  We intend to create a new risk assessment methodology that combines the best
characteristics of both risk score and machine learning models. More
specifically, we aim to develop a method that, besides having a good
performance, offers a personalized model and outcome for each patient, presents
high interpretability, and incorporates an estimation of the prediction
reliability which is not usually available. By combining these features in the
same approach we expect that it can boost the confidence of physicians to use
such a tool in their daily activity. In order to achieve the mentioned goals, a
three-step methodology was developed: several rules were created by
dichotomizing risk factors; such rules were trained with a machine learning
classifier to predict the acceptance degree of each rule (the probability that
the rule is correct) for each patient; that information was combined and used
to compute the risk of mortality and the reliability of such prediction. The
methodology was applied to a dataset of patients admitted with any type of
acute coronary syndromes (ACS), to assess the 30-days all-cause mortality risk.
The performance was compared with state-of-the-art approaches: logistic
regression (LR), artificial neural network (ANN), and clinical risk score model
(Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events - GRACE). The proposed approach
achieved testing results identical to the standard LR, but offers superior
interpretability and personalization; it also significantly outperforms the
GRACE risk model and the standard ANN model. The calibration curve also
suggests a very good generalization ability of the obtained model as it
approaches the ideal curve. Finally, the reliability estimation of individual
predictions presented a great correlation with the misclassifications rate.
Those properties may have a beneficial application in other clinical scenarios
as well. [abridged]
