  Most mechanistic predator-prey modelling has involved either parameterization
from process rate data or inverse modelling. Here, we take a median road: we
aim at identifying the potential benefits of combining datasets, when both
population growth and predation processes are viewed as stochastic. We fit a
discrete-time, stochastic predator-prey model of the Leslie type to simulated
time series of densities and kill rate data. Our model has both environmental
stochasticity in the growth rates and interaction stochasticity, i.e., a
stochastic functional response. We examine what the kill rate data brings to
the quality of the estimates, and whether estimation is possible (for various
time series lengths) solely with time series of population counts or biomass
data. Both Bayesian and frequentist estimation are performed, providing
multiple ways to check model identifiability. The Fisher Information Matrix
suggests that models with and without kill rate data are all identifiable,
although correlations remain between parameters that belong to the same
functional form. However, our results show that if the attractor is a fixed
point in the absence of stochasticity, identifying parameters in practice
requires kill rate data as a complement to the time series of population
densities, due to the relatively flat likelihood. Only noisy limit cycle
attractors can be identified directly from population count data (as in inverse
modelling), although even in this case, adding kill rate data - including in
small amounts - can make the estimates much more precise. Overall, we show that
under process stochasticity in interaction rates, interaction data might be
essential to obtain identifiable dynamical models for multiple species. These
results may extend to other biotic interactions than predation, for which
similar models combining interaction rates and population counts could be
developed.
