  In this paper, we address one of the main puzzles in finance observed in the
stock market by proponents of behavioral finance: the stock predictability
puzzle. We offer a statistical model within the context of rational finance
which can be used without relying on behavioral finance assumptions to model
the predictability of stock returns. We incorporate the predictability of stock
returns into the well-known Black-Scholes option pricing formula. Empirically,
we analyze the option and spot trader's market predictability of stock prices
by defining a forward-looking measure which we call "implied excess
predictability". The empirical results indicate the effect of option trader's
predictability of stock returns on the price of stock options is an increasing
function of moneyness, while this effect is decreasing for spot traders. These
empirical results indicate potential asymmetric predictability of stock prices
by spot and option traders. We show in pricing options with the strike price
significantly higher or lower than the stock price, the predictability of the
underlying stock's return should be incorporated into the option pricing
formula. In pricing options that have moneyness close to one, stock return
predictability is not incorporated into the option pricing model because stock
return predictability is the same for both types of traders. In other words,
spot traders and option traders are equally informed about the future value of
the stock market in this case. Comparing different volatility measures, we find
that the difference between implied and realized variances or variance risk
premium can potentially be used as a stock return predictor.
