  Search engines are considered the primary tool to assist and empower learners
in finding information relevant to their learning goals-be it learning
something new, improving their existing skills, or just fulfilling a curiosity.
While several approaches for improving search engines for the learning scenario
have been proposed, instructional scaffolding has not been studied in the
context of search as learning, despite being shown to be effective for
improving learning in both digital and traditional learning contexts. When
scaffolding is employed, instructors provide learners with support throughout
their autonomous learning process. We hypothesize that the usage of scaffolding
techniques within a search system can be an effective way to help learners
achieve their learning objectives whilst searching. As such, this paper
investigates the incorporation of scaffolding into a search system employing
three different strategies (as well as a control condition): (I) AQE_{SC}, the
automatic expansion of user queries with relevant subtopics; (ii) CURATED_{SC},
the presenting of a manually curated static list of relevant subtopics on the
search engine result page; and (iii) FEEDBACK_{SC}, which projects real-time
feedback about a user's exploration of the topic space on top of the
CURATED_{SC} visualization. To investigate the effectiveness of these
approaches with respect to human learning, we conduct a user study (N=126)
where participants were tasked with searching and learning about topics such as
`genetically modified organisms'. We find that (I) the introduction of the
proposed scaffolding methods does not significantly improve learning gains.
However, (ii) it does significantly impact search behavior. Furthermore, (iii)
immediate feedback of the participants' learning leads to undesirable user
behavior, with participants focusing on the feedback gauges instead of
learning.
