  This paper assesses the equity impacts of for-hire autonomous vehicles (AVs)
and investigates regulatory policies that promote spatial and social equity in
future autonomous mobility ecosystems. To this end, we consider a multimodal
transportation network, where a ride-hailing platform operates a fleet of AVs
to offer mobility-on-demand services in competition with a public transit
agency that offers transit services on a transportation network. A
game-theoretic model is developed to characterize the intimate interactions
between the ride-hailing platform, the transit agency, and multiclass
passengers with distinct income levels. An algorithm is proposed to compute the
Nash equilibrium of the game and conduct an ex-post evaluation of the
performance of the obtained solution. Based on the proposed framework, we
evaluate the spatial and social equity in transport accessibility using the
Theil index, and find that although the proliferation of for-hire AVs in the
ride-hailing network improves overall accessibility, the benefits are not
fairly distributed among distinct locations or population groups, implying that
the deployment of AVs will enlarge the existing spatial and social inequity
gaps in the transportation network if no regulatory intervention is in place.
To address this concern, we investigate two regulatory policies that can
improve transport equity: (a) a minimum service-level requirement on
ride-hailing services, which improves the spatial equity in the transport
network; (b) a subsidy on transit services by taxing ride-hailing services,
which promotes the use of public transit and improves the spatial and social
equity of the transport network. We show that the minimum service-level
requirement entails a trade-off: as a higher minimum service level is imposed,
the spatial inequity reduces, but the social inequity will be exacerbated. On
the other hand ...
