  The questions of what represents space-time in GR, the status of
gravitational energy, the substantivalist-relationalist issue, and the
(non)exceptional status of gravity are interrelated. If space-time has
energy-momentum, then space-time is substantival. Two extant ways to avoid the
substantivalist conclusion deny that the energy-bearing metric is part of
space-time or deny that gravitational energy exists. Feynman linked doubts
about gravitational energy to GR-exceptionalism; particle physics
egalitarianism encourages realism about gravitational energy.
  This essay proposes a third view, involving a particle physics-inspired
non-perturbative split that characterizes space-time with a constant background
_matrix_ (not a metric), avoiding the inference from gravitational energy to
substantivalism: space-time is (M, eta), where eta=diag(-1,1,1,1) is a
spatio-temporally constant numerical signature matrix (already used in GR with
spinors). The gravitational potential, bearing any gravitational energy, is
g_(munu)(x)-eta (up to field redefinitions), an _affine_ geometric object with
a tensorial Lie derivative and a vanishing covariant derivative. This
non-perturbative split permits strong fields, arbitrary coordinates, and
arbitrary topology, and hence is pure GR by almost any standard. This
razor-thin background, unlike more familiar ones, involves no extra gauge
freedom and so lacks their obscurities and carpet lump-moving.
  After a discussion of Curiel's GR exceptionalist rejection of energy
conservation, the two traditional objections to pseudotensors, coordinate
dependence and nonuniqueness, are explored. Both objections are inconclusive
and getting weaker. A literal interpretation of Noether's theorem (infinitely
many energies) largely answers Schroedinger's false-negative coordinate
dependence problem. Bauer's nonuniqueness (false positive) objection has
several answers.
