  Online Social Networks represent a novel opportunity for political campaigns,
revolutionising the paradigm of political communication. Nevertheless, many
studies uncovered the presence of d/misinformation campaigns or of malicious
activities by genuine or automated users, putting at severe risk the
credibility of online platforms. This phenomenon is particularly evident during
crucial political events, as political elections. In the present paper, we
provide a comprehensive description of the structure of the networks of
interactions among users and bots during the UK elections of 2019. In
particular, we focus on the polarised discussion about Brexit on Twitter
analysing a data set made of more than 10 million tweets posted for over a
month. We found that the presence of automated accounts fostered the debate
particularly in the days before the UK national elections, in which we find a
steep increase of bots in the discussion; in the days after the election day,
their incidence returned to values similar to the ones observed few weeks
before the elections. On the other hand, we found that the number of suspended
users (i.e. accounts that were removed by the platform for some violation of
the Twitter policy) remained constant until the election day, after which it
reached significantly higher values. Remarkably, after the TV debate between
Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn, we observed the injection of a large number of
novel bots whose behaviour is markedly different from that of pre-existing
ones. Finally, we explored the bots' stance, finding that their activity is
spread across the whole political spectrum, although in different proportions,
and we studied the different usage of hashtags by automated accounts and
suspended users, thus targeting the formation of common narratives in different
sides of the debate.
