  Simulations by transport codes are indispensable to extract valuable physics
information from heavy ion collisions. In order to understand the origins of
discrepancies between different widely used transport codes, we compare 15 such
codes under controlled conditions of a system confined to a box with periodic
boundary, initialized with Fermi-Dirac distributions at saturation density and
temperatures of either 0 or 5 MeV. In such calculations, one is able to check
separately the different ingredients of a transport code. In this second
publication of the code evaluation project, we only consider the two-body
collision term, i.e. we perform cascade calculations. When the Pauli blocking
is artificially suppressed, the collision rates are found to be consistent for
most codes (to within $1\%$ or better) with analytical results, or completely
controlled results of a basic cascade code after eliminating the correlations
within the same pair of colliding particles. In calculations with active Pauli
blocking, the blocking probability was found to deviate from the expected
reference values. The reason is found in substantial phase-space fluctuations
and smearing tied to numerical algorithms and model assumptions in the
representation of phase space. This results in the reduction of the blocking
probability in most transport codes, so that the simulated system gradually
evolves away from the Fermi-Dirac towards a Boltzmann distribution. As a result
of this investigation, we are able to make judgements about the most effective
strategies in transport simulations for determining the collision probabilities
and the Pauli blocking. Investigation in a similar vein of other ingredients in
transport calculations, like the mean field propagation or the production of
nucleon resonances and mesons, will be discussed in the future publications.
