  There is by now a large consensus in modern monetary policy. This consensus
has been built upon a dynamic general equilibrium model of optimal monetary
policy as developed by, e.g., Goodfriend and King (1997), Clarida et al.
(1999), Svensson (1999) and Woodford (2003). In this paper we extend the
standard optimal monetary policy model by introducing nonlinearity into the
Phillips curve. Under the specific form of nonlinearity proposed in our paper
(which allows for convexity and concavity and secures closed form solutions),
we show that the introduction of a nonlinear Phillips curve into the structure
of the standard model in a discrete time and deterministic framework produces
radical changes to the major conclusions regarding stability and the efficiency
of monetary policy. We emphasize the following main results: (i) instead of a
unique fixed point we end up with multiple equilibria; (ii) instead of
saddle--path stability, for different sets of parameter values we may have
saddle stability, totally unstable equilibria and chaotic attractors; (iii) for
certain degrees of convexity and/or concavity of the Phillips curve, where
endogenous fluctuations arise, one is able to encounter various results that
seem intuitively correct. Firstly, when the Central Bank pays attention
essentially to inflation targeting, the inflation rate has a lower mean and is
less volatile; secondly, when the degree of price stickiness is high, the
inflation rate displays a larger mean and higher volatility (but this is
sensitive to the values given to the parameters of the model); and thirdly, the
higher the target value of the output gap chosen by the Central Bank, the
higher is the inflation rate and its volatility.
