  In 1979 following a decade of hyperinflation, Iceland introduced
Ver{\dh}trygg{\dh} l\'an, negatively amortised, index-linked loans whose
outstanding principal is increased by the rate of the consumer price inflation
index(CPI). The loans were part of a general government policy which used
indexation to the CPI to address the economic consequences of the
hyperinflation. Although most other forms of indexation were subsequently
removed, loan indexation has remained, and these loans now comprise the
majority of mortgages in Iceland. Although it is still often argued that
index-linked loans helped to stop the hyperinflation, these arguments are
typically based on high level macro-economic interpretations of the Icelandic
economy, they fail to identify specific mechanisms to support their claims. In
this paper we take the opposite approach, and present a detailed analysis of
the monetary mechanics used for the loans at the double entry bookkeeping level
of the banking system.
  Based on this analysis there appears to be no evidence or mechanism that
would support the claim that index-linked loans reduce or stop inflation. On
the contrary: our research shows that the bookkeeping treatment of these loans
within the banking system directly contributes to the banking system's monetary
expansion rate, and hence index-linked loans act to increase the inflation rate
to which they are linked, rather than reducing it. They consequently create a
positive feedback loop within the banking system's monetary regulation
operating directly on the money supply. Since the feedback into monetary
expansion only occurs at annual CPI rates above approximately 2%, we suggest
one solution would be to stabilise the money supply to 0% growth, and we
explore some ways this could be achieved by modifying the Basel Regulatory
Framework within the Icelandic Banking System.
