  In a recent review paper [{\em Phys. Reports} {\bf 214} (1992) 339] we
proposed, within conventional quantum mechanics, new definitions for the
sub-barrier tunnelling and reflection times. \ Aims of the present paper are: \
(i) presenting and analysing the results of various numerical calculations
(based on our equations) on the penetration and return times $<\tau_{\, \rm
Pen}>$, $<\tau_{\, \rm Ret}>$, during tunnelling {\em inside} a rectangular
potential barrier, for various penetration depths $x_{\rm f}$; \ (ii) putting
forth and discussing suitable definitions, besides of the mean values, also of
the {\em variances} (or dispersions) ${\rm D} \, {\tau_{\rm T}}$ and ${\rm D}
\, {\tau_{\, \rm R}}$ for the time durations of transmission and reflection
processes; \ (iii) mentioning, moreover, that our definition $<\tau_{\rm T}>$
for the average transmission time results to constitute an {\em improvement} of
the ordinary dwell--time ${\ove \tau}^{\rm Dw}$ formula: \ (iv) commenting, at
last, on the basis of our {\em new} numerical results, upon some recent
criticism by C.R.Leavens. \ \ We stress that our numerical evaluations {\em
confirm} that our approach implied, and implies, the existence of the {\em
Hartman effect}: an effect that in these days (due to the theoretical
connections between tunnelling and evanescent--wave propagation) is receiving
---at Cologne, Berkeley, Florence and Vienna--- indirect, but quite
interesting, experimental verifications. \ Eventually, we briefly analyze some
other definitions of tunnelling times.
