[{"bbox": [140, 152, 1136, 260], "category": "Text", "text": "provincial and local governments. At the beneficiary school level, where most of the SESP expenditures are made, the main frontline actors are the community schools, responsible for managing the school-level activities through school management committees (SMCs). Parent-teacher associations (PTAs) function as watchdogs."}, {"bbox": [140, 270, 1136, 323], "category": "Text", "text": "Policy direction is entirely the purview of the MoEST. Responsibility for overall programme monitoring is shared between the CEHRD and the MoEST. The MoEST also oversees aid-coordination."}, {"bbox": [140, 335, 1136, 494], "category": "Text", "text": "The EU Delegation is member of the LEG and signatory of the JFA. The EU Delegation will be also member of the overall management and decision regarding the complementary measures and it will participate to the review as part of the steering committee of the implementation of the EU complementary measures to support the education sector which will improve the role of EU in sector policy dialogue at federal, provincial and local level. Moreover, the EU will lead the harmonisation and the alignment of the Technical Assistance framework for the SESP."}, {"bbox": [140, 507, 1136, 586], "category": "Text", "text": "As part of its prerogative of budget implementation and to safeguard the financial interests of the Union, the Commission may participate in the above governance structures set up for governing the implementation of the action."}, {"bbox": [130, 621, 694, 655], "category": "Section-header", "text": "# 5. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT"}, {"bbox": [130, 687, 493, 720], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 5.1 Monitoring and Reporting"}, {"bbox": [140, 740, 1136, 954], "category": "Text", "text": "The day-to-day technical and financial monitoring of the implementation of this action will be a continuous process, and part of the implementing partner's responsibilities. To this aim, the implementing partner shall establish a permanent internal, technical and financial monitoring system for the action and elaborate regular progress reports (not less than annual) and final reports. Every report shall provide an accurate account of implementation of the action, difficulties encountered, changes introduced, as well as the degree of achievement of its results (Outputs and direct Outcomes) as measured by corresponding indicators, using as reference the logframe matrix (for project modality) and the partner's strategy, policy or reform action plan list (for budget support)."}, {"bbox": [140, 958, 1136, 1040], "category": "Text", "text": "The Commission may undertake additional project monitoring visits both through its own staff and through independent consultants recruited directly by the Commission for independent monitoring reviews (or recruited by the responsible agent contracted by the Commission for implementing such reviews)."}, {"bbox": [140, 1044, 788, 1073], "category": "Text", "text": "Roles and responsibilities for data collection, analysis and monitoring:"}, {"bbox": [140, 1083, 1136, 1244], "category": "Text", "text": "The statistical and monitoring systems as well as the quality of official data in the policy field covered have been assessed. This assessment has fed into the design of the action as follows: Identification of DLIs including baselines and targets based on IEMIS and specific studies. Through the BRM and JFM, there is a comprehensive overall framework for monitoring and reporting on the implementation of sector policies and strategies as set out in the JFA, which has been revised based on the lessons learned from the SSDP and to align with the results-based funding mechanism."}, {"bbox": [140, 1255, 1136, 1415], "category": "Text", "text": "The BRM will review the SESP plans and budget (ASIP/AWPB) for the next fiscal year; assess overall programme performance and implementation progress based on the reports specified below; assess and confirm the achievement of any DLIs not assessed in the previous DLI review during the JRM in November and for which evidence has been submitted; assess progress towards meeting the current year DLIs and identify steps to remove obstacles if any; review compliance with financial management responsibilities and procurement procedures as mentioned in the JFA; assess outcome of other reviews."}, {"bbox": [140, 1426, 1136, 1587], "category": "Text", "text": "The JRM will assess overall programme performance and implementation progress based on the reports specified below; assess and confirm the achievement of annual DLIs for which evidence has been submitted; agree on the actions to be taken and the evidence to be submitted to fulfil the DLIs for the current year; review compliance with financial management responsibilities and procurement procedures as mentioned in the JFA; and assess outcome of other reviews. Data quality audit of IEMIS will be implemented periodically in addition to the internal quality control."}, {"bbox": [1027, 1680, 1143, 1705], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 25 of 26"}]