  Cardiovascular diseases are among the most important causes of global
mortality. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is a powerful research tool that
analyzes the hemodynamics of artery and blood flow patterns. In this study, CFD
simulations are performed to assess the patient-specific healthy aorta,
fusiform, and saccular aneurysm with various mesh types, including tetrahedral,
polyhedral, and poly-hexacore. The aim of this study is to explore how
different mesh types and grid densities impact the hemodynamic properties of
physiological flows, with the goal of identifying the most cost-effective
meshing approach. A mesh independence study is carried out to ensure the
precision of the results, considering the wall shear stress distribution. For
this, five different mesh resolutions are generated for each geometry. The
uncertainties of the simulations associated with the discretization techniques
and solutions are evaluated using the Grid Convergence Index (GCI) method. The
findings showed that increasing the mesh density provides smaller uncertainty.
GCI values for the wall shear stress are in the range of convergence,
indicating that the results are reliable and accurate. Mesh type selection
affects the accuracy and computational cost of our simulations. The polyhedral
and poly-hexacore meshes lead to a good compromise between precision and
computational cost, while the tetrahedral mesh style gives the most precise
results with fluctuation. This work provides a systematic approach based on the
Grid Convergence Index method in order to select the most appropriate mesh type
for evaluating uncertainties in CFD simulations of patient-specific healthy
aortas and aortas with abdominal aneurysms. According to the findings and GCI
analysis, the polyhedral mesh type was chosen for all patient-specific aorta
models. The study clearly demonstrated its superiority over other mesh types,
...
