  Inference and testing in general point process models such as the Hawkes
model is predominantly based on asymptotic approximations for likelihood-based
estimators and tests. As an alternative, and to improve finite sample
performance, this paper considers bootstrap-based inference for interval
estimation and testing. Specifically, for a wide class of point process models
we consider a novel bootstrap scheme labeled 'fixed intensity bootstrap' (FIB),
where the conditional intensity is kept fixed across bootstrap repetitions. The
FIB, which is very simple to implement and fast in practice, extends previous
ideas from the bootstrap literature on time series in discrete time, where the
so-called 'fixed design' and 'fixed volatility' bootstrap schemes have shown to
be particularly useful and effective. We compare the FIB with the classic
recursive bootstrap, which is here labeled 'recursive intensity bootstrap'
(RIB). In RIB algorithms, the intensity is stochastic in the bootstrap world
and implementation of the bootstrap is more involved, due to its sequential
structure. For both bootstrap schemes, we provide new bootstrap (asymptotic)
theory which allows to assess bootstrap validity, and propose a
'non-parametric' approach based on resampling time-changed transformations of
the original waiting times. We also establish the link between the proposed
bootstraps for point process models and the related autoregressive conditional
duration (ACD) models. Lastly, we show effectiveness of the different bootstrap
schemes in finite samples through a set of detailed Monte Carlo experiments,
and provide applications to both financial data and social media data to
illustrate the proposed methodology.
