  Controversy regarding the correctness of a test for aliasing proposed by
Hinich and Wolinsky has been surprisingly long-lived. Two factors have
prolonged this controversy. One factor is the presence of deep-seated
intuitions that such a test is fundamentally incoherent. Perhaps the most
compelling objection is that, given a set of discrete-time samples, one can
construct an unaliased continuous-time series which exactly fits those samples.
Therefore, the samples alone can not show that the original time series was
aliased. The second factor prolonging the debate has been an inability of its
proponents to unseat those objections. In fact, as is shown here, all
objections can be met and the test as stated is correct. In particular, the
role of stationarity as knowledge in addition to the sample values turns out to
be crucial. Under certain conditions, including those addressed by the
bispectral aliasing test, the continuous-time signals reconstructed from
aliased samples are non-stationary. Therefore detecting aliasing in (at least
some) stationary continuous-time processes both makes sense and can be done.
The merits of the bispectral test for practical use are briefly addressed, but
our primary concern here is its theoretical soundness.
