  In software system design, one of the purposes of diagrammatic modeling is to
explain something (e.g., data tables) to others. Very often, syntax of diagrams
is specified while the intended meaning of diagrammatic constructs remains
intuitive and approximate. Conceptual modeling has been developed to capture
concepts and their interactions with each other in the intended domain and to
represent structural and behavioral features of the modeled system. This paper
is a venture into diagrammatic approaches to the semantics of modeling
notations, with a focus on data and graph semantics. The first decade of the
new millennium has seen several new world-changing businesses spring to life
(e.g., Google and Twitter), that have put connected data at the center of their
trade. Harnessing such data requires significant effort and expertise, and it
quickly becomes prohibitively expensive. One solution involves building
graph-based data models, which is a challenging problem. In many applications,
the utilized software is managing not just objects as well as isolated and
discrete data items but also the connections between them. Data semantics is a
key ingredient to construct a model that explicitly describes the relationships
between data objects. In this paper, we claim that current ad hoc graphs that
attempt to provide semantics to data structures (e.g., relational tables and
tabular SQL) are problematic. These graphs mix static abstract concepts with
dynamic specification of objects (particulars). Such a claim is supported by
analysis that applies the thinging machine (TM) model to provide diagrammatic
representations of data (e.g., Neo4J graphs). The study s results show that to
take advantage of graph algorithms and simultaneously achieve appropriate data
semantics, the data graphs should be developed as simplified forms of TM.
