Hub hopping reviews

  1. Carb Diva profile image88
    Carb Divaposted 3 years ago

    I wish that when evaluating a hub there could also be a space for providing a paragraph (or so) as a summary to the author to speak of specific problems, issues, places to improve--or focusing on the things that were really great! The simple evaluate from zero to whatever is not very helpful.

    1. HubPages profile image
      89
      HubPagesposted 3 years ago in reply to this

      This is a good suggestion.  I'll bring it up in our Community Meeting next week.  Thanks!  smile  Robin

 
working
http://hubpages.com/community/forum/115172/hub-hopping-reviews
hubpages.com
crawl=CC-MAIN-2017-22
25177
application/http; msgtype=response
sha1:V6ZT2MIF3X6AKYGH4PFT3OGJSM6YAD5E
<urn:uuid:fa6c9e84-870e-4b59-8156-e1eebaec8ffb>
2017-05-27T16:33:16Z
34.204.155.31
text/html
sha1:G35DI6NQQ27E3KNF4KNWVVC3AUD5F2WE
<urn:uuid:3a3e6c44-0426-410e-af27-ef8de0687501>
http://hubpages.com/community/forum/115172/hub-hopping-reviews
response
<urn:uuid:4d956f92-7c3d-4905-9965-d5ec177017a5>
robots: classic
hostname: ip-10-185-224-210.ec2.internal
software: Nutch 1.6 (CC)/CC WarcExport 1.0
isPartOf: CC-MAIN-2017-22
operator: Common Crawl Admin
description: Wide crawl of the web for May 2017
publisher: Common Crawl
format: WARC File Format 1.0
conformsTo: http://bibnum.bnf.fr/WARC/WARC_ISO_28500_version1_latestdraft.pdf