[gmx-users] Moving this mailing list to Discourse format

Hannes Loeffler Hannes.Loeffler at stfc.ac.uk
Thu Apr 21 15:53:37 CEST 2016


Hi Mark,

many thanks.

At the end it is really just a question if the user has flexibility
over how to visualise the communications.  I'm happy to hear that the
old-fashioned email way would still have (some) support :-)

I hope you get sufficient feedback and support from the community.

Cheers,
Hannes.


On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 08:47:56 +0000
Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Hannes,
> 
> Yes, previous discussion has identified this as a likely key feature,
> and thanks for adding confirmation of that. Discourse can be
> integrated with functionality for replying to threads from email to
> suit people who want that kind of small change to their workflows;
> that will indeed suit simple discussions. Obviously there's
> configurable email activity digests and notifications also, which
> provide links to the forum proper.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:52 AM Hannes Loeffler
> <Hannes.Loeffler at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 07:11:42 +0000
> > Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi people,
> > >
> > > As part of the new BioExcel project (http://bioexcel.eu/) that
> > > supports biomolecular research with codes including GROMACS, we're
> > > exploring migrating the gmx-users mailing list to the Discourse
> > > format. You can see an example at http://try.discourse.org! This
> > > has a number of immediate advantages, including attachments,
> > > single-click sign-up, tagging, voting and contributing to old
> > > discussions. We might also integrate features like replying to
> > > threads via email, or real-time chat. We also know such a change
> > > might be something people don't like, and we would like to get a
> > > feel for that. The community should like its forum, after
> > > all! :-) So please let us know how you feel at
> > > http://goo.gl/forms/k8lhTliffO.
> >
> > I think such a discussion would need a bit more space than just a
> > few pre-canned questions.
> >
> > I am on various mailing lists and happy with my email client as a
> > central "collector" of all those discussions.  I am personally not
> > fond of another web page interface with its very own features,
> > bells and whistles and what not, but typically unlike any other
> > existing one. And this is in essence the major shortcoming unless
> > it would be still possible to receive all messages through a
> > mailing list as it is now.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Hannes.
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >



More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list
https://mailman-1.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/2016-April/105223.html
mailman-1.sys.kth.se
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-30
7210
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ZNSTEBI7XLRI3C4OBVLUUHCIZWNLGZUY
<urn:uuid:e3e911ab-5ea8-4025-97b1-1efccb8c713a>
2019-07-16T07:27:21Z
130.237.48.102
text/html
sha1:R34DLFKKAXB5JVXLWQFK2OQTRIQ6GYHA
<urn:uuid:bbbcea83-71fd-4196-9b45-69a7732febab>
https://mailman-1.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users/2016-April/105223.html
response
<urn:uuid:567e1a34-f92e-40f8-a7e4-34c691b1a58b>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-30
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for July 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-157-191-33.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/