  Offshore wind energy is rapidly expanding, facilitated largely through
auctions run by governments. We provide a detailed quantified overview of
applied auction schemes, including geographical spread, volumes, results, and
design specifications. Our comprehensive global dataset reveals heterogeneous
designs. Although most remuneration designs provide some form of revenue
stabilisation, their specific instrument choices vary and include feed-in
tariffs, one-sided and two-sided contracts for difference, mandated power
purchase agreements, and mandated renewable energy certificates. We review the
schemes used in all eight major offshore wind jurisdictions across Europe,
Asia, and North America and evaluate bids in their jurisdictional context. We
analyse cost competitiveness, likelihood of timely construction, occurrence of
strategic bidding, and identify jurisdictional aspects that might have
influenced auction results. We find that auctions are embedded within their
respective regulatory and market design context, and are remarkably diverse,
though with regional similarities. Auctions in each jurisdiction have evolved
and tend to become more exposed to market price risks over time. Less mature
markets are more prone to make use of lower-risk designs. Still, some form of
revenue stabilisation is employed for all auctioned offshore wind energy farms
analysed here, regardless of the specific policy choices. Our data confirm a
coincidence of declining costs and growing diffusion of auction regimes.
