  The estimation of the correct number of dimensions is a long-standing problem
in psychometrics. Several methods have been proposed, such as parallel analysis
(PA), Kaiser-Guttman's eigenvalue-greaterthan-one rule, multiple average
partial procedure (MAP), the maximum-likelihood approaches that use fit indexes
as BIC and EBIC and the less used and studied approach called very simple
structure (VSS). In the present paper a new approach to estimate the number of
dimensions will be introduced and compared via simulation to the traditional
techniques pointed above. The approach proposed in the current paper is called
exploratory graph analysis (EGA), since it is based on the graphical lasso with
the regularization parameter specified using EBIC. The number of dimensions is
verified using the walktrap, a random walk algorithm used to identify
communities in networks. In total, 32,000 data sets were simulated to fit known
factor structures, with the data sets varying across different criteria: number
of factors (2 and 4), number of items (5 and 10), sample size (100, 500, 1000
and 5000) and correlation between factors (orthogonal, .20, .50 and .70),
resulting in 64 different conditions. For each condition, 500 data sets were
simulated using lavaan. The result shows that the EGA performs comparable to
parallel analysis, EBIC, eBIC and to KaiserGuttman rule in a number of
situations, especially when the number of factors was two. However, EGA was the
only technique able to correctly estimate the number of dimensions in the
four-factor structure when the correlation between factors were .7, showing an
accuracy of 100% for a sample size of 5,000 observations. Finally, the EGA was
used to estimate the number of factors in a real dataset, in order to compare
its performance with the other six techniques tested in the simulation study.
