  Proton arc therapy has emerged as a promising approach for faster treatment
delivery in comparison to conventional proton treatments. However, unexpected
prolonged treatment times in several proton arc planning studies have raised
concerns. In this study, we aim to address the challenge of minimizing delivery
time through dosimetry-guided energy layer filtering, comparing its performance
to a baseline approach without filtering. We developed three methods of energy
layer (EL) filtering: unrestricted, switch-up (SU), and switch-up gap (SU gap)
filtering. The unrestricted method filters the lowest weighted EL while the SU
gap filtering removes in priority the EL around a new SU to minimize the gantry
rotation braking. The SU filtering removes the lowest weighted group of EL that
includes a SU. These post-processing filters were used in conjunction with the
RayStation dynamic proton arc optimization framework (ELSA). Four bilateral
oropharyngeal cancer patients' data were used for evaluation. Objective
function values, target coverage robustness, organ-at-risk doses and NTCP
evaluations, as well as comparisons to IMPT plans, were used to assess plan
quality. The SU gap filtering algorithm performed best in three out of the four
cases, maintaining plan quality within tolerance while significantly reducing
beam delivery time. It achieved up to approximately 22% reduction in delivery
time. The unrestricted filtering algorithm followed closely. In contrast, the
SU filtering showed limited improvement, suppressing hardly a few SU without
substantial delivery time shortening. Robust target coverage was kept within 1%
of variation compared to the ELSA baseline plan while OAR doses slighlty
decreased in all four patients. Both arc plans present large reductions in NTCP
values for dysphagia and xerostomia compared to the reference IMPT plan.
