  We present a new framework to conceptualize and operationalize the total user
experience of search, by studying the entirety of a search journey from an
utilitarian point of view.
  Web search engines are widely perceived as "free". But search requires time
and effort: in reality there are many intermingled non-monetary costs (e.g.
time costs, cognitive costs, interactivity costs) and the benefits may be
marred by various impairments, such as misunderstanding and misinformation.
This characterization of costs and benefits appears to be inherent to the human
search for information within the pursuit of some larger task: most of the
costs and impairments can be identified in interactions with any web search
engine, interactions with public libraries, and even in interactions with
ancient oracles. To emphasize this innate connection, we call these costs and
benefits Delphic, in contrast to explicitly financial costs and benefits.
  Our main thesis is that the users' satisfaction with a search engine mostly
depends on their experience of Delphic cost and benefits, in other words on
their utility. The consumer utility is correlated with classic measures of
search engine quality, such as ranking, precision, recall, etc., but is not
completely determined by them. To argue our thesis, we catalog the Delphic
costs and benefits and show how the development of search engines over the last
quarter century, from classic Information Retrieval roots to the integration of
Large Language Models, was driven to a great extent by the quest of decreasing
Delphic costs and increasing Delphic benefits.
  We hope that the Delphic costs framework will engender new ideas and new
research for evaluating and improving the web experience for everyone.
