  Air travel has become one of the most common means of transportation. The
most common question which is generally asked is: How does an airplane gain
lift? And the most common answer is via the Bernoulli principle. It turns out
that it is wrongly applied in common explanations, and there are certain
misconceptions. In an alternative explanation the push of air from below the
wing is argued to be the lift generating force via Newton's law. There are
problems with this explanation too. In this paper we try to clear these
misconceptions, and the correct explanation, using the Lancaster-Prandtl
circulation theory, is discussed. We argue that even the Lancaster-Prandtl
theory at the zero angle of attack needs further insights. To this end, we put
forward a theory which is applicable at zero angle of attack. A new length
scale perpendicular to the lower surface of the wing is introduced and it turns
out that the ratio of this length scale to the cord length of a wing is roughly
$0.4930\pm0.09498$ for typical NACA airfoils that we analyzed. This invariance
points to something fundamental. The idea of our theory is simple. The
"squeezing" effect of the flow above the wing due to camber leads to an
effective Venturi tube formation and leads to higher velocity over the upper
surface of the wing and thereby reducing pressure according the Bernoulli
theorem and generating lift. Thus at zero angle of attack there is no need to
invoke vortex and anti-vortex pair generation. In fact vortex and anti-vortex
pair generation cannot be justified. We come up with the equation for the lift
coefficient at zero angle of attack: \[C_l = \frac{1}{c}\int_0^c dx
\left(\frac{h_c^2}{(h_c - f(x))^2}-1\right).\] Here $C_l$ is the lift
coefficient, $h_c$ is our new length scale perpendicular to the lower surface
of the wing and $f(x)$ is the functional profile of the upper surface of the
wing.
