  This work is concerned with the application of game theoretic principles to
model competition between demand response aggregators for selling excess energy
stored in electrochemical storage devices directly to other aggregators in a
power market. This market framework is presented as an alternative to the
traditional vertically integrated market structure, which may be better suited
for developing demand response and smart grid technologies, in addition to
increasing penetration of independent renewable energy generation devices.
Demand for power generated by the utility through combustion of fuel could be
replaced, lowering emission of pollutants, when the energy used to charge the
batteries is produced sustainably and traded on smaller scales. The four
variants of game are considered: both non-cooperative (unregulated competition)
and Stackelberg (regulations on transaction price and size), each with and
without DR scheduling. The Nash equilibrium is derived for each game variant in
order to serve as a bid-price decision making criteria which determines the
optimal bidding strategy for an aggregator to sell in the market. The model is
applied to a case study involving completion for selling between two
aggregators. Bidding strategy is dependent on parameters inherent to an
aggregator's energy storage hardware, and the strategy selected by each
aggregator does not vary with the variations in the game conditions considered.
Demand response scheduling offers greater payoff for aggregators who implement
it, compared with those who do not. Addition of transaction price and volume
regulations to the market do not affect the participants optimal bidding
strategies (the Nash equilibrium), but lowers payoffs for all aggregators
participating in the market relative to unregulated competition.
