[{"bbox": [82, 106, 1145, 374], "category": "Text", "text": "violence, promoting peace and fostering resilience thanks to a problem-solving and -driven iterative process. The report recommended to \"balance development support provided to central and federal state level\" and that \"formal service delivery should be combined with community-driven development programmes\". The action will be permanently informed by a learning method and political economy analyses, in a contextualized manner that will help identify the structural causes of conflict which are resistant to immediate change, and triggers for peace or violence. Somali communities have proven to be resilient in face of the country's history of violence. Engaging better with them as a starting point to address security and justice needs more effectively shall contribute to a more peaceful society. This shall also promote a better understanding of concerns and grievances vis-à-vis security and justice actors, including as regards the different types of justice, in order to reduce the risk of doing harm. Different options for access to justice will be taken into account making sure women, children, youth and minorities can benefit from them."}, {"bbox": [82, 396, 322, 422], "category": "Section-header", "text": "### Disaster Risk Reduction"}, {"bbox": [82, 423, 1145, 531], "category": "Text", "text": "The action will assist communities to better address the consequences of climate-related shocks since Somalia is particularly affected by drought and flooding. Recurrent natural disasters lead to local conflicts over access to natural resources and livelihoods, exacerbating existing community tensions and vulnerabilities. The action will therefore provide support to the peaceful resolution of conflicts as part of addressing larger security and justice challenges."}, {"bbox": [70, 567, 395, 595], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 3.4. Risks and Lessons Learnt"}, {"bbox": [68, 607, 1156, 1527], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><thead><tr><td>Category</td><td>Risks</td><td>Likelihood (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Impact (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Mitigating measures</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Political</td><td>Worsening political instability with heightened risk of violent conflicts, leaving little space for meaningful progress on state-building.</td><td>M/H</td><td>M/H</td><td>Flexibility built into the programme to allow for scale-back or relocation of projects from affected areas. Potential to rebalance in favour of community-level work that focuses on protecting civilians from worst effects of violence.<br/>Close engagement with the FGS and FMS to encourage peaceful resolution of crises through accepted governance structures and institutions.</td></tr><tr><td rowspan=\"2\">Security</td><td>Civil unrest and/or conflict spreads, increased threats of Al-Shabaab destabilising hitherto stable areas, reducing access for partners and inhibiting delivery.</td><td>M</td><td>H</td><td>The Action is designed to provide considerable flexibility to respond to change - including scaling up or reducing investment in capacity-building according to the context and focusing on community security and stabilisation priorities in a context of escalating violence.<br/>Regular review of the political and security context and its interaction with programming, as well as Political Economy Analysis throughout the cycle of the action will allow for correct and timely understanding of the situation on the ground.</td></tr><tr><td>Lack of compliance with basic human rights standards by security forces.</td><td>H</td><td>M</td><td>Systematic monitoring of supported security actors as well as conflict sensitivity assessments are foreseen.</td></tr></tbody></table>"}, {"bbox": [1039, 1662, 1157, 1687], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 11 of 24"}]