  There has been huge recent interest in the potential of making operational
weather forecasts using machine learning techniques. As they become a part of
the weather forecasting toolbox, there is a pressing need to understand how
well current machine learning models can simulate high-impactweather events. We
compare forecasts of Storm Ciar\'an, a European windstorm that caused sixteen
deaths and extensive damage in Northern Europe, made by machine learning and
numericalweather prediction models. The four machine learning models considered
(FourCastNet, Pangu-Weather, GraphCast and FourCastNet-v2) produce forecasts
that accurately capture the synoptic-scale structure of the cyclone including
the position of the cloud head, shape of the warm sector and location of warm
conveyor belt jet, and the large-scale dynamical drivers important for the
rapid storm development such as the position of the storm relative to the
upper-level jet exit. However, their ability to resolve the more detailed
structures important for issuing weather warnings is more mixed. All of the
machine learning models underestimate the peak amplitude of winds associated
with the storm, only some machine learning models resolve the warm core
seclusion and none of the machine learning models capture the sharp bent-back
warm frontal gradient. Our study shows there is a great deal about the
performance and properties of machine learning weather forecasts that can be
derived from case studies of high-impact weather events such as Storm Ciar\'an.
