[{"bbox": [86, 103, 412, 133], "category": "Section-header", "text": "### 3.4. Risks and Lessons Learnt"}, {"bbox": [67, 170, 1157, 1614], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><thead><tr><td>Category</td><td>Risks</td><td>Likelihood (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Impact (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Mitigating measures</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1</td><td>Risk 1 Civil unrest. Whilst Kenya is politically stable, the project will still be under implementation during the 2022 elections, where one of the target groups (youth) have been known to become vulnerable to political agitation.</td><td>L</td><td>L</td><td>Partially suspend activities and, if necessary depending on the severity/duration of the civil unrest, request a revision of the project or project timeline to deal with any fallout from unrest.</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Risk 2 Mistrust of duty-bearers and public institutions by the general public.</td><td>M</td><td>H</td><td>While this programme is meant to address this problem directly by improving government service delivery and transparency, it will also seek to mitigate this issue by supporting also communication and community engagement. It will also support the government in its complaints mechanisms for the land digitisation system (NLIMS).</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Risk 3 Fluidity of government commitment. A likely risk is a change in government focus and changes in government officers, in particular the closer we get to the elections.</td><td>L</td><td>L</td><td>Presentation of the project to new government officers. The conclusion of any activity-based agreements with the government prior to the election period, where possible.</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>Risk 4 Delays in the approval of regulations/legislations which are meant to unblock identified bottlenecks in land processes</td><td>M</td><td>M</td><td>Identification of key bottle necks as early as possible. Incorporation of county governments, regional economic blocks, national government and private sector apex bodies in activities designed to build consensus.</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Risk 5 County executives fail to support the project or become disengaged with project, despite their legal requirements and mandates for improved land use planning and use of GIS.</td><td>L</td><td>L</td><td>Ensure the counties are involved in all the key project activities. Where possible, ensure the counties directly contribute to the some of the project activities either through cash or in-kind (such as dedicated personnel, offices or provision of other county resources).</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Risk 6 Limited number of staff assigned to land issues compared to total county populations and high demand to respond to land disputes, conflicts and general land administration.</td><td>L</td><td>M</td><td>County Governments are aware of the need to hire more staff and allocate funds that invest in their human resource needs. Encourage them to put in place incentives and entry level contracts to mitigate this risk</td></tr></tbody></table>"}, {"bbox": [1039, 1662, 1157, 1686], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 11 of 26"}]