  With the rapid proliferation of the Internet, the area of education has
undergone a massive transformation in terms of how students and instructors
interact in a classroom. Online learning now takes more than one form,
including the use of technology to enhance a face-to-face class, a hybrid class
that combines both face-to-face meetings and online work, and fully online
courses. Further, online classrooms are usually composed of an online education
forum (OEF) where students and instructor discuss open-ended questions for
gaining better understanding of the subject. However, empirical studies have
repeatedly shown that the dropout rates in these online courses are very high
partly due to the lack of motivation among the enrolled students. We undertake
an empirical comparison of student behavior in OEFs associated with a
graduate-level course during two terms. We identify key parameters dictating
the dynamics of OEFs like effective incentive design, student heterogeneity,
and super-posters phenomenon. Motivated by empirical observations, we propose
an analytical model based on continuous time Markov chains (CTMCs) to capture
instructor-student interactions in an OEF. Using concepts from lumpability of
CTMCs, we compute steady state and transient probabilities along with expected
net-rewards for the instructor and the students. We formulate a mixed-integer
linear program which views an OEF as a single-leader-multiple-followers
Stackelberg game. Through simulations, we observe that students exhibit varied
degree of non-monotonicity in their participation (with increasing instructor
involvement). We also study the effect of instructor bias and budget on the
student participation levels. Our model exhibits the empirically observed
super-poster phenomenon under certain parameter configurations and recommends
an optimal plan to the instructor for maximizing student participation in OEFs.
