  We utilize a fundamentally different model of trading costs to look at the
effect of the opening of the Hong Kong Shanghai Connect that links the stock
exchanges in the two cities, arguably the biggest event in international
business and finance since Christopher Columbus set sail for India. We design a
novel methodology that compensates for the lack of data on trading costs in
China. We estimate trading costs across similar positions on the dual listed
set of securities in Hong Kong and China, hoping to provide useful pieces of
information to help scale 'The Great Wall of Chinese Securities Trading Costs'.
We then compare actual and estimated trading costs on a sample of real orders
across the Hong Kong securities in the dual listed pair to establish the
accuracy of our measurements. The primary question we seek to address is 'Which
market would be better to trade to gain exposure to the same (or similar) set
of securities or sectors?' We find that trading costs on Shanghai, which might
have been lower than Hong Kong, might have become higher leading up to the
Connect. What remains to be seen is whether this increase in trading costs is a
temporary equilibrium due to the frenzy to gain exposure to Chinese securities
or whether this phenomenon will persist once the two markets start becoming
more and more tightly coupled. It would be interesting to see if this
pioneering policy will lead to securities exchanges across the globe linking up
one another, creating a trade anything, anywhere and anytime marketplace.
Looking beyond mere trading costs, such studies can be used to gather some
evidence on what effect the mode of governance and other aspects of life in one
country have on another country, once they start joining up their financial
markets.
