  The influence of forest loss on rainfall remains poorly understood.
Addressing this challenge Spracklen et al. recently presented a pan-tropical
study of rainfall and land-cover that showed that satellite-derived rainfall
measures were positively correlated with the degree to which model-derived air
trajectories had been exposed to forest cover. This result confirms the
influence of vegetation on regional rainfall patterns suggested in previous
studies. However, we find that the conclusion of Spracklen et al. -- that
differences in rainfall reflect air moisture content resulting from
evapotranspiration while the circulation pattern remains unchanged -- appears
undermined by methodological inconsistencies. We identify methodological
problems with the underlying analyses and the quantitative estimates for
rainfall change predicted if forest cover is lost in the Amazon. We discuss
some alternative explanations that include the distinct role of forest
evapotranspiration in creating low pressure systems that draw moisture from the
oceans to the continental hinterland. Our analysis of meteorological data from
three regions in Brazil, including the central Amazon forest, reveal a tendency
for rainy days during the wet season with column water vapor (CWV) exceeding 50
mm to have higher pressure than rainless days; while at lower CWV rainy days
tend to have lower pressure than rainless days. The coupling between
atmospheric moisture content and circulation dynamics underlines that the
danger posed by forest loss is greater than suggested by focusing only on
moisture recycling alone.
