  A variation of the Minority Game has been applied to study the timing of
promotional actions at retailers in the fast moving consumer goods market. The
underlying hypotheses for this work are that price promotions are more
effective when fewer than average competitors do a promotion, and that a
promotion strategy can be based on past sales data. The first assumption has
been checked by analysing 1467 promotional actions for three products on the
Dutch market (ketchup, mayonnaise and curry sauce) over a 120-week period, both
on an aggregated level and on retailer chain level.
  The second assumption was tested by analysing past sales data with the
Minority Game. This revealed that high or low competitor promotional pressure
for actual ketchup, mayonnaise, curry sauce and barbecue sauce markets is to
some extent predictable up to a forecast of some 10 weeks. Whereas a random
guess would be right 50% of the time, a single-agent game can predict the
market with a success rate of 56% for a 6 to 9 week forecast. This number is
the same for all four mentioned fast moving consumer markets. For a multi-agent
game a larger variability in the success rate is obtained, but predictability
can be as high as 65%.
  Contrary to expectation, the actual market does the opposite of what game
theory would predict. This points at a systematic oscillation in the market.
Even though this result is not fully understood, merely observing that this
trend is present in the data could lead to exploitable trading benefits. As a
check, random history strings were generated from which the statistical
variation in the game prediction was studied. This shows that the odds are
1:1,000,000 that the observed pattern in the market is based on coincidence.
