  Many open source projects provide good first issues (GFIs) to attract and
retain newcomers. Although several automated GFI recommenders have been
proposed, existing recommenders are limited to recommending generic GFIs
without considering differences between individual newcomers. However, we
observe mismatches between generic GFIs and the diverse background of
newcomers, resulting in failed attempts, discouraged onboarding, and delayed
issue resolution. To address this problem, we assume that personalized first
issues (PFIs) for newcomers could help reduce the mismatches. To justify the
assumption, we empirically analyze 37 newcomers and their first issues resolved
across multiple projects. We find that the first issues resolved by the same
newcomer share similarities in task type, programming language, and project
domain. These findings underscore the need for a PFI recommender to improve
over state-of-the-art approaches. For that purpose, we identify features that
influence newcomers' personalized selection of first issues by analyzing the
relationship between possible features of the newcomers and the characteristics
of the newcomers' chosen first issues. We find that the expertise preference,
OSS experience, activeness, and sentiment of newcomers drive their personalized
choice of the first issues. Based on these findings, we propose a Personalized
First Issue Recommender (PFIRec), which employs LamdaMART to rank candidate
issues for a given newcomer by leveraging the identified influential features.
We evaluate PFIRec using a dataset of 68,858 issues from 100 GitHub projects.
The evaluation results show that PFIRec outperforms existing first issue
recommenders, potentially doubling the probability that the top recommended
issue is suitable for a specific newcomer and reducing one-third of a
newcomer's unsuccessful attempts to identify suitable first issues, in the
median.
