  Markov chain geostatistics is a methodology for simulating categorical
fields. Its fundamental model for conditional simulation is the Markov chain
random field (MCRF) model, and its basic spatial correlation measure is the
transiogram. There are different ways to get transiogram models (i.e.,
continuous-lag transiograms) for MCRF simulation based on sample data and
expert knowledge: linear interpolation method, mathematical model joint-fitting
method, and a mixed method of the former two. Two case studies were conducted
to show how simulated results, including optimal prediction maps and simulated
realization maps, would respond to different sets of transiogram models
generated by the three different transiogram jointing modeling methods. Results
show that the three transiogram joint modeling methods are applicable; the MCRF
model is generally not very sensitive to the transiogram models produced by
different methods, especially when sample data are sufficient to generate
reliable experimental transiograms; and the differences between overall
simulation accuracies based on different sets of transiogram models are not
significant. However, some minor classes show obvious improvement in simulation
accuracy when theoretical transiogram models (generated by mathematical model
fitting with expert knowledge) are used for minor classes. In general, this
study indicates that the methods for deriving transiogram models from
experimental transiograms can perform well in conditional simulations of
categorical soil variables when meaningful experimental transiograms can be
estimated. Employing mathematical models for transiogram modeling of minor
classes provides a way to incorporate expert knowledge and improve the
simulation accuracy of minor classes.
