  We examine cooperative games where the viability of a coalition is determined
by whether or not its members have the ability to communicate amongst
themselves independently of non-members. This necessary condition for viability
was proposed by Myerson (1977) and is modeled via an interaction graph
$G=(V,E)$; a coalition $S\subseteq V$ is then viable if and only if the induced
graph $G[S]$ is connected. The non-emptiness of the core of a coalition game
can be tested by a well-known covering LP. Moreover, the integrality gap of its
dual packing LP defines exactly the multiplicative least-core and the relative
cost of stability of the coalition game. This gap is upper bounded by the
packing-covering ratio which, for graphical coalition games, is known to be at
most the treewidth of the interaction graph plus one (Meir et al. 2013).
  We examine the packing-covering ratio and integrality gaps of graphical
coalition games in more detail. We introduce the thicket parameter of a graph,
and prove it precisely measures the packing-covering ratio. It also
approximately measures the primal and dual integrality gaps. The thicket number
provides an upper bound of both integrality gaps. Moreover we show that for any
interaction graph, the primal integrality gap is, in the worst case, linear in
terms of the thicket number while the dual integrality gap is polynomial in
terms of it. At the heart of our results, is a graph theoretic minmax theorem
showing the thicket number is equal to the minimum width of a vine
decomposition of the coalition graph (a vine decomposition is a generalization
of a tree decomposition). We also explain how the thicket number relates to the
VC-dimension of the set system produced by the game.
