  SNNs are an active research domain towards energy efficient machine
intelligence. Compared to conventional ANNs, SNNs use temporal spike data and
bio-plausible neuronal activation functions such as Leaky-Integrate
Fire/Integrate Fire (LIF/IF) for data processing. However, SNNs incur
significant dot-product operations causing high memory and computation overhead
in standard von-Neumann computing platforms. Today, In-Memory Computing (IMC)
architectures have been proposed to alleviate the "memory-wall bottleneck"
prevalent in von-Neumann architectures. Although recent works have proposed
IMC-based SNN hardware accelerators, the following have been overlooked- 1) the
adverse effects of crossbar non-ideality on SNN performance due to repeated
analog dot-product operations over multiple time-steps, 2) hardware overheads
of essential SNN-specific components such as the LIF/IF and data communication
modules. To this end, we propose SpikeSim, a tool that can perform realistic
performance, energy, latency and area evaluation of IMC-mapped SNNs. SpikeSim
consists of a practical monolithic IMC architecture called SpikeFlow for
mapping SNNs. Additionally, the non-ideality computation engine (NICE) and
energy-latency-area (ELA) engine performs hardware-realistic evaluation of
SpikeFlow-mapped SNNs. Based on 65nm CMOS implementation and experiments on
CIFAR10, CIFAR100 and TinyImagenet datasets, we find that the LIF/IF neuronal
module has significant area contribution (>11% of the total hardware area). We
propose SNN topological modifications leading to 1.24x and 10x reduction in the
neuronal module's area and the overall energy-delay-product value,
respectively. Furthermore, in this work, we perform a holistic comparison
between IMC implemented ANN and SNNs and conclude that lower number of
time-steps are the key to achieve higher throughput and energy-efficiency for
SNNs compared to 4-bit ANNs.
