  We consider a platform facilitating trade between sellers and buyers with the
objective of maximizing consumer surplus. Even though in many such marketplaces
prices are set by revenue-maximizing sellers, platforms can influence prices
through (i) price-dependent promotion policies that can increase demand for a
product by featuring it in a prominent position on the webpage and (ii) the
information revealed to sellers about the value of being promoted. Identifying
effective joint information design and promotion policies is a challenging
dynamic problem as sellers can sequentially learn the promotion value from
sales observations and update prices accordingly. We introduce the notion of
confounding promotion policies, which are designed to prevent a Bayesian seller
from learning the promotion value (at the expense of the short-run loss of
diverting some consumers from the best product offering). Leveraging these
policies, we characterize the maximum long-run average consumer surplus that is
achievable through joint information design and promotion policies when the
seller sets prices myopically. We then construct a Bayesian Nash equilibrium in
which the seller's best response to the platform's optimal policy is to price
myopically in every period. Moreover, the equilibrium we identify is
platform-optimal within the class of horizon-maximin equilibria, in which
strategies are not predicated on precise knowledge of the horizon length, and
are designed to maximize payoff over the worst-case horizon. Our analysis
allows one to identify practical long-run average optimal platform policies in
a broad range of demand models.
