  Arboreal categories, introduced by Abramsky and Reggio, axiomatise categories
with tree-shaped objects. These categories provide a categorical language for
formalising behavioural notions such as simulation, bisimulation, and
resource-indexing. Comonadic adjunctions between an arboreal category and any
extensional category of objects, called arboreal covers, allow for application
of the behavioural notions to the static objects of the extensional category.
  In this paper, we demonstrate that every arboreal category has an associated
linear arboreal subcategory which admits a categorical version of trace
equivalence and complete trace equivalence. This generalises the connection
between the pebble-relation comonad, of Montacute and Shah, and the pebbling
comonad, of Abramsky, Dawar, and Wang. Specialising to the pebble-relation
comonad, we obtain categorical semantics for equivalence in a restricted
conjunction fragment of infinitary finite variable logic. As another example,
we construct a linear modal comonad recovering trace inclusion, trace
equivalence, and complete trace equivalence between transition systems as
instances of their categorical definitions. We conclude with a new Rossman
preservation theorem relating trace inclusion with trace equivalence, and a van
Benthem characterisation theorem relating complete trace equivalence with a
linear fragment of modal logic.
