  This paper is concerned with the findings related to the robust first-stage
F-statistic in the Monte Carlo analysis of Andrews (2018), who found in a
heteroskedastic grouped-data design that even for very large values of the
robust F-statistic, the standard 2SLS confidence intervals had large coverage
distortions. This finding appears to discredit the robust F-statistic as a test
for underidentification. However, it is shown here that large values of the
robust F-statistic do imply that there is first-stage information, but this may
not be utilized well by the 2SLS estimator, or the standard GMM estimator. An
estimator that corrects for this is a robust GMM estimator, denoted GMMf, with
the robust weight matrix not based on the structural residuals, but on the
first-stage residuals. For the grouped-data setting of Andrews (2018), this
GMMf estimator gives the weights to the group specific estimators according to
the group specific concentration parameters in the same way as 2SLS does under
homoskedasticity, which is formally shown using weak instrument asymptotics.
The GMMf estimator is much better behaved than the 2SLS estimator in the
Andrews (2018) design, behaving well in terms of relative bias and Wald-test
size distortion at more standard values of the robust F-statistic. We show that
the same patterns can occur in a dynamic panel data model when the error
variance is heteroskedastic over time. We further derive the conditions under
which the Stock and Yogo (2005) weak instruments critical values apply to the
robust F-statistic in relation to the behaviour of the GMMf estimator.
