  We analyze the relation between strategy-proofness and preference reversal in
the case that agents may declare indifference. Interestingly, Berga and Moreno
(2020), have recently derived preference reversal from group strategy-proofness
of social choice functions on strict preferences domains if the range has no
more than three elements. We extend this result and at the same time simplify
it. Our analysis points out the role of individual strategy-proofness in
deriving the preference reversal property, giving back to the latter its
original individual nature (cfr. Eliaz, 2004).
  Moreover, we show that the difficulties Berga and Moreno highlighted relaxing
the assumption on the cardinality of the range, disappear under a proper
assumption on the domain. We introduce the concept of complete sets of
preferences and show that individual strategy-proofness is sufficient to obtain
the preference reversal property when the agents' feasible set of orderings is
complete. This covers interesting cases like single peaked preferences, rich
domains admitting regular social choice functions, and universal domains. The
fact that we use individual rather than group strategy-proofness, allows to get
immediately some of the known, and some new, equivalences between individual
and group strategy-proofness. Finally, we show that group strategy-proofness is
only really needed to obtain preference reversal if there are infinitely many
voters.
