  Digital communication has made the public discourse considerably more
complex, and new actors and strategies have emerged as a result of this seismic
shift. Aside from the often-studied interactions among individuals during
opinion formation, which have been facilitated on a large scale by social media
platforms, the changing role of traditional media and the emerging role of
"influencers" are not well understood, and the implications of their engagement
strategies arising from the incentive structure of the attention economy even
less so. Here we propose a novel opinion dynamics model that accounts for these
different roles, namely that media and influencers change their own positions
on slower time scales than individuals, while influencers dynamically gain and
lose followers. Numerical simulations show the importance of their relative
influence in creating qualitatively different opinion formation dynamics: with
influencers, fragmented but short-lived clusters emerge, which are then
counteracted by more stable media positions. Mean-field approximations by
partial differential equations reproduce this dynamic. Based on the mean-field
model, we study how strategies of influencers to gain more followers can
influence the overall opinion distribution. We show that moving towards extreme
positions can be a beneficial strategy for influencers to gain followers.
Finally, we demonstrate that optimal control strategies allow other influencers
or media to counteract such attempts and prevent further fragmentation of the
opinion landscape. Our modelling framework contributes to better understanding
the different roles and strategies in the increasingly complex information
ecosystem and their impact on public opinion formation.
