  The sociality of cattle facilitates the maintenance of herd cohesion and
synchronisation, making these species the ideal choice for domestication as
livestock for humans. However, livestock populations are not self-regulated,
and farmers transfer individuals across different groups throughout their lives
for reasons such as genetic mixing, reproduction and pastureland management.
Individuals consequently have to adapt to different group compositions during
their lives rather than choose their own herd mates, as they would do in the
wild. These changes may lead to social instability and stress, entailing
potentially negative effects on animal welfare. In this study, we assess how
the transfer of Highland cattle (Bos taurus) impacts individual and group
social network measures. Four groups with nine different compositions and 18
individual transfers were studied to evaluate 1) the effect of group
composition on individual social centralities and 2) the effect of group
composition changes on these centralities. As shown in previous works, dyadic
associations are stronger between individuals with similar age and dominance
rank. This study reveals that the relative stability of dyadic spatial
relationships between changes in group composition or enclosure is due to the
identities of transferred individuals more than the quantity of individuals
that are transferred. Older cattle had higher network centralities than other
individuals. The centrality of individuals was also affected by their sex and
the number of familiar individuals in the group. This study reveals the
necessity of understanding the social structure of a group to predict social
instability following the transfer of individuals between groups. The
developing of guidelines for the modification of group composition could
improve livestock management and reduce stress for the animals concerned.
