User talk:Stripy Socks

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stripy Socks!

File:Alia_Shawkat_(Got_a_Room).jpgEdit

 
File:Alia_Shawkat_(Got_a_Room).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Lupo 12:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Gina_Yashere_satnd_up_comedy_photo.jpgEdit

 
File:Gina_Yashere_satnd_up_comedy_photo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Lupo 12:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


File:Rachelle_Lefevre_and_Cam_Gigandet.jpgEdit

  File:Rachelle_Lefevre_and_Cam_Gigandet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Lupo 13:12, 25 May 2010 (UTC)


 
This user has been blocked indefinitely. See block log.

বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Zazaki | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Kurdî | Македонски | മലയാളം | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

Strange account. Sockpuppet, Intended for nothing but stealing, doing flickr washing again although you said, that you not will do it again, wasting other peoples time with starting endless chatter at COM:UNDEL just to defend lies. Indefblocked, the sockmaster too. --Martin H. (talk) 03:25, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

The sockpuppet allegation is now backed up with Checkuser evidence. This behaviour is simply too abusive, flickr washing, nominating the file for deletion and making a point at COM:UNDEL. Any request for unblock will not have a chance for sucess, but you may explain, what drives you to this idiotic behaviour (yes, it is nothing else but that). --Martin H. (talk) 03:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
The photo WTLO nominated for deletion is not the same photo as the above. I was attacked and accused i defended myself and asked for the photo to be undeleted and when i was attacked again povided an explanation, perhaps it was long but a lot was needed. What do you eman by 'sockpuppet' of WTLO? --Stripy Socks (talk) 08:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Ah, i see now. Well i am not the same person who has the account of WTLO. The IP adresses match because we live in the same house. I said i knew the user, i did not say in what manner i knew them. --Stripy Socks (talk) 08:14, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

That doesnt matter. You not only live in the same house or only share the same computer, you also do the same bad things and you use the same flickr account that both of you controll to launder images for use on Commons. Maybe you "two" will take a tea together and talk about, what went wrong. In your conversation you may complain that you was incited by your friend to do something bad, but please, I dont want that you "two" to disagree over this and divide in dispute ;). --Martin H. (talk) 08:45, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Stripy Socks".
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stripy_Socks
commons.m.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-09
72493
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5H37Q5ZVZH23AODUNQK6D3RAIHQZLT3X
<urn:uuid:6da5f8a9-f231-47c9-889a-cfaa4021c16a>
2017-02-27T05:05:12Z
208.80.154.224
sha1:2J5OL76KBNULUV7AURINDCFPZNRO43QH
<urn:uuid:ab398c83-509b-4919-ba85-73254d5c6396>
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stripy_Socks
length
response
<urn:uuid:c531cf06-9ccf-4dfb-9dfe-6a9d7dd42fc9>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-171-10-108.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-09
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2017
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf