  Digital scans of analogue photographic film typically contain artefacts such
as dust and scratches. Automated removal of these is an important part of
preservation and dissemination of photographs of historical and cultural
importance.
  While state-of-the-art deep learning models have shown impressive results in
general image inpainting and denoising, film artefact removal is an
understudied problem. It has particularly challenging requirements, due to the
complex nature of analogue damage, the high resolution of film scans, and
potential ambiguities in the restoration. There are no publicly available
high-quality datasets of real-world analogue film damage for training and
evaluation, making quantitative studies impossible.
  We address the lack of ground-truth data for evaluation by collecting a
dataset of 4K damaged analogue film scans paired with manually-restored
versions produced by a human expert, allowing quantitative evaluation of
restoration performance. We construct a larger synthetic dataset of damaged
images with paired clean versions using a statistical model of artefact shape
and occurrence learnt from real, heavily-damaged images. We carefully validate
the realism of the simulated damage via a human perceptual study, showing that
even expert users find our synthetic damage indistinguishable from real. In
addition, we demonstrate that training with our synthetically damaged dataset
leads to improved artefact segmentation performance when compared to previously
proposed synthetic analogue damage.
  Finally, we use these datasets to train and analyse the performance of eight
state-of-the-art image restoration methods on high-resolution scans. We compare
both methods which directly perform the restoration task on scans with
artefacts, and methods which require a damage mask to be provided for the
inpainting of artefacts.
