  A certain spectrum, indexed by a\in[0,\infty], of upper bounds P_a(X;x) on
the tail probability P(X\geq x), with P_0(X;x)=P(X\geq x) and P_\infty(X;x)
being the best possible exponential upper bound on P(X\geq x), is shown to be
stable and monotonic in a, x, and X, where x is a real number and X is a random
variable. The bounds P_a(X;x) are optimal values in certain minimization
problems. The corresponding spectrum, also indexed by a\in[0,\infty], of upper
bounds Q_a(X;p) on the (1-p)-quantile of X is stable and monotonic in a, p, and
X, with Q_0(X;p) equal the largest (1-p)-quantile of X. In certain sense, the
quantile bounds Q_a(X;p) are usually close enough to the true quantiles
Q_0(X;p). Moreover, Q_a(X;p) is subadditive in X if a\geq 1, as well as
positive-homogeneous and translation-invariant, and thus is a so-called
coherent measure of risk. A number of other useful properties of the bounds
P_a(X;x) and Q_a(X;p) are established. In particular, quite similarly to the
bounds P_a(X;x) on the tail probabilities, the quantile bounds Q_a(X;p) are the
optimal values in certain minimization problems. This allows for a
comparatively easy incorporation of the bounds P_a(X;x) and Q_a(X;p) into more
specialized optimization problems. It is shown that the minimization problems
for which P_a(X;x) and Q_a(X;p) are the optimal values are in a certain sense
dual to each other; in the case a=\infty this corresponds to the bilinear
Legendre--Fenchel duality. In finance, the (1-p)-quantile Q_0(X;p) is known as
the value-at-risk (VaR), whereas the value of Q_1(X;p) is known as the
conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) and also as the expected shortfall (ES),
average value-at-risk (AVaR), and expected tail loss (ETL). It is shown that
the quantile bounds Q_a(X;p) can be used as measures of economic inequality.
The spectrum parameter, a, may be considered an index of sensitivity to
risk/inequality.
