  Purpose. It has been reported clinically that rupture or dissections in
thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) often occur due to hypertension which may be
modelled with sudden increase of peripheral resistance, inducing acute changes
of blood volumes in the aorta. There is clinical evidence that more compliant
aneurysms are less prone to rupture as they can sustain such changes of volume.
The aim of the current paper is to verify this paradigm by evaluating
computationally the role played by the variation of peripheral resistance and
the impact of aortic stiffness onto peak wall stress in ascending TAA. Methods.
Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) analyses were performed using
patient-specific geometries and boundary conditions derived from 4D MRI
datasets acquired on a patient. Blood was assumed incompressible and was
treated as a non-Newtonian fluid using the Carreau model while the wall
mechanical properties were obtained from the bulge inflation tests carried out
in vitro after surgical repair. The Navier Stokes equations were solved in
ANSYS Fluent. The Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian formulation was used to account
for the wall deformations. At the interface between the solid domain and the
fluid domain, the fluid pressure was transferred to the wall and the
displacement of the wall was transferred to the fluid. The two systems were
connected by the System Coupling component which controls the solver execution
of fluid and solid simulations in ANSYS. Fluid and solid domains were solved
sequentially starting from the fluid simulations. Results. Distributions of
blood flow, wall shear stress and wall stress were evaluated in the ascending
thoracic aorta using the FSI analyses. We always observed a significant flow
eccentricity in the simulations, in very good agreement with velocity profiles
measured using 4D MRI. The results also showed significant increase of peak
wall stress due to the increase of peripheral resistance and aortic stiffness.
In the worst case scenario, the largest peripheral resistance (10 10 kg.s.m-4)
and stiffness (10 MPa) resulted in a maximal principal stress equal to 702 kPa,
whereas it was only 77 kPa in normal conditions. Conclusions. This is the first
time that the risk of rupture of an aTAA is quantified in case of the combined
effects of hypertension and aortic stiffness increase. Our findings suggest
that a stiffer TAA may have the most altered distribution of wall stress and an
acute change of peripheral vascular resistance could significantly increase the
risk of rupture for a stiffer aneurysm.
