Re: Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?

Subject: Re: Re[2]: moderate techwr-l?
From: Jan Boomsliter <boom -at- CADENCE -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 1995 08:40:23 -0800

Too bad; discussion started anyway:

Are you comparing rewriting and editing with censorship?

You can't have meant that. Boggles the mind.


jb
================================
Kinda sounds like cencorship to me. Bad idea... Bad... Bad...

Doesn't strike you as just a teensy ironic that "censorship" is automatically
dismissed as bad on the same list that takes it for granted that programmers an

engineers shouldn't have *their* words published verbatim?

Not an intent to start a discussion, just appreciating the irony. ;{>}


Have fun,
Arlen
Chief Managing Director In Charge, Department of Redundancy Department
DNRC 24

Arlen -dot- P -dot- Walker -at- JCI -dot- Com
----------------------------------------------
In God we trust; all others must provide data.
----------------------------------------------


Previous by Author: standard references
Next by Author: Re: SGML Temp. Job (RTP, NC)
Previous by Thread: Re: moderate techwr-l?
Next by Thread: Re: Moderate techwr-l?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads
http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/9501/techwhirl-9501-00275.html
www.techwr-l.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-17
18901
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:DMJQLUEN2WZBTO7MSY5DCRVEX34UT57D
<urn:uuid:fecbae6c-4fc4-4557-936b-d676e579047f>
2018-04-26T00:17:41Z
184.106.92.169
text/html
sha1:QCA5DFZX7DG4SDJYT7XBKYKSDM2GT4HX
<urn:uuid:da04073c-6791-4531-ba9b-3ee71237541f>
http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/9501/techwhirl-9501-00275.html
length
response
<urn:uuid:6fbafd0a-7d98-49cd-ad20-218300025378>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-158-89-8.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-17
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf