  How do we assign value to economic transactions? To answer this question, we
must consider whether the value of objects is inherent, is a product of social
interaction, or involves other mechanisms. Economic theory predicts that there
is an optimal price for any market transaction, and can be observed during
auctions or other bidding processes. However, there are also social, cultural,
and cognitive components to the assignation of value, which can be observed in
both human and non-human Primate societies. While behaviors related to these
factors are embedded in market interactions, they also involve a biological
substrate for the assignation of value (valuation). To synthesize this
diversity of perspectives, we will propose that the process of valuation can be
modeled computationally and conceived of as a set of interrelated cultural
evolutionary, cognitive, and neural processes. To do this, contextual geometric
structures (CGS) will be placed in an agent-based context (minimal and
compositional markets). Objects in the form of computational propositions can
be acquired and exchanged, which will determine the value of both singletons
and linked propositions. Expected results of this model will be evaluated in
terms of their contribution to understanding human economic phenomena. The
paper will focus on computational representations and how they correspond to
real-world concepts. The implications for evolutionary economics and our
contemporary understanding of valuation and market dynamics will also be
discussed.
