  While surface temperature gradients have been highlighted as drivers of
low-level atmospheric circulation, the underlying physical mechanisms remain
unclear. Lindzen and Nigam (1987) noted that sea level pressure (SLP) gradients
are proportional to surface temperature gradients if isobaric height (the
height where pressure does not vary in the horizontal plane) is constant; their
own model of low-level circulation assumed that isobaric height in the tropics
is around 3 km. Recently Bayr and Dommenget (2013) proposed a simple model of
temperature-driven air redistribution from which they derived that the isobaric
height in the tropics again varies little but occurs higher (at the height of
the troposphere). Here investigations show that neither the empirical
assumption of Lindzen and Nigam (1987) nor the theoretical derivations of Bayr
and Dommenget (2013) are plausible. Observations show that isobaric height is
too variable to determine a universal spatial or temporal relationship between
local values of air temperature and SLP. Since isobaric height cannot be
determined from independent considerations, the relationship between SLP and
temperature is not evidence that differential heating drives low-level
circulation. An alternative theory suggests SLP gradients are determined by the
condensation of water vapor as moist air converges towards the equator. This
theory quantifies the meridional SLP differences observed by season across the
Hadley cells reasonably well. Higher temperature of surface air where SLP is
low may be determined by equatorward transport and release of latent heat below
the trade wind inversion layer. The relationship between atmospheric
circulation and moisture dynamics merits further investigation.
