View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Apr 26, 2018 4:47 pm



Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
 Humans aren't forerunner? 
Author Message
Data [Authenticated]

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:53 pm
Posts: 71
Location: Massachusetts
Unread post Re: Humans aren't forerunner?
Incidentally, I agree with both of you completely. But as I may havve said before (maybe it was on HBO), I try to think of theories and look for justification, since while they often go nowhere, they help to uncover new stuff or look at old stuff in a new ight, as this has.


Thu Nov 15, 2007 8:54 pm
Profile
Data [Authenticated]

Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:25 pm
Posts: 203
Location: Somewhere (not there though).
Unread post Re: Humans aren't forerunner?
thebruce wrote:
totally agreed. I still hold to the figurative 'you are (essentially) forerunner' meaning from Spark...

The Precurser stuff is relatively new info, and I like the potential parallel in that the Forerunners are like humanity - they don't know their origins, and they discovered higher technology strewn about the galaxy, and they were in search of answers, struggling in a war with the Flood... what if, we are actually descendants of the precursers, so we're actually like the parents to the Forerunners? :) heh or we share them as a common ancestor? long before the age of the Forerunners, the Precursers did all this stuff that uncle_trubble believes, and that's why the FR think we're special... :)

really, just shooting aimlessly now, heh.


It's clear enough that forerunner stuff is, as of now, very OLD. Humanity itself has only been around for so long. If we were the Precursers, then this would have to mean that the forerunner empire rose and fell overnight (which I don't believe happened, as the terminals lead us to think), or that here is some major flaw in the dating of human history in terms of the ages of human/hominid fossils (could be possible, considering that all of our scientific equipment missed something as large as the warp sphere generator to the Ark under New Mombossa).

Frankly, if it's not the latter, I don't see how it could be true at all.


Sat Nov 17, 2007 2:12 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.
http://args.bungie.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1082&p=20203&sid=7f5aae6f682b3b4e3c7771c4c0317d0a
args.bungie.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-17
20237
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:UWRSYZ2OR4PRG4ZYZ4P6QNLQBW47SZUZ
<urn:uuid:72422cc8-20c3-44d2-bb01-013069b954d1>
2018-04-26T16:47:43Z
192.155.235.212
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:SX64SL6VQNU7OFIQ47W7FG3ZRHZRUKAN
<urn:uuid:6189447c-995d-4928-9388-3c020d03285b>
http://args.bungie.org/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1082&p=20203&sid=7f5aae6f682b3b4e3c7771c4c0317d0a
length
response
<urn:uuid:6b6b4040-2087-49d8-9c3b-68614e5c9b90>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-141-39-188.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-17
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf