Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Fishead Date: May 11, 2006 5:33am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why change something that was so good and make it so bad?

this is the 1st day!!! chill!!! give them time !!!!! before the bashing !!! geez!!!! complain !! complain !!!! complain!!!

if you don't like it ....get your own damm site !!! wink!

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: laptaper Date: May 11, 2006 5:40am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: Why change something that was so good and make it so bad?

Yes!!!!!!!!!Absolutely!!!!!!!!!!!!!excamation!!!!!!!!!!!!!!points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
::::::::::::::-----------------------;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
Rock on, Diana, you, Brewster and the rest are the nads. :-)
http://archive.org/post/60670/why-change-something-that-was-so-good-and-make-it-so-bad
archive.org
crawl=CC-MAIN-2016-36
42495
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:Z67RVT5OBXHU4K2FR2KFNYUZ4MJGFDKX
<urn:uuid:b43ec367-e466-450e-9b30-1040e3871bb4>
2016-08-29T00:28:05Z
207.241.224.2
sha1:RSPKGRV6D2W2H2OTUQUI3HOP3EORFKYP
<urn:uuid:38d26f6d-66ef-44e2-8d46-a34718304762>
http://archive.org/post/60670/why-change-something-that-was-so-good-and-make-it-so-bad
length
response
<urn:uuid:6bdd12ac-7748-462b-b00b-e677fc42b69c>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-153-172-175.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2016-36
operator: CommonCrawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for August 2016
publisher: CommonCrawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf