  According to current models, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are produced when the
energy carried by a relativistic outflow is dissipated and converted into
radiation. The efficiency of this process, $\epsilon_\gamma$, is one of the
critical factors in any GRB model. The X-ray afterglow light curves of Swift
GRBs show an early stage of flat decay. This has been interpreted as reflecting
energy injection. When combined with previous estimates, which have concluded
that the kinetic energy of the late ($\gtrsim 10$ hr) afterglow is comparable
to the energy emitted in gamma-rays, this interpretation implies very high
values of $\epsilon_\gamma \gtrsim 0.9$. Such a high efficiency is hard to
reconcile with most models, including in particular the popular internal-shocks
model. We re-analyze the derivation of the kinetic energy from the afterglow
X-ray flux and re-examine the resulting estimates of the efficiency. We confirm
that, if the flatt decay arises from energy injection and the pre-Swift
broad-band estimates of the kinetic energy are correct, then $\epsilon_\gamma
\gtrsim 0.9$. We point out, however, that another interpretation of the
flattish decay - a variable X-ray afterglow efficiency (e.g., due to a time
dependence of afterglow shock microphysical parameters) - is possible. We also
show that direct estimates of the kinetic energy from the late X-ray afterglow
flux are sensitive to the assumed values of the shock microphysical parameters
and suggest that broad-band afterglow fits might have underestimated the
kinetic energy (e.g., by overestimating the fraction of electrons that are
accelerated to relativistic energies). Either one of these possibilities
implies a lower gamma-ray efficiency, and their joint effect could conceivably
reduce the estimate of the typical $\epsilon_\gamma$ to $\sim 0.1-0.5$.
