 

What is fact-checking activity based on?

28.08.2020

Fact-checking has become an attractive additional heading for media publications, although fact-checking should be the first step in a journalist’s work and a story’s editor constant companion.

Fact-checking as a separate, autonomous activity began in December 2003 in the United States when a former Associated Press, Wall Street Journal, and CNN reporter, Brooks Jackson, launched factcheck.org at Annenberg Public Policy Center of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania.

To date, hundreds of fact-checking initiatives have been set up, some of which operate independently and some of which are part of a press release.

Recently, there has been more and more talk about the activities of fact-checkers and the accompanying measures, but less public attention has been paid to the principles that one or another fact-finding initiative follows.

A more in-depth investigation revealed that a large number of fact-checkers have joined The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), launched at the Poynter Institute in 2015, which has now become a leading agency for bringing together fact-checkers.

IFCN maintains and develops the quality of fact-checking, provides training to members of the network, distributes grants, publishes a weekly magazine, organizes a conference of fact-checkers “Global Fact”, celebrates International Fact-Checking Day on April 2 and much more.

However, the most important task of the IFCN is to ensure that each member meets the standards set by the network. Prerequisite for membership is a thorough preliminary inspection and verification that the joining group meets the requirements.

The IFCN has established a code of five principles on which all members base their day-to-day fact-checking work. Four of the five principles focus on transparency:

  1. A COMMITMENT TO NONPARTISANSHIP AND FAIRNESS
    We fact-check claims using the same standard for every fact check. We do not concentrate our fact-checking on any one side. We follow the same process for every fact check and let the evidence dictate our conclusions. We do not advocate or take policy positions on the issues we fact-check.
  2. A COMMITMENT TO TRANSPARENCY OF SOURCES
    We want our readers to be able to verify our findings themselves. We provide all sources in enough detail that readers can replicate our work, except in cases where a source’s personal security could be compromised. In such cases, we provide as much detail as possible.
  3. A COMMITMENT TO TRANSPARENCY OF FUNDING & ORGANIZATION
    We are transparent about our funding sources. If we accept funding from other organizations, we ensure that funders have no influence over the conclusions we reach in our reports. We detail the professional background of all key figures in our organization and explain our organizational structure and legal status. We clearly indicate a way for readers to communicate with us.
  4. A COMMITMENT TO TRANSPARENCY OF METHODOLOGY
    We explain the methodology we use to select, research, write, edit, publish and correct our fact checks. We encourage readers to send us claims to fact-check and are transparent on why and how we fact-check.
  5. A COMMITMENT TO OPEN AND HONEST CORRECTIONS
    We publish our corrections policy and follow it scrupulously. We correct clearly and transparently in line with our corrections policy, seeking so far as possible to ensure that readers see the corrected version.

At the end of August, 83 fact-checking groups are following these principles. In recent years, both Postimees and Delfi have been engaged in fact-checking in Estonia in cooperation with the Estonian Debate Society and the Debunk.eu application from Lithuania.

For example, being a member of the International Fact-Checking Network at the Poynter Institute is also a prerequisite for being a Facebook fact-checking partner.

Propastop, which by its nature also works as a fact-checking format and has repeatedly written over the years about the need to launch an independent fact-checking in Estonia. In 2018, we wrote about the most prominent fact-checking initiatives in Europe and this summer about Facebook’s fact-checking partners being targeted.

Photo: Allan LEONARD/Flickr/CC

 
https://www.propastop.org/eng/2020/08/28/what-is-fact-checking-activity-based-on/
www.propastop.org
CC-MAIN-2023-14
95380
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:NPKUXP7QKC6CMH7YUL6NX3NTM6535LOH
<urn:uuid:b9f4aa09-7e31-4e54-a717-430fb7e31763>
2023-04-01T14:11:00Z
141.101.90.16
text/html
sha1:LILL4JSV4ZI5RLQMBWFZ2EQSUGO72WTD
<urn:uuid:bb7af70e-8c52-4257-9ab9-b2de97f43184>
https://www.propastop.org/eng/2020/08/28/what-is-fact-checking-activity-based-on/
response
<urn:uuid:91396bf2-e444-4914-9bed-130fe476491e>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-14
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for March/April 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-36
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/