O slideshow foi denunciado.
Utilizamos seu perfil e dados de atividades no LinkedIn para personalizar e exibir anúncios mais relevantes. Altere suas preferências de anúncios quando desejar.

Checking for originality: Crossref Similarity Check

436 visualizações

Publicada em

Similarity Check presentation given at Crossref LIVE in Yogyakarta in November 2017

  • Seja o primeiro a comentar

  • Seja a primeira pessoa a gostar disto

Checking for originality: Crossref Similarity Check

  1. 1. Checking for originality: Crossref Similarity Check
  2. 2. What is Similarity Check? • Not plagiarism detection • It is a similarity screening service that uses the iThenticate text comparison software that was developed by Turnitin • What are papers checked against? • 59.1 million items from 1,271 Crossref organizations participating in the service (over 1,500 distinct members) • 105 million items from other content partners like Pearson, McGraw Hill, Cengage, EBSCOHost • Over 60 billion web pages archived back nearly a decade • Then provides a report for editors to evaluate
  3. 3. Good and growing adoption Total number of manuscripts scanned in iThenticate between 1st Oct 2016 - 1 Oct 2017 was 4,720,098
  4. 4. Setting up the service • Must be registering content and assigning DOIs in order to start using the service • Content must be indexed to be added to the Turnitin database • Indexing is done via as-crawled URLs. These must be present in your Crossref DOI deposit metadata • Function to deposit as-crawled URLs available in OJS 2.4.7 and above
  5. 5. What are as-crawled URLs? • Link used by Turnitin’s crawler service to identify and index the content associated with your DOIs • The as-crawled URL points the location of the full- text content, either PDF or HTML, associated with the DOI. • New DOIs the URL an be included as part the deposit metadata • Existing DOIs maybe updated
  6. 6. Similarity report
  7. 7. What issues are publishers looking for • Poor, missing, or incomplete references (can be fixed) • Self-plagiarism/text recycling (can be fixed) • Unattributed use of parts of another person’s work • Submitting another person’s work as your own • Is the author attempting to mislead/misrepresent?
  8. 8. How are people using it? Publishers putting time and effort into their policies and workflows: • Resources (staff & time) • Cost • Workflow • What will you look for & how will you look for it? • Education • Follow-up actions
  9. 9. Cost • Administrative fee = 20% of Crossref member fee • Document checking fees paid annually to Turnitin • Each publisher has their own login • More cost effective than joining Turnitin directly
  10. 10. Demo
  11. 11. Questions?

×
https://pt.slideshare.net/CrossRef/checking-for-originality-crossref-similarity-check
pt.slideshare.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-51
157402
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:TVHJ3XMXNXCTRZJ7WROZCQUJVRYJNBTC
<urn:uuid:9a40b029-da03-4417-86bc-fef43efabf15>
2019-12-06T23:32:04Z
144.2.12.10
text/html
sha1:6GY3MK42QZFYG2I7OLFVD7D6KNHSXXL4
<urn:uuid:680f2da9-dc75-4331-99d0-25daf76b3743>
https://pt.slideshare.net/CrossRef/checking-for-originality-crossref-similarity-check
response
<urn:uuid:aaa79c25-7c8c-4827-a7b7-16bb12e0e08d>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-51
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for December 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-113.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/