  Basic mirroring (BM) classified as RAID level 1 replicates data on two disks,
thus doubling disk access bandwidth for read requests. RAID1/0 is an array of
BM pairs with balanced loads due to striping. When a disk fails the read load
on its pair is doubled, which results in halving the maximum attainable
bandwidth. We review RAID1 organizations which attain a balanced load upon disk
failure, but as shown by reliability analysis tend to be less reliable than
RAID1/0. Hybrid disk arrays which store XORed instead of replicated data tend
to have a higher reliability than mirrored disks, but incur a higher overhead
in updating data. Read request response time can be improved by processing them
at a higher priority than writes, since they have a direct effect on
application response time. Shortest seek distance and affinity based routing
both shorten seek time. Anticipatory arm placement places arms optimally to
minimize the seek distance. The analysis of RAID1 in normal, degraded, and
rebuild mode is provided to quantify RAID1/0 performance. We compare the
reliability of mirrored disk organizations against each other and hybrid disks
and erasure coded disk arrays.
