  The $\Lambda$CDM model is the current standard model in cosmology thanks to
its ability to reproduce the observations. Its first observational evidence
appeared from the type Ia supernovae (SNIa) Hubble diagram. However, there has
been some debate in the literature concerning the statistical treatment of
SNIa. In this paper we relax the standard assumption that SNIa intrinsic
luminosity is independent of the redshift, and we examine whether it may have
an impact on the accelerated nature of the expansion of the Universe. In order
to be as general as possible, we reconstruct the expansion rate of the Universe
through a cubic spline interpolation fitting observations of different probes:
SNIa, baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), and the high-redshift information
from the cosmic microwave background (CMB). We show that when SNIa intrinsic
luminosity is not allowed to vary as a function of the redshift, cosmic
acceleration is definitely proven in a model-independent approach. However,
allowing for a redshift dependence, a non-accelerated reconstruction of the
expansion rate is able to fit, as well as $\Lambda$CDM, the combination of SNIa
and BAO data, both treating the BAO standard ruler $r_d$ as a free parameter,
or adding the recently published prior from CMB observations. We further extend
the analysis by including the CMB data, and we show that a non-accelerated
reconstruction is able to nicely fit this combination of low and high-redshift
data. In this work we present a model-independent reconstruction of a
non-accelerated expansion rate of the Universe that is able to nicely fit all
the main background cosmological probes. However, the predicted value of $H_0$
is in tension with recent direct measurements. Our analysis points out that a
final, reliable, and consensual value for $H_0$ would be critical to
definitively prove the cosmic acceleration in a model-independent way.
[Abridged]
