  We present a new test of hypothesis in which we seek the probability of the
null conditioned on the data, where the null is a simplification undertaken to
counter the intractability of the more complex model, that the simpler null
model is nested within. With the more complex model rendered intractable, the
null model uses a simplifying assumption that capacitates the learning of an
unknown parameter vector given the data. Bayes factors are shown to be known
only up to a ratio of unknown data-dependent constants--a problem that cannot
be cured using prescriptions similar to those suggested to solve the problem
caused to Bayes factor computation, by non-informative priors. Thus, a new test
is needed in which we can circumvent Bayes factor computation. In this test, we
undertake generation of data from the model in which the null hypothesis is
true and can achieve support in the measured data for the null by comparing the
marginalised posterior of the model parameter given the measured data, to that
given such generated data. However, such a ratio of marginalised posteriors can
confound interpretation of comparison of support in one measured data for a
null, with that in another data set for a different null. Given an application
in which such comparison is undertaken, we alternatively define support in a
measured data set for a null by identifying the model parameters that are less
consistent with the measured data than is minimally possible given the
generated data, and realising that the higher the number of such parameter
values, less is the support in the measured data for the null. Then, the
probability of the null conditional on the data is given within an MCMC-based
scheme, by marginalising the posterior given the measured data, over parameter
values that are as, or more consistent with the measured data, than with the
generated data.
