  We propose a distributionally robust formulation of the traditional risk
parity portfolio optimization problem. Distributional robustness is introduced
by targeting the discrete probabilities attached to each observation used
during parameter estimation. Instead of assuming that all observations are
equally likely, we consider an ambiguity set that provides us with the
flexibility to find the most adversarial probability distribution based on the
investor's desired degree of robustness. This allows us to derive robust
estimates to parametrize the distribution of asset returns without having to
impose any particular structure on the data. The resulting distributionally
robust optimization problem is a constrained convex-concave minimax problem.
Our approach is financially meaningful and attempts to attain full risk
diversification with respect to the worst-case instance of the portfolio risk
measure. We propose a novel algorithmic approach to solve this minimax problem,
which blends projected gradient ascent with sequential convex programming. By
design, this algorithm is highly flexible and allows the user to choose among
alternative statistical distance measures to define the ambiguity set.
Moreover, the algorithm is highly tractable and scalable. Our numerical
experiments suggest that a distributionally robust risk parity portfolio can
yield a higher risk-adjusted rate of return when compared against the nominal
portfolio.
