  One of the greatest goals of neuroscience in recent decades has been to
rehabilitate individuals who no longer have a functional relationship between
their mind and their body. Although neuroscience has produced technologies
which allow the brains of paralyzed patients to accomplish tasks such as spell
words or control a motorized wheelchair, these technologies utilize parts of
the brain which may not be optimal for simultaneous use. For example, if you
needed to look at flashing lights to spell words for communication, it would be
difficult to simultaneously look at where you are moving. To improve upon this
issue, this study developed and tested the foundation for a speech prosthesis
paradigm which would utilize the innate neurophysiology of the human brain's
speech system. In this experiment, two participants were asked to respond to a
yes or no question via an EEG-based BCI of three different types; SSVEP-based,
motor imagery-based, and laryngeal-imagery-based. By comparing the accuracy of
the two established BCI paradigms to the novel laryngeal-imagery paradigm, we
can establish the relative effectiveness of the novel paradigm. Machine
learning algorithms were used to classify the EEG signals which had been
transformed into frequency space (spectrograms) and common spatial pattern
(CSP) dimensions. The SSVEP control task was able to be classified with better
accuracy (62.5\%) than the no information rate of 50\% on the test set, but
motor activity/imagery and laryngeal activity/imagery control tasks were not.
Although the laryngeal methods did not produce accuracies above the no
information rate, it is possible that with a larger amount of higher-quality
data, this could prove otherwise. In the future, similar research should focus
on reproducing the methods used here with better quality and more data.
