  The takeoff point for this paper is the voluminous body of literature
addressing recursive betting games with expected logarithmic growth of wealth
being the performance criterion. Whereas almost all existing papers involve use
of linear feedback, the use of nonlinear control is conspicuously absent. This
is epitomized by the large subset of this literature dealing with Kelly
Betting. With this as the high-level motivation, we study the potential for use
of nonlinear control in this framework. To this end, we consider a
``demonstration case'' which is one of the simplest scenarios encountered in
this line of research: repeated flips of a biased coin with probability of
heads~$p$, and even-money payoff on each flip. First, we formulate a new robust
nonlinear control problem which we believe is both simple to understand and
apropos for dealing with concerns about distributional robustness; i.e.,
instead of assuming that~$p$ is perfectly known as in the case of the classical
Kelly formulation, we begin with a bounding set ~${\cal P} \subseteq [0,1]$ for
this probability. Then, we provide a theorem, our main result, which gives a
closed-form description of the optimal robust nonlinear controller and a
corollary which establishes that it robustly outperforms linear controllers
such as those found in the literature. A second, less significant, contribution
of this paper bears upon the computability of our solution. For an $n$-flip
game, whereas an admissible controller has~$2^n-1$ parameters, at the optimum
only~$O(n^2)$ of them turn out to be distinct. Finally, it is noted that the
initial assumptions on payoffs and the use of the uniform distribution on~$p$
are made solely for simplicity of the exposition and compliance with length
requirements for a Letter. Accordingly, the paper also includes a new section
with a discussion indicating how these assumptions can be relaxed.
