  Building trustworthy autonomous systems is challenging for many reasons
beyond simply trying to engineer agents that 'always do the right thing.' There
is a broader context that is often not considered within AI and HRI: that the
problem of trustworthiness is inherently socio-technical and ultimately
involves a broad set of complex human factors and multidimensional
relationships that can arise between agents, humans, organizations, and even
governments and legal institutions, each with their own understanding and
definitions of trust. This complexity presents a significant barrier to the
development of trustworthy AI and HRI systems---while systems developers may
desire to have their systems 'always do the right thing,' they generally lack
the practical tools and expertise in law, regulation, policy and ethics to
ensure this outcome. In this paper, we emphasize the "fuzzy" socio-technical
aspects of trustworthiness and the need for their careful consideration during
both design and deployment. We hope to contribute to the discussion of
trustworthy engineering in AI and HRI by i) describing the policy landscape
that must be considered when addressing trustworthy computing and the need for
usable trust models, ii) highlighting an opportunity for trustworthy-by-design
intervention within the systems engineering process, and iii) introducing the
concept of a "policy-as-a-service" (PaaS) framework that can be readily applied
by AI systems engineers to address the fuzzy problem of trust during the
development and (eventually) runtime process. We envision that the PaaS
approach, which offloads the development of policy design parameters and
maintenance of policy standards to policy experts, will enable runtime trust
capabilities intelligent systems in the wild.
