  An important step of modeling spatially-referenced data is appropriately
specifying the second order properties of the random field. A scientist
developing a model for spatial data has a number of options regarding the
nature of the dependence between observations. One of these options is deciding
whether or not the dependence between observations depends on direction, or, in
other words, whether or not the spatial covariance function is isotropic.
Isotropy implies that spatial dependence is a function of only the distance and
not the direction of the spatial separation between sampling locations. A
researcher may use graphical techniques, such as directional sample
semivariograms, to determine whether an assumption of isotropy holds. These
graphical diagnostics can be difficult to assess, subject to personal
interpretation, and potentially misleading as they typically do not include a
measure of uncertainty. In order to escape these issues, a hypothesis test of
the assumption of isotropy may be more desirable. To avoid specification of the
covariance function, a number of nonparametric tests of isotropy have been
developed using both the spatial and spectral representations of random fields.
Several of these nonparametric tests are implemented in the R package spTest,
available on CRAN. We demonstrate how graphical techniques and the hypothesis
tests programmed in spTest can be used in practice to assess isotropy
properties.
