  Low-cost sensors (LCS) for measuring air pollution are increasingly being
deployed in mobile applications but questions concerning the quality of the
measurements remain unanswered. For example, what is the best way to correct
LCS data in a mobile setting? Which factors most significantly contribute to
differences between mobile LCS data and higher-quality instruments? Can data
from LCS be used to identify hotspots and generate generalizable pollutant
concentration maps? To help address these questions we deployed low-cost PM2.5
sensors (Alphasense OPC-N3) and a research-grade instrument (TSI DustTrak) in a
mobile laboratory in Boston, MA, USA. We first collocated these instruments
with stationary PM2.5 reference monitors at nearby regulatory sites. Next,
using the reference measurements, we developed different models to correct the
OPC-N3 and DustTrak measurements, and then transferred the corrections to the
mobile setting. We observed that more complex correction models appeared to
perform better than simpler models in the stationary setting; however, when
transferred to the mobile setting, corrected OPC-N3 measurements agreed less
well with corrected DustTrak data. In general, corrections developed using
minute-level collocation measurements transferred better to the mobile setting
than corrections developed using hourly-averaged data. Mobile laboratory speed,
OPC-N3 orientation relative to the direction of travel, date, hour-of-the-day,
and road class together explain a small but significant amount of variation
between corrected OPC-N3 and DustTrak measurements during the mobile
deployment. Persistent hotspots identified by the OPC-N3s agreed with those
identified by the DustTrak. Similarly, maps of PM2.5 distribution produced from
the mobile corrected OPC-N3 and DustTrak measurements agreed well.
