  The ability to estimate the evolutionary distance between extant genomes
plays a crucial role in many phylogenomic studies. Often such estimation is
based on the parsimony assumption, implying that the distance between two
genomes can be estimated as the rearrangement distance equal the minimal number
of genome rearrangements required to transform one genome into the other.
However, in reality the parsimony assumption may not always hold, emphasizing
the need for estimation that does not rely on the rearrangement distance. The
distance that accounts for the actual (rather than minimal) number of
rearrangements between two genomes is often referred to as the true
evolutionary distance. While there exists a method for the true evolutionary
distance estimation, it however assumes that genomes can be broken by
rearrangements equally likely at any position in the course of evolution. This
assumption, known as the random breakage model, has recently been refuted in
favor of the more rigorous fragile breakage model postulating that only certain
"fragile" genomic regions are prone to rearrangements.
  We propose a new method for estimating the true evolutionary distance between
two genomes under the fragile breakage model. We evaluate the proposed method
on simulated genomes, which show its high accuracy. We further apply the
proposed method for estimation of evolutionary distances within a set of five
yeast genomes and a set of two fish genomes.
