  We investigate a fundamental question regarding a benchmark class of shapes
in one of the simplest, yet most widely utilized abstract models of algorithmic
tile self-assembly. Specifically, we study the directed tile complexity of a $k
\times N$ thin rectangle in Winfree's abstract Tile Assembly Model, assuming
that cooperative binding cannot be enforced (temperature-1 self-assembly) and
that tiles are allowed to be placed at most one step into the third dimension
(just-barely 3D). While the directed tile complexities of a square and a
scaled-up version of any algorithmically specified shape at temperature 1 in
just-barely 3D are both asymptotically the same as they are (respectively) at
temperature 2 in 2D, the bounds on the directed tile complexity of a thin
rectangle at temperature 2 in 2D are not known to hold at temperature 1 in
just-barely 3D. Motivated by this discrepancy, we establish new lower and upper
bounds on the directed tile complexity of a thin rectangle at temperature 1 in
just-barely 3D. We develop a new, more powerful type of Window Movie Lemma that
lets us upper bound the number of "sufficiently similar" ways to assign glues
to a set of fixed locations. Consequently, our lower bound,
$\Omega\left(N^{\frac{1}{k}}\right)$, is an asymptotic improvement over the
previous best lower bound and is more aesthetically pleasing since it
eliminates the $k$ that used to divide $N^{\frac{1}{k}}$. The proof of our
upper bound is based on a just-barely 3D, temperature-1 counter, organized
according to "digit regions", which affords it roughly fifty percent more
digits for the same target rectangle compared to the previous best counter.
This increase in digit density results in an upper bound of
$O\left(N^{\frac{1}{\left\lfloor\frac{k}{2}\right\rfloor}}+\log N\right)$, that
is an asymptotic improvement over the previous best upper bound and roughly the
square of our lower bound.
