  Chaos control techniques have been applied to a wide variety of experimental
systems, including magneto-elastic ribbons, lasers, chemical reactions,
arrhythmic cardiac tissue, and spontaneously bursting neuronal networks. An
underlying assumption in all of these studies is that the system being
controlled is chaotic. However, the identification of chaos in experimental
systems, particularly physiological systems, is a difficult and often
misleading task. Here we demonstrate that the chaos criteria used in a recent
study can falsely classify a noise-driven, non-chaotic neuronal model as being
chaotic. We apply chaos control, periodic pacing, and anticontrol to the
non-chaotic model and obtain results which are similar to those reported for
apparently chaotic, {\em in vitro} neuronal networks. We also obtain similar
results when we apply chaos control to a simple stochastic system. These novel
findings challenge the claim that the aforementioned neuronal networks were
chaotic and suggest that chaos control techniques can be applied to a wider
range of experimental systems than previously thought.
