  Recently, V. Laure van Bambeke used an original approach to solve the famous
problem of transformation of values into production prices by considering that
capital reallocation to each department (branch) was part of the problem. Here,
we confirm the validity of this consideration in relation with the satisfaction
of demand (social need which is able to pay for the given product). In contrast
to V. Laure van Bambeke's method of solving an overdetermined system of
equations (implying that compliance with Marx's fundamental equalities could
only be approached), we show that the transformation problem is solvable from a
determined (two-branch models) or an underdetermined system of equations
enabling to obtain exact solutions through an algorithm we provide, with no
approximation needed. For systems with three branches or more, the solution of
the transformation problem belongs to an infinite ensemble, accounting for the
observed high competition-driven market fluidity. Furthermore, we show that the
transformation problem is solvable in the absence of fixed capital, supporting
that dealing with the latter is not essential and cannot be seen as a potential
flaw of the approach. Our algorithm enables simulations illustrating how the
transient rise in the rate of profit predicted by the Okishio theorem is
consistent with the tendency of the rate of profit to fall (TRPF) subsequent to
capital reallocation, and how the TRPF is governed by the increase of organic
composition, in value. We establish that the long-standing transformation
problem is not such a problem since it is easily solved through our algorithm,
whatever the number of branches considered. This emphasizes the high coherence
of Marx's conception, and its impressive relevance regarding issues such as the
TRPF, which have remained intensely debated.
