  Returning universities to full on-campus operations while the COVID-19
pandemic is ongoing has been a controversial discussion in many countries. The
risk of large outbreaks in dense course settings is contrasted by the benefits
of in-person teaching. Transmission risk depends on a range of parameters, such
as vaccination coverage and efficacy, number of contacts and adoption of
non-pharmaceutical intervention measures (NPIs). Due to the generalised
academic freedom in Europe, many universities are asked to autonomously decide
on and implement intervention measures and regulate on-campus operations. In
the context of rapidly changing vaccination coverage and parameters of the
virus, universities often lack sufficient scientific insight to base these
decisions on. To address this problem, we analyse a calibrated, data-driven
agent-based simulation of transmission dynamics of 10755 students and 974
faculty members in a medium-sized European university. We use a co-location
network reconstructed from student enrollment data and calibrate transmission
risk based on outbreak size distributions in education institutions. We focus
on actionable interventions that are part of the already existing
decision-making process of universities to provide guidance for concrete policy
decisions. Here we show that, with the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus,
even a reduction to 25% occupancy and universal mask mandates are not enough to
prevent large outbreaks given the vaccination coverage of about 80% recently
reported for students in Austria. Our results show that controlling the spread
of the virus with available vaccines in combination with NPIs is not feasible
in the university setting if presence of students and faculty on campus is
required.
