  We provide new (parameterized) computational hardness results for Interval
Scheduling on Unrelated Machines. It is a classical scheduling problem
motivated from just-in-time or lean manufacturing, where the goal is to
complete jobs exactly at their deadline. We are given $n$ jobs and $m$
machines. Each job has a deadline, a weight, and a processing time that may be
different on each machine. The goal is find a schedule that maximized the total
weight of jobs completed exactly at their deadline. Note that this uniquely
defines a processing time interval for each job on each machine.
  Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines is closely related to coloring
interval graphs and has been thoroughly studied for several decades. However,
as pointed out by Mnich and van Bevern [Computers \& Operations Research,
2018], the parameterized complexity for the number $m$ of machines as a
parameter remained open. We resolve this by showing that Interval Scheduling on
Unrelated Machines is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the number $m$ of
machines. To this end, we prove W[1]-hardness with respect to $m$ of the
special case where we have parallel machines with eligible machine sets for
jobs. This answers Open Problem 8 of Mnich and van Bevern's list of 15 open
problems in the parameterized complexity of scheduling [Computers \& Operations
Research, 2018].
  Furthermore, we resolve the computational complexity status of the unweighted
version of Interval Scheduling on Unrelated Machines by proving that it is
NP-complete. This answers an open question by Sung and Vlach [Journal of
Scheduling, 2005].
