  A mathematical conjecture is successfully identified, which is used for
relativistic analysis of dielectric Einstein-box thought experiment in a Letter
(Ramos, Rubilar, and Obukhov, Phys. Lett. A 375, 1703 (2011)), where the
authors conjecture (without any citations) that, the symmetry and
divergence-less property of a Lorentz 4-tensor is a sufficient condition for
the time-column space integrals to constitute a Lorentz 4-vector. This
mathematical conjecture has been thought to be "a mathematical fact the
validity of which was shown well" in textbooks. However in this paper, we
indicate that this conjecture has never been proved mathematically. By
enumerating a counterexample, we find that this mathematical conjecture is
flawed, and it is not persuasive to use a flawed mathematical conjecture as a
starting point to resolve Abraham-Minkowski controversy over light momentum in
a dielectric medium. We also indicate that this flawed mathematical conjecture
is actually a widely-accepted conjecture in the dynamics of relativity in
textbooks for many decades. To eliminate a misunderstanding of this flawed
conjecture in the community, we provide a detailed elucidation of why
M{\o}ller's mathematical statement, also called "M{\o}ller's version of von
Laue's theorem", only defines a trivial zero 4-vector for an electromagnetic
stress-energy Lorentz 4-tensor.
