  Although recent studies have shown that electricity systems with shares of
wind and solar above 80% can be affordable, economists have raised concerns
about market integration. Correlated generation from variable renewable sources
depresses market prices, which can cause wind and solar to cannibalise their
own revenues and prevent them from covering their costs from the market. This
cannibalisation appears to set limits on the integration of wind and solar, and
thus to contradict studies that show that high shares are cost effective. Here
we show from theory and with simulation examples how market incentives interact
with prices, revenue and costs for renewable electricity systems. The decline
in average revenue seen in some recent literature is due to an implicit policy
assumption that technologies are forced into the system, whether it be with
subsidies or quotas. This decline is mathematically guaranteed regardless of
whether the subsidised technology is variable or not. If instead the driving
policy is a carbon dioxide cap or tax, wind and solar shares can rise without
cannibalising their own market revenue, even at penetrations of wind and solar
above 80%. The strong dependence of market value on the policy regime means
that market value needs to be used with caution as a measure of market
integration. Declining market value is not necessarily a sign of integration
problems, but rather a result of policy choices.
