  The household secondary attack risk (SAR), often called the secondary attack
rate or secondary infection risk, is the probability of infectious contact from
an infectious household member A to a given household member B, where we define
infectious contact to be a contact sufficient to infect B if he or she is
susceptible. Estimation of the SAR is an important part of understanding and
controlling the transmission of infectious diseases. In practice, it is most
often estimated using binomial models such as logistic regression, which
implicitly attribute all secondary infections in a household to the primary
case. In the simplest case, the number of secondary infections in a household
with m susceptibles and a single primary case is modeled as a binomial(m, p)
random variable where p is the SAR. Although it has long been understood that
transmission within households is not binomial, it is thought that multiple
generations of transmission can be safely neglected when p is small. We use
probability generating functions and simulations to show that this is a
mistake. The proportion of susceptible household members infected can be
substantially larger than the SAR even when p is small. As a result, binomial
estimates of the SAR are biased upward and their confidence intervals have poor
coverage probabilities even if adjusted for clustering. Accurate point and
interval estimates of the SAR can be obtained using longitudinal chain binomial
models or pairwise survival analysis, which account for multiple generations of
transmission within households, the ongoing risk of infection from outside the
household, and incomplete follow-up. We illustrate the practical implications
of these results in an analysis of household surveillance data collected by the
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health during the 2009 influenza A
(H1N1) pandemic.
