  Sonification is the technique of representing data with sound, with potential
applications in astronomy research for aiding discovery and accessibility.
Several astronomy-focused sonification tools have been developed; however,
efficacy testing is extremely limited. We performed testing of astronify, a
prototype tool for sonification functionality within the Barbara A. Mikulski
Archive for Space Telescopes (MAST). We created synthetic light curves
containing zero, one, or two transit-like signals with a range of
signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs=3-100) and applied the default mapping of
brightness to pitch. We performed remote testing, asking participants to count
signals when presented with light curves as a sonification, visual plot, or
combination of both. We obtained 192 responses, of which 118 self-classified as
experts in astronomy and data analysis. For high SNRs (=30 and 100), experts
and non-experts performed well with sonified data (85-100% successful signal
counting). At low SNRs (=3 and 5) both groups were consistent with guessing
with sonifications. At medium SNRs (=7 and 10), experts performed no better
than non-experts with sonifications but significantly better (factor of ~2-3)
with visuals. We infer that sonification training, like that experienced by
experts for visual data inspection, will be important if this sonification
method is to be useful for moderate SNR signal detection within astronomical
archives and broader research. Nonetheless, we show that even a very simple,
and non-optimised, sonification approach allows users to identify high SNR
signals. A more optimised approach, for which we present ideas, would likely
yield higher success for lower SNR signals.
