  Stance detection automatically detects the stance in a text towards a target,
vital for content analysis in web and social media research. Despite their
promising capabilities, LLMs encounter challenges when directly applied to
stance detection. First, stance detection demands multi-aspect knowledge, from
deciphering event-related terminologies to understanding the expression styles
in social media platforms. Second, stance detection requires advanced reasoning
to infer authors' implicit viewpoints, as stance are often subtly embedded
rather than overtly stated in the text. To address these challenges, we design
a three-stage framework COLA (short for Collaborative rOle-infused LLM-based
Agents) in which LLMs are designated distinct roles, creating a collaborative
system where each role contributes uniquely. Initially, in the multidimensional
text analysis stage, we configure the LLMs to act as a linguistic expert, a
domain specialist, and a social media veteran to get a multifaceted analysis of
texts, thus overcoming the first challenge. Next, in the reasoning-enhanced
debating stage, for each potential stance, we designate a specific LLM-based
agent to advocate for it, guiding the LLM to detect logical connections between
text features and stance, tackling the second challenge. Finally, in the stance
conclusion stage, a final decision maker agent consolidates prior insights to
determine the stance. Our approach avoids extra annotated data and model
training and is highly usable. We achieve state-of-the-art performance across
multiple datasets. Ablation studies validate the effectiveness of each design
role in handling stance detection. Further experiments have demonstrated the
explainability and the versatility of our approach. Our approach excels in
usability, accuracy, effectiveness, explainability and versatility,
highlighting its value.
