  We often estimate a parameter of interest psi when the identifying conditions
involve a nuisance parameter theta. Examples from causal inference are Inverse
Probability Weighting, Marginal Structural Models and Structural Nested Models.
To estimate treatment effects from observational data, these methods posit a
(pooled) logistic regression model for the treatment and/or censoring
probabilities and estimate these first. These methods are all based on unbiased
estimating equations. First, we provide a general formula for the variance of
the parameter of interest psi when the nuisance parameter theta is estimated in
a first step, using the Partition Inverse Formula. Then, we present 4 results
for estimators psi-hat based on unbiased estimating equations including a
nuisance parameter theta which is estimated by solving (partial) score
equations, if psi does not depend on theta. This regularly happens in causal
inference if theta describes the treatment probabilities, in settings with
missing data where theta describes the missingness probabilities, and settings
with measurement error where theta describes the measurement error
distribution. 1. Counter-intuitively, the limiting variance of psi-hat is
typically smaller when theta is estimated, compared to if a known theta were
plugged in. 2. If estimating theta is ignored, the resulting sandwich estimator
for the variance of psi-hat is conservative. 3. A consistent estimator for the
variance of psi-hat can provide results fast: no bootstrap. 4. If psi-hat with
the true theta plugged in is efficient, the limiting variance of psi-hat does
not depend on whether theta is estimated. To illustrate we use observational
data to estimate 1. the effect of cazavi versus colistin in patients with
resistant bacterial infections and 2. how the effect of one year of
antiretroviral treatment depends on its initiation time in HIV-infected
patients.
