  We present modelling results that examine the consequences of implementing
cumulative labelling with thymidine analogues, to estimate the cell cycle time
and growth fraction of dividing cells, when the steady-state assumption is
violated. We fix the value of the cell cycle time a priori and examine whether
cumulative labelling can reproduce this value. We find that the cumulative
labelling technique systematically overestimates the growth fraction and cell
cycle time in non-steady cell populations. Our results suggest an explanation
for discrepancies in experimental measurements of oligodendrocyte precursor
cell properties using cumulative labelling. These results also emphasise the
utility of using computational models to determine what violating the
assumptions of experimental techniques would look like in the laboratory before
experiments are undertaken.
