  We study the optimal portfolio allocation problem from a Bayesian perspective
using value at risk (VaR) and conditional value at risk (CVaR) as risk
measures. By applying the posterior predictive distribution for the future
portfolio return, we derive relevant quantiles needed in the computations of
VaR and CVaR, and express the optimal portfolio weights in terms of observed
data only. This is in contrast to the conventional method where the optimal
solution is based on unobserved quantities which are estimated, leading to
suboptimality. We also obtain the expressions for the weights of the global
minimum VaR and CVaR portfolios, and specify conditions for their existence. It
is shown that these portfolios may not exist if the confidence level used for
the VaR or CVaR computation are too low. Moreover, analytical expressions for
the mean-VaR and mean-CVaR efficient frontiers are presented and the extension
of theoretical results to general coherent risk measures is provided. One of
the main advantages of the suggested Bayesian approach is that the theoretical
results are derived in the finite-sample case and thus they are exact and can
be applied to large-dimensional portfolios.
  By using simulation and real market data, we compare the new Bayesian
approach to the conventional method by studying the performance and existence
of the global minimum VaR portfolio and by analysing the estimated efficient
frontiers. It is concluded that the Bayesian approach outperforms the
conventional one, in particular at predicting the out-of-sample VaR.
