  Transportation systems will be likely transformed by the emergence of
automated vehicles (AVs) promising for safe, convenient, and efficient
mobility, especially if used in shared systems (shared AV or SAV). However, the
potential tendency is observed towards owning AV as a private asset rather than
using SAV. This calls for a research on investigating individuals' attitude
towards AV in comparison with SAV to recognize the barriers to the public's
tendency towards SAV. To do so, the present study proposes a modeling framework
based on the theories in behavioral psychology to explain individuals'
preference for owning AV over using SAV, built as a latent (subjective)
psychometric construct, by three groups of explanatory latent constructs
including: (i) desire for searching for benefits, i.e., extrinsic motive
manifested in utilitarian beliefs; (ii) tendency towards seeking pleasure and
joy, i.e., intrinsic motive reflected in hedonic beliefs; and (iii) attitude
towards three configurations of shared mobility, i.e., experience with car and
ridesharing, bikesharing, and public transit. Estimated on a sample dataset
from the State of California, the findings can shed initial lights on the
psychological determinants of the public's attitude towards owning AV versus
using SAV, which can furthermore provide policy implications intriguing for
policy makers and stakeholders. Of note, the findings reveal the strongest
influential factor on preference for AV over SAV as hedonic beliefs reflected
in perceived enjoyment. This preference is next affected by utilitarian
beliefs, particularly perceived benefit and trust of stranger, followed by
attitude towards car and ride sharing.
