  In this paper, I try to tame "Basu's elephants" (data with extreme selection
on observables). I propose new practical large-sample and finite-sample methods
for estimating and inferring heterogeneous causal effects (under
unconfoundedness) in the empirically relevant context of limited overlap. I
develop a general principle called "Stable Probability Weighting" (SPW) that
can be used as an alternative to the widely used Inverse Probability Weighting
(IPW) technique, which relies on strong overlap. I show that IPW (or its
augmented version), when valid, is a special case of the more general SPW (or
its doubly robust version), which adjusts for the extremeness of the
conditional probabilities of the treatment states. The SPW principle can be
implemented using several existing large-sample parametric, semiparametric, and
nonparametric procedures for conditional moment models. In addition, I provide
new finite-sample results that apply when unconfoundedness is plausible within
fine strata. Since IPW estimation relies on the problematic reciprocal of the
estimated propensity score, I develop a "Finite-Sample Stable Probability
Weighting" (FPW) set-estimator that is unbiased in a sense. I also propose new
finite-sample inference methods for testing a general class of weak null
hypotheses. The associated computationally convenient methods, which can be
used to construct valid confidence sets and to bound the finite-sample
confidence distribution, are of independent interest. My large-sample and
finite-sample frameworks extend to the setting of multivalued treatments.
