  Satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) has been increasingly employed
for the estimation of ground-level PM2.5, which is often achieved by modeling
the relationship between AOD and PM2.5. To evaluate the accuracy of PM2.5
estimation, the cross-validation (CV) technique has been widely used. There
have been several CV-based validation approaches applied for the AOD-PM2.5
models. However, the applicable conditions of these validation approaches still
remain unclear. Additionally, is there space to develop better validation
approaches for the AOD-PM2.5 models? The contributions of this study can be
summarized as two aspects. Firstly, we comprehensively analyze and assess the
existing validation approaches, and give the suggestions for applicable
conditions of them. Then, the existing validation approaches do not take the
distance to monitoring station into consideration. A new validation approach
considering the distance to monitoring station is proposed in this study. Among
the existing validation approaches, the sample-based CV is used to reflect the
overall prediction ability; the site-based CV and the region-based CV have the
potentials to evaluate spatial prediction performance; the time-based CV and
the historical validation are capable of evaluating temporal prediction
accuracy. In addition, the validation results indicate that the proposed
validation approach has shown great potentials to better evaluate the accuracy
of PM2.5 estimation. This study provides application implications and new
perspectives for the validation of AOD-PM2.5 models.
