  Price of anarchy quantifies the degradation of social welfare in games due to
the lack of a centralized authority that can enforce the optimal outcome. At
its antipodes, mechanism design studies how to ameliorate these effects by
incentivizing socially desirable behavior and implementing the optimal state as
equilibrium. In practice, the responsiveness to such measures depends on the
wealth of each individual. This leads to a natural, but largely unexplored,
question. Does optimal mechanism design entrench, or maybe even exacerbate,
social inequality?
  We study this question in nonatomic congestion games, arguably one of the
most thoroughly studied settings from the perspectives of price of anarchy as
well as mechanism design. We introduce a new model that incorporates the wealth
distribution of the population and captures the income elasticity of travel
time. This allows us to argue about the equality of wealth distribution both
before and after employing a mechanism. We start our analysis by establishing a
broad qualitative result, showing that tolls always increase inequality in
symmetric congestion games under any reasonable metric of inequality, e.g., the
Gini index. Next, we introduce the iniquity index, a novel measure for
quantifying the magnitude of these forces towards a more unbalanced wealth
distribution and show it has good normative properties (robustness to scaling
of income, no-regret learning). We analyze iniquity both in theoretical
settings (Pigou's network under various wealth distributions) as well as
experimental ones (based on a large scale field experiment in Singapore).
Finally, we provide an algorithm for computing optimal tolls for any point of
the trade-off of relative importance of efficiency and equality. We conclude
with a discussion of our findings in the context of theories of justice as
developed in contemporary social sciences.
