  This work aims at carving out more clearly the basic assumptions behind the
"track-event theory" (TET) and its derivate radiation action model based on
nanodosimetry (RAMN) by clearly distinguishing between effects of tracks at the
cellular level and the induction of lesions in subcellular targets. It is
demonstrated that the model assumptions of Poisson distribution and statistical
independence of the frequency of single and clustered DNA lesions are
dispensable for multi-event distributions, because they follow from the Poisson
distribution of the number of tracks affecting the considered target volume. It
is also shown that making these assumptions for the single-event distributions
of the number of lethal and sublethal lesions within a cell would lead to an
essentially exponential dose dependence of survival for practically relevant
values of the absorbed dose. Furthermore, it is elucidated that the model
equation used in the literature for consideration of repair within the TET is
based on the assumption that DNA lesions induced by different tracks are
repaired independently and that the model equation is presumably inconsistent
with the model assumptions and requires an additional model parameter.
Furthermore, the methodology for deriving model parameters from nanodosimetric
properties of particle track structure is critically assessed. Based on data
from proton track simulations it is shown that the assumption of statistically
independent targets leads to a prediction of negligible frequency of clustered
DNA damage. An approach is outlined how track structure could be considered in
determining the model parameters, and the implications for TET and RAMN are
discussed.
