  For decades, agronomists have used remote sensing to monitor key crop
parameters like biomass, fractional cover, and plant health. Vegetation indices
(VIs) are popular for this purpose, primarily leveraging the spectral red edge
in multispectral imagery. In contrast, spectral mixture models use the full
reflectance spectrum to simultaneously estimate area fractions of multiple
endmember materials present within a mixed pixel. Here, we characterize the
relationships between hyperspectral endmember fractions and 6 common
multispectral VIs in crops & soils of California agriculture. Fractional area
of green vegetation (Fv) was estimated directly from 64,000,000 5 nm, 3 to 5 m
reflectance spectra compiled from a mosaic of 15 AVIRIS-ng flightlines.
Simulated Planet SuperDove reflectance spectra were then derived from the
AVIRIS-ng, and used to compute 6 popular VIs (NDVI, NIRv, EVI, EVI2, SR, DVI).
Multispectral VIs were compared to hyperspectral Fv using parametric (Pearson
correlation, r) and nonparametric (Mutual Information, MI) similarity metrics.
4 VIs (NIRv, DVI, EVI, EVI2) showed strong linear relationships to Fv (r >
0.94; MI > 1.2). NIRv & DVI showed strong interrelation (r > 0.99, MI > 2.4),
but deviated significantly from 1:1 relative to Fv. EVI & EVI2 were also
strongly interrelated (r > 0.99, MI > 2.3) and more closely followed a 1:1
relation with Fv. In contrast, NDVI & SR showed weaker, nonlinear,
heteroskedastic relation to Fv (r < 0.84, MI = 0.69). NDVI showed especially
severe sensitivity to substrate background reflectance (-0.05 < NDVI < +0.6 for
unvegetated spectra) and saturation (0.2 < Fv < 0.8 for NDVI = 0.7). These
direct observational constraints on multispectral VI and hyperspectral mixture
model comparability can serve as a quantitative benchmark for agronomic
applications in the coming era of increasing spatial & spectral resolution
Earth observation.
