[{"bbox": [72, 96, 1657, 842], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><thead><tr><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Output 2</td><td>A strengthened pluralist, inclusive and fact-based public discourse</td><td>2.1. Extent to which initiatives/products supported by the EU-funded intervention contribute to more pluralistic, inclusive and fact-based public discourse<br>2.2. Percentage of project partner organisations that have integrated public debates, traditional/social media approaches, art-related/historical dialogue events to promote pluralistic and inclusive discourse into their regular programmes<br>2.3. Number and quality of public debates (involving diverse audiences) based on findings of annual Sri Lanka Barometer survey supported by the EU-funded intervention<br>2.4. Number of people reached by traditional/digital media actors and campaigns that engage in positive or firm messaging to counter hate speech and disinformation<br>2.5. Number of media actors trained on ethically sensitive journalism and reporting and other relevant issues<br>2.6. Percentage of participants in art-related dialogue events who confirm to have questioned/challenged their assumptions about other groups (disaggregated by sex and age)<br>2.7. Number of public historians who show a high level of personal initiative to engage in historical dialogue/archiving initiatives</td><td>Baselines will be defined during the first year of implementation. Scores in terms of percentage will be calculated referring to data at 0% at the time of the baseline</td><td>1.2.1. At least 50% of project-supported initiatives/products annually have been taken up in the wider public discourse in Sri Lanka<br>1.2.2. At least 50% of partner organisations have integrated relevant activities/approaches into their regular programmes<br>1.2.3. 10% improvement (=some qualitative improvement of ways of women and girls involvement in public life is portrayed.<br>1.2.3. At least 12 public debates involving diverse audiences for every annual barometer, with participants rating the debates as at least a 7 on a scale from 1 to 10<br>1.2.4. At least 1 million people reached by program-supported media campaigns<br>1.2.5. At least 150 media actors trained<br>1.2.6. At least 50% of participants confirm to have questioned/ challenged their assumptions<br>1.2.7. At least 15 history teachers/lecturers and another 15 public historians show a high level of personal initiative</td><td>2.1. Project-internal monitoring; external media analysis<br>2.2. Reports and cross reports from implementing organisations<br>2.3. Project-internal monitoring<br>2.4. Project-internal monitoring<br>2.5. Project-internal monitoring/ external media analysis<br>2.6. Project-internal monitoring<br>2.7. Survey/focus group discussion<br>2.8. Project-internal monitoring</td><td>Political, economic and security situation continue at least at the same level to allow space for constructive narrative<br>Supported local actors are credible and feel safe to operate<br>Internet and social media are still freely accessible<br>Influence of voices of factions of extremists remain within manageable limits</td></tr></tbody></table>"}, {"bbox": [1052, 1107, 1169, 1131], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 15 of 20"}]