Peer Review Process

Each article sent to the editor will be selected through an initial review process by the Editorial Board. Next, a plagiarism check will be carried out using the existing plagiarism tool. Some policies in the review of Journal La Sociale:

1. Reviewers will review any submitted paper.

2. Each article submitted will be reviewed by two to three reviewer.

3. Review process employs a double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa.

4. In the review process, reviewers consider the correspondence of title, abstract, introduction, results and discussion and conclusion. Beside, reviewers also examine the novelty, scientific impact, and references used in the paper.

 
http://newinera.com/index.php/JournalLaSociale/PeerReview
newinera.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-17
13995
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:KBHAHYWMDPKTJYYXTBVDIUQHRFZSPPLS
<urn:uuid:4eef9474-851c-46c9-b6e0-7f9bd8ada563>
2021-04-11T10:25:59Z
103.28.12.222
text/html
sha1:SRRTRMCYHVMNOC3JRFZNC3LH7YLLWDVA
<urn:uuid:60f6c4f9-13b1-4375-b0bf-3bb5d8880dbe>
http://newinera.com/index.php/JournalLaSociale/PeerReview
response
<urn:uuid:8969a84b-5cb6-44ff-ba8e-c0f1a9888ea1>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-17
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-232.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/