  In its simplest form, the competitive exclusion principle states that a
number of species competing for a smaller number of resources cannot coexist.
However, it has been observed empirically that in some settings it is possible
to have coexistence. One example is Hutchinson's `paradox of the plankton'.
This is an instance where a large number of phytoplankton species coexist while
competing for a very limited number of resources. Both experimental and
theoretical studies have shown that temporal fluctuations of the environment
can facilitate coexistence for competing species. Hutchinson conjectured that
one can get coexistence because nonequilibrium conditions would make it
possible for different species to be favored by the environment at different
times.
  In this paper we show in various settings how a variable (stochastic)
environment enables a set of competing species limited by a smaller number of
resources or other density dependent factors to coexist. If the environmental
fluctuations are modeled by white noise, and the per-capita growth rates of the
competitors depend linearly on the resources, we prove that there is
competitive exclusion. However, if either the dependence between the growth
rates and the resources is not linear or the white noise term is nonlinear we
show that coexistence on fewer resources than species is possible. Even more
surprisingly, if the temporal environmental variation comes from switching the
environment at random times between a finite number of possible states, it is
possible for all species to coexist even if the growth rates depend linearly on
the resources. We show in an example (a variant of which first appeared in
Benaim and Lobry '16) that, contrary to Hutchinson's explanation, one can
switch between two environments in which the same species is favored and still
get coexistence.
