  In this article we prove two main results. Firstly, we show that any six-line
arrangement, consisting of three pairs of mutually perpendicular lines, does
not give rise to a "very generic or sufficiently general" discriminantal
arrangement in the sense of C. A. Athanasiadis \cite{MR1720104}. We give two
proofs of the first result. The second result is as follows. The
codimension-one boundary faces of (a region) a convex cone of a very generic
discriminantal arrangement has not been characterized and is not known even
though the intersection lattice of a very generic discriminantal arrangement is
known. So secondly, we show that the number of simplex cells of the very
generic hyperplane arrangement
$\mathcal{H}^m_n=\{H_i:\underset{j=1}{\overset{m}{\sum}}a_{ij}x_j=c_i,1\leq
i\leq n\}$ may not be not precisely equal to the number of codimension-one
boundary hyperplanes of $\mathbb{R}^n$ of the convex cone $C$ containing
$(c_1,c_2,\ldots,c_n)$ in the associated very generic discriminantal
arrangement. That is, for $1\leq i_1<i_2<\ldots<i_m<i_{m+1}\leq n$, if
$\Delta^m H_{i_1}H_{i_2}\ldots H_{i_m}H_{i_{m+1}}$ is a simplex cell of the
hyperplane arrangement $\mathcal{H}^m_n$ then it need not give rise to a
codimension-one boundary hyperplane of the convex cone $C$ containing
$(c_1,c_2,\ldots,c_n)$ in the associated very generic discriminantal
arrangement. We finally mention an interesting open-ended remark before the
appendix section.
  In the appendix section we give a self contained exposition and describe
combinatorially the intersection lattice of a (Zariski open and dense) class of
"very generic or sufficiently general" discriminantal arrangements. As a
consequence, we give a geometric description of the lattice elements as sets of
concurrencies of the hyperplane arrangements which give the same "very generic
or sufficiently general" discriminantal arrangement.
