  Empirical analyses on income and wealth inequality and those in other fields
in economics and finance often face the difficulty that the data is
heterogeneous, heavy-tailed or correlated in some unknown fashion. The paper
focuses on applications of the recently developed \textit{t}-statistic based
robust inference approaches in the analysis of inequality measures and their
comparisons under the above problems. Following the approaches, in particular,
a robust large sample test on equality of two parameters of interest (e.g., a
test of equality of inequality measures in two regions or countries considered)
is conducted as follows: The data in the two samples dealt with is partitioned
into fixed numbers $q_1, q_2\ge 2$ (e.g., $q_1=q_2=2, 4, 8$) of groups, the
parameters (inequality measures dealt with) are estimated for each group, and
inference is based on a standard two-sample $t-$test with the resulting $q_1,
q_2$ group estimators. Robust $t-$statistic approaches result in valid
inference under general conditions that group estimators of parameters (e.g.,
inequality measures) considered are asymptotically independent, unbiased and
Gaussian of possibly different variances, or weakly converge, at an arbitrary
rate, to independent scale mixtures of normal random variables. These
conditions are typically satisfied in empirical applications even under
pronounced heavy-tailedness and heterogeneity and possible dependence in
observations. The methods dealt with in the paper complement and compare
favorably with other inference approaches available in the literature. The use
of robust inference approaches is illustrated by an empirical analysis of
income inequality measures and their comparisons across different regions in
Russia.
