  The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (phase 6) (CMIP6) global
circulation models (GCMs) predict equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) values
ranging between 1.8 and 5.7 $^\circ$C. To narrow this range, we group 38 GCMs
into low, medium and high ECS subgroups and test their accuracy and precision
in hindcasting the mean global surface warming observed from 1980-1990 to
2011-2021 in the ERA5 T2m, HadCRUT5, GISTEMP v4, and NOAAGlobTemp v5 global
surface temperature records. We also compare the GCM hindcasts to the
satellite-based UAH MSU v6 lower troposphere global temperature record. We use
143 GCM ensemble averaged simulations under four slightly different forcing
conditions, 688 GCM member simulations, and Monte Carlo modeling of the
internal variability of the GCMs under three different model accuracy
requirements. We found that the medium and high ECS GCMs run too hot up to over
95% and 97% of cases, respectively. The low ECS GCM group agrees best with the
warming values obtained from the surface temperature records, ranging between
0.52 and 0.58 $^\circ$C. However, when comparing the observed and GCM
hindcasted warming on land and ocean regions, the surface-based temperature
records appear to exhibit a significant warming bias. If the satellite based
UAH MSU lt record is accurate, actual surface warming from 1980 to 2021 may
have been around 0.40 $^\circ$C (or less), i.e. up to about 30% less than what
is reported by the surface based temperature records. The latter situation
implies that even the low ECS models would have produced excessive warming from
1980 to 2021. These results suggest that the actual ECS may be relatively low,
i.e. lower than 3 $^\circ$C or even less than 2 $^\circ$C. Therefore, the
projected global climate warming over the next few decades could be moderate
and probably not particularly alarming.
