  With the emergence of high-frequency connected and automated vehicle data,
analysts have become able to extract useful information from them. To this end,
the concept of "driving volatility" is defined and explored as deviation from
the norm. Several measures of dispersion and variation can be computed in
different ways using vehicles' instantaneous speed, acceleration, and jerk
observed at intersections. This study explores different measures of
volatility, representing newly available surrogate measures of safety, by
combining data from the Michigan Safety Pilot Deployment of connected vehicles
with crash and inventory data at several intersections. The intersection data
was error-checked and verified for accuracy. Then, for each intersection, 37
different measures of volatility were calculated. These volatilities were then
used to explain crash frequencies at intersection by estimating fixed and
random parameter Poisson regression models. Results show that an increase in
three measures of driving volatility are positively associated with higher
intersection crash frequency, controlling for exposure variables and geometric
features. More intersection crashes were associated with higher percentages of
vehicle data points (speed & acceleration) lying beyond threshold-bands. These
bands were created using mean plus two standard deviations. Furthermore, a
higher magnitude of time-varying stochastic volatility of vehicle speeds when
they pass through the intersection is associated with higher crash frequencies.
These measures can be used to locate intersections with high driving
volatilities, i.e., hot-spots where crashes are waiting to happen. Therefore, a
deeper analysis of these intersections can be undertaken and proactive safety
countermeasures considered at high volatility locations to enhance safety.
