Tag:peer review feedback form

While you can't guarantee that your journal will receive top-notch reviewer comments all of the time, there are some steps your editorial team can take to improve reviewer comment quality.

Every journal's peer review process can use some polishing from time to time. In this blog post we outline three areas of peer review that all journals should audit and how to approach data collection.

In this post we outline some best practices for creating a peer review feedback form and what yours should cover.
https://blog.scholasticahq.com/tags/peer-review-feedback-form/
blog.scholasticahq.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-18
13725
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:C5SLL7UZBR63EFSPBC7DRWI4SP2XCB6S
<urn:uuid:1a0c16c9-9650-4a03-a5f0-21282018e957>
2019-04-24T00:17:51Z
13.249.44.107
text/html
sha1:33A6SGF44SVLF2JTMZJMP6AKSEK557VW
<urn:uuid:87d70a04-d1d4-4ce1-8ebf-931fa55fb44e>
https://blog.scholasticahq.com/tags/peer-review-feedback-form/
response
<urn:uuid:13e32302-9d7d-46a7-9064-bb1b3720e66c>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-18
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-203-193-188.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/