  The quality of the inverse approach in electroencephalography (EEG) source
analysis is - among other things - depending on the accuracy of the forward
modeling approach, i.e., the simulation of the electric potential for a known
dipole source in the brain. Here, we use multilayer sphere modeling scenarios
to investigate the performance of three different finite element method (FEM)
based EEG forward approaches - subtraction, Venant and partial integration - in
the presence of tissue conductivity anisotropy in the source space. In our
studies, the effect of anisotropy on the potential is related to model errors
when ignoring anisotropy and to numerical errors, convergence behavior and
computational speed of the different FEM approaches. Three different source
space anisotropy models that best represent adult, child and premature baby
volume conduction scenarios, are used. Major findings of the study include (1)
source space conductivity anisotropy has a significant effect on electric
potential computation: The effect increases with increasing anisotropy ratio;
(2) with numerical errors far below anisotropy effects, all three FEM
approaches are able to model source space anisotropy accordingly, with the
Venant approach offering the best compromise between accuracy and computational
speed; (3) FE meshes have to be fine enough in the subdomain between the source
and the sensors that capture its main activity. We conclude that, especially
for the analysis of cortical development, but also for more general
applications using EEG source analysis techniques, source space conductivity
anisotropy should be modeled and the FEM Venant approach is an appropriate
method.
