  The so-called Benford's laws are of frequent use in order to observe
anomalies and regularities in data sets, in particular, in election results and
financial statements. Yet, basic financial market indices have not been much
studied, if studied at all, within such a perspective. This paper presents
features in the distributions of S\&P500 daily closing values and the
corresponding daily log returns over a long time interval, [03/01/1950 -
22/08/2014], amounting to 16265 data points. We address the frequencies of the
first, second, and first two significant digits counts and explore the
conformance to Benford's laws of these distributions at five different (equal
size) levels of disaggregation. The log returns are studied for either positive
or negative cases. The results for the S&P500 daily closing values are showing
a huge lack of non-conformity, whatever the different levels of disaggregation.
Some "first digits" and "first two digits" values are even missing. The causes
of this non-conformity are discussed, pointing to the danger in taking
Benford's laws for granted in huge databases, whence drawing "definite
conclusions". The agreements with Benford's laws are much better for the log
returns. Such a disparity in agreements finds an explanation in the data set
itself: the inherent trend in the index. To further validate this, daily
returns have been simulated calibrating the simulations with the observed data
averages and tested against Benford's laws. One finds that not only the trend
but also the standard deviation of the distributions are relevant parameters in
concluding about conformity with Benford's laws.
