  We study route choice in a repeated routing game where an uncertain state of
nature determines link latency functions, and agents receive private route
recommendation. The state is sampled in an i.i.d. manner in every round from a
publicly known distribution, and the recommendations are generated by a
randomization policy whose mapping from the state is known publicly. In a
one-shot setting, the agents are said to obey recommendation if it gives the
smallest travel time in a posteriori expectation. A plausible extension to
repeated setting is that the likelihood of following recommendation in a round
is related to regret from previous rounds. If the regret is of satisficing type
with respect to a default choice and is averaged over past rounds and over all
agents, then the asymptotic outcome under an obedient recommendation policy
coincides with the one-shot outcome. We report findings from an experiment with
one participant at a time engaged in repeated route choice decision on
computer. In every round, the participant is shown travel time distribution for
each route, a route recommendation generated by an obedient policy, and a
rating suggestive of average experience of previous participants with the
quality of recommendation. Upon entering route choice, the actual travel times
are revealed. The participant evaluates the quality of recommendation by
submitting a review. This is combined with historical reviews to update rating
for the next round. Data analysis from 33 participants each with 100 rounds
suggests moderate negative correlation between the display rating and the
average regret, and a strong positive correlation between the rating and the
likelihood of following recommendation. Overall, under obedient recommendation
policy, the rating converges close to its maximum value by the end of the
experiments in conjunction with very high frequency of following
recommendations.
