  Large-scale systems with arrays of solid state disks (SSDs) have become
increasingly common in many computing segments. To make such systems resilient,
we can adopt erasure coding such as Reed-Solomon (RS) code as an alternative to
replication because erasure coding can offer a significantly lower storage cost
than replication. To understand the impact of using erasure coding on system
performance and other system aspects such as CPU utilization and network
traffic, we build a storage cluster consisting of approximately one hundred
processor cores with more than fifty high-performance SSDs, and evaluate the
cluster with a popular open-source distributed parallel file system, Ceph. Then
we analyze behaviors of systems adopting erasure coding from the following five
viewpoints, compared with those of systems using replication: (1) storage
system I/O performance; (2) computing and software overheads; (3) I/O
amplification; (4) network traffic among storage nodes; (5) the impact of
physical data layout on performance of RS-coded SSD arrays. For all these
analyses, we examine two representative RS configurations, which are used by
Google and Facebook file systems, and compare them with triple replication that
a typical parallel file system employs as a default fault tolerance mechanism.
Lastly, we collect 54 block-level traces from the cluster and make them
available for other researchers.
