Advertisement

Evaluation on Academic Libraries’ Websites of the Autonomous State Universities: The Minimum Level of Success and Failure Criteria

  • Pornwilai Sukmak
  • Nathaporn UtakritEmail author
Conference paper
  • 21 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1135)

Abstract

The importance of Internet access in the digital era cannot be overstated. While the digital revolution has an impact on online services and resources, the website plays a valuable tool in library services. Users can access many useful features when visiting the library without physical presence. The purposes of libraries in academic institutions are not different. Libraries disseminate information and media within the internal databases and connect users to other external sources and show the results to all academic persons and general interests. While traditional library remains in the services, the additional supports have been addressed to ensure that all users have equal access. Not only the ordinary persons can make use of the library, but also the people with disabilities are the stakeholder. This research examined web accessibility compliance to WCAG 2.0 level A of the 23 Thai academic libraries on most common pages, which were home, book loan service information, and e-databases pages. Each webpage was assessed using multiple tools and manual check and made a comparison of the success criteria with 25 checkpoints. The research approach was carried out following the Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology. The finding results were found that people with disabilities could have a barrier to access to materials available on the academic libraries’ websites. Non-text content was the most critical barrier. While AChecker could identify the most violation, an additional approach to increase the accuracy is recommended. Manual check also needs a professional person to ensure accurate and robust judgment for better web accessibility.

Keywords

Web accessibility WCAG 2.1 Accessibility evaluation People with disabilities Academic libraries 

References

  1. 1.
    Diaz, K.: The role of the library web site. Ref. User Serv. Q. 38(1), 41–43 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Accessibility. (n.d.). Yale University Library. https://web.library.yale.edu/site-resources-help/accessibility. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
  3. 3.
    Web Accessibility. (2019). University Libraries. https://library.stonybrook.edu/web-accessibility/. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
  4. 4.
    Crichlow, T., (n.d.).: Website Accessibility Policy. Duke University Libraries. https://library.duke.edu/using/policies/accessibility. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
  5. 5.
    Rosen, S.: Research Guides: Digital Accessibility. University of Michigan Library (2018). https://guides.lib.umich.edu/c.php?g=773360&p=6069533. Accessed 26 Feb 2019
  6. 6.
    Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities. Information on Disability Issue. The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2016). https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Disability/StudyEqualityAndNonDiscrimination/States/Thailand.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2019
  7. 7.
    Report of the students with disabilities in all education area districts categorized by grades. Special Education Bureau (2016). http://specialbasic.specialset.bopp.go.th/specialbasic/download/student_2559_2_class_de.pdf. Accessed 24 Feb 2019
  8. 8.
    Yang, Y.T., Chen, B.: Web accessibility for older adults: a comparative analysis of disability laws. Gerontologist 55(5), 854–864 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mueller, M.J., Jolly, R., Eggert, E.: Guidelines on Dissemination of Information through Government Websites. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2018). https://www.w3.org/WAI/policies/hong-kong/. Accessed 12 May 2019
  10. 10.
    GovHK: Web Accessibility Conformance Statements. GovHK (2017). https://www.gov.hk/en/about/accessibility/conformance.htm. Accessed 12 May 2019
  11. 11.
    Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., Jacobs, I.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C (1999). https://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/. Accessed 15 May 2019
  12. 12.
    W3C. Diverse Abilities and Barriers. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2017). https://www.w3.org/WAI/people-use-web/abilities-barriers/. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  13. 13.
    Rush, S., et al.: Easy Checks - A First Review of Web Accessibility. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2017). https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/preliminary/. Accessed 17 Feb 2019
  14. 14.
    W3C. What’s New in WCAG 2.1. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2018). https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-21/. Accessed 18 Feb 2019
  15. 15.
    Kirkpatrick, A., Connor, J.O., Campbell, A., Cooper, M.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. W3C (2018). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed 19 May 2019
  16. 16.
    Saud, K., Azhar, K.: Web accessibility initiatives in Malaysian academic libraries: enthusiasm and challenges. In: 2017 International Conference on Library and Information Science, Sapporo Convention Centre, Hokkaido, Japan, pp. 1–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arasid, W., Abdullah, A.G., Wahyudin, D., Abdullah, C.U., Widiaty, I., Zakaria, D., Amelia, N., Juhana, A.: An analysis of website accessibility in higher education in Indonesia based on WCAG 2.0 guidelines. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 306, pp. 1–8 (2018)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Navarro-Molina, C., López-Gil, J.-M., Aleixandre-Benavent, R., Valderrama-Zurián, J.-C.: Study of the accessibility of a sample of scientific electronic journal publishing platforms Changes from 2011 to 2016. Online Inf. Rev. 42(3), 387–411 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ismail, A., Kuppusamy, K.: Accessibility of Indian universities’ homepages: an exploratory study. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 30(2), 268–278 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henry, S.L.: Evaluating Web Accessibility Overview. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2018). https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/. Accessed 14 May 2019
  21. 21.
    W3C. WCAG-EM Overview: Website Accessibility Conformance Evaluation Methodology. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2016). https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/conformance/wcag-em/. Accessed 17 Feb 2019
  22. 22.
    Srisa-arn, W.: Public Autonomous University. Wichitlikhit (2016). http://www.wichitlikhit.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/A2-for-reading.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2019
  23. 23.
    Autonomous State Universities. (n.d.). Wikiwand. http://www.wikiwand.com/th/. Accessed 29 May 2019
  24. 24.
    Hackett, S., Parmanto, B.: Homepage not enough when evaluating web site accessibility. Internet Res. 19(1), 78–87 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vigo, M., Brown, J., Conway, V.: Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In: W4A 2013 Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fiers, W.: Accessibility Conformance Testing Framework Requirements. W3C.github (2017). https://w3c.github.io/wcag-act/act-fr-reqs.html. Accessed 12 May 2019
  27. 27.
    W3C. Step 4: Audit the Selected Sample (2016). https://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/report-tool/#/evaluation/audit. Accessed 27 Feb 2019
  28. 28.
    Abou-Zahra, S.: Define audit results ‘Not checked’, ‘Passed’, ‘Failed’, ‘Not present’, and ‘Cannot tell’ · Issue #296 · w3c/wcag-em-report-tool, GitHub (2019). https://github.com/w3c/wcag-em-report-tool/issues/296. Accessed 06 Mar 2019
  29. 29.
    W3C. Template for Accessibility Evaluation Reports. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) (2018). https://www.w3.org/WAI/test-evaluate/report-template/. Accessed 27 Feb 2019
  30. 30.
    Accessibility Checker: Test WCAG 2.1 & Section 508 Compliance. PowerMapper (2019). https://www.powermapper.com/products/sortsite/checks/accessibility-checks/. Accessed 25 May 2019
  31. 31.
    WAVE Help. (n.d.). WebAim. http://wave.webaim.org/help. Accessed 25 May 2019
  32. 32.
    IDI Web Accessibility Checker : Web Accessibility Checker. A Checker (2011). https://achecker.ca/checker/index.php. Accessed 25 May 2019
  33. 33.
    Chi-Square Test for Association using SPSS Statistics - Procedure, assumptions and reporting the output. (n.d.). Leard Statistics. https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/chi-square-test-for-association-using-spss-statistics.php. Accessed 25 May 2019
  34. 34.
    LibGuides: SPSS Tutorials: Chi-Square Test of Independence. Kent State University (2019). https://libguides.library.kent.edu/SPSS/ChiSquare. Accessed 29 May 2019
  35. 35.
    POL242 LAB MANUAL: EXERCISE 3A Crosstabulation with Nominal Variables. (n.d.). Computing in the Humanities and Social Sciences Faculty of Arts & Science, University of Toronto. http://groups.chass.utoronto.ca/pol242/Labs/LM-3A/LM-3A_content.htm. Accessed 25 May 2019
  36. 36.
    Introduction to Understanding WCAG 2.0. W3C (2016). https://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/intro.html. Accessed 25 May 2019
  37. 37.
    Bailey, E.: The Importance Of Manual Accessibility Testing. Smashing Magazine (2018). https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2018/09/importance-manual-accessibility-testing/. Accessed 06 Mar 2019
  38. 38.
    Brown, J., Hollier, S.: The challenges of Web accessibility: the technical and social aspects of a truly universal Web. First Monday 20(9) (2015)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    W3C. H30: Providing link text that describes the purpose of a link for anchor elements | Techniques for WCAG 2.0. W3C (2016). https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20161007/H30.html. Accessed 25 May 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teacher Training in Electrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Technical EducationKing Mongkut’s University of Technology North BangkokBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Technical Education Management Department, Faculty of Technical EducationKing Mongkut’s University of Technology North BangkokBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-40271-6_38
link.springer.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-16
87956
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:472KA646X2MVLVWSWJGMOSD5H5GQGLBP
<urn:uuid:271fc8d8-6e2e-46c5-b968-83905137b0c7>
2020-04-04T01:01:53Z
151.101.248.95
text/html
sha1:SQBRD3A24AD55GAYFLAOWR4AVAQHZHO6
<urn:uuid:9bdef53f-eae1-4a37-875a-5da4f126a49c>
https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-40271-6_38
response
<urn:uuid:6ae2ceac-499d-42b8-a06f-ade3111bf4a3>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-16
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for March/April 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-202.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/