Please complete and return this evaluation no more than four weeks following the receipt of your honorarium.

The purpose of this evaluation form is to assist the MAP office in the following:
• To evaluate your experience,
• To help us improve the program,
• To determine whether we are clearly communicating expectations, and
• To report statistics to IMLS

If you have any questions, please contact us at map@aam-us.org or 202-289-9118.

* 1. Your name and museum reviewed:

* 2. Assessment Type

* 3. Was this your first MAP assessment?

* 4. How many hours did you spend preparing for this assessment, traveling, conducting the site visit, and writing the report? (Your best guess estimate is sufficient.)

* 5. Was the information you received from the MAP museum sufficient for you to prepare effectively for the site visit?

* 6. The Alliance provides a number of resources to assist reviewers in their work. Please rate the usefulness of the following.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor Not Used Very Valuable
Peer Review Manual
Peer Review Web Resources

* 7. What additional resources would be helpful to you in the future?

* 8. Did you use the Report Writing Guide when:

  Yes No
Preparing the report?
Outlining the layout of the report?
Guiding the content of the report?

* 9. Was there anything that did not fit the checklist?

* 10. How do you rate your overall experience with this assessment?

* 11. Would you be interested in remaining in contact with the museum?

* 12. What benefits did you derive from conducting this assessment? (Check all that apply.)

* 13. What problems/concerns, if any, did you encounter conducting this assessment (including preparation, arranging the visit, the visit, and writing the report)? (Check all that apply.)

* 14. Do you feel there was clear and consistent lines of communication open at all times

  Yes No
between you and the MAP office?
between you and the museum?
between you the Peer Reviewer team member? (if applicable)

* 15. Do you feel that your expectations were in alignment?

  Yes No
with the MAP office?
with the museum?

* 16. The MAP staff was

* 17. What changes, if any, do you suggest in the MAP process?

* 18. Add a comment about the value of MAP to help promote the program. In providing this testimonial, you are giving permission to the Museum Assessment Program to use it in future MAP promotions.

* 19. CONFIDENTIAL: We realize that sometimes there is feedback that you would rather not share with the museum. However, this information may be important for Alliance staff so we may better serve future participants. In the following space, please share with Alliance anything regarding your experience that you would like us to treat confidentially.

Help us Expand the Peer Review Program! Please recommend professionals you feel would be excellent peer reviewers: (Keep in mind those individuals you came into contact with at the museum you visited.)

* 20. Peer Reviewer Suggestion 1

* 21. Peer Reviewer Suggestion 2

Report a problem

T
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/mapreviewer?sm=3KNwE6agMxduBANPusNU1JjE29vgS4mfzOXiN501RKs%3D
www.surveymonkey.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-30
153804
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:IL7LHQIWDDGUUESZLMI4CO3F7QRHV3PN
<urn:uuid:c4d306e0-c26e-43bc-b77b-ce65ecb379d1>
2017-07-23T16:46:45Z
75.98.93.51
text/html
sha1:WR53P66LB3WEFLCGILIJ3TT37Z4VPIG4
<urn:uuid:c7b9cb80-a4de-4363-9022-f27d309f65cf>
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/mapreviewer?sm=3KNwE6agMxduBANPusNU1JjE29vgS4mfzOXiN501RKs%3D
length
response
<urn:uuid:e401ac49-138c-44b6-830c-8c61ae7b1e3c>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-35-221-38.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-30
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf