  The precision with which hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) is obtained
determines how accurately important observables, such as the muon anomalous
magnetic moment, a_\mu, or the low-energy running of the electromagnetic
coupling, \alpha, are predicted. The two most precise approaches for
determining HVP are: dispersive relations combined with e+e- to hadrons
cross-section data, and lattice QCD. However, the results obtained in these two
approaches display significant tensions, whose origins are not understood. Here
we present a framework that sheds light on this issue and, if the two
approaches can be reconciled, allows them to be combined. Via this framework,
we test the hypothesis that the tensions can be explained by modifying the
R-ratio in different intervals of center-of-mass energy sqrt(s). As
ingredients, we consider observables that have been precisely determined in
both approaches. These are the leading hadronic contributions to a_\mu, to the
so-called intermediate window observable and to the running of \alpha between
spacelike virtualities 1GeV^2 and 10GeV^2 (for which only a preliminary lattice
result exists). Our tests take into account all uncertainties and correlations,
as well as uncertainties on uncertainties in the lattice results. Among our
findings, the most striking is that results obtained in the two approaches can
be made to agree for all three observables by modifying the \rho peak in the
experimental spectrum. In particular, we find that this requires a common ~5\%
increase in the contributions of the peak to each of the three observables.
This finding is robust against the presence or absence of one of the
constraining observables. However, such an increase is much larger than the
uncertainties on the measured R-ratio. We also discuss a variety of
generalizations of the methods used here, as well as the limits in the
information that can be extracted...
