  In the study of the evolution of cooperation, many mechanisms have been
proposed to help overcome the self-interested cheating that is individually
optimal in the Prisoners' Dilemma game. These mechanisms include assortative or
networked social interactions, other-regarding preferences considering the
payoffs of others, reciprocity rules to establish cooperation as a social norm,
and multilevel selection involving simultaneous competition between individuals
favoring cheaters and competition between groups favoring cooperators. In this
paper, we build on recent work studying PDE replicator equations for multilevel
selection to understand how within-group mechanisms of assortment,
other-regarding preferences, and both direct and indirect reciprocity can help
to facilitate cooperation in concert with evolutionary competition between
groups. We consider a group-structured population in which interactions between
individuals consist of Prisoners' Dilemma games, and study the dynamics of
multilevel competition determined by the payoffs individuals receive when
interacting according to these within-group mechanisms. We find that the
presence of each of these mechanisms acts synergistically with multilevel
selection for the promotion of cooperation, decreasing the strength of
between-group competition required to sustain long-time cooperation and
increasing the collective payoff achieved by the population. However, we find
that only other-regarding preferences allows for the achievement of socially
optimal collective payoffs for Prisoners' Dilemma games in which average payoff
is maximized by an intermediate mix of cooperators and defectors. For the other
three mechanisms, the multilevel dynamics remain susceptible to a shadow of
lower-level selection, as the collective outcome fails to exceed the payoff of
the all-cooperator group.
