  Reaching the 2030 targets for the EU primary energy use (PE) and CO2eq
emissions (CE) requires an accurate assessment of how different technologies
perform on these two fronts. In this regard, the focus in academia is
increasingly shifting from traditional technologies to electricity consuming
alternatives. Calculating and comparing their performance with respect to
traditional technologies requires conversion factors (CFs) like a primary
energy factor and a CO2eq intensity. These reflect the PE and CE associated
with each unit of electricity consumed. Previous work has shown that the
calculation and use of CFs is a contentious and multifaceted issue. However,
this has mostly remained a theoretical discussion. A stock-taking of how CFs
are actually calculated and used in academic literature has so far been
missing, impeding insight into what the contemporary trends and challenges are.
Therefore, we structurally review 65 publications across six methodological
aspects. We find that 72% of the publications consider only a single country,
86% apply a purely retrospective perspective, 54% apply a yearly temporal
resolution, 65% apply a purely operational (instead of a life-cycle)
perspective, 91% make use of average (rather than marginal) CFs, and 75% ignore
electricity imports from surrounding countries. We conclude that there is a
strong need in the literature for a publicly available, transparently
calculated dataset of CFs, which avoids the shortcomings found in the
literature. This would enable more accurate and transparent PE and CE
calculations, and support the development of new building energy performance
assessment methods and smart grid algorithms.
