图书情报工作 ›› 2019, Vol. 63 ›› Issue (20): 62-73.DOI: 10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2019.20.007

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

档案文献编纂成果传播媒介评价实证研究

邓君, 于梦文, 钟楚依, 宋雪雁   

  1. 吉林大学管理学院 长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-27 修回日期:2019-08-09 出版日期:2019-10-20 发布日期:2019-10-20
  • 通讯作者: 宋雪雁(ORCID:0000-0003-1955-6685),副教授,博士生导师,通讯作者,E-mail:songxueyan@126.com
  • 作者简介:邓君(ORCID:0000-0002-3291-7193),教授,博士生导师;于梦文(ORCID:0000-0003-4920-1957),硕士研究生;钟楚依(ORCID:0000-0002-7871-9328),硕士研究生。
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社会科学基金项目"数字时代档案文献编纂与成果利用研究"（项目编号：18BTQ098）研究成果之一。

The Empirical Research on the Evaluation of the Archival Documents Compilation Work Media

Deng Jun, Yu Mengwen, Zhong Chuyi, Song Xueyan   

  1. School of Management, Jilin University, Changchun 130022
  • Received:2019-05-27 Revised:2019-08-09 Online:2019-10-20 Published:2019-10-20

摘要： [目的/意义]通过对档案文献编纂成果传播媒介评价的实证研究，为档案文献编纂成果的有效传播和用户满意度的提升提供数据支持和参考。[方法/过程]通过文献搜集、专家访谈以及问卷调查3种方式确立档案文献编纂成果传播媒介的评价指标，运用主成分分析法计算各指标权重，应用MUSA模型和标杆分析法，对4种档案文献编纂成果传播媒介进行满意度实证研究。[结果/结论]获得4种传播媒介的用户满意度测评结果，定位每种媒介在档案文献编纂成果传播过程中的主要竞争优势、主要竞争劣势、薄弱之处以及需优先改善之处，为档案文献编纂成果传播的理论研究以及档案文献编纂工作的实践活动提供借鉴。

关键词: 档案文献编纂成果, 传播媒介, MUSA模型, 标杆分析法

Abstract: [Purpose/significance]Through the empirical research on the evaluation of archival documents compilation work media, this paper hopes to provide data support and reference for the improvement of the effective dissemination and user satisfaction of archival documents compilation work.[Method/process] Through the literature collecting, expert investigation and questionnaire surveys, this paper establishes the evaluation index of archival documents compilation work media. Then, this paper uses the principal component analysis to calculate the weights of each index. And it uses MUSA model and benchmarking management methods to conduct an empirical analysis on the satisfaction of four archival documents compilation work media.[Result/conclusion] The evaluation results of the user satisfaction of four archival documents compilation work media are actually obtained, and the competitive advantages, competitive disadvantages, weaknesses and priorities for improvement of each media in the process of archival documents compilation work dissemination are located. This paper can provide reference for the theoretical research and the practical activities of the archival documents compilation work.

Key words: archival documents compilation work, media, MUSA model, benchmarking

中图分类号: 
http://www.lis.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract23191.shtml
www.lis.ac.cn
crawl=CC-MAIN-2022-33
66879
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:V7AWVXSNK4CDN6B3CUFUELITH37LCZV7
<urn:uuid:e5039494-c308-40a6-93b6-54509dac6aad>
2022-08-15T18:50:08Z
159.226.102.81
text/html
sha1:KCDLZX7ST2L2QBTANZ3H6KLLXN4QZ357
<urn:uuid:a2468fa7-0f28-4af5-85e7-50d89f7db867>
http://www.lis.ac.cn/CN/abstract/abstract23191.shtml
response
<urn:uuid:eafb03ff-bdd1-40d1-a550-c5b36979cf34>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2022-33
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2022
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-209
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.4-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/