tag:tagteam.harvard.edu,2005:/hubs/oatp/tag/atom/oa Items tagged with oa.publshers in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) 2018-07-05T18:19:29-04:00 TagTeam social RSS aggregrator tag:tagteam.harvard.edu,2005:FeedItem/2452522 2018-07-05T18:18:12-04:00 2018-07-05T18:19:29-04:00 France's National Plan for Open Science Released, English Translations Available <blockquote> <p>An English translation of France’s new national plan to activate Open Science — presented by the French Minister of Higher Education, Research and Innovation, <a href="https://twitter.com/vidalfrederique">Frédérique Vidal</a>, at LIBER’s <a href="https://www.liberconference.eu/">2018 Annual Conference</a> — is now available.</p> </blockquote> tag:tagteam.harvard.edu,2005:FeedItem/2294636 2017-10-11T11:22:20-04:00 2017-10-11T11:22:20-04:00 ResearchGate is Hiding Open Access Articles | University Library <p>"Now, facing legal pressure from several publishers, it looks like ResearchGate is starting to abandon its role as a tool for circumventing paywalls. As many of the deposits on ResearchGate clearly violate the terms of the publishers’ policies, it’s not too surprising that the International Association of Scientific Technical and Medical Publishers (STM), Elsevier, American Chemical Society (ACS), and others are looking for ways to take articles down. However, as Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe describes, it is unsettling that ResearchGate (RG) has been so quiet. Given that RG sends me at least an email a day, one would think that they’d send some kind of heads up to their users about their plans. Instead, RG and Springer Nature have offered a press release hinting at a collaboration to find “solutions to sharing scientific journal articles online, while at the same time protecting intellectual property rights.” If you ask me, that doesn’t sound like ResearchGate thinks it can continue to let authors choose how to provide open access to their work."</p> tag:tagteam.harvard.edu,2005:FeedItem/2294635 2017-10-11T11:18:58-04:00 2017-10-11T11:18:58-04:00 Coalition for Responsible Sharing: ResearchGate Removed Significant Number of Copyrighted Articles — Coalition for Responsible Sharing <p>"The Coalition for Responsible Sharing has noticed that scholarly collaboration network ResearchGate has removed from public view a significant number of copyrighted articles it is hosting on its site. ResearchGate has not shared any information with the Coalition about this change. Nevertheless, we welcome this if it is a first step towards operating ResearchGate’s service in copyright-compliance. At this point, not all violations have been addressed and ResearchGate will need to take additional steps to cease unauthorized distribution of research articles."</p> tag:tagteam.harvard.edu,2005:FeedItem/2200766 2016-10-27T11:25:57-04:00 2016-10-27T11:25:57-04:00 Librarians Working Inside Out: An Open Access Week Interview <p>"I visited with Joseph at SPARC’s Washington, D.C., office for a wide-ranging conversation about past progress, the state of open access today, the road ahead, and how open access could change the role of academic librarians."</p> tag:tagteam.harvard.edu,2005:FeedItem/2135252 2015-12-16T11:30:10-05:00 2015-12-16T11:30:10-05:00 PLOS Genetics: PLOS Genetics Data Sharing Policy: In Pursuit of Functional Utility <p>"About a year ago, PLOS implemented a new process intended to further the overarching principle that data used in the work we publish should be accessible and reusable. The motivation goes hand-in-hand with both our open access ethos and the scientific method itself: the validity of a conclusion depends on the ability to reproduce the underlying results. In theory, PLOS’ new data policy, in which 'all data underlying the findings described [must be] fully available,' is not so new; in practice, though, it may be perceived as burdensome, complicated, and/or inefficient. The policy and its purpose has been discussed extensively among PLOS Genetics Editorial Board members with regard to its potential impact on editors, authors, the community, and research subjects. The purpose of this editorial is 2-fold: to acknowledge and discuss aspects of the 'data-sharing' process that are especially challenging, and to provide additional clarification and guidance in the context of a few scenarios that are especially relevant, all from the perspective of working scientists who read, evaluate, and contribute to research based on genetics and genomics. We also suggest a way forward that builds on what already works at PLOS: consulting with multiple stakeholders whose interests intersect to develop consensus ..."</p> tag:tagteam.harvard.edu,2005:FeedItem/363695 2014-03-02T09:16:05-05:00 2014-03-02T09:16:05-05:00 AERA Appoints Inaugural Editors for New Open-Access Journal "The American Educational Research Association, the nation’s largest professional organization devoted to the scientific study of education, has named three professors from the University of California, Irvine as the inaugural editors of AERA Open, the association’s new open-access journal. Mark Warschauer, associate dean of UCI’s School of Education and founding editor of another open access journal, Language Learning &amp; Technology, will serve as editor in chief’ Greg J. Duncan and Jacquelynne Eccles will be co-editors ..." tag:tagteam.harvard.edu,2005:FeedItem/336382 2014-01-24T07:54:48-05:00 2014-03-28T09:48:20-04:00 Open access at Elsevier – 2013 in retrospect and a look at 2014 | Elsevier Connect "At Elsevier, we have been reflecting upon how the open access landscape progressed during 2013 and what 2014 might hold. Key themes during 2013 were multi-stakeholder collaboration and scaling up gold open access publishing. These trends look set to continue for 2014, along with a greater focus on the many issues and opportunities that green open access offers. 2013 was an important year for open access to scientific literature, at Elsevier and well beyond. In areas where there has been real progress in open access, we see strong collaboration among authors, institutions, funders, libraries,and publishers. Of course, that same spirit of collaboration is also required to work through some of the remaining complexities and issues in 2014 ... <span>In the UK, </span><a href="http://www.elsevier.com/connect/what-do-the-new-uk-open-access-policies-mean-for-authors">we have been helping to support the implementation of the national open access policy</a><span>, and the new open access policies of the Research Councils UK and Wellcome Trust. Elsevier's contributions have spanned gold open access, green open access,and licensed access. In partnership with </span><a href="http://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/">JISC Collections</a><span>, Elsevier has undertaken a number of initiatives focused on affordability for institutions. We launched a gold open access prepayment pilot plan to help participating universities budget during the transition to open access. Elsevier also facilitated the retrospective conversion to open access of 672 articles published in 2012 by authors in UK universities. These agreements were possible because of a focused attention to scale up our gold open access publishing initiatives, which are described more fully below ... </span><span>In the US, we have spent a great deal of time engaging with the many stakeholders committed to expanding public access. The</span><a href="http://chorusaccess.org/"> CHORUS</a><span> initiative (Clearinghouse for the Open Research of the United States) enables publishers to work with US government funding agencies to provide public access in a very cost-effective manner and in ways that do not increase administrative and compliance burdens for researchers and universities. CHORUS will help institutions identify and discover articles reporting on federally funded research building upon existing platforms. We explained more about CHORUS in our article '</span><a href="http://www.elsevier.com/connect/q-and-a-susan-king-on-chorus-proposal-for-public-access-to-research">Q&amp;A: Susan King on CHORUS proposal for public access to research</a><span>.' There appear to many synergies between CHORUS and</span><a href="http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/share-proposal-07june13.pdf"> SHARE</a><span> (Shared Access Research Ecosystem), a similar initiative to leverage networked repositories to expand public access and that will be an important conversation to continue in 2014 ... </span><span>Internationally, Elsevier was an active participant in the</span><span> </span><a href="http://scoap3.org/">SCOAP3 open access initiative for the high- energy physics community</a><span>, led by CERN. We adjusted library contracts worldwide to reimburse the subscription prices for the two participating Elsevier journals;</span><span> </span><em>Physics Letters B</em><span> </span><span>and</span><span> </span><em>Nuclear Physics Letter B</em><span>. In turn, libraries redirected these funds to</span><span> </span><a href="http://scoap3.org/about.html">SCOAP3</a><span>, which centrally supports the open access costs of the flipped journals. This means article publishing charges are paid centrally and not by individual authors. Read more in our article '</span><a href="http://www.elsevier.com/connect/cern-driven-open-access-initiative-to-take-off-and-elseviers-on-board">CERN-driven open access initiative to take off, and Elsevier's on board</a><span>.'</span><p>In addition, Elsevier's popular <a href="http://www.elsevier.com/connect/program-offers-free-workshops-and-webcasts-for-early-career-researchers">Publishing Connect workshops</a>,  run in collaboration with universities around the world, help educate early-career researchers about open access publishing and the new choices they need to consider. We have also been engaged closely with funders and policy makers around the globe about successful, scalable open access policies. In April, for example, we collaborated with the African Academy of Sciences to discuss '<a href="http://www.elsevier.com/connect/open-access-in-africa-changes-and-challenges">Open access in Africa – changes and challenges</a>,' and during the year, we visited funders and other stakeholders on every continent except Antarctica ..."</p>
http://tagteam.harvard.edu/hubs/oatp/tag/atom/oa.publshers
tagteam.harvard.edu
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-18
20196
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:3EE54TI6C5NGGEDGBP76M72X5S7MF3WX
<urn:uuid:3961253e-2b25-400f-bf32-ed988b17586d>
2019-04-24T16:10:59Z
128.103.64.74
application/atom+xml
sha1:YYABQ2ZRR7L7AHVRBQPLZYST34HHJHQJ
<urn:uuid:93f026d6-108d-4899-abba-b64ee29bba26>
http://tagteam.harvard.edu/hubs/oatp/tag/atom/oa.publshers
response
<urn:uuid:245b2b2e-453d-47a0-9ece-fc4c71d388b1>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-18
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-141-45-27.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/