  Objective: Human-curated disease ontologies are widely used for diagnostic
evaluation, treatment and data comparisons over time, and clinical decision
support. The classification principles underlying these ontologies are guided
by the analysis of observable pathological similarities between disorders,
often based on anatomical or histological principles. Although, thanks to
recent advances in molecular biology, disease ontologies are slowly changing to
integrate the etiological and genetic origins of diseases, nosology still
reflects this "reductionist" perspective. Proximity relationships of disease
modules (hereafter DMs) in the human interactome network are now increasingly
used in diagnostics, to identify pathobiologically similar diseases and to
support drug repurposing and discovery. On the other hand, similarity relations
induced from structural proximity of DMs also have several limitations, such as
incomplete knowledge of disease-gene relationships and reliability of clinical
trials to assess their validity. The purpose of the study described in this
paper is to shed more light on disease similarities by analyzing the
relationship between categorical proximity of diseases in human-curated
ontologies and structural proximity of the related DM in the interactome.
Method: We propose a methodology (and related algorithms) to automatically
induce a hierarchical structure from proximity relations between DMs, and to
compare this structure with a human-curated disease taxonomy. Results: We
demonstrate that the proposed methodology allows to systematically analyze
commonalities and differences among structural and categorical similarity of
human diseases, help refine and extend human disease classification systems,
and identify promising network areas where new disease-gene interactions can be
discovered.
