  Multiobjective optimization is a hot topic in the artificial intelligence and
operations research communities. The design and development of multiobjective
methods is a frequent task for researchers and practitioners. As a result of
this vibrant activity, a myriad of techniques have been proposed in the
literature to date, demonstrating a significant effectiveness for dealing with
situations coming from a wide range of real-world areas. This paper is focused
on a multiobjective problem related to optimizing Infrastructure-as-Code
deployment configurations. The system implemented for solving this problem has
been coined as IaC Optimizer Platform (IOP). Despite the fact that a
prototypical version of the IOP has been introduced in the literature before, a
deeper analysis focused on the resolution of the problem is needed, in order to
determine which is the most appropriate multiobjective method for embedding in
the IOP. The main motivation behind the analysis conducted in this work is to
enhance the IOP performance as much as possible. This is a crucial aspect of
this system, deeming that it will be deployed in a real environment, as it is
being developed as part of a H2020 European project. Going deeper, we resort in
this paper to nine different evolutionary computation-based multiobjective
algorithms. For assessing the quality of the considered solvers, 12 different
problem instances have been generated based on real-world settings. Results
obtained by each method after 10 independent runs have been compared using
Friedman's non-parametric tests. Findings reached from the tests carried out
lad to the creation of a multi-algorithm system, capable of applying different
techniques according to the user's needs.
