  We prove comparison principles for nonlinear potential theories in euclidian
spaces in a very straightforward manner from duality and monotonicity. We shall
also show how to deduce comparison principles for nonlinear differential
operators, a program seemingly different from the first. However, we shall
marry these two points of view, for a wide variety of equations, under
something called the correspondence principle. In potential theory one is given
a constraint set F on the 2-jets of a function, and the boundary of F gives a
differential equation. There are many differential operators, suitably
organized around F, which give the same equation. So potential theory gives a
great strengthening and simplification to the operator theory. Conversely, the
set of operators associated to F can have much to say about the potential
theory. An object of central interest here is that of monotonicity, which
explains and unifies much of the theory. We shall always assume that the
maximal monotonicity cone for a potential theory has interior. This is
automatic for gradient-free equations where monotonicity is simply the standard
degenerate ellipticity and properness assumptions. We show that for each such
potential theory F there is an associated canonical operator, defined on the
entire 2-jet space and having all the desired properties. Furthermore,
comparison holds for this operator on any domain which admits a regular
strictly M-subharmonic function, where M is a monotonicity subequation for F.
On the operator side there is an important dichotomy into the unconstrained
cases and constrained cases, where the operator must be restricted to a proper
subset of 2-jet space. These two cases are best illustrated by the canonical
operators and Dirichlet-Garding operators, respectively. The article gives
many, many examples from pure and applied mathematics, and also from
theoretical physics.
