  We look into the problems of comparing nondeterministic discounted-sum
automata on finite and infinite words. That is, the problems of checking for
automata $A$ and $B$ whether or not it holds that for all words $w$,
$A(w)=B(w), A(w) \leq B(w)$, or $A(w)<B(w)$.
  These problems are known to be decidable when both automata have the same
single integral discount factor, while decidability is open in all other
settings: when the single discount factor is a non-integral rational; when each
automaton can have multiple discount factors; and even when each has a single
integral discount factor, but the two are different.
  We show that it is undecidable to compare discounted-sum automata with
multiple discount factors, even if all are integrals, while it is decidable to
compare them if each has a single, possibly different, integral discount
factor. To this end, we also provide algorithms to check for given
nondeterministic automaton $N$ and deterministic automaton $D$, each with a
single, possibly different, rational discount factor, whether or not $N(w) =
D(w)$, $N(w) \geq D(w)$, or $N(w) > D(w)$ for all words $w$.
