  The Taylor hypothesis which allows surrogating spatial measurements requiring
many experimental probes by time series from one or two probes is examined on
the basis of a simple analytic model of turbulent statistics. The main points
are as follows: (i) The Taylor hypothesis introduces systematic errors in the
evaluation of scaling exponents. (ii) When the mean wind $\bar{V}_0$ is not
infinitely larger than the root-mean-square longitudinal turbulent fluctuations
$v_T$, the effective Taylor advection velocity $V_{ad}$ should take the latter
into account.
  (iii) When two or more probes are employed the application of the Taylor
hypothesis and the optimal choice of the effective advecting wind $V_{ad}$ need
extra care. We present practical considerations for minimizing the errors
incurred in experiments using one or two probes. (iv) Analysis of the Taylor
hypothesis when different probes experience different mean winds is offered.
