  Models of consumer responsiveness to medical care prices are central in the
optimal design of health insurance. However, consumers are rarely given
spending information at the time they consume care, a delay which many models
do not account for and may create distortions in the choice of future care
consumption. We study household responses to scheduled medical services before
and after pricing information arrives, leveraging quasi-experimental variation
in the time it takes for an insurer to process a bill. Immediately after
scheduled services, households increase their spending by roughly 46%; however,
a bill's arrival causes households to reduce their spending by 7 percentage
points (nearly 20% of the initial increase). These corrections are concentrated
among households who are under-informed about their deductible or whose
expenditures fall just short of meeting the deductible, suggesting that a bill
provides useful pricing information. These corrections occur across many types
of health services, including high- and low-value care. We model household
beliefs and learning about expenditures and find that households overestimate
their expenditures by 10% prior to a bill's arrival. This leads to an
over-consumption of $842.80 ($480.59) for the average (median) affected
household member. There is evidence that households learn from repeated use of
medical services; however, household priors are estimated to be as high as 80%
larger than true prices, leaving low-spending households especially
under-informed. Our results suggest that long deductible periods coupled with
price non-transparency may lead to an over-consumption of medical care.
