  Of the 2652 articles considered, 106 met the inclusion criteria. Review of
the included papers resulted in identification of 43 chronic diseases, which
were then further classified into 10 disease categories using ICD-10. The
majority of studies focused on diseases of the circulatory system (n=38) while
endocrine and metabolic diseases were fewest (n=14). This was due to the
structure of clinical records related to metabolic diseases, which typically
contain much more structured data, compared with medical records for diseases
of the circulatory system, which focus more on unstructured data and
consequently have seen a stronger focus of NLP. The review has shown that there
is a significant increase in the use of machine learning methods compared to
rule-based approaches; however, deep learning methods remain emergent (n=3).
Consequently, the majority of works focus on classification of disease
phenotype with only a handful of papers addressing extraction of comorbidities
from the free text or integration of clinical notes with structured data. There
is a notable use of relatively simple methods, such as shallow classifiers (or
combination with rule-based methods), due to the interpretability of
predictions, which still represents a significant issue for more complex
methods. Finally, scarcity of publicly available data may also have contributed
to insufficient development of more advanced methods, such as extraction of
word embeddings from clinical notes. Further efforts are still required to
improve (1) progression of clinical NLP methods from extraction toward
understanding; (2) recognition of relations among entities rather than entities
in isolation; (3) temporal extraction to understand past, current, and future
clinical events; (4) exploitation of alternative sources of clinical knowledge;
and (5) availability of large-scale, de-identified clinical corpora.
