  This paper introduces a new solution concept for non-cooperative games in
normal form with no ties and pure strategies: the Perfectly Transparent
Equilibrium. The players are rational in all possible worlds and know each
other's strategies in all possible worlds, which together we refer to as
Perfect Prediction. The anticipation of a player's decision by their opponents
is counterfactually dependent on the decision, unlike in Nash Equilibra where
the decisions are made independently. The equilibrium, when it exists, is
unique and is Pareto optimal.
  This equilibrium is the normal-form counterpart of the Perfect Prediction
Equilibrium; the prediction happens "in another room" rather than in the past.
The equilibrium can also be seen as a natural extension of Hofstadter's
superrationality to non-symmetric games.
  Algorithmically, an iterated elimination of non-individually-rational
strategy profiles is performed until at most one remains. An equilibrium is a
strategy profile that is immune against knowledge of strategies in all possible
worlds and rationality in all possible worlds, a stronger concept than common
knowledge of rationality but also than common counterfactual belief of
rationality.
  We formalize and contrast the Non-Nashian Decision Theory paradigm, common to
this and several other papers, with Causal Decision Theory and Evidential
Decision Theory. We define the Perfectly Transparent Equilibrium
algorithmically and, when it exists, prove its uniqueness, its
Pareto-optimality, and that it coincides with the Hofstadter's Superrationality
on symmetric games.
  We also relate to concepts found in literature such as Individual
Rationality, Minimax-Rationalizability, the Correlated Equilibrium.
  Finally, we specifically discuss inclusion relationships on the special case
of symmetric games and contrast them with asymmetric games.
