  With the emergence of conversational artificial intelligence (AI) agents, it
is important to understand the mechanisms that influence users' experiences of
these agents. We study a common tool in the designer's toolkit: conceptual
metaphors. Metaphors can present an agent as akin to a wry teenager, a toddler,
or an experienced butler. How might a choice of metaphor influence our
experience of the AI agent? Sampling metaphors along the dimensions of warmth
and competence---defined by psychological theories as the primary axes of
variation for human social perception---we perform a study (N=260) where we
manipulate the metaphor, but not the behavior, of a Wizard-of-Oz conversational
agent. Following the experience, participants are surveyed about their
intention to use the agent, their desire to cooperate with the agent, and the
agent's usability. Contrary to the current tendency of designers to use high
competence metaphors to describe AI products, we find that metaphors that
signal low competence lead to better evaluations of the agent than metaphors
that signal high competence. This effect persists despite both high and low
competence agents featuring human-level performance and the wizards being blind
to condition. A second study confirms that intention to adopt decreases rapidly
as competence projected by the metaphor increases. In a third study, we assess
effects of metaphor choices on potential users' desire to try out the system
and find that users are drawn to systems that project higher competence and
warmth. These results suggest that projecting competence may help attract new
users, but those users may discard the agent unless it can quickly correct with
a lower competence metaphor. We close with a retrospective analysis that finds
similar patterns between metaphors and user attitudes towards past
conversational agents such as Xiaoice, Replika, Woebot, Mitsuku, and Tay.
