  In the context of distributed synchronous computing, processors perform in
rounds, and the time-complexity of a distributed algorithm is classically
defined as the number of rounds before all computing nodes have output. Hence,
this complexity measure captures the running time of the slowest node(s). In
this paper, we are interested in the running time of the ordinary nodes, to be
compared with the running time of the slowest nodes. The node-averaged
time-complexity of a distributed algorithm on a given instance is defined as
the average, taken over every node of the instance, of the number of rounds
before that node output. We compare the node-averaged time-complexity with the
classical one in the standard LOCAL model for distributed network computing. We
show that there can be an exponential gap between the node-averaged
time-complexity and the classical time-complexity, as witnessed by, e.g.,
leader election. Our first main result is a positive one, stating that, in
fact, the two time-complexities behave the same for a large class of problems
on very sparse graphs. In particular, we show that, for LCL problems on cycles,
the node-averaged time complexity is of the same order of magnitude as the
slowest node time-complexity.
  In addition, in the LOCAL model, the time-complexity is computed as a worst
case over all possible identity assignments to the nodes of the network. In
this paper, we also investigate the ID-averaged time-complexity, when the
number of rounds is averaged over all possible identity assignments. Our second
main result is that the ID-averaged time-complexity is essentially the same as
the expected time-complexity of randomized algorithms (where the expectation is
taken over all possible random bits used by the nodes, and the number of rounds
is measured for the worst-case identity assignment).
  Finally, we study the node-averaged ID-averaged time-complexity.
