  Kopitzki et al (preceeding comment) claim that the relationship between
Renormalized and Kullback-Leibler entropies has already been given in their
previous papers. Moreover, they argue that the first can give more useful
information for e.g. localizing the seizure-generating area in epilepsy
patients.
  In our reply we stress that if the relationship between both entropies would
have been known by them, they should have noticed that the condition on the
effective temperature is unnecessary. Indeed, this condition led them to choose
different reference segments for different channels, even if this was
physiologically unplausible. Therefore, we still argue that it is very unlikely
that renormalized entropy will give more information than the conventional
Kullback-Leibler entropy.
