  In recent years there has been great progress in the use of machine learning
algorithms to develop interatomic potential models. Machine-learned potential
models are typically orders of magnitude faster than density functional theory
but also orders of magnitude slower than physics-derived models such as the
embedded atom method. In our previous work, we used symbolic regression to
develop fast, accurate and transferrable interatomic potential models for
copper with novel functional forms that resemble those of the embedded atom
method. To determine the extent to which the success of these forms was
specific to copper, here we explore the generalizability of these models to
other face-centered cubic transition metals and analyze their out-of-sample
performance on several material properties. We found that these forms work
particularly well on elements that are chemically similar to copper. When
compared to optimized Sutton-Chen models, which have similar complexity, the
functional forms discovered using symbolic regression perform better across all
elements considered except gold where they have a similar performance. They
perform similarly to a moderately more complex embedded atom form on properties
on which they were trained, and they are more accurate on average on other
properties. We attribute this improved generalized accuracy to the relative
simplicity of the models discovered using symbolic regression. The genetic
programming models are found to outperform other models from the literature
about 50% of the time in a variety of property predictions, with about 1/10th
the model complexity on average. We discuss the implications of these results
to the broader application of symbolic regression to the development of new
potentials and highlight how models discovered for one element can be used to
seed new searches for different elements.
