  Bayesian likelihood-free inference, which is used to perform Bayesian
inference when the likelihood is intractable, enjoys an increasing number of
important scientific applications. However, many aspects of a Bayesian analysis
become more challenging in the likelihood-free setting. One example of this is
prior-data conflict checking, where the goal is to assess whether the
information in the data and the prior are inconsistent. Conflicts of this kind
are important to detect, since they may reveal problems in an investigator's
understanding of what are relevant values of the parameters, and can result in
sensitivity of Bayesian inferences to the prior. Here we consider methods for
prior-data conflict checking which are applicable regardless of whether the
likelihood is tractable or not. In constructing our checks, we consider
checking statistics based on prior-to-posterior Kullback-Leibler divergences.
The checks are implemented using mixture approximations to the posterior
distribution and closed-form approximations to Kullback-Leibler divergences for
mixtures, which make Monte Carlo approximation of reference distributions for
calibration computationally feasible. When prior-data conflicts occur, it is
useful to consider weakly informative prior specifications in alternative
analyses as part of a sensitivity analysis. As a main application of our
methodology, we develop a technique for searching for weakly informative priors
in likelihood-free inference, where the notion of a weakly informative prior is
formalized using prior-data conflict checks. The methods are demonstrated in
three examples.
