  In this paper, we compare maximum likelihood (ML), quasi likelihood (QL) and
weighted least squares (WLS) estimators for proportional error nonlinear
regression models. Literature on thermoluminescence sedimentary dating revealed
another estimator similar to weighted least squares but observed responses used
as weights. This estimator that we refer to as data weighted least squares
(DWLS) is also included in the comparison. We show that on the order $\sigma, $
all four estimators behave similar to ordinary least squares estimators for
standard linear regression models. On the order of $\sigma^2, $ the estimators
have biases. Formulae that are valid in the limit of small measurement error
are derived for the biases and the variances of the four estimators. The
maximum likelihood estimator has less bias compared to the quasi likelihood
estimator. Conditions are derived under which weighted least squares and
maximum likelihood estimators have similar biases. On the order of $\sigma^ {2}
$, all estimators have similar standard errors. On higher order of $\sigma$,
maximum likelihood estimator has smaller variance compared to quasi likelihood
estimator, provided that the random errors have the same first four moments as
the normal distribution. The maximum likelihood and quasi-likelihood estimating
equations are unbiased. In large samples, these two estimators are distributed
as multivariate normal. The estimating equations for weighted least squares and
data weighted least squares are biased. However, in the limit of $\sigma \to 0$
and $n \to \infty, $ if $ n^ {1/2} \sigma$ remains bounded, these two
estimators are also distributed as multivariate normal. A simulation study
justified the applicability of the derived formulae in the presence of
measurement errors typical in sedimentary data. Results are illustrated with a
data set from thermoluminescence sedimentary dating.
