  Purpose: In digital histopathology, virtual multi-staining is important for
diagnosis and biomarker research. Additionally, it provides accurate
ground-truth for various deep-learning tasks. Virtual multi-staining can be
obtained using different stains for consecutive sections or by re-staining the
same section. Both approaches require image registration to compensate tissue
deformations, but little attention has been devoted to comparing their
accuracy.
  Approach: We compare variational image registration of consecutive and
re-stained sections and analyze the effect of the image resolution which
influences accuracy and required computational resources. We present a new
hybrid dataset of re-stained and consecutive sections (HyReCo, 81 slide pairs,
approx. 3000 landmarks) that we made publicly available and compare its image
registration results to the automatic non-rigid histological image registration
(ANHIR) challenge data (230 consecutive slide pairs).
  Results: We obtain a median landmark error after registration of 7.1 {\mu}m
(HyReCo) and 16.0 {\mu}m (ANHIR) between consecutive sections. Between
re-stained sections, the median registration error is 2.3 {\mu}m and 0.9 {\mu}m
in the two subsets of the HyReCo dataset. We observe that deformable
registration leads to lower landmark errors than affine registration in both
cases, though the effect is smaller in re-stained sections. Conclusion:
Deformable registration of consecutive and re-stained sections is a valuable
tool for the joint analysis of different stains.
  Significance: While the registration of re-stained sections allows
nucleus-level alignment which allows for a direct analysis of interacting
biomarkers, consecutive sections only allow the transfer of region-level
annotations. The latter can be achieved at low computational cost using coarser
image resolutions.
