  •  
  •  
 

Communications of the Association for Information Systems

Abstract

Cuellar, Truex, and Tajeda (2019) take the position that counting the number of articles published in ranked venues is an inappropriate method of evaluating the scholarly performance of faculty. They base their contention on a number of unfounded assertions and unsupported arguments, which the author details and analyzes. They propose an alternative evaluation criterion, which they call the “scholarly capital model”. In this rejoinder, I critique this model and find it wanting.

DOI

10.17705/1CAIS.04414

Share

COinS
 
 
 
https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol44/iss1/14/
aisel.aisnet.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-05
33442
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:FCAD36AD4GMU3XLANFVBVJXHDSBU7OAZ
<urn:uuid:6add12f4-1f56-426b-9d92-f494be482046>
2020-01-19T12:42:03Z
13.57.92.51
text/html
sha1:FGLDGRDLKZTC72NA7VYKLLC44DDNPO3M
<urn:uuid:2eb3d2db-ac15-4631-892f-6b8051bcebb5>
https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol44/iss1/14/
response
<urn:uuid:5b2e717c-cd8d-427f-a0b9-4b608bb43bc9>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-05
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-154.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/