Share this post with Digg

Looking for data on who owns a company, government spending or political influence? Use these resources to get started

Want to create your own fake news? Yep, there’s an app for that.

Want to have fun while learning how to dump fake news from your media diet? Fortunately, there are a few apps for that too.

The epidemic of fake news during and after the U.S. presidential election convinced several game designers and journalists to think outside the box for trying to tackle the problem. They say that great minds think alike — and three different groups have created three similar apps to help users learn how to tell the difference between misleading headlines and factual claims.

German daily Die Welt has taken the strategy of countering falsehoods and hate speech with more speech to heart on its Facebook page.

It began in the fall of 2014 with lighthearted, sometimes snarky, sometimes earnest responses to comments on its Facebook posts, ramping up the frequency of official responses from the verified Welt account with a new two-person social media staff. The team took to trolling trolls with memes and gifs, amusing others with pop culture references and jokes, thanking those who wrote insightful comments, on top of addressing questions about the outlet’s editorial decisions and helping with social verification during breaking news coverage. Die Welt reads emails from readers, but perhaps even more admirably, it reads all its Facebook comments (tens of thousands per day) and makes sure its official account’s voice is present in the comments below every post on its page.

Faktisk is a collaborative fact-checking project between VG, Dagbladet, NRK and TV 2

While misinformation is an unambiguous menace of our public discourse, the research on how best to correct it remains far from settled. But at least one thing is undeniably true about fact-checking and verification: timing makes a difference.

How though does one sift misinformation from the infinite social web in time to actually make a difference? While there is still no technological silver bullet, well-organized groups of journalists can utilize existing technology disrupt misinformation. Monitoring techniques like the ones I’ll present here supported our work during this year’s snap election in the United Kingdom and in social newsgathering enterprises like Electionland.

%d bloggers like this:
http://erkansaka.net/2017/08/24/journalism-agenda-18-data-sources-for-investigative-journalists/
erkansaka.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-39
99147
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:2OUI2IWN6AZD4EHSG4XGZRMZF3S5YWJZ
<urn:uuid:09fd6ab7-f980-43f3-90d8-019b12392764>
2017-09-21T10:38:17Z
109.232.218.16
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:QTX7HEIHN77XI3GNVMXQ6XTBEF3WWMZQ
<urn:uuid:eba407ea-fa0e-4c26-ba62-1d28143ec24f>
http://erkansaka.net/2017/08/24/journalism-agenda-18-data-sources-for-investigative-journalists/
length
response
<urn:uuid:c9b0f37d-0772-4fa5-85c3-70e456a8c0dc>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-71-239-59.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-39
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf