  Recently, Zhong et al. performed landmark Gaussian boson sampling experiments
with up to 144 modes using threshold detectors. The authors claim to have
achieved quantum computational advantage with the implementation of these
experiments, named Jiuzhang 1.0 and Jiuzhang 2.0. Their experimental results
are validated against several classical hypotheses and adversaries using tests
such as the comparison of statistical correlations between modes, Bayesian
hypothesis testing and the Heavy Output Generation (HOG) test. We propose an
alternative classical hypothesis for the validation of these experiments using
the probability distribution of mixtures of coherent states sent into a lossy
interferometer; these input mixed states, which we term squashed states, have
vacuum fluctuations in one quadrature and excess fluctuations in the other. We
find that for configurations in the high photon number density regime, the
comparison of statistical correlations does not tell apart the ground truth of
the experiment (two-mode squeezed states sent into an interferometer) from our
alternative hypothesis. The Bayesian test indicates that, for all
configurations excepting Jiuzhang 1.0, the ground truth is a more likely
explanation of the experimental data than our alternative hypothesis. A similar
result is obtained for the HOG test: for all configurations of Jiuzhang 2.0,
the test indicates that the experimental samples have higher ground truth
probability than the samples obtained form our alternative distribution; for
Jiuzhang 1.0 the test is inconclusive. Our results provide a new hypothesis
that should be considered in the validation of future GBS experiments, and shed
light into the need to identify proper metrics to verify quantum advantage in
the context of GBS. They also indicate that a classical explanation of the
Jiuzhang 1.0 experiment, lacking any quantum features, has not been ruled out.
