  Machine learning technologies are increasingly developed for use in
healthcare. While research communities have focused on creating
state-of-the-art models, there has been less focus on real world implementation
and the associated challenges to accuracy, fairness, accountability, and
transparency that come from actual, situated use. Serious questions remain
under examined regarding how to ethically build models, interpret and explain
model output, recognize and account for biases, and minimize disruptions to
professional expertise and work cultures. We address this gap in the literature
and provide a detailed case study covering the development, implementation, and
evaluation of Sepsis Watch, a machine learning-driven tool that assists
hospital clinicians in the early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis. We, the
team that developed and evaluated the tool, discuss our conceptualization of
the tool not as a model deployed in the world but instead as a socio-technical
system requiring integration into existing social and professional contexts.
Rather than focusing on model interpretability to ensure a fair and accountable
machine learning, we point toward four key values and practices that should be
considered when developing machine learning to support clinical
decision-making: rigorously define the problem in context, build relationships
with stakeholders, respect professional discretion, and create ongoing feedback
loops with stakeholders. Our work has significant implications for future
research regarding mechanisms of institutional accountability and
considerations for designing machine learning systems. Our work underscores the
limits of model interpretability as a solution to ensure transparency,
accuracy, and accountability in practice. Instead, our work demonstrates other
means and goals to achieve FATML values in design and in practice.
