  Ensuring the consistent usage of formatting conventions is an important
aspect of modern software quality assurance. While formatting convention
violations can be automatically detected by format checkers implemented in
linters, there is no satisfactory solution for repairing them. Manually fixing
formatting convention violations is a waste of developer time and code
formatters do not take into account the conventions adopted and configured by
developers for the used linter. In this paper, we present Styler, a tool
dedicated to fixing formatting rule violations raised by format checkers using
a machine learning approach. For a given project, Styler first generates
training data by injecting violations of the project-specific rules in
violation-free source code files. Then, it learns fixes by feeding long
short-term memory neural networks with the training data encoded into token
sequences. Finally, it predicts fixes for real formatting violations with the
trained models. Currently, Styler supports a single checker, Checkstyle, which
is a highly configurable and popular format checker for Java. In an empirical
evaluation, Styler repaired 41% of 26,791 Checkstyle violations mined from 104
GitHub projects. Moreover, we compared Styler with the IntelliJ plugin
CheckStyle-IDEA and the machine-learning-based code formatters Naturalize and
CodeBuff. We found out that Styler fixes violations of a diverse set of
Checkstyle rules (24/25 rules), generates smaller repairs in comparison to the
other systems, and predicts repairs in seconds once trained on a project.
Through a manual analysis, we identified cases in which Styler does not succeed
to generate correct repairs, which can guide further improvements in Styler.
Finally, the results suggest that Styler can be useful to help developers
repair Checkstyle formatting violations.
