  Lambda calculi with algebraic data types lie at the core of functional
programming languages and proof assistants, but conceal at least two
fundamental theoretical problems already in the presence of the simplest
non-trivial data type, the sum type. First, we do not know of an explicit and
implemented algorithm for deciding the beta-eta-equality of terms---and this in
spite of the first decidability results proven two decades ago. Second, it is
not clear how to decide when two types are essentially the same, i.e.
isomorphic, in spite of the meta-theoretic results on decidability of the
isomorphism.
  In this paper, we present the exp-log normal form of types---derived from the
representation of exponential polynomials via the unary exponential and
logarithmic functions---that any type built from arrows, products, and sums,
can be isomorphically mapped to. The type normal form can be used as a simple
heuristic for deciding type isomorphism, thanks to the fact that it is a
systematic application of the high-school identities.
  We then show that the type normal form allows to reduce the standard beta-eta
equational theory of the lambda calculus to a specialized version of itself,
while preserving the completeness of equality on terms. We end by describing an
alternative representation of normal terms of the lambda calculus with sums,
together with a Coq-implemented converter into/from our new term calculus. The
difference with the only other previously implemented heuristic for deciding
interesting instances of eta-equality by Balat, Di Cosmo, and Fiore, is that we
exploit the type information of terms substantially and this often allows us to
obtain a canonical representation of terms without performing sophisticated
term analyses.
