  Randomized experiments are the gold standard for causal inference, and
justify simple comparisons across treatment groups. Regression adjustment
provides a convenient way to incorporate covariate information for additional
efficiency. This article provides a unified account of its utility for
improving estimation efficiency in multi-armed experiments. We start with the
commonly used additive and fully interacted models for regression adjustment,
and clarify the trade-offs between the resulting ordinary least-squares (OLS)
estimators for estimating average treatment effects in terms of finite-sample
performance and asymptotic efficiency. We then move on to regression adjustment
based on restricted least squares (RLS), and establish for the first time its
properties for inferring average treatment effects from the design-based
perspective. The resulting inference has multiple guarantees. First, it is
asymptotically efficient when the restriction is correctly specified. Second,
it remains consistent as long as the restriction on the coefficients of the
treatment indicators, if any, is correctly specified and separate from that on
the coefficients of the treatment-covariates interactions. Third, it can have
better finite-sample performance than its unrestricted counterpart even if the
restriction is moderately misspecified. It is thus our recommendation for
covariate adjustment in multi-armed experiments when the OLS fit of the fully
interacted regression risks large finite-sample variability in case of many
covariates, many treatments, yet a moderate sample size. In addition, the
proposed theory of RLS also provides a powerful tool for studying OLS-based
inference from general regression specifications. As an illustration, we
demonstrate its unique value for studying OLS-based regression adjustment in
factorial experiments via both theory and simulation.
