  A seller wants to sell an item to n buyers. Buyer valuations are drawn i.i.d.
from a distribution unknown to the seller; the seller only knows that the
support is included in [a, b]. To be robust, the seller chooses a DSIC
mechanism that optimizes the worst-case performance relative to the first-best
benchmark. Our analysis unifies the regret and the ratio objectives.
  For these objectives, we derive an optimal mechanism and the corresponding
performance in quasi-closed form, as a function of the support information and
the number of buyers n. Our analysis reveals three regimes of support
information and a new class of robust mechanisms. i.) With "low" support
information, the optimal mechanism is a second-price auction (SPA) with random
reserve, a focal class in earlier literature. ii.) With "high" support
information, SPAs are strictly suboptimal, and an optimal mechanism belongs to
a class of mechanisms we introduce, which we call pooling auctions (POOL);
whenever the highest value is above a threshold, the mechanism still allocates
to the highest bidder, but otherwise the mechanism allocates to a uniformly
random buyer, i.e., pools low types. iii.) With "moderate" support information,
a randomization between SPA and POOL is optimal.
  We also characterize optimal mechanisms within nested central subclasses of
mechanisms: standard mechanisms that only allocate to the highest bidder, SPA
with random reserve, and SPA with no reserve. We show strict separations in
terms of performance across classes, implying that deviating from standard
mechanisms is necessary for robustness.
