 

Study Finds Wikipedia is Accurate, But Oh-So Boring

#Internet

Thu, Jun 10th, 2010 09:58 by capnasty NEWS

You might learn something on Wikipedia, if you don't fall asleep first. A new study finds the online, user-generated encyclopedia is more accurate than some previous reports have suggested. But boy, is it boring. (via TMN)

  476

 

You may also be interested in:

The E-mail Really is Deadlier Than the Mail
ISPs react, sort of support network neutrality--with caveats
Emergent: Real-Time Rumour Tracker
Philippe Dubost's Amazon-Like Curriculum Vitae
40 Characters is the Magic Number for a Facebook Post
http://con.ca/view/news/4496-Study-Finds-Wikipedia-is-Accurate-But-Oh-So-Boring
con.ca
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-22
10448
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:3SB432NKLRVV36HVMYLWVWT5U2CAPZMI
<urn:uuid:c36e4c4a-450b-4a4a-8e4e-71512ca1b102>
2017-05-23T20:40:28Z
104.24.108.231
text/html
sha1:VVJ4DKZF52TL3CG2QASAFUYC6HECJXJQ
<urn:uuid:b18f8029-c2e0-4521-9731-270420240fb2>
http://con.ca/view/news/4496-Study-Finds-Wikipedia-is-Accurate-But-Oh-So-Boring
length
response
<urn:uuid:e3b289c1-0555-4fcf-8e42-fed67e5c9299>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-185-224-210.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-22
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf