  In economics literature, it is accepted that all people are rational and they
try to maximize their utilities as possible as they can. In addition, economic
theories are formed with the assumptions not suitable to real life. For
instance, indifference curves are drawn with the assumptions that there are two
goods, people are rational, more is preferred to less and so on. Hence, the
consumer behaviors are guessed according to this analysis. Nevertheless, these
are invalid in real life. And this inconsistencey are examined by behavioral
economics and neuroeconomics. Behavioral economics claims that people can
behave what they are not expected since people can be irrational, their
willpower is limited and altruistic behaviors can be seen and they can give
more value to what they own. As a result of these, consumer behaviors become
more different than that of economic theory. In addition to behavioral
economics, neuroeconomics also examines consumer behaviors more differently
than mainstream economic theory. It emphasizes the people using prefrontial
cortex of the brain are more rational than the people using hippocampus of the
brain. Therefore, people can make illogical choices compared to economic
theory. In these cases, levying taxes such as personal income tax or value
added tax can be ineffective or effective. In other words, the effect becomes
ambigious. Hence,the hypothesis that if government desires to levy personal
income tax or value added tax, it makes a detailed research in terms of
productivity of taxes forms the fundamental of this study.
