  In this paper I elaborated on the idea of David Harel and Amir Pnueli to
think systems and their interaction from the point of view of their
compositional behaviour.
  The obvious idea to base the composition of systems on the concept of
computable functions and their compositional behaviour leads to supersystem
formation by composing simple and recursive systems.
  But this approach does not allow to account adequately for systems that
interact with many other systems in a stateful and nondeterministic way, which
is why I introduce the concept of interactivity and cooperation. In order to
describe interactive systems satisfactorily, a balance is needed between the
representation of their relationship to all the other systems and what happens
within the systems. I thus introduce the complementary descriptions of external
interactions and internal coordination, both based on a role concept in the
sense of a projection of a system onto its interactions. It actually mirrors
the internal vs. external distinction initially introduced by the system model
and reflects the problem how systems are supposed to cooperate without melting
into a common supersystem.
  Components become systems, intended for (a given) composition and with the
notion of an interface we subsume all relevant information necessary for this
composition.
  I introduce the concept of decisions as an additional internal input alphabet
in order to determine nondeterministic interactions and thus fictitiously
assume a system function where we actually do not have the knowledge to do so.
Thus, the close relationship between protocols and games becomes obvious.
  Finally, I transfer the gained insights to the field of IT system
architecture and introduce the concept of the "interaction oriented
architecture (IOA)" for interactive systems with its three elements of roles,
coordination rules, and decisions.
