[{"bbox": [79, 106, 1149, 159], "category": "Text", "text": "private sector to invest in greener technologies that will enable them in greening their service delivery as well as protecting resources and adapting to climate change."}, {"bbox": [79, 159, 1149, 345], "category": "Text", "text": "* The current political reforms pose a challenge on the technical capacity building measures (e.g., on modelling) supported by the Programme. Without sustainable know-how and holistic understanding of internalities and externalities of the current economic system and its needed transformation future targeted green economic policy may not be effective. It is evident from this experience that the Programme needs to extend the technical modelling trainings 1) in terms of content to a broader sensitization about the needed economic paradigm shift and 2) in terms of audience beyond governmental entities to incorporate universities, non-governmental agencies and research institutes to further sustain its capacity building measures."}, {"bbox": [79, 345, 1149, 531], "category": "Text", "text": "* Extensive engagement of the private sector (incl. financial sector) i.e., through consultations of the private sector in the policy-making process e.g., for new laws and fiscal incentives, is important to ensure that the sector's actual needs and bottlenecks are addressed. Only then can framework conditions be created in which green economic practices can be introduced, promoted and used. Experience of the IRDP has highlighted the importance of finding the right 'level' of stakeholder involvement in this process: while participants in the consultations should be as close to practice as possible (e.g., individual business representatives), they should also be 'high' enough to be able to reach a wider audience (e.g. through associations)."}, {"bbox": [79, 531, 1149, 610], "category": "Text", "text": "* Experiences during the pandemic have shown the relevance of digitalisation. The Programme therefore intends to work with partner organisations to digitize their services (e.g., advisory services, networking, training, access to information) aimed at efficiency during and after the pandemic."}, {"bbox": [79, 610, 1149, 742], "category": "Text", "text": "* The dialogue with central and local authorities must be strengthened with a financing model (e.g., through co-contributions from private associations and Oblast Development Funds) early in the final phase in order to ensure take-over of local economic activities and ensure sustainability of the Programme's results and achievements. Precise modalities will have to be worked out, since so far both the GESPSD and the IRDP have been the main financers of PPD activities in the country."}, {"bbox": [79, 742, 1149, 928], "category": "Text", "text": "* For output 3, a focus on the number of awareness activities and the number of people reached incentivised the project to deliver on these numbers while deeper formative analyses of context and audiences as well as monitoring had to be deprioritised. The quantitative prescription clearly had trade-offs with the effectiveness of communication and behavioural impact. The output orientation further compromised possibilities to invest in capacity development on CSBC. It will hence be important to, together with local CSBC focal points, develop a CSBC process standard and pilot it in-depth, focusing on a few cases that may have potential to cause behaviour change as ambitious and effective as possible."}, {"bbox": [79, 928, 1149, 1088], "category": "Text", "text": "* While the tourism intervention area benefits by the nature of its activity from a country-wide focus, the agriculture value chains are more localised. Any effort at upscaling successful interventions and innovations would require geographical proximity to enable networking and exchange of experiences between stakeholders. The new programme phase should therefore stick to the southern Oblasts (Batken, Jalal-Abad, Osh) for its agricultural activities. This could also pave the ground for a future regional collaboration between Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan on climate and agriculture under the new BMZ 2030 directives."}, {"bbox": [72, 1131, 361, 1163], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 3.5 The Intervention Logic"}, {"bbox": [1040, 1637, 1158, 1662], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 21 of 33"}]