  The engagement with online health misinformation, particularly during
COVID-19, poses unprecedented threats to societal well-being. The
susceptibility to misinformation is heightened within a multi-topic context
during health crises. This paper addresses a critical gap in understanding
online engagement with multi-topic misinformation related to COVID-19. We
conduct a comprehensive analysis of 7273 fact-checked source news claims
related to COVID-19 and their corresponding social engagement on X/Twitter
through the lens of topic diversity and conspiracy theories. Our analysis
yields several key findings: (i) False news, especially when accompanied by
conspiracy theories, exhibits higher topic diversity compared to true news.
(ii) In terms of engagement from source claims to online posts, false news has
a longer lifetime and receives more posts on X/Twitter compared to true news.
Additionally, the integration of conspiracy theories is associated with a
longer lifetime of COVID-19 misinformation. (iii) News posts characterized by
heightened topic diversity receive increased social engagement on X/Twitter in
terms of reposts, likes, and replies. However, the effect of topic diversity is
moderated by the news veracity. High topic diversity is linked to more
engagement with true news posts compared to false news posts. (iiii) The
integration of conspiracy theories is linked to more social engagement with
misinformation on X/Twitter. False news posts that contain conspiracy theories,
on average, receive 40.8% more reposts, 45.2% more likes, and 44.1% more
replies compared to false news posts without conspiracy theories. These
findings offer insights into understanding the engagement with multi-topic
misinformation during health crises and highlight the importance of considering
topic diversity and conspiracy theories in developing targeted interventions.
