  We argue that while the experiment of Remez et al. is interesting and its
conclusions may well be correct, the observed lack of dependence of the
measured distributions on the electron's transverse coherence length should
have been expected for the parameters chosen. This is because for Smith-Purcell
radiation it is the coherence length of a virtual photon that plays a role of
the radiation formation width and not the entire electron's coherence length
that can well be orders of magnitude larger. This is a common feature for all
the radiation processes in which a photon is emitted not directly by the
electron, which can be delocalized in space, but rather by a much better
localized atom or a conduction electron on a surface. Therefore, in our opinion
the results of Remez et al. cannot rule out the alternative hypothesis of the
delocalized charge. The question, mainly addressed in the comment by Karnieli
et al., of whether the measurements were performed in the wave zone or not is
interesting but secondary. We emphasize that the measured distributions are
unusually wide and neither the original paper nor the recent comment fully
discusses and rules out all alternative hypotheses that could have led to the
same distributions. On the contrary, there exists a family of classical effects
that could also have resulted in the measured distributions and that were
neither discussed nor even mentioned by the authors. Such alternative
hypotheses include (i) effects of the beam sizes, of its angular divergence, of
the temporal coherence of the process, and (ii) influence of the grating shape
and of its material. Finally, we propose to repeat the experiment and to
measure diffraction radiation from a thin metallic semi-plane or Compton
emission in a laser pulse. In these cases, the classical effects play a much
smaller role and the results of such measurements would have higher
credibility.
