  Gil-Alana et al. (Physica A: 396, 42-50, 2014) compared the sunspot number
record and the temperature record and found that they differ: the sunspot
number record is characterized by a dominant 11-year cycle while the
temperature record appears to be characterized by a singularity or pole in the
spectral density function at the zero frequency. Consequently, they claimed
that the two records are characterized by substantially different statistical
fractional models and rejected the hypothesis that sun influences significantly
global temperatures. I show that: (1) the "singularity" or "pole" in the
spectral density function of the global surface temperature at the "zero"
frequency does not exist - it is a typical misinterpretation that discrete
power spectra of non-stationary signals can suggest; (2) appropriate continuous
periodograms clarify the issue and also show a signature of the 11-year solar
cycle (amplitude <0.1 K), which since 1850 has an average period of about 10.4
year, and of many other natural oscillations; (3) the solar signature in the
surface temperature record can be recognized only using specific techniques of
analysis that take into account non-linearity and filtering of the multiple
climate change contributions; (4) the post 1880-year temperature warming trend
cannot be compared or studied against the sunspot record and its 11-year cycle,
but requires solar proxy models showing short and long scale oscillations plus
the contribution of anthropogenic forcings, as done in the literature. Multiple
evidences suggest that global temperatures and sunspot numbers are quite
related to each other at multiple time scales through complex and non-linear
processes. Finally, I show that the prediction of a semi-empirical model for
the global temperature based on astronomical oscillations and anthropogenic
forcing proposed by Scafetta since 2009 has up to date been successful.
