  On-demand mobility platforms play an increasingly important role in urban
mobility systems. Impacts are still debated, as these platforms supply
personalized and optimized services, while also contributing to existing
sustainability challenges. Recently, microtransit services have emerged,
promising to combine advantages of pooled on-demand rides with more sustainable
fixed-route public transit services. Understanding traveler behavior becomes a
primary focus to analyze adoption likelihood and perceptions of different
microtransit attributes. The COVID-19 pandemic context adds an additional layer
of complexity to analyzing mobility innovation acceptance. This study
investigates the potential demand for microtransit options against the
background of the pandemic. We use a stated choice experiment to study the
decision-making of Israeli public transit and car commuters when offered to use
novel microtransit options (sedan vs. passenger van). We investigate the
tradeoffs related to traditional fare and travel time attributes, along with
microtransit features; namely walking time to pickup location, vehicle sharing,
waiting time, minimum advanced reservation time, and shelter at designated
boarding locations. Additionally, we analyze two latent constructs: attitudes
towards sharing, as well as experiences and risk-perceptions related to the
COVID-19 pandemic. We develop Integrated Choice and Latent Variable models to
compare the two commuter groups in terms of the likelihood to switch to
microtransit, attribute trade-offs, sharing preferences and pandemic impacts.
The results reveal high elasticities of several time and COVID effects for car
commuters compared to relative insensitivity of transit commuters to the risk
of COVID contraction. Moreover, for car commuters, those with strong sharing
identities were more likely to be comfortable in COVID risk situations, and to
accept microtransit.
