  The increasing penetration of renewable energy poses significant challenges
to power grid reliability. There have been increasing interests in utilizing
financial tools, such as insurance, to help end-users hedge the potential risk
of lost load due to renewable energy variability. With insurance, a user pays a
premium fee to the utility, so that he will get compensated in case his demand
is not fully satisfied. A proper insurance design needs to resolve the
following two challenges: (i) users' reliability preference is private
information; and (ii) the insurance design is tightly coupled with the
renewable energy investment decision. To address these challenges, we adopt the
contract theory to elicit users' private reliability preferences, and we study
how the utility can jointly optimize the insurance contract and the planning of
renewable energy. A key analytical challenge is that the joint optimization of
the insurance design and the planning of renewables is non-convex. We resolve
this difficulty by revealing important structural properties of the optimal
solution, using the help of two benchmark problems: the no-insurance benchmark
and the social-optimum benchmark. Compared with the no-insurance benchmark, we
prove that the social cost and users' total energy cost are always no larger
under the optimal contract. Simulation results show that the largest benefit of
the insurance contract is achieved at a medium electricity-bill price together
with a low type heterogeneity and a high renewable uncertainty.
