  Gender bias in political discourse is a significant problem on today's social
media. Previous studies found that the gender of politicians indeed influences
the content directed towards them by the general public. However, these works
are particularly focused on the global north, which represents individualistic
culture. Furthermore, they did not address whether there is gender bias even
within the interaction between popular journalists and politicians in the
global south. These understudied journalist-politician interactions are
important (more so in collectivistic cultures like the global south) as they
can significantly affect public sentiment and help set gender-biased social
norms. In this work, using large-scale data from Indian Twitter we address this
research gap.
  We curated a gender-balanced set of 100 most-followed Indian journalists on
Twitter and 100 most-followed politicians. Then we collected 21,188 unique
tweets posted by these journalists that mentioned these politicians. Our
analysis revealed that there is a significant gender bias -- the frequency with
which journalists mention male politicians vs. how frequently they mention
female politicians is statistically significantly different ($p<<0.05$). In
fact, median tweets from female journalists mentioning female politicians
received ten times fewer likes than median tweets from female journalists
mentioning male politicians. However, when we analyzed tweet content, our
emotion score analysis and topic modeling analysis did not reveal any
significant gender-based difference within the journalists' tweets towards
politicians. Finally, we found a potential reason for the significant gender
bias: the number of popular male Indian politicians is almost twice as large as
the number of popular female Indian politicians, which might have resulted in
the observed bias. We conclude by discussing the implications of this work.
