  Using a set of oscillator strengths and excited-state dipole moments of near
full configuration interaction (FCI) quality determined for small compounds, we
benchmark the performances of several single-reference wave function methods
(CC2, CCSD, CC3, CCSDT, ADC(2), and ADC(3/2)) and time-dependent
density-functional theory (TD-DFT) with various functionals (B3LYP, PBE0,
M06-2X, CAM-B3LYP, and $\omega$B97X-D). We consider the impact of various
gauges (length, velocity, and mixed) and formalisms: equation of motion (EOM)
\emph{vs} linear response (LR), relaxed \emph{vs} unrelaxed orbitals, etc.
Beyond the expected accuracy improvements and a neat decrease of formalism
sensitivy when using higher-order wave function methods, the present
contribution shows that, for both ADC(2) and CC2, the choice of gauge impacts
more significantly the magnitude of the oscillator strengths than the choice of
formalism, and that CCSD yields a notable improvement on this transition
property as compared to CC2. For the excited-state dipole moments, switching on
orbital relaxation appreciably improves the accuracy of both ADC(2) and CC2,
but has a rather small effect at the CCSD level. Going from ground to excited
states, the typical errors on dipole moments for a given method tend to roughly
triple. Interestingly, the ADC(3/2) oscillator strengths and dipoles are
significantly more accurate than their ADC(2) counterparts, whereas the two
models do deliver rather similar absolute errors for transition energies.
Concerning TD-DFT, one finds: i) a rather negligible impact of the gauge on
oscillator strengths for all tested functionals (except for M06-2X); ii)
deviations of ca.~0.10 D on ground-state dipoles for all functionals; iii) the
better overall performance of CAM-B3LYP for the two considered excited-state
properties.
