  There is a paucity of guidelines relating to displays in digital pathology
making procurement decisions, and display configuration challenging. Experience
suggests pathologists have personal preferences for brightness when using a
microscope which we hypothesised could be used as a predictor for display
setup. We conducted an online survey across 6 NHS hospitals to capture
brightness adjustment habits on both microscopes and screens. A subsample of
respondents took part in a practical task to determine microscope brightness
and display luminance preferences.
  The survey indicates 81% of respondents adjust the brightness on their
microscope, compared with 11% adjusting their digital display. Display
adjustments are more likely for visual comfort and ambient light compensation
rather than for tissue factors, common for microscope adjustments. Twenty
consultants took part in the practical brightness assessment. Light preferences
on the microscope showed no correlation with screen preferences, except where a
pathologist has a markedly brighter microscope preference. All of the
preferences in this cohort were for a display luminance of less than
500cd/m$^2$, with 90% preferring 350cd/m$^2$ or less. There was no correlation
between these preferences and the ambient lighting in the room.
  We conclude that microscope preferences can only be used to predict screen
luminance requirements where the microscope is being used at very high
brightness levels. A display capable of a brightness of 500cd/m$^2$ should be
suitable for almost all pathologists with 300cd/m$^2$ suitable for the
majority. The ability to adjust display luminance was felt to be important by
the majority of respondents. Further work needs to be undertaken to establish
the relationship between diagnostic performance, preferences and ambient
lighting levels.
