  Spin-glasses constitute a well-grounded framework for evolutionary models. Of
particular interest for (some of) these models is the lack of self-averaging of
their order parameters (e.g. the Hamming distance between the genomes of two
individuals), even in asymptotic limits, much as like the behavior of the
overlap between the configurations of two replica in mean-field spin-glasses.
In the latter, this lack of self-averaging is related to peculiar fluctuations
of the overlap, known as Ghirlanda-Guerra identities and Aizenman-Contucci
polynomials, that cover a pivotal role in describing the ultrametric structure
of the spin-glass landscape. As for evolutionary models, such identities may
therefore be related to a taxonomic classification of individuals, yet a full
investigation on their validity is missing. In this paper, we study ultrametric
identities in simple cases where solely random mutations take place, while
selective pressure is absent, namely in {\em flat landscape} models. In
particular, we study three paradigmatic models in this setting: the {\em one
parent model} (which, by construction, is ultrametric at the level of single
individuals), the {\em homogeneous population model} (which is replica
symmetric), and the {\em species formation model} (where a broken-replica
scenario emerges at the level of species). We find analytical and numerical
evidence that in the first and in the third model nor the Ghirlanda-Guerra
neither the Aizenman-Contucci constraints hold, rather a new class of
ultrametric identities is satisfied; in the second model all these constraints
hold trivially. Very preliminary results on a real biological human genome
derived by {\em The 1000 Genome Project Consortium} and on two artificial human
genomes (generated by two different types neural networks) seem in better
agreement with these new identities rather than the classic ones.
