  In this work, we prove limitations on the known methods for designing matrix
multiplication algorithms. Alman and Vassilevska Williams recently defined the
Universal Method, which substantially generalizes all the known approaches
including Strassen's Laser Method and Cohn and Umans' Group Theoretic Method.
We prove concrete lower bounds on the algorithms one can design by applying the
Universal Method to many different tensors. Our proofs use new tools for upper
bounding the asymptotic slice rank of a wide range of tensors. Our main result
is that the Universal method applied to any Coppersmith-Winograd tensor $CW_q$
cannot yield a bound on $\omega$, the exponent of matrix multiplication, better
than $2.16805$. By comparison, it was previously only known that the weaker
`Galactic Method' applied to $CW_q$ could not achieve an exponent of $2$.
  We also study the Laser Method (which is, in principle, a highly special case
of the Universal Method) and prove that it is "complete" for matrix
multiplication algorithms: when it applies to a tensor $T$, it achieves $\omega
= 2$ if and only if it is possible for the Universal method applied to $T$ to
achieve $\omega = 2$. Hence, the Laser Method, which was originally used as an
algorithmic tool, can also be seen as a lower bounding tool. For example, in
their landmark paper, Coppersmith and Winograd achieved a bound of $\omega \leq
2.376$, by applying the Laser Method to $CW_q$. By our result, the fact that
they did not achieve $\omega=2$ implies a lower bound on the Universal Method
applied to $CW_q$. Indeed, if it were possible for the Universal Method applied
to $CW_q$ to achieve $\omega=2$, then Coppersmith and Winograd's application of
the Laser Method would have achieved $\omega=2$.
