  The goal of few-shot image recognition (FSIR) is to identify novel categories
with a small number of annotated samples by exploiting transferable knowledge
from training data (base categories). Most current studies assume that the
transferable knowledge can be well used to identify novel categories. However,
such transferable capability may be impacted by the dataset bias, and this
problem has rarely been investigated before. Besides, most of few-shot learning
methods are biased to different datasets, which is also an important issue that
needs to be investigated deeply. In this paper, we first investigate the impact
of transferable capabilities learned from base categories. Specifically, we use
the relevance to measure relationships between base categories and novel
categories. Distributions of base categories are depicted via the instance
density and category diversity. The FSIR model learns better transferable
knowledge from relevant training data. In the relevant data, dense instances or
diverse categories can further enrich the learned knowledge. Experimental
results on different sub-datasets of ImagNet demonstrate category relevance,
instance density and category diversity can depict transferable bias from base
categories. Second, we investigate performance differences on different
datasets from dataset structures and different few-shot learning methods.
Specifically, we introduce image complexity, intra-concept visual consistency,
and inter-concept visual similarity to quantify characteristics of dataset
structures. We use these quantitative characteristics and four few-shot
learning methods to analyze performance differences on five different datasets.
Based on the experimental analysis, some insightful observations are obtained
from the perspective of both dataset structures and few-shot learning methods.
We hope these observations are useful to guide future FSIR research.
