  The paper is concerned with examining the effects that design-for-demise
solutions can have not only on the demisability of components, but also on
their survivability that is their capability to withstand impacts from space
debris. First two models are introduced. A demisability model to predict the
behaviour of spacecraft components during the atmospheric re-entry and a
survivability model to assess the vulnerability of spacecraft structures
against space debris impacts. Two indices that evaluate the level of
demisability and survivability are also proposed. The two models are then used
to study the sensitivity of the demisability and of the survivability indices
as a function of typical design-for-demise options. The demisability and the
survivability can in fact be influenced by the same design parameters in a
competing fashion that is while the demisability is improved, the survivability
is worsened and vice versa. The analysis shows how the design-for-demise
solutions influence the demisability and the survivability independently. In
addition, the effect that a solution has simultaneously on the two criteria is
assessed. Results shows which, among the design-for-demise parameters mostly
influence the demisability and the survivability. For such design parameters
maps are presented, describing their influence on the demisability and
survivability indices. These maps represent a useful tool to quickly assess the
level of demisability and survivability that can be expected from a component,
when specific design parameters are changed.
