  The neocortex is widely believed to be the seat of intelligence and "mind".
However, it's unclear what "mind" is, or how the special features of neocortex
enable it, though likely "connectionist" principles are involved *A. The key to
intelligence1 is learning relationships between large numbers of signals (such
as pixel values), rather than memorizing explicit patterns. Causes (such as
objects) can then be inferred from a learned internal model. These
relationships fall into 2 classes: simple pairwise or second-order correlations
(socs), and complex, and vastly more numerous, higher-order correlations
(hocsB), such as the product of 3 or more pixels averaged over a set of images.
Thus if 3 pixels correlate, they may give an "edge". Neurons with "Hebbian"
synapses (changing strength in response to input-output spike-coincidences) are
sensitive to such correlations, and it's likely that learned internal models
use such neurons. Because output firing depends on input firing via the
relevant connection strengths, Hebbian learning provides, in a feedback manner,
sensitivity to input correlations. Hocs are vital, since they express
"interesting" structure2 (e.g. edges), but their detection requires nonlinear
rules operating at synapses of individual neurons. Here we report that in
single model neurons learning from hocs fails, and defaults to socs, if
nonlinear Hebbian rules are not sufficiently connection-specific. Such failure
would inevitably occur if a neuron's input synapses were too crowded, and would
undermine biological connectionism. Since the cortex must be hoc-sensitive to
achieve the type of learning enabling mind, we propose it uses known, detailed
but poorly understood circuitry and physiology to "proofread" Hebbian
connections. Analogous DNA proofreading allows evolution of complex genomes
(i.e. "life").
