10
$\begingroup$

The looks useless and I think it needs removing.

Currently it is only used on one question (which is a duplicate of another question which didn't use the tag and got answers).

I can't see being used anywhere else.

| |
$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Good catch, as iklsr said, (almost) anyone can create a new tag, and some of them, like this one, are not needed at all. PS this is a perfect use of the meta, any time you have a question, or concern about the main site post a question here. $\endgroup$ – David Apr 28 '15 at 21:30
7
$\begingroup$

It was just created, new users create these all the time however we don't normally have tags for simple features like this, it has been removed.

| |
$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
https://blender.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/688/do-we-need-the-undo-tag
blender.meta.stackexchange.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-34
116657
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:76LAPC5IFPXDD5DCUP7S2X7EVPVGYGZW
<urn:uuid:81d4c1b4-8767-4631-9d03-ef3c84533a91>
2020-08-11T15:17:06Z
151.101.129.69
text/html
sha1:A7A4AE4RNKGCPPWIXWEEOPF2EQJ3BKK6
<urn:uuid:5315df29-918a-4b3c-bd62-5511bb2670b2>
https://blender.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/688/do-we-need-the-undo-tag
response
<urn:uuid:528f8e79-ab50-4660-88d4-4f0c2ab5dfa3>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-34
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-230.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/