https://groups.google.com/d/forum/lrmi Learning Resource Metadata Initiative Development of a common machine-readable vocabulary for learning resources. Google Groups bader salmeen 2017-11-12T21:42:58Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/qW-ptl7XSlk Fwd: Us congress hearing of maan alsaan Money laundry قضية الكونغجرس لغسيل الأموال للمليادير معن الصانع YouTube videos of U.S. Congress money laundering hearing of Saudi Billionaire " Maan Al sanea" with bank of America and The owner of Saad Hospital and Schools in the Eastern Province in Saudi Arabia and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Awal Bank in Bahrain With Phil Barker 2017-11-01T14:12:07Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org Well that was quick :) The Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org Community Group has now been set up. If you would like to contribute to the work of the group (or even just lurk and follow what we do) please join it by visiting https://www.w3.org/community/eocred-schema/join Phil Barker 2017-11-01T11:41:33Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org Thank you for all your support regarding this idea. I have proposed a W3C Community Group to address it. It now needs the support of four other people for it to happen. To support it you must have a W3C account, and then visit the Community Groups page, and scroll down a little to the proposed Steve Midgley 2017-10-30T23:06:44Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org +1 - Very needed work. I'm very interested and motivated to work on this as part of the Credential Registry work I'm doing for the Credential Engine community. We're working right now on semantic linking between competencies and credentials, so this is very timely. Keep us all posted where we can Joshua Marks 2017-10-29T18:14:35Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org +1! This intersection of competencies, competency assertions, badges and credentials is critically important to the evaluation and evolution of educational attainment and professional certification. Happy to help however I can. Joshua Marks On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Phil Barker <phil.... Phil Barker 2017-10-27T16:03:35Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org Thanks Dan, that's very kind. I am getting financial support from the Credential Engine which means that I have time to chair the group and put time into the work generally. Very happy for other people to contribute too, of course. The plan is to follow the same approach as we did for Courses, Vicki Tardif Holland 2017-10-27T15:59:54Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org I agree that starting sooner rather than later makes sense. I am happy to help in whatever way I can. - Vicki On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Phil Barker <phil....@pjjk.co.uk> wrote: > > > On 27/10/17 16:42, Vicki Tardif wrote: > > I agree a group would be useful. Do you have a time frame for Phil Barker 2017-10-27T15:56:39Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org On 27/10/17 16:42, Vicki Tardif wrote: I agree a group would be useful. Do you have a time frame for putting this together? Thanks Vicki. As for time scale, assuming there are no objections, I was thinking of initiating a W3C Community Group next week. Difficult to be sure how long it would Dan Brickley 2017-10-27T15:54:04Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org On 27 October 2017 at 17:42, Vicki Tardif <vta...@google.com> wrote: > I agree a group would be useful. Do you have a time frame for putting this > together? > +1 this topic has been bubbling under for years, it feels like the right time to address it, tying together the edu and jobs strands of Vicki Tardif Holland 2017-10-27T15:42:11Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Re: Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org I agree a group would be useful. Do you have a time frame for putting this together? - Vicki On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 7:53 AM, Phil Barker <phil....@pjjk.co.uk> wrote: > Hello all, one important aspect of education that is not represented well > in schema.org is educational and occupational Jim Goodell 2017-10-26T20:11:09Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org I’m interested and agree this would be valuable. Jim Goodell Phil Barker 2017-10-25T11:53:26Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/YPvtJkVD1vI Educational and Occupational Credentials in schema.org Hello all, one important aspect of education that is not represented well in schema.org is educational and occupational credentials, i.e. diplomas, academic degrees, certifications, etc [Terms]. These act as an important link between outcomes of educational courses, people, and occupations / job Phil Barker 2017-10-25T09:46:38Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Re: Status of the LRMI task group Yes, time is usually 8:00 AM Pacific Time (US and Canada), which would normally be 1700 in Central Europe (depending on daylight saving). You'll get a reminder / full details through the TG list. DCMI host the meeting using Zoom <https://zoom.us/> Phil On 25/10/17 01:25, Hugh Paterson III wrote: Hugh Paterson III 2017-10-25T00:25:17Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Re: Status of the LRMI task group @Phil, thank you. is there a standing time and medium for these calls? just subscribed to that list too. - Hugh On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:30 AM, Phil Barker <phil....@pjjk.co.uk> wrote: > Hello Hugh, everyone. > > Modelling a specific curriculum or subject would be out of scope of the > TG. Phil Barker 2017-10-24T08:30:34Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Re: Status of the LRMI task group Hello Hugh, everyone. Modelling a specific curriculum or subject would be out of scope of the TG. The work of the task group is more about building the metadata framework through which models of any curriculum for any subject could be expressed. That said, I am sure that language learning would Hugh Paterson III 2017-10-24T07:13:04Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Re: Status of the LRMI task group I am interested in learning more about the TG. I am currently working though a list of competencies in linguistics, language learning, and language development (I have not found a resource that contains these sorts of competencies). I have the goal of aligning curriculum components to these Phil Barker 2017-10-19T17:58:36Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Re: Status of the LRMI task group Hi Dan, On 13/10/17 18:42, Dan Brickley wrote: Further work needs to be done on Learning Resource Type and a decision made as to the accessibility vocabularies. Glad to hear things are moving along. If there's interest in getting the Schema.org representation of LRMI updated, we ought to make Dan Brickley 2017-10-13T17:42:52Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Re: Status of the LRMI task group hi folks, On 13 October 2017 at 12:40, Stuart Sutton <stuart...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Adrian and Phil. Phil is correct that on all counts. The LRMI TG is > active. DCMI is going through a update and consolidation of its technical > infrastructure, part of which was the decommissioning of the Stuart 2017-10-13T11:40:21Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Re: Status of the LRMI task group Hi Adrian and Phil. Phil is correct that on all counts. The LRMI TG is active. DCMI is going through a update and consolidation of its technical infrastructure, part of which was the decommissioning of the wiki. The next step will be integration of the current LRMI website into the new DCMI Phil Barker 2017-10-13T09:55:05Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Re: Status of the LRMI task group Hello Adrian, everyone, Stuart Sutton might be best placed to answer some of these questions that relate to changes in the DCMI web site, but I am not sure whether he is able to answer emails at the moment so I will try. LRMI task group is active. Currently focussing on some proposed work for Adrian Pohl 2017-10-13T09:31:51Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/tTiOzi_F5wo Status of the LRMI task group Hello, I am currently co-authoring a paper that – amongst other things – makes the case for using schema.org/LRMI for publishing OER metadata. Looking into the development of LRMI controlled vocabularies, I got confused about the status of the group. Here are some of the reasons for my Phil Barker 2017-04-10T15:28:00Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/WvW3TxDmIAs Re: LRMI Training Resources for Instructional Designers Hello Peter, I am not aware of much by way of material specifically designed for training but (with apologies for the blatant self publicity), these are all attempts to explain the thinking behind LRMI. All these are licensed as CC:BY (except for the video) so feel free to incorporate them in Joshua Marks 2017-04-10T15:23:20Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/WvW3TxDmIAs Re: LRMI Training Resources for Instructional Designers Peter, You might find this a good place to start-> https://lornamcampbell.wordpress.com/tag/lrmi-implementation/ -Joshua On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:07 AM, <mass...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Can anyone recommend good LMRI training resources for instructional > designers who don't mass...@gmail.com 2017-04-10T15:07:01Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/WvW3TxDmIAs LRMI Training Resources for Instructional Designers Hi everyone, Can anyone recommend good LMRI training resources for instructional designers who don't work frequently with coding? Peter Shea Director, Office of Professional Development OER Co-Coordinator Middlesex Community College Bedford/Lowell, MA Adrian Pohl 2016-11-21T10:54:17Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/-gRcLk1ZFXI Re: Open Educational Resources Schema and W3C Community group Any news on this? Am 15.09.2016 um 16:37 schrieb Paul Libbrecht: > Phil Barker wrote: >> Maybe we could arrange a meeting with them to compare aims? > That would be real cool. > I've contacted a person i know of there. > > Paul > -- Adrian Pohl hbz - Hochschulbibliothekszentrum des Paul Libbrecht 2016-09-15T14:48:35Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/-gRcLk1ZFXI Re: Open Educational Resources Schema and W3C Community group It looks like the follow web-page is their home: http://oerschema.org and they display a schema that looks fairly complementary to LRMI (in the direction of course organization and reporting). Paul Paul Libbrecht 15 September 2016 at 16:37 That would be real cool. I've contacted a person i know Paul Libbrecht 2016-09-15T14:37:16Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/-gRcLk1ZFXI Re: Open Educational Resources Schema and W3C Community group That would be real cool. I've contacted a person i know of there. Paul Phil Barker 2016-09-15T13:47:17Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/-gRcLk1ZFXI Re: Open Educational Resources Schema and W3C Community group Good spot Adrian. I don't know any of the people involved. I recall hearing about the oer schema idea earlier this year, I am pretty usre it was Cable or one of his CC colleagues who alerted me. I think I contacted Alex Boyce to point out that their work was similar to LRMI and Schema Course Adrian Pohl 2016-09-15T13:04:37Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/-gRcLk1ZFXI Open Educational Resources Schema and W3C Community group Hello, I just stumbled over the Open Educational Resources Schema W3C Community [Group]. The group launched in June but obviously they are already working on the [schema]. The group's chair Alex Boyce writes in a [comment] the the goal would be "extending schema.org vocabulary to be semantic Phil Barker 2016-09-12T08:57:00Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/n4PPzqLdcHQ Re: RDF property for educational level On 09/09/2016 16:17, Stuart wrote: While Phil is absolutely correct, this could be handled with AlignmentObject, it is in fact a "bit of a kludge". I'm not so sure I'd give up on pushing for the addition of an "educationLevel" property. Nothing says that the current LRMI extension is sufficient Stuart 2016-09-09T15:17:02Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/n4PPzqLdcHQ Re: RDF property for educational level While Phil is absolutely correct, this could be handled with AlignmentObject, it is in fact a "bit of a kludge". I'm not so sure I'd give up on pushing for the addition of an "educationLevel" property. Nothing says that the current LRMI extension is sufficiently complete. The need for education Phil Barker 2016-08-19T12:36:24Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/n4PPzqLdcHQ Re: RDF property for educational level You're welcome. Please let me know how you get on. Phil On 19/08/2016 12:42, Adrian Pohl wrote: > Thanks for the quick answer! I will have a look into what adjustments > we have to do to implement this. > > Cheers > Adrian > > Am 19.08.2016 um 13:34 schrieb Phil Barker: >> Hello Adrian. Adrian Pohl 2016-08-19T11:42:30Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/n4PPzqLdcHQ Re: RDF property for educational level Thanks for the quick answer! I will have a look into what adjustments we have to do to implement this. Cheers Adrian Am 19.08.2016 um 13:34 schrieb Phil Barker: > Hello Adrian. > > The educationalAlignment property will allow you to do this via an > AlignmentObject with alignmentType of Phil Barker 2016-08-19T11:35:00Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/n4PPzqLdcHQ Re: RDF property for educational level Hello Adrian. The educationalAlignment property will allow you to do this via an AlignmentObject with alignmentType of educationLevel There are code examples at http://schema.org/AlignmentObject It's a bit of kludge I know, but there were reasons for it. "All problems in computer science can Adrian Pohl 2016-08-19T10:59:58Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/n4PPzqLdcHQ RDF property for educational level Hello all, for the OER World [Map] project we created a [SKOS] vocabulary of the [ISCED-1997] levels of education. We use ISCED-1997 to indicate the level of education a specific OER website is intended for. See for example the [Merlot] entry on the OER World Map. We currently mainly use Lorna Johnstone 2016-05-19T07:55:30Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/i3hWupIhQaM Re: Metadata application profiles Many thanks Steve, much appreciated. Lorna On Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 5:01:40 PM UTC+1, Steve Midgley wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but here's a sample > json-ld schema.org document including a range of LRMI terms: > https://gist.github.com/science/4f351ee1e9e4a4 Hugh Paterson III 2016-05-20T14:35:51Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/i3hWupIhQaM Re: Metadata application profiles @Lorna Are you talking about application profiles in the Dublin Core sense as explained here?: - http://dublincore.org/documents/profile-guidelines/ and here: - http://dublincore.org/documents/singapore-framework/ The way we (in the organization I work with) approach LRMI is that Steve Midgley 2016-05-18T16:01:40Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/i3hWupIhQaM Re: Metadata application profiles I'm not sure if this is what you're looking for, but here's a sample json-ld schema.org document including a range of LRMI terms: https://gist.github.com/science/4f351ee1e9e4a476d291 The "real" LRMI/schema.org document starts at line 21.. The document above that is a learning registry "envelope" Lorna Johnstone 2016-05-18T11:39:47Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/i3hWupIhQaM Metadata application profiles Afternoon all I am currently studying for a Masters in Information Technology (Business) at Heriot-Watt University and undertaking a thesis into the development of a metadata application profile for learning resources. The aim of the project is to create an application profile from data Dave Gladney 2016-05-03T17:53:10Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/9KD8jWxmMLM Ed Tech Forum in Philadelphia next month Hi all, Apologies for the cross-post but I thought both of these groups might be interested in an event we’re hosting next month in Philadelphia on ed tech standards and product development. The Ed Tech Forum is a pre-conference workshop at the Content in Context conference, happening June 6 at Hugh Paterson III 2016-04-15T03:59:34Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/hZqp3UtDZy4 Re: relationships Paul, There is no document on the LRMI side of things which is confusing. We have a repository which uses DC metadata. We are adding metadata to better describe our learning resources. We have a process to add new schemas or metadata elements to our existing schema. That process requires that Paul Libbrecht 2016-04-14T21:12:02Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/hZqp3UtDZy4 Re: relationships Phil, this is clearly an example of relationship specialization or? Phil Barker wrote: > * hasVersion: yes, in the sense that this links to "A related resource > that is a version, edition, or adaptation of the described resource"-- > isBasedOnUrl covers the 'adaptation of the described Stuart 2016-04-14T20:56:24Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/uGGrUlWdw9M Re: On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Joshua Marks <jma...@curriki.org> wrote: > Stuart, > > Perhaps this thread shoudl be cross posted to the IMS TF discussion board? > Is cross-posting to an internal IMS forum technically feasible? > > Stuart wrote: First, are you meaning "GUIDS" in the rather Joshua Marks 2016-04-14T20:14:09Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/uGGrUlWdw9M Re: Stuart, Perhaps this thread shoudl be cross posted to the IMS TF discussion board? Stuart wrote: First, are you meaning "GUIDS" in the rather loose sense used in the IMS definition as used in the Common Cartridge (i.e., including URI) or in the traditional sense as a 128-bit integer number? JM; Phil Barker 2016-04-14T18:30:25Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/hZqp3UtDZy4 Re: relationships On 14/04/16 19:25, Phil Barker wrote: ... > That said, the answer to your question is: > > The use case for isBasedOnUrl was that very often open educational > resources are repurposed before being reused. For example, I, in the > UK, may take a resource which compares rainfall between US Phil Barker 2016-04-14T18:25:13Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/hZqp3UtDZy4 Re: relationships On 14/04/16 18:17, Hugh Paterson III wrote: Greetings, I am looking for the difference between: LRMI's relationship "isBasedOn" which expects the URL to the related resource and a Dublin Core relationship such as: "hasPart", "isPartOf", "hasFormat", "isVersionOf", "isFormatOf". Is there an Hugh Paterson III 2016-04-14T17:18:00Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/hZqp3UtDZy4 relationships Greetings, I am looking for the difference between: LRMI's relationship "isBasedOn" which expects the URL to the related resource and a Dublin Core relationship such as: "hasPart", "isPartOf", "hasFormat", "isVersionOf", "isFormatOf". Is there an intentional and unique semantic difference Stuart 2016-04-14T14:09:40Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/uGGrUlWdw9M Re: Joshua, I have a couple of questions. First, are you meaning "GUIDS" in the rather loose sense used in the IMS definition as used in the Common Cartridge (i.e., including URI) or in the traditional sense as a 128-bit integer number? Second, what exactly is meant by "consistent GUIDS"? Does the Valerie Smothers 2016-04-11T11:44:06Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/uGGrUlWdw9M RE: Re: Hi, all. MedBiquitous also has an ANSI standard for representing competency frameworks that has adoption in the medical community. See: http://www.medbiq.org/node/819 Best, Valerie Valerie Smothers Deputy Director MedBiquitous vsmo...@jhmi.edu www.medbiq.org MedBiquitous 2016 Steve Midgley 2016-04-09T16:16:21Z https://groups.google.com/d/topic/lrmi/uGGrUlWdw9M Re: That's great to hear! If you don't mind keeping this list updated on your progress hopefully I'm not the only one very interested in the results of your work. On Apr 9, 2016 9:10 AM, "Joshua Marks" <jma...@curriki.org> wrote: > Hugh et al, > > I will also note that I am co-chairing a task force
https://groups.google.com/forum/feed/lrmi/msgs/atom_v1_0.xml?num=50
groups.google.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-51
32186
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MO4CQHHVCHJBPWQES47WRBRFQHEQY6RE
<urn:uuid:d488782a-f5a3-4337-bf2d-354848127c81>
2017-12-13T23:15:05Z
173.194.204.102
application/xml
sha1:B2M45ANFJ47VK2DRF7HO6L2C7GNYRQ3V
<urn:uuid:66f8f06b-1c47-4831-a160-56c2c5d1bfdd>
https://groups.google.com/forum/feed/lrmi/msgs/atom_v1_0.xml?num=50
length
response
<urn:uuid:873305f3-5aa0-4df3-869e-937b2dca035f>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-140-251-107.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-51
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for December 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf