  The Random Utility Maximization model is by far the most adopted framework to
estimate consumer choice behavior. However, behavioral economics has provided
strong empirical evidence of irrational choice behavior, such as halo effects,
that are incompatible with this framework. Models belonging to the Random
Utility Maximization family may therefore not accurately capture such
irrational behavior. Hence, more general choice models, overcoming such
limitations, have been proposed. However, the flexibility of such models comes
at the price of increased risk of overfitting. As such, estimating such models
remains a challenge. In this work, we propose an estimation method for the
recently proposed Generalized Stochastic Preference choice model, which
subsumes the family of Random Utility Maximization models and is capable of
capturing halo effects. Specifically, we show how to use partially-ranked
preferences to efficiently model rational and irrational customer types from
transaction data. Our estimation procedure is based on column generation, where
relevant customer types are efficiently extracted by expanding a tree-like data
structure containing the customer behaviors. Further, we propose a new
dominance rule among customer types whose effect is to prioritize low orders of
interactions among products. An extensive set of experiments assesses the
predictive accuracy of the proposed approach. Our results show that accounting
for irrational preferences can boost predictive accuracy by 12.5% on average,
when tested on a real-world dataset from a large chain of grocery and drug
stores.
