  Under the optimal withdrawal strategy of a policyholder, the pricing of
variable annuities with Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefit (GMWB) is an
optimal stochastic control problem. The surrender feature available in marketed
products allows termination of the contract before maturity, making it also an
optimal stopping problem. Although the surrender feature is quite common in
variable annuity contracts, there appears to be no published analysis and
results for this feature in GMWB under optimal policyholder behaviour - results
found in the literature so far are consistent with the absence of such a
feature. Also, it is of practical interest to see how the much simpler
bang-bang strategy, although not optimal for GMWB, compares with optimal GMWB
strategy with surrender option.
  In this paper we extend our recently developed algorithm (Luo and Shevchenko
2015a) to include surrender option in GMWB and compare prices under different
policyholder strategies: optimal, static and bang-bang. Results indicate that
following a simple but sub-optimal bang-bang strategy does not lead to
significant reduction in the price or equivalently in the fee, in comparison
with the optimal strategy. We observed that the extra value added by the
surrender option could add very significant value to the GMWB contract. We also
performed calculations for static withdrawal with surrender option, which is
the same as bang-bang minus the "no-withdrawal" choice. We find that the fee
for such contract is only less than 1% smaller when compared to the case of
bang-bang strategy, meaning that th "no-withdrawal" option adds little value to
the contract.
