The Instigator
a.paxton
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
benloti
Pro (for)
Winning
4 Points

Why don't have any debate about books?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
benloti
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/19/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 433 times Debate No: 59200
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (1)

 

a.paxton

Con

Book support us a huge of knowledge but there are 2 sides of content of book. Right information or wrong information. So we need many debate to discuss which book we should read and which book we shouldn't?
benloti

Pro

There is no need to debate on which books we should read. All you have to do is find a book that has been approved if you are targeting a non-fiction book. If you are going for children books, or books that are more like stories, there is almost no 'wrongs' in it.
Debate Round No. 1
a.paxton

Con

a.paxton forfeited this round.
benloti

Pro

Since we're on the topic of why there are no books, allow me to list some examples of book debates.
http://www.debate.org...
http://www.debate.org...
and more.
These debates can be found when you search for books in the search list.
Debate Round No. 2
a.paxton

Con

a.paxton forfeited this round.
benloti

Pro

Vote for me :D
/(^.^)\
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by ben671176 2 years ago
ben671176
I got one on reading.
Posted by ben671176 2 years ago
ben671176
Have you seen my debate?
Posted by Daltonian 2 years ago
Daltonian
Post things like this in the forums.
Posted by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
this should not be a debate.
Posted by Sashil 2 years ago
Sashil
I think there are plenty of forum topics regarding this subject.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 2 years ago
bladerunner060
a.paxtonbenlotiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct and arguments for Con's lack of participation. As always, happy to clarify this RFD.
http://www.debate.org/debates/Why-dont-have-any-debate-about-books/1/
www.debate.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-22
44530
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:ANLHGOAT3A6XUT4556BHFFF56OV7VUYQ
<urn:uuid:9bd36b02-17ab-45fd-aebc-0bec3a1c29c6>
2017-05-26T11:41:51Z
34.199.175.203
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:5IOF3SSVZHHMGQMWIDUOLCFPRR25XZGK
<urn:uuid:c35686a4-5411-4ad2-9ec0-fd3006476cfc>
http://www.debate.org/debates/Why-dont-have-any-debate-about-books/1/
response
<urn:uuid:a0719283-96e0-4798-bdd8-189f027536eb>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-185-224-210.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-22
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf