  The dominance of proprietary LLMs has led to restricted access and raised
information privacy concerns. High-performing open-source alternatives are
crucial for information-sensitive and high-volume applications but often lag
behind in performance. To address this gap, we propose (1) A untargeted variant
of iterative self-critique and self-refinement devoid of external influence.
(2) A novel ranking metric - Performance, Refinement, and Inference Cost Score
(PeRFICS) - to find the optimal model for a given task considering refined
performance and cost. Our experiments show that SoTA open source models of
varying sizes from 7B - 65B, on average, improve 8.2% from their baseline
performance. Strikingly, even models with extremely small memory footprints,
such as Vicuna-7B, show a 11.74% improvement overall and up to a 25.39%
improvement in high-creativity, open ended tasks on the Vicuna benchmark.
Vicuna-13B takes it a step further and outperforms ChatGPT post-refinement.
This work has profound implications for resource-constrained and
information-sensitive environments seeking to leverage LLMs without incurring
prohibitive costs, compromising on performance and privacy. The domain-agnostic
self-refinement process coupled with our novel ranking metric facilitates
informed decision-making in model selection, thereby reducing costs and
democratizing access to high-performing language models, as evidenced by case
studies.
