  How do humans learn language, and can the first language be learned at all?
These fundamental questions are still hotly debated. In contemporary
linguistics, there are two major schools of thought that give completely
opposite answers. According to Chomsky's theory of universal grammar, language
cannot be learned because children are not exposed to sufficient data in their
linguistic environment. In contrast, usage-based models of language assume a
profound relationship between language structure and language use. In
particular, contextual mental processing and mental representations are assumed
to have the cognitive capacity to capture the complexity of actual language use
at all levels. The prime example is syntax, i.e., the rules by which words are
assembled into larger units such as sentences. Typically, syntactic rules are
expressed as sequences of word classes. However, it remains unclear whether
word classes are innate, as implied by universal grammar, or whether they
emerge during language acquisition, as suggested by usage-based approaches.
Here, we address this issue from a machine learning and natural language
processing perspective. In particular, we trained an artificial deep neural
network on predicting the next word, provided sequences of consecutive words as
input. Subsequently, we analyzed the emerging activation patterns in the hidden
layers of the neural network. Strikingly, we find that the internal
representations of nine-word input sequences cluster according to the word
class of the tenth word to be predicted as output, even though the neural
network did not receive any explicit information about syntactic rules or word
classes during training. This surprising result suggests, that also in the
human brain, abstract representational categories such as word classes may
naturally emerge as a consequence of predictive coding and processing during
language acquisition.
