  The study by Oberlack et al. (2006) consists of two main parts: a direct
numerical simulation (DNS) of a turbulent plane channel flow with streamwise
rotation and a preceding Lie-group symmetry analysis on the two-point
correlation equation (TPC) to analytically predict the scaling of the mean
velocity profiles for different rotation rates. We will only comment on the
latter part, since the DNS result obtained in the former part has already been
commented on by Recktenwald et al. (2009), stating that the observed mismatch
between DNS and their performed experiment is possibly due to the prescription
of periodic boundary conditions on a too small computational domain in the
spanwise direction. By revisiting the group analysis part in Oberlack et al.
(2006), we will generate more natural scaling laws describing better the mean
velocity profiles than the ones proposed. However, due to the statistical
closure problem of turbulence, this improvement is illusive. As we will
demonstrate, any arbitrary invariant scaling law for the mean velocity profiles
can be generated consistent to any higher order in the velocity correlations.
This problem of arbitrariness in invariant scaling persists even if we would
formally consider the infinite statistical hierarchy of all multi-point
correlation equations. The closure problem of turbulence simply cannot be
circumvented by just employing the method of Lie-group symmetry analysis alone:
as the statistical equations are unclosed, so are their symmetries! Hence, an a
priori prediction as how turbulence scales is thus not possible. Only a
posteriori by anticipating what to expect from numerical or experimental data
the adequate invariant scaling law can be generated through an iterative
trial-and-error process. Finally, apart from this issue, also several
inconsistencies and incorrect statements to be found in Oberlack et al. (2006)
will be pointed out.
