  In spite of a growing body of scientific evidence on the effectiveness of
individual face mask usage for reducing transmission rates, individual face
mask usage has become a highly polarized topic within the United States. A
series of policy shifts by various governmental bodies have been speculated to
have contributed to the polarization of face masks. A typical method to
investigate the effects of these policy shifts is to use surveys. However,
survey-based approaches have multiple limitations: biased responses, limited
sample size, badly crafted questions may skew responses and inhibit insight,
and responses may prove quickly irrelevant as opinions change in response to a
dynamic topic. We propose a novel approach to 1) accurately gauge public
sentiment towards face masks in the United States during COVID-19 using a
multi-modal demographic inference framework with topic modeling and 2)
determine whether face mask policy shifts contributed to polarization towards
face masks using offline change point analysis on Twitter data. First, we infer
several key demographics of individual Twitter users such as their age, gender,
and whether they are a college student using a multi-modal demographic
prediction framework and analyze the average sentiment for each respective
demographic. Next, we conduct topic analysis using latent Dirichlet allocation
(LDA). Finally, we conduct offline change point discovery on our sentiment time
series data using the Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT) search algorithm.
Experimental results on a large corpus of Twitter data reveal multiple insights
regarding demographic sentiment towards face masks that agree with existing
surveys. Furthermore, we find two key policy-shift events contributed to
statistically significant changes in sentiment for both Republicans and
Democrats.
