  We consider the problem of parameterizing Newman-type models of Li-ion
batteries focusing on quantifying the inherent uncertainty of this process and
its dependence on the discharge rate. In order to rule out genuine experimental
error and instead isolate the intrinsic uncertainty of model fitting, we
concentrate on an idealized setting where "synthetic" measurements in the form
of voltage curves are manufactured using the full, and most accurate, Newman
model with parameter values considered "true", whereas parameterization is
performed using simplified versions of the model, namely, the single-particle
model and its recently proposed corrected version. By framing the problem in
this way, we are able to eliminate aspects which affect uncertainty, but are
hard to quantity such as, e.g., experimental errors. The parameterization is
performed by formulating an inverse problem which is solved using a
state-of-the-art Bayesian approach in which the parameters to be inferred are
represented in terms of suitable probability distributions; this allows us to
assess the uncertainty of their reconstruction. The key finding is that while
at slow discharge rates the voltage curves can be reconstructed quite
accurately, this can be achieved with some parameter varying by 300\% or more,
thus providing evidence for very high uncertainty of the parameter inference
process. As the discharge rate increases, the reconstruction uncertainty is
reduced but at the same time the fits to the voltage curves becomes less
accurate. These observations highlight the ill-posedness of the inverse problem
of parameter reconstruction in models of Li-ion battery operation.In practice,
using simplified model appears to be a viable and useful strategy provided that
the assumptions facilitating the model simplification are truly valid for the
battery operating regimes in which the data was collected.
