  We develop and compare model-error representation schemes derived from data
assimilation increments and nudging tendencies in multi-decadal simulations of
the community atmosphere model, version 6. Each scheme applies a bias
correction during simulation run-time to the zonal and meridional winds. We
quantify to which extent such online adjustment schemes improve the model
climatology and variability on daily to seasonal timescales. Generally, we
observe a ca. 30% improvement to annual upper-level zonal winds, with largest
improvements in boreal spring (ca. 35%) and winter (ca. 47%). Despite only
adjusting the wind fields, we additionally observe a ca. 20% improvement to
annual precipitation over land, with the largest improvements in boreal fall
(ca. 36%) and winter (ca. 25%), and a ca. 50% improvement to annual sea level
pressure, globally. With mean state adjustments alone, the dominant pattern of
boreal low-frequency variability over the Atlantic (the North Atlantic
Oscillation) is significantly improved. Additional stochasticity further
increases the modal explained variances, which brings it closer to the observed
value. A streamfunction tendency decomposition reveals that the improvement is
due to an adjustment to the high- and low-frequency eddy-eddy interaction
terms. In the Pacific, the mean state adjustment alone led to an erroneous
deepening of the Aleutian low, but this was remedied with the addition of
stochastically selected tendencies. Finally, from a practical standpoint, we
discuss the performance of using data assimilation increments versus nudging
tendencies for an online model-error representation.
