  Pseudo-Random Number Generators (PRNGs) have become ubiquitous in machine
learning technologies because they are interesting for numerous methods. The
field of machine learning holds the potential for substantial advancements
across various domains, as exemplified by recent breakthroughs in Large
Language Models (LLMs). However, despite the growing interest, persistent
concerns include issues related to reproducibility and energy consumption.
Reproducibility is crucial for robust scientific inquiry and explainability,
while energy efficiency underscores the imperative to conserve finite global
resources. This study delves into the investigation of whether the leading
Pseudo-Random Number Generators (PRNGs) employed in machine learning languages,
libraries, and frameworks uphold statistical quality and numerical
reproducibility when compared to the original C implementation of the
respective PRNG algorithms. Additionally, we aim to evaluate the time
efficiency and energy consumption of various implementations. Our experiments
encompass Python, NumPy, TensorFlow, and PyTorch, utilizing the Mersenne
Twister, PCG, and Philox algorithms. Remarkably, we verified that the temporal
performance of machine learning technologies closely aligns with that of
C-based implementations, with instances of achieving even superior
performances. On the other hand, it is noteworthy that ML technologies consumed
only 10% more energy than their C-implementation counterparts. However, while
statistical quality was found to be comparable, achieving numerical
reproducibility across different platforms for identical seeds and algorithms
was not achieved.
