  Modern information systems are changing the idea of "data processing" to the
idea of "concept processing", meaning that instead of processing words, such
systems process semantic concepts which carry meaning and share contexts with
other concepts. Ontology is commonly used as a structure that captures the
knowledge about a certain area via providing concepts and relations between
them. Traditionally, concept hierarchies have been built manually by knowledge
engineers or domain experts. However, the manual construction of a concept
hierarchy suffers from several limitations such as its coverage and the
enormous costs of its extension and maintenance. Ontology learning, usually
referred to the (semi-)automatic support in ontology development, is usually
divided into steps, going from concepts identification, passing through
hierarchy and non-hierarchy relations detection and, seldom, axiom extraction.
It is reasonable to say that among these steps the current frontier is in the
establishment of concept hierarchies, since this is the backbone of ontologies
and, therefore, a good concept hierarchy is already a valuable resource for
many ontology applications. The automatic construction of concept hierarchies
from texts is a complex task and much work have been proposing approaches to
better extract relations between concepts. These different proposals have never
been contrasted against each other on the same set of data and across different
languages. Such comparison is important to see whether they are complementary
or incremental. Also, we can see whether they present different tendencies
towards recall and precision. This paper evaluates these different methods on
the basis of hierarchy metrics such as density and depth, and evaluation
metrics such as Recall and Precision. Results shed light over the comprehensive
set of methods according to the literature in the area.
