  Essential genes constitute the core of genes which cannot be mutated too much
nor lost along the evolutionary history of a species. Natural selection is
expected to be stricter on essential genes and on conserved (highly shared)
genes, than on genes that are either nonessential or peculiar to a single or a
few species. In order to further assess this expectation, we study here how
essentiality of a gene is connected with its degree of conservation among
several unrelated bacterial species, each one characterised by its own codon
usage bias. Confirming previous results on E. coli, we show the existence of a
universal exponential relation between gene essentiality and conservation in
bacteria. Moreover we show that, within each bacterial genome, there are at
least two groups of functionally distinct genes, characterised by different
levels of conservation and codon bias: i) a core of essential genes, mainly
related to cellular information processing; ii) a set of less conserved
nonessential genes with prevalent functions related to metabolism. In
particular, the genes in the first group are more retained among species, are
subject to a stronger purifying conservative selection and display a more
limited repertoire of synonymous codons. The core of essential genes is close
to the minimal bacterial genome, which is in the focus of recent studies in
synthetic biology, though we confirm that orthologs of genes that are essential
in one species are not necessarily essential in other species. We also list a
set of highly shared genes which, reasonably, could constitute a reservoir of
targets for new anti-microbial drugs.
