  The concept of fundamental dynamic uncertainty (multivaluedness) developed in
Parts I-III of this work and used to establish the consistent understanding of
genuine chaos in Hamiltonian systems provides also causal description of the
quantum measurement process. The modified Schroedinger formalism involving
multivalued effective dynamical functions reveals the dynamic origin of quantum
measurement indeterminacy as the intrinsic instability in the compound system
of 'measured object' and (dissipative) 'instrument' with respect to splitting
into spatially localised 'realisations'. As a result, the originally wide
measured wave catastrophically (and really!) "shrinks" around a random
accessible point thus losing all its 'nonlocal properties' with respect to
other points/realisations. The dissipativity of one of the interacting objects
(serving as 'instrument') is reduced to its (arbitrarily small) openness
towards other systems (levels of complexity) and determines the difference
between quantum measurement and quantum chaos, the latter corresponding to an
effectively isolated system of interacting (micro-) objects. We do not use any
assumptions on particular "classical", "macroscopic", "stochastic", etc. nature
of the instrument or environment: physical reduction and indeterminacy
dynamically appear already in interaction between two microscopic (quantum)
deterministic systems, the object and the instrument, possessing just a few
degrees of freedom a part of which, belonging to the instrument, should
correspond to locally starting, arbitrarily weak excitation. This dynamically
indeterminate wave reduction occurs in agreement with the postulates of the
conventional quantum mechanics, including the rule of probabilities, which
transforms them into consequences of the dynamic uncertainty.
