  A long line of work in social psychology has studied variations in people's
susceptibility to persuasion -- the extent to which they are willing to modify
their opinions on a topic. This body of literature suggests an interesting
perspective on theoretical models of opinion formation by interacting parties
in a network: in addition to considering interventions that directly modify
people's intrinsic opinions, it is also natural to consider interventions that
modify people's susceptibility to persuasion. In this work, motivated by this
fact we propose a new framework for social influence. Specifically, we adopt a
popular model for social opinion dynamics, where each agent has some fixed
innate opinion, and a resistance that measures the importance it places on its
innate opinion; agents influence one another's opinions through an iterative
process. Under non-trivial conditions, this iterative process converges to some
equilibrium opinion vector. For the unbudgeted variant of the problem, the goal
is to select the resistance of each agent (from some given range) such that the
sum of the equilibrium opinions is minimized. We prove that the objective
function is in general non-convex. Hence, formulating the problem as a convex
program as in an early version of this work (Abebe et al., KDD'18) might have
potential correctness issues. We instead analyze the structure of the objective
function, and show that any local optimum is also a global optimum, which is
somehow surprising as the objective function might not be convex. Furthermore,
we combine the iterative process and the local search paradigm to design very
efficient algorithms that can solve the unbudgeted variant of the problem
optimally on large-scale graphs containing millions of nodes. Finally, we
propose and evaluate experimentally a family of heuristics for the budgeted
variation of the problem.
