  Changes in extreme weather may produce some of the largest societal impacts
of anthropogenic climate change. However, it is intrinsically difficult to
estimate changes in extreme events from the short observational record. In this
work we use millennial runs from the CCSM3 in equilibrated pre-industrial and
possible future conditions to examine both how extremes change in this model
and how well these changes can be estimated as a function of run length. We
estimate changes to distributions of future temperature extremes (annual minima
and annual maxima) in the contiguous United States by fitting generalized
extreme value (GEV) distributions. Using 1000-year pre-industrial and future
time series, we show that the magnitude of warm extremes largely shifts in
accordance with mean shifts in summertime temperatures. In contrast, cold
extremes warm more than mean shifts in wintertime temperatures, but changes in
GEV location parameters are largely explainable by mean shifts combined with
reduced wintertime temperature variability. In addition, changes in the spread
and shape of the GEV distributions of cold extremes at inland locations can
lead to discernible changes in tail behavior. We then examine uncertainties
that result from using shorter model runs. In principle, the GEV distribution
provides theoretical justification to predict infrequent events using time
series shorter than the recurrence frequency of those events. To investigate
how well this approach works in practice, we estimate 20-, 50-, and 100-year
extreme events using segments of varying lengths. We find that even using GEV
distributions, time series that are of comparable or shorter length than the
return period of interest can lead to very poor estimates. These results
suggest caution when attempting to use short observational time series or model
runs to infer infrequent extremes.
