  The idea of intersectionality has become a frequent topic of discussion both
in academic sociology, as well as among popular movements for social justice
such as Black Lives Matter, intersectional feminism, and LGBT rights.
Intersectionality proposes that an individual's experience of society has
aspects that are irreducible to the sum of one's various identities considered
individually, but are "greater than the sum of their parts." In this work, we
show that the effects of intersectional identities can be statistically
observed in empirical data using information theory. We show that, when
considering the predictive relationship between various identities categories
such as race, sex, and income (as a proxy for class) on outcomes such as health
and wellness, robust statistical synergies appear. These synergies show that
there are joint-effects of identities on outcomes that are irreducible to any
identity considered individually and only appear when specific categories are
considered together (for example, there is a large, synergistic effect of race
and sex considered jointly on income irreducible to either race or sex). We
then show using synthetic data that the current gold-standard method of
assessing intersectionalities in data (linear regression with multiplicative
interaction coefficients) fails to disambiguate between truly synergistic,
greater-than-the-sum-of-their-parts interactions, and redundant interactions.
We explore the significance of these two distinct types of interactions in the
context of making inferences about intersectional relationships in data and the
importance of being able to reliably differentiate the two. Finally, we
conclude that information theory, as a model-free framework sensitive to
nonlinearities and synergies in data, is a natural method by which to explore
the space of higher-order social dynamics.
