  In this paper, we contrast parametric and semi-parametric representations of
unobserved heterogeneity in hierarchical Bayesian multinomial logit models and
leverage these methods to infer distributions of willingness to pay for
features of shared automated vehicle (SAV) services. Specifically, we compare
the multivariate normal (MVN), finite mixture of normals (F-MON) and Dirichlet
process mixture of normals (DP-MON) mixing distributions. The latter promises
to be particularly flexible in respect to the shapes it can assume and unlike
other semi-parametric approaches does not require that its complexity is fixed
prior to estimation. However, its properties relative to simpler mixing
distributions are not well understood. In this paper, we evaluate the
performance of the MVN, F-MON and DP-MON mixing distributions using simulated
data and real data sourced from a stated choice study on preferences for SAV
services in New York City. Our analysis shows that the DP-MON mixing
distribution provides superior fit to the data and performs at least as well as
the competing methods at out-of-sample prediction. The DP-MON mixing
distribution also offers substantive behavioural insights into the adoption of
SAVs. We find that preferences for in-vehicle travel time by SAV with
ride-splitting are strongly polarised. Whereas one third of the sample is
willing to pay between 10 and 80 USD/h to avoid sharing a vehicle with
strangers, the remainder of the sample is either indifferent to ride-splitting
or even desires it. Moreover, we estimate that new technologies such as vehicle
automation and electrification are relatively unimportant to travellers. This
suggests that travellers may primarily derive indirect, rather than immediate
benefits from these new technologies through increases in operational
efficiency and lower operating costs.
