  Dynamic Random Subjective Expected Utility (DR-SEU) allows to model choice
data observed from an agent or a population of agents whose beliefs about
objective payoff-relevant states and tastes can both evolve stochastically. Our
observable, the augmented Stochastic Choice Function (aSCF) allows, in contrast
to previous work in decision theory, for a direct test of whether the agent's
beliefs reflect the true data-generating process conditional on their private
information as well as identification of the possibly incorrect beliefs. We
give an axiomatic characterization of when an agent satisfies the model, both
in a static as well as in a dynamic setting. We look at the case when the agent
has correct beliefs about the evolution of objective states as well as at the
case when her beliefs are incorrect but unforeseen contingencies are
impossible.
  We also distinguish two subvariants of the dynamic model which coincide in
the static setting: Evolving SEU, where a sophisticated agent's utility evolves
according to a Bellman equation and Gradual Learning, where the agent is
learning about her taste. We prove easy and natural comparative statics results
on the degree of belief incorrectness as well as on the speed of learning about
taste.
  Auxiliary results contained in the online appendix extend previous decision
theory work in the menu choice and stochastic choice literature from a
technical as well as a conceptual perspective.
