  While many efforts are currently devoted to vaccines development and
administration, social distancing measures, including severe restrictions such
as lockdowns, remain fundamental tools to contain the spread of COVID-19. A
crucial point for any government is to understand, on the basis of the epidemic
curve, the right temporal instant to set up a lockdown and then to remove it.
Different strategies are being adopted with distinct shades of intensity. USA
and Europe tend to introduce restrictions of considerable temporal length. They
vary in time: a severe lockdown may be reached and then gradually relaxed. An
interesting alternative is the Australian model where short and sharp responses
have repeatedly tackled the virus and allowed people a return to near normalcy.
After a few positive cases are detected, a lockdown is immediately set. In this
paper we show that the Australian model can be generalized and given a rigorous
mathematical analysis, casting strategies of the type short-term pain for
collective gain in the context of sliding-mode control, an important branch of
nonlinear control theory. This allows us to gain important insights regarding
how to implement short-term lockdowns, obtaining a better understanding of
their merits and possible limitations. Our model predicts the duration of the
severe lockdown to be set to maintain e.g. the number of people in intensive
care under a certain threshold. After tuning our strategy exploiting data
collected in Italy, it turns out that COVID-19 epidemic could be e.g.
controlled by alternating one or two weeks of complete lockdown with one or two
months of freedom, respectively. Control strategies of this kind, where the
lockdown's duration is well circumscribed, could be important also to alleviate
coronavirus impact on economy.
