On Goguryeo

I should have been more specific. The issue is about putting reconstructions, and specifically, reconstructions made by a single scholar into an appendix and/or allowing them in the main namespace? Also of interest is that these terms are being added as Chinese characters--if these are reconstructions, then applying Chinese characters seems valid, if shaky.

BB12 (talk)21:21, 25 October 2012

Well, citations of usage require three, but we have no specific requirement for reconstructions so one source can be enough. But if they are indeed reconstructed then they probably don't belong in mainspace.

CodeCat21:36, 25 October 2012

Thank you for the guidance!

BB12 (talk)22:38, 25 October 2012
 
 
Last modified on 8 March 2014, at 18:56
http://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Thread:User_talk:CodeCat/On_Goguryeo/reply_(2)
en.m.wiktionary.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-10
20271
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:LPNRJ7BYLHIBQU7WJFLOPX5XQ6ORXIN6
<urn:uuid:40423d65-2adf-4b89-abb7-69eb3614a305>
2014-03-08T18:56:31Z
208.80.154.236
sha1:57IJD7DIGGGPMQFJU57T5RSW75UCRFSE
<urn:uuid:6bdbf6a6-e594-4652-981b-e5c950669af0>
http://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/Thread:User_talk:CodeCat/On_Goguryeo/reply_(2)
response
<urn:uuid:7ee501ac-3029-4a8f-880d-a07ebe15c3a3>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-183-142-35.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-10
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for March 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf