  Background: The speed and precision with which objects are moved by hand or
hand-tool interaction under image guidance depend on a specific type of visual
and spatial sensorimotor learning. Novices have to learn to optimally control
what their hands are doing in a real-world environment while looking at an
image representation of the scene on a video monitor. Previous research has
shown slower task execution times and lower performance scores under
image-guidance compared with situations of direct action viewing. The cognitive
processes for overcoming this drawback by training are not yet understood.
Methods: We investigated the effects of training on the time and precision of
direct view versus image guided object positioning on targets of a Real-world
Action Field (RAF). Two men and two women had to learn to perform the task as
swiftly and as precisely as possible with their dominant hand, using a tool or
not and wearing a glove or not. Individuals were trained in sessions of mixed
trial blocks with no feed-back. Results: As predicted, image-guidance produced
significantly slower times and lesser precision in all trainees and
sessionscompared with direct viewing. With training, all trainees get faster in
all conditions, but only one of them gets reliably more precise in the
image-guided conditions. Speed-accuracy trade-offs in the individual
performance data show that the highest precision scores and steepest learning
curve, for time and precision, were produced by the slowest
starter.Conclusions: Performance evolution towards optimal precision is
compromised when novices start by going as fast as they can. The findings have
direct implications for individual skill monitoring in training programmes for
image-guided technology applications with human operators.
