  Tweets are the most concise form of communication in online social media,
wherein a single tweet has the potential to make or break the discourse of the
conversation. Online hate speech is more accessible than ever, and stifling its
propagation is of utmost importance for social media companies and users for
congenial communication. Most of the research barring a recent few has focused
on classifying an individual tweet regardless of the tweet thread/context
leading up to that point. One of the classical approaches to curb hate speech
is to adopt a reactive strategy after the hate speech postage. The ex-post
facto strategy results in neglecting subtle posts that do not show the
potential to instigate hate speech on their own but may portend in the
subsequent discussion ensuing in the post's replies. In this paper, we propose
DRAGNET++, which aims to predict the intensity of hatred that a tweet can bring
in through its reply chain in the future. It uses the semantic and propagating
structure of the tweet threads to maximize the contextual information leading
up to and the fall of hate intensity at each subsequent tweet. We explore three
publicly available Twitter datasets -- Anti-Racism contains the reply tweets of
a collection of social media discourse on racist remarks during US political
and Covid-19 background; Anti-Social presents a dataset of 40 million tweets
amidst the COVID-19 pandemic on anti-social behaviours; and Anti-Asian presents
Twitter datasets collated based on anti-Asian behaviours during COVID-19
pandemic. All the curated datasets consist of structural graph information of
the Tweet threads. We show that DRAGNET++ outperforms all the state-of-the-art
baselines significantly. It beats the best baseline by an 11% margin on the
Person correlation coefficient and a decrease of 25% on RMSE for the
Anti-Racism dataset with a similar performance on the other two datasets.
