  We propose a new model for forming beliefs and learning about unknown
probabilities (such as the probability of picking a red marble from a bag with
an unknown distribution of coloured marbles). The most widespread model for
such situations of 'radical uncertainty' is in terms of imprecise
probabilities, i.e. representing the agent's knowledge as a set of probability
measures. We add to this model a plausibility map, associating to each measure
a plausibility number, as a way to go beyond what is known with certainty and
represent the agent's beliefs about probability. There are a number of standard
examples: Shannon Entropy, Centre of Mass etc. We then consider learning of two
types of information: (1) learning by repeated sampling from the unknown
distribution (e.g. picking marbles from the bag); and (2) learning higher-order
information about the distribution (in the shape of linear inequalities, e.g.
we are told there are more red marbles than green marbles). The first changes
only the plausibility map (via a 'plausibilistic' version of Bayes' Rule), but
leaves the given set of measures unchanged; the second shrinks the set of
measures, without changing their plausibility. Beliefs are defined as in Belief
Revision Theory, in terms of truth in the most plausible worlds. But our belief
change does not comply with standard AGM axioms, since the revision induced by
(1) is of a non-AGM type. This is essential, as it allows our agents to learn
the true probability: we prove that the beliefs obtained by repeated sampling
converge almost surely to the correct belief (in the true probability). We end
by sketching the contours of a dynamic doxastic logic for statistical learning.
