  Modeling lies at the core of both the financial and the insurance industry
for a wide variety of tasks. The rise and development of machine learning and
deep learning models have created many opportunities to improve our modeling
toolbox. Breakthroughs in these fields often come with the requirement of large
amounts of data. Such large datasets are often not publicly available in
finance and insurance, mainly due to privacy and ethics concerns. This lack of
data is currently one of the main hurdles in developing better models. One
possible option to alleviating this issue is generative modeling. Generative
models are capable of simulating fake but realistic-looking data, also referred
to as synthetic data, that can be shared more freely. Generative Adversarial
Networks (GANs) is such a model that increases our capacity to fit very
high-dimensional distributions of data. While research on GANs is an active
topic in fields like computer vision, they have found limited adoption within
the human sciences, like economics and insurance. Reason for this is that in
these fields, most questions are inherently about identification of causal
effects, while to this day neural networks, which are at the center of the GAN
framework, focus mostly on high-dimensional correlations. In this paper we
study the causal preservation capabilities of GANs and whether the produced
synthetic data can reliably be used to answer causal questions. This is done by
performing causal analyses on the synthetic data, produced by a GAN, with
increasingly more lenient assumptions. We consider the cross-sectional case,
the time series case and the case with a complete structural model. It is shown
that in the simple cross-sectional scenario where correlation equals causation
the GAN preserves causality, but that challenges arise for more advanced
analyses.
