  Decision support tools enable improved decision-making for challenging
decision problems by empowering stakeholders to process, analyze, visualize,
and otherwise make sense of a variety of key factors. Their intentional design
is a critical component of the value they create. All decision-support tools
share in common that there is a complex decision problem to be solved for which
decision-support is useful, and moreover, that appropriate analytics expertise
is available to produce solutions to the problem setting at hand. When
well-designed, decision support tools reduce friction and increase efficiency
in providing support for the decision-making process, thereby improving the
ability of decision-makers to make quality decisions. On the other hand, the
presence of overwhelming, superfluous, insufficient, or ill-fitting information
and software features can have an adverse effect on the decision-making process
and, consequently, outcomes. We advocate for an innovative, and perhaps
overlooked, approach to designing effective decision support tools: genuinely
listening to the project stakeholders, to ascertain and appreciate their real
needs and perspectives. By prioritizing stakeholder needs, a foundation of
mutual trust and understanding is established with the design team. We maintain
this trust is critical to eventual tool acceptance and adoption, and its
absence jeopardizes the future use of the tool, which would leave its
analytical insights for naught. We discuss examples across multiple contexts to
underscore our collective experience, highlight lessons learned, and present
recommended practices to improve the design and eventual adoption of decision
dupport tools.
