  The famous 2R hypothesis was first proposed by Susumu Ohno in 1970. It states
that the two whole genome duplications had shaped the genome of early
vertebrates. The most convincing evidence for 2R hypothesis comes from the 4:1
ratio chromosomal regions that have preserved both gene content and order in
vertebrates compared with closely related. However, due to the shortage of such
strict evidence, the 2R hypothesis is still under debates.
  Here, we present a combined perspective of phylogenetic and genomic homology
to revisit the hypothesis of 2R whole genome duplications. Ancestral vertebrate
genomes as well as ancient duplication events were created from 17 extant
vertebrate species. Extant descendants from the duplication events at early
vertebrates were extracted and reorganized to partial genomes. We then examined
the gene order based synteny, and projected back to phylogenetic gene trees for
examination of synteny evidence of the reconstructed early vertebrate genes. We
identified 7877 ancestral genes that were created from 3026 duplication events
at early vertebrates, and more than 50% of the duplication events show synteny
evidence. Thus, our reconstructions provide very strong evidence for the 2R
hypothesis.
  We also reconstructed the genome of early vertebrates, and built a model of
the gene gains and losses in early vertebrates. We estimated that there were
about 12,000 genes in early vertebrates before 2R, and the probability of a
random gene get lost after the first round of whole genome duplication is
around 0.45, and the probability of a random gene get lost after the second
round of whole genome duplication is around 0.55.
  This research provides convincing evidence for the 2R hypothesis, and may
provide further insights in vertebral evolution.
  Data availability: https://github.com/haimingt/Ohnologs-and-2R-WGD
