  Successful deployment of geological carbon storage (GCS) requires an
extensive use of reservoir simulators for screening, ranking and optimization
of storage sites. However, the time scales of GCS are such that no sufficient
long-term data is available yet to validate the simulators against. As a
consequence, there is currently no solid basis for assessing the quality with
which the dynamics of large-scale GCS operations can be forecasted.
  To meet this knowledge gap, we have conducted a major GCS validation
benchmark study. To achieve reasonable time scales, a laboratory-size
geological storage formation was constructed (the "FluidFlower"), forming the
basis for both the experimental and computational work. A validation experiment
consisting of repeated GCS operations was conducted in the FluidFlower,
providing what we define as the true physical dynamics for this system. Nine
different research groups from around the world provided forecasts, both
individually and collaboratively, based on a detailed physical and
petrophysical characterization of the FluidFlower sands.
  The major contribution of this paper is a report and discussion of the
results of the validation benchmark study, complemented by a description of the
benchmarking process and the participating computational models. The forecasts
from the participating groups are compared to each other and to the
experimental data by means of various indicative qualitative and quantitative
measures. By this, we provide a detailed assessment of the capabilities of
reservoir simulators and their users to capture both the injection and
post-injection dynamics of the GCS operations.
