  We reconsider the problem of the interpretation of the Quantum Theory (QT) in
the perspective of the entire universe and of Bphr idea that the classical
language is the language of our experience and QT acquires a meaning only with
a reference to it. We distinguish a classical or macroscopic level, and a
quantum or microscopic one that is perceived only through the modifications
that it induces in the first. The macroscopic state of the universe is assumed
to be specified by a set of variables, a classical energy momentum tensor and
some conserved currents, which are supposed to have a well defined value across
the entire space-time. To the energy-momentum tensor a classical metric is
related by the Einstein equation. The quantum state and dynamics are expressed
by the usual QT formalism in terms of a density operator and the ordinary
quantum operators in Heisenberg picture. For the macroscopic variables a basic
distribution of probability is postulated in terms of a density and the
corresponding quantum operators, so in some way their evolution is driven by
the underlying QT. Such postulate essentially replaces the usual elfadjoint
operators correspondence. For the Universe we adopt a variance of the
{\Lambda}CDM model with Omega=1, one single inflaton with an Higgs type
potential, the initial time at t=minus infinite. The expectation values of all
fundamental fields are supposed to vanish for time going to minus infinite. In
the framework the scalar fluctuation in the Cosmic Microwave Background are
correctly explained giving appropriate calue to the parameters in the
potential. As in more conventional models the absence of the tensor
fluctuations remains not understood, if even a quantum metric is introduced.
This seems to suggest that Gravity is a pure classical phenomenon, what could
be consistently accommodated in our formalism by an appropriate even if
somewhat ad hoc assumption
