  We consider in this paper some structured financial products, known as
reverse convertible notes, that resulted in substantial losses to certain
buyers of these notes in recent years. We shall focus on specific reverse
convertible notes known as "Autocallable Optimization Securities with
Contingent Protection Linked to the S\&P 500 Financial Index," because these
notes are representative of the broad spectrum of reverse convertibles notes.
Therefore, the analysis provided in this paper is applicable to many other
reverse convertible notes.
  We begin by describing the notes in detail and identifying potential areas of
confusion in the pricing supplement to the prospectus for the notes. We deduce
two possible interpretations of the payment procedure for the notes and apply
the Law of Total Expectation to develop a probabilistic analysis for each
interpretation. We also determine the corresponding expected net payments to
note-holders under various scenarios for the financial markets and show that,
under a broad range of scenarios, note-holders were likely to suffer
substantial losses.
  As a consequence, we infer that the prospectus is sufficiently complex that
financial advisers generally lacked the mathematical knowledge and expertise to
understand the prospectus completely. Therefore, financial advisers who
recommended purchases of the notes did not have the knowledge and expertise
that is required by a fiduciary relationship, hence were unable to exercise
fiduciary duty, and ultimately misguided their clients. We conclude that these
reverse convertibles notes were designed by financial institutions to insure
themselves, against significant declines in the equities markets, at the
expense of note-holders.
