  Structured deformations provide a multiscale geometry that captures the
contributions at the macrolevel of both smooth geometrical changes and
non-smooth geometrical changes (disarrangements) at submacroscopic levels. For
each (first-order) structured deformation $(g,G)$ of a continuous body, the
tensor field $G$ is known to be a measure of deformations without
disarrangements, and $M:=\nabla g-G$ is known to be a measure of deformations
due to disarrangements. The tensor fields $G$ and $M$ together deliver not only
standard notions of plastic deformation, but $M$ and its curl deliver the
Burgers vector field associated with closed curves in the body and the
dislocation density field used in describing geometrical changes in bodies with
defects. Recently, Owen and Paroni [13] evaluated explicitly some relaxed
energy densities arising in Choksi and Fonseca's energetics of structured
deformations [4] and thereby showed: (1) $(trM)^{+}$, the positive part of
$trM$, is a volume density of disarrangements due to submacroscopic
separations, (2) $(trM)^{-}$, the negative part of $trM$, is a volume density
of disarrangements due to submacroscopic switches and interpenetrations, and
(3) $|trM|$, the absolute value of $trM$, is a volume density of all three of
these non-tangential disarrangements: separations, switches, and
interpenetrations. The main contribution of the present research is to show
that a different approach to the energetics of structured deformations, that
due to Ba\'ia, Matias, and Santos [1], confirms the roles of $(trM)^{+}$,
$(trM)^{-}$, and $|trM|$ established by Owen and Paroni. In doing so, we give
an alternative, shorter proof of Owen and Paroni's results, and we establish
additional explicit formulas for other measures of disarrangements.
