     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Requests for new "Notable Editors" fora
Somey
post Mon 23rd June 2008, 5:58am
Post #21


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,815
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



I'm afraid this is one of those instances where the "auto-close thread after x days" feature might have come in handy...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wikiwhistle
post Mon 23rd June 2008, 3:08pm
Post #22


Postmaster
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,928
Joined: Mon 26th Nov 2007, 2:17pm
Member No.: 3,953



why has dtobias made comments such as the one at the bottom here, when he is actually on this forum? Was it before he joined or is he being tongue-in-cheek? You have to go in the actual main talk history to see some of the comments, rather than that archive. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=119293180
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Rhindle
post Thu 3rd July 2008, 8:28pm
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 324
Joined: Mon 30th Jun 2008, 8:51pm
Member No.: 6,834



Is it time for this ID cabal to get their own subforum?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Thu 3rd July 2008, 8:56pm
Post #24


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



The Final Absolution

QUOTE(Rhindle @ Thu 3rd July 2008, 4:28pm) *
Is it time for this ID cabal to get their own subforum?

It's time for them to get their own Pythonesque Spammish Inquisition.

With 4-part harmony and 2-part melody.

(And some really painful lyrics.)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Viridae
post Wed 9th July 2008, 8:22am
Post #25


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,319
Joined: Sat 19th May 2007, 4:16am
Member No.: 1,498

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Giano II migth qualify for a subforum by now btw?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Disillusioned Lackey
post Mon 28th July 2008, 1:09am
Post #26


Unregistered









Please, a new Gwernol forum Long overdue.


GWERNOL's COI WATCHDOG FILES


[*] Half Dozen a Day COI Guy - Gwernol 07:59, 12 July 2008 (UTC). If you happen to have a webserver, MySQL, ...... I've found myself giving out up to half a dozen COI warnings a day now. ...
[*] About Boodles the Cat - Gwernol 17:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC). You have been blocked from editing for ...... One option is to designate a specific set of COI-affected editors who we ..
[*] Gwernol kicks IPTV off of Wikipedia (So what if it's a large company owned by the Lauder family? Gwernol says COI, Gwernol is right)- This link was deleted by Gwernol on the basis that it was a COI. As I have written extensively on this subject, and am very active in standards development, ... (and blah blah blah) Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-07-18 IPTV
[*] Don't Ever Write About Where You Work! - User talk:Eli Falk - The UCSC Wikipedia Trust Project
Best, Gwernol 17:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC) .... By the way, about writing an article about a school where you teach, I'd recommend looking at WP:COI. ..
[*] Gwernol, Telling it Like it Is - User talk:Ryan Keyes - The UCSC Wikipedia Trust Project
Best, Gwernol 03:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC) ... help editors create articles or resolve disputes some of the ones I recommend you read are WP:COI WP:RS WP:N ..
[*] Bagging on Bagley with COI - The Wikipedia Review > JzG: Wikipedia Review superfan
Bagley went to WP with COI proof. Unfortunately for him it was proof against the ..... FeloniousMonk, Gwernol, JustZisGuy, KillerChihuahua, and SlimVirgin. ...
[*] Gwernol Advises - User talk:Gnif global - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gwernol, if I find an peer-reviewed article from a blog, ... There's also the WP:COI issue; you shouldn't add your own work or group's work, rather suggest ...
[*] Gwernol Keeps it Clean - Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Radio - Wikipedia, the free ...
Procedural nomination Gwernol 09:34, 12 July 2008 (UTC) .... The article is written by the club historian, hence a WP:COI problem.
[url=http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:NobilityPublishing]
Gwernol Says "Dont Write About Your Own Company"[/url] - User talk:NobilityPublishing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Thank you, Gwernol 23:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC) ... Finally, you shouldn't be composing the article about your own company, see WP:COI. ...
[*] Gwernol 01:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC). Delete - It's not that notable of a game. ...... I also suggest that it falls under WP:COI, or WP:OR if you assume good ...
[*] Non-notable, no reliable sources, violates WP:AUTO and WP:COI. ...... Gwernol 19:49, 31 March 2007 (UTC); Delete not on the grounds of the poetry being bad, ...
[/list]

This post has been edited by Disillusioned Lackey: Mon 28th July 2008, 1:39am
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
The Joy
post Fri 29th August 2008, 2:47am
Post #27


I am a millipede! I am amazing!
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,839
Joined: Sat 17th Feb 2007, 2:25am
From: The Moon
Member No.: 982



It appears Betacommand has a few threads about him (and more likely to follow before he's banned). Should we have a forum for him? The oldest thread goes back to April 2008.

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20078
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=19227
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=19022
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=18212
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=14702
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Raquel_Baranow
post Sun 10th May 2009, 5:47pm
Post #28


Neophyte


Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri 8th May 2009, 6:03pm
From: Tucson, AZ (Babylon, U$A)
Member No.: 11,714

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



I'd like to see Jonathan Hochman [Jehochman] [added to the list, DUROVA mentored him.

If U do a Google search of his name + Wikipedia, U'll see how Hochman is in the business of canvassing clients so he can make Wiki articles about their company.

Most of his posts are in the administrative areas. He claims to like to write about shipwrecks but he's most busy banning people from 9/11 related articles. (See my userpage how he banned me.)

He graduated from Yale (a recruiting ground for CIA agents) and then went to work a few years in Russia (or maybe USSR then), the CIA would certainly have an interest in useing him as an asset. (Bush, Senior, went to Yale and later sold oil well drilling equipment in the USSR, as U know, Bush went on to head the CIA.

Big discussion at a 9/11 forum, with me included, about recent sockpuppet/meatpuppet investigation in the WP article about Controlled demolition of the WTC. Hochman and George William Herbert are also mentioned in the 9/11 forum thread.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LessHorrid vanU
post Sun 10th May 2009, 6:32pm
Post #29


Devils Advocaat
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 836
Joined: Thu 11th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
Member No.: 3,466

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Raquel_Baranow @ Sun 10th May 2009, 6:47pm) *

I'd like to see Jonathan Hochman [Jehochman] [added to the list, DUROVA mentored him.

If U do a Google search of his name + Wikipedia, U'll see how Hochman is in the business of canvassing clients so he can make Wiki articles about their company.

Most of his posts are in the administrative areas. He claims to like to write about shipwrecks but he's most busy banning people from 9/11 related articles. (See my userpage how he banned me.)

He graduated from Yale (a recruiting ground for CIA agents) and then went to work a few years in Russia (or maybe USSR then), the CIA would certainly have an interest in useing him as an asset. (Bush, Senior, went to Yale and later sold oil well drilling equipment in the USSR, as U know, Bush went on to head the CIA.

Big discussion at a 9/11 forum, with me included, about recent sockpuppet/meatpuppet investigation in the WP article about Controlled demolition of the WTC. Hochman and George William Herbert are also mentioned in the 9/11 forum thread.


I think you will find that JH banned you under the consensus that your advocacy of The Controlled Demolition of the WTC was beginning to get beyond tiresome. You may find that the mods at WR have even less patience, especially if you start promoting the Jewish conspiracy angle as well.

Raquel Baranow's contrib history.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sun 10th May 2009, 6:37pm
Post #30


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(LessHorrid vanU @ Sun 10th May 2009, 11:32am) *

I think you will find that JH banned you under the consensus that your advocacy of The Controlled Demolition of the WTC was beginning to get beyond tiresome. You may find that the mods at WR have even less patience, especially if you start promoting the Jewish conspiracy angle as well.

My vote for understatement of the year. Can tell you're a Brit just for that one comment alone.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Sun 10th May 2009, 8:09pm
Post #31


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



We don't do POV bans here. In fact, we do very few bans of any kind. Our members are entitled to conspiracy theorize to their hearts' content, provided they keep in mind that the overall objective of this forum is to provide a public service by illuminating the dark corners of WikiCorruption, and we frown on editors who try to supercede this mission with personal schticks and wakning. That said, the remedy is usually to move offending posts to the off-topic fora, not to ban the editor.

For more information on this topic, see our posting rules.

As far as a "notable editor" subforum for Jhochman is concerned, it has been a long time since we added one. As I recall, the criterion was five or more threads on the topic of the editor in question. It looks to me like Jehochman makes the cut. Are there any objections?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Eva Destruction
post Sun 10th May 2009, 8:18pm
Post #32


Fat Cat
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,735
Joined: Sun 30th Sep 2007, 7:22pm
Member No.: 3,301

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 10th May 2009, 9:09pm) *

As far as a "notable editor" subforum for Jhochman is concerned, it has been a long time since we added one. As I recall, the criterion was five or more threads on the topic of the editor in question. It looks to me like Jehochman makes the cut. Are there any objections?

I'd question the need – all but one of those threads dates from last year, and most of them seem to be incidental to his spats with Durova and Elonka in 2008. No strong opinion, though.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Sun 10th May 2009, 9:01pm
Post #33


Can't actually moderate (or even post)
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,815
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 10th May 2009, 3:09pm) *
Are there any objections?

He's a member here, so maybe we should just ask him? Most of those threads aren't really about him specifically - some may have started out that way, but he somehow ends up being a minor player in whatever dispute brought them about.

If we're essentially saying that these "Notable editors" subforums are a kind of "Hall of Shame" for egregiously nasty WP'ers, I'd probably vote against such a subforum for Mr. Hochman. I'm not sure he qualifies as "abusive," at least not chronically so... He's definitely over-officious, at times annoyingly smug, and I don't think he's the sort of person I'd want to hang out with on weekends. But if those things were the primary arbiters of who "gets in" and who doesn't, we'd have quite a few more of those subforums than we do now. blink.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Sun 10th May 2009, 10:56pm
Post #34


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Point taken, and also the point about most of his threads being outdated. Let's see what others have to say.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LessHorrid vanU
post Mon 11th May 2009, 8:02pm
Post #35


Devils Advocaat
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 836
Joined: Thu 11th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
Member No.: 3,466

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Herschelkrustofsky @ Sun 10th May 2009, 9:09pm) *

We don't do POV bans here. In fact, we do very few bans of any kind. Our members are entitled to conspiracy theorize to their hearts' content, provided they keep in mind that the overall objective of this forum is to provide a public service by illuminating the dark corners of WikiCorruption, and we frown on editors who try to supercede this mission with personal schticks and wakning. That said, the remedy is usually to move offending posts to the off-topic fora, not to ban the editor.

For more information on this topic, see our posting rules.

As far as a "notable editor" subforum for Jhochman is concerned, it has been a long time since we added one. As I recall, the criterion was five or more threads on the topic of the editor in question. It looks to me like Jehochman makes the cut. Are there any objections?


I did not say that the WR mods would ban for having a POV about the events of September 11, but would likely get tired even quicker of having every possible thread hijacked to express that view that which happened eventually at WP.

Different emphasis.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Tue 12th May 2009, 3:54am
Post #36


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Don't forget, Georgewilliamherbert is qualified for HIS own subforum.....

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=16583
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=23478
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=20138
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=16866
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=8671
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=7084

Remember all those people who he blocked as "Wordbomb sockpuppets"?
I'd list all the associated threads, but there are too many.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Herschelkrustofsky
post Tue 12th May 2009, 6:35am
Post #37


Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 5,199
Joined: Tue 18th Apr 2006, 12:05pm
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 130

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



GWH is a WikiPutz of some repute.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
-DS-
post Thu 10th March 2011, 11:32am
Post #38


Ethernaut
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 164
Joined: Sun 23rd Jan 2011, 3:44pm
Member No.: 39,458



May I recommend a Cirt subforum?

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=21135&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=28265&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=27899&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=29740&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=30256&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=31400&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=30246&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=32726&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=31930&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=32848&hl=Cirt

http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=33206&hl=Cirt

Eleven threads is a lot.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gomi
post Thu 10th March 2011, 5:40pm
Post #39


Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 3,022
Joined: Fri 17th Nov 2006, 6:38pm
Member No.: 565



QUOTE(-DS- @ Thu 10th March 2011, 3:32am) *

May I recommend a Cirt subforum?

Eleven threads is a lot.

Makes sense to me. I'll create the forum, but I am too busy just at the moment to move all the threads.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gruntled
post Fri 11th March 2011, 12:21pm
Post #40


Quite an unusual member
***

Group: On Vacation
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue 2nd Feb 2010, 12:23pm
Member No.: 16,954



QUOTE(gomi @ Thu 10th March 2011, 5:40pm) *

QUOTE(-DS- @ Thu 10th March 2011, 3:32am) *

May I recommend a Cirt subforum?

Eleven threads is a lot.

Makes sense to me. I'll create the forum, but I am too busy just at the moment to move all the threads.

Another triumph for the Cirt fanboi mob.

Can we modify the subtitle for the FT2 forum? How about "Wikipedia's leading animal lover"?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V < 1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th 1 18, 11:36pm
 
     
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=30185b0add611ffb0f7dccd578ae090c&showtopic=16035&st=20
wikipediareview.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2018-05
159466
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:RBSPTX55XJEBTRHI2VCSW5HFZPEOHPI7
<urn:uuid:5baad181-95d7-461e-8ab1-27e6629677aa>
2018-01-18T23:36:12Z
192.254.236.99
application/xhtml+xml
sha1:ASKU7GZJOOGG4ML3IBQFIJLRUFT36XVR
<urn:uuid:54e7dc66-fde0-4e8e-ac32-73922eef36ce>
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=30185b0add611ffb0f7dccd578ae090c&showtopic=16035&st=20
length
response
<urn:uuid:863ed123-81c9-465c-a07f-27c20b189549>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-146-219-137.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2018-05
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for January 2018
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf