  A major challenge for autonomous vehicles is handling interactive scenarios,
such as highway merging, with human-driven vehicles. A better understanding of
human interactive behaviour could help address this challenge. Such
understanding could be obtained through modelling human behaviour. However,
existing modelling approaches predominantly neglect communication between
drivers and assume that some drivers in the interaction only respond to others,
but do not actively influence them. Here we argue that addressing these two
limitations is crucial for accurate modelling of interactions. We propose a new
computational framework addressing these limitations. Similar to game-theoretic
approaches, we model the interaction in an integral way rather than modelling
an isolated driver who only responds to their environment. Contrary to game
theory, our framework explicitly incorporates communication and bounded
rationality. We demonstrate the model in a simplified merging scenario,
illustrating that it generates plausible interactive behaviour (e.g.,
aggressive and conservative merging). Furthermore, human-like gap-keeping
behaviour emerged in a car-following scenario directly from risk perception
without the explicit implementation of time or distance gaps in the model's
decision-making. These results suggest that our framework is a promising
approach to interaction modelling that can support the development of
interaction-aware autonomous vehicles.
