  We study sorting by queues that can rearrange their content by applying
permutations from a predefined set. These new sorting devices are called
shuffle queues and we investigate those of them corresponding to sets of
permutations defining some well-known shuffling methods. If
$\mathbb{Q}_{\Sigma}$ is the shuffle queue corresponding to the shuffling
method $\Sigma$, then we find a number of surprising results related to two
natural variations of shuffle queues denoted by $\mathbb{Q}_{\Sigma}^{\prime}$
and $\mathbb{Q}_{\Sigma}^{\textsf{pop}}$. These require the entire content of
the device to be unloaded after a permutation is applied or unloaded by each
pop operation, respectively.
  First, we show that sorting by a deque is equivalent to sorting by a shuffle
queue that can reverse its content. Next, we focus on sorting by cuts. We prove
that the set of permutations that one can sort by using
$\mathbb{Q}_{\text{cuts}}^{\prime}$ is the set of the $321$-avoiding separable
permutations. We give lower and upper bounds to the maximum number of times the
device must be used to sort a permutation. Furthermore, we give a formula for
the number of $n$-permutations, $p_{n}(\mathbb{Q}_{\Sigma}^{\prime})$, that one
can sort by using $\mathbb{Q}_{\Sigma}^{\prime}$, for any shuffling method
$\Sigma$, corresponding to a set of irreducible permutations.
  We also show that $p_{n}(\mathbb{Q}_{\Sigma}^{\textsf{pop}})$ is given by the
odd indexed Fibonacci numbers $F_{2n-1}$, for any shuffling method $\Sigma$
having a specific "back-front" property. The rest of the work is dedicated to a
surprising conjecture inspired by Diaconis and Graham, which states that one
can sort the same number of permutations of any given size by using the devices
$\mathbb{Q}_{\text{In-sh}}^{\textsf{pop}}$ and
$\mathbb{Q}_{\text{Monge}}^{\textsf{pop}}$, corresponding to the popular
In-shuffle and Monge shuffling methods.
