  Risk measures are commonly used to capture the risk preferences of
decision-makers (DMs). The decisions of DMs can be nudged or manipulated when
their risk preferences are influenced by factors such as the availability of
information about the uncertainties. This work proposes a Stackelberg risk
preference design (STRIPE) problem to capture a designer's incentive to
influence DMs' risk preferences. STRIPE consists of two levels. In the lower
level, individual DMs in a population, known as the followers, respond to
uncertainties according to their risk preference types. In the upper level, the
leader influences the distribution of the types to induce targeted decisions
and steers the follower's preferences to it. Our analysis centers around the
solution concept of approximate Stackelberg equilibrium that yields suboptimal
behaviors of the players. We show the existence of the approximate Stackelberg
equilibrium. The primitive risk perception gap, defined as the Wasserstein
distance between the original and the target type distributions, is important
in estimating the optimal design cost. We connect the leader's optimality
compromise on the cost with her ambiguity tolerance on the follower's
approximate solutions leveraging Lipschitzian properties of the lower level
solution mapping. To obtain the Stackelberg equilibrium, we reformulate STRIPE
into a single-level optimization problem using the spectral representations of
law-invariant coherent risk measures. We create a data-driven approach for
computation and study its performance guarantees. We apply STRIPE to contract
design problems under approximate incentive compatibility. Moreover, we connect
STRIPE with meta-learning problems and derive adaptation performance estimates
of the meta-parameters.
