  In order-driven markets, limit-order book (LOB) resiliency is an important
microscopic indicator of market quality when the order book is hit by a
liquidity shock and plays an essential role in the design of optimal submission
strategies of large orders. However, the evolutionary behavior of LOB
resilience around liquidity shocks is not well understood empirically. Using
order flow data sets of Chinese stocks, we quantify and compare the LOB
dynamics characterized by the bid-ask spread, the LOB depth and the order
intensity surrounding effective market orders with different aggressiveness. We
find that traders are more likely to submit effective market orders when the
spreads are relatively low, the same-side depth is high, and the opposite-side
depth is low. Such phenomenon is especially significant when the initial spread
is 1 tick. Although the resiliency patterns show obvious diversity after
different types of market orders, the spread and depth can return to the sample
average within 20 best limit updates. The price resiliency behavior is dominant
after aggressive market orders, while the price continuation behavior is
dominant after less-aggressive market orders. Moreover, the effective market
orders produce asymmetrical stimulus to limit orders when the initial spreads
equal to 1 tick. Under this case, effective buy market orders attract more buy
limit orders and effective sell market orders attract more sell limit orders.
The resiliency behavior of spread and depth is linked to limit order intensity.
