  Digital contact tracing and analysis of social distancing from smartphone
location data are two prime examples of non-therapeutic interventions used in
many countries to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. While many
understand the importance of trading personal privacy for the public good,
others have been alarmed at the potential for surveillance via measures enabled
through location tracking on smartphones. In our research, we analyzed massive
yet atomic individual-level location data containing over 22 billion records
from ten Blue (Democratic) and ten Red (Republican) cities in the U.S., based
on which we present, herein, some of the first evidence of how Americans
responded to the increasing concerns that government authorities, the private
sector, and public health experts might use individual-level location data to
track the COVID-19 spread. First, we found a significant decreasing trend of
mobile-app location-sharing opt-out. Whereas areas with more Democrats were
more privacy-concerned than areas with more Republicans before the advent of
the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a significant decrease in the overall opt-out
rates after COVID-19, and this effect was more salient among Democratic than
Republican cities. Second, people who practiced social distancing (i.e., those
who traveled less and interacted with fewer close contacts during the pandemic)
were also less likely to opt-out, whereas the converse was true for people who
practiced less social-distancing. This relationship also was more salient among
Democratic than Republican cities. Third, high-income populations and males,
compared with low-income populations and females, were more
privacy-conscientious and more likely to opt-out of location tracking.
