  Network Creation Games are a well-known approach for explaining and analyzing
the structure, quality and dynamics of real-world networks like the Internet
and other infrastructure networks which evolved via the interaction of selfish
agents without a central authority. In these games selfish agents which
correspond to nodes in a network strategically buy incident edges to improve
their centrality. However, past research on these games has only considered the
creation of networks with unit-weight edges. In practice, e.g. when
constructing a fiber-optic network, the choice of which nodes to connect and
also the induced price for a link crucially depends on the distance between the
involved nodes and such settings can be modeled via edge-weighted graphs. We
incorporate arbitrary edge weights by generalizing the well-known model by
Fabrikant et al.[PODC'03] to edge-weighted host graphs and focus on the
geometric setting where the weights are induced by the distances in some metric
space. In stark contrast to the state-of-the-art for the unit-weight version,
where the Price of Anarchy is conjectured to be constant and where resolving
this is a major open problem, we prove a tight non-constant bound on the Price
of Anarchy for the metric version and a slightly weaker upper bound for the
non-metric case. Moreover, we analyze the existence of equilibria, the
computational hardness and the game dynamics for several natural metrics. The
model we propose can be seen as the game-theoretic analogue of a variant of the
classical Network Design Problem. Thus, low-cost equilibria of our game
correspond to decentralized and stable approximations of the optimum network
design.
