tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32079676.post1454822024215456836..comments2021-11-18T07:29:03.056-08:00Comments on RRResearch: How many for-profit publishers are repackaging CC-BY articles into books?Rosie Redfieldhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06807912674127645263noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32079676.post-82848832498011410252013-08-11T19:44:53.300-07:002013-08-11T19:44:53.300-07:00Another thought: Both Amazon and Google are in a ...Another thought:<br /><br />Both Amazon and Google are in a good position to check for prior publication. Both of them scan parts of the book for previews (link below). They have the data on hand, the problem is convincing them to do anything about it. They probably don&#39;t want to aggravate any of the publishers.<br /><br />Perhaps they could include a note on their previews to alert readers that the content of these books had been previously published. FWIW, I added comments to that effect to both Amazon&#39;s and Google&#39;s page for the Epigenetics book.<br /><br />http://www.amazon.com/Epigenetics-Environment-Genes-Sun-Kang/dp/1926895258 - See more at: http://rrresearch.fieldofscience.com/2013/08/how-many-for-profit-publishers-are.html?showComment=1376275353456#c8231120907674945378Adam Retchlesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10276008143626244411noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32079676.post-82311209076749453782013-08-11T19:42:33.456-07:002013-08-11T19:42:33.456-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Adam Retchlesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10276008143626244411noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32079676.post-38842705461901582642013-08-11T19:24:21.693-07:002013-08-11T19:24:21.693-07:00Have you seen the CC-BY license terms: You are fre...Have you seen the CC-BY license terms:<br />You are free:<br /><br />to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work<br />to Remix — to adapt the work<br />to make commercial use of the work<br /><br />?<br /><br />If you want to get paid for your work, you might want to consider a different license.<br /><br />Here is what the notice says for one such publication that appears in an Apple compilation:<br /><br />This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.<br /><br />Are they not properly citing these works? That is what Retchless seems to indicate. Or is it that they are not properly cited. A proper citation would include the fact that the article is a CC-BY licensed work. I have no idea whether Apple Publishing is doing this, and certainly it would make sense to have this information available to potential buyers of the book.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02117892404897808529noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32079676.post-54068012526587792532013-08-10T12:55:29.090-07:002013-08-10T12:55:29.090-07:00This may have to fall to librarians, as a form of ...This may have to fall to librarians, as a form of quality control on their purchases. Perhaps there is some clever way to glean some of this information from publicly released information about the books (as you have), but any attempt to handle this systematically will run into the problem that you need to have access to the book&#39;s material before you can tell if it&#39;s original.<br /><br />Maybe if a publisher submits abstracts to a literature database, then we could look for plagiarized abstracts. Perhaps database administrators could also contact the listed authors to verify that the indexed publication is an original publication of theirs. Adam Retchlesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10276008143626244411noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32079676.post-71121710043553796732013-08-10T12:53:34.803-07:002013-08-10T12:53:34.803-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Adam Retchlesshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10276008143626244411noreply@blogger.com
http://rrresearch.fieldofscience.com/feeds/1454822024215456836/comments/default
rrresearch.fieldofscience.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-49
12588
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:6NWLV7VPB7X3MU3FIJ4C4LWC544NHABQ
<urn:uuid:5417ba44-95ea-4309-9da5-81ad655ac6e7>
2021-12-06T21:38:45Z
142.250.188.51
application/atom+xml
sha1:SMAYQR4VT4FQ7KOFF4XAFNQTSI6C3TJU
<urn:uuid:78baef3b-3d41-42e0-b04b-72b6a99bc120>
http://rrresearch.fieldofscience.com/feeds/1454822024215456836/comments/default
response
<urn:uuid:9aef59e6-8dbd-4346-b4e5-47bace591da9>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-49
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-133
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/