  We carry out an extensive comparison between Johnson-Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov
(JMAK) theory of first-order phase transformation kinetics and phase-field (PF)
results of a benchmark problem on nucleation. To address the stochasticity of
the problem, several hundreds of simulations are performed to establish a
comprehensive, statistically-significant analysis of the coincidences and
discrepancies between PF and JMAK transformation kinetics. We find that PF
predictions are in excellent agreement with both classical nucleation theory
and JMAK theory, as long as the original assumptions of the latter are
appropriately reproduced - in particular, the constant nucleation and growth
rates in an infinite domain. When deviating from these assumptions, PF results
are at odds with JMAK theory. In particular, we observe that the size of the
initial particle radius $r_0$ relative to the critical nucleation radius $r^*$
has a significant effect on the rate of transformation. While PF and JMAK agree
when $r_0$ is sufficiently higher than $r^*$, the duration of initial transient
growth stage of a particle, before it reaches a steady growth velocity,
increases as $r_0/r^*\to 1$. This incubation time has a significant effect on
the overall kinetics, e.g. on the Avrami exponent of the multi-particle
simulations. In contrast, for the considered conditions and parameters, the
effect of interface curvature upon transformation kinetics - in particular
negative curvature regions appearing during particle impingement, present in PF
but absent in JMAK theory - appears to be minor compared to that of $r_0/r^*$.
We argue that rigorous benchmarking of phase-field models of stochastic
processes (e.g. nucleation) need sufficient statistical data in order to make
rigorous comparisons against ground truth theories. In these problems, analysis
of probability distributions is clearly preferable to a deterministic approach.
