  \emph{Focused sequent calculi} are a refinement of sequent calculi, where
additional side-conditions on the applicability of inference rules force the
implementation of a proof search strategy. Focused cut-free proofs exhibit a
special normal form that is used for defining identity of sequent calculi
proofs. We introduce a novel focused display calculus fD.LG and a fully
polarized algebraic semantics FP.LG for Lambek-Grishin logic by generalizing
the theory of \emph{multi-type calculi} and their algebraic semantics with
\emph{heterogenous consequence relations}. The calculus fD.LG has \emph{strong
focalization} and it is \emph{sound and complete} w.r.t. FP.LG. This
completeness result is in a sense stronger than completeness with respect to
standard polarized algebraic semantics (see e.g. the phase semantics of
Bastenhof for Lambek-Grishin logic or Hamano and Takemura for linear logic),
insofar we do not need to quotient over proofs with consecutive applications of
shifts over the same formula. We plan to investigate the connections, if any,
between this completeness result and the notion of \emph{full completeness}
introduced by Abramsky et al. We also show a number of additional results.
fD.LG is sound and complete w.r.t. LG-algebras: this amounts to a semantic
proof of the so-called \emph{completeness of focusing}, given that the standard
(display) sequent calculus for Lambek-Grishin logic is complete w.r.t.
LG-algebras. fD.LG and the focused calculus f.LG of Moortgat and Moot are
equivalent with respect to proofs, indeed there is an effective translation
from f.LG-derivations to fD.LG-derivations and vice versa: this provides the
link with operational semantics, given that every f.LG-derivation is in a
Curry-Howard correspondence with a directional
$\overline\lambda\mu\widetilde{\mu}$-term.
