15
$\begingroup$

While browsing the featured question list I noticed that this question was edited by the asker to a completely different question, from something related to quantum field theory (I think?) to a contest math question. Moreover, this edit occured after another user placed a 250 bounty on the original question.

As far as I can tell it looks like the asker is trying to take advantage of the bounty the other user started. Should this edit be made undone?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Maybe you should flag for moderator attention. $\endgroup$ – Michael Albanese Nov 21 '15 at 17:44
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The question has apparently completely changed twice... It seems like the user in question doesn't really understand how the platform works (or maybe is bypassing a question ban). $\endgroup$ – Najib Idrissi Nov 21 '15 at 17:59
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Strange thing. Meanwhile a moderator rolled it back. $\endgroup$ – quid Nov 21 '15 at 18:11
  • $\begingroup$ @quid Good to see that this got solved so quickly, and I now know to flag the question if I ever see something like this again (I thought that flagging was more as spam/inappropriate content type of thing). Now that this question has become superfluous, do you think I should delete it? Or should I edit it into a more general question about what to do in these situations? Or just leave it as it is? $\endgroup$ – Marc Paul Nov 21 '15 at 20:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think it makes sense this is recorded. I gave a quick answer. I tried to write it so that you can leave the question as is or generalize it, as you like. $\endgroup$ – quid Nov 21 '15 at 22:11
  • $\begingroup$ May I suggest refunding the users reputation for the bounty too, since this mess means he probably isn't getting his 'money's worth? $\endgroup$ – user14972 Nov 22 '15 at 13:09
12
$\begingroup$

There can hardly be any good reason to change a question-post into something completely different, rather than to post a new question. If there is a bounty on the post it makes the situation even worse.

In such a situation one can and should do at least one of the two:

  • Flag for moderator attention (flag "other") and explain the situation. A moderator can not only restore the original version, but could even lock the post in that state if needed.

  • Rollback to the earlier revision and explain via a comment and/or in the edit summary that this is something that should not be done.

One might not be able or confident to do the latter, in which case one should do the former. Even doing both can be justified in a case where one suspects this is a bad-faith activity or back-and-forth in edits might follow.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Related: What can moderators do when a user defaces his/her own post?. The received wisdom is that if rolling the change back once is contested, let a moderator take control (but watch for Edit Wars VII, coming soon to the big screen). $\endgroup$ – hardmath Nov 21 '15 at 22:31
  • $\begingroup$ Oops, I just rolled it back a second time before reading this. But I also flagged for attention. I agree this seems super problematic. $\endgroup$ – Morgan Rodgers Nov 22 '15 at 8:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .
https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22022/question-changed-completely-after-another-user-started-bounty
math.meta.stackexchange.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-05
127815
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:QTXL4RCY2AGPWT6FJHDXUETEAXFRJY7A
<urn:uuid:926cbdfe-5e2d-4fb5-bec9-d7afd1a8ce9a>
2020-01-18T18:15:09Z
151.101.129.69
text/html
sha1:IQCQMTTQXTYLPC45BWRN7QPRM3GF4GQ7
<urn:uuid:501386e1-fded-4732-9cc7-542888ba5ac3>
https://math.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/22022/question-changed-completely-after-another-user-started-bounty
response
<urn:uuid:dff9cf2d-9692-4817-917d-746aed1bd66b>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-05
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-154.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/