  Millimeter Waves (mmW) and sub-THz frequencies are the candidate bands for
the upcoming Sixth Generation (6G) of communication systems. The use of
collimated beams at mmW/sub-THz to compensate for the increased path and
penetration loss arises the need for a seamless Beam Management (BM),
especially for high mobility scenarios such as the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure
(V2I) one. Recent research advances in Integrated Sensing and Communication
(ISAC) indicate that equipping the network infrastructure, e.g., the Base
Station (BS), with either a stand-alone radar or sensing capabilities using
optimized waveforms, represents the killer technology to facilitate the BM.
However, radio sensing should accurately localize the Vehicular Equipment
(VE)'s antenna, which is not guaranteed in general. Differently, employing side
information from VE's onboard positioning sensors might overcome this
limitation at the price of an increased control signaling between VE and BS.
This paper provides a pragmatic comparison between radar-assisted and
position-assisted BM for mmW V2I systems in a typical urban scenario in terms
of BM training time and beamforming gain loss due to a wrong BM decision.
Simulation results, supported by experimental evidence, show that the point
target approximation of a traveling VE does not hold in practical V2I scenarios
with radar-equipped BS. Therefore, the true antenna position has a residual
uncertainty that is independent of radar's resolution and implies 50\,\% more
BM training time on average. Moreover, there is not a winning technology for BM
between BS-mounted radar and VE's onboard positioning systems. They provide
complementary performance, depending on position, although outperforming blind
BM techniques compared to conventional blind methods. Thus, we propose to
optimally combine radar and positioning information in a multi-technology
integrated BM solution.
