  With the recent advances in A.I. methodologies and their application to
medical imaging, there has been an explosion of related research programs
utilizing these techniques to produce state-of-the-art classification
performance. Ultimately, these research programs culminate in submission of
their work for consideration in peer reviewed journals. To date, the criteria
for acceptance vs. rejection is often subjective; however, reproducible science
requires reproducible review. The Machine Learning Education Sub-Committee of
SIIM has identified a knowledge gap and a serious need to establish guidelines
for reviewing these studies. Although there have been several recent papers
with this goal, this present work is written from the machine learning
practitioners standpoint. In this series, the committee will address the best
practices to be followed in an A.I.-based study and present the required
sections in terms of examples and discussion of what should be included to make
the studies cohesive, reproducible, accurate, and self-contained. This first
entry in the series focuses on the task of image classification. Elements such
as dataset curation, data pre-processing steps, defining an appropriate
reference standard, data partitioning, model architecture and training are
discussed. The sections are presented as they would be detailed in a typical
manuscript, with content describing the necessary information that should be
included to make sure the study is of sufficient quality to be considered for
publication. The goal of this series is to provide resources to not only help
improve the review process for A.I.-based medical imaging papers, but to
facilitate a standard for the information that is presented within all
components of the research study. We hope to provide quantitative metrics in
what otherwise may be a qualitative review process.
