  Ecologists use distance sampling to estimate the abundance of plants and
animals while correcting for undetected individuals. By design, data collection
is simplified by requiring only the distances from a transect to the detected
individuals be recorded. Compared to traditional design-based methods that
require restrictive assumption and limit the use of distance sampling data,
model-based approaches enable broader applications such as spatial prediction,
inferring species-habitat relationships, unbiased estimation from
preferentially sampled transects, and integration into multi-type data models.
Unfortunately, model-based approaches require the exact location of each
detected individual in order to incorporate environmental and habitat
characteristics as predictor variables. We modified model-based methods for
distance sampling data by including a probability distribution that accounts
for location uncertainty generated when only the distances are recorded. We
tested and demonstrated our method using a simulation experiment and by
modeling the habitat use of Dickcissels (Spiza americana) using distance
sampling data collected from the Konza Prairie in Kansas, USA. Our results
showed that ignoring location uncertainty can result in biased coefficient
estimates and predictions. However, accounting for location uncertainty
remedies the issue and results in reliable inference and prediction. Like other
types of measurement error, hierarchical models can accommodate the data
collection process thereby enabling reliable inference. Our approach is a
significant advancement for the analysis of distance sampling data because it
remedies the deleterious effects of location uncertainty and requires only
distances be recorded. In turn, this enables historical distance sampling data
sets to be compatible with modern data collection and modeling practices.
