  Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) interpreted on finite traces is a robust
specification framework popular in formal verification. However, despite the
high interest in the logic in recent years, the topic of their quantitative
extensions is not yet fully explored. The main goal of this work is to study
the effect of adding weak forms of percentage constraints (e.g. that most of
the positions in the past satisfy a given condition, or that sigma is the
most-frequent letter occurring in the past) to fragments of LTL. Such
extensions could potentially be used for the verification of influence networks
or statistical reasoning. Unfortunately, as we prove in the paper, it turns out
that percentage extensions of even tiny fragments of LTL have undecidable
satisfiability and model-checking problems. Our undecidability proofs not only
sharpen most of the undecidability results on logics with arithmetics
interpreted on words known from the literature, but also are fairly simple. We
also show that the undecidability can be avoided by restricting the allowed
usage of the negation, and briefly discuss how the undecidability results
transfer to first-order logic on words.
