  Purpose: Handheld gamma cameras with coded aperture collimators are under
investigation for intraoperative imaging in nuclear medicine. Coded apertures
are a promising collimation technique for applications such as lymph node
localization due to their high sensitivity and the possibility of 3D imaging.
We evaluated the axial resolution and computational performance of two
reconstruction methods. Methods: An experimental gamma camera was set up
consisting of the pixelated semiconductor detector Timepix3 and MURA mask of
rank $31$ with round holes of $0.08$mm in diameter in a $0.11$mm thick Tungsten
sheet. A set of measurements was taken where a point-like gamma source was
placed centrally at $21$ different positions within the range of $12$ to
$100$mm. For each source position, the detector image was reconstructed in
$0.5$mm steps around the true source position, resulting in an image stack. The
axial resolution was assessed by the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the
contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) profile along the z-axis of the stack. Two
reconstruction methods were compared: MURA Decoding and a 3D maximum likelihood
expectation maximization algorithm (3D-MLEM). Results: While taking $4{,}400$
times longer in computation, 3D-MLEM yielded a smaller axial FWHM and a higher
CNR. The axial resolution degraded from $5.3$mm and $1.8$mm at $12$mm to
$42.2$mm and $13.5$mm at $100$mm for MURA Decoding and 3D-MLEM respectively.
Conclusion: Our results show that the coded aperture enables the depth
estimation of single point-like sources in the near field. Here, 3D-MLEM
offered a better axial resolution but was computationally much slower than MURA
Decoding, whose reconstruction time is compatible with real-time imaging.
