  We present a method of rank-optimal weighting which can be used to explore
the best possible position of a subject in a ranking based on a composite
indicator by means of a mathematical optimization problem. As an example, we
explore the dataset of the OECD Better Life Index and compute for each country
a weight vector which brings it as far up in the ranking as possible with the
greatest advance of the immediate rivals. The method is able to answer the
question "What is the best possible rank a country can achieve with a given set
of weighted indicators?" Typically, weights in composite indicators are
justified normatively and not empirically. Our approach helps to give bounds on
what is achievable by such normative judgments from a purely output-oriented
and strongly competitive perspective. The method can serve as a basis for exact
bounds in sensitivity analysis focused on ranking positions.
  In the OECD Better Life Index data we find that 19 out the 36 countries in
the OECD Better Life Index 2014 can be brought to the top of the ranking by
specific weights. We give a table of weights for each country which brings it
to its highest possible position. Many countries achieve their best rank by
focusing on their strong dimensions and setting the weights of many others to
zero. Although setting dimensions to zero is possible in the OECD's online
tool, this contradicts the idea of better life being multidimensional in
essence. We discuss modifications of the optimization problem which could take
this into account, e.g. by allowing only a minimal weight of one.
  Methods to find rank-optimal weights can be useful for various
multidimensional datasets like the ones used to rank universities or employers.
