[{"bbox": [95, 151, 1133, 232], "category": "Text", "text": "partnerships with LGUs, support to LGU's on efficient public administration, including Public Finance Management (with emphasis on green budgeting and anti-corruption); support to promotion of sustainable Public Private Partnerships."}, {"bbox": [95, 257, 486, 285], "category": "Section-header", "text": "### Conflict sensitivity, peace and resilience"}, {"bbox": [95, 285, 1133, 498], "category": "Text", "text": "Ensuring better access to justice can help prevent conflict and promote peace. When people have access to a fair and effective justice system, they are more likely to trust in the rule of law and are less likely to resort to violence to resolve disputes. Involving CSOs and the CHR will help building the bridge needed between the Filipinos and their judicial institutions. In addition, improving access to justice, and specifically ADR, can also help deactivate early conflicts and build resilience in communities affected by conflict. By providing legal aid, support for alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and mediation, communities can better address grievances and resolve disputes in a peaceful and sustainable manner. The inclusion of women in conflict resolution is essential to break deeply rooted gender inequalities."}, {"bbox": [95, 522, 336, 547], "category": "Section-header", "text": "### Disaster Risk Reduction"}, {"bbox": [95, 550, 238, 577], "category": "Text", "text": "Not applicable."}, {"bbox": [95, 602, 409, 626], "category": "Section-header", "text": "### Other considerations if relevant"}, {"bbox": [95, 629, 238, 656], "category": "Text", "text": "Not applicable."}, {"bbox": [84, 748, 423, 776], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 3.4 Risks and Lessons Learnt"}, {"bbox": [82, 791, 1167, 1635], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><thead><tr><td>Category</td><td>Risks</td><td>Likelihood (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Impact (High/ Medium/ Low)</td><td>Mitigating measures</td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>1- External environment</td><td>Risk 1<br/>Challenges to democratisation and the separation of powers.</td><td>M</td><td>H</td><td>Efforts continue to be made to insulate/disassociate the programme from political issues by promoting the programme as an implementation of PDP 2023-2028.</td></tr><tr><td>2 - Planning, processes and systems</td><td>Risk 2<br/>Difficulty in gathering data, especially with sex-disaggregation, resulting in insufficient impact measurement</td><td>L</td><td>M</td><td>The programme shall improve capacity of agencies to collect manage, organize and interpret data (sex-disaggregated as a minimum)</td></tr><tr><td>3 - People and the organization</td><td>Risk 3<br/>The successors of the current Principals are reluctant to honour the organisational commitments made</td><td>L</td><td>H</td><td>The adoption of a sector-wide approach to justice sector reform as stipulated in the PDP 2023-2028 and whose development was supported by GOJUST and GOJUST II programmes is a clear indication that the new Principals honour the organizational commitments made by previous</td></tr></tbody></table>"}, {"bbox": [84, 1680, 203, 1706], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 16 of 32"}]