  In a market system, regulations are designed to prevent or rectify market
failures that inhibit fair exchange, such as monopoly or transactions with
hidden costs. Because regulations reduce profits to those possessing unfair
advantage, these advantaged corporations (whether individuals, companies, or
other collective organizations) are motivated to influence regulators.
Regulatory bodies created to protect the market are instead co-opted to advance
the interests of the corporations they are charged to regulate. This
wide-spread influence, known as "regulatory capture," has been recognized for
over 100 years, and according to expectations of rational behavior, will exist
wherever it is in the mutual self-interest of corporations and regulators. Here
we model the interaction between corporations and regulators using a new game
theory framework explicitly accounting for players' mutual influence, and
demonstrate the incentive for collusion. Communication between corporations and
regulators enables them to collude and split the resulting profits. We identify
when collusion is profitable for both parties. The intuitive results show that
capture occurs when the benefits to the corporation outweigh the costs to the
regulator. Under these conditions, the corporation can compensate the regulator
for costs incurred and, further, provide a profit to both parties. In the real
world, benefits often far outweigh costs, providing large incentives to collude
and making capture likely. Regulatory capture is inhibited by decreasing the
influence between parties through strict separation, independent market
knowledge and research by regulators, regulatory and market transparency,
regulatory accountability for market failures, widely distributed regulatory
control, and anti-corruption enforcement.
