  Until recently, social media were seen to promote democratic discourse on
social and political issues. However, this powerful communication ecosystem has
come under scrutiny for allowing hostile actors to exploit online discussions
in an attempt to manipulate public opinion. A case in point is the ongoing U.S.
Congress investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election
campaign, with Russia accused of, among other things, using trolls (malicious
accounts created for the purpose of manipulation) and bots (automated accounts)
to spread propaganda and politically biased information. In this study, we
explore the effects of this manipulation campaign, taking a closer look at
users who re-shared the posts produced on Twitter by the Russian troll accounts
publicly disclosed by U.S. Congress investigation. We collected a dataset of 13
million election-related posts shared on Twitter in the year of 2016 by over a
million distinct users. This dataset includes accounts associated with the
identified Russian trolls as well as users sharing posts in the same time
period on a variety of topics around the 2016 elections. We use label
propagation to infer the users' ideology based on the news sources they share.
We are able to classify a large number of users as liberal or conservative with
precision and recall above 84%. Conservative users who retweet Russian trolls
produced significantly more tweets than liberal ones, about 8 times as many in
terms of tweets. Additionally, trolls' position in the retweet network is
stable over time, unlike users who retweet them who form the core of the
election-related retweet network by the end of 2016. Using state-of-the-art bot
detection techniques, we estimate that about 5% and 11% of liberal and
conservative users are bots, respectively.
