  The potential tradeoff between health outcomes and economic impact has been a
major challenge in the policy making process during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Epidemic-economic models designed to address this issue are either too
aggregate to consider heterogeneous outcomes across socio-economic groups, or,
when sufficiently fine-grained, not well grounded by empirical data. To fill
this gap, we introduce a data-driven, granular, agent-based model that
simulates epidemic and economic outcomes across industries, occupations, and
income levels with geographic realism. The key mechanism coupling the epidemic
and economic modules is the reduction in consumption demand due to fear of
infection. We calibrate the model to the first wave of COVID-19 in the New York
metropolitan area, showing that it reproduces key epidemic and economic
statistics, and then examine counterfactual scenarios. We find that: (a) both
high fear of infection and strict restrictions similarly harm the economy but
reduce infections; (b) low-income workers bear the brunt of both the economic
and epidemic harm; (c) closing non-customer-facing industries such as
manufacturing and construction only marginally reduces the death toll while
considerably increasing unemployment; and (d) delaying the start of protective
measures does little to help the economy and worsens epidemic outcomes in all
scenarios. We anticipate that our model will help designing effective and
equitable non-pharmaceutical interventions that minimize disruptions in the
face of a novel pandemic.
