  In this study we investigated the effect of body ownership illusion-based
body scaling on physics plausibility in Virtual Reality (VR). Our interest was
in examining whether body ownership illusion-based body scaling could affect
the plausibility of rigid body dynamics similarly to altering VR users' scale
by manipulating their virtual interpupillary distance and viewpoint height. The
procedure involved the conceptual replication of two previous studies. We
investigated physics plausibility with 40 participants under two conditions. In
our synchronous condition, we used visuo-tactile stimuli to elicit a body
ownership illusion of inhabiting an invisible doll-sized body on participants
reclining on an exam table. Our asynchronous condition was otherwise similar,
but the visuo-tactile stimuli were provided asynchronously to prevent the onset
of the body ownership illusion. We were interested in whether the correct
approximation of physics (true physics) or physics that are incorrect and
appearing as if the environment is five times larger instead (movie physics)
appear more realistic to participants as a function of body scale. We found
that movie physics did appear more realistic to participants under the body
ownership illusion condition. However, our hypothesis that true physics would
appear more realistic in the asynchronous condition was unsupported. Our
exploratory analyses revealed that movie physics were perceived as plausible
under both conditions. Moreover, we were not able to replicate previous
findings from literature concerning object size estimations while inhabiting a
small invisible body. However, we found a significant opposite effect regarding
size estimations; the object sizes were on average underestimated during the
synchronous visuo-tactile condition when compared to the asynchronous
condition.
