  Interference tests are used in shale reservoirs to evaluate the strength of
connectivity between wells. The results inform engineering decisions about well
spacing. In this paper, we propose a new procedure for interpreting
interference tests. We fit the initial interference response with the solution
to the 1D diffusivity equation at an offset observation point. It is
advantageous to use the initial interference response, rather than the
subsequent trend, because it is less affected by nonlinearities, time-varying
boundary conditions, and uncertainties about flow geometry and regime. From the
curve fit, we estimate the hydraulic diffusivity and conductivity of the
fractures connecting the wells. For engineering purposes, it would be useful to
quantify the impact of interference on well production. Thus, we seek a
relationship between the degree of production interference (DPI) and an
appropriate dimensionless quantity that can be derived from the estimate of
fracture conductivity. Using simulations run under a wide range of conditions,
we find that the classical definition for dimensionless fracture conductivity
does not achieve a consistent prediction of DPI. This occurs because the
dimensionless fracture conductivity is derived assuming radial flow geometry,
but the dominant flow geometry during shale production is linear. We also find
that the CPG (Chow Pressure Group) metric does not yield consistently accurate
predictions of DPI. As an alternative, we derive a dimensionless quantity
similar to the classical dimensionless fracture conductivity, but derived for
linear, flow geometry. Using this approach, we calculate a dimensionless
interference length that collapses all cases onto a single curve that predicts
DPI as a function of fracture conductivity, well spacing, and formation
properties. We conclude by applying the new method to field cases from the
Anadarko and Delaware Basins.
