  Manual delineation of volumes of interest (VOIs) by experts is considered the
gold-standard method in radiomics analysis. However, it suffers from inter- and
intra-operator variability. A quantitative assessment of the impact of
variations in these delineations on the performance of the radiomics predictors
is required to develop robust radiomics based prediction models. In this study,
we developed radiomics models for the prediction of pathological complete
response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with two different breast
cancer subtypes based on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging acquired
prior to treatment (baseline MRI scans). Different mathematical operations such
as erosion, smoothing, dilation, randomization, and ellipse fitting were
applied to the original VOIs delineated by experts to simulate variations of
segmentation masks. The effects of such VOI modifications on various steps of
the radiomics workflow, including feature extraction, feature selection, and
prediction performance, were evaluated. Using manual tumor VOIs and radiomics
features extracted from baseline MRI scans, an AUC of up to 0.96 and 0.89 was
achieved for human epidermal growth receptor 2 positive and triple-negative
breast cancer, respectively. For smoothing and erosion, VOIs yielded the
highest number of robust features and the best prediction performance, while
ellipse fitting and dilation lead to the lowest robustness and prediction
performance for both breast cancer subtypes. At most 28% of the selected
features were similar to manual VOIs when different VOI delineation data were
used. Differences in VOI delineation affects different steps of radiomics
analysis, and their quantification is therefore important for development of
standardized radiomics research.
