  A celebrated and controversial hypothesis conjectures that some biological
systems --parts, aspects, or groups of them-- may extract important functional
benefits from operating at the edge of instability, halfway between order and
disorder, i.e. in the vicinity of the critical point of a phase transition.
Criticality has been argued to provide biological systems with an optimal
balance between robustness against perturbations and flexibility to adapt to
changing conditions, as well as to confer on them optimal computational
capabilities, huge dynamical repertoires, unparalleled sensitivity to stimuli,
etc. Criticality, with its concomitant scale invariance, can be conjectured to
emerge in living systems as the result of adaptive and evolutionary processes
that, for reasons to be fully elucidated, select for it as a template upon
which higher layers of complexity can rest. This hypothesis is very suggestive
as it proposes that criticality could constitute a general and common
organizing strategy in biology stemming from the physics of phase transitions.
However, despite its thrilling implications, this is still in its embryonic
state as a well-founded theory and, as such, it has elicited some healthy
skepticism. From the experimental side, the advent of high-throughput
technologies has created new prospects in the exploration of biological
systems, and empirical evidence in favor of criticality has proliferated, with
examples ranging from endogenous brain activity and gene-expression patterns,
to flocks of birds and insect-colony foraging, to name but a few...
