  In single-objective optimization, it is well known that evolutionary
algorithms also without further adjustments can tolerate a certain amount of
noise in the evaluation of the objective function. In contrast, this question
is not at all understood for multi-objective optimization.
  In this work, we conduct the first mathematical runtime analysis of a simple
multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) on a classic benchmark in the
presence of noise in the objective functions. We prove that when bit-wise prior
noise with rate $p \le \alpha/n$, $\alpha$ a suitable constant, is present, the
\emph{simple evolutionary multi-objective optimizer} (SEMO) without any
adjustments to cope with noise finds the Pareto front of the OneMinMax
benchmark in time $O(n^2\log n)$, just as in the case without noise. Given that
the problem here is to arrive at a population consisting of $n+1$ individuals
witnessing the Pareto front, this is a surprisingly strong robustness to noise
(comparably simple evolutionary algorithms cannot optimize the single-objective
OneMax problem in polynomial time when $p = \omega(\log(n)/n)$). Our proofs
suggest that the strong robustness of the MOEA stems from its implicit
diversity mechanism designed to enable it to compute a population covering the
whole Pareto front.
  Interestingly this result only holds when the objective value of a solution
is determined only once and the algorithm from that point on works with this,
possibly noisy, objective value. We prove that when all solutions are
reevaluated in each iteration, then any noise rate $p = \omega(\log(n)/n^2)$
leads to a super-polynomial runtime. This is very different from
single-objective optimization, where it is generally preferred to reevaluate
solutions whenever their fitness is important and where examples are known such
that not reevaluating solutions can lead to catastrophic performance losses.
