  We consider a panel data setting in which one observes measurements of units
over time, under different interventions. Our focus is on the canonical family
of synthetic control methods (SCMs) which, after a pre-intervention time period
when all units are under control, estimate counterfactual outcomes for test
units in the post-intervention time period under control by using data from
donor units who have remained under control for the entire post-intervention
period. In order for the counterfactual estimate produced by synthetic control
for a test unit to be accurate, there must be sufficient overlap between the
outcomes of the donor units and the outcomes of the test unit. As a result, a
canonical assumption in the literature on SCMs is that the outcomes for the
test units lie within either the convex hull or the linear span of the outcomes
for the donor units. However despite their ubiquity, such overlap assumptions
may not always hold, as is the case when, e.g., units select their own
interventions and different subpopulations of units prefer different
interventions a priori.
  We shed light on this typically overlooked assumption, and we address this
issue by incentivizing units with different preferences to take interventions
they would not normally consider. Specifically, we provide a SCM for
incentivizing exploration in panel data settings which provides
incentive-compatible intervention recommendations to units by leveraging tools
from information design and online learning. Using our algorithm, we show how
to obtain valid counterfactual estimates using SCMs without the need for an
explicit overlap assumption on the unit outcomes.
