  The emergence of new organizational forms--such as virtual teams--has brought
forward some challenges for teams. One of the most relevant challenges is
coordinating the decisions of team members who work from different time zones.
Intuition suggests that task performance should improve if the team members'
decisions are coordinated. However, previous research suggests that the effect
of coordination on task performance is ambiguous. Specifically, the effect of
coordination on task performance depends on aspects such as the team members'
learning and the changes in team composition over time. This paper aims to
understand how individual learning and team composition moderate the
relationship between coordination and task performance. We implement an
agent-based modeling approach based on the NK-framework to fulfill our research
objective. Our results suggest that both factors have moderating effects.
Specifically, we find that excessively increasing individual learning is
harmful for the task performance of fully autonomous teams, but less
detrimental for teams that coordinate their decisions. In addition, we find
that teams that coordinate their decisions benefit from changing their
composition in the short-term, but fully autonomous teams do not. In
conclusion, teams that coordinate their decisions benefit more from individual
learning and dynamic composition than teams that do not coordinate.
Nevertheless, we should note that the existence of moderating effects does not
imply that coordination improves task performance. Whether coordination
improves task performance depends on the interdependencies between the team
members' decisions.
