  This paper employs a nonlinear difference-in-differences approach to
empirically examine the Maximally Maintained Inequality (MMI) hypothesis in
rural Benin. The findings of this study confirm the MMI hypothesis. In
particular, it is observed that when 76% of educated parents choose to educate
their daughters in the absence of educational programs, in contrast to only 37%
among non-educated parents, the average impact of tuition fee subsidy on
enrollment probability in primary schools stands at 3.8\% for non-educated
households and 0.27% for educated households. Conversely, in cases where only
27% of educated parents decide to educate their daughters without education
programs, the average effect of tuition fee waivers on enrollment probability
in primary schools increases to 19.64\% for non-educated households and 24\%
for educated households. From the analysis of household education decisions
influenced by a preference for education and budget constraints, three key
conclusions emerge to explain the mechanism behind the MMI. Firstly, when the
income advantage of educated households compared to non-educated households is
significantly high, irrespective of the level of their preference advantage,
reducing the financial cost of education induces a greater shift in education
decisions among non-educated households. Secondly, in situations where educated
households do not possess an income advantage relative to non-educated
households, the reduction in education-related financial costs leads to a more
pronounced change in education decisions among educated households. Lastly, for
the low-income advantage of educated households, as the income advantage of
educated households increases, non-educated households respond more to
education policy than educated parents, if the preference advantage of educated
households is relatively smaller.
