  This paper presents new methods for ensuring that the energy system of a
neighborhood that is designed with the objective of being zero emission is
actually operated in a way that allows it to reach net zero emissions in its
lifetime. This paper highlights the necessity of taking into account realistic
operation strategies when designing the energy system of such neighborhoods. It
also suggests methods that can be used in the operation of ZENs to ensure
carbon neutrality. An optimization model for designing the energy system of a
Zero Emission Neighborhood (ZEN) is first presented and used to produce two
designs for a campus in the South of Norway in the case where the amount of PV
is limited (PVlim) and when it is not (Base). Several operation approaches are
then introduced to compare their operation cost and the CO2 emissions and
compensations. These approaches are perfect foresight used as a reference
(Ref.),a purely economic model predictive control (E-MPC), an MPC with
penalization if deviating from emission targets (EmE-MPC)and a receding horizon
MPC where we have a net zero emission constraint over the year (RH-MPC). The
resulting energy systems are, in the Base case, PV, heat pumps, a gas boiler
and heat storage and, in the PVlim case, a smaller amount of PV, a CHP plant,
and heat storage. In the Base case all operation strategies manage to reach net
zero emissions, largely due to the passive compensations obtained from the PV.
RH-MPC offers the lowest cost. In the PVlim case, the passive effect of the PV
is not sufficient to reach net zero emissions and an operation approach
specifically taking into account the emissions is necessary. EmE-MPC achieves
the lowest emissions but it comes at a much higher cost. We conclude that the
best overall strategy is RH-MPC which maintains both the cost and the
emission-compensation balance close to the reference case with perfect
foresight.
