  It is pointed out that Coleman and Van Vleck make a major blunder in their
discussion of the Shockly-James paradox by designating relativistic hidden
mechanical momentum as the basis for resolution of the paradox. This blunder
has had a wide influence in the current physics literature, including erroneous
work on the Shockley-James paradox, on Mansuripur's paradox, on the motion of a
magnetic moment, on the Aharonov-Bohm phase shift, and on the Aharonov-Casher
phase shift. Although hidden mechanical momentum is indeed dominant for
non-interacting particles moving in a closed orbit under the influence of an
external electric field, the attention directed toward hidden mechanical
momentum represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the classical
electromagnetic interaction between a multiparticle magnet and an external
point charge. In the interacting multiparticle situation, the external charge
induces an electrostatic polarization of the magnet which leads to an internal
electromagnetic momentum in the magnet where both the electric and magnetic
fields for the momentum are contributed by the magnet particles. This internal
electromagnetic momentum for the interacting multiparticle situation is equal
in magnitude and opposite in direction compared to the familiar external
electromagnetic momentum where the electric field is contributed by the
external charged particle and the magnetic field is that due to the magnet. In
the present article, the momentum balance of the Shockley-James situation for a
system of a magnet and a point charge is calculated in detail for a magnet
model consisting of two interacting point charges which are constrained to move
in a circular orbit on a frictionless ring with a compensating negative charge
at the center.
