  Detecting accounting anomalies is a recurrent challenge in financial
statement audits. Recently, novel methods derived from Deep-Learning (DL) have
been proposed to audit the large volumes of a statement's underlying accounting
records. However, due to their vast number of parameters, such models exhibit
the drawback of being inherently opaque. At the same time, the concealing of a
model's inner workings often hinders its real-world application. This
observation holds particularly true in financial audits since auditors must
reasonably explain and justify their audit decisions. Nowadays, various
Explainable AI (XAI) techniques have been proposed to address this challenge,
e.g., SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). However, in unsupervised DL as
often applied in financial audits, these methods explain the model output at
the level of encoded variables. As a result, the explanations of Autoencoder
Neural Networks (AENNs) are often hard to comprehend by human auditors. To
mitigate this drawback, we propose (RESHAPE), which explains the model output
on an aggregated attribute-level. In addition, we introduce an evaluation
framework to compare the versatility of XAI methods in auditing. Our
experimental results show empirical evidence that RESHAPE results in versatile
explanations compared to state-of-the-art baselines. We envision such
attribute-level explanations as a necessary next step in the adoption of
unsupervised DL techniques in financial auditing.
