  Trust is an important aspect of human life. It provides instrumental value in
allowing us to collaborate on and defer actions to others, and intrinsic value
in our intimate relationships with romantic partners, family, and friends. In
this paper I examine the nature of trust from a philosophical perspective.
Specifically I propose to view trust as a context-sensitive state in a manner
that will be made precise. The contribution of this paper is threefold.
  First, I make the simple observation that an individual's trust is typically
both action- and context-sensitive. Action-sensitivity means that trust may
obtain between a given truster and trustee for only certain actions.
Context-sensitivity means that trust may obtain between a given truster and
trustee, regarding the same action, in some conditions and not others. I also
opine about what kinds of things may play the role of the truster, trustee, and
action.
  Second, I advance a theory for the nature of contextual trust. I propose that
the answer to "What does it mean for $A$ to trust $B$ to do $X$ in context
$C$?" has two conditions. First, $A$ must take $B$'s doing $X$ as a means
towards one of $A$'s ends. Second, $A$ must adopt an unquestioning attitude
concerning $B$'s doing $X$ in context $C$. This unquestioning attitude is
similar to the attitude introduced in Nguyen 2021.
  Finally, we explore how contextual trust can help us make sense of trust in
general non-interpersonal settings, notably that of artificial intelligence
(AI) systems. The field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) assigns
paramount importance to the problem of user trust in opaque computational
models, yet does little to give trust diagnostic or even conceptual criteria. I
propose that contextual trust is a natural fit for the task by illustrating
that model transparency and explainability map nicely into our construction of
the contexts $C$.
