  During the current century, each major coronavirus outbreak has triggered a
quick surge of academic publications on this topic. The spike in research
publications following the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19), however, has been
like no other. The global crisis caused by the Covid-19 pandemic has mobilised
scientific efforts in an unprecedented way. In less than five months, more than
12,000 research items have been indexed while the number increasing every day.
With the crisis affecting all aspects of life, research on Covid-19 seems to
have become a focal point of interest across many academic disciplines. Here,
scientometric aspects of the Covid-19 literature are analysed and contrasted
with those of the two previous major Coronavirus diseases, i.e. SARS and MERS.
The focus is on the co-occurrence of key-terms, bibliographic coupling and
citation relations of journals and collaborations between countries. Certain
recurring patterns across all three literatures were discovered. All three
outbreaks have commonly generated three distinct and major cohort of studies:
(i) studies linked to the public health response and epidemic control, (ii)
studies associated with the chemical constitution of the virus and (iii)
studies related to treatment, vaccine and clinical care. While studies
affiliated with the category (i) seem to have been the first to emerge, they
overall received least numbers of citations compared to those of the two other
categories. Covid-19 studies seem to have been distributed across a broader
variety of journals and subject areas. Clear links are observed between the
geographical origins of each outbreak or the local geographical severity of
each outbreak and the magnitude of research originated from regions. Covid-19
studies also display the involvement of authors from a broader variety of
countries compared to SARS and MRS.
