  Congestion games constitute an important class of non-cooperative games which
was introduced by Rosenthal in 1973. In recent years, several extensions of
these games were proposed to incorporate aspects that are not captured by the
standard model. Examples of such extensions include the incorporation of risk
sensitive players, the modeling of altruistic player behavior and the
imposition of taxes on the resources. These extensions were studied intensively
with the goal to obtain a precise understanding of the inefficiency of
equilibria of these games. In this paper, we introduce a new model of
congestion games that captures these extensions (and additional ones) in a
unifying way. The key idea here is to parameterize both the perceived cost of
each player and the social cost function of the system designer. Intuitively,
each player perceives the load induced by the other players by an extent of
{\rho}, while the system designer estimates that each player perceives the load
of all others by an extent of {\sigma}. The above mentioned extensions reduce
to special cases of our model by choosing the parameters {\rho} and {\sigma}
accordingly. As in most related works, we concentrate on congestion games with
affine latency functions here. Despite the fact that we deal with a more
general class of congestion games, we manage to derive tight bounds on the
price of anarchy and the price of stability for a large range of pa- rameters.
Our bounds provide a complete picture of the inefficiency of equilibria for
these perception-parameterized congestion games. As a result, we obtain tight
bounds on the price of anarchy and the price of stability for the above
mentioned extensions. Our results also reveal how one should "design" the cost
functions of the players in order to reduce the price of anar- chy.
