  In this paper I develop a framework for relating dualities and emergence: two
notions that are close to each other but also exclude one another. I adopt the
conception of duality as 'isomorphism', cashing it out in terms of three
conditions. These three conditions prompt two conceptually different ways in
which a duality can be modified to make room for emergence; and I argue that
this exhausts the possibilities for combining dualities and emergence (via
coarse-graining).
  I apply this framework to gauge/gravity dualities, considering in detail
three examples: AdS/CFT, Verlinde's scheme, and black holes. My main point
about gauge/gravity dualities is that the theories involved, qua theories of
gravity, must be background-independent. I distinguish two senses of
background-independence: (i) minimalistic and (ii) extended. The former is
sufficiently strong to allow for a consistent theory of quantum gravity; and
AdS/CFT is background-independent on this account; while Verlinde's scheme best
fits the extended sense. I argue that this extended sense should be applied
with some caution: on pain of throwing the baby (general relativity) out with
the bath-water (extended background-independence). Nevertheless, it is an
interesting and potentially fruitful heuristic principle for quantum gravity
theory construction. The interpretation of dualities is articulated in terms
of: (i) epistemic and metaphysical commitments; (ii) parts vs. wholes.
  I then analyse the emergence of gravity in gauge/gravity dualities in terms
of the two available conceptualisations of emergence; and I show how emergence
in AdS/CFT and in Verlinde's scenario differ from each other. Finally, I give a
novel derivation of the Bekenstein-Hawking black hole entropy formula based on
Verlinde's scheme; the derivation sheds light on several aspects of Verlinde's
scheme and how it compares to Bekenstein's original calculation.
