  TensorFlow has been the most widely adopted Machine/Deep Learning framework.
However, little exists in the literature that provides a thorough understanding
of the capabilities which TensorFlow offers for the distributed training of
large ML/DL models that need computation and communication at scale. Most
commonly used distributed training approaches for TF can be categorized as
follows: 1) Google Remote Procedure Call (gRPC), 2) gRPC+X: X=(InfiniBand
Verbs, Message Passing Interface, and GPUDirect RDMA), and 3) No-gRPC: Baidu
Allreduce with MPI, Horovod with MPI, and Horovod with NVIDIA NCCL. In this
paper, we provide an in-depth performance characterization and analysis of
these distributed training approaches on various GPU clusters including the Piz
Daint system (6 on Top500). We perform experiments to gain novel insights along
the following vectors: 1) Application-level scalability of DNN training, 2)
Effect of Batch Size on scaling efficiency, 3) Impact of the MPI library used
for no-gRPC approaches, and 4) Type and size of DNN architectures. Based on
these experiments, we present two key insights: 1) Overall, No-gRPC designs
achieve better performance compared to gRPC-based approaches for most
configurations, and 2) The performance of No-gRPC is heavily influenced by the
gradient aggregation using Allreduce. Finally, we propose a truly CUDA-Aware
MPI Allreduce design that exploits CUDA kernels and pointer caching to perform
large reductions efficiently. Our proposed designs offer 5-17X better
performance than NCCL2 for small and medium messages, and reduces latency by
29% for large messages. The proposed optimizations help Horovod-MPI to achieve
approximately 90% scaling efficiency for ResNet-50 training on 64 GPUs.
Further, Horovod-MPI achieves 1.8X and 3.2X higher throughput than the native
gRPC method for ResNet-50 and MobileNet, respectively, on the Piz Daint
cluster.
