tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4503292949532760618.post8144377516232570082..comments2024-05-24T07:05:51.301-07:00Comments on DSHR's Blog: Improving e-Journal Ingest (among other things)David.http://www.blogger.com/profile/14498131502038331594noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4503292949532760618.post-23171041816003700912016-08-30T20:07:27.277-07:002016-08-30T20:07:27.277-07:00See Geoff Bilder&#39;s discussion of &quot;fake DO...See Geoff Bilder&#39;s discussion of <a href="http://blog.crossref.org/2016/06/doi-like-strings-and-fake-dois.html%22" rel="nofollow">&quot;fake DOIs&quot;</a> on the CrossRef blog.David.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14498131502038331594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4503292949532760618.post-82025621725126072162016-06-23T20:40:54.810-07:002016-06-23T20:40:54.810-07:00The awesome Eric Hellman has a detailed dissection...The awesome Eric Hellman has a <a href="https://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2016/06/wileys-fake-journal-of-constructive.html" rel="nofollow">detailed dissection of Wiley&#39;s &quot;fake DOIs&quot;</a> which are in fact simply trap URLs that, because of the URL structure of Wiley&#39;s platform, look like DOIs. Eric comments:<br /><br />&quot;the trap URLs being deployed by Wiley are sophomoric and a technical embarrassment.&quot;<br /><br />because, among other things, they provide a simple way for an attacker to get a University banned from accessing even Wiley&#39;s open access content and, because robots.txt is mis-configured, are indexed by search engines.David.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14498131502038331594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4503292949532760618.post-48494284170998771352016-05-30T13:00:31.104-07:002016-05-30T13:00:31.104-07:00The fake DOI culprit is Wiley, see here. Eric Hell...The fake DOI culprit is Wiley, see <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uTVHPI8r4VO31KihsyiBHsh_gp8jZ38fMvP5nP5XOkw/edit" rel="nofollow">here</a>. <a href="https://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2016/03/sci-hub-libgen-and-total-information.html" rel="nofollow">Eric Hellman&#39;s</a> and <a href="http://gavialib.com/2016/02/playing-whack-a-sci-hub/" rel="nofollow">Library Loon&#39;s</a> warnings of the horribles to come are starting to look prophetic.David.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14498131502038331594noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4503292949532760618.post-85459361622555771522016-05-28T12:39:20.979-07:002016-05-28T12:39:20.979-07:00A footnote that was excised from the final version...A footnote that was excised from the final version of this paper reported one result<br />from a study we are conducting (slowly) as a background exercise:<br /><br />&quot;For example, approximately 1.5% (7/455) of a random sample of DOIs from the CLOCKSS archive resolve to valid articles but return 404 from the CrossRef metadata API.&quot;<br /><br />The study uses the <a href="http://blog.dshr.org/2013/04/talk-on-lockss-metadata-extraction-at.html" rel="nofollow">metadata that LOCKSS and CLOCKSS extracts</a> from <a href="https://documents.clockss.org/index.php?title=LOCKSS:_Extracting_Bibliographic_Metadata" rel="nofollow">the content</a> as input. The output is intended to be a paper entitled <i>Noise in e-Journal Metadata</i>.<br /><br />Our going-in assumption was that the various kinds of noise we find were accidents, the results of sloppy processes. But no, now Rik Smith-Unna discovers that at least one large publisher is deliberately inserting noise by <a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/blahah404/status/736301152942346240" rel="nofollow">using fake DOIs as crawler traps</a>.David.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14498131502038331594noreply@blogger.com
https://blog.dshr.org/feeds/8144377516232570082/comments/default
blog.dshr.org
CC-MAIN-2024-22
11085
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:PQ52QLPZWTPIZET4OMTDEZMOQ5LDTXF5
<urn:uuid:b72e6f97-d3b4-44b2-98d8-7651bd9ea7ca>
2024-05-24T16:30:52Z
142.251.167.121
application/atom+xml
sha1:LKBMC2WHUIWBYXQ7TDDFHOSX4UTS27OK
<urn:uuid:1db756ce-dd78-46b5-af15-3cc54e2cf43e>
https://blog.dshr.org/feeds/8144377516232570082/comments/default
response
<urn:uuid:fa16bf52-21f2-4070-81e3-f30fc284ee4e>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-22
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-217
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/