  Fractional order proportional-integral-derivative (FOPID) controllers are
designed for load frequency control (LFC) of two interconnected power systems.
Conflicting time domain design objectives are considered in a multi objective
optimization (MOO) based design framework to design the gains and the
fractional differ-integral orders of the FOPID controllers in the two areas.
Here, we explore the effect of augmenting two different chaotic maps along with
the uniform random number generator (RNG) in the popular MOO algorithm - the
Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II). Different measures of
quality for MOO e.g. hypervolume indicator, moment of inertia based diversity
metric, total Pareto spread, spacing metric are adopted to select the best set
of controller parameters from multiple runs of all the NSGA-II variants (i.e.
nominal and chaotic versions). The chaotic versions of the NSGA-II algorithm
are compared with the standard NSGA-II in terms of solution quality and
computational time. In addition, the Pareto optimal fronts showing the
trade-off between the two conflicting time domain design objectives are
compared to show the advantage of using the FOPID controller over that with
simple PID controller. The nature of fast/slow and high/low noise amplification
effects of the FOPID structure or the four quadrant operation in the two
inter-connected areas of the power system is also explored. A fuzzy logic based
method has been adopted next to select the best compromise solution from the
best Pareto fronts corresponding to each MOO comparison criteria. The time
domain system responses are shown for the fuzzy best compromise solutions under
nominal operating conditions. Comparative analysis on the merits and de-merits
of each controller structure is reported then. A robustness analysis is also
done for the PID and the FOPID controllers.
