Difference between revisions of "Additional resources"

From Harvard Open Access Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 95: Line 95:
  
 
* COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories), [http://www.coar-repositories.org/news-media/sustainable-practices-for-populating-repositories-report-published/ Incentives, Integration, and Mediation: Sustainable Practices for Populating Repositories], June 18, 2013.
 
* COAR (Confederation of Open Access Repositories), [http://www.coar-repositories.org/news-media/sustainable-practices-for-populating-repositories-report-published/ Incentives, Integration, and Mediation: Sustainable Practices for Populating Repositories], June 18, 2013.
 +
 +
* DORA (Declaration on Research Assessment), [http://www.ascb.org/dora/inspiration-and-good-practices/ Inspiration and good practices], undated and apparently updated now and then.
  
 
* Ellen Finnie Duranceau and Sue Kriegsman, [http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/files/content/resources/papers/ir_ch05_.pdf Implementing Open Access Policies Using Institutional Repositories], chapter 5 of Pamela Bluh and Cindy Hepfer (eds.), ''The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges'', American Library Association, Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS), January 2013.  
 
* Ellen Finnie Duranceau and Sue Kriegsman, [http://www.ala.org/alcts/sites/ala.org.alcts/files/content/resources/papers/ir_ch05_.pdf Implementing Open Access Policies Using Institutional Repositories], chapter 5 of Pamela Bluh and Cindy Hepfer (eds.), ''The Institutional Repository: Benefits and Challenges'', American Library Association, Association for Library Collections and Technical Services (ALCTS), January 2013.  

Revision as of 17:21, 4 February 2017

Policies of the kind recommended in the guide

Chronological by date of adoption. Links point to policies, not institutional home pages.

For those considering adopting their own policies, we recommend starting with the current Harvard model policy, which incorporates the latest recommended practices described in this guide. HOAP project staff are available for consultation on drafting as well.

  1. Harvard Faculty of Arts and Sciences, February 12, 2008
  2. Harvard Law School, May 1, 2008
  3. Stanford University School of Education, June 26, 2008
  4. Harvard Kennedy School of Government, March 10, 2009
  5. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), March 18, 2009
  6. University of Kansas, April 30, 2009
  7. University of Oregon, Library Faculty, May 7, 2009
  8. University of Oregon, Department of Romance Languages, May 14, 2009
  9. Harvard Graduate School of Education, June 1, 2009
  10. Trinity University, October 27, 2009
  11. Oberlin College, November 18, 2009
  12. Wake Forest University, Library Faculty, February 1, 2010
  13. Harvard Business School, February 12, 2010
  14. Rollins College, February 25, 2010
  15. Duke University, March 18, 2010
  16. University of Puerto Rico Law School, March 24, 2010
  17. Harvard Divinity School, November 15, 2010
  18. The University of Hawaii-Manoa, Faculty Senate December 2010, Final adoption March 2012
  19. Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, December 22, 2010
  20. Strathmore University, c. February 2011
  21. Emory University, March 15, 2011
  22. Harvard Graduate School of Design, March 20, 2011
  23. Columbia University Libraries, June 1, 2011
  24. Princeton University, September 19, 2011
  25. Hope College, October 15, 2011
  26. University of Illinois Chicago, Library Faculty, November 21, 2011
  27. Bifröst University (in English), or in Icelandic, first vote May 2011; confirmed January 2012
  28. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, c. March 2012
  29. Ohio State University Libraries, March 15, 2012.
  30. Utah State University, April 2012
  31. Miami University of Ohio, Library faculty, May 14, 2012
  32. University of California - San Francisco, May 21, 2012
  33. University of Massachusetts Medical School, July 27, 2012
  34. McGill University Librarians, c. October 2012.
  35. Rutgers University, October 19, 2012
  36. Harvard School of Public Health, November 26, 2012
  37. Georgia Institute of Technology, November 27, 2012
  38. Olin College of Engineering, November 28, 2012
  39. University of Nairobi, December 2012
  40. Wellesley College, February 6, 2013
  41. College of Wooster, March 4, 2013
  42. Amherst College, March 5, 2013
  43. University of Rhode Island, March 21, 2013
  44. Allegheny College, May 16, 2013
  45. Stanford doctoral students at the Graduate School of Education, May 24, 2013
  46. California Institute of Technology, June 10, 2013
  47. Oregon State University, June 13, 2013
  48. University of California, July 24, 2013; strengthened, October 26, 2015
  49. Bryn Mawr College, December 11, 2013
  50. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), July 1, 2014
  51. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), October 7, 2014
  52. Harvard Medical School, June 18, 2014
  53. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University, October 9, 2014
  54. Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard University, December 2014
  55. University of Minnesota, December 2014
  56. Boston University, February 11, 2015
  57. University of Delaware, April 6, 2015
  58. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, April 24, 2015
  59. Harvard University Center for the Environment, July 1, 2015
  60. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, October 19, 2015
  61. University of Massachusetts Libraries, January 6, 2016.
  62. Florida State University, February 17, 2016.
  63. University of Arizona, April 4, 2016
  64. University of Massachusetts Amherst, April 7, 2016
  65. Middlebury College, May 17, 2016
  66. University of Texas Libraries, October 5, 2016
  67. Simon Fraser University, January 2017

Other recommendations for university OA policies

University OA policies in general

  • ROARMAP (Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies). The most comprehensive list of university OA mandates. Also includes funding-agency OA mandates.



Return to the table of contents.
https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/?title=Additional_resources&diff=next&oldid=5708
cyber.harvard.edu
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-34
48269
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:R35GWXX2WDOFW5Y3KL3BJE7Z5G4UTVBC
<urn:uuid:6e1a9240-50e2-44f6-8676-8a85ac0e55ed>
2020-08-15T11:40:49Z
128.103.64.74
text/html
sha1:4MQDLC6I6WZGP6TSNDIPIRHVUI37YB2B
<urn:uuid:3150c63c-73c7-4ba4-9021-41a8a96251ed>
https://cyber.harvard.edu/hoap/?title=Additional_resources&diff=next&oldid=5708
response
<urn:uuid:2be1d4a5-8487-4cbc-9600-07538ba8e61f>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-34
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-20.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/