  The boxicity $\operatorname{box}(H)$ of a graph $H$ is the smallest integer
$d$ such that $H$ is the intersection of $d$ interval graphs, or equivalently,
that $H$ is the intersection graph of axis-aligned boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$.
These intersection representations can be interpreted as covering
representations of the complement $H^c$ of $H$ with co-interval graphs, that
is, complements of interval graphs. We follow the recent framework of global,
local and folded covering numbers (Knauer and Ueckerdt, Discrete Mathematics
339 (2016)) to define two new parameters: the local boxicity
$\operatorname{box}_\ell(H)$ and the union boxicity
$\overline{\operatorname{box}}(H)$ of $H$. The union boxicity of $H$ is the
smallest $d$ such that $H^c$ can be covered with $d$ vertex-disjoint unions of
co-interval graphs, while the local boxicity of $H$ is the smallest $d$ such
that $H^c$ can be covered with co-interval graphs, at most $d$ at every vertex.
  We show that for every graph $H$ we have $\operatorname{box}_\ell(H) \leq
\overline{\operatorname{box}}(H) \leq \operatorname{box}(H)$ and that each of
these inequalities can be arbitrarily far apart. Moreover, we show that local
and union boxicity are also characterized by intersection representations of
appropriate axis-aligned boxes in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We demonstrate with a few
striking examples, that in a sense, the local boxicity is a better indication
for the complexity of a graph, than the classical boxicity.
