  This study aims to investigate the effects of violations of the sphericity
assumption on Type I error rates for different methodical approaches of
repeated measures analysis using a simulation approach. In contrast to previous
simulation studies on this topic, up to nine measurement occasions were
considered. Therefore, two populations representing the conditions of a
violation vs. a non-violation of the sphericity assumption without any
between-group effect or within-subject effect were created and 5,000 random
samples of each population were drawn. Finally, the mean Type I error rates for
Multilevel linear models (MLM) with an unstructured covariance matrix (MLM-UN),
MLM with compound-symmetry (MLM-CS) and for repeated measures analysis of
variance (rANOVA) models (without correction, with
Greenhouse-Geisser-correction, and Huynh-Feldt-correction) were computed. To
examine the effect of both the sample size and the number of measurement
occasions, sample sizes of n = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 were considered as well
as measurement occasions of m = 3, 6 and 9. For MLM-UN, the results illustrate
a massive progressive bias for small sample sizes (n =20) and m = 6 or more
measurement occasions. This effect could not be found in previous simulation
studies with a smaller number of measurement occasions. The mean Type I error
rates for rANOVA with Greenhouse-Geisser-correction demonstrate a small
conservative bias if sphericity was not violated, sample sizes were small (n =
20), and m = 6 or more measurement occasions were conducted. The results plead
for a use of rANOVA with Huynh-Feldt-correction, especially when the sphericity
assumption is violated, the sample size is rather small and the number of
measurement occasions is large. MLM-UN may be used when the sphericity
assumption is violated and when sample sizes are large.
