  Stochastic parametrisations are used in weather and climate models to improve
the representation of unpredictable unresolved processes. When compared to a
deterministic model, a stochastic model represents `model uncertainty', i.e.,
sources of error in the forecast due to the limitations of the forecast model.
We present a technique for systematically deriving new stochastic
parametrisations or for constraining existing stochastic approaches. A
high-resolution model simulation is coarse-grained to the desired forecast
model resolution. This provides the initial conditions and forcing data needed
to drive a Single Column Model (SCM). By comparing the SCM parametrised
tendencies with the evolution of the high resolution model, we can estimate the
error in the SCM tendencies that a stochastic parametrisation seeks to
represent. We use this approach to assess the physical basis of the widely used
Stochastically Perturbed Parametrisation Tendencies (SPPT) scheme. We find
justification for the multiplicative nature of SPPT, and for the use of
spatio-temporally correlated stochastic perturbations. We find evidence that
the stochastic perturbation should be positively skewed, indicating that
occasional large-magnitude positive perturbations are physically realistic.
However other key assumptions of SPPT are less well justified, including
coherency of the stochastic perturbations with height, coherency of the
perturbations for different physical parametrisation schemes, and coherency for
different prognostic variables. Relaxing these SPPT assumptions allows for an
error model that explains a larger fractional variance than traditional SPPT.
In particular, we suggest that independently perturbing the tendencies
associated with different parametrisation schemes is justifiable, and would
improve the realism of the SPPT approach.
