  Worst-case input generation aims to automatically generate inputs that
exhibit the worst-case performance of programs. It has several applications,
and can, for example, detect vulnerabilities to denial-of-service attacks.
However, it is non-trivial to generate worst-case inputs for concurrent
programs, particularly for resources like memory where the peak cost depends on
how processes are scheduled.
  This article presents the first sound worst-case input generation algorithm
for concurrent programs under non-monotone resource metrics like memory. The
key insight is to leverage resource-annotated session types and symbolic
execution. Session types describe communication protocols on channels in
process calculi. Equipped with resource annotations, resource-annotated session
types not only encode cost bounds but also indicate how many resources can be
reused and transferred between processes. This information is critical for
identifying a worst-case execution path during symbolic execution. The
algorithm is sound: if it returns any input, it is guaranteed to be a valid
worst-case input. The algorithm is also relatively complete: as long as
resource-annotated session types are sufficiently expressive and the background
theory for SMT solving is decidable, a worst-case input is guaranteed to be
returned. A simple case study of a web server's memory usage demonstrates the
utility of the worst-case input generation algorithm.
