Talk:Debate:How should Conservapedia work to avoid having a conservative bias?

From Conservapedia

Jump to: navigation, search

I think its important for everyone to realize that acknowledging an argument that is contrary to one's own beliefs, does not mean you support that counter-argument. If Conservapedia wants to avoid having a conservative bias, we might want to use critical analysis and pursue a perspective that is respectful of a diversity of thought

Personal tools
http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Debate:How_should_Conservapedia_work_to_avoid_having_a_conservative_bias%3F
conservapedia.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-20
12949
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MDPNWMVH7YXTFY26TK4X64M3ZOWNR2PV
<urn:uuid:c4c5874d-3e8a-48cb-8872-e270ce0349ce>
2013-05-25T16:57:26Z
65.60.9.250
sha1:H2SBQRT47SEOYCRVP6VZHLJWTKFN6YTP
<urn:uuid:d8c67e6f-0cb7-49ac-b092-558485305255>
http://conservapedia.com/Talk:Debate:How_should_Conservapedia_work_to_avoid_having_a_conservative_bias%3F
response
<urn:uuid:87648772-1ce3-4df8-92e6-5d7118af8c1d>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-60-113-184.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-20
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Spring 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf