  Globally, we are witnessing the rise of complex, non-communicable diseases
(NCDs) related to changes in our daily environments. Obesity, asthma,
cardiovascular disease, and type 2 diabetes are part of a long list of
"lifestyle" diseases that were rare throughout human history but are now
common. A key idea from anthropology and evolutionary biology--the evolutionary
mismatch hypothesis--seeks to explain this phenomenon. It posits that humans
evolved in environments that radically differ from the ones experienced by most
people today, and thus traits that were advantageous in past environments may
now be "mismatched" and disease-causing. This hypothesis is, at its core, a
genetic one: it predicts that loci with a history of selection will exhibit
"genotype by environment" (GxE) interactions and have differential health
effects in ancestral versus modern environments. Here, we discuss how this
concept could be leveraged to uncover the genetic architecture of NCDs in a
principled way. Specifically, we advocate for partnering with small-scale,
subsistence-level groups that are currently transitioning from environments
that are arguably more "matched" with their recent evolutionary history to
those that are more "mismatched". These populations provide diverse genetic
backgrounds as well as the needed levels and types of environmental variation
necessary for mapping GxE interactions in an explicit mismatch framework. Such
work would make important contributions to our understanding of environmental
and genetic risk factors for NCDs across diverse ancestries and sociocultural
contexts.
