  Recently there has been a lot of work on pruning filters from deep
convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with the intention of reducing
computations.The key idea is to rank the filters based on a certain criterion
(say, l1-norm) and retain only the top ranked filters. Once the low scoring
filters are pruned away the remainder of the network is fine tuned and is shown
to give performance comparable to the original unpruned network. In this work,
we report experiments which suggest that the comparable performance of the
pruned network is not due to the specific criterion chosen but due to the
inherent plasticity of deep neural networks which allows them to recover from
the loss of pruned filters once the rest of the filters are fine-tuned.
Specifically we show counter-intuitive results wherein by randomly pruning
25-50% filters from deep CNNs we are able to obtain the same performance as
obtained by using state-of-the-art pruning methods. We empirically validate our
claims by doing an exhaustive evaluation with VGG-16 and ResNet-50. We also
evaluate a real world scenario where a CNN trained on all 1000 ImageNet classes
needs to be tested on only a small set of classes at test time (say, only
animals). We create a new benchmark dataset from ImageNet to evaluate such
class specific pruning and show that even here a random pruning strategy gives
close to state-of-the-art performance. Unlike existing approaches which mainly
focus on the task of image classification, in this work we also report results
on object detection and image segmentation. We show that using a simple random
pruning strategy we can achieve significant speed up in object detection (74%
improvement in fps) while retaining the same accuracy as that of the original
Faster RCNN model. Similarly we show that the performance of a pruned
Segmentation Network (SegNet) is actually very similar to that of the original
unpruned SegNet.
