  In this paper, we revisit the relationship between investors' utility
functions and portfolio allocation rules. We derive portfolio allocation rules
for asymmetric Laplace distributed $ALD(\mu,\sigma,\kappa)$ returns and compare
them with the mean-variance approach, which is based on Gaussian returns. We
reveal that in the limit of small $\frac{\mu}{\sigma}$, the Markowitz
contribution is accompanied by a skewness term. We also obtain the allocation
rules when the expected return is a random normal variable in an average and
worst-case scenarios, which allows us to take into account uncertainty of the
predicted returns. An optimal worst-case scenario solution smoothly
approximates between equal weights and minimum variance portfolio, presenting
an attractive convex alternative to the risk parity portfolio. We address the
issue of handling singular covariance matrices by imposing conditional
independence structure on the precision matrix directly. Finally, utilizing a
microscopic portfolio model with random drift and analytical expression for the
expected utility function with log-normal distributed cross-sectional returns,
we demonstrate the influence of model parameters on portfolio construction.
This comprehensive approach enhances allocation weight stability, mitigates
instabilities associated with the mean-variance approach, and can prove
valuable for both short-term traders and long-term investors.
