  Enormous volumes of short reads data from next-generation sequencing (NGS)
technologies have posed new challenges to the area of genomic sequence
comparison.
  The multiple sequence alignment approach is hardly applicable to NGS data due
to the challenging problem of short read assembly.
  Thus alignment-free methods need to be developed for the comparison of NGS
samples of short reads.
  Recently, new $k$-mer based distance measures such as {\it CVTree},
$d_{2}^{S}$, {\it co-phylog} have been proposed to address this problem.
  However, those distances depend considerably on the parameter $k$, and how to
choose the optimal $k$ is not trivial since it may depend on different aspects
of the sequence data.
  Hence, in this paper we consider an alternative parameter-free approach:
compression-based distance measures.
  These measures have shown impressive performance on long genome sequences in
previous studies, but they have not been tested on NGS short reads.
  In this study we perform extensive validation and show that the
compression-based distances are highly consistent with those distances obtained
from the $k$-mer based methods, from the alignment-based approach, and from
existing benchmarks in the literature.
  Moreover, as these measures are parameter-free, no optimization is required
and they still perform consistently well on multiple types of sequence data,
for different kinds of species and taxonomy levels.
  The compression-based distance measures are assembly-free, alignment-free,
parameter-free, and thus represent useful tools for the comparison of long
genome sequences and NGS samples of short reads.
