  An increasing number of studies have demonstrated correlations between
climate trends and body size change of organisms. In many cases, climate might
be expected to influence body size by altering thermoregulation, energetics or
food availability. However, observed body size changes can result from
ecological processes (e.g., growth, selection, population dynamics), yet may
also be due to imperfect observation. We used two extensive datasets to
evaluate alternative hypotheses for recently reported changes in the observed
body size of plethodontid salamanders. We found that mean adult body size of
salamanders can be highly sensitive to survey conditions, particularly
rainfall, such that smaller individuals are more likely to be sampled under dry
conditions. This systematic bias in the detection of individuals across a range
in body size would result in a signature of body size reduction in relation to
reported climate trends when it is simply observation error. We also identify
considerable variability in body size distributions among years that shows
correspondence with rainfall. This suggests that annual variation in growth or
shifting population age structure could also result in a correlation between
climate and mean body size. Finally, our study demonstrates that measures of
mean adult body size can be highly variable among surveys and that large sample
sizes may be required to make reliable inferences. Identifying the effects of
climate change is critical for future research in ecology and conservation.
Researchers should be aware that observed body size changes in some organisms
may be a result of true ecological processes or systematic bias due to
non-random sampling of populations. Ultimately, the credibility of ecological
research related to climate change depends on researchers demonstrating a
thorough consideration of alternative hypotheses for observed changes in
species.
