  Companies regularly spend millions of dollars producing electronically-stored
documents in legal matters. Recently, parties on both sides of the 'legal
aisle' are accepting the use of machine learning techniques like text
classification to cull massive volumes of data and to identify responsive
documents for use in these matters. While text classification is regularly used
to reduce the discovery costs in legal matters, it also faces a peculiar
perception challenge: amongst lawyers, this technology is sometimes looked upon
as a "black box", little information provided for attorneys to understand why
documents are classified as responsive. In recent years, a group of AI and ML
researchers have been actively researching Explainable AI, in which actions or
decisions are human understandable. In legal document review scenarios, a
document can be identified as responsive, if one or more of its text snippets
are deemed responsive. In these scenarios, if text classification can be used
to locate these snippets, then attorneys could easily evaluate the model's
classification decision. When deployed with defined and explainable results,
text classification can drastically enhance overall quality and speed of the
review process by reducing the review time. Moreover, explainable predictive
coding provides lawyers with greater confidence in the results of that
supervised learning task. This paper describes a framework for explainable text
classification as a valuable tool in legal services: for enhancing the quality
and efficiency of legal document review and for assisting in locating
responsive snippets within responsive documents. This framework has been
implemented in our legal analytics product, which has been used in hundreds of
legal matters. We also report our experimental results using the data from an
actual legal matter that used this type of document review.
