  While many neuroscience questions aim to understand the human brain, much
current knowledge has been gained using animal models, which replicate genetic,
structural, and connectivity aspects of the human brain. While voxel-based
analysis (VBA) of preclinical magnetic resonance images is widely-used, a
thorough examination of the statistical robustness, stability, and error rates
is hindered by high computational demands of processing large arrays, and the
many parameters involved. Thus, workflows are often based on intuition or
experience, while preclinical validation studies remain scarce. To increase
throughput and reproducibility of quantitative small animal brain studies, we
have developed a publicly shared, high throughput VBA pipeline in a
high-performance computing environment, called SAMBA. The increased
computational efficiency allowed large multidimensional arrays to be processed
in 1-3 days, a task that previously took ~1 month. To quantify the variability
and reliability of preclinical VBA in rodent models, we propose a validation
framework consisting of morphological phantoms, and four metrics. This
addresses several sources that impact VBA results, including registration and
template construction strategies. We have used this framework to inform the VBA
workflow parameters in a VBA study for a mouse model of epilepsy. We also
present initial efforts towards standardizing small animal neuroimaging data in
a similar fashion with human neuroimaging. We conclude that verifying the
accuracy of VBA merits attention, and should be the focus of a broader effort
within the community. The proposed framework promotes consistent quality
assurance of VBA in preclinical neuroimaging; facilitating the creation and
communication of robust results.
