  A likely source of earthquake clustering is static stress transfer between
individual events. Previous attempts to quantify the role of static stress for
earthquake triggering generally considered only the stress changes caused by
large events, and often discarded data uncertainties. We conducted a robust
two-fold empirical test of the static stress change hypothesis by accounting
for all events of magnitude M>=2.5 and their location and focal mechanism
uncertainties provided by catalogs for Southern California between 1981 and
2010, first after resolving the focal plane ambiguity and second after randomly
choosing one of the two nodal planes. For both cases, we find compelling
evidence supporting the static triggering with stronger evidence after
resolving the focal plane ambiguity above significantly small (about 10 Pa) but
consistently observed stress thresholds. The evidence for the static triggering
hypothesis is robust with respect to the choice of the friction coefficient,
Skempton's coefficient and magnitude threshold. Weak correlations between the
Coulomb Index (fraction of earthquakes that received positive Coulomb stress
change) and the coefficient of friction indicate that the role of normal stress
in triggering is rather limited. Last but not the least, we determined that the
characteristic time for the loss of the stress change memory of a single event
is nearly independent of the amplitude of the Coulomb stress change and varies
between ~95 and ~180 days implying that forecasts based on static stress
changes will have poor predictive skills beyond times that are larger than a
few hundred days on average.
