  Logic-Based Benders Decomposition (LBBD) and its Branch-and-Cut variant,
namely Branch-and-Check, enjoy an extensive applicability on a broad variety of
problems, including scheduling. Although LBBD offers problem-specific cuts to
impose tighter dual bounds, its application to resource-constrained scheduling
remains less explored. Given a position-based Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
(MILP) formulation for scheduling on unrelated parallel machines, we notice
that certain $k-$OPT neighbourhoods could implicitly be explored by regular
local search operators, thus allowing us to integrate Local Branching into
Branch-and-Check schemes. After enumerating such neighbourhoods and obtaining
their local optima - hence, proving that they are suboptimal - a local
branching cut (applied as a Benders cut) eliminates all their solutions at
once, thus avoiding an overload of the master problem with thousands of Benders
cuts. However, to guarantee convergence to optimality, the constructed
neighbourhood should be exhaustively explored, hence this time-consuming
procedure must be accelerated by domination rules or selectively implemented on
nodes which are more likely to reduce the optimality gap. In this study, the
realisation of this idea is limited on the common 'internal (job) swaps' to
construct formulation-specific $4$-OPT neighbourhoods. Nonetheless, the
experimentation on two challenging scheduling problems (i.e., the minimisation
of total completion times and the minimisation of total tardiness on unrelated
machines with sequence-dependent and resource-constrained setups) shows that
the proposed methodology offers considerable reductions of optimality gaps or
faster convergence to optimality. The simplicity of our approach allows its
transferability to other neighbourhoods and different sequencing optimisation
problems, hence providing a promising prospect to improve Branch-and-Check
methods.
