  Predicting the adaptation of populations to a changing environment is crucial
to assess the impact of human activities on biodiversity. Many theoretical
studies have tackled this issue by modeling the evolution of quantitative
traits subject to stabilizing selection around an optimum phenotype, whose
value is shifted continuously through time. In this context, the population
fate results from the equilibrium distribution of the trait, relative to the
moving optimum. Such a distribution may vary with the shape of selection, the
system of reproduction, the number of loci, the mutation kernel or their
interactions. Here, we develop a methodology that provides quantitative
measures of population maladaptation and potential of survival directly from
the entire profile of the phenotypic distribution, without any a priori on its
shape.We investigate two different models of reproduction (asexual and
infinitesimal sexual models of inheritance), with general forms of selection.In
particular, we recover that fitness functions such that selection weakens away
from the optimum lead to evolutionary tipping points, with an abrupt collapse
of the population when the speed of environmental change is too high. Our
unified framework furthermore allows highlighting the underlying mechanisms
that lead to this phenomenon. More generally, it allows discussing similarities
and discrepancies between the two reproduction models, the latter being
ultimately explained by different constraints on the evolution of the
phenotypic variance. We demonstrate that the mean fitness in the population
crucially depends on the shape of the selection function in the sexual
infinitesimal model, in contrast with the asexual model.In the asexual model,
we also investigate the effect of the mutation kernel and we show that kernels
with higher kurtosis tend to reduce maladaptation and improve fitness,
especially in fast changing environments.
