  If a particle has to fall first vertically 1 m from A and then move
horizontally 1 m to B, it takes a time
$t(=\tau_1+\tau_2=\tau_3=3/\sqrt{2g})=0.67$ s. Under gravity and without
friction, if it sides down on a linear track inclined at $45^0$ between two
points A and B of 1 m height, it takes time $t(=\tau_4=2/\sqrt{g})=0.63$ s.
Between these two extremes, historically, Bernoulli (1718) proved that the
fastest track between these points A and B is cycloid with the least time of
descent $t=\tau_B=0.58$ s. Apart from other interesting cases, here we study
the frictionless motion of a particle/bead on an interesting track/wire between
A and B given by $y(x)=(1-x^{\nu})^{1/\nu}.$ For $\nu > 1$ the track becomes
convex and $t>>\tau_4$, and when $\nu >1.22$, the motion with zero initial
speed is not possible. We find that when $\nu \in (0.09653, 0.31749), \tau_4<t
<\tau_3$ and when $\nu \in ( 0.31749, 1),\tau_B < t < \tau_4$. But most
remarkably, the concave curve becomes very steep/deep if $\nu \in (0,
\nu_c=0.09653)$, then $t=0.2258$ s $< \tau_B$, this is as though a particle
would travel 1 meter horizontally with a speed equal $\sqrt{2g}$ m/sec to take
the time ($=1/\sqrt{2g}=\tau_2) < \tau_B$. The function $t(\nu$) suffers a jump
discontinuity at $\nu=\nu_c$, we offer some resolution.
