  This article-based doctoral thesis explores the stakeholder perspectives and
experiences of crowdsourced creative work on two of the leading crowdsourcing
platforms. The thesis has two parts. In the first part, we explore creative
work from the perspective of the crowd worker. In the second part, we explore
and study the requester's perspective in different contexts and several case
studies. The research is exploratory and we contribute empirical insights using
survey-based and artefact-based approaches common in the field of
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). In the former approach, we explore the key
issues that may limit creative work on paid crowdsourcing platforms. In the
latter approach, we create computational artefacts to elicit authentic
experiences from both crowd workers and requesters of crowdsourced creative
work. The thesis contributes a classification of crowd workers into five
archetypal profiles, based on the crowd workers' demographics, disposition, and
preferences for creative work. We propose a three-part classification of
creative work on crowdsourcing platforms: creative tasks, creativity tests, and
creativity judgements (also referred to as creative feedback). The thesis
further investigates the emerging research topic of how requesters can be
supported in interpreting and evaluating complex creative work. Last, we
discuss the design implications for research and practice and contribute a
vision of creative work on future crowdsourcing platforms with the aim of
empowering crowd workers and fostering an ecosystem around tailored platforms
for creative microwork.
  Keywords: creative work, creativity, creativity support tools, crowdsourcing
