  Empirical studies on food expenditure are largely based on cross-section data
and for a few studies based on longitudinal (or panel) data the focus has been
on the conditional mean. While the former, by construction, cannot model the
dependencies between observations across time, the latter cannot look at the
relationship between food expenditure and covariates (such as income,
education, etc.) at lower (or upper) quantiles, which are of interest to
policymakers. This paper analyzes expenditures on total food (TF), food at home
(FAH), and food away from home (FAFH) using mean regression and quantile
regression models for longitudinal data to examine the impact of economic
recession and various demographic, socioeconomic, and geographic factors. The
data is taken from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) and comprises of
2174 families in the United States (US) observed between 2001-2015. Results
indicate that age and education of the head, family income, female headed
family, marital status, and economic recession are important determinants for
all three types of food expenditure. Spouse education, family size, and some
regional indicators are important for expenditures on TF and FAH, but not for
FAFH. Quantile analysis reveals considerable heterogeneity in the covariate
effects for all types of food expenditure, which cannot be captured by models
focused on conditional mean. The study ends by showing that modeling
conditional dependence between observations across time for the same family
unit is crucial to reducing/avoiding heterogeneity bias and better model
fitting.
