  We empirically analyze five online communities: Friendster, Livejournal,
Facebook, Orkut, Myspace, to identify causes for the decline of social
networks. We define social resilience as the ability of a community to
withstand changes. We do not argue about the cause of such changes, but
concentrate on their impact. Changes may cause users to leave, which may
trigger further leaves of others who lost connection to their friends. This may
lead to cascades of users leaving. A social network is said to be resilient if
the size of such cascades can be limited. To quantify resilience, we use the
k-core analysis, to identify subsets of the network in which all users have at
least k friends. These connections generate benefits (b) for each user, which
have to outweigh the costs (c) of being a member of the network. If this
difference is not positive, users leave. After all cascades, the remaining
network is the k-core of the original network determined by the cost-to-benefit
c/b ratio. By analysing the cumulative distribution of k-cores we are able to
calculate the number of users remaining in each community. This allows us to
infer the impact of the c/b ratio on the resilience of these online
communities. We find that the different online communities have different
k-core distributions. Consequently, similar changes in the c/b ratio have a
different impact on the amount of active users. As a case study, we focus on
the evolution of Friendster. We identify time periods when new users entering
the network observed an insufficient c/b ratio. This measure can be seen as a
precursor of the later collapse of the community. Our analysis can be applied
to estimate the impact of changes in the user interface, which may temporarily
increase the c/b ratio, thus posing a threat for the community to shrink, or
even to collapse.
