  We study a market of investments on networks, where each agent (vertex) can
invest in any enterprise linked to her, and at the same time, raise capital for
her firm's enterprise from other agents she is linked to. Failing to raise
sufficient capital results with the firm defaulting, being unable to invest in
others. Our main objective is to examine the role of collateral contracts in
handling the strategic risk that can propagate to a systemic risk throughout
the network in a cascade of defaults. We take a mechanism-design approach and
solve for the optimal scheme of collateral contracts that capital raisers offer
their investors. These contracts aim at sustaining the efficient level of
investment as a unique Nash equilibrium, while minimizing the total collateral.
  Our main results contrast the network environment with its non-network
counterpart (where the sets of investors and capital raisers are disjoint). We
show that for acyclic investment networks, the network environment does not
necessitate any additional collaterals, and systemic risk can be fully handled
by optimal bilateral collateral contracts between capital raisers and their
investors. This is, unfortunately, not the case for cyclic investment networks.
We show that bilateral contracting will not suffice to resolve systemic risk,
and the market will need an external entity to design a global collateral
scheme for all capital raisers. Furthermore, the minimum total collateral that
will sustain the efficient level of investment as a unique equilibrium may be
arbitrarily higher, even in simple cyclic investment networks, compared with
its corresponding non-network environment. Additionally, we prove
computational-complexity results, both for a single enterprise and for
networks.
