  We analyze the properties of model food webs and of fifteen community food
webs from a variety of environments. We first perform a theoretical analysis of
the niche model of Williams and Martinez. We derive analytical expressions for
the distributions of species' number of prey, number of predators, and total
number of trophic links and find that they follow universal functional forms.
We also derive expressions for a number of other biologically relevant
parameters, including the fraction of top, intermediate, basal, and cannibal
species, the standard deviations of generality and vulnerability, the
correlation coefficient between species' number of prey and number of
predators, and assortativity. We show that our findings are robust under rather
general conditions. We then use our analytical predictions as a guide to the
analysis of fifteen of the most complete empirical food webs available. We
uncover quantitative unifying patterns that describe the properties of the
model food webs and most of the trophic webs considered. Our results support a
strong new hypothesis that the empirical distributions of number of prey and
number of predators follow universal functional forms that, without free
parameters, match our analytical predictions. Further, we find that the
empirically observed correlation coefficient, assortativity, and fraction of
cannibal species are consistent with our analytical expressions and simulations
of the niche model. Finally, we show that the average distance between nodes
and the average clustering coefficient show a high degree of regularity for
both the empirical data and simulations of the niche model. Our findings
suggest that statistical physics concepts such as scaling and universality may
be useful in the description of natural ecosystems.
