Author Topic: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.  (Read 21373 times)

megagoten

  • Guest
A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« on: May 05, 2009, 09:13:49 AM »
Well, I never made a forum but I have a lot of suggestion for it.

1) Input a Q&A section for people who does not understand something.

2) A suggestion section. 'nuff said.

3) Another section where you could post every kind of custom game.

4) More smilies

I'll post others later but I don't feel like it now. So, what about it?

P-S: Maybe we should focus more on the game rather than the forum but the forum does needs more improvement.

Anybody gonna reply one day?
« Last Edit: May 11, 2009, 04:48:31 AM by megagoten »

Alex

  • Administrator
  • Ent
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 3
  • -Receive: 15
  • Posts: 1,035
Re: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2009, 05:32:11 PM »
I'm quite happy for the first two to go in here, and the third one to go in the levels board. I think things are okay as-is - there are already four boards which is more than I ever thought there'd be a need for :D

megagoten

  • Guest
Re: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2009, 08:16:42 AM »
Though, there isn't a lot of person who goes in this forum except you, Rudolph and a few other person. It's unfortunate.

Rudolf

  • Administrator
  • Old Oak
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 5
  • -Receive: 13
  • Posts: 669
  • Eufloria: Yes
Re: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2009, 08:48:39 AM »
Its ok, the forum has far exceeded my personal expectations. I m regularly awed by the posts we see occuring. :-D

megagoten

  • Guest
Re: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2009, 08:50:45 AM »
Well, I guess this is alright. Although we should have a suggestion and Q&A. That would definitely be helpful for every new people who comes in with interrogation point on their head.

Rudolf

  • Administrator
  • Old Oak
  • *****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 5
  • -Receive: 13
  • Posts: 669
  • Eufloria: Yes
Re: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2009, 12:12:41 AM »
We need to update the FAQ as well.

Aino

  • Ent
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 4
  • -Receive: 31
  • Posts: 1,527
  • Eufloria: Yes
Re: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2011, 08:34:00 PM »
IMO we'll need subforums in the forum sections... cause it is alll so messy IMO :P

Pilchard123

  • Tester
  • Old Oak
  • ****
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 4
  • -Receive: 24
  • Posts: 932
  • Eufloria: Yes
Re: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2011, 03:24:08 AM »
...You do realise the post before yours was more than two years old, don't you?

Aino

  • Ent
  • ******
  • Thank You
  • -Given: 4
  • -Receive: 31
  • Posts: 1,527
  • Eufloria: Yes
Re: A whole lot of suggestion for the forum.
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2011, 03:46:36 AM »
So?

Isn't it more stupid to make a new topic about it just because you want to say something you saw here?

It's better to post on an ancient topic, rather than have two topics for the same thing...
« Last Edit: June 22, 2011, 04:04:57 AM by Aino »

 
https://www.euflorium.com/index.php?topic=160.0
www.euflorium.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-24
39042
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:VOOZNRDD6Y3ITKWLOIQKFOXE32PGJZL6
<urn:uuid:ef7d84e9-7616-4f17-a0e6-5aa42cf48539>
2020-05-27T22:01:15Z
208.113.155.67
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:3WLVXW74WMSGBN7UP2QXFPIFVXHC5ODV
<urn:uuid:951664f6-c3bf-4a35-ab01-ac8fa9f7b1b7>
https://www.euflorium.com/index.php?topic=160.0
response
<urn:uuid:b0f3e7b2-5b08-4760-a34f-7b7c4b01b950>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-24
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May/June 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-124.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/