↓ Skip to main content

Algorithms for “hers”: in whose interests?

Overview of attention for article published in Feminist Media Studies, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Algorithms for “hers”: in whose interests?
Published in
Feminist Media Studies, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/14680777.2020.1783798
Authors

Beverley Skeggs

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,011,643
of 15,465,536 outputs
Outputs from Feminist Media Studies
#388
of 641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,665
of 211,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Feminist Media Studies
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,465,536 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.
https://www.altmetric.com/details/84669614
www.altmetric.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-34
23782
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:CYYHWGX3OFKG3RH2UXLUU73KFFSFCJWI
<urn:uuid:3782e643-4cab-449a-9f68-947cc9abbe31>
2020-08-10T02:32:51Z
199.232.66.2
text/html
sha1:TRFOZHXKDM4UUNKIMAAGN65YQOF3RPZE
<urn:uuid:2d437941-1f08-4d5e-a383-6be49f1c96a9>
https://www.altmetric.com/details/84669614
response
<urn:uuid:1f86dcbe-c8ae-4d9a-824e-cdbeb4475186>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-34
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-189.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/