  We study shared processor scheduling of $\textit{multiprocessor}$ weighted
jobs where each job can be executed on its private processor and simultaneously
on possibly $\textit{many}$ processors shared by all jobs in order to reduce
their completion times due to processing time overlap. Each of $m$ shared
processors may charge different fee but otherwise the processors are identical.
The total weighted overlap of all jobs is to be maximized. This problem is key
to subcontractor scheduling in extended enterprises and supply chains, and
divisible load scheduling in computing. We prove that, quite surprisingly,
$\textit{synchronized}$ schedules that complete each job using shared
processors at the same time on its private and shared processors include
optimal schedules. We show that optimal $\alpha$-$\textit{private}$ schedules
that require each job to use its private processor for at least
$\alpha=1/2+1/(4(m+1))$ of the time required by the job guarantee more than an
$\alpha$ fraction of the total weighted overlap of the optimal schedules. This
gives an $\alpha$-approximation algorithm that runs in strongly polynomial time
for the problem, and improves the $1/2$-approximation reported recently in the
literature to $5/8$-approximation for a single shared processor problem. The
computational complexity of the problem, both single and multi-shared
processor, remains open. We show however an LP-based optimal algorithm for
$\textit{antithetical}$ instances where for any pair of jobs $j$ and $i$, if
the processing time of $j$ is smaller than or equal to the processing time of
$i$, then the weight of $j$ is greater than or equal to the weight of $i$.
