  How do networks form and what is their ultimate topology? Most of the
literature that addresses these questions assumes complete information: agents
know in advance the value of linking to other agents, even with agents they
have never met and with whom they have had no previous interaction (direct or
indirect). This paper addresses the same questions under what seems to us to be
the much more natural assumption of incomplete information: agents do not know
in advance -- but must learn -- the value of linking to agents they have never
met. We show that the assumption of incomplete information has profound
implications for the process of network formation and the topology of networks
that ultimately form. Under complete information, the networks that form and
are stable typically have a star, wheel or core-periphery form, with high-value
agents in the core. Under incomplete information, the presence of positive
externalities (the value of indirect links) implies that a much wider
collection of network topologies can emerge and be stable. Moreover, even when
the topologies that emerge are the same, the locations of agents can be very
different. For instance, when information is incomplete, it is possible for a
hub-and-spokes network with a low-value agent in the center to form and endure
permanently: an agent can achieve a central position purely as the result of
chance rather than as the result of merit. Perhaps even more strikingly: when
information is incomplete, a connected network could form and persist even if,
when information were complete, no links would ever form, so that the final
form would be a totally disconnected network. All of this can occur even in
settings where agents eventually learn everything so that information, although
initially incomplete, eventually becomes complete.
