  Choosing optimal maskers for existing soundscapes to effect a desired
perceptual change via soundscape augmentation is non-trivial due to extensive
varieties of maskers and a dearth of benchmark datasets with which to compare
and develop soundscape augmentation models. To address this problem, we make
publicly available the ARAUS (Affective Responses to Augmented Urban
Soundscapes) dataset, which comprises a five-fold cross-validation set and
independent test set totaling 25,440 unique subjective perceptual responses to
augmented soundscapes presented as audio-visual stimuli. Each augmented
soundscape is made by digitally adding "maskers" (bird, water, wind, traffic,
construction, or silence) to urban soundscape recordings at fixed
soundscape-to-masker ratios. Responses were then collected by asking
participants to rate how pleasant, annoying, eventful, uneventful, vibrant,
monotonous, chaotic, calm, and appropriate each augmented soundscape was, in
accordance with ISO 12913-2:2018. Participants also provided relevant
demographic information and completed standard psychological questionnaires. We
perform exploratory and statistical analysis of the responses obtained to
verify internal consistency and agreement with known results in the literature.
Finally, we demonstrate the benchmarking capability of the dataset by training
and comparing four baseline models for urban soundscape pleasantness: a
low-parameter regression model, a high-parameter convolutional neural network,
and two attention-based networks in the literature.
