  In this paper, we analyze how different path aspects affect a user's
experience, mainly VR sickness and overall comfort, while immersed in an
autonomously moving telepresence robot through a virtual reality headset. In
particular, we focus on how the robot turns and the distance it keeps from
objects, with the goal of planning suitable trajectories for an autonomously
moving immersive telepresence robot in mind; rotational acceleration is known
for causing the majority of VR sickness, and distance to objects modulates the
optical flow. We ran a within-subjects user study (n = 36, women = 18) in which
the participants watched three panoramic videos recorded in a virtual museum
while aboard an autonomously moving telepresence robot taking three different
paths varying in aspects such as turns, speeds, or distances to walls and
objects. We found a moderate correlation between the users' sickness as
measured by the SSQ and comfort on a 6-point Likert scale across all paths.
However, we detected no association between sickness and the choice of the most
comfortable path, showing that sickness is not the only factor affecting the
comfort of the user. The subjective experience of turn speed did not correlate
with either the SSQ scores or comfort, even though people often mentioned
turning speed as a source of discomfort in the open-ended questions. Through
exploring the open-ended answers more carefully, a possible reason is that the
length and lack of predictability also play a large role in making people
observe turns as uncomfortable. A larger subjective distance from walls and
objects increased comfort and decreased sickness both in quantitative and
qualitative data. Finally, the SSQ subscales and total weighted scores showed
differences by age group and by gender.
