Nascent

Comment threads on PLoS One

Deepak and Cameron both have interesting posts up that analyse the comments, notes and ratings left at PLoS One since inception. Making this data available was a cool thing for PLoS to do as they’re one of the few publishers / journals taking a serious stab at implementing commenting properly (Highwire’s BMJ and BioMedCentral being others. And us, of course, shortly ). Bora sent us the data too. I got caught up in other stuff and didn’t have time to analyze the dataset by the agreed date, but now I’m thinking that was actually a good thing as there’s some 

BACK TO ARTICLE

Tell a Friend

Please ensure that your friend is content to receive an email from us with a link to the article. Select the following link to view our Privacy Policy.

BACK TO ARTICLE
http://blogs.nature.com/nascent/tell-a-friend?id=277
blogs.nature.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2020-24
35320
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:5BJ6ITGAXWGGIXHXW2SYHKVZPQGNDZVM
<urn:uuid:c20e4f3e-cd41-41b0-a0d4-b20ef706bcce>
2020-06-07T03:54:29Z
35.234.135.3
text/html
sha1:ELVBN46XZ6JMXTNYIC2FT3KMVIG7KPEY
<urn:uuid:d825e755-61fb-41c8-82e6-c0eb40139de5>
http://blogs.nature.com/nascent/tell-a-friend?id=277
response
<urn:uuid:8c13b713-9811-40a2-8362-b2ce526bc86d>
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2020-24
publisher: Common Crawl
description: Wide crawl of the web for May/June 2020
operator: Common Crawl Admin (info@commoncrawl.org)
hostname: ip-10-67-67-21.ec2.internal
software: Apache Nutch 1.16 (modified, https://github.com/commoncrawl/nutch/)
robots: checked via crawler-commons 1.1-SNAPSHOT (https://github.com/crawler-commons/crawler-commons)
format: WARC File Format 1.1
conformsTo: http://iipc.github.io/warc-specifications/specifications/warc-format/warc-1.1/