  We use the Nernst effect to delineate the boundary of the pseudogap phase in
the temperature-doping phase diagram of cuprate superconductors. New data for
the Nernst coefficient $\nu(T)$ of YBa$_{2}$Cu$_{3}$O$_{y}$ (YBCO),
La$_{1.8-x}$Eu$_{0.2}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (Eu-LSCO) and
La$_{1.6-x}$Nd$_{0.4}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (Nd-LSCO) are presented and compared with
previous data including La$_{2-x}$Sr$_x$CuO$_4$ (LSCO). The temperature $T_\nu$
at which $\nu/T$ deviates from its high-temperature behaviour is found to
coincide with the temperature at which the resistivity deviates from its
linear-$T$ dependence, which we take as the definition of the pseudogap
temperature $T^\star$- in agreement with gap opening detected in ARPES data. We
track $T^\star$ as a function of doping and find that it decreases linearly vs
$p$ in all four materials, having the same value in the three LSCO-based
cuprates, irrespective of their different crystal structures. At low $p$,
$T^\star$ is higher than the onset temperature of the various orders observed
in underdoped cuprates, suggesting that these orders are secondary
instabilities of the pseudogap phase. A linear extrapolation of $T^\star(p)$ to
$p=0$ yields $T^\star(p\to 0)\simeq T_N(0)$, the N\'eel temperature for the
onset of antiferromagnetic order at $p=0$, suggesting that there is a link
between pseudogap and antiferromagnetism. With increasing $p$, $T^\star(p)$
extrapolates linearly to zero at $p\simeq p_{\rm c2}$, the critical doping
below which superconductivity emerges at high doping, suggesting that the
conditions which favour pseudogap formation also favour pairing. We also use
the Nernst effect to investigate how far superconducting fluctuations extend
above $T_{\rm c}$, as a function of doping, and find that a narrow fluctuation
regime tracks $T_{\rm c}$, and not $T^\star$. This confirms that the pseudogap
phase is not a form of precursor superconductivity.
