  Variation in behavior among group members often impacts collective outcomes.
Individuals may vary both in the task that they perform and in the persistence
with which they perform each task. Although both the distribution of
individuals among tasks and differences among individuals in behavioral
persistence can each impact collective behavior, we do not know if and how they
jointly affect collective outcomes. Here we use a detailed computational model
to examine the joint impact of colony-level distribution among tasks and
behavioral persistence of individuals, specifically their fidelity to
particular resource sites, on the collective tradeoff between exploring for new
resources and exploiting familiar ones. We developed an agent-based model of
foraging honey bees, parameterized by data from 5 colonies, in which we
simulated scouts, who search the environment for new resources, and individuals
who are recruited by the scouts to the newly found resources, i.e., recruits.
We found that for each value of persistence there is a different optimal ratio
of scouts to recruits that maximizes resource collection by the colony.
Furthermore, changes to the persistence of scouts induced opposite effects from
changes to the persistence of recruits on the collective foraging of the
colony. The proportion of scouts that resulted in the most resources collected
by the colony decreased as the persistence of recruits increased. However, this
optimal proportion of scouts increased as the persistence of scouts increased.
Thus, behavioral persistence and task participation can interact to impact a
colony's collective behavior in orthogonal directions. Our work provides new
insights and generates new hypotheses into how variation in behavior at both
the individual and colony levels jointly impact the trade-off between exploring
for new resources and exploiting familiar ones.
