  Most causal inference studies rely on the assumption of overlap to estimate
population or sample average causal effects. When data exhibit non-overlap,
estimation of these estimands requires reliance on model specifications, due to
poor data support. All existing methods to address non-overlap, such as
trimming or down-weighting data in regions of poor support, change the
estimand. In environmental health research, where study results are often
intended to influence policy, changes in the estimand can diminish the study's
impact, because estimates may not be representative of effects in the
population of interest to policymakers. Researchers may be willing to make
additional, minimal modeling assumptions in order to preserve the ability to
estimate population average causal effects. We seek to make two contributions
on this topic. First, we propose a flexible, data-driven definition of
propensity score overlap and non-overlap regions. Second, we develop a novel
Bayesian framework to estimate population average causal effects with minor
model dependence and appropriately large uncertainties in the presence of
non-overlap. In this approach, the tasks of estimating causal effects in the
overlap and non-overlap regions are delegated to two distinct models, suited to
the degree of data support in each region. Tree ensembles are used to
non-parametrically estimate individual causal effects in the overlap region,
where the data can speak for themselves. In the non-overlap region, where
insufficient data support means reliance on model specification is necessary,
individual causal effects are estimated by extrapolating trends from the
overlap region via a spline model. The promising performance of our method is
demonstrated in simulations. Finally, we utilize our method to perform a novel
investigation of the causal effect of natural gas compressor station exposure
on cancer outcomes.
