  The relationships which characterise the outcomes of the interactions between
firms in the economy appear to follow power law behaviour. In particular, there
is evidence that the empirical power laws which relate the size of an
extinction to its frequency are similar for both biological species and firms
in the economy .Biological species interact with each other in ways which
either increase or decrease the fitness levels of individual species. In the
same way, firms in the economy carry out strategies, and the net outcome of the
interactions between firms is to increase or decrease the fitness of other
firms.. Models which are used to describe the interactions of biological
species can be given straightforward interpretations in terms of the
interactions of firms in an industry. The general versions of models of
interactions between agents allow for co-operative behaviour between pairs of
agents. We contrast the properties of such a model with special cases of it, in
which interactions are restricted so that only competitive interactions between
pairs of agents are permitted. Such pure economic competition (PEC) behaviour
is regarded as desirable by economic theory, The properties of the two models
are strikingly different. A power law no longer provides a good description of
the relationship between the size and frequency of extinctions in the PEC
model, in which there are substantial numbers of very large extinctions. As a
result, the level of fitness of the system as a whole remains considerably
lower than in the general version of the model. This suggests that models of
pure economic competition do not provide a good description of how many
industries actually behave, and that a certain amount of collaboration and
co-operation between firms is required for the survival of an industry.
