  A decent number of lower bounds for non-elitist population-based evolutionary
algorithms has been shown by now. Most of them are technically demanding due to
the (hard to avoid) use of negative drift theorems -- general results which
translate an expected progress away from the target into a high hitting time.
  We propose a simple negative drift theorem for multiplicative drift scenarios
and show that it can simplify existing analyses. We discuss in more detail
Lehre's (PPSN 2010) \emph{negative drift in populations} method, one of the
most general tools to prove lower bounds on the runtime of non-elitist
mutation-based evolutionary algorithms for discrete search spaces. Together
with other arguments, we obtain an alternative and simpler proof, which also
strengthens and simplifies this method. In particular, now only three of the
five technical conditions of the previous result have to be verified. The lower
bounds we obtain are explicit instead of only asymptotic. This allows to
compute concrete lower bounds for concrete algorithms, but also enables us to
show that super-polynomial runtimes appear already when the reproduction rate
is only a $(1 - \omega(n^{-1/2}))$ factor below the threshold. For the special
case of algorithms using standard bit mutation with a random mutation rate
(called uniform mixing in the language of hyper-heuristics), we prove the
result stated by Dang and Lehre (PPSN 2016) and extend it to mutation rates
other than $\Theta(1/n)$, which includes the heavy-tailed mutation operator
proposed by Doerr, Le, Makhmara, and Nguyen (GECCO 2017). We finally apply our
method and a novel domination argument to show an exponential lower bound for
the runtime of the mutation-only simple genetic algorithm on \onemax for
arbitrary population size.
