  In [FL1, FL3] we found mathematical interpretations of the one-loop conformal
four-point Feynman integral as well as the vacuum polarization Feynman integral
in the context of representations of a Lie group U(2,2) and quaternionic
analysis. Then we raised a natural question of finding mathematical
interpretation of other Feynman diagrams in the same setting. In this article
we describe this interpretation for all conformal four-point integrals. Using
this interpretation, we give a representation-theoretic proof of an operator
version of the "magic identities" for the conformal four-point integrals
described by the box diagrams.
  The original "magic identities" are due to J.M.Drummond, J.Henn, V.A.Smirnov
and E.Sokatchev, they assert that all n-loop box integrals for four scalar
massless particles are equal to each other [DHSS]. The authors give a proof of
the magic identities for the Euclidean metric case only and claim that the
result is also true for the Minkowski metric case. However, the Minkowski case
is much more subtle. In this article we prove an operator version of the magic
identities in the Minkowski metric case and, in particular, specify the
relative positions of cycles of integration that make these identities correct.
  No prior knowledge of physics or Feynman diagrams is assumed from the reader.
We provide a summary of all relevant results from quaternionic analysis to make
the article self-contained.
