Should Google Tweak the News We Consume?

Should Google play an editorial role in presenting readers with news?

That question was a matter of debate at Zeitgeist, a Google conference this week in Paradise Valley, Ariz., where Larry Page, Google’s co-founder and chief executive, said that Google had a responsibility to improve media.

The question came up when Ted Koppel, the longtime broadcast journalist, complained that too much news was drivel, as reporters cover the Casey Anthony trial instead of life-and-death issues in Africa. People are being fed the news they want instead of the news they need because that makes news organizations money, he said.

Nicholas Thompson, a senior editor at The New Yorker, then asked Mr. Koppel if Google should tweak its algorithm to deliver people the news they need instead of entertainment-as-news.

“That wouldn’t be a bad idea,” Mr. Koppel said.

To be clear, Google has said many times that its algorithm presents users with the most relevant search results and does not exercise editorial control, so the question is likely to remain no more than a matter of debate. It reiterated that this week, after Rick Santorum said he thought Google should remove a dirty joke that showed up in searches for his last name.

Still, Mr. Page said that Google could do a better job of getting people to focus on certain issues, though he did not address Mr. Koppel’s statement directly.

“I see this as our responsibility to some extent, trying to improve media,” Mr. Page said. “If you ask anyone about how that information’s going to be propagated, what you’re going to focus on, I think it could work a lot better than it does now.”

“We as an Internet community, we have a responsibility to make those things work a lot better and get people focused on what are the real issues, what should you be thinking about,” he said. “And I think we as a whole are not doing a good job of that at all.”

Google has taken small steps toward editing search results for content. In February, for example, it changed its algorithm to weed out Web sites that it thinks have subpar articles and videos, like content farms, a move that affected 12 percent of search queries.

Advertisement
https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/29/should-google-tweak-the-news-we-consume/?_r=0
bits.blogs.nytimes.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-47
34519
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:O7MMNPSNL2DKOFGCKCUA56YZBPEB4CLJ
<urn:uuid:46d02161-158d-42a0-ab09-c24fb5a873bf>
2017-11-22T18:55:55Z
151.101.33.164
text/html
sha1:AENAKSXYDUCZ44VQCD2GVYDFNFKWFWML
<urn:uuid:20483738-fe0d-405f-9802-d539cbd7cc5d>
https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/29/should-google-tweak-the-news-we-consume/?_r=0
response
<urn:uuid:2f556973-8363-4921-a450-7e1a317b24ee>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-159-1-36.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-47
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for November 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf