  General purpose CPUs used in high performance computing (HPC) support a
vector instruction set and an out-of-order engine dedicated to increase the
instruction level parallelism. Hence, related optimizations are currently
critical to improve the performance of applications requiring numerical
computation. Moreover, the use of a Java run-time environment such as the
HotSpot Java Virtual Machine (JVM) in high performance computing is a promising
alternative. It benefits from its programming flexibility, productivity and the
performance is ensured by the Just-In-Time (JIT) compiler. Though, the JIT
compiler suffers from two main drawbacks. First, the JIT is a black box for
developers. We have no control over the generated code nor any feedback from
its optimization phases like vectorization. Secondly, the time constraint
narrows down the degree of optimization compared to static compilers like GCC
or LLVM. So, it is compelling to use statically compiled code since it benefits
from additional optimization reducing performance bottlenecks. Java enables to
call native code from dynamic libraries through the Java Native Interface
(JNI). Nevertheless, JNI methods are not inlined and require an additional cost
to be invoked compared to Java ones. Therefore, to benefit from better static
optimization, this call overhead must be leveraged by the amount of computation
performed at each JNI invocation. In this paper we tackle this problem and we
propose to do this analysis for a set of micro-kernels. Our goal is to select
the most efficient implementation considering the amount of computation defined
by the calling context. We also investigate the impact on performance of
several different optimization schemes which are vectorization, out-of-order
optimization, data alignment, method inlining and the use of native memory for
JNI methods.
