  Purpose: Human-machine collaboration is a promising strategy to improve
hazard inspection. However, research on the effective integration of opinions
from humans with machines for optimal group decision making is lacking. Hence,
considering the benefits of a brain-computer interface (BCI) to enable
intuitive commutation, this study proposes a novel method to predict human
hazard response choices and decision confidence from brain activities for a
superior confidence-weighted voting strategy. Methodology: First, we developed
a Bayesian inference-based algorithm to ascertain the decision threshold above
which a hazard is reported from human brain signals. This method was tested
empirically with electroencephalogram (EEG) data collected in a laboratory
setting and cross-validated using behavioral indices of the signal detection
theory. Subsequently, based on numerical simulations, the decision criteria for
low-, medium-, and high-confidence level differentiations characterized by
parietal alpha-band EEG power were determined. Findings : The investigated
hazard recognition task was described as a process of probabilistic inference
involving a decision uncertainty evaluation. The results demonstrated the
feasibility of EEG measurements in observing human internal representations of
hazard discrimination. Moreover, the optimal criteria to differentiate between
low-, medium-, and high-confidence levels were obtained by benchmarking against
an optimal Bayesian observer. Originality: This research demonstrates the
potential of a BCI as an effective channel for telecommunication, laying the
foundation for the design of future hazard detection techniques in the
collaborative human-machine systems research field.
