  Due to the significant role that curiosity plays in our lives, several
theoretical constructs, such as the information gap theory and compression
progress theory, have sought to explain how we engage in its practice.
According to the former, curiosity is the drive to acquire information that is
missing from our understanding of the world. According to the latter, curiosity
is the drive to construct an increasingly parsimonious mental model of the
world. To complement the densification processes inherent to these theories, we
propose the conformational change theory, wherein we posit that curiosity
results in mental models with marked conceptual flexibility. We formalize
curiosity as the process of building a growing knowledge network to
quantitatively investigate information gap theory, compression progress theory,
and the conformational change theory of curiosity. In knowledge networks, gaps
can be identified as topological cavities, compression progress can be
quantified using network compressibility, and flexibility can be measured as
the number of conformational degrees of freedom. We leverage data acquired from
the online encyclopedia Wikipedia to determine the degree to which each theory
explains the growth of knowledge networks built by individuals and by
collectives. Our findings lend support to a pluralistic view of curiosity,
wherein intrinsically motivated information acquisition fills knowledge gaps
and simultaneously leads to increasingly compressible and flexible knowledge
networks. Across individuals and collectives, we determine the contexts in
which each theoretical account may be explanatory, thereby clarifying their
complementary and distinct explanations of curiosity. Our findings offer a
novel network theoretical perspective on intrinsically motivated information
acquisition that may harmonize with or compel an expansion of the traditional
taxonomy of curiosity.
