User talk:Abhidevananda

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Abhidevananda!

File:PROUTlogo.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PROUTlogo.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−

bobrayner (talk) 11:59, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, could you please fill out the "source" and "author" fields for the above. Correct me if I've misunderstood, but it seems it's not your own work, so we need to know who created it and where it originally came from. The OTRS ticket covers you for permission. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
HJ, thank you kindly for restoring the graphic. The source is a combination of material from PROUT-related graphics and my own modifications for greater clarity. As there is no official logo for the socioeconomic theory, Progressive Utilization Theory or PROUT, this is just one image that may be used as such. Regarding the author of this particular graphic, I believe it would be correct to say Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha (with my assistance). So that is what I will write. --Abhidevananda (talk) 23:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
That works for me, thanks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Abhidevananda
commons.wikimedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-07
47220
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5QGFBZ4EB6BH4AUCGDZ2BNROW4ANIOXM
<urn:uuid:7c8694c9-25c5-4659-b5eb-b0c98ae0ba81>
2016-02-06T11:57:04Z
208.80.154.224
sha1:5JZ5TG6VXJRQEA5EPX5THTCGG7J2E5EL
<urn:uuid:039608d8-fc74-463e-b6a7-5afdd4e47551>
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Abhidevananda
response
<urn:uuid:48b46aae-9e70-4e8f-8ec0-8888b50f4dd4>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-236-182-209.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-07
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf