  While the potential for peer-to-peer electricity trading, where households
trade surplus electricity with peers in a local energy market, is rapidly
growing, the drivers of participation in this trading scheme have been
understudied so far. In particular, there is a dearth of research on the role
of non-monetary incentives for trading surplus electricity, despite their
potentially important role. This paper presents the first discrete choice
experiment conducted with prosumers (i.e. proactive households actively
managing their electricity production and consumption) in the Netherlands.
Electricity trading preferences are analyzed regarding economic, environmental,
social and technological parameters, based on survey data (N = 74). The
dimensions most valued by prosumers are the environmental and, to a lesser
extent, economic dimensions, highlighting the key motivating roles of
environmental factors. Furthermore, a majority of prosumers stated they would
provide surplus electricity for free or for non-monetary compensations,
especially to energy-poor households. These observed trends were more
pronounced among members of energy cooperatives. This suggests that
peer-to-peer energy trading can advance a socially just energy transition.
Regarding policy recommendations, these findings point to the need for
communicating environmental and economic benefits when marketing P2P
electricity trading platforms and for technical designs enabling effortless and
customizable transactions
