Forums

Topic: Images in the signature

Posts 1 to 11 of 11

Old_School

Hello admins, I had a question. Is it possible to post images in our signatures?

Vegeta: Just...just...transform damn you...
Bulma: We are going to have a penthouse sweet...and he'll drive a corvet...and we will make love every single...
Zarbon: (transforms)
Bulma: KILL IT WITH FIRE!

Chatham

Yes.

Email: mallrat425@hotmail.com
PSN Name: EricChatham
Wii FC: 1599-5101-5844-5527
Too many codes to list... E-mail me, add me, and then we'll go from there...
The #2 hookadikka
I have WiiSpeak, The Conduit, COD, All GH/RB, and pretty much everything else online...

warioswoods

I'd warn that such a practice quickly gets monstrously irritating on forums; before long, you'll be scrolling through a million ridiculous banners in order to read down a thread. In the interest of aesthetic cleanliness, I'd recommend dropping that ability.

Twitter is a good place to throw your nonsense.
Wii FC: 8378 9716 1696 8633 || "How can mushrooms give you extra life? Get the green ones." -Lakitu 64
Join us in the epic Nintendo Life Wii Music Thread

Old_School

How?

Vegeta: Just...just...transform damn you...
Bulma: We are going to have a penthouse sweet...and he'll drive a corvet...and we will make love every single...
Zarbon: (transforms)
Bulma: KILL IT WITH FIRE!

Nanaki

Not possible, no. Image linking has been disabled in signatures because they generate an eyesore, and image signatures only really interest their proprietors anyways.

Nanaki

Objection

I'd like to be able to have my Backloggery image in my sig. However, I also agree with warioswoods. There needs to be drastic limits to keep it from being annoying, such as only ONE image in sig and a SIZE limit.

[21:14] pixelman: I blame fheblackdragon
[21:15] pixelman: That's not an f by the way, it's a fancy t.
[21:15] Objection: Tales of Graces "fancy t"
[21:15] Objection: Tinal Tantasy
[21:15] theblackdragon: lol OB
[21:15] pixelman: OB knows what he's asking about.
Backloggery My LP Youtube

3DS Friend Code: 1934-0835-3789

Sean_Aaron

warioswoods wrote:

I'd warn that such a practice quickly gets monstrously irritating on forums; before long, you'll be scrolling through a million ridiculous banners in order to read down a thread. In the interest of aesthetic cleanliness, I'd recommend dropping that ability.

Agreed. I think we have a nice balance between free-for-all sites have have avatars and signatures filled with giant animated gifs and places like EG that don't allow avatars or sigs of any kind.

Old_School

Okay, sounds reasonable. Thank you all for your help.

Vegeta: Just...just...transform damn you...
Bulma: We are going to have a penthouse sweet...and he'll drive a corvet...and we will make love every single...
Zarbon: (transforms)
Bulma: KILL IT WITH FIRE!

AlexSays

The long signatures with several upon several friend codes and games people are now playing, thinking about playing, and looked at in the super market is annoying enough.

Like Chatham's signature, that already annoys me.

AlexSays

Sean_Aaron
Atlantis1982

AlexSays wrote:

The long signatures with several upon several friend codes and games people are now playing, thinking about playing, and looked at in the super market is annoying enough.

Like Chatham's signature, that already annoys me.

Its not annoying, but it is not much different from having an image of that same size. Think something like for friend codes should be in an address book, but that is a whole different suggestion.

Atlantis1982

Top

  • Pages:
  • 1

Please login or sign up to reply to this topic
http://www.nintendolife.com/forums/feedback/images_in_the_signature
www.nintendolife.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-34
50279
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:2RMVALH4AXT6WYFUTPODIHHEEJBCBSG6
<urn:uuid:b8fc1490-cfc0-4872-b988-1db199d14973>
2017-08-18T05:10:04Z
104.24.30.24
text/html
sha1:6WEMWTY4LFZYDHWRWA3L2LUQDVRJ6VVF
<urn:uuid:b7e53069-aa3a-41be-8e69-b0c5cdaeda53>
http://www.nintendolife.com/forums/feedback/images_in_the_signature
length
response
<urn:uuid:9f2c41ea-6034-4d69-9cf1-3992fb1f8f87>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-225-194-121.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-34
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf