  Model selection aims to identify a sufficiently well performing model that is
possibly simpler than the most complex model among a pool of candidates.
However, the decision-making process itself can inadvertently introduce
non-negligible bias when the cross-validation estimates of predictive
performance are marred by excessive noise. In finite data regimes,
cross-validated estimates can encourage the statistician to select one model
over another when it is not actually better for future data. While this bias
remains negligible in the case of few models, when the pool of candidates
grows, and model selection decisions are compounded (as in forward search), the
expected magnitude of selection-induced bias is likely to grow too. This paper
introduces an efficient approach to estimate and correct selection-induced bias
based on order statistics. Numerical experiments demonstrate the reliability of
our approach in estimating both selection-induced bias and over-fitting along
compounded model selection decisions, with specific application to forward
search. This work represents a light-weight alternative to more computationally
expensive approaches to correcting selection-induced bias, such as nested
cross-validation and the bootstrap. Our approach rests on several theoretic
assumptions, and we provide a diagnostic to help understand when these may not
be valid and when to fall back on safer, albeit more computationally expensive
approaches. The accompanying code facilitates its practical implementation and
fosters further exploration in this area.
