  Background: Systematic literature review (SLR) has been widely adopted to
synthesize evidence in a reliable and unbiased manner. The process of
conducting SLR is rigorous and well-known; however, most SLR have not followed
this process systematically, leading to various problems, including poor
documentation, lack of quality, and difficulty to be reproduced. These problems
are added to the inherent difficulties in conducting SLR, especially regarding
effort and time consumption. Several practices (including methods, techniques,
and tools) have already been experimented with to mitigate such problems.
Still, it is unclear which practices should be prioritized to reduce such
problems and difficulties. Aims: The main goal of this paper is to contribute
to improving the SLR process being adopted by the community. For that, we
introduce the idea of the Maturity Model for SLR process (MM4SLR). Method: We
systematically examined the literature searching for practices destined to
support or improve the SLR process. After collecting 84 practices, we analyzed,
grouped, and synthesized them into 46 key practices further distributed into 15
specific goals. Inspired by the maturity model for software development
process, we also propose five process areas and an initial version of MM4SLR
containing four maturity levels. Results: MM4SLR provides a new view on those
practices that could be progressively adopted to improve the SLR process.
MM4SLR could define a pragmatic pathway that guides the adoption of those
practices, which better fit the reality of who conducts SLR. Conclusion: The
SLR process is very complex and should be more investigated. We argue that ways
to better select and adopt the various existing practices are necessary. We
conclude that a long research agenda to be fulfilled addressing the SLR process
still exists.
