RE: terminology question

Subject: RE: terminology question
From: Joyce -dot- Fetterman -at- L-3com -dot- com
To: "Milan Davidovic" <milan -dot- lists -at- gmail -dot- com>, "Debbie Hemstreet" <D_Hemstreet -at- rambam -dot- health -dot- gov -dot- il>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:24:18 -0400

I understand Debbie's concern. I wouldn't necessarily click through if I thought that I was only going to get a 360 tour; I'm rarely impressed with them. She wants a more encompassing term to attract people who may not want just that single option and that makes sense to me.

I'd probably go with "Photos and Videos" or some such. Someone may come up with a cute term but the clear and concise option usually works just fine.

Joyce Fetterman


-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+joyce -dot- fetterman=l-3com -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+joyce -dot- fetterman=l-3com -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Milan Davidovic
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 9:33 AM
To: Debbie Hemstreet
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: terminology question

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Debbie Hemstreet <D_Hemstreet -at- rambam -dot- health -dot- gov -dot- il> wrote:
> They will get access to photos, youtube movies, and the 360 degree tour...

I'll try again.

You wrote: "I was thinking Virtual Tour without the additional text, but we are concerned people will think its only the 360 degree view before they click". Why is that a *concern*? For example, are you concerned that if they won't click through if they think it's only the
360 degree view? That they won't notice the other features available?



^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
terminology question: From: Debbie Hemstreet
Re: terminology question: From: William Sherman
RE: terminology question: From: Debbie Hemstreet
Re: terminology question: From: Milan Davidović
RE: terminology question: From: Debbie Hemstreet
Re: terminology question: From: Milan Davidović

Previous by Author: RE: IS or ARE
Next by Author: Re: FrameMaker 10/Adobe Acrobat Question
Previous by Thread: Re: terminology question
Next by Thread: Re: terminology question


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads
http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/1207/techwhirl-1207-00380.html
www.techwr-l.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-09
25972
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:GJLJXPL5LANN7DRWFNI3UCRQYTAVITDZ
<urn:uuid:6217f1e2-2ad5-43c7-aae0-b4135ad0c2ac>
2019-02-18T11:58:45Z
184.106.92.169
text/html
sha1:BHPHR7BIDVECZXFXR6QLWVGIUV3YULM3
<urn:uuid:e90a2ed0-22d2-4b27-a729-688b3436dd53>
http://www.techwr-l.com/archives/1207/techwhirl-1207-00380.html
response
<urn:uuid:43bd54f3-23ca-4041-892d-65418f269075>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-09
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for February 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-165-219-203.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 0.11-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/