  In social dilemmas under weak selection, the capacity for a player to exhibit
updating passivity or interact with its own strategy can lead to conflicting
outcomes. The central question is which effect is stronger and how their
simultaneous presence influences the evolution of cooperation. We introduce a
model that considers both effects using different weight factors. We derive
theoretical solutions for the conditions of cooperation success and the
cooperation level under weak selection, scanning the complete parameter space.
When the weight factors are equally strong, the promoting effect of
self-interaction to cooperation surpasses the inhibitory effect of updating
passivity. Intriguingly, however, we identify non-monotonous
cooperation-supporting effects when the weight of updating passivity increases
more rapidly. Our findings are corroborated by Monte Carlo simulations and
demonstrate robustness across various game types, including the prisoner's
dilemma, stag-hunt, and snowdrift games.
