  Approximate string-matching methods to account for complex variation in
highly discriminatory text fields, such as personal names, can enhance
probabilistic record linkage. However, discriminating between matching and
non-matching strings is challenging for logographic scripts, where similarities
in pronunciation, appearance, or keystroke sequence are not directly encoded in
the string data. We leverage a large Chinese administrative dataset with known
match status to develop logistic regression and Xgboost classifiers integrating
measures of visual, phonetic, and keystroke similarity to enhance
identification of potentially-matching name pairs. We evaluate three methods of
leveraging name similarity scores in large-scale probabilistic record linkage,
which can adapt to varying match prevalence and information in supporting
fields: (1) setting a threshold score based on predicted quality of
name-matching across all record pairs; (2) setting a threshold score based on
predicted discriminatory power of the linkage model; and (3) using empirical
score distributions among matches and nonmatches to perform Bayesian adjustment
of matching probabilities estimated from exact-agreement linkage. In
experiments on holdout data, as well as data simulated with varying name error
rates and supporting fields, a logistic regression classifier incorporated via
the Bayesian method demonstrated marked improvements over exact-agreement
linkage with respect to discriminatory power, match probability estimation, and
accuracy, reducing the total number of misclassified record pairs by 21% in
test data and up to an average of 93% in simulated datasets. Our results
demonstrate the value of incorporating visual, phonetic, and keystroke
similarity for logographic name matching, as well as the promise of our
Bayesian approach to leverage name-matching within large-scale record linkage.
