  The inclination $I$ of an Earth's satellite in polar orbit undergoes a
secular De Sitter precession of $-7.6$ milliarcseconds per year for a suitable
choice of the initial value of its non-circulating node $\Omega$. The competing
long-periodic harmonic rates of change of $I$ due to the even and odd zonal
harmonics of the geopotential vanish for either a circular or polar orbit,
while no secular rates occur at all. This may open up, in principle, the
possibility of measuring the geodesic precession in the weak-field limit with
an accurately tracked satellite by improving the current bound of $9\times
10^{-4}$ from Lunar Laser Ranging, which, on the other hand, may be even rather
optimistic, by one order of magnitude, or, perhaps, even better. The most
insidious competing effects are due to the solid and ocean components of the
$K_1$ tide since their perturbations have nominal huge amplitudes and the same
temporal pattern of the De Sitter signature. They vanish for polar orbits.
Departures of $\simeq 10^{-5}-10^{-3}~\textrm{deg}$ from the ideal polar
geometry allow to keep the $K_1$ tidal perturbations to a sufficiently small
level. Most of the other gravitational and non-gravitational perturbations
vanish for the proposed orbital configuration, while the non-vanishing ones
either have different temporal signatures with respect to the De Sitter effect
or can be modeled with sufficient accuracy. In order to meet the proposed goal,
the measurement accuracy of $I$ should be better than $\simeq
35~\textrm{microarcseconds}=0.034~\textrm{milliarcseconds}$ over, say, 5 yr.
