  In sensing applications where multiple sensors observe the same scene, fusing
sensor outputs can provide improved results. However, if some of the sensors
are providing lower quality outputs, the fused results can be degraded. In this
work, a multi-sensor conflict measure is proposed which estimates multi-sensor
conflict by representing each sensor output as interval-valued information and
examines the sensor output overlaps on all possible n-tuple sensor
combinations. The conflict is based on the sizes of the intervals and how many
sensors output values lie in these intervals. In this work, conflict is defined
in terms of how little the output from multiple sensors overlap. That is, high
degrees of overlap mean low sensor conflict, while low degrees of overlap mean
high conflict. This work is a preliminary step towards a robust conflict and
sensor fusion framework. In addition, a sensor fusion algorithm is proposed
based on a weighted sum of sensor outputs, where the weights for each sensor
diminish as the conflict measure increases. The proposed methods can be
utilized to (1) assess a measure of multi-sensor conflict, and (2) improve
sensor output fusion by lessening weighting for sensors with high conflict.
Using this measure, a simulated example is given to explain the mechanics of
calculating the conflict measure, and stereo camera 3D outputs are analyzed and
fused. In the stereo camera case, the sensor output is corrupted by additive
impulse noise, DC offset, and Gaussian noise. Impulse noise is common in
sensors due to intermittent interference, a DC offset a sensor bias or
registration error, and Gaussian noise represents a sensor output with low SNR.
The results show that sensor output fusion based on the conflict measure shows
improved accuracy over a simple averaging fusion strategy.
