  In this paper, motivated by the celebrated work of Kelly, we consider the
problem of portfolio weight selection to maximize expected logarithmic growth.
Going beyond existing literature, our focal point here is the rebalancing
frequency which we include as an additional parameter in our analysis. The
problem is first set in a control-theoretic framework, and then, the main
question we address is as follows: In the absence of transaction costs, does
high-frequency trading always lead to the best performance? Related to this is
our prior work on betting, also in the Kelly context, which examines the impact
of making a wager and letting it ride. Our results on betting frequency can be
interpreted in the context of weight selection for a two-asset portfolio
consisting of one risky asset and one riskless asset. With regard to the
question above, our prior results indicate that it is often the case that there
are no performance benefits associated with high-frequency trading. In the
present paper, we generalize the analysis to portfolios with multiple risky
assets. We show that if there is an asset satisfying a new condition which we
call dominance, then an optimal portfolio consists of this asset alone; i.e.,
the trader has "all eggs in one basket" and performance becomes a constant
function of rebalancing frequency. Said another way, the problem of rebalancing
is rendered moot. The paper also includes simulations which address practical
considerations associated with real stock prices and the dominant asset
condition.
