  Rapid individual cognitive phenotyping holds the potential to revolutionize
domains as wide-ranging as personalized learning, employment practices, and
precision psychiatry. Going beyond limitations imposed by traditional lab-based
experiments, new efforts have been underway towards greater ecological validity
and participant diversity to capture the full range of individual differences
in cognitive abilities and behaviors across the general population. Building on
this, we developed Skill Lab, a novel game-based tool that simultaneously
assesses a broad suite of cognitive abilities while providing an engaging
narrative. Skill Lab consists of six mini-games as well as 14 established
cognitive ability tasks. Using a popular citizen science platform (N = 10725),
we conducted a comprehensive validation in the wild of a game-based cognitive
assessment suite. Based on the game and validation task data, we constructed
reliable models to simultaneously predict eight cognitive abilities based on
the users' in-game behavior. Follow-'-up validation tests revealed that the
models can discriminate nuances contained within each separate cognitive
ability as well as capture a shared main factor of generalized cognitive
ability. Our game-based measures are five times faster to complete than the
equivalent task-based measures and replicate previous findings on the decline
of certain cognitive abilities with age in our large cross-sectional population
sample (N = 6369). Taken together, our results demonstrate the feasibility of
rapid in-the-wild systematic assessment of cognitive abilities as a promising
first step towards population-scale benchmarking and individualized mental
health diagnostics.
