  The field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) is going through a period of great
expectations, introducing a certain level of anxiety in research, business and
also policy. This anxiety is further energised by an AI race narrative that
makes people believe they might be missing out. Whether real or not, a belief
in this narrative may be detrimental as some stake-holders will feel obliged to
cut corners on safety precautions, or ignore societal consequences just to
"win". Starting from a baseline model that describes a broad class of
technology races where winners draw a significant benefit compared to others
(such as AI advances, patent race, pharmaceutical technologies), we investigate
here how positive (rewards) and negative (punishments) incentives may
beneficially influence the outcomes. We uncover conditions in which punishment
is either capable of reducing the development speed of unsafe participants or
has the capacity to reduce innovation through over-regulation. Alternatively,
we show that, in several scenarios, rewarding those that follow safety measures
may increase the development speed while ensuring safe choices. Moreover, in
{the latter} regimes, rewards do not suffer from the issue of over-regulation
as is the case for punishment. Overall, our findings provide valuable insights
into the nature and kinds of regulatory actions most suitable to improve safety
compliance in the contexts of both smooth and sudden technological shifts.
