﻿ Evaluation of a Digital Story - #!

Evaluation of a Digital Story

Your mission should you chose to accept it:
Evaluate digital stories with reasonable criteria.

More Deets:

Think about the digital stories you’ve read so far. Which are the best? Why are those particular digital stories good? If you can answer the last question, you’ll know what criteria (or standards) by which to measure good digital stories.

Main Points

  • You don’t need plot summaries for this blog.

  • Assert reasonable criteria for what makes a good digital story.

  • Explain how specific examples from specific digital stories reasonably support your criteria for what makes a good digital story.

  • Properly cite your primary sources (the good digital stories you use as examples) and any other sources used.

  • Use end-of-text citation properly (and include hyperlinks).

  • Make sure to post at least 500 words.
http://www.briankhudson.com/courses/digital-storytelling/eval-blog/
www.briankhudson.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-51
31004
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MN5INF6DWBRZGJXIUGLBCKGTKZP3N5CG
<urn:uuid:33b0fce5-af5f-4298-8415-a2d8561c61f8>
2019-12-11T05:04:11Z
198.38.77.45
text/html
sha1:7P33V3JX5ZXOBFNVT3ZWOFUBEYO4MFZJ
<urn:uuid:0de99108-642d-4332-ab98-2ecc47165d91>
http://www.briankhudson.com/courses/digital-storytelling/eval-blog/
response
<urn:uuid:dd0aa33e-83a5-4294-b916-72eeceac6fd2>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-51
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for December 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-27.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/