  As is known, for each fixed $\nu\in\{0,1\},$ the spectra of two operators
generated by $-y''(x)+q(x)y(x-a)$ and the boundary conditions
$y^{(\nu)}(0)=y^{(j)}(\pi)=0,$ $j=0,1,$ uniquely determine the complex-valued
square-integrable potential $q(x)$ vanishing on $(0,a)$ as soon as
$a\in[2\pi/5,\pi).$ Meanwhile, it actually became the main question of the
inverse spectral theory for Sturm-Liouville operators with constant delay
whether the uniqueness holds also for smaller values of $a.$ Recently, a
negative answer was given by the authors [Appl. Math. Lett. 113 (2021) 106862]
for $a\in[\pi/3,2\pi/5)$ in the case $\nu=0$ by constructing an infinite family
of iso-bispectral potentials. Moreover, an essential and dramatic reason was
established why this strategy, generally speaking, fails in the remarkable case
when $\nu=1.$ Here we construct a counterexample giving a negative answer for
$\nu=1,$ which is an important subcase of the Robin boundary condition at zero.
We also refine the former counterexample for $\nu=0$ to $W_2^1$-potentials.
