  Respirators, medical masks, and barrier face coverings all filter airborne
particles using similar physical principles. However, they are tested for
certification using a variety of standardized test methods, creating challenges
for the comparison of differently certified products. We have performed
systematic experiments to quantify and understand the differences between
standardized test methods for N95 respirators (NIOSH TEB-APR-STP-0059 under US
42 CFR 84), medical face masks (ASTM F2299/F2100), and COVID-19-related barrier
face coverings (ASTM F3502-21). Our experiments demonstrate the role of face
velocity, particle properties (mean size, size variability, electric charge,
density, and shape), measurement techniques, and environmental preconditioning.
The measured filtration efficiency was most sensitive to changes in face
velocity and particle charge. Relative to the NIOSH method, users of the ASTM
F2299/F2100 method have commonly used non-neutralized (highly charged) aerosols
as well as smaller face velocities, each of which may result in approximately
10% higher measured filtration efficiencies. In the NIOSH method, environmental
conditioning at elevated humidity increased filtration efficiency in some
commercial samples while decreasing it in others, indicating that measurement
should be performed both with and without conditioning. More generally, our
results provide an experimental basis for the comparison of respirators
certified under various international methods, including FFP2, KN95, P2, Korea
1st Class, and DS2.
