[{"bbox": [106, 151, 1132, 286], "category": "Text", "text": "conservation measures, to erosion control, to avoiding deforestation, to increasing infrastructures' climate-proofing. Specific shock-sensitive solutions, such as Crisis Modifiers, may be defined under the implementation contracts, wherever considered feasible and suitable to enhance the action's capacity and flexibility to respond to extreme shocks. This feature would enable early action and rapid response to new humanitarian needs that could occur in the project areas during the implementation phase."}, {"bbox": [106, 297, 420, 321], "category": "Section-header", "text": "**Other considerations if relevant**"}, {"bbox": [106, 324, 156, 347], "category": "Text", "text": "N/A."}, {"bbox": [84, 396, 423, 425], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 3.4 Risks and Lessons Learnt"}, {"bbox": [98, 426, 1142, 1640], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><thead><tr><td>Category</td><td>Risks</td><td>Likelihood (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Impact (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Mitigating measures</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Risk 1: Extreme weather events affect implementation and investments</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Climate proofing and climate risk assessments of programme investments. Support for preparedness, adaptive response, and coping strategies of beneficiaries as part of value-chain strategies and landscape approaches, as well as, increased resilience through support for nature-based solutions. Integration of specific shock-sensitive solutions, such as crisis modifiers to mitigate impact of extreme weather shocks.</td></tr><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Risk 2: Economic and financial adverse conditions for value-chains and business development</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Favourable regulatory reforms and financing instruments will be developed and promoted to soften the effect of external environment on the viability of the supported investments.</td></tr><tr><td>Planning processes and systems</td><td>Risk 3: Weak engagement of public entities and consequent lack of implementation of reforms</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Technical support and policy dialogue at the different levels of Government and support to business associations and multi-stakeholder platforms for advocacy.</td></tr><tr><td>Planning processes and systems</td><td>Risk 4: Increased pressure on protected areas and natural ecosystems fuelled by agriculture intensification</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Collaboration at landscape level. Environmental and ecosystems assessments. Innovative finance for conservation.</td></tr><tr><td>Planning processes and systems</td><td>Risk 5: Low interest of banks and financial intermediaries to develop financial products for sustainable agriculture</td><td>Low</td><td>Medium</td><td>Provision of technical assistance and guidance to support the development of specific financial products. Financial incentives (de-risking, guarantees, etc.)</td></tr><tr><td>Planning processes and systems</td><td>Risk 6: Lack of willingness of stakeholders to establish collaboration</td><td>Low</td><td>Medium</td><td>Promote participatory engagement of stakeholders through facilitation and negotiation. Develop tailored approaches and demonstrate the</td></tr></tbody></table>"}, {"bbox": [1026, 1680, 1142, 1705], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 12 of 26"}]