  For safety purposes, reliable reignition of aircraft engines in the event of
flame blow-out is a critical requirement. Typically, an external ignition
source in the form of a spark is used to achieve a stable flame in the
combustor. However, such forced turbulent ignition may not always successfully
relight the combustor, mainly because the state of the combustor cannot be
precisely determined. Uncertainty in the turbulent flow inside the combustor,
inflow conditions, and spark discharge characteristics can lead to variability
in sparking outcomes even for nominally identical operating conditions. Prior
studies have shown that of all the uncertain parameters, turbulence is often
dominant and can drastically alter ignition behavior. For instance, even when
different fuels have similar ignition delay times, their ignition behavior in
practical systems can be completely different. In practical operating
conditions, it is challenging to understand why ignition fails and how much
variation in outcomes can be expected. The focus of this work is to understand
relight variability induced by turbulence for two different aircraft fuels,
namely Jet-A and a variant named C1. A detailed, previously developed
simulation approach is used to generate a large number of successful and failed
ignition events. Using this data, the cause of misfire is evaluated based on a
discriminant analysis that delineates the difference between turbulent initial
conditions that lead to ignition or failure. It was determined that the cause
of ignition failure is different for the two fuels. While it was found that
Jet-A is influenced by fuel entrainment, C1 was found to be more sensitive to
small scale turbulence features. A larger variability is found in the ignition
modes of C1, which can be subject to extreme events induced by kernel
breakdown.
