  Public policy must confront emergencies that evolve in real time and in
uncertain directions, yet little is known about the nature of policy response.
Here we take the coronavirus pandemic as a global and extraordinarily
consequential case, and study the global policy response by analyzing a novel
dataset recording policy documents published by government agencies, think
tanks, and intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) across 114 countries (37,725
policy documents from Jan 2nd through May 26th 2020). Our analyses reveal four
primary findings. (1) Global policy attention to COVID-19 follows a remarkably
similar trajectory as the total confirmed cases of COVID-19, yet with evolving
policy focus from public health to broader social issues. (2) The COVID-19
policy frontier disproportionately draws on the latest, peer-reviewed, and
high-impact scientific insights. Moreover, policy documents that cite science
appear especially impactful within the policy domain. (3) The global policy
frontier is primarily interconnected through IGOs, such as the WHO, which
produce policy documents that are central to the COVID19 policy network and
draw especially strongly on scientific literature. Removing IGOs' contributions
fundamentally alters the global policy landscape, with the policy citation
network among government agencies increasingly fragmented into many isolated
clusters. (4) Countries exhibit highly heterogeneous policy attention to
COVID-19. Most strikingly, a country's early policy attention to COVID-19 shows
a surprising degree of predictability for the country's subsequent deaths.
Overall, these results uncover fundamental patterns of policy interactions and,
given the consequential nature of emergent threats and the paucity of
quantitative approaches to understand them, open up novel dimensions for
assessing and effectively coordinating global and local responses to COVID-19
and beyond.
