  Assessing the costs of climate change is essential to finding efficient
pathways for the transition to a net-zero emissions economy, which is necessary
to stabilise global temperatures at any level. In evaluating the benefits and
costs of climate change mitigation, the discount rate converting future damages
and costs into net-present values influences the timing of mitigation.
  Here, we amend the DICE model with a stochastic interest rate model to
consider the uncertainty of discount rates in the future. Since abatement
reduces future damages, changing interest rates renders abatement investments
more or less beneficial. Stochastic interest rates will hence lead to a
stochastic abatement strategy.
  We introduce a simple stochastic abatement model and show that this can
increase intergenerational inequality concerning cost and risk.
  Analysing the sensitivities of the model calibration analytically and
numerically exhibits that intergenerational inequality is a consequence of the
DICE model calibration (and maybe that of IAMs in general).
  We then show that introducing funding of abatement costs reduces the
variation of future cash-flows, which occur at different times but are
off-setting in their net-present value. This effect can be interpreted as
improving intergenerational effort sharing, which might be neglected in
classical optimisation. This mechanism is amplified, including dependence of
the interest rate risk on the amount of debt to be financed, i.e. considering
the limited capacity of funding sources. As an alternative policy optimisation
method, we propose limiting the total cost of damages and abatement below a
fixed level relative to GDP - this modification induces equality between
generations compared to their respective economic welfare, inducing early and
fast mitigation of climate change to keep the total cost of climate change
below 3% of global GDP.
