tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post774752045632454577..comments2014-07-27T10:47:04.982-06:00Comments on The Ancestry Insider: Cite the Source You SeeThe Ancestry Insiderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02490682912125335188noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-91530852402246706462011-05-19T18:37:16.400-06:002011-05-19T18:37:16.400-06:00Monica, As we shall see, your citation will inclu...Monica,<br /><br />As we shall see, your citation will include both the copy that you saw and the original.<br /><br />-- The InsiderThe Ancestry Insiderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02490682912125335188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-27823402154438893922011-05-19T17:21:28.877-06:002011-05-19T17:21:28.877-06:00I reread your post and I think I understand what y...I reread your post and I think I understand what you are saying. You mean that one shouldn&#39;t cite a record that they haven&#39;t actually seen, such as citing a birth certificate based on information from an index (for example). Is that correct or am I misunderstanding still? I&#39;m sorry!Monica Palmerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04905975922475393289noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-53514967636125301342011-05-19T14:53:34.335-06:002011-05-19T14:53:34.335-06:00Monica, I don&#39;t understand what you mean by &...Monica,<br /><br />I don&#39;t understand what you mean by &quot;I have a photocopy of death certificate that belongs to someone else&quot;.<br /><br />-- The InsiderThe Ancestry Insiderhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02490682912125335188noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-60059765973315762372011-05-19T07:05:57.558-06:002011-05-19T07:05:57.558-06:00Excuse my ignorance, but as someone still learning...Excuse my ignorance, but as someone still learning the correct way to cite sources, will you please clarify? Does that mean if I have a photocopy of death certificate that belongs to someone else, I should cite the repository as that person? And not the repository that she got it from? Is the purpose to cite so that someone else may find it also? Or just to show where I found it personally? Thank you!Monica Palmerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04905975922475393289noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-28314077791100324162011-05-05T23:38:33.229-06:002011-05-05T23:38:33.229-06:00Please clarify this. When I go to an archive, and...Please clarify this. When I go to an archive, and get a copy from a microfilm which was made from an original (or possibly from another microfilm of the original), should my citation say &quot;from a copy of a microfilm of an original?&quot; What if the microfilm is several generations from the original, what then?Stuarthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16218874833803647816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5512311610334754148.post-11752250316362729192011-04-27T08:37:28.989-06:002011-04-27T08:37:28.989-06:00I couldn&#39;t agree more.I couldn&#39;t agree more.Boss Gatorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11994122170193771929noreply@blogger.com
http://www.ancestryinsider.org/feeds/774752045632454577/comments/default
www.ancestryinsider.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-23
12880
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:DYEN37EW6XMO67X7STWHKGOA4353GGHI
<urn:uuid:39d63905-9a03-47f9-9134-2af707d713c7>
2014-07-30T07:03:03Z
74.125.20.121
sha1:4XWOC3PKTXPNXNSZUAG74Y3VSPQHAXW3
<urn:uuid:e7dbfe9c-6351-4d9d-a84f-41db8bb2375a>
http://www.ancestryinsider.org/feeds/774752045632454577/comments/default
length
response
<urn:uuid:388560d4-de42-44c4-958c-d84a824e5e97>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-146-231-18.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-23
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for July 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf