  When building a global brand of any kind -- a political actor, clothing
style, or belief system -- developing widespread awareness is a primary goal.
Short of knowing any of the stories or products of a brand, being talked about
in whatever fashion -- raw fame -- is, as Oscar Wilde would have it, better
than not being talked about at all. Here, we measure, examine, and contrast the
day-to-day raw fame dynamics on Twitter for US Presidents and major US
Presidential candidates from 2008 to 2020: Barack Obama, John McCain, Mitt
Romney, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Joe Biden. We assign ``lexical
fame'' to be the number and (Zipfian) rank of the (lowercased) mentions made
for each individual across all languages. We show that all five political
figures have at some point reached extraordinary volume levels of what we
define to be ``lexical ultrafame'': An overall rank of approximately 300 or
less which is largely the realm of function words and demarcated by the highly
stable rank of `god'. By this measure, `trump' has become enduringly
ultrafamous, from the 2016 election on. We use typical ranks for country names
and function words as standards to improve perception of scale. We quantify
relative fame rates and find that in the eight weeks leading up the 2008 and
2012 elections, `obama' held a 1000:757 volume ratio over `mccain' and 1000:892
over `romney', well short of the 1000:544 and 1000:504 volumes favoring `trump'
over `hillary' and `biden' in the 8 weeks leading up to the 2016 and 2020
elections. Finally, we track how only one other entity has more sustained
ultrafame than `trump' on Twitter: The K-pop (Korean pop) band BTS. We chart
the dramatic rise of BTS, finding their Twitter handle `@bts\_twt' has been
able to compete with `a' and `the'. Our findings for BTS more generally point
to K-pop's growing economic, social, and political power.
