mnml.nl

thank you for visiting !
It is currently Fri May 26, 2017 6:09 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 9:39 pm 
Offline
mnml admn
mnml admn
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 10:21 pm
Posts: 6084
Location: detroit metro : walk the -e[art]h-
Please put release number or it will be removed !!!

instead of attempting to change the entire site and have a structured format to post releases..

PLEASE READ what is (already) asked in the announcement in regards to what information is needed in the title in order to post a release..

apparently we need TWO ANNOUNCEMENTS for people to understand. :? otherwise it will be removed.

please follow: [release #] - artist - title

thank you in advance for your time.

_________________
Image
.]>


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:26 am 
Offline
mnml mdrtr
mnml mdrtr

Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 4:27 pm
Posts: 2688
Location: Vienna
Please use the [URL] Tag for your links to Samples. Otherwise the Link will be broken if you edit your own Topic.

Thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2011 11:28 pm 
Offline
mnml maxi
mnml maxi
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:14 pm
Posts: 624
Location: The space between space
I whole heartedly agree with John's reiteration of common sense but I also have another suggestion for those who manage net-labels... just a suggestion of course...

Please follow the same format for file naming!

[lablerelease0001]name of artist (name of release) - Track name (name of remixer)

or

[lablerelease0001]name of artist - Track name (name of remixer)

or

name of artist - Track name (name of remixer)

Those are the best file name types. There is nothing worse than releases which are just a folder with a bunch of tracks like '01 - track name blah' '02 - track name bleh'

The truth is few people care about the folder of your release. Not everyone manages their music though iTunes's lame id3 file system. Very few if any sit down and listen to you the tracks end to end and in the order they are numbered in the folder and even fewer will keep an entire release. (I have an ipod... hate it. Sony MP3 player FTW!) People keep the tracks they like and toss the rest. Fact. It is just an annoyance when you have to go through music and rename tracks all the time. Keep things simple. Don't fck about with nonsense. Just make things clear and try your best to minimize the organizational burdens of the people who are the most appreciative of the music and will help to spread it.

edit: hmmm, maybe I should post this in the other thread too because one does not seem to be enough.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.mnml.nl/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=50793&sid=5dadf0df4d783b8c2566446d5f421c72
www.mnml.nl
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-22
22999
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:RYUZDUOAIFB44TLIQGU44ZZAOMMR5RAJ
<urn:uuid:c96a9279-8205-4dbd-85ef-fa974f3d8404>
2017-05-26T11:09:34Z
141.138.139.55
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:BJ3LAFLPKSRBJQWYAU3LINQWX2SDROVP
<urn:uuid:ca4fcea9-ca2b-498c-b2f2-1b7d059c3316>
http://www.mnml.nl/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=50793&sid=5dadf0df4d783b8c2566446d5f421c72
response
<urn:uuid:59fa7106-b77a-413c-a6f1-787ca013c235>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-185-224-210.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-22
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf