  This work aims to monitor and control the presence of UPNA research staff in
the main research profiles platforms, not only in the most obvious ones such as
Google Scholar Citation, Researcher ID, Scopus ID and ORCID, but also in other
services that, in practice, they function as research profiles, such as
Mendeley, Linkedin, ResearchGate, Academia.edu and Academica-e. We also find it
interesting to analyze that presence and see how it responds to a variables,
such as the department, gender, job category, research group. In this study we
have excluded some platforms for different reasons. Dialnet profiles are
entered from the UPNA library (BUPNA), which means that all those who meet the
requirements for inclusion would be there, so their analysis does not make much
sense, since it depends on factors outside the will of the researcher himself.
The same is the case with the UPNA Scientific Production Portal (PPC): the data
is entered from the Vicerrectorado de Investigaci\'on and should include all
members of the UPNA PDI. Using as a base the census of university research
staff provided by the Vicerrectorado de Investigaci\'on, it has been verified,
for each author, the existence or not of a profile in the different services
studied. The results have been tabulated in an Excel file to be able to analyze
them later. The data has been collected in March 2018 for Orcid, ResearcherID,
ScopusID, Google Scholar Citations and Mendeley. In November 2018, data from
Academica-e, Academia.edu, ResearchGate and Linkedin were taken. For each of
the profiles, a search by institutional affiliation was used, when possible, to
obtain a first list of UPNA research personnel with that profile. Subsequently,
a search was carried out, person by person, of the rest of the research staff
that did not appear in that first list.
