  A database of DIII-D plasmas without ELMs compares the operating space and
plasma performance of stationary no-ELM regimes: RMP-ELM suppression, QH-mode,
I-mode, EDA H-mode, L-mode, and negative triangularity L-mode (Neg-D).
Operational space is documented in terms of engineering and physics parameters,
revealing divergent constraints. Some operational space discriminants (such as
pedestal collisionality) are well known, while others, such as low torque &
safety factor, or high power & density, are less commonly emphasized.
Normalized performance (confinement quality and normalized pressure) also
discriminate the no-ELM regimes and favor the regimes tolerant to power in
DIII-D: RMP, QH, and Neg-D. Absolute performance (triple product <p>$\tau$)
also discriminates no-ELM regimes and is found to rise linearly with IaB and
also benefits from tolerance to power. The highest normalized performance using
the metric <p>$\tau$/IaB is found in QH and RMP regimes. Though comparable QH
and RMP performance is found, the pedestal pressure (p_ped) is very different.
p_ped in RMP plasmas is relatively low, and the best performance is found with
a high core <p> fraction alongside high core rotation, consistent with an ExB
shear confinement enhancement. p_ped of QH plasmas is significantly higher than
RMP, and QH performance does not correlate with core rotation. However, the
highest QH p_ped are found with high carbon fraction. While normalized
performance of Neg-D plasmas is comparable to QH and RMP plasmas, the absolute
confinement of Neg-D is lower, owing to low elongation and low p_ped achieved
thus far. Only the EDA-H, Neg-D, and L-mode scenarios have approached
divertor-compatible high separatrix density conditions, with Neg-D preserving
the highest performance owing to its compatibility with both high power and
density.
