  In this work, we present methodologies for the quantification of confidence
in bottom-up coarse-grained models for molecular and macromolecular systems.
Coarse-graining methods have been extensively used in the past decades in order
to extend the length and time scales accessible by simulation methodologies.
The quantification, though, of induced errors due to the limited availability
of fine-grained data is not yet established. Here, we employ rigorous
statistical methods to deduce guarantees for the optimal coarse models obtained
via approximations of the multi-body potential of mean force, with the relative
entropy, the relative entropy rate minimization, and the force matching
methods. Specifically, we present and apply statistical approaches, such as
bootstrap and jackknife, to infer confidence sets for a limited number of
samples, i.e., molecular configurations. Moreover, we estimate asymptotic
confidence intervals assuming adequate sampling of the phase space. We
demonstrate the need for non-asymptotic methods and quantify confidence sets
through two applications. The first is a two-scale fast/slow diffusion process
projected on the slow process. With this benchmark example, we establish the
methodology for both independent and time-series data. Second, we apply these
uncertainty quantification approaches on a polymeric bulk system. We consider
an atomistic polyethylene melt as the prototype system for developing
coarse-graining tools for macromolecular systems. For this system, we estimate
the coarse-grained force field and present confidence levels with respect to
the number of available microscopic data.
