  One of the most famous conjectures in computer algebra is that matrix
multiplication might be feasible in not much more than quadratic time. The best
known exponent is 2.376, due to Coppersmith and Winograd. Many attempts to
solve this problems in the literature work by solving, fixed-size problems and
then apply the solution recursively. This leads to pure combinatorial
optimisation problems with fixed size. These problems are unlikely to be
solvable in polynomial time.
  In 1976 Laderman published a method to multiply two 3x3 matrices using only
23 multiplications. This result is non-commutative, and therefore can be
applied recursively to smaller sub-matrices. In 35 years nobody was able to do
better and it remains an open problem if this can be done with 22
multiplications. We proceed by solving the so called Brent equations [7]. We
have implemented a method to converting this very hard problem to a SAT
problem, and we have attempted to solve it, with our portfolio of some 500 SAT
solvers. With this new method we were able to produce new solutions to the
Laderman's problem. We present a new fully general non-commutative solution
with 23 multiplications and show that this solution is new and is NOT an
equivalent variant of the Laderman's original solution. This result
demonstrates that the space of solutions to Laderman's problem is larger than
expected, and therefore it becomes now more plausible that a solution with 22
multiplications exists. If it exists, we might be able to find it soon just by
running our algorithms longer, or due to further improvements in the SAT solver
algorithms.
