  Sites for next-generation telescopes are chosen decades before the first
light of a telescope. Site selection is usually based on recent measurements
over a period that is too short to account for long-term changes in observing
conditions such as those arising from anthropogenic climate change. In this
study, we analyse trends in astronomical observing conditions for eight sites.
Most sites either already host telescopes that provide in situ measurements of
weather parameters or are candidates for hosting next-generation telescopes.
For a fine representation of orography, we use the highest resolution global
climate model (GCM) ensemble available provided by the high-resolution model
intercomparison project and developed as part of the European Union Horizon
2020 PRIMAVERA project. We evaluate atmosphere-only and coupled PRIMAVERA GCM
historical simulations against in situ measurements and the fifth generation
atmospheric reanalysis (ERA5) of the ECMWF. The projections of changes in
current site conditions are then analysed for the period 2015-2050 using
PRIMAVERA future climate simulations. Over most sites, we find that PRIMAVERA
GCMs show good agreement in temperature, specific humidity, and precipitable
water vapour compared to in situ observations and ERA5. The ability of
PRIMAVERA to simulate those variables increases confidence in their
projections. For those variables, the model ensemble projects an increasing
trend for all sites. On the other hand, no significant trends are projected for
relative humidity, cloud cover, or astronomical seeing and PRIMAVERA does not
simulate these variables well compared to observations and reanalyses.
Therefore, there is little confidence in these projections. Our results show
that climate change likely increases time lost due to bad site conditions.
