  Linear logic has provided new perspectives on proof-theory, denotational
semantics and the study of programming languages. One of its main successes are
proof-nets, canonical representations of proofs that lie at the intersection
between logic and graph theory. In the case of the minimalist proof-system of
multiplicative linear logic without units (MLL), these two aspects are
completely fused: proof-nets for this system are graphs satisfying a
correctness criterion that can be fully expressed in the language of graphs.
  For more expressive logical systems (containing logical constants,
quantifiers and exponential modalities), this is not completely the case. The
purely graphical approach of proof-nets deprives them of any sequential
structure that is crucial to represent the order in which arguments are
presented, which is necessary for these extensions. Rebuilding this order of
presentation - sequentializing the graph - is thus a requirement for a graph to
be logical. Presentations and study of the artifacts ensuring that
sequentialization can be done, such as boxes or jumps, are an integral part of
researches on linear logic.
  Jumps, extensively studied by Faggian and di Giamberardino, can express
intermediate degrees of sequentialization between a sequent calculus proof and
a fully desequentialized proof-net. We propose to analyze the logical strength
of jumps by internalizing them in an extention of MLL where axioms on a
specific formula, the jumping formula, introduce constrains on the possible
sequentializations. The jumping formula needs to be treated non-linearly, which
we do either axiomatically, or by embedding it in a very controlled fragment of
multiplicative-exponential linear logic, uncovering the exponential logic of
sequentialization.
