  Wildfires pose a growing risk to public safety in regions like the western
United States, and, historically, electric power systems have ignited some of
the most destructive wildfires. To reduce wildfire ignition risks, power system
operators preemptively de-energize high-risk power lines during extreme
wildfire conditions as part of "Public Safety Power Shutoff" (PSPS) events.
While capable of substantially reducing acute wildfire risks, PSPS events can
also result in significant amounts of load shedding as the partially
de-energized system may not be able to supply all customer demands. In this
work, we investigate the extent to which infrastructure investments can support
system operations during PSPS events by enabling reduced load shedding and
wildfire ignition risk. We consider the installation of grid-scale batteries,
solar PV, and line hardening or maintenance measures (e.g., undergrounding or
increased vegetation management). Optimally selecting the locations, types, and
sizes of these infrastructure investments requires considering the line
de-energizations associated with PSPS events. Accordingly, this paper proposes
a multi-period optimization formulation that locates and sizes infrastructure
investments while simultaneously choosing line de-energizations to minimize
wildfire ignition risk and load shedding. This formulation is evaluated using
two geolocated test cases along with realistic infrastructure investment
parameters and actual wildfire risk data from the US Geological Survey. We
evaluate the performance of investment choices by simulating de-energization
decisions for the entire 2021 wildfire season with optimized infrastructure
placements. With investment decisions varying significantly for different test
cases, budgets, and operator priorities, the numerical results demonstrate the
proposed formulation's value in tailoring investment choices to different
settings.
