  The foundational concepts behind the persistence of ecological communities
have been based on two ecological properties: dynamical stability and
feasibility. The former is typically regarded as the capacity of a community to
return to an original equilibrium state after a perturbation in species
abundances, and is usually linked to the strength of interspecific
interactions. The latter is the capacity to sustain positive abundances on all
its constituent species, and is linked to both interspecific interactions and
species demographic characteristics. Over the last 40 years, theoretical
research in ecology has emphasized the search for conditions leading to the
dynamical stability of ecological communities, while the conditions leading to
feasibility have been overlooked. However, thus far, we have no evidence of
whether species interactions are more conditioned by the community's need to be
stable or feasible. Here, we introduce novel quantitative methods and use
empirical data to investigate the consequences of species interactions on the
dynamical stability and feasibility of mutualistic communities. First, we
demonstrate that the more nested the species interactions in a community are,
the lower the mutualistic strength that the community can tolerate without
losing dynamical stability. Second, we show that high feasibility in a
community can be reached either with high mutualistic strength or with highly
nested species interactions. Third, we find that during the assembly process of
a seasonal pollinator community located at The Zackenberg Research Station (NE
Greenland), a high feasibility is reached through the nested species
interactions established between newcomer and resident species. Our findings
imply that nested mutualistic communities promote feasibility over stability,
which may suggest that the former can be key for community persistence.
