  Geostationary observations offer the unique opportunity to resolve the
diurnal cycle of the Earth's Radiation Budget at the top of the atmosphere
(TOA), crucial for climate-change studies. However, a drawback of the
continuous temporal coverage of the geostationary orbit is the fixed viewing
geometry. As a consequence, imperfections in the angular distribution models
(ADMs) used in the radiance-to-flux conversion process or residual
angular-dependent narrowband-to-broadband conversion errors can result in
systematic errors of the estimated radiative fluxes. In this work, focusing on
clear-sky reflected TOA observations, we compare the overlapping views from
Meteosat Second Generation satellites at 0{\deg} and 41.5{\deg}E longitude
which enable a quantification of viewing-angle-dependent differences. Using
data derived from SEVIRI, we identify some of the main sources of
discrepancies, and show that they can be significantly reduced at the level of
one month. This is achieved, separately for each satellite, via a masking
procedure followed by an empirical fit at the pixel-level that takes into
account all the clear-sky data from that satellite, calculated separately per
timeslot of the day, over the month of November 2016. The method is then
applied to each month of 2017, and gives a quadratic mean of the albedo
root-mean squared difference over the dual-view region which is comparable from
month to month, with a 2017 average value of 0.01. Sources of discrepancies
include the difficulty to estimate the flux over the sunglint ocean region
close to the limbs, the fact that the data processing does not include
dedicated angular distribution models for the aerosol-over-ocean case, and the
existence of an observer-dependent diurnal-asymmetry artefact affecting the
clear-sky-albedo dependence on the solar zenith angle particularly over land
areas.
