  Motion is a typical reaction among animals and humans trying to reach better
conditions in a changing world. This aspect has been studied intensively in
social dilemmas where competing players' individual and collective interests
are in conflict. Starting from the traditional public goods game model, where
players are locally fixed and unconditional cooperators or defectors are
present, we introduce two additional strategies through which agents can change
their positions of dependence on the local cooperation level. More importantly,
these so-called sophisticated players should bear an extra cost to maintain
their permanent capacity to evaluate their neighborhood and react accordingly.
Hence, four strategies compete, and the most successful one can be imitated by
its neighbors. Crucially, the introduction of costly movement has a highly
biased consequence on the competing main strategies. In the majority of
parameter space, it is harmful to defectors and provides a significantly higher
cooperation level when the population is rare. At an intermediate population
density, which would be otherwise optimal for a system of immobile players, the
presence of mobile actors could be detrimental if the interaction pattern
changes slightly, thereby blocking the optimal percolation of information flow.
In this parameter space, sophisticated cooperators can also show the co-called
Moor effect by first avoiding the harmful vicinity of defectors; they
subsequentially transform into an immobile cooperator state. Hence,
paradoxically, the additional cost of movement could be advantageous to reach a
higher general income, especially for a rare population when subgroups would be
isolated otherwise.
