  Collaboration frequently yields better results in decision making, learning,
and haptic interactions than when these actions are performed individually.
However, is collaboration always superior to solo actions, or do its benefits
depend on whether collaborating individuals have different or the same roles?
To answer this question, we asked human subjects to perform virtual-reality
collaborative and individual beam transportation tasks. These tasks were
simulated in real-time by coupling the motion of a pair of hand-held robotic
manipulanda to the virtual beam using virtual spring-dampers. For the task to
be considered successful, participants had to complete it within temporal and
spatial constraints. While the visual feedback remained the same, the
underlying dynamics of the beam were altered to create two distinctive task
contexts which were determined by a moving pivot constraint. When the pivot was
placed at the center of the beam, two hands contribute to the task with
symmetric mechanical leverage (symmetric context). When the pivot was placed at
the left side of the beam, two hands contribute to the task with asymmetric
mechanical leverage (asymmetric context). Participants performed these task
contexts either individually with both hands (solo), or collaboratively by
pairing one hand with another one (dyads). We found that dyads in the
asymmetric context performed better than solos. In contrast, solos performed
the symmetric context better than dyads. Importantly, we found that two hands
took different roles in the asymmetric context for both solos and dyads. In
contrast, the contribution from each hand was statistically indistinguishable
in the symmetric context. Our findings suggest that better performance in dyads
than solos is not a general phenomenon, but rather that collaboration yields
better performance only when role specialization emerges in dyadic
interactions.
