  Resonance energy transfer methods are in wide use for evaluating
protein-protein interactions and protein conformational changes in living
cells. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measures energy transfer
as a function of the acceptor:donor ratio, generating FRET saturation curves.
Modeling these curves by Michaelis-Menten kinetics allows characterization by
two parameters, which serve to evaluate apparent affinity between two proteins
and to compare this affinity in different experimental conditions. To reduce
the effect of sampling variability, several statistical samples of the
saturation curve are generated in the same biological conditions. Here we study
three procedures to determine whether statistical samples in a collection are
homogeneous, in the sense that they are extracted from the same regression
model. From the hypothesis testing viewpoint, we considered an F test and a
procedure based on bootstrap resampling. The third method analyzed the problem
from the model selection viewpoint, and used the Akaike information criterion
(AIC). Although we only considered the Michaelis-Menten model, all statistical
procedures would be applicable to any other nonlinear regression model. We
compared the performance of the homogeneity testing methods in a Monte Carlo
study and through analysis in living cells of FRET saturation curves for
dimeric complexes of CXCR4, a seven-transmembrane receptor of the G
protein-coupled receptor family. We show that the F test, the bootstrap
procedure and the model selection method lead in general to similar
conclusions, although AIC gave the best results when sample sizes were small,
whereas the F test and the bootstrap method were more appropriate for large
samples. In practice, all three methods are easy to use simultaneously and show
consistency, facilitating conclusions on sample homogeneity.
