  The dependency structure of credit risk parameters is a key driver for
capital consumption and receives regulatory and scientific attention. The
impact of parameter imperfections on the quality of expected loss (EL) in the
sense of a fair, unbiased estimate of risk expenses however is barely covered.
So far there are no established backtesting procedures for EL, quantifying its
impact with regards to pricing or risk adjusted profitability measures. In this
paper, a practically oriented, top-down approach to assess the quality of EL by
backtesting with a properly defined risk measure is introduced. In a first
step, the concept of risk expenses (Cost of Risk) has to be extended beyond the
classical provisioning view, towards a more adequate capital consumption
approach (Impact of Risk, IoR). On this basis, the difference between
parameter-based EL and actually reported Impact of Risk is decomposed into its
key components. The proposed method will deepen the understanding of practical
properties of EL, reconciles the EL with a clearly defined and observable risk
measure and provides a link between upcoming IFRS 9 accounting standards for
loan loss provisioning with IRBA regulatory capital requirements. The method is
robust irrespective whether parameters are simple, expert based values or
highly predictive and perfectly calibrated IRBA compliant methods, as long as
parameters and default identification procedures are stable.
