  Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now
being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing
equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical
law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanying
discrepancy model to account for the inevitable mismatch between theory and
measurements. By revisiting the classic problem of modeling falling objects of
different size and mass, we highlight a number of nuanced issues that must be
addressed by modern data-driven methods for automated physics discovery.
Specifically, we show that measurement noise and complex secondary physical
mechanisms, like unsteady fluid drag forces, can obscure the underlying law of
gravitation, leading to an erroneous model. We use the sparse identification of
nonlinear dynamics (SINDy) method to identify governing equations for
real-world measurement data and simulated trajectories. Incorporating into
SINDy the assumption that each falling object is governed by a similar physical
law is shown to improve the robustness of the learned models, but discrepancies
between the predictions and observations persist due to subtleties in drag
dynamics. This work highlights the fact that the naive application of ML/AI
will generally be insufficient to infer universal physical laws without further
modification.
