< Back to Main Site

EDUCAUSE review onlineEDUCAUSE review online

Digging into Archaeological Data

1 Comment

E-Content [All Things Digital]

Elizabeth A. Waraksa (ewaraksa@lmu.edu) was interim Librarian for Middle Eastern Studies at the University of California, Los Angeles from January 2009 through August 2011. She is currently a Lecturer in Egyptology at UCLA and Loyola Marymount University.

Comments on this article can be posted to the web via the link at the bottom of this page.

The explosion of online, open access collections of ancient texts and artifacts, along with the secondary literature surrounding them, has transformed the speed and manner in which scholars of the ancient world perform their research. Among the various types of electronic resources for the study of the ancient world, open access collections of primary archaeological data—for example, the Archaeology Data Service (http://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/) and the Archaeobotanical Database (http://www.cuminum.de/archaeobotany/)—are a particular boon for researchers, especially those for whom annual fieldwork may not always be possible, in that these collections bring large quantities of raw data directly to the researchers’ fingertips . 

With more and more scholars sharing quantities of raw excavation data in large-scale e-repositories, the amount of data available for cross-site, cross-cultural, diachronic, and high-performance computing research continues to grow. Perhaps even more significant is that this data is now accessible wherever an Internet connection is available. Field archaeologists can search online for comparable material at the moment that a feature or artifact emerges; instructors and students alike can demonstrate the research value of such repositories in the classroom and at virtual or physical conferences; and scholars can perform in-depth research in the comfort of a home or university office or even on-the-go, without the need to sift through dusty field notebooks or drawers of “small finds” that have been relegated to off-site storage. Multi-institutional and multinational projects such as Open Context (http://opencontext.org/about/) are providing access to this primary archaeological data explicitly so that scholars and students can “easily find and reuse content created by others, which are key to advancing research and education.”

Archaeological data in such repositories is massaged to facilitate searching and thus requires expert curation, management, and preservation. However, such data should—and typically does—retain the better part of its “raw,” idiosyncratic nature. Users should be able to read notebook entries or item descriptions provided by the excavators, click through digital images of excavation units and finds, and visualize the site through contour maps, digital photographs, or GoogleMaps without major interventions from a curator or digital librarian. As more data enters these repositories (or a single repository of the future), one can imagine the rich output that will result: studies in long-distance trade and migration and cross-cultural investigations of specific technologies or materials, for example, will become even more richly informed than they are today. Historic data also has a place in these repositories. The list of densely populated site-specific or individual-specific archives—such as the Giza Archives (http://www.gizapyramids.org/code/emuseum.asp) or the Roland de Mecquenem Archives de Suse (http://www.mom.fr/mecquenem/)—is ever-growing, yet at the moment these collections are frustratingly diverse, making the promise of federated searching so very exhilarating.

Aggregated archaeological data sets, like their sister collections of primary and secondary textual material, deserve the kind of large-scale, long-term support envisioned by Charles Henry in his EDUCAUSE Review E-Content column of earlier this year,1 so that archaeological and related raw data—such as maps, plans, and satellite imagery; personal diaries and correspondence; and even original clothing, tools, and ephemera from past excavations—can be gathered, maintained, regularized, and disseminated on a wide scale, freeing the data from institutional (and individual) archives and hard drives and enabling the next generation of researchers to mine it for all it is worth. One need only peruse the programs of recent conferences such as the annual meetings of the Society for American Archaeology (SAA) or the Archaeological Institute of America (AIA) to see examples of how digging into quantities of archaeological data leads to new and deeper understandings of our collective human heritage.

Global aggregation of archaeological data holds not only untold benefits for research and teaching but also manifold opportunities to involve nascent and seasoned researchers in its development and maintenance. Numerous archaeological and related web portals have developed ways to capture and display users’ expertise as a means of augmenting the raw data presented. For example, the Temple Mount Sifting Project recently launched an Unidentified Finds Research Forum (http://www.echad.info/uifinds/), calling on users to publicly comment on digital photographs of as-yet-unidentified small finds from the excavations. The comments posted often spur dialogue between excavator and commenter, serving not only as scholarly discussions in and of themselves but also as a visual display of the scholarly engagement process, something that is equally illuminating. One can easily imagine implementing such user-driven participation in a massive database of archaeological data. Mining the comments alone might spawn a thesis for a future anthropologist, science historian, computer scientist, or computational linguist.

At the moment, there is no one institution or cooperation that has assumed the role of amassing, curating, disseminating, and preserving the world’s archaeological heritage. But whoever the final steward or stewards of this data may be, academic libraries will want to play a major role. After all, as James Neal sagely observed in his recent E-Content column, the “multiple personalities” of academic libraries will persist: we will be legacy, infrastructure, repository, portal, enterprise, and public interest2—a suite of personalities that might be applied just as easily to archaeologists.

Notes

1. Charles J. Henry, “National-Scale Solutions,” EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 46, no. 1 (January/February 2011), <http://www.educause.edu/library/erm1115>.

2. James G. Neal, “Prospects for Systemic Change across Academic Libraries,” EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 46, no. 2 (March/April 2011), <http://www.educause.edu/library/erm1129>.

EDUCAUSE Review, vol. 46, no. 5 (September/October 2011)

 

1 Comment

First of all i am very

First of all i am very thankful to you for sharing this information, Very interesting and thought provoking. thanks. I found a intresting information in this artcle , and i would you like to share something about Archaeology . Last time i read a book about Archaeology, I found in this very intresting information. some thing about this - Classical archaeology has undergone profound change in recent years; new theoretical positions and the development of cutting-edge methodologies have prompted classical archaeologists to pose more challenging questions of the extraordinarily rich data we possess from the ancient Mediterranean world. Classical Archaeology is designed to encourage further critical thinking about the role of ancient material culture in modern times and the role of modern preoccupations in shaping the study of ancient material. You can Read more here :- http:/bit.ly/oRTUnK

Posted by: scottaleger on September 21, 2011

 

Log in to comment

Most Popular

Stay Up-to-Date

RSS Email Twitter

Share Your Work and Ideas

Issues coming up will focus on digital scholarship, administrative computing, the value of IT, and building the profession. Share your work and ideas with EDUCAUSE Review Online.

E-mail us >

Purchase

EDUCAUSE Members: $6.00
Non-Members: $6.00
Close
Close


EDUCAUSE Connect
View dates and locations

Events for all Levels and Interests

Whether you're looking for a conference to attend face-to-face to connect with peers, or for an online event for team professional development, see what's upcoming.

Close

EDUCAUSE Institute
Leadership/Management Programs
Explore More

Career Center


Leadership and Management Programs

EDUCAUSE Institute
Project Management

 

 

Jump Start Your Career Growth

Explore EDUCAUSE professional development opportunities that match your career aspirations and desired level of time investment through our interactive online guide.

 

Close
EDUCAUSE organizes its efforts around three IT Focus Areas

 

 

Join These Programs If Your Focus Is

Close

Get on the Higher Ed IT Map

Employees of EDUCAUSE member institutions and organizations are invited to create individual profiles.
 

 

Close

2014 Strategic Priorities

  • Building the Profession
  • IT as a Game Changer
  • Foundations


Learn More >

Uncommon Thinking for the Common Good™

EDUCAUSE is the foremost community of higher education IT leaders and professionals.
 

 
http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/digging-archaeological-data
www.educause.edu
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-15
61534
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:UJUFS5UFFGNVFESXH674WIHUR4PA342Z
<urn:uuid:63fd5771-1265-4fdb-afed-ee110c44071a>
2014-04-23T08:00:50Z
64.92.222.139
sha1:SHLY7AVMJJ2DF7I7WQP3E3JC5GCQQLGH
<urn:uuid:b2d6c4ee-15f2-4abd-ba1d-eca252b14c1c>
http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/digging-archaeological-data
response
<urn:uuid:51a6b380-3162-4230-abda-0a1e05262888>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-147-4-33.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-15
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for April 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf