  Objective: The overarching objective is to make the definition of the
clinical target volume (CTV) in radiation oncology less subjective and more
scientifically based. The specific objective of this study is to investigate
similarities and differences between two methods that model tumor spread beyond
the visible gross tumor volume (GTV): 1. The shortest path model, which is the
standard method of adding a geometric GTV-CTV margin, and 2. The
reaction-diffusion model.
  Approach: These two models to capture the invisible tumor "fire front" are
defined and compared in mathematical terms. The models are applied to example
cases that represent tumor spread in non-uniform and anisotropic media with
anatomical barriers.
  Main Results: The two seemingly disparate models bring forth traveling waves
that can be associated with the front of tumor growth outward from the GTV. The
shape of the fronts is similar for both models. Differences are seen in cases
where the diffusive flow is reduced due to anatomical barriers, and in complex
spatially non-uniform cases. The diffusion model generally leads to smoother
fronts. The smoothness can be controlled with a parameter defined by the ratio
of the diffusion coefficient and the proliferation rate.
  Significance: Defining the CTV has been described as the weakest link of the
radiotherapy chain. There are many similarities in the mathematical description
and the behavior of the common geometric GTV-CTV expansion method, and the
definition of the CTV tumor front via the reaction-diffusion model. Its
mechanistic basis and the controllable smoothness make the diffusion model an
attractive alternative to the standard GTV-CTV margin model.
