  As the COVID-19 outbreak is developing the two most frequently reported
statistics seem to be the raw confirmed case and case fatalities counts.
Focusing on Italy, one of the hardest hit countries, we look at how these two
values could be put in perspective to reflect the dynamics of the virus spread.
In particular, we find that merely considering the confirmed case counts would
be very misleading. The number of daily tests grows, while the daily fraction
of confirmed cases to total tests has a change point. It (depending on region)
generally increases with strong fluctuations till (around, depending on region)
15th-22nd March and then decreases linearly after. Combined with the increasing
trend of daily performed tests, the raw confirmed case counts are not
representative of the situation and are confounded with the sampling effort.
This we observe when regressing on time the logged fraction of positive tests
and for comparison the logged raw confirmed count. Hence, calibrating model
parameters for this virus's dynamics should not be done based only on confirmed
case counts (without rescaling by the number of tests), but take also
fatalities and hospitalization count under consideration as variables not prone
to be distorted by testing efforts. Furthermore, reporting statistics on the
national level does not say much about the dynamics of the disease, which are
taking place at the regional level. These findings are based on the official
data of total death counts up to 15th April 2020 released by ISTAT and up to
10th May 2020 for the number of cases. In this work we do not fit models but we
rather investigate whether this task is possible at all. This work also informs
about a new tool to collect and harmonize official statistics coming from
different sources in the form of a package for the R statistical environment
and presents the COVID-19 Data Hub.
