  Bounded rationality is an important consideration stemming from the fact that
agents often have limits on their processing abilities, making the assumption
of perfect rationality inapplicable to many real tasks. We propose an
information-theoretic approach to the inference of agent decisions under
Smithian competition. The model explicitly captures the boundedness of agents
(limited in their information-processing capacity) as the cost of information
acquisition for expanding their prior beliefs. The expansion is measured as the
Kullblack-Leibler divergence between posterior decisions and prior beliefs.
When information acquisition is free, the homo economicus agent is recovered,
while in cases when information acquisition becomes costly, agents instead
revert to their prior beliefs. The maximum entropy principle is used to infer
least-biased decisions based upon the notion of Smithian competition formalised
within the Quantal Response Statistical Equilibrium framework. The
incorporation of prior beliefs into such a framework allowed us to
systematically explore the effects of prior beliefs on decision-making in the
presence of market feedback, as well as importantly adding a temporal
interpretation to the framework. We verified the proposed model using
Australian housing market data, showing how the incorporation of prior
knowledge alters the resulting agent decisions. Specifically, it allowed for
the separation of past beliefs and utility maximisation behaviour of the agent
as well as the analysis into the evolution of agent beliefs.
