  How do people internalize visualizations: as images or information? In this
study, we investigate the nature of internalization for visualizations (i.e.,
how the mind encodes visualizations in memory) and how memory encoding affects
its retrieval. This exploratory work examines the influence of various design
elements on a user's perception of a chart. Specifically, which design elements
lead to perceptions of visualization as an image or as information?
Understanding how design elements contribute to viewers perceiving a
visualization more as an image or information will help designers decide which
elements to include to achieve their communication goals. For this study, we
annotated 500 visualizations and analyzed the responses of 250 online
participants, who rated the visualizations on a bilinear scale as image or
information. We then conducted an in-person study (n = 101) using a free recall
task to examine how the image/information ratings and design elements impact
memory. The results revealed several interesting findings: Image-rated
visualizations were perceived as more aesthetically appealing, enjoyable, and
pleasing. Information-rated visualizations were perceived as less difficult to
understand and more aesthetically likable and nice, though participants
expressed higher positive sentiment when viewing image-rated visualizations and
felt less guided to a conclusion. We also found different patterns among
participants that were older. Importantly, we show that visualizations
internalized as images are less effective in conveying trends and messages,
though they elicit a more positive emotional judgment, while informative
visualizations exhibit annotation focused recall and elicit a more positive
design judgment. We discuss the implications of this dissociation between
aesthetic pleasure and perceived ease of use in visualization design.
