  We develop a duality theory for the problem of maximising expected lifetime
utility from inter-temporal wealth over an infinite horizon, under the minimal
no-arbitrage assumption of No Unbounded Profit with Bounded Risk (NUPBR). We
use only deflators, with no arguments involving equivalent martingale measures,
so do not require the stronger condition of No Free Lunch with Vanishing Risk
(NFLVR). Our formalism also works without alteration for the finite horizon
version of the problem. As well as extending work of Bouchard and Pham to any
horizon and to a weaker no-arbitrage setting, we obtain a stronger duality
statement, because we do not assume by definition that the dual domain is the
polar set of the primal space. Instead, we adopt a method akin to that used for
inter-temporal consumption problems, developing a supermartingale property of
the deflated wealth and its path that yields an infinite horizon budget
constraint and serves to define the correct dual variables. The structure of
our dual space allows us to show that it is convex, without forcing this
property by assumption. We proceed to enlarge the primal and dual domains to
confer solidity to them, and use supermartingale convergence results which
exploit Fatou convergence, to establish that the enlarged dual domain is the
bipolar of the original dual space. The resulting duality theorem shows that
all the classical tenets of convex duality hold. Moreover, at the optimum, the
deflated wealth process is a potential converging to zero. We work out
examples, including a case with a stock whose market price of risk is a
three-dimensional Bessel process, so satisfying NUPBR but not NFLVR.
