  This paper considers the problem of measuring spatial and temporal variation
in driver productivity on ride-sourcing trips. This variation is especially
important from a driver's perspective: if a platform's drivers experience
systematic disparities in earnings because of variation in their riders'
destinations, they may perceive the pricing model as inequitable. This
perception can exacerbate search frictions if it leads drivers to avoid
locations where they believe they may be assigned "unlucky" fares. To
characterize any such systematic disparities in productivity, we develop an
analytic framework with three key components. First, we propose a productivity
metric that looks two consecutive trips ahead, thus capturing the effect on
expected earnings of market conditions at drivers' drop-off locations. Second,
we develop a natural experiment by analyzing trips with a common origin but
varying destinations, thus isolating purely spatial effects on productivity.
Third, we apply a spatial denoising method that allows us to work with raw
spatial information exhibiting high levels of noise and sparsity, without
having to aggregate data into large, low-resolution spatial zones. By applying
our framework to data on more than 1.4 million rides in Austin, Texas, we find
significant spatial variation in ride-sourcing driver productivity and search
frictions. Drivers at the same location experienced disparities in productivity
after being dispatched on trips with different destinations, with origin-based
surge pricing increasing these earnings disparities. Our results show that trip
distance is the dominant factor in driver productivity: short trips yielded
lower productivity, even when ending in areas with high demand. These findings
suggest that new pricing strategies are required to minimize random disparities
in driver earnings.
