  In the Steiner Tree problem we are given an edge weighted undirected graph $G
= (V,E)$ and a set of terminals $R \subseteq V$. The task is to find a
connected subgraph of $G$ containing $R$ and minimizing the sum of weights of
its edges. We observe that many approximation algorithms for Steiner Tree
follow a similar scheme (meta-algorithm) and perform (exhaustively) a similar
routine which we call star contraction. Here, by a star contraction, we mean
finding a star-like subgraph in the input graph minimizing the ratio of its
weight to the number of contained terminals minus one. It is not hard to see
that the well-known MST-approximation seeks the best star to contract among
those containing two terminals only. We perform an empirical study of star
contractions with the relaxed condition on the number of terminals in each star
contraction. Our experiments suggest the following: -- if the algorithm
performs star contractions exhaustively, the quality of the solution is usually
slightly better than Zelikovsky's 11/6-approximation algorithm, -- on average
the quality of the solution returned by the MST-approximation algorithm
improves with every star contraction, -- the same holds for iterated MST
(MST+), which outperforms MST in every measurement while keeping very fast
running time (on average $\sim 3\times$ slower than MST), -- on average the
quality of the solution obtained by exhaustively performing star contraction is
about 16\% better than the initial MST-approximation, and -- we propose a more
precise way to find the so-called improved stars which yield a slightly better
solution within a comparable running time (on average $\sim 3\times$ slower).
Furthermore, we propose two improvements of Zelikovsky's 11/6-approximation
algorithm and we empirically confirm that the quality of the solution returned
by any of these is better than the one returned by the former algorithm.
