  We investigate the statistical evidence for the use of `rough' fractional
processes with Hurst exponent $H< 0.5$ for the modeling of volatility of
financial assets, using a model-free approach. We introduce a non-parametric
method for estimating the roughness of a function based on discrete sample,
using the concept of normalized $p$-th variation along a sequence of
partitions. We investigate the finite sample performance of our estimator for
measuring the roughness of sample paths of stochastic processes using detailed
numerical experiments based on sample paths of fractional Brownian motion and
other fractional processes. We then apply this method to estimate the roughness
of realized volatility signals based on high-frequency observations. Detailed
numerical experiments based on stochastic volatility models show that, even
when the instantaneous volatility has diffusive dynamics with the same
roughness as Brownian motion, the realized volatility exhibits rough behaviour
corresponding to a Hurst exponent significantly smaller than $0.5$. Comparison
of roughness estimates for realized and instantaneous volatility in fractional
volatility models with different values of Hurst exponent shows that,
irrespective of the roughness of the spot volatility process, realized
volatility always exhibits `rough' behaviour with an apparent Hurst index
$\hat{H}<0.5$. These results suggest that the origin of the roughness observed
in realized volatility time-series lies in the microstructure noise rather than
the volatility process itself.
