  Policy evaluation studies, which intend to assess the effect of an
intervention, face some statistical challenges: in real-world settings
treatments are not randomly assigned and the analysis might be further
complicated by the presence of interference between units. Researchers have
started to develop novel methods that allow to manage spillover mechanisms in
observational studies; recent works focus primarily on binary treatments.
However, many policy evaluation studies deal with more complex interventions.
For instance, in political science, evaluating the impact of policies
implemented by administrative entities often implies a multivariate approach,
as a policy towards a specific issue operates at many different levels and can
be defined along a number of dimensions. In this work, we extend the
statistical framework about causal inference under network interference in
observational studies, allowing for a multi-valued individual treatment and an
interference structure shaped by a weighted network. The estimation strategy is
based on a joint multiple generalized propensity score and allows one to
estimate direct effects, controlling for both individual and network
covariates. We follow the proposed methodology to analyze the impact of the
national immigration policy on the crime rate. We define a multi-valued
characterization of political attitudes towards migrants and we assume that the
extent to which each country can be influenced by another country is modeled by
an appropriate indicator, summarizing their cultural and geographical
proximity. Results suggest that implementing a highly restrictive immigration
policy leads to an increase of the crime rate and the estimated effects is
larger if we take into account interference from other countries.
