  A classical way of describing a dielectric function employs sums of
contributions from damped harmonic oscillators. Each term leads to a maximum in
the imaginary part of the dielectric function at the transversal optical (TO)
resonance frequency of the corresponding oscillator. In contrast, the peak
maxima of the negative imaginary part of the inverse dielectric function are
attributed to the so-called longitudinal optical (LO) oscillator frequencies.
The shapes of the corresponding bands resemble those of the imaginary part of
the dielectric function. Therefore, it seems natural to also employ sums of the
contributions of damped harmonic oscillators to describe the imaginary part of
the inverse dielectric function. In this contribution, we derive the
corresponding dispersion relations to investigate and establish the
relationship between the transversal and longitudinal optical oscillator
strength, which can differ, according to experimental results, by up to three
orders of magnitude. So far, these differences are not understood and prevent
the longitudinal optical oscillator strengths from proper interpretation. We
demonstrate that transversal and longitudinal oscillator strengths should be
identical for a single oscillator and that the experimental differences are in
this case due to the introduction of a dielectric background in the dispersion
formula. For this effect we derive an exact correction. Based on this
correction we further derive a modified Kramers-Kronig sum rule for the
isotropic case as well as for the components of the inverse dielectric function
tensor. For systems with more than one oscillator, our model for the isotropic
case can be extended to yield oscillator strengths and LO resonance wavenumber
for uncoupled LO modes with or without dielectric background...
