  Rock-paper-scissors games metaphorically model cyclic dominance in ecology
and microbiology. In a static environment, these models are characterized by
fixation probabilities obeying two different "laws" in large and small
well-mixed populations. Here, we investigate the evolution of these
three-species models subject to a randomly switching carrying capacity modeling
the endless change between states of resources scarcity and abundance. Focusing
mainly on the zero-sum rock-paper-scissors game, equivalent to the cyclic
Lotka-Volterra model, we study how the ${\it coupling}$ of demographic and
environmental noise influences the fixation properties. More specifically, we
investigate which species is the most likely to prevail in a population of
fluctuating size and how the outcome depends on the environmental variability.
We show that demographic noise coupled with environmental randomness "levels
the field" of cyclic competition by balancing the effect of selection. In
particular, we show that fast switching effectively reduces the selection
intensity proportionally to the variance of the carrying capacity. We determine
the conditions under which new fixation scenarios arise, where the most likely
species to prevail changes with the rate of switching and the variance of the
carrying capacity. Random switching has a limited effect on the mean fixation
time that scales linearly with the average population size. Hence,
environmental randomness makes the cyclic competition more egalitarian, but
does not prolong the species coexistence. We also show how the fixation
probabilities of close-to-zero-sum rock-paper-scissors games can be obtained
from those of the zero-sum model by rescaling the selection intensity.
