[{"bbox": [86, 153, 399, 183], "category": "Section-header", "text": "3.5 The Intervention Logic"}, {"bbox": [96, 198, 1161, 385], "category": "Text", "text": "The underlying intervention logic for the Action is that only if the transitional justice system is efficient and has high credibility among victims and survivors and the general public, then it can be a cornerstone for sustainable peace and a stronger Colombian democracy, since a transitional justice system that does not deliver as expected by the public, will have detrimental effects for a resilient peace in the country where victims and survivors will not experience redemption and reconciliation. For the JEP to be efficient, both the Chambers and the tribunal need increased capacity, especially considering that three new macro cases have already been opened in 2022 and another one will be opened shortly."}, {"bbox": [96, 396, 1161, 530], "category": "Text", "text": "Moreover, the verdicts to be passed need to be duly communicated and in line with expectations of victims and survivors and the general public. For this to become a reality, the JEP needs to continue working on its strategic communication, which was supported by the previous Action funded by the FPI. If this communication fails, there is a risk that the JEP – even if improving efficiency – will lose credibility, which will hamper its possibilities to function properly and contribute to a sustainable peace."}, {"bbox": [96, 541, 1161, 699], "category": "Text", "text": "The activities will focus on addressing bottlenecks within the JEP to gain maximum effect of the Action. This will require strong coordination with the different units of the JEP and other donors, including key actors in formulation of activities – not only for the formulation of the project but also during the course of the Action. Additionally, because of the nature of the innovative and unique transitional justice system, the JEP is working in unchartered territories, which requires a high degree of flexibility during the implementation phase to accommodate to unforeseen needs."}, {"bbox": [96, 713, 1161, 821], "category": "Text", "text": "Considering outcome 1, if dialogue between the parties (chambers-victims and survivors-perpetrators) with regard to the restorative measures and sanctions is fostered by the chambers and the tribunal of the JEP, then the practice of transitional justice can satisfy the rights of those affected, be less burdened with conflicts and disappointments, and be more sensitive to the gender perspective thanks to the co-construction process of peace."}, {"bbox": [96, 832, 1161, 912], "category": "Text", "text": "In outcome 2, if the communication strategy of the JEP with victims and survivors and the general public is implemented according to plan, then it can provide the basis for the legitimacy and trust in the JEP and the restorative sanctions system because timely communications provides a necessary foundation for understanding between parties."}, {"bbox": [1027, 1680, 1144, 1705], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 11 of 18"}]