  Several scalp EEG functional connectivity studies, mostly clinical, seem to
overlook the reference electrode impact. The subsequent interpretation of brain
connectivity is thus often biased by the choice a non-neutral reference. This
study aims at systematically investigating these effects. As EEG reference, we
examined: the vertex electrode (Cz), the digitally linked mastoids (DLM), the
average reference (AVE), and the Reference Electrode Standardization Technique
(REST). As a connectivity metric, we used the imaginary part of coherency. We
tested simulated and real data (eyes open resting state), by evaluating the
influence of electrode density, effect of head model accuracy in the REST
transformation, and impact on the characterization of the topology of
functional networks from graph analysis. Simulations demonstrated that REST
significantly reduced the distortion of connectivity patterns when compared to
AVE, Cz and DLM references. Moreover, the availability of high-density EEG
systems and an accurate knowledge of the head model are crucial elements to
improve REST performance. For real data, a systematic change of the spatial
pattern of functional connectivity depending on the chosen reference was also
observed. The distortion of connectivity patterns was larger for the Cz
reference, and progressively decreases when using the DLM, the AVE, the REST.
Strikingly, we also showed that network attributes derived from graph analysis,
i.e., node degree and local efficiency, are significantly influenced by the EEG
reference choice. Overall, this study highlights that significant differences
arise in scalp EEG functional connectivity and graph network properties, in
dependence of the chosen reference. We hope our study will convey the message
that caution should be taken when interpreting and comparing results obtained
from different laboratories when using different reference schemes.
