  In 1822, Cauchy presented the idea of traction vector that contains both the
normal and tangential components of the internal surface forces per unit area
and gave the tetrahedron argument to prove the existence of stress tensor.
These great achievements form the main part of the foundation of continuum
mechanics. For about two centuries, some versions of tetrahedron argument and a
few other proofs of the existence of stress tensor are presented in every text
on continuum mechanics, fluid mechanics, and the relevant subjects. In this
article, we show the birth, importance, and location of these Cauchy's
achievements, then by presenting the formal tetrahedron argument in detail, for
the first time, we extract some fundamental challenges. These conceptual
challenges are related to the result of applying the conservation of linear
momentum to any mass element, the order of magnitude of the surface and volume
terms, the definition of traction vectors on the surfaces that pass through the
same point, the approximate processes in the derivation of stress tensor, and
some others. In a comprehensive review, we present the different tetrahedron
arguments and the proofs of the existence of stress tensor, discuss the
challenges in each one, and classify them in two general approaches. In the
first approach that is followed in most texts, the traction vectors do not
exactly define on the surfaces that pass through the same point, so most of the
challenges hold. But in the second approach, the traction vectors are defined
on the surfaces that pass exactly through the same point, therefore some of the
relevant challenges are removed. We also study the improved works of Hamel and
Backus, and indicate that the original work of Backus removes most of the
challenges. This article shows that the foundation of continuum mechanics is
not a finished subject and there are still some fundamental challenges.
