  Research suggests that exposure to the natural environment can improve mood,
however, current reviews are limited in scope and there is little understanding
of moderators. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive systematic review and
meta-analysis of the evidence for the effect of short-term exposure to the
natural environment on depressive mood. Five databases were systematically
searched for relevant studies published up to March 2018. Risk of bias was
evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool 1.0 and the Risk of Bias
in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool where appropriate.
The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of evidence overall. A
random-effects meta-analysis was performed. 20 potential moderators of the
effect size were coded and the machine learning-based MetaForest algorithm was
used to identify relevant moderators. These were then entered into a
meta-regression. 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Effect sizes ranged
from -2.30 to 0.84, with a pooled effect size of $\gamma$ = -0.30 95% CI [-0.50
to -0.10]. However, there was significant residual heterogeneity between
studies and risk of bias was high. Type of natural environment, type of built
environment, gender mix of the sample, and region of study origin, among
others, were identified as relevant moderators but were not significant when
entered in a meta-regression. Quality of evidence was rated very low to low. An
assessment of publication bias was inconclusive. A small effect was found for
reduction in depressive mood following exposure to the natural environment.
However, the high risk of bias and low quality of studies limits confidence in
the results. The variation in effect size also remains largely unexplained. It
is recommended that future studies make use of reporting guidelines and aim to
reduce the potential for bias where possible.
