  Background. Large scale metagenomic projects aim to extract biodiversity
knowledge between different environmental conditions. Current methods for
comparing microbial communities face important limitations. Those based on
taxonomical or functional assignation rely on a small subset of the sequences
that can be associated to known organisms. On the other hand, de novo methods,
that compare the whole sets of sequences, either do not scale up on ambitious
metagenomic projects or do not provide precise and exhaustive results.
  Methods. These limitations motivated the development of a new de novo
metagenomic comparative method, called Simka. This method computes a large
collection of standard ecological distances by replacing species counts by
k-mer counts. Simka scales-up today's metagenomic projects thanks to a new
parallel k-mer counting strategy on multiple datasets.
  Results. Experiments on public Human Microbiome Project datasets demonstrate
that Simka captures the essential underlying biological structure. Simka was
able to compute in a few hours both qualitative and quantitative ecological
distances on hundreds of metagenomic samples (690 samples, 32 billions of
reads). We also demonstrate that analyzing metagenomes at the k-mer level is
highly correlated with extremely precise de novo comparison techniques which
rely on all-versus-all sequences alignment strategy or which are based on
taxonomic profiling.
