  Social platforms, and the online communities that use them, are evolving at a
rapid pace. As a result, research and development regarding how to moderate
online communities is being out-paced. In this paper, we present a novel
framework that will allow moderation researchers and practitioners to not only
keep-up with the diverse landscape of available platforms and affordances, but
also comprehensively represent and analyze moderation on these platforms. The
MIC framework represents a social platform's moderation ecosystem using a
base-set of 12 platform-level affordances, along with a notion of the
inter-affordance relationships that can exist between them. These affordances
fall into the three categories -- Members, Infrastructure, and Content -- that
are derived from Grimmelmann's taxonomy of moderation, a framework that is
already widely accepted and used by the moderation research community. To show
how MIC serves as an insightful augmentation of Grimmelmann's lens, we begin by
describing how its components have already been shown to impact Grimmelmann's
techniques for moderation. Then, we demonstrate the advantages of using an
affordance-aware framework like MIC by analyzing several social platforms over
the course of two case studies. First, we analyze individual platforms using
MIC and demonstrate how MIC can be used to examine the effects of platform
changes on the moderation ecosystem and identify potential new challenges in
moderation. Next, use MIC to systematically compare three platforms and propose
potential moderation mechanisms that each can adapt. Moderation researchers and
stakeholders can use such comparisons to uncover where platforms can emulate
established, successful and better-studied platforms, as well as learn from the
pitfalls other platforms have encountered.
