  The problem of automated car damage assessment presents a major challenge in
the auto repair and damage assessment industry. The domain has several
application areas ranging from car assessment companies such as car rentals and
body shops to accidental damage assessment for car insurance companies. In
vehicle assessment, the damage can take any form including scratches, minor and
major dents to missing parts. More often, the assessment area has a significant
level of noise such as dirt, grease, oil or rush that makes an accurate
identification challenging. Moreover, the identification of a particular part
is the first step in the repair industry to have an accurate labour and part
assessment where the presence of different car models, shapes and sizes makes
the task even more challenging for a machine-learning model to perform well. To
address these challenges, this research explores and applies various instance
segmentation methodologies to evaluate the best performing models.
  The scope of this work focusses on two genres of real-time instance
segmentation models due to their industrial significance, namely SipMask and
Yolact. These methodologies are evaluated against a previously reported car
parts dataset (DSMLR) and an internally curated dataset extracted from local
car repair workshops. The Yolact-based part localization and segmentation
method performed well when compared to other real-time instance mechanisms with
a mAP of 66.5. For the workshop repair dataset, SipMask++ reported better
accuracies for object detection with a mAP of 57.0 with outcomes for
AP_IoU=.50and AP_IoU=.75 reporting 72.0 and 67.0 respectively while Yolact was
found to be a better performer for AP_s with 44.0 and 2.6 for object detection
and segmentation categories respectively.
