  In a heterogeneous medium, the wavefield can be decomposed as an infinite
series known as the Born expansion. Each term of the Born expansion corresponds
to a scattering order, it is thus theoretically possible to discriminate single
and multiple scattering field components. Experimentally, what is actually
measured is the total field in which all scattering orders interfere.
Conventional imaging methods usually rely on the assumption that the multiple
scattering contribution can be disregarded. In a back-scattering configuration,
this assumption is valid for small depths, and begins to fail for depths larger
than the scattering mean-free path $\ell_s$. It is therefore a key issue to
estimate the relative amount of single and multiple scattering in experimental
data. To this end, a single scattering estimator $\hat{\rho}$ computed from the
reflection matrix has been introduced in order to assess the weight of single
scattering in the backscattered wavefield. In this article, the meaning of this
estimator is investigated and a particular attention is given to recurrent
scattering. In a diffraction-limited experiment, a multiple scattering sequence
is said to be recurrent if the first and last scattering events occur in the
same resolution cell. Recurrent scattering is shown to be responsible for
correlations between single scattering and higher scattering orders of the Born
expansion, inducing a bias to the estimator $\hat{\rho}$ that should rather be
termed confocal scattering ratio. Interestingly, a more robust estimator is
built by projecting the reflection matrix in a focused basis. The argument is
sustained by numerical simulations as well as ultrasonic data obtained around
1.5~MHz in a model medium made of nylon rods immersed in water. From a more
general perspective, this work raises fundamental questions about the impact of
recurrent scattering on wave imaging.
