  Network-based interventions against epidemic spread are most powerful when
the full network structure is known. However, in practice, resource constraints
require decisions to be made based on partial network information. We
investigated how the accuracy of network data available at individual and
village levels affected network-based vaccination effectiveness. We simulated a
Susceptible-Infected-Recovered process on empirical social networks from 75
villages. First, we used regression to predict the percentage of individuals
ever infected based on village-level network. Second, we simulated vaccinating
10 percent of each of the 75 empirical village networks at baseline, selecting
vaccinees through one of five network-based approaches: random individuals;
random contacts of random individuals; random high-degree individuals; highest
degree individuals; or most central individuals. The first three approaches
require only sample data; the latter two require full network data. We also
simulated imposing a limit on how many contacts an individual can nominate
(Fixed Choice Design, FCD), which reduces the data collection burden but
generates only partially observed networks. We found mean and standard
deviation of the degree distribution to strongly predict cumulative incidence.
In simulations, the Nomination method reduced cumulative incidence by one-sixth
compared to Random vaccination; full network methods reduced infection by
two-thirds. The High Degree approach had intermediate effectiveness.
Surprisingly, FCD truncating individuals' degrees at three was as effective as
using complete networks. Using even partial network information to prioritize
vaccines at either the village or individual level substantially improved
epidemic outcomes. Such approaches may be feasible and effective in outbreak
settings, and full ascertainment of network structure may not be required.
