  Numerous challenges in science and engineering can be framed as optimization
tasks, including the maximization of reaction yields, the optimization of
molecular and materials properties, and the fine-tuning of automated hardware
protocols. Design of experiment and optimization algorithms are often adopted
to solve these tasks efficiently. Increasingly, these experiment planning
strategies are coupled with automated hardware to enable autonomous
experimental platforms. The vast majority of the strategies used, however, do
not consider robustness against the variability of experiment and process
conditions. In fact, it is generally assumed that these parameters are exact
and reproducible. Yet some experiments may have considerable noise associated
with some of their conditions, and process parameters optimized under precise
control may be applied in the future under variable operating conditions. In
either scenario, the optimal solutions found might not be robust against input
variability, affecting the reproducibility of results and returning suboptimal
performance in practice. Here, we introduce Golem, an algorithm that is
agnostic to the choice of experiment planning strategy and that enables robust
experiment and process optimization. Golem identifies optimal solutions that
are robust to input uncertainty, thus ensuring the reproducible performance of
optimized experimental protocols and processes. It can be used to analyze the
robustness of past experiments, or to guide experiment planning algorithms
toward robust solutions on the fly. We assess the performance and domain of
applicability of Golem through extensive benchmark studies and demonstrate its
practical relevance by optimizing an analytical chemistry protocol under the
presence of significant noise in its experimental conditions.
