  The design of online policies for stochastic matching and revenue management
settings is usually bound by the Bayesian prior that the demand process is
formed by a fixed-length sequence of queries with unknown types, each drawn
independently. This assumption of serial independence implies that the demand
of each type, i.e., the number of queries of a given type, has low variance and
is approximately Poisson-distributed. Thus, matching policies are often based
on ``fluid'' LPs that only use the expectations of these distributions.
  This paper explores alternative stochastic models for online matching that
allow for nonparametric, higher variance demand distributions. We propose two
new models, \Indep and \Correl, that relax the serial independence assumption
in different ways by combining a nonparametric distribution for the demand with
standard assumptions on the arrival patterns -- adversarial or random-order. In
our \Indep model, the demand for each type follows an arbitrary distribution,
while being mutually independent across different types. In our \Correl model,
the total demand follows an arbitrary distribution, and conditional on the
sequence length, the type of each query is drawn independently. In both
settings, we show that the fluid LP relaxation based on only expected demands
can be an arbitrarily bad benchmark for algorithm design. We develop tighter LP
relaxations for the \Indep and \Correl models that leverage the exact
distribution of the demand, leading to matching algorithms that achieve
constant-factor performance guarantees under adversarial and random-order
arrivals. More broadly, our paper provides a data-driven framework for
expressing demand uncertainty (i.e., variance and correlations) in online
stochastic matching models.
