  Obtaining in-depth understanding of the relationships between the additive
manufacturing (AM) process, microstructure and mechanical properties is crucial
to overcome barriers in AM. In this study, database of metal AM was created
thanks to many literature studies. Subsequently meta-analyses on the data was
undertaken to provide insights into whether such relationships are well
reflected in the literature data. The analyses help reveal the bias and what
the data tells us, and to what extent machine learning (ML) can learn from the
data. The first major bias is associated with common practices in identifying
the process based on optimizing the consolidation. Most reports were for
consolidation while data on microstructure and mechanical properties was
significantly less. In addition, only high consolidation values was provided,
so ML was not able to learn the full spectrum of the process - consolidation
relationship. The common identification of process maps based on only
consolidation also poses another bias as mechanical properties that ultimately
govern the quality of an AM build are controlled not only by the consolidation,
but also microstructure. Meta-analysis of the literature data also shows weak
correlation between process with consolidation and mechanical properties. This
weak correlation is attributed to the stated biases and the non-monotonic and
non-linear relationships between the process and quality variables.
Fortunately, trained ML models capture well the influence and interactions
between process parameters and quality variables, and predicts accurately the
yield stress, suggesting that the correlation between process, microstructure
and yield strength is well reflected in the data. Lastly, due to the current
limitation in the process map identification, we propose to identify the
process map based on not only the consolidation, but also mechanical
properties.
