  Safety in human-robot interaction can be divided into physical safety and
perceived safety, where the latter is still under-addressed in the literature.
Investigating perceived safety in human-robot interaction requires a
multidisciplinary perspective. Indeed, perceived safety is often considered as
being associated with several common factors studied in other disciplines,
i.e., comfort, predictability, sense of control, and trust. In this paper, we
investigated the relationship between these factors and perceived safety in
human-robot interaction using subjective and objective measures. We conducted a
two-by-five mixed-subjects design experiment. The five within-subjects
conditions correspond to (1) baseline, and the manipulations of robot behaviors
to stimulate: (2) discomfort, (3) decreased perceived safety, (4) decreased
sense of control and (5) distrust. Twenty-seven young adult participants took
part in the experiments. Participants were asked to answer questionnaires that
measure the manipulated factors after within-subjects conditions. Besides
questionnaire data, we collected objective measures such as videos and
physiological data. The questionnaire results show a correlation between
comfort, sense of control, trust, and perceived safety. We also discuss the
effect of individual human characteristics (such as personality and gender)
that they could be predictors of perceived safety. We used the physiological
signal data and facial affect from videos for estimating perceived safety where
participants' subjective ratings were utilized as labels. The data from
objective measures revealed that the prediction rate was higher from
physiological signal data. This paper can play an important role in the goal of
better understanding perceived safety in human-robot interaction.
