  Given their importance in shaping social networks and determining how
information or diseases propagate in a population, human interactions are the
subject of many data collection efforts. To this aim, different methods are
commonly used, from diaries and surveys to wearable sensors. These methods show
advantages and limitations but are rarely compared in a given setting. As
surveys targeting friendship relations might suffer less from memory biases
than contact diaries, it is also interesting to explore how daily contact
patterns compare with friendship relations and with online social links. Here
we make progresses in these directions by leveraging data from a French high
school: face-to-face contacts measured by two concurrent methods, sensors and
diaries; self-reported friendship surveys; Facebook links. We compare the data
sets and find that most short contacts are not reported in diaries while long
contacts have larger reporting probability, with a general tendency to
overestimate durations. Measured contacts corresponding to reported friendship
can have durations of any length but all long contacts correspond to reported
friendships. Online links not associated to reported friendships correspond to
short face-to-face contacts, highlighting the different nature of reported
friendships and online links. Diaries and surveys suffer from a low sampling
rate, showing the higher acceptability of sensor-based platform. Despite the
biases, we found that the overall structure of the contact network, i.e., the
mixing patterns between classes, is correctly captured by both self-reported
contacts and friendships networks. Overall, diaries and surveys tend to yield a
correct picture of the structural organization of the contact network, albeit
with much less links, and give access to a sort of backbone of the contact
network corresponding to the strongest links in terms of cumulative durations.
