  The most popular method for determining coronal temperatures is the
scale-height-method (shm). It is based on electron density profiles inferred
from White Light (WL) brightness measurements of the corona during solar
eclipses. This method has been applied to several published coronal electron
density models. The calculated temperature distributions reach a maximum at r >
1.3 RS, and therefore do not satisfy one of the conditions for applying the shm
method. Another method is the hydrostatic equilibrium method (hst), which
enables coronal temperature distributions to be determined, providing solutions
to the hydrostatic equilibrium equation. The temperature maximas using the hst
method are almost equal to those obtained using the shm method, but the
temperature peak is always at significantly lower altitude when the hst-method
is used than when the shm-method is used. A third and more recently developed
method, dyn, can be used for the same published electron density profiles. The
temperature distributions obtained using the dyn method are regular solutions
of the hydrodynamic equations. They depend on the expansion velocity of the
coronal plasma considered as a free input parameter in the calculations. At the
base of the solar corona, where the coronal bulk velocity is small (subsonic),
the dyn and hst methods give similar temperature values. Larger differences are
found at higher altitudes where the expansion velocity approaches and exceeds
the velocity of sound. This paper shows also the effects of the flow tube
geometry and ion temperatures on the electron temperature distributions. The
dyn method is a generalization of the hst method, where the electron
temperature distribution tends to zero at infinite radial distances. It is a
new diagnostic tool for determining from WL coronal observations the range of
radial distances where the coronal heating rate is at its maximum.
