  Kleene Algebra (KA) is a useful tool for proving that two programs are
equivalent by reasoning equationally. Because it abstracts from the meaning of
primitive programs, KA's equational theory is decidable, so it integrates well
with interactive theorem provers. This raises the question: which equations can
we (not) prove using the laws of KA? Moreover, which models of KA are complete,
in the sense that they satisfy exactly the provable equations? Kozen (1994)
answered these questions by characterizing KA in terms of its language model.
Concretely, equivalences provable in KA are exactly those that hold for regular
expressions.
  Pratt (1980) observed that KA is complete w.r.t. relational models, i.e.,
that its provable equations are those that hold for any relational
interpretation. A less known result due to Palka (2005) says that finite models
are complete for KA, i.e., that provable equivalences coincide with equations
satisfied by all finite KAs. Phrased contrapositively, the latter is a finite
model property (FMP): any unprovable equation is falsified by a finite KA.
These results can be argued using Kozen's theorem, but the implication is
mutual: given that KA is complete w.r.t. finite (resp. relational) models,
Palka's (resp. Pratt's) arguments show that it is complete w.r.t. the language
model.
  We embark on a study of the different complete models of KA, and the
connections between them. This yields a fourth result subsuming those of Palka
and Pratt, namely that KA is complete w.r.t. finite relational models. Next, we
put an algebraic spin on Palka's techniques, which yield an elementary proof of
the finite model property, and by extension, of Kozen's and Pratt's theorems.
In contrast with earlier approaches, this proof relies not on minimality or
bisimilarity of automata, but rather on representing the regular expressions
involved in terms of transformation automata.
