  The main goal in this paper is to point out that quantity $||\nabla R||^2(p)$
on a harmonic space can not be determined by the spectra of local geodesic
spheres or balls, therefore the main results of [AM-S] (quoted in the title)
are wrong. My strong interest in the above theorem is motivated by the fact
that it contradicts some of my isospectrality examples constructed on geodesic
spheres and balls of certain harmonic manifolds. The authors overlooked that
the Lichnerowicz identity is not determined by the given spectral data, and so
is the final crucial equation obtained by eliminating with the Lichnerowicz
identity. In short, the above theorem has falsely been established by
spectrally undetermined identities which can not be computed (determined) by
the spectra of local geodesic spheres. More complicated spectrally undetermined
functions cause the problems also in case of local geodesic balls. I describe
also a strong physical argument which clearly explains why the manifolds
appearing in my examples are isospectral. It must be pointed out, however, that
a very remarkable new idea, namely, the asymptotic expansion of the heat
invariants $a_k(p,r)$ defined on geodesic spheres, $S_p(r)$, is introduced in
the paper. It can be used for developing both geometric uncertainty theory and
global vs. local spectral investigations. Among my contributions to this
developing field is the following statement: Average volumes, $\int
vol(B_p(r))dp$ resp. $\int vol(S_p(r))dp$, of geodesic balls resp. spheres are
generically not determined by the spectra of compact Riemann manifolds. This
theorem interestingly contrasts the statement asserting that the volume of the
whole manifold can be determined in terms of this global spectrum. We also
have: Music written for local drums can not be played, in general, on the whole
manifold.
