  It is feasible and practically-valuable to bridge the characteristics between
graph neural networks (GNNs) and logical reasoning. Despite considerable
efforts and successes witnessed to solve Boolean satisfiability (SAT), it
remains a mystery of GNN-based solvers for more complex predicate logic
formulae. In this work, we conjectures with some evidences, that
generally-defined GNNs present several limitations to certify the
unsatisfiability (UNSAT) in Boolean formulae. It implies that GNNs may probably
fail in learning the logical reasoning tasks if they contain proving UNSAT as
the sub-problem included by most predicate logic formulae.
