  What is the difference between a long-lived unstable (or quasi-stable)
multiple star system and a bona fide star cluster? In this paper, we present a
possible framework to address this question, by studying the distributions of
disruption times for chaotic gravitational encounters as a function of the
number of interacting particles. To this end, we perform a series of numerical
scattering experiments with the \texttt{FEWBODY} code, to calculate the
distributions of disruption times as a function of both the particle number N
and the virial coefficient k. The subsequent distributions are fit with a
physically-motivated function, consisting of an initial exponential decay
followed by a very slowly decreasing tail at long encounter times due to
long-lived quasi-stable encounters. We find three primary features
characteristic of the calculated distributions of disruption times. These are:
(1) the system half-life increases with increasing particle number, (2) the
fraction of long-lived quasi-stable encounters increases with increasing
particle number and (3) both the system half-life and the fraction of
quasi-stable encounters increase with decreasing virial coefficient. We discuss
the significance of our results for collisional dynamics, and consider the
extrapolation of our results to larger-N systems. We suggest that this could
potentially offer a clear and unambiguous distinction between star clusters and
(unstable or quasi-stable) multiple star systems. Although we are limited by
very small-number statistics, our results tentatively suggest that (for our
assumptions) this transition occurs at a critical particle number of order 100.
