  Given the concerns around the existing subjective and objective policy
evaluation approaches, this study proposes a new combined subjective-objective
policy evaluation approach to choose better policy that reflects the will of
citizens and is backed up by objective facts. Subjective approaches, such as
the Life Satisfaction Approach and the Contingent Valuation Method, convert
subjectivity into economic value, raising the question whether a higher
economic value really accords with what citizens want. Objective policy
evaluation approaches, such as Evidence Based Policy Making and
Multi-Agent-Based Simulation, do not take subjectivity into account, making it
difficult to choose from diverse and pluralistic candidate policies. The
proposed approach establishes a subjective target function based on a multiple
regression analysis of the results of a residents questionnaire survey, and
uses MABS to calculate the objective evaluation indices for a number of
candidate policies. Next, a new subjective-objective coupling target function,
combining the explanatory variables of the subjective target function with
objective evaluation indices, is set up, optimized to select the preferred
policies from numerous candidates. To evaluate this approach, we conducted a
verification of renewable energy introduction policies at Takaharu Town in
Miyazaki Prefecture, Japan. The results show a good potential for using a new
subjective-objective coupling target function to select policies consistent
with the residents values for well-being from 20,000 policy candidates for
social, ecological, and economic values obtained in MABS. Using the new
approach to compare several policies enables concrete expression of the will of
stakeholders with diverse values, and contributes to constructive discussions
and consensus-building.
