  The ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) revolution has the potential to
change almost every line of work. As AI capabilities continue to improve in
accuracy, robustness, and reach, AI may outperform and even replace human
experts across many valuable tasks. Despite enormous efforts devoted to
understanding AI's impact on labor and the economy and its recent success in
accelerating scientific discovery and progress, we lack a systematic
understanding of how advances in AI may benefit scientific research across
disciplines and fields. Here we develop a measurement framework to estimate
both the direct use of AI and the potential benefit of AI in scientific
research by applying natural language processing techniques to 87.6 million
publications and 7.1 million patents. We find that the use of AI in research
appears widespread throughout the sciences, growing especially rapidly since
2015, and papers that use AI exhibit an impact premium, more likely to be
highly cited both within and outside their disciplines. While almost every
discipline contains some subfields that benefit substantially from AI,
analyzing 4.6 million course syllabi across various educational disciplines, we
find a systematic misalignment between the education of AI and its impact on
research, suggesting the supply of AI talents in scientific disciplines is not
commensurate with AI research demands. Lastly, examining who benefits from AI
within the scientific workforce, we find that disciplines with a higher
proportion of women or black scientists tend to be associated with less
benefit, suggesting that AI's growing impact on research may further exacerbate
existing inequalities in science. As the connection between AI and scientific
research deepens, our findings may have an increasing value, with important
implications for the equity and sustainability of the research enterprise.
