  The fast-growing market of autonomous vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles, and
fleets in general necessitates the design of smart and automatic navigation
systems considering the stochastic latency along different paths in the traffic
network. The longstanding shortest path problem in a deterministic network,
whose counterpart in a congestion game setting is Wardrop equilibrium, has been
studied extensively, but it is well known that finding the notion of an optimal
path is challenging in a traffic network with stochastic arc delays. In this
work, we propose three classes of risk-averse equilibria for an atomic
stochastic congestion game in its general form where the arc delay
distributions are load dependent and not necessarily independent of each other.
The three classes are risk-averse equilibrium (RAE), mean-variance equilibrium
(MVE), and conditional value at risk level $\alpha$ equilibrium
(CVaR$_\alpha$E) whose notions of risk-averse best responses are based on
maximizing the probability of taking the shortest path, minimizing a linear
combination of mean and variance of path delay, and minimizing the expected
delay at a specified risky quantile of the delay distributions, respectively.
We prove that for any finite stochastic atomic congestion game, the
risk-averse, mean-variance, and CVaR$_\alpha$ equilibria exist. We show that
for risk-averse travelers, the Braess paradox may not occur to the extent
presented originally since players do not necessarily travel along the shortest
path in expectation, but they take the uncertainty of travel time into
consideration as well. We show through some examples that the price of anarchy
can be improved when players are risk-averse and travel according to one of the
three classes of risk-averse equilibria rather than the Wardrop equilibrium.
