  Given a CNF formula F on n variables, the problem of model counting or #SAT
is to compute the number of satisfying assignments of F . Model counting is a
fundamental but hard problem in computer science with varied applications.
Recent years have witnessed a surge of effort towards developing efficient
algorithmic techniques that combine the classical 2-universal hashing with the
remarkable progress in SAT solving over the past decade. These techniques
augment the CNF formula F with random XOR constraints and invoke an NP oracle
repeatedly on the resultant CNF-XOR formulas. In practice, calls to the NP
oracle calls are replaced a SAT solver whose runtime performance is adversely
affected by size of XOR constraints. The standard construction of 2-universal
hash functions chooses every variable with probability p = 1/2 leading to XOR
constraints of size n/2 in expectation. Consequently, the challenge is to
design sparse hash functions where variables can be chosen with smaller
probability and lead to smaller sized XOR constraints.
  In this paper, we address this challenge from theoretical and practical
perspectives. First, we formalize a relaxation of universal hashing, called
concentrated hashing and establish a novel and beautiful connection between
concentration measures of these hash functions and isoperimetric inequalities
on boolean hypercubes. This allows us to obtain (log m) tight bounds on
variance and dispersion index and show that p = O( log(m)/m ) suffices for
design of sparse hash functions from {0, 1}^n to {0, 1}^m. We then use sparse
hash functions belonging to this concentrated hash family to develop new
approximate counting algorithms. A comprehensive experimental evaluation of our
algorithm on 1893 benchmarks demonstrates that usage of sparse hash functions
can lead to significant speedups.
