  Multi types---aka non-idempotent intersection types---have been used to
obtain quantitative bounds on higher-order programs, as pioneered by de
Carvalho. Notably, they bound at the same time the number of evaluation steps
and the size of the result. Recent results show that the number of steps can be
taken as a reasonable time complexity measure. At the same time, however, these
results suggest that multi types provide quite lax complexity bounds, because
the size of the result can be exponentially bigger than the number of steps.
  Starting from this observation, we refine and generalise a technique
introduced by Bernadet & Graham-Lengrand to provide exact bounds for the
maximal strategy. Our typing judgements carry two counters, one measuring
evaluation lengths and the other measuring result sizes. In order to emphasise
the modularity of the approach, we provide exact bounds for four evaluation
strategies, both in the lambda-calculus (head, leftmost-outermost, and maximal
evaluation) and in the linear substitution calculus (linear head evaluation).
  Our work aims at both capturing the results in the literature and extending
them with new outcomes. Concerning the literature, it unifies de Carvalho and
Bernadet & Graham-Lengrand via a uniform technique and a complexity-based
perspective. The two main novelties are exact split bounds for the leftmost
strategy---the only known strategy that evaluates terms to full normal forms
and provides a reasonable complexity measure---and the observation that the
computing device hidden behind multi types is the notion of substitution at a
distance, as implemented by the linear substitution calculus.
