  Choose a topos $E$. There are several different "notions of sheafness" on
$E$. How do we visualize them?
  Let's refer to the classifier object of $E$ as $\Omega$, and to its Heyting
Algebra of truth-values, $Sub(1_E)$, as $H$; we will sometimes call $H$ the
"logic" of the topos. There is a well-known way of representing notions of
sheafness as morphisms $j:\Omega\to \Omega$, but these `$j$'s yield big
diagrams when we draw them explicitly; here we will see a way to represent
these `$j$'s as maps $J:H\to H$ in a way that is much more manageable.
  In the previous paper of this series we showed how certain toy models of
Heyting Algebras, called "ZHAs", can be used to develop visual intuition for
how Heyting Algebras and Intuitionistic Propositional Logic work; here we will
extend that to sheaves. The full idea is this: notions of sheafness correspond
to local operators and vice-versa; local operators correspond to J-operators
and vice-versa; if our Heyting Algebra $H$ is a ZHA then J-operators correspond
to slashings on $H$, and vice-versa; slashings on $H$ correspond to "sets of
question marks" and vice-versa, and each set of question marks induces a notion
of erasing and reconstructing, which induces a sheaf. Also, every ZHA $H$
corresponds to an (acyclic) 2-column graph, and vice-versa, and for any
two-column graph $(P,A)$ the logic of the topos $\mathbf{Set}^{(P,A)}$ is
exactly the ZHA $H$ associated to $(P,A)$.
