  A recent strand of research in structural proof theory aims at exploring the
notion of analytic calculi (i.e. those calculi that support general and modular
proof-strategies for cut elimination), and at identifying classes of logics
that can be captured in terms of these calculi. In this context, Wansing
introduced the notion of proper display calculi as one possible design
framework for proof calculi in which the analiticity desiderata are realized in
a particularly transparent way. Recently, the theory of properly displayable
logics (i.e. those logics that can be equivalently presented with some proper
display calculus) has been developed in connection with generalized Sahlqvist
theory (aka unified correspondence). Specifically, properly displayable logics
have been syntactically characterized as those axiomatized by analytic
inductive axioms, which can be equivalently and algorithmically transformed
into analytic structural rules so that the resulting proper display calculi
enjoy a set of basic properties: soundness, completeness, conservativity, cut
elimination and subformula property. In this context, the proof that the given
calculus is complete w.r.t. the original logic is usually carried out
syntactically, i.e. by showing that a (cut free) derivation exists of each
given axiom of the logic in the basic system to which the analytic structural
rules algorithmically generated from the given axiom have been added. However,
so far this proof strategy for syntactic completeness has been implemented on a
case-by-case base, and not in general. In this paper, we address this gap by
proving syntactic completeness for properly displayable logics in any normal
(distributive) lattice expansion signature. Specifically, we show that for
every analytic inductive axiom a cut free derivation can be effectively
generated which has a specific shape, referred to as pre-normal form.
