  Intracranial EEG (iEEG) is the gold standard technique for epileptogenic zone
(EZ) localisation, but requires a hypothesis of which tissue is epileptogenic,
guided by qualitative analysis of seizure semiology and other imaging
modalities such as magnetoencephalography (MEG). We hypothesised that if
quantifiable MEG band power abnormalities were sampled by iEEG, then patients'
post-resection seizure outcome were better.
  Thirty-two individuals with neocortical epilepsy underwent MEG and iEEG
recordings as part of pre-surgical evaluation. Interictal MEG band power
abnormalities were derived using 70 healthy controls as a normative baseline.
MEG abnormality maps were compared to electrode implantation, with the spatial
overlap of iEEG electrodes and MEG abnormalities recorded. Finally, we assessed
if the implantation of electrodes in abnormal tissue, and resection of the
strongest abnormalities determined by MEG and iEEG explained surgical outcome.
  Intracranial electrodes were implanted in brain tissue with the most abnormal
MEG findings in individuals that were seizure-free post-resection (T=3.9,
p=0.003). The overlap between MEG abnormalities and iEEG electrodes
distinguished outcome groups moderately well (AUC=0.68). In isolation, the
resection of the strongest MEG and iEEG abnormalities separated surgical
outcome groups well (AUC=0.71, AUC=0.74 respectively). A model incorporating
all three features separated outcome groups best (AUC=0.80).
  Intracranial EEG is a key tool to delineate the EZ and help render patients
seizure-free after resection. We showed that data-driven abnormalities derived
from interictal MEG recordings have clinical value and may help guide electrode
placement in individuals with neocortical epilepsy. Finally, our predictive
model of post-operative seizure-freedom, which leverages both MEG and iEEG
recordings, may aid patient counselling of expected outcome.
