  Reliably predictive simulation of complex flows requires a level of model
sophistication and robustness exceeding the capabilities of current
Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models. The necessary capability can
often be provided by well-resolved large eddy simulation (LES), but, for many
flows of interest, such simulations are too computationally intensive to be
performed routinely. In principle, hybrid RANS/LES (HRL) models capable of
transitioning through arbitrary levels of modeled and resolved turbulence would
ameliorate both RANS deficiencies and LES expense. However, these HRL
approaches have led to a host of unique complications, in addition to those
already present in RANS and LES. This work proposes a modeling approach aimed
at overcoming such challenges. The approach presented here relies on splitting
the turbulence model into three distinct components: two responsible for the
standard subgrid model roles of either providing the unresolved stress or
dissipation and a third which reduces the model length scale by creating
resolved turbulence. This formulation renders blending functions unnecessary in
HRL. Further, the split-model approach both reduces the physics-approximation
burden on simple eddy-viscosity-based models and provides convenient
flexibility in model selection. In regions where the resolution is adequate to
support additional turbulence, fluctuations are generated at the smallest
locally resolved scales of motion. This active forcing drives the system
towards a balance between RANS and grid-resolved LES for any combination of
resolution and flow while the split-model formulation prevents local disruption
to the total stress. The model is demonstrated on fully-developed,
incompressible channel flow [1] and the periodic hill [2], in which it is shown
to produce accurate results and avoid common HRL shortcomings, such as model
stress depletion.
