  Historical (Stressed-) Value-at-Risk ((S)VAR), and Expected Shortfall (ES),
are widely used risk measures in regulatory capital and Initial Margin, i.e.
funding, computations. However, whilst the definitions of VAR and ES are
unambiguous, they depend on input distributions that are data-cleaning- and
Data-Model-dependent. We quantify the scale of these effects from USD CDS
(2004--2014), and from USD interest rates (1989--2014, single-curve setup
before 2004, multi-curve setup after 2004), and make two standardisation
proposals: for data; and for Data-Models. VAR and ES are required for lifetime
portfolio calculations, i.e. collateral calls, which cover a wide range of
market states. Hence we need standard, i.e. clean, complete, and common (i.e.
identical for all banks), market data also covering this wide range of market
states. This data is historically incomplete and not clean hence data
standardization is required. Stressed VAR and ES require moving market
movements during a past (usually not recent) window to current, and future,
market states. All choices (e.g. absolute difference, relative, relative scaled
by some function of market states) implicitly define a Data Model for
transformation of extreme market moves (recall that 99th percentiles are
typical, and the behaviour of the rest is irrelevant). Hence we propose
standard Data Models. These are necessary because different banks have
different stress windows. Where there is no data, or a requirement for
simplicity, we propose standard lookup tables (one per window, etc.). Without
this standardization of data and Data Models we demonstrate that VAR and ES are
complex derivatives of subjective choices.
