quality:correction, linguistic:translation
Warfare and the use of torture

When it emerged that psychologists, as part of the Behavioral Science Consultation Team, were assisting interrogators in Guantánamo and other U.S. facilities on improving the effectiveness of the " enhanced interrogation techniques ", the APA called on the U.S. government to prohibit the use of unethical interrogation techniques and labeled specific techniques as torture. However, the APA declined to advise its members not to participate in such "enhanced interrogations." Finally, after the scandal broke, In September 2008, the APA's members passed a resolution stating that psychologists may not work in settings where "persons are held outside, or in violation of, either international law (e.g., the UN Convention Against Torture and the Geneva Conventions) or the U.S. Constitution (where appropriate), unless they are working directly for the persons being detained or for an independent third party working to protect human rights." The resolution became official APA policy in February 2009. However, the APA has refused to sanction those members known to have participated in and, in some cases, designed abusive interrogation techniques used in Guantanamo Bay, Iraq, and Afghanistan interrogation centers.