  Structural reliability analysis is concerned with estimation of the
probability of a critical event taking place, described by $P(g(\textbf{X})
\leq 0)$ for some $n$-dimensional random variable $\textbf{X}$ and some
real-valued function $g$. In many applications the function $g$ is practically
unknown, as function evaluation involves time consuming numerical simulation or
some other form of experiment that is expensive to perform. The problem we
address in this paper is how to optimally design experiments, in a Bayesian
decision theoretic fashion, when the goal is to estimate the probability
$P(g(\textbf{X}) \leq 0)$ using a minimal amount of resources. As opposed to
existing methods that have been proposed for this purpose, we consider a
general structural reliability model given in hierarchical form. We therefore
introduce a general formulation of the experimental design problem, where we
distinguish between the uncertainty related to the random variable $\textbf{X}$
and any additional epistemic uncertainty that we want to reduce through
experimentation. The effectiveness of a design strategy is evaluated through a
measure of residual uncertainty, and efficient approximation of this quantity
is crucial if we want to apply algorithms that search for an optimal strategy.
The method we propose is based on importance sampling combined with the
unscented transform for epistemic uncertainty propagation. We implement this
for the myopic (one-step look ahead) alternative, and demonstrate the
effectiveness through a series of numerical experiments.
