  In this article, we present a lifecycle study of We Dare You, a
Substitutional Reality (SR) installation that combines visual and tactile
stimuli. The installation is set up in a center for architecture, and invites
visitors to explore its facade while playing with vertigo, in a visual Virtual
Reality (VR) environment that replicates the surrounding physical space of the
installation. Drawing on an ethnographic approach, including observations and
interviews, we researched the exhibit from its opening, through the initial
months plagued by technical problems, its subsequent success as a social and
playful installation, on to its closure, due to COVID-19, and its subsequent
reopening. Our findings explore the challenges caused by both the hybrid nature
of the installation, as well as the visitor' playful use of the installation
which made the experience social and performative - but also caused some
problems. We also discuss the problems We Dare You faced in light of hygiene
demands due to COVID-19. The analysis contrasts the design processes and
expectations of stakeholders with the audience's playful appropriation, which
led the stakeholders to see the installation as both a success and a failure.
Evaluating the design and redesign through use on behalf of visitors, we argue
that an approach that further opens up the post-production experience to a
process of continuous redesign based on the user input - what has been termed
"design-after-design" - could facilitate the design of similar experiences in
the museum and heritage sector, supporting a participatory agenda in the design
process, and helping to resolve the tension between stakeholders' expectations
and visitors' playful appropriations.
