  Bed load transport is the movement of particles along the top of a bed
through rolling, saltation, and suspension created by turbulent lift above the
bed surface. In recent years, there has been a resurgence of interest in the
idea that bed load transport is significant for proppant transport during
hydraulic fracturing. However, scaling arguments suggest that bed load
transport is only dominant in the laboratory and is negligible at the field
scale. I review laboratory experiments that have been used to develop concepts
of bed load transport in hydraulic fracturing. I also review the scaling
arguments and laboratory results that have been used to argue that viscous
drag, not bed load transport, is dominant at the field scale. I compare
literature correlations for fluvial sediment transport and for pipeline slurry
transport with published laboratory data on proppant transport in slot flow.
The comparisons indicate that fluvial transport correlations are suitable for
predicting the rate of sediment erosion due to flow of proppant-free fluid over
a bed. The pipeline slurry correlations are suitable for predicting the ability
of proppant that is already in suspension to flow in bed transport without
settling, but only if the aspect ratio of the flowing region in the slot is
close to unity. This can occur at the laboratory scale, but not in the field.
The comparison indicates that at low rates of proppant flow, the equilibrium
bed height in a laboratory proppant transport experiment can be predicted from
pipeline slurry correlations. However, as the volumetric flow rate and the
aspect ratio of the flowing region in the slot increase, the applicability of
the pipeline slurry correlations breaks down. Laboratory experiments using
higher volumetric flow rate indicate that bed load transport rates are too low
to be significant at the field scale, even if the flow velocity is very high.
