  We present an intercomparison and verification analysis of 20 GCMs included
in the 4th IPCC assessment report regarding their representation of the
hydrological cycle on the Danube river basin for 1961-2000 and for the
2161-2200 SRESA1B scenario runs. The basin-scale properties of the hydrological
cycle are computed by spatially integrating the precipitation, evaporation, and
runoff fields using the Voronoi-Thiessen tessellation formalism. The span of
the model simulated mean annual water balances is of the same order of
magnitude of the observed Danube discharge of the Delta; the true value is
within the range simulated by the models. Some land components seem to have
deficiencies since there are cases of violation of water conservation when
annual means are considered. The overall performance and the degree of
agreement of the GCMs are comparable to those of the RCMs analyzed in a
previous work, in spite of the much higher resolution and common nesting of the
RCMs. The reanalyses are shown to feature several inconsistencies and cannot be
used as a verification benchmark for the hydrological cycle in the Danubian
region. In the scenario runs, for basically all models the water balance
decreases, whereas its interannual variability increases. Changes in the
strength of the hydrological cycle are not consistent among models: it is
confirmed that capturing the impact of climate change on the hydrological cycle
is not an easy task over land areas. Moreover, in several cases we find that
qualitatively different behaviours emerge among the models: the ensemble mean
does not represent any sort of average model, and often it falls between the
models' clusters.
