  In this study, we present models where participants strategically select
their risk levels and earn corresponding rewards, mirroring real-world
competition across various sectors. Our analysis starts with a normal form game
involving two players in a continuous action space, confirming the existence
and uniqueness of a Nash equilibrium and providing an analytical solution. We
then extend this analysis to multi-player scenarios, introducing a new
numerical algorithm for its calculation. A key novelty of our work lies in
using regret minimization algorithms to solve continuous games through
discretization. This groundbreaking approach enables us to incorporate
additional real-world factors like market frictions and risk correlations among
firms. We also experimentally validate that the Nash equilibrium in our model
also serves as a correlated equilibrium. Our findings illuminate how market
frictions and risk correlations affect strategic risk-taking. We also explore
how policy measures can impact risk-taking and its associated rewards, with our
model providing broader applicability than the Diamond-Dybvig framework. We
make our methodology and open-source code available at
https://github.com/louisabraham/cfrgame
  Finally, we contribute methodologically by advocating the use of algorithms
in economics, shifting focus from finite games to games with continuous action
sets. Our study provides a solid framework for analyzing strategic interactions
in continuous action games, emphasizing the importance of market frictions,
risk correlations, and policy measures in strategic risk-taking dynamics.
