  Simulation models for pedestrian crowds are a ubiquitous tool in research and
industry. It is crucial that the parameters of these models are calibrated
carefully and ultimately it will be of interest to compare competing models to
decide which model is best suited for a particular purpose. In this
contribution, I demonstrate how Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC), which
is already a popular tool in other areas of science, can be used for model
fitting and model selection in a pedestrian dynamics context. I fit two
different models for pedestrian dynamics to data on a crowd passing in one
direction through a bottleneck. One model describes movement in
continuous-space, the other model is a cellular automaton and thus describes
movement in discrete-space. In addition, I compare models to data using two
metrics. The first is based on egress times and the second on the velocity of
pedestrians in front of the bottleneck. My results show that while model
fitting is successful, a substantial degree of uncertainty about the value of
some model parameters remains after model fitting. Importantly, the choice of
metric in model fitting can influence parameter estimates. Model selection is
inconclusive for the egress time metric but supports the continuous-space model
for the velocity-based metric. These findings show that ABC is a flexible
approach and highlight the difficulties associated with model fitting and model
selection for pedestrian dynamics. ABC requires many simulation runs and
choosing appropriate metrics for comparing data to simulations requires careful
attention. Despite this, I suggest ABC is a promising tool, because it is
versatile and easily implemented for the growing number of openly available
crowd simulators and data sets.
