  Self-consistent full-size turbulent-transport simulations of the divertor and
SOL of existing tokamaks have recently become feasible. This enables the direct
comparison of turbulence simulations against experimental measurements. In this
work, we perform a series of diverted Ohmic L-mode discharges on the TCV
tokamak, building a first-of-a-kind dataset for the validation of edge
turbulence models. This dataset, referred to as TCV-X21, contains measurements
from 5 diagnostic systems -- giving a total of 45 1- and 2-D comparison
observables in two toroidal magnetic field directions. The dataset is used to
validate three flux-driven 3D fluid-turbulence models: GBS, GRILLIX and
TOKAM3X. With each model, we perform simulations of the TCV-X21 scenario,
tuning the particle and power source rates to achieve a reasonable match of the
upstream separatrix value of density and electron temperature. We find that the
simulations match the experimental profiles for most observables at the OMP --
both in terms of profile shape and absolute magnitude -- while a poorer
agreement is found towards the divertor targets. The match between simulation
and experiment is seen to be sensitive to the value of the resistivity, the
heat conductivities, the power injection rate and the choice of sheath boundary
conditions. Additionally, despite targeting a sheath-limited regime, the
discrepancy between simulations and experiment also suggests that the neutral
dynamics should be included. The results of this validation show that
turbulence models are able to perform simulations of existing devices and
achieve reasonable agreement with experimental measurements. Where disagreement
is found, the validation helps to identify how the models can be improved. By
publicly releasing the experimental dataset, this work should help to guide and
accelerate the development of predictive turbulence simulations of the edge and
SOL.
