  Quality-Diversity optimisation (QD) has proven to yield promising results
across a broad set of applications. However, QD approaches struggle in the
presence of uncertainty in the environment, as it impacts their ability to
quantify the true performance and novelty of solutions. This problem has been
highlighted multiple times independently in previous literature. In this work,
we propose to uniformise the view on this problem through four main
contributions. First, we formalise a common framework for uncertain domains:
the Uncertain QD setting, a special case of QD in which fitness and descriptors
for each solution are no longer fixed values but distribution over possible
values. Second, we propose a new methodology to evaluate Uncertain QD
approaches, relying on a new per-generation sampling budget and a set of
existing and new metrics specifically designed for Uncertain QD. Third, we
propose three new Uncertain QD algorithms: Archive-sampling,
Parallel-Adaptive-sampling and Deep-Grid-sampling. We propose these approaches
taking into account recent advances in the QD community toward the use of
hardware acceleration that enable large numbers of parallel evaluations and
make sampling an affordable approach to uncertainty. Our final and fourth
contribution is to use this new framework and the associated comparison methods
to benchmark existing and novel approaches. We demonstrate once again the
limitation of MAP-Elites in uncertain domains and highlight the performance of
the existing Deep-Grid approach, and of our new algorithms. The goal of this
framework and methods is to become an instrumental benchmark for future works
considering Uncertain QD.
