  Using institutional economic theory as our guiding framework, we develop a
model to describe how populist discourse by a nation's political leader
influences entrepreneurship. We hypothesize that populist discourse reduces
entrepreneurship by creating regime uncertainty concerning the future stability
of the institutional environment, resulting in entrepreneurs anticipating
higher future transaction costs. Our model highlights two important factors
that moderate the relationship. First, is the strength of political checks and
balances, which we hypothesize weakens the negative relationship between
populist discourse and entrepreneurship by providing entrepreneurs with greater
confidence that the actions of a populist will be constrained. Second, the
political ideology of the leader moderates the relationship between populist
discourse and entrepreneurship. The anti-capitalistic rhetoric of left-wing
populism will create greater regime uncertainty than right-wing populism, which
is often accompanied by rhetoric critical of free trade and foreigners but also
supportive of business interests. The effect of centrist populism, which is
accompanied by a mix of contradictory and often moderate ideas that make it
difficult to discern future transaction costs, will have a weaker negative
effect on entrepreneurship than either left-wing or right-wing populism. We
empirically test our model using a multi-level design and a dataset comprised
of more than 780,000 individuals in 33 countries over the period 2002-2016. Our
analysis largely supports our theory regarding the moderating role of ideology.
Still, surprisingly, our findings suggest that the negative effect of populism
on entrepreneurship is greater in nations with stronger checks and balances.
