  Our Bayesian approach to Mendelian Randomisation uses multiple instruments to
assess the putative causal effect of an exposure on an outcome. The approach is
robust to violations of the (untestable) Exclusion Restriction condition, and
hence it does not require instruments to be independent of the outcome
conditional on the exposure and on the confounders of the exposure-outcome
relationship. The Bayesian approach offers a rigorous handling of the
uncertainty (e.g. about the estimated instrument-exposure associations),
freedom from asymptotic approximations of the null distribution and the
possibility to elaborate the model in any direction of scientific relevance. We
illustrate the last feature with the aid of a study of the metabolic mediators
of the disease-inducing effects of obesity, where we elaborate the model to
investigate whether the causal effect of interest interacts with a covariate.
The proposed model contains a vector of unidentifiable parameters, $\beta$,
whose $j$th element represents the pleiotropic (i.e., not mediated by the
exposure) component of the association of instrument $j$ with the outcome. We
deal with the incomplete identifiability by assuming that the pleiotropic
effect of some instruments is null, or nearly so, formally by imposing on
$\beta$ Carvalho's horseshoe shrinkage prior, in such a way that different
components of $\beta$ are subjected to different degrees of shrinking,
adaptively and in accord with the compatibility of each individual instrument
with the hypothesis of no pleiotropy. This prior requires a minimal input from
the user. We present the results of a simulation study into the performance of
the proposed method under different types of pleiotropy and sample sizes.
Comparisons with the performance of the weighted median estimator are made.
Choice of the prior and inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo are discussed.
