  In their work on second-order equational logic, Fiore and Hur have studied
presentations of simply typed languages by generating binding constructions and
equations among them. To each pair consisting of a binding signature and a set
of equations, they associate a category of `models', and they give a monadicity
result which implies that this category has an initial object, which is the
language presented by the pair.
  In the present work, we propose, for the untyped setting, a variant of their
approach where monads and modules over them are the central notions. More
precisely, we study, for monads over sets, presentations by generating
(`higher-order') operations and equations among them. We consider a notion of
2-signature which allows to specify a monad with a family of binding operations
subject to a family of equations, as is the case for the paradigmatic example
of the lambda calculus, specified by its two standard constructions
(application and abstraction) subject to $\beta$- and $\eta$-equalities. Such a
2-signature is hence a pair $(\Sigma,E)$ of a binding signature $\Sigma$ and a
family $E$ of equations for $\Sigma$. This notion of 2-signature has been
introduced earlier by Ahrens in a slightly different context.
  We associate, to each 2-signature $(\Sigma,E)$, a category of `models of
$(\Sigma,E)$; and we say that a 2-signature is `effective' if this category has
an initial object; the monad underlying this (essentially unique) object is the
`monad specified by the 2-signature'. Not every 2-signature is effective; we
identify a class of 2-signatures, which we call `algebraic', that are
effective.
  Importantly, our 2-signatures together with their models enjoy `modularity':
when we glue (algebraic) 2-signatures together, their initial models are glued
accordingly.
  We provide a computer formalization for our main results.
