  In the celebrated stable-matching problem, there are two sets of agents M and
W, and the members of M only have preferences over the members of W and vice
versa. It is usually assumed that each member of M and W is a single entity.
However, there are many cases in which each member of M or W represents a team
that consists of several individuals with common interests. For example,
students may need to be matched to professors for their final projects, but
each project is carried out by a team of students. Thus, the students first
form teams, and the matching is between teams of students and professors.
  When a team is considered as an agent from M or W, it needs to have a
preference order that represents it. A voting rule is a natural mechanism for
aggregating the preferences of the team members into a single preference order.
In this paper, we investigate the problem of strategic voting in the context of
stable-matching of teams. Specifically, we assume that members of each team use
the Borda rule for generating the preference order of the team. Then, the
Gale-Shapley algorithm is used for finding a stable-matching, where the set M
is the proposing side. We show that the single-voter manipulation problem can
be solved in polynomial time, both when the team is from M and when it is from
W. We show that the coalitional manipulation problem is computationally hard,
but it can be solved approximately both when the team is from M and when it is
from W.
