  Standard robot grippers are not designed for elasticity estimation. In this
work, a professional biaxial compression device was used as a control setup to
study the accuracy with which material properties can be estimated by two
standard parallel jaw grippers and a force/torque sensor mounted at the robot
wrist. Using three sets of deformable objects, different parameters were varied
to observe their effect on measuring material characteristics: (1) repeated
compression cycles, (2) compression speed, and (3) the surface area of the
gripper jaws. Gripper effort versus position curves were obtained and
transformed into stress/strain curves. The modulus of elasticity was estimated
at different strain points. Viscoelasticity was assessed using the energy
absorbed in a compression/decompression cycle, the Kelvin-Voigt, and
Hunt-Crossley models. Our results can be summarized as follows: (1) better
results were obtained with slower compression speeds, while additional
compression cycles or surface area did not improve estimation; (2) the robot
grippers, even after calibration, were found to have a limited capability of
delivering accurate estimates of absolute values of Young's modulus and
viscoelasticity; (3) relative ordering of material characteristics was largely
consistent across different grippers; (4) despite the nonlinear characteristics
of deformable objects, fitting linear stress/strain approximations led to more
stable results than local estimates of Young's modulus; (5) to assess
viscoelasticity, the Hunt-Crossley model worked best. Finally, we show that a
two-dimensional space representing elasticity and viscoelasticity estimates is
advantageous for the discrimination of deformable objects. A single-grasp,
online, classification and sorting of such objects is thus possible. An
additional contribution is the dataset and data processing codes that we make
publicly available.
