  We reanalyze the recently released SH0ES data for the determination of $H_0$.
We focus on testing the homogeneity of the Cepheid+SnIa sample and the
robustness of the results in the presence of new degrees of freedom in the
modeling of Cepheids and SnIa. We thus focus on the four modeling parameters of
the analysis: the fiducial luminosity of SnIa $M_B$ and Cepheids $M_W$ and the
two parameters ($b_W$ and $Z_W$) standardizing Cepheid luminosities with period
and metallicity. After reproducing the SH0ES baseline model results, we allow
for a transition of the value of any one of these parameters at a given
distance $D_c$ or cosmic time $t_c$ thus adding a single degree of freedom in
the analysis. When the SnIa absolute magnitude $M_B$ is allowed to have a
transition at $D_c\simeq 50Mpc$ (about $160Myrs$ ago), the best fit value of
the Hubble parameter drops from $H_{0}=73.04\pm1.04\,km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}$ to
$H_0=67.32\pm 4.64\, km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}$ in full consistency with the Planck
value. Also, the best fit SnIa absolute magnitude $M_B^>$ for $D>D_c$ drops to
the Planck inverse distance ladder value $M_{B}^>=-19.43\pm 0.15$ while the low
distance best fit $M_B^<$ parameter remains close to the original distance
ladder calibrated value $M_{B}^<=-19.25\pm 0.03$. Similar hints for a
transition behavior is found for the other three main parameters of the
analysis ($b_W$, $M_W$ and $Z_W$) at the same critical distance $D_c\simeq
50\,Mpc$ even though in that case the best fit value of $H_0$ is not
significantly affected. When the inverse distance ladder constraint on $M_B^>$
is included in the analysis, the uncertainties for $H_0$ reduce dramatically
($H_0= 68.2\pm 0.8\, km\,s^{-1}\,Mpc^{-1}$) and the $M_B$ transition model is
strongly preferred over the baseline SH0ES model ($\Delta \chi^2 \simeq -15$,
$\Delta AIC \simeq -13$) according to AIC and BIC model selection criteria.
