[{"bbox": [114, 94, 1643, 1127], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><tr><td></td><td>advocating for the fight against corruption</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td>3.2 Effectiveness and transparency of public procurement, financial and fiscal systems are improved with the cooperation of CSO specialised in audit and budget control</td><td>3.2.1 Number of MDAs compliant with e-procurement rules and number of tiers of government utilising e-procurement systems<br>3.2.2 Number of IEC materials, simplified audit reports with infographics disseminated to the community,</td><td>3.2.1 E-procurement to be or started at federal and state levels in pilot MDAs<br>3.2.2 No IEC materials disseminated and simplified audit reports accessible online</td><td>3.2.1 Public procurement agencies capable to expand e-procurement across all MDAs and the three tiers of government<br>3.2.2 Producing IEC materials and simplified audit reports online and through media</td><td>3.2.1 Reports of Public Procurement agencies at federal and state levels<br>3.2.2 Reports of beneficiary MDAs</td><td>CSOs will get essential support from key institutions mainly Public Accounts Committees and Auditor-General's Office.</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>3.3. Coordination and collaboration amongst the ACAs and between the ACAs, MDAs, CSO, media and private sector are consolidated</td><td>3.3.1 Establishment of a quarterly information exchange and referral system among ACAs at federal level<br>3.3.2 Establishment of a formal and structured coordination and collaboration mechanism among ACAs at federal and state levels<br>3.3.3 Number of joint initiatives developed and functioning with MDAs, CSOs, media and private sector</td><td>3.3.1 IATT/TUGAR led thematic area working group<br>3.3.2 No regular coordination platform exists between ACAS at federal and state levels<br>3.3.3 no regular coordination forum exists</td><td>3.3.2 A regular and functioning coordination system enabling information exchange referrals<br>3.3.2 A regular federal-state ACAs' platform created and functioning<br>3.3.3 Forums for regular coordination created and functioning with MDAs, CSOs, media and private sector</td><td>3.3.1 Reports of TUGAR<br>3.3.2 RoLAC annual reports<br>3.3.3 MDAs, CSOs and media briefings</td><td>ACAs, MDAs, CSOs, media and the private sector will commit to cooperation on AC on operational level</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>3.4 Reinforced or established ACTUs and AC internal oversight mechanisms (where needed) combined with strengthened citizens' information and participation mechanisms monitoring the implementation of AC reforms at state and sub-state level</td><td>3.4.1 Number of ACTUs established, supported by the intervention and number of internal oversight mechanisms supported through capacity building in MDAs by the intervention<br>3.4.2 Establishment and functioning of platforms for public engagement on crucial AC issues</td><td>3.4.1 Of the MDAs responding to ACTU effectiveness index 46% rated ACTUs as effective, while the rest 54% rated ACTUs as ineffective, dormant or non-existent<br>3.4.2 No regular public engagement platforms</td><td>3.4.1 Increase in the establishment of ACTUs in MDAs by 25% per annum, increasing effectiveness of ACTUs and internal oversight mechanisms by 5% per annum.<br>3.4.2 Establishing biannual consultations on public engagement and weekly media platforms</td><td>3.4.1 ACTUs effectiveness index, report by ICPC and individual MDAs on the number and performance of ACTUs and internal oversight mechanisms established and strengthened</td><td>MDAs will be responsive and remain committed to the establishment of ACTUs and the strengthening of internal oversight mechanisms</td></tr></table>"}, {"bbox": [1525, 1149, 1643, 1173], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 23 of 29"}]