  Testing individuals for pathogens can affect the spread of epidemics.
Understanding how individual-level processes of sampling and reporting test
results can affect community- or population-level spread is a dynamical
modeling question. The effect of testing processes on epidemic dynamics depends
on factors underlying implementation, particularly testing intensity and on
whom testing is focused. Here, we use a simple model to explore how the
individual-level effects of testing might directly impact population-level
spread. Our model development was motivated by the COVID-19 epidemic, but has
generic epidemiological and testing structures. To the classic SIR framework we
have added a per capita testing intensity, and compartment-specific testing
weights, which can be adjusted to reflect different testing emphases --
surveillance, diagnosis, or control. We derive an analytic expression for the
relative reduction in the basic reproductive number due to testing,
test-reporting and related isolation behaviours. Intensive testing and fast
test reporting are expected to be beneficial at the community level because
they can provide a rapid assessment of the situation, identify hot spots, and
may enable rapid contact-tracing. Direct effects of fast testing at the
individual level are less clear, and may depend on how individuals' behaviour
is affected by testing information. Our simple model shows that under some
circumstances both increased testing intensity and faster test reporting can
reduce the effectiveness of control, and allows us to explore the conditions
under which this occurs. Conversely, we find that focusing testing on infected
individuals always acts to increase effectiveness of control.
