  We show that, under a standard hardness assumption, there is no
computationally efficient algorithm that given $n$ samples from an unknown
distribution can give valid answers to $n^{3+o(1)}$ adaptively chosen
statistical queries. A statistical query asks for the expectation of a
predicate over the underlying distribution, and an answer to a statistical
query is valid if it is "close" to the correct expectation over the
distribution.
  Our result stands in stark contrast to the well known fact that exponentially
many statistical queries can be answered validly and efficiently if the queries
are chosen non-adaptively (no query may depend on the answers to previous
queries). Moreover, a recent work by Dwork et al. shows how to accurately
answer exponentially many adaptively chosen statistical queries via a
computationally inefficient algorithm; and how to answer a quadratic number of
adaptive queries via a computationally efficient algorithm. The latter result
implies that our result is tight up to a linear factor in $n.$
  Conceptually, our result demonstrates that achieving statistical validity
alone can be a source of computational intractability in adaptive settings. For
example, in the modern large collaborative research environment, data analysts
typically choose a particular approach based on previous findings. False
discovery occurs if a research finding is supported by the data but not by the
underlying distribution. While the study of preventing false discovery in
Statistics is decades old, to the best of our knowledge our result is the first
to demonstrate a computational barrier. In particular, our result suggests that
the perceived difficulty of preventing false discovery in today's collaborative
research environment may be inherent.
