  Models with intractable likelihood functions arise in areas including network
analysis and spatial statistics, especially those involving Gibbs random
fields. Posterior parameter es timation in these settings is termed a
doubly-intractable problem because both the likelihood function and the
posterior distribution are intractable. The comparison of Bayesian models is
often based on the statistical evidence, the integral of the un-normalised
posterior distribution over the model parameters which is rarely available in
closed form. For doubly-intractable models, estimating the evidence adds
another layer of difficulty. Consequently, the selection of the model that best
describes an observed network among a collection of exponential random graph
models for network analysis is a daunting task. Pseudolikelihoods offer a
tractable approximation to the likelihood but should be treated with caution
because they can lead to an unreasonable inference. This paper specifies a
method to adjust pseudolikelihoods in order to obtain a reasonable, yet
tractable, approximation to the likelihood. This allows implementation of
widely used computational methods for evidence estimation and pursuit of
Bayesian model selection of exponential random graph models for the analysis of
social networks. Empirical comparisons to existing methods show that our
procedure yields similar evidence estimates, but at a lower computational cost.
