  The chromatic number, which refers to the minimum number of colours required
to colour the vertices of graphs properly, is one of the most central notions
of the graph chromatic theory. Several of its aspects of interest have been
investigated in the literature, including variants for modifications of proper
colourings. These variants include, notably, the achromatic number of graphs,
which is the maximum number of colours required to colour the vertices of
graphs properly so that each possible combination of distinct colours is
assigned along some edge. The behaviours of this parameter have led to many
investigations of interest, bringing to light both similarities and
discrepancies with the chromatic number. This work takes place in a recent
trend aiming at extending the chromatic theory of graphs to the realm of signed
graphs, and, in particular, at investigating how classic results adapt to the
signed context. Most of the works done in that line to date are with respect to
two main generalisations of proper colourings of signed graphs, attributed to
Zaslavsky and Guenin. Generalising the achromatic number to signed graphs was
initiated recently by Lajou, his investigations being related to Guenin's
colourings. We here pursue this line of research, but with taking Zaslavsky's
colourings as our notion of proper colourings. We study the general behaviour
of our resulting variant of the achromatic number, mainly by investigating how
known results on the classic achromatic number generalise to our context. Our
results cover, notably, bounds, standard operations on graphs, and complexity
aspects.
