  Background: Modern statistical tools provide the ability to compare the
information content of observables and provide a path to explore which
experiments would be most useful to give insight into and constrain theoretical
models. Purpose: In this work we study three such tools in the context of
nuclear reactions with the goal of constraining the optical potential. Method:
The three statistical tools examined are: i) the principal component analysis;
ii) the sensitivity analysis based on derivatives; and iii) the Bayesian
evidence. We first apply these tools to a toy-model case, comparing the form of
the imaginary part of the optical potential. Then we consider two different
reaction observables, elastic angular distributions and polarization data for
reactions on 48Ca at two different beam energies. Results: For the toy-model
case, we find significant discrimination power in the sensitivities and the
Bayesian evidence, showing clearly that the volume imaginary term is more
useful to describe scattering at higher energies. When comparing between
elastic cross sections and polarization data using realistic optical models,
sensitivity studies indicate that both observables are roughly equally
sensitive but the variability of the optical model parameters is strongly angle
dependent. The Bayesian evidence shows some variability between the two
observables, but the Bayes factor obtained is not sufficient to discriminate
between angular distributions and polarization. Conclusions: From the cases
considered, we conclude that in general elastic scattering angular
distributions have similar impact in constraining the optical potential
parameters compared to the polarization data. The angular ranges for the
optimum experimental constraints can vary significantly with the observable
considered.
