Peer Review Process

The publishing house of the journal practices single blind peer review after consideration by editors.  After the appropriate decision of the editors, the manuscript is submitted for expert evaluation to the relevant reviewer. The manuscript is blindly reviewed: neither the authors nor the reviewers know each other. The reviewer's comments are sent to the authors along with a possible recommendation to review the manuscript. The editor informs the authors whether the manuscript has been accepted as not requiring revision, or whether the authors are given the opportunity to rework the manuscript and submit it again, or whether the manuscript is rejected.
https://isg-journal.com/isjel/Review_Process
isg-journal.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-40
11649
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MBFRVFLVKYLGVGW6CZ7PNJSQIXMLD62R
<urn:uuid:e858ccca-ed67-48db-a27e-0731c68faabb>
2022-10-01T20:19:32Z
31.131.26.202
text/html
sha1:ILRS3Z654XG6QE5NPBICVQGFSSXDFTPU
<urn:uuid:9314d3e2-64b1-491d-b1a4-9d01732ab8ad>
https://isg-journal.com/isjel/Review_Process
response
<urn:uuid:d2ba0f92-2ff8-49fe-b4b4-797c833e47cb>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September/October 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-215
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/