  Admixture models are a ubiquitous approach to capture latent population
structure in genetic samples. Despite the widespread application of admixture
models, little thought has been devoted to the quality of the model fit or the
accuracy of the estimates of parameters of interest for a particular study.
Here we develop methods for validating admixture models based on posterior
predictive checks (PPCs), a Bayesian method for assessing the quality of a
statistical model. We develop PPCs for five population-level statistics of
interest: within-population genetic variation, background linkage
disequilibrium, number of ancestral populations, between-population genetic
variation, and the downstream use of admixture parameters to correct for
population structure in association studies. Using PPCs, we evaluate the
quality of the model estimates for four qualitatively different population
genetic data sets: the POPRES European individuals, the HapMap phase 3
individuals, continental Indians, and African American individuals. We found
that the same model fitted to different genomic studies resulted in highly
study-specific results when evaluated using PPCs, illustrating the utility of
PPCs for model-based analyses in large genomic studies.
