  Given that measuring food consumption at a population scale is a challenging
task, researchers have begun to explore digital traces (e.g., from social media
or from food-tracking applications) as potential proxies. However, it remains
unclear to what extent digital traces reflect real food consumption. The
present study aims to bridge this gap by quantifying the link between dietary
behaviors as captured via social media (Twitter) v.s. a food-tracking
application (MyFoodRepo). We focus on the case of Switzerland and contrast
images of foods collected through the two platforms, by designing and deploying
a novel crowdsourcing framework for estimating biases with respect to
nutritional properties and appearance. We find that the food type distributions
in social media v.s. food tracking diverge; e.g., bread is 2.5 times more
frequent among consumed and tracked foods than on Twitter, whereas cake is 12
times more frequent on Twitter. Controlling for the different food type
distributions, we contrast consumed and tracked foods of a given type with
foods shared on Twitter. Across food types, food posted on Twitter is perceived
as tastier, more caloric, less healthy, less likely to have been consumed at
home, more complex, and larger-portioned, compared to consumed and tracked
foods. The fact that there is a divergence between food consumption as measured
via the two platforms implies that at least one of the two is not a faithful
representation of the true food consumption in the general Swiss population.
Thus, researchers should be attentive and aim to establish evidence of validity
before using digital traces as a proxy for the true food consumption of a
general population. We conclude by discussing the potential sources of these
biases and their implications, outlining pitfalls and threats to validity, and
proposing actionable ways for overcoming them.
