  This paper is about two things: (i) Charles Sanders Peirce (1837-1914) -- an
iconoclastic philosopher and polymath who is among the greatest of American
minds. (ii) Abductive inference -- a term coined by C. S. Peirce, which he
defined as "the process of forming explanatory hypotheses. It is the only
logical operation which introduces any new idea."
  Abductive inference and quantitative economics: Abductive inference plays a
fundamental role in empirical scientific research as a tool for discovery and
data analysis. Heckman and Singer (2017) strongly advocated "Economists should
abduct." Arnold Zellner (2007) stressed that "much greater emphasis on
reductive [abductive] inference in teaching econometrics, statistics, and
economics would be desirable." But currently, there are no established theory
or practical tools that can allow an empirical analyst to abduct. This paper
attempts to fill this gap by introducing new principles and concrete procedures
to the Economics and Statistics community. I termed the proposed approach as
Abductive Inference Machine (AIM).
  The historical Peirce's experiment: In 1872, Peirce conducted a series of
experiments to determine the distribution of response times to an auditory
stimulus, which is widely regarded as one of the most significant statistical
investigations in the history of nineteenth-century American mathematical
research (Stigler, 1978). On the 150th anniversary of this historical
experiment, we look back at the Peircean-style abductive inference through a
modern statistical lens. Using Peirce's data, it is shown how empirical
analysts can abduct in a systematic and automated manner using AIM.
