  Mediation analyses are a statistical tool for testing the hypothesis about
how the relationship between two variables may be direct or indirect via a
third variable. Assessing statistical significance has been an area of active
research; however, assessment of statistical power has been hampered by the
lack of closed form calculations and the need for substantial amounts of
computational simulations. The current work provides a detailed explanation of
implementing large scale simulation procedures within a shared computing
cluster environment. In addition, all results and code for implementing these
procedures is publicly available. The resulting power analyses compare the
effects of sample size and strength and direction of the relationships between
the three variables. Comparisons of three confidence interval calculation
methods demonstrated that the bias-corrected method is optimal and requires
approximately ten less participants than the percentile method to achieve
equivalent power. Differing strengths of distal and proximal effects were
compared and did not differentially affect the power to detect mediation
effects. Suppression effects were explored and demonstrate that in the presence
of no observed relationship between two variables, entrance of the mediating
variable into the model can reveal a suppressed relationship. The power to
detect suppression effects is similar to unsuppressed mediation. These results
and their methods provide important information about the power of mediation
models for study planning. Of greater importance is that the methods lay the
groundwork for assessment of statistical power of more complicated models
involving multiple mediators and moderators.
