  Functional MRI (fMRI) has been widely used to study activity patterns in the
human brain. It infers neuronal activity from the associated hemodynamic
response, which fundamentally limits its spatial and temporal specificity. In
mice, the Direct Imaging of Neuronal Activity (DIANA) method revealed MRI
signals that correlated with intracellular voltage changes, showing high
spatial and temporal specificity. In this work we attempted DIANA in humans.
Four visual paradigms were tested, exploring different stimulus types
(flickering noise patterns, and naturalistic images) and stimulus durations
(50-200ms). Regions of interest (ROI) were derived from traditional fMRI
acquisitions and anatomical scans. When using small manually drawn ROI, signals
were detected that resembled possible functional activity. However, increasing
the stimulus duration did not lead to corroborating signal changes. Moreover,
these signals disappeared when averaged over larger functionally or
anatomically derived ROI. Further analysis of the data highlighted, DIANA's
sensitivity to inflow effects and subject motion. Therefore, care should be
taken not to mistake artifacts for neuronal activity. Although we did not yet
observe clear DIANA signals in humans, it is possible that a higher spatial
resolution is needed to separate signals with opposite signs in different
laminar compartments. However, obtaining such data may be particularly
challenging because repetitive experiments with short interstimulus intervals
can be strenuous for the subjects. To obtain better data, improvements in
sequence and stimulus designs are needed to maximize the DIANA signal and
minimize confounds. However, without a clear understanding of DIANA's
biophysical underpinnings it is difficult to do so. Therefore, it may be more
effective to first study DIANA's biophysical underpinnings in a controlled, yet
biologically revenant, setting.
