Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by wjwlsn

I'm seeing a lot of unwarranted (IMO) down-moderation lately, mostly on posts that express a minority opinion or that question a majority opinion (judging minority/majority based on discussion context). As a result, there are many posts ranked -1 or 0 that probably deserve higher scores.

I'd like to remind moderators that you're supposed to "Concentrate more on promoting than demoting". In the meantime, I'm going to spend all my mod points on posts that I think have been modded down unfairly. I encourage others to consider spending some mod points in this fashion as well.

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Open4D on Tuesday April 01 2014, @12:27PM

    by Open4D (371) on Tuesday April 01 2014, @12:27PM (#24067) Journal

    Also, there could be a similar system, allowing us to "thank" people for their comments.

    Now, this does overlap with the moderation system somewhat, because every +1 moderation is effectively the moderator thanking the commenter for a worthwhile comment. But we could still have both. Unlike moderation, any registered user at any time could click "thank" on any comment.

     
    Of course, it should be possible in a user's preferences to make these 3 fields hidden.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by wjwlsn on Tuesday April 01 2014, @12:51PM

    by wjwlsn (171) on Tuesday April 01 2014, @12:51PM (#24096) Homepage Journal

    These are both good ideas. I prefer the first one though (agree/disagree alongside moderation). It would be very interesting to see a "+5 Insightful" comment that is 90% disagree, for example. Being the kind of person that I am, those are probably the types of comments I would seek out when I'm reading or participating in a discussion. And, I just realized that this is why I'm so against using mod-points to vote down comments based on agreement / disagreement: it penalizes what I would consider to be the most valuable comments of all, the ones that would probably teach me the most.

    --
    I am a traveler of both time and space. Duh.
    • (Score: 2) by fliptop on Tuesday April 01 2014, @10:09PM

      by fliptop (1666) on Tuesday April 01 2014, @10:09PM (#24493) Journal

      It would be very interesting to see a "+5 Insightful" comment that is 90% disagree, for example

      I agree, this is a great idea. It can provide a way to vote down w/o actually voting down, which seems to be quite taboo. You're right, sometimes comments that are voted down and subsequently buried can be valuable (which is why I usually browse at -1 raw, uncut).

      Now the question is, what are the chances NCommander can front-burner code to do this?

      --
      Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?noupdate=1&sid=923&cid=24067
soylentnews.org
CC-MAIN-2024-38
22002
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:RUEYKXRD7RUI2OONBZHECJOBC4FT4QWE
<urn:uuid:4728f30e-202d-4ddf-a5cf-558eab9d84d6>
2024-09-12T16:30:24Z
23.239.29.31
text/html
sha1:74SL4MLT3MBP5DQQFAT2UCYAPEVA2JCQ
<urn:uuid:798ac975-ec0e-4111-a152-83044205442a>
https://soylentnews.org/comments.pl?noupdate=1&sid=923&cid=24067
response
<urn:uuid:f6824da9-8664-4b72-b1bc-5dcb99e50369>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-38
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-37
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/