  The present study assesses RANS-based turbulence models to simulate
isothermal flow in a combustor representing a constituent can combustor of
can-annular configuration used in jet engines. Two-equation models (standard
$k-\epsilon$, realizable $k-\epsilon$, standard $k-\omega$, SST $k-\omega$),
and Linear Pressure Strain - Reynolds Stress Model (LPS-RSM), are assessed by
comparing their predictions of mean axial and transverse velocity, turbulent
kinetic energy, and shear stress with the experimental data at the primary and
dilution hole planes in combustor. While the two-equation models generally have
failed to predict the confined swirling flow at both positions accurately, the
SST $k-\omega$ model yielded the most accurate, followed by standard $k-\omega$
and realizable $k-\epsilon$ models. The discrepancies between the computational
and experimental results could be attributed to the isotropic turbulence
assumptions, which, however, are invalid for confined swirling flows. Further,
the two-equation model formulations cannot capture the intricacies of vortex
flow and its interaction with the surroundings in confined swirling flows.
LPS-RSM, which considers turbulence anisotropy, showed some promise, although
overpredicted results follow the trend with experimental values at the primary
holes plane. However, at dilution holes plane, the model overpredicted the
velocity field and underestimated turbulence field, including turbulent kinetic
energy and shear stress. These observed discrepancies can be ascribed to the
pressure-strain correlation in the LPS-RSM, which assumes the pressure is a
linear function of the strain-rate tensor. However, for complex flows, this
linear assumption is quite simplistic. Hence, this study suggests that more
advanced turbulence models such as non-LPS-RSM are needed to accurately predict
the confined swirling flow in combustors.
