  Technological advancement has lead to an increase in number and type of
trading venues and diversification of goods traded. These changes have
re-emphasized the importance of understanding the effects of market
competition: does proliferation of trading venues and increased competition
lead to dominance of a single market or coexistence of multiple markets? In
this paper, we address these questions in a stylized model of Zero Intelligence
traders who make repeated decisions at which of three available markets to
trade. We analyse the model numerically and analytically and find that
parameters that govern traders' decisions -- memory length and intensity of
choice, e.g. how strongly decisions are based on past success -- make the key
distinctions between consolidated and fragmented steady states of the
population of traders. All three markets coexist with equal shares of traders
only when either learning is too weak and traders choose randomly, or when
markets are identical. In the latter case, the population of traders is
fragmented across the markets. For the more general case of markets with
different biases, we note that market dominance is the more typical scenario.
These results are interesting because previously either strong differentiation
of markets or heterogeneity in the needs of traders was found to be a necessary
condition for market coexistence. We show that, in contrast, these states can
emerge simply as a consequence of co-adaptation of an initially homogeneous
population of traders.
