  The received wisdom on how activity affects energy expenditure is that the
more activity is undertaken, the more calories will have been burned by the end
of the day. Yet traditional hunter-gatherers, who lead physically hard lives,
burn no more calories each day than western populations living in labour-saving
environments. Indeed, there is now a wealth of data, both for humans and other
animals, demonstrating that long-term lifestyle changes involving increases in
exercise or other physical activities do not result in commensurate increases
in daily energy expenditure (DEE). This is because humans and other animals
exhibit a degree of energy compensation at the organismal level, ameliorating
some of the increases in DEE that would occur from the increased activity by
decreasing the energy expended on other biological processes. And energy
compensation can be sizable, reaching many hundreds of calories in humans. But
the processes that are downregulated in the long-term to achieve energy
compensation are far from clear, particularly in humans. We do not know how
energy compensation is achieved. My review here of the literature on relevant
exercise intervention studies, for both humans and other species, indicates
conflict regarding the role that basal metabolic rate (BMR) or low level
activity such as fidgeting play, if any, particularly once changes in body
composition are factored out. In situations where BMR and low-level activity
are not major components of energy compensation, what then drives it? I discuss
how changes in mitochondrial efficiency and changes in circadian fluctuations
in BMR may contribute to our understanding of energy management. Currently
unexplored, these mechanisms and others may provide important insights into the
mystery of how energy compensation is achieved.
