[{"bbox": [72, 99, 1697, 336], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><tr><td>positively impact subnational or national efforts directed to ending VAWG/HP or promoting GEWE.</td><td></td><td>government records</td><td>stakeholders' knowledge of EVAWG mechanisms.</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">[1] E.g. the CEDAW, UPR shadow reports, and social accountability mechanisms such as social audits, citizen report cards, etc.</td></tr></table>"}, {"bbox": [83, 337, 1654, 388], "category": "Text", "text": "Output D.3 Women's rights, youth groups and relevant CSOs representing groups facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination/marginalisation have strengthened capacities and support to jointly design, implement and monitor programmes on the effectiveness of ending VAWG/HP coordinating mechanisms at district and national levels."}, {"bbox": [72, 401, 1697, 680], "category": "Table", "text": "<table><tr><td>D.3.1. Number of official outstanding EVAWG/HP initiatives (including dialogues, human impact cases) proving the functioning of ending-VAWG/HP coordinating mechanisms enabled by joint projects of women's rights groups, relevant CSOs, including youths and groups facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination.</td><td>Baseline data to be collected at inception (ongoing work will ease the collection of the data)</td><td>TbD with representatives of concerned institutions and groups</td><td>Publicly available documents describing the process and outcome of such dialogues.</td><td>This indicator measures an increase in the skill-base of women's rights groups, networks and relevant CSOs in networking, partnering and jointly programming/acting for progress and improved political commitment on ending VAWG/HP coordinating mechanisms, at subnational (district for instance), regional or national levels.</td></tr></table>"}, {"bbox": [1569, 1134, 1690, 1158], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 28 of 35"}]