  We consider the problem of rational secret sharing introduced by Halpern and
Teague [1], where the players involved in secret sharing play only if it is to
their advantage. This can be characterized in the form of preferences. Players
would prefer to get the secret than to not get it and secondly with lesser
preference, they would like as few other players to get the secret as possible.
Several positive results have already been published to efficiently solve the
problem of rational secret sharing but only a handful of papers have touched
upon the use of an asynchronous broadcast channel. [2] used cryptographic
primitives, [3] used an interactive dealer, and [4] used an honest minority of
players in order to handle an asynchronous broadcast channel.
  In our paper, we propose an m-out-of-n rational secret sharing scheme which
can function over an asynchronous broadcast channel without the use of
cryptographic primitives and with a non-interactive dealer. This is possible
because our scheme uses a small number, k+1, of honest players. The protocol is
resilient to coalitions of size up to k and furthermore it is
{\epsilon}-resilient to coalitions of size up to and including m-1. The
protocol will have a strict Nash equilibrium with probability Pr((k+1)/n) and
an {\epsilon}-Nash equilibrium with probability Pr((n-k-1)/n) . Furthermore,
our protocol is immune to backward induction.
  Later on in the paper, we extend our results to include malicious players as
well.
  We also show that our protocol handles the possibility of a player deviating
in order to force another player to get a wrong value in what we believe to be
a more time efficient manner than was done in Asharov and Lindell [5].
