  The improbability of a spontaneously generated self-assembling molecule has
suggested that life began with a set of simpler, collectively replicating
elements, such as an enclosed autocatalytic set of polymers (or protocell).
Since replication occurs without a self-assembly code, acquired characteristics
are inherited. Moreover, there is no strict distinction between alive and dead;
one can only infer that a protocell was alive if it replicates. These features
of early life render natural selection inapplicable to the description of its
change-of-state because they defy its underlying assumptions. Moreover, natural
selection describes only randomly generated novelty; it cannot describe the
emergence of form at the interface between organism and environment.
Self-organization is also inadequate because it is restricted to interactions
amongst parts; it too cannot account for context-driven change. A modified
version of selection theory or self-organization would not work because the
description of change-of-state through interaction with an incompletely
specified context has a completely different mathematical structure, i.e.
entails a non-Kolmogorovian probability model. It is proposed that the
evolution of early life is appropriately described as lineage transformation
through context-driven actualization of potential (CAP), with self-organized
change-of-state being a special case of no contextual influence, and
competitive exclusion of less fit individuals through a selection-like process
possibly (but not necessarily) playing a secondary role. It is argued that
natural selection played an important role in evolution only after genetically
mediated replication was established.
