  Both humans and social animals live in groups and are frequently faced to
choose between options with different qualities. When no leader agents are
controlling the group decision, consensus can be achieved through repeated
interactions among group members. Various studies on CDM illustrate how the
dynamics of opinions are determined by the structure of the social network and
the methods that individuals use to share and update their opinion upon a
social interaction. In this paper, we are interested in further exploring how
cognitive, social, and environmental factors interactively contribute to
determining the outcome of a collective best-of-n decision process involving
asymmetric options, i.e., different costs and/or benefits for each option. We
propose and study a novel model capturing those different factors, i) the error
in processing social information, ii) the number of zealots (i.e., asocial
agents who never change their opinion), iii) the option qualities, iv) the
social connectivity structure, and v) the degree centrality of the asocial
agents. By using the HMF approach, we study the impact of the above-mentioned
factors in the decision dynamics. Our findings indicate that when susceptible
agents use the voter model as a mechanism to update their opinion, both the
number and the degree of connectivity of the zealots can lead the population to
converge towards the lowest quality option. Instead, when susceptible agents
use methods more cognitively demanding, the group is marginally impacted by the
presence of zealots. The results of the analytical model are complemented and
extended by agent-based simulations. Our analysis also shows that the network
topology can modulate the influence of zealots on group dynamics.
