  We introduce a family of random measures $M_{H,T} (d t)$, namely log S-fBM,
such that, for $H>0$, $M_{H,T}(d t) = e^{\omega_{H,T}(t)} d t$ where
$\omega_{H,T}(t)$ is a Gaussian process that can be considered as a stationary
version of an $H$-fractional Brownian motion. Moreover, when $H \to 0$, one has
$M_{H,T}(d t) \rightarrow {\widetilde M}_{T}(d t)$ (in the weak sense) where
${\widetilde M}_{T}(d t)$ is the celebrated log-normal multifractal random
measure (MRM). Thus, this model allows us to consider, within the same
framework, the two popular classes of multifractal ($H = 0$) and rough
volatility ($0<H < 1/2$) models. The main properties of the log S-fBM are
discussed and their estimation issues are addressed. We notably show that the
direct estimation of $H$ from the scaling properties of $\ln(M_{H,T}([t,
t+\tau]))$, at fixed $\tau$, can lead to strongly over-estimating the value of
$H$. We propose a better GMM estimation method which is shown to be valid in
the high-frequency asymptotic regime. When applied to a large set of empirical
volatility data, we observe that stock indices have values around $H=0.1$ while
individual stocks are characterized by values of $H$ that can be very close to
$0$ and thus well described by a MRM. We also bring evidence that unlike the
log-volatility variance $\nu^2$ whose estimation appears to be poorly reliable
(though used widely in the rough volatility literature), the estimation of the
so-called "intermittency coefficient" $\lambda^2$, which is the product of
$\nu^2$ and the Hurst exponent $H$, appears to be far more reliable leading to
values that seem to be universal for respectively all individual stocks and all
stock indices.
