  Objective This study provides an objective measure based on actigraphy for
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) diagnosis in children. We
search for motor activity features that could allow further investigation into
their association with other neurophysiological disordered traits.
  Method The study involved $n=29$ (48 eligible) male participants aged
$9.89\pm0.92$ years (8 controls, and 7 in each group: ADHD combined subtype,
ADHD hyperactive-impulsive subtype, and autism spectrum disorder, ASD) wearing
a wristwatch actigraph continuously for a week ($9\%$ losses in daily records)
in two acquisition modes. We analyzed 47 quantities: from sleep duration or
movement intensity to theory-driven scaling exponents or non-linear prediction
errors of both diurnal and nocturnal activity. We used them in supervised
classification to obtain cross-validated diagnostic performance.
  Results We report the best performing measures, including a nearest neighbors
4-feature classifier providing $69.4\pm1.6\%$ accuracy, $78.0\pm2.2\%$
sensitivity and $60.8\pm2.6\%$ specificity in a binary ADHD vs control
classification and $46.5\pm1.1\%$ accuracy (against $25\%$ baseline),
$61.8\pm1.4\%$ sensitivity and $79.30 \pm0.43\%$ specificity in 4-class task
(two ADHD subtypes, ASD, and control). The most informative feature is skewness
of the shape of Zero Crossing Mode (ZCM) activity. Mean and standard deviation
of nocturnal activity are among the least informative.
  Conclusion Actigraphy causes only minor discomfort to the subjects and is
inexpensive. The range of existing mathematical and machine learning tools also
allow it to be a useful add-on test for ADHD or differential diagnosis between
ADHD subtypes. The study was limited to a small, male sample without the
inattentive ADHD subtype.
