  The short answer is $\textit{probably no}$. Specifically, this paper
considers a recent body of work which suggests that general relativity requires
neither the support of dark matter halos, nor unconventional baryonic profiles,
nor any infrared modification, to be consistent after all with the anomalously
rapid orbits observed in many galactic discs. In particular, the
gravitoelectric flux is alleged to collapse nonlinearly into regions of
enhanced force, in an analogue of the colour-confining chromoelectric flux tube
model which has yet to be captured by conventional post-Newtonian methods.
However, we show that the scalar gravity model underpinning this proposal is
wholly inconsistent with the nonlinear Einstein equations, which themselves
appear to prohibit the linear confinement-type potentials which could indicate
a disordered gravitational phase. Our findings challenge the fidelity of the
previous Euclidean lattice analyses. We confirm by direct calculation using a
number of perturbation schemes and gauges that the next-to-leading order
gravitoelectric correction to the rotation curve of a reasonable baryonic
profile would be imperceptible. The `gravitoelectric flux collapse' programme
was also supported by using intragalactic lensing near a specific galactic
baryon profile as a field strength heuristic. We recalculate this lensing
effect, and conclude that it has been overstated by three orders of magnitude.
As a by-product, our analysis suggests fresh approaches to (i) the fluid ball
conjecture and (ii) gravitational energy localisation, both to be pursued in
future work. In summary, whilst it may be interesting to consider the
possibility of confinement-type effects in gravity, we may at least conclude
here that confinement-type effects $\textit{cannot play any significant part}$
in explaining flat or rising galactic rotation curves without dark matter
halos.
