  This work evaluates the potential root causes of fatigue using a
biomathematical model and a robust sample of aircrew rosters from the Brazilian
regular aviation. The fatigue outcomes derive from the software Sleep,
Activity, Fatigue, and Task Effectiveness Fatigue Avoidance Scheduling Tool
(SAFTE-FAST). The average minimum SAFTE-FAST effectiveness during critical
phases of flight decreases cubically with the number of shifts that elapse
totally or partially between mid-night and 6 a.m. within a 30-day period
($N_{NS}$). As a consequence, the relative fatigue risk increases by 23.3% (95%
CI, 20.4-26.2%) when increasing $N_{NS}$ from 1 to 13. The average maximum
equivalent wakefulness in critical phases also increases cubically with the
number of night shifts and exceeds 24 hours for rosters with $N_{NS}$ above 10.
The average fatigue hazard area in critical phases of flight varies
quadratically with the number of departures and landings within 2 and 6 a.m.
($N_{Wocl}$). These findings demonstrate that both $N_{NS}$ and $ N_{Wocl}$
should be considered as key performance indicators and be kept as low as
reasonably practical when building aircrew rosters. The effectiveness scores at
30 minute time intervals allowed a model estimate for the relative fatigue risk
as a function of the time of the day, whose averaged values show reasonable
qualitative agreement with previous measurements of pilot errors. Tailored
analyses of the SAFTE-FAST inputs for afternoon naps before night shifts,
commuting from home to station and vice-versa, and bedtime before early-start
shifts show relevant group effects ($p < 0.001$) comparing the groups with and
without afternoon naps, with one or two hours of commuting and with or without
the advanced bedtime feature of the SAFTE-FAST software, evidencing the need of
a better and more accurate understanding of these parameters when modelling
fatigue risk factors.
