  Knowledge of how science is consumed in public domains is essential for a
deeper understanding of the role of science in human society. While science is
heavily supported by public funding, common depictions suggest that scientific
research remains an isolated or 'ivory tower' activity, with weak connectivity
to public use, little relationship between the quality of research and its
public use, and little correspondence between the funding of science and its
public use. This paper introduces a measurement framework to examine public
good features of science, allowing us to study public uses of science, the
public funding of science, and how use and funding relate. Specifically, we
integrate five large-scale datasets that link scientific publications from all
scientific fields to their upstream funding support and downstream public uses
across three public domains - government documents, the news media, and
marketplace invention. We find that the public uses of science are extremely
diverse, with different public domains drawing distinctively across scientific
fields. Yet amidst these differences, we find key forms of alignment in the
interface between science and society. First, despite concerns that the public
does not engage high-quality science, we find universal alignment, in each
scientific field and public domain, between what the public consumes and what
is highly impactful within science. Second, despite myriad factors underpinning
the public funding of science, the resulting allocation across fields presents
a striking alignment with the field's collective public use. Overall, public
uses of science present a rich landscape of specialized consumption, yet
collectively science and society interface with remarkable, quantifiable
alignment between scientific use, public use, and funding.
