[{"bbox": [86, 153, 398, 184], "category": "Section-header", "text": "3.5 The Intervention Logic"}, {"bbox": [96, 199, 1161, 312], "category": "Text", "text": "The underlying intervention logic for this action is that if production and processing systems of the smallholder farmers, herders and fisherman cooperatives/associations in the nutritious value chains will be increased, and more sustainable and decent jobs will be created for youth in the agriculture sector, and equal access to natural resources will be guaranteed in conflict areas, then there will be a positive impact on food security and livelihood resilience."}, {"bbox": [96, 329, 269, 357], "category": "Section-header", "text": "Theory of change:"}, {"bbox": [96, 375, 1161, 432], "category": "Text", "text": "IF the productivity and profitability of smallholder agriculture and livestock nutritious short value chains will increase in a sustainable way using climate change adapted agro ecological practices,"}, {"bbox": [96, 449, 1161, 506], "category": "Text", "text": "IF more youths, including from IDP, PwD and refugee populations, in rural and food insecure areas will have access to sustainable and decent jobs,"}, {"bbox": [96, 523, 1161, 580], "category": "Text", "text": "IF equal and sustainable access to natural resources will increase so to determine access to food, mitigation of conflict and allow the voluntary return of conflict-displaced people,"}, {"bbox": [96, 597, 1161, 654], "category": "Text", "text": "THEN the action will contribute to increase food security, livelihood resilience and sustainable growth for rural communities in the areas most affected by food insecurity and by the effect of climate change."}, {"bbox": [1027, 1680, 1144, 1706], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 14 of 26"}]