Peer Review Proccess

The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated in the office, whether it is suitable for our focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw. This manuscript will be sent to at least two peer reviewer (Double-Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses. The suggested decision will be evaluated in an editorial board meeting. Afterward, the editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
http://jurnalpolitanipyk.ac.id/index.php/JH/Peer_Review_Proccess
jurnalpolitanipyk.ac.id
CC-MAIN-2023-06
11063
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:YYA2LOW6EZAQBBMIEMMBGD4QFUHXQJOQ
<urn:uuid:25125996-2c0b-4f32-b764-ea5507d361ec>
2023-01-29T15:09:24Z
203.175.8.48
text/html
sha1:PIHEWCILPPFZEYNGYWECKQMRPAQJRD3H
<urn:uuid:8dcb16bb-cad2-49cd-a65d-05b53d70218a>
http://jurnalpolitanipyk.ac.id/index.php/JH/Peer_Review_Proccess
response
<urn:uuid:d5d3e241-af63-4b9c-85da-f3e0cefd0735>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-06
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for January/February 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-197
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/