  The Best Estimate plus Uncertainty (BEPU) approach for nuclear systems
modeling and simulation requires that the prediction uncertainty must be
quantified in order to prove that the investigated design stays within
acceptance criteria. A rigorous Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) process should
simultaneously consider multiple sources of quantifiable uncertainties: (1)
parameter uncertainty due to randomness or lack of knowledge; (2) experimental
uncertainty due to measurement noise; (3) model uncertainty caused by
missing/incomplete physics and numerical approximation errors, and (4) code
uncertainty when surrogate models are used. In this paper, we propose a
comprehensive framework to integrate results from inverse UQ and quantitative
validation to provide robust predictions so that all these sources of
uncertainties can be taken into consideration.
  Inverse UQ quantifies the parameter uncertainties based on experimental data
while taking into account uncertainties from model, code and measurement. In
the validation step, we use a quantitative validation metric based on Bayesian
hypothesis testing. The resulting metric, called the Bayes factor, is then used
to form weighting factors to combine the prior and posterior knowledge of the
parameter uncertainties in a Bayesian model averaging process. In this way,
model predictions will be able to integrate the results from inverse UQ and
validation to account for all available sources of uncertainties. This
framework is a step towards addressing the ANS Nuclear Grand Challenge on
"Simulation/Experimentation" by bridging the gap between models and data.
