  In this comment we argue that while the conclusions in the original paper (Y.
Kafri, D. Mukamel and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4988 (2000)) are correct
for asymptotically long DNA chains, they do not apply to the chains used in
typical experiments. In the added last paragraph, we point out that for real
DNA the average distance between denatured loops is not of the order of the
persistence length of a single-stranded chain but much larger. This
corroborates our reasoning that the double helix between loops is quite rigid,
and thereby our conclusion.
