  There has been a recent surge of interest in the role of information in
strategic interactions. Much of this work seeks to understand how the realized
equilibrium of a game is influenced by uncertainty in the environment and the
information available to players in the game. Lurking beneath this literature
is a fundamental, yet largely unexplored, algorithmic question: how should a
"market maker" who is privy to additional information, and equipped with a
specified objective, inform the players in the game? This is an informational
analogue of the mechanism design question, and views the information structure
of a game as a mathematical object to be designed, rather than an exogenous
variable.
  We initiate a complexity-theoretic examination of the design of optimal
information structures in general Bayesian games, a task often referred to as
signaling. We focus on one of the simplest instantiations of the signaling
question: Bayesian zero-sum games, and a principal who must choose an
information structure maximizing the equilibrium payoff of one of the players.
In this setting, we show that optimal signaling is computationally intractable,
and in some cases hard to approximate, assuming that it is hard to recover a
planted clique from an Erdos-Renyi random graph. This is despite the fact that
equilibria in these games are computable in polynomial time, and therefore
suggests that the hardness of optimal signaling is a distinct phenomenon from
the hardness of equilibrium computation. Necessitated by the non-local nature
of information structures, en-route to our results we prove an "amplification
lemma" for the planted clique problem which may be of independent interest.
