  Both experimental and computational biology is becoming increasingly
automated. Laboratory experiments are now performed automatically on
high-throughput machinery, while computational models are synthesized or
inferred automatically from data. However, integration between automated tasks
in the process of biological discovery is still lacking, largely due to
incompatible or missing formal representations. While theories are expressed
formally as computational models, existing languages for encoding and
automating experimental protocols often lack formal semantics. This makes it
challenging to extract novel understanding by identifying when theory and
experimental evidence disagree due to errors in the models or the protocols
used to validate them. To address this, we formalize the syntax of a core
protocol language, which provides a unified description for the models of
biochemical systems being experimented on, together with the discrete events
representing the liquid-handling steps of biological protocols. We present both
a deterministic and a stochastic semantics to this language, both defined in
terms of hybrid processes. In particular, the stochastic semantics captures
uncertainties in equipment tolerances, making it a suitable tool for both
experimental and computational biologists. We illustrate how the proposed
protocol language can be used for automated verification and synthesis of
laboratory experiments on case studies from the fields of chemistry and
molecular programming.
