  Jumping take-off in birds is an explosive behaviour with the goal of
providing a rapid transition from ground to airborne locomotion. An effective
jump is predicated on the need to maintain dynamic stability through the
acceleration phase. The present study concerns understanding how birds retain
control of body attitude and trajectory during take-off. Cursory observation
suggests that stability is achieved with relatively little cost. However,
analysis of the problem shows that the stability margins during jumping are
actually very small and that stability considerations play a significant role
in selection of appropriate jumping kinematics. We use theoretical models to
understand stability in prehensile take-off (from a perch) and also in
non-prehensile take-off (from the ground). The primary instability is tipping,
defined as rotation of the centre of gravity about the ground contact point.
Tipping occurs when the centre of pressure falls outside the functional foot. A
contribution of the paper is the development of graphical tipping stability
margins for both centre of gravity location and acceleration angle. We show
that the nose-up angular acceleration extends stability bounds forward and is
hence helpful in achieving shallow take-offs. The stability margins are used to
interrogate simulated take-offs of real birds using published experimental
kinematic data from a guinea fowl (ground take-off) and a diamond dove (perch
take-off). For the guinea fowl the initial part of the jump is stable, however
simulations exhibit a stuttering instability not observed experimentally that
is probably due to absence of compliance in the idealised joints. The diamond
dove model confirms that the foot provides an active torque reaction during
take-off, extending the range of stable jump angles by around 45{\deg}.
