  This contribution deals with a two-level discrete decision problem, a
so-called Stackelberg strategic game: A Subset Sum setting is addressed with a
set $N$ of items with given integer weights. One distinguished player, the
leader, may alter the weights of the items in a given subset $L\subset N$, and
a second player, the follower, selects a solution $A\subseteq N$ in order to
utilize a bounded resource in the best possible way. Finally, the leader
receives a payoff from those items of its subset $L$ that were included in the
overall solution $A$, chosen by the follower. We assume that the follower
applies a publicly known, simple, heuristic algorithm to determine its solution
set, which avoids having to solve NP-hard problems.
  Two variants of the problem are considered, depending on whether the leader
is able to control (i.e., change) the weights of its items (i) in the objective
function or (ii) in the bounded resource constraint. The leader's objective is
the maximization of the overall weight reduction, for the first variant, or the
maximization of the weight increase for the latter one. In both variants there
is a trade-off for each item between the contribution value to the leader's
objective and the chance of being included in the follower's solution set.
  We analyze the leader's pricing problem for a natural greedy strategy of the
follower and discuss the complexity of the corresponding problems. We show that
setting the optimal weight values for the leader is, in general, NP-hard. It is
even NP-hard to provide a solution within a constant factor of the best
possible solution. Exact algorithms, based on dynamic programming and running
in pseudopolynomial time, are provided. The additional cases, in which the
follower faces a continuous (linear relaxation) version of the above problems,
are shown to be straightforward to solve.
