  Innovation is to organizations what evolution is to organisms: it is how
organisations adapt to changes in the environment and improve. Governments,
institutions and firms that innovate are more likely to prosper and stand the
test of time; those that fail to do so fall behind their competitors and
succumb to market and environmental change. Yet despite steady advances in our
understanding of evolution, what drives innovation remains elusive. On the one
hand, organizations invest heavily in systematic strategies to drive
innovation. On the other, historical analysis and individual experience suggest
that serendipity plays a significant role in the discovery process. To unify
these two perspectives, we analyzed the mathematics of innovation as a search
process for viable designs across a universe of building blocks. We then tested
our insights using historical data from language, gastronomy and technology. By
measuring the number of makeable designs as we acquire more components, we
observed that the relative usefulness of different components is not fixed, but
cross each other over time. When these crossovers are unanticipated, they
appear to be the result of serendipity. But when we can predict crossovers
ahead of time, they offer an opportunity to strategically increase the growth
of our product space. Thus we find that the serendipitous and strategic visions
of innovation can be viewed as different manifestations of the same thing: the
changing importance of component building blocks over time.
