I find it odd that after 17 years of Wikipedia’s existence, its Mediawiki software is still so very crap in terms of usability, styling and adaptability. Having spent 4 days working on project documentation in Mediawiki in the past 2 weeks, I wonder how all Wikipedians learned to ignore the many hurdles their tool of choice has.
https://www.zylstra.org/blog/tag/wikipedia/
www.zylstra.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-24
36747
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:F3Z3GRFP4UVSX3NQRXEJRBHYL47M4Q2V
<urn:uuid:36d68f3c-ea5a-44c3-8254-1a2e97bac93e>
2020-05-26T07:38:30Z
84.241.180.151
text/html
sha1:KVPKSRVGOYKC7KID5SPTTPBCLAJ7I2V2
<urn:uuid:eed689bc-5a13-4fb1-807c-21d144c9b6f6>
https://www.zylstra.org/blog/tag/wikipedia/
response
<urn:uuid:088ef280-fb9d-4a2c-a4e5-a0b69cff3ae8>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-24
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May/June 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-190.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/