  Tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated particle fuel is a robust nuclear fuel
and determining its reliability is critical for the success of advanced nuclear
technologies. However, TRISO failure probabilities are small and the associated
computational models are expensive. We used coupled active learning,
multifidelity modeling, and subset simulation to estimate the failure
probabilities of TRISO fuels using several 1D and 2D models. With multifidelity
modeling, we replaced expensive high-fidelity (HF) model evaluations with
information fusion from two low-fidelity (LF) models. For the 1D TRISO models,
we considered three multifidelity modeling strategies: only Kriging, Kriging LF
prediction plus Kriging correction, and deep neural network (DNN) LF prediction
plus Kriging correction. While the results across these multifidelity modeling
strategies compared satisfactorily, strategies employing information fusion
from two LF models consistently called the HF model least often. Next, for the
2D TRISO model, we considered two multifidelity modeling strategies: DNN LF
prediction plus Kriging correction (data-driven) and 1D TRISO LF prediction
plus Kriging correction (physics-based). The physics-based strategy, as
expected, consistently required the fewest calls to the HF model. However, the
data-driven strategy had a lower overall simulation time since the DNN
predictions are instantaneous, and the 1D TRISO model requires a non-negligible
simulation time.
