  The tendency for individuals to form social ties with others who are similar
to themselves, known as homophily, is one of the most robust sociological
principles. Since this phenomenon can lead to patterns of interactions that
segregate people along different demographic dimensions, it can also lead to
inequalities in access to information, resources, and opportunities. As we
consider potential interventions that might alleviate the effects of
segregation, we face the challenge that homophily constitutes a pervasive and
organic force that is difficult to push back against. Designing effective
interventions can therefore benefit from identifying counterbalancing social
processes that might be harnessed to work in opposition to segregation.
  In this work, we show that triadic closure -- another common phenomenon that
posits that individuals with a mutual connection are more likely to be
connected to one another -- can be one such process. In doing so, we challenge
a long-held belief that triadic closure and homophily work in tandem. By
analyzing several fundamental network models using popular integration
measures, we demonstrate the desegregating potential of triadic closure. We
further empirically investigate this effect on real-world dynamic networks,
surfacing observations that mirror our theoretical findings. We leverage these
insights to discuss simple interventions that can help reduce segregation in
settings that exhibit an interplay between triadic closure and homophily. We
conclude with a discussion on qualitative implications for the design of
interventions in settings where individuals arrive in an online fashion, and
the designer can influence the initial set of connections.
