  How robust is the natural genetic code with respect to mistranslation errors?
It has long been known that the genetic code is very efficient in limiting the
effect of point mutation. A misread codon will commonly code either for the
same amino acid or for a similar one in terms of its biochemical properties, so
the structure and function of the coded protein remain relatively unaltered.
Previous studies have attempted to address this question more quantitatively,
namely by statistically estimating the fraction of randomly generated codes
that do better than the genetic code regarding its overall robustness. In this
paper, we extend these results by investigating the role of amino acid
frequencies in the optimality of the genetic code. When measuring the relative
fitness of the natural code with respect to a random code, it is indeed natural
to assume that a translation error affecting a frequent amino acid is less
favorable than that of a rare one, at equal mutation cost. We find that taking
the amino acid frequency into account accordingly decreases the fraction of
random codes that beat the natural code, making the latter comparatively even
more robust. This effect is particularly pronounced when more refined measures
of the amino acid substitution cost are used than hydrophobicity. To show this,
we devise a new cost function by evaluating with computer experiments the
change in folding free energy caused by all possible single-site mutations in a
set of known protein structures. With this cost function, we estimate that of
the order of one random code out of 100 millions is more fit than the natural
code when taking amino acid frequencies into account. The genetic code seems
therefore structured so as to minimize the consequences of translation errors
on the 3D structure and stability of proteins.
