  Sensing technologies deployed in the workplace can unobtrusively collect
detailed data about individual activities and group interactions that are
otherwise difficult to capture. A hopeful application of these technologies is
that they can help businesses and workers optimize productivity and wellbeing.
However, given the workplace's inherent and structural power dynamics, the
prevalent approach of accepting tacit compliance to monitor work activities
rather than seeking workers' meaningful consent raises privacy and ethical
concerns. This paper unpacks the challenges workers face when consenting to
workplace wellbeing technologies. Using a hypothetical case to prompt
reflection among six multi-stakeholder focus groups involving 15 participants,
we explored participants' expectations and capacity to consent to these
technologies. We sketched possible interventions that could better support
meaningful consent to workplace wellbeing technologies by drawing on critical
computing and feminist scholarship -- which reframes consent from a purely
individual choice to a structural condition experienced at the individual level
that needs to be freely given, reversible, informed, enthusiastic, and specific
(FRIES). The focus groups revealed how workers are vulnerable to "meaningless"
consent -- as they may be subject to power dynamics that minimize their ability
to withhold consent and may thus experience an erosion of autonomy, also
undermining the value of data gathered in the name of "wellbeing." To
meaningfully consent, participants wanted changes to the technology and to the
policies and practices surrounding the technology. Our mapping of what prevents
workers from meaningfully consenting to workplace wellbeing technologies
(challenges) and what they require to do so (interventions) illustrates how the
lack of meaningful consent is a structural problem requiring socio-technical
solutions.
