  The French Revolution brought principles of "liberty, equality, and
brotherhood" to bear on the day-to-day challenges of governing what was then
the largest country in Europe. Its experiments provided a model for future
revolutions and democracies across the globe, but this first modern revolution
had no model to follow. Using reconstructed transcripts of debates held in the
Revolution's first parliament, we present a quantitative analysis of how this
system managed innovation. We use information theory to track the creation,
transmission, and destruction of patterns of word-use across over 40,000
speeches and more than one thousand speakers. The parliament as a whole was
biased toward the adoption of new patterns, but speakers' individual qualities
could break these overall trends. Speakers on the left innovated at higher
rates while speakers on the right acted, often successfully, to preserve prior
patterns. Key players such as Robespierre (on the left) and Abb\'e Maury (on
the right) played information-processing roles emblematic of their politics.
Newly-created organizational functions---such as the Assembly's President and
committee chairs---had significant effects on debate outcomes, and a distinct
transition appears mid-way through the parliament when committees, external to
the debate process, gain new powers to "propose and dispose" to the body as a
whole. Taken together, these quantitative results align with existing
qualitative interpretations but also reveal crucial information-processing
dynamics that have hitherto been overlooked. Great orators had the public's
attention, but deputies (mostly on the political left) who mastered the
committee system gained new powers to shape revolutionary legislation.
