  With the recognized crisis of credibility in scientific research, there is a
growth of reproducibility studies in computer science, and although existing
surveys have reviewed reproducibility from various perspectives, especially
very specific technological issues, they do not address the author-publisher
relationship in the publication of reproducible computational scientific
articles. This aspect requires significant attention because it is the basis
for reliable research. We have found a large gap between the
reproducibility-oriented practices, journal policies, recommendations,
publisher artifact Description/Evaluation guidelines, submission guides,
technological reproducibility evolution, and its effective adoption to
contribute to tackling the crisis. We conducted a narrative survey, a
comprehensive overview and discussion identifying the mutual efforts required
from Authors, Journals, and Technological actors to achieve reproducibility
research. The relationship between authors and scientific journals in their
mutual efforts to jointly improve the reproducibility of scientific results is
analyzed. Eventually, we propose recommendations for the journal policies, as
well as a unified and standardized Reproducibility Guide for the submission of
scientific articles for authors. The main objective of this work is to analyze
the implementation and experiences of reproducibility policies, techniques and
technologies, standards, methodologies, software, and data management tools
required for scientific reproducible publications. Also, the benefits and
drawbacks of such an adoption, as well as open challenges and promising trends,
to propose possible strategies and efforts to mitigate the identified gaps. To
this purpose, we analyzed 200 scientific articles, surveyed 16 Computer Science
journals, and systematically classified them according to reproducibility
strategies, technologies, policies, code citation, and editorial business. We
conclude there is still a reproducibility gap in scientific publications,
although at the same time also the opportunity to reduce this gap with the
joint effort of authors, publishers, and technological providers.
