  We present a replication and correction of a recent article (Ramirez, P.,
Reade, J.J., Singleton, C., Betting on a buzz: Mispricing and inefficiency in
online sportsbooks, International Journal of Forecasting, 39:3, 2023, pp.
1413-1423, doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.07.011). RRS measure profile page
views on Wikipedia to generate a "buzz factor" metric for tennis players and
show that it can be used to form a profitable gambling strategy by predicting
bookmaker mispricing. Here, we use the same dataset as RRS to reproduce their
results exactly, thus confirming the robustness of their mispricing claim.
However, we discover that the published betting results are significantly
affected by a single bet (the "Hercog" bet), which returns substantial outlier
profits based on erroneously long odds. When this data quality issue is
resolved, the majority of reported profits disappear. One strategy, which only
bets on "competitive" matches, remains profitable in the original out-of-sample
period, thus confirming RRS' market inefficiency claim. As an extension, we
continue backtesting after 2020 on a cleaned dataset. Results show that (a) the
"competitive" strategy generates no further profits, suggesting markets have
become more efficient, and (b) model coefficients estimated over this more
recent period are no longer reliable predictors of bookmaker mispricing. We
present this work as a case study demonstrating the importance of replication
studies in sports forecasting, and the necessity to clean data. We open-source
release comprehensive datasets and code.
