REVIEWER'S HOME

 

Reviewers play an essential part in science and in scholarly publishing. Scientists and scholars have relied upon peer review to validate research, engage other specialists in the support of submitted work, and increase networking possibilities within specific specialist communities.

 

Although in recent years the peer review process has attracted some criticism, it remains the only widely accepted method for research validation and a cornerstone of the scientific publishing process. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities like most scientific journals, relies on effective peer review processes to uphold not only the quality and validity of individual articles, but also the overall integrity of the journal.

 

Pertanika expects its reviewers to have experience in publishing especially in Scopus index publication.
http://journals-jd.upm.edu.my/pjssh/reviewer
journals-jd.upm.edu.my
CC-MAIN-2024-22
12609
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ILTF3BH54GUL4ION2AJV65BXVRP4FJKG
<urn:uuid:4ecdfaef-5f83-42fa-850b-c3ac3dbb03b8>
2024-05-24T12:59:01Z
119.40.116.186
text/html
sha1:YR7MKE2F55FKJOD424GLGGB3T7LO7HIA
<urn:uuid:5f6cccb6-a94f-421a-a0ec-9b96a278510c>
http://journals-jd.upm.edu.my/pjssh/reviewer
response
<urn:uuid:23ff75c8-b27e-4144-a589-0513a2b7cc2d>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-22
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-29
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/