  We explore conclusions a person draws from observing society when he allows
for the possibility that individuals' outcomes are affected by group-level
discrimination. Injecting a single non-classical assumption, that the agent is
overconfident about himself, we explain key observed patterns in social
beliefs, and make a number of additional predictions. First, the agent believes
in discrimination against any group he is in more than an outsider does,
capturing widely observed self-centered views of discrimination. Second, the
more group memberships the agent shares with an individual, the more positively
he evaluates the individual. This explains one of the most basic facts about
social judgments, in-group bias, as well as "legitimizing myths" that justify
an arbitrary social hierarchy through the perceived superiority of the
privileged group. Third, biases are sensitive to how the agent divides society
into groups when evaluating outcomes. This provides a reason why some
ethnically charged questions should not be asked, as well as a potential
channel for why nation-building policies might be effective. Fourth, giving the
agent more accurate information about himself increases all his biases. Fifth,
the agent is prone to substitute biases, implying that the introduction of a
new outsider group to focus on creates biases against the new group but lowers
biases vis a vis other groups. Sixth, there is a tendency for the agent to
agree more with those in the same groups. As a microfoundation for our model,
we provide an explanation for why an overconfident agent might allow for
potential discrimination in evaluating outcomes, even when he initially did not
conceive of this possibility.
