  When can an interest group exploit polarization between political parties to
its advantage? Building upon Battaglini and Patacchini (2018), we study a model
where an interest group credibly promises payments to legislators conditional
on voting for its preferred policy. A legislator can be directly susceptible to
other legislators and value voting like them. The overall pattern of
inter-legislator susceptibility determines the relative influence of individual
legislators, and therefore the relative influence of the parties. We show that
high levels of ideological or affective polarization are more likely to benefit
the interest group when the party ideologically aligned with the interest group
is relatively more influential. However, ideological and affective polarization
operate in different ways. The influence of legislators is independent of
ideological polarization. In contrast, affective polarization effectively
creates negative links between legislators across parties, and thus modifies
the relative influence of individual legislators and parties.
