  We consider a general class of Bayesian Games where each players utility
depends on his type (possibly multidimensional) and on the strategy profile and
where players' types are distributed independently. We show that if their full
information version for any fixed instance of the type profile is a smooth game
then the Price of Anarchy bound implied by the smoothness property, carries
over to the Bayes-Nash Price of Anarchy. We show how some proofs from the
literature (item bidding auctions, greedy auctions) can be cast as smoothness
proofs or be simplified using smoothness. For first price item bidding with
fractionally subadditive bidders we actually manage to improve by much the
existing result \cite{Hassidim2011a} from 4 to $\frac{e}{e-1}\approx 1.58$.
This also shows a very interesting separation between first and second price
item bidding since second price item bidding has PoA at least 2 even under
complete information. For a larger class of Bayesian Games where the strategy
space of a player also changes with his type we are able to show that a
slightly stronger definition of smoothness also implies a Bayes-Nash PoA bound.
We show how weighted congestion games actually satisfy this stronger definition
of smoothness. This allows us to show that the inefficiency bounds of weighted
congestion games known in the literature carry over to incomplete versions
where the weights of the players are private information. We also show how an
incomplete version of a natural class of monotone valid utility games, called
effort market games are universally $(1,1)$-smooth. Hence, we show that
incomplete versions of effort market games where the abilities of the players
and their budgets are private information has Bayes-Nash PoA at most 2.
