  This paper examines the impact of government procurement in social welfare
programs on consumers, manufacturers, and the government. We analyze the U.S.
infant formula market, where over half of the total sales are purchased by the
Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program. The WIC program utilizes
first-price auctions to solicit rebates from the three main formula
manufacturers, with the winner exclusively serving all WIC consumers in the
winning state. The manufacturers compete aggressively in providing rebates
which account for around 85% of the wholesale price. To rationalize and
disentangle the factors contributing to this phenomenon, we model
manufacturers' retail pricing competition by incorporating two unique features:
price inelastic WIC consumers and government regulation on WIC brand prices.
Our findings confirm three sizable benefits from winning the auction: a notable
spill-over effect on non-WIC demand, a significant marginal cost reduction, and
a higher retail price for the WIC brand due to the price inelasticity of WIC
consumers. Our counterfactual analysis shows that procurement auctions affect
manufacturers asymmetrically, with the smallest manufacturer harmed the most.
More importantly, by switching from the current mechanism to a predetermined
rebate procurement, the government can still contain the cost successfully,
consumers' surplus is greatly improved, and the smallest manufacturer benefits
from the switch, promoting market competition.
