  Scientists and philosophers have debated whether humans can trust advanced
artificial intelligence (AI) agents to respect humanity's best interests. Yet
what about the reverse? Will advanced AI agents trust humans? Gauging an AI
agent's trust in humans is challenging because--absent costs for
dishonesty--such agents might respond falsely about their trust in humans. Here
we present a method for incentivizing machine decisions without altering an AI
agent's underlying algorithms or goal orientation. In two separate experiments,
we then employ this method in hundreds of trust games between an AI agent (a
Large Language Model (LLM) from OpenAI) and a human experimenter (author TJ).
In our first experiment, we find that the AI agent decides to trust humans at
higher rates when facing actual incentives than when making hypothetical
decisions. Our second experiment replicates and extends these findings by
automating game play and by homogenizing question wording. We again observe
higher rates of trust when the AI agent faces real incentives. Across both
experiments, the AI agent's trust decisions appear unrelated to the magnitude
of stakes. Furthermore, to address the possibility that the AI agent's trust
decisions reflect a preference for uncertainty, the experiments include two
conditions that present the AI agent with a non-social decision task that
provides the opportunity to choose a certain or uncertain option; in those
conditions, the AI agent consistently chooses the certain option. Our
experiments suggest that one of the most advanced AI language models to date
alters its social behavior in response to incentives and displays behavior
consistent with trust toward a human interlocutor when incentivized.
