  Brain-controlled robots are a promising new type of assistive device for
severely impaired persons. Little is however known about how to optimize the
interaction of humans and brain-controlled robots. Information about the
human's perceived correctness of robot performance might provide a useful
teaching signal for adaptive control algorithms and thus help enhancing robot
control. Here, we studied whether watching robots perform erroneous vs. correct
action elicits differential brain responses that can be decoded from single
trials of electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings, and whether brain activity
during human-robot interaction is modulated by the robot's visual similarity to
a human. To address these topics, we designed two experiments. In experiment I,
participants watched a robot arm pour liquid into a cup. The robot performed
the action either erroneously or correctly, i.e. it either spilled some liquid
or not. In experiment II, participants observed two different types of robots,
humanoid and non-humanoid, grabbing a ball. The robots either managed to grab
the ball or not. We recorded high-resolution EEG during the observation tasks
in both experiments to train a Filter Bank Common Spatial Pattern (FBCSP)
pipeline on the multivariate EEG signal and decode for the correctness of the
observed action, and for the type of the observed robot. Our findings show that
it was possible to decode both correctness and robot type for the majority of
participants significantly, although often just slightly, above chance level.
Our findings suggest that non-invasive recordings of brain responses elicited
when observing robots indeed contain decodable information about the
correctness of the robot's action and the type of observed robot.
