  We here study the Battle of the Sexes game, a textbook case of asymmetric
games, on small networks. Due to the conflicting preferences of the players,
analytical approaches are scarce and most often update strategies are employed
in numerical simulations of repeated games on networks until convergence is
reached. As a result, correlations between the choices of the players emerge.
Our approach is to study these correlations with a generalized Ising model.
Using the response strategy framework, we describe how the actions of the
players can bring the network into a steady configuration, starting from an
out-of-equilibrium one. We obtain these configurations using game-theoretical
tools, and describe the results using Ising parameters. We exhaust the
two-player case, giving a detailed account of all the equilibrium
possibilities. Going to three players, we generalize the Ising model and
compare the equilibrium solutions of three representative types of network. We
find that players that are not directly linked retain a degree of correlation
that is proportional to their initial correlation. We also find that the local
network structure is the most relevant for small values of the magnetic field
and the interaction strength of the Ising model. Finally, we conclude that
certain parameters of the equilibrium states are network independent, which
opens up the possibility of an analytical description of asymmetric games
played on networks.
