  After the review by Hauge and Stovneng the old question of "How long does it
take to tunnel through the barrier?" has not still lost its relevance. As
before, there is no clear answer to this question even for the one-dimensional
completed scattering (OCS). In this paper we show that this seemingly simple
question stands alongside with such fundamental problems of quantum mechanics
(QM) as the Schrodinger's-cat and and EPR-Bohm paradoxes. Their common feature
is that the states of a scattered particle, a radioactive atom and electron
EPR-pair represent pure {\it micro-cat} states. It is widely accepted that the
EPR-Bohm paradox implies the non-existence of local hidden variables (LHVs),
the cat paradox represents a macro-objectification problem and the tunneling
time is an observer-dependent quantity whose definitions must be 'operational'.
At the same time, according to the probabilistic approach (Accardi, Khrennikov,
Philipp, Hess {\it et al.}) to Bell's inequality that underlies the EPR-Bohm
experiments, its experimental violation means simply that it contains
probability distributions associated with mutually incompatible statistical
data. We argue that this approach must be extended onto micro-cat states
because they describe, too, mutually incompatible statistical data. The current
practice to interpret the squared modulus of a micro-cat state as the
probability density should be recognized as erroneous. It is this practice that
makes QM incompatible with classical physical theories and, thereby, makes the
micro-world 'unspeakable'. The known 'operational' tunneling-time concepts,
elaborated in line with this practice, are logically inconsistent. We argue
that the TTP and the cat paradox must be solved at the level of single
electrons and atoms, without resorting to environment and measurement contexts.
We present a new model of the OCS and solve the TTP on its basis.
