, not a single
transcendental number can be computed under this notion.
  In this paper, we lift the finitary requirement on equilibria. That is, we
consider systems with a continuum of equilibria. We show that essentially all
numbers in [0,1] that are computable by bounded general-purpose analog
computers (GPACs) or chemical reaction networks (CRNs) can also be computed by
LPPs under this new definition. This implies a rich series of numbers (e.g.,
the reciprocal of Euler's constant, $\pi/4$, Euler's $\gamma$, Catalan's
constant, and Dottie number) are all computable by LPPs. Our proof is
constructive: We develop an algorithm that transfers bounded GPACs/CRNs into
LPPs. Our algorithm also fixes a gap in Bournez et al.'s construction of LPPs
designed to compute any arbitrary algebraic number in [0,1].
