  Thanks to the widespread availability of large-scale datasets on scholarly
outputs, science itself has come under the microscope with the aim of capturing
a quantitative understanding of its workings. In this study, we leverage
well-established cognitive models coming from anthropology in order to
characterise the personal network of collaborations between scientists, i.e.,
the network considered from the standpoint of each individual researcher
(referred to as ego network), in terms of the cognitive investment they devote
to the different collaborations. Building upon these models, we study the
interplay between the structure of academic collaborations, academic
performance, and academic mobility at different career stages. We take into
account both purely academic mobility (i.e., the number of affiliation changes)
and geographical mobility (i.e., physical relocations to different countries).
For our investigation, we rely on a dataset comprising the geo-referenced
publications of a group of 81,500 authors extracted from Scopus, one of the
biggest repositories of academic knowledge. Our main finding is that there is a
clear correlation between the structure of co-authorship ego networks and
academic performance indices: the more one publishes and the higher their
impact, the larger their collaboration network. However, we observe a capacity
bound effect, whereby, beyond a certain point, higher performances become
increasingly less correlated with large collaboration networks. We also find
that international academic migrants are better at growing their networks than
researchers that only migrate within the same country, but the latter seem to
be better in exploiting their collaboration to achieve higher impact. High
academic mobility does not appear to translate into better academic performance
or larger collaboration networks.
