LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.5

Help for CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB Archives

CODE4LIB Archives


CODE4LIB@LISTS.CLIR.ORG


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB Home

CODE4LIB  August 2013

CODE4LIB August 2013

Subject:

Re: LibGuides: I don't get it

From:

davesgonechina <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Code for Libraries <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:07:21 +0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (165 lines)

You guys are awesome, this is great stuff, really helpful. My impression of
libguides has been fairly negative for many of the reasons mentioned, but
Sean has a good point about content strategy and training, and Wilhemina
has a good point about the costs of open source not always being
appreciated.

Has anyone tried the two platforms Andrew Darby mentioned, SubjectsPlus and
Library a la Carte? That's the sort of thing I've been looking for but
never found until now.

Dave


On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Sean Hannan <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Again, this not a technical issue. It's a content strategy issue.
>
> Believe me, I was where you were. I was using all kinds of javascript and
> CSS hacks to try to prevent people from getting creative with color. I was
> getting to the point of setting up Capybara tests to run against the guides
> to alert me to abusive uses of bold and italics.
>
> The folks creating guides are content people, not web people. Take the web
> out of it. Focus on the content. Pick a couple heuristics to educate them
> on
> (we picked 7 +/- 2, above the fold/below the fold, and F-shaped reading
> patterns). Above all, show them statistics. And not the built-in LibGuides
> stats, either.
>
> New vs. returning. Average time on page. Pageviews over the course of a
> year. Very, very, very quickly our librarians realized what content is
> important, what content is superfluous, and that the time the spend
> carefully manicuring and maintaining their guides would (and could) be
> better spent elsewhere.
>
> -Sean
>
> On 8/12/13 9:35 AM, "Joshua Welker" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > I just have to say I have been thinking the exact same thing about
> LibGuides
> > for the two years I've been using it. I feel vindicated knowing others
> feel
> > the same way.
> >
> > At UCMO, we will be migrating to Drupal in the next several months, and
> I am
> > hoping very much that I can convince people to use less LibGuides.
> >
> > LibGuides is great in its ease of use, but fails on just about every
> design
> > principle I can think of. There have been several studies on "tab
> blindness"
> > in LibGuides, and don't get me started on the sub-tab links that are
> hiding
> > and require the user to mouse over a tab to even see what is there. I've
> > tried telling people so many times to have just a few tabs and always to
> use
> > a table of contents for the main page, but they rarely do. And it becomes
> > just about impossible to have a consistent look and feel across your
> website
> > when LibGuides allows guide creators to modify every element on the page
> as
> > they see fit. People will do crazy things like putting page content in a
> > sidebar element, something you'd never ever ever see on any website on
> the
> > Internet. I tried to enforce uniform colors and column sizes across all
> the
> > guides, but I was told to let it go because my coworkers wanted to be
> able
> > to decide those things on a guide-by-guide basis.
> >
> > I've worked at two institutions that use LibGuides, and what inevitably
> > happens is that librarians create one Uber Guide for entire subject areas
> > (biology, religion, etc) and then create sub-pages for all the dozens of
> > specific disciplines within those subject areas. And then, assuming the
> user
> > somehow manages to find these pages, they are typically not much more
> than a
> > list of links that could have easily been included on the main library
> > website.
> >
> > Okay, sorry for the rant. It has been building up for several years and
> > never had a chance to voice out.
> >
> > Josh Welker
> > Information Technology Librarian
> > James C. Kirkpatrick Library
> > University of Central Missouri
> > Warrensburg, MO 64093
> > JCKL 2260
> > 660.543.8022
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Code for Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> > Robert Sebek
> > Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 11:21 AM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: [CODE4LIB] LibGuides: I don't get it
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Heather Rayl <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> >> I have to say that I loathe LibGuides. My library makes extensive use
> >> of them, too. Need a web solution? The first thing out of someone's
> >> mouth is "Let's put it in a LibGuide!"
> >>
> >> Shudder
> >>
> >> This fall, I'll be moving our main site over to Drupal, and I'm hoping
> >> that eventually I can convince people to re-invent their LibGuides
> >> there. I can use the "saving money" card, and the "content silos are
> >> bad" card and
> >> *maybe* I will be successful.
> >>
> >> Anyone fought this particular battle before?
> >>
> >> ~heather
> >>
> >> I'm fighting that battle right now. We have an excellent CMS into
> >> which I
> > have set up all our database URLs, descriptions, etc.Anytime we need to
> > refer to a database on a page, we use one of those entries. That database
> > just changed platforms? No problem. I change the URL in one place and
> > everything automatically updates (hooray CMSs!).
> >
> > All of our subject guides (http://www.lib.vt.edu/subject-guides/) are
> in the
> > CMS using the exact same database entries. I converted from our failing,
> > home-grown system into the CMS and then gave training on how to maintain
> > from there (remove an entry, add an entry, create a parallel course
> > guide)--using the same skills as maintaining any other web page that
> > librarian is responsible for. But apparently that's too hard.
> >
> > So we have a trial of LibGuides. NO ONE here has created a guide from
> > scratch yet, but they all say this is going to be easy. No one will
> admit
> > that someone will have to recreate all those database entries (literally
> > hundreds) and then maintain those entries. When presented with this,
> several
> > librarians said--oh that won't be necessary, we'll just create individual
> > entries as needed on individual guides. WHAT?!
> >
> > If implemented, we'll have hundreds and hundreds of entries, any of which
> > could be out of date and nonfunctional, with no easy way to find and fix,
> > other than waiting for patrons to complain that the link doesn't work.
> Ugh.
> > All for several thousand dollar a year (as opposed for free in the CMS).
> >
> > And yes, those librarians' favorite example libguides have a dozen tabs
> with
> > hundreds of links on each tab. Overwhelm the patron with links--who
> cares!
> > Just let me recreate the Yahoo Directory I so miss with every possible
> > resource I can find online. Half those links don't work next semester?
> > Doesn't matter, as no one will ever maintain that page again (and no
> patron
> > will use it, since they will just Google these resources anyway).
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Robert Sebek
> > Webmaster, Virginia Tech Libraries
> > (http://www.lib.vt.edu/)
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTS.CLIR.ORG

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager
https://lists.clir.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1308&L=CODE4LIB&D=0&F=P&P=75285
lists.clir.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-21
63925
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:MPS4CKHNXRURK6P5FPLCN72IBP65ZYZM
<urn:uuid:bd87900e-5792-4210-91b3-16c871efc487>
2021-05-09T14:30:05Z
66.175.211.245
text/html
sha1:XGU25F5GDQMGURXJEEOU3FFSBSR4XHBN
<urn:uuid:04765338-8891-421d-a7b3-6fbf28d148a7>
https://lists.clir.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1308&L=CODE4LIB&D=0&F=P&P=75285
response
<urn:uuid:96304780-ca47-481e-85f9-08b0d7bbac58>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-21
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-17.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/