  Cooperation in evolutionary biology means paying a cost, c, to enjoy
benefits, b. A defector is one who does not pay any cost but enjoys the
benefits of cooperators. Human societies, especially, have evolved a strategy
to discourage defection, punishment. Costly punishment is a type of punishment
where an agent in a biological network or some cooperative scheme pays a cost
to ensure another agent incurs some cost. A previous study shows how parameters
like diversity in neighbors across games, density of connectivity, and costly
punishment influence the evolution of cooperation in non-regular networks. In
this study, evolution in regular networks due to the influence of costly
punishment is also considered, specifically spatial lattices. This study
compares observations between non-regular and regular networks as these
parameters change and brings a clearer understanding of interactions that occur
in these networks. The models, results and analysis bring a new understanding
to game theory and punishment. The results show that costly punishment never
arises as a sole evolutionary strategy. However, in evolutionary games where
costly punishers could evolve more favorable strategies, the initial presence
of costly punishers would bring about high average payoffs in all types of
regular networks and heterogeneous networks. In regular networks, every node
has the same degree, k. Although punishment is conventionally thought to be
anti-progressive, in the presence of diversity in neighbors, it magnifies the
payoff of a group for all heterogeneous networks. In regular networks however,
diversity in neighbors is not required for costly punishment to boost average
payoff. This suggests an answer to the question on why costly punishment has
been favored by natural selection, which is particularly obvious in human
populations.
