  The recent social unrest across the Middle East and North Africa has deposed
dictators who had ruled for decades. While the events have been hailed as an
"Arab Spring" by those who hope that repressive autocracies will be replaced by
democracies, what sort of regimes will eventually emerge from the crisis
remains far from certain. Here we provide a complex systems framework,
validated by historical precedent, to help answer this question. We describe
the dynamics of governmental change as an evolutionary process similar to
biological evolution, in which complex organizations gradually arise by
replication, variation and competitive selection. Different kinds of
governments, however, have differing levels of complexity. Democracies must be
more systemically complex than autocracies because of their need to incorporate
large numbers of people in decision-making. This difference has important
implications for the relative robustness of democratic and autocratic
governments after revolutions. Revolutions may disrupt existing evolved
complexity, limiting the potential for building more complex structures
quickly. Insofar as systemic complexity is reduced by revolution, democracy is
harder to create in the wake of unrest than autocracy. Applying this analysis
to the Middle East and North Africa, we infer that in the absence of stable
institutions or external assistance, new governments are in danger of facing
increasingly insurmountable challenges and reverting to autocracy.
