  Objective: Radiomics, an emerging tool for medical image analysis, is
potential towards precisely characterizing gastric cancer (GC). Whether using
one-slice 2D annotation or whole-volume 3D annotation remains a long-time
debate, especially for heterogeneous GC. We comprehensively compared 2D and 3D
radiomic features' representation and discrimination capacity regarding GC, via
three tasks.
  Methods: Four-center 539 GC patients were retrospectively enrolled and
divided into the training and validation cohorts. From 2D or 3D regions of
interest (ROIs) annotated by radiologists, radiomic features were extracted
respectively. Feature selection and model construction procedures were customed
for each combination of two modalities (2D or 3D) and three tasks.
Subsequently, six machine learning models (Model_2D^LNM, Model_3D^LNM;
Model_2D^LVI, Model_3D^LVI; Model_2D^pT, Model_3D^pT) were derived and
evaluated to reflect modalities' performances in characterizing GC.
Furthermore, we performed an auxiliary experiment to assess modalities'
performances when resampling spacing is different.
  Results: Regarding three tasks, the yielded areas under the curve (AUCs)
were: Model_2D^LNM's 0.712 (95% confidence interval, 0.613-0.811),
Model_3D^LNM's 0.680 (0.584-0.775); Model_2D^LVI's 0.677 (0.595-0.761),
Model_3D^LVI's 0.615 (0.528-0.703); Model_2D^pT's 0.840 (0.779-0.901),
Model_3D^pT's 0.813 (0.747-0.879). Moreover, the auxiliary experiment indicated
that Models_2D are statistically more advantageous than Models3D with different
resampling spacings.
  Conclusion: Models constructed with 2D radiomic features revealed comparable
performances with those constructed with 3D features in characterizing GC.
  Significance: Our work indicated that time-saving 2D annotation would be the
better choice in GC, and provided a related reference to further
radiomics-based researches.
