     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

 
Closed TopicStart new topic
> Welcome to The Wikipedia Review!, Introduction and FAQ - Please read before posting!
Selina
post Tue 21st February 2006, 7:37pm
Post #1


Cat herder
******

Group: Staffy
Posts: 1,513
Joined: Sun 19th Feb 2006, 10:28pm
Member No.: 1

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



(note to all admins and moderators: Feel free to edit this!)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Review.

This is an open forum is provided for people to talk about issues related to Wikipedia and sister projects like Wiktionary and Wikimedia Commons without the possibility of censorship by the Wikimedia Foundation openly-undemocratic administration ("Voting is evil" --Jimbo Wales).

You can read this forum without creating an account, but you are encouraged to open an account so that:
  • You can post new topics and polls and reply to messages here.
  • Others cannot use your name to impersonate you.
  • The forum can keep track for you which topics you have read and which you have not.
  • If you make a mistake you can edit the post to correct it.
  • You can send and receive private messages with other users.
  • You can vote in polls.
Anonymous users cannot do any of the above.

Opening an account is free and just takes just a few minutes. As well as posting, it will also allow you to vote in polls, which you may not do without an account. All you need to open an account is a valid e-mail address - after making your account you will receive an email either instantly or within 5 minutes with a link you can click to activate your account.

Frequently Asked Questions
Was The Wikipedia Review created or run by Daniel Brandt?
No.

Was The Wikipedia Review created by Igor Alexander?
Yes.

Is The Wikipedia Review run by Igor Alexander?
No.

Is The Wikipedia Review anti-Google/Wiki/Linux/Open-source/collaboration/anti free-speech/anti-Wikipedia?
No to all is most likely, but it depends on who's talking at the time! smile.gif

Is The Wikipedia Review pro-Britannica/Encarta/World Book?
No to all is most likely, but it depends on who's talking at the time! smile.gif

Will you ban me for saying nice things about Wikipedia on your board?
No.

Will you ban me for saying nasty things about you on this board?
Maybe.

Additions by Blu Aardvark:
What are the rules of this forum?
There is only one. "Don't act like a total jackass".

Can I remain anonymous?
Yes. You are free to choose anonymous usernames if you so desire, but it is the opinion of many members of this board that anonymity = cowardice. If you're here to troll, we'll at least think a little more of you don't hide behind a fake ID.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Closed TopicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th 8 15, 11:44am
 
     
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=41&pid=41&st=0
wikipediareview.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-32
57195
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:L7V4DPQON2ELYN6KNJOL2SNGGPFOKMLK
<urn:uuid:52afc202-433d-466a-9b52-ed803c4ef146>
2015-08-04T11:44:30Z
192.254.236.99
sha1:6G35VMDI6NAVNOORXVQCB2DAJLIQ4C7X
<urn:uuid:b922d2f3-88be-407f-9598-bff62b1f8b55>
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=41&pid=41&st=0
length
response
<urn:uuid:4e7679c1-2f04-4e4e-8cdc-0807cac0ae78>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-236-191-2.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-32
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf