  Understanding effects of ionisation in the lower atmosphere is a new
interdisciplinary area, crossing traditionally distinct scientific boundaries.
Following the paper of Erlykin et al. (Astropart. Phys. 57--58 (2014) 26--29)
we develop the interpretation of observed changes in long-wave (LW) radiation
(Aplin and Lockwood, Env. Res. Letts. 8, 015026 (2013)), by taking account of
cosmic ray ionisation yields and atmospheric radiative transfer. To demonstrate
this, we show that the thermal structure of the whole atmosphere needs to be
considered along with the vertical profile of ionisation. Allowing for
ionisation by all components of a cosmic ray shower and not just by the muons,
reveals that the effect we have detected is certainly not inconsistent with
laboratory observations of the LW absorption cross section. The analysis
presented here, although very different from that of Erlykin et al., does come
to the same conclusion that the events detected were not caused by individual
cosmic ray primaries -- not because it is impossible on energetic grounds, but
because events of the required energy are too infrequent for the 12/hr rate at
which they were seen by the AL experiment. The present paper numerically models
the effect of three different scenario changes to the primary GCR spectrum
which all reproduce the required magnitude of the observed effect. However,
they cannot solely explain the observed delay in the peak effect which, if
confirmed, would appear to open up a whole new and interesting area in the
study of water oligomers and their effects on LW radiation. We argue that a
technical artefact in the earlier experiment is highly unlikely and that our
initial observations merit both follow-up experiments and more rigorous,
self-consistent, three-dimensional radiative transfer modelling.
