  We study the spatial rock-paper-scissors model, where resource competitors'
cyclic dominance impacts organisms' energy levels. Our model assumes that
failed selection interactions can lead to energy loss, reducing the chances of
success in the spatial game and hastening decline. To prevent death by energy
insufficiency, organisms of one out of the species strategically perform a
trade-off between reproduction and mobility. When prioritising exploring more
extensive areas, organisms aim to maximise the chances of acquiring resources
to regain high energy levels. Through simulation, we examine the effect of
survival behaviour on species segregation and spatial patterns. Our outcomes
show that the trade-off between offspring generation and accelerated movement
effectively protects individuals from death due to lack of energy. Moreover,
the risk of being eliminated by an enemy in the cyclic game reduces due to the
behavioural strategy. Considering a three-state model, we quantify how the
trade-off parameter controls the organisms' energy recovery. Computing the
median organisms' survival time, we find that although individuals performing
the trade-off strategy may live longer, the organisms of other species are
negatively affected by a life expectancy reduction. Our research may elucidate
the role of adaptive survival strategies in species persistence and provide
valuable insights for ecologists.
