  This paper examines the dependence of network performance measures on network
size and considers scaling results for large networks. We connect two
performance measures that are well studied, but appear to be unrelated. The
first measure is concerned with energy metrics, namely the $\Hcal_2$--norm of a
network, which arises in control theory applications. The second measure is
concerned with the notion of "tail risk" which arises in economic and financial
networks. We study the question of why such performance measures may
deteriorate at a faster rate than the growth rate of the network. We first
focus on the energy metric and its well known connection to controllability
Gramian of the underlying dynamical system. We show that undirected networks
exhibit the most graceful energy growth rates as network size grows. This rate
is quantified completely by the proximity of spectral radius to unity or
distance to instability. In contrast, we show that the simple characterization
of energy in terms of network spectrum does not exist for directed networks. We
demonstrate that, for any fixed distance to instability, energy of a directed
network can grow at an exponentially faster rate. We provide general methods
for manipulating networks to reduce energy. In particular, we prove that
certain operations that increase the symmetry in a network cannot increase
energy (in an order sense). Secondly, we focus on tail risk in economic and
financial networks. In contrast to $\Hcal_2$--norm which arises from computing
the expectation of energy in the network, tail risk focuses on tail probability
behavior of network variables. Although the two measures differ substantially
we show that they are precisely connected through the system Gramian. This
surprising result explains why topology considerations rather than specific
performance measures dictate the large scale behavior of networks.
