Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1588

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1587

Brokedownandmadeone
Pixel Perfection - I still call her Lightning Bolt
Lunar Supporter - Helped forge New Lunar Republic's freedom in the face of the Solar Empire's oppressive tyrannical regime (April Fools 2023).
Non-Fungible Trixie -
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Artistic Detective - For awesome dedication to sleuthing out and maintaining artist tags and links
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Equality - In our state, we're all equal here!

BigThirsty ponybooru.org
>>3332596
Tags were changed again before tag lock but wasn’t sure if it was just dubious consent or proper rape. Feels like former with nervousness/fear but still looking like he wanted to and in the last panel seems like genuine desire for her to take her time. Currently has both along with spikeabuse, abuse.

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1586

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1585

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1584

Background Pony #BC65
Requesting rating check for >>3061905. currently set to semi-grimdark, should it be grimdark instead?
Semi-grimdark description states “Minor physical/sexual abuse, including very dubious consent”. But since the original upload by one of the artists who worked on the animation, the game has been stated as tentacle rape porn.
Also not sure on the tags of dubious consent and dubious consentacles. While the tentacles don’t visibly maim Applejack, they clearly aren’t being gentle on her and her visual discomfort lasts throughout the entire animation
Posted Report

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1583

Background Pony #4230
If I’m not missing something, >>108063 would be safe or maybe semi-grimdark, definitely not explicit, right?
Posted Report

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1582

Princess Luna
Preenhub - We all know what you were up to this evening~
Thread Starter - Started a thread with over 100 pages
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Notoriously Divine Tagger - Consistently uploads images above and beyond the minimum tag requirements. And/or additionally, bringing over the original description from the source if the image has one. Does NOT apply to the uploader adding several to a dozen tags after originally uploading with minimum to bare tagging.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Economist -
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
From the Night -

Senior Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
@Snicky
That part of the guidelines is about the character’s action, not the camera’s, zooming in on a butt is something done in FiM itself at times, but there’s no direct equivalent for the dancing motion. The image is currently under review.
Posted Report

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1581

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1580

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1579

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1578

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1577

Snicky
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!

>>3314194 was changed to Safe by staff, but is pretty aggressively Suggestive.
As per the Suggestive description “Sexually showing off part of the body or a situation with more than just a saucy look, like presenting a butt or stroking a stuffed belly seductively “ and I think the camera being zoomed in on Fluttershy twerking at it clearly counts as “presenting a butt”.
Posted Report

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1576

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1575

Background Pony #4230
Rating check:
>>2250148 is currently questionable, should it be explicit instead?
>>2556541 is currently questionable, is it indeed showing “Moderately-detailed genital or anus outlines in clothing” or does it reach explicit-level?
Same question: >>3015863
Isn’t a sex toy, such as a dildo, not in use not automatically explicit? For example, should >>3289822 (currently explicit) be rated down to questionable?

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1574

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1573

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1572

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1571

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1570

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1569

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1568

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1567

Background Pony #4230
I think the micro in >>3132068 might be naked - there’s possibly about a quarter of a JPEG artifact worth of a nipple. It’s currently suggestive; should it be questionable?

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1566

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1565

Tagging Discussion » Rating tags general » Post 1564

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta
https://trixiebooru.org/posts?pq=topic_id%3A24461
trixiebooru.org
CC-MAIN-2024-18
171313
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5IUF2VJBGUTUKDXWZXBDQLBI6EHR6XXM
<urn:uuid:5d324d4d-94ec-434c-9d50-fd22771a374b>
2024-04-17T03:28:12Z
172.67.70.64
text/html
sha1:QKYSSUYLJ6B3I6C2ZRJU5SJJUJTRAJUB
<urn:uuid:b5095fb9-18fc-4277-8132-58023db570e8>
https://trixiebooru.org/posts?pq=topic_id%3A24461
response
<urn:uuid:38d65551-3f0e-4c61-b337-e084cc5f1b04>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-18
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-97
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/