  While service-dominant logic proposes that all "Goods are a distribution
mechanism for service provision" (FP3), there is a need to understand when and
why a firm would utilise direct or indirect (goods) service provision, and the
interactions between them, to co-create value with the customer. Three
longitudinal case studies in B2B equipment-based 'complex service' systems were
analysed to gain an understanding of customers' co-creation activities to
achieve outcomes. We found the nature of value, degree of contextual variety
and the firm's legacy viability to be viability threats. To counter this, the
firm uses (a) Direct Service Provision for Scalability and Replicability, (b)
Indirect Service Provision for variety absorption and co-creating emotional
value and customer experience and (c) designing direct and indirect provision
for Scalability and Absorptive Resources of the customer. The co-creation of
complex multidimensional value could be delivered through different value
propositions of the firm. The research proposes a value-centric way of
understanding the interactions between direct and indirect service provision in
the design of the firm's value proposition and proposes a viable systems
approach towards reorganising the firm. The study provides a way for managers
to understand the effectiveness (rather than efficiency) of the firm in
co-creating value as a major issue in the design of complex socio-technical
systems. Goods are often designed within the domain of engineering and product
design, often placing human activity as a supporting role to the equipment.
Through an SDLogic lens, this study considers the design of both equipment and
human activity on an equal footing for value co-creation with the customer, and
it yielded interesting results on when direct provisioning (goods) should be
redesigned, considering all activities equally.
