  Legal case retrieval plays an important role for legal practitioners to
effectively retrieve relevant cases given a query case. Most existing neural
legal case retrieval models directly encode the whole legal text of a case to
generate a case representation, which is then utilised to conduct a nearest
neighbour search for retrieval. Although these straightforward methods have
achieved improvement over conventional statistical methods in retrieval
accuracy, two significant challenges are identified in this paper: (1) Legal
feature alignment: the usage of the whole case text as the input will generally
incorporate redundant and noisy information because, from the legal
perspective, the determining factor of relevant cases is the alignment of key
legal features instead of whole text matching; (2) Legal context preservation:
furthermore, since the existing text encoding models usually have an input
length limit shorter than the case, the whole case text needs to be truncated
or divided into paragraphs, which leads to the loss of the global context of
legal information. In this paper, a novel legal case retrieval framework,
PromptCase, is proposed to tackle these challenges. Firstly, legal facts and
legal issues are identified and formally defined as the key features
facilitating legal case retrieval based on a thorough study of the definition
of relevant cases from a legal perspective. Secondly, with the determining
legal features, a prompt-based encoding scheme is designed to conduct an
effective encoding with language models. Extensive zero-shot experiments have
been conducted on two benchmark datasets in legal case retrieval, which
demonstrate the superior retrieval effectiveness of the proposed PromptCase.
The code has been released on https://github.com/yanran-tang/PromptCase.
