  \emph{Reductions} combine collections of input values with an associative
(and usually also commutative) operator to produce either a single, or a
collection of outputs. They are ubiquitous in computing, especially with big
data and deep learning. When the \emph{same} input value contributes to
multiple output values, there is a tremendous opportunity for reducing (pun
intended) the computational effort. This is called \emph{simplification}.
\emph{Polyhedral reductions} are reductions where the input and output data
collections are (dense) multidimensional arrays (i.e., \emph{tensors}),
accessed with linear/affine functions of the indices. % \emph{generalized
tensor contractions} Gautam and Rajopadhye \cite{sanjay-popl06} showed how
polyhedral reductions could be simplified automatically (through compile time
analysis) and optimally (the resulting program had minimum asymptotic
complexity). Yang, Atkinson and Carbin \cite{yang2020simplifying} extended this
to the case when (some) input values depend on (some) outputs. Specifically,
they showed how the optimal simplification problem could be formulated as a
bilinear programming problem, and for the case when the reduction operator
admits an inverse, they gave a heuristic solution that retained optimality. In
this note, we show that simplification of dependent reductions can be
formulated as a simple extension of the Gautam-Rajopadhye backtracking search
algorithm.
