  Object orientation has become the predominant paradigm for conceptual
modeling (e.g., UML), where the notions of class and object form the primitive
building blocks of thought. Classes act as templates for objects that have
attributes and methods (actions). The modeled systems are not even necessarily
software systems: They can be human and artificial systems of many different
kinds (e.g., teaching and learning systems). The UML class diagram is described
as a central component of model-driven software development. It is the most
common diagram in object-oriented models and used to model the static design
view of a system. Objects both carry data and execute actions. According to
some authorities in modeling, a certain degree of difficulty exists in
understanding the semantics of these notions in UML class diagrams. Some
researchers claim class diagrams have limited use for conceptual analysis and
that they are best used for logical design. Performing conceptual analysis
should not concern the ways facts are grouped into structures. Whether a fact
will end up in the design as an attribute is not a conceptual issue. UML leads
to drilling down into physical design details (e.g., private/public attributes,
encapsulated operations, and navigating direction of an association). This
paper is a venture to further the understanding of object-orientated concepts
as exemplified in UML with the aim of developing a broad comprehension of
conceptual modeling fundamentals. Thinging machine (TM) modeling is a new
modeling language employed in such an undertaking. TM modeling interlaces
structure (components) and actionality where actions infiltrate the attributes
as much as the classes. Although space limitations affect some aspects of the
class diagram, the concluding assessment of this study reveals the class
description is a kind of shorthand for a richer sematic TM construct.
