  Purpose: Metrics derived from eye-gaze-tracking and pupillometry show promise
for cognitive load assessment, potentially enhancing training and patient
safety through user-specific feedback in tele-robotic surgery. However, current
eye-tracking solutions' effectiveness in tele-robotic surgery is uncertain
compared to everyday situations due to close-range interactions causing extreme
pupil angles and occlusions. To assess the effectiveness of modern
eye-gaze-tracking solutions in tele-robotic surgery, we compare the Tobii Pro 3
Glasses and Pupil Labs Core, evaluating their pupil diameter and gaze stability
when integrated with the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK). Methods: The study
protocol includes a nine-point gaze calibration followed by pick-and-place task
using the dVRK and is repeated three times. After a final calibration, users
view a 3x3 grid of AprilTags, focusing on each marker for 10 seconds, to
evaluate gaze stability across dVRK-screen positions with the L2-norm.
Different gaze calibrations assess calibration's temporal deterioration due to
head movements. Pupil diameter stability is evaluated using the FFT from the
pupil diameter during the pick-and-place tasks. Users perform this routine with
both head-worn eye-tracking systems. Results: Data collected from ten users
indicate comparable pupil diameter stability. FFTs of pupil diameters show
similar amplitudes in high-frequency components. Tobii Glasses show more
temporal gaze stability compared to Pupil Labs, though both eye trackers yield
a similar 4cm error in gaze estimation without an outdated calibration.
Conclusion: Both eye trackers demonstrate similar stability of the pupil
diameter and gaze, when the calibration is not outdated, indicating comparable
eye-tracking and pupillometry performance in tele-robotic surgery settings.
