  Social issues are generally discussed by highly-involved and less-involved
people to build social norms defining what has to be thought and done about
them. As self-involved agents share different attitude dynamics to other agents
Wood, Pool et al, 1996, we study the emergence and evolution of norms through
an individual-based model involving these two types of agents. The dynamics of
self-involved agents is drawn from Huet and Deffuant, 2010, and the dynamics of
others, from Deffuant et al, 2001. The attitude of an agent is represented as a
segment on a continuous attitudinal space. Two agents are close if their
attitude segments share sufficient overlap. Our agents discuss two different
issues, one of which, called main issue, is more important for the
self-involved agents than the other, called secondary issue. Self-involved
agents are attracted on both issues if they are close on main issue, but shift
away from their peer's opinion if they are only close on secondary issue.
Differently, non-self-involved agents are attracted by other agents when they
are close on both the main and secondary issues. We observe the emergence of
various types of extreme minor clusters. In one or different groups of
attitudes, they can lead to an already-built moderate norm or a norm polarized
on secondary and/or main issues. They can also push disagreeing agents gathered
in different groups to a global moderate consensus.
