  The growing volume of online content prompts the need for adopting
algorithmic systems of information curation. These systems range from web
search engines to recommender systems and are integral for helping users stay
informed about important societal developments. However, unlike journalistic
editing the algorithmic information curation systems (AICSs) are known to be
subject to different forms of malperformance which make them vulnerable to
possible manipulation. The risk of manipulation is particularly prominent in
the case when AICSs have to deal with information about false claims that
underpin propaganda campaigns of authoritarian regimes. Using as a case study
of the Russian disinformation campaign concerning the US biolabs in Ukraine, we
investigate how one of the most commonly used forms of AICSs - i.e. web search
engines - curate misinformation-related content. For this aim, we conduct
virtual agent-based algorithm audits of Google, Bing, and Yandex search outputs
in June 2022. Our findings highlight the troubling performance of search
engines. Even though some search engines, like Google, were less likely to
return misinformation results, across all languages and locations, the three
search engines still mentioned or promoted a considerable share of false
content (33% on Google; 44% on Bing, and 70% on Yandex). We also find
significant disparities in misinformation exposure based on the language of
search, with all search engines presenting a higher number of false stories in
Russian. Location matters as well with users from Germany being more likely to
be exposed to search results promoting false information. These observations
stress the possibility of AICSs being vulnerable to manipulation, in particular
in the case of the unfolding propaganda campaigns, and underline the importance
of monitoring performance of these systems to prevent it.
