  While supervised neural networks have become state of the art for identifying
the rare strong gravitational lenses from large imaging data sets, their
selection remains significantly affected by the large number and diversity of
nonlens contaminants. This work evaluates and compares systematically the
performance of neural networks in order to move towards a rapid selection of
galaxy-scale strong lenses with minimal human input in the era of deep,
wide-scale surveys. We used multiband images from PDR2 of the HSC Wide survey
to build test sets mimicking an actual classification experiment, with 189
strong lenses previously found over the HSC footprint and 70,910 nonlens
galaxies in COSMOS. Multiple networks were trained on different sets of
realistic strong-lens simulations and nonlens galaxies, with various
architectures and data pre-processing. The overall performances strongly depend
on the construction of the ground-truth training data and they typically, but
not systematically, improve using our baseline residual network architecture.
Improvements are found when applying random shifts to the image centroids and
square root stretches to the pixel values, adding z band, or using random
viewpoints of the original images, but not when adding difference images to
subtract emission from the central galaxy. The most significant gain is
obtained with committees of networks trained on different data sets, and
showing a moderate overlap between populations of false positives.
Nearly-perfect invariance to image quality can be achieved by training networks
either with large number of bands, or jointly with the PSF and science frames.
Overall, we show the possibility to reach a TPR0 as high as 60% for the test
sets under consideration, which opens promising perspectives for pure selection
of strong lenses without human input using the Rubin Observatory and other
forthcoming ground-based surveys.
