  Experimentally realizable quantum computers are rapidly approaching the
threshold of quantum supremacy. Quantum Hamiltonian simulation promises to be
one of the first practical applications for which such a device could
demonstrate an advantage over all classical systems. However, these early
devices will inevitably remain both noisy and small, precluding the use of
quantum error correction. We use high-performance classical tools to construct,
optimize, and simulate quantum circuits subject to realistic error models in
order to empirically determine the "simulation capacity" of near-term
simulation experiments implemented via quantum signal processing (QSP),
describing the relationship between simulation time, system size, and
resolution of QSP circuits which are optimally configured to balance
algorithmic precision and external noise. From simulation capacity models, we
estimate maximum tolerable error rate for meaningful simulation experiments on
a near-term quantum computer.
  By exploiting symmetry inherent to the QSP circuit, we further demonstrate
that its capacity for quantum simulation can be increased by at least two
orders of magnitude if errors are systematic and unitary. We find that a device
with $\epsilon^2=10^{-5}$ systematic amplitude errors could meaningfully
simulate systems up to $n\approx16$ with an expected failure rate below $10\%$,
whereas the largest system a device with a stochastic error rate of
$p_\epsilon=10^{-5}$ could meaningfully simulate with the same rate of failure
is between $n=3$ and $n=5$ (depending on the stochastic channel). Extrapolating
from empirical results, we estimate that one would typically need a stochastic
error rate below $p_\epsilon=10^{-8}$ to perform a meaningful $n=50$ simulation
experiment with a failure rate below $10\%$, while the same experiment could
tolerate systematic unitary errors with strength $\epsilon^2\approx10^{-6}$.
