↓ Skip to main content

Historical Topographic Map Collection bookmark

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Historical Topographic Map Collection bookmark
Published in
US Geological Survey, June 2017
DOI 10.3133/gip179
Authors

Fishburn, Kristin A., Allord, Gregory J., Kristin A. Fishburn, Gregory J. Allord

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2017.
All research outputs
#2,387,074
of 11,411,580 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#259
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,682
of 260,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#32
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,411,580 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
https://www.altmetric.com/details/21415650
www.altmetric.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2019-18
21785
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:H6H5N5PQIFUGJRR5QGD7H7IAGA6E6SJ5
<urn:uuid:3bf6dda0-4345-4f34-988b-07a2c68655eb>
2019-04-25T18:09:46Z
151.101.202.2
text/html
sha1:45LTCIPMRI552E2KLJAYOWXLXGTPEYPJ
<urn:uuid:324f1d45-a068-4f89-b770-7b2874a974aa>
https://www.altmetric.com/details/21415650
response
<urn:uuid:b40946b4-8f53-45b9-be1f-8c7b788532bb>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2019-18
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for April 2019
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-136-233-116.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.15 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/