  Among professionals and academics alike, it is well known that active
portfolio management is unable to provide additional risk-adjusted returns
relative to their benchmarks. For this reason, passive wealth management has
emerged in recent decades to offer returns close to benchmarks at a lower cost.
In this article, we first refine the existing results on the theoretical
properties of oblique Brownian motion. Then, assuming that the returns follow
skew geometric Brownian motions and that they are correlated, we describe some
statistical properties for the \emph{ex-post}, the \emph{ex-ante} tracking
errors, and the forecasted tracking portfolio. To this end, we develop an
innovative statistical methodology, based on a benchmark-asset principal
component factorization, to determine a tracking portfolio that replicates the
performance of a benchmark by investing in a subset of the investable universe.
This strategy, named hybrid Principal Component Analysis (hPCA), is applied
both on normal and skew distributions. In the case of skew-normal returns, we
propose a framework for calibrating the model parameters, based on the maximum
likelihood estimation method. For testing and validation, we compare four
alternative models for index tracking. The first two are based on the hPCA when
returns are assumed to be normal or skew-normal. The third model adopts a
standard optimization-based approach and the last one is used in the financial
sector by some practitioners. For validation and testing, we present a thorough
comparison of these strategies on real-world data, both in terms of performance
and computational efficiency. A noticeable result is that, not only, the
suggested lean PCA-based portfolio selection approach compares well versus
cumbersome algorithms for optimization-based portfolios, but, also, it could
provide a better service to the asset management industry.
