  Interdisciplinary research has emerged as a hotbed for innovation and
discoveries. The increasing dominance of grant-supported research, combined
with growing interest in funding interdisciplinary work, raises fundamental
questions on the role of interdisciplinary grants in supporting high-impact
interdisciplinary advances. Here we develop a measurement framework to quantify
the interdisciplinarity of both research grants and publications and apply it
to 350K grants from 164 funding agencies over 26 countries and 1.3M papers that
acknowledged the support of these grants from 1985 to 2009. Our analysis
uncovers two contradictory patterns. On the one hand, interdisciplinary grants
tend to produce interdisciplinary papers and interdisciplinary papers are
associated with high impact. On the other hand, compared to their disciplinary
counterparts, interdisciplinary grants produce much fewer papers and
interdisciplinary papers that they support have substantially reduced impact.
We show that the key to resolving this discrepancy lies in the power of
disciplinary grants: Highly interdisciplinary papers supported by deeply
disciplinary grants garner disproportionately high impacts from both core
disciplines and broader fields. Further, the broad and deep impacts of
disciplinary grants are not simply due to funding size, reception of ideas
within disciplinary boundaries, or collaborative formats. When it comes to
producing key interdisciplinary advances, disciplinary grants appear to do more
with less and seem especially powerful when paired with other similar
disciplinary grants. Amidst the rapid rise of support for interdisciplinary
work across the sciences, these results highlight the underexplored role of
disciplinary grants in driving crucial interdisciplinary advances, suggesting
that interdisciplinary research is a risky endeavor and requires deep
disciplinary expertise and investments.
