  A simple but useful method of reciprocal values is introduced, explained and
illustrated. This method simplifies the analysis of hyperbolic distributions,
which are causing serious problems in the demographic and economic research. It
allows for a unique identification of hyperbolic distributions and for
unravelling components of more complicated trajectories. This method is
illustrated by a few examples. They show that fundamental postulates of the
demographic and economic research are contradicted by data, even by precisely
the same data, which are used in this research. The generally accepted
postulates are based on the incorrect understanding of hyperbolic
distributions, which characterise the historical growth of population and the
historical economic growth. In particular, data used, but never analysed,
during the formulation of the Unified Growth Theory show that this theory is
based on fundamentally incorrect premises and thus is fundamentally defective.
Application of this simple method of analysis points to new directions in the
demographic and economic research. It suggests simpler interpretations of the
mechanism of growth. The concept or the evidence of the past primitive and
difficult living conditions, which might be perhaps described as some kind of
stagnation, is not questioned or disputed. It is only demonstrated that
trajectories of the past economic growth and of the growth of population were
not reflecting any form of stagnation and thus that they were not shaped by
these primitive and difficult living conditions. The concept or evidence of an
explosion in technology, medicine, education and in the improved living
conditions is not questioned or disputed. It is only demonstrated that this
possible explosion is not reflected in the trajectories of the economic growth
and of the growth of population.
