[{"bbox": [84, 145, 1130, 975], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Scarce, inadequate or inexistent shelters for protection of survivors under threat by perpetrators</td><td>H</td><td>H</td><td>Expedite the study and mapping of feasible protection sites, community networks and any other local proven effective protection mechanism to offer alternatives to survivors.</td></tr><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Economic empowerment activities may not lead to access to market or revenue increase.</td><td>M</td><td>H</td><td>Carrying out preliminary studies to identify promising opportunities / value chains and consequently determine the activities.</td></tr><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Occurrence of new weather-related disasters</td><td>H</td><td>H</td><td>Integration of specific shock-sensitive and gender-sensitive solutions, such as crisis modifier and PSEA revised guidelines. Apply 'Building Back Better' principles.</td></tr><tr><td>Planning, processes and systems</td><td>Limited institutional and technical capacity of stakeholders to benefit from funding opportunities provided</td><td>M</td><td>M</td><td>Promote targeted communication to all stakeholders and identify key stakeholders to act as info contact points. Provide training and coaching.</td></tr><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Reluctance from local communities to discuss and disseminate sensitive LGBT+ related messages.</td><td>H</td><td>H</td><td>Involvement of local, opinion and influential leaders while ensuring that there is no backlash or security implications for LGBT+.</td></tr><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Similar lockdown measures that would compromise program implementation as COVID-19 did.</td><td>M</td><td>H</td><td>Concentrate endeavours through radio, community radios, digital tools and including social media and messages sent by mobile aiming to reduce domestic and sexual violence in the context of confinement.</td></tr></table>"}, {"bbox": [95, 987, 256, 1012], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## Lessons Learnt:"}, {"bbox": [95, 1026, 1122, 1134], "category": "Text", "text": "The assessment of the Spotlight Initiative in Mozambique confirmed the relevance of the intervention and its coherence with development efforts and Mozambique's policies. Spotlight introduced the fight against SGBV in the agendas of all State institutions and the civil society involved and established a solid foundation in the target provinces and respective districts. Lessons learned were of great value at the national level too."}, {"bbox": [95, 1144, 1122, 1305], "category": "Text", "text": "Tolerância Zero! builds on the experience of the Spotlight and seeks to address some of the challenges identified. Overall, the coordination model was rather complex. The four UN Agencies involved had diverse management, procurement, CSOs selection approaches, etc. This led to confusion, limited information sharing and overlaps or lack of complementarity in some areas/actions, besides draining efforts and resources. From the different modalities applied, direct transfer of funds to the provincial authorities, proved to be the most cost-effective and efficient. With regards to SI's pillars, main lessons learnt were:"}, {"bbox": [95, 1316, 1122, 1397], "category": "Text", "text": "**Laws and policies** to prevent violence, discrimination and address impunity were vastly advocated for, elaborated and disseminated. Efforts should now focus on further dissemination at the district level, while ensuring accessible language for different audiences, and accessible formats for persons with disabilities."}, {"bbox": [95, 1408, 1122, 1516], "category": "Text", "text": "Spotlight strengthened national Government and institutions. However, its efforts were mostly concentrated at the central level and some key institutional development actions did not reach target provinces and districts. MGCAS should be supported to strengthen its coordination and leading role in order to make a nationwide contribution to fight against SGBV."}, {"bbox": [95, 1527, 1122, 1608], "category": "Text", "text": "With regards to prevention, the way the Initiative impacted target populations' attitudes, through the promotion of gender-equitable social norms, attitudes and behaviours was positive. The Initiative could have been more effective if it had engaged boys and men in SGBV awareness earlier/more broadly."}, {"bbox": [1026, 1681, 1142, 1705], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 13 of 25"}]