  We study the effect of using high-resolution elevation data on the selection
of the most fuel-efficient (greenest) path for different trucks in various
urban environments. We adapt a variant of the Comprehensive Modal Emission
Model (CMEM) to show that the optimal speed and the greenest path are slope
dependent (dynamic). When there are no elevation changes in a road network, the
most fuel-efficient path is the shortest path with a constant (static) optimal
speed throughout. However, if the network is not flat, then the shortest path
is not necessarily the greenest path, and the optimal driving speed is dynamic.
We prove that the greenest path converges to an asymptotic greenest path as the
payload approaches infinity and that this limiting path is attained for a
finite load. In a set of extensive numerical experiments, we benchmark the CO2
emissions reduction of our dynamic speed and the greenest path policies against
policies that ignore elevation data. We use the geo-spatial data of 25 major
cities across 6 continents, such as Los Angeles, Mexico City, Johannesburg,
Athens, Ankara, and Canberra. Our results show that, on average, traversing the
greenest path with a dynamic optimal speed policy can reduce the CO2 emissions
by 1.19% to 10.15% depending on the city and truck type for a moderate payload.
They also demonstrate that the average CO2 reduction of the optimal dynamic
speed policy is between 2% to 4% for most of the cities, regardless of the
truck type. We confirm that disregarding elevation data yields sub-optimal
paths that are significantly less CO2 efficient than the greenest paths.
