  Documenting languages helps to prevent the extinction of endangered dialects,
many of which are otherwise expected to disappear by the end of the century.
When documenting oral languages, unsupervised word segmentation (UWS) from
speech is a useful, yet challenging, task. It consists in producing time-stamps
for slicing utterances into smaller segments corresponding to words, being
performed from phonetic transcriptions, or in the absence of these, from the
output of unsupervised speech discretization models. These discretization
models are trained using raw speech only, producing discrete speech units that
can be applied for downstream (text-based) tasks. In this paper we compare five
of these models: three Bayesian and two neural approaches, with regards to the
exploitability of the produced units for UWS. For the UWS task, we experiment
with two models, using as our target language the Mboshi (Bantu C25), an
unwritten language from Congo-Brazzaville. Additionally, we report results for
Finnish, Hungarian, Romanian and Russian in equally low-resource settings,
using only 4 hours of speech. Our results suggest that neural models for speech
discretization are difficult to exploit in our setting, and that it might be
necessary to adapt them to limit sequence length. We obtain our best UWS
results by using Bayesian models that produce high quality, yet compressed,
discrete representations of the input speech signal.
