  Previous studies have shown that the interiors of proteins are densely
packed, reaching packing fractions that are as large as those found for static
packings of individual amino-acid-shaped particles. How can the interiors of
proteins take on such high packing fractions given that amino acids are
connected by peptide bonds and many amino acids are hydrophobic with attractive
interactions? We investigate this question by comparing the structural and
mechanical properties of collapsed attractive disk-shaped bead-spring polymers
to those of three reference systems: static packings of repulsive disks, of
attractive disks, and of repulsive disk-shaped bead-spring polymers. We show
that attractive systems quenched to temperatures below the glass transition $T
\ll T_g$ and static packings of both repulsive disks and bead-spring polymers
possess similar interior packing fractions. Previous studies have shown that
static packings of repulsive disks are isostatic at jamming onset, i.e. the
number of contacts $N_c$ matches the number of degrees of freedom, which
strongly influences their mechanical properties. We find that repulsive
polymers are hypostatic at jamming onset, but effectively isostatic when
including quartic modes. While attractive disk and polymer packings are
hyperstatic, we identify a definition for interparticle contacts for which they
can also be considered as effectively isostatic. As a result, we show that the
mechanical properties (e.g. scaling of the potential energy with excess contact
number and low-frequency contribution to the density of vibrational modes) of
weakly attractive disk and polymer packings are similar to those of ${\it
isostatic}$ repulsive disk and polymer packings. Our results demonstrate that
static packings generated via attractive collapse or compression of repulsive
particles possess similar structural and mechanical properties.
