  The time-varying reproduction number $R(t)$ measures the number of new
infections per infectious individual and is closely correlated with the time
series of infection incidence by definition. The timings of actual infections
are rarely known, and analysis of epidemics usually relies on time series data
for other outcomes such as symptom onset. A common implicit assumption, when
estimating $R(t)$ from an epidemic time series, is that $R(t)$ has the same
relationship with these downstream outcomes as it does with the time series of
incidence. However, this assumption is unlikely to be valid given that most
epidemic time series are not perfect proxies of incidence. Rather they
represent convolutions of incidence with uncertain delay distributions. Here we
define the apparent time-varying reproduction number, $R_A(t)$, the
reproduction number calculated from a downstream epidemic time series and
demonstrate how differences between $R_A(t)$ and $R(t)$ depend on the
convolution function. The mean of the convolution function sets a time offset
between the two signals, whilst the variance of the convolution function
introduces a relative distortion between them. We present the convolution
functions of epidemic time series that were available during the SARS-CoV-2
pandemic. Infection prevalence, measured by random sampling studies, presents
fewer biases than other epidemic time series. Here we show that additionally
the mean and variance of its convolution function were similar to that obtained
from traditional surveillance based on mass-testing and could be reduced using
more frequent testing, or by using stricter thresholds for positivity.
Infection prevalence studies continue to be a versatile tool for tracking the
temporal trends of $R(t)$, and with additional refinements to their study
protocol, will be of even greater utility during any future epidemics or
pandemics.
