  The Schelling model of segregation was introduced in economics to show how
micro-motives can influence macro-behavior. Agents on a lattice have two colors
and try to move to a different location if the number of their neighbors with a
different color exceeds some threshold. Simulations reveal that even such mild
local color preferences, or homophily, are sufficient to cause segregation. In
this work, we propose a stochastic generalization of the Schelling model, based
on both race and wealth, to understand how carefully architected placement of
incentives, such as urban infrastructure, might affect segregation. In our
model, each agent is assigned one of two colors along with a label, rich or
poor. Further, we designate certain vertices on the lattice as "urban sites,"
providing civic infrastructure that most benefits the poorer population, thus
incentivizing the occupation of such vertices by poor agents of either color.
We look at the stationary distribution of a Markov process reflecting these
preferences to understand the long-term effects. We prove that when incentives
are large enough, we will have "urbanization of poverty," an observed effect
whereby poor people tend to congregate on urban sites. Moreover, even when
homophily preferences are very small, if the incentives are large and there is
income inequality in the two-color classes, we can get racial segregation on
urban sites but integration on non-urban sites. In contrast, we find overall
mitigation of segregation when the urban sites are distributed throughout the
lattice and the incentives for urban sites exceed the homophily biases. We
prove that in this case, no matter how strong homophily preferences are, it
will be exponentially unlikely that a configuration chosen from stationarity
will have large, homogeneous clusters of agents of either color, suggesting we
will have racial integration with high probability.
