  Modern code review is a critical and indispensable practice in a pull-request
development paradigm that prevails in Open Source Software (OSS) development.
Finding a suitable reviewer in projects with massive participants thus becomes
an increasingly challenging task. Many reviewer recommendation approaches
(recommenders) have been developed to support this task which apply a similar
strategy, i.e. modeling the review history first then followed by
predicting/recommending a reviewer based on the model. Apparently, the better
the model reflects the reality in review history, the higher recommender's
performance we may expect. However, one typical scenario in a pull-request
development paradigm, i.e. one Pull-Request (PR) (such as a revision or
addition submitted by a contributor) may have multiple reviewers and they may
impact each other through publicly posted comments, has not been modeled well
in existing recommenders. We adopted the hypergraph technique to model this
high-order relationship (i.e. one PR with multiple reviewers herein) and
developed a new recommender, namely HGRec, which is evaluated by 12 OSS
projects with more than 87K PRs, 680K comments in terms of accuracy and
recommendation distribution. The results indicate that HGRec outperforms the
state-of-the-art recommenders on recommendation accuracy. Besides, among the
top three accurate recommenders, HGRec is more likely to recommend a diversity
of reviewers, which can help to relieve the core reviewers' workload congestion
issue. Moreover, since HGRec is based on hypergraph, which is a natural and
interpretable representation to model review history, it is easy to accommodate
more types of entities and realistic relationships in modern code review
scenarios. As the first attempt, this study reveals the potentials of
hypergraph on advancing the pragmatic solutions for code reviewer
recommendation.
