  Recent systems applying Machine Learning (ML) to solve the Traveling Salesman
Problem (TSP) exhibit issues when they try to scale up to real case scenarios
with several hundred vertices. The use of Candidate Lists (CLs) has been
brought up to cope with the issues. The procedure allows to restrict the search
space during solution creation, consequently reducing the solver computational
burden. So far, ML were engaged to create CLs and values on the edges of these
CLs expressing ML preferences at solution insertion. Although promising, these
systems do not clearly restrict what the ML learns and does to create
solutions, bringing with them some generalization issues. Therefore, motivated
by exploratory and statistical studies, in this work we instead use a machine
learning model to confirm the addition in the solution just for high probable
edges. CLs of the high probable edge are employed as input, and the ML is in
charge of distinguishing cases where such edges are in the optimal solution
from those where they are not. . This strategy enables a better generalization
and creates an efficient balance between machine learning and searching
techniques. Our ML-Constructive heuristic is trained on small instances. Then,
it is able to produce solutions, without losing quality, to large problems as
well. We compare our results with classic constructive heuristics, showing good
performances for TSPLIB instances up to 1748 cities. Although our heuristic
exhibits an expensive constant time operation, we proved that the computational
complexity in worst-case scenario, for the solution construction after
training, is $O(n^2 \log n^2)$, being $n$ the number of vertices in the TSP
instance.
