  Zipf's law is the main regularity of quantitative linguistics. Despite of
many works devoted to foundations of this law, it is still unclear whether it
is only a statistical regularity, or it has deeper relations with
information-carrying structures of the text. This question relates to that of
distinguishing a meaningful text (written in an unknown system) from a
meaningless set of symbols that mimics statistical features of a text. Here we
contribute to resolving these questions by comparing features of the first half
of a text (from the beginning to the middle) to its second half. This
comparison can uncover hidden effects, because the halves have the same values
of many parameters (style, genre, author's vocabulary {\it etc}). In all
studied texts we saw that for the first half Zipf's law applies from smaller
ranks than in the second half, i.e. the law applies better to the first half.
Also, words that hold Zipf's law in the first half are distributed more
homogeneously over the text. These features do allow to distinguish a
meaningful text from a random sequence of words. Our findings correlate with a
number of textual characteristics that hold in most cases we studied: the first
half is lexically richer, has longer and less repetitive words, more and
shorter sentences, more punctuation signs and more paragraphs. These
differences between the halves indicate on a higher hierarchic level of text
organization that so far went unnoticed in text linguistics. They relate the
validity of Zipf's law to textual information. A complete description of this
effect requires new models, though one existing model can account for some of
its aspects.
