  Causal gene networks model the flow of information within a cell, but
reconstructing them from omics data is challenging because correlation does not
imply causation. Combining genomics and transcriptomics data from a segregating
population allows to orient the direction of causality between gene expression
traits using genomic variants. Instrumental-variable methods (IV) use a local
expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) as a randomized instrument for a
gene's expression level, and assign target genes based on distal eQTL
associations. Mediation-based methods (ME) additionally require that distal
eQTL associations are mediated by the source gene. Here we used Findr, a
software providing uniform implementations of IV, ME, and coexpression-based
methods, a recent dataset of 1,012 segregants from a cross between two budding
yeast strains, and the YEASTRACT database of known transcriptional interactions
to compare causal gene network inference methods. We found that causal
inference methods result in a significant overlap with the ground-truth,
whereas coexpression did not perform better than random. A subsampling analysis
revealed that the performance of ME decreases at large sample sizes, due to a
loss of sensitivity when residual correlations become significant. IV methods
contain false positive predictions, due to genomic linkage between eQTL
instruments. IV and ME methods also have complementary roles for identifying
causal genes underlying transcriptional hotspots. IV methods correctly
predicted STB5 targets for a hotspot centred on the transcription factor STB5,
whereas ME failed due to Stb5p auto-regulating its own expression. ME suggests
a new candidate gene, DNM1, for a hotspot on Chr XII, where IV methods could
not distinguish between multiple genes located within the hotspot.
