  Solar flare prediction is a central problem in space weather forecasting and
has captivated the attention of a wide spectrum of researchers due to recent
advances in both remote sensing as well as machine learning and deep learning
approaches. The experimental findings based on both machine and deep learning
models reveal significant performance improvements for task specific datasets.
Along with building models, the practice of deploying such models to production
environments under operational settings is a more complex and often
time-consuming process which is often not addressed directly in research
settings. We present a set of new heuristic approaches to train and deploy an
operational solar flare prediction system for $\geq$M1.0-class flares with two
prediction modes: full-disk and active region-based. In full-disk mode,
predictions are performed on full-disk line-of-sight magnetograms using deep
learning models whereas in active region-based models, predictions are issued
for each active region individually using multivariate time series data
instances. The outputs from individual active region forecasts and full-disk
predictors are combined to a final full-disk prediction result with a
meta-model. We utilized an equal weighted average ensemble of two base
learners' flare probabilities as our baseline meta learner and improved the
capabilities of our two base learners by training a logistic regression model.
The major findings of this study are: (i) We successfully coupled two
heterogeneous flare prediction models trained with different datasets and model
architecture to predict a full-disk flare probability for next 24 hours, (ii)
Our proposed ensembling model, i.e., logistic regression, improves on the
predictive performance of two base learners and the baseline meta learner
measured in terms of two widely used metrics True Skill Statistic (TSS) and
Heidke Skill core (HSS), and (iii) Our result analysis suggests that the
logistic regression-based ensemble (Meta-FP) improves on the full-disk model
(base learner) by $\sim9\%$ in terms TSS and $\sim10\%$ in terms of HSS.
Similarly, it improves on the AR-based model (base learner) by $\sim17\%$ and
$\sim20\%$ in terms of TSS and HSS respectively. Finally, when compared to the
baseline meta model, it improves on TSS by $\sim10\%$ and HSS by $\sim15\%$.
