  Background Food taxes and subsidies are one intervention to address poor
diets. Price elasticity (PE) matrices are commonly used to model the change in
food purchasing. Usually a PE matrix is generated in one setting then applied
to another setting with differing starting consumption and prices of foods.
This violates econometric assumptions resulting in likely misestimation of
total food consumption. We illustrate rescaling all consumption after applying
a PE matrix using a total food expenditure elasticity (TFEe, the expenditure
elasticity for all food combined given the policy induced change in the total
price of food). We use case studies of NZ$2 per 100g saturated fat (SAFA) tax,
NZ$0.4 per 100g sugar tax, and a 20% fruit and vegetable (F&V) subsidy. Methods
We estimated changes in food purchasing using a NZ PE matrix applied
conventionally, then with TFEe adjustment. Impacts were quantified for total
food expenditure and health adjusted life years (HALYs) for the total NZ
population alive in 2011 over the rest of their lifetime using a multistate
lifetable model. Results Two NZ studies gave TFEes of 0.68 and 0.83, with
international estimates ranging from 0.46 to 0.90. Without TFEe adjustment,
total food expenditure decreased with the tax policies and increased with the
F&V subsidy, implausible directions of shift given economic theory. After TFEe
adjustment, HALY gains reduced by a third to a half for the two taxes and
reversed from an apparent health loss to a health gain for the F&V subsidy.
With TFEe adjustment, HALY gains (in 1000s) were 1,805 (95% uncertainty
interval 1,337 to 2,340) for the SAFA tax, 1,671 (1,220 to 2,269) for the sugar
tax, and 953 (453 to 1,308) for the F&V subsidy. Conclusions If PE matrices are
applied in settings beyond where they were derived, additional scaling is
likely required. We suggest that the TFEe is a useful scalar.
