  I highlight the remarkable advances in the past few years in CMB research on
total primary anisotropies, in determining the power spectrum, deriving
cosmological parameters from it, and more generally lending credence to the
basic inflation-based paradigm for cosmic structure formation, with a flat
geometry, substantial dark matter and dark energy, baryonic density in good
accord with that from nucleosynthesis, and a nearly scale invariant initial
fluctuation spectrum. Some parameters are nearly degenerate with others and CMB
polarization and many non-CMB probes are needed to determine them, even within
the paradigm. Such probes and their tools were the theme of the TAW8 meeting:
our grand future of CMB polarization, with AMiBA, ACBAR, B2K2, CBI, COMPASS,
CUPMAP, DASI, MAP, MAXIPOL, PIQUE, Planck, POLAR, Polatron, QUEST,
Sport/BaRSport, and of Sunyaev-Zeldovich experiments, also using an array of
platforms and detectors, e.g. AMiBA, AMI (Ryle+), CBI, CARMA (OVROmm+BIMA),
MINT, SZA, BOLOCAM+CSO, LMT, ACT. The SZ probe will be informed and augmented
by new ambitious attacks on other cluster-system observables discussed at TAW8:
X-ray, optical, weak lensing. Interpreting the mix is complicated by such
issues as entropy injection, inhomogeneity, non-sphericity, non-equilibrium,
and these effects must be sorted out for the cluster system to contribute to
``high precision cosmology'', especially the quintessential physics of the dark
energy that adds further mystery to a dark matter dominated Universe. We will
have to address ``Is it cluster evolution or is it cosmology?''. The answer
will be both, but we can be optimistic that, with the huge data influx,
computational power increase, and talented people joining the adventure, we can
handle both observationally, theoretically and phenomenologically.
