  This paper considers the pricing of long-term options on assets such as
housing, where either government intervention or the economic nature of the
asset is assumed to limit large falls in prices. The observed asset price is
modelled by a geometric Brownian motion (the 'notional price') reflected at a
lower barrier. The resulting observed price has standard dynamics but with
localised intervention at the barrier, which allows arbitrage with interim
losses; this is funded by the government's unlimited powers of intervention,
and its exploitation is subject to credit constraints. Despite the lack of an
equivalent martingale measure for the observed price, options on this price can
be expressed as compound options on the arbitrage-free notional price, to which
standard risk-neutral arguments can be applied. Because option deltas tend to
zero when the observed price approaches the barrier, hedging with the observed
price gives the same results as hedging with the notional price, and so exactly
replicates option payoffs. Hedging schemes are not unique, with the cheapest
scheme for any derivative being the one which best exploits the interventions
at the barrier. The price of a put is clear: direct replication has a lower
initial cost than synthetic replication, and the replication portfolio always
has positive value. The price of a call is ambiguous: synthetic replication has
a lower initial cost than direct replication, but the replication portfolio may
give interim losses, and so the preferred replication strategy (and hence
price) of a call may depend on what margin payments need to be made on these
losses.
