  Robotic minimally invasive interventions typically require using more than
two instruments. We thus developed a foot pedal interface which allows the user
to control a robotic arm (simultaneously to working with the hands) with four
degrees of freedom in continuous directions and speeds. This paper evaluates
and compares the performances of ten naive operators in using this new pedal
interface and a traditional button interface in completing tasks. These tasks
are geometrically complex path-following tasks similar to those in laparoscopic
training, and the traditional button interface allows axis-by-axis control with
constant speeds. Precision, time, and smoothness of the subjects' control
movements for these tasks are analysed. The results demonstrate that the pedal
interface can be used to control a robot for complex motion tasks. The subjects
kept the average error rate at a low level of around 2.6% with both interfaces,
but the pedal interface resulted in about 30% faster operation speed and 60%
smoother movement, which indicates improved efficiency and user experience as
compared with the button interface. The results of a questionnaire show that
the operators found that controlling the robot with the pedal interface was
more intuitive, comfortable, and less tiring than using the button interface.
