Last modified on 27 August 2014, at 23:22

On Goguryeo

I really have no idea about Goguryeo, sorry.

CodeCat20:29, 25 October 2012

I should have been more specific. The issue is about putting reconstructions, and specifically, reconstructions made by a single scholar into an appendix and/or allowing them in the main namespace? Also of interest is that these terms are being added as Chinese characters--if these are reconstructions, then applying Chinese characters seems valid, if shaky.

BB12 (talk)21:21, 25 October 2012

Well, citations of usage require three, but we have no specific requirement for reconstructions so one source can be enough. But if they are indeed reconstructed then they probably don't belong in mainspace.

CodeCat21:36, 25 October 2012

Thank you for the guidance!

BB12 (talk)22:38, 25 October 2012
 
 
 
http://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Thread:User_talk:CodeCat/On_Goguryeo/reply
en.m.wiktionary.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-35
22231
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:HX7LR3CVREAZ22RGCKPMCZ44BIAIDJXF
<urn:uuid:e835d37b-2c07-47b1-ad53-3f44fa3e1671>
2014-08-27T23:22:55Z
208.80.154.236
sha1:AABLSGEGVKPEHQUTPQCXOQEOJI56TQMK
<urn:uuid:49f43f44-2f31-45b9-bc20-dc8866147e19>
http://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Thread:User_talk:CodeCat/On_Goguryeo/reply
response
<urn:uuid:d2fab106-fcbb-4a95-93d6-4ccc670d5cda>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-180-136-8.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-35
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for August 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf