  Many universities have courses and projects revolving around compiler or
interpreter implementation as part of their degree programmes in computer
science. In such teaching activities, tool support can be highly beneficial.
While there are already several tools for assisting with development of the
front end of compilers, tool support tapers off towards the back end, or
requires more background experience than is expected of undergraduate students.
  Structural operational semantics is a useful and mathematically simple
formalism for specifying the behaviour of programs and a specification lends
itself well to implementation; in particular big-step or natural semantics is
often a useful and simple approach. However, many students struggle with
learning the notation and often come up with ill-defined and meaningless
attempts at defining a structural operational semantics. A survey shows that
students working on programming language projects feel that tool support is
lacking and would be useful.
  Many of these problems encountered when developing a semantic definition are
similar to problems encountered in programming, in particular ones that are
essentially the result of type errors.
  We present a pedagogical metalanguage based on natural semantics, and its
implementation, as an attempt to marry two notions: a syntax similar to
textbook notation for natural semantics on the one hand, and automatic
verification of some correctness properties on the other by means of a strong
type discipline. The metalanguage and the tool provide the facilities for
writing and executing specifications as a form of programming. The user can
check that the specification is not meaningless as well as execute programs, if
the specification makes sense.
