  In the past decade, sparse principal component analysis has emerged as an
archetypal problem for illustrating statistical-computational tradeoffs. This
trend has largely been driven by a line of research aiming to characterize the
average-case complexity of sparse PCA through reductions from the planted
clique (PC) conjecture - which conjectures that there is no polynomial-time
algorithm to detect a planted clique of size $K = o(N^{1/2})$ in
$\mathcal{G}(N, \frac{1}{2})$. All previous reductions to sparse PCA either
fail to show tight computational lower bounds matching existing algorithms or
show lower bounds for formulations of sparse PCA other than its canonical
generative model, the spiked covariance model. Also, these lower bounds all
quickly degrade with the exponent in the PC conjecture. Specifically, when only
given the PC conjecture up to $K = o(N^\alpha)$ where $\alpha < 1/2$, there is
no sparsity level $k$ at which these lower bounds remain tight. If $\alpha \le
1/3$ these reductions fail to even show the existence of a
statistical-computational tradeoff at any sparsity $k$. We give a reduction
from PC that yields the first full characterization of the computational
barrier in the spiked covariance model, providing tight lower bounds at all
sparsities $k$. We also show the surprising result that weaker forms of the PC
conjecture up to clique size $K = o(N^\alpha)$ for any given $\alpha \in (0,
1/2]$ imply tight computational lower bounds for sparse PCA at sparsities $k =
o(n^{\alpha/3})$. This shows that even a mild improvement in the signal
strength needed by the best known polynomial-time sparse PCA algorithms would
imply that the hardness threshold for PC is subpolynomial. This is the first
instance of a suboptimal hardness assumption implying optimal lower bounds for
another problem in unsupervised learning.
