  The influence of cooling rate on the intensity of thermoremanent
magnetization (TRM) and the necessity to correct archaeo/palaeointensities for
this effect have long been recognized. However the reliability of the
correction is still questioned. We studied 35 bricks baked in two modern kilns
(SK and BK) in known experimental conditions and with measurements of the
direction and intensity of the geomagnetic field at the site. The smallest kiln
(SK, 0.2 m 3) cooled in around 12 hours and the biggest kiln (BK, 8 m 3) in
around 40 hours. Thermomagnetic, hysteresis and backfield curves indicated that
the main magnetic carriers were Ti-poor titanomagnetites and
Tipoortitanohematites. The fraction of the TRM carried by Ti-poor
titanohematites is the maindifference between the two sets of bricks. This
fraction is around 5-10% in bricks from BK kilnand up to 40% in those from SK
kiln. Intensities of the Earth's magnetic field were determinedusing the
original Thellier-Thellier protocol with correction of TRM anisotropy. The
averageintensities overestimate the expected field intensity by 5% (SK) and 6%
(BK). This resultemphasizes the necessity of the cooling rate correction. In
order to have a detailed evaluation ofthe cooling rate effect, we used several
slow cooling rates: 0.8, 0.4, 0.2 and 0.1{\textdegree}C/min. Thecorrection
factors obtained with the 0.8{\textdegree}C/min cooling ranged between -2% and
21% and wereproportional to the TRM fraction carried by Ti-poor titanohematite.
The higher proportion ofthese grains in bricks from SK kiln led to an
overestimate of the correction factor and anunderestimate of the intensity by
7%. However, the expected intensity is recovered whentemperature steps higher
than 580{\textdegree}C (i.e. in the range of Ti-poor titanohematites
unblockingtemperatures) were excluded from the calculation of archaeointensity
and cooling rate correction.In the case of the BK kiln bricks, for which
Ti-poor titanohematites does not contributesignificantly to the TRM, all tested
cooling rates give average intensities close to the expectedvalue. Incorrectly
estimating the duration of the archaeological cooling has therefore a lowimpact
on the accuracy of the archaeointensity data on these kinds of material.
