  When analysing in vitro data, growth kinetics of influenza strains are often
compared by computing their growth rates, which are sometimes used as proxies
for fitness. However, analogous to mechanistic epidemic models, the growth rate
can be defined as a function of two parameters: the basic reproduction number
(the average number of cells each infected cell infects) and the mean
generation time (the average length of a replication cycle). Using a
mechanistic model, previously published data from experiments in human lung
cells, and newly generated data, we compared estimates of all three parameters
for six influenza A strains. Using previously published data, we found that the
two human-adapted strains (pre-2009 seasonal H1N1, and pandemic H1N1) had a
lower basic reproduction number, shorter mean generation time and slower growth
rate than the two avian-adapted strains (H5N1 and H7N9). These same differences
were then observed in data from new experiments where two strains were
engineered to have different internal proteins (pandemic H1N1 and H5N1), but
the same surface proteins (PR8), confirming our initial findings and implying
that differences between strains were driven by internal genes. Also, the model
predicted that the human-adapted strains underwent more replication cycles than
the avian-adapted strains by the time of peak viral load, potentially
accumulating mutations more quickly. These results suggest that the in vitro
reproduction number, generation time and growth rate differ between
human-adapted and avian-adapted influenza strains, and thus could be used to
assess host adaptation of internal proteins to inform pandemic risk assessment.
