  This paper studies a variation of the continuous-time mean-variance portfolio
selection where a tracking-error penalization is added to the mean-variance
criterion. The tracking error term penalizes the distance between the
allocation controls and a reference portfolio with same wealth and fixed
weights. Such consideration is motivated as follows: (i) On the one hand, it is
a way to robustify the mean-variance allocation in case of misspecified
parameters, by "fitting" it to a reference portfolio that can be agnostic to
market parameters; (ii) On the other hand, it is a procedure to track a
benchmark and improve the Sharpe ratio of the resulting portfolio by
considering a mean-variance criterion in the objective function. This problem
is formulated as a McKean-Vlasov control problem. We provide explicit solutions
for the optimal portfolio strategy and asymptotic expansions of the portfolio
strategy and efficient frontier for small values of the tracking error
parameter. Finally, we compare the Sharpe ratios obtained by the standard
mean-variance allocation and the penalized one for four different reference
portfolios: equal-weights, minimum-variance, equal risk contributions and
shrinking portfolio. This comparison is done on a simulated misspecified model,
and on a backtest performed with historical data. Our results show that in most
cases, the penalized portfolio outperforms in terms of Sharpe ratio both the
standard mean-variance and the reference portfolio.
