  We consider the problem of quantifying the quality of a model selection
problem for a graphical model. We discuss this by formulating the problem as a
detection problem. Model selection problems usually minimize a distance between
the original distribution and the model distribution. For the special case of
Gaussian distributions, the model selection problem simplifies to the
covariance selection problem which is widely discussed in literature by
Dempster [2] where the likelihood criterion is maximized or equivalently the
Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence is minimized to compute the model covariance
matrix. While this solution is optimal for Gaussian distributions in the sense
of the KL divergence, it is not optimal when compared with other information
divergences and criteria such as Area Under the Curve (AUC).
  In this paper, we analytically compute upper and lower bounds for the AUC and
discuss the quality of model selection problem using the AUC and its bounds as
an accuracy measure in detection problem. We define the correlation
approximation matrix (CAM) and show that analytical computation of the KL
divergence, the AUC and its bounds only depend on the eigenvalues of CAM. We
also show the relationship between the AUC, the KL divergence and the ROC curve
by optimizing with respect to the ROC curve. In the examples provided, we pick
tree structures as the simplest graphical models. We perform simulations on
fully-connected graphs and compute the tree structured models by applying the
widely used Chow-Liu algorithm [3]. Examples show that the quality of tree
approximation models are not good in general based on information divergences,
the AUC and its bounds when the number of nodes in the graphical model is
large. We show both analytically and by simulations that the 1-AUC for the tree
approximation model decays exponentially as the dimension of graphical model
increases.
