  We evaluate the applicability of the generic Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG)
mechanism as an antimonopoly measure against a profit-maximizing producer with
market power operating a portfolio of generating units at the centralized
two-settlement energy market. The producer may indicate in its bid not only the
altered cost function but also the distorted values of the technical parameters
of its generating units, which enter the system-wide constraints of the
centralized dispatch optimization problem. To ensure the applicability of the
VCG method in this setting, we identify an additional assumption on the changes
of the feasible set of the centralized dispatch optimization problem induced by
variations of the producer's technical parameters. In the framework of the
generic VCG mechanism, we propose an antimonopoly regulation method based on a
regulator estimate of the producer's truthful bid. If this estimate is exact,
the producer's maximum profit coincides with that in the case of the truthful
bidding when no antimonopoly measure is applied. If the estimate is not exact,
the error affects neither the producer's (weakly) dominant bid nor its optimal
nodal output but manifests itself in the total uplift payment. This ensures an
efficient allocation in the form of the optimal output/consumption schedule and
shields the (pre-uplift) market prices from the producer's market power. We
compare the suggested method with the alternative antimonopoly regulation
approach based on the replacement of the producer's bid by a bid composed by
the regulator.
