  Context: Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are eruptions of plasma from the Sun
that travel through interplanetary space and may encounter Earth. CMEs often
enclose a magnetic flux rope (MFR), the orientation of which largely determines
the CME's geoeffectiveness. Current operational CME models do not model MFRs,
but a number of research ones do, including the Open Solar Physics Rapid
Ensemble Information (OSPREI) model. Aims: We report the sensitivity of OSPREI
to a range of user-selected photospheric and coronal conditions. Methods: We
model four separate CMEs observed in situ by Parker Solar Probe (PSP). We vary
the input photospheric conditions using four input magnetograms (HMI
Synchronic, HMI Synoptic, GONG Synoptic Zero-Point Corrected, and GONG ADAPT).
To vary the coronal field reconstruction, we employ the Potential-Field
Source-Surface (PFSS) model and we vary its source-surface height in the range
1.5--3.0 R$_{\odot}$ with 0.1 R$_{\odot}$ increments. Results: We find that
both the input magnetogram and PFSS source surface often affect the evolution
of the CME as it propagates through the Sun's corona into interplanetary space,
and therefore the accuracy of the MFR prediction compared to in-situ data at
PSP. There is no obvious best combination of input magnetogram and PFSS source
surface height. Conclusions: The OSPREI model is moderately sensitive to the
input photospheric and coronal conditions. Based on where the source region of
the CME is located on the Sun, there may be best practices when selecting an
input magnetogram to use.
