  Runaway electron modelling efforts are motivated by the risk these energetic
particles pose to large fusion devices. The sophisticated kinetic models can
capture most features of the runaway electron generation but have high
computational costs which can be avoided by using computationally cheaper
reduced kinetic codes. In this paper, we compare the reduced kinetic and
kinetic models to determine when the former solvers, based on analytical
calculations assuming quasi-stationarity, can be used. The Dreicer generation
rate is calculated by two different solvers in parallel in a workflow developed
in the European Integrated Modelling framework, and this is complemented by
calculations of a third code that is not yet integrated into the framework.
Runaway Fluid, a reduced kinetic code, NORSE, a kinetic code using non-linear
collision operator, and DREAM, a linearized Fokker-Planck solver, are used to
investigate the effect of a dynamic change in the electric field for different
plasma scenarios spanning across the whole tokamak-relevant range. We find that
on time scales shorter than or comparable to the electron collision time at the
critical velocity for runaway electron generation kinetic effects not captured
by reduced kinetic models play an important role. This characteristic time
scale is easy to calculate and can reliably be used to determine whether there
is a need for kinetic modelling, or cheaper reduced kinetic codes are expected
to deliver sufficiently accurate results. This criterion can be automated, and
thus it can be of great benefit for the comprehensive self-consistent modelling
frameworks that are attempting to simulate complex events such as tokamak
start-up or disruptions.
