  If you have a restless intellect, it is very likely that you have played at
some point with the idea of investigating the meaning and conceptual
foundations of quantum mechanics. It is also probable (albeit not certain) that
your intentions have been stopped on their tracks by an encounter with some
version of the "Shut up and calculate" command. You may have heard that
everything is already understood. That understanding is not your job. Or, if it
is, it is either impossible or very difficult. Maybe somebody explained to you
that physics is concerned with "hows" and not with "whys"; that whys are the
business of "philosophy" ---you know, that dirty word. That what you call
"understanding" is just being Newtonian; which of course you cannot ask quantum
mechanics to be. Perhaps they also added some norms: The important thing a
theory must do is predict; a theory must only talk about measurable quantities.
It may also be the case that you almost asked "OK, and why is that?", but you
finally bit your tongue. If you persisted in your intentions and the debate got
a little heated up, it is even possible that it was suggested that you suffered
of some type of moral or epistemic weakness that tend to disappear as you grow
up. Maybe you received some job advice such as "Don't work in that if you ever
want to own a house".
  I have certainly met all these objections in my short career, and I think
that they are all just wrong. In this somewhat personal document, I try to
defend that making sense of quantum mechanics is an exciting, challenging,
important and open scientific endeavor. I do this by compulsively quoting
Feynman (and others), and I provide some arguments that you might want to use
the next time you confront the mentioned "opinions". By analogy with the
anti-rationalistic Copenhagen command, all the arguments are subsumed in a
standard answer to it: "Shut up and let me think"
