User talk:SubSeven

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


UFC 84[edit]

A discussion is happening right now on the fate of UFC 84. Because the outcome of this discussion could affect other MMA event pages and how/when they are created, your input would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is happening here. Thank you for your assistance! Gromlakh (talk) 17:49, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Magazine request[edit]

Hey, I noticed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Magazines/PC Gamer (US) that you have the March 1999 issue that mentions Midtown Madness. If this is true, could you please email me a copy - my email is g1ggyman@gmail.com.

Thanks in advance, giggy (:O) 05:16, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

I see you have two issues which mention Planescape: Torment. The article recently had a major overhaul to become a "Good Article", and soon there might be a push for FA. Do you still have your November 1998 and March 2000 issues of PC Gamer available? If you could help in anyway, that would be great. You can e-mail me if you'd like. — Twas Now ( talkcontribse-mail ) 12:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
That's great! Thank you. — Twas Now ( talkcontribse-mail ) 19:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Magazine question[edit]

Do you, perchance, have the April 1999 issue of PC Gamer US? It contains a review of Thief: The Dark Project that would be extremely helpful, as that article is currently undergoing a very successful collaboration. I know you aren't listed as having it, but since the issues you listed were so random and far apart, I thought that you might have been giving a general outline of the issues of PC Gamer US that you have. If not, I apologize in advance. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi, those are indeed the only issues I own (from that time frame). I wasn't a subscriber then, just a kid who bought an issue whenever he had the cash :)
I hope you are able to track down the issue! --SubSeven (talk) 23:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 02:26, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Wikipedia Reviewer.svg

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Dragonblazetitlescr.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dragonblazetitlescr.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Magazine request[edit]

Hi. Looks like I've asked you for Thief material before, but here I am again. It is listed here that a The Dark Project preview is in the September 1997 issue of PC Gamer US. If you have time, scans/photos/etc. of this preview would be extremely helpful. I'm preparing to make a large push on the article, and I need all the material I can get my hands on. Thanks. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 06:00, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I don't have this issue either. No wonder I wasn't into Thief much :) For what it's worth, User:Thibbs is the one who posted that Sep. 1997 issue, although he didn't 'sign' it. --SubSeven (talk) 01:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Oh; sorry to bother you again. I was sure that you'd merely forgotten to sign it, since you were the one with all of the issues surrounding it. Looks like Thibbs is still editing, though, so I'll drop a note on his talk page. Thanks for the tip. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 02:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Magicianlordboxcover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Magicianlordboxcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:PrideFinalConflict2003.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PrideFinalConflict2003.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:49, 7 February 2012 (UTC)


Heroes of Might and Magic[edit]

Thanks SubSeven for cleaning this reception section up, that's all I was looking for. I had no idea how to cleanly reference an existing citation twice in one article, hence I did not do it! :)Mike padilla (talk) 23:11, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I saw your new edits. Looks good! --SubSeven (talk) 00:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


Please stop undoing my small contribution. There is no reason : all I say is true, and I can cite the change log of 1.2 to prove it : there is no mention of the AI being fixed, the balance being fixed, or countless other bugs reported being fixed. Even Ubisoft has acknowledge what I said, by saying they have still many patches to make (roughly 4 more). Anonymous_carl. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.230.144.8 (talk) 02:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Your statement needs to be properly sourced. You have links on your talk page which introduce you to using references on Wikipedia. Let me know if you have any specific questions about that. And a changelog is probably not a sufficient source. --SubSeven (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

PC Gamer[edit]

Hi! I was told by User:Thibbs that you own some old PC Gamer US issues. Could you mail me some scans of The Curse of Monkey Island preview from July 1997 issue (provided that you have it, of course)? Thanks in advance, Electroguv (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, I have a handful of issues from that time period, but July 1997 is not one of them, I'm afraid. --SubSeven (talk) 16:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to hear that. Still, thanks for your time. Electroguv (talk) 19:08, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Anon vandal[edit]

Just FYI, I have reported the IP vandal on the Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. DP76764 (Talk) 16:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Beat me to it.. --SubSeven (talk) 16:33, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Ha, that's a first for me :) Cheers! DP76764 (Talk) 16:34, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

I've reported you both for violating Terms of Use of Wikipedia. Personals egos are not to be fullfilled here at Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agamemnon s (talkcontribs) 16:35, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Apologize for this. was not privy to WP rules and regulations regarding sourced content etc. Will refrain and leave such opinion for other blogs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.238.117.186 (talk) 20:36, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Vandalism is pointless[edit]

Please do not vandalize the article for Black Swan again. Or you will be reported. Adminstrators have already agreed that "critical acclaim" is an opinion, and cannot be used to describe a film's critical reception. Thank you.--Norgizfox5041 (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Which admins would those be? --SubSeven (talk) 20:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
A lenghty discussion about it took place at the talk page of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2. Now i already warned you once of vandalizing the article, and you did it again. If you revert it, you WILL be reported. Thank you.--Norgizfox5041 (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
First of all, nothing that has happened here is 'vandalism'. I read the page that you linked, and administrators agreed on no such thing. The one admin who was participating was coming down more on your side, if anything.
If you disagree with the editors involved in the conversation above, then your next step should probably be initiating a Request for Comment. If you would like help with that, let me know. But in the meantime, I recommend you stop making edits based on WP:POINT. --SubSeven (talk) 23:02, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
The source for Black Swan isn't even accurate. The Rotten Tomatoes page does not say anywhere that it received "widespread acclaim".--Norgizfox5041 (talk) 00:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:PrideTotalElimination2003.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PrideTotalElimination2003.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:40, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Black Swan (film)". Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 18:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution (Diablo III)[edit]

Hey SubSeven,

Looks like the bot didn't notify you, but there's a DRN over D3 at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Diablo_III. -- ferret (talk) 13:12, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks ferret. --SubSeven (talk) 15:07, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, why do not fit, they told me to put the link that has to do with Formula 1.[edit]

Trophy.png Hi, why do not fit, they told me to put the link that has to do with Formula 1.
Hi, why do not fit, they told me to put the link that has to do with Formula 1. Edvardbrns (talk) 05:06, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating 2012 Breeders' Cup, SubSeven!

Wikipedia editor Theopolisme just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the new article; keep it up! :) —Theopolisme 23:28, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Theopolisme's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Sega Saturn - your comment and revert of the edit[edit]

Hi SubSeven,

I am the webmaster of the site that you just deleted the link with an obscure comment on the Sega Saturn page.
It was the first time I added myself the link to my site, and I don't understand your comment.
Could you explain the meaning of your comment and what you don't like about the site ? Why do I feel so much anger in your words ?
My goal is not to spam Wikipedia or anything else that could hurt people of other sites and I want to understand why you reacted this way.


Thanks for your reply and your interest, and sorry if I misused something here as I am new to Wikipedia.

Cheers,

Madroms (talk) 21:40, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Old Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain review[edit]

Hi SubSeven. Sorry to bother you, but I'm working on a rewrite of the Blood Omen: Legacy of Kain article, and the reference library notes that you're able to provide an old writeup on the game. The issue in question is December 1997 of the US edition of PC Gamer. If it's not an imposition, could I ask you to send a scan, or any material, from the review in this magazine if you get a chance? Anything you can send would be very much appreciated, but thanks for your time in any case. --LoK Wiki (talk) 16:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Well I've embarrassingly just realised that I somehow completely forgot to offer my gratitude to you for retrieving this scan. Definitely going to make use of it soon, so I hope it's not inappropriate to say an extremely belated thank you very much. --LoK Wiki (talk) 22:01, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
No trouble at all, you're welcome! --SubSeven (talk) 01:25, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your vote at DRV...[edit]

... won't be counted because its a personal attack not a policy based argument. Please consider removing your abuse and replacing it with something policy based. Thanks. Spartaz Humbug! 17:19, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

I didn't vote. Thanks for your concern. --SubSeven (talk) 17:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
If its not a vote then you won't mind my removing it then? Spartaz Humbug! 17:38, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Go ahead, remove it. Mtking is stating a falsehood as if it were fact, and using it as a foundation for his DRV. We wouldn't want anybody to know that, now, would we? Let him lie. --SubSeven (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Definition of inventor[edit]

It seems that there's a dispute as to whether the USPTO/patent law definition of "inventor" is the same as the Oxford definition.

According to the online glossary provided by uspto.gov, an "inventor" is someone "who contributes to the conception of an invention."

The Oxford dictionary defines an "inventor" as "a person who invented a particular process or device or who invents things as an occupation." To "invent", according to their definition, is to create or design (something that has not existed before)or be the originator of a product.

The uspto.gov definition gives a person the legal status of inventor if they contribute to a conception of a device, no matter how small the contribution (as long as they contribute to its concept). From my interpretation of the Oxford definition, the words "create", "design" and " originator" imply that that person is mostly or solely responsible for that product's coming into existence, and there's no evidence that Jobs played this role in any of his patents.

He is an "inventor", but by USPTO standards. Feel free to give me your own interpretation of the two definitions. In my opinion, there are subtle differences between the two, hence the edit. (Nbanato (talk) 08:57, 19 February 2013 (UTC))

So you're saying he was a co-inventor in some cases. Again, this was already in the text and did not need to be elaborated. --SubSeven (talk) 15:52, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
As long as it says that he is legally a primary inventor and/or a co-inventor by USPTO (United States Patent Trademark Office) standards clearly, I'm fine with that. Try changing the words of the sentence until we reach an agreement. (Nbanato (talk) 17:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC))
By saying he is credited with USPTO patents, are we not doing exactly that? --SubSeven (talk) 18:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
If you are still trying to say that USPTO doesn't know what it means to be an inventor, that is well outside the scope of an article about Steve Jobs, and, more importantly is not mentioned anywhere in the source. --SubSeven (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
Nbanato was blocked 31 hours for edit warring on this matter; he might be slow to respond. He can still comment on his talk page, if you like. FYI. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 20:02, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png The Barnstar of Diligence
You appear a lot of times in my watchlist. Thanks for your work! LlamaAl (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
Very kind, thanks! --SubSeven (talk) 06:38, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Breaking Bad[edit]

The official title of S05E09 is "The Decision". Don't revert my edit again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CocoaPuff310 (talkcontribs) 23:22, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Link removal question[edit]

Hi, I was wondering if you could specify which external link you removed, as I added several today. -Rachelgolston — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachelgolston (talkcontribs) 18:11, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

The Black Beetle - Reinstated Link[edit]

Hi, you deleted a link at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Black_Beetle_(Dark_Horse_Comics)#External_links to the Dark Horse digital store. This is not spam. This is the official site to buy the digital comic. I have reinstated the link.

Hellboybookeeper (talk) 06:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Admin Request[edit]

I have seen all your work and would like to know if you would want to be put into trial for an admin. Please write back as soon as you can. buffbills (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Not really interested, thanks though. --SubSeven (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

RFC[edit]

Thank you for talking on the RFC, it was moved to RFC/U. Can you comment here? [1] Thank you, MarioNovi (talk) 09:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

I'll be happy to comment once it gets going. I can't sign as a certifier, as I can't really point to any conflict I've had with him. (yet..) --SubSeven (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)


Bad Blood episode dispute[edit]

I saw you got involved with the Breaking Bad episode dispute. The editor in question proceeded to use obscenities to defend his position. This editor referred to an IP as a terrorist and an editor as a little bitch last month and was warned such behavior is uncalled for and could lead to blocking. Now he is referring to another editor as a giant dick and using obscenities. I figured I should let you know. Further, it seems like his behavior escalates. I felt you deserved a heads up. 108.76.229.159 (talk) 15:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


For a summary you posted[edit]

Barnstar of Humour Hires.png The Barnstar of Good Humor
With vandalism comes redundancies, however you clearly know how to keep it funny... I hope. I found the revert summery to be quite funny on [List of House of Cards episodes.].—CKY2250 ταικ 04:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)


Q re linking to Chessgames.com games (not Openings Explorer)[edit]

Hi SubSeven. Can I ask you a Q? Do you remember this thread? (It was about removing Infobox links to Chessgames.com's Openings Explorer.) My Q isn't about that (though I still think the free info up to where a paywall would block, has use and value; you felt WP:ELNO says don't link to sites requiring payment to see the info), but a related Q ... WP:ELNO discourages linking to sites requiring payment, what about two points down where WP:ELNO discourages linking to sites requiring Java? (There are many many links to Chessgames.com games in chess-related articles.) I guess I'd like to get your opinion on that, how you read that, and what is consistent and why or why not. Thanks for your consider. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 06:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

It's kind of fuzzy, since they do have a non-Java game viewer option, but, if the default behavior when hitting a CG.com game page is to attempt to load a Java applet, which I believe is the case, then I think alternatives should be considered. I think it's something that should be discussed. --SubSeven (talk) 15:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
I believe that's the case, too (i.e. default is Java). I was interested in why you wouldn't for example feel the situation was clearly against policy rather than fuzzy, since on the paywall issue your take was a strict application of what it says at ELNO about sites requiring payment to view content. (It discourages use in virtually the same language at ELNO re sites that require Java. [Only the word "Java" supplanted word "payment", basically.] I'm wondering why fuzzy re policy here, but not fuzzy re policy re paywall, in your thinking. What is the consistency. [I'm not familiar w/ the non-Java viewer at Chessgames.com, I'd like to go there to find it 'cause I'm curious how they work that w/o Java. OK, I think I understand you that the existence of said option was the tipping factor in your assessment of paywall versus Java in ELNO. Sorry if I didn't catch that at first.) Thanks. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 15:55, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
The fuzzy part is whether these pages require Java. Technically you can disable Java and still get all of the information. So I don't know if I would automatically strike it based on that. I'm honestly not sure how to apply the policy there. --SubSeven (talk) 16:03, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
OK I found this at the site:

Chessgames.com requires Java which may not be present on your computer. You can download Java for free from here. Java technology, unfortunately, tends to be unstable for some users. To solve this, we provide more than one Java viewer: if one doesn't work, try another. (You can change your Java viewer setting on the preferences page or on any game page.)

Note that it is possible to configure your browser to view PGN files from the web in a PGN viewing application; once you do this, the "download PGN" link found on the game pages should display the game using your own software.

Man! (The latter sounds like a bit of a hassle to get the value. Remember we link 1000s of games on Chessgames.com in 100s of chess-related articles.) Ok, Ihardlythinkso (talk) 16:08, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
That information looks somewhat out of date. There is definitely a non-Java viewer available (pgn2web), because I use it. It is documented at this link.
That said, if the Wikipedia end user follows these links and has to fool around with viewer configuration to avoid using Java, that's not exactly ideal. So I do think it's a grey area. --SubSeven (talk) 19:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Plainlist template removals[edit]

Could you please explain why you removed the plainlist template from those The Following episodes? You didn't provide an edit summary. Gloss • talk 20:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

The markup was contradictory, using both the plainlist template (unbulleted list), and asterisks which would indicate a bulleted list.
If you think the plainlist is better, I don't really care, but I think it's generally accepted practice to use the bulleted list for episode guest stars. --SubSeven (talk) 21:12, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on User:Upedge/Windows XP Survey[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on User:Upedge/Windows XP Survey. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Seahorse[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Seahorse. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Unified Modeling Language[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Unified Modeling Language. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Artpop[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Artpop. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Circumcision[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Circumcision. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SubSeven
en.wikipedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2014-15
100872
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:T6RBQG7UA2A3KI4JPLQTTHR3JUVVI7WS
<urn:uuid:74221cca-35d9-4e70-9038-85fbcfc0aebf>
2014-04-18T04:00:17Z
208.80.154.224
sha1:2JJRVP36VA5PDRWSYPWNQU4AYSWCM6LR
<urn:uuid:20389483-25e1-4418-8db6-d30769cf33f3>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SubSeven
response
<urn:uuid:f721216a-3955-425e-ae8b-580903f2f33e>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-147-4-33.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2014-15
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for April 2014
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf