  This paper studies politically feasible policy solutions to inequities in
local public goods provision. I focus in particular on the entwined issues of
high property taxes, geographic income disparities, and inequalities in public
education prevalent in the United States. It has long been recognized that with
a mobile population, local administration and funding of schools leads to
competition between districts. By accounting for heterogeneity in incomes and
home qualities, I am able to shed new light on this phenomenon, and make novel
policy recommendations. I characterize the equilibrium in a dynamic general
equilibrium model of location choice and education investment with a
competitive housing market, heterogeneous wealth levels and home qualities, and
strategic district governments. When all homes are owner-occupied, I show that
competition between strategic districts leads to over-taxation in an attempt to
attract wealthier residents. A simple class of policies that cap and/or tax the
expenditure of richer districts are Pareto improving, and thus politically
feasible. These policies reduce inequality in access to education while
increasing expenditure for under-funded schools. Gains are driven by mitigation
of the negative externalities generated by excessive spending among wealthier
districts. I also discuss the policy implications of the degree of
homeownership. The model sheds new light on observed patterns of homeownership,
location choice, and income. Finally, I test the assumptions and implications
empirically using a regression discontinuity design and data on property tax
referenda in Massachusetts.
