  Purpose: In this work, we explore the potential and limitations of simulating
gaze-contingent tunnel vision conditions using Virtual Reality (VR) with
built-in eye tracking technology. This approach promises an easy and accessible
way of expanding study populations and test groups for visual training, visual
aids, or accessibility evaluations. However, it is crucial to assess the
validity and reliability of simulating these types of visual impairments and
evaluate the extend to which participants with simulated tunnel vision can
represent real patients. Methods: Two age-matched participant groups were
acquired: The first group (n=8 aged 20-60, average 49.1, sd 13.2) consisted of
patients diagnosed with Retinitis pigmentosa (RP). The second group (n=8, aged
27-59, average 46.5, sd 10.8) consisted of visually healthy participants with
simulated tunnel vision. Both groups carried out different visual tasks in a
virtual environment for 30 minutes per day over the course of four weeks. Task
performances as well as gaze characteristics were evaluated in both groups over
the course of the study. Results: Using the "two one-sided tests for
equivalence" method, the two groups were found to perform similar in all three
visual tasks. Significant differences between groups were found in different
aspects of their gaze behavior, though most of these aspects seem to converge
over time. Conclusion: Our study evaluates the potential and limitations of
using Virtual Reality technology to simulate the effects of tunnel vision
within controlled virtual environments. We find that the simulation accurately
represents performance of RP patients in the context of group averages, but
fails to fully replicate effects on gaze behavior.
