  Whether at phenomenological or microscopic levels, most theoretical
approaches to charge transport through molecular junctions postulate or attempt
to justify microscopically the existence of a dominant molecular orbital (MO).
Within such single level descriptions, experimental current-voltage I-V curves
are sometimes/often analyzed by using analytical formulas expressing the
current as a cubic expansion in terms of the applied voltage V, and relate
possible V-driven shifts of the level energy offset relative to the metallic
Fermi energy \varepsilon_{0} to an asymmetry of molecule-electrode couplings or
to an asymmetric location of the "center of gravity" of the MO with respect to
electrodes. In this paper, we present results demonstrating the failure of
these intuitive expectations. For example, we show how typical data processing
based on cubic expansions yields a value of \varepsilon_0 underestimated by a
typical factor of about two. When compared to theoretical results of DFT
approaches, which typically underestimate the HOMO-LUMO gap by a similar
factor, this may create the false impression of "agreement" with experiments in
situations where this is actually not the case. Further, such cubic expansions
yield model parameter values dependent on the bias range width employed for
fitting, which is unacceptable physically. Finally, we present an example
demonstrating that, counter-intuitively, the bias-induced change in the energy
of an MO located much closer to an electrode can occur in a direction that is
opposite to the change in the Fermi energy of that electrode. This is contrary
to what one expects based on a "lever rule" argument, according to which the MO
"feels" the local value of the electric potential, which is assumed to vary
linearly across the junction and is closer to the potential of the closer
electrode.
