  We discuss the government's reward and penalty mechanism in the presence of
asymmetric information and carbon emission constraint when downstream retailers
compete in a reverse supply chain network. Considering five game models which
are different in terms of the coordination structure of the reverse supply
chain network and power structure of the reward-penalty mechanism: (1) the
reverse supply chain network centralized decision-making model; (2) the reverse
supply chain network centralized decision-making model with carbon emission
constraint; (3) the retailers' competition reverse supply chain network
decentralized decision-making model; (4) the retailers' competition reverse
supply chain network decentralized decision-making model with carbon emission
constraint; (5) the retailers' competition reverse supply chain network
decentralized decision-making model with carbon emission constraint and the
government's reward-penalty mechanism. Building the participation-incentive
contract under each model use the principal-agent theory, and solving the model
use the Lagrange multiplier method. We can get the following conclusion: 1)
when the government implements the reward-penalty mechanism for carbon emission
and recycling simultaneously, the recycling rate as well as the buy-back price
offered by the manufacturer are higher than those when the government conducts
reward-penalty mechanism exclusively for carbon emission; 2) when the
government implements carbon emission constraint, both retailers' selling
prices of the new product are higher than those when no carbon emission
constraint is forced; 3) there is no certain relationship between the two
retailers' selling prices of the new product when the government implements the
reward-penalty mechanism only for carbon emission and when it implements the
mechanism for carbon emission as well as recycling.
