  Inspired by the flashing ratchet, Parrondo's game presents an apparently
paradoxical situation. Parrondo's game consists of two individual games, game A
and game B. Game A is a slightly losing coin-tossing game. Game B has two
coins, with an integer parameter $M$. If the current cumulative capital (in
discrete unit) is a multiple of $M$, an unfavorable coin $p_b$ is used,
otherwise a favorable $p_g$ coin is used. Paradoxically, combination of game A
and game B could lead to a winning game, which is the Parrondo effect. We
extend the original Parrondo's game to include the possibility of $M$ being
either $M_1$ or $M_2$. Also, we distinguish between strong Parrondo effect,
i.e. two losing games combine to form a winning game, and weak Parrondo effect,
i.e. two games combine to form a better-performing game. We find that when
$M_2$ is not a multiple of $M_1$, the combination of $B(M_1)$ and $B(M_2)$ has
strong and weak Parrondo effect for some subsets in the parameter space
$(p_b,p_g)$, while there is neither strong nor weak effect when $M_2$ is a
multiple of $M_1$. Furthermore, when $M_2$ is not a multiple of $M_1$,
stochastic mixture of game A may cancel the strong and weak Parrondo effect.
Following a discretization scheme in the literature of Parrondo's game, we
establish a link between our extended Parrondo's game with the analysis of
discrete Brownian ratchet. We find a relation between the Parrondo effect of
our extended model to the macroscopic bias in a discrete ratchet. The slope of
a ratchet potential can be mapped to the fair game condition in the extended
model, so that under some conditions, the macroscopic bias in a discrete
ratchet can provide a good predictor for the game performance of the extended
model. On the other hand, our extended model suggests a design of a ratchet in
which the potential is a mixture of two periodic potentials.
