  An approximate program transformation is a transformation that can change the
semantics of a program within a specified empirical error bound. Such
transformations have wide applications: they can decrease computation time,
power consumption, and memory usage, and can, in some cases, allow
implementations of incomputable operations. Correctness proofs of approximate
program transformations are by definition quantitative. Unfortunately, unlike
with standard program transformations, there is as of yet no modular way to
prove correctness of an approximate transformation itself. Error bounds must be
proved for each transformed program individually, and must be re-proved each
time a program is modified or a different set of approximations are applied. In
this paper, we give a semantics that enables quantitative reasoning about a
large class of approximate program transformations in a local, composable way.
Our semantics is based on a notion of distance between programs that defines
what it means for an approximate transformation to be correct up to an error
bound. The key insight is that distances between programs cannot in general be
formulated in terms of metric spaces and real numbers. Instead, our semantics
admits natural notions of distance for each type construct; for example,
numbers are used as distances for numerical data, functions are used as
distances for functional data, an polymorphic lambda-terms are used as
distances for polymorphic data. We then show how our semantics applies to two
example approximations: replacing reals with floating-point numbers, and loop
perforation.
