  Purpose: Field-to-susceptibility inversion in quantitative susceptibility
mapping (QSM) is ill-posed and needs numerical stabilization through either
regularization or oversampling by acquiring data at three or more object
orientations. Calculation Of Susceptibility through Multiple Orientations
Sampling (COSMOS) is an established oversampling approach and regarded as QSM
gold standard. It achieves a well-conditioned inverse problem, requiring
rotations by 0{\deg}, 60{\deg} and 120{\deg} in the yz-plane. However, this is
impractical in vivo, where head rotations are typically restricted to a range
of +-25{\deg}. Non-ideal sampling degrades the conditioning with residual
streaking artifacts whose mitigation needs further regularization. Moreover,
susceptibility anisotropy in white matter is not considered in the COSMOS
model, which may introduce additional bias. The current work presents a
thorough investigation of these effects in primate brain.
  Methods: Gradient-recalled echo (GRE) data of an entire fixed chimpanzee
brain were acquired at 7 T (350 microns resolution, 10 orientations) including
ideal COSMOS sampling and realistic rotations in vivo. Comparisons of the
results included ideal COSMOS, in-vivo feasible acquisitions with 3-8
orientations and single-orientation iLSQR QSM.
  Results: In-vivo feasible and optimal COSMOS yielded high-quality
susceptibility maps with increased SNR resulting from averaging multiple
acquisitions. COSMOS reconstructions from non-ideal rotations about a single
axis required additional L2-regularization to mitigate residual streaking
artifacts.
  Conclusion: In view of unconsidered anisotropy effects, added complexity of
the reconstruction, and the general challenge of multi-orientation
acquisitions, advantages of sub-optimal COSMOS schemes over regularized
single-orientation QSM appear limited in in-vivo settings.
