  The study of polarity in computation has revealed that an "ideal" programming
language combines both call-by-value and call-by-name evaluation; the two
calling conventions are each ideal for half the types in a programming
language. But this binary choice leaves out call-by-need which is used in
practice to implement lazy-by-default languages like Haskell. We show how the
notion of polarity can be extended beyond the value/name dichotomy to include
call-by-need by adding a mechanism for sharing which is enough to compile a
Haskell-like functional language with user-defined types. The key to capturing
sharing in this mixed-evaluation setting is to generalize the usual notion of
polarity "shifts:" rather than just two shifts (between positive and negative)
we have a family of four dual shifts.
  We expand on this idea of logical duality -- "and" is dual to "or;" proof is
dual to refutation -- for the purpose of compiling a variety of types. Based on
a general notion of data and codata, we show how classical connectives can be
used to encode a wide range of built-in and user-defined types. In contrast
with an intuitionistic logic corresponding to pure functional programming,
these classical connectives bring more of the pleasant symmetries of classical
logic to the computationally-relevant, constructive setting. In particular, an
involutive pair of negations bridges the gulf between the wide-spread notions
of parametric polymorphism and abstract data types in programming languages. To
complete the study of duality in compilation, we also consider the dual to
call-by-need evaluation, which shares the computation within the control flow
of a program instead of computation within the information flow.
