  Advertisements (ads) are an innate part of search engine business models.
Advertisers are willing to pay search engines to promote their content to a
prominent position in the search result page (SERP). This raises concerns about
the search engine manipulation effect (SEME): the opinions of users can be
influenced by the way search results are presented. In this work, we
investigate the connection between SEME and sponsored content in the health
domain. We conduct a series of user studies in which participants need to
evaluate the effectiveness of different non-prescription natural remedies for
various medical conditions. We present participants SERPs with different
intentionally created biases towards certain viewpoints, with or without
sponsored content, and ask them to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment
only based on the information presented to them. We investigate two types of
sponsored content: 1. Direct marketing ads that directly market the product
without expressing an opinion about its effectiveness, and 2. Indirect
marketing ads that explicitly advocate the product's effectiveness on the
condition in the query. Our results reveal a significant difference between the
influence on users from these two ad types. Though direct marketing ads are
mostly skipped by users, they can tilt users decision making towards more
positive viewpoints. Indirect marketing ads affect both the users' examination
behaviour and their perception of the treatment's effectiveness. We further
discover that the contrast between the indirect marketing ads and the viewpoint
presented in the organic search results plays an important role in users'
decision-making. When the contrast is high, users exhibit a strong preference
towards a negative viewpoint, and when the contrast is low or none, users
exhibit preference towards a more positive viewpoint.
