moderated Re: Paid vs free policy- request


 

Mark,


I'm happy to continue discussing, but beta probably isn't the place for it. I'll be locking the topic soon.

I happen to agree with the OP Ken (Kloeber) on his point, and would be happy to share my reasoning. If not here, where? Does beta need a subgroup for such side discussions? Or do you prefer to take them individually and privately?

I also happen to agree with him that beta is an appropriate place for having made his suggestion: it would be an improvement (in my eyes at least) to the Groups.io service to avoid putting such offers (or any other form of discrimination) on its official pages (cf: Excluding selected members from Yahoo Group transfer). However, I also agree with you that beta may not a good place a detailed discussion of why it is or is not a good suggestion or even an appropriate suggestion.

Shal

Join main@beta.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.
https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/21165
beta.groups.io
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-49
78870
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5GSP3VVDUW6XNHHWHJ7LD5J77MT2IBG5
<urn:uuid:0dacbb68-7b8c-42cd-86e6-03b634215623>
2021-12-05T13:43:26Z
173.255.221.194
text/html
sha1:33JXWXEDKVJCPLFBB4KX7VJGVCTKVT3Z
<urn:uuid:1465cd86-5476-48bc-ae70-28f2926e6376>
https://beta.groups.io/g/main/message/21165
response
<urn:uuid:68defa20-564c-4e24-9a9e-30c763b479ad>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-49
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for November/December 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-235
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.3-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/