  Decision maker's preferences are often captured by some choice functions
which are used to rank prospects. In this paper, we consider ambiguity in
choice functions over a multi-attribute prospect space. Our main result is a
robust preference model where the optimal decision is based on the worst-case
choice function from an ambiguity set constructed through preference
elicitation with pairwise comparisons of prospects. Differing from existing
works in the area, our focus is on quasi-concave choice functions rather than
concave functions and this enables us to cover a wide range of utility/risk
preference problems including multi-attribute expected utility and $S$-shaped
aspirational risk preferences. The robust choice function is increasing and
quasi-concave but not necessarily translation invariant, a key property of
monetary risk measures. We propose two approaches based respectively on the
support functions and level functions of quasi-concave functions to develop
tractable formulations of the maximin preference robust optimization model. The
former gives rise to a mixed integer linear programming problem whereas the
latter is equivalent to solving a sequence of convex risk minimization
problems. To assess the effectiveness of the proposed robust preference
optimization model and numerical schemes, we apply them to a security budget
allocation problem and report some preliminary results from experiments.
