  Uncertainty quantification for Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) is critical
for comparing flow fields with Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) results, and
model design and validation. However, PIV features a complex measurement chain
with coupled, non-linear error sources, and quantifying the uncertainty is
challenging. Multiple assessments show that none of the current methods can
reliably measure the actual uncertainty across a wide range of experiments.
Because the current methods differ in assumptions regarding the measurement
process and calculation procedures, it is not clear which method is best to use
for an experiment. To address this issue, we propose a method to estimate an
uncertainty method's sensitivity and reliability, termed the Meta-Uncertainty.
The novel approach is automated, local, and instantaneous, and based on
perturbation of the recorded particle images. We developed an image
perturbation scheme based on adding random unmatched particles to the
interrogation window pair considering the signal-to-noise (SNR) of the
correlation plane. Each uncertainty scheme's response to several trials of
random particle addition is used to estimate a reliability metric, defined as
the rate of change of the inter-quartile range (IQR) of the uncertainties with
increasing levels of particle addition. We also propose applying the
meta-uncertainty as a weighting metric to combine uncertainty estimates from
individual schemes, based on ideas from the consensus forecasting literature.
We use PIV measurements across a range of canonical flows to assess the
performance of the uncertainty schemes.The results show that the combined
uncertainty method outperforms the individual methods, and establish the
meta-uncertainty as a useful reliability assessment tool for PIV uncertainty
quantification.
