[{"bbox": [84, 145, 1157, 1604], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><tr><td>External environment</td><td>Risk 3: Extreme weather events affect implementation and investments</td><td>Medium</td><td>High</td><td>Field-based activities to prioritize low-risk periods when possible and utilisation of weather forecast tools.<br/>Climate proofing and climate risk assessments of programme investments and of actions promoted through the observatory. Improved collection and availability of data on climate risk through the observatory.<br/>Support for increasing preparedness, adaptive response, and coping strategies of beneficiaries as part of value chain strategies and marine community co-management, as well as increased resilience through support for nature-based solutions.<br/>Activation of specific shock-sensitive solutions, such as crisis modifiers.<br/>Funds are reserved in the indicative budget under contingencies to be used during implementation to meet unforeseen costs and the revision of activities as relevant.</td></tr><tr><td>Planning processes and systems</td><td>Risk 4: Low levels of engagement by government at national and local levels, and weak inter-Ministerial cooperation</td><td>Medium</td><td>Medium</td><td>Training and capacity building focused on government institutions.<br/>Ensure programme is implemented in close collaboration with relevant sub-national government services.<br/>Integration of the blue economy observatory into government strategy and institutions.</td></tr><tr><td>Planning processes and systems</td><td>Risk 5: Gender considerations not sufficiently incorporated into detailed programme planning and implementation</td><td>Medium</td><td>Medium</td><td>Appropriate interventions to address root causes of gender inequality built into the action's interventions to ensure gender-responsive blue economy and value chain development.<br/>Implementing partners to include specific capacity on gender equality and women's rights.<br/>Monitoring and mid-term evaluation to include assessments of gender outcomes.</td></tr><tr><td>Planning processes and systems</td><td>Risk 6: Overlap of donor interventions leads to detrimental competition among implementers and ineffective outcomes</td><td>Medium</td><td>Medium</td><td>Criteria for districts' selection will consider interventions and implementing partners present in the district and potential risk for overlapping.<br/>Effective coordination mechanisms at provincial and district level will be set-up to ensure the alignment of activities.<br/>Participate actively in existing donor coordination at national level including</td></tr></table>"}, {"bbox": [1026, 1680, 1142, 1706], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 13 of 25"}]