  The governance of the political and economic world order builds on a complex
architecture of international treaties at various geographical scales. In a
historical phase of high institutional turbulence, assessing the stability of
such architecture with respect to the unilateral defection of single countries
and to the breakdown of single treaties is important. We carry out this
analysis on the whole global architecture and find that the countries with the
highest disruption potential are not major world powers (with the exception of
Germany and France) but mostly medium-small and micro-countries. Political
stability is highly dependent on many former colonial overseas territories that
are today part of the global network of fiscal havens, as well as on emerging
economies, mostly from South-East Asia. Economic stability depends on medium
sized European and African countries. However, single global treaties have
surprisingly less disruptive potential, with the major exception of the WTO.
These apparently counter-intuitive results highlight the importance to a
nonlinear approach to international relations where the complex multilayered
architecture of global governance is analyzed using advanced network science
techniques. Our results suggest that the potential fragility of the world order
seem to be much more directly related to global inequality and fiscal injustice
than it is commonly believed, and that the legacy of the colonial world order
is still very strong in the current international relations scenario. In
particular, vested interests related to tax avoidance seem to have a structural
role in the political architecture of global governance
