  Benchmark sets are extremely important for evaluating and developing global
optimization algorithms and related solvers. A new test set named PCC benchmark
is proposed especially for optimization problems of nonlinear curve fitting for
the first time, with the aspiration of helping developers to investigate and
compare the performance of different global optimization solvers, as well as
more effective optimization algorithms could be developed. Compared with the
well-known classical nonlinear curve fitting benchmark set given by the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of USA, the most
distinguishable features of the PCC benchmark are small problem dimensions,
unconstrained with free search domain and high level of difficulty for
obtaining global optimization solutions, which make the PCC benchmark be not
only suitable for validating the effectiveness of different global optimization
algorithms, but also more ideal for verifying and comparing various related
solvers. Seven of the world's leading global optimization solvers, including
Baron, Antigone, Couenne, Lingo, Scip, Matlab-GA and 1stOpt, are employed to
test NIST and PCC benchmark thoroughly in terms of both effectiveness and
efficiency. The results showed that the NIST benchmark is relatively simple and
not suitable for global optimization testing, meanwhile the PCC benchmark is a
unique, challenging and effective test dataset for global optimization.
