  Vehicle electronic systems currently utilize wired networks for power
delivery (from the main battery) and communication (e.g., LIN, CAN, FlexRay)
between nodes. Wired networks cannot practically accommodate nodes in moving
parts (e.g., tires) and with the increasing functional complexity in vehicles,
they require kilometer-long harnesses, significantly increasing fuel
consumption and manufacturing and design costs. As an alternative, energy
harvesting intra-vehicular wireless sensor networks (IVWSN) can accommodate
nodes in all locations and they obviate the need for wiring, significantly
lowering costs. In this paper, we empirically analyze the feasibility of such
an IVWSN framework via extensive in-vehicle measurements for communications at
2.4 GHz, ultra wideband (UWB) and millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies together
with radio frequency (RF), thermal and vibration energy harvesting. Our
analyses show that mmWave performs best for short line-of-sight (LoS) links in
the engine compartment with performance close to UWB for LoS links in the
chassis and passenger compartments in terms of worst case
signal-to-interference-and-noise-ratio. For non-LoS links, which appear
especially more in the engine compartment and chassis, UWB provides the highest
security and reliability. 2.4 GHz suffers heavily from interference in all
compartments while UWB utilizes narrowband suppression techniques at the cost
of lower bandwidth; mmWave inherently experiences very low interference due to
its propagation characteristics. On the other hand, RF energy harvesting
provides up to 1 mW of power in all compartments. Vibration and thermal energy
harvesters can supply all nodes consuming <10 mW in the engine compartment and
all <5 mW nodes in the chassis. In the passenger compartment, thermal
harvesting is not available due to low temperature gradients but vibration and
RF sources can supply <1 mW nodes.
