  The IPv4 addresses exhaustion demands a protocol transition from IPv4 to
IPv6. The original transition technique, the dual stack, is not widely deployed
yet and it demanded the creation of new transition techniques to extend the
transition period. This work makes an experimental comparison of techniques
that use dual stack with a limited IPv4 address. This limited address might be
a RFC 1918 address with a NAT at the Internet Service Provider (ISP) gateway,
also known as Carrier Grade NAT (CGN), or an Address Plus Port (A+P) shared
IPv4 address. The chosen techniques also consider an IPv6 only ISP network. The
transport of the IPv4 packets through the IPv6 only networks may use IPv4
packets encapsulated on IPv6 packets or a double translation, by making one
IPv4 to IPv6 translation to enter the IPv6 only network and one IPv6 to IPv4
translation to return to the IPv4 network. The chosen techniques were DS-Lite,
464XLAT, MAP-E and MAP-T. The first part of the test is to check some of the
most common usages of the Internet by a home user and the impacts of the
transition techniques on the user experience. The second part is a measured
comparison considering bandwidth, jitter and latency introduced by the
techniques and processor usage on the network equipment.
