  Bounds consistency is usually enforced on continuous constraints by first
decomposing them into binary and ternary primitives. This decomposition has
long been shown to drastically slow down the computation of solutions. To
tackle this, Benhamou et al. have introduced an algorithm that avoids formally
decomposing constraints. Its better efficiency compared to the former method
has already been experimentally demonstrated. It is shown here that their
algorithm implements a strategy to enforce on a continuous constraint a
consistency akin to Directional Bounds Consistency as introduced by Dechter and
Pearl for discrete problems. The algorithm is analyzed in this framework, and
compared with algorithms that enforce bounds consistency. These theoretical
results are eventually contrasted with new experimental results on standard
benchmarks from the interval constraint community.
