  During recent crisis, wage subsidies played a major role in sheltering firms
and households from economic shocks. During COVID-19, most workers were
affected and many liberal welfare states introduced new temporary wage
subsidies to protected workers' earnings and employment (OECD, 2021). New wage
subsidies marked a departure from the structure of traditional income support
payments and required reform. This paper uses simulated datasets to assess the
structure and incentives of the Irish COVID-19 wage subsidy scheme (CWS) under
five designs. We use a nowcasting approach to update 2017 microdata, producing
a near real time picture of the labour market at the peak of the crisis. Using
microsimulation modelling, we assess the impact of different designs on income
replacement, work incentives and income inequality. Our findings suggest that
pro rata designs support middle earners more and flat rate designs support low
earners more. We find evidence for strong work disincentives under all designs,
though flat rate designs perform better. Disincentives are primarily driven by
generous unemployment payments and work related costs. The impact of design on
income inequality depends on the generosity of payments. Earnings related pro
rata designs were associated to higher market earnings inequality. The
difference in inequality levels falls once benefits, taxes and work related
costs are considered. In our discussion, we turn to transaction costs, the
rationale for reform and reintegration of CWS. We find some support for the
claim that design changes were motivated by political considerations. We
suggest that establishing permanent wage subsidies based on sectorial turnover
rules could offer enhanced protection to middle-and high-earners and reduce
uncertainty, the need for reform, and the risk of politically motivated
designs.
