  Active muscles are crucial for maintaining postural stability when seated in
a moving vehicle. Advanced active 3D non-linear full body models have been
developed for impact and comfort simulation, including large numbers of
individual muscle elements, and detailed non-linear models of the joint
structures. While such models have an apparent potential to provide insight
into postural stabilization, they are computationally demanding, making them
less practical in particular for driving comfort where long time periods are to
be studied. In vibrational comfort and in general biomechanical research,
linearized models are effectively used. This paper evaluates the effectiveness
of simplified 3D full-body human models to capture comfort provoked by
whole-body vibrations. An efficient seated human body model is developed and
validated using experimental data. We evaluate the required complexity in terms
of joints and degrees of freedom for the spine, and explore how well linear
spring-damper models can approximate reflexive postural stabilization. Results
indicate that linear stiffness and damping models can well capture the human
response. The results are improved by adding proportional integral derivative
(PID) and head-in-space (HIS) controllers to maintain the defined initial body
posture. The integrator is shown to be essential to prevent drift from the
defined posture. The joint angular relative displacement is used as the input
reference to each PID controller. With this model, a faster than real-time
solution is obtained when used with a simple seat model. The paper also
discusses the advantages and disadvantages of various models and provides
insight into which models are more appropriate for motion comfort analysis.
