  In the problem of aggregating experts' probabilistic predictions over an
ordered set of outcomes, we introduce the axiom of level-strategy\-proofness
(level-SP) and prove that it is a natural notion with several applications.
Moreover, it is a robust concept as it implies incentive compatibility in a
rich domain of single-peakedness over the space of cumulative distribution
functions (CDFs). This contrasts with the literature which assumes
single-peaked preferences over the space of probability distributions. Our main
results are: (1) a reduction of our problem to the aggregation of CDFs; (2) the
axiomatic characterization of level-SP probability aggregation functions with
and without the addition of other axioms; (3) impossibility results which
provide bounds for our characterization; (4) the axiomatic characterization of
two new and practical level-SP methods: the proportional-cumulative method and
the middlemost-cumulative method; and (5) the application of
proportional-cumulative to extend approval voting, majority rule, and majority
judgment methods to situations where voters/experts are uncertain about how to
grade the candidates/alternatives to be ranked.\footnote{We are grateful to
Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Roger Cooke, Aris Filos-Ratsikas, Herv\'e Moulin, Clemens
Puppe and some anonymous EC2021 referees for their helpful comments and
suggestions.}
  \keywords{Probability Aggregation Functions \and ordered Set of Alternatives
\and Level Strategy-Proofness \and Proportional-Cumulative \and
Middlemost-Cumulative}
