Difference between revisions of "6/JSC/ALA/21"

From CCDA
Jump to: navigation, search
(Constituency Responses)
(Constituency Responses)
Line 43: Line 43:
  
 
Agree to LC's proposed changes to 2.2.2 and to 2.3.1.1.
 
Agree to LC's proposed changes to 2.2.2 and to 2.3.1.1.
 +
 +
Adding a definition of "cover" is also OK by me -- but is one needed for "jacket" then too?
  
 
- Glennan (PCC), 10/23/12
 
- Glennan (PCC), 10/23/12

Revision as of 10:26, 23 October 2012

6JSC/ALA/21 Proposed Revision of RDA instructions of Sources of Information (RDA 2.2.2.1-2.2.2.4)

To enter your comments in this click on the [edit] link for the section where you want to comment. You must be logged in to comment.

Please include in your comments:

  • Your name/liaison organization
  • Month/day/year

Never copy and paste over the entire original wiki document.

Constituency Responses

Proposal and responses

Summary: CILIP doesn't think the revisions change anything; others agree in general.

A. Containers in 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.4: ACOC, CCC, DNB, LC agree; BL disagrees on some details; LC offers a different wording. Need ALA position.

B. Covers as sources of information: ACOC, BL, CCC, DNB, LC agree; LC suggests including jackets, revising 2.3.1.1, and defining "cover". Need ALA position.

C. Priority of sources in 2.2.2.3 and 2.2.2.4: ACOC, BL, CCC, DNB, LC agree in general; ACOC, BL find the wording confusing; CCC, LC each provide different wording. Need ALA position.

-- John Attig/JSC Rep 2012/10/10


A. Containers in 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.4:

Regarding BL comments on 2.2.2.1: I'm not wedded to the tense change, but I don't think it does any harm either. I sympathize with the complaint about the long parenthetical, but I like the idea of the clamshell box example. Perhaps we could just stop after "compact discs" and make no mention of the individual cases?

Regarding LC comments on 2.2.4.a: Accept LC's rewording.

Regarding other LC comments on section A: I'm confused by the stated acceptance of proposed changes to paragraph c -- I don't think ALA made any changes here. I agree with LC's observation that c) and b) could be switched here, although I'd appreciate hearing from those who work with special/archival materials to make sure I'm not missing something important.

- Glennan (PCC), 10/23/12


B. Covers as sources of information:

Agree to LC's proposed changes to 2.2.2 and to 2.3.1.1.

Adding a definition of "cover" is also OK by me -- but is one needed for "jacket" then too?

- Glennan (PCC), 10/23/12
http://wikis.ala.org/ccda/index.php?title=6/JSC/ALA/21&diff=9111&oldid=9110
wikis.ala.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-40
17218
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:QASNZNE5ZEW36IBSWCBDFZ7H34URMXWB
<urn:uuid:fb57b63f-9382-4d7a-9f72-705d5436ee88>
2015-10-10T19:10:22Z
216.80.72.149
sha1:FV5YEWXIV6BLR4GVDR5523ZSBKM32GW2
<urn:uuid:5aea7e6e-4470-468d-8216-3fcb7742f0d3>
http://wikis.ala.org/ccda/index.php?title=6/JSC/ALA/21&diff=9111&oldid=9110
length
response
<urn:uuid:281cc7a5-3239-4b13-a8a4-ddadd09c509d>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-137-6-227.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-40
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf