  Group recommender systems (GRSs) identify items to recommend to a group of
people by aggregating group members' individual preferences into a group
profile, and selecting the items that have the largest score in the group
profile. The GRS predicts that these recommendations would be chosen by the
group, by assuming that the group is applying the same preference aggregation
strategy as the one adopted by the GRS. However, predicting the choice of a
group is more complex since the GRS is not aware of the exact preference
aggregation strategy that is going to be used by the group.
  To this end, the aim of this paper is to validate the research hypothesis
that, by using a machine learning approach and a data set of observed group
choices, it is possible to predict a group's final choice, better than by using
a standard preference aggregation strategy. Inspired by the Decision Scheme
theory, which first tried to address the group choice prediction problem, we
search for a group profile definition that, in conjunction with a machine
learning model, can be used to accurately predict a group choice. Moreover, to
cope with the data scarcity problem, we propose two data augmentation methods,
which add synthetic group profiles to the training data, and we hypothesize
they can further improve the choice prediction accuracy.
  We validate our research hypotheses by using a data set containing 282
participants organized in 79 groups. The experiments indicate that the proposed
method outperforms baseline aggregation strategies when used for group choice
prediction. The method we propose is robust with the presence of missing
preference data and achieves a performance superior to what humans can achieve
on the group choice prediction task. Finally, the proposed data augmentation
method can also improve the prediction accuracy.
