  The positions of over 1000 gamma-ray bursts detected with the BATSE
experiment on board of the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory are uniformly and
randomly distributed in the sky, with no significant concentration to the
galactic plane or to the galactic center. The strong gamma-ray bursts have an
intensity distribution consistent with a number density independent of distance
in Euclidean space. Weak gamma-ray bursts are relatively rare, indicating that
either their number density is reduced at large distances or that the space in
which they are distributed is non-Euclidean. In other words, we appear to be at
the center of a spherical and bounded distribution of bursters. This is
consistent with the distribution of all objects that are known to be at
cosmological distances (like galaxies and quasars), but inconsistent with the
distribution of any objects which are known to be in our galaxy (like stars and
globular clusters). If the bursters are at cosmological distances then the
weakest bursts should be redshifted, i.e. on average their durations should be
longer and their spectra should be softer than the corresponding quantities for
the strong bursts. There is some evidence for both effects in the BATSE data.
  At this time the cosmological distance scale is strongly favored over the
galactic one, but is not proven. A definite proof (or dis-proof) could be
provided with the results of a search for very weak bursts in the Andromeda
galaxy (M31) with an instrument $ \sim 10 $ times more sensitive than BATSE.
  If the bursters are indeed at cosmological distances then they are the most
luminous sources of electromagnetic radiation known in the universe. At this
time we have no clue as to their nature, even though well over a hundred
suggestions were published in the scientific journals. An experiment providing
