  Together with the variational indicators of chaos, the spectral analysis
methods have also achieved great popularity in the field of chaos detection.
The former are based on the concept of local exponential divergence. The latter
are based on the numerical analysis of some particular quantities of a single
orbit, e.g. its frequency. In spite of having totally different conceptual
bases, they are used for the very same goals such as, for instance, separating
the chaotic and the regular component. In fact, we show herein that the
variational indicators serve to distinguish both components of a Hamiltonian
system in a more reliable fashion than a spectral analysis method does. We
study two start spaces for different energy levels of a self-consistent
triaxial stellar dynamical model by means of some selected variational
indicators and a spectral analysis method. In order to select the appropriate
tools for this paper, we extend previous studies where we make a comparison of
several variational indicators on different scenarios. Herein, we compare the
Average Power Law Exponent (APLE) and an alternative quantity given by the Mean
Exponential Growth factor of Neary Orbits (MEGNO): the MEGNO's Slope Estimation
of the largest Lyapunov Characteristic Exponent (SElLCE). The spectral analysis
method selected for the investigation is the Frequency Modified Fourier
Transform (FMFT). Besides a comparative study of the APLE, the Fast Lyapunov
Indicator (FLI), the Orthogonal Fast Lyapunov Indicator (OFLI) and the
MEGNO/SElLCE, we show that the SElLCE could be an appropriate alternative to
the MEGNO when studying large samples of initial conditions. The SElLCE
separates the chaotic and the regular components reliably and identifies the
different levels of chaoticity. We show that the FMFT is not as reliable as the
SElLCE to describe clearly the chaotic domains in the experiments.
