19

I'm new here, and have been reading Meta questions and such as I try to get a handle on things like answers vs comments, what's on topic, etc. I greatly appreciate the thought that has clearly gone into the shaping of the site (even when I don't always agree with the outcome).

I also recently re-watched the Tour, and noticed that the question highlighted in animation does not seem to meet current standards. Specifically, it asks for a definition without describing any research:

Screen capture of EL&U's Tour page

Many of the answers here in Meta and also comments on "bad" questions point new users to the Tour, so it seems like it would be in everyone's best interests if the question featured there actually represented current best practices. Is it possible to fix this?

**Edited title and tags to reflect suggestions by @DanBron and @SvenYargs, and to not bury the lede.

5
  • 5
    I agree this should be done. There are some restrictions on which questions can appear in the tour, such as total length, but I'm too lazy right now to find the relevant post on Meta.se. But once we do, the next step would be to find really stellar questions (or at least not terrible questions) which meet those criteria, and one other: ones which whet the appetites of new visitors. Such candidates should be proposed using answers to this question. – Dan Bron Jul 9 '16 at 15:34
  • 6
    This is an excellent observation—and the included screenshot offers strong evidence that what constituted an archetypally good answer in the past (when high-reputation answerers were taken to be experts and not expected to show their work or cite sources) might well be viewed as incomplete today. Moreover, the question in the screenshot shows no research effort on the OP's part, which is a charge repeatedly brought against questions deemed unacceptable today. – Sven Yargs Jul 9 '16 at 19:05
  • Feel free to give that question a close vote too: english.stackexchange.com/q/33860/59258 – curiousdannii Jul 10 '16 at 11:04
  • 2
    Ah, it seems we're not the only site that suffers this issue. The tour is intended to be short and digestible, so Q&A used as examples in the tour are constrained to be short & digestible. Which effectively means: low effort but popular. The worst of the lot. – Dan Bron Jul 10 '16 at 14:45
  • @DanBron, maybe some appropriate answer could be temporarily edited to fit? E.g., I ran across this question as a great example in another Meta discussion (I'm sorry I can't remember exactly where) that looks like it might work: english.stackexchange.com/questions/168562/…. The question would need to have a few words edited out, and the answer would need to be reformatted without block quotes (and maybe a few more introductory words). If the screenshot is static, the edits could be reverted after. – 1006a Jul 10 '16 at 20:13
11

The Tour page describes editing others' questions and answers, but it doesn't mention one of the most important editing functions: editing your own post, especially to incorporate suggestions in the Comments about how to improve your post.

I'd list this as the first explanation on editing. After all, the Tour is primarily for those who are (a) new (or relatively new) to the site, and (b) have at least some degree of interest in how the site works. It's this latter 5% of new users who would most benefit from highlighting this self-editing expectation.

To expand on part II of Rathony's answer, how difficult would it be to engineer ELU so that a pop-up message appears when a low-rep user commences a question or answer, presenting a couple of really basic dot points - e.g. a note that ELU isn't for opinions; a link to How to write a good question/answer; a link to ELL. It wouldn't stop flagworthy posts, but it might reduce the flood. Is such a structural enhancement possible for just the ELU site?

1
  • 1
    Have you seen the sidebar on the Ask Question page? The sidebar box has only limited space/length available, but it was adjusted not all that long ago. – Andrew Leach Mod Jul 14 '16 at 14:11
10

The tour page would be far better if it included:

  1. Detailed explanation on the differences between ELU and ELL and a link to ELL for learners.

  2. A few good example questions that are well researched with clear context.

  3. A guide to use the search box encouraging new users to search a key word or phrase before asking a question.

  4. A sentence emphasizing ELU is not a discussion forum and any question seeking an opinion is off-topic.

  5. A sentence emphasizing "What does XYZ mean?" or "Proof-reading request" type of question is off-topic unless well researched and a specific source of concern is identified.

The above was intended to attract upvotes.


More serious notes

  1. I doubt many new users are reading the tour page and guidelines on our Help Center. If they did, a majority of questions would not be posted in the first place. More than 80 to 90% of new users don't come back after posting one new question. I don't think changing the tour page would be as much effective as we expect.

  2. The more important things to do:

(1) make a specific comment that mentions a related guideline so that new users can edit their question. For example, Questions on choosing an ideal word or phrase must include information on how it will be used in order to be answered for Single-Word-Request questions.

(2) give new users a warning that an off-topic question could be close-voted unless properly edited

(3) put low-quality questions on hold as soon as possible if no edit attempt is made.

(4) edit a question proactively when it looks salvageable by editing.

We need more participation of experienced users in helping new users get familiarized with the ELU's guidelines and standards.

2
  • How about changing the tag line to Ask questions, get answers, no riff raff? – deadrat Jul 10 '16 at 18:16
  • 3
    @deadrat How about "Ask questions, get answers, beware CPVPV"? – user140086 Jul 10 '16 at 18:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8140/how-can-the-tour-screenshot-be-updated-to-reflect-current-standards-for-question
english.meta.stackexchange.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-31
152616
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:WHGGUBPNW2ZCO4VTKTJ2LJL2LYABSAOO
<urn:uuid:b40f4b0a-5930-41f5-b6fc-00ef80d17fb6>
2021-07-30T19:52:37Z
151.101.129.69
text/html
sha1:SCZEH6A3DIWXBTNVL7UWZIK6ICNJEQNB
<urn:uuid:53583af2-5f7a-4ac6-b9ec-51eac3e90c32>
https://english.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/8140/how-can-the-tour-screenshot-be-updated-to-reflect-current-standards-for-question
response
<urn:uuid:afed9869-9836-49d2-9450-14b7e6ae87c4>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-31
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for July/August 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-148.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/