[{"bbox": [81, 103, 1146, 266], "category": "Text", "text": "relevant for those states from which irregular migration prevails (or the transition states), e.g. Lagos, Ogun, Edo, Delta and Enugu States. As the action takes a value chain development approach it, will look at the development of the sector \"from farm to fork\", or in other words, all the way from the \"production belt\" in the North (agricultural production, aggregation, storage, processing) to the \"consumption belt\" in the South (transport, cold chain, storage, wholesale, retail). In this way, decent job alternatives will be created in the states from which internal migration to the cities occurs, as well as those states from which irregular migration stems."}, {"bbox": [108, 321, 432, 350], "category": "Section-header", "text": "### 3.4. Risks and Lessons Learnt"}, {"bbox": [67, 360, 1157, 1647], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><thead><tr><td>Category</td><td>Risks</td><td>Likelihood (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Impact (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Mitigating measures</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>People and the organisation</td><td>Limited knowledge and technological support base for proposed intervention activities</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td><ul><li>Ensure support is provided to increase the required literacy level for adequate access</li><li>Agriculture TVET</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Shifts in governmental regulations and change of government and delays incurred through inability to develop essential policy frameworks or stakeholder consent</td><td>High</td><td>Medium</td><td><ul><li>Public Private Dialogues</li><li>Close engagement with public sector to anticipate potential regulatory changes</li><li>Interventions will be proposed on the basis of lessons learned around political economy and market development factors gained from precursor actions</li><li>Specific high-level advisory support offered to FMARD via twinning</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>Planning, processes and systems</td><td>Existing business models do not meet requirements of replicability and funding</td><td>Medium</td><td>Medium</td><td><ul><li>Strict selection process to identify sectors and partners to be supported that meet the minimum eligibility criteria</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>Planning, processes and systems</td><td>Existing innovative technologies are too expensive</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td><ul><li>Identify partnerships that can support the adaptation of climate smart technologies (impact investors, private equity, DFIs)</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Security challenges and localised conflicts.</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td><ul><li>Locations will be chosen after consideration of the potential unrest</li><li>Flexible implementation approach</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Governments promote state-led investment models predicated on expropriation of land in conflict with inclusive principles</td><td>Medium</td><td>Medium</td><td><ul><li>Actively promote attractiveness and advantages of inclusive business models based on core best practice principles, emphasising their relevance to attracting large scale impact investment.</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td rowspan=\"2\">External environment</td><td rowspan=\"2\">Environmental and climate/weather risks<br>A gender-blind, neutral, or negative context and problem analysis could reinforce existing gender inequalities and non-realization of human rights in the sector and hinder the efficiency and</td><td>High</td><td>High</td><td rowspan=\"2\"><ul><li>Actively promote CSA and agro ecological practices</li></ul></td></tr><tr><td>Medium</td><td>High</td></tr></tbody></table>"}, {"bbox": [1039, 1662, 1157, 1687], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 11 of 28"}]