  Suppose that a polynomial-time mixed-state quantum circuit, described as a
sequence of local unitary interactions followed by a partial trace, generates a
quantum state shared between two parties. One might then wonder, does this
quantum circuit produce a state that is separable or entangled? Here, we give
evidence that it is computationally hard to decide the answer to this question,
even if one has access to the power of quantum computation. We begin by
exhibiting a two-message quantum interactive proof system that can decide the
answer to a promise version of the question. We then prove that the promise
problem is hard for the class of promise problems with "quantum statistical
zero knowledge" (QSZK) proof systems by demonstrating a polynomial-time Karp
reduction from the QSZK-complete promise problem "quantum state
distinguishability" to our quantum separability problem. By exploiting Knill's
efficient encoding of a matrix description of a state into a description of a
circuit to generate the state, we can show that our promise problem is NP-hard
with respect to Cook reductions. Thus, the quantum separability problem (as
phrased above) constitutes the first nontrivial promise problem decidable by a
two-message quantum interactive proof system while being hard for both NP and
QSZK. We also consider a variant of the problem, in which a given
polynomial-time mixed-state quantum circuit accepts a quantum state as input,
and the question is to decide if there is an input to this circuit which makes
its output separable across some bipartite cut. We prove that this problem is a
complete promise problem for the class QIP of problems decidable by quantum
interactive proof systems. Finally, we show that a two-message quantum
interactive proof system can also decide a multipartite generalization of the
quantum separability problem.
