Comments for page "Document 001-O5" http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5 Posts in the discussion thread "Document 001-O5" Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:30:56 +0000 http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-4624584 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-4624584 Fri, 01 May 2020 19:58:44 +0000 Nagiros 4665703

But an author writing a story in a collaborative canon saying "Everything other authors have written is actually not true, this story is the only true one" just seems like they think they are way more important than everyone else.

Stepping on other authors' toes is an inherent part of the collaborative experience. I wouldn't be upset if another author contradicted something in my articles and it's not particularly fair to limit creative expression because someone else said something different.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-4624391 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-4624391 Fri, 01 May 2020 16:02:51 +0000 Doctor Professor 4463564 Eh, it's well written and it's somewhat interesting, but considering this canon hurts most of the entries on this site. Standing on it's own it's decent, if the metaphor for the founding of the wiki was intentional it's pretty good (If it wasn't it's still a good metaphor, but I'm not sure I should judge an article based on things that weren't intentional.). But an author writing a story in a collaborative canon saying "Everything other authors have written is actually not true, this story is the only true one" just seems like they think they are way more important than everyone else.
I get that there being no canon is a big part of the scp wiki, so that makes it somewhat acceptable. But a story that can't fit into an already existing headcanon without making it worse isn't for me.

But, like I said in the beginning it's well written, the ending is great. I think you could make something great going outward from this story (people probably already have), and in its time the wiki was much smaller and extensive origin stories were less common. (I think, I've mostly read series 3 and onward.) That makes it less of a dick move. I think if this was written today I would downvote, but in it's original context it's a no vote.

(Also, yes I did accuse the writer of thinking they are way more important than they are in a very long comment detailing why I, a random user that hasn't written a single article, don't like this classic one written by a very popular and active user.)

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-4455852 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-4455852 Sat, 28 Dec 2019 07:05:06 +0000 DrEverettMann 323946 Because they weren't "discovered." They weren't found. They had always been there. They had always been in containment, with neatly written reports.

They just hadn't always been there the day before.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-4455522 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-4455522 Fri, 27 Dec 2019 18:12:39 +0000 Bitterice 5054311 "We have never discovered an SCP" but then he says there are SCPs that have appeared that they have never created. That doesn't make any sense.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-4099719 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-4099719 Wed, 26 Dec 2018 17:26:25 +0000 DrEverettMann 323946 "We were none of us" is a shade old fashioned (as suits a character born in the 19th century), but perfectly sound grammar.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-4099523 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-4099523 Wed, 26 Dec 2018 13:14:56 +0000 dreadlordhg 2829990 “We were none of us poor“ why is it that the locked pages always have the worst grammar?

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-3913994 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-3913994 Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:46:08 +0000 stormbreath 3075960 ]]> http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2838190 Meh http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2838190 Wed, 31 May 2017 22:52:19 +0000 Sumoterminator 3073016 Good read and well written and everything, just not enough details to get me intrigued far enough. I also don't like the idea, if this were official lore it would make things a lot less interesting in my opinion.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2385763 Re: Getting things right... http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2385763 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:47:21 +0000 Zyn 1404533

I know how O5-4 tried to take over. I know how he did it. I know how he failed. What I don't know, however, is at what point THIS article takes place.

This is assuming Ecce Perago/Annon are actually canon and this is as well. Which, granted, is totally fine to believe for your personal headcanon.

For other thoughts on O5s to add to your cognitive dissonance, consider looking up Sophia Light's The Flytrap.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2385638 Re: Getting things right... http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2385638 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 12:27:04 +0000 dankaar 1790336 IIRC, there's at least one headcanon that states the O5s are really some normal civilian ARG players who don't realize that their in-game decisions run the Foundation.

It's not my Headcanon, but that might make a good tale (if it isn't one already).

"There is no Canon" makes more sense if you think of the wiki as doing something similar as the DC and Marvel universes. This isn't one universe, but a multiverse that makes each SCP, tale, and canon simultaneously true and canon, but not "truly" canon.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2385629 Re: Getting things right... http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2385629 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:59:18 +0000 rumetzen 209204 Who says either of them are?

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2385624 Re: Getting things right... http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2385624 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:28:21 +0000 MrWrong 2039383 Well, there is no canon. The O5 can be anything for all we know. The "Council" could well be a cover for "The Administrator" to act out his directives, or be reduced to puppets of an unknown anomalous being.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2385622 Getting things right... http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2385622 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:26:13 +0000 Agent 16 2231133 Ive looked into a LOT about the O5 council. I know how O5-4 tried to take over. I know how he did it. I know how he failed. What I don't know, however, is at what point THIS article takes place.
Is it just another lie of the foundation, like http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-001-o5 ?

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2363599 What http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2363599 Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:03:39 +0000 DrMorris 2231487 This is just… what. That's all I can say. It sounds so ridiculous at first but then it all seems to make sense, but it's still so confusing. I really like it though, so I'm upvoting.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2253277 Staff Post - Reversion Notice http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2253277 Thu, 19 Mar 2015 04:37:28 +0000 Wogglebug 1341523 Version 7 of this article was reverted, as it added unneeded links to the article without author permission.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2145284 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2145284 Fri, 31 Oct 2014 15:37:56 +0000 Doctor Chem 1992290 I'm going to upvote this because of how well written it is.
Even though I don't like that part about the Flesh's origin.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2119041 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2119041 Fri, 26 Sep 2014 16:52:56 +0000 Amo387 1731153 Aww… I'm relatively new compared to the "ol' veterans" who actually started this way back when, but… the feels, man… THE FEELS!

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2088262 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2088262 Wed, 13 Aug 2014 22:08:44 +0000 kreejaffa 1937443 I was going to down-vote, as I think the back-story of all SCPs being created by the O5's is pretty lame, but then I saw something else in this one. I'm not sure if this was the intent, but this whole story comes off as a metaphor for you guys coming up with the first SCPs, coming up the idea for the SCP-Wiki, setting up the website, and having all sort of people submit their own articles. And it starts with a path that only leads upward if you go the right way. An idea that would become a phenomenon if implemented well.

Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but this is brilliant if it was your intent. Either way, up-voted. Granted, I haven't read all of the 001 proposals yet, so maybe I'll find more of them that are the same kind of metaphor.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-2025045 +200 http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-2025045 Sun, 04 May 2014 02:24:05 +0000 Thekillerax 1832151 Congratulations.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1989741 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1989741 Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:47:59 +0000 Doctor Song 1813758 OO

i dont belive anymore

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1892515 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1892515 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:27:10 +0000 Technician D 1754732 I was not at all sold on this article until I read this, it all seems more believable after that thought. Thanks :>

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1841642 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1841642 Thu, 29 Aug 2013 01:19:15 +0000 Cr1m5on 1371265 Fair enough. I assume that means it's not a mistake?

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1841174 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1841174 Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:59:44 +0000 AdminBright 224440 You failed not to nitpick.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1841163 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1841163 Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:29:37 +0000 Cr1m5on 1371265 Not to nitpick, but I thought it was "Able," not "Abel."

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1827809 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1827809 Tue, 06 Aug 2013 19:29:31 +0000 Forehead 450020 I'm very late to the party here, but that was the best thing I've read in any discussion page on this site. Thank you for that.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1734553 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1734553 Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:59:53 +0000 Dr Acerbus 1578575 Fair enough; I like to take these proposals for SCP-001 as mostly lies with perhaps fragments of truth to keep the attention of those forces looking for such origins, after all whatever the foundation actually amounted to could either be mundane (at which point the Foundations enemies are on some monumental wild goose chases) or possibly devastating should the knowledge get out without necesarrily being a physical threat (and as such being completely hidden even from new O-5s).

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1734518 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1734518 Wed, 20 Mar 2013 13:31:28 +0000 Devilot 299577 You have a point that I didn't mention those issues in my post, and didn't even consider the idea that this isn't the full and exact truth… but to my mind, these simply aren't enough to save a core concept that's fundamentally flawed to begin with.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1734314 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1734314 Wed, 20 Mar 2013 04:17:27 +0000 Dr Acerbus 1578575 That assumes that the O-5 who wrote this is telling the whole truth however. Also that even if it is the truth you seem to have missed the point that they were never in control and that something has been manipulating them the whole time (sapient or otherwise) with the Foundation simply trying to hold on until they can figure out what.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1732482 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1732482 Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:55:56 +0000 Devilot 299577 I have to go against the grain on this one and say it sucks. A lot. I'm always wary of 001 proposals that are "The secret true origins of the SCPs", rather than simply the first or most significant SCP, and this one is a good example of why I'm wary of them. "We were making them all along and most of the other organizations don't even really exist" is not a clever and frightening twist. It's a horrific, poorly-considered, buildup-negating Ass Pull on the level of "It was all just a dream!"

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1726006 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1726006 Thu, 07 Mar 2013 19:19:22 +0000 Zetaprime9699 1511896 Was I an admin, this would be the winner in it's category.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1554762 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1554762 Mon, 03 Sep 2012 06:58:24 +0000 Dr Redd 1429837 The allegory… it's brilliant. What is progress, but an uphill path? This is progress without destination, which easily spirals into madness. It doesn't creep me out so much as it inspires me, which is the very danger being conveyed. Messing with reality is generally a bad idea, but it feels… so… GOOD!

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1536295 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1536295 Mon, 13 Aug 2012 21:46:04 +0000 TheMagus 1416824 I would have upvoted just for the line "that damnable lizard", merely because the idea of 05-█ actually typing/writing that out is humorous, but the implications of the whole story, and the final lines especially are just perfect. Wish I could do more than just +1 this.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1482131 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1482131 Sun, 17 Jun 2012 06:21:02 +0000 GuesssWho 1373493 Creeepy

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1470429 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1470429 Mon, 04 Jun 2012 18:58:28 +0000 TheAdrift 1353436 I just mentioned this on the discussion pages for SCP-579 as one of my favorite Tales and a part of my headcanon, so I figured I'd come back, reread and upvote appropriately. :)

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1469449 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1469449 Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:57:52 +0000 TheLonging 1162434 Keep in mind, that the O5's don't exactly tell the truth per se.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1469447 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1469447 Sun, 03 Jun 2012 20:55:15 +0000 Hangers 621155 I dig this, but I'm worried about the 'we never discovered any SCPs' thing. What about SCPs like SCP-1548 and SCP-169? SCPs that are anomalous, and didnt appear in containment, and/or arent contained at all? I guess you could say the foundation created them somehow, but that could imply an excessive use of resources.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1454696 +100 http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1454696 Sun, 20 May 2012 23:26:28 +0000 Rejekyll 1225984 Congrats, Mann. Absolutely chilling, like an ice cube.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1453616 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1453616 Sat, 19 May 2012 14:50:27 +0000 DieselBudgie 1364915 When I read the last paragraph I immediately thought about that old phrase, "Who will watch the watchers?" Or in this case, "Who is watching the watchers? And since when?"

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1391155 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1391155 Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:00:30 +0000 Count Montivan 1312717 Gooosebumps

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1377931 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1377931 Mon, 20 Feb 2012 05:58:57 +0000 thedeadlymoose 732274

I really like the idea that The Foundation is both the creator and containment group for all of these things, with one side not knowing a thing about the other. The last paragraph kind of feels like a cop out.

It's always possible that the Foundation is still the creator, but they've set in motion a creation process which they can never really hope to understand.

Or the narrator is lying, hoping to absolve themselves of some responsibility in the eyes of the presumed reader, because they're ashamed.

I like all of these statements plus the more obvious one (that the narrator is telling the truth - they aren't really in control, not truly, and they never were - which is also my favorite because it's the biggest oh shit moment from where I'm standing, taking all the SCPs, even the bland or fun ones, and putting a huge vast dark unknown something behind them that us humans have not or cannot directly conceived of and it's getting eager… you get my point). All hinge on that paragraph existing. Which is why I thoroughly like it.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1368764 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1368764 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 02:33:13 +0000 Salvador 5 1299715 I kind of had the opposite reaction to the last paragraph. I really like the idea that The Foundation is both the creator and containment group for all of these things, with one side not knowing a thing about the other. The last paragraph kind of feels like a cop out.

It's all good, though. Still an amazing piece of work.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1259311 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1259311 Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:49:11 +0000 DrEverettMann 323946 For the first, consider that the first laboratory was basically just a shack some guy set up in the woods. That shack is where those equations were derived. Afterwards, the organization grew slowly. This might have been their only parcel of land in a suitably out-of-the-way location for a while. Read the story again. The Foundation didn't crop up overnight. And, of course, it is the place where it all started. They have a vested interest in keeping the area secure and watching for any changes. Anything they might have missed the first time. And it's kind of a legacy site. Not even the O5s are immune to sentiment.

For the second, that neatness, that improbable wholeness, is the whole point of this. That's what makes it horrifying.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1259177 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1259177 Thu, 15 Sep 2011 07:34:42 +0000 Khym Chanur 163438 I really like this. Two minor criticisms:

  1. If the equations describing SCP-001 are what enables the creation of new SCPs, there's no reason for the first laboratory to have been set up near SCP-001.
  2. Things going out of control in just the right way that "We have never discovered an SCP" remains technically true seems really contrived to me.
]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1239578 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1239578 Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:29:20 +0000 Dr Davidson 721283 This is my new favorite SCP-001 idea, and it makes the SCP-001 idea I was batting around in my head look incredibly stupid.

I think I'll take this as canon.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1207523 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1207523 Fri, 22 Jul 2011 02:13:07 +0000 GrimDisaster 1013500 It gave me a new outlook on the whole series, very thought provoking stroy and extremely well written with that "chills-up-your-spine" cliffhanger ending. I enjoyed reading it, and then re-reading it two more times to make sure I didn't miss any details. I wish more stories were like this.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1196436 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1196436 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 04:01:10 +0000 Communism will win 617958 I'm upvoting the discussion page because of this.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1196383 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1196383 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 03:00:14 +0000 TroyL 451071 Sabs is right. In fact, if you look around enough, you will find MORE articles like this one, postulating different origins entirely.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1196368 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1196368 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 02:42:47 +0000 The Raven 174995 Awesome. Really awesome. But I couldn't help picturing the narrator as the Cancer Man from The X-Files. But that makes it even better, so upvoted.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1196359 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1196359 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 02:38:28 +0000 709742 Nothing is canon. You are absolutely free to pretend this article never existed.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1196315 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1196315 Fri, 08 Jul 2011 01:49:52 +0000 TheSneakyAdvent 493366 Well written, wickedly intriguing, I could go on and on.

But, eh. The mystery of the SCP's was what was so intriguing. It seems like a part of that mystery has been wiped away. This is always gonna be in the back of my mind. Peh.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1186824 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1186824 Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:00:45 +0000 Tiberti 440234 As far as i know, Agatha is her real name.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177400 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177400 Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:38:00 +0000 Tabbyclaw 344105 Don't tempt me. I have already promised to write far too many other fics first.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177312 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177312 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:52:12 +0000 Ninteen45 629367 Only weak when one is usually referred by their second name.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177282 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177282 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:07:14 +0000 Bland 663362 …I'd ask but I could never trust the answer either way…

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177253 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177253 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 21:35:05 +0000 Tabbyclaw 344105 +1

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177139 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177139 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:50:57 +0000 TroyL 451071 You know, I've always wondered.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177096 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177096 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:52:41 +0000 DrClef 213153 You may as well ask if Clef was inspired by that short dude from Rayearth.

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177080 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177080 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:35:56 +0000 Bland 663362 OOoooohhhh!!!!!

(Well, at least this one isn't following Rule 34.)

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177073 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177073 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:26:20 +0000 thedeadlymoose 732274 I meant a crossover goddammit :(

]]>
http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303#post-1177070 (no title) http://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/forum/t-366303/document-001-o5#post-1177070 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:21:39 +0000 Bland 663362 Some days I hate myself. (Today is not one of them.)

]]>
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/feed/forum/t-366303.xml
scp-wiki.wikidot.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2021-43
47129
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:6OMLZDGRIWZBFOFLXF2YLHYOZUPIX5WU
<urn:uuid:4c02ee7b-832e-4883-a739-c0eb5e8dc670>
2021-10-27T11:30:56Z
107.20.139.176
application/rss+xml
sha1:Q2W3LDW4KAT7YTUGLKNBLLWFSEDOPQIY
<urn:uuid:e61bf48e-613b-4155-ab41-7080e27a6702>
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/feed/forum/t-366303.xml
response
<urn:uuid:89f99e87-6fe5-4801-95b0-59de9d2f2cfc>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2021-43
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for October 2021
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-40
software: Apache Nutch 1.18 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: https://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/