  We revisit the causal backreaction paradigm, in which the need for Dark
Energy is eliminated via the generation of an apparent cosmic acceleration from
the causal flow of inhomogeneity information coming in towards each observer
from distant structure-forming regions. This second-generation formalism
incorporates "recursive nonlinearities": the process by which
already-established metric perturbations will then act to slow down all future
flows of inhomogeneity information. Here, the long-range effects of causal
backreaction are now damped, weakening its impact for models that were
previously best-fit cosmologies. Nevertheless, we find that causal backreaction
can be recovered as a replacement for Dark Energy via the adoption of larger
values for the dimensionless `strength' of the clustering evolution functions
being modeled -- a change justified by the hierarchical nature of clustering
and virialization in the universe, occurring on multiple cosmic length scales
simultaneously. With this, and with one new model parameter representing the
slowdown of clustering due to astrophysical feedback processes, an alternative
cosmic concordance can once again be achieved for a matter-only universe in
which the apparent acceleration is generated entirely by causal backreaction
effects. One drawback is a new degeneracy which broadens our predicted range
for the observed jerk parameter $j_{0}^{\mathrm{Obs}}$, thus removing what had
appeared to be a clear signature for distinguishing causal backreaction from
Cosmological Constant $\Lambda$CDM. As for the long-term fate of the universe,
incorporating recursive nonlinearities appears to make the possibility of an
`eternal' acceleration due to causal backreaction far less likely; though this
does not take into account gravitational nonlinearities or the large-scale
breakdown of cosmological isotropy, effects not easily modeled within this
formalism.
