  In many insect species, the thoracic structure plays a crucial role in
enabling flight. In the dipteran indirect flight mechanism, the thorax acts as
a transmission link between the flight muscles and the wings, and it is often
thought to act as an elastic modulator: improving flight motor efficiency
thorough linear or nonlinear resonance. But as peering closely into the
drivetrain of tiny insects is experimentally difficult, the nature of this
elastic modulation, and any associated resonant effects, are unclear. Here, we
present a new inverse-problem methodology to surmount this difficulty. In a
data synthesis process, we integrate experimentally-observable aerodynamic and
musculoskeletal data for the fruit fly D. melanogaster, and identify several
surprising properties of the fly's thorax. We find that fruit flies have an
energetic need for flight motor resonance: energy savings due to flight motor
elasticity can be up be to 30%. However, the elasticity of the flight muscles
themselves is sufficient - and sometimes more than sufficient - to ensure
flight motor resonance. In fruit flies, the role of the thorax as an elastic
modulator is likely to be insignificant. We discover also a fundamental link
between the fruit fly wingbeat kinematics and musculature dynamics: wingbeat
kinematics show key adaptions, including in wing elevation angle, that ensure
that wingbeat load requirements match musculature load output capability.
Together, these newly-identified properties lead to novel conceptual model of
the fruit fly's flight motor: a strongly-nonlinear structure, resonant due to
muscular elasticity, and intensely concerned with ensuring that the primary
flight muscles are operating efficiently. Our inverse-problem methodology sheds
new light on the complex behavior of these tiny flight motors, and provides
avenues for further studies in a range of other insects.
