  This paper is our attempt at answering a twofold question covering the areas
of ethics and authorship analysis. Firstly, since the methods used for
performing authorship analysis imply that an author can be recognized by the
content he or she creates, we were interested in finding out whether it would
be possible for an author identification system to correctly attribute works to
authors if in the course of years they have undergone a major psychological
transition. Secondly, and from the point of view of the evolution of an
author's ethical values, we checked what it would mean if the authorship
attribution system encounters difficulties in detecting single authorship. We
set out to answer those questions through performing a binary authorship
analysis task using a text classifier based on a pre-trained transformer model
and a baseline method relying on conventional similarity metrics. For the test
set, we chose works of Arata Osada, a Japanese educator and specialist in the
history of education, with half of them being books written before the World
War II and another half in the 1950s, in between which he underwent a
transformation in terms of political opinions. As a result, we were able to
confirm that in the case of texts authored by Arata Osada in a time span of
more than 10 years, while the classification accuracy drops by a large margin
and is substantially lower than for texts by other non-fiction writers,
confidence scores of the predictions remain at a similar level as in the case
of a shorter time span, indicating that the classifier was in many instances
tricked into deciding that texts written over a time span of multiple years
were actually written by two different people, which in turn leads us to
believe that such a change can affect authorship analysis, and that historical
events have great impact on a person's ethical outlook as expressed in their
writings.
