  The composition as well as the very existence of the interior of a
Schwarzschild black hole (BH) remains at the forefront of open problems in
fundamental physics. To address this issue, we turn to Hawking's "principle of
ignorance", which says that, for an observer with limited information, all
descriptions that are consistent with known physics are equally valid. We
compare three different observers who view the BH from the outside and agree on
the external Schwarzschild geometry. First, the modernist, who accepts the
classical BH as the final state of gravitational collapse, the singularity
theorems that underlie this premise and the central singularity that the
theorems predict. The modernist is willing to describe matter in terms of
quantum fields in curved space but insists on (semi)classical gravity. Second
is the skeptic, who wishes to evade any singular behavior by finding a loophole
to the singularity theorems within the realm of classical general relativity
(GR). The third is a postmodernist who similarly wants to circumvent the
singularity theorems but is willing to invoke exotic quantum physics in the
gravitational and/or matter sector to do so. The postmodern view suggests that
the uncertainty principle can stabilize a classically singular BH in a similar
manner to the stabilization of the classically unstable hydrogen atom: Strong
quantum effects in the matter and gravitational sectors resolve the would-be
singularity over horizon-sized length scales. The postmodern picture then
requires a significant departure from (semi)classical gravity, as well as some
exotic matter beyond the standard model of particle physics (SM). We find that
only the postmodern framework is consistent with what is known so far about BH
physics and conclude that a valid description of the BH interior needs matter
beyond the SM and gravitational physics beyond (semi)classical GR.
