  Asteroid mining has been proposed as an approach to complement Earth-based
supplies of rare earth metals and supplying resources in space, such as water.
Existing research on asteroid mining has mainly looked into its economic
viability, technological feasibility, cartography of asteroids, and legal
aspects. More recently, potential environmental benefits for asteroid mining
have been considered. However, no quantitative estimate of these benefits has
been given. This paper attempts to determine if and under which conditions
asteroid mining would have environmental benefits, compared to either
Earth-based mining or launching equipment and resources into space. We focus on
two cases: Water supply to cis-lunar orbit and platinum mining. First, we
conduct a state-of-the-art of current environmental life cycle assessment for
the space domain and platinum mining. Second, a first order environmental life
cycle assessment is conducted, including goal and scope definition, inventory
analysis, and impact assessment. We compare water supply to cis-lunar orbit
with and without asteroid mining and go on to compare terrestrial with
space-based platinum mining. The results indicate that asteroid water mining
would have environmental benefits, as soon as the amount of water supplied via
mining is larger than the mass of the spacecraft used for mining. For platinum
mining, we find that by comparing the operations phase of terrestrial and space
mining, space mining would have a lower environmental impact, if the spacecraft
is able to return between 0.3 to 7% of its mass in platinum to Earth, assuming
100% primary platinum or 100% secondary platinum, respectively. For future
work, we propose a more detailed analysis, based on a more precise inventory
and a larger system boundary, including the production of the launcher and
spacecraft.
