  As the title says we want to answer the question; how and why does
statistical mechanics work? As we know from the most used prescription of Gibbs
we calculate the phase space averages of dynamical quantities and we find that
these phase averages agree very well with experiments. Clearly actual
experiments are not done on a hypothetical ensemble they are done on the actual
system in the laboratory and these experiments take a finite amount of time.
Thus it is usually argued that actual measurements are time averages and they
are equal to phase averages due to ergodicity. Aim of the present review is to
show that ergodicity is not relevant for equilibrium statistical mechanics
(with Tolman and Landau). We will see that the solution of the problem is in
the very peculiar nature of the macroscopic observables and with the very large
number of the degrees of freedom involved in macroscopic systems as first
pointed out by Khinchin. Similar arguments are used by Landau based upon the
approximate property of "Statistical Independence". We review these ideas in
detail and in some cases present a critique. We review the role of chaos
(classical and quantum) where it is important and where it is not important. We
criticise the ideas of E. T. Jaynes who says that the ergodic problem is
conceptual one and is related to the very concept of ensemble itself which is a
by-product of frequency theory of probability, and the ergodic problem becomes
irrelevant when the probabilities of various micro-states are interpreted with
Laplace-Bernoulli theory of Probability (Bayesian viewpoint). In the end we
critically review various quantum approaches (quantum-statistical typicality
approaches) to the foundations of statistical mechanics.
