
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GFDL GR: Amendment: no significant invariant sections in main



On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 07:14:22PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 10:22:11 +0900, Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org> said:
> 
> [...]
> >  GFDL blah, blah,...
> > Invariant section being following comment section in SGML
> > <!--
> >   chapter 1: author1_name name1@isp.dom
> >   chapter 2: author2_name name2@isp.dom
> > -->
> [...]

Hmmm... my example may have been confusing.
 
> This cannot be an invariant section as defined by the GFDL, because the
> GFDL says that an invariant section must be a secondary section, and a
> secondary section must be a named appendix.  A source comment is not a
> named appendix.

You are talking "Invariant Sections" (capitalized) in GFDL.  I, also
Adeodato Simó I think, use lower case "invariant section(s)" which is
combination of "Invariant Sections, Cover Texts, Acknowledgements, and
Dedications" being "invariant sections" which suffer restriction in GFDL
4 MODIFICATIONS.

> Such a document would have to be licensed under a license other than the
> GFDL.
> That said, I understand the motivation of Osamu's proposal, and I would
> consider invariant comments to be more acceptable than invariant
> portions of the documentation.  (Of course, the line again gets a bit
> blurred when you consider documentation generated from the comments.)

That why we need some space for judgement based on each case.  

> But I don't know whether I would consider it free or not.

I do not either until I see real case.

Osamu

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00549.html
lists.debian.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2015-27
7997
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:FKO3LXRUNECWZ6O7JDZDAX5UWVLE35WH
<urn:uuid:a5ab2a2b-c670-43d3-a952-a1ef68430a9a>
2015-07-03T22:35:13Z
82.195.75.100
sha1:3722YU43C3VCLHKKT4O2VOOP2MQ4RW7A
<urn:uuid:73671f79-59ce-46a3-86cf-b845a90992cd>
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg00549.html
response
<urn:uuid:dd77aa6a-115b-4e86-be73-0361fe76a0ae>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-179-60-89.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2015-27
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for June 2015
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf