  The Julia programming language was designed to fill the needs of scientific
computing by combining the benefits of productivity and performance languages.
Julia allows users to write untyped scripts easily without needing to worry
about many implementation details, as do other productivity languages. If one
just wants to get the work done-regardless of how efficient or general the
program might be, such a paradigm is ideal. Simultaneously, Julia also allows
library developers to write efficient generic code that can run as fast as
implementations in performance languages such as C or Fortran. This combination
of user-facing ease and library developer-facing performance has proven quite
attractive, and the language has increasing adoption.
  With adoption comes combinatorial challenges to correctness. Multiple
dispatch -- Julia's key mechanism for abstraction -- allows many libraries to
compose "out of the box." However, it creates bugs where one library's
requirements do not match what another provides. Typing could address this at
the cost of Julia's flexibility for scripting.
  I developed a "best of both worlds" solution: gradual typing for Julia. My
system forms the core of a gradual type system for Julia, laying the foundation
for improving the correctness of Julia programs while not getting in the way of
script writers. My framework allows methods to be individually typed or
untyped, allowing users to write untyped code that interacts with typed library
code and vice versa. Typed methods then get a soundness guarantee that is
robust in the presence of both dynamically typed code and dynamically generated
definitions. I additionally describe protocols, a mechanism for typing
abstraction over concrete implementation that accommodates one common pattern
in Julia libraries, and describe its implementation into my typed Julia
framework.
