  New satellite sensors will soon make it possible to estimate field-level crop
yields, showing a great potential for agricultural index insurance. This paper
identifies an important threat to better insurance from these new technologies:
data with many fields and few years can yield downward biased estimates of
basis risk, a fundamental metric in index insurance. To demonstrate this bias,
we use state-of-the-art satellite-based data on agricultural yields in the US
and in Kenya to estimate and simulate basis risk. We find a substantive
downward bias leading to a systematic overestimation of insurance quality.
  In this paper, we argue that big data in crop insurance can lead to a new
situation where the number of variables $N$ largely exceeds the number of
observations $T$. In such a situation where $T\ll N$, conventional asymptotics
break, as evidenced by the large bias we find in simulations. We show how the
high-dimension, low-sample-size (HDLSS) asymptotics, together with the spiked
covariance model, provide a more relevant framework for the $T\ll N$ case
encountered in index insurance. More precisely, we derive the asymptotic
distribution of the relative share of the first eigenvalue of the covariance
matrix, a measure of systematic risk in index insurance. Our formula accurately
approximates the empirical bias simulated from the satellite data, and provides
a useful tool for practitioners to quantify bias in insurance quality.
