  Using an extremely large number of processing elements in computing systems
leads to unexpected phenomena, such as different efficiencies of the same
system for different tasks, that cannot be explained in the frame of classical
computing paradigm. The simple non-technical (but considering the temporal
behavior of the components) model, introduced here, enables us to set up a
frame and formalism, needed to explain those unexpected experiences around
supercomputing. Introducing temporal behavior into computer science also
explains why only the extreme scale computing enabled us to reveal the
experienced limitations. The paper shows, that degradation of efficiency of
parallelized sequential systems is a natural consequence of the classical
computing paradigm, instead of being an engineering imperfectness. The
workload, that supercomputers run, is much responsible for wasting energy, as
well as limiting the size and type of tasks. Case studies provide insight, how
different contributions compete for dominating the resulting payload
performance of a computing system, and how enhancing the interconnection
technology made computing+communication to dominate in defining the efficiency
of supercomputers. Our model also enables to derive predictions about
supercomputer performance limitations for the near future, as well as it
provides hints for enhancing supercomputer components. Phenomena experienced in
large-scale computing show interesting parallels with phenomena experienced in
science, more than a century ago, and through their studying a modern science
was developed.
