  For environmental problems such as global warming future costs must be
balanced against present costs. This is traditionally done using an exponential
function with a constant discount rate, which reduces the present value of
future costs. The result is highly sensitive to the choice of discount rate and
has generated a major controversy as to the urgency for immediate action. We
study analytically several standard interest rate models from finance and
compare their properties to empirical data. From historical time series for
nominal interest rates and inflation covering 14 countries over hundreds of
years, we find that extended periods of negative real interest rates are
common, occurring in many epochs in all countries. This leads us to choose the
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck model, in which real short run interest rates fluctuate
stochastically and can become negative, even if they revert to a positive mean
value. We solve the model in closed form and prove that the long-run discount
rate is always less than the mean; indeed it can be zero or even negative,
despite the fact that the mean short term interest rate is positive. We fit the
parameters of the model to the data, and find that nine of the countries have
positive long run discount rates while five have negative long-run discount
rates. Even if one rejects the countries where hyperinflation has occurred, our
results support the low discounting rate used in the Stern report over higher
rates advocated by others.
