  In the previous paper [J. R. Mannouch and J. O. Richardson,
J.~Chem.~Phys.~xxx, xxxxx (xxxx)] we derived a new partially linearized
mapping-based classical-trajectory technique, called spin-PLDM. This method
describes the dynamics associated with the forward and backward electronic path
integrals, using a Stratonovich-Weyl approach within the spin-mapping space.
While this is the first example of a partially linearized spin mapping method,
fully linearized spin mapping is already known to be capable of reproducing
dynamical observables for a range of nonadiabatic model systems reasonably
accurately. Here we present a thorough comparison of the terms in the
underlying expressions for the real-time quantum correlation functions for
spin-PLDM and fully linearized spin mapping in order to ascertain the relative
accuracy of the two methods. In particular, we show that spin-PLDM contains an
additional term within the definition of its real-time correlation function,
which diminishes many of the known errors that are ubiquitous for fully
linearized approaches. One advantage of partially linearized methods over their
fully linearized counterparts is that the results can be systematically
improved by re-sampling the mapping variables at intermediate times. We derive
such a scheme for spin-PLDM and show that for systems for which the
approximation of classical nuclei is valid, numerically exact results can be
obtained using only a few `jumps'. Additionally, we implement focused initial
conditions for the spin-PLDM method, which reduces the number of classical
trajectories that are needed in order to reach convergence of dynamical
quantities, with seemingly little difference to the accuracy of the result.
