  Assortment optimization concerns the problem of selling items with fixed
prices to a buyer who will purchase at most one. Typically, retailers select a
subset of items, corresponding to an "assortment" of brands to carry, and make
each selected item available for purchase at its brand-recommended price.
Despite the tremendous importance in practice, the best method for selling
these fixed-price items is not well understood, as retailers have begun
experimenting with making certain items available only through a lottery.
  In this paper we analyze the maximum possible revenue that can be earned in
this setting, given that the buyer's preference is private but drawn from a
known distribution. In particular, we introduce a Bayesian mechanism design
problem where the buyer has a random ranking over fixed-price items and an
outside option, and the seller optimizes a (randomized) allocation of up to one
item. We show that allocations corresponding to assortments are suboptimal in
general, but under many commonly-studied Bayesian priors for buyer rankings
such as the MNL and Markov Chain choice models, assortments are in fact
optimal. Therefore, this large literature on assortment optimization has much
greater significance than appreciated before -- it is not only computing
optimal assortments; it is computing the economic limit of the seller's revenue
for these fixed-price substitute items.
  We derive several further results -- a more general sufficient condition for
assortments being optimal that captures choice models beyond Markov Chain, a
proof that Nested Logit choice models cannot be captured by Markov Chain but
can be partially captured by our condition, and suboptimality gaps for
assortments when our condition does not hold. Finally, we show that our
mechanism design problem provides the tightest-known LP relaxation for
assortment optimization under the ranking distribution model.
