  This exploratory study delves into persistent homology, an integral component
of TDA that initially aimed at differentiating between signal and noise. We
explore two methodologies for this differentiation: the conventional cycle
length approach and the novel death-birth ratio method proposed by Bobrowski
and Skraba. Analyzing comprehensive rs-fMRI data from the Human Connectome
Project and daily S\&P 500 financial networks, our study compares these methods
in identifying significant cycles. A pivotal discovery of this paper is a
robust relationship between z-score thresholds applied to bar lengths or ratios
and, respectively, behavioural traits in brain networks and market volatility
in financial networks. In the brain, this is evident in the strong correlation
between the number of significant 1-cycles in brain networks, brain volumes,
and sex-based differences. In financial markets, a fractal pattern emerges,
where market volatility consistently negatively correlates with the number of
significant cycles, indicating that more intricate market topologies are
associated with increased stability and less susceptibility to rapid shifts.
Our findings also imply a fractal nature of 1-cycles at both population levels
and across multiple days in the stock market. Notably, the distribution of
significant loops, marked by high z-scores, remains consistent across various
z-score thresholds, revealing a scale-invariant, fractal structure in both data
sets. Given the scale invariance in these fractal structures, the traditional
TDA distinction between signal and noise becomes less meaningful. The fractal
nature of 1-cycles suggests that all scales of cycle length are relevant,
challenging the conventional approach of segregating signal from noise. This
realization broadens the scope of TDA, underscoring its potential to reveal
intricate, scale-invariant relationships in complex systems.
