  The performance of different probabilistic amplitude shaping (PAS) techniques
in the nonlinear regime is investigated, highlighting its dependence on the PAS
block length and the interaction with carrier phase recovery (CPR). Different
PAS implementations are considered, based on different distribution matching
(DM) techniques-namely, sphere shaping, shell mapping with different number of
shells, and constant composition DM-and amplitude-to-symbol maps. When CPR is
not included, PAS with optimal block length provides a nonlinear shaping gain
with respect to a linearly optimized PAS (with infinite block length); among
the considered DM techniques, the largest gain is obtained with sphere shaping.
On the other hand, the nonlinear shaping gain becomes smaller, or completely
vanishes, when CPR is included, meaning that in this case all the considered
implementations achieve a similar performance for a sufficiently long block
length. Similar results are obtained in different link configurations (1x180km,
15x80km, and 27x80km single-mode-fiber links), and also including laser phase
noise, except when in-line dispersion compensation is used. Furthermore, we
define a new metric, the nonlinear phase noise (NPN) metric, which is based on
the frequency resolved logarithmic perturbation models and explains the
interaction of CPR and PAS. We show that the NPN metric is highly correlated
with the performance of the system. Our results suggest that, in general, the
optimization of PAS in the nonlinear regime should always account for the
presence of a CPR algorithm. In this case, the reduction of the rate loss
(obtained by using sphere shaping and increasing the DM block length) turns out
to be more important than the mitigation of the nonlinear phase noise (obtained
by using constant-energy DMs and reducing the block length), the latter being
already granted by the CPR algorithm.
