  Social media provides an essential platform for shaping and sharing opinions
and consuming information in a decentralized way. However, users often interact
with and are exposed to information mostly aligned with their beliefs, creating
a positive feedback mechanism that reinforces those beliefs and excludes
contrasting ones. In this paper, we study such mechanisms by analyzing the
social network dynamics of controversial Twitter discussions using unsupervised
methods that demand little computational power. Specifically, we focus on the
retweet networks of the climate change conversation during 2019, when important
climate social movements flourished. We find echo chambers of climate believers
and climate skeptics that we identify based solely on the retweeting patterns
of Twitter users. In particular, we study the information sources, or chambers,
consumed by the audience of the leading users of the conversation. Users with
similar (contrasting) ideological positions show significantly high
(low)-overlapping chambers, resulting in a bimodal overlap distribution.
Further, we uncover the ideological position of previously unobserved
high-impact users based on how many audience members fall into either echo
chamber. We uncover the ideology of more than half of the retweeting population
as either climate believers or skeptics and find that the cross-group
communication is small. Moreover, we find that, while the echo chamber
structures are consistent throughout the year, most users inside the echo
chambers change from one week to the next, suggesting that they are a stable
emergent property of the Twittersphere. Interestingly, we detect a significant
decrease in polarization and a significant increase on the number of climate
skeptics that coincides with the main #FridaysForFuture strikes during
September, 2019.
