
PDA

View Full Version : Have Sigs ever been considered here?



Andre-G
01-20-2005, 06:45 PM
I was wondering if putting small sig pictures in your signature has ever been brought up or considered here on the boards.

penciljack
01-20-2005, 08:00 PM
Pictures in sigs were considered from the beginning, and from the beginning I decided to not allow them. I've seen how they clutter up other forums.

xadrian
01-20-2005, 09:38 PM
Thank god.

cphoopz
01-21-2005, 09:24 AM
Amen :rolleyes:

goldenavatar
01-21-2005, 08:26 PM
;) Good choice, besides, text link sigs are WAY more effective.

Andre-G
02-24-2005, 06:01 PM
Definitely a wise decision for this forum. So many members, the images would be rediculous.

turnbolt
02-24-2005, 10:35 PM
They do make things look chaotic as Hell... much better without them!

Spidey
03-02-2005, 09:34 PM
They also make the pages load slower.

Vargas Prime
03-03-2005, 09:05 AM
Ever go to the Image Comics boards? Many of the people there have HUGE pictures as their sigs... It's ridiculous.

It's nice when the board is easier to read. I don't think anyone really gets that much enjoyment out of seeing your "cool" picture of Knight Rider running over Rainbow Brite, or some crap like that.
http://www.penciljack.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-55363.html
www.penciljack.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2013-48
4741
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:KPUR6W2JSFIC5CUE4SMG3WXOCRR66E3K
<urn:uuid:26cdbd61-70ea-4dc4-b76a-e8bf1bc9907a>
2013-12-06T09:09:48Z
72.29.67.166
sha1:NQCFYRYIPSMFDQM35OQFCY2E2Y334CHW
<urn:uuid:e592ecf9-ea61-4ba0-a0c5-d49fcb43310a>
http://www.penciljack.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-55363.html
length
response
<urn:uuid:92396369-f75a-4729-9825-8c2462e85a0d>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-33-133-15.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2013-48
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web with URLs provided by Blekko for Winter 2013
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf