  The benefits of investments in sustainability are often public goods that
accrue at broad scales and to many people. Urban forests exemplify this; trees
supply ecosystem service benefits from local (in the case of shade) to global
(in the case of carbon sequestration) scales. The complex mosaic of public and
private ownership that typically defines an urban forest makes the public goods
problem of investing in forest sustainability especially acute. This results in
incentives for private tree owners to invest in tree care that typically fall
short of those of a public forest manager aiming for the social optimum. The
management of a forest pest, such as emerald ash borer, provides a salient
focus area because pests threaten the provision of public goods from urban
forests and pest management generates feedback that alters pest spread and
shapes future risks. We study how managers can design policies to address
forest pest outbreaks and achieve uniform management across a mosaic of
ownership types. We develop a game theoretic model to derive optimal subsidies
for the treatment of forests pests and evaluate the efficacy of these policies
in mitigating the spread of forest pests with a dynamic epidemiological model.
Our results suggest that a combination of optimal treatment subsidies for
privately owned trees and targeted treatment of public trees can be far more
effective at reducing pest-induced tree mortality than either approach in
isolation. While we focus on the management of urban forests, designing
programs that align private and public incentives for investment in public
goods could advance sustainability in a wide range of systems.
