  Quantitative estimate of observational uncertainty is an essential ingredient
to correctly interpret changes in climatic and environmental variables such as
wildfires. In this work we compare four state-of-the-art satellite fire
products with the gridded, ground-based EFFIS dataset for Mediterranean Europe
and analyse their statistical differences. The data are compared for spatial
and temporal similarities at different aggregations to identify a spatial scale
at which most of the observations provide equivalent results. The results of
the analysis indicate that the datasets show high temporal correlation with
each other (0.5/0.6) when aggregating the data at resolution of at least
1.0{\deg} or at NUTS3 level. However, burned area estimates vary widely between
datasets. Filtering out satellite fires located on urban and crop land cover
classes greatly improves the agreement with EFFIS data. Finally, in spite of
the differences found in the area estimates, the spatial pattern is similar for
all the datasets, with spatial correlation increasing as the resolution
decreases. Also, the general reasonable agreement between satellite products
builds confidence in using these datasets and in particular the most-recent
developed dataset, FireCCI51, shows the best agreement with EFFIS overall. As a
result, the main conclusion of the study is that users should carefully
consider the limitations of the satellite fire estimates currently available,
as their uncertainties cannot be neglected in the overall uncertainty
estimate/cascade that should accompany global or regional change studies and
that removing fires on human-dominated land areas is key to analyze forest
fires estimation from satellite products.
