  Background: A major question in Covid-19 research is whether democracies
handled the Covid-19 pandemic crisis better or worse than authoritarian
countries. However, it is important to consider the issues of democracy versus
authoritarianism, and state fragility, when examining official Covid-19 death
counts in research, because these factors can influence the accurate reporting
of pandemic deaths by governments. In contrast, excess deaths are less prone to
variability in differences in definitions of Covid-19 deaths and testing
capacities across countries. Here we use excess pandemic deaths to explore
potential relationships between political systems and public health outcomes.
  Methods: We address these issues by comparing the official government
Covid-19 death counts in a well-established John Hopkins database to the
generally more reliable excess mortality measure of Covid-19 deaths, taken from
the recently released World Mortality Dataset. We put the comparison in the
context of the political and fragile state dimensions.
  Findings: We find (1) significant potential underreporting of Covid-19 deaths
by authoritarian governments and governments with high state fragility and (2)
substantial geographic variation among countries and regions with regard to
standard democracy indices. Additionally, we find that more authoritarian
governments are (weakly) associated with more excess deaths during the pandemic
than democratic governments.
  Interpretations: The inhibition and censorship of information flows, inherent
to authoritarian states, likely results in major inaccuracies in pandemic
statistics that confound global public health analyses. Thus, both excess
pandemic deaths and official Covid-19 death counts should be examined in
studies using death as an outcome variable.
