  Recently, scholars from law and political science have introduced metrics
which use only election outcomes (and not district geometry) to assess the
presence of partisan gerrymandering. The most high-profile example of such a
tool is the efficiency gap. Some scholars have suggested that such tools should
be sensitive enough to alert us when two election outcomes have the same
percentage of votes going to political party $A$, but one of the two awards
party $A$ more seats. When a metric is able to distinguish election outcomes in
this way, that metric is said to satisfy the efficiency principle.
  In this article, we show that the efficiency gap fails to satisfy the
efficiency principle. We show precisely how the efficiency principle breaks
down in the presence of unequal voter turnout. To do this, we first present a
construction that, given any rationals $1/4< V<3/4$ and $0<S<1$, constructs an
election outcome with vote share $V$, seat share $S$, and EG = 0. (For
instance, one party can get 26% of the vote and anywhere from 1% to 99% of the
seats while the efficiency gap remains zero.) Then, for any election with vote
share $1/4<V<3/4$, seat share $S$, and EG= 0, we express the ratio $\rho$ of
average turnout in districts party $A$ lost to average turnout in districts
party $A$ won as a function in only $V$ and $S$. It is well known that when all
districts have equal turnout, EG can be expressed as a simple formula in $V$
and $S$; we express the efficiency gap of any election as an equation only in
$V, S,$ and $\rho$. We also report on the values of $\rho$ that can be observed
in actual elections.
