  With the rapid progress in virtual reality (VR) technology, the scope of VR
applications has greatly expanded across various domains. However, the
superiority of VR training over traditional methods and its impact on learning
efficacy are still uncertain. To investigate whether VR training is more
effective than traditional methods, we designed virtual training systems for
mechanical assembly on both VR and desktop platforms, subsequently conducting
pre-test and post-test experiments. A cohort of 53 students, all enrolled in
engineering drawing course without prior knowledge distinctions, was randomly
divided into three groups: physical training, desktop virtual training, and
immersive VR training. Our investigation utilized analysis of covariance
(ANCOVA) to examine the differences in post-test scores among the three groups
while controlling for pre-test scores. The group that received VR training
showed the highest scores on the post-test. Another facet of our study delved
into the presence of the virtual system. We developed a specialized scale to
assess this aspect for our research objectives. Our findings indicate that VR
training can enhance the sense of presence, particularly in terms of sensory
factors and realism factors. Moreover, correlation analysis uncovers
connections between the various dimensions of presence. This study confirms
that using VR training can improve learning efficacy and the presence in the
context of mechanical assembly, surpassing traditional training methods.
Furthermore, it provides empirical evidence supporting the integration of VR
technology in higher education and engineering training. This serves as a
reference for the practical application of VR technology in different fields.
