

Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
"Ignore Post List" - Would You Put Someone In?  
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8764 posts, RR: 42
Posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2262 times:

Imagine a.net profiles had the following option: a list of users whose posts you don't want to read. Every time you read the forums, their posts will either only be shown as existent, or you won't see them at all. That way, the "extreme right-wing ar$eholes" would be able to spare themselves from the "idiotic socialist responses of those liberal morons" and vice versa...  Laugh out loud

I guess that it might save some people from serious anger every day, but it would also prevent some interesting discussions from starting. So considering this, are there users you would or definitely would not include in that kind of list?

Please note that this is not intended to be an offense to anyone, so I'll start right away with some folks I would never or rather not include: 747-451, ADG, Alpha 1, DeltaASA16 and of course a whole lot of people whose posts in the Civil Aviation and Tech/Ops Forums I'll hardly ever be able to compete with.

Cheers!




Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
39 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDavid b. From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3148 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2226 times:

It would be a good idea. Ans yes, I would.

747-451, Rednecks like JSC17, B757300 and a few others.

Alpha1, Im begining to like  Smile/happy/getting dizzy



Teenage-know-it-alls should be shot on sight
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16365 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2219 times:

Well, I argue it's our differences that make life interesting. No one should be banned for their political or social positions or opinions.




Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlinePacificjourney From New Zealand, joined Jul 2001, 2734 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2216 times:

No, bad idea. Half the threads would be a collection of unrelated posts (as opposed to the collection of unreasonable posts they are now).

Perhaps some kind of once-a-year/month "shut the f++k up card' you are allowed to throw on someone and delete their posts on a particular thread for no reason.



" Help, help ... I'm being oppressed ... "
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8764 posts, RR: 42
Reply 4, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2213 times:

"Well, I argue it's our differences that make life interesting. No one should be banned for their political or social positions or opinions."

Quite true, but I'm not talking about bans or such. Just something to prevent you from getting mad about posts on an internet forum.



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16365 posts, RR: 56
Reply 5, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 2210 times:

Just something to prevent you from getting mad about posts

I would argue that should come from self-control or putting anet in perspective rather than via a form of censorship.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2182 times:

B757300 never has anything worthwhile to say.


Dear moderators: No.
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2182 times:

JCS17 a redneck. LMAO. Someone should get a clue as to what a redneck is.

Oh, I'd ignore We're Nuts.  Big grin


User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2182 times:

I think it's pretty harsh to say someone never has anything worthwhile to say. I can't imagine deliberately ignoring someone's posts. After all, we're all entitled to speak our minds, no matter how much we may disagree with each other. That's the beauty of the forums.

User currently offlineMarcus From Mexico, joined Apr 2001, 1808 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2169 times:

I like this "shut the f++k up card' idea..........I previously suggested a "I couldn't recognize the truth even if it bit me in the ass" rating but it was declined.




Kids!....we are going to the happiest place on earth...TIJUANA! signed: Krusty the Clown
User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 10, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 2172 times:

So nice to see how everyone here wants their opinions expressed but don't want anyone else to express theirs. Grow up children.


"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineCedarjet From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 8193 posts, RR: 54
Reply 11, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2159 times:

757300: "So nice to see how everyone here wants their opinions expressed but don't want anyone else to express theirs. Grow up children."

Bingo.



fly Saha Air 707s daily from Tehran's downtown Mehrabad to Mashhad, Kish Island and Ahwaz
User currently offlineStaffan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2148 times:

Nobody


Fillerfiller


User currently offlineB757300 From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 4114 posts, RR: 22
Reply 13, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 2149 times:

Cedarjet, I could care less what anyone else says. Say your opinion and you have the right to it. I'll just skip over it if I don't want to read it. On the other hand, this thread was started, not as an idea for site improvement, but as an attack on other members.

So mods, why is Nutsy and several others here allowed to make a personal attack and yet I've had messages deleted for the same thing. Oh that right, I forgot that certain people on this forum have a pass when it comes to following the rules.



"There is no victory at bargain basement prices."
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8764 posts, RR: 42
Reply 14, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2130 times:

"Cedarjet, I could care less what anyone else says. Say your opinion and you have the right to it. I'll just skip over it if I don't want to read it."

Well, that's exactly what that list would facilitate / make unnecessary...

"On the other hand, this thread was started, not as an idea for site improvement, but as an attack on other members."

Was it? "Please note that this is not intended to be an offense to anyone". Nope, it was started to be the expression of a wild idea - nothing I suppose to improve a.net; if that was my point, this thread would be in the site related forum.




Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13745 posts, RR: 19
Reply 15, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2128 times:

What a wonderful thread.

I would say but certain people would hold it against me.  Insane



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
User currently offlineJBirdAV8r From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 4491 posts, RR: 21
Reply 16, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2121 times:

Maybe we could add an Asshole Rating beside the Respect Rating  Big grin


I got my head checked--by a jumbo jet
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8764 posts, RR: 42
Reply 17, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2112 times:

hehe... Already discussed! "How About A 'W**ker' Rating?"


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineWietse From Netherlands, joined Oct 2001, 3809 posts, RR: 55
Reply 18, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2108 times:

B-OTCH, NikonF100 and RoastedNutz...

Wietse



Wietse de Graaf
User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2072 times:

Please.
Half the fun on here is shooting down arguments of those you disagree with.
If we all thought alike, life would be boring.


User currently offlineSeb146 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 11796 posts, RR: 15
Reply 20, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2057 times:

Or you could try this (what I do): See a thread that will get the blood boiling and DO NOT CLICK ON IT!!!! Wow! What a concept!

GO CANUCKS!!



Life in the wall is a drag.
User currently offlineWe're Nuts From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 5722 posts, RR: 19
Reply 21, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2035 times:

B757300, I have no pact with the moderators, but judging from your previous posts, it is easy to understand how they might dislike you. You are a big baby. "Idiot Rats" does not count as an opinion, numbnuts. You are a classic example of the man who cries "fire!" in a crowded theater.


Dear moderators: No.
User currently offline747-451 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 2417 posts, RR: 6
Reply 22, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 2032 times:

No, I wouldn't want to filter my posts. It's nice to see posts by sheltered neophytes who think they know what they are talking about, lower themselves by name calling or being narrowminded and judgemental (D@vidB, Aloges, Schonerama, 777-236  Insane  Yeah sure).

All kidding aside, blocking posts defeats what a "forum" is all about, differing opinions and points of view.

[Edited 2003-05-01 00:40:51]

User currently offlineCO 757 200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2020 times:

I sort of agree with the idea, but I know in realism it won't happen most likely. I just have my own informal blacklist right now (just two users on there at present time)...any post with their user name, I don't read....pure and simple.......

I only blacklist users who speak from both mouths, or cannot contribute to a discussion without engaging in personal attacks, and the BL is purely a last resort.

Personally, I like to see the opposing viewpoint in things as well, so most people who can do a constructive discussion/disagreement will NEVER get on the list, regardless of how much I disagree with them......

[Edited 2003-05-01 01:18:26]

User currently offlineNational_757 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (11 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2016 times:

I would put nobody in an ignore list. Sure, I really don't like sometimes what some people say, but why should I restrict my self to only one point of view?

[Edited 2003-05-01 01:09:11]

25 Post contains images 777236ER : It's nice to see posts by sheltered neophytes who think they know what they are talking about, lower themselves by name calling or being narrowminded
26 AA61hvy : Like I have said before, I would not give the people I don't like the time of day. I would not waste my energy typing their names.
27 Post contains images Airplay : My policy in life is fairly simple and far from unique: Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. If you ignore people who represent things tha
28 BOEING747-700 : I don't think its a good idea to have that, those people that get under your skin add some flare to this board. If you eliminate that, then this board
29 B757300 : If you eliminate that, then this board becomes pretty monogamous. Sadly that is what around a dozen or so members would like to have happen.
30 Post contains images NWA742 : B757300, I have no pact with the moderators, but judging from your previous posts, it is easy to understand how they might dislike you. You are a big
31 NormalSpeed : I don't think that there is anyone on this website that I automatically ignore just because of the source. (I certainly don't reply to everything that
32 Post contains images ADG : I like this "shut the f++k up card' idea..........I previously suggested a "I couldn't recognize the truth even if it bit me in the ass" rating but it
33 Post contains images Dragogoalie : Can someone tell me why this whole post is empty? --dragogoalie-#88--
34 We're Nuts : If you can't see the difference between one person calling someone else (justifiably, too) a "baby", and one person calling 50% of the nation "Idiots"
35 NWA742 : If you can't see the difference between one person calling someone else (justifiably, too) a "baby", and one person calling 50% of the nation "Idiots"
36 Post contains images DeltaASA16 : Aloges: you mean you don't want to read my posts??? Im hurt DeltaASA16
37 Aloges : "some folks I would never or rather not include: ... DeltaASA16 ..." If I didn't like reading your posts, I'd never have "revived" The Never Ending St
38 Post contains images DeltaASA16 : Yeah, I'm special! DeltaASA16
39 RoastedNutz : Same to you Wietse...same to you.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"But Would You Want Your Daughter To Marry One?" posted Thu May 25 2006 04:17:32 by AerospaceFan
What Would You Put Into Room 101? posted Thu Jun 1 2006 17:37:47 by Cosec59
Would You Turn Him In? posted Fri Jul 5 2002 23:54:10 by Lubcha132
What Year Would You Travel Back In Time To? posted Mon Apr 23 2001 04:53:21 by Us330
Would You Live In A "haunted House"? posted Sat Jul 13 2002 23:48:13 by 737doctor
The "Would You Rather..." Game #2 posted Mon Sep 18 2006 05:05:29 by Iamcanadian
The "Would You Rather..." Game posted Fri Sep 15 2006 19:03:01 by Iamcanadian
What Type Would You Say Is Your "type?" posted Tue Jun 13 2006 00:36:22 by Planespotting
The Official: "If You're Drunk, Post!" Thread posted Sat Apr 2 2005 00:27:20 by UAL747
"made IN" Important To You? posted Thu Oct 21 2004 23:48:33 by N771AN
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/non_aviation/read.main/384913/
www.airliners.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-52
205273
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5ONOYSDKKUTG6JDIZWN4SP36ETWRRRWQ
<urn:uuid:30f36b12-24e3-4cd5-9593-40d436070f1d>
2014-12-20T05:56:53Z
23.227.10.54
sha1:MSB4L2P7J75KL2UN6YVPNQYAHSYP756O
<urn:uuid:50c027e3-0edb-4baa-aca6-4a2e102c64c1>
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/non_aviation/read.main/384913/
length
response
<urn:uuid:ffbc221f-13b1-4e22-b4c6-317ea0307024>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-231-17-201.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-52
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for December 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf