  This paper investigates the risk-return relationship in determination of
housing asset pricing. In so doing, the paper evaluates behavioral hypotheses
advanced by Case and Shiller (1988, 2002, 2009) in studies of boom and
post-boom housing markets. The paper specifies and tests a multi-factor housing
asset pricing model. In that model, we evaluate whether the market factor as
well as other measures of risk, including idiosyncratic risk, momentum, and MSA
size effects, have explanatory power for metropolitan-specific housing returns.
Further, we test the robustness of the asset pricing results to inclusion of
controls for socioeconomic variables commonly represented in the house price
literature, including changes in employment, affordability, and foreclosure
incidence. We find a sizable and statistically significant influence of the
market factor on MSA house price returns. Moreover we show that market betas
have varied substantially over time. Also, results are largely robust to the
inclusion of other explanatory variables, including standard measures of risk
and other housing market fundamentals. Additional tests of model validity using
the Fama-MacBeth framework offer further strong support of a positive risk and
return relationship in housing. Our findings are supportive of the application
of a housing investment risk-return framework in explanation of variation in
metro-area cross-section and time-series US house price returns. Further,
results strongly corroborate Case-Shiller survey research indicating the
importance of speculative forces in the determination of U.S. housing returns.
