  The declining price anomaly states that the price weakly decreases when
multiple copies of an item are sold sequentially over time. The anomaly has
been observed in a plethora of practical applications. On the theoretical side,
Gale and Stegeman proved that the anomaly is guaranteed to hold in full
information sequential auctions with exactly two buyers. We prove that the
declining price anomaly is not guaranteed in full information sequential
auctions with three or more buyers. This result applies to both first-price and
second-price sequential auctions. Moreover, it applies regardless of the
tie-breaking rule used to generate equilibria in these sequential auctions. To
prove this result we provide a refined treatment of subgame perfect equilibria
that survive the iterative deletion of weakly dominated strategies and use this
framework to experimentally generate a very large number of random sequential
auction instances. In particular, our experiments produce an instance with
three bidders and eight items that, for a specific tie-breaking rule, induces a
non-monotonic price trajectory. Theoretic analyses are then applied to show
that this instance can be used to prove that for every possible tie-breaking
rule there is a sequential auction on which it induces a non-monotonic price
trajectory. On the other hand, our experiments show that non-monotonic price
trajectories are extremely rare. In over six million experiments only a
0.000183 proportion of the instances violated the declining price anomaly.
