  This chapter will appear in the forthcoming Handbook of Approximate Bayesian
Computation (2018).
  The conceptual and methodological framework that underpins approximate
Bayesian computation (ABC) is targetted primarily towards problems in which the
likelihood is either challenging or missing. ABC uses a simulation-based
non-parametric estimate of the likelihood of a summary statistic and assumes
that the generation of data from the model is computationally cheap. This
chapter reviews two alternative approaches for estimating the intractable
likelihood, with the goal of reducing the necessary model simulations to
produce an approximate posterior. The first of these is a Bayesian version of
the synthetic likelihood (SL), initially developed by Wood (2010), which uses a
multivariate normal approximation to the summary statistic likelihood. Using
the parametric approximation as opposed to the non-parametric approximation of
ABC, it is possible to reduce the number of model simulations required. The
second likelihood approximation method we consider in this chapter is based on
the empirical likelihood (EL), which is a non-parametric technique and involves
maximising a likelihood constructed empirically under a set of moment
constraints. Mengersen et al (2013) adapt the EL framework so that it can be
used to form an approximate posterior for problems where ABC can be applied,
that is, for models with intractable likelihoods. However, unlike ABC and the
Bayesian SL (BSL), the Bayesian EL (BCel) approach can be used to completely
avoid model simulations in some cases. The BSL and BCel methods are illustrated
on models of varying complexity.
