  Two theoretical frameworks have been widely used to understand the response
of monsoons to local and remote forcings: the vertically integrated atmospheric
energy budget and convective quasi-equilibrium (CQE). Existing forms of these
frameworks neglect some of the complexities of monsoons, such as the shallow
meridional circulations that advect dry air from adjacent deserts into the
middle and lower troposphere of monsoon regions. Here the fidelity of energy
budget and CQE theories for monsoon location is assessed in a three-dimensional
beta-plane model with boundary conditions representative of an off-equatorial
continent with a tropical grassland and an adjacent subtropical desert. Energy
budget theories show mixed success for various SST and land surface albedo
forcings, with the ITCZ being collocated with the energy flux equator but a
non-monotonic relationship existing between ITCZ latitude and cross-equatorial
energy transport. Accounting for the off-equatorial position of the unperturbed
energy flux equator is shown to be important when a linearization of meridional
energy transports is used to quantitatively diagnose ITCZ location. CQE
theories that diagnose ITCZ location based on the subcloud moist static energy
maximum are shown to have large biases; accounting for convective entrainment
of dry air by using a lower-tropospheric mean moist static energy provides a
more correct diagnosis of ITCZ location. Finally, it is shown that although
ITCZ shifts can be diagnosed by modified CQE and energy budget frameworks,
neither can be used in a quantitatively prognostic capacity due to
unpredictable feedbacks that are often larger than the imposed forcing.
