  Many cities around the world have introduced dockless micromobility services
in recent years and witnessed their rapid growth. Shared dockless e-scooters
have the potential to benefit neighborhoods that lack access to station-based
bikeshare services, but they may also exacerbate the existing spatial
disparities. While some studies have examined the equity of station-based
bikeshare systems, limited knowledge is available regarding dockless e-scooter
services. This study uses Washington DC as a case study, a city with both
dockless e-scooter and station-based bikeshare systems, to conduct equity
analysis of the two types of micromobility options. We develop an analytical
framework to examine how dockless e-scooter and station-based bikeshare differ
on a set of equity-related outcomes (i.e., availability, accessibility, usage,
and idle time) across neighborhoods of different socioeconomic categories.
Results reveal that dockless e-scooter services increase accessibility to
shared micromobility options for disadvantaged neighborhoods but also widen the
access gap across neighborhoods. Compared to bikeshare, shared e-scooters have
a higher level of spatial accessibility overall due to greater supply; however,
the greater supply largely leads to longer average idle time of shared
e-scooters rather than a greater number of trips. Finally, it appears that the
bikeshare system's equity program effectively promotes low-income use but
e-scooters' equity programs do not. Our findings suggest that increasing
vehicle supply alone would probably not lead to higher micromobility use in
disadvantaged neighborhoods. Instead, policymakers should combine a variety of
strategies such as promoting the enrollment of equity programs and reducing
access barriers (e.g., smartphone and banking requirements) to micromobility
services.
