  Since the inception of the FIRST Robotics Competition (FRC) and its special
playoff system, robotics teams have longed to appropriately quantify the
strengths of their designed robots. The FRC includes a playground draft-like
phase (alliance selection), arguably the most game-changing part of the
competition, in which the top-8 robotics teams in a tournament based on the
FRC's ranking system assess potential alliance members for the opportunity of
partnering in a playoff stage. In such a three-versus-three competition,
several measures and models have been used to characterize actual or relative
robot strengths. However, existing models are found to have poor predictive
performance due to their imprecise estimates of robot strengths caused by a
small ratio of the number of observations to the number of robots. A more
general regression model with latent clusters of robot strengths is, thus,
proposed to enhance their predictive capacities. Two effective estimation
procedures are further developed to simultaneously estimate the number of
clusters, clusters of robots, and robot strengths. Meanwhile, some measures are
used to assess the predictive ability of competing models, the agreement
between published FRC measures of strength and model-based robot strengths of
all, playoff, and FRC top-8 robots, and the agreement between FRC top-8 robots
and model-based top robots. Moreover, the stability of estimated robot
strengths and accuracies is investigated to determine whether the scheduled
matches are excessive or insufficient. In the analysis of qualification data
from the 2018 FRC Houston and Detroit championships, the predictive ability of
our model is also shown to be significantly better than those of existing
models. Teams who adopt the new model can now appropriately rank their
preferences for playoff alliance partners with greater predictive capability
than before.
