  While quantitative methods have been used to examine changes in word usage in
books, studies have focused on overall trends, such as the shapes of
narratives, which are independent of book length. We instead look at how words
change over the course of a book as a function of the number of words, rather
than the fraction of the book, completed at any given point; we define this
measure as "cumulative word-time". Using ousiometrics, a reinterpretation of
the valence-arousal-dominance framework of meaning obtained from semantic
differentials, we convert text into time series of power and danger scores in
cumulative word-time. Each time series is then decomposed using empirical mode
decomposition into a sum of constituent oscillatory modes and a non-oscillatory
trend. By comparing the decomposition of the original power and danger time
series with those derived from shuffled text, we find that shorter books
exhibit only a general trend, while longer books have fluctuations in addition
to the general trend. These fluctuations typically have a period of a few
thousand words regardless of the book length or library classification code,
but vary depending on the content and structure of the book. Our findings
suggest that, in the ousiometric sense, longer books are not expanded versions
of shorter books, but are more similar in structure to a concatenation of
shorter texts. Further, they are consistent with editorial practices that
require longer texts to be broken down into sections, such as chapters. Our
method also provides a data-driven denoising approach that works for texts of
various lengths, in contrast to the more traditional approach of using large
window sizes that may inadvertently smooth out relevant information, especially
for shorter texts. These results open up avenues for future work in
computational literary analysis, particularly the measurement of a basic unit
of narrative.
