  The forecasting of credit default risk has been an active research field for
several decades. Historically, logistic regression has been used as a major
tool due to its compliance with regulatory requirements: transparency,
explainability, and fairness. In recent years, researchers have increasingly
used complex and advanced machine learning methods to improve prediction
accuracy. Even though a machine learning method could potentially improve the
model accuracy, it complicates simple logistic regression, deteriorates
explainability, and often violates fairness. In the absence of compliance with
regulatory requirements, even highly accurate machine learning methods are
unlikely to be accepted by companies for credit scoring. In this paper, we
introduce a novel class of monotonic neural additive models, which meet
regulatory requirements by simplifying neural network architecture and
enforcing monotonicity. By utilizing the special architectural features of the
neural additive model, the monotonic neural additive model penalizes
monotonicity violations effectively. Consequently, the computational cost of
training a monotonic neural additive model is similar to that of training a
neural additive model, as a free lunch. We demonstrate through empirical
results that our new model is as accurate as black-box fully-connected neural
networks, providing a highly accurate and regulated machine learning method.
