  The main aim of the article is to give a simple and conceptual account for
the correspondence (originally described by Bodini, Gardy, and Jacquot) between
$\alpha$-equivalence classes of closed linear lambda terms and isomorphism
classes of rooted trivalent maps on compact oriented surfaces without boundary,
as an instance of a more general correspondence between linear lambda terms
with a context of free variables and rooted trivalent maps with a boundary of
free edges. We begin by recalling a familiar diagrammatic representation for
linear lambda terms, while at the same time explaining how such diagrams may be
read formally as a notation for endomorphisms of a reflexive object in a
symmetric monoidal closed (bi)category. From there, the "easy" direction of the
correspondence is a simple forgetful operation which erases annotations on the
diagram of a linear lambda term to produce a rooted trivalent map. The other
direction views linear lambda terms as complete invariants of their underlying
rooted trivalent maps, reconstructing the missing information through a
Tutte-style topological recurrence on maps with free edges. As an application
in combinatorics, we use this analysis to enumerate bridgeless rooted trivalent
maps as linear lambda terms containing no closed proper subterms, and conclude
by giving a natural reformulation of the Four Color Theorem as a statement
about typing in lambda calculus.
