  We study "active" decision making over sensor networks where the sensors'
sequential probing actions are actively chosen by continuously learning from
past observations. We consider two network settings: with and without central
coordination. In the first case, the network nodes interact with each other
through a central entity, which plays the role of a fusion center. In the
second case, the network nodes interact in a fully distributed fashion. In both
of these scenarios, we propose sequential and adaptive hypothesis tests
extending the classic Chernoff test. We compare the performance of the proposed
tests to the optimal sequential test. In the presence of a fusion center, our
test achieves the same asymptotic optimality of the Chernoff test, minimizing
the risk, expressed by the expected cost required to reach a decision plus the
expected cost of making a wrong decision, when the observation cost per unit
time tends to zero. The test is also asymptotically optimal in the higher
moments of the time required to reach a decision. Additionally, the test is
parsimonious in terms of communications, and the expected number of channel
uses per network node tends to a small constant. In the distributed setup, our
test achieves the same asymptotic optimality of Chernoff's test, up to a
multiplicative constant in terms of both risk and the higher moments of the
decision time. Additionally, the test is parsimonious in terms of
communications in comparison to state-of-the-art schemes proposed in the
literature. The analysis of these tests is also extended to account for message
quantization and communication over channels with random erasures.
