  In the face of the stupefying complexity of the human brain, network analysis
is a most useful tool that allows one to greatly simplify the problem,
typically by approximating the billions of neurons comprising the brain by
means of a coarse-grained picture with a practicable number of nodes. But even
such relatively small and coarse networks, such as the human connectome with
its 100-1000 nodes, may present challenges for some computationally demanding
analyses that are incapable of handling networks with more than a handful of
nodes. With such applications in mind, we set out to further coarse-grain the
human connectome by taking a modularity-based approach, the goal being to
produce a network of a relatively small number of modules. We applied this
approach to study critical phenomena in the brain; we formulated a hypothesis
based on the coarse-grained networks in the context of criticality in the
Wilson-Cowan and Ising models, and we verified the hypothesis, which connected
a transition value of the former with the critical temperature of the latter,
using the original networks. We found that the qualitative behavior of the
coarse-grained networks reflected that of the original networks, albeit to a
less pronounced extent. This, in principle, allows for the drawing of similar
qualitative conclusions by analysing the smaller networks, which opens the door
for studying the human connectome in contexts typically regarded as
computationally intractable, such Integrated Information Theory and quantum
models of the human brain.
