  We consider joint optimization of artificial noise (AN) and information
signals in a MIMO wiretap interference network, wherein the transmission of
each link may be overheard by several MIMO-capable eavesdroppers. Each
information signal is accompanied with AN, generated by the same user to
confuse nearby eavesdroppers. Using a noncooperative game, a distributed
optimization mechanism is proposed to maximize the secrecy rate of each link.
The decision variables here are the covariance matrices for the information
signals and ANs. However, the nonconvexity of each link's optimization problem
(i.e., best response) makes conventional convex games inapplicable, even to
find whether a Nash Equilibrium (NE) exists. To tackle this issue, we analyze
the proposed game using a relaxed equilibrium concept, called quasi-Nash
equilibrium (QNE). Under a constraint qualification condition for each player's
problem, the set of QNEs includes the NE of the proposed game. We also derive
the conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the resulting QNE. It turns
out that the uniqueness conditions are too restrictive, and do not always hold
in typical network scenarios. Thus, the proposed game often has multiple QNEs,
and convergence to a QNE is not always guaranteed. To overcome these issues, we
modify the utility functions of the players by adding several specific terms to
each utility function. The modified game converges to a QNE even when multiple
QNEs exist. Furthermore, players have the ability to select a desired QNE that
optimizes a given social objective (e.g., sum-rate or secrecy sum-rate).
Depending on the chosen objective, the amount of signaling overhead as well as
the performance of resulting QNE can be controlled. Simulations show that due
to the QNE selection mechanism, we can achieve a significant improvement in
terms of secrecy sum-rate and power efficiency.
