  We propose a robust Bayesian method for economic models that can be rejected
under some data distributions. The econometrician starts with a structural
assumption which can be written as the intersection of several assumptions, and
the joint assumption is refutable. To avoid the model rejection, the
econometrician first takes a stance on which assumption $j$ is likely to be
violated and considers a measurement of the degree of violation of this
assumption $j$. She then considers a (marginal) prior belief on the degree of
violation $(\pi_{m_j})$: She considers a class of prior distributions $\pi_s$
on all economic structures such that all $\pi_s$ have the same marginal
distribution $\pi_m$. Compared to the standard nonparametric Bayesian method
that puts a single prior on all economic structures, the robust Bayesian method
imposes a single marginal prior distribution on the degree of violation. As a
result, the robust Bayesian method allows the econometrician to take a stance
only on the likeliness of violation of assumption $j$. Compared to the
frequentist approach to relax the refutable assumption, the robust Bayesian
method is transparent on the econometrician's stance of choosing models. We
also show that many frequentists' ways to relax the refutable assumption can be
found equivalent to particular choices of robust Bayesian prior classes. We use
the local average treatment effect (LATE) in the potential outcome framework as
the leading illustrating example.
