  Many methods for the verification of complex computer systems require the
existence of a tractable mathematical abstraction of the system, often in the
form of an automaton. In reality, however, such a model is hard to come up
with, in particular manually. Automata learning is a technique that can
automatically infer an automaton model from a system -- by observing its
behaviour. The majority of automata learning algorithms is based on the
so-called L* algorithm. The acceptor learned by L* has an important property:
it is canonical, in the sense that, it is, up to isomorphism, the unique
deterministic finite automaton of minimal size accepting a given regular
language. Establishing a similar result for other classes of acceptors, often
with side-effects, is of great practical importance. Non-deterministic finite
automata, for instance, can be exponentially more succinct than deterministic
ones, allowing verification to scale. Unfortunately, identifying a canonical
size-minimal non-deterministic acceptor of a given regular language is in
general not possible: it can happen that a regular language is accepted by two
non-isomorphic non-deterministic finite automata of minimal size. In
particular, it thus is unclear which one of the automata should be targeted by
a learning algorithm. In this thesis, we further explore the issue and identify
(sub-)classes of acceptors that admit canonical size-minimal representatives.
