  Supply Shortage Outages are a major concern during peak demand for developing
countries. In the Philippines, commercial loads have unused backup generation
of up to 3000 MW, at the same time there are shortages of as much as 700 MW
during peak demand. This gives utilities the incentive to implement Demand
Response programs to minimize this shortage. But when considering Demand
Response from a modeling perspective, social welfare through profit is always
the major objective for program implementation. That isn't always the case
during an emergency situation as there can be a trade-off between grid
resilience and cost of electricity.
  The question is how the Distribution Utility (DU) shall optimally allocate
the unused generation to meet the shortage when this trade-off exists. We
formulate a combined multi-objective optimal dispatch model where we can make a
direct comparison between the least-cost and resilience objectives.
  We find that this trade-off is due to the monotonically increasing nature of
energy cost functions. If the supply is larger than the demand, the DU can
perform a least-cost approach in the optimal dispatch since maximizing the
energy generated in this case can lead to multiple solutions. We also find in
our simulation that in cases where the supply of energy from the customers is
less than shortage quantity, the DU must prioritize maximizing the generated
energy rather than minimizing cost.
