  Causally identifying the effect of digital advertising is challenging,
because experimentation is expensive, and observational data lacks random
variation. This paper identifies a pervasive source of naturally occurring,
quasi-experimental variation in user-level ad-exposure in digital advertising
campaigns. It shows how this variation can be utilized by ad-publishers to
identify the causal effect of advertising campaigns. The variation pertains to
auction throttling, a probabilistic method of budget pacing that is widely used
to spread an ad-campaign`s budget over its deployed duration, so that the
campaign`s budget is not exceeded or overly concentrated in any one period. The
throttling mechanism is implemented by computing a participation probability
based on the campaign`s budget spending rate and then including the campaign in
a random subset of available ad-auctions each period according to this
probability. We show that access to logged-participation probabilities enables
identifying the local average treatment effect (LATE) in the ad-campaign. We
present a new estimator that leverages this identification strategy and outline
a bootstrap procedure for quantifying its variability. We apply our method to
real-world ad-campaign data from an e-commerce advertising platform, which uses
such throttling for budget pacing. We show our estimate is statistically
different from estimates derived using other standard observational methods
such as OLS and two-stage least squares estimators. Our estimated conversion
lift is 110%, a more plausible number than 600%, the conversion lifts estimated
using naive observational methods.
