Scholarlyeditors.co.uk review – Rated 3.6/10

Finding a custom essay writing service to suit your needs can be hard work. There’s so many to choose from; it’s easy to get overwhelmed and not even know where to begin.

Top Rated Services
Rank
About company
Rating
Choose your service
1
OxEssays.com
biggest team of writers
balanced pricing
writers verification
9.8 /10
         
students choice
2
UkWritings.com
urgent deadlines
outstanding reputation
9.5 /10
         
3
GradeOnFire.com
best for dissertations
PhD and MA level
9.4 /10
         

However, you might have found your way over to Scholarly Editors, a custom essay writing service that claims to be one of the best while making the process as easy as possible. Here’s everything you need to know.

Services

Unlike most custom essay writing services, the only single service that Scholarly Editors provides is editing. There are no services for writing from scratch and no proofreading services, just editing. This means you will have already had to have written your essay for the service to be worth anything.

However, this may be what you’re after. If so, the site covers pretty much all the subjects you could be writing an essay about.

scholarlyeditors.co.uk review

Quality

There’s no reviews or testimonials page on the website and not even online. This leads us to believe the website is new and hasn’t had any real customers who have left reviews.

This means the quality of the editing is debatable and invest your time and money in this service would be a risk on your behalf.

Prices

The only way to get a price for your editing task is by signing up for an account using your email address, name and phone number. This is a poor way to do things since you’re handing over all your personal details before you even know whether or not you’re going to use the website.

There’s no sign saying that the website doesn’t sell your private information. The site probably quotes on an individual basis or charges a huge amount of money which is why they’re hiding the prices until you’ve gone through the sign-up process.

Support

Since there are no pages on the website apart from the homepage, there’s also no contact page which means you’re going to have to go hunting if you want to get in contact with the site. In the header, you’ll find a UK phone number and a single email address. There’s also a live chat feature.

However, there are no social media links, Skype or customer service email addresses, something a good website should have.

No reviews from previous customers, no information about the company. Lack of pages on website.
  • 3.6/10
    Rating - 3.6/10
3.6/10

Summary

All in all, we were rather disappointed with the Scholarly Editors experience. Despite only offering one service, this is not a service they excel in, and there’s not enough information to prove that the website is a complete and trustworthy service. Why take the risk when you can get a guaranteed service elsewhere?

6 thoughts on “Scholarlyeditors.co.uk review – Rated 3.6/10


  • Permalink

    Got them on google, but I really didn’t like what they did with my assignment. Also, despite only offering editing service they actually write papers, but they are not good at it at all!

    Reply

  • Permalink

    I searched them on google and then Sam Wilson contacted me several time to choose them to write my work . they didn’t explain anything in beginning and offered me discount for first time .I paid money in their account , then they asked for instructions in detail I told them but right after 3 days they returned my work in worst form which was totally wrong and opposite .then they said order is completed even I didn’t confirm if work is right or wrong , After that this Sam Wilson disappeared on the last day of my submission and left me in stressed condition. I tried to call them 1000 times they didn’t answer. Next day their one colleague received call and said your order was completed if you want to change something you need to place another order and pay more £60 . This way they trap people on less money and then they create situation that someone can ready to pay anything what they ask. I will suggest everyone if you are happy to get black -mail then definitely you should try these people.

    Reply

    • Permalink

      i agree with this email. they wrote the worse essay i have ever read it was written by someone who’s first langue was not English. the work did not answer the question i had told them. i have to say they wrote the essay 5 times but all were awful. i asked for a refund but never received and could not use any of the work. it let me very stressed and i would say do not use this company.

      Reply

  • Permalink

    This is a scam web. They delivered completely trash.I have failed in the module.
    -Not subjective.
    -Used some tool to rewrite the existing article.
    – worst customer service.
    -No work been delivered full.

    Reply

  • Permalink

    Completely trash. They don’t know english. They stole my money and delivered nothing.

    Reply

  • Permalink

    They are a scam website. Active online and telephone but when it comes to delivery they do not deliver.
    Sent money and I never got anything back. Do not use this website , they are cheat talkers with no service delivery just thieves.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
https://bestbritishessays.com/scholarlyeditors-co-uk-review/
bestbritishessays.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-40
48454
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:654B3KVBAWHATA7FWFQODXXNSZGZUIGR
<urn:uuid:513863f8-b532-4439-a3ab-c3a46beca5c5>
2020-09-23T10:40:54Z
178.62.54.248
text/html
sha1:H7HSASVZZNAV2JHVZNCPL2Z42BDRBUQH
<urn:uuid:068c05f3-ed38-461d-90e9-1b63e7f8d8d7>
https://bestbritishessays.com/scholarlyeditors-co-uk-review/
response
<urn:uuid:45849a8f-b7e6-4b69-9571-40a50e8aeab4>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-40
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for September 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-115.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.17 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.2-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/