  This paper proposes averaging estimation methods to improve the finite-sample
efficiency of the instrumental variables quantile regression (IVQR) estimation.
First, I apply Cheng, Liao, Shi's (2019) averaging GMM framework to the IVQR
model. I propose using the usual quantile regression moments for averaging to
take advantage of cases when endogeneity is not too strong. I also propose
using two-stage least squares slope moments to take advantage of cases when
heterogeneity is not too strong. The empirical optimal weight formula of Cheng
et al. (2019) helps optimize the bias-variance tradeoff, ensuring uniformly
better (asymptotic) risk of the averaging estimator over the standard IVQR
estimator under certain conditions. My implementation involves many
computational considerations and builds on recent developments in the quantile
literature. Second, I propose a bootstrap method that directly averages among
IVQR, quantile regression, and two-stage least squares estimators. More
specifically, I find the optimal weights in the bootstrap world and then apply
the bootstrap-optimal weights to the original sample. The bootstrap method is
simpler to compute and generally performs better in simulations, but it lacks
the formal uniform dominance results of Cheng et al. (2019). Simulation results
demonstrate that in the multiple-regressors/instruments case, both the GMM
averaging and bootstrap estimators have uniformly smaller risk than the IVQR
estimator across data-generating processes (DGPs) with all kinds of
combinations of different endogeneity levels and heterogeneity levels. In DGPs
with a single endogenous regressor and instrument, where averaging estimation
is known to have least opportunity for improvement, the proposed averaging
estimators outperform the IVQR estimator in some cases but not others.
