  Credit risk rating is shown to be a relevant determinant in order to estimate
good corporate governance and to self-optimize capital structure. The
conclusion is argued from a study on a selected (and justified) sample of (182)
companies listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange
and which use the same Shanghai Brilliance Credit Rating & Investors Service
Company assessment criteria, for their credit ratings, from 2010 to 2015.
Practically, 3 debt ratios are examined in terms of 11 characteristic
variables. Moreover, any relationship between credit rating and corporate
governance can be thought to be an interesting finding. The relationship
between credit rating and leverage is not as evident as that found by other
researchers from different countries; it is significantly positively related to
the outside director, firm size, tangible assets and firm age, and CEO and
chairman office plurality. However, leverage is found to be negatively
correlated with board size, profitability, growth opportunity, and non-debt tax
shield. Credit rating is positively associated with leverage, but in a less
significant way. CEO-Board chairship duality is insignificantly related to
leverage. The non-debt tax shield is significantly correlated with leverage.
The correlation coefficient between CEO duality and auditor is positive but
weakly significant, but seems not consistent with expectations. Finally,
profitability cause could be regarded as an interesting finding. Indeed, there
is an inverse correlation between profitability and total debt (Notice that the
result supports the pecking order theory). In conclusion, it appears that
credit rating has less effect on the so listed large Chinese companies than in
other countries. Nevertheless, the perspective of assessing credit risk rating
by relevant agencies is indubitably a recommended time dependent leverage
determinant.
