  Recent advances have allowed for both morphological fossil evidence and
molecular sequences to be integrated into a single combined inference of
divergence dates under the rule of Bayesian probability. In particular the
fossilized birth-death tree prior and the Lewis-Mk model of discrete
morphological evolution allow for the estimation of both divergence times and
phylogenetic relationships between fossil and extant taxa. We exploit this
statistical framework to investigate the internal consistency of these models
by producing phylogenetic estimates of the age of each fossil in turn, within
two rich and well-characterized data sets of fossil and extant species
(penguins and canids). We find that the estimation accuracy of fossil ages is
generally high with credible intervals seldom excluding the true age and median
relative error in the two data sets of 5.7% and 13.2% respectively. The median
relative standard error (RSD) was 9.2% and 7.2% respectively, suggesting good
precision, although with some outliers. In fact in the two data sets we analyze
the phylogenetic estimates of fossil age is on average < 2 My from the midpoint
age of the geological strata from which it was excavated. The high level of
internal consistency found in our analyses suggests that the Bayesian
statistical model employed is an adequate fit for both the geological and
morphological data, and provides evidence from real data that the framework
used can accurately model the evolution of discrete morphological traits coded
from fossil and extant taxa. We anticipate that this approach will have diverse
applications beyond divergence time dating, including dating fossils that are
temporally unconstrained, testing of the "morphological clock", and for
uncovering potential model misspecification and/or data errors when
controversial phylogenetic hypotheses are obtained based on combined divergence
dating analyses.
