  We propose a novel portfolio selection approach that manages to ease some of
the problems that characterise standard expected utility maximisation. The
optimal portfolio is no longer defined as the extremum of a suitably chosen
utility function: the latter, instead, is reinterpreted as the logarithm of a
probability distribution for optimal portfolios and the selected portfolio is
defined as the expected value with respect to this distribution. A further
theoretical aspect is the adoption of a Bayesian inference framework. We find
that this approach has several attractive features, when comparing it to the
standard maximisation of expected utility.We remove the over-pronounced
sensitivity on external parameters that plague optimisation procedures and
obtain a natural and self consistent way to account for uncertainty in
knowledge and for personal views. We test the proposed method against
traditional expected utility maximisation, using artificial data to simulate
finite-sample behaviour, and find superior performance of our procedure. All
numerical integrals are carried out by using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, where
the chains are generated by an adapted version of Hybrid Monte Carlo. We
present numerical results for a portfolio of eight assets using historical time
series running from January 1988 to January 2002.
