  Due to their high energy intensity, buildings play a major role in the
current worldwide energy transition. Building models are ubiquitous since they
are needed at each stage of the life of buildings, i.e. for design,
retrofitting, and control operations. Classical white-box models, based on
physical equations, are bound to follow the laws of physics but the specific
design of their underlying structure might hinder their expressiveness and
hence their accuracy. On the other hand, black-box models are better suited to
capture nonlinear building dynamics and thus can often achieve better accuracy,
but they require a lot of data and might not follow the laws of physics, a
problem that is particularly common for neural network (NN) models. To counter
this known generalization issue, physics-informed NNs have recently been
introduced, where researchers introduce prior knowledge in the structure of NNs
to ground them in known underlying physical laws and avoid classical NN
generalization issues.
  In this work, we present a novel physics-informed NN architecture, dubbed
Physically Consistent NN (PCNN), which only requires past operational data and
no engineering overhead, including prior knowledge in a linear module running
in parallel to a classical NN. We formally prove that such networks are
physically consistent - by design and even on unseen data - with respect to
different control inputs and temperatures outside and in neighboring zones. We
demonstrate their performance on a case study, where the PCNN attains an
accuracy up to 40% better than a classical physics-based resistance-capacitance
model on 3-day long prediction horizons. Furthermore, despite their constrained
structure, PCNNs attain similar performance to classical NNs on the validation
data, overfitting the training data less and retaining high expressiveness to
tackle the generalization issue.
