  The ply elastic constants needed for classical lamination theory analysis of
multi-directional laminates may differ from those obtained from unidirectional
laminates because of three dimensional effects. In addition, the unidirectional
laminates may not be available for testing. In such cases, full-field
displacement measurements offer the potential of identifying several material
properties simultaneously. For that, it is desirable to create complex
displacement fields that are strongly influenced by all the elastic constants.
In this work, we explore the potential of using a laminated plate with an
open-hole under traction loading to achieve that and identify all four ply
elastic constants (E 1, E 2, 12, G 12) at once. However, the accuracy of the
identified properties may not be as good as properties measured from individual
tests due to the complexity of the experiment, the relative insensitivity of
the measured quantities to some of the properties and the various possible
sources of uncertainty. It is thus important to quantify the uncertainty (or
confidence) with which these properties are identified. Here, Bayesian
identification is used for this purpose, because it can readily model all the
uncertainties in the analysis and measurements, and because it provides the
full coupled probability distribution of the identified material properties. In
addition, it offers the potential to combine properties identified based on
substantially different experiments. The full-field measurement is obtained by
moir\'e interferometry. For computational efficiency the Bayesian approach was
applied to a proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) of the displacement fields.
The analysis showed that the four orthotropic elastic constants are determined
with quite different confidence levels as well as with significant correlation.
Comparison with manufacturing specifications showed substantial difference in
one constant, and this conclusion agreed with earlier measurement of that
constant by a traditional four-point bending test. It is possible that the POD
approach did not take full advantage of the copious data provided by the full
field measurements, and for that reason that data is provided for others to use
(as on line material attached to the article).
