  We propose and study a framework for quantifying the importance of the
choices of parameter values to the result of a query over a database. These
parameters occur as constants in logical queries, such as conjunctive queries.
In our framework, the importance of a parameter is its SHAP score. This score
is a popular instantiation of the game-theoretic Shapley value to measuring the
importance of feature values in machine learning models. We make the case for
the rationale of using this score by explaining the intuition behind SHAP, and
by showing that we arrive at this score in two different, apparently opposing,
approaches to quantifying the contribution of a parameter.
  The application of the SHAP score requires two components in addition to the
query and the database: (a) a probability distribution over the combinations of
parameter values, and (b) a utility function that measures the similarity
between the result for the original parameters and the result for hypothetical
parameters. The main question addressed in the paper is the complexity of
calculating the SHAP score for different distributions and similarity measures.
We first address the case of probabilistically independent parameters. The
problem is hard if we consider a fragment of queries that is hard to evaluate
(as one would expect), and even for the fragment of acyclic conjunctive
queries. In some cases, though, one can efficiently list all relevant parameter
combinations, and then the SHAP score can be computed in polynomial time under
reasonable general conditions. Also tractable is the case of full acyclic
conjunctive queries for certain (natural) similarity functions. We extend our
results to conjunctive queries with inequalities between variables and
parameters. Finally, we discuss a simple approximation technique for the case
of correlated parameters.
