  Some organism-specific databases about regulation in bacteria have become
larger, accelerated by high-throughput methodologies, while others are no
longer updated or accessible. Each database homogenize its datasets, giving
rise to heterogeneity across databases. Such heterogeneity mainly encompasses
different names for a gene and different network representations, generating
duplicated interactions that could bias network analyses. Abasy
(Across-bacteria systems) Atlas consolidates information from different sources
into meta-curated regulatory networks in bacteria. The high-quality networks in
Abasy Atlas enable cross-organisms analyses, such as benchmarking studies where
gold standards are required. Nevertheless, network incompleteness still casts
doubts on the conclusions of network analyses, and available sampling methods
cannot reflect the curation process. To tackle this problem, the updated
version of Abasy Atlas presented in this work provides historical snapshots of
regulatory networks. Thus, network analyses can be performed at different
completeness levels, making possible to identify potential bias and to predict
future results. We leverage the recently found constraint in the complexity of
regulatory networks to develop a novel model to quantify the total number of
regulatory interactions as a function of the genome size. This completeness
estimation is a valuable insight that may aid in the daunting task of network
curation, prediction, and validation. The new version of Abasy Atlas provides
76 networks (204,282 regulatory interactions) covering 42 bacteria (64%
Gram-positive and 36% Gram-negative) distributed in 9 species, containing 8,459
regulons and 4,335 modules.
