  Soft electronic skins are one of the means to turn an industrial manipulator
into a collaborative robot. For manipulators that are already fit for physical
human-robot collaboration, soft skins can make them safer. In this work, we
study the after impact behavior of two collaborative manipulators (UR10e and
KUKA LBR iiwa) and one classical industrial manipulator (KUKA Cybertech), in
presence or absence of an industrial protective skin (AIRSKIN). In addition, we
isolate the effects of the passive padding and the active contribution of the
sensor to robot reaction. We present a total of 2250 collision measurements and
study the impact force, contact duration, clamping force, and impulse. The
dataset is publicly available. We summarize our results as follows. For
transient collisions, the passive skin properties lowered the impact forces by
about 40 %. During quasi-static contact, the effect of skin covers -- active or
passive -- cannot be isolated from the collision detection and reaction by the
collaborative robots. Important effects of the stop categories triggered by the
active protective skin were found. We systematically compare the different
settings and the empirically established safe velocities with prescriptions by
the ISO/TS 15066. In some cases, up to the quadruple of the ISO/TS 15066
prescribed velocity can comply with the impact force limits and thus be
considered safe. We propose an extension of the formulas relating impact force
and permissible velocity that take into account the stiffness and compressible
thickness of the protective cover, leading to better predictions of the
collision forces. At the same time, this work emphasizes the need for in situ
measurements as all the factors we studied -- presence of active/passive skin,
safety stop settings, robot collision reaction, impact direction, and, of
course, velocity -- have effects on the force evolution after impact.
