  What is motivation and how does it work? Where do goals come from and how do
they vary within and between species and individuals? Why do we prefer some
things over others? MEDO is a theoretical framework for understanding these
questions in abstract terms, as well as for generating and evaluating specific
hypotheses that seek to explain goal-oriented behavior. MEDO views preferences
as selective pressures influencing the likelihood of particular outcomes. With
respect to biological organisms, these patterns must compete and cooperate in
shaping system evolution. To the extent that shaping processes are themselves
altered by experience, this enables feedback relationships where histories of
reward and punishment can impact future motivation. In this way, various biases
can undergo either amplification or attenuation, resulting in preferences and
behavioral orientations of varying degrees of inter-temporal and
inter-situational stability. MEDO specifically models all shaping dynamics in
terms of natural selection operating on multiple levels--genetic, neural, and
cultural--and even considers aspects of development to themselves be
evolutionary processes. Thus, MEDO reflects a kind of generalized Darwinism, in
that it assumes that natural selection provides a common principle for
understanding the emergence of complexity within all dynamical systems in which
replication, variation, and selection occur. However, MEDO combines this
evolutionary perspective with economic decision theory, which describes both
the preferences underlying individual choices, as well as the preferences
underlying choices made by engineers in designing optimized systems. In this
way, MEDO uses economic decision theory to describe goal-oriented behaviors as
well as the interacting evolutionary optimization processes from which they
emerge. (Please note: this manuscript was written and finalized in 2012.)
