  In the context of high-accuracy computational thermochemistry, the valence
CCSD correlation component of molecular atomization energies present the most
severe basis set convergence problem, followed by the (T) component. In the
present paper, we make a detailed comparison, for an expanded version of the
W4-11 thermochemistry benchmark, between on the one hand orbital-based
CCSD/AV{5,6}Z+d and CCSD/ACV{5,6}Z extrapolation, and on the other hand
CCSD-F12b calculations with cc-pVQZ-F12 and cc-pV5Z-F12 basis sets. This latter
basis set, now available for H--He, B--Ne, and Al--Ar, is shown to be very
close to the basis set limit. Apparent differences (which can reach 0.35
kcal/mol for systems like CCl4) between orbital-based and CCSD-F12b basis set
limits disappear if basis sets with additional radial flexibility, such as
ACV{5,6}Z, are used for the orbital calculation. Counterpoise calculations
reveal that, while TAEs with V5Z-F12 basis sets are nearly free of BSSE,
orbital calculations have significant BSSE even with AV(6+d)Z basis sets,
leading to non-negligible differences between raw and counterpoise-corrected
extrapolated limits. This latter problem is greatly reduced by switching to
ACV{5,6}Z core-valence basis sets, or simply adding an additional zeta to just
the valence orbitals. Previous reports that all-electron approaches like HEAT
lead to different CCSD(T) limits than valence limit+CV correction approaches
like FPD and W4 theory can be rationalized in terms of the greater radial
flexibility of core-valence basis sets. W4-F12 is found to agree slightly
better than W4 with ATcT (active thermochemical tables) data, at a substantial
saving in CPU time and especially I/O overhead. A W4-F12 calculation on benzene
is presented as a proof of concept.
