  Biological and artificial learning agents face numerous choices about how to
learn, ranging from hyperparameter selection to aspects of task distributions
like curricula. Understanding how to make these meta-learning choices could
offer normative accounts of cognitive control functions in biological learners
and improve engineered systems. Yet optimal strategies remain challenging to
compute in modern deep networks due to the complexity of optimizing through the
entire learning process. Here we theoretically investigate optimal strategies
in a tractable setting. We present a learning effort framework capable of
efficiently optimizing control signals on a fully normative objective:
discounted cumulative performance throughout learning. We obtain computational
tractability by using average dynamical equations for gradient descent,
available for simple neural network architectures. Our framework accommodates a
range of meta-learning and automatic curriculum learning methods in a unified
normative setting. We apply this framework to investigate the effect of
approximations in common meta-learning algorithms; infer aspects of optimal
curricula; and compute optimal neuronal resource allocation in a continual
learning setting. Across settings, we find that control effort is most
beneficial when applied to easier aspects of a task early in learning; followed
by sustained effort on harder aspects. Overall, the learning effort framework
provides a tractable theoretical test bed to study normative benefits of
interventions in a variety of learning systems, as well as a formal account of
optimal cognitive control strategies over learning trajectories posited by
established theories in cognitive neuroscience.
