  Biological systems with many components often exhibit seemingly critical
behaviors, characterized by atypically large correlated fluctuations. Yet the
underlying causes remain unclear. Here we define and examine two types of
criticality. Intrinsic criticality arises from interactions within the system
which are fine-tuned to a critical point. Extrinsic criticality, in contrast,
emerges without fine tuning when observable degrees of freedom are coupled to
unobserved fluctuating variables. We unify both types of criticality using the
language of learning and information theory. We show that critical
correlations, intrinsic or extrinsic, lead to diverging mutual information
between two halves of the system, and are a feature of learning problems, in
which the unobserved fluctuations are inferred from the observable degrees of
freedom. We argue that extrinsic criticality is equivalent to standard
inference, whereas intrinsic criticality describes fractional learning, in
which the amount to be learned depends on the system size. We show further that
both types of criticality are on the same continuum, connected by a smooth
crossover. In addition, we investigate the observability of Zipf's law, a
power-law rank-frequency distribution often used as an empirical signature of
criticality. We find that Zipf's law is a robust feature of extrinsic
criticality but can be nontrivial to observe for some intrinsically critical
systems, including critical mean-field models. We further demonstrate that
models with global dynamics, such as oscillatory models, can produce observable
Zipf's law without relying on either external fluctuations or fine tuning. Our
findings suggest that while possible in theory, fine tuning is not the only,
nor the most likely, explanation for the apparent ubiquity of criticality in
biological systems with many components.
