  In multimedia crowdsourcing, the requester's quality requirements and reward
decisions will affect the workers' task selection strategies and the quality of
their multimedia contributions. In this paper, we present a first study on how
the workers' bounded cognitive rationality interacts with and affects the
decisions and performance of a multimedia crowdsourcing system. Specifically,
we consider a two-stage model, where a requester first determines the reward
and the quality requirement for each task, and the workers select the tasks to
accomplish accordingly. First, we consider the benchmark case where users are
fully rational, and derive the requester's optimal rewards and quality
requirements for the tasks. Next, we focus on the more practical bounded
rational case by modeling the workers' task selection behaviors using the
cognitive hierarchy theory. Comparing with the fully rational benchmark, we
show that the requester can increase her profit by taking advantage of the
workers' bounded cognitive rationality, especially when the workers' population
is large or the workers' average cognitive level is low. When the workers'
average cognitive level is very high, however, the equilibrium under the
practical bounded rational model converges to that under the benchmark fully
rational model. It is because workers at different levels make decisions
sequentially and high cognitive level workers can accurately predict other
users' strategies. Under both the fully and bounded rational models, we show
that if workers are heterogeneous but one type of workers (either the high or
the low quality) dominates the platform, the requester cannot make a higher
profit by setting different quality requirements for different tasks.
