  Context. Pair programming (PP) has been found to increase student interest in
Computer Science, particularly so for women, and would therefore appear to be a
way to help remedy their under-representation, which could be partially
motivated by gender stereotypes applied to software engineers, assuming that
men perform better than their women peers. If this same bias is present in pair
programming, it could work against the goal of improving gender balance.
  Objective. In a remote setting in which students cannot directly observe
their peers, we aim to explore whether they behave differently when the
perceived gender of their remote PP partners changes, searching for differences
in (i) the perceived productivity compared to solo programming; (ii) the
partner's perceived technical competency compared to their own; (iii) the
partner's perceived skill level; (iv) the interaction behavior, such as the
frequency of source code additions, deletions, etc.; and (v) the type and
relative frequencies of dialog messages in a chat window.
  Method. Using the twincode platform, several behaviors are automatically
measured during the remote PP process, together with two questionnaires and a
semantic tagging of the pairs' chats. A series of experiments to identify the
effect, if any, of possible gender bias shall be performed. The control group
will have no information about their partner's gender, whereas the treatment
group will receive such information but will be selectively deceived about
their partner's gender. For each response variable we will (i) compare control
and experimental groups for the score distance between two in-pair tasks; then,
using the data from the experimental group only, we will (ii) compare scores
using the partner's perceived gender as a within-subjects variable; and (iii)
analyze the interaction between the partner's perceived gender and the
subject's gender.
