  For the integration of renewable energy sources, power grid operators need
realistic information about the effects of energy production and consumption to
assess grid stability.
  Recently, research in scenario planning benefits from utilizing generative
adversarial networks (GANs) as generative models for operational scenario
planning.
  In these scenarios, operators examine temporal as well as spatial influences
of different energy sources on the grid.
  The analysis of how renewable energy resources affect the grid enables the
operators to evaluate the stability and to identify potential weak points such
as a limiting transformer.
  However, due to their novelty, there are limited studies on how well GANs
model the underlying power distribution.
  This analysis is essential because, e.g., especially extreme situations with
low or high power generation are required to evaluate grid stability.
  We conduct a comparative study of the Wasserstein distance,
binary-cross-entropy loss, and a Gaussian copula as the baseline applied on two
wind and two solar datasets with limited data compared to previous studies.
  Both GANs achieve good results considering the limited amount of data, but
the Wasserstein GAN is superior in modeling temporal and spatial relations, and
the power distribution.
  Besides evaluating the generated power distribution over all farms, it is
essential to assess terrain specific distributions for wind scenarios.
  These terrain specific power distributions affect the grid by their
differences in their generating power magnitude.
  Therefore, in a second study, we show that even when simultaneously learning
distributions from wind parks with terrain specific patterns, GANs are capable
of modeling these individualities also when faced with limited data.
