  Objective. Neural self-regulation is necessary for achieving control over
brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). This can be an arduous learning process
especially for motor imagery BCI. Various training methods were proposed to
assist users in accomplishing BCI control and increase performance. Notably the
use of biased feedback, i.e. non-realistic representation of performance.
Benefits of biased feedback on performance and learning vary between users
(e.g. depending on their initial level of BCI control) and remain speculative.
To disentangle the speculations, we investigate what personality type, initial
state and calibration performance (CP) could benefit from a biased feedback.
Methods. We conduct an experiment (n=30 for 2 sessions). The feedback provided
to each group (n=10) is either positively, negatively or not biased. Results.
Statistical analyses suggest that interactions between bias and: 1) workload,
2) anxiety, and 3) self-control significantly affect online performance. For
instance, low initial workload paired with negative bias is associated to
higher peak performances (86%) than without any bias (69%). High anxiety
relates negatively to performance no matter the bias (60%), while low anxiety
matches best with negative bias (76%). For low CP, learning rate (LR) increases
with negative bias only short term (LR=2%) as during the second session it
severely drops (LR=-1%). Conclusion. We unveil many interactions between said
human factors and bias. Additionally, we use prediction models to confirm and
reveal even more interactions. Significance. This paper is a first step towards
identifying optimal biased feedback for a personality type, state, and CP in
order to maximize BCI performance and learning.
