Reply to post: Re: I wonder.

The Register comment guidelines 2010

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: I wonder.

So basically you feel aggrieved because you can't come here on the regular to slag off the writers, which for some reason is vitally important to you even though you're already an active member on a site you actually like?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019
https://forums.theregister.co.uk/post/reply/820318
forums.theregister.co.uk
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-51
61064
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:TTFRP2YADWFMTZUYP4AYWAZ6A4M7R5HB
<urn:uuid:af5eed9c-db40-4484-8caa-fd115d66a42b>
2019-12-09T23:50:53Z
104.18.234.86
text/html
sha1:3ITRF2B5RJ7K2HAOXM4E64FOPRGHMZO4
<urn:uuid:6001b433-8475-4192-82ba-d5935adb8b64>
https://forums.theregister.co.uk/post/reply/820318
response
<urn:uuid:4da437c5-c02e-419f-b808-55644e7bbfa0>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-51
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for December 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-80.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/