  There is both theoretical and numerical evidence that the set of irreducible
representations of a reductive group over local or finite fields is naturally
partitioned into families according to analytic properties of representations.
Examples of such properties are the rate of decay at infinity of "matrix
coefficients" in the local field setting, and the order of magnitude of
"character ratios" in the finite field situation. In these notes we describe
known results, new results, and conjectures in the theory of "size" of
representations of classical groups over finite fields, whose ultimate goal is
to classify the above mentioned families of representations and accordingly to
estimate the relevant analytic properties of each family. Specifically, we
treat two main issues: the first is the introduction of a rigorous definition
of a notion of size for representations of classical groups, and the second
issue is a method to construct and obtain information on each family of
representation of a given size. In particular, we propose several compatible
notions of size that we call U-RANK, TENSOR RANK and ASYMPTOTIC RANK, and we
develop a method called ETA CORRESPONDENCE to construct the families of
representation of each given rank. Rank suggests a new way to organize the
representations of classical groups over finite and local fields - a way in
which the building blocks are the "smallest" representations. This is in
contrast to Harish-Chandra's philosophy of cusp forms that is the main
organizational principle since the 60s, and in it the building blocks are the
cuspidal representations which are, in some sense, the "LARGEST".
