  Given a sequence $S$ of length $n$, a letter-duplicated subsequence is a
subsequence of $S$ in the form of $x_1^{d_1}x_2^{d_2}\cdots x_k^{d_k}$ with
$x_i\in\Sigma$, $x_j\neq x_{j+1}$ and $d_i\geq 2$ for all $i$ in $[k]$ and $j$
in $[k-1]$. A linear time algorithm for computing the longest letter-duplicated
subsequence (LLDS) of $S$ can be easily obtained. In this paper, we focus on
two variants of this problem. We first consider the constrained version when
$\Sigma$ is unbounded, each letter appears in $S$ at least 6 times and all the
letters in $\Sigma$ must appear in the solution. We show that the problem is
NP-hard (a further twist indicates that the problem does not admit any
polynomial time approximation). The reduction is from possibly the simplest
version of SAT that is NP-complete, $(\leq 2,1,\leq 3)$-SAT, where each
variable appears at most twice positively and exact once negatively, and each
clause contains at most three literals and some clauses must contain exactly
two literals. (We hope that this technique will serve as a general tool to help
us proving the NP-hardness for some more tricky sequence problems involving
only one sequence -- much harder than with at least two input sequences, which
we apply successfully at the end of the paper on some extra variations of the
LLDS problem.) We then show that when each letter appears in $S$ at most 3
times, then the problem admits a factor $1.5-O(\frac{1}{n})$ approximation.
Finally, we consider the weighted version, where the weight of a block
$x_i^{d_i} (d_i\geq 2)$ could be any positive function which might not grow
with $d_i$. We give a non-trivial $O(n^2)$ time dynamic programming algorithm
for this version, i.e., computing an LD-subsequence of $S$ whose weight is
maximized.
