  This paper prices and replicates the financial derivative whose payoff at $T$
is the wealth that would have accrued to a $\$1$ deposit into the best
continuously-rebalanced portfolio (or fixed-fraction betting scheme) determined
in hindsight. For the single-stock Black-Scholes market, Ordentlich and Cover
(1998) only priced this derivative at time-0, giving
$C_0=1+\sigma\sqrt{T/(2\pi)}$. Of course, the general time-$t$ price is not
equal to $1+\sigma\sqrt{(T-t)/(2\pi)}$. I complete the Ordentlich-Cover (1998)
analysis by deriving the price at any time $t$. By contrast, I also study the
more natural case of the best levered rebalancing rule in hindsight. This
yields $C(S,t)=\sqrt{T/t}\cdot\,\exp\{rt+\sigma^2b(S,t)^2\cdot t/2\}$, where
$b(S,t)$ is the best rebalancing rule in hindsight over the observed history
$[0,t]$. I show that the replicating strategy amounts to betting the fraction
$b(S,t)$ of wealth on the stock over the interval $[t,t+dt].$ This fact holds
for the general market with $n$ correlated stocks in geometric Brownian motion:
we get $C(S,t)=(T/t)^{n/2}\exp(rt+b'\Sigma b\cdot t/2)$, where $\Sigma$ is the
covariance of instantaneous returns per unit time. This result matches the
$\mathcal{O}(T^{n/2})$ "cost of universality" derived by Cover in his
"universal portfolio theory" (1986, 1991, 1996, 1998), which super-replicates
the same derivative in discrete-time. The replicating strategy compounds its
money at the same asymptotic rate as the best levered rebalancing rule in
hindsight, thereby beating the market asymptotically. Naturally enough, we find
that the American-style version of Cover's Derivative is never exercised early
in equilibrium.
