  There is as yet no theoretical framework to guide the search for emergent
constraints. As a result, there are significant risks that indiscriminate
data-mining of the multidimensional outputs from GCMs could lead to spurious
correlations and less than robust constraints on future changes. To mitigate
against this risk, Cox et al (hereafter CHW18) proposed a theory-motivated
emergent constraint, using the one-box Hasselmann model to identify a linear
relationship between ECS and a metric of global temperature variability
involving both temperature standard deviation and autocorrelation ($\Psi$). A
number of doubts have been raised about this approach, some concerning the
theory and the application of the one-box model to understand relationships in
complex GCMs which are known to have more than the single characteristic
timescale. We illustrate theory driven testing of emergent constraints using
this as an example, namely we demonstrate that the linear $\Psi$-ECS
proportionality is not an artifact of the one-box model and rigorously features
to a good approximation in more realistic, yet still analytically soluble
conceptual models, namely the two-box and diffusion models. Each of the
conceptual models predict different power spectra with only the diffusion
model's pink spectrum being compatible with observations and the complex CMIP5
GCMs. We also show that the theoretically predicted $\Psi$-ECS relationship
exists in the \texttt{piControl} as well as \texttt{historical} CMIP5
experiments and that the differing gradients of the proportionality are
inversely related to the effective forcing in that experiment.
