  In recent decades, there has been a major shift towards improved digital
access to scholarly works. However, even now that these works are available in
digital form, they remain document-based, making it difficult to communicate
the knowledge they contain. The next logical step is to extend these works with
more flexible, fine-grained, semantic, and context-sensitive representations of
scholarly knowledge. The Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) is a platform
that structures and interlinks scholarly knowledge, relying on crowdsourced
contributions from researchers (as a crowd) to acquire, curate, publish, and
process this knowledge. In this experience report, we consider the ORKG in the
context of Crowd-based Requirements Engineering (CrowdRE) from two
perspectives: (1) As CrowdRE researchers, we investigate how the ORKG
practically applies CrowdRE techniques to involve scholars in its development
to make it align better with their academic work. We determined that the ORKG
readily provides social and financial incentives, feedback elicitation
channels, and support for context and usage monitoring, but that there is
improvement potential regarding automated user feedback analyses and a holistic
CrowdRE approach. (2) As crowd members, we explore how the ORKG can be used to
communicate scholarly knowledge about CrowdRE research. For this purpose, we
curated qualitative and quantitative scholarly knowledge in the ORKG based on
papers contained in two previously published systematic literature reviews
(SLRs) on CrowdRE. This knowledge can be explored and compared interactively,
and with more data than what the SLRs originally contained. Therefore, the ORKG
improves access and communication of the scholarly knowledge about CrowdRE
research. For both perspectives, we found the ORKG to be a useful multi-tool
for CrowdRE research.
