  Cognitive endurance -- the ability to sustain performance on a
cognitively-demanding task over time -- is thought to be a crucial productivity
determinant. However, a lack of data on this variable has limited researchers'
ability to understand its role for success in college and the labor market.
This paper uses college-admission-exam records from 15 million Brazilian high
school students to measure cognitive endurance based on changes in performance
throughout the exam. By exploiting exogenous variation in the order of exam
questions, I show that students are 7.1 percentage points more likely to
correctly answer a given question when it appears at the beginning of the day
versus the end (relative to a sample mean of 34.3%). I develop a method to
decompose test scores into fatigue-adjusted ability and cognitive endurance. I
then merge these measures into a higher-education census and the earnings
records of the universe of Brazilian formal-sector workers to quantify the
association between endurance and long-run outcomes. I find that cognitive
endurance has a statistically and economically significant wage return.
Controlling for fatigue-adjusted ability and other student characteristics, a
one-standard-deviation higher endurance predicts a 5.4% wage increase. This
wage return to endurance is sizable, equivalent to a third of the wage return
to ability. I also document positive associations between endurance and college
attendance, college quality, college graduation, firm quality, and other
outcomes. Finally, I show how systematic differences in endurance across
students interact with the exam design to determine the sorting of students to
colleges. I discuss the implications of these findings for the use of cognitive
assessments for talent selection and investments in interventions that build
cognitive endurance.
