  We study a coin-tossing model used by a ratings agency to justify the sale of
constant proportion debt obligations (CPDOs), and prove that it was impossible
for CPDOs to achieve in a finite lifetime the Cash-In event of doubling its
capital. In the best-case scenario of a two-headed coin, we show that the goal
of attaining the Cash-In event in a finite lifetime is precisely the goal,
described more than two thousand years ago in Zeno's Paradox of the Dichotomy,
of obtaining the sum of an infinite geometric series with only a finite number
of terms. In the worst-case scenario of a two-tailed coin, we prove that the
Cash-Out event occurs in exactly ten tosses.
  If the coin is fair, we show that if a CPDO were allowed to toss the coin
without regard for the Cash-Out rule then the CPDO eventually has a high
probability of attaining large net capital levels; however, hundreds of
thousands of tosses may be needed to do so. Moreover, if after many tosses the
CPDO shows a loss then the probability is high that it will Cash-Out on the
very next toss. If a CPDO experiences a tail on the first toss or on an early
toss, we show that, with high probability, the CPDO will have capital losses
thereafter for hundreds of tosses; moreover, its sequence of net capital levels
is a martingale. When the Cash-Out rule holds, we modify the Cash-In rule to
mean that the CPDO attains a profit of 90 percent on its capital; then we prove
that the CPDO game, almost surely, will end in finitely many tosses and the
probability of Cash-Out is at least 89 percent.
  In light of our results, our fears about the durability of worldwide
financial crises are heightened by the existence of other financial derivatives
more arcane than CPDOs. In particular, we view askance all later-generation
CPDOs that depend mean-reversion assumptions or use a betting strategy similar
to their first-generation counterparts.
