  This paper utilizes a mixture of qualitative, formal, and statistical
socio-semantic network analyses to examine how cultural homophily works when
field logic meets practice. On the one hand, because individuals in similar
field positions are also imposed with similar cultural orientations, cultural
homophily reproduces objective field structure in intersubjective social
network ties. On the other hand, fields are operative in practice and to
accomplish pragmatic goals individuals who occupy different field positions
often join in groups, creatively reinterpret the field-imposed cultural
orientations, and produce cultural similarities alternative to the
position-specific ones. Drawing on these emergent similarities, the cultural
homophily mechanism might stimulate social network ties between members who
occupy not the same but different field positions, thus contesting fields. I
examine this ambivalent role of cultural homophily in two creative collectives,
each embracing members positioned closer to the opposite poles of the field of
cultural production. I find different types of cultural similarities to affect
different types of social network ties within and between the field positions:
Similarity of vocabularies stimulates friendship and collaboration ties within
positions, thus reproducing the field, while affiliation with the same cultural
structures stimulates collaboration ties between positions, thus contesting the
field. The latter effect is visible under statistical analysis of ethnographic
data, but easy to oversee in qualitative analysis of texts because informants
tend to flag conformity to their positions in their explicit statements. This
highlights the importance of mixed socio-semantic network analysis, both
sensitive to the local context and capable of unveiling the mechanisms
underlying the interplay between the cultural and the social.
