  Causal inference is difficult in the presence of unobserved confounders. We
introduce the instrumented common confounding (ICC) approach to
(nonparametrically) identify causal effects with instruments, which are
exogenous only conditional on some unobserved common confounders. The ICC
approach is most useful in rich observational data with multiple sources of
unobserved confounding, where instruments are at most exogenous conditional on
some unobserved common confounders. Suitable examples of this setting are
various identification problems in the social sciences, nonlinear dynamic
panels, and problems with multiple endogenous confounders. The ICC identifying
assumptions are closely related to those in mixture models, negative control
and IV. Compared to mixture models [Bonhomme et al., 2016], we require less
conditionally independent variables and do not need to model the unobserved
confounder. Compared to negative control [Cui et al., 2020], we allow for
non-common confounders, with respect to which the instruments are exogenous.
Compared to IV [Newey and Powell, 2003], we allow instruments to be exogenous
conditional on some unobserved common confounders, for which a set of relevant
observed variables exists. We prove point identification with outcome model and
alternatively first stage restrictions. We provide a practical step-by-step
guide to the ICC model assumptions and present the causal effect of education
on income as a motivating example.
