  A commutative cancellative monoid is atomic if every non-invertible element
factors into irreducibles (also called atoms), while an integral domain is
atomic if its multiplicative monoid is atomic. Back in the eighties, Gilmer
posed the question of whether the fact that a torsion-free monoid~$M$ and an
integral domain $R$ are both atomic implies that the monoid algebra $R[M]$ of
$M$ over $R$ is also atomic. In general this is not true, and the first
negative answer to this question was given by Roitman in 1993: he constructed
of an atomic integral domain whose polynomial extension is not atomic. More
recently, Coykendall and the first author constructed finite-rank torsion-free
atomic monoids whose algebras over certain finite fields are not atomic. Still,
the ascent of atomicity from finite-rank torsion-free monoids to their monoid
algebras over fields of characteristic zero is an open problem. The main
purpose of this paper is to provide a negative answer to this problem. We
actually construct a rank-one torsion-free atomic monoid whose monoid algebras
over any field are not atomic. To do so, we introduce and study a
methodological construction inside the class of rank-one torsion-free monoid
that we call lifting: it consists in embedding a given monoid into another
monoid that is often more tractable from the arithmetic viewpoint.
