  In 1933 Dayton Miller published in this journal the results of his voluminous
observations using his ether drift interferometer, and proclaimed that he had
determined the "absolute motion of the earth". This result is in direct
conflict with the prediction of Special Relativity, and also with numerous
related experiments that found no such signal or "absolute motion". This paper
presents a complete explanation for his anomalous result by: a) showing that
his results are not statistically significant, b) describing in detail how
flaws in his analysis procedure produced a false signal with precisely the
properties he expected, and c) presenting a quantitative model of his
systematic drift that shows there is no real signal in his data. In short, this
is every experimenter's nightmare: he was unknowingly looking at statistically
insignificant patterns in his systematic drift that mimicked the appearance of
a real signal. An upper limit on "absolute motion" of 6 km/sec is derived from
his raw data, fully consistent with similar experimental results and the
prediction of Special Relativity. The key point of this paper is the need for a
comprehensive and quantitative error analysis. The concepts and techniques used
in this analysis were not available in Miller's day, but are now standard.
These problems also apply to the famous measurements of Michelson and Morley,
and to most if not all similar experiments; appendices are provided discussing
several such experiments.
