  Taking a decision in democratic social groups is based on the opinion of the
majority or on the consensus. So, the study of opinion dynamics is of great
interest in analyzing social phenomena. Among the different models of opinion
dynamics, bounded confidence models have been studied in different contexts and
shown interesting dynamics [1-3]. In [E. Kurmyshev, H.A. Ju\'arez, and R.A.
Gonz\'alez-Silva, Phys. A 390, 16 (2011)] we proposed a new bounded confidence
model and studied the self-formation of opinion in heterogeneous societies
composed by agents of two psychological types, concord (C-) and partial
antagonism (PA-) agents. In this work we study the influence of "leaders" on
the clustering of opinions. Mixed C/PA-societies along with the pure C- and
PA-society are studied. The influence of the leader's connectivity in the
network, his toughness or tolerance and his opinion on the opinion dynamics is
studied as a function of the initial opinion uncertainty (tolerance) of the
population. Numerical results obtained with leaders at low, high and average
tolerance show complex bifurcation patterns of the group opinion; a decrease or
even the total lost of control of the leader over the society is observed in
different intervals of tolerance of agents in the case of C/PA-societies. We
found that in the C-society a leader showing high opinion tolerance has more
control over the population. In the PA-society a leader changes the bifurcation
pattern of group opinion in a drastic and unexpected way, contrary to the
common sense, and generates stronger polarization in the opposite opinion
groups; the connectivity of the leader is an important factor that usually
improves the adhesion of agents to the leader's opinion. A low tolerance
(authoritarian) leader has greater control over a PA-society than that of a
high tolerance (democratic) one; the opposite result is obtained in the
C-society.
