  We consider an insurance company whose surplus is represented by the
classical Cramer-Lundberg process. The company can invest its surplus in a risk
free asset and in a risky asset, governed by the Black-Scholes equation. There
is a constraint that the insurance company can only invest in the risky asset
at a limited leveraging level; more precisely, when purchasing, the ratio of
the investment amount in the risky asset to the surplus level is no more than
a; and when shortselling, the proportion of the proceeds from the short-selling
to the surplus level is no more than b. The objective is to find an optimal
investment policy that minimizes the probability of ruin. The minimal ruin
probability as a function of the initial surplus is characterized by a
classical solution to the corresponding Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation.
We study the optimal control policy and its properties. The interrelation
between the parameters of the model plays a crucial role in the qualitative
behavior of the optimal policy. E.g., for some ratios between a and b, quite
unusual and at first ostensibly counterintuitive policies may appear, like
short-selling a stock with a higher rate of return to earn lower interest, or
borrowing at a higher rate to invest in a stock with lower rate of return. This
is in sharp contrast with the unrestricted case, first studied in Hipp and Plum
(2000), or with the case of no shortselling and no borrowing studied in Azcue
and Muler (2009).
