Microprocessing

Almost Everything About Goodreads Is Broken

Despite Amazon’s innovation elsewhere, Goodreads has stagnated for 12 years, and its problems are endless

Angela Lashbrook
OneZero
Published in
9 min readSep 4, 2019
Credit: bookriot.com

GGoodreads, the largest literary social media network, should be a good gathering place for readers. It is one of the only online communities for people who like to read books, but the service’s apparent monopoly seems to have stopped it from innovating, based on complaints from users and, well, basic observation. As a result, readers don’t have a good, central online community where they can discuss favorite novels or dish about exciting new releases; authors and publishers don’t have a reliable, trustworthy way to promote their books and interact with fans; book clubs and literary publications don’t have a good way to use the site to gain members and foster discussions.

What Goodreads is good for is keeping your own list of books you want to read or have read this year. It’s a list-making app. And while that’s useful, it doesn’t live up to the company’s full promise of being a haven for readers. Readers and authors deserve a better online community. And while Amazon has at least some nominal interest in improving many of its other products — Alexa, for example, becomes more advanced with each passing year — Goodreads lingers in the dustbin of the early aughts, doomed to the hideous beige design and uninspiring organization of a strip mall doctor’s office.

“It’s just really clunky and slow,” says Dustin Martin, a reader, Goodreads user, and software engineer. “Even having the resources of Amazon behind it, the site feels like a relic, an early web 2.0 sort of deal. I don’t think I’ve seen real improvement or new features since I started using the site in 2014.”

Martin brings up the difficulty of searching for books, a feature that numerous other frustrated Goodreads users complained to me about: The search tool is not intuitive, and if the user makes any mistakes, the book may not come up in Goodreads search at all. Even when a book or author is accurately entered into the search bar, the correct result is often, inexplicably, at the bottom of a list following 10 irrelevant other books.

--

--

Angela Lashbrook
OneZero

I’m a columnist for OneZero, where I write about the intersection of health & tech. Also seen at Elemental, The Atlantic, VICE, and Vox. Brooklyn, NY.
https://onezero.medium.com/almost-everything-about-goodreads-is-broken-662e424244d5
onezero.medium.com
CC-MAIN-2023-50
90176
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:WVN4GHA4MYQSNDCCAA6ZYBT6CPITMQU2
<urn:uuid:02074f6f-f952-416f-8ec3-f9b64992e339>
2023-12-10T23:15:43Z
162.159.152.4
text/html
sha1:KKVNGRDD3VHJPC2V46BS7BYPZ2EK6KNY
<urn:uuid:4ed0b51e-98d7-43eb-8fcc-a7e38a695331>
https://onezero.medium.com/almost-everything-about-goodreads-is-broken-662e424244d5
response
<urn:uuid:d44a575c-a39f-4893-8548-518eca8c0524>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-50
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-40
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/