Variable-order Markov model - Wikiwand

# Variable-order Markov model

In the mathematical theory of stochastic processes, variable-order Markov (VOM) models are an important class of models that extend the well known Markov chain models. In contrast to the Markov chain models, where each random variable in a sequence with a Markov property depends on a fixed number of random variables, in VOM models this number of conditioning random variables may vary based on the specific observed realization.

This realization sequence is often called the context; therefore the VOM models are also called context trees.[1] The flexibility in the number of conditioning random variables turns out to be of real advantage for many applications, such as statistical analysis, classification and prediction.[2][3][4]

## Example

Consider for example a sequence of random variables, each of which takes a value from the ternary alphabet {abc}. Specifically, consider the string aaabcaaabcaaabcaaabc...aaabc constructed from infinite concatenations of the sub-string aaabc.

The VOM model of maximal order 2 can approximate the above string using only the following five conditional probability components: {Pr(a | aa) = 0.5, Pr(b | aa) = 0.5, Pr(c | b) = 1.0, Pr(a | c)= 1.0, Pr(a | ca) = 1.0}.

In this example, Pr(c|ab) = Pr(c|b) = 1.0; therefore, the shorter context b is sufficient to determine the next character. Similarly, the VOM model of maximal order 3 can generate the string exactly using only five conditional probability components, which are all equal to 1.0.

To construct the Markov chain of order 1 for the next character in that string, one must estimate the following 9 conditional probability components: {Pr(a | a), Pr(a | b), Pr(a | c), Pr(b | a), Pr(b | b), Pr(b | c), Pr(c | a), Pr(c | b), Pr(c | c)}. To construct the Markov chain of order 2 for the next character, one must estimate 27 conditional probability components: {Pr(a | aa), Pr(a | ab), ..., Pr(c | cc)}. And to construct the Markov chain of order three for the next character one must estimate the following 81 conditional probability components: {Pr(a | aaa), Pr(a | aab), ..., Pr(c | ccc)}.

In practical settings there is seldom sufficient data to accurately estimate the exponentially increasing number of conditional probability components as the order of the Markov chain increases.

The variable-order Markov model assumes that in realistic settings, there are certain realizations of states (represented by contexts) in which some past states are independent from the future states; accordingly, "a great reduction in the number of model parameters can be achieved."[1]

## Definition

Let A be a state space (finite alphabet) of size ${\displaystyle |A|}$.

Consider a sequence with the Markov property ${\displaystyle x_{1}^{n}=x_{1}x_{2}\dots x_{n))$ of n realizations of random variables, where ${\displaystyle x_{i}\in A}$ is the state (symbol) at position i ${\displaystyle \scriptstyle (1\leq i\leq n)}$, and the concatenation of states ${\displaystyle x_{i))$ and ${\displaystyle x_{i+1))$ is denoted by ${\displaystyle x_{i}x_{i+1))$.

Given a training set of observed states, ${\displaystyle x_{1}^{n))$, the construction algorithm of the VOM models[2][3][4] learns a model P that provides a probability assignment for each state in the sequence given its past (previously observed symbols) or future states.

Specifically, the learner generates a conditional probability distribution ${\displaystyle P(x_{i}\mid s)}$ for a symbol ${\displaystyle x_{i}\in A}$ given a context ${\displaystyle s\in A^{*))$, where the * sign represents a sequence of states of any length, including the empty context.

VOM models attempt to estimate conditional distributions of the form ${\displaystyle P(x_{i}\mid s)}$ where the context length ${\displaystyle |s|\leq D}$ varies depending on the available statistics. In contrast, conventional Markov models attempt to estimate these conditional distributions by assuming a fixed contexts' length ${\displaystyle |s|=D}$ and, hence, can be considered as special cases of the VOM models.

Effectively, for a given training sequence, the VOM models are found to obtain better model parameterization than the fixed-order Markov models that leads to a better variance-bias tradeoff of the learned models.[2][3][4]

## Application areas

Various efficient algorithms have been devised for estimating the parameters of the VOM model.[3]

VOM models have been successfully applied to areas such as machine learning, information theory and bioinformatics, including specific applications such as coding and data compression,[1] document compression,[3] classification and identification of DNA and protein sequences,[5] [1][2] statistical process control,[4] spam filtering,[6] haplotyping[7] and others.

## References

1. ^ a b c Rissanen, J. (Sep 1983). "A Universal Data Compression System". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 29 (5): 656–664. doi:10.1109/TIT.1983.1056741.
2. ^ a b c d Shmilovici, A.; Ben-Gal, I. (2007). "Using a VOM Model for Reconstructing Potential Coding Regions in EST Sequences". Computational Statistics. 22 (1): 49–69. doi:10.1007/s00180-007-0021-8.
3. Begleiter, R.; El-Yaniv, R.; Yona, G. (2004). "On Prediction Using Variable Order Markov models" (PDF). Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research. 22: 385–421. doi:10.1613/jair.1491.
4. ^ a b c d Ben-Gal, I.; Morag, G.; Shmilovici, A. (2003). "CSPC: A Monitoring Procedure for State Dependent Processes" (PDF). Technometrics. 45 (4): 293–311. doi:10.1198/004017003000000122.
5. ^ Grau J.; Ben-Gal I.; Posch S.; Grosse I. (2006). "VOMBAT: Prediction of Transcription Factor Binding Sites using Variable Order Bayesian Trees" (PDF). Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 34, issue W529–W533. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
6. ^ Bratko, A.; Cormack, G. V.; Filipic, B.; Lynam, T.; Zupan, B. (2006). "Spam Filtering Using Statistical Data Compression Models" (PDF). Journal of Machine Learning Research. 7: 2673–2698.
7. ^ Browning, Sharon R. "Multilocus association mapping using variable-length Markov chains." The American Journal of Human Genetics 78.6 (2006): 903–913.

[1]

1. ^ Smith, A. R.; Denenberg, J. N.; Slack, T. B.; Tan, C. C.; Wohlford, R. E (August 1985). "Application of a Sequential Pattern Learning System to Connected Speech Recognition" (PDF). Proceedings of the IEEE 1985 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing: 1201–1204.
{"found_math": true, "script_math_tex": 0, "script_math_asciimath": 0, "math_annotations": 14, "math_alttext": 0, "mathml": 0, "mathjax_tag": 0, "mathjax_inline_tex": 0, "mathjax_display_tex": 0, "mathjax_asciimath": 1, "img_math": 0, "codecogs_latex": 0, "wp_latex": 0, "mimetex.cgi": 0, "/images/math/codecogs": 0, "mathtex.cgi": 0, "katex": 0, "math-container": 0, "wp-katex-eq": 0, "align": 0, "equation": 0, "x-ck12": 0, "texerror": 0}