https://www.dandwiki.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=69.156.93.181&feedformat=atom D&D Wiki - User contributions [en] 2022-11-28T17:55:52Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.35.8 https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=D%26D_Wiki_talk:Requests_for_Adminship/Great_Wyrm_Black_Dragon&diff=180637 D&D Wiki talk:Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon 2007-12-10T13:05:17Z <p>69.156.93.181: /* Wikipedia Admin? */</p> <hr /> <div>As the vandal in question, Black Dragon himself has reverted the changes I made to his page to it's current version, and added onto it. '''unsigned'''<br /> <br /> :I added this to the talk page, as it seems a more appropriate place. Since you're clearly looking at my edits, let me just suggest that you take a similar course to mine, and instead of vandalizing, post a comment at the bottom of the voting page. The comments section is free for unregistered users to use, so go ahead and post there if you have something to say. Just please keep it clean. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 19:31, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> ::But that's no fun. :| Besides, I got to see some legendary vandal busting action, worthy of another Barnstar or so. I already voiced my complaints against this joke of a human as everyone is probably aware, and drew quite a bit of attention to his profile, which is far more offensive than me, on the premise that he's serious and I'm just a troll with fast internet and a slippery connection. If my opinion's worth anything, don't let him on the team. --g0tt<br /> <br /> :::Well, then create an account and become a registered wiki user, then you can cast your vote officially, which might actually work towards him not becoming an admin, if that's what you want. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 19:44, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> ::::Looks like others have caught the smell and have also picked up on this, with the inclusion of a rather condemning piece of evidence against him. Registering at this point would be moot, since anyone that actually supports him will obviously be out of their minds. --g0tt<br /> <br /> == Wikipedia Admin? ==<br /> <br /> You claim to have been part of wikipedia administration. Can you verify this in any way?--[[User:Mander|Mander]] 10:49, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> :For that matter, what corruption drove you from wikipedia? --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 10:51, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> ::The corruption that obviously prevents him from spreading his disgusting views. Alternately, he's probably 14 and thinks being anti-establishment is the cool thing to do and any wiki that's not wikipedia is all about fighting the system. I just wish my own personal revisions of his user page would be kept. --g0tt</div> 69.156.93.181 https://www.dandwiki.com/w/index.php?title=D%26D_Wiki:Requests_for_Adminship/Great_Wyrm_Black_Dragon&diff=180636 D&D Wiki:Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon 2007-12-10T13:01:28Z <p>69.156.93.181: </p> <hr /> <div>===[[Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon|Great Wyrm Black Dragon]]===<br /> '''[{{fullurl:Requests for Adminship/Great Wyrm Black Dragon|action=edit}} Voice your opinion]'''<br /> '''(0/9/0) Ending 6:00 (PM), 14 December 2007 (MDT)'''<br /> <br /> I am nominating myself because I understand fully the devotion and commitment needed for wikis. I was formerly and admin for Wikipedia. One day while banning spammers on the Dungeons &amp; Dragons wikipage, I noticed that dandwiki.com was a new external link I had never known. I have always love D&amp;D and since wikipedia was becoming corrupt, I renounced my adminship and decided that I would like to help out dandwiki.com<br /> <br /> :Candidates Prelude <br /> <br /> ;Questions for the candidate<br /> Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve D&amp;D Wiki in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:<br /> :'''1.''' What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please read the page about [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators administrators] and the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_reading_list administrators' reading list] on Wikipedia before answering.<br /> ::'''A:''' I plan on banning people for spamming. I also plan on making bots to keep dandwiki up to date and faster <br /> <br /> :'''2.''' Of your articles or contributions to D&amp;D Wiki, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?<br /> ::'''A:''' Not as of yet because I am a farely new member<br /> <br /> :'''3.''' Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?<br /> ::'''A:''' I have never had any conflict on dandwiki!<br /> <br /> ;General comments<br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> &lt;!-- IMPORTANT: Only registered D&amp;D Wikians may comment in the &quot;support&quot;, &quot;oppose&quot; or &quot;neutral&quot; sections. Non-registered users or editors who are not logged in are welcome to participate in the &quot;comments&quot; and &quot;questions&quot; sections. --&gt;<br /> <br /> '''Discussion''' <br /> <br /> Is... this a serious request? I'm having a bit of difficulty taking it seriously. I kinda want to add it to [[:Category:April Fools]]. —[[User:Sledged|Sledged]] ([[User talk:Sledged|talk]]) 02:35, 9 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> :Good idea... --[[User:Sam Kay|Sam Kay]] 03:14, 9 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> ::Okay. Good to see I'm not the only one who finds this ridiculous. I saw the RFA on the main page, checked out his user page and was about to revert the vandalism I saw... Then I noticed it wasn't vandalism. Some of his user page information is racially offensive. I don't remember if we had a &quot;Terms of Use&quot; on signup but if there is, I think Great Wyrm Black Dragon should get a warning and be asked to remove the content. That is up to the admins here of course, but really... Not cool. --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] 13:15, 9 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> :::I agree, his user page is very offensive. See also [[User talk:Great Wyrm Black Dragon#User Page]]. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:09, 9 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> ::::Kill it hard and fast. This is kind of what I was getting at. --g0tt<br /> <br /> '''Support'''<br /> <br /> '''Oppose'''<br /> * '''Oppose''' Considering the potentially offensive things on his user page, I oppose Great Wyrm Black Dragon becoming an admin. I believe that admins should be, as has been said elsewhere, &quot;the face&quot; of the wiki. I personally do not feel comfortable being part of a wiki with an admin who posts such offensive things, and I'm certain I'm not the only one who feels that way. However, considering the vandalism attacks that occurred moments ago, if I'm told that those posts were part of the vandalism, I'll retract this vote. --[[User:Daniel Draco|Daniel Draco]] 19:09, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> As the vandal in question, Black Dragon himself has reverted the changes I made to his page to it's current version, and added onto it. You can easily check the history log to see himself add his offensive information before any vandalism began.<br /> <br /> * '''Oppose''' This user is abrasive, uncouth, and irresponsible. Please remember this discussion: [[User talk:Green Dragon/Archive 6#You Suck!!!]]. If he becomes an admin, I might consider leaving the wiki. That is how strong my aversion to this user is. &amp;ndash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 19:45, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> * '''Oppose'''I oppose because of the above mentioned. --Dhyn Ktonos 19:51, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> * '''Oppose''' I believe an administrator must remain neutral when it comes to the individuals who add to this page. They need to watch out for inappropriate contributions but should not make judgments on the people who make those contributions. His user page clearly points out that he is not ok with certain life styles or races. He hates &quot;non-Mormon,&quot; &quot;sand-niggers,&quot; &quot;gays,&quot; and many other people. I fear that he would abuse his administrative powers to ban people who he dislikes. His primary goal in becoming administration is to ban people for spamming. Spamming usually means posting unwanted advertisements but some times it can simply mean posting unwanted posts. --[[User:Mander|Mander]] 20:17, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> * '''Oppose''' I oppose for the reasons mentioned above. When multiple users are put up for a RfA, it does not mean that every user should be put up. &amp;mdash; &lt;span style=&quot;color:#002137;&quot;&gt;[[User:Blue Dragon|Blue Dragon]] &lt;small&gt; ([[User_talk:Blue Dragon|talk]])&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 22:18, 7 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> * '''Oppose''' I have seen none of this user's contributions, and he has not contributed regularly that I have seen. Having seen [[User talk:Green Dragon/Archive 6|Archive 6]], I also believe him to be irresponsible and rude. --[[User:Sam Kay|Sam Kay]] 04:02, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> * '''Oppose''' I would tend to oppose this nomination as a matter of principle as GWBD nominated himself. Added to the extremely offensive comments on his user page, I feel that promoting this member to Adminship would look like the Wiki community were endorsing his viewpoint. I also think the kind of bigotry that page shows gives Christians of all kinds a bad name. [[User:MorkaisChosen|MorkaisChosen]] 07:23, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> **Yes, definitely. I have to say, the comments on his user page are actually against the teachings in the christian new testament. --[[User:Sam Kay|Sam Kay]] 10:17, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> ***After a second look at his user page, I think is is too offensive to have on this (or any) wiki. Please note the use of racist comments. Not nice. I implore an admin to do something about it, before somebody referred to on the page sees it and takes offense. --[[User:Sam Kay|Sam Kay]] 10:23, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> ::::A bit late to prevent offense, but I'm sure I got my point across as intended. --g0tt<br /> <br /> *'''Oppose''' All previous &amp;lsquo;oppose&amp;rsquo; comments have merit, and I will not repeat them. So far unmentioned is that this user's existing page and previous contributions appear designed to increase controversy rather than consensus. Given that record, this request for adminship seems meant to draw opprobrium. If the request be seriously meant, I suggest the user abandon his current name and attempt to build a more positive record of contribution. [[User:Roszlishan|Roszlishan]] 11:04, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> ::I had the same impression. Was this a joke or simply a troll? I think it is rather apparant that he wont become an admin (thank you dandwiki community) and perhaps further action will be needed. But I think we dont need to rush into that. Give this person a bit more time to show his true colors more clearly.--[[User:Mander|Mander]] 15:23, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> :::Actually, he has been around for quite a while, and--as far as I can tell-- everything he does is trolling. I find it hard to believe, for example, that he user page really is anything but an effort to upset as many people as possible, as the [[User talk:Green Dragon/Archive 6#You Suck!!!|conversation I mentioned]] above clearly is. I agree, some sort of action is necessary, but we shouldn't rush into anything. &amp;ndash;[[User:EldritchNumen|EldritchNumen]] 16:36, 8 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> *'''Oppose''' For all the reasons above... --[[User:Aarnott|Aarnott]] 13:17, 9 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> *'''Oppose''' For all the reasons above... I hope this is a sick joke or something... Also, enyone up for ending this early? --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 16:10, 9 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> ::I say end it.--[[User:Mander|Mander]] 17:19, 9 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> :::So, everyone okay with ending this early? Also, as a side comment, I like how this &quot;Great Wyrm Black Dragon&quot; has not come back to respond to his nomination in any way, shape, or form. I can tell how much he/she cares about it. --[[User:Green Dragon|Green Dragon]] 20:34, 9 December 2007 (MST)<br /> <br /> ::::No one will even care if it's pruned now. --g0tt<br /> <br /> '''Neutral'''</div> 69.156.93.181
https://www.dandwiki.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=69.156.93.181&feedformat=atom
www.dandwiki.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-49
15436
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:PQ7EE7CIQ3BS3M2ZQ6I264QRDITKQWCG
<urn:uuid:a62e74e5-796f-44a5-91a8-320603c3f8c6>
2022-11-28T17:55:52Z
172.67.210.95
application/atom+xml
sha1:COJZ4VZQZ5L3XKVMX732WUWL66BNP4TG
<urn:uuid:a0294722-3af1-4a98-86df-942423e04847>
https://www.dandwiki.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=69.156.93.181&feedformat=atom
response
<urn:uuid:c03362e9-336d-48d7-9917-1cb4b2430b84>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-49
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-189
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/