  We consider a modification of the adaptive contact process which, interpreted
in the context of opinion dynamics, breaks the symmetry of the coevolutionary
voter model by assigning to each node type a different strategy to promote
consensus: orthodox opinion holders spread their opinion via social pressure
and rewire their connections following a segregationist strategy; heterodox
opinion holders adopt a proselytic strategy, converting their neighbors through
personal interactions, and relax to the orthodox opinion according to its
representation in the population. We give a full description of the phase
diagram of this asymmetric model, using the standard pair approximation
equations and assessing their performance by comparison with stochastic
simulations. We find that although global consensus is favored with regard to
the symmetric case, the asymmetric model also features an active phase. We
study the stochastic properties of the corresponding metastable state in
finite-size networks, discussing the applicability of the analytic
approximations developed for the coevolutionary voter model. We find that, in
contrast to the symmetric case, the final consensus state is predetermined by
the system's parameters and independent of initial conditions for sufficiently
large system sizes. We also find that rewiring always favors consensus, both by
significantly reducing convergence times and by changing their scaling with
system size.
