﻿ ethics of publications
ЧОРНОМОРСЬКИЙ БОТАНIЧНИЙ ЖУРНАЛ • ЧЕРНОМОРСКИЙ БОТАНИЧЕСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ • CHORNOMORSKI BOTANICAL JOURNAL

Publication Ethics

            1.1 Publication and authorship

- All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two international reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper;

- the possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection;

- if authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted;

- no copyright infringement, plagiarism or presentation of fraudulent data is allowed;

- no same research can be published in more than one journal;

- all papers include a list of references and, if applicable, a list of financial supporters.

 

1.2 Authors' responsibilities

- Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work;

- authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere;

- authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere;

- authors are obliged to participate in the peer review process;

- authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes;

- authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest;

- authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.

 

1.3 Reviewers' responsibilities

- Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information;

- reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author;

- reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments;

- reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author;

- reviewers should also call to the Editor attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper;

- reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

 

1.4  Editors' responsibilities

- Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article;

- editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record;

- editors should base their decisions solely one the papers' importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication's scope;

- editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason;

- editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers;

- editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines;

- editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.



 
http://cbj.kspu.edu/index.php/en/authors-and-interested/ethics-of-publications-en
cbj.kspu.edu
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-35
35665
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MU32L3TSQQ2D3CD5IECS4GP2MGY6WNW2
<urn:uuid:471fb32b-8107-4131-a511-5a5234dc3921>
2019-08-18T13:36:44Z
195.230.129.180
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:SL4RQWKHYTA6MCWPUW4ALJYIZBH5LBNH
<urn:uuid:1edf9ea3-38ef-4436-8def-3f298e14f95b>
http://cbj.kspu.edu/index.php/en/authors-and-interested/ethics-of-publications-en
response
<urn:uuid:d34d91cf-852d-47c5-b3c5-673a1daddb15>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-35
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-188.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/