  Two-player zero-sum "graph games" are a central model, which proceeds as
follows. A token is placed on a vertex of a graph, and the two players move it
to produce an infinite "play", which determines the winner or payoff of the
game. Traditionally, the players alternate turns in moving the token. In
"bidding games", however, the players have budgets and in each turn, an auction
(bidding) determines which player moves the token. So far, bidding games have
only been studied as full-information games. In this work we initiate the study
of partial-information bidding games: we study bidding games in which a
player's initial budget is drawn from a known probability distribution. We show
that while for some bidding mechanisms and objectives, it is straightforward to
adapt the results from the full-information setting to the partial-information
setting, for others, the analysis is significantly more challenging, requires
new techniques, and gives rise to interesting results. Specifically, we study
games with "mean-payoff" objectives in combination with "poorman" bidding. We
construct optimal strategies for a partially-informed player who plays against
a fully-informed adversary. We show that, somewhat surprisingly, the "value"
under pure strategies does not necessarily exist in such games.
