Forum:New Administrator Nominations

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > New Administrator Nominations (talk)
Note: This topic has been unedited for 3660 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Hello, and welcome to the "New Administrator Nominations" voting page. Here, administrators will be able to nominate current users for an administrative position. After a period of time (probably 2 or 3 days) all users receiving a nomination accompanied by at least two supporting votes will be transferred to a separate voting page where the entire community will be eligible to vote.

Please keep in mind that any votes placed on this page will NOT be transferred to the community voting page, and therefore you should vote even if you don't necessarily want the user to be adminned. You may vote for up to three people, unless you nominate a user in which case you will only be allowed 2 votes. There should be only one nomination for each administrator.

Users may leave and comments, questions, and/or concerns on this page's talk page. Before leaving a comment, please realize that a lot of thought has gone into the voting process this time around (no, really, I swear), and we would appreciate it if no one filps out. Also, to Benson, better luck next time, buddy.

Errata:In the spirit of unilateralism embodied in the preceding text, I am unilaterally declaring the preceeding text to be null and void. Just kidding. Or am I?
Thank you for voting, the vote is now closed. Expect a VFS post shortly.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 22:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Forum:New Admin vote for the lazy, and future reference. Spang talk 23:57, 13 Jan 2007

Nominations

Zombiebaron (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

  • Nominate. Promised I would aeons ago; and here's me living up to my word. --KATIE!! 02:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Seconded tireless worker for the last year. -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 02:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Thoided I think it's his turn now. —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 02:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Fourthed I forget who hates him but I like his work. And his metric fuckton of joke-bans must count for something. But only if he trims down his sig. Bone_F_clear.png Sir Famine, Gun Petition » 01/12 02:54
  • Fifthed. The obvious choice. ---QuillRev. Isra (talk) 05:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • For. I'm not writing "sixthed", because that would be just daft. Nonetheless, he's been one of the prime candidates for opping for a good long while. And let's face it, it's always good to have the undead on your side. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • For, how long has he deserved this?--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Brains.......by which I mean...Foooor R 13:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Against Still don't think he's ready. Has also shown some instability in the past... Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Against... Yeah.. Sorry, Zombie... But I still get the impression you're studying how to pass a test, if you get what I mean... ⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ignSTFU F@H|UotM|+S 18:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Tom mayfair (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

  • Nominate. Does a lot around the place and is a thoroughly nice chap (hope that doesn't count against him!). -- Sir Mhaille Icons-flag-gb (talk to me) 02:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Sure. As long as it doesn't lead to an increase in the number of large red and yellow templates going around. Spang talk 08:45, 12 Jan 2007
  • Against. I love Tom, but I think he just needs a little more grooming. By which I mean in the sense that a paedophile "grooms" his victims. I'm sure Tom's personal hygeine is impeccable. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • For. He has the experience, at least in my eyes. Tompkinssig Smallturtle t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Against, similar to Codeine. Seems like there might be some conflicts, and as admins need to be able to support each-other... There are other reasons I won't openly discuss. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Nah. No offense to the Comrade Premier, but I think he needs a bit more time to, um, "ripen." —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Flyingfeline (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

  • Nominate. Because Spang can't nominate two, and she would have my vote anyway. What Spang said, she does good work, helpful, and level headed. She'll do well. -- sannse@fandom (talk) 08:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I still approve. Same reasons I put before they were removed. Spang talk 08:45, 12 Jan 2007
  • Strong For. Always rolling up her sleeves and getting stuck into maintenance work, let's make it easier for her. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 10:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • For. It was a close call for me between voting for ff and nomming Olipro, but we need more female admins here, so that breaks the tie.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • For, as per sannse. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 09:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • For. We need more nice admins. I'm trying to be nice, but it just isn't working.The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 20:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Olipro (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

  • Nominate. Because I'm certain that he would look absolutely scrumptious in drag. You go girl! --Carlb 23:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Support Fine chap, even-tempered, plus it helps even out the American bias of the team. Now, we need some people that are not from the US, GB (this includes Canada), or Belgium, so we don't look like we're some kind of United Anglo lovefest. Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 08:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • My name is Hinoa, and I approve this message.Correspondent Hin Arash, PRAA Icons-flag-us [TALK] [KUN] (20:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC))
  • For. Fair and balanced (in a genuine sense, not the "Fox News" one) -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Braydie (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Benson (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Benson (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Todd Lyons (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Personal tools
projects
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:New_Administrator_Nominations
uncyclopedia.wikia.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-04
124919
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:UT4LWB3WGCA3N3HO7SBK4G34ZDSOLFKZ
<urn:uuid:9c1d68b3-b143-4750-b76f-ddf94389cb86>
2017-01-21T11:13:27Z
104.156.85.194
sha1:QFWYUIQ43PKIZBGVKJ32H2L36IGBSZFV
<urn:uuid:742af629-a540-4a05-b74f-8a9dae8d46a7>
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:New_Administrator_Nominations
response
<urn:uuid:22a928fc-8016-460d-a1b7-beb131834f7f>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-171-10-70.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-04
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2017
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf