  The current COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdowns have highlighted the
close and delicate relationship between a country's public health and economic
health. Macroeconomic models that use preexisting epidemic models to calculate
the impacts of a disease outbreak are therefore extremely useful for
policymakers seeking to evaluate the best course of action in such a crisis. We
develop an SIR model of the COVID-19 pandemic that explicitly considers herd
immunity, behavior-dependent transmission rates, remote workers, and indirect
externalities of lockdown. This model is presented as an exit time control
problem where lockdown ends when the population achieves herd immunity, either
naturally or via a vaccine. A social planner prescribes separate levels of
lockdown for two separate sections of the adult population: low-risk (ages
20-64) and high-risk (ages 65 and over). These levels are determined via
optimization of an objective function which assigns a macroeconomic cost to the
level of lockdown and the number of deaths. We find that, by ending lockdowns
once herd immunity is reached, high-risk individuals are able to leave lockdown
significantly before the arrival of a vaccine without causing large increases
in mortality. Moreover, if we incorporate a behavior-dependent transmission
rate which represents increased personal caution in response to increased
infection levels, both output loss and total mortality are lowered. Lockdown
efficacy is further increased when there is less interaction between low- and
high-risk individuals, and increased remote work decreases output losses.
Overall, our model predicts that a lockdown which ends at the arrival of herd
immunity, combined with individual actions to slow virus transmission, can
reduce total mortality to one-third of the no-lockdown level, while allowing
high-risk individuals to leave lockdown well before vaccine arrival.
