  In recent years, the sequencing, assembling and annotation of prokaryotic
genomes has become increasingly easy and cheap. Thus it becomes increasingly
feasible and interesting to perform comparative genomics analyses of new
genomes to those of related organisms. Thereby related organisms can be defined
by different criteria, such as taxonomy or phenotype.
  Expectations regarding the contents of genomes are often expressed in
scientific articles describing group of organisms. Evaluating such
expectations, when a new genome becomes available, requires analysing the text
snippets which express such expectations, extracting the logical elements of
the text and enabling a formal expression, more suitable for further automated
analyses.
  Hereby we present a theoretical framework, alongside practical consideration
for expressing expectations about the content of genomes, with the purpose of
enabling such comparative genomics analyses. The components of the framework
include a system for the definition of groups of organisms, supported by a
Prokaryotic Group Types Ontology, a system for the definition of genomic
contents, supported by a Prokaryotic Genomic Contents Definition Ontology.
Finally we discuss how the combination of these two systems may enable an
unambiguous definition of absolute and relative genome content expectation
rules.
