[{"bbox": [85, 151, 424, 180], "category": "Section-header", "text": "3.4 Risks and Lessons Learnt"}, {"bbox": [82, 193, 1167, 1628], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><thead><tr><td>Category</td><td>Risks</td><td>Likelihood (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Impact (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Mitigating measures</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1-to the external environment</td><td>Risk 1: The political and security situation in the country deteriorates even more into conflict/civil war, not allowing for effective implementation of activities (either because implementation becomes technically impossible or because of sensitivity issues)</td><td>M</td><td>M</td><td>Close monitoring during the life of the action and design of the communication strategy in a way that guarantee flexibility and adaptability.<br/>A conflict sensitive approach will be applied and embedded in the communication strategy developed by the Delegation. Messaging will be adapted to the evolving context, ensuring that the activities foresee stay feasible.</td></tr><tr><td>1-to the external environment</td><td>Risk 2: Campaigns / communication activities are perceived as a political intervention by the de facto authorities, which leads to political backlash and possibly to threats to the security of EU partners.<br/>The roll out of major public campaigns turns to be counter-productive or not allowed by the military government.</td><td>M</td><td>H</td><td>The objective and scope of each communication activity will be clearly defined and include risk-assessment to ensure a cautious approach is kept. Decision on communication related to sensitive key topics will be made on a case-by-case basis.<br/>The political situation will be closely monitored, including monitoring social media to identify potential trends.<br/>Sensitive partnerships or communication on confidential and/or high-risk programmes or priority will be avoided or anonymised.</td></tr><tr><td>1-to the external environment</td><td>Risk 3: Opposition and civil society become suspicious of perception surveys and campaigns / communication activities are misinterpreted by some stakeholders/groups and seen as lenient or supporting the de facto authorities, leading to reputational damage and possible online backlash,</td><td>H</td><td>H</td><td>The delegation will develop a clear and consistent messaging strategy emphasizing its commitment to supporting democracy and human rights in Myanmar. This messaging should be consistent and conflict-sensitive to ensure positive response from key pro-democracy stakeholders.<br/>This action will include close monitoring of social media to identify trends and negative feedback, allowing to quickly respond to any misinformation or misinterpretation of its messaging. This will also be supported by tailored</td></tr></tbody></table>"}, {"bbox": [1026, 1653, 1142, 1678], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 10 of 17"}]