  How much risk, and what types of risk, is the Universities Superannuation
Scheme (USS) taking? This is a critical question for universities across the UK
and many of their employees. Will the fund have enough money to pay for all our
pensions? Will it run out? Or is there a significant risk that we are
collectively overpaying? In September 2021, David Miles and James Sefton, from
Imperial College Business School, stepped into this vacuum, publishing 'How
much risk is the USS taking?'. The paper presents important, accessible and
highly readable analysis which estimates how likely the USS is to default over
time. Their work is particularly relevant to the current UCU dispute with 69
employers over the benefit cuts that Universities UK (UUK) is planning to
implement on the basis of the 2020 USS valuation. In this Brief, we assess the
assumptions, replicate the results, explore further their model and consider
potential extensions. We demonstrate that for a cautious model with reasonable
assumptions for assets and asset growth, the fund has a less than 7% chance of
defaulting for the duration that pensions promises are due, but a greater than
80% chance of being over funded by at least {\pounds}100bn, and nearly 50%
chance of having over {\pounds}400bn. We offer warm thanks to David Miles and
James Sefton for sharing their code and data, for their helpful conversations
and clarification. Their analysis is infinitely clearer, better and more
credible than anything the USS has produced. We hope this paper will be the
beginning of more work in this area. All errors are our own.
