[{"bbox": [82, 147, 1167, 615], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><tr><td></td><td>election/election year approaches, politicians may approach EU Delegation to increase their visibility.</td><td></td><td></td><td>officer to research and have adequate information about the personnel.</td></tr><tr><td>5. Communication and information</td><td>Cautious of politician (pro Russian or Chinese) owned media for any false, negative information that may divert public attention away</td><td>L</td><td>H</td><td>Actions will take into consideration the media landscape in Mongolia and strengthen and work closely with independent media organization, association(s) that uphold EU values and ethical codes</td></tr></table>"}, {"bbox": [92, 618, 252, 642], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## Lessons Learnt:"}, {"bbox": [92, 665, 1161, 750], "category": "Text", "text": "Due the specificity of this action and the geopolitics/political situation in country, there are some risks identified above and some assumptions below. Based on past experience with communication carried out at projects level, the following elements must be taken into account for a successful communication strategy:"}, {"bbox": [92, 769, 687, 795], "category": "List-item", "text": "- good coordination between EU Delegation and Headquarters;"}, {"bbox": [92, 795, 843, 821], "category": "List-item", "text": "- communication topics remaining stable (eg on Global Gateway, Team Europe)"}, {"bbox": [92, 821, 870, 847], "category": "List-item", "text": "- ‘whole of Delegation’ approach to strategic communication and public diplomacy"}, {"bbox": [92, 847, 1007, 874], "category": "List-item", "text": "- ensuring coherence between different funding sources, notably those managed by EEAS and FPI"}, {"bbox": [92, 874, 518, 900], "category": "List-item", "text": "- good management of the various contracts;"}, {"bbox": [92, 900, 418, 927], "category": "List-item", "text": "- high quality of experts supplied."}, {"bbox": [85, 944, 397, 975], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 3.5 The Intervention Logic"}, {"bbox": [95, 991, 1161, 1047], "category": "Text", "text": "The underlying intervention logic for this action is to support the EU-Mongolia partnership. It will enable the EU to build support for priorities under the country MIP and key global and regional strategies."}, {"bbox": [95, 1065, 1161, 1150], "category": "Text", "text": "By targeting specified audiences through professionally designed and implemented strategic communication activities, the action will contribute to measurably increase awareness, understanding and perception of the EU's partnership with the country."}, {"bbox": [85, 1182, 439, 1213], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 3.6 Logical Framework Matrix"}, {"bbox": [95, 1228, 930, 1254], "category": "Text", "text": "Given the nature of this Action a Logical Framework Matrix is not required at Action level."}, {"bbox": [85, 1313, 706, 1345], "category": "Section-header", "text": "# 4 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS"}, {"bbox": [85, 1378, 380, 1408], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 4.1 Financing Agreement"}, {"bbox": [95, 1450, 1123, 1477], "category": "Text", "text": "In order to implement this action, it is not envisaged to conclude a financing agreement with the partner country."}, {"bbox": [85, 1519, 509, 1550], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 4.2 Indicative Implementation Period"}, {"bbox": [95, 1565, 1161, 1644], "category": "Text", "text": "The indicative operational implementation period of this action, during which the activities described in section 3 will be carried out and the corresponding contracts and agreements implemented, is **42 months** from the date of adoption by the Commission of this Financing Decision."}, {"bbox": [1037, 1681, 1142, 1705], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 7 of 10"}]