  In November, 2011, the Financial Stability Board, in collaboration with the
International Monetary Fund, published a list of 29 "systemically important
financial institutions" (SIFIs). This designation reflects a concern that the
failure of any one of them could have dramatic negative consequences for the
global economy and is based on "their size, complexity, and systemic
interconnectedness". While the characteristics of "size" and "systemic
interconnectedness" have been the subject of a good deal of quantitative
analysis, less attention has been paid to measures of a firm's "complexity." In
this paper we take on the challenges of measuring the complexity of a financial
institution and to that end explore the use of the structure of an individual
firm's control hierarchy as a proxy for institutional complexity. The control
hierarchy is a network representation of the institution and its subsidiaries.
We show that this mathematical representation (and various associated metrics)
provides a consistent way to compare the complexity of firms with often very
disparate business models and as such may provide the foundation for
determining a SIFI designation. By quantifying the level of complexity of a
firm, our approach also may prove useful should firms need to reduce their
level of complexity either in response to business or regulatory needs. Using a
data set containing the control hierarchies of many of the designated SIFIs, we
find that in the past two years, these firms have decreased their level of
complexity, perhaps in response to regulatory requirements.
