Quantcast

Do you think they should bring back the down raving feature to SH?

No One 2012/11/30 15:19:51
Related Topics: rave
You!
Add Photos & Videos
I mean do you think they should bring back the feature that was the opposite of the rave feature?
Add a comment above

Top Opinion

  • Jack's Pearl 2012/11/30 15:54:54
    No they shouldn't!
    Jack's Pearl
    +10
    Why? Just so people can get even nastier to each other? I can see why they got rid of it in the first place.

Sort By
  • Most Raves
  • Least Raves
  • Oldest
  • Newest
Opinions

  • Marcus Clark 2012/12/05 06:13:18
    No they shouldn't!
    Marcus Clark
    +1
    I do think we should be able to remove a rave. This would be quite appropriate because:
    1)mistaken clicks
    2)changed mind
    3)edited posts
    4)previously misunderstood posts.
  • timothy.hill.14 2012/12/02 07:24:40
    Yes they should!
    timothy.hill.14
    +1
    Sounds good to me, although since we can respond to other people's responses I don't think it's necessary. If it's necessary, isn't more fun to call out an idiot and state the reasons they are wrong rather than just giving them the stupid sign?
  • LayLady 2012/12/02 07:12:51
    Undecided!
    LayLady
    I don't care
  • ☆stillthe12c☆ 2012/12/02 01:44:27
    Undecided!
    ☆stillthe12c☆
    +1
    Just give me the ability to remove any rave when I did it by accident.
  • iamthemob ~ the 444th Guru ~ 2012/12/01 14:39:18
    No they shouldn't!
    iamthemob ~ the 444th Guru ~
    I don't see the point.

    Unpopular answers will often just get less raves.

    And those that get lots of raves will certainly be commented on by those that disagree.
  • No One iamthem... 2012/12/01 14:58:33
    No One
    Yes unpopular answers do get less raves but popularity probably isn't the only factor in determining how many raves a post gets. I would immagine that comments posted soon after the poll they are on is posted will tend to get more raves than ones that are posted later on even if both comments are about the same quality simply because more people will see the comments that are posted early on than those posted later. I think the down rave feature could help balance that fact as comments posted early on would also get more down raves if there was the down raving feature so that the ratio of raves to down raves could be taken for each comment to determine it's true popularity.
  • Flamingolady 2012/12/01 14:21:27
    Yes they should!
    Flamingolady
    +1
    Why not? Lots of other sites have it.
  • OPen Minded 2012/12/01 08:27:25
    Yes they should!
    OPen Minded
    +1
    RAVE THE DOWN-RAVE!
  • I~Fell~Down~A~Rabbithole 2012/12/01 07:29:59
    Yes they should!
    I~Fell~Down~A~Rabbithole
    +2
    There are just some comments that I would down rave a thousand times over if I could -.-
  • Olde' Smoke 2012/12/01 04:33:11
    Yes they should!
    Olde' Smoke
    +1
    I never knew SH had that. That would be great, but probably get me in to much trouble
  • Ville Squiggles The Finn\(>... 2012/12/01 02:56:58
  • Tattoo Nana 2012/12/01 01:00:11
    Yes they should!
    Tattoo Nana
    +1
    The only way the down rave would help is if the meanies would use it instead of using ugly words, LOL Also I change my vote if it would mean that we lose points. :)
  • clasact 2012/12/01 00:34:44
    Yes they should!
    clasact
    +2
    maybe some on here could just down rave me instead of calling me names then
  • Sinister Ken Doll™ 2012/11/30 23:59:36
    No they shouldn't!
    Sinister Ken Doll™
    +2
    there's enough negativity on this site already, i don't think we really need to add to that
  • Hannie 2012/11/30 23:23:52
    Yes they should!
    Hannie
    +1
    Yeah, let ass holes be ass holes.
  • terrabytes 2012/11/30 22:23:38
    No they shouldn't!
    terrabytes
    +2
    It would be abused by some SodaHeads.
  • bob h. 2012/11/30 21:45:31
    Yes they should!
    bob h.
    +1
    Why not?
  • michael 2012/11/30 21:39:46
    Yes they should!
    michael
  • hermit57 2012/11/30 21:08:50 (edited)
    Yes they should!
    hermit57
    +2
    Maybe it will cut down on some of the nasty remarks. But they shouldn't take away points as thumbs up or "raves" give us points.
  • L1 2012/11/30 21:05:52
    Undecided!
    L1
    I heard they used to have one, but it was stopped to prevent further headaches....
  • Swan Eshdeh 2012/11/30 20:28:59
    No they shouldn't!
    Swan Eshdeh
    +2
    no ..it will be abused by people
  • Robert Strobel 2012/11/30 19:59:39
    Undecided!
    Robert Strobel
    +1
    Never knew they had one.
  • scbluesman13 2012/11/30 19:29:47
    Yes they should!
    scbluesman13
    +1
    Absolutely.
  • David 2012/11/30 19:26:44
    No they shouldn't!
    David
    +1
    Very seldom used it!
  • Maleficent 2012/11/30 19:25:58
    Undecided!
    Maleficent
    +1
    never knew they had that.
  • Sir Anthony 2012/11/30 19:15:56
    Undecided!
    Sir Anthony
    What would happen if they did?
  • Lady Whitewolf 2012/11/30 19:08:22
    Yes they should!
    Lady Whitewolf
    YES
  • studiobrat PWCM AFCL 2012/11/30 18:46:37
    No they shouldn't!
    studiobrat  PWCM AFCL
    +2
    It would only add fuel to the fire! Thumb down
  • Spy Master 2012/11/30 18:45:09
    No they shouldn't!
    Spy Master
    +4
    one side or the other will PM each other and intentionally down rave everything as it suits them; no; let's see the arguments..I do love a fight animated fighting
  • Tropiceagle33 2012/11/30 18:40:53
    Yes they should!
    Tropiceagle33
    +3
    because, I have had people trying to forced their over ridiculous thought on me as if it is a must to believe in what they say, and they would not hear your say. So they should bring it back
    SH is about everybody opinions, not one singled person
  • NYCbrit 2012/11/30 18:32:36
    No they shouldn't!
    NYCbrit
    +3
    Probably not. Too much potential for abuse.
  • hermit57 NYCbrit 2012/11/30 21:17:13
  • Erik Dean 2012/11/30 18:25:51
    Yes they should!
    Erik Dean
    +3
    Sure, why not?
  • Shifting Piece 2012/11/30 18:20:07
    Yes they should!
    Shifting Piece
    +2
    I dunno why not.
  • wolf sloan 2012/11/30 18:07:26
    No they shouldn't!
    wolf sloan
    +2
    it might hurt someone's feelings.
  • hermit57 wolf sloan 2012/11/30 21:20:52
    hermit57
    +2
    No more than someone cursing me for no valid reason other than they disagreed with me. Personally, I'd rather see a thumbs down count if, they don't want to give a valid argument.
  • wolf sloan hermit57 2012/11/30 21:35:59
    wolf sloan
    +3
    it was sarcasm
  • hermit57 wolf sloan 2012/11/30 21:53:10
    hermit57
    +2
    With some of the juvenile answers I see sometimes, it's getting hard to tell any more! Not that I don't appreciate good sarcasm! And that's a good one! :D
  • Destiny SizzleWink 2012/11/30 18:00:35 (edited)
    No they shouldn't!
    Destiny SizzleWink
    +1
    i dnt even know what that is but it doesnt sound good
  • hermit57 Destiny... 2012/11/30 21:24:40
    hermit57
    +2
    When someone likes or agrees with your opinion, you get a thumbs up, or "rave". If someone disagrees with your opinion, you get a thumbs down. I'd rather see a thumbs down count, than a loony cursing me for no valid reason.

See Votes by State

The map above displays the winning answer by region.

Fun

2015/04/27 20:55:43

Hot Questions on SodaHead
More Hot Questions

More Community More Originals
http://www.sodahead.com/fun/do-you-think-they-should-bring-back-the-down-raving-feature-to-sh/question-3358953/
www.sodahead.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-18
147520
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:3WA4ZGSS2ZBIYUBBSX7OGDPVNYDDUFOR
<urn:uuid:385dbafc-448a-42df-b691-d4e89942366e>
2015-04-27T20:55:44Z
208.81.201.210
sha1:6BQMBP34ZUCHCODI37F2ANK6WCYQ5FOG
<urn:uuid:ed86e321-ec47-488a-8fae-13b9951a1e1a>
http://www.sodahead.com/fun/do-you-think-they-should-bring-back-the-down-raving-feature-to-sh/question-3358953/
response
<urn:uuid:91ba885d-e220-4345-96fb-2ba8f2a86772>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-235-10-82.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-18
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf