Wikipedia:Wikipedia is in the real world

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"WP:IRL" redirects here. For the Ireland WikiProject, see WP:WikiProject Ireland.
"WP:REAL" redirects here. For the Real Madrid article taskforce, see WP:WikiProject Football/Real Madrid task force.
"WP:REALWORLD" redirects here; not to be confused with MOS:REALWORLD (Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction#Real-world perspective)
What you say in Wikipedia can have serious consequences.

Wikipedia is highly visible in the Internet; any Google or other search engine search on a subject for which Wikipedia has an article is likely to display that article on the first page of results, and quite likely as the first or second result returned. If you edit that article, then anyone who is interested in the subject is going to be able to see what you wrote. They will also be able to track your activity across the site, in project and user pages as well as in articles. So anything you say here and anything you do here can have real world consequences. Consider carefully what you write (or delete!); keep in mind that you (and other people) can get hurt.

Wikipedia is a public place[edit]

In Wikipedia, everyone can hear you talking.

It is tempting to view Wikipedia as something of a private club, but it is really much more like Hyde Park. Anyone who abides by the rules is welcome to edit; anyone with a web browser is welcome to read. Therefore, you should consider that you have about as much privacy as you would if you got on a soapbox in the town square and used a megaphone. The whole world can hear you, including your wife/husband/significant other, your children, your boss, your neighbors, spy agencies, the police, investigative reporters, Rush Limbaugh, Stephen Colbert, The New York Times, and the pope. If you don't want them to read what you're saying, you shouldn't post it here.

Those outside readers will also read your words in the context of generally understood meanings, not Wikipedia definitions. Appeal to Wikipedia rules and process will not save you from misunderstandings.

Wikipedia is not a role-playing game[edit]

Wikipedia is not edited by miniatures.

Editors in Wikipedia are (one hopes) writing about real-world subjects, not creating a fantasy world. Editors are not characters in a game; they are real people. You should not be here to gain experience points, create your own reality, play mind games with others, or engage in satisfying your taste for single combat. If you say something malicious about someone, you're saying it about a real person, and that real person may well get angry with you. Don't visualize your discussion opponents as NPCs in EditQuest or World of Wikicraft or Jimbo's Call; visualize them as someone sitting across the table from you. After all, the Golden Rule isn't just a rule; it's a good idea.

Don't count on your anonymity[edit]

Although the true identity of Wikipedia editors is not normally revealed within the site, and efforts to "out" editors are frowned upon, it is impossible to prevent attempts at unmasking editors. From time to time editors have been the subject of such attempts. Wikipedia cannot forestall the consequences of being identified, so the best course may be to edit defensively:

In Wikipedia, your mask can fall off.

Administrators and long standing members of the community, having developed a high profile, can expect inverse surveillance. If passers-by and other editors mistake the recipient of your acts for a punching bag, they'll want to know why you're doing it. And to know why, they'll want to know who you are, even if the Wikipedia culture values privacy.

Wikipedia keeps an Akashic record[edit]

Edits and discussions are kept forever unless oversighted.

All your contributions to Wikipedia, including comments in talk pages, edits to articles, comments in article for deletion discussions, etc., are kept forever by the wiki software unless oversighted. Anything that you say that has not been deleted by an administrator or via oversight will be available to anyone for research via your contributions page. The aggregation of all these contributions represents your public identity to others and can be used to make an assessment of your personal viewpoints, personality, edit patterns, and motivations.

Real world conflicts are not different in Wikipedia[edit]

If you don't like controversy, you should stay away from editing controversial topics. And if you don't like being tagged with a position on a controversial topic, you should be very wary of editing articles on it. It's not like The Wizard of Id; if you write "The king is a fink!" here, everyone will see you doing it.

Wikipedia's visibility makes it a natural haunt of viewpoint pushers on political and social controversies. Even if you try to be scrupulously careful about avoiding POV edits, other editors working on the same topic may assume that you are a party to the dispute and assign you to one of the various camps. If this offends, annoys, or troubles you, you should consider staying out of the fray. And if being identified with one of the parties to the dispute would be difficult for you in real life, you should consider well the consequences of being identified, and refrain if you feel the stakes are too high.

The bottom line[edit]

Wikipedia is not a soapbox; but when people get angry about a cause, they often take their grievances to Wikipedia.

Take responsibility for your actions here, and you will be less likely to be surprised by any undesirable consequences of what you say and do. Use the preview button, and think before pressing "Save page". You can always self-revert, but what you said may remain.

See also[edit]

Essays
Articles

External link[edit]

Policies and guidelines
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_in_the_real_world
en.wikipedia.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-30
46988
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:UYTCEF63GTFYM336VKRWTL4HX7VZICDI
<urn:uuid:257bea14-b7f5-4784-967c-e4ec89227769>
2016-07-25T06:39:14Z
208.80.154.224
sha1:6RVIX3P4LIUEXNI2ZWAH33JJ4VMNULOR
<urn:uuid:ab741c80-efae-421c-9556-e36147cdd39c>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_in_the_real_world
response
<urn:uuid:ec84f6b7-e68e-4de8-8ab6-7367b91161fa>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-185-27-174.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-30
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf