[{"bbox": [102, 105, 464, 134], "category": "Section-header", "text": "## 3.6 Logical Framework Matrix"}, {"bbox": [84, 157, 1097, 183], "category": "Text", "text": "This indicative logframe constitutes the basis for the monitoring, reporting and evaluation of the intervention."}, {"bbox": [84, 189, 1678, 269], "category": "Text", "text": "On the basis of this logframe matrix, a more detailed logframe (or several) may be developed at contracting stage. In case baselines and targets are not available for the action, they should be informed for each indicator at signature of the contract(s) linked to this AD, or in the first progress report at the latest. New columns may be added to set intermediary targets (milestones) for the Output and Outcome indicators whenever it is relevant."}, {"bbox": [122, 274, 1169, 301], "category": "List-item", "text": "- At inception, the first progress report should include the complete logframe (e.g. including baselines/targets)."}, {"bbox": [122, 307, 1008, 334], "category": "List-item", "text": "- Progress reports should provide an updated logframe with current values for each indicator."}, {"bbox": [122, 340, 1029, 367], "category": "List-item", "text": "- The final report should enclose the logframe with baseline and final values for each indicator."}, {"bbox": [84, 372, 1505, 399], "category": "Text", "text": "The indicative logical framework matrix may evolve during the lifetime of the action depending on the different implementation modalities of this action."}, {"bbox": [84, 404, 1678, 458], "category": "Text", "text": "The activities, the expected Outputs and related indicators, targets and baselines included in the logframe matrix may be updated during the implementation of the action, no amendment being required to the Financing Decision."}, {"bbox": [84, 463, 1658, 515], "category": "Text", "text": "Corporate indicators from GERF and programming document must be included where possible. GERF indicators should be identified with ** and indicators coming from the relevant MIP marked with *. Please check that none is missing in the LFM below."}, {"bbox": [84, 515, 1316, 542], "category": "Text", "text": "For further inspiration on results chains and thematic indicators, you can check https://europa.eu/capacity4dev/results-and-indicators."}, {"bbox": [84, 542, 310, 568], "category": "Text", "text": "Summary of comments:"}, {"bbox": [122, 571, 1680, 622], "category": "List-item", "text": "- The causal links of this results framework are not always correct at output level, where several statements were referring to outcomes – outside the area of control of the intervention – rather than outputs"}, {"bbox": [122, 636, 1678, 689], "category": "List-item", "text": "- The alignment of the results chain and the commitments selected via the markers in table 1.1 of the Action Document is not explicit for Risk Reduction and the Rio Markers for biodiversity and desertification. A clearer link with the climate change linked markers has been introduced in the revisions of the results chain."}, {"bbox": [122, 702, 1678, 781], "category": "List-item", "text": "- The indicators were not always pitched at the correct level and linked to the correct result, as a result of the incorrect causal links in the results chain. There are currently an exceeding number of indicators in the Logframe that should be streamlined to facilitate an effective reporting of results. It is highly recommended to use GERF and EFSD+ ReMF indicators as much as possible (and relevant)."}, {"bbox": [122, 795, 1678, 848], "category": "List-item", "text": "- Some EFSD+ ReMF indicators for this type of blending operation have been used. Others were added or rephrased accordingly to facilitate the monitoring and reporting through OPSYS when time comes."}, {"bbox": [122, 861, 1176, 888], "category": "List-item", "text": "- The indicative activities would benefit from additional specification to better assess the validity of the outputs"}, {"bbox": [122, 901, 1678, 955], "category": "List-item", "text": "- The assumptions need to be elaborated and included in both the intervention logic description and the logframe. They need to be in line with the proposed changes in the results chain. Killer assumptions should be avoided."}, {"bbox": [122, 968, 1678, 1021], "category": "List-item", "text": "- Years of reference and values of baselines and targets as well as sources of data need to be completed as much as possible. If baseline studies are needed to provide values please mention this in section 5.1"}, {"bbox": [122, 1034, 1642, 1061], "category": "List-item", "text": "- Sources of Data are either missing, not clearly identified or there is more than one SoD per indicator. The column of Sources of Data should be further revisited."}, {"bbox": [1570, 1135, 1692, 1160], "category": "Page-footer", "text": "Page 16 of 34"}]