  Cooperative Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) algorithms with
Zero-Shot Coordination (ZSC) have gained significant attention in recent years.
ZSC refers to the ability of agents to coordinate zero-shot (without additional
interaction experience) with independently trained agents. While ZSC is crucial
for cooperative MARL agents, it might not be possible for complex tasks and
changing environments. Agents also need to adapt and improve their performance
with minimal interaction with other agents. In this work, we show empirically
that state-of-the-art ZSC algorithms have poor performance when paired with
agents trained with different learning methods, and they require millions of
interaction samples to adapt to these new partners. To investigate this issue,
we formally defined a framework based on a popular cooperative multi-agent game
called Hanabi to evaluate the adaptability of MARL methods. In particular, we
created a diverse set of pre-trained agents and defined a new metric called
adaptation regret that measures the agent's ability to efficiently adapt and
improve its coordination performance when paired with some held-out pool of
partners on top of its ZSC performance. After evaluating several SOTA
algorithms using our framework, our experiments reveal that naive Independent
Q-Learning (IQL) agents in most cases adapt as quickly as the SOTA ZSC
algorithm Off-Belief Learning (OBL). This finding raises an interesting
research question: How to design MARL algorithms with high ZSC performance and
capability of fast adaptation to unseen partners. As a first step, we studied
the role of different hyper-parameters and design choices on the adaptability
of current MARL algorithms. Our experiments show that two categories of
hyper-parameters controlling the training data diversity and optimization
process have a significant impact on the adaptability of Hanabi agents.
