  Surfactant choice is key in starting the phenomena of artificial
morphogenesis, the bottom-up growth of geometric particles from cooled emulsion
droplets, as well as the bottom-up self-assembly of rechargeable microswimmer
robots from similar droplets. The choice of surfactant is crucial for the
formation of a plastic phase at the oil-water interface, for the kinetics, and
for the onset temperature of these processes. But further details are needed to
control these processes for bottom-up manufacturing and understand their
molecular mechanisms. Still unknown are the minimum concentration of the
surfactant necessary to induce the processes, or competing effects in a mixture
of surfactants when only one is capable of inducing shapes. Here we
systematically study the effect of surfactant nature and concentration on the
shape-inducing behaviour of hexadecane-in-water emulsions with both cationic
(CTAB) and non-ionic (Tween, Brij) surfactants over up to five orders of
magnitude of concentration. The minimum effective concentration is found
approximately equal to the critical micelle concentration (CMC), or the
solubility limit below the Krafft point of the surfactant. However, the
emulsions show low stability at the vicinity of CMC. In a mixed surfactant
experiment (Tween 60 and Tween 20), where only one (Tween 60) can induce shapes
we elucidate the role of competition at the interface during mixed surfactant
adsorption by varying the composition. We find that a lower bound of ~ 75%
surface coverage of the shape-inducing surfactant with C14 or longer chain
length is necessary for self-shaping to occur. The resulting technique produces
a clear visual readout of otherwise difficult to investigate molecular events
and establish basic requirements for minimum concentration and protocols to
find % surface coverage to induce oil self-shaping by surfactant mixtures.
