  This manuscript describes in detail the symplectic sum formulas in
Gromov-Witten theory and related topological and analytic issues. In
particular, we analyze and compare two analytic approaches to these formulas.
The Ionel-Parker formula contains two unique features, rim tori refinements of
relative invariants and the so-called S-matrix, which have been a mystery in
GW-theory over the past decade. We explain why the latter, which appears due to
imprecise reasoning, should not be present and how the former should be
interpreted. While the gluing argument in the IP work attempts to address all
of the issues relevant to certain "semi-positive" cases, it contains several
highly technical, but crucial, mistakes, which invalidate it and thus the whole
paper almost completely. The SFT type idea behind the Li-Ruan approach has the
potential of avoiding many issues with the degeneration of the metric on the
target occurring in the IP approach. Unfortunately, the LR paper is vague about
the key notions and aspects of the setup, including the definition of relative
stable maps, and does not contain even a description of the local structure of
the relative moduli space or an attempt at a complete proof of any major
statement. The only technical arguments in this paper concern fairly minor
points and are either incorrect or unnecessary. Neither of the two papers even
considers gluing stable maps with extra rubber structure, which is necessary
for defining the relevant invariants outside of a relatively narrow collection
of "semi-positive" cases. In this manuscript, we re-formulate the (numerical)
symplectic sum formula, describe the issues arising in both approaches, and
explain how the Li-Ruan SFT type idea can be used to address them.
