  Fake news is today a major threat to free and democratic making of public
opinion. To curb their spread, all efforts by institutions and policy makers
rely mainly on imposing restriction, prohibition and fact checking sites, which
end up to an effective limitation of freedom of speech. This policy of
prohibition, supported by a wide consensus, has been recently broken by the
controversial policy applied by Elon Musk to regulate the social media X, with
a backlash accusing him of promoting hate speech. Here, notwithstanding these
two policies, I explore another avenue denoted ``No ban, No spread - with
Sequestration", which amounts at the same time preserving full freedom of
speech and neutralization of fake news impact. To investigate the feasibility
of my proposal, I tackle the issue within the Galam model of opinion dynamics.
In addition to the basic ingredients of the model, I explore for the first time
the effect on the dynamics of opinion of a simultaneous activation of prejudice
tie breaking and contrarian behavior. The results show that indeed most pieces
of fake news do not propagate beyond small groups of people and thus pose no
global threat. However, I have unveiled some peculiar sets of parameters for
which fake news, even if initially shared by only a handful of agents, spreads
``naturally" to invade a whole community with no resistance. Based on these
findings, I am able to outline a path to neutralize such invasive fake news by
blocking "naturally" its spread, effectively sequestering it in very small
social networks of people. The scheme relies on reshaping the social geometry
of the landscape in which fake news evolves. No prohibition is required with
fake news left free to prosper but being sequestrated. Next challenging step
will be designing measures to implement the model's findings into the real
world of social media.
