  Road transport sector is found to be one of the major emitters, and
responsible for serious air pollution and huge pubic health losses. One
important parameter for determining the consequences of transport demand shocks
for the macroeconomy, air pollution and public health is the elasticity of the
demand for transport. Most published studies that use flexible functional forms
have ignored the theoretical regularity conditions implied by microeconomic
theories. Moreover, even a few studies have checked and/or imposed regularity
conditions, most of them equate curvature alone with regularity, thus ignoring
or minimizing the importance of other regularities. And then, the results
appear biased and may in fact be biased. Therefore, we select three of the most
widely used flexible functional forms, the Rotterdam model, the Almost Ideal
Demand System (AIDS), and the quadratic AIDS (QUAIDS) to investigate the demand
for road transport in China using recent annual expenditure data, over a 13
year period from 2002 to 2014, on three expenditure categories in the
transportation sector: private transportation, local transportation and
intercity transportation. Estimation shows that the AIDS model is the only
model that is able to provide theoretically consistent estimates of the
residents demand for road transport in China. Our estimates show that the
private transportation is a luxury among the transportation goods, and is
elastic in price changes relatively. The empirical results imply that the
private and the local transportation, the local and intercity transportation
are gross complements. And, the private transportation is a substitute for the
inter-city transportation, while the intercity transportation is a complement
of the private transportation.
