  Attempts to curb illegal activity by enforcing regulations gets complicated
when agents react to the new regulatory regime in unanticipated ways to
circumvent enforcement. We present a research strategy that uncovers such
reactions, and permits program evaluation net of such adaptive behaviors. Our
interventions were designed to reduce over-fishing of the critically endangered
Pacific hake by either (a) monitoring and penalizing vendors that sell illegal
fish or (b) discouraging consumers from purchasing using an information
campaign. Vendors attempt to circumvent the ban through hidden sales and other
means, which we track using mystery shoppers. Instituting random monitoring
visits are much more effective in reducing true hake availability by limiting
such cheating, compared to visits that occur on a predictable schedule.
Monitoring at higher frequency (designed to limit temporal displacement of
illegal sales) backfires, because targeted agents learn faster, and cheat more
effectively. Sophisticated policy design is therefore crucial for determining
the sustained, longer-term effects of enforcement. Data collected from
fishermen, vendors, and consumers allow us to document the upstream,
downstream, spillover, and equilibrium effects of enforcement on the entire
supply chain. The consumer information campaign generates two-thirds of the
gains compared to random monitoring, but is simpler for the government to
implement and almost as cost-effective.
