Peer Review Process

The peer review process aims to ensure that high-quality manuscripts relevant to the topics of the journal are published. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are peer-reviewed following the procedure outlined below.

Administrative submission evaluation
All submissions are checked by the Journal Administrator to ensure that they conform to the paper requirements outlined on the author information page of the journal website. Issues such as paper length, the standard of the English language, format of diagrams, referencing style, plagiarism, etc. are considered. If the submission does not meet all or some of these criteria the submission will be declined, and the authors asked to resubmit after addressing the issues.

Initial Editorial evaluation
One of the Chief Editors evaluates all submitted manuscripts. A manuscript can be rejected at this stage due to not being insufficiently original, having serious scientific flaws, having poor language, or being outside the aims and scope of the journal. Manuscripts that meet the minimum criteria are either managed by the Chief Editor or passed to an Associate Editor to manage the peer review process.

Indonesian Journal of Halal Research adopts a double-blind peer-reviewing that which the reviewer does not know the author's identity and vice versa. The initial authors and articles are not displayed until the articles are accepted for further review and publication. Some policies in the review of the Indonesian Journal of Halal Research:

  1. Any submitted paper will be reviewed by reviewers. The reviewers will review the submitted article that follows the guidelines and template of the journal provided.
  2. Review is done to provide good quality script guarantees. A reviewer is an expert who is deep in understanding with research on Halal or related.
  3. Each submitted paper will be reviewed by at least two reviewers to ensure the quality of the article.
  4. The review process will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references. The reviewers ensure the quality of the articles of their title, abstract, methods, result and discussion, and conclusion. Besides, the reviewers also verify the plagiarism and ethics of publication.
  5. The reviewer also provides feedback on whether the article is accepted, rejected, or needs minor or major revision.
  6. The editor of the Indonesian Journal of Halal Research has the full right to decide whether the article is accepted or rejected.

Please confirm by email: ijhar@uinsgd.ac.id after making the submission

 
https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/ijhar/pages/view/Peer%20Review%20Process
journal.uinsgd.ac.id
CC-MAIN-2023-40
57319
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:6HYXXKEJ43BYV54PVM2Q3RLY2D6J647N
<urn:uuid:8a21e3e1-3e25-4b33-8e43-939b38c22539>
2023-09-25T00:59:02Z
103.55.33.96
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:5EC7CH75ME7AAY2TLQUJ5LI4JFTNLDSK
<urn:uuid:495c7ec4-f87f-48f9-b3c5-f44d551c6612>
https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/ijhar/pages/view/Peer%20Review%20Process
response
<urn:uuid:31122c90-f325-4fb8-b29f-23e281ac1a3f>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2023-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September/October 2023
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-5
software: Apache Nutch 1.19 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.5-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/