  The rod-climbing or Weissenberg effect in which the free surface of a complex
fluid climbs a thin rotating rod is a popular and convincing experiment
demonstrating the existence of elasticity in polymeric fluids. The interface
shape depends on the rotation rate, fluid elasticity, surface tension, and
inertia. By solving the equations of motion in the low rotation rate limit for
a second-order fluid, a mathematical relationship between the interface
deflection and the fluid material functions, specifically the first and second
normal stress differences, emerges. This relationship has been used in the past
to measure the climbing constant, a combination of the first ($\Psi_{1,0}$) and
second ($\Psi_{2,0}$) normal stress difference coefficients from experimental
observations of rod-climbing in the low inertia limit. However, a quantitative
reconciliation of such observations with the capabilities of modern-day
torsional rheometers is lacking. To this end, we combine rod-climbing
experiments with both small amplitude oscillatory shear flow measurements and
steady shear measurements of the first normal stress difference from commercial
rheometers to quantify the values of both normal stress differences for a
series of polymer solutions. Furthermore, by retaining the oft-neglected
inertial terms, we show that the climbing constant
$\hat{\beta}=0.5\Psi_{1,0}+2\Psi_{2,0}$ can be measured even when the fluids,
in fact, experience rod descending. A climbing condition derived by considering
the competition between elasticity and inertial effects accurately predicts
whether a fluid will undergo rod-climbing or rod-descending. The analysis and
observations presented in this study establish rotating rod rheometry as a
prime candidate for measuring normal stress differences in polymeric fluids at
low shear rates that are often below commercial rheometers' sensitivity limits.
