  We develop a model-independent framework to study the dynamics of
decision-making in opinion networks for an arbitrary number of agents and an
arbitrary number of options. Model-independence means that the analysis is not
performed on a specific set of equations, in contrast to classical approaches
to decision making that fix a specific model and analyze it. Rather, the
general features of decision making in dynamical opinion networks can be
derived starting from empirically testable hypotheses about the deciding
agents, the available options, and the interactions among them. After
translating these empirical hypotheses into algebraic ones, we use the tools of
equivariant bifurcation theory to uncover model-independent properties of
dynamical opinion networks. The model-independent results are illustrated on a
novel analytical model that is constructed by plugging a generic sigmoidal
nonlinearity, modeling boundedness of opinions and opinion perception, into the
model-independent equivariant structure. Our analysis reveals richer and more
flexible opinion-formation behavior as compared to model-dependent approaches.
For instance, analysis reveals the possibility of switching between consensus
and various forms of dissensus by modulation of the level of agent
cooperativity and without requiring any particular ad-hoc interaction topology
(e.g., structural balance). From a theoretical viewpoint, we prove new results
in equivariant bifurcation theory. We construct an exhaustive list of axial
subgroups for the action of $\ES_n \times \ES_3$ on $\R^{n-1}\otimes\R^{2}$. We
also generalize this list to the action of $\ES_n \times \ES_k$ on
$\R^{n-1}\otimes \R^{k-1}$, i.e., for $n$ agents and $k$ options, although
without proving that in this case the list is exhaustive.
