2

This answer was in the Low Quality Review. The review was completed with 4 "Recommend Deletion" and 3 "Looks OK".

As I can read in Let's get rid of the 10K flag queue:

  1. Task accumulates EffectiveReviewsRequired "Looks Good" reviews. Outcome: if the number of (Recommend)Delete reviews is >= the number of Looks Good reviews, mark flags "disputed" and raise DisputedLowQuality mod flag. Otherwise, mark flags "declined".

the DisputedLowQuality mod flag should be raised.

After four days I flagged the answer as NAA (my fault), because I thought it matches When to flag an answer as "not an answer"?:

Asking for clarifications

My flag was declined by moderator.

My question is: Do I have any chance to see, if a DisputedLowQuality mod flag is already declined, so I know, that a NAA flag would be declined, too?

  • 3
    Those flags go directly to the mod queue and are only viewable by mods. It wouldn't help anyway as they're not handled like normal flags where they're marked helpful or declined, since it's informational stuff by the system, we tend to mark them helpful once we've looked regardless of the outcome. – Jon Clements Aug 24 '16 at 11:12
1

As Jon points out in his comment, the "disputed low quality review" flags are auto-generated by the system in response to certain circumstances:

  • A user undeletes a post that was deleted via review
  • An upvoted post receives unanimous delete votes
  • A post receives more delete votes than "looks good"

These flags do not impact any flag counts for users, so you wouldn't see them in any way. I should point out that the last category of these flags has been almost pure noise, and SE has already increased the threshold once to remove many of these from review. I personally think that whole category could go away and just leave the other two and we wouldn't lose any information.

In your case, this wouldn't even matter, since your flag was directly declined by a moderator and was not judged in review. An earlier "not an answer" flag by another person was what triggered that review, which disputed their flag, but that review was not contentious enough to trigger an automatic system flag.

A moderator did see your flag, judge the post, and decide that "not an answer" didn't apply there, so there's no more action to be taken.

  • Could you say, what but that review was not contentious enough to trigger an automatic system flag. means? What's the rule? – dur Aug 24 '16 at 15:39
  • 2
    @dur - Not sure what it's been adjusted to now, but I think it requires twice as many "Recommend Deletion" votes as "Looks Good". Again, these are pretty worthless flags, and tend to carry little information. The posts almost always aren't worthy of deletion, and at best they point to a few misguided reviewers. Not a lot that's actionable in these, which is why I think this flag subtype should probably be removed. – Brad Larson Aug 24 '16 at 15:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333073/is-it-possible-to-see-if-disputedlowquality-mod-flag-already-declined
meta.stackoverflow.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-51
116793
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:WTYEVAQZ2JLOGI2T3CYYC7IY2U722OJV
<urn:uuid:bb6a23b1-dccd-46ee-9a36-e5449adabafb>
2019-12-16T09:09:54Z
151.101.1.69
text/html
sha1:PZY6O2K67YBOOBESJLQQCLWPMH6R36AM
<urn:uuid:1520f5ad-29ce-4e0e-b00d-9fe21458282c>
https://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/333073/is-it-possible-to-see-if-disputedlowquality-mod-flag-already-declined
response
<urn:uuid:84be460b-bfa4-4c7e-b4d9-936ede9aa7ae>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-51
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for December 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-9.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/