[{"bbox": [87, 145, 1142, 828], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><tr><td></td><td>the work of human rights agencies on these levels. Consequently, the action could be implemented isolated and incoherently due to this ongoing practice.</td><td></td><td></td><td>departments. The project, in coordination with the EU Delegation, may seek to encourage a formalised coordination/consultation mechanism between federal and provincial levels, also capitalising on the joint use of data information systems that will be supported under outcome 1.</td></tr><tr><td>Gender Equality</td><td>A gender-blind, neutral, or negative context and problem analysis could reinforce existing gender inequalities and non-realisation of human rights in the sector and hinder the efficiency and sustainability of the action.</td><td>Medium</td><td>Medium</td><td>Knowledge and tools of gender mainstreaming are available. Gender-sensitive monitoring, use of sex-disaggregated data, and gender-sensitive indicators. Gender mainstreaming is applied in all phases of support services.</td></tr></table>"}, {"bbox": [98, 830, 257, 854], "category": "Section-header", "text": "Lessons Learnt:"}, {"bbox": [98, 873, 1134, 1035], "category": "Text", "text": "1. The risks can be viewed as relatively high in areas where human rights governance mechanisms alter how right-holders and their representatives interact with the government (oversight, dispute resolution, monitoring). Therefore, a long-term perspective is required for legal and institutional reforms and overcoming resistance to change regarding business and human rights. In addition to establishing public trust in the human rights system, there is the possibility that all necessary legislative steps and their full realisation may not be achieved within the action's lifecycle, depending on the political will of the future government."}, {"bbox": [98, 1045, 1134, 1157], "category": "Text", "text": "2. CSOs may find it very challenging to participate in this process due to a shrinking space and increased administrative control. However, as part of the action, the EU will engage in regular dialogue with the Government to ensure that the security and safety risks for the CSOs representatives and organisations are mitigated to prevent unintended harmful effects."}, {"bbox": [98, 1177, 1134, 1347], "category": "Text", "text": "3. The 18th Constitutional Amendment that was passed in the Parliament in 2010 redefined the institutional frame of the State through a shift from a heavily centralised to a predominantly decentralised federation. While this structure has advantages, it also poses significant challenges to national coordination since different provincial authorities have different levels of commitment to federal policies and plans for disability-inclusive development. The challenges include achieving a similar level of commitment and coordination from all provincial bureaus of statistics for consistency and efficiency in the statistical system."}, {"bbox": [98, 1365, 1134, 1535], "category": "Text", "text": "4. E-justice could provide valuable solutions to enhance efficiency and quality by reducing the cost of services and minimising corruption. Developing realistic objectives and expected results is essential, considering the national partners' absorption capacity and political commitment. Comparative analyses of the normative environment on personal data protection with determinants and bottlenecks are an important start for such intervention. Pros and cons must be appropriately weighed during a project's design phase and should be incorporated into policies and programmes."}, {"bbox": [1058, 1637, 1081, 1660], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "16"}]