  A debate in the scientific literature has arisen regarding whether the orb
depicted in Salvator Mundi, which has been attributed by some experts to
Leonardo da Vinci, was rendered in a optically faithful manner or not. Some
hypothesize that it was solid crystal while others hypothesize that it was
hollow, with competing explanations for its apparent lack of background
distortion and its three white spots. In this paper, we study the optical
accuracy of the Salvator Mundi using physically based rendering, a
sophisticated computer graphics tool that produces optically accurate images by
simulating light transport in virtual scenes. We created a virtual model of the
composition centered on the translucent orb in the subject's hand. By
synthesizing images under configurations that vary illuminations and orb
material properties, we tested whether it is optically possible to produce an
image that renders the orb similarly to how it appears in the painting. Our
experiments show that an optically accurate rendering qualitatively matching
that of the painting is indeed possible using materials, light sources, and
scientific knowledge available to Leonardo da Vinci circa 1500. We additionally
tested alternative theories regarding the composition of the orb, such as that
it was a solid calcite ball, which provide empirical evidence that such
alternatives are unlikely to produce images similar to the painting, and that
the orb is instead hollow.
