  Recent publications have described and applied a novel metric that quantifies
the genetic distance of an individual with respect to two population samples,
and have suggested that the metric makes it possible to infer the presence of
an individual of known genotype in a sample for which only the marginal allele
frequencies are known. However, the assumptions, limitations, and utility of
this metric remained incompletely characterized. Here we present an exploration
of the strengths and limitations of that method. In addition to analytical
investigations of the underlying assumptions, we use both real and simulated
genotypes to test empirically the method's accuracy. The results reveal that,
when used as a means by which to identify individuals as members of a
population sample, the specificity is low in several circumstances. We find
that the misclassifications stem from violations of assumptions that are
crucial to the technique yet hard to control in practice, and we explore the
feasibility of several methods to improve the sensitivity. Additionally, we
find that the specificity may still be lower than expected even in ideal
circumstances. However, despite the metric's inadequacies for identifying the
presence of an individual in a sample, our results suggest potential avenues
for future research on tuning this method to problems of ancestry inference or
disease prediction. By revealing both the strengths and limitations of the
proposed method, we hope to elucidate situations in which this distance metric
may be used in an appropriate manner. We also discuss the implications of our
findings in forensics applications and in the protection of GWAS participant
privacy.
