Recent Questions - Area 51 Discussions most recent 30 from discuss.area51.stackexchange.com 2014-09-18T23:45:28Z http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/feeds http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/rdf http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17957 0 This is most likely an Alkida Conspracy user259041 http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/116333 2014-09-18T16:30:11Z 2014-09-18T18:08:52Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76944/terrorism"><strong>Terrorism</strong></a></p> <p>They want to create a Stackexchange site to discuss their plans.</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17956 0 Backlog grooming as a task [on hold] Martin Frank http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/118504 2014-09-18T16:24:09Z 2014-09-18T16:24:09Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76461/agile"><strong>Agile</strong></a> is backlog grooming supposed to be a task?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17953 0 Point of sales as embedded systems Gilles http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/18685 2014-09-18T14:49:25Z 2014-09-18T14:49:25Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76422/pos-point-of-sale-service-systems"><strong>POS (Point of Sale/Service) Systems</strong></a></p> <p>Point of sales is a highly focused audience. It's also an audience that overlaps a lot with other types of devices (smartphones as point of sales…).</p> <p>Therefore I suggest to join forces with the <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/70800/embedded-systems-programming-and-design?referrer=ugotaNldoh5JOVkcEm-iDw2">Embedded Systems proposal</a>. <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/50195/embedded-systems">Embedded Systems</a> already went to private beta once and failed due to a lack of traffic. I think all types of embedded systems should join forces if we're to have a decent chance of success.</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17949 0 Would a site for free software creation make sense? Shahbaz http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/61656 2014-09-18T10:22:52Z 2014-09-18T10:22:52Z <p>I'm asking for opinions on this. Regarding whether it's a good idea, if it fits with the spirit of SE and whether you think it would work.</p> <p>There are many pieces of free software being written. You can take a look at github for an idea. Free software is great, but there are a couple of issues that are hard to address:</p> <ul> <li>For new programmers, it's hard to know where to start, based on their interests.</li> <li>When you start a new free software, it's hard to make it known and attract other developers.</li> <li>It's not always easy to find a project that already does what you have in mind, before you decide to start one yourself.</li> </ul> <p>I was thinking of a proposal that would try to address these issues. That is a site where people who are looking to do free software can ask about free software, whether it is to find what projects they can contribute to, what tools would likely help them with a particular project idea or a way to announce their project.</p> <p>Some possible examples:</p> <hr> <p>Q: I'm interested in image processing, what free software is there on this topic? (tag: image-processing)</p> <p>A: [X](link) is an advanced library for medical image processing. It emphasizes on A and B...</p> <p>A: [Y](link) is a rather new project that aims to do C and D...</p> <hr> <p>Q: I'm writing a tool to run Mac software on Linux, similar to Wine. I need advice. (tag: mac, linux, cross-platform)</p> <p>A: Cool, be sure to pay attention to the X feature of Mac which needs to be simulated.</p> <p>A: Project [Z](link) is trying to do the same thing, perhaps you could contribute to that. At the time of this writing, they have E and F features running and they need expertise on G.</p> <hr> <p>I realize that the answers are subjective. I have no idea how many users the site may attract and how many questions per day may pop up, but nevertheless I personally would find such a site useful. I've sometimes found interesting projects through channels like mailing lists. Even in the chat of a half-real-half-game site like <a href="https://habitrpg.com/" rel="nofollow">HabitRPG</a> (which is free software on its own) you find people asking for projects they can contribute to, so I assume that conversation is happening in many other places I don't know about.</p> <p>I'm asking here therefore to find out how such a proposal would be perceived.</p> <hr> <p>P.S. While I have trouble figuring out an appropriate name for such a site, it might make sense for it to cover not just software, but also hardware (and perhaps other things that could be done collaboratively)</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17946 -5 having interrups from 'chicken' and no strong scrum master [on hold] Martin Frank http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/118504 2014-09-18T05:49:29Z 2014-09-18T11:51:56Z <p>Proposal <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76461/agile"><strong>Agile</strong></a> Help on Interrupts</p> <p>We are developing in a Scrum Team of eight people and get often <strong>interrupted</strong> by requests from other teams or emergeny bugs so we cant really concentrate on our sprint goals. </p> <p>Right now we already have a buffer of story points for emergency tasks but often the buffer is not big enough and a real sprint cant be achived.</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17943 1 does this site include questions about developing emacs? connor http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/62372 2014-09-17T21:48:39Z 2014-09-18T13:25:12Z <p>The description for this site reads, "Proposed Q&amp;A site for those using, extending or developing emacs." As I understand it, that last bit means questions about actually contributing to the emacs project. It seems like all of the example questions are about using and configuring emacs though. Are questions about developing emacs itself be on topic?</p> <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76571/emacs"><strong>Emacs</strong></a></p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17938 1 Should comic book characters being considered supernatural beings? Linger http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/57281 2014-09-17T16:53:15Z 2014-09-17T16:53:15Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76148/zombies-and-other-supernatural-beings"><strong>Zombies and other supernatural beings</strong></a></p> <p>Most comic book characters possess powers/capabilities/characteristics that are far different than a <strong>normal being</strong>. So, should they be considered supernatural beings?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17936 2 Should we advertise this proposal on other Korean-languege forums? kikjezrous http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/106254 2014-09-17T15:42:18Z 2014-09-17T18:33:34Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/74083/korean-language-and-usage"><strong>Korean Language and Usage</strong></a></p> <p>I'm not a speaker of Korean, but I'd love to be, so I'm naturally very excited for this proposal. I linked the Stack Exchange proposal onto the /r/Korean sub last night, and I'd like to think that the spike in followers is due somewhat to that.<br> Would it be appropriate to advertise the Korean Language proposal on other known high-quality Korean Language forums/sites?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17934 3 Isn't this a subset of Travel.SE? warren http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/2988 2014-09-17T15:30:16Z 2014-09-17T19:56:24Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76880/bicycle-touring"><strong>Bicycle Touring</strong></a> - the "touring" part is covered by <a href="http://travel.stackexchange.com"><strong>Travel.SE</strong></a> pretty well.</p> <p>The "bicycle" part is on <a href="http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17933/2988"><strong>The Great Outdoors</strong></a>. And if not there, then definitely at [<strong>Bicycles.SE</strong>}(<a href="http://bicycles.stackexchange.com">http://bicycles.stackexchange.com</a>), As @<a href="http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/5/robert-cartaino">Robert Cartaino</a> pointed-out.</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17933 3 Bicycle Touring on The Great Outdoors DJClayworth http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/4676 2014-09-17T15:12:46Z 2014-09-17T15:12:46Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76880/bicycle-touring"><strong>Bicycle Touring</strong></a></p> <p>Proposal: <a href="http://outdoors.stackexchange.com/"><strong>The Great Outdoors</strong></a></p> <p>I'm pretty sure the nice people at The Great Outdoors site would welcome all questions on bicycle touring.</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17930 1 Where did you see that web apps/services were off topic? Robert Cartaino http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/5 2014-09-17T14:14:26Z 2014-09-17T17:21:22Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76871/webapp-and-service-recommendations"><strong>Webapp and Service Recommendations</strong></a></p> <p>The premise of this proposal is that web apps and web services were deemed off topic on our <a href="http://softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/web-apps">Software Recommendations</a> site. That does not seem to be the case:</p> <p><a href="http://meta.softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/191/can-i-ask-for-recommended-websites"><strong>Can I ask for recommended websites?</strong></a></p> <p><a href="http://meta.softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/255/can-i-answer-with-website-webapp"><strong>Can I answer with website/webapp?</strong></a></p> <p><a href="http://meta.softwarerecs.stackexchange.com/questions/460/usage-of-web-apps-for-questions-about-webapps-development"><strong>Usage of <code>web-apps</code> for questions about webapps development</strong></a></p> <p>I see that Software Recs does not allow pure, non-application commodity recommendations (e.g. hosting providers), but we're getting into an incredibly niche space between what Software Recs allows and what what goes <em>beyond</em> software and into our individual expert sites (that don't allow recommendations at all).</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17927 -2 Civil Litigation- How do I sue someone? [on hold] user118462 http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/118462 2014-09-17T08:55:37Z 2014-09-17T08:55:37Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76862/law-commons"><strong>Law Commons</strong></a></p> <p>What are the steps and forms needed to start a civil action?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17926 3 Duplicate of Law MrLore http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/66641 2014-09-16T23:16:31Z 2014-09-16T23:16:31Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76862/law-commons"><strong>Law Commons</strong></a> appears to be a duplicate of <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/67858/law"><strong>Law</strong></a>, unless 'Commons' means some subset of law I'm not familiar with. Even in such a case, a subset of a proposal is going to do worse than the original.</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17925 -2 Real Estate - Title Insurance [on hold] user118462 http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/118462 2014-09-16T20:29:12Z 2014-09-16T20:29:12Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76862/law-commons"><strong>Law Commons</strong></a></p> <p>What are the benefits of buying title insurance? Are there any other ways to insure title?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17923 19 What to expect in the Emacs private beta Jon Ericson http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/38417 2014-09-16T18:38:59Z 2014-09-17T23:02:33Z <h1>Background</h1> <p>It's a bit unusual for us to write about an upcoming private beta. <a href="http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/a/13654/38417">Most proposals</a> struggle to get critical mass, so beta periods tend to be the culmination of months of community building. When it launches early next week, Emacs will be the second fastest site to go from initial proposal to private beta which is a <a href="http://meta.stackexchange.com/a/236870/1438">key to site success</a>. (<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/69388?phase=commitment">Craft CMS</a> holds the record at 12 days. As with this proposal, the majority of that time was waiting for us to launch the site after 100% commitment.) So we are pretty sure this site will be fast out of the gate.</p> <p>Even so, we have some concerns. Dominate among them: <strong>we don't want to divide Stack Overflow into an archipelago of platform islands</strong>. If Emacs succeeds, there will be pressure to create sites for <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76728/vi-vim">Vi</a>, <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/eclipse">Eclipse</a>, <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/visual-studio">Visual Studio</a>, etc. and so on. In fact, we debated internally whether or not to close this proposal as a duplicate. It was a close call, but we did decide to let the proposal go to private beta. (Note: we decided <em>before</em> <a href="http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/17909/did-joel-spolsky-just-renounce-merging-season">Joel committed to it</a>. He wasn't part of our conversation.)</p> <p><strong>A quick aside</strong>: Stack Overflow is an extremely strong brand among developers and technical folks. When I tell people I work for Stack Overflow, they generally know the site. When I say I work for Stack Exchange, they assume it has something to do with Wall Street. (Confusingly, our headquarters is <em>in</em> <a href="https://www.google.com/maps/preview?safe=active&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;fb=1&amp;gl=us&amp;q=Financial+District,+New+York,+NY&amp;ei=nnAYVNmKLIqDiwL0moH4BA&amp;ved=0CJcBEPIBMAo" rel="nofollow">the Financial District</a>.) It's increasingly strange that you go to Stack Overflow for coding questions, Programmers for design questions, Code Review for peer review, and Code Golf for a bit of serious frivolity. Closer to our bottom line, if you want a job or to hire a programmer, you go to Careers 2.0. So splitting off Emacs questions runs counter to our current thinking about what's best for our company and (we suspect) the users of Stack Overflow. </p> <h1>How will Emacs be evaluated in the private beta?</h1> <p>Given that programming questions are best asked on Stack Overflow, we are going to be looking for the Emacs site to cover topics not easily raised on our flagship site. At the end of the private beta, we'll have no problem shutting down a site that mostly mimics the <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/tagged/emacs">emacs tag</a>. That's not to say that <a href="http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/questions/17880/shouldnt-it-say-emacs-and-elisp-emacs-lisp-should-we-make-elisp-questions">elisp is off topic</a>. Rather, we will be discounting questions like those (that seem to fare pretty well on SO today) when evaluating what the beta tells us about the need for a site like this. We'll be looking more at the activity level on questions that highlight benefits that <em>can't</em> be had without a more dedicated community, like:</p> <blockquote> <p><a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76571/emacs/76583#76583">How can I get emacs to search the text of all files inside a single project?</a></p> <p><a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76571/emacs/76574#76574">How can I select a rectangular area that isn't complete lines?</a></p> <p><a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76571/emacs/76635#76635">How do I execute remote commands in emacs?</a></p> </blockquote> <p>While the answers to these questions will probably include some code, that has more to do with the nature of Emacs (a full programmable editor) than with what's being asked. It's ok to ask programmers' questions (like "<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76571/emacs/76589#76589">How to get intelligent auto-completion in C++?</a>") but if they dominate, there's little reason not to fold Emacs.SE back into Stack Overflow. </p> <h1>Questions? Concerns? Comments?</h1> <p>Stick 'em below. I will be posting a similar post on meta when the site has been created.</p> <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76571/emacs"><strong>Emacs</strong></a></p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17922 4 So this is "Code Review" but to sister with the Electronics.SE site? warren http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/2988 2014-09-16T16:45:28Z 2014-09-17T16:02:32Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76853/stack-overflow-code-review"><strong>μ-Stack Overflow + Code Review</strong></a> <em>sounds</em> like a mimic of CodeReview.SE for Electronics.SE.</p> <p>Is that correct? If so, I think it sounds pretty cool.</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17910 10 *BSD is already covered by Unix.SE warren http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/2988 2014-09-15T19:57:47Z 2014-09-17T17:59:03Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76823/bsd"><strong>*BSD</strong></a></p> <p><img src="http://i.stack.imgur.com/lrtIl.png" alt="enter image description here"></p> <p>Why should it be splintered-away from Unix.SE?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17880 6 Shouldn't it say "Emacs and Elisp (Emacs Lisp)"? Should we make Elisp questions explicitly on-topic? Flow http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/35609 2014-09-11T12:33:48Z 2014-09-17T13:35:56Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76571/emacs"><strong>Emacs</strong></a></p> <p>Elisp questions are always relevant to Emacs, e.g. It is hard to ask an elisp question that is not related to Emacs. I think they should be explicitly on-topic on emacs.SX, and new elisp questions on stackoverflow should be migrated over to emacs.SX.</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17875 8 How do we (if at all) draw the line between built-in emacs features and user-written packages? Trevoke http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/16376 2014-09-10T23:18:34Z 2014-09-18T09:16:09Z <p>The emacs mentality encourages everyone to solve the problem they have, scratch their own itches. So there's a lot of existing user-written solutions out there.</p> <p>Should we mark a preference for built-in emacs solutions? What do you think?</p> <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76571/emacs"><strong>Emacs</strong></a></p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17856 1 What distinguishes “Evidence Based” from other science proposals? winerd http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/86595 2014-09-10T09:30:40Z 2014-09-18T11:25:51Z <p>What should be the characteristics of the proposal “<a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76540/evidence-based"><strong>Evidence based</strong></a>” that make it different from other scientific SE proposals and sites?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17821 0 On topic at StackOverflow Liath http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/52422 2014-09-08T07:13:58Z 2014-09-18T14:52:32Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/76422/pos-point-of-sale-service-systems"><strong>POS (Point of Sale/Service) Systems</strong></a></p> <p>I think fact you've linked several of your questions to existing SO questions shows that many of your example questions are on topic there. By splitting POS out into a new SE site you're likely to form a much smaller community which a subset of SO.</p> <p>In my opinion sub communities for SO based on the type of software is a bad idea. At a basic level Devs would have to change communities each time they change jobs!</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17690 -2 Duplicate of meditation? Matt S. http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/99365 2014-08-28T14:30:16Z 2014-09-18T11:58:43Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/75846/thinking"><strong>Thinking</strong></a></p> <p>From the description it sounds like it's about meditation. Which there is <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/75825/meditation">already a proposal for</a>.</p> <p>What's different about this proposal, and how will the questions not be on-topic at <a href="http://philosophy.stackexchange.com/">philosophy.se</a>?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17640 0 What would be the scope of Retrocomputing? Iain http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/117049 2014-08-24T06:42:04Z 2014-09-18T15:20:10Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/74814/retrocomputing"><strong>Retrocomputing</strong></a></p> <p>Is this to include help on vintage games, for example "How do I get past SuperBadGuy on level 5 of FantasticGame". Would it be more limited to repair, maintain and modifying?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17561 4 What 'Java Mobiles' apart from Android? DJClayworth http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/4676 2014-08-16T18:56:40Z 2014-09-17T18:53:39Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/75566/java-mobiles"><strong>Java Mobiles</strong></a></p> <p>Proposal: <a href="http://android.stackexchange.com/"><strong>Andoid Devices</strong></a></p> <p>Which "Java Based Mobile Operating Systems" is 'Java Mobiles' focussing on, not counting those already covered by 'Android Devices'?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17546 5 Overlaps with Earth Science & Sustainability? Simon W http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/96331 2014-08-14T18:23:49Z 2014-09-17T19:53:37Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/75294/global-warming-and-environmental-science"><strong>Global Warming and Environmental Science</strong></a></p> <p>Very heavy overlap with the Earth Science beta Stackexchange, and to a lesser extent (?) Sustainability. </p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17484 2 Potential duplicate of DIY / Hacking proposal dcc http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/100046 2014-08-09T03:09:47Z 2014-09-17T20:53:38Z <p>I'd consider the subject of this proposal to fall under the scope of the <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/65915/diy-hacking">DIY / Hacking proposal</a></p> <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/74621/macgyvering"><strong>MacGyvering</strong></a></p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17453 6 How to deal with dialects? Sammaye http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/112766 2014-08-07T08:43:56Z 2014-09-18T23:23:47Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/62022/arabic-language"><strong>Arabic Language</strong></a></p> <p>This question recently made me wonder about this proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/62022/arabic-language/67683#67683">http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/62022/arabic-language/67683#67683</a> whereby it essentially asks for a map between Quranic and MS Arabic.</p> <p>This has got me wondering: how would we deal with the differences in dialects? </p> <p>Most Western Arabic learners will infact be using Quranic Arabic, for example every Arabic learning course I find is in fact for Quranic Arabic, not MSA.</p> <p>This could, of course, cause misunderstandings and irregularities on the site for people who are expecting MSA but are infact getting classical, resulting in incorrect questions and answers.</p> <p>But this discussion might not end there, since there are many variants of Arabic you could extend this to many more situations, and all dialects that this site might attract.</p> <p>I see three solutions currently:</p> <ul> <li>state in the question what dialect it is</li> <li>tag the dialect, MSA has a tag and classical has one</li> <li>Assume ALL questions and answers are MSA or classical</li> </ul> <p>The last one is one that is actually implemented by SE itself whereby it assmes UK English as its default English dialect but that is possible since the differences between US and UK English is merely omittance of letters and the conversion of "s" to "z".</p> <p>So what would be the way to deal with this problem?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/17447 0 Should this community be extended to the general ERP field? Vitaly Mijiritsky http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/36802 2014-08-06T20:20:18Z 2014-09-18T13:03:54Z <p>I was just wondering whether there's an ERP.SE and found this proposal. It doesn't seem very active. What if we extended it from just SAP to the general field of ERP, so it also included Oracle and others?</p> <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/66343/sap-technologies"><strong>SAP Technologies</strong></a></p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/13645 1 Can the group include rovers Matt Droter http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/25510 2014-03-07T07:54:22Z 2014-09-17T15:52:25Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/63158/diy-drones"><strong>DIY Drones</strong></a></p> <p>Can this also include rovers?</p> http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/q/13079 7 Expand the scope of the Go proposal Potato http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/users/99523 2014-01-24T07:03:40Z 2014-09-17T14:52:25Z <p>Proposal: <a href="http://area51.stackexchange.com/proposals/63965/baduk-weiqi-igo"><strong>Baduk/Weiqi/Igo</strong></a></p> <p>The English-speaking Go community is already dreadfully small. Why, then, is the scope of proposed Go stackexchange restricted to professional or Dan level players? Why not open it to all players? </p>
http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/feeds
discuss.area51.stackexchange.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-41
50242
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:R3TGDHSFUWQA5F4N47QSGEXOLMQ2XBN3
<urn:uuid:21ef348f-f812-43ab-a6ae-67e383094717>
2014-09-18T23:45:29Z
198.252.206.24
sha1:MCRIFO5TEGUZSH43QFNQVT33MHPM7FPH
<urn:uuid:36e9539e-9bc6-4138-88b7-a568529461e1>
http://discuss.area51.stackexchange.com/feeds
response
<urn:uuid:aba0f35c-52b6-46ee-9aeb-6c6bcf6ab179>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-196-40-205.us-west-1.compute.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-41
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for September 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf