  In the second half of the 20th century, Parliament allowed broadcasters to
transmit radio and eventually television coverage of debates and meetings of
select committees. More recently, in an effort to further improve transparency
and citizen engagement, the UK Parliament started publishing videos of these
debates and meetings itself, and tweeting details of debates as they happened.
In this paper, we attempt to characterise how people engage with video data of
Parliamentary debates by using more than two years of Google Analytics data
around these videos. We analyse the patterns of engagement - how do they land
on a particular video? How do they hear about this video, i.e., what is the
(HTTP) referrer website that led to the user clicking on the video? Once a user
lands on a video, how do they engage with it? For how long is the video played?
What is the next destination? etc. Answering these questions is an important
first step towards understanding why and how people use Parliamentary videos,
and therefore, how the video delivery platform should be adapted and
personalised for the needs of the citizens of the country. Taking inspiration
from An, Kwak, and Jansen (2017), we employ Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
(NMF) (Lee and Seung, 1999) on the video views matrix to identify different
archetypes of users, and identify archetypes. A deeper examination of the
archetypes we find reveals that they are primarily distinguished by how they
land on the video page: Search (i.e., through a search engine), Referral (i.e.,
from other Parliamentary websites), Direct (i.e., through a direct link, which
is embedded on another website), Social (i.e., through a social platform such
as Facebook or Twitter) and Others.
