  Waveform cross correlation is an efficient tool for detection and
characterization of seismic signals. The efficiency critically depends on the
availability of master events. For the purposes of the Comprehensive
Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, cross correlation can globally reduce the threshold
monitoring by 0.3 to 0.4 magnitude units. In seismically active regions, the
optimal choice of master events is straightforward. There are two approaches to
populate the global grid in aseismic areas: the replication of real masters and
synthetic seismograms calculated for seismic arrays of the International
Monitoring System. Synthetic templates depend on the accuracy of shape and
amplitude predictions controlled by focal depth and mechanism, source function,
velocity structure and attenuation along the master/station path. As in Part I,
we test three focal mechanisms (explosion, thrust fault, and actual Harvard CMT
solution for one of the April 11, 2012 Sumatera aftershocks) and two velocity
structures (ak135 and CRUST 2.0). Sixteen synthetic master events were
distributed over a 1ox1o grid. We built five cross correlation standard event
lists (XSEL) and compared detections and events with those built using the real
and grand master events as well as with the Reviewed Event Bulletin of the
International Data Centre. The XSELs built using the source of explosion and
ak135 and the reverse fault with isotropic radiation pattern demonstrate the
performance similar to that of the real and grand masters. Therefore, it is
possible to cover all aseismic areas with synthetic masters without significant
loss in seismic monitoring capabilities based on cross correlation.
