  Delineating and planning with respect to regions suspected to contain
microscopic tumor cells is an inherently uncertain task in radiotherapy. The
recently proposed \textit{clinical target distribution} (CTD) is an alternative
to the conventional \textit{clinical target volume} (CTV), with initial
promise. Previously, using the CTD in planning has primarily been evaluated in
comparison to a conventionally defined CTV. We propose to compare the CTD
approach against CTV margins of various sizes, dependent on the threshold at
which the tumor infiltration probability is considered relevant. First, a
theoretical framework is presented, concerned with optimizing the trade-off
between the probability of sufficient target coverage and the penalties
associated with high dose. From this framework we derive conventional CTV-based
planning and contrast it with the CTD approach. The approaches are
contextualized further by comparison with established methods for managing
geometric uncertainties. Second, for both a one- and a three-dimensional
phantom, we compare a set of CTD plans created by varying the target objective
function weight against a set of plans created by varying both the target
weight and the CTV margin size. The results show that CTD-based planning gives
slightly inefficient trade-offs between the evaluation criteria for a case in
which near-minimum target dose is the highest priority. However, in a case when
sparing a proximal organ at risk is critical, the CTD is better at maintaining
sufficiently high dose toward the center of the target. We conclude that
CTD-based planning is a computationally efficient method for planning with
respect to delineation uncertainties, but that the inevitable effects on the
dose distribution should not be disregarded.
