  Instrumental variables (IV) regression is widely used to estimate causal
treatment effects in settings where receipt of treatment is not fully random,
but there exists an instrument that generates exogenous variation in treatment
exposure. While IV can recover consistent treatment effect estimates, they are
often noisy. Building upon earlier work in biostatistics (Joffe and Brensinger,
2003) and relating to an evolving literature in econometrics (including Abadie
et al., 2019; Huntington-Klein, 2020; Borusyak and Hull, 2020), we study how to
improve the efficiency of IV estimates by exploiting the predictable variation
in the strength of the instrument. In the case where both the treatment and
instrument are binary and the instrument is independent of baseline covariates,
we study weighting each observation according to its estimated compliance (that
is, its conditional probability of being affected by the instrument), which we
motivate from a (constrained) solution of the first-stage prediction problem
implicit to IV. The resulting estimator can leverage machine learning to
estimate compliance as a function of baseline covariates. We derive the
large-sample properties of a specific implementation of a weighted IV estimator
in the potential outcomes and local average treatment effect (LATE) frameworks,
and provide tools for inference that remain valid even when the weights are
estimated nonparametrically. With both theoretical results and a simulation
study, we demonstrate that compliance weighting meaningfully reduces the
variance of IV estimates when first-stage heterogeneity is present, and that
this improvement often outweighs any difference between the compliance-weighted
and unweighted IV estimands. These results suggest that in a variety of applied
settings, the precision of IV estimates can be substantially improved by
incorporating compliance estimation.
