  Concurrent multi-player games with $\omega$-regular objectives are a standard
model for systems that consist of several interacting components, each with its
own objective. The standard solution concept for such games is Nash
Equilibrium, which is a "stable" strategy profile for the players.
  In many settings, the system is not fully observable by the interacting
components, e.g., due to internal variables. Then, the interaction is modelled
by a partial information game. Unfortunately, the problem of whether a partial
information game has an NE is not known to be decidable. A particular setting
of partial information arises naturally when processes are assigned IDs by the
system, but these IDs are not known to the processes. Then, the processes have
full information about the state of the system, but are uncertain of the effect
of their actions on the transitions.
  We generalize the setting above and introduce Multi-Topology Games (MTGs) --
concurrent games with several possible topologies, where the players do not
know which topology is actually used. We show that extending the concept of NE
to these games can take several forms. To this end, we propose two notions of
NE: Conservative NE, in which a player deviates if she can strictly add
topologies to her winning set, and Greedy NE, where she deviates if she can win
in a previously-losing topology. We study the properties of these NE, and show
that the problem of whether a game admits them is decidable.
