  We compare two distinct approaches for querying data in the context of the
life sciences. The first approach utilizes conventional databases to store the
data and intuitive form-based interfaces to facilitate easy querying of the
data. These interfaces could be seen as implementing a set of "pre-canned"
queries commonly used by the life science researchers that we study. The second
approach is based on semantic Web technologies and is knowledge (model) driven.
It utilizes a large OWL ontology and same datasets as before but associated as
RDF instances of the ontology concepts. An intuitive interface is provided that
allows the formulation of RDF triples-based queries. Both these approaches are
being used in parallel by a team of cell biologists in their daily research
activities, with the objective of gradually replacing the conventional approach
with the knowledge-driven one. This provides us with a valuable opportunity to
compare and qualitatively evaluate the two approaches. We describe several
benefits of the knowledge-driven approach in comparison to the traditional way
of accessing data, and highlight a few limitations as well. We believe that our
analysis not only explicitly highlights the specific benefits and limitations
of semantic Web technologies in our context but also contributes toward
effective ways of translating a question in a researcher's mind into precise
computational queries with the intent of obtaining effective answers from the
data. While researchers often assume the benefits of semantic Web technologies,
we explicitly illustrate these in practice.
