  The gist of the quickest change-point detection problem is to detect the
presence of a change in the statistical behavior of a series of sequentially
made observations, and do so in an optimal
detection-speed-vs.-"false-positive"-risk manner. When optimality is understood
either in the generalized Bayesian sense or as defined in Shiryaev's
multi-cyclic setup, the so-called Shiryaev-Roberts (SR) detection procedure is
known to be the "best one can do", provided, however, that the observations'
pre- and post-change distributions are both fully specified. We consider a more
realistic setup, viz. one where the post-change distribution is assumed known
only up to a parameter, so that the latter may be "misspecified". The question
of interest is the sensitivity (or robustness) of the otherwise "best" SR
procedure with respect to a possible misspecification of the post-change
distribution parameter. To answer this question, we provide a case study where,
in a specific Gaussian scenario, we allow the SR procedure to be "out of tune"
in the way of the post-change distribution parameter, and numerically assess
the effect of the "mistuning" on Shiryaev's (multi-cyclic) Stationary Average
Detection Delay delivered by the SR procedure. The comprehensive quantitative
robustness characterization of the SR procedure obtained in the study can be
used to develop the respective theory as well as to provide a rational for
practical design of the SR procedure. The overall qualitative conclusion of the
study is an expected one: the SR procedure is less (more) robust for less
(more) contrast changes and for lower (higher) levels of the false alarm risk.
