  We investigate how the choice of decision makers can be varied under the
presence of risk and uncertainty. Our analysis is based on the approach we have
previously applied to individual decision makers, which we now generalize to
the case of decision makers that are members of a society. The approach employs
the mathematical techniques that are common in quantum theory, justifying our
naming as Quantum Decision Theory. However, we do not assume that decision
makers are quantum objects. The techniques of quantum theory are needed only
for defining the prospect probabilities taking into account such hidden
variables as behavioral biases and other subconscious feelings. The approach
describes an agent's choice as a probabilistic event occurring with a
probability that is the sum of a utility factor and of an attraction factor.
The attraction factor embodies subjective and unconscious dimensions in the
mind of the decision maker. We show that the typical aggregate amplitude of the
attraction factor is $1/4$, and it can be either positive or negative depending
on the relative attraction of the competing choices. The most efficient way of
varying the decision makers choice is realized by influencing the attraction
factor. This can be done in two ways. One method is to arrange in a special
manner the payoff weights, which induces the required changes of the values of
attraction factors. We show that a slight variation of the payoff weights can
invert the sign of the attraction factors and reverse the decision preferences,
even when the prospect utilities remain unchanged. The second method of
influencing the decision makers choice is by providing information to decision
makers. The methods of influencing decision making are illustrated by several
experiments, whose outcomes are compared quantitatively with the predictions of
our approach.
