User talk:Tailsultimatefan3891

From Test Wiki
Latest comment: 5 June by Tailsultimatefan3891 in topic New signature

Send a message here, then I'll respond swiftly. If you can't edit this page because not to disturb you or other reasons why I asked you not to, you may leave a message. Tailsultimatefan3891 talklogscontribs

Archive
Archives

1

Welcome![edit source]

Welcome to the Test Wiki!
We're glad to have you here, Tailsultimatefan3891! The Test Wiki is a giant wiki which anyone including you can contribute to and edit. With 61 articles, 4,255 users, 33 active users, 49,211 edits and 31 files, the Test Wiki has been thriving!

Make sure to always assume good faith.

Remember to sign your posts with ~~~~.

If you would like to test Administrator/Bureaucrat tools, please make a request for permission!

Do you have any questions? Don't hesitate to inquire on the community portal!

We hope you'll make great edits!
 

CM3891 (talk) 00:06, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@CM3891: Thanks! Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 01:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My log was constructive.[edit source]

My log was constructive. Please revert your action and send me a message. Thanks. TUFTest4 (talk) 17:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@TUFTest4: I will, only if your edit summary was constructive. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 17:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New signature[edit source]

Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk | contribs | rights | block) 20:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Chat moderator and confirmed[edit source]

I want those requests those permission now TUFTest4 (talk) 00:15, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Done Enjoy! Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk | contribs | rights | block) 00:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Revoked Do not revert unless totally necessary. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk | contribs | rights | block) 00:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add permissions[edit source]

Can I have confirmed, chat mdoerator, autopatrolled, and researchers permissions. Thank you. CM8782 (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Do it here. CM8782 (talk) 00:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Done Happy testing! Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 00:19, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. REDIRECT Special:MyLanguage/Template:Not doneTailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 23:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User rights[edit source]

Can I have patroller please. CM8782 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 00:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Quickly done Happy testing! Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 00:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. REDIRECT Special:MyLanguage/Template:Not doneTailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 23:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

rollback[edit source]

may i have permission for this? thank you – Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolkikmoddi (talkcontribs)

Already done. Also, please make sure to sign your posts like this: ~~~~ Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 21:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As an administrator you already have this right. See Special:ListGroupRights. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 21:06, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bureaucrat[edit source]

May you please look at my request? thank you. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolkikmoddi (talkcontribs)

Already done. Also, please make sure to sign your posts like this: ~~~~ Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 21:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

False positive[edit source]

Hello. It seems you blocked TUFTest4 indefinitely. Could you unblock him as a false positive? Example (talk) 17:20, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Technially yes. If this user misbehaves the user, he will be reblocked. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 17:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I could either reply to Example or not, but I'm gonna leave it to admins, crats, or stewards. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 23:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for giving me another chance. TUFTest4 (talk) 17:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Now blocked for numerous violations: sockpuppet, abusing multiple accounts, vandalism, long term abuse. Drummingman recently restored the block of TUFTest4 by Q8j. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 23:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Blocked[edit source]

Discussion[edit source]

Dear, Tailsultimatefan3891 I have blocked you indefinitely for harassment, sock puppet abuse and as far as I am concerned for abuse of authority. If you can show that you are not going to harass and abuse with multiple accounts you can be unblocked, but I will leave that to other admins or stewards. Regards, Drummingman (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Drummingman: Actually, can I wait? And do I have to add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} ? Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 23:15, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I am not convinced that works here. As a blocking administrator, I recommend that you wait at least another six months. I hope by then you can show on other wikis that you can contribute constructively; without sock puppetry, ed. Furthermore, your talk page is now only open for discussion about your blocking, please only talk about that, otherwise your talk page will also be blocked. Drummingman (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Drummingman: Yep, if I make constructive edits to Wikimedia projects, I would recommend waiting for at least a year from today. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 20:48, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay, as you suggested. I sincerely hope you do and that I don't see you blocked again for the same things in any wiki project: because this is already the 3rd project as far as I know in which you have been blocked for sock puppet abuse; good hand bad hand and harassment. I don't know if you really get it, I hope you understand the gravity of the situation. Drummingman (talk) 22:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Drummingman: Will make an unblock request on or after 20:48, 27 October 2023 (UTC). Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 21:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's fine with me, in the meantime show that you can edit constructively to other projects, and then we'll see further if you can come back. I sincerely hope, I can give positive advice for your unblocking. I hope you don't disappoint us. Greetings, Drummingman (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Drummingman: I have Meta account here. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 21:45, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I know it :-), Drummingman (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Drummingman: When I will get admin and bureaucrat privileges back. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 23:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
As long as you are still blocked, that is impossible. Thereafter, we will see if and when you can get them back. I kindly ask you to stop the consultation now until your unblocking request in 1 year as you yourself suggested. Drummingman (talk) 23:16, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I created new sections now. Thanks for the reply! Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 23:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear Tailsultimatefan3891, as I see you have been blocked indefinitely on meta-wiki for vandalism. I can only conclude that you are untrustworthy. Therefore, I cannot give a positive unblocking advice, the matter is now up to the stewards as far as I am concerned if and when they want to give you another chance on this wiki. Greetings from, Drummingman (talk) 16:05, 1 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I concur with Drummingman here. When I last investigated this in November, I saw obvious sockpuppetry together with highly disruptive vandalism. I'm not prepared to restore your user talk page access at this point, but if one bureaucrat agrees to extending you a modest leash to formulate a new appeal, by way of a reply here, I'd be open to at least restoring your user talk page access. Note I would want to see an indefinite user restriction limiting you to one user account and restricting you against using VPNs/open proxies without express on-wiki consent of a Steward, but in addition to that, I would also like to see you publicly acknowledge all of your incorrect behaviour, how you plan to correct that, and, crucially, what, if any, other counter-measures you propose should you contravene your promises in the future. Dmehus (talk) 20:10, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agree. I've restored TPA myself because I'd like to allow a public appeal due to the length of time that has passed and the fact that a WM unlock was granted recently. Tailsultimatefan3891, your appeal must contain an acknowledgement and how you plan to correct past incorrect behavior, or it will be declined. Justarandomamerican (talk) 20:06, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Drummingman: as the original blocking bureaucrat (now steward), what is your opinion on restoring TPA? Justarandomamerican (talk) 20:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
IMHO i would say leave the ban as is @Justarandomamerican Cocopuff2018 (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Perhaps I will be wrong, and they will simply get back and abuse TPA. I am granting them a public appeal, and that only. I will not unblock them. Justarandomamerican (talk) 20:19, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
is this person an LTA Of Seiyena @Justarandomamerican Cocopuff2018 (talk) 20:22, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's not likely given the fact that WM stewards unlocked their account. Seiyena is WMF global banned, and I'm fairly certain WM stewards would at least perform an investigation before unlocking. Justarandomamerican (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
are they a n LTA of Seiyena @Justarandomamerican Cocopuff2018 (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Again, that is unlikely because of the reasons I mentioned above. It is possible, but not plausible. Justarandomamerican (talk) 20:28, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Justarandomamericanthey have the same profile page as them Cocopuff2018 (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's fine. I'm curious if Tailsultimatefan3891's behavior has changed positively? Drummingman (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Numberous extremely highly disruptive behavior was spotted to me both on-wiki and off-wiki. First, I started on Fandom, made numberous socks on fandom (e.g. Commonprenton, Existnot, Passwordsishere, etc.) Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:36, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commonprenton's Numberblocks Wiki Block: [1] Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This really doesn’t help your unblock case. X (talk) 15:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also have Wikimedia account Commonprenton locked. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fandom account Existnot is globally blocked, then globally locked. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:40, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
100.11.109.181 is blocked for 3 days for disruptive editing on Wikipedia on May 15, 2021 to May 18, 2021: [2] Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
How is this relevant to an appeal? X (talk) 15:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Relevant appeals: Will read WP:GTAB. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:45, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
How about to get @MacFan4000: involved in this? Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:47, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Less than half an hour than 100.11.109.181 was blocked for disruptive editing on Wikipedia on May 15, 2021, The IP lost TPA rights as 331dot changed block settings for this IP: [3] Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block)

And I did nothing after the UTRS appeal was declined until May 18, 2021. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:50, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ponyo blocked 100.11.109.181 on Wikipedia again on June 11, 2021 for disruptive editing and extreme WP:CIR issues: [4] Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Gldgenga471834gldben account on Wikipedia made numberous edits without providing citing sources. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Please note that your talk page access is only permitted to be used to discuss your block and possibly an unblock. Any further unrelated comments will lead to you not being able to edit your talk page. X (talk) 16:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unblock requests[edit source]

Suggestions for unblock request[edit source]

Hi, I just wanted to ask you two quesrions that might help here.

1. What did you do wrong to be blocked here?

2. What can you do here differently that will be good here?

Try to focus on just this wiki, not on Fandom or Wikimedia. Think about your actions on this wiki only.

I hope this helps. Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 16:04, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unblock request 1[edit source]

Status:   Done

Here is the reason why you should unblock me:

"Overall, first, I am confirmed I did sockpuppetry, harassment, intimidating, obscene, and abusive behavior, disorderly conduct. I abuse multiple accounts. Also for long-term abuse and also cross-wiki abuse. For abuse of privilege beyond testually reasonable, I'm also blocked. Drummingman, Justarandomamerican, Dmehus, Seiyena, and X was involved in this.

In the future: Indefinite restriction to one account, abusive behavior de-escalated, and VPNs/proxies use not permitted. VPNs/proxies use prohibited. Grossly disruptive behavior, will result in a one-strike block. Creating pages with grossly illegal, immoral, unethical, insulting, degrading, or offensive material to the standards of morality, decency and propriety is strictly prohibited and will result in a one-strike block."

Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 18:50, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This sounds like a reasonable appeal to me. Nice job. Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 19:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
After a discussion with @Drummingman, this is   Done. In addition to the above restrictions, you may not request sysop rights for 2 weeks from now or bureaucrat rights until a month from now. This is to show you can be trusted. X (talk) 19:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Indeed. You've been given another chance on this wiki, don't ruin it. Drummingman (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I will also not request steward rights for 3 months from now or system administrator rights for 6 months from now. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 01:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That’s fine, and probably wise. But just note that this isn’t an official restriction. X (talk) 01:54, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

question[edit source]

are you a sock account of Seiyena @Tailsultimatefan3891 Cocopuff2018 (talk) 20:24, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nope, 2 separate LTAs. X (talk) 20:31, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Indeed that had already been investigated by another steward Drummingman (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks for confirming. X (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
so seiyena and tailsulimatefan3891? are the same person @Drummingman@X Cocopuff2018 (talk) 21:09, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No, they arnt the same person. X (talk) 21:17, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Well? That's a easy question for X to answer. The discussion is to be closed. Do not reply to me. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:27, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What’s that supposed to mean. I believe the words you’re looking for are “thank you for granting me a second chance to appeal”. X (talk) 15:32, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
"thank you for granting me a second chance to appeal". When a chance to appeal is blocked, I get another chance to appeal after waiting long periods of time. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 15:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Congrats![edit source]

Congratulations on your unblock here. Also, congrats on getting your Wikimedia account unlocked. My own account is still locked but I hope it will be unlocked before too long like yours was. Seiyena (My Contribs | Talk to me) 19:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Warning ⛔️[edit source]

This is a formal warning on behalf of @Drummingman and I. Please don’t accuse random users of sock puppetry with no evidence at all. This is unreasonable and unacceptable. Thank you. X (talk) 21:57, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry. I won't do it again. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 22:08, 30 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Things to remember[edit source]

  1. Follow behavior guidelines.
  2. The following are prohibited and I refer them to the prohibited things:
    1. Intimidating behavior
    2. Obscene behavior
    3. Abusive behavior
    4. Disruptive behavior
    5. Harassment
    6. Legal threats
    7. NSFW behavior
    8. Immoral behavior
    9. Illegal behavior
    10. Unethical behavior
    11. Slurs
    12. Heavy amount and realistic details of inappropriate content
    13. Libelous behavior
    14. Defamatory behavior
    15. Things against the law
    16. Unlawful behavior
    17. Hate speech
    18. Cross-wiki abuse
    19. Long-term abuse
    20. Sockpuppetry
    21. Meatpuppetry
    22. Extremely bad behavior
    23. Google Terms of Use, Wikimedia Terms of Use, Miraheze Terms of Use, and/or Fandom Terms of Use violations
    24. Copyright violations
    25. Privacy violations
    26. Grossly insulting, degrading, and/or offensive material and detailed
    27. Grossly insulting, degrading, and/or offensive material to the standards of morality, decency and propriety
    28. Frequently and/or highly crossly, gratuitous, cruel, exploitative, and/or offensive behavior
  3. No false statements are allowed unless evidence considers it true.
  4. I will blocked if I do anything that is noticed as I refer to the prohibited things.

Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) (contribs) (rights) (block) 00:50, 1 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New signature[edit source]

Tailsultimatefan3891 (T | C | UR | B) 12:49, 2 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mass creation of pages[edit source]

If you want to test creation and editing, create 1 page and test on that one page. Repeatedly creating pages imposes a burden on us to delete all of them once we think your test is done, sometimes requiring the use of mass deletion. Justarandomamerican (talk) 00:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Duplicate test page creations and file uploads[edit source]

Hi Tailsultimatefan3891,

I'm Doug, a Steward, and I've just kindly cleaned up your test page creations and file uploads. While testing here is fine, I do not see a need to create duplicates of the same pages and image uploads, particularly when you don't have sysop permissions. I would normally invite you to request that permission, but given the unexplained page creations, I'm reluctant to grant that permission. If you have a good explanation, or if another steward or bureaucrat supports granting the permission, I can be persuaded otherwise.

Thanks,
Dmehus (talk) 00:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Undo partial block Community portal indef block[edit source]

I was adding numberous CP discussions that are not necessary and I will not do it again.

  • Start of block: 2023-07-03T20:18:04
  • Expiration of block: no expiry set
  • Intended blockee: ‪Tailsultimatefan3891‬
  • Block ID: #10587.

Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 00:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Partially blocked from Test Wiki:Community portal[edit source]

Hi Tailsultimatefan3891,

I was originally just going to give you a final warning, but had to partially block you as you subsequently posted a new discussion at Test Wiki:Community portal immediately after my reverting your multiple added proposals in rapid succession. While it is an indefinite Steward block, I will unblock you immediately if you promise not to start more than one discussion as a person at any given time. That is to say, until a discussion you start as a person, regardless of which user account you started it under, has been closed, you are indefinitely prohibited from starting a new discussion concurrently.

Thanks,
Dmehus (talk) 00:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll need you to reply to this thread, please, stating you understand the conditions outlined herein. :) Dmehus (talk) 00:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'll agree to the following conditions: (a) Multiple community portal dicussions are not accepted, (b) Inappropriate behavior not allowed, (c) Serious impacts of vandalism on the wiki (including trolling and bad faith behavior) and creating multiple community portal discussion will result in an ONESTRIKE block. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 00:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually, looking at your block log and your prior warnings, I'm seeing you having reverted to the same abuse patterns, so to help us help you and avoid a potential community block, I'm going to extend your block to sitewide, with appeals considered not sooner than three months. I'll leave the researcher permission to help you assess what we mean by abuse. Should an appeal be successful, the partial block will remain until you agree to the conditions I outlined above. Should you engage in sockpuppetry, the date for an appeal resets to the date of most recent proven sock. Dmehus (talk) 00:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I would like to request that for a future sitewide unblock request to be accepted, they shall agree to a ban from the Template and Module namespaces, to be enforced by a partial block. There appears to be a recurring issue of cut-and-paste imports leading to a lot of broken templates. Justarandomamerican (talk) 00:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
That's reasonable and probably a good idea. That can be added to their partial block should an appeal be accepted. Feel free to update the permalink to this revision on their user page. :) Dmehus (talk) 00:59, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
This is completely unwarranted, and I strongly oppose it. We are really blocking people for posting too much at the community portal. Why? And then we extended it to sitewide. Why? And this is all after being given 0 warnings about community portal involvement. And then you make appeals for 3 months!?! For commenting too much on the community portal?!? I am dumbfounded. I think this block is completely unnecessary and I’d like it to be removed immediately @Dmehus. X (talk) 01:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Was the partial block necessary to prevent disruption at the time it was placed? I'd say so, given that they added a similar discussion to the ones being reverted after they were reverted. The sitewide block, however, is debatable. Justarandomamerican (talk) 01:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah, I think a warning was more appropriate, but I don’t think the temporary block was completely wrong. What I strongly oppose is the sitewide block. X (talk) 01:22, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I question the reason for the sitewide indef, @Dmehus: what led you to believe they were returning to old ways? Justarandomamerican (talk) 01:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I know that as part of my unblock conditions, if I should slip back into old ways, people are to warn me first before blocking me up to 2 weeks. Why doesn't that apply to Tails as well?
Justarandomamerican, it was actually your indef block in March 2023 and the reasons for it, together with the behaviour precipitated the prior warnings on this user talk page and blocks. The edits in Template: and Module: did not help matters, either. In my view, I thought it would be best for the user to have a time out for a few months, to assess their behaviour reflectively, rather than have them continue and have it turn into a community block because the community was really annoyed. Dmehus (talk) 01:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I think I agree with your reasoning now, it just needed explanation. Thanks! Justarandomamerican (talk) 01:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
To be honest, I did consider a thirty-day time-limited block, but given the prior blocks, decided this was the better approach, but am happy to shorten it to one-month if you guys prefer. The partial blocks should be indef, though, I think. :) Dmehus (talk) 01:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I still don’t think this block was necessary now, and making them wait 3 months to appeal is cruel. Please switch to 1 month, or preferably just restore the partial block. Can you talk on Discord now? X (talk) 01:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I would not say it's cruel given the disruption. Isn't it worse to let someone stay here, continue to disrupt, and annoy the community so much as to precipitate a community block? If Justarandomamerican and Piccadilly both agree to shortening it to one-month, Justarandomamerican or I can do that. :) Dmehus (talk) 01:55, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
And yes, going there now. :) Dmehus (talk) 01:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I definitely agree to shortening the block. Piccadilly (My Contribs | Talk to me) 01:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So do I. If the block expires and disruption continues, then perhaps an indef with a minimum of 3 months having passed to appeal is the way to go. Justarandomamerican (talk) 02:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Done. X (talk) 02:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Also, just a side comment about something unrelated. On Tails' user page, there is a link to what might be their English Wikipedia profile, but I'm not sure how that's relevant to their status here. I'm still globally locked on Wikimedia, but nobody seems to mind or feel the need to bring that up. I'm just wondering why that link was added, that's all. Piccadilly (My Contribs | Talk to me) 01:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Considering I had disruption in Fandom too, I had several socks, including Commonprenton, Existsnot, and Passwordsishere. Commonprenton and Existsnot had been blocked on Numberblocks Wiki in 2020 and the latter of which had been blocked on BFB Wiki in the same year. Considering this, my Wikimedia account "Commonprenton" created in July 2020 had been globally locked as of 2023 (Existsnot and Passwordsishere was not on Wikimedia). In May 2021, was an IP was blocked from Wikipedia due to disruptive editing, with TPA revoked the same day the IP was blocked. In June an IP was blocked again, with TPA revoked, due to extreme WP:CIR issues and disruptive editing (remained until 1 month after the block was made). In October 2021, Gldgenga471834gldben was created and was warned by numberous users, last edit on December 30, 2021. In June 2022, an IP was persistently changing Gldgenga471834gldben's talk page, including instant abuse filters. The same month, Among Us for Potus (the Wikipedia user) warned the IP, then blocked by Liz (expired the same month). An IP and Vegrar81uyiA80 (the month the user was created was June 2022 as well, created because Gldgenga471834gldben's password was lost) were both BADHAND accounts. The same month, an IP was used for creating more WNR and NROS, final warning by BF10. In July 2022, Cdmxm8807i8x used made, it was the user page to used to be Gldgenga471834gldben and Vegrar81uyiA80, the same day it was made, blocked by Hoary (and Gldgenga471834gldben was blocked by the same admin as well). In August 2022, Vegrar81uyiA80 and Cdmxm8807i8x made a comeback editing their user talk pages, but the same month, Vegrar81uyiA80's TPA was revoked by Yamla. In August 2022, Cdmxm8807i8x was blocked on Commons. In September 2022, the Wikimedia user with the same username of my username was created, and it was blocked just about 2 days after it was made. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 02:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
So the user on Wikipedia with the same name isn't you? Just wondering. Piccadilly (My Contribs | Talk to me) 02:48, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I also have Existsnot globally blocked on Fandom, globally locked later. Probably that neither are any of the socks I made (Commonprenton, Existsnot, Passwordsishere, etc.) has ever made an edit to Fandom Test Wiki. ￼ ￼ ￼ ￼ Also in June 2022, IP lost access to his IP talk page on Wikipedia, but he wasn't blocked on BetaWiki, even a single block. I never edited on Miraheze, WikiTide, or For-Test Wiki before. Well, also, in July 2022, earlier before Cdmxm8807i8x was registered on Wikimedia, an IP started disruptive behavior, including reverting removal of Vegrar81uyiA80's message on Gldgenga471834glbdben's user talk page (the user belonging this user talk page was not blocked yet, but later this month). In August 2022, Vegrar81uyiA80 was on Test Wikipedia, with TTW registered with username Tm8150switch88 on late of August 29, 2022. On September 28, 2022, Tailsultimatefan3891 was blocked as a sock of Gldgenga471834gldben (Commonprenton effective) on Wikipedia, along with Gldgenga471834gldben (effective), Vegrar81uyiA80, and Cdmxm8807i8x. The block of Tailsultimatefan3891 Wikipedia account]. In October 2021, due to intimidating behavior/harassment and IP CheckUser privacy violations the image when had tested, Tm8150switch88 had been blocked on The Test Wiki, along with Vista[###], Vista[####], Switch98, Switch68, and other socks TM88 made. The same month, Tm8150switch88 was registered, later blocked by me when I'm an admin, changed block settings by Drummingman (and possibly X, Justarandomamerican, AlPaD, and/or Seiyena (now Piccadilly)). On November 1, 2022, Tailsultimatefan3891 was blocked on Meta-Wiki indefinitely vandalism and it was globally locked 2 days later (now unlocked, but I'm not using this account anymore since I disclosed it and I made a new account after Tailsultimatefan3891). In December 2022, All acconts Cdmxm8807i8x and older was globally locked for lock evasion of Tailsultimatefan3891 (the Wikimedia account). Numberous IPs was edited the same month through January of this year before Solaris5296 on Wikimedia was made again. On January 20, 2023, Solaris5296 was blocked on Wikipedia for suspected sock of Gldgenga471834gldben (Commonprenton effective). Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 23:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also had Hubbycolipster391 and it was created on April 2023 and blocked only about several hours when the account was made. Around several of the wikis he was going to, he was blocked. I was also Tails6000D on Illogicopedia and Cg098 blocked me 3 times on that wiki, with unblock on the 1st block before it expired and TPA revoked on the 3rd block. The 3rd block is currently happening now. Here is the link for the Tails6000D blocks for Illogicopedia: [5]. Also have my TTW accounts banned on October 11, 2022. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 22:08, 5 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'll probably have to appeal to the community and have to see when an admin could block me. Please note that my block appeal reason must be copied to a discussion about unblock of Tailsultimatefan3891 at the community portal. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I'm never on Miraheze. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 12:29, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Existsnot was blocked on Arthur Wiki (the fandom wiki) for mini-modding another user, spam as first edits (later added): [6] and [7]. This user also created this page: [8]. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 12:33, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Unblock request[edit source]

Status: Done

Can you unblock me? I will never do the disruptive pattern of editing here again. I promise I will be behaving better. And I am acting more mature now. I will stop and think twice carefully this time, if one's edit is for mistake, I can easily undo or revert it. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 01:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't see why you can't have a chance to contribute productively to Templates and Modules. Just be careful. Justarandomamerican (talk) 01:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Fine, I will be really careful when I edit templates and modules, and even I am not even blocked on Miraheze or Fandom, as the username CVP8805a1. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 11:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You created your account two days ago and haven't made any edits on Miraheze. X (talk + contribs) 11:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Okay. You can now show me that, as I have unblocked you. Justarandomamerican (talk) 19:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tailsultimatefan3892[edit source]

I created this doppelganger account to prevent impersonation from vandals. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 10:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dear @Tailsultimatefan3891 you should have had permission from a steward to create this extra account. I am still discussing with another steward what the duration of your blocking will be, of course, you may make another statement below, and we will take that into account in the final decision. Drummingman (talk) 15:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Pinging @Drummingman, Dmehus, MacFan4000, X, Jody, and Justarandomamerican:. In the courtesy of such the account in action the Tailsultimatefan3892 is reserved because it is to prevent impersonation from vandals, especially the long-term abuse of Piccadilly (formerly Seiyena). Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In addition, shall this account be unblocked, I will not create sockpuppets unless if granted permission. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 21:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
You promised us that before, and violated that promise just today. X (talk + contribs) 23:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Together with @Justarandomamerican, I have decided to block you for 1 week. I kindly ask you to fulfill the restrictions imposed on you after the first indef blocking, otherwise you will be blocked again and the duration will certainly be longer. Greetings, Drummingman (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Dear, @Tailsultimatefan3891, to protect yourself I have suppressed your edits that you had first put down. You gave personal privacy information about IP addresses and other accounts (of Wikimedia). That is not necessary at all. Be careful in the future. If you continue, I will block access to your talk page to protect yourself. This page can only be accessed about your current block, not about other blocks from other sites. Drummingman (talk) 14:38, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I also suppressed IP addresses in the heading, "Partially blocked from Test Wiki:Community portal". Drummingman (talk) 15:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact stewards by submitting a request to staff@testwiki.wiki.

Justarandomamerican (talk) 12:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I am sorry and I will not cause this bad behavior to happen again. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 16:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your oppose at the community portal[edit source]

That along with Seriously?!? This user has no long history, new to this wiki, despite knowing… and This right is extremely powerful. I hope this will be absolutely rejected. You'll hear no complaints from me. doesn't show any good faith or civility from you. Please do not repeat this, and always respect the nominee and everyone else at the community portal. Consider this as your final warning. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 03:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hey! Tailsultimatefan3891 , I think after you unblocking from stewards you on test wiki ;after I granted sysop privileges to you and I will aspecting to you always respecting and civility to assuming good faith to other editors on here but I saw you're this edit are not good and this is not a really way to give votes on TW:CP, and I seriously you warn first and last time if you didn't assume good faith with others editors, they results is you blocked as indef for you're this bad work and also revoking you're administrator privileges. Happy testing ---Infínítybσy7[@píng mє] 05:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
In your oppose, you used a total of 22 intensifiers, if my count is not off. This steward   endorses this final warning. Justarandomamerican (talk) 10:46, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Yeah I was also shocked at seeing the amount of words used to oppose; it's just wrong and I also   support the final warning and propose a partial block from the community portal again. The AP (talk) 11:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I   Support this final warning; such behaviour is unacceptable. I also would support the propose from The AP. Gepard talk 11:20, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  Oppose the final warning and the proposal but never repeat this behavior again. Sorry. Tailsultimatefan3891 (talk) 21:16, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New signature[edit source]

My new signature is Tailsultimatefan3891 talkcontribs 00:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Tailsultimatefan3891&mobileaction=toggle_view_mobile
testwiki.wiki
CC-MAIN-2024-26
435423
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:B3Z43WBRHBR5TSNN7OT3PGMWBCYJUGWD
<urn:uuid:f32a59be-443a-485c-92f9-8a94594158f3>
2024-06-14T22:14:13Z
150.136.254.2
text/html
sha1:U5SDB7NZPVBKEUKXDO2A52O4KTE7IGTB
<urn:uuid:da863d1e-5d5e-4110-9064-9e2a276acd3e>
https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Tailsultimatefan3891&mobileaction=toggle_view_mobile
response
<urn:uuid:08cc224e-f974-4dcf-9cb0-3dab72a12104>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2024-26
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for June 2024
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-116
software: Apache Nutch 1.20 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/