  Simplicity bias is an intriguing phenomenon prevalent in various input-output
maps, characterized by a preference for simpler, more regular, or symmetric
outputs. Notably, these maps typically feature high-probability outputs with
simple patterns, whereas complex patterns are exponentially less probable. This
bias has been extensively examined and attributed to principles derived from
algorithmic information theory and algorithmic probability. In a significant
advancement, it has been demonstrated that the renowned logistic map
$x_{k+1}=\mu x_k(1-x_k)$, and other one-dimensional maps exhibit simplicity
bias when conceptualized as input-output systems. Building upon this
foundational work, our research delves into the manifestations of simplicity
bias within the random logistic map, specifically focusing on scenarios
involving additive noise. This investigation is driven by the overarching goal
of formulating a comprehensive theory for the prediction and analysis of time
series.Our primary contributions are multifaceted. We discover that simplicity
bias is observable in the random logistic map for specific ranges of $\mu$ and
noise magnitudes. Additionally, we find that this bias persists even with the
introduction of small measurement noise, though it diminishes as noise levels
increase. Our studies also revisit the phenomenon of noise-induced chaos,
particularly when $\mu=3.83$, revealing its characteristics through
complexity-probability plots. Intriguingly, we employ the logistic map to
underscore a paradoxical aspect of data analysis: more data adhering to a
consistent trend can occasionally lead to reduced confidence in extrapolation
predictions, challenging conventional wisdom.We propose that adopting a
probability-complexity perspective in analyzing dynamical systems could
significantly enrich statistical learning theories related to series
prediction.
