  Discovery program (DISC) is a policy used by the New York City Department of
Education (NYC DOE) to increase the number of admissions of students from low
socio-economic background to specialized high schools. This policy has been
instrumental in increasing the number of disadvantaged students attending these
schools. However, assuming that students care more about the school they are
assigned to rather than the type of seat they occupy (\emph{school-over-seat
hypothesis}), our empirical analysis using data from 12 recent academic years
shows that DISC creates about 950 in-group blocking pairs each year amongst
disadvantaged students, impacting about 650 disadvantaged students every year.
Moreover, we find that this program does not respect improvements, thus
unintentionally creating an incentive to under-perform. These experimental
results are confirmed by our theoretical analysis.
  In order to alleviate the concerns caused by DISC, we explore two alternative
policies: the minority reserve (MR) and the joint-seat allocation (JSA)
mechanisms. As our main theoretical contribution, we introduce a feature of
markets, that we term high competitiveness, and we show that under this
condition, JSA dominates MR for all disadvantaged students. We give sufficient
conditions under which high competitiveness is verified. Data from NYC DOE
satisfies the high competitiveness condition, and for this dataset our
empirical results corroborate our theoretical predictions, showing the
superiority of JSA. Given that JSA can be implemented by a simple modification
of the classical deferred acceptance algorithm with responsive preference
lists, we believe that, when the school-over-seat hypothesis holds, the
discovery program can be changed for the better by implementing the JSA
mechanism, leading in particular to aligned incentives for the top-performing
disadvantaged students.
