  Context: In the light of the swift and iterative nature of Agile Software
Development (ASD) practices, establishing deeper insights into capability
measurement within the context of team formation is crucial, as the capability
of individuals and teams can affect team performance and productivity. Although
a former Systematic Literature Review (SLR) synthesized the state of the art in
relation to capability measurement in ASD with a focus on selecting individuals
to agile teams, and capabilities related to team performance and success,
determining to what degree the SLR's results apply to practice can provide
progressive insights to both research and practice.
  Objective: Our study investigates how agile practitioners perceive the
relevance of individual and team level measures for characterizing the
capability of an agile team and its members. Furthermore, to scrutinize
variations in practitioners' perceptions, our study further analyzes
perceptions across stratified demographic groups.
  Method: We undertook a Web-based survey using a questionnaire built based on
the capability measures identified from a previously conducted SLR.
  Results: Our survey responses (60) indicate that 127 individual and 28 team
capability measures were considered as relevant by the majority of
practitioners. We also identified seven individual and one team capability
measure that have not been previously characterized by our SLR. The surveyed
practitioners suggested that an agile team member's responsibility and
questioning skills significantly represent the member's capability.
  Conclusion: Results from our survey align with our SLR's findings. Measures
associated with social aspects were observed to be dominant compared to
technical and innovative aspects. Our results can support agile practitioners
in their team composition decisions.
