  In this paper we analyze biased Maker-Breaker games and Avoider-Enforcer
games, both played on the edge set of a random board $G\sim \gnp$. In
Maker-Breaker games there are two players, denoted by Maker and Breaker. In
each round, Maker claims one previously unclaimed edge of $G$ and Breaker
responds by claiming $b$ previously unclaimed edges. We consider the
Hamiltonicity game, the perfect matching game and the $k$-vertex-connectivity
game, where Maker's goal is to build a graph which possesses the relevant
property. Avoider-Enforcer games are the reverse analogue of Maker-Breaker
games with a slight modification, where the two players claim at least 1 and at
least $b$ previously unclaimed edges per move, respectively, and Avoider aims
to avoid building a graph which possesses the relevant property.
  Maker-Breaker games are known to be "bias-monotone", that is, if Maker wins
the $(1,b)$ game, he also wins the $(1,b-1)$ game. Therefore, it makes sense to
define the critical bias of a game, $b^*$, to be the "breaking point" of the
game. That is, Maker wins the $(1,b)$ game whenever $b\leq b^*$ and loses
otherwise. An analogous definition of the critical bias exists for
Avoider-Enforcer games: here, the critical bias of a game $b^*$ is such that
Avoider wins the $(1,b)$ game for every $b > b^*$, and loses otherwise.
  We prove that, for every $p=\omega(\frac{\ln n}{n})$, $G\sim\gnp$ is
typically such that the critical bias for all the aforementioned Maker-Breaker
games is asymptotically $b^*=\frac{np}{\ln n}$. We also prove that in the case
$p=\Theta(\frac{\ln n}{n})$, the critical bias is $b^*=\Theta(\frac{np}{\ln
n})$. These results settle a conjecture of Stojakovi\'c and Szab\'o. For
Avoider-Enforcer games, we prove that for $p=\Omega(\frac{\ln n}{n})$, the
critical bias for all the aforementioned games is $b^*=\Theta(\frac{np}{\ln
n})$.
