  State-of-the-art recommender system (RS) mostly rely on complex deep neural
network (DNN) model structure, which makes it difficult to provide explanations
along with RS decisions. Previous researchers have proved that providing
explanations along with recommended items can help users make informed
decisions and improve their trust towards the uninterpretable blackbox system.
In model-agnostic explainable recommendation, system designers deploy a
separate explanation model to take as input from the decision model, and
generate explanations to meet the goal of persuasiveness. In this work, we
explore the task of ranking textual rationales (supporting evidences) for
model-agnostic explainable recommendation. Most of existing rationales ranking
algorithms only utilize the rationale IDs and interaction matrices to build
latent factor representations; and the semantic information within the textual
rationales are not learned effectively. We argue that such design is suboptimal
as the important semantic information within the textual rationales may be used
to better profile user preferences and item features. Seeing this gap, we
propose a model named Semantic-Enhanced Bayesian Personalized Explanation
Ranking (SE-BPER) to effectively combine the interaction information and
semantic information. SE-BPER first initializes the latent factor
representations with contextualized embeddings generated by transformer model,
then optimizes them with the interaction data. Extensive experiments show that
such methodology improves the rationales ranking performance while simplifying
the model training process (fewer hyperparameters and faster convergence). We
conclude that the optimal way to combine semantic and interaction information
remains an open question in the task of rationales ranking.
