  We present the analysis of 2,033 current sheets (CS) observed aboard four
Cluster spacecraft in a pristine solar wind. Four-spacecraft estimates of the
CS normal and propagation velocity are compared with different
single-spacecraft estimates. The Minimum Variance Analysis (MVA) of the
magnetic field is shown to be highly inaccurate in estimating the normal. The
MVA normal often differs by more than 60 degrees from the normal obtained by
multi-spacecraft timing method, likely due to ambient turbulent fluctuations.
In contrast, the cross-product of magnetic fields at the CS boundaries delivers
the normal with the uncertainty of less than 15 degrees at the confidence level
of 90%. The CSs are essentially frozen into plasma flow, since their
propagation velocity is consistent with local ion flow velocity within 20% at
the confidence level of 90%. The single-spacecraft methodology based on the
cross-product method and frozen-in assumption delivers the CS thickness and
current density amplitude within 20% of their actual values at the confidence
level of 90%. The CSs are kinetic-scale structures with half-thickness
$\lambda$ from a few tenths to tens of local proton inertial length
$\lambda_{p}$ and scale-dependent shear angle and current density amplitude,
$\Delta \theta \propto (\lambda/\lambda_p)^{0.5}$ and $J_0\propto
(\lambda/\lambda_{p})^{-0.5}$. The classification of the CSs in terms of
tangential and rotational discontinuities remains a challenge, because even the
four-spacecraft normal has too large uncertainties to reveal the actual normal
magnetic field component. The presented results will be valuable for the
analysis of solar wind CSs, when only single-spacecraft measurements are
available.
