  Context: Software development benefits from having Boundary Artefacts (BAs),
as a single artefact can supply stakeholders with different boundaries,
facilitating collaboration among social worlds. When those artefacts display
inconsistencies, such as incorrect information, the practitioners have
decreased trust in the BA. As trust is an essential factor guiding the
utilisation of BAs in software projects, it is necessary to understand which
principles should be observed when creating them. Objective: This study aimed
at develop and validate a preliminary guideline support the creation of
trustworthy BAs. Method: We followed a multi-step approach. We developed our
guideline through a literature review and previous results from our case study.
Second, we submitted the guideline for an expert evaluation via two workshops
and a survey. At last, we adjusted our guideline by incorporating the feedback
obtained during the workshops. Results: We grouped the principles collected
from a literature review into three categories. The first category (Scope)
focuses on the scope, displaying principles referring to defining each
boundary's target audience, needs, and terminology. The second category
(Structure) relates to how the artefact's content is structured to meet
stakeholders' needs. The third (Management) refers to principles that can guide
the establishment of practices to manage the artefact throughout time. The
expert validation revealed that the principles contribute to creating
trustworthy BAs at different levels. Also, the relevance of the guideline and
its usefulness. Conclusions: The guideline strengthen BA traits such as shared
understanding, plasticity and ability to transfer. Practitioners can utilise
the guideline to guide the creation or even evaluate current practices for
existing BAs.
