  This application paper presents a comprehensive experimental evaluation of
the suitability of Topological Data Analysis (TDA) for the quantitative
comparison of turbulent flows. Specifically, our study documents the usage of
the persistence diagram of the maxima of flow enstrophy (an established
vorticity indicator), for the topological representation of 180 ensemble
members, generated by a coarse sampling of the parameter space of five
numerical solvers. We document five main hypotheses reported by domain experts,
describing their expectations regarding the variability of the flows generated
by the distinct solver configurations. We contribute three evaluation protocols
to assess the validation of the above hypotheses by two comparison measures:
(i) a standard distance used in scientific imaging (the L2 norm) and (ii) an
established topological distance between persistence diagrams (the
L2-Wasserstein metric). Extensive experiments on the input ensemble demonstrate
the superiority of the topological distance (ii) to report as close to each
other flows which are expected to be similar by domain experts, due to the
configuration of their vortices. Overall, the insights reported by our study
bring an experimental evidence of the suitability of TDA for representing and
comparing turbulent flows, thereby providing to the fluid dynamics community
confidence for its usage in future work. Also, our flow data and evaluation
protocols provide to the TDA community an application-approved benchmark for
the evaluation and design of further topological distances.
