  In the case of multi-parameter full-waveform inversion, the computation of
the additional Hessian terms that contain derivatives with respect to more than
one type of parameter is necessary. If a simple gradient-based minimization is
used, different choices of parameterization can be interpreted as different
preconditioners that change the condition number of the Hessian. If the
non-linear inverse problem is well-posed, then the inversion should converge to
a band-limited version of the true solution irrespective of the
parameterization choice, provided we start sufficiently close to the global
minimum. However, the choice of parameterization will affect the rate of
convergence to the exact solution and the best choice of parameterization is
the one with the fastest rate. In this paper, we search for the best choice for
acoustic multi-parameter full-waveform inversion, where 1. anomalies with a
size less than a quarter of the dominant wavelength have to be estimated
without the risk of converging to a local minimum; 2. the scattered wavefield
is recorded at all the scattering angles; 3. a steepest-descent minimization
scheme is used. Our examples suggest that the best choice of parameterization
depends on the contrast of the subsurface scatterer that the inversion tries to
estimate. Based on the results, we observe that there is no best
parameterization choice for full-waveform inversion. We also observe that a
parameterization using the acoustic impedance and mass density has the worst
convergence rate. Finally, we also show that the parameterization analysis
during a hierarchical inversion, where the data have limited scattering angles,
only helps to select a subspace for mono-parameter inversion. For
multi-parameter hierarchical inversion, the search for the best
parameterization in terms of the convergence speed might be obfuscated by
non-uniqueness problems.
