  Existing approaches to coalition formation often assume that requirements
associated with tasks are precisely specified by the human operator. However,
prior work has demonstrated that humans, while extremely adept at solving
complex problems, struggle to explicitly state their solution strategy.
Further, existing approaches often ignore the fact that experts may utilize
different, but equally-valid, solutions (i.e., heterogeneous strategies) to the
same problem. In this work, we propose a two-part framework to address these
challenges. First, we tackle the challenge of inferring implicit strategies
directly from expert demonstrations of coalition formation. To this end, we
model and infer such heterogeneous strategies as capability-based requirements
associated with each task. Next, we propose a method capable of adaptively
selecting one of the inferred strategies that best suits the target team
without requiring additional training. Specifically, we formulate and solve a
constrained optimization problem that simultaneously selects the most
appropriate strategy given the target team's capabilities, and allocates its
constituents into appropriate coalitions. We evaluate our approach against
several baselines, including some that resemble existing approaches, using
detailed numerical simulations, StarCraft II battles, and a multi-robot
emergency-response scenario. Our results indicate that our framework
consistently outperforms all baselines in terms of requirement satisfaction,
resource utilization, and task success rates.
