  Over the last two decades, several methods have been proposed for stabilizing
the dynamics of biological populations. However, these methods have typically
been evaluated using different population dynamics models and in the context of
very different concepts of stability, which makes it difficult to compare their
relative efficiencies. Moreover, since the dynamics of populations are
dependent on the life-history of the species and its environment, it is
conceivable that the stabilizing effects of control methods would also be
affected by such factors, a complication that has typically not been
investigated. In this study we compare six different control methods with
respect to their efficiency at inducing a common level of enhancement (50%
increase) for two kinds of stability (constancy and persistence) under four
different life history/ environment combinations. Since these methods have been
analytically studied elsewhere, we focus on an intuitive understanding of
realistic simulations incorporating noise, extinction probability and lattice
effect. We show that for these six methods, even when the magnitude of
stabilization attained is the same, other aspects of the dynamics like
population size distribution can be very different. Consequently, correlated
aspects of stability, like the amount of persistence for a given degree of
constancy stability (and vice versa) or the corresponding effective population
size (a measure of resistance to genetic drift) vary widely among the methods.
Moreover, the number of organisms needed to be added or removed to attain
similar levels of stabilization also varies for these methods, a fact that has
economic implications. Finally, we compare the relative efficiency of these
methods through a composite index of various stability related measures. We
find that restocking to a constant lower threshold seems to be the optimal
method under most conditions.
