[Noisebridge-discuss] noisebridge-discuss: mailing list versus forum system

jim jim at well.com
Thu Jan 27 05:53:33 UTC 2011



On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:41 -0800, aestetix aestetix wrote:
> I'd really not rather use something that's not locally hosted. What if
> their system had a malfunction and we couldn't get access to
> troubleshoot it? Also, global politics aside, I don't like someone who
> is not a Noisebridger having the "god key" to enable or disable the
> entire system.
JS: YES! 

> Further, regardless of the complexity, if we have something local, we
> can modify it, and even create new modules and patches for it. 
JS: YES, YES! AMEN! 

> This said, nothing is stopping someone from going and creating one and
> getting people to use it. 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Robert Fletcher
> <lobatifricha at gmail.com> wrote:
>         Google groups provides both functions.  I presume we have
>         reasons for not using them, but it's food for thought in terms
>         of how it can be done well.
>         
>         -Robert
>         
>         
>         On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Glen Jarvis
>         <glen at glenjarvis.com> wrote:
>         
>                 
>                         So my question is: why doesn't noisebridge
>                         consider a forum system
>                         versus a mailinglist system?
>                 
>                 
>                 Set up a forum. It's a doacracy (and easy software to
>                 install) :) 
>                 
>                 
>                 I don't think it will be used, however. :(   I know
>                 that, for me, even though its less logical, I want the
>                 mail to come to me in my inbox instead of having me to
>                 go out and find it in a forum. Logical or not, it's
>                 what's comfortable for me and my habits. I think it
>                 may be the same for others.
>                 
>                 
>                 But, I could be wrong. The nice thing about this is --
>                 set one up. If people use it, great -- you'll have
>                 fixed an obvious problem and be our hero.
>                 
>                 
>                 If people don't, well, the forums will die a slow
>                 death and we'll still be sending a crap-load of emails
>                 back and forth to each other :)  
>                 
>                 
>                 Cheers,
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 
>                 Glen
>                 -- 
>                 Things which matter most must never be at the mercy of
>                 things which matter least.
>                 
>                 -- Goethe 
>                 
>                 
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>                 Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>                 https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>                 
>                 
>         
>         
>         _______________________________________________
>         Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
>         Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
>         https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss
>         
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
> Noisebridge-discuss at lists.noisebridge.net
> https://www.noisebridge.net/mailman/listinfo/noisebridge-discuss




More information about the Noisebridge-discuss mailing list
https://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2011-January/020320.html
lists.noisebridge.net
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-09
7989
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:HSBCQZTIGB7SD75BG7VOGKPGZXJQHRLQ
<urn:uuid:fd0488b7-9de0-4cce-b86d-c94f239773fd>
2018-02-22T13:13:52Z
216.252.162.220
text/html
sha1:SCWOWN54I5P3ODK3FM6OOA7ES4YJLK22
<urn:uuid:cef1764c-0365-465a-a787-da95e938bd0c>
https://lists.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2011-January/020320.html
response
<urn:uuid:a30edf93-1ae1-4c5b-841e-b9ffe9222a94>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-169-229-75.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-09
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf