  The general aim of the recommender system is to provide personalized
suggestions to users, which is opposed to suggesting popular items. However,
the normal training paradigm, i.e., fitting a recommender model to recover the
user behavior data with pointwise or pairwise loss, makes the model biased
towards popular items. This results in the terrible Matthew effect, making
popular items be more frequently recommended and become even more popular.
Existing work addresses this issue with Inverse Propensity Weighting (IPW),
which decreases the impact of popular items on the training and increases the
impact of long-tail items. Although theoretically sound, IPW methods are highly
sensitive to the weighting strategy, which is notoriously difficult to tune. In
this work, we explore the popularity bias issue from a novel and fundamental
perspective -- cause-effect. We identify that popularity bias lies in the
direct effect from the item node to the ranking score, such that an item's
intrinsic property is the cause of mistakenly assigning it a higher ranking
score. To eliminate popularity bias, it is essential to answer the
counterfactual question that what the ranking score would be if the model only
uses item property. To this end, we formulate a causal graph to describe the
important cause-effect relations in the recommendation process. During
training, we perform multi-task learning to achieve the contribution of each
cause; during testing, we perform counterfactual inference to remove the effect
of item popularity. Remarkably, our solution amends the learning process of
recommendation which is agnostic to a wide range of models -- it can be easily
implemented in existing methods. We demonstrate it on Matrix Factorization (MF)
and LightGCN [20]. Experiments on five real-world datasets demonstrate the
effectiveness of our method.
