  Private donors contributed more than $350 million to local election officials
to support the administration of the 2020 election. Supporters argue these
grants were neutral and necessary to maintain normal election operations during
the pandemic, while critics worry these grants mostly went to Democratic
strongholds and tilted election outcomes. These concerns have led twenty-four
states to restrict private election grants. How much did these grants shape the
2020 presidential election? To answer this question, we collect administrative
data on private election administration grants and election outcomes. We then
use new advances in synthetic control methods to compare presidential election
results and turnout in counties that received grants to counties with identical
average presidential election results and turnout before 2020. While counties
that favor Democrats were much more likely to apply for a grant, we find that
the grants did not have a noticeable effect on the presidential election. Our
estimates of the average effect of receiving a grant on Democratic vote share
range from 0.02 percentage points to 0.36 percentage points. Our estimates of
the average effect of receiving a grant on turnout range from -0.03 percentage
points to 0.13 percentage points. Across specifications, our 95% confidence
intervals typically include negative effects, and our confidence intervals from
all specifications fail to include effects on Democratic vote share larger than
0.58 percentage points and effects on turnout larger than 0.40 percentage
points. We characterize the magnitude of our effects by asking how large they
are compared to the margin by which Biden won the 2020 election. In simple
bench-marking exercises, we find that the effects of the grants were likely too
small to have changed the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.
