[{"bbox": [805, 153, 1150, 202], "category": "Text", "text": "skills to conduct advocacy based on evidence"}, {"bbox": [790, 207, 1150, 260], "category": "List-item", "text": "* Sensitize government authorities on advocacy role of CSOs."}, {"bbox": [79, 261, 1150, 316], "category": "Text", "text": "**Lessons Learnt:** This action integrates mainly lessons learnt from the implementation of the ongoing Accountable Democratic Governance Programme (11th EDF ADGP). Main lessons learnt from the programme include:"}, {"bbox": [117, 336, 1150, 417], "category": "List-item", "text": "* Desired EU outcomes and outputs are often ambitious, given human resources' capacities and institutional constraints. Previous programmes demonstrated gaps between the formulation and implementation phases in addressing the evolving needs of the sector."}, {"bbox": [117, 443, 1150, 551], "category": "List-item", "text": "* The intervention logic on voice and accountability through civil society organisations should be linked with the expected performance of those organisations. Previous experiences demonstrate that many opportunities were missed to build on joint approaches between public institutions and civil society organisations, to promote local dynamics."}, {"bbox": [117, 578, 1150, 659], "category": "List-item", "text": "* Ensuring the Programme's overall flexibility in management modalities and closed relationships between EU support and Rwandan institutions is critical to allow bespoke responses to changing contexts and institutions, and to capitalise on emerging opportunities."}, {"bbox": [117, 686, 1150, 766], "category": "List-item", "text": "* The use of high skilled local expertise may support more efficiently the programme. Continue involving senior public officials in Steering Committees to generate a strong ownership at policy level, and at operational level for solving efficiently structural issues."}, {"bbox": [117, 793, 1150, 901], "category": "List-item", "text": "* Establish a monitoring tool as learning mechanism to document, monitor, integrate the programme's benchmarks is critical to improve institutional performance. Previous experiences demonstrate limited technical capacity among implementing staff to carry out monitoring and evaluation functions as learning tools thereby losing focus on results."}, {"bbox": [1015, 1653, 1143, 1680], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 13 of 25"}]