  In epidemiological cohort studies, the relative risk (also known as risk
ratio) is a major measure of association to summarize the results of two
treatments or exposures. Generally, it measures the relative change in disease
risk as a result of treatment application. Standard approaches to estimating
relative risk available in common software packages may produce biased
inference when applied to correlated binary data collected from longitudinal or
clustered studies. In recent years, several methods for estimating the risk
ratio for correlated binary data have been published, some of which maintain a
well-controlled coverage probability but do not maintain an appropriate
interval width or the interval location to measure the balance between distal
and mesial noncoverage probabilities accurately or, vice versa. This paper
develops efficient and straightforward inference procedures for estimating a
confidence interval for risk ratio based on a hybrid method. In general, the
hybrid method combines two separate confidence intervals for two single risk
rates to form a hybrid confidence interval for their ratio. Additionally, we
propose the procedures for constructing a confidence interval for risk ratio
that directly extends recently recommended methods for correlated binary data
by building on the concepts of the design effect and effective sample sizes
typically used in representative sample surveys. In order to investigate the
performance of these proposed methods, we conduct an extensive simulation
study. To demonstrate the utility of our proposed methods, we present three
examples from real-life applications, comparing the side effects of low-dose
tricyclic antidepressants with a placebo, the efficacy of the treatment group
in a teratological experiment, and the efficiency of the active drugs in curing
infection for clinical trials.
