[{"bbox": [96, 163, 1156, 217], "category": "Text", "text": "a) Piloting of innovative delivery and funding partnership modalities e.g. with private sector, county governments, civil society, development partners and others."}, {"bbox": [96, 217, 1156, 269], "category": "Text", "text": "b) Mainstreaming NDMA CMDRR/ward contingency planning regime through partnerships with counties and local organisations."}, {"bbox": [96, 269, 1120, 294], "category": "Text", "text": "c) Explore the potential of leveraging financing through EFSD+ guarantees notably in relation to catastrophe (CAT) bonds."}, {"bbox": [96, 345, 1156, 398], "category": "Text", "text": "**Indicative Activities 3.3** (related to Output 3.3 - *Strengthened NDMA capacity to perform its core DRM mandate and to attract investment*):"}, {"bbox": [96, 399, 1038, 426], "category": "Text", "text": "a) Strengthening NDMA's Drought Early Warning System (DEWS) capacity, accuracy and timeliness."}, {"bbox": [96, 426, 1087, 478], "category": "Text", "text": "b) Strengthening internal and external NDMA knowledge management, research oversight and Management Information System (MIS)."}, {"bbox": [96, 479, 692, 506], "category": "Text", "text": "c) Strengthening NDMA policy advocacy capacity and visibility."}, {"bbox": [96, 506, 762, 533], "category": "Text", "text": "d) Strengthening NDMA resource mobilisation and partnership capacity."}, {"bbox": [96, 533, 940, 559], "category": "Text", "text": "e) Strengthening NDMA capacity to drive EDE innovation and stakeholder-led coordination"}, {"bbox": [96, 559, 1115, 612], "category": "Text", "text": "f) Technical assistance to NDMA to support implementation of drought risk management and capacity building interventions and compliance with EU/GoK regulations."}, {"bbox": [96, 637, 1156, 744], "category": "Text", "text": "The commitment of the EU's contribution to the Team Europe Initiative to which this action refers, will be complemented by other contributions from Team Europe members. It is subject to the formal confirmation of each respective member's meaningful contribution as early as possible. In the event that the TEIs and/or these contributions do not materialise, the EU action may continue outside a TEI framework."}, {"bbox": [86, 769, 310, 799], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 3.3 Mainstreaming"}, {"bbox": [96, 828, 540, 855], "category": "Section-header", "text": "### Environmental Protection & Climate Change"}, {"bbox": [96, 881, 1156, 934], "category": "Text", "text": "**Outcomes of the EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) screening** (relevant for projects and/or specific interventions within a project):"}, {"bbox": [171, 934, 675, 959], "category": "Section-header", "text": "**On Sustainable, inclusive and resilient urbanisation**"}, {"bbox": [171, 960, 1156, 1200], "category": "Text", "text": "The EIA (Environment Impact Assessment) screening is in the process of being finalised for the GPTP in so far as the potential construction of dedicated lanes and bus stations are concerned for the intended Clean BRT Line 3. The National Environmental Management Authority (NEMA) for the GoK has so far given an *a priori* green light to the project as no major environmental impacts are expected but subject to finalising the EIA. The slums and housing related interventions will go through the relevant screening in due course but it is anticipated the impacts will not only be low but that they will be exemplary in terms of lower-embodied energy materials being used and other aspects such as improved solid waste management. PINUA specific locations of low-cost housing developments are yet to be identified, and once these are decided EIAs will be a requirement. KISIP 2 will also require an EIA."}, {"bbox": [171, 1232, 660, 1258], "category": "Section-header", "text": "**On rural climate change adaptation and resilience**"}, {"bbox": [171, 1265, 1156, 1317], "category": "Text", "text": "The EIA (Environment Impact Assessment) screening classified the action as Category C (no need for further assessment)."}, {"bbox": [96, 1345, 1156, 1398], "category": "Text", "text": "**Outcome of the CRA (Climate Risk Assessment) screening** (relevant for projects and/or specific interventions within a project)"}, {"bbox": [171, 1398, 675, 1423], "category": "Section-header", "text": "**On Sustainable, inclusive and resilient urbanisation**"}, {"bbox": [171, 1424, 1156, 1556], "category": "Text", "text": "No Climate Risk Assessment (CRA) screening has been undertaken at this stage. However, the Nairobi Metropolitan Area is not subject to major climate risks that would have a significant influence of public transport, slum upgrading and housing, with the exception of some rare flooding events which is an important consideration for the design of the Clean BRT line 3 and will be for the slum improvements (e.g. drainage being central) and for the housing sites that may be identified."}, {"bbox": [171, 1563, 660, 1590], "category": "Section-header", "text": "**On rural climate change adaptation and resilience**"}, {"bbox": [1056, 1680, 1170, 1706], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 17 of 37"}]