  Robotic collectives are large groups (at least 50) of locally sensing and
communicating robots that encompass characteristics of swarms and colonies,
whose emergent behaviors accomplish complex tasks. Future human-collective
teams will extend the ability of operators to monitor, respond, and make
decisions in disaster response, search and rescue, and environmental monitoring
problems. This manuscript evaluates two collective best-of-n decision models
for enabling collectives to identify and choose the highest valued target from
a finite set of n targets. Two challenges impede the future use of
human-collective shared decisions: 1) environmental bias reduces collective
decision accuracy when poorer targets are easier to evaluate than higher
quality targets, and 2) little is understood about shared human-collective
decision making interaction strategies. The two evaluated collective best-of-n
models include an existing insect colony decision model and an extended
bias-reducing model that attempts to reduce environmental bias in order to
improve accuracy. Collectives using these two strategies are compared
independently and as members of human-collective teams. Independently, the
extended model is slower than the original model, but the extended algorithm is
57% more accurate in decisions where the optimal option is more difficult to
evaluate. Human-collective teams using the bias-reducing model require less
operator influence and achieve 25% higher accuracy with difficult decisions,
than the human-collective teams using the original model. Further, a novel
human-collective interaction strategy enables operators to adjust collective
autonomy while making multiple simultaneous decisions.
