  Pedestrian crowding occurs more frequent. As a result of the increasing
pedestrian demand in public space, the limits of pedestrian spaces are of
increasing interest. Some research on the maximum demand that can flow through
a cross-section has been presented, which mainly features simple movement base
cases, low-density situations and/or a homogeneous crowd. Consequently, it is
currently unclear to what extent their findings apply to heterogeneous
high-density crowds, which are often encountered during real-world scenarios.
The CrowdLimits experiment attempted to reproduce crowd movement dynamics of
heterogeneous crowds experiencing higher densities than have been recorded up
to this moment. Here, the aim was to study the impact of the three important
differences between the current laboratory studies and real-world crowd
dynamics in crowded pedestrian spaces simultaneously, namely crowd
heterogeneity, high densities movements, and (more) complex movement base
cases. This study shows that there are substantial differences in the maximum
sustainable flow rate, and the maximum local and global sustainable density for
distinct movement base cases and flow ratios. Moreover, the results provide
evidence of that continuation of flow under very high densities can be
recreated under laboratory conditions using a heterogeneous population of
pedestrians. Besides, the experimental results indicate that the maximum global
flow rate decreases when the scenario becomes more difficult (i.e.
bidirectional to intersecting) and the collision avoidance opportunities
decrease (i.e. 80-20 to 50-50 flow ratio). Thus, this paper concludes that the
maximum flow rate of pedestrian infrastructures decreases with increasing
complexity.
