  The irrelevant speech effect (ISE) characterizes detriment to cognitive task
performance in the presence of irrelevant speech. This paper examines whether
the ISE varies due to the number of simultaneously active nearby talkers (for
up to two talkers), or the overall sound level, within the context of a
simulated open-plan office. Two experiments were conducted within a
climate-controlled chamber that was set-up as a medium-sized open-plan office.
The cognitive tasks performed by the participants included the digit recall
task, and a writing task, within a room acoustic simulation of realistic
multi-talker speech from spatially separated talkers. Within Experiment 1
(n=60), an increase in the number of talkers from none (T0) to one (T1), and
from one to two (T2) simultaneous talkers resulted in statistically significant
decline in the digit recall task performances, with effect sizes of 24% (i.e.,
T1 vs. T0), and 12% (i.e., T2 vs. T1), respectively. The pauses between words
during the writing task were similar for T0 and T1, but showed a statistically
significant increase within T2 vs. T1, with an effect size of 12%. The findings
of Experiment 1 are inconsistent with the maximally distracting status
attributed to T1 in some studies, but is consistent with findings in other
studies. Within Experiment 2 (n = 62), the cognitive performance in T2 remained
largely invariant between 45 and 57 dB (A-weighted sound pressure levels),
which represents a typical range of levels within open-plan offices. In
general, these findings have relevance for characterizing auditory distraction
within complex multi-talker environments; both in laboratory studies and actual
open-plan offices. (Abridged version; please see the paper for the full
abstract)
