  The global expansion of the Internet has brought many challenges to
geopolitics. Cyberspace is a space of strategic priority for many states.
Understanding and representing its geography remains an ongoing challenge.
Nevertheless, we need to comprehend Cyberspace as a space organized by humans
to analyse the strategies of the actors. This geography requires a
multidisciplinary dialogue associating geopolitics, computer science and
mathematics. Cyberspace is represented as three superposed and interacting
layers: the physical, logical, and informational layers. This paper focuses on
the logical layer through an analysis of the structure of connectivity and the
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). This protocol determines the routes taken by the
data. It has been leveraged by countries to control the flow of information,
and to block the access to contents (going up to full disruption of the
internet) or for active strategic purposes such as hijacking traffic or
attacking infrastructures. Several countries have opted for a BGP strategy. The
goal of this study is to characterize these strategies, to link them to current
architectures and to understand their resilience in times of crisis. Our
hypothesis is that there are connections between the network architecture
shaped through BGP, and strategy of stakeholders at a national level. We chose
to focus on the case of Iran because, Iran presents an interesting BGP
architecture and holds a central position in the connectivity of the Middle
East. Moreover, Iran is at the center of several ongoing geopolitical rifts.
Our observations make it possible to infer three ways in which Iran could have
used BGP to achieve its strategic goals: the pursuit of a self-sustaining
national Internet with controlled borders; the will to set up an Iranian
Intranet to facilitate censorship; and the leverage of connectivity as a tool
of regional influence.
