  We study the problem of computing Nash equilibria of zero-sum games. Many
natural zero-sum games have exponentially many strategies, but highly
structured payoffs. For example, in the well-studied Colonel Blotto game
(introduced by Borel in 1921), players must divide a pool of troops among a set
of battlefields with the goal of winning (i.e., having more troops in) a
majority. The Colonel Blotto game is commonly used for analyzing a wide range
of applications from the U.S presidential election, to innovative technology
competitions, to advertisement, to sports. However, because of the size of the
strategy space, standard methods for computing equilibria of zero-sum games
fail to be computationally feasible. Indeed, despite its importance, only a few
solutions for special variants of the problem are known.
  In this paper we show how to compute equilibria of Colonel Blotto games.
  Moreover, our approach takes the form of a general reduction: to find a Nash
equilibrium of a zero-sum game, it suffices to design a separation oracle for
the strategy polytope of any bilinear game that is payoff-equivalent. We then
apply this technique to obtain the first polytime algorithms for a variety of
games. In addition to Colonel Blotto, we also show how to compute equilibria in
an infinite-strategy variant called the General Lotto game; this involves
showing how to prune the strategy space to a finite subset before applying our
reduction. We also consider the class of dueling games, first introduced by
Immorlica et al. (2011). We show that our approach provably extends the class
of dueling games for which equilibria can be computed: we introduce a new
dueling game, the matching duel, on which prior methods fail to be
computationally feasible but upon which our reduction can be applied.
