  Models of economic decision makers often include idealized assumptions, such
as rationality, perfect foresight, and access to all relevant pieces of
information. These assumptions often assure the models' internal validity, but,
at the same time, might limit the models' power to explain empirical phenomena.
This paper is particularly concerned with the model of the hidden action
problem, which proposes an optimal performance-based sharing rule for
situations in which a principal assigns a task to an agent, and the action
taken to carry out this task is not observable by the principal. We follow the
agentization approach and introduce an agent-based version of the hidden action
problem, in which some of the idealized assumptions about the principal and the
agent are relaxed so that they only have limited information access, are
endowed with the ability to gain information, and store it in and retrieve it
from their (limited) memory. We follow an evolutionary approach and analyze how
the principal's and the agent's decisions affect the sharing rule, task
performance, and their utility over time. The results indicate that the optimal
sharing rule does not emerge. The principal's utility is relatively robust to
variations in intelligence, while the agent's utility is highly sensitive to
limitations in intelligence. The principal's behavior appears to be driven by
opportunism, as she withholds a premium from the agent to assure the optimal
utility for herself.
