  The unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic has been an unprecedented challenge
for news media around the globe. While journalism is meant to process yet
unknown events by design, the dynamically evolving situation affected all
aspects of life in such profound ways that even the routines of crisis
reporting seemed to be insufficient. Critics noted tendencies to horse-race
reporting and uncritical coverage, with journalism being too close to official
statements and too affirmative of political decisions. However, empirical data
on the performance of journalistic news media during the crisis has been
lacking thus far. The current study analyzes the Facebook messages of
journalistic news media during the early Coronavirus crisis, based on a large
German data set from January to March 2020. Using computational content
analysis methods, reach and interactions, topical structure, relevant actors,
negativity of messages, as well as the coverage of fabricated news and
conspiracy theories were examined. The topical structure of the near-time
Facebook coverage changed during various stages of the crisis, with just
partial support for the claims of critics. The initial stages were somewhat
lacking in topical breadth, but later stages offered a broad range of coverage
on Corona-related issues and societal concerns. Further, journalistic media
covered fake news and conspiracy theories during the crisis, but they
consistently contextualized them as what they were and debunked the false
claims circulating in public. While some criticism regarding the performance of
journalism during the crisis received mild empirical support, the analysis did
not find overwhelming signs of systemic dysfunctionalities. Overall,
journalistic media did not default to a uniform reaction nor to sprawling,
information-poor pandemic news, but they responded with a multi-perspective
coverage of the crisis.
