  In a recent work (Ghazi et al., SODA 2016), the authors with Komargodski and
Kothari initiated the study of communication with contextual uncertainty, a
setup aiming to understand how efficient communication is possible when the
communicating parties imperfectly share a huge context. In this setting, Alice
is given a function $f$ and an input string $x$, and Bob is given a function
$g$ and an input string $y$. The pair $(x,y)$ comes from a known distribution
$\mu$ and $f$ and $g$ are guaranteed to be close under this distribution. Alice
and Bob wish to compute $g(x,y)$ with high probability. The previous work
showed that any problem with one-way communication complexity $k$ in the
standard model has public-coin communication $O(k(1+I))$ bits in the uncertain
case, where $I$ is the mutual information between $x$ and $y$. A lower bound of
$\Omega(\sqrt{I})$ bits on the public-coin uncertain communication was also
shown. An important question that was left open is the power that public
randomness brings to uncertain communication. Can Alice and Bob achieve
efficient communication amid uncertainty without using public randomness? How
powerful are public-coin protocols in overcoming uncertainty? Motivated by
these two questions:
  - We prove the first separation between private-coin uncertain communication
and public-coin uncertain communication. We exhibit a function class for which
the communication in the standard model and the public-coin uncertain
communication are $O(1)$ while the private-coin uncertain communication is a
growing function of the length $n$ of the inputs.
  - We improve the lower-bound of the previous work on public-coin uncertain
communication. We exhibit a function class and a distribution (with $I \approx
n$) for which the one-way certain communication is $k$ bits but the one-way
public-coin uncertain communication is at least $\Omega(\sqrt{k} \cdot
\sqrt{I})$ bits.
