  This research investigates the impact of gender-related differences in
preferences and efficiency in household tasks on the time distribution
throughout marriages, aiming to uncover the underlying reasons behind
gender-based discrepancies in labor earnings, especially regarding childcare
duties. By utilizing aggregated data from Japan's "Survey on Time Use and
Leisure Activities," this study enhances the life cycle model introduced
initially by Blundell et al. (2018) by integrating a heterogeneous range of
ages for a child, covering her growth from infancy to adulthood. The outcomes
derived from the model are then aligned with actual data through a fitting
process, followed by simulations of policies catering to married couples'
varying educational backgrounds. Our model's calculations indicate a reduction
in maternal earnings after childbirth, consistent with the findings of the
empirical investigation known as the "child penalty." However, a notable
disparity emerges between the projected outcomes of the model and the observed
data during the subsequent phase of maternal earnings recovery, with a
discrepancy of approximately 40 %. Furthermore, our calculations demonstrate
that a 25 % increase in the income replacement rate for parental leave results
in an almost 20 % increase in the utilization of parental leave. In contrast, a
steady 10 % rise in wages leads to a modest 2.5 % increase in the utilization
of parental leave.
