  Neutrino cross-section measurements are often presented as unfolded binned
distributions in "true" variables. The ill-posedness of the unfolding problem
can lead to results with strong anti-correlations and fluctuations between
bins, which make comparisons to theoretical models in plots difficult. To
alleviate this problem, one can introduce regularisation terms in the unfolding
procedure. These suppress the anti-correlations in the result, at the cost of
introducing some bias towards the expected shape of the data. This paper
discusses a method using simple linear algebra, which makes it is possible to
regularise any result that is presented as a central value and a covariance
matrix. This "post-hoc" regularisation is generally much faster than repeating
the unfolding method with different regularisation terms. The method also
yields a regularisation matrix which connects the regularised to the
unregularised result, and can be used to retain the full statistical power of
the unregularised result when publishing a nicer looking regularised result. In
addition to the regularisation method, this paper also presents some thoughts
on the presentation of correlated data in general. When using the proposed
method, the bias of the regularisation can be understood as a data
visualisation problem rather than a statistical one. The strength of the
regularisation can be chosen by minimising the difference between the
implicitly uncorrelated distribution shown in the plots and the actual
distribution described by the unregularised central value and covariance. Aside
from minimising the difference between the shown and the actual result,
additional information can be provided by showing the local log-likelihood
gradient of the models shown in the plots. This adds more information about
where the model is "pulled" by the data than just comparing the bin values to
the data's central values.
