  Computational simulation is increasingly relied upon for high-consequence
engineering decisions, and a foundational element to solid mechanics
simulations, such as finite element analysis (FEA), is a credible constitutive
or material model. Calibration of these complex models is an essential step;
however, the selection, calibration and validation of material models is often
a discrete, multi-stage process that is decoupled from material
characterization activities, which means the data collected does not always
align with the data that is needed. To address this issue, an integrated
workflow for delivering an enhanced characterization and calibration procedure
(Interlaced Characterization and Calibration (ICC)) is introduced. This
framework leverages Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED) to select the
optimal load path for a cruciform specimen in order to collect the most
informative data for model calibration. The critical first piece of algorithm
development is to demonstrate the active experimental design for a fast model
with simulated data. For this demonstration, a material point simulator that
models a plane stress elastoplastic material subject to bi-axial loading was
chosen. The ICC framework is demonstrated on two exemplar problems in which
BOED is used to determine which load step to take, e.g., in which direction to
increment the strain, at each iteration of the characterization and calibration
cycle. Calibration results from data obtained by adaptively selecting the load
path within the ICC algorithm are compared to results from data generated under
two naive static load paths that were chosen a priori based on human intuition.
In these exemplar problems, data generated in an adaptive setting resulted in
calibrated model parameters with reduced measures of uncertainty compared to
the static settings.
