  Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of
shape and heterogeneity features in both Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and
low-dose Computed Tomography (CT) components of PET/CT. A secondary objective
was to investigate the impact of image quantization.Material and methods: A
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act -compliant secondary
analysis of deidentified prospectively acquired PET/CT test-retest datasets of
74 patients from multi-center Merck and ACRIN trials was performed.
Metabolically active volumes were automatically delineated on PET with Fuzzy
Locally Adaptive Bayesian algorithm. 3DSlicerTM was used to semi-automatically
delineate the anatomical volumes on low-dose CT components. Two quantization
methods were considered: a quantization into a set number of bins
(quantizationB) and an alternative quantization with bins of fixed width
(quantizationW). Four shape descriptors, ten first-order metrics and 26
textural features were computed. Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify
repeatability. Features were subsequently categorized as very reliable,
reliable, moderately reliable and poorly reliable with respect to the
corresponding volume variability. Results: Repeatability was highly variable
amongst features. Numerous metrics were identified as poorly or moderately
reliable. Others were (very) reliable in both modalities, and in all categories
(shape, 1st-, 2nd- and 3rd-order metrics). Image quantization played a major
role in the features repeatability. Features were more reliable in PET with
quantizationB, whereas quantizationW showed better results in CT.Conclusion:
The test-retest repeatability of shape and heterogeneity features in PET and
low-dose CT varied greatly amongst metrics. The level of repeatability also
depended strongly on the quantization step, with different optimal choices for
each modality. The repeatability of PET and low-dose CT features should be
carefully taken into account when selecting metrics to build multiparametric
models.
