  Motivated by recent concerns that queuing delays in the Internet are on the
rise, we conduct a performance evaluation of Compound TCP (C-TCP) in two
topologies: a single bottleneck and a multi-bottleneck topology, under
different traffic scenarios. The first topology consists of a single bottleneck
router, and the second consists of two distinct sets of TCP flows, regulated by
two edge routers, feeding into a common core router. We focus on some dynamical
and statistical properties of the underlying system. From a dynamical
perspective, we develop fluid models in a regime wherein the number of flows is
large, bandwidth-delay product is high, buffers are dimensioned small
(independent of the bandwidth-delay product) and routers deploy a Drop-Tail
queue policy. A detailed local stability analysis for these models yields the
following key insight: smaller buffers favour stability. Additionally, we
highlight that larger buffers, in addition to increasing latency, are prone to
inducing limit cycles in the system dynamics, via a Hopf bifurcation. These
limit cycles in turn cause synchronisation among the TCP flows, and also result
in a loss of link utilisation. For the topologies considered, we also
empirically analyse some statistical properties of the bottleneck queues. These
statistical analyses serve to validate an important modelling assumption: that
in the regime considered, each bottleneck queue may be approximated as either
an $M/M/1/B$ or an $M/D/1/B$ queue. This immediately makes the modelling
perspective attractive and the analysis tractable. Finally, we show that
smaller buffers, in addition to ensuring stability and low latency, would also
yield fairly good system performance, in terms of throughput and flow
completion times.
