  We propose a new class of games, called Multi-Games (MG), in which a given
number of players play a fixed number of basic games simultaneously. In each
round of the MG, each player will have a specific set of weights, one for each
basic game, which add up to one and represent the fraction of the player's
investment in each basic game. The total payoff for each player is then the
convex combination, with the corresponding weights, of the payoffs it obtains
in the basic games. The basic games in a MG can be regarded as different
environments for the players. When the players' weights for the different games
in MG are private information or types with given conditional probability
distributions, we obtain a particular class of Bayesian games. We show that for
the class of so-called completely pure regular Double Game (DG) with finite
sets of types, the Nash equilibria (NE) of the basic games can be used to
compute a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the DG in linear time with respect to
the number of types of the players. We study a DG for the Prisoner's Dilemma
(PD) by extending the PD with a second so-called Social Game (SG), generalising
the notion of altruistic extension of a game in which players have different
altruistic levels (or social coefficients). We study two different examples of
Bayesian games in this context in which the social coefficients have a finite
set of values and each player only knows the probability distribution of the
opponent's social coefficient. In the first case we have a completely pure
regular DG for which we deduce a Bayesian NE. Finally, we use the second
example to compare various strategies in a round-robin tournament of the DG for
PD, in which the players can change their social coefficients incrementally
from one round to the next.
