[{"bbox": [127, 135, 1178, 302], "category": "Text", "text": "particular with respect to address all measurable questions for the programme. This will include the definition of an explicit theory of change against which the final evaluation will judge the worth of the programme. Furthermore, it is expected that the evaluation will come up with specific and tailored recommendations on appropriate and relevant indicators at strategic and operational level that will be used and monitored during the implementation process. The mid-term evaluation/assessment will also suggest, if needed, adjustments to the course of action, in order to achieve the expected outputs, analyse the feasibility of launching a second phase of the action."}, {"bbox": [127, 309, 1178, 421], "category": "Text", "text": "The Commission shall inform the implementing partner at least 30 days in advance of the dates envisaged for the evaluation missions. The implementing partner shall collaborate efficiently and effectively with the evaluation experts, and inter alia provide them with all necessary information and documentation, as well as access to the project premises and activities."}, {"bbox": [127, 428, 1178, 540], "category": "Text", "text": "The evaluation reports may be shared with the partners and other key stakeholders following the best practice of evaluation dissemination. The implementing partner and the Commission shall analyse the conclusions and recommendations of the evaluations and, where appropriate, apply the necessary adjustments. Evaluation services may be contracted under a framework contract"}, {"bbox": [116, 563, 438, 590], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 5.3 Audit and Verifications"}, {"bbox": [127, 608, 1178, 687], "category": "Text", "text": "Without prejudice to the obligations applicable to contracts concluded for the implementation of this action, the Commission may, on the basis of a risk assessment, contract independent audit or verification assignments for one or several contracts or agreements."}, {"bbox": [116, 715, 1069, 747], "category": "Section-header", "text": "# 6 STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION AND PUBLIC DIPLOMACY"}, {"bbox": [127, 780, 1178, 834], "category": "Text", "text": "The 2021-2027 programming cycle will adopt a new approach to pooling, programming and deploying strategic communication and public diplomacy resources."}, {"bbox": [127, 842, 1178, 1037], "category": "Text", "text": "In line with the 2022 \"Communicating and Raising EU Visibility: Guidance for External Actions\", it will remain a contractual obligation for all entities implementing EU-funded external actions to inform the relevant audiences of the Union's support for their work by displaying the EU emblem and a short funding statement as appropriate on all communication materials related to the actions concerned. This obligation will continue to apply equally, regardless of whether the actions concerned are implemented by the Commission, partner countries, service providers, grant beneficiaries or entrusted or delegated entities such as UN agencies, international financial institutions and agencies of EU member states."}, {"bbox": [127, 1046, 1178, 1129], "category": "Text", "text": "However, action documents for specific sector programmes are in principle no longer required to include a provision for communication and visibility actions promoting the programmes concerned. These resources will instead be consolidated in Cooperation Facilities established by support measure action documents, allowing"}, {"bbox": [1495, 1151, 1615, 1174], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 32 of 35"}]