  Metabolic control analysis (Kacser & Burns (1973). Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 27,
65-104; Heinrich & Rapoport (1974). Eur. J. Biochem. 42, 89-95) was developed
for the understanding of multi-enzyme networks. At the core of this approach is
the flux summation theorem. This theorem implies that there is an invariant
relationship between the control coefficients of enzymes in a pathway. One of
the main conclusions that has been derived from the summation theorem is that
phenotypic robustness to mutation (e.g. dominance) is an inherent property of
metabolic systems and hence does not require an evolutionary explanation
(Kacser & Burns (1981). Genetics. 97, 639-666; Porteous (1996). J. theor. Biol.
182, 223-232). Here we show that for mutations involving discrete changes (of
any magnitude) in enzyme concentration the flux summation theorem does not
hold. The scenarios we examine are two-enzyme pathways with a diffusion
barrier, two enzyme pathways that allow for enzyme saturation and two enzyme
pathways that have both saturable enzymes and a diffusion barrier. Our results
are extendable to sequential pathways with any number of enzymes. The fact that
the flux summation theorem cannot hold in sequential pathways casts serious
doubts on the claim that robustness with respect to mutations is an inherent
property of metabolic systems.
